Paper - Vertebrate cephalogenesis 2 (1892)

From Embryology
Embryology - 23 Feb 2020    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Ayers H. Vertebrate cephalogenesis, II. A contribution to the morphology of the vertebrate ear, with a reconsideration of its functions . (1892) J Morphol. 6(3): 1-360.

Online Editor 
Mark Hill.jpg
This 1892 historic paper by yers describes hearing and head development in several species including human. Note that this review contains extensive untranslated quotes from the earlier German literature.

Also by this author: Ayers H. Concerning vertebrate cephalogenesis. (1890) J Morphol. 4: 221-245.

Modern Notes: hearing | head

Hearing Links: Introduction | inner ear | middle ear | outer ear | balance | placode | hearing neural | Science Lecture | Lecture Movie | Medicine Lecture | Stage 22 | hearing abnormalities | hearing test | sensory | Student project

  Categories: Hearing | Outer Ear | Middle Ear | Inner Ear | Balance

Historic Hearing 
Historic Embryology: 1880 Platypus cochlea | 1892 Vertebrate Ear | 1902 Development of Hearing | 1906 Membranous Labyrinth | 1910 Auditory Nerve | 1913 Tectorial Membrane | 1918 Human Embryo Otic Capsule | 1918 Cochlea | 1918 Grays Anatomy | 1922 Human Auricle | 1922 Otic Primordia | 1931 Internal Ear Scalae | 1932 Otic Capsule 1 | 1933 Otic Capsule 2 | 1936 Otic Capsule 3 | 1933 Endolymphatic Sac | 1934 Otic Vesicle | 1934 Membranous Labyrinth | 1934 External Ear | 1938 Stapes - 7 to 21 weeks | 1938 Stapes - Term to Adult | 1940 Stapes | 1942 Stapes - Embryo 6.7 to 50 mm | 1943 Stapes - Fetus 75 to 150 mm | 1946 Aquaductus cochleae and periotic (perilymphatic) duct | 1946 aquaeductus cochleae | 1948 Fissula ante fenestram | 1948 Stapes - Fetus 160 mm to term | 1959 Auditory Ossicles | 1963 Human Otocyst | Historic Disclaimer

Head Links: Introduction | Medicine Lecture | Medicine Lab | Science Lecture | Lecture Movie | Science Lab | pharyngeal arch | Craniofacial Seminar | mouth | palate | tongue | placode | skull | neural crest | Head and Face Movies | head abnormalities | Category:Head
Historic Head Embryology  
1910 Skull | 1910 Skull Images | 1912 Nasolacrimal Duct | 1921 Human Brain Vascular | 1923 Head Subcutaneous Plexus | 1919 21mm Embryo Skull | 1920 Human Embryo Head Size | 1921 43 mm Fetal Skull | Historic Disclaimer
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

Vertebrate Cephalogenesis

II. A Contribution to the Morphology of the Vertebrate Ear, with a Reconsideration of its Functions

Howard Ayers,

Dtrbctos of the Lakx Laboratoky, Mllwaukee, Wis.

A. Introductory

" Es fehlt auf diesem Gebiete nicht an Darstellungen, die Anspruch auf eine vergleichende Anatomie des Gehdrorgans erheben; allein sie entbehren eben der genttgenden Grundlage." — Q. Hasse, Vergieichtnde Morpkologie des Gehororganes der Wirbelthiere, 1 873, p. i.

As true as Hasse's words were at the time he wrote them, so true have they unfortunately remained until this time, notwithstanding Hassc*s labors, which he characterizes as a "mehrjahrigen iiber alle klassen und selbst iiber die meisten der einzelnen Familien ausgedehnten Untersuchung, die nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen angestellt ist," and notwithstanding the even more extensive and detailed studies incorporated in the great work published a few years since by Retzius, entitied Das Gehororgan der Wirbelthiere, Feeling the need of a "geniigende Grundlage" for the comparative study of the vertebrate ear, in my endeavors to understand the problems of vertebrate cephalogenesis^ I have sought for, and have, I believe, at last found, the basis from which the characteristic structures of the internal ear take their origin, and the law according to which this development takes place throughout the vertebrate group. The study of the morphology of the internal ear of vertebrates has naturally made much more progress than the study of its phylogeny. In fact, until the publication of Beard's paper on the branchial sense organs, we had no sure basis for homologizing the ear with other sense organs of the vertebrate body. Hence, the internal ear has always been looked upon as a Ding an sich even by those investigators who were constantly endeavoring to gain a clearer insight into its phylogenesis.

In 1883 J. Beard arrived at the conclusion that the vertebrate auditory organ was only a modified portion of the system of superficial sense organs, for which he proposed the name branchial sense organs. Beard arranged the sense organs of the vertebrate head according to their mode of development and their relations to the cranial nerves. He found that the nose and the ear sense organs were related to the surface of the body and the central nervous system through the mediation of the cranial nerves, in much the same way as the sense organs of the superficial system, which he called the branchial sense organs. He did not go further than to state that these two pairs of higher sense organs were derived from branchial sense organs. We shall see further on how far Beard was from a conception of the true nature of the auditory organs. On this occasion, I shall confine myself to a consideration of the auditory organ alone, leaving the nasal organ for a separate paper.

In the paper cited above, Beard says, p. 143 : " The auditory organ is, like the segmental sense organs, really a modified portion of the epiblast. Very early in development it becomes shut off in a sac from the epidermis, a condition which only arises later in the segmental sense organs." Beard clearly enough failed to appreciate the significance of the early infolding of the auditory sense organ into its auditory vesicle, or incipient canal, and he equally failed to see the value of the semicircular canals as evidence of the descent of the auditory organ; for he continues, loc, cit,^ "the semicircular canals, etc. (meaning thereby, I infer, the utriculus, sacculus, cochlea, and the other parts of the so-called labyrinth) are clearly secondary complications; for in every embryo the auditory organ is at first a simple sac, shut off from the epidermis ; of which sac a portion of the inner wall consists of two layers of modified epiblastic cells, connected by a dorsal sensory branch of a segmental nerve with the brain." As is well known, the ear is usually inclosed within the head before the surface canal organs are formed ; so that, excepting a few forfPiSf the direct connection of the auditory organ with the canal sense organs which remain on the surface of the body is not an ontogenetic occurrence.

In sharks, for example, the ear appears long before the other sense organs of the surface of the body, and has sunk below the surface, divided, and begun the production of semicircular canals by the time the organs that are to remain on the surface of the body are apparent. Mitrophanow has recently worked on the development of the lateral line organs in Elasmobranchs. On what species I do not know, since, unfortunately, I have been unable to consult his paper published in Russian. My own observations begun in the summer of 1889 at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Wood's Holl, Mass., on embryos of the Smooth and the Spiny Dogfish (Galeus canis and Acanthias vulgaris) and an undetermined species of Batoid, probably Torpedo occidentalism leave no doubt that the ear is derived from the sense organs of the lateral line group ; for in these species the ear retains its canal connection with the so-called aural group or line of surface organs long after the canal organs and their canals have become well developed.

My observations would perhaps have been fruitless of the main result had I not at that time received a copy of Allis's paper on the development of the lateral line organs of the Ganoid Dogfish.

While reading his account of the manner in which the surface canals are formed in that fish, it was recalled to mind that Van Noordcn had described the formation of ampullae and ear canals as progressing in a manner practically identical in the Teleost ear. The conviction at once forced itself upon me that since we find in the development identical mechanical processes on the surface of the body and within the ear, resulting in similar structures, viz. the enclosing canals of the sense organs, the ear canals must be genetically related with the surface canals; for my own observations had just shown me that, in two forms at least, the internal ear was a sense organ taken out of a group, the remainder of which is enclosed within the so-called aural canal, near its junction with the occipital and lateral, as I shall describe more fully and with figures further on. Beard ascribed this earlier inclosure of the auditory organ to the fact that the hairs on the auditory cells are concerned in the perception of much finer wave motions than the superficial sense organs, viz. sound waves alone; and he concludes {loc, cit, p. 143), "In accordance with, and as a direct consequence of, this function of receiving waves of sound, the auditory organ has been early shut off from the external surface, and has developed accessory structures in the shape of semicircular canals, etc. Thus its primitive simplicity has been lost.'* I shall endeavor to show that there is no change in the plan of structure of the auditory organ as it grows towards its adult condition, and that there is no more a loss of its "primitive simplicity " than in the case of the superficial sense organs, which, by dividing, produce several or many organs, and where they are canal organs, concomitantly bring about the production of a canal complex made up of a number of simple homodynamous units, each related to its fellows according to a simple and symmetrical plan. We need no longer think of the ear as a complicated labyrinthine structure, but rather as a symmetrical group of organs.

Although Beard's paper marked a great advance, we were still without clue to the significance of the peculiar and strikingly characteristic structures of the internal ear of vertebrates and the older view which Hasse advanced and defended ; viz. that there is a complete agreement between the early stages in the development of the vertebrate ear and the invertebrate auditory organs, and that the former had arisen out of the latter by a transformation of its walls and chambers, was still, if not


accepted by all vertebrate morphologists, at least unchallenged, for the very good reason that there was no basis on which to make any adequate argument to the contrary.

Below I quote Hasse's words expressing his convictions after many years' work in this field of vertebrate morphology, which will apply to his views as advocated by Hertwig in the latter's Lebrbiich d, VergL Embryologie, Ed. 1888. "Bei immer weiter in der Thierreihe ausgedehnten Unutersuchungen ist es begrieflich, dass manche Ansicht, die man bei den ersten Schritten auf diesem schwierigen Gebiete gewonnen und als fundamental hingestellt, im weiteren Verlaufe der Beobachtungen nicht unbedeutende Modificationen erfahrt, dass das, was das eine Mai wichtig erschien, spater als Beiwerk sich herausstellt."

It can now be shown that the vertebrate ear is derived from a superficial structure not known to exist among invertebrates, and it consequently follows that the auditory organs of the two groups cannot be genetically related in any more direct or important sense than that involved in the common descent of all animals from some simpler parental form, — a proposition which no one at the present day would for a moment think sufficient ground for establishing the genetic connection of the organs in the two groups. I shall now endeavor to place in clear light the indisputable claims of the canal organ as parent form of the vertebrate internal ear. I do so, however, in the same spirit in which Hasse offered his solution of the problem of the phylogeny of the auditory organ, expressing my feelings in his words. "Gliicklich ware ich, sollte es einem anderen Forscher auf Grund ebenso eingehender Forschung gelingen, die Haltbarkeit oder Unhaltbarkeit meiner folgenden Auseinandersetung nachzuweisen, es hatte dann doch ein kleines Kapitel der Vergleichenden Anatomic der Wirbelthiere einen gewissen Abschluss erreicht, der, um der Morphologic des Menschen ein fcstes, wissenschaftliches Fundament zu geben, den meisten iibrigen dringend zu wiinschen ware." While I believe that we now possess the essentials of the whole history of the vertebrate ear, I am none the less conscious of the extremely slow growth our knowledge of this subject has had, and of its fragmentary state in many details. I should do myself an injustice did I not state that I am cognizant of the fact that some old, and more new, problems are yet to be solved, but I think they are of secondary importance as compared with the main facts establishing the genesis of the ear in a canal organ group, and its retreat to a place by itself deeper within the head, where it has developed, in its own peculiar and highly functional way, into one of the three main mechanisms controlling our acquisition of knowledge ; into one of the principal instruments on which we must depend in our exploration of the vast unknown.

To combine the results of the anatomical investigations with those from the embryological field, and to deduce from this accumulation of facts the general law of development of the vertebrate ear is the purpose of this paper. How well I may succeed I leave time to decide by bringing new and completer knowledge than we now possess of many of the details of the developmental processes, as also of many matters of adult relations of the organ in question which still need elucidation.

For many favors and substantial aid in carrying on my investigations I wish to make grateful acknowledgment to the following gentlemen : —

To Dr. G. D. Ladd and Dr. E. M. Connell for valued assistance. To Professor G. W. Peckham for the use of a fine immersion lens. To Messrs. Cudahy for much valuable material on the mammalian ear. To the director of the Marine Biological Laboratory, Professor C. O. Whitman, and the gentlemen comprising his staff, for very efficient aid in securing the needed marine vertebrates, and also for the excellent library and laboratory facilities accorded me during a short stay in June-July, 1 89 1. And to Mr. E. P. Allis for the gift of living adult and embryonic material of our native marsupial, the Virginia Opossum, which has enabled me to give some account of the auditory anatomy of one member of a group which in this respect is entirely new to science.

The following list includes the forms which have served as the basis for my conclusions. Some species were examined for the solution of one or more doubtful points ; but most of them have been carefully anatomized and studied in histological detail as well. As far as possible the material has been studied in the living condition, and I have endeavored by using several methods to reduce the errors necessarily introduced into the microscopic observations of animal tissues due to changes caused by the killing, hardening, or preserving media. An asterisk in place of a number in the table signifies an undetermined number of ears selected from a large series.

Namb of Species.

No. OF Ears.

Name of SpBaES.

No. OF £aks.

Amphioxus lanceolatus. .

Didelphys virginiana . .


Cavia cobaia . . .




Lepus cunniculus .


Pctromyzon Planeri . .


Mus musculus . .


marinus . .


" ratus . . Canis familiaris .



Acanthias vulgaris . . .

Felis catus . .


Galeocerdo tigriiius . . .


Bos taurus . .


Galeiis canis

Sus scrofa . . .


Carcharinus obscums . .


Ovis aries . . .


Sphyma zygseiia . . .


Homo sapiens . .


Carcharinus glaucus . .


Odontaspis littoralis . .


Embryonic material.

Torpedo occidentalis . .


Amphioxus lanceolatus .

Raja erinacea

Petromyzon Planeri . .




Galeus canis ....



Acanthias vulgans . .

eglanteria . . . .


Batoid, undetermined




Salmo fario ....

Dasyatis centrums . . .


'* salar ....

Chelydra serpentina . .


Felis catus . . .


Chrysemys picta ....


Sus scrofa ....

Alligator mississippiensis .


Ovis aries ....


Gallopavo americanus . .


Bos taurus ....


Callus domesticus . . .


Lepus cunniculus . .


Mimus polyglottus . . .


Didelphys virginiana .


B. Morphological

"Die atiaserordentliche Mannichfaltigkeit in der Bildong der Grundform erklfirt sich bei den Organen ebenso wie bei den Plastiden daraus, dass die AnpassungsVerhSltnisse dieser morphologischen Individualitat absolut mannichfaltig sind, und dass keine Schranke die Ausbildung des Organs wie der Plastide nach den verschiedensten Richtungen behindert. Dazu kommt noch, dass die verwickelte Zusammensetzong der hohern Organe aus Complexen von niederen, die hochst complicirte Verfiechtung von Zellfusionen, einfachen Organen, zusammengesetzten Organen, Organ-Systemen und Organ-Apparaten, alle m^glichen Grundformen zu verwirklichen im Stande ist" — Haeckel, GenerelU Morphologies II. 531.

  1. Stage of the cell colony.
  2. Stage of the simple or homoplastic organ.
  3. Stage of the compound or heteroplastic organ.
  4. Stage of the organ system.
  5. Stage of the organ apparatus.

Auditory Organology.

simplest condition and earliest phase of a group of ectoderm cells transformed to sensory cells.

recognized by its sharp differentiation from surrounding tissue. The surface sense organ.

recognized by the division and protection of the organs in canals below the surface.

the phase in which the canal complex, although complicated, remains independent as the functional ear.

the phase in which the canal complex acquires anatomical and physiological relations with other very different structures {eg. the middle and outer ear of higher vertebrates) and with them performs the auditory function.

A description of the internal ear of the Sting Ray {Dasyatis centrums)^ with comparative accounts of the internal ears of the Electric Ray (Torpedo occidentalis)^ the Hagfish {Myxine glutinosa), the Lamper Eel (Petrotnyzon marinus), the Alligator {A, mtssissippiensis)y the Mocking-bird {Mimus polyglottus)^ and of Man.

1. Canals.

2. Endolymphatic duct.

3. Maculae.

4. Utriculus.

5. Sacculus.

6. Lagena (cochlea), of the ichthyopsida and sauropsida

7. Tectorial membranes and cupulae terminales.

8. Otoliths otoconie.

9. Peril)rmphatic spaces of the ear.

10. Continuity of the cerebral and auditory spaces.

11. Mammalian cochlea.

12. Auditory nerve.

As a basis .for the account of the vertebrate ear which follows, I shall describe the Elasmobranch ear, using for this purpose, one Selachoid and two Batoid forms, — Carcharias lilloralis, Dasyatis cetitrurus, and Torpedo occidentalis (PI. I, Figs, i, 2, and 3, and Cut i). In Fig. I is shown the left ear of Dasyatis, seen from the outside. The most important feature of this ear is the perfection in which the canal plan, or the arrangement of the canals, is presented. The primary channel of communication with the surface parent canal, the ditcuis endolympliaticus ( ), enlarges gradually as it sinks into the head. Its enlarged lower end is bifurcate, the median raphe of the utriculo-sacculus separating the primary chamber into two secondary — the permanent or adult ones, which are the tecied out of its cwiiiagii

Utriculus (a) and the sacculus (s) capsule, and viewed from the outof anatomists. From the utricular »'*'=: "^^ ""mc-hat diagrani.

The left internal of Torpedo aeetdentalis da

endolymphatic duct is given off a found in a lish five feet in length,

tube, short and relatively narrow, -4". anterior ampulla; A; anterior

which soon enlarges into the anterior '"' "'■"<J't°0' nerve; «, en , , J ; , r • dolymphatic canal; to, utnculo canal complex {x) ; similarly, from the ^^^^„ ^„„,. jj. „,^^j ,^.

sacculus, but further down on its pulla; Ifi, external canal; mu, body, is given off a tube which opens macula ulriculi. auct.; l, lagena

into the posterior canal {z). This. ."face pore of endoljTnph canal; i, ili

car, then, shows very plamly the two „^. /*., po,i„ior ampuiU; p,

chambers usually described as SUpe- pottenor canal; 5r, laccului and

rior and inferior divisions of the car '" macula sacculi; V and U",

cavity, or the utriculus and sacculus, "'"="'"" '"** utriculo - saccular chamber, and It is perfectly evident that these chambers are not superposed, but placed one beside the other in an antero-postcrior direction. The utricular and saccular chambers are nearly equal in size in Dasyatis ; but in most other Elasmobranch forms, as well as in all the higher groups, there is a varying disproportion, the sacculus becoming in general the larger of the two chambers.

In the Cyclostomata, as one would expect, these chambers are very nearly equal in size, and in some forms are scarcely separated from one another. In Dasyatis the sacculus is drawn out backwards, downwards, and outwards, into a curved blind pocket (/.), the lagena. The utriculus in this species does not show a similar pocket, though it is well developed in some Elasmobranch fishes, and the sense-organ differentiation connected with it variously indicated in many of the higher forms. The anterior canal complex is made up of the two semicircular canals known as the anterior (ca.) and the external {ce.)y respectively, their ampullae {aa.)^ and {ae.) the anterior and external ampullae, the common ama of the two anterior canals, and the enlargement with which the ampullae communicate by their short ampullar tubes. The posterior canal {cp.) has failed in this species to produce a canal complex ; but, as we shall see, its sense organ has by division produced two ampullar sense organs, one of which does not develop an ampulla and canal. The posterior canal, its ampulla (ap.)y and the tube placing the ampulla in communication with the short canal {z)y are the parts of the saccular canal.

The endolymphatic duct of Dasyatis (d.) is relatively large, and preserves the continuity of the lining coat of the internal ear with the surface of the body from which it sprang, and thus in a certain sense the superficial position of the auditory sense organs. When we recall the well-known facts relative to the location of the lateral line organs, — placed below the surface of the skin in canals, in pits, or at the bottom of deep depressions in the surface of the body in many species, or going still further to occupy channels hollowed out in the subdermal cartilage, and more or less complete canals formed in the dermal bones and scales of the body in other forms, — we perceive at once that the position of the ear within the skull is different from that of its relatives at or nearer the surface of the body, merely in the degree of removal and the extent of the modifications induced by such removal from the surface.

The utricular and saccular chambers of the Torpedo ear (Fig. 3) and of the Carcharias ear (Fig. 2) are quite similar in shape. The separation of the two chambers (Cut i) from the median portion (inner end of the endolymphatic duct) is not so complete and typical as in the case of the Dasyatis ear. The two chambers appear as appendages of the median much-enlarged portion, and their relation to the median raphe of division is masked somewhat by the size and position of the median chamber. The enlarged end of the surface canal, the so-called endolymphatic duct, forms in these ears the utriculo-sacculus proper, which is a relatively large pear-shaped or subconical sac. Its walls are perforated by holes, one placed on the anterior inner face, the other on the posterior inner face of the median sac. The median chamber forms about one-third of the ear sac of the Torpedo, and the utriculus and sacculus appear to spring out of its lower anterior, inner and lower posterior, inner faces, respectively. The stem of the pear is formed by the long endolymphatic duct, which leads off from the funnel-shaped enlargement at the small end of the pear. This part corresponds to the aqueducUis vcstibuli of other vertebrate forms, and is clearly the basal portion of the endolymphatic duct, which, remaining undivided, does not so openly disclose its nature as does the homologous part in the Sting Ray (PI. I, Fig. i).

