2010 Students: z3305561 | z3288088 | z3254433 | z3186755 | z3292955 | z3265772 | z3252833 | z3224500 | z3245851 | z3252635 | z3318446 | z3292208 | z3252083 | z3291079 | z3293029 | z3241780 | z3290040 | z3254753 | z3216889
Group Assessment Criteria
The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described
While formatting is easy to discuss it is structure and content that is critical to the assessment.
The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area
Content is correctly cited and referenced
The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations
Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities
Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology
Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki
Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement
The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning
Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines