User:Z5039628: Difference between revisions
(→Lab9) |
|||
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
This group had found some good animal of their project. Very detailed content in each section but it seems a bit meticulous and even messy, sub-titles should be added to be systematically and clear. Good references formatting. This group have left some area that to be posted such as history, function and glossary, they should be as much as the existed part to be more balanced. We could find the abnormality part under some titles, I think this group group member could add an abnormality part the list out the disease related to this signalling. More picture should be added to help audience to understand the topic, there is the only one in the beginning. | This group had found some good animal of their project. Very detailed content in each section but it seems a bit meticulous and even messy, sub-titles should be added to be systematically and clear. Good references formatting. This group have left some area that to be posted such as history, function and glossary, they should be as much as the existed part to be more balanced. We could find the abnormality part under some titles, I think this group group member could add an abnormality part the list out the disease related to this signalling. More picture should be added to help audience to understand the topic, there is the only one in the beginning. | ||
====GP3 peer review==== | |||
Introduction had explained what does this signalling pathway do and importance and page outlining. Followed by history part but seems more would be added. Pictures and table are used to assist explanations. Detailed content but seems need sub-heading or spacing ( formatting). Some gap parts are found. If the abnormality could be linked to the table above would be better. Quiz part is made but needs questions. Some pending glossary are found. Good references formatting. | |||
====GP6 peer review==== | ====GP6 peer review==== |
Revision as of 01:56, 12 October 2016
Student Information (expand to read) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please leave this template on top of your student page as I will add your assessment items here. Beginning your online work - Working Online in this course
Click here to email Dr Mark Hill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 1 Assessment - Researching a Topic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the lab I showed you how to find the PubMed reference database and search it using a topic word. Lab 1 assessment will be for you to use this to find a research reference on "fertilization" and write a brief summary of the main finding of the paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 2 Assessment - Uploading an Image | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OK you are now in a group
Initially the topic can be as specific or as broad as you want. Chicken embryo E-cad and P-cad gastrulation[1] References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 4 Assessment - GIT Quiz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANAT2341 Quiz Example | Category:Quiz | ANAT2341 Student 2015 Quiz Questions | Design 4 quiz questions based upon gastrointestinal tract. Add the quiz to your own page under Lab 4 assessment and provide a sub-sub-heading on the topic of the quiz. An example is shown below (open this page in view code or edit mode). Note that it is not just how you ask the question, but also how you explain the correct answer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 5 Assessment - Course Review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complete the course review questionnaire and add the fact you have completed to your student page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 6 Assessment - Cleft Lip and Palate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 7 Assessment - Muscular Dystrophy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 8 Assessment - Quiz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A brief quiz was held in the practical class on urogenital development. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 9 Assessment - Peer Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 10 Assessment - Stem Cells | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As part of the assessment for this course, you will give a 15 minutes journal club presentation in Lab 10. For this you will in your current student group discuss a recent (published after 2011) original research article (not a review!) on stem cell biology or technology.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lab 11 Assessment - Heart Development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the following recent review article on heart repair and from the reference list identify a cited research article and write a brief summary of the paper's main findings. Then describe how the original research result was used in the review article.
<pubmed>26932668</pubmed>Development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assignments
Lab 1
High Serum FSH is Associated with Brown Oocyte Formation and a Lower Pregnacy Rate in Human IVF Parctice
By Hongyi Xu, Kai Deng, Qingbing Luo, Juan Chen, Xin Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Honglu Diao, Changjun Zhang
It is been trusted by the research team that the probability of successfully implantation is proportional to the quality of the oocyte that forms embryo, especially in in vitro fertilization since to increase the rate of success. Thus the examination of quality of oocyte is vital for IVF. The quality of embryo could be depended on varied features of the oocyte. However there is no formal and confirmed agreement of the effects of morphological anomalies of oocyte and their potential effects. One of the anomalies, the brown oocyte that show brown or black color in the zona pellucida (ZP) others than the normal oocyte shows pale colors, had been chosen as the independent variable for the research while keeps other features as same conditions. The outcomes, including the physical conditions and hormone level of mother during pregnancy and the rate of fertility, will be compared. The result shows that there is no significant changes about the status of the mother between the normal oocyte and brown oocyte. However it has been found that the high level dosage of FSH serum used in order to accelerate the maturation of the follicle leads to the infertility in certain reasons related to the development of the oocyte.