In the Torpedo the utricular and saccular evaginations, which have resulted in the formation of the semicircular canals, communicate at three points with the auditory sac. They are placed, as an inspection of Cut i shows, one near the anterior border of the utriculus, one near the posterior border of the sacculus, and one near the apex of the cone-shaped chamber common to both the utriculus and sacculus. The first of these openings is a "half-pore," as defined by Allis, and represents the original pore left by the canal formed over the anterior ampullar sense organ. The canal leading outwards from this pore soon splits into two, one of which leads into the external ampulla. This splitting of the canal was induced during development by the division of the anterior ampullar sense organ, and resulted in providing the offspring of the parent organ with a canal of its own, which, however, does not, as in some species, acquire a separate opening into the utriculus, but uses the parent canal for such communication. The second opening is that of the saccular ampullar organ, or that of the posterior canal, which in this species has budded off a sense organ.^ The third opening is used by all three canals, whose amal ends here unite into the common pore opening into the remnant of the primitive utriculo-saccular chamber. There is a much greater variation among the vertebrate forms yet studied in the manner in which the amal ends open into the auditory sac than is the case with the ampullar ends, and this variation is due in large part to the mechanical influences at work, shaping the auditory canal complex during its early stages of development. Each of the canals at its amal end is swollen out into k sub-oval sac, which I shall designate the ama (from the Gr. ama, water-holder). This second enlargement of the canals at their upper (outer) ends deserves special mention from its wide distribution among vertebrates. It is in no way related to sense organs, and is always lined by a pavement of epithelium. It occurs in some or all of the canals of the majority of Elasmobranchs ; has been figured but not specially described for Teleosts ; is known to occur in the human ear, and other mammalian forms in the adult stage, though much more distinctly marked off during the foetal life of these forms, when the double curvature of the canals, so constant a feature of the fish type of canals, is also well developed.

In the Sting Ray (PI. I, Fig. i) the canal offshoots from the utriculus and sacculus differ materially, as has been indicated in their relations to the central parts of the canal complex. Owing, in the first place, to the greater simplicity of the central chambers in Dasyatis, the canals do not open into the undivided median part, although there is an approach to this condition in the position of the connecting tube of the anterior canal complex. The canals of each chamber communicate with that chamber alone, and in this respect preserve their primitive relations.


In Torpedo the semicircular canals measure 1.4 mm. in diameter, the actual length of the largest canal (the anterior) being 5.2 cm. Each canal lies in a relatively large channel, hollowed out in the cartilaginous capsule. These canals are by no means semicircular in shape, nor are they placed at right angles to each other.

  • The position of this organ is shown in Fl. I, Fig. 3, ab. and rl. ad.

The planes in which the canals for the most part lie are not parallel with the three planes of the animal's body; viz. the sagittal, transverse, and horizontal respectively.

The extent of the variations from these three planes are shown in Cuts 2-6. The anterior vertical canal ca,^ as seen from above, bends caudad in its distal portion, and cephalad in its proximal portion ; its plane cuts the sagittal plane of the body at an angle of 50^ The angle included between it and its fellow, the posterior vertical canal (fp), is not 90^ but only 82^ The angle at which the posterior vertical canal cuts the sagittal axis of the body is consequently 48^ and it does not coincide with any transverse plane passed through the body. It is thus seen that

Cut 2. — A projection of the semicircular canals of the ear of the Torpedo occu dentalis on the horizontal plane, to show their angular relations to the vertical (sagittal) plane.

the vertical canals do not lie in planes parallel with two axial planes of the body, respectively, the sagittal and the transverse, as is commonly supposed. The so-called horizontal canal, or, as I prefer to designate it, the external, does not lie in a plane parallel with the horizontal plane of the body, but always, as I have found it, inclined in two directions to that plane. The usual arrangement is presented by the Torpedo where the plane of this canal inclines downwards and forwards from the horizontal.

On comparing the various canal-forms found among vertebrates, one is struck by the great variety presented. The size, the shape, the position of the parts of the canalar arch with respect to the three planes of space are subject to extensive variation.

We have just seen the character and degree of these variations in Torpedo. I can do no more here than to state that every species of vertebrate has its own peculiar variation above and beyond the individual differences. As regards the length of the canals, they vary from about i mm. in length, as in the smaller species, especially of the higher vertebrates, to 1 3 cm.,

as in the case of a shark measuring seven feet in length. In our recent sharks the canals do not, perhaps, exceed 20 cm. in length in any case. In the sevenfoot shark, with canals 13 cm. in length, the largest teeth measured only one inch across the base. In nearly related extinct forms with teeth measuring five inches across the base, if the C«/j.— A projection of the hori- same proportion held good be zontal canal of the same ear on the ^^^^^ ^j^cir canal and teeth sagittal plane, to show its relation to the horizontal plane. measurements, — and there is every reason to suppose that such was the case, — these enormous extinct forms must have had canals at least 65 cm. in length. That such angular variations from the commonly understood relations of the canals, as I have described, are of frequent occurrence has long been known, but not much, if any, allowance has been made for the almost universal failure of the canals to come up to the theoretical standard, and no notice has been taken of the very much modified type by the speculative physiologist. Hasse described in 1868 (117) the frog's ear canals in great detail. He found that the external canal projects upward from the horizontal plane at an angle of from 40** to 55°, and the anterior and posterior canals are nearly as much out of the sagittal and transverse planes. Hasse had already pointed out the general law, that the ampullae and the canals are placed obliquely to the planes, whose names they bear, and he says further {ioc. cit, p. 12), "Es ist demnach nicht vollkommen richtig, wenn wir von einem horizontalen, einen frontalen oder sagittalen Bogengang sprechen. Auch beim Menschen kommen solche abweichungen von den verschiedenen Ebenen, und zwar konstant, vor," u.s.w. ; and he cites the passage in Henle's Splanchnologies dealing with measurements of the angles of divergence. Henle gives 10* divergence from the assumed normal planes as the most constant (normal) condition in the human subject.

In the Sting Ray the posterior canal is almost entirely separated from the sacculus, and has no relation to either of the remaining canals. Its means of communication with the sacculus is a very small tube, given ofif from the canal above the ampulla, as already described (Fig. i). The same condition of separation has been figured by both Hasse and Retzius for

Cut 4. - A projection of the semicircular canals of the ear of DasytUis cenirurui on the horizontal plane, to show their angular relations with the vertical (sagittal) plane.

Other Elasmobranch forms, and is one of the characters of special importance, which we shall need to consider again.

The anterior and external canals, which unite into a common tube (PI. I, Fig. i) above, are only connected with the utriculus by a very small hollow stem.

It is thus apparent that the channels, placing the utricular and saccular canals in communication with their respective chambers, are very much simpler than those present in Torpedo (Cut i).

The separation of the posterior canal progresses in some instances to a complete separation from the sacculus, the communicating tube becoming closed and persisting as a solid thread between the two structures. The endeavors of anatomists to arrange the canals under a common type have not proved

fruitful, for the reason that no such relations exist between the canals and the other parts as has been supposed. Each canal is an individuality whose characters, so far as shape, size, and spatial relations, are not connected in any special way with the corresponding characters of its neighbors. In its development each canal takes such shape and relations to other parts as its surroundings permit. They are not developed as specially functional structures^ and their relations may well be a matter of no account to the animal. As we shall see further

Cut 5. — The horizontal canal of the same ear projected in the sagittal plane.

Cut 6. — A projection of the semicircular canals of a Galeus cams Bve feet in length on the horizontal plane, to show their angular relations to the sagittal plane and to each other. No allowance is made for the curvature of the canals in their proper planes. Natural size.

on, two of them are related as parent and offspring, descended from the utriculus, while the remaining posterior canal is a descendant of the sacculus.

The canals among the Elasmobranchs have retained more of their primitive relations to the utriculo-sacculus than those of any other group, except the Cyclostomes. This is due to the fact of the greater separation of the canals by the presence of the double-chambered utriculo-sacculus between them, which in the higher forms becomes more and more indistinct and reduced by the migration of the main portion of the sacculus ventrad of the utriculus, its upper portion only being left in connection with the utriculus.

Hasse and Retzius both describe the ear of Myxine as possessing but one semicircular canal, which they term the vertical canal, and Retzius further regards the single canal arch in Myxine as the homologue and forerunner of the utriculus of the Gnathostome vertebrates. Since the single tubular arch in Myxine rises at either end out of an ampulla, just as the anterior and posterior vertical canals of all other forms take their origin, and since the ampullar of the two ends of the canal in Myxine are related to the utriculus as regards the anterior ampulla and the sacculus as regards the posterior ampulla in exactly the same manner, both with respect to the walls of the chambers and the sense organs contained, as they are c«,;._Th« right fDt«i..i™r in all forms above the Hagfish ; and of the iiagbh (^siyxim gtuHfinally and especially since the an- """'), seen from the inside oc

terior and posterior roots of the au- ""'" ^'8«"« «"" G.

,. , . Keliiui. The figure reproenti

ditory ner%'e innervate the anterior ^^^ ,„ „mewhat enUrged, «nd

and posterior ends of the canal re- does not show the shape or exact

SpCCtively, it is an unavoidable con- posilions of the contained «enie

elusion that either the so^:alIed single "'S'""- "• '"'"io' »">?""»; "A

1 postenor ainpulla; , •ntenor and

vertical canal in Myxine is a product of the fusion of the two verticals of putlu ends of the same; d, dueother forms, or that it represents a lusenilolymph»ticui; mH, macula primitive undifferentiated condition, "'"^""""f:""! ".t.erveb«nch.

. lets; K, utncalo-sacculut ; j, sac Lspecially so, since its near relative cuius endolymphaticus. Petromyzon has two canals. These

two canals, however, unite with each other before opening into the utriculo-sacculus, and it is only the common tube thus formed which lies between the point of union and the utriculo-saccular wall that is present in Myxine. An examination of the type figure for the Cyclostome ear (PL IX, Fig. 2) well illustrates the character and extent of the difference between Myxine and Petromyzon in this respect. The semicircular arch of Myxine is, then, composed of the anterior and posterior vertical canals of the Gnathostome vertebrate ear. It is hardly necessary to add that the argument of degeneration based in part on this peculiarity of the internal ear of the Hagfish is not sustained by the facts in the case. Retzius states that if the single canal of Myxine is homologous with any part of the higher vertebrate ear, it must be with the utriculus (according to the old conception of the extent of this chamber). Retzius says that it cannot be the equivalent of the vertical canals of other forms. Of the third or external canal Retzius was likewise led to conclude that not a trace of it is present ; but just as in higher forms the macula neglecta or abortiva does not develop a canal and ampulla, although it has its discreet nerve branch, so here, although ampulla and canal are not developed, still the sense organ is in some degree separated from its parent, the anterior ampullar organ, for it receives a discreet branch of the ampullar nerve, and relying upon the nerve distribution there are in Myxine as in Petromyzon indications of the future secondary canals. The endolymphatic duct is present and sometimes bifurcates in its distal portion. This bifurcation is probably a remnant of a previous double condition.

Cut .— The right internal ear of a Lamper Eel ( Petromyton fltwiatilis ) , viewed from its inner or cerebral face. The figure after Retzius. ac^ auditory nerve; r, anterior canal ; r/, posterior canal; », ramus utricularis; np^ ramus saccularis; My utriculus; upy sacculus; J, ductus et sacculus endolymphaticus.

The canals in the Lamper Eel are well developed, but on account of their close application to the surface of the utriculosacculus they are not apparent as sei>arate canals from the outside. In order to arrive at an adequate knowledge of their size, shape, and mutual relations, it is necessary to study them in sections of the ear. They are, however, fully separated from the utriculus and sacculus for at least part of their length, and in the large Lamprey one is able to pass a sound between the canal and main chamber

on removing the perilymphatic connective tissue. The anterior vertical canal springs from the utriculus, and curving upward, outward, and backward unites with the posterior vertical canal, which, after arising from the posterior end of the sacculus and passing upwards, forwards, curving as it does so, first outwards, then inwards, meets its fellow above the median portion of the utriculo-sacculus. They are somewhat flattened in section at their ends, and open by wide mouths into the middle divisions of their respective ampullar chambers. In the middle of their course their cross-section is circular. Seen from the inside of the utriculo-sacculus, the canals present the appearance of short archways leading from the large ampullar chambers, below where they freely communicate with the utriculo-sacculus up to the narrowed ends of these same chambers, into which they again open. The endolymphatic ducts, for Petromyzon possesses a pair of them, both proceed from the utriculo-sacculus to the cranial cavity. One of them opens into the lower posterior face of the utriculus, while the other perforates the median triangular plate between the utriculus and sacculus, with a tendency to open more into one chamber than the other, and it is sometimes the utriculus and sometimes the sacculus with which it most freely communicates. The last-mentioned duct contains a large sense organ (PI. I, Fig. 14, and PI. X, Fig. 2).

In the Alligator the canals have begun to lose their importance. Passing from the Cyclostomes, where they begin their differentiation, through the Elasmobranchs and true fishes, where they reach their greatest perfection, we find them among the Amphibia and all the air-breathers gradually losing their prominence relative to the other parts of the ear, especially the saccular region from which the lagena has begun its growth.

I think it is not necessary to enter into a detailed description of the semicircular canals here, although there is much of value which might be recorded of these canals in the Sauropsid types.

In Mimus as a representative of the avian type and in the mammalia as represented in Man, the canals are characterized by an increased delicacy and regularity of outline, seldom showing those modifications of form so apparent in the fish types. In size the canals undergo considerable variation, and on the whole, as said before, they are evidently of less importance to the auditory economy than in the Ichthyopsida. In Mimus the canals are not so large as those of the pigeon, have nearly the same diameter, but have decidedly different shape and individual peculiarities of spatial relation, resembling very closely in these things the song thrush {Turdus musicus), A close agreement between these two forms was to be expected. The anterior ampulla of Mimus is much smaller than either the posterior or the horizontal, and of these two the former is the larger.


In the Torpedo the endolymphatic duct is the long tube which runs from the funnel-shaped cap of the utriculo-sacculus through the muscles, skull, and skin to open out on the dorsal surface of the head just in front of the so-called aural line of canal organs.^ It does so by means of a funnel-shaped depression in the skin. Just beneath the skin it swells out into a sac-like enlargement which is usually filled with otolithic crystals. The communication thus kept up between the sea-water and the internal ear renders the liquid contained in the ear very like the sea-water, and analysis gives only a trace of organic matters, such as mucin and other albuminoids. The sharks preserve this duct in its simplest form ; i.e. in its most primitive form. In the remaining Ichthyopsida and in the Sauropsida the organ is much reduced and its course of development changed. In the forms just named it does not open upon the surface of the head, but it may communicate with the lymph spaces about the central nervous system. In other forms it ends blindly in a saccular enlargement, usually after having penetrated into the cranial cavity, and finally it may be present as an inconspicuous protuberance on the dorso-median portion of the ear sac.

When it communicates with the brain spaces, its inclusion within the skull is due to its being inclosed by the membrane bones during development, — the bones which normally protected its parent organs. In this connection I wish to call attention to some modifications of this duct and of the utriculosaccular walls which possess great interest from their unusual relation to other organs of the body, particularly the central nervous system, but whose morphological as well as physiological significance is still entirely unknown.

In some Elasmobranch forms the endolymphatic duct opens on the surface behind the aural canal. In all species the tube pierces the skin obliquely, and is here much contracted ; the opening, whether slit-like or a funnel-shaped depression, is usually situate on the top of a dermal hillock.

These structures are known as the otolith sacs of the brain and spinal cord and as the chalk sacs covering the ventral surfaces of the spinal ganglia in many Amphibia. The endolymphatic sac is otherwise peculiarly modified, as in the oftmentioned Phyllodactylus, where it forms a large flattened shoulder sac lying beneath the skin, partly hidden by the muscles.

That we have to deal in many of these cases with outgrowths of the primitive auditory vesicle is evident, but we do not yet know suflficient of their development, adult structure, and relations to other organs to hazard opinions as to their functions. We are very much in need of further knowledge of these structures, and the subject will doubtless well repay the investigator.

The endolymphatic duct, which in man is bifurcate at its lower end, serves to unite indirectly the two primary divisions of the ear. This condition is now seen to be a remnant of the early relation of these two chambers, as may be deduced from the account of the ears of Myxine, Petromyzon, and Dasyatis.

A comparison of the ears of Myxine, Petromyzon, Dasyatis, Torpedo, and Man clearly shows the connection of the duct with the utricular and saccular chambers to be a fundamental condition, and not a secondary acquirement, as has hitherto been held.

In the preceding account I have mentioned two tubes in the Cyclostome ear, and described them as the endolymphatic ducts. In Petromyzon (A marinus and Planert) the second tube, from its position and connections, is equally entitled to be classed as an endolymphatic duct It has been figured and described by only two authors, and in both instances inadequately. The relative size and the position of this second tube is shown in PI. X, Fig. 2, D.e^. I shall designate this tube the utricular duct, or the Ductus endolymphaticus utriculi^ while for the other tube I propose the name Ductus endolymphaticus sacculi, or saccular duct. The saccular duct is the larger of the two, having a greater diameter, a larger end, and a somewhat greater length, while the utricular duct, although nearly as long, tapers to its end, which is only slightly enlarged The utricular duct leaves the utricular chamber cephalad of the median line as a tubular evagination from the lower, posterior lateral face, deep within the utriculo-saccular groove, but it is much less a median structure than the saccular duct which leaves the utriculo-saccular chamber almost immediately from the line of union of the two chambers. Both ducts run upwards (and near each other in so doing), inwards, and backwards, piercing the cranial wall side by side, and end projecting into the subdural lymph space. The foramen giving passage to these ducts lies above and is entirely unconnected with the large foramen for the passage of the auditory nerve. It is much smaller and is nearly filled by the two tubes, the remaining space being occupied by the perilymphatic tissue. The saccular duct is lined by a pavement epithelium throughout, except where the sense organ furnishes a columnar epithelium.

The importance of this question has led me to search for the second duct among the Gnathostomes, and if one can rely on the literature of the subject, two endolymphatic ducts are present in some of the Elasmobranch fishes.

Hasse found (and in this he agrees with Ibsen) a bifurcated endolymphatic duct, the main branch of which arose from the inner wall of the sac, while the small branch arose from the upper inner wall of the Recessus utriculi and opened into the larger tube. Hasse, however, was in error in regard to the extent of the tube.

I have not seen the bifurcate endolymphatic duct, described by Hasse for the species which he studied, but the two endolymphatic tubes observed by E. H. Weber, I have found beautifully developed in Sphyrna zygaena, and there is not the slightest doubt as to their occurrence.^ Although I have never found two open endolymphatic ducts, except in the Hammer-head Shark, I have frequently found in the place one would seek for a second tube, a rod, apparently solid, reaching from the sacculus

^ Breschet (40, 1838) describes the main facts about the endolymphatic ducts as observed by him in the following words : " Sur la c6te interne du bulbe auditif, on voit deux cavites dirigees de haut en bas et recourbees en arri^re vers Icur extremites. Ces conduits se retrecissent pr^s de la peau exterieure et semblent dtre bouchees en cet endroit par du tissu cellulaire; ils aboutissent k la partie moyenne et superieure de la tSte ou ils s*ouvrent par deux petits orifices."

" Dans le milandre {Squauius gaieus^ Z.), il y a ce qu*on nomme improprement des ivents : ceux-ci s'ouvrent par des petits orifices sur la tite, pr^s de la ligne m6diane (a prolongation of whose wall it seems to be) to the roof of the auditory chamber, which, as the reader will recall, is formed by the tympanoid sheet of connective tissue (the perichondrium) closing the posterior auditory foramen. Further than this I have not been able to trace this cord, and of its ontogeny I know nothing. But when we recall the two tubes in Petromyzon with their remarkable relation to the utriculo-sacculus in connection with the nerve supply of at least one of them, the development of the sense organs of the ear in Petromyzon, together with the entirely similar nerve supply and development in the Gnathostomic forms, — when we recall these and other related facts, the conclusion is near at hand, that the double endolymphatic ducts so constant in Petromyzon, occasional, if rare, in Gnathostomes, represent an ancestral condition, and they constitute most valuable evidence in tracing the phylogeny of the ear.

Breschet (40, 1838) discovered in the sturgeon's ear a small body attaching the membranous sacculus to the cartilaginous wall. He considered this body the homologue of the ear bones of higher forms, and described its structure as osseus, naming it the stapes of the sturgeon.

Retzius (237, 188 1) confirmed Breschet as to the fact of occurrence, but was inclined to doubt the justness of homologizing this body with the auditory ossicles of higher forms. Retzius could offer no explanation of its occurrence. This body in the sturgeon is in all probability — indeed, I think there can be no doubt about it — identical with the cord which I have described above, and would consequently represent the saccular endolymphatic duct. Embryology will very likely reveal the whole truth.

et au-dcssus des organes auditifs; ces petits pertuis conduisent dans un canal qui I'^largit considerablement en descendant, il a sa plus grande largeur \ peu pr^ au niveau du cerveau. Le canal se trouve sur la cdte interne du bulbe auditif, et n'est separe de la cavite crdnienne que par une mince lame cartilagineuse. Vers la base de la cavit6 cr&nienne il se recourbe en arri^re. Ce canal est tapisse d'une membrane, et voici comment il se comport \ Tegard de Torgane auditif : i. il communique avec I'interieure du bulbe auditif, au moyen d'une oriHce d*une ligne de diametre ; cet oriHce est en dehors et se dirige de haute en bas; 2. il communique (en s'y terminant inferieurcment) avec le canal semi-circulaire posterieure [italics mine,] en se continuant avec Tampoule inferieure de celui-ci. D'apres tout cela, il me semble que Y event de ce poisson n*est autre chose que Taqueduc du vestibule des animaux superieures." Our author found in Rays that *' cette cavit6 auditive a deux sortes de communications avec Texterieure : I. elle presente ce que, dans Tanatomie de Toreille, onappelle one fendtre ; 2. une communication se voit entre la cavit^ du labyrinthe membraneux et I'ext^rieure. La premiere, ferm6e par une membrane, est en rapport, par sa face interne, avec la cavite du labyrinthe cartilagineux, contenant la perilymphe. La seconde, plus remarciuable encore et plus isolite, etablit une voie libre entre le sinus fntdian et le milieu dans laquel vit Tanimal."

The first anatomist to record the structure of the so-called oval (or round) window of the Elasmobranch ear was Scarpa, who (250, 1789) described two round depressions which appear on the top of the occipital region after removing the skin. The floors of the shallow depressions are formed by thin connective tissue membranes, which he likened to tympanic membranes. Removing these, the membranous ear is exposed, or, as he thought, the vestibular chamber alone.^

E. H. Weber (285, 1820) described with great exactness and detail the Batoid ear (Raja ntiraletus, clavata, torpedo^ and aquila).

