User:Z5075309: Difference between revisions
From Embryology
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ANAT2341ProjectGroup2017table}} | {{ANAT2341ProjectGroup2017table}} | ||
Peer review feedback | ==Peer review feedback== | ||
===Cerebral cortex=== | |||
* Introduction | |||
** Could have been linked together with anatomy and function for better structuring of page | |||
** Simple diagram could have been used to provide context on body location | |||
* Development of the cerebral cortex | |||
** Section should be expanded upon to give context to the content | |||
*** Seemed like a sudden introduction of neuronal classes and key developmental zones without much expansion | |||
** Section seemed to be more about components of the developing cerebral cortex rather than development itself – could update subheading to reflect this or update content to focus more on development | |||
* Timeline of corticogenesis | |||
** Could have been its own subheading | |||
* Anatomy | |||
** Should be moved up towards start of the page with introduction | |||
* Functions | |||
** Should be moved up towards start of page with introduction | |||
** Functional areas should be expanded upon to briefly discuss their different roles | |||
** Should not rely too much on linked video | |||
* Abnormalities | |||
** Diagram “disorders of cortical formation” gave little information relating to section – seemed like illustration related little to the mentioned stages. Instead, could have mentioned that abnormalities arise during proliferation, migration and organisation during cortical development | |||
** Lettering and numbering of subheadings in this section should be switched for clarity | |||
* Overall was well done. However: | |||
** Some diagrams lacked descriptions and figure legends/abbreviation definitions – diagrams should be self-explanatory and be understandable in combination with their descriptions, when taken out of their contexts within the page | |||
** Minor grammatical errors present throughout the page | |||
** Mostly well-structured but some subheadings can be shifted around - see above for specific feedback | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{2017ANAT2341 footer}} | {{2017ANAT2341 footer}} |
Revision as of 13:25, 12 October 2017
2017 Project Groups | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 |
Mark Hill - Lab 1 page |
Peer review feedback
Cerebral cortex
- Introduction
- Could have been linked together with anatomy and function for better structuring of page
- Simple diagram could have been used to provide context on body location
- Development of the cerebral cortex
- Section should be expanded upon to give context to the content
- Seemed like a sudden introduction of neuronal classes and key developmental zones without much expansion
- Section seemed to be more about components of the developing cerebral cortex rather than development itself – could update subheading to reflect this or update content to focus more on development
- Section should be expanded upon to give context to the content
- Timeline of corticogenesis
- Could have been its own subheading
- Anatomy
- Should be moved up towards start of the page with introduction
- Functions
- Should be moved up towards start of page with introduction
- Functional areas should be expanded upon to briefly discuss their different roles
- Should not rely too much on linked video
- Abnormalities
- Diagram “disorders of cortical formation” gave little information relating to section – seemed like illustration related little to the mentioned stages. Instead, could have mentioned that abnormalities arise during proliferation, migration and organisation during cortical development
- Lettering and numbering of subheadings in this section should be switched for clarity
- Overall was well done. However:
- Some diagrams lacked descriptions and figure legends/abbreviation definitions – diagrams should be self-explanatory and be understandable in combination with their descriptions, when taken out of their contexts within the page
- Minor grammatical errors present throughout the page
- Mostly well-structured but some subheadings can be shifted around - see above for specific feedback