Mark Hill 18 August 2016 - You have not added the citation correctly, the brief written summary of the article findings is good. I guess I am wondering what a znal pellucid that makes a "Brown Oocyte" actually is?
<pubmed>27442586</pubmed> |
Assessment 4/5 |
Referencing
PMID 27442586
Lab2
Mark Hill 29 August 2016 - All information Reference, Copyright and Student Image template included with the file and referenced on your page here. There are some formatting issues. The file summary box reference subheading should have just <pubmed>21217828</pubmed> to display the reference correctly.
I also asked that the original file name (File:Pone.0015329.g001 z5039628.jpg) be replaced with a more descriptive name, say "scoring of blastocysts donated for stem cell.jpg". On your page here you need with the figure legend the citation as shown here and FYI, I have added correctly below. <ref name="PMID21217828"><pubmed>21217828</pubmed></ref> |
Assessment 4/5 |
Lab 3 Assessment
Mark Hill 31 August 2016 - Lab 3 Assessment Quiz - Mesoderm and Ectoderm development. | Assessment 2.5/5 |
Lab 4 Assessment
GIT
Placenta
Lab 5 Assessment
Z5039628 (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2016 (AEST) Questionnaire completed
Lab 6
http://mj-med-u-tokai.com/pdf/400207.pdf PMID 26150185
Trisomy 13
Lab9
GP1 peer review
Things are worth to be learnt:
- To do list, clear process that need to be done (but seems only one thing, good beginning.
-Small summary of each article used ( in "WnT-Calcium Ion Pathway" part) .
-Clear point form
Things needed to be improved:
- Do not use real names in the page and should be replaced by Zpass, but you guys showed the work divisions.
- References part is messy, more detail could be found in editing links.
- Add pictures, pictures are easier way to understand the topic.
-Table could be used for "WnT-Calcium Ion Pathway" part.
-Introduction is missing.
Overall, this group had done quite a lot, the three pathways of this signalling, only needs more formatting, also the to do list actually should be in discussion page, but good. Looking forward for the final product.
GP2 peer review
Things are worth to be learnt:
-Formatted reference part.
-Used time line about the history the notch signalling findings.
-Suitable length for each section and informative.
Things needed to be improved:
-Pictures are assists, could be attached more.
Overall group 2 had a good progress of their project, use the history of the notch signalling as part of introduction, clear content. Only needs to fill the gaps in the page and try to add more pictures to help the audience understand the topic, especially for the abnormality of this signalling.
GP4 peer review
This group had found some good animal of their project. Very detailed content in each section but it seems a bit meticulous and even messy, sub-titles should be added to be systematically and clear. Good references formatting. This group have left some area that to be posted such as history, function and glossary, they should be as much as the existed part to be more balanced. We could find the abnormality part under some titles, I think this group group member could add an abnormality part the list out the disease related to this signalling. More picture should be added to help audience to understand the topic, there is the only one in the beginning.
GP3 peer review
Introduction had explained what does this signalling pathway do and importance and page outlining. Followed by history part but seems more would be added. Pictures and table are used to assist explanations. Detailed content but seems need sub-heading or spacing ( formatting). Some gap parts are found. If the abnormality could be linked to the table above would be better. Quiz part is made but needs questions. Some pending glossary are found. Good references formatting.
GP6 peer review
Things are worth to be learnt:
-Good picture used and with explanations, description are found in picture page.
Things needed to be improved:
-Only the introduction and small part of limitation of this signalling pathway could be found
-Messy content and references part
Overall it seems this just is the start of their progress, i think more quantity and formatted references and contents such as history of findings, the sub-division pathways,importance, abnormality, could be found in final submission. In addition, part of the content in the introduction could be moved to other parts.
TBC
Z5039628 (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2016 (AEST)
PMID 10235264 PMID 18505863 PMID 15066124
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025576/
Lab Attendance
Z5039628 (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 14:11, 2 September 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2016 (AEST)
Z5039628 (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2016 (AEDT)
Demonstrations
Demonstrations |
---|
===Internal Link===
https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/ANAT2341_Lab_1 ReferencingPMID 27487396 |
- ↑ Susanne Ström, Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg, Frida Holm, Rosita Bergström, Linda Eklund, Anne-Marie Strömberg, and Outi Hovatta No Relationship between Embryo Morphology and Successful Derivation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines 2010 Dec 31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015329
- ↑ <pubmed>21217828</pubmed>