He discovered two external openings (endolymphatic ducts) for each ear of these animals. The anterior of these corresponds to the endolymphatic duct of other authors, but according to Weber, opens out on the surface, after enlarging into the saccus endolymphaticus, through three tubes. These pores I have figured on PI. I, Fig. 13, for Raja ocellata of the New England coast. The pores of the aural canal also occasionally communicate with the distal section of the endolymphatic duct. In the Torpedo, however, Weber found only one canal leading outward from the endolymphatic sac (loc. cit,y PI. IX, Figs. 75-86).

Recently G. B. Howes (144, 1891) has advanced the theory that the thin membrane filling the fenestra vestibuli cartilaginei, as described by Scarpa, is the first trace of the vertebrate tympanum, and he calls attention to the presence of a mass of homogeneous semifluid stuff" which occupies the space between the skin and this so-called tympanic membrane. The homology which Howes seeks to establish cannot be maintained. The fenestras rotunda and ovalis of the mammalian ear have no genetic relationship with the so-called fenestra ovalis (or rotunda) of the Elasmobranch ear. The latter is the result of the closing of the foramen of passage of the saccular endolymphatic duct or surface canal, while the former are new formations. The membrane which closes the foramen in the Elasmobranch cannot then be a true tympanum, for the latter is a product of the closure of a gill cleft, and belongs to an entirely different territory of the head.

  • In Scyllium, Cestracion, and Chinisnra, where this region is covered deep under muscles, these openings are small, and may be entirely absent. Among the skates the openings are usually large and the membrane well developed. It is worthy of note that in no case does the skin show any modification (as greater thinness) over the foramen and its tympanoid cover as occurs over the true tympanum of other vertebrates.

Long after the rest of the ear is inclosed in a cartilaginous case the endolympathic duct of the mammal ear leads out to the surface of its capsule through a foramen in the cartilaginous wall and ends in a semi-gelatinous tissue just as it does in the adult shark. Boettcher (31, 1869) describes this condition in the 2.8 cm. embryo sheep in these words : •* Wahrend, wie bemerkt, die halbzirkelformigen Canale ganz, die Anlage der Vorhofssachen und des Canalis cochlearis von aussen und unten von knorpligem Gewebe eingeschlossen sind, liegt der Recessus labyrinthi in einer bindegewebigen Umhiillung die sich aus spindelformigen Elementen mit sparlicher Zwischensubstanz zusammensetzt. Diese spaltet sich an Durchschnitten mit den oberen zwei Drittheilen des Recessus labyrinthi von der knorpelig consolodirten Kapsel des Gehororgans leicht ab. Zwischen dem Recessus und der letzteren verlaufen Blutgefasse in der Richtung des Canals zu dem weiten klaffenden Sinus petrosus inferior, welcher in dem Winkel zwischen dem Blindsack des Recessus und der Knorpelkapsel des Labyrinths beiden Theilen hart anliegt."

I have not studied the development of the mammalian /^'«^J/r«  rotunda and ovalis sufficiently to enable me to give an account either of the causes which have been active in their production or of the histological details of the processes. They lie outside of the province of this memoir, since they have no structural connection with the sense organ canals.

Boettcher (31, 1869) gives the following account, from observations on the adult cat {loc, cit, p. 41) : "Der Recessus labyrinthi underscheidet sich gerade dadurch wesentlich von den iibrigen Theilen der Labyrinthblase, das sich in seiner Umgebung kein accessorischer Hohlraum entwickelt. Der epitheliale Canal verwachst allseitig mit seiner Umgebung und erscheint nach erfolgter Verknocherung in der Felsenbeinpyramide von dem Periost des knochemen Aquaductus vestibuli und an seinem hinteren blinden Ende von der Dura mater dicht umschlossen." A condition of things which I have often observed, and which, when we recall the embryonic condition in connection with the permanent arrangement in sharks, receives its explanation.

The semi-gelatinous mass of the embryo, which occupies the foramen for the ductus endolymphaticus is ultimately obliterated, being encroached upon by the ossifying membrane bones and closely invested, since the whole of these structures lie within the dermal zone. The perilymphatic spaces are confined to those parts of the canal complex which retain the primitive chondrocranial capsule, to which the ossific processes are confined.

The sense organs of the internal ear have not been studied from the standpoint of their descent from superficial canal organs, and I think this in many ways fortunate for my demonstration. For we find in the literature numerous accounts of the development of the auditory nerve-end organs in several vertebrate forms, which agree in a remarkable manner with the accounts given of the development of the canal organs. We are thus provided with a valuable fund of knowledge that is certainly entirely unprejudiced and thoroughly independent. This evidence I shall give further on. Just here I shall give an account merely of the shape of these sense organs and of their position within the ear cavity. The so-called macula all lie within the larger cavities of the ear, but are not separated from the cristce by any sharply defined characters such as would seem to be indicated by the older accounts of them and by the terminology applied to them.

They are usually oval bodies, and are seldom irregular in shape. They may be circular, or drawn out into bands. They lie flat upon the walls of the ear chambers in which they are placed, and do not show the tendency to elevation observed in the cristae or ampullar sense organs. The hair cells are thus placed on a level floor, and none of the hairs project beyond their neighbors, unless by reason of superior length. The utricular end organ — macula acustica utriculi — of many Elasmobranch species, and from here on throughout the remaining members of the vertebrate group, frequently appears in part as a serially arranged patch or row of sense organs, — indeed, such is the morphological value of the greater portion of the so-called macula utriculi, the remaining part being the parent organ. Although arising by the division of the utricular sense organ and at first having the same general form and mural relations, the cristas soon begin a growth which makes them quite distinct from these latter. This process of growth is caused by the peculiar mode of development of the ampullae and by the manner in which the nerve branch enters the wall to distribute its fibres to the sensory cells. The ventral ampullar wall is pushed upwards into the ampullar cavity in the form of a transverse ridge or crest, in connection with the ingrowth of the nerve. The hair cells cover this crest, and are consequently most advantageously placed for the reception of wave motions of the endolymph. The canal sense organs of the surface of the body are in many species located on crests or elevations in the manner just described. The conclusion I wish to draw from the facts recited is that the crista acustica of the ampullae retain their original form, while the maculae have lost the tendency to assume the crest shape, i.e, the tendency to acquire an elevated position above the surrounding adjacent surface. In Myxine and Petromyzon the so-called macula aaistica cofnmunis possesses more than usual interest for the morphologist from the fact, first noted by Retzius, that, owing to its position within the ear cavity, and also to the nerve branches which supply it, the sensory surface is with propriety spoken of as composed of several sense organs. Retzius was led by the nerve distribution to think that perhaps the posterior branch of the anterior root was the homologue of the ramus utriculi, and that the anterior branch of the three branches of the posterior root was the homologue of the ramus sacculi, while the whole of the third branch was the ramus ampullae posterioris, the second branch being the ramulus lagenae. The table given in connection with the account of the distribution of the auditory nerve in Myxine explains more fully my classification of the nerve branches, and particularizes the differences between it and Retzius* classification.

Corti's organ, as such, appears for the first time among the mammalia, and it progresses gradually in its complication toward the higher forms. It is derived from the so-called lagena of the Ichthyopsoid and of the Sauropsoid forms lower than the alligator. The lowest mammals, Echidna and Ornithorhynchus, show most decided reptilian characteristics, and they may be said with truth, I think, to possess a well-developed lagena, or the Anlage of a cochlea, as well as the organ of Corti. One great peculiarity of the cochlea is the spiral twisting it has acquired during its phylogeny, and which is repeated in each ontogeny. Since the cochlear sense organ originates as a canal sense organ, and its adult condition is directly traceable from such primitive conditions, we must conclude that the organ of Corti is a canal organ derivative, and that in the adult condition it either represents a chain of sense organs closely connected, or it is a single but much elongated organ.

When one studies the condition of the sense organs of the vertebrate ear, as found, for instance, in Torpedo and Dasyatis (Cut I and PL I, Figs, i and 3), the equal division of nerve end organs between the two branches of the auditory nerve, the anterior and posterior respectively, is perhaps the most fundamental and important relation presented. I am sure, however, that we cannot overestimate the fact that the ampullar organs are here sharply divided into two groups, each group communicating with its own division of the utriculo-sacculus, the anterior consisting of a pair of ampullar organs formed by the division of the anterior ampullar organ of the Cyclostome type, the posterior remaining a single organ so far as the production of an ampulla is concerned. Nor must the relation escape us that the anterior group is connected with the utricular organ, while the posterior group is as certainly connected with the saccular organ. (See type figures, PL IX, Figs. 2 and 3.)

The ampullar sense organs not infrequently divide without causing a division of the ampulla and canal, but in all such cases we find the supernumerary organ still inclosed in the ampulla with its parent, though supplied by a distinct branch of the ampullar nerve. The offspring is usually removed a short distance from the parent and may lie anywhere between the utriculo-saccular chamber and the parent ampullar chamber. I have seen as many as four sense organs in the course of a single ampullar canal.


The utriculo-sacculus of the Hagfish (PI. IX, Fig. 2 and Cut 2) includes all the body of the internal ear, exclusive of the relatively large ampullae (a, and a.p)^ and represents the little modified remnant of the auditory vesicle after the production of the two ampullar organs and their confluent canals (c,a, and c.p.). The utriculo-saccular sense organ (the maculae acusticae utriculi and sacculi) covers a considerable portion of the floor of this chamber, and is drawn out into an oval band ; its division into discreet sense organs is at least indicated by the manner in which the nerve branches are distributed to it. The walls of the chamber, especially in the region of the nerve entrance, on its ventral face, show the beginnings of the groove which becomes so prominent in the Petromyzon ear, caused by a meridianal constriction of its wall corresponding to the internal perforated partition. This partition in Myxine does not separate the sense organ into two parts.

Petromyzon (PI. IX, Fig. 2 ; PI. X, Fig. 2).

The Lamprey has developed along the line marked out in Myxine, and as a result the utriculo-saccular cavity is well separated into two distinct chambers communicating by means of the large sub-central perforation of the membranous partition. The partition is incomplete above, where the semicircular canals open into a common chamber, and below, where their ampullae open out onto its floor. This partition has been described as a pair of folds, one of which occupies the inner face of the external wall of the ear, and the other of which occupies the inner face of the medial or inner wall. The position of both of these vertical folds is indicated on the exterior by grooves, that of the outer fold being the deepest and serving to mark off very distinctly the anterior chamber or the utriculus from the posterior chamber or the sacculus.

As the folds approach the bottom of the chamber, they become lower and indistinct. The floor of the chamber adjacent to the middle of the posterior wall is depressed, or pushed downwards, inwards, and backwards, forming what I shall designate the lagena. This pocket lies entirely within the territory of the sacculus, although the anterior third of it appears to communicate directly with the utriculus, while the posterior twothirds communicate with the sacculus. The walls of this evagination do not show a continuation of the utriculo-saccular partition, as Ketel (i6o, 1872) and Retzius (237, 1881) have maintained and as it appears at first glance, for a careful study of the partition shows that it exists on the floor of the ear as a low fold, and that it is pushed cephalad by the lagena to such an extent as to mask the true position of this chamber. The recessus utriculi lies cephalad of the partition and forms a depression in the floor of the utriculus.

The canals, their ampullae trifidae, and the endolymphatic ducts offer exceptional features ; but as I shall describe them more fully in another paper, they need not detain us here. The sense organs included in the Petromyzon ear are seven in number: the maculae utriculi and sacculi, each discreet sensory patches, the cristae acusticae ampullarum anteriores et posteriores, also discreet, and the papilla lagenae, which is possibly continuous with the macula utriculi, the sense organ in the recessus utriculi, and the sense organ of the undeveloped external ampulla, about which we need more information.

Beginning with the macula utriculi anteriorly, we find this sense organ placed anterior to the plane of the utriculo-saccular partition. It passes over the anterior edge of the sacculolagenar pocket, down its anterior wall, and out over its floor for a short distance. It does not reach to the base of the hill which lies in the bottom of the saccular portion of the pocket {i.e. the lagena). Its epithelium passes out into the columnar lining of the pocket, and this, in its turn, soon increases in height and becomes columnar as it ascends the hill, or papilla lagenae. The epithelium on the posterior face of the papilla does not change again, but is continuous, with at most only an indication of a break, with the macula sacculi.

Mimus polyglottus (compare Cut 10).

The utriculus of the Mocking-bird is relatively very small, and is somewhat tubular, that portion of it containing the macula utriculi being marked off from the more central portion by a constriction of the walls of this chamber, followed by an enlargement, the chamber of the recessus utriculi, which is somewhat flattened from above downwards. It has a reniform outline seen from above, but is decidedly oval seen from the side. The concave floor (from within) supports the macula utriculi and is carried over into the mouths of the ampulla; of the anterior and horizontal canals. The macula utriculi covers most of the floor and is irregularly oval, being very much larger at one end than at the other. The sensory hairs are very long and support a layer of otolithic bodies.

Alligator <Cut 9).

The utriculus in this reptile has assumed a tubular form, and, as compared with the enlarged sacculus, no longer appears as a

Cut 9. — The right intemal e«r of Jliigator miuiiiiffuHiit, Men from the outer filce, figure after G.*et. zius. The lif^re outlines do not bring out the relBtioni of the paiti dtilinclly, and only the more important pafta are lettered, at, audiloiy nene; i, pan batiUrii cochlex aacL; e, anterior canal; ck, external onid; f/, poiterior canal ; /, iagena; ', cri*tK acuticae of the ampullz; t, lac

Cut 10. — The right intemtl ear of Turdut mu>ica, >een from the inner or neural face. Figure aflcr G. Reliius. The leltera ate placed only on those psrti of the organ plainly visible in the figure.

canali cA, external canal;

phaticus; t, Iagena; mt, sacculi; », lagenar nerve; tae acusticx of the ampuikc.

't, pot

chamber of equal value, structurally and functionally, with the latter.



[Vol. VI.

Man (Cut 11).

In Man and other mammalia the utriculus^ forms a small chamber, from which are given off seven processes. Five of these belong to the canals ; the other two are the canalis reuniens and the utricular blind sac. The utriculus and sacculus, although nearly equal in size, are very small relative to the long, enlarged cochlea, and they are relatively of less importance than in the Alligator.


The saccular region of the Torpedo, viewed from the side, is a somewhat sickle -shaped body, with the cutting edge of the sickle blade directed forwards, downwards, outwards. The sacculus proper is a broadly rounded sac with scarcely a constriction where it opens into the common utriculo- saccular chamber above. The long axis of the sac bends backwards and outwards from the axis of the common chamber of the ear, while its lagenar prolongation carries the axis forwards by a bend at the point of origin from the

Cut II, — The left internal car of a human embryo, 22 mm. in length, seen from without and below. Figure after W. His, Jr. The figure is from a model constructed from serial sections, and represents the ear much magnified, a, anterior canal; a/», ampulla; am'f amse (the middle reference line is superfluous); f, cochlea; </, ductus endolymphalicus; ^, external canal; j, sacculus (in the restricted sense; really only the recessus sacculi); », utriculus.

sacculus. The sacculus possesses one of the canal sense organs, and its lagenar prolongation contains a bud from this organ which in the higher forms grows out into and forms the major portion of the cochlear organ. The utriculo-saccular chamber of other vertebrates, as of the forms described above, is really the transformed canal of the primitive auditory organ, some of the offspring remaining in the parental canal with parent organs just as the macula abortiva and the crista acustica posterior do in the case of the posterior canal.

It should not be forgotten that the utriculus of these forms is really the primitive utriculus plus a small portion of the primitive sacculus, i.e. that part of the chamber from which the posterior canal arises is of saccular origin.

Among the forms occurring between the Elasmobranchs and the Mammalia we find almost every conceivable gradation between the simple sacculus of the Cyclostomes and lower Elasmobranch species and the very complicated and highly differentiated structure known in the Mammalia as the cochlea and its organ of Corti.

The Hagfish can be said to possess a sacculus in its simplest condition in the first stages of development. The auditory chamber, designated sacculus by Retzius, is clearly the utriculosacculus of other forms. The separation being indicated by the very meagre transverse furrow in the bottom of the basal or ventral portion of the ear sac, and by the branches of the auditory nerve distributed to the compound sense organ, which covers more or less completely the floor of the double chamber.

Petromyzon presents us with an advance on the Myxine condition, for here the median raphe has acquired a greater size, but the anterior and posterior halves of the chamber are still in open communication with each other. They have, however, developed pocket-like processes, which represent the first traces of the recessus utriculi and of the legena of the higher forms.


In this reptile the sacculus has become distinctly marked off from the utriculus, and is only connected by a much reduced canalis sacculo-utricularis. The avian sacculus communicates even less freely than the reptilian, though within the group there is a constant reduction of the connecting canals progressing from the lower to the higher types. In other particulars there is no essential difference between the saccular regions of the two groups.

The sacculus of the Mocking-bird is a minute chamber placed alongside the utriculus, with which it communicates by means of an opening, all there is to represent the longer canalis utriculo-sacculus, so well developed in some of the lower vertebrates, and by means of the canalis sacculo-cochlearis it opens out into the cochlear tube. This canal is a long, curved tube of relatively large dimensions, and is formed by the secondary constriction of the neck of the cochlea.

In the Mammalia at last we find the two chambers in the adult entirely separated so far as the sacculo-utricular canal is concerned. The two chambers are connected indirectly by the splitting of the ductus endolymphaticus, whose proximal portion is involved in the division of the ear chamber and really represents the utriculo-cochlear canal. It should be emphasized that the division of the internal ear is not into upper and lower portions, so far as the primitive auditory vesicle and its sense organs are concerned, but into anterior and posterior portions, the latter of which very soon assumes a ventral position, which is constantly magnified and increased ever after during the development of the phylum. It is very important to keep this distinction in mind when trying to unravel complications of structure of the mammalian ear which were puzzling enough to gain the name of auditory labyrinth.

LAGENA (cochlea).

The lagenar tube of the Torpedo is a short, curved, blind pouch given off from the sacculus. It forms a continuation of this chamber downwards, backwards, and outwards. The evagination is developed from the floor of the chamber, but owing to secondary changes involved in the separation of the lagenar papilla from the saccular or parent sense organ, the pocket many times appears to be an evagination of the lateral walls of the chamber. In the Sting Ray such is the case (Fig. i), while in the ear of Carcharias (Fig. 3) the lagena is a quite shallowdepression in the floor of the sacculus near its posterior wall. A cochlea in the restricted sense of the term has not yet made its appearance.

As already stated, Myxine shows no trace of a lagenar pocket, but Petromyzon has acquired a distinct chamber and sense organ in the manner described, which are homologous with the parts of the lagena in the Elasmobranchs.

The position occupied by the lagenar opening in the wall of the sacculus in the Petromyxon ear is a peculiarity of the group. The lagena appears to open upward into the common utriculosaccular chamber, its opening passing through the plane of the utriculo-saccular partition. On the completion of this partition, which is scarcely indicated in Myxine, but which is well grown

in Petromyzon, the ear chambers would communicate only by the separated ends of the endolymphatic ducts (PL IX, Fig. 2), as in the Gnathostome type, and, as will be perfectly evident on the inspection of the diagram mentioned (which, although a diagram, is true to the anatomical relations of the parts in Petromyzon), that the lagenar sack would be divided into two

chambers entirely cut off from each other, the anterior or the utricular being the smaller of the two and containing a portion of the macula utriculi, the posterior and (two times) larger containing the well-formed papilla lagenae and a part of the macula sacculi, which laps down over the edge of the pocket. These two pockets would thus communicate with the posterior inner and anterior inner angles of the utriculus and sacculus respectively. I was at first inclined to think that the cochlear and utricular recesses had been formed in this manner, but the discovery that the utriculo-saccular partition was continued cephalad of the lagena, and further, that there exists in the Petromyzon ear an independent utricular recess, decide the question as to the value of the Cyclostome lagena. It is purely a saccular pocket.

In the higher forms the lagenar pocket appears to be given oflF from the posterior outer angle of the sacculus, and has thus been displaced backwards and outwards.

In the bony fishes the lagena offers nothing of unusual interest for consideration here, and it is not until we reach the higher ichthyopsoid forms that the papilla basilaris, the parent organ of all the genuine cochlear structures, is developed. It is first produced, so far as our knowledge of living forms reaches, in the Anura, among which and the lower Reptilia it remains undeveloped and probably functionally insignificant. When, however, we reach the Saurians, the organ undergoes great changes in its structure, and in the Crocodilia reaches a condition of development but little if at all inferior to the Monotreme cochlea.

Alligator (PI. VII, Figs. 2, 4, 7, and 9; PI. X, Figs. 3 and 4).

The cochlea of the Alligator forms a depressed tube of angular outline and of relatively large size. It is curved in two directions, but not in as marked a degree as in Mammals and some Birds, though it approaches the Monotreme condition in this one thing and has as great a curvature as some species of Birds. The importance of this spiral twisting is due to the fact that the Alligator belongs to a group of animals possessing all grades of development of the cochlear pocket or tube, as the case may be. The lower members of the reptilian class have a lagenar pocket not much advanced beyond the Torpedo condition, while the highest families of the class show a greater differentiation of the cochlear tube with its contained organs than the Birds. Thus in the Saurians the cochlear tube begins a spiral twisting that is carried on through the whole of the mammalian group. The homologies of the cochlear framework I cannot enter into in this place. The roof of the cochlear tube acquires such relations to the bounding walls and is so sharply marked off from the side walls in some parts as to form ^a membrana Reissneri with nearly mammalian characteristics.

The membrana basilaris is composed of three superposed layers of fine, parallel fibres, packed closely together in the form of three continuous sheets, of which the middle one is the best developed. The membrane itself is not pierced by the cochlear nerve as in Mammals, for the nerve enters the membrane after piercing the cartilaginous frame of the inner edge, and is then distributed to the different parts of the cochlear organ by radiation to the inside and outside from a point in the floor near the middle of the sensory structures. In its thickest parts the membrana basilaris is thicker than the remaining parts of the cochlear organ, and is suited in nowise as a vibrating membrane (PL X, Fig. 3). The fibres of the middle layer cross from one side to the other of the framework, and in the thickest parts of the membrane present a very characteristic appearance, as indicated in PI. VII, Fig. 2 ; and PI. X, Fig. 3.

Retzius thought that only the middle epithelial ridge of the cochlea was concerned in the auditory function as a nerve-end organ. This he called without hesitation the papilla acustica basilaris, and considered it to be the homologue of the organ of Corti. In this, however, he is in error. Besides the very important organ he recognized, there is another, nearly as large, lying to the inner side of the incipient organ of Corti, which Retzius has several times imperfectly figured. He has likewise correctly given the relation of the membrana tectoria to it, as seen in ordinary preparations of the Alligator ear. This other organ, which I shall call the Sauropsid organ, lies upon the inner cartilage, and bears the same relation to the first named organ, which I believe to be the incipient organ of Corti, that the large epithelial ridge does to the small epithelial ridge in the developing mammalian ear.

The hair cells are more widely separated in these two organs of the Alligator than in the mammalian organ of Corti, and in consequence the membrana tectoria is looser in texture, but owing to the absence of otoliths and the strength and size of the individual hairs, the membrane appears much simpler in structure than that of the lagenar organ, for example. I have positive proof that there is nothing in the Alligator's membrana tectoria other than the long filaments into which it is with no great difficulty resolved, and there can be no doubt that these filaments are normally continuations of the auditory cells as their proper hairs.

Mimtis polyglottus (PL VI, Figs. 6 and 8).

In the Mocking-bird the internal ear lies in the occipital face of the skull. The anterior edge is presented outwards, the posterior inwards, and the outer face looks down.wards and almost directly backwards.

The anterior canals lie in planes nearly transverse to the long axis of the body, instead of occupying positions very nearly parallel to the sagittal plane. They are not, however, perpendicular to the long axis. The posterior canals lie very close to the edges of the foramen magnum ; in fact, may be said to take part in forming its thickened border. Owing to the curvature of the occipital face of the skull, the so-called horizontal canals lie very nearly in the vertical plane and transverse to the long axis of the body.

The sense organs found in this type of ear are —

1. Macula utriculi.

2. Macula sacculi.

3. 4. Cristae acusticse ampullanim (anterioris and horizontalis) .

5. Crista acustica ampullae posterioris.

6. Crista acustica abortiva.

7. Papilla acustica basilaris.

8. Papilla acustica lagenae.


In this account of avian cochlea no mention is made of the scala vestibuli or tympani, but only of the endolymphatic tube, or cochlea proper, — scala media. The cochlea of the Mockingbird is an elongated pocket hanging down from the floor of the sacculus. In length it equals more than half of the vertical height of the whole car and approximates one-third its length. Its diameter in the adult is greater than that of the sacculus. Its course, referred to the planes of the body, is downwards, inwards, and backwards. Its general shape and the main anatomical features do not differ materially from those of the pigeon, as described by Hasse and Retzius.

The lagena is relatively larger and more sharply marked oflF from the basilar portion than it is in the pigeon, and the latter part is more distinctly triangular in shape, with its base joined to the sacculus by means of the narrow canalis sacculo-cochlearis.

The cochlear canal is doubly curved, i.e. it has the form of the basal part of the cochlear canal of the Mammal ear, but projects from the saccular region more nearly perpendicular to the vertical axis of the whole organ than does the cochlea in the latter group.

The first curve is a bend transverse to its long axis and affects the upper portion of the tube most ; the second curve is more equally distributed throughout the length of the tube. The upper two-thirds of the canal is occupied by the basilar sense organ, while the lower third is taken up by the constriction which marks off the lagenar pocket.

The lagenar pocket is nearly filled with the lagenar sense organ, the floor of the pocket, with the exception of a border all around, being covered by the sensory epithelium.

Already in the bird the pseudo-cartilaginous oval frame which supports the cochlear organs has made good progress toward forming a protective case for the whole cochlear apparatus. By the fusion of the lateral bars of the frame in the lower half of their course the scala tympani is inclosed with the cochlear duct. The fibres of the cochlear nerve enter the cartilage at once after leaving its ganglion in the form of a continuous sheet of threads, and passes through the edge of the basilar membrane to be distributed to the sensory cells on its vestibular surface.

Alligator (PL VII, Figs. 2, 4, 7, and 9 ; PL X, Figs. 3 and 4).

The sense organ of the basilar portion of the cochlea is composed of two groups of cells, or two epithelial ridges, which run nearly parallel with each other. There are other epithelial ridges which, however, do not seem to contain sensory cells (Fig. 3, e,eJ), The larger or middle ridge is the most prominent part of the organ, and is the homologue of the small epithelial ridge of the Mammal ear; the inner ridge (/.^.r.) is the homologue of the larger epithelial ridge of the Mammal embryo and bears, especially on its outer border, hair cells similar to those covering most of the smaller epithelial ridge ; but whether its entire surface bears cells auditory in function remains to be determined.

The middle region of this ridge has near its inner border several rows of large hair cells, which vary in number with the place from which the section is taken. At the extreme ends no cells are seen, yet on advancing toward the middle of the ridge the hair cells appear, first as a single row, then double, triple, quadruple, quintuple, and on up to eight neighboring cell rows near the middle of the papilla.

These very remarkable cells are the large hair cells and occupy the inner border, while the remainder of the papilla is made up, or, more correctly, covered over with the smaller hair cells. But above and below the middle of the papilla the rows number eight to ten, while in the middle part of the sensory patch there are found as many as twenty cells in transverse section.

The sensory epithelium is supported by a lamina reticularis, which rapidly fades away towards the sides. As one nears the large hair cells the meshes become incomplete. This reticular membrane is especially pronounced in osmic preparations, scarcely visible in Miiller preparations, and here as elsewhere it is an artifact.

The supporting cells are long and irregularly cylindrical cells, which reach from the surface of the basilar papilla quite to the basilar membrane upon which they are inserted. They bear their nuclei in the basal portions of their cell bodies. They are loosely placed, with considerable interspaces between the cells.

Retzius concluded that neither representatives nor developmental stages of such representatives of Corti*s arches are present in the Alligator, and my own studies are only confirmatory of this view.

The nerve fibres pass from the cochlear ganglion as medullated fibres through the holes of the zona perforata, lose their sheaths, and ascend in the basilar papilla, spreading out fanshaped in the transverse axis, from the point of entrance and end in the bases of the hair cells.

Mimus polyglotUis (PI. VI, Figs. 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10; PI. VII, Figs. 1-9 and 12).

The sense organ of the basilar portion of the cochlea lies upon the basilar membrane as a two (several) layered plate of cells, broadest in its upper portion, gradually narrowing downwards, like the basilar membrane. It is rounded off at both ends. The sense organ occupies only about two-thirds the breadth of the basilar membrane, but is not confined to this membrane. It rests upon the quadrangular cartilaginous frame of the basilar papilla up to the entrance of the nerve fibres into the organ, or, in terms of mammalian anatomy, the habenula perforata. It is separated from the lagenar sense organ by an interval free of sensory epithelial cells. These two sense organs, though originating by the division of the primitive cochlear sense organ, are in the bird distinctly separated, and their nerves show even more distinctly the separation of the two structures.

In cross-section of the papilla basilaris the epithelial cells are largest near the inner border, but gradually increase from both sides towards the centre. The highest cells are, however, placed nearly over the edge of the cartilaginous frame. Between the middle and the inner border of the outer third of the basilar membrane the sensory epithelium passes into the ordinary lining of the cochlear canal. The number of cells in transverse rows in the broadest part of the membrane, i.e. near the middle of its length, is about forty. The cells are much shorter than in the other sense organs, and they are well isolated by the supporting cells. The cell caps are quite regularly hexagonal. Two important features of difference between the Thrush and Alligator cochlea are the absence in the former of the epithelial ridges found in the alligator and the absence of the large hair cells.

The cochlear organ thus appears to be made up of a large number of similar hair cells in the form of an even plate.

Although both Retzius and Hasse conclude that in the papilla basilaris of the bird we do not have a genuine organ of Corti, they consider the membrana tectoria of this organ as the homologue of the membrana Cortii of the mammalian ear.

Retzius describes this membrane as a somewhat soft, homogeneous, gelatinous skin, whose substance is perforated with many holes. In cross-section triangular, it varies in different parts of the organ, both in size and shape. He figures (PL XVIII, Fig. 13) two very distinct parts, which he describes as having somewhat different structures. That part {tuts) which lies against the clear cylinder cells of the inner border of the organ has its long axis placed perpendicularly with the basilar membrane, while the larger part (;«/.), or the membrana tectoria propria, always lies with its long axis (in cross-section) placed parallel with the surface of the basilar papilla, as is readily seen from his figures. The tectorial membrane lies somewhat above the surface of the sensory cells, so that a narrow cleft is left between them, into which (across which) the hairs project. The membrane does not extend to the inner border of the papilla, and consequently three or four rows of the inner hair cells are left uncovered. The other hairs come in contact with the surface of the membrane, and in many cases seem to project into the holes of the membrane. These inner hairs Retzius found covered by the peculiar long hyaline cells. The membrane reaches quite to the outer border of the sense organ. As the nature of the tectorial membranes will be discussed in another chapter, it will suffice to say here that Retzius did not observe the tectorial membrane in its living condition and normal relations.

The tectorial membrane of the lagenar organ is apparently composed of the irregular network of fibres inclosing numerous otolith crystals, especially in its upper part. The otoliths lie either on the surface of the network or partly imbedded in it. Such is the appearance of the membrane as a whole in ordinary preparations of the ear.

Alligator (PI. X, Figs. 3 and 4).

The sense organ of the lagenar portion of the cochlea rises gradually from the lining epithel of the lagenar chamber. It is completely separated from the basilar papilla, and lies entirely below and beyond it in the cochlear canal. It covers more than a zone of the floor of the lagena, and reaches up on the side walls of the chamber. The outer (i.e. anterior) end even passes over on to the roof of the pocket.

In structure the papilla lagenae resembles the macula sacculi.

Mimus polyglottus.

The sense organ of the lagena forms a somewhat horseshoeshaped structure, which occupies the central part of the floor of the lagena. Its boundaries are rendered conspicuous by the presence of a sharply defined, white otolithic mass which adheres to the tips of the long hairs of the sensory cells. The rest of the floor is covered by a single-layered epithelium composed of regular polygonal cells. The papilla lagenae has its long axis transverse to the vertical (primary) axis of the lagena, and is one and one-half times as long as the lagenar pocket is broad. The sense organ consequently curves up on to the sides of the pocket and reaches for a short distance on to the roof portion of the pocket (not the membrana Reissneri).

The histological characteristics of the sensory and supporting cells of the sense organs are essentially the same as have been already given for fishes. The cells connected with the nerve fibres are quite uniformly flask-shaped and in general bear much longer hairs than the authors have figured or described.

According to Retzius, the auditory hairs are tolerably stiff, straight, fibrillate, conical structures, which rise from a welldefined cuticular plate as a base. This plate forms the cap of the sensory cell. His measurements of the hairs gave lengths varying between 0.048 and 0.005 mm. They end finely pointed, the point being frequently turned to one side. Retzius leaves the question of the nerve terminations in the sensory cells in part an open question. He describes and figures one mode of termination as certain. In preparations of the cristas acusticae (maceration preparations) he found the thicker nerve fibres ending in expanded plates in contact with the bases of the sensory cells, and believes that the cell protoplasm here fuses with the nerve axis cylinders. Other and finer fibres he found with unattached ends between the cells some distance above their bases.

My own studies lead me to look upon the nerve plates which Retzius figures as products of the maceration process, perhaps of both reagents and manipulation, and I am confident that the nerve fibres which this author finds between the hair cells, or rather in situations such that he thinks they lay normally between the cells, do not have this relation to the living hair cells.


Alligator (PI. IX, Figs. 3 and 4).

The membrana Cortii (tectoria) in fresh condition is a soft structure which is greatly contracted by alcohol, but is well preserved in dilute glycerine to which a trace of osmic has been added, after which reagent it appears striated from base to upper surface. It is clear as glass, and it is honeycombed by irregular canals in all its parts. It is applied to the whole of the surface of the basilar papilla. Its transection at any point resembles in shape the cupula terminalis of an ampullar organ. The lower surface of the membrane near the middle line shows the most and largest pores. In ordinary preparations the membrane appears to be fixed by its inner edge to the large epithelial ridge, and from here to extend freely out over the surface of the organ, roofing over the groove between the large and small epithelial ridges, but coming to an end before reaching the outermost hair cells.

The horseshoe-shaped membrana tectoria of the lagena is composed of a dendritic network of many homogeneous fibres. Masses of otoliths are inclosed in the meshes, especially in the upper part of the structure. Retzius describes it as a tolerably thin horseshoe-shaped otolithic mass, containing larger crystals than are found over any other sense organs.

In the sacculus the otolithic accumulation nearly fills the chamber without showing any specially well-developed membrana tectoria. Retzius failed to find the latter. The hairs are present, however, and lie close to the tops of the sensory cells.


In the Mocking-bird I have always found the hair plate of the cochlear organ in osmic acid preparations and always free of otoliths. Its structure is shown in Fig. 10, PL VII. The meshes of the network are relatively wide, usually oval in shape, with the long axis of the oval parallel with the course of the auditory hairs, which in the membrane are glued together in bands separated incompletely by the interspaces. The membrana Cortii is characterized by radial striations, while the " membranes " over the maculae utriculi and sacculi are more loosely put together, and appear to be made up of a network of fine fibres. These fibres anastomose freely and are structureless and hyaline under ordinary' powers of the microscope. With requisite treatment and sufficiently high powers the meshes of the network are seen to be composed of bundles of fibrillae. The otolithic crystals are supported on the upper surface of the tectorial membrane and are disposed in several layers. How they are retained in place is not apparent. The extreme edges of the membrane are free from the crystals.


Otolithic calcareous matter is deposited in the ears of all vertebrate animals. It is precipitated out of the lymph at first in the form of small granules usually crystalline. These primary otoliths grow as all crystals grow when immersed in solutions containing their salts under proper chemical and physical conditions. The calcareous salts are supplied in two quite different ways. The first and probably the most important source in the adult ear is the lymph which, passing from the blood-vessels into the cavity of the internal ear, contains the calcareous salts in solution. The second and probably most important source of calcareous matter during embryonic life is the auditory epithelium which during its passage through the ontogenetic stages of its development exerts one of its phylogenetic functions, that of calcareous secretion, for dermal purposes. This embryonic activity gradually gives way as the adult functions of the cells become more and more pronounced.

The otoliths of the vertebrate ear are then by nature foreign bodies, just as renal and vesical calculi are, though of course there are certain differences in the conditions leading up to their production in the different organs. Those vertebrate forms which retain most of the primitive relations of the auditory organs deposit most calcareous matter {e.g. Sharks, Skates), though it is occasionally true here that the otoliths are secondarily dissolved out by the sea-water : such dissolution is usually prevented by the plugging up of the entrance to the ear by a mass of calcareous matter imbedded in mucus.

The presence of otoliths over the area occupied by the maculae utriculae and sacculi in all vertebrates, and the assumed universal presence of these structures in the auditory organs of all invertebrates, has led P. Meyer into a speculation as to their significance. He starts with the assumption that Johannes Miiller had proved that the otoliths in fishes were of service to the animal in audition by reinforcing sound by resonance, whereas this was merely a supposition of Miiller's. Meyer also points out that the membrana tectoria of the cochlear papilla basilaris is free from the otolithic structures present in the other cochlear organ of the Sauropsids, the papilla lagenae. The speculations offered by this author are simply repetitions of some of the views already offered, and with the exception of those referring to the otoliths themselves are treated of in another place. The functions of the otoliths are entirely unknown ; but, for my own part, I consider them foreign bodies, which, if now of functional value to the vertebrate ear, have acquired that value, or rather have forced the sensory structures to which they adhere with great readiness and in large numbers, to accommodate themselves to their presence. It is possible that they now perform their functions with the aid of the otoliths, though it is difficult to see what possible service the otoliths can render the auditory percipient elements, and their presence can be shown to be detrimental to the action of the percipient elements, as they execute their function in their primal state. Hence I may say that, so far as the otoliths are concerned, I am not in possession at present of facts enough to deny that they may play a r61e in auditory physiology. It is true, however, that they are not primarily necessary structures, for they are absent from the canal sense organs. They are produced in the greatest relative and absolute abundance in the lower vertebrate forms, whose cars retain connection with the sea-water, and whose blood is surcharged with calcareous matter; ct^. sharks. In bony fishes the separate particles, which in sharks always remain discrete, are united together, forming the ear stones.

There are many instances of calculi formed in other parts of the body, e.g, renal calculi, vesical calculi, pineal calculi, etc. These calcareous concretions or crystals lie within the normal cavities of these structures, or else within lymph spaces in their walls ; they are abnormal, notwithstanding which they may exist for long periods of time within these organs without causing disturbance in the economy of the organ.

So far as my reading extends, the older observers have never put to themselves the question : Why do the otolithic crystals, which are heavier than the endolymph, occupy the surfaces of the hair cell areas, which as a rule project considerably above the surface of the floor of the auditory chamber in which they are found, and often in part lie on the side walls of the chambers of the ear ?

Having greater specific gravity than the endolymph, the crystals might be supposed to be always dropping to a lower level until they reached the lowest, — the lagenar sac.

That this displacement of the otoliths could easily follow is a necessary consequence of the motions of the animal, giving gravity the opportunity to pull the crystals to the lowest level.

It is true that, generally speaking, the otolithic bodies occupy the lower chambers, but they do not necessarily, and do not usually lie in the lowest levels of these chambers, but defy the law of gravitation by remaining perched on the top of the hair cells or depending from the ends of the hair composing the hair field, as the case may be, according to the position of the sense organ on the walls of the chamber.

Most writers on the ear have contented themselves with saying that the sense organs were provided with a tectorial membrane {Dcckmembrane)^ which frequently contained otoliths as integral parts. But as the tectorial membranes can now be conclusively shown to have no existence in nature as integral parts of the living sense organs, it remains to be explained how the otoliths are retained in place on the surface formed by the tips or the sides of the hairs.

One can hardly maintain that a mass of fine crystals of calcium carbonate weighing from one to two ounces, lying like a sediment upon the floor of the central chamber of the ear of a fish of six feet length (Blue Shark, Carcharias cceruleus)^ can really serve any physiological function auditory in nature, and I have already shown that they did not primitively have such a function ; and consequently, if they now have a function in the ear, it must be an acquired one.

We have no evidence that there is any special restraint placed upon the cells involuted with the sensory structures, — we will say in the Shark's ear, — and they certainly have not specialized in any direction, so far as we can see. All that they do is to serve as a lining of the auditory canal chambers, and the most that we are entitled to say, in the present state of our knowledge, is that they may have the function of secreting calcareous salts, held somewhat in abeyance, owing to the lack of external stimuli to encourage it.

While we are considering the question of stimulation, this fact should not be lost sight of; viz. during the time when the auditory sense organs were superficial in position the surface cells about them had this ^Ualcarcous function in greater or less degree. It was controlled centrally, and carried out by alterations of blood supply. This control by inhibition or excitation was effected by a central co-ordinating mechanism composed of association fibres which brought into direct or indirect relation all the centres of the brain. Since these organs were superficial, their immediate surroundings must have been thus controlled ; and since this control could only have been exercised through the fibres of the nerves supplying this region, it follows that the so-called auditory nerve must contain within it those fibres which controlled calcareous production on the surface ; and since we are not at liberty to assume an entire annihilation of the co-ordinations of earlier days, it follows that there must be some sort of control of this function exerted on the lining cells of the auditory channels of the ears of all existing vertebrates, and that, when the function is exercised in local peripheral situations in response to local stimulation, it must be exercised by sympathetic action in the ear itself, and hence cause the deposit in the ear of calcareous matter, either amorphous or crystalline.

In this connection I wish to quote Hasse*s observation on the nerve relations to the ciliate epithelium in Petromyzon. With reference to Kctel's researches on the Cyclostome ear, he says:

"Positive Beobachtungen fiir den Zusammenhang der Nervenfasern mit den Flimmerzellen hat er damals nicht beibringen konnen, allein es bleibt kaum eine andere Moglichkeit ubrig und es sprechen dafiir gerade die Beobachtungen Boll's [on Pterotrachea] und ferner der Umstand, dass bei Thieren, deren Schleimhaut auf ausgedehnten Strecken Flimmerepithel tragt, diese einen grossen Reichthum an Nerven besitzt. Ich zweifle nicht daran und ich hoffe, in Zukunft positiv beweisen zu konnen, dass, wo Flimmerzellen vorhanden, dieselben mit Nerven in Verbindung stehen, und wenn solche wie bei Evertebraten und bei Petromyzon in der Bahn der Gehomerven verlaufen, so sind sie doch von ihm gesondert und als besondere Cerebralnerven anzusehen, die sich bei Petromyzon gleichsam zum Facialis gruppiren, und das Epithel ist nicht so ohne Weiteres als Gehorepithel aufzufassen."

As I have shown, the facial accessory nerve supplies sense organs in the ear of Petromyzon, and while I have no positive observations to record, it seems a more reasonable view to me that owing to the central relations of all peripheral nerves, which I have only faintly indicated in accounting for the presence of the otoliths, the ciliate epithelium is probably controlled by all the nerve branches entering the ear, since it occurs in the chambers supplied by both a?tterior and posterior nerve branches.

This view seems specially probable now that the main portion of the auditory accessorius is known to enter the endolymphatic and the commissural sense organs as a sensory nerve, leaving only a part of its fibres, on the most liberal allowance, to end in ciliate cells.

In tracing the otolithic bodies through the vertebrate phylum Hasse gives the following comparative account of their characters: —

" Wir finden bei Myxine glutinosa sowohl auf der macula als auf den cristae acusticae brocklige Otolithenmasscn, die jedoch bereits den cristas der Neunangen, wie den Ampullen der iibrigen Wirbclthiere fehlten. Bei ihnen finden wir die Otolithen nur an der macula recessus utriculi, sacculi, und cochleae und zwar in derselben Weise, als zusammenhangende Kalkmasse, bei den Teleostiern, wahrend wir dagegen bei den Plagiostomen Anhaufungen von einzelnen Kalkkrystallchen, Otolithenmasscn finden. Solche finden wir auch bei den Amphibien im recessus utriculi, im sacculus und im Endtheile der Schnecke, der lagena, die ja das Homologon der Schnecke der Fische ist, allein bei Siredon, Triton und Salamandra gestellt sich eine solche auch fiir den Anfangstheil der Schnecke hinzu, die aber bei den Ranae wieder verschwunden. Von diesen Thieren an bis zu den Saugern finden wir dann nur Otolithenmassen im recessus utriculi, im sacculus und im Schneckenende, der lagena, dem hautigen Kuppelblindsacke und in dem letzteren des Menschen und der Sanger finde ich auch davon keine Spur, so dass bei ihnen die ganze Schnecke frei von Kalkkrystallen ist. Dabei finden wir dann immer und iiberall, das die Otolithen oder Otolithenmassen, und das gilt namentlich fiir sacculus, den Binnenraum desselben nahezu auszufiillen, so das nur geringe Fliissigkeitsmassen (Endolymphe) zwischen ihnen und der Sackwandung bleiben. Im recessus utriculi und in der lagena ist das viel weniger der Fall. Die Otolithen ruhen dabei immer den maculae und deren Umgebung auf und werden selbst wenn sie aufrecht stehen, daran festgehalten und zwar dadurch, dass sie sich auf die immer gekriimmte Unterwand, den Boden, respective auf die Aussenwand stiitzen."

In criticising Hasse's views it should be borne in mind that he considered the terminal cupola of the cochlear spire to be a remnant of the lagena of other forms. He believed its sense organ had disappeared, and along with it the otoliths. The question of the homology of the apical portion of the cochlea cannot be considered as finally settled ; but, leaving this aside, there is no question as to the fact of the disappearance ; and this being the case, it is important to determine, if possible, the causes of the disappearance of the otoliths from this part of the ear. As yet the matter has not been investigated thoroughly enough to disclose a solution, though the idea that this phenomenon is directly connected with the increased delicacy of the cochlea at once suggests itself.


These spaces are developed from the lymphatic spaces which are usually found well developed around the bases of the sense organs of the lateral line. These spaces have been described by Carriire, the brothers Sarassin, and others, and it is sufficient here to recall the fact of their ver}' general occurrence. Of the causes which have led to their enormous development in fishes, amphibia, and reptiles, with their reduction among birds and mammals, we know nothing definite. The physico-physiological conditions and consequences of this development I have not investigated.


According to Schwalbe, the subdural space in Man communicates with the perilymphatic spaces through the porus acusticus, and Key and Retzius found that not only the subdural, but also the subarachnoidal space was accessible through the perilymphatic channels.

Weber-Liel has shown experimentally that the perilymphatic spaces of the ear are connected with the subarachnoidal spaces about the brain.

The perilymph, according to Hasse, flows principally through a membranous canal, ductus perilymphaticus, through the foramen jugulare into the lymph channels at the base of the head, — some part of it passes in through the porus acusticus internus into the subdural spaces about the brain. The endolymph flows out through the arachnoidal sheath of the auditory nerve into the subarachnoidal spaces, and renews itself perhaps by transfusion through the ductus and saccus endolymphaticus. The continuity of these spaces is much more distinct in the fishes than in the higher forms.


PI. Ill, Figs. I and 2 ; PI. V, Fig. 9 ; PI. VI, i ; PI. X, Figs. 3 and 4 ; and PI. XII. The Sauropsid organ. Corti's organ in the Mammalia.

a. Relation of component structures and of the cellular elements.

The cochlear frame.

b. Canal organ arrangement of the cell groups and the composi tion of a group.

c. The inner and outer hair cells.

d. The supporting cells. Pillars of Corti.

e. The hair band or membrana tectoria and the mb. reticularis.


/. The basilar membrane.

g. The cochlear nerves and nerve ends.

h. Marsupials and Monotremes.

The Cochlea,

AUe physiologischen Individuen, gleichviel welche xnoq^hologische Individualitats-Ordnung ihr materialles Substrat bildet, sind in alien ihren Leistungen und Korm-Verhaltnissen auf die morphologischen Individuen erster Ordnung, die Plastiden (Cytoden oder Zellen) als " Elementar-Organismen " zuriickzufuhren, da jedes Bion entweder selbst eine einfache Plastide (Monoplastis) oder ein Aggregat (S}iiusie, Colenie, Complex) von mehreren Plastiden ist (Polyplastis). — Haeckel, Generelle Morphologie, I, p. 370.

Der Organismus ist um so voUkommener, je abhifngiger die gleichartigen Individualitaten, welche ihn zusammensetzen, von einandcr und vom ganzen sind, und je xnehr also der ganze Organismus centralisirt ist, und alle subordinirten Individualit2ten herrscht (Gesetz der Centralization). — Ibid. 372.

Der Organismus ist um so voUkommener, je hoher zwischen alien untergeordneten Individualitatcn welche ihn zusammensetzen, der Grad der Arbeitstheilung und der Grad der Wechselwirkung ist, je grosser mithin die Differenzirung und die Centralization des ganzen Organismus ist. — Ibid.

The general features of the development of the organ of Corti I have already given in the account of the morphology of the sauropsid and mammalian cochlear organs. In the following account which, though by no means exhaustive, will serve to illustrate the ontogeny of the organ, I shall dwell almost entirely on the organ of Corti proper, and shall have very little to say of the other parts of the cochlear apparatus ; e.g, the scalae of the cochlear walls except so far as they take part in the formation of the organ of Corti, or influence the performance of its function. The account is mainly based on my studies of the development as it occurs in the pig, although many facts have been verified for the rabbit, sheep, ox, opossum, and other mammals.

So far as my observations go, and they agree with Boettcher*s, there arc but the slightest differences noticeable in the development of the ear among the domestic mammals, the only ones heretofore studied with a sufficient degree of completeness for the purpose of comparison.

The first thing of fundamental importance to be noted is that the cochlear tube is accompanied on its sense-organ wall or floor by a ganglionic nerve trunk («. cochlcce)^ an artery {a. basilaris cochlea) of which the vascula spiralis is one branch, a vein {v, basilaris cochlea)^ and a lymphatic canal of large proportions; and since such structures accompany in an entirely similar manner the sense-organ canals in fishes, we discover in this new evidence of the nature of the cochlear tube.

As is well known, the cochlear ganglion arises in contact with the cochlear tube, and no sharp line of demarcation is at first to be seen between the sensory epithelium and the ganglionic tissue. This condition does not last long ; for as the tube increases its size it becomes sharply marked off from the ganglion and before long separated from it, mainly, as it would seem, by the ingrowth of the intracapsular connective tissue, which at this time is beginning to assume its cartilaginous nature. The separation increases with the growth of the parts, until finally in the adult the sense organs in the cochlear tube are connected with the cochlear ganglion by a very long, narrow band of nerve fibres, as viewed in section transverse to the long axis of the canal.

The nerves pierce the floor (basilar membrane) about the line of contact of the small and large epithelial ridges.

The organ of Corti is the final product of a long series of developmental changes in the cochlear organ. The earliest condition of the cochlear organ in the mammal, which in its development very completely epitomizes the phylogenetic history, is of course the simple pocket budded off from the sacculus, its inner surface being lined with a columnar epithelium. To confine our attention to the points of most interest to us, we will pass over all the changes between this earliest condition and the stage in which the floor of the cochlear tube, now well grown out, has become thickened, the thickening being in the form of a ridge (later ridges) running parallel to the long axis of the tube. Kolliker, Middendorp, and Boettcher have described these elevations and applied to the two most prominent ones, which play the greatest part in the subsequent history of the mammalian cochlea, the names small and large epithelial ridges. The large epithelial ridge lies nearest the lamina spiralis ossea, and consequently is nearest the nerve supply ; the small epithelial ridge lies beyond it outside, and receives its nerve supply only after the nerves have been given off to or passed through the large epithelial ridge.

Owing to their subsequent history, I shall call the large epithelial ridge the Sauropsid cochlear organ and the small epithelial ridge the mammalian cochlear organ or the organ of Corti.

As soon as these two ridges are formed, they are separated by a shallow groove which really forms a part of the sulcus spiralis internus in the adult condition, but in this sense only. The Sauropsid sulcus (internus ?), as I shall call this groove, separates the two ridges, and its deepest part lies over the boundary line between the two ridges. Now since the large ridge disappears during postembryonic development in all mammals yet studied, it follows that at least half of the Sauropsid sulcus is taken up in and forms a part of the space left vacant by the large epithelial ridge, which is the sulcus spiralis internus. For a long time, relatively, the two ridges grow but little, but suddenly they both receive an impetus and begin increasing in size, the period in their ontogeny having arrived when this phylogenctic impulse must be reproduced. The larger ridge grows most rapidly under this stimulus, and this may be due to the more direct connection with the nervous centres controlling the organ. From their first appearance there is to be seen over them, covering their apices, a delicate whitish sheet of substance, supposed by KoUiker and others to be a gelatinous excretion from the cells themselves, but which more careful examination of properly prepared material shows to be composed of a forest of small hairs growing out of the tops of the cells, which in this manner are shown to be hair-bearing sensory cells, since, as mentioned above, they are connected with the fibres of the cochlear nerve.

The large epithelial ridge grows in two ways : by increase in the height of the cells, and by increase in its breadth, due to the division of the cells. As the cells increase in size, the hairs grow longer and apparently more rapidly than the cells, for they finally surpass them in length. Having reached its complete development, the large epithelial ridge remains for a time unchanged and in this condition is known as the Organon Kollikcri, this name having been applied to it by Hensen in honor of its first describer, A. von Kolliker. Kollikcr's account of this organ is by no means complete, since he failed to make out of the covering membrane or mass anything more than a nearly homogeneous mass of gelatinous substance, which he supposed was simply the increased exudation noticed by him in the earlier stages. The significance of this structure was far from his mind.

The little epithelial ridge grows more slowly, and at the time the large ridge has reached the height of its development, it is still in a very immature state, though the structures which serve to distinguish it and make it peculiarly a mammalian organ are marked out so definitely that no parts are added to the organ as it now exists. From this time on, it is evidently the organ of Corti, though about this homology there exists in the literature a great amount of confusion. Retzius correctly recognizes the ontogenetic relation of the adult organ of Corti to the small epithelial ridge, but he says the organ of Corti is the homologue of the macula acustica papillae basilaris, which it never is. Even among the higher Sauropsida (saurians and birds) there is such a differentiation of parts as to necessitate our recognition of the fact that the sensory plate of the papilla acustica basilaris of these forms cannot be considered the homologue of the simpler plate in the lower forms. Likewise, when we pass by the unknown forms between the Sauropsida and the Mammalia we find ourselves face to face with an entirely new organ that has, at most, only the slightest indications of its beginnings in the ear of the Alligator, the intervening stages of development so far as at present known having been annihilated with their possessors, the Sauropsid ancestors of the Mammalia.

The causes which have led up to the annihilation of the large epithelial ridge during ontogenetic process as a part of the phylogenetic advancement of the Mammalia are very obscure as yet. For the present, suffice it to say that such is the fact, easy of observation, and that connected with this annihilation of the Sauropsid organ is the rapid advancement and perfection of the mammalian organ of Corti. The Sauropsid organ at the height of its development takes more of the nerve supply from the cochlear nerve than does the organ of Corti ; but as the latter grows and the former fades, this condition is reversed, until the cochlear nerve gives off fibres to the organ of Corti alone. What becomes of the fibres supplied to the Sauropsid organ } Do they simply disappear through resorption } I have observed that the bundle gradually grows smaller, but I am unable to detail the process of disappearance.

The Sauropsid organ disappears through a process of resorption ; that is, first of all, through a loss of its nutritive supply, and then by a gradual decrease in size of the cells until only a few dwarfed remnants remain in the place of the once powerful organ of the Sauropsid type. The histology of the organ has already been given by Boettcher (31, 1869), Kolliker (166, 1861 ; 164, 1879), Retzius (237, 1884), and others, but only in a very incomplete manner. I am able to make some few additions to it, based on observations made on the organ in its mature state. The long cylindrical cells occupy the whole depth of the organ and fasten upon the developing membrana basilaris. They are polygonal columns, more or less bent, depending upon their position in the organ (PI. VI, Fig. i). Within, the protoplasm is clear and is provided with a single oval nucleus, which lies at different niveaux in different cells and in different parts of the organ. The cells are never multinucleate, as has been asserted by Boettcher (31, 1869). From the top of each cell there rises a 16ng, slender hair structure, which curves over toward the inner edge of the organ over the region of the entrance of the cochlear nerve. This part of the floor of the cochlear canal is on a lev^l (at this time) with the top of the cells of the Sauropsid organ, although the floor is here not near as thick as it is under (and including) the Sauropsid organ. In consequence, the hairs seem to fall over on to the surface of this plateau, the inner portion of which later on is known as the Limbus spiralis intcrnus.

Owing also to the relation of this plateau, when the Sauropsid organ has disappeared the open canal occupied by the organ is left free, and over this the hairs of the organ of Corti project, roofing over the canal, but only incompletely closing it in.

The human cochlea may be taken as fairly representing mammalian conditions. It is not so much coiled as the cochlear tube of some of the higher Mammalia, but it stands much nearer the apex of the scries than to the lowest members, as represented by Echidna and Ornithorhynchus, which are but little above the avian and saurian conditions. The human cochlear tube is a flattened canal having in different parts of its course a varying cross-section, from nearly circular and oval to distinctly triangular form. In the adult ear it possesses about three spiral turns, and along its floor, extending from one end to the other, is a linear scries of sense organs so closely united together as to have been described as a single band-like sensory apparatus by all anatomists from its discoverer, Marchese Corti (185 1), down to the present time. Relative to the mass of the body, the longest cochlear tubes are found among the Chiroptera and the Rodentia, while the Cetacea possess the relatively smallest.

In the Mammalia the cochlear tube has become much more completely separated from the sacculus than in any other group of vertebrates. It is connected with the parent chamber by the narrow sacculo-cochlear canal, — the canalis reuniens of Hensen.

The term organ of Corti, as it is used in anatomy, is, strictly speaking, not sufficiently exact for scientific purposes, and some of the parts included in it have no functional relation to the physiologically active parts of the mammalian cochlear organ. Such parts as the auditory denticles and related structures have certainly no intimate relation to the working of the organ today, nor are they concerned in perfecting the organ structurally. They are simply the remnants of a previous condition of structure.

The mutual relations of the structures forming the organ of Corti vary in different periods of the growth and life of the organ. In the embryonic condition all the cells are firmly planted on the floor of the canal, and this floor is attached on both the inside and the outside edges to a thick cartilaginous plate or bar, the derivative of the parallel cartilaginous bars of the ancestral Sauropsids.

As all the cells are in contact with this basement or basilar membrane, which, although a thick plate at this time, thins out later to form a tensely drawn membranous structure, and as likewise all the cells take part in the formation of the free surface of the organ, they all have the same length, both supporting and sensory cells : indeed, it is extremely difficult at this early time to distinguish the supporting cells as such.

The first change of importance is marked by the appearance of the rods of Corti, by means of which the uniformity of the cell arrangement is broken up. The rods as they develop cause an elevation or upheaval of the two parts of the sensory plate, between which they have arisen, so that from this time on, in ever-increasing degree, till adult life is reached, the edges of the organ lying on the uplifting limbs of the arches are raised from the basilar membrane. The inner edge is disturbed the most, and the inner row of hair cells and some of the supporting cells no longer reach the basilar plate. The outer hair cells almost always reach to the floor of the canal. The processes concerned in this uplifting cannot be detailed here further than to say that the bases of the rods of Corti spread apart while the apices remain united, and owing to the plough-shaped foot of each arch, they are readily forced under the neighboring cells. Working with this process, and perhaps more prominent than it, is the process of growth in the basilar membrane, by means of which the feet of the pillars are carried further apart. By the resorption of the Sauropsid organ and the growth in height of the whole organ of Corti, the latter comes to project from the basilar membrane into the cochlear canals, a long, well-rounded ridge, from the apex of which five to seven more or less complete* rows of hairs project in a sweeping curve over towards the foot of Reissner's membrane. As compared with the older conceptions of the structure of Corti's organ and the relations of its parts, the organ, as I have here briefly sketched it, is a simple and compact structure. There are many of the important histological intricacies yet to be made out concerning the cell parts and their relations to the parent and neighboring cells and to the nerves, but these need not detain us here.

The essentials of the organ of Corti are then, in brief, a long, fluid-filled canal, with a series of nerves piercing its floor to pass up among the cells of a ridge, the apex of which is crowned by several rows of long filamentous hairs which arise from the tops of the sensory cells with which the nerves connect.

The sensory cells are arranged in groups, but, as might be expected, these groups are by no means as regular as they would be were they free to multiply and shape themselves, as is the case of the sensory cell groups in the surface canals of fishes. It should be noted that after being shut up in the cranial box the canal organs'were so hemmed in that there was no room to spare for the usual amount of canal space to accommodate a single sense organ, and the larger patches of sensory cells, such as the maculae utriculi sacculi and the papilla lagenae, were formed in a manner quite unlike the more typical cristoe of the ampullae. With the lengthening of the lagenar pocket there was afforded opportunity for the growth of a series of closely related canal organs ; the opportunity was seized ; the sense organs grew in all directions, practically covering the floor of the chamber. These cells were, however, of low stage of differentiation, not raised above the cells of the maculae sacculi and utriculi in physiological capabilities, and consequently the limit was soon gained for a useful multiplication of the sensory structures in this way. If a few cells could do all the work of the many and subserve other functions at the same time, it would be of advantage to the animal to reduce the number of cells, conserve its nerve energy, and gain in perfection of service.

  • There are usually four quite complete rows with straggling cells beyond.

Just this has been done in the transformation of the Sauropsid cochlear organs into the mammalian condition, but at the same time the length of the narrowed series has been greatly increased, so that information is reported to the brain from a hundred independent sources in the mammal ear where it was reported from ten in the Sauropsid ear, serially speaking ; for the important condition of sequence is concerned only when the reporting cells are at different distances from the brain. Where all the cells are the same distance from the brain, they speak practically as one.

There is then a repetition of canal-organ arrangement in the cochlear organ of the Mammalia, and this is indicated by the nerve supply, the blood supply, the separation of the end cells themselves, and by all the subordinate structures that have been impressed with the structural relations of the sense organs and their connections. In PI. XII, I have attempted to illustrate in a perspective view the existing condition of things in the human ear.

The structure of the hair-bearing cells in the cochlea of the mammalian ear has been a subject for difference of opinion ever since their discovery.

Waldeyer and Gottstein describe them as twin cells composed of upper and lower halves, the parts corresponding to the hair cells and the supporting cells of other authors. I have never found a double or twin cell among my many preparations, and I do not believe in their existence. The hair cells as I have found them correspond to the upper halves of the twin cells of Waldeyer and Gottstein, the hair cells of Retzius and of Paul Meyer.

The hair cells of the outer rows are larger than those of the inner. They are cylindrical in shape and filled with a clear fluid in their upper parts, while their basal portions, around and below the nucleus, contain a coarsely granular protoplasm. There is not much variation in shape between the cells from the different mammals studied. In all species the basal end of the cylinder is quite regular, somewhat swollen, and the upper rim of the cell wall, where it joins the cell cap, turned out like a flange. This conformation gives the whole cell, when viewed from the side, a vase-like shape. The action of reagents on the cell contents affects their appearance, so that the clear upper half, so distinct in the living cell, may be coagulated or have its invisible structure more or less clearly brought to sight. Contrary to the statements of Retzius, the auditory hairs arise, as Waldeyer has already claimed, from the whole upper surface of the cell cap. The crescentic outline or horseshoe figure (hufeisen oder halbkreisformiger Anordnung) or style of arrangement which Retzius has made us familiar with, is an optical effect and entirely illusory. The explanation of this mistake (which many other investigators besides Retzius have likewise made) lies in the fact of the oblique position of the hair-cell cap with respect to the focal plane of the observer's lenses, so that unless great care and a sufficiently high power is used, the apparent arrangement of the hairs in the optical section of the cell cap of the thickness of the focal depth is mistaken for the actual arrangement, which is usually only to be determined by a careful analysis and combination of the several images of the optical sections of any given cell cap. Whatever the shape of the cell cap, whether circular, oval, polygonal, or irregular, the hairs arise from the whole of the upper surface, and they are evenly distributed over this surface.

These hairs are more numerous on the hair cells from man's ear than the mammals which I have studied. The differences are not very great between man, the ox, and pig. Quantitative results I shall reserve for a later paper.

Retzius has shown conclusively enough that the human cochlea docs not contain a larger number of rows of hair-bearing cells than that of most mammals, e,g. the dog and cat ; but his calculations show the rows to be much longer in man than in the cat and rabbit.

The row of inner hair cells offers some important points for consideration, — points of difference in structure and perhaps origin and development. These hair cells do not vary much in their characters in domestic animals. This row is the most complete of the several rows of the organ, and it shows supernumerary cells less often than the other rows. In histological details the cells are quite unlike those of the outer rows, and, according to Retzius, they approach those of the maculae utriculi and sacculi in their shape, size, and structure. They are entirely filled with a dark, coarsely granular protoplasm, and consequently lack the clear end space of the cells of the outer rows. The hairs appear to be better developed than in the case of the cells of the maculae.

According to Gottstein and Waldeyer, and Retzius agrees with them, the inner row of hair cells is developed from the outermost cell of the large epithelial ridge ; but according to Boettcher the innermost cell of the small ridge gives rise to the inner hair cell. It becomes a matter of great importance for the correct understanding of the organ of Corti to determine the source of all its elements. For my own part I am fully persuaded that the inner row of hair cells arises entirely within the bounds of the small epithelial ridge, and the evidence is not merely embryological, as derived from the study of mammalian development, but comparative anatomical, based on the study of the organ of Corti in the Alligator and several mammalian ears. Allowing that the inner cell is developed from the outermost cell of the large epithelial ridge, we should have to separate the organ of Corti into two very distinct portions, one of which would include the portion supplied by the Sauropsid organ, i.e. the inner row of hair cells, and its supporting cells, or the inner row of Corti's pillars; while the other one would include the rows of the outer hair cells and the outer pillars of Corti. While my own observations on the ontogeny of the ear agree with Boettcher' s, they are not sufficient to warrant at this time a final conclusion as to the part actually played by the Sauropsid organ in the adult mammalian ear. As I have said before, I think it disappears as a sense organ, being represented in the adult mammal only by the lining epithelium of the sulcus spiralis internus.

The structure of the Sauropsid and mammalian organs as they exist in the Alligator is such that I am inclined to think the whole of the organ of Corti as it exists in mammals is a direct descendant of the organ of Corti as found in the Alligator, and for the following reasons : the Sauropsid organ of the Alligator is made up of sensory cells of a different character from those found in the Alligator's organ of Corti. This is especially true of the innermost four or five rows of the organ of Corti. For in these innermost rows the cells are more like those of the organ of Corti in the mammals than those of any other parts of the epithelial ridges, and are very different from the remaining cells of the organ lying outside of them.

I look upon these rows of modified cells in the Alligator's organ of Corti as the earliest indication of the peculiar and characteristic structures of the organ of Corti in the Mammalia ; and if such is the truth, the latter organ must have arisen entirely from the former. Accepting the other supposition, we should necessarily have to conclude that the arches of Corti arose from the supporting cells of the edges of the Sauropsid and mammalian organs, and that Corti's canal is represented in the Alligator by the deep valley separating these two structures.

While it is entirely possible for the supporting arcade to have arisen in this way, and although such a method of origin would render some difficult problems much easier of solution, and has thus the factor of simplicity in its favor, it must be said that at the present time the latter view is not so well supported by facts as the former.

The arch of Corti in the mammalian ear (PI. XII) is located outside of the place of entrance of the cochlear nerve into the cochlear canal, and in the Alligator the relation to the organ of Corti {i,e. the inner four or five rows of modified cells) is very similar, while the relation of the nerve to the Sauropsid organ is very different and of the same nature as that sustained by the cochlear nerve to the large epithelial ridge in the developing mammal.

The supporting cells of the organ of Corti, like those of all other sense organs of the lateral-line category, comprise all of the non-sensory cells of the ridge-like organ. So far as my observations enable me to decide, these cells are all simple, i.e. there are no twin cells in the sense in which Wuldeycr, Gottstein, and Nuel use the term. Since the supporting cells, with the exception of the double row called Corti's pillars, ate of interest mainly from the histological standpoint, I shall not enter into a detailed account of them here. Suffice to say that they are of various sizes and shapes, depending upon their position in the sensory ridge, and they pass over into the indifferent epithelial lining, of the sulci internus and externus. The rods of Corti are of unusual interest, since they make their appearance among existing forms only in the Mammalia. In the Monotremes, where the cochlea retains a lagena, its main Sauropsid character, the arches of Corti are already well developed, and we must look for their early stages of growth and development among extinct forms of the Post Reptilia, The story of their development will be given further on ; but when once matured they constitute the long tent-like cover or inclosure of the canal of Corti. Each rod is composed of a large number of isolable, fine, transparent threads, of circular section. The minute hyaline cylinders conform to the curvature of their rod. The whole bundle is inclosed in a cell which for the greater part of its length fits it closely like a sleeve, while at its foot and sometimes at its head the remaining protoplasm of the cell is collected. The cell nucleus, which persists throughout the life of the rod, lies always in the foot on the tunnel face of the rod. The fibres of the two rods opposite each other seem to blend at their union above, thus forming the keystone of the arch.

From here they diverge until they come in contact with the basilar membrane, when they turn suddenly outwards, i.e. away from the tunnel, and run parallel with the fibres of the basilar membrane, among which they sometimes appear to be rooted ; and Nuel was led by this appearance to figure and describe a continuity of the pillar fibres with those of the basilar membrane. I am convinced such does not exist.

The cell caps of the cells forming the ridge of Corti are fused together,^ thus forming a continuous sheet, and the pillar heads form a broad, smooth band, marked only by transverse and parallel lines, which, throughout the length of this plate, divide it into inner and outer halves, and these into segments (PI. Ill, Figs. I and 7; PI. IV, Fig. 6; PL V, Figs. T and 10;

1 While in the living condition the caps of the epithelial cells are in close contact, in hardened preparations they are more or less soldered together by the action of the reagents, and their continuity is thus mechanical and not organic. They do not differ in this respect from other forms of epithelial cells.

PI. VIII, Fig. 6 ; and PI. XII). This plate, one part of which has received the name of Hensen's Randkorper, another part of which is known as the membrana reticularis, and whose third and inner part has never been specially named, will be considered more in detail further on.

The membrana basilaris is that part of the connective tissue wall of the cochlear tube which lies under the sense organ and forms its floor, as well as the basement membrane of its epithelium. Like the basement membrane of all sense organs of this system, it is a portion of the dermis of the head, modified in the direction of homogeneity of composition. Its structure and arrangement have been many times correctly described in detail, and I have little to add to its histology ; but when we consider its morphological significance, I am sure that heretofore the true nature and relations of this now well-known plate have not been correctly apprehended. It is far from being the most delicate membrane of the cochlear wall, and is, as stated, actually the thickest part of the connective tissue wall which is exposed to the perilymphatic spaces. Rcissner's membrane, or the roof of the canal, is very much thinner and less resistant, since its basement membrane is a very delicate plate and the two plates of epithelial cells covering it are many times more delicate than those supported by the cochlear floor. The membrana basilaris has only one character that renders it of special interest, and that is its relation as basement membrane to the sensory cells whose nerves must pierce it in order to reach their terminations.

Boettcher thought he had proved a structural continuity of the epithelium, i,e. the rods, with the basilar membrane, but from his embryological studies he concluded that the layers of the membrana basilaris were in no sense derived from the epithelial layer supported on its inner surface. This conclusion no one can refuse to acquiesce in when the evidence of comparative anatomy is considered. The epithelial cells of the sense organs of the lateral line are supported by the dermis on which they rest, which thus constitutes the basilar membranes of these organs. It normally develops lymphatic channels below the sense organs. Thus the dermis between the organ and the lymph spaces becomes the functional basilar membrane of the organ, and is very much thinner than the surrounding dermis. These modifications do not affect the relation of the epithelial cells to the connective tissue cells, and the two layers retain their structural independence.

The basilar membrane of the organ of Corti is a complex structure composed of cells and fibres of varying sizes, which have arisen from the dermis. These fibres run both directly and obliquely across the open basilar space, and form a two to several layered floor, on which the cochlear organ rests. Anatomists have made various divisions of its surface, based usually on the relative position of the cochlear ridge and the nerve foramina to the surface of the plate. It is usually divided first into two main zones, an inner and an outer. The former is very sparsely striated, i.e, fibrous ; for in this part the individuality of the fibres is more or less in abeyance. This part bpars the organ of Corti, and runs under the sulcus spiralis internus, where it is perforated by the foramina for the nerves, to its insertion into the limbus spiralis.

The outer zone is usually considered to begin in the immediate neighborhood of the feet of the outer pillars of Corti, i.e, outside the arch of Corti, and extends from this region outward to its insertion in the angle of the ligamentum spiralis. The fibres of this zone are very distinctly separated from each other, and are easily separated in microscopic preparations of the membrane.

There are at least two layers of fibres present in this membrane in all mammals, and in some three and four. There is a general agreement among investigators that the basilar membrane of the human ear is thinner and relatively broader than it is in most, if not all, other mammalian species, a belief which I think is insufficiently borne out by the facts, but the number and completeness of the layers of fibres is subject to change during development, and is different for different species. The surface layers of both faces of the membrane are in the adult usually incomplete, and appear as bundles or bands of fine fibrils lying on the deeper layers of the membrane.

The basilar membrane in the pig and ox shows during its development that it is not in any way built up from the ectoepithelial structures lying on its upper surface and derived from the surface of the head, nor from the meso-epithelial structures evolved during the ontogenetic processes as cellular lining of the lymphatic canals of the ear, as was supposed by Deiters and Lavdowsky. The basilar membrane, considered phylogenetically, is. merely a portion of the connective-tissue floor of the sense-organ canal of fishes.

Of the basilar membrane Retzius says (loc, cit, p. 280),

Diese wichtige Membran^ die Gnindmembran des akustischcn Apparates der Sc/tenecke, welche von Labium tympanicum bis zum Ligamentum spirale strafif ausgespannt liegt, lasst sich am ehesten in die eigentliche Membran und die tympanale Belgschicht thcilen." The lining tissue of the scali tynipani or the lymph space normally developed below the floor of the sense organ is as normal a component of the basilar membrane as the cellular plate which covers the face of Reissner's membrane turned towards the scala vestibuli, and must be considered when we estimate the physical properties of the basilar membrane.

The importance of the basilar membrane to previous investigators was due mainly, if not entirely, to their views as to its function. It was the harp of many chords on which Helmholtz played with variations his later piano-string theory of musical perception. On PL VIII, Figs. 5 and 7 show the basilar membrane of the Opossum and its component layers, some of which are strictly transverse, while others run longitudinally, crossing the former nearly at right angles. These fibres are all held together as a compact plate during life, and are with difficulty separated enough to show their mutual relations. When hardened or properly macerated, they may be readily separated, and the upper layers are most readily displaced. These upper bundles of fibres have played an interesting part in the history of the mammalian cochlea, as will be further explained when we come to treat of the nerves. The histological character of this membrane has been so many times the subject of careful research that it might seem presumptuous for one to attempt to add anything to our knowledge of it. I do not intend to enter into any long account of the condition of the basilar membrane in the forms studied by me, but only to call attention to the facts (and illustrate them with a few camera drawings) that investigators have ascribed to the membrana basilaris qualities which it certainly does not possess. Its elasticity is not great enough to serve for the transmission of the delicate undulations which it has been supposed to transmit, and from its composition a great deal of the motion imparted to it would necessarily be lost in transmission. Likewise before reaching the plate of transverse fibres which form the completest part of the basilar membrane as previously conceived, the motion would have to be transmitted through a continuous homogeneous layer of substance lying below and inclosing the fibres from the scala tympani.

When we reduce the cochlear spiral to a straight line, we have the cochlea in the form of a straight canal, receiving its nerves along one side — the lower inner angle, if one may speak of angles of a tube more or less oval in cross-section. The nerve does not enter the walls of the tube as a continuous band, but is previously divided into sub-equal sections, which form branches about twice as broad as thick. There are about fifty of these branches in the middle spiral of the ear of Sus and a total of from no to 125 in the entire cochlea.

Each branch of the cochlear nerve is supplied to a single sense organ composed of about ten hair cells counted lineally in either the row of inner hair cells or the inner row of outer hair cells. There is a tendency to fuse into a continuous band, owing to the suppression of the supporting cells between the sense organs, which renders the determination of the boundaries of most of the organs a matter of difficulty and in many cases an impossibility. Assuming that there are four rows of hair cells regularly completed, each fasiculus would supply on the average about forty hair-bearing elements of Corti's organ in the adult. The extremes I have found are four lineal and sixteen lineal with ten cells as the average length of the sense organ.

After passing through the floor of the canal the nerve fibres enter the epithelial ridge and traverse the intercellular spaces, branching, as they do so, until they arrive at the end cell, into which they enter. The general features of the relation of the nerve bundles, as they pass out of the lamina spiralis ossea through the habenula perforata, during the passage of which they lose their meduUated sheaths, have often and accurately been described, and there is substantial agreement among the authorities in the matter, but the course of the non-medullated fibres from the habenula perforata to their ends, and the relation they sustain to the other structure of the organ, are not so well agreed upon. The discussion which is at once opened when the subject of the peripheral endings of sensory nerves is touched upon is one of long standing and exceeding great difficulty when it comes to the presentation of demonstrations and conclusive arguments.

There are two questions remaining for consideration in this paragraph, — the spiral or longitudinal nerve bands and the peripheral ends of the radial nerves in the hair cells. Discovered by F. E. Schultze, described especially well by Deiters, the spiral nerves have been found by the majority of investigators since their time (Kolliker, Hensen, Loewenberg, Nuel, Gottstein, Lavdowsky, and Retzius), though some authorities have been unable to satisfy themselves that the spiral fibres are really nervous in nature (Rosenberg, Boettcher, Waldeyer, and Middendorp). With the latter group my own investigations compel me to place myself, for they have led me to the same conclusion arrived at by Waldeyer in 1870. I am fully convinced that there are no bundles of spiral nerve fibres in the cochlea such as Deiters, Hensen, Gottstein, Nuel, Lavdowsky, and others have described. Cf. Deiters (69), Taf. VII, Fig. 28, and Taf. VIII, Figs. 34 and 36; Nuel (206), PL IV; and Lavdowsky (178), Taf. XXXV, Figs. 5, 12, 13, 20. As to the existence of such structures as are here displayed there can be no question. I have often had the counterpart of Deiters' Fig. 28, PI. VII, but the fibres there shown are not nerves, but connective tissue fibres belonging, as I believe, entirely, and, as I have demonstrated, at least in part, to the basilar membrane. NueVs figures show mostly fibres of a different nature microscopically ; but although I have seen such fibres as he offers in the figure on PI. IV only a few times, they appear to me to be connective-tissue fibres modified by the reagents used and more or less transposed during the preparation. It should be recalled here that the radial nerve fibres after they leave the habenula perforata do not run in straight lines, but suffer two sorts of displacement, one of which is due to the spiral growth of the cochlear canal, by means of which the relations of all the contained structures are considerably distorted in a plane parallel to the basilar membrane, and the other of which is an easy undulation of the nerve fibre itself. This undulation of the nerve fibre I have seen in all preparations showing the nerves, but since the nerves are invisible without previous chemical treatment, it by no means follows that the undulations exist during life ; still it is not improbable that this is the case since such a disposition is not uncommon in the smaller nerves in the tissues of other organs. The various authors who have described the system of spiral nerve fibres do not agree among themselves as to what constitute the complete system or where the various bundles are to be found. No one has yet been able to trace the connection between these so-called spiral nerve fibres and the hair cells. Boettcher, whose extensive researches into both the embryonic and adult structure of the cochlea entitle his opinion to great consideration, calls attention to the logical inconsistency of the accounts of the authors describing these courses of fibres, in that they fail to find the origin and end of the spiral nerves and they do not agree as to their position and characters. No one has yet claimed that these tracts of spiral nerves have any representation in any of the other sense organs, nor has their existence been shown in the ear of the Alligator, in which type the mammalian organ exists in a much simpler condition than in any of the mammalia. From what I have already seen of the cellular structure of the Alligator's cochlea I am confident that spiral nerves occur neither in the sauropsid nor in the mammalian organ of this animal's ear. Waldcyer says in his resume of the controversial points of the mammalian cochlea : " In stating my views in regard to the cells and fibres which arc the subject of dispute, I will say that the observations which I have made with positiveness in regard to the nerve endings make it probable that neither the granule cells \i.e, the epithelial lining of the sulcus spiralis internus ; these are the cells which Waldeyer had compared with the inner "granule layer" of the retina] nor the spiral fibres have a nervous character; otherwise we should be obliged to claim a double nerve ending. The difference between the well-established radial nerve fibres and the spiral fibre bands opposes this supposition. Still this point can only be determined by further careful examinations based on embryological researches.**

Boettcher's monograph on the development of the mammalian cochlea appeared after this was written, though the researches were actually carried out some years before, and Boettcher's conclusion was that both theoretical .considerations and the embryological data were against the nervous nature of these spiral bands of threads.

In his earlier account of some points of cochlear anatomy, Nuel (207) described in great detail the system of spiral nerve fibres, and noted the following important fact which vitiates the theory of spiral nerves in the organ of Corti : " Eine Merkwurdigkeit von diesen Fasem muss ich noch erwahnen, namlich auch in Bezug auf diese Faden finden wir das System der Horzellen in den ausseren Stutzzellen vorgebildet, dem ich fand ein ganz identisches System von spiralen Fasern zwischen den Stutzzellen, die, wie gesagt, den Horzellen schon analog gelagert sind."

The fact that the so-called spiral nerve bands are well developed in connection with non-sensory cells casts doubt upon their nervous nature. I believe the "spiral nerves" exist in the living condition as delicate walled but relatively large lymph channels which are formed between the bases of the cells, and which are found not only in the organ of Corti and the Sauropsid organ, but also in the organs of the lateral line and the sense organs of the ears of fishes. In Petromyzon such a lymph channel is well developed in the surface canal sense organ (PI. VIII, Fig. 11), and I have figured the lymph vessel under the inner row of outer hair cells of the pig on PI. Ill, Fig. 10. There are numerous moniliform threads shown here, but they are part of the wall of the lymph space, and are not nerves, but connectivetissue fibres. These lymph spaces contract under the influence of reagents along with the other parts of the organ, and then appear in cross section, not as intercellular spaces, but as granular bodies placed on or near the bases of the hair cells ; and this appearance is what Retzius has figured in sections of the mammalian cochlea. The fibres do not stain in DogieKs methyl blue, and osmic acid does not differentiate them from other fibres of undoubted connective-tissue nature. The varicose fibres have appeared most distinct under low powers and after alkaline reagents. Finally, the evidence of comparative anatomy is entirely against the existence of these spiral nerve bands.

From the foregoing account of the cochlear ridge in the Hydrosauria and in the Mammalia it appears that a large number of cells outside of the last row of external hair cells seem to be non-sensory in character. Hitherto, at any rate, they have been classed as supporting cells and non-sensory. They have never been shown to have hairs upon their cell caps, though these same cell tops separate from the cells much as the tops of the genuine hair cells do. They have never been shown to have nerve connection, though it is difficult to understand why they should be so well developed and in such abundance if they have no function beyond forming a ridge-like body; for it cannot be longer seriously held, I think, that all these strongly developed cells, forming more than half the bulk of the ridge of Corti, are merely supporting cells. Why should the organ need so much " support ** on one side only } The cells are found only on one side in abundance, and on the side where they are fewest embryology shows us they are the degraded hair and supporting cells of an atrophied sense organ. In some parts of the Cortian auditory ridge these cells appear hypertrophied as compared with the hair cells themselves. If they are not all supporting cells, may not some have a sensory function, since they belong to a ridge supplied abundantly with nerves } I think it more than probable that renewed search will show that these cells are, part of them, connected with the fibres of the auditory nerve, and perhaps bearers of sensory apparatus on their upper ends. A careful analysis of the elements of Loewenberg's net and the membrana reticularis may reveal more than we yet know of the nature of these numerous welldeveloped cells.

The second topic is that of the peripheral endings of the radial nerve fibres. As Waldeyer has truly said, anatomists have described every known method of nerve ending as having been found in the cochlea. Since Deiters* time, however, there has been a general agreement that the radial nerves ended in hair cells as one of their endings. Of the other supposed endings we have heard less, the more thoroughly the Cortian organ has been studied, and to-day it may be considered practically settled that the radial nerves end only in the hair cells of the inner and outer rows.

The exact manner in which the nerves terminate in the hair cells is still an open question. Lavdowsky maintains that the nerve fibres more frequently end in the hair cells in the neighborhood of the nucleus than at their lower ends.

The nerve fibre penetrates the cell and ends in the protoplasm near the nucleus or in the nucleus itself, as he thought he had found. In young animals the nerve may present the appearance of ending bluntly against the side of the cell. This mode of ending is the one almost exclusively figured by Retzius for all the forms he studied, both adult and embryonic.

The latter author is specially positive that he has never observed anything approaching a penetration of the nerves into the cell protoplasm, and concludes that the nerve fibre merely applies itself to the surface of the cell wall by a more or less swollen and uneven plate. This contact is not easily destroyed, but Retzius thinks that there is no actual fusion of nerve substance with cell substance.

He says (237, II), p. 368: "Wie endigen nun diese Fasem.^ Hier bleibt eben die grosste Lucke in unserer Kenntniss vom feineren Bau des Gehororgans. Ich habe mich viellfach bemiiht, diese Liicke auszufullen, bisher aber fast vergebens. So viel ist jedoch sicher, dass die unteren Enden der ausseren Haarzellen die obcren Fasern der Spiralziige beriihren und ihnen sogar anhaften ; einen directen Uebergang der Nervenfasern in die Haarzellen sah ich aber nie ; nie sah ich die von Nuel beschriebenen, nach oben zu den Haarzellenden hin emporsteigenden Nervenfasern. Diese Hauptfrage der Histologic des Gehororgans der Saugethiere muss meiner Ansicht nach noch als unbeantwortct betrachtet werden." While I do not doubt that the last word has not been said on this topic, my own conviction is that in all the vertebrates I have studied, in this particular, spiral nerve courses do not exist, and that the fibres which pierce the floor of the canal make their way as directly as circunstances allow to the morphological bases of the hair-bearing cells and enter into such a union with them that a protoplasmic continuity is established between all living parts of the cell and the nerve end, and that there exists in the cell a specially arranged mechanism for the transfer by transformation of the mass motion of the endolymph into the molecular motion of the nerves.

Within all of the hair-bearing cells, and apparently running from cell cap to nucleus and from nucleus to basal end of the cell, arc to be seen, especially well in cells killed in chromic solution, but also after the reaction of other chemicals, extremely delicate moniliform threads, in number varying considerably so far as appearances go ; the extremes of variation, though difficult of determination, are about the same as those of the hairs borne by these same cells. These filaments I propose to call the capillo-nuclear and the nucleo-neural filaments, and I hold that they are continuations of the nerve into the hair processes. Whether they pass through or around the nucleus is a matter which I have not succeeded in demonstrating. The first account of these structures which I find in the literature is that given by Boettcher (31), who describes these central fibres of the cell in the following words : " Ich habe friiher Angegeben, dass in ihnen \t,e, the hair cells] ein glasheller centraler faden enthalten sei, wclcher den Kern umfasst und selbst von einer blassen Hulle umschlossen werde, aber schon damals ausdriicklich hervorgehoben, dass sie im frischen Zustande anders erscheinen. Von spatern Beobachtern hat ausser Henle, Niemand auf diesen Centralfaden Riicksicht genommen. Letzterer bestatigt es dass, wie ich mitgetheilt hatte, die Corti'schen Zellen in verdiinnter Salzsaiire die von mir beschriebene Form annehmen, meint jedoch, Mass die Umwandlung Folge einer Gerinnung des Zelleninhalts sei.*

"Damitist die Sache, glaube ich, nicht abgethan und jene eigenthiimliche, immer in derselben Weise wiederkehrendd^ Veranderung der Corti'schen Zellen nicht erklart. Es liegt mir fern behaupten zu wollen, dass das Bild, welches Man nach der Salzsaurebehandlung erhalt, dem normalen Zustande entspreche, auf andern Seite kann ich aber auch nicht zugeben, dass ein durchweg gleichmassiges Protoplasma constant in der Weise gerinne, dass es einen central verlaufenden glanzenden Faden bildet. Wir haben oben gesehen, welche Unterschiede die Bogenfasern im frischen Zustande und nach ihrer Behandlung mit Salzsaure oder Chromsaure darbieten. Auch hier existirt eine Hiille, die bisher ubersehen worden ist.

"Aehnliche Verwandlungen eines besonders organisirten Theil der Zelle diirften bei dem Auftreten des Centralfadens der Corti'schen Zellen vorauszusetzen sein. Hiernach kann ich die Annahme nicht Raumgeben, dass derselbe ein Gerinnungsproduct sei, glaube vielmehr, dass er auch im frischen Zustande vorhanden ist und vielleicht in Form feinster Fasern durch die Zelle verlauft, in Folge der Behandlung mit Salzsaure aber erst als dickerer glanzender Faden hervortritt." These observations show that Boettcher did not see the fibres as I have found them, although on general grounds he thought the single coarse fibre might be composed of finer ones drawn together by the contracting action of the reagent, or swollen till they coalesced into one large rod, as is more likely to be the case when hydrochloric acid is used. My discovery of these numerous moniliform threads was made entirely independently of Boettcher's investigations, as I had not been able at that time to consult his paper so rich in accurate observations.

Boettcher's observations have not received their just recognition at the hands of anatomists. Their full value for the physiologist we may not now properly appreciate, but that we shall in the near future in greater measure than in the past I do not doubt. My own observations enable me to go much further in theory than Boettcher dared to go, as they carry the morphological basis much further and render the relations of nerve and nerve-end cell much more intelligible than ever before, and enable us to demonstrate a physically continuous protoplasmic path from the percipient element in the ear to the receiving centres in the brain. That this is a gain for the experimental physiologist, as well as the speculative physiologist, is apparent enough.

Other investigators have searched for these filaments, but have not found them. Nuel (206, 1878) was not successful in demonstrating their presence, and considered them artifacts.

Paul Meyer (192, 1876) says: "Jamais nous n'avons pu constater de liaison aucune entre cette cupule et le noyau de la cellule.

" Du reste, ainsi que le montrent les imbibitions par Tacide osmique ou par des matiires colorantes, nous avons affaire ici 4 un veritable corps solide, et c'est ne pas une simple illusion d'optique, comme semble Tadmettre Retzius, d'apris lequel ce disque terminal ne serait du qu'^ un jeu de lumiire sur la partie sup^rieure plane ou un peu excavte de la cellule.

" Cette cupule solide porte les cils terminaux ; les deux ne constituent qu'une mdme masse." Meyer did not observe this terminal body to be connected with the nucleus of the cell ; on the other hand, as he expressly says, "nous n'avons eu sous les yeux une preparation nous permettant d'aflSrmer nettement une continuation directe entre le noyau de la cellule et le filet qui y p^nitre par Textremite inferieure," i.e. the nerve fibril which, according to Meyer, comes into close contact with the cell, — fusion with cell wall, — but does not penetrate into its protoplasm.

In describing the hair-bearing cell from the comparative standpoint, Hasse says {loc. cit. p. Jf) : " Am freien Ende tragt jede Zelle einen homogenen, cuticularen Verdickungssaum, ahnlich wie die Darmcylinder und aus demselben erhebt sich ein ebenfalls als cuticulares Gebilde anzusehendes, namentlich bei den Fischen ungemein langes, steifes, Kegelformiges, unendlich fein auslaufendes Haar, dessen Basis, wie erwahnt, Langsstreifungen zeigt, die warscheinlich der Ausdruck von Stiftchen sind, die von der Basis der Haare gedeckt werden und vielleicht mit den Nervenenden in Zusammenhang stehen, da ich glaube, dass die an das basale Ende der Gehorzelle herangetretene Nervenfaser vielleicht unter Theilung das Centrum der Zelle bis zum cuticularen, Verdickungssaume durchsetzt und nun entweder in die Basis des Haares tritt, oder vielleicht auch in einem Korperchen endet, auf das Hensen im peripherischen Theile der Zelle unter dem Verdickungssaume zuerst aufmerksam gemacht hat. Die ins Epithel getretenen Nervenfasern gehen entweder als blasse, ungetheilte Axencylinder an das untere Ende der Horzellen, oder theilen sich, innerhalb des Epithels einen intraepithelialen Plexus bildend und oft auf weite Strecken horizontal verlaufend, in mehrere Aeste, bei den hoheren Thieren in zwei bis drei, um dann zum basalen Ende der Gehorzellen zu treten."

And further on, page 93, in describing the conditions found in mammals, he says : " . . . aber jedenfals hier nicht enden, sondern wahrscheinlich durch das Innere der Zelle bis zu dem basalsaume und vielleicht durch diesen bis zur Basis des Gehorhaares und den Stiftchen verlaufen."

A study of these filaments in the hair cells of the organ of Corti in the ox, cat, dog, pig, and rabbit enables me to give the following details of their arrangement and relations. The capillo-nuclear fibres, to begin at the cell cap, appear to be continuations of the bases of the hairs, and in this region, together with the cell caps, have given rise to the structure discovered and described by Hensen (1871, 129), and which by later authors has been called Hensen's body or nucleus. Hensen found in the top of the outer hair cells an ovoid refractive body somewhat smaller than the nucleus of the cell, variable in size, which seemed to be surrounded by spirally arranged threads, which, notwithstanding its minute size, recalled nerve end bodies and bulbs to our author's mind. Although he usually found it near the upper end of the cell in close relation to the cell caps, he also found it at all distances between the upper end and the nucleus (PI. V, Figs. 4, 5, 7, and 8; PL X, Fig. 4; and PI. XII).

This body presented the appearance of a thin walled ovoidal capsule encircled by a fine, evenly, spirally wound fibre. Below this ovoid body, and usually in contact with it, he found still another small round nuclear body, which he thought was, under normal conditions, inside the cell. It is impossible to say what the cause of the peculiar form of the cell's central protoplasmic mass in Hcnsen's preparations may have been, but I think there is no reasonable doubt that Hensen had under his lens merely a modification of the structure discovered by Boettcher and later observed by Henle, and which I have myself undertaken to describe more fully. The normal condition of this part of the cell, so far as the capillo-nuclear filaments are concerned, is then as follows : The upper end of the cell is filled with a clear protoplasm, more fluid at the circumference and between the threads which lead downwards from the bases of the hairs to the nucleus. These filaments appear to be connected with the nucleus. Whether or not they are so connected is not to be determined readily in the whole cell, but in sections, or, better still, in teased preparations where the parts of the cell are more or less separated from each other. The surface of free nuclei may be seen to be studded with projections, due apparently to the remnants of protoplasmic filaments penetrating the nucleus from the cell protoplasm. In Fig. 8, PI. V, is shown such a free nucleus, in which the projections are separated into two sets, each set occupying the polar part of the upper and lower hemispheres of the nucleus respectively. On either side of the nuclear body are two smaller, deeply stained, spherical bodies without visible connection with the nucleus. These two bodies lie opposite each other in the equatorial zone of the nucleus which is free from the projections spoken of above. The struc

76 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

ture and functions of the small paranuclear bodies is entirely unknown.

The filaments either pass into the nucleus or are closely applied to its surface as they pass it by. Considering the fact that the nucleus itself presents an appearance in harmony with the actual penetration of the capillo-nuclear filaments, it is not out of the way to conclude that there is such structural relation between these sensory fibres and the body of the nucleus. The fibres which leave the nucleus over its lower hemisphere arrive in due course at the bottom of the cell, and are only separated from the nerve end by the cell membrane. It is admissible, however, that these nucleo-neural filaments may with truth be called the prolongations of the nerve inwards to the cell nucleus; but that is a minor consideration as compared with the fact of the actual connection of the two ends of the cell by direct protoplasmic paths of such definite arrangement as to leave no doubt of their general nature as mediators between the percipient cochlear hairs and the transmitting cochlear nerves.

Since the above was written I have received a paper by Dr. K. C. Schneider, entitled " Untersuchungen iiber die Zelle,** in Claus Arbeiten, IX, 2, 1891, in which the author shows that such a condition of the nucleus as I figure in PI. V is the ordinary condition for all cells. The author further describes the relations of the nuclear and cellular protoplasmic motile filaments at length, and figures on PI. I, Fig. 7, the projection of vibratile cilia beyond the surface of the cell, i.e. through the cell wall, and their continuation centred into the nucleus. As such a condition is the normal one for the Infusoria, it is not at all strange that in the sensory structures of higher animals the extra-cellular projections should be continued structurally into the nuclear network. Schneider's definition — or perhaps I should say demonstration — of the nature of the cell wall enables us to readily conceive how the nerve threads (I do not mean axis cylinders, but the ultimate threads resulting from the breaking up of such a nerve end as we encountered in the case of the hair cells) may easily penetrate into the cell, or even establish protoplasmic continuity without so penetrating.

So that we are not compelled to make the assumption of a ' penetration in order to establish an actual continuity of the two


Structures, such as shall be effective in mediating between the nerve-end organ and the nerve.

In concluding this paragraph I wish to propound the definite thesis that there is an unbroken protoplasmic path from the base of the hair cells to the brain cells, along which path the auditory stimuli travel, and during which time and before leavmg the end cell they are transformed from mass motion to molecular motion.

After having traced the cochlear organ from the Fishes up to the Saurians, and described its sudden and very remarkable development in this group as exemplified in the Alligator, and after having studied in some detail the main characters of the higher mammalian ear, the determination of the characters of the monotreme cochlea has become a truly enticing topic for investigation.

Urban Pritchard (216, 1881) has done the only work, of which the results have been published, on the anatomy of the membranous cochlea of the Monotremes, but his observations, although valuable, are not so complete as we need at the present time. The membranous cochlea is of course shorter (apparent length) and smaller than the bony tube, but a very good idea of its length may be had from the size of the latter.

Pritchard gives one-fourth inch as the length of the bony cochlea in Ornithorhynchus paradoxus (more accurately 6.3 mm.). However, on account of its curvature around the end of the lamina spiralis ossea, its entire length is greater than that of the bony cochlea. It runs nearly horizontally forwards and curves at the same time slightly outwards. The lagena appears as a swelling on the cochlear tube, much as in Saurians (Alligator, Crocodile) and Birds. It has a greater diameter than the rest of the cochlear tube, and is flattened parallel with the plane of the basilar membrane. The Sauropsid characters of the Ornithorhynchus cochlea are then more prominent than the mammalian so far as the general shape is concerned, but when we come to the internal characters we find them so far as known strictly mammalian.

The Sauropsid organ has disappeared ; the mammalian organ of Corti is well developed, but possesses two rows of inner hair cells instead of the one usual among other types of mammals. The neural cartilage of the Sauropsid ear has been converted

78 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

into the lamina spiralis ossea and supporting bone. The cochlear canal is triangular in section throughout most of its course, and has the same general position within the lymphatic space formed by the two scalae — s. tympani and vestibuli — that it has in the higher mammals. The basilar membrane is a threelayered, relatively thick plate. The lower layer is composed of longitudinal fibres with spindle-shaped nuclei ; the middle layer contains transverse fibres, while the upper layer is composed of fine transverse fibres.

The pillars of Corti are well developed, and they inclose a triangular tunnel much as in mammals generally. The pillar feet of the inner and outer pillars are very similar in shape and size, but the enlarged heads differ; that of the inner rod is oblong in shape with a delicate process projecting inwards from its upper part, while that of the outer pillar is rounded and fits into a hollow of the head of the inner rod. As Pritchard found the hair cells, each one appeared to bear on its upper end four or five stiff and relatively thick bristles — the auditory hairs.

The hair cells are well-defined structures with flat, circular tops, from which the stiff hairs rise, with large nuclei imbedded in a granular protoplasm.

The supporting cells are well developed, and extend from the basement membrane quite to the surface of the sensory ridge.

After having left their channels in the lamina spiralis ossea near its lower border, the nerves pierce the upper layers of the lamina spiralis membranacea (basilar membrane), forming in so doing the usual habenula perforata. The nerve fibrillae pass upwards and outwards to the inner hair cells, and the latter or outermost fibres, after crossing the canal of Corti, end in the outer hair cells. The mammalian organ does not extend further towards the apex of the cochlear tube than the lamina spiralis ossea, and here the tube narrows, to suddenly enlarge again into the lagenar pocket, which is curved around the open space called the helicotrema, by means of which the two perilymphatic spaces communicate. The lagenar sense organ in Ornithorhynchus is found to be in structure much like the maculae of the utriculus and sacculus of this animal's ear, but more like the lagenar organ of the Sauropsida. The usual otolith collection is present on the surface of the sensory hair field.


The cochlear ganglion is inclosed in the bony plate, along the inner border of the cochlear floor as in other mammals.

The rods of Corti are placed on the. basilar membrane at a much sharper angle than they are in the higher Mammalia, in consequence of which the canal of Corti is less broad than usual in this class. This condition I consider to be more primitive than the adult condition of the higher Mammalia, as the latter forms pass through a stage identical with this, which occurs in late embryonic life.

Pritchard's deduction with reference to the homologies of parts between the cochlear channels of Ornithorhynchus and the higher mammals contains a grave error due, in the first place, to his misconception of the true nature of the cochlear tube especially, as well as of the so-called scalae, and secondly to ignorance of the actual conditions existing in Birds. He says {Joe. cit, p. 278) : that the lamina ossea of Ornithorhynchus (and other mammals) corresponds to the avian quadrilateral cartilage, and that the mammalian ligamentum cochleae is represented in the Bird by the triangular cartilage. Also that, whereas the lower division or scala tympani of each corresponds, the ductus cochleae of the Bird occupies the whole of the upper division, and therefore corresponds to the scala vestibuli and scala media (or ductus cochleae) of the mammal."

That the cochlear tube of the avian ear possesses well-developed scalae tympani and vestibuli is such a well-published fact that one is at a loss to understand how Professor Pritchard could have overlooked it ; besides which, any transverse section of the bird cochlea prepared with ordinary care would have prevented the above blunder.

The general rule which Hasse laid down that "wenn einmal ein Theil mit eincr macula oder crista acustica mit Ncrvenendapparaten des Hornerven differenzirt ist, dieser nicht vcrschwindet, sondem, namcntlich wenn er die Schnecke angchort, in der VVirbelthiere reihe immer mehr entwickelt," is no longer to be considered as stating the usual course of events ; for of three important exceptions to his rule the most important one affects the strongest clause in the rule, viz. that concerning cochlear organs. Unaccountable as it still is, the fact remains that the largest and at one time most important cochlear organ docs disappear from the mammalian cochlea about the time of birth.

8o AVERS. [Vol. VI.

after the forces of the organism have been expended in building it up to a state of physiological perfection, while its place is taken by an organ very similar to it in the earlier stages of its development, but which, it must be admitted, develops along a different line from the Sauropsid organ. Of the greatest importance in tracing the descent of the mammalian ear from the Sauropsid condition is the recognition of the fact that at least two species of lower mammals retain the papilla acustica lagenae in a condition of development entirely identical with that found in Birds and Hydrosaurians. The existence of the crista acustica abortiva has not been determined in the MonotremeSi

An explanation of the origin and significance of the pillars of Corti at once in harmony with their origin and with their function, as I conceive it, and as it seems clearly indicated by the new light we have received as to the nature of the whole organ, is that, owing to the increasing length of the hairs of the hair cells, there arose need of greater isolation and firmer support.

The inner hair cells, being the oldest row, are first affected and first supplied.

There are indications of a progression of this process outwards, between the rows of the so-called outer hair cells, and there is evidence (see PI. X, Fig. 4) that this process has already begun in the organ of Corti of the Alligator: it is here seen between the innermost and the second rows of hair cells.

The pillars of Corti are then isolating and specially and peculiarly constituted supporting structures. As the ear differentiates we may expect similar pillars to form between the second and third, and third and fourth rows, as well as between the latter and the fifth or outermost row of hair cells.

There is evidence that the number of rows of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea is on the increase. All the facts point to the conclusion that the number of rows is increasing at the same time that they are becoming more highly modified, i.e. specialized and capable of executing the functions of the organ in ever-increasing degree of perfection.

The Alligator's organ of Corti shows a larger number of rows of hair cells than the mammalian organ, and all mammal forms which have been studied so far show unmistakable indications of the increasing differentiation of the organ of Corti. In the


Alligator we find that the nerve distribution is, as far as the external branch is concerned, fundamentally the same as in mammals. For instance, in the Alligator the nerve enters through the cartilaginous supporting bar at the inside of the Sauropsid acoustic papilla, and piercing the cartilage passes out underneath the inner hair cell row, to which it gives off fibres, under the main plate of the cochlear organ, and here disappears at the bases of the cells. As the fibres approach the bases of the hair cells, which here rest on the cushion formed by the supporting cells of the organ, they lose their meduUated sheaths, and passing upwards, pierce the upper layers of the supporting cushion, reaching finally the bases of the hair cells, probably penetrating into their substance, and entering into direct communication with their nuclei as in the mammalian cochlea. The fibres which pass beyond the row of inner hair cells cross obliquely the space outside these cells and disappear among the outer hair cells. The hairs which are given off at the top of the cells appear to be thicker and shorter than the hairs of the corresponding cells in the mammalian ear, and consequently the membrana tectoria which they form is a wider band relatively, but neither absolutely nor relatively as thick. It is also thickest in its middle part, thinning off both ways.

The inner row of outer hair cells of the mammalian cochlea shows much more than the inner hair cells, the same form of body and relation to supporting cells and basilar membrane that the remaining hair cells of the organ of Corti display; indeed, they may be said to have progressed beyond them but little except in the more perfect isolation of the cells and the consequent greater separation of the hairs of the row. The isolation cells are not so distinct and do not play as important a part in the separation and support of the cells beyond the second row as they do between the first two rows of inner hair cells ; they are, however, much advanced beyond the condition of development, in which they exist between the cells of the outer, unmodified portion of the papilla basilaris. Here they present the simple unmodified condition which characterizes them in the maculae, cristae, and papillae of the other parts of the ear.

The pillars of Corti present in their development among the

82 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

Mammalia an epitome of their phylogenetic history, and in the embryo mammal we may recognize the reptilian condition as illustrated in the organ of Corti of the Alligator ear. These cells appear to be well formed and separate the first two rows of hair cells, but they do not possess such marked fibrous structures as are present in the mammalian pillar cells. The bloodvessel which runs below the floor of the organ (formed by the basilar membrane) is present practically as in the mammalian ear.

Connected with the pillars of Corti and forming a part of its supporting framework is a structure formed by the cell caps of the supporting cells on either side of the pillar row, and which, from its appearance when isolated, has been called very appropriately the membrana reticularis.

I am confident that the reticular structure is a product merely of the cell caps of the supporting cells,^ and that the intercellular substance, if such exist, is not important in the formation of its framework. The hair cells are only lightly attached to the supporting cells. Everywhere except in the region of the reticulate membrane they are separated, in fact, by considerable interspace, but in this region the cell caps of the hair cells seem to fill interspaces or the reticula of the membrane ; and since the tops of all the cells of the organ lie close together and form a mosaic, and since the supporting cells adhere very tenaciously to one another by their cell caps, it is very easily understood how the structure may appear as a discrete structure, after the organ of Corti has been passed through the processes of preservation, hardening, staining, clearing, dissecting, and mounting, one or all, before observation.

The membrane has no individual existence any more than the membrana tectoria, and with this we have removed another feature of the cochlear anatomy, which appeared to show a want of harmony between the type anatomy of the canal organ and that of the highly modified Corti*s organ.

1 The reticulate membrane very frequently retains the cell caps of the hair cells within its meshes, but under the definition they are not to be considered constituents of this structure. From the new standpoint they are on the same footing with the isolation cells as contributors to the reticulate frame. That the hair cells are less firmly fixed by their upper ends is apparent from the greater ease with which they separate from the membrane.


The essential elements of the organ of Corti are, then, —

The hair cells — Percipient elements.

The nerve cells and fibres — Transmitting elements.

The supporting cells — Isolating and supporting elements.

These three include the only structures that are necessary for the performance of the physiological function of the cochlea, notwithstanding previous physiological speculations with respect to the necessity of a damping apparatus and of a vibrating membrane composed of separable but fixed cords, because they are the only structures present ivhich can possibly have to do with the auditory function^ and they also represent the structures present in the type organ^ from ivhich they have descended.

Concerning the nervous elements in the mammalian organ of Corti, there is still much uncertainty as to the exact distribution, the number, and terminations of the fibres of the cochlear nerve entering the organ through the limbus spiralis. There is substantial agreement, however, as to the main facts of nerve supply so far as course and general disposition of the nerve fibres of what may be called the direct system.

We know enough about the matter to entitle us to enter into comparisons with the lower forms, more especially those which have been investigated up to date, and whose organ of Corti presents as many rows of hair cells as are found in man. In those cases in which the rows are not numerically as strongly marked as in man, the cochlear organ appears to have lagged behind in its development. It is true some forms have a greater number of spiral turns to the cochlea without at the same time actually having larger cochlear organs, i,e, increased number of percipient elements. For, manifestly, it is not suflficient in estimating the number of hair cells in a row to simply count the number of complete turns of the cochlear tube and reckon on the basis of the number of cells counted in the spiral turn of some one form chosen as type. For the length of the curves, i,e, the openness or closeness of the spiral, involves the circumference of the complete ring of the spiral, and hence the number of cells contained in it.

It is evident that greater isolation of the hair cells of a compound sense organ, and thus of their percipient hairs, is obtained by the elongation of a few rows of cells, with the scant

84 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

development of the remainder, than by massing together the whole large number of cells into a compact plate as in a macula or a papilla, as occurs in most of the sense organs of the ear. I conceive the cause which lies behind the remarkable growth of the cochlea in length and spiral course to be the physical necessity for the isolation of the cells and the greater perfection, the increased delicacy and sensitiveness for perception of the hairs borne by the cells.


1. Historical.

2. Form and Relations of the Band to the Cochlea.

3. Sensory Hairs.

a. Disposition in the band. Relation to the sensory cell. d. origin.

c. number.

d. course.

e. normal relation to scala media.

/. size at base and tip and relative lengths of hairs in different

parts of the organ of Corti. g, intercapillary substance. h, comparative.

4. Loewenberg*s Net.

a, position and extent.

b. size of net and meshes. r. origin and attachments.

d. varieties and variations in same cochlea.

e. composition of the cords of the meshes.

All students of the anatomy of the vertebrate ear down to the time of Ecker and Reich had failed to find in the chambers of the ear cellular structures of a specific kind, and almost all of them considered the ear to be more or less completely filled with a gelatinous matter which was specially well marked in the ampullae and over the maculae, — in connection with the jelly otoliths were frequently found. F. E. Schultze in 1858 first described the ampullary gelatine as a crest of long, straight, auditory hairs, as he called them. It is true Ecker, and later his student Reich, had found the ciliate epithelium of the Petromyzon ear, but they did not discover the true auditory


percipient structures. Although Schultze's observations were accepted by competent authorities as correct, the older idea of the presence of the auditory jelly was only slightly affected ; and while there was nothing in Schultze's observations to give color to the view, it was held, however, that the auditory hairs, although undoubtedly present, did not project into a lymph-like liquid, but were received into canals or other openings within the gelatinous mass later called a "cupula terminalis." The cupula terminalis was thought to be a secretion of the non-hairbearing cells of the sensory area. This idea gradually grew, and was extended to the covering structures of all the auditory sense organs, which were variously termed the membranae tectoriae, otolithic membranes, or reticulate membranes. The special term applied by Lang to the gelatinous mass of the ampulla was the cupula terminalisy and it was not until 1878 that the whole error was overthrown and the complete meaning as well as the entire accuracy of Schultze's observations was demonstrated for the ampullar sense organs. Hensen, to whom we owe this important demonstration, worked single handed against the most determined resistance on the part of his contemporaries, and it was only after several years' time, during which he repeated his own observations and republished his account with additional facts and evidence, that he forced those of different mind to admit that their ideas of the relation of the sensory hairs to the ampullar cavity were entirely erroneous and that the microscopic preparations of the ear sense organs, which they supposed fully proved their position, normal though they seemed, were artifacts^ creations of their own unconscious efforts, which although made, it must be admitted, in most if not all cases, with the express purpose of getting at the truth, were none the less destructive of the truth and constructive of false conditions and conceptions.

The demonstration by Lang of a dome-shaped, striated (sometimes apparently homogeneous) mass resembling stratified jelly, led him to publish his cupula terminalis idea, and the ease of demonstration and apparent constancy of the structure after ordinary histological preparation led off other workers only too completely, until Hensen took up the subject and studied the ampulla under conditions as natural as it was possible to obtain, with the result already mentioned

86 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

Max Schultze (1858, 256) discovered the auditory hairs of the cristae acusticae of the fish ear (Teleost). He found them projecting freely into the endolymph.

Franz Eilhard Schulze (1862, 255) re-examined the question, and found that Schultze's observations were correct so far as they went ; but he discovered that the hairs were much longer than Schultze had described them to be. They were equal in length to at least one-half the diameter of the ampullae, and probably were even considerably longer.

Lang (1863, 175) found in preparations of the ampullae treated with hydrochloric acid and alcohol that a finely striated mass, which he called the ** cupula terminalis," covered the auditory crest. He considered the auditory hairs, previously described by Schulze and others, to be artifacts resulting from the transforming action of the acid and alcohol on the cupula.

Hensen (1863, 130) confirmed the discoveries of Schulze, and Hasse (1870, 1 16) accepted the arguments of Lang, but regarded the hairs as relatively short structures.

Retzius (1872, 238) agreed with Lang and Hasse.

Paul Meyer (1876, 192) was in essential agreement with Hasse and Retzius.

Dr. Kuhn (1877, 170) found in the ampullae of all the species he worked upon (fishes, amphibia, and reptiles) what he considered to be a cuticular structure of such form and extent as to serve as a dome-shaped cover of the crista and its sensory hairs, effectually shutting oflF the hair chamber from the rest of the ampulla. This organ — the so-called cupula terminalis — was of form and structure varying with the species studied.

Kuhn says {loc. cit. p. 316) : "An frischen Praparaten ist es unmoglich dieselbe in situ zu Beobachten ; sie fallt von der crista ab und wird ihrer Durchsichtigkeit halber stets iibersehen." In ears hardened in chromic or osmic acid, Kuhn was able to study the structure and relations of the body to the hair cells and to the crest. Even in these cases, however, the cupulae were frequently absent wholly or in part. The base of the cupula was always found to be concave, repeating, as a rule, the curve of the crista acustica. He never found the cupula projecting beyond the edges of the liair<ell territory ; and consequently any relation to the planum semilunatum was not to be thought of. The body of the cupula, rising from its concave


base, was dome-shaped, though, as Dr. Kuhn's figures show his preparations, this was by no means the constant form. Some of his figures, as Fig. 38, PI. XX, show a form of "cupula" which was doubtless produced by the separation of the hair tuft near the apex of the crista, from which line of separation they fell flat to the floor of the chamber either way, forming in this manner a bilobed cupula that certainly does not appear "terminal." In the fresh cupula, Kuhn never saw the fibrous structure which appears in most hardened preparations, though not in all. He considered the fresh cupula to be composed of a homogeneous, more or less glassy, transparent, and refractive, gelatinous matter of slight resistance, in which no trace of striation was present. In most other matters of detail, Kuhn agreed with the previous investigators who had gone over the matter, Lang, Clason, Retzius, Meyer, and others ; but he did not accept the conclusions of Hensen and Cissow. Kuhn separated the fibres of the cupula by teasing, and, as his figures show, obtained bodies of the shape and size of the terminal portions of the ampullar hairs.

Hensen (1878, 131) renewed his studies of the auditory hairs, and arrived at the following results : —

{ft) In embryo Teleosts (Gobiiis Ruthcnsparri^ minor and microps) from 40-45 mm. length, the hairs of the crista acustica project nearly if not quite across the ampulla (in length consequently equa^ to the diameter of the ampulla), and hence bear entirely different relations to the ampullar structures from those described by the authors who have touched upon this subject.

(p) In the living condition and in fresh preparations there is no ampullar cupula terminalis to be found.

(c) It is impossible that any solid matter is present within the ampullar above or among the hairs, for these may be seen to become applied so closely together as to leave no free space between them.

(d) On the contrary, the solid cupula terminalis is produced by the action of the reagent used, e.g, hydrochloric acid and alcohol (Lang), which causes the hairs to disappear as such, and converts them into gelatinous substance or a thick mucous liquid.

Retzius (1881, 237) described many capulae terminalcs in the first volume of his extensive monograph on the ear of vertebrates, and held to his original views, extending his observations

88 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

over many species of fishes and amphibia. He considered the cupula to be a normal structural element of the vertebrate ampulla, since he had always found it as a sharply defined and regularly formed structure, on account of which he was unable to accept Hensen's views, though he distinctly states that owing to the fact that his observations had for the most part been made before Hensen*s article was published, he did not give the latter that consideration which he now concedes was its just due. He had never found the auditory hairs free and long except in the case of Proteus, and this, to him, unusual condition he was entirely unable to explain in the light of the cupula terminalis.

Hensen (1881, 132) appeared again in print, denying in the most emphatic manner the natural existence of the cupula terminalis. He repeated his former observations and measurements of the auditory hairs made on species of Gobius, this time a younger fish, 10-30 mm. long, and arrived at the same results as formerly. Concerning the relations of the otolith hairs to the otoliths, he states that the latter are borne by the hairs o.oi mm. from the surface of the epithelium. The small otoliths seem to be inclosed in a membrane, while the larger ones lack the membranous envelope. The coverings of the maculae utriculi and sacculi, Hensen could not find ; and so he declared those described by various authors to be artifacts.

The long auditory hairs of the ampullae of adult Teleosts may be readily observed if the ampulla is carefully removed from the head, and examined under slight pressure. They may also be seen more or less well preserved in suitable sections. In the closed ampulla of Pleuronectes sp,, Hensen measured hairs 0.19-0.2 mm. The breadth of the ampulla over the crista was 0.5 mm. The actual length of the hairs was 0.4 mm. The hairs after removal from the ampulla measured (maximum) o. 1 2 mm.

Owing to thickness of the ampullar walls and pigment deposit the Frog's auditory hairs are invisible in the unopened ampulla. They measure 0.12 mm. when taken out, and are probably at least 0.2 mm. long in the uninjured state. Every motion of the water throws these hairs into the greatest confusion, tangling them in hopeless fashion ; and they remain as a compact, gelatinous, spongy tissue or more solid mass. In this


condition they easily break away en masse^ or stick to the walls. Hensen concluded that the hairs of the Frog end more pointedly than those of fishes, but that they also have heavier bases, with more sharply defined structural detail. Hensen confirms Retzius's discovery that the so-called hair from a cell is composed of many finer fibrillae. In optical cross-section one is able to determine that the number of fibres which enter into the body of a round hair is about eighteen to twenty. The thickness of a single fibre is 0.0007 mm. Hensen found that in some species of Teleosts, if the ampulla was disturbed before killing and fixing with osmic, no cupula was formed. It was invariably present when the ampulla was hardened in osmic in situ. In other species the ampullae would bear removal, and still give good cupulae.

When such osmic cupulas were hardened in M tiller's solution, for twelve hours after fixing, it was found that they remained firmly fixed to the crista, contrary to the observations of other authors, with respect to lack of attachment of the cupula to the crista.

Hensen was enabled to observe the various stages of the formation of the cupula by the action of reagents, and to prove conclusively that it was gradually formed from the hairs or from the intercapillary substance. He was inclined to think that the latter matter was the source of the artifact and that the hairs projected up into it or were more or less bent outward before entering the gelatinous mass. The cupula of osmic acid is much different from the chromic acid structure (Kuhn's), or from the hydrochloric acid cupula (Lang's).

Retzius (1884, 237, II) gives up his former position, after a careful study of the problem, admits the truth of Hensen's position, but calls attention to the fact that the latter author assumes the presence of an intercapillary substance whose coagulation by reagents gives rise to the cupula, so that, as he thinks, Hensen really assumes the presence of a sort of fluid cupula after all. Although loath to give up his former views entirely, resting as they did on many carefully prepared ears and on their careful study both by himself and his friends, Retzius does so since he had observed the degrees of cupula formation.

My own observations lead me to deny the presence of a special intercapillary substance anywhere in the ear.

90 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

The brothers Sarasin (1887, 248, II, 2, p. 46) describe a mucous secretion which they found quite regularly in preparations of the sense organs of the Ichthyophis, which surrounded and extended beyond the sensory hairs, was unstained by borax carmine, and was undoubtedly excreted by the supporting cells, since the sensory cells all ended in sensory hairs, which precluded the formation of an excretion. They were unable to decide which of the supporting cells were concerned in the production of the secretion, and expressed the opinion that they all possessed limited secretory powers. The secretion thus produced may form a tubular process projecting beyond the sense organ and serving in a measure to protect it. This is the equivalent of the so-called hyaline tube so often described for fishes and larval amphibia by F. E. Schulze and others.

It hardly admits of doubt that the auditory club described by Sarasin brothers for the well-developed lateral sense organs which they consider accessory auditory organs is either a product of the sensory hairs alone, in which case it would be the analogue of the cupulae, or of these and some additional substance. In any case it has nothing in common with the auditory otoliths.

As I shall show further on, the so-called supporting cells are in part true mucous cells, and the hyaline tube is a product of their genuine mucous secretion, its tubular form depending on the absence of the secreting cells from the centre of the sense organ. This secretion bears the same relation to the sense organ that the mucous canals of Elasmobranchs do to the ampullae of Lorenzini, which lie at the bottom of canals, i,e, at their proximal blind ends.

The auditory club which these authors describe for the accessory auditory organs of the trunk region of Ichthyophis is very refractive, but is not a genuine otolith, since it lacks calcareous matter, and it is further not a true cuticular structure, since it swells in strong caustic potash and dissolves. They considered it to be a hardened glandular secretion, the product of the gland cells (/>. supporting cells) of the organ, and functional as an otolith. The structure readily falls out of its cavity in manipulation so that sections are found without this structure.

The test of their view that these lateral line organs were accessory ears the authors found in the study of the ear itself, and


figure a section through the sense organ of the sacculus, and carry out a detailed comparison of the structures of the two organs. The auditory club is physiologically equivalent to the otoliths. Morphologically, however, the brothers Sarasin think it is more like the cupula terminalis which Lang, Kuhn, Hasse, and Kolliker, found in the ampullae of the ear.

After thus briefly reviewing the history of the cupula terminalis, we are better prepared to estimate the value of the views which have been, and which in part are still held concerning the tectorial membrane of Corti's organ or the auditory damper of the physiologists.

Its discoverer, Marquis Corti (185 1, 59), gave the following account of it : " Quant on observe une bandelette dentel6e dans r^tat le plus frais et le plus intact possible, on voit que la membrane trfes mince qui lui sert de toit et tr^s tendue sur la bandelette m^me et ne pr<Jsente jamais aucun plis. Cette membrane part, comme nous avons vu, environ du bord externe convexe de la bandelette sillonn<Je en couvrant les dents de la premiere rang6e, et arrive ^ couvrir a peu pr^s trois rangdes de cellules ^pithiJliales plac^es sur la zone pectin6e," and he calculated the distance between the ** bandelette dentel6e'* and the membrane to be about 0.0085'".

Claudius (1855, 53) described Corti's membrane as a tolerably tough, but extremely thin membrane, finely striated with parallel markings ; to him it appeared elastic. It begins on the inner border of the crista sulcata below the epithelium without apparent boundaries, covers over the crista to the teeth, and from the apices of the latter it stretches across to the periost of the outer cochlear wall, running parallel with the membrana basilaris. It inserts in the periost under the epithelial coat. It retains these characters in all parts of the cochlea.

Boettcher (1856, 29) wrote: "Corti*s membrane stretches parallel with the membrana basilaris from the acoustic teeth to the inner surface of the outer cochlear wall, so that, together with the basilar membrane, it forms a closed canal."

Kolliker (1859, ^^7)- Corti's membrane is composed of (i) a special striated lamella, (2) an epithelium, and (3) a delicate connective tissue. The striated lamella appears to be of connective tissue nature, is separable into a thinner and thicker portion. The thinner is transversely fibrous, the thicker striated (/.r.

92 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

fibrous) parallel with the long axis of the cochlea. The rounded end appears frequently canal-like, in which Kolliker thought he detected a blood-vessel in a few preparations.

Boettcher (1859, 35) defends his former views relative to Corti's membrane. He recognizes two zones, an inner and an outer. The inner is extremely pale, with pronounced cell markings (impressions). External to the acoustic teeth the second and thicker zone begins. It is very thickly and finely striated. On the external border of the latter zone one frequently finds broad branching fibres, which usually form the border, then bending at right angles are dissipated in a brush of branches, which pass inward and are lost in the fine striation. Not far from the border one frequently sees a seam which may perhaps mark the line of insertion of the third zone. Boettcher also had preparations which showed even a second membrane running across the scala media into the cochlear wall.

Deiters (i860, 69) described this structure as follows : " Corti's membrane does not begin at the apices of the cells, but passes on beyond them ; but beyond the apices it is fine, transparent, and scarcely striated. External to the teeth it shows a diagonal striation due to folds or fibres. The outer border of the membrane really inserts on the ligamentum spirale. The upper surface is covered by a simple, thin, polygonal epithelium. The lower surface has none."

Kolliker (1861, 166) studied the development of the cochlea, and concluded that ontogenetically the lamina reticularis, as well as Corti's membrane, are cuticular formations, both secreted by the cells of the epithelial ridge, beginning in the early stages of cochlear growth.

The cochlear canal begins to develop as a purely epithelial tube, and it shows on the floor which later on becomes converted into Corti's organ, three thickenings, one large and two smaller ones. The large epithelial ridge is covered by a structureless or, perhaps, finely striated membrane, the rudiment of Corti's membrane, and it is a cuticular product of the long epithelial cells.

Hensen (1863, 130) wrote : "The membrana Cortii is secreted in the embryo by a group of cells known as the Organon Kollikeri, which undergoes atrophy as the membrane increases in size, and whose function in consequence seems to be that of


secreting the tectorial membrane. It never leaves these cells, but lies upon them throughout life, except the anterior ends.**

It is of a soft almost mucous consistency, withstands tearing with considerable force, and swells much in hydrochloric acid. The fibrillae are separable, and there is probably an inter-fibrillar ground substance. In that portion of the lower face in contact with the teeth, one finds meshes of a network impressed on the surface. Corti's division of the membrane into four zones can, although they are usually present, be referred (H.) to external and secondary influences, and hence may be disregarded. The part lying on the teeth is relatively very thin. Not only is the thickness of the membrane subject to great variation, — depending on the height of the teeth or of the papilla or the sulcus epithelium, but also in the different parts of the same cochlear canal. At the hamulus and radix the membrane ends in a somewhat pointed and dentate manner corresponding to the end of the teeth and the papilla.

In breadth it increases as the hamulus is approached. The proximal edge lies in the line of origin of the memb. Reissneri. In the pig, however, it passes up onto this membrane a few cells breadth. The outer border was always found in adult human ears not to overlap or pass beyond the outer row of Corti's cells. It is at any rate certain that the membrane of Corti is fixed from the teeth over the lower wall of the sulcus, and outward from this lies free upon the rods of the lamina reticularis.

Loewcnberg (1864, 185): The membrana Cortii shows three zones,— an inner, a middle, and an outer. The inner has no transverse striations and no network imprinted on its under surface. The middle zone has both. The striations really run obliquely to cross-section. They lie in several layers, and are arched over Corti's organ. Besides these I found a peculiar "accessory layer,'* wliich extended from the second third outward. This structure looked like a much perforated lamella, forming now and then a tissue of broad stripes. These stripes are nearly parallel to one another, and run in one direction, which nearly coincides with the border of the membrane. In sections, however, one sees that the perforations are in reality only thin places in the membrane, and the stripes are thickenings. Internally, this layer becomes very thin and its commencement very difficult to trace. Externally, it grows thicker and forms

94 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

a wedge-shaped portion in which one can distinguish a structureless mass inclosing an elongated portion that has the appearance of a number of capillary vessels in cross-section. Corti's membrane is related to the surrounding parts in such a manner that its inner and middle zones rest upon Huschke's elevation (promontory) ; it then applies itself to the epithelial thickening external to this and spreads out over Corti's organ, inserting finally on the upper process of the ligamentum spirale of the outer cochlear wall. By this means a canal is produced between the basilar membrane and Corti's membrane, and between this and Reissner's membrane another heretofore unknown canal, so that with the two scalae there are four canals.

Henle (1866, 124): The cochlear canal is divided into two chambers by a membrane stretched across the canal parallel to the basilar membrane, from the labium vestibulare to the outer cochlear wall. This membrane — the membrana tectoria (M. Cortii) — is very delicate, but notwithstanding its thinness, firm and resistant and of a very peculiar brittleness and elasticity.

It is inserted on the outer wall between the insertion of the membrana basilaris and the stria vascularis. Three zones are distinguishable, the middle of which is composed of several layers of fine, somewhat bent fibres. The inner is structureless and perforated by many holes. The outer is composed of a very fine network made up of elongated meshes.

Middendorp (1868, 193) : Corti's membrane is a cell secretion. It covers the crista sulcata from the inner angle of the membranous cochlea quite to the free border; from here it stretches across to the roof of the pillars of Corti, and ends in a narrow seam or line which is fastened to the first connecting members : a membrane with blood-vessels is never present. It is ifjL thick. It is a firm, elastic membrane.

Kollikcr (1867, 167) : The inner and outer hair cells all bear a brush of fine, stiff, short hairs, which are inserted on the top of the cell in a more or less semicircular line. The membrana tectoria was still considered to be a discrete structure having no organic relation to the auditory hairs.

Rosenberg (1868, 242) : The largest portion of the epithelium of the lower wall of the developing cochlear canal is cov


ered by a ciiticulay the beginning of the membrane of Corti, which first appears on the median wall. It is quite thick for about half its breadth, and simply covers the outer supporting cells. Loewenberg's statement that Corti's membrane is inserted into the outer wall of the cochlear canal is incorrect.

Boettcher (1869, 31) gives a histological account of the development of Corti's organ, in which he describes the ontogenetic changes of this much-studied structure in detail as follows : —

Corti*s membrane appears early in development as a thin, radiately striated skin (Hdutcheti) or membrane, lying close upon the epithelium of the lower wall of the cochlear tube, the thickest portion of which is near the inner edge. In the fully developed condition the membrane appears, when studied fresh, obliquely striated from within outward, diagonally upwards, i.e, towards the apex of the helix. It seems to be soft and yielding, but extremely elastic. At this time it is divisible into three zones. The inner zone begins at the inner angle of the cochlear canal and stretches across to the free border of the labium vestibulare. It is thin at its inner border, but grows thicker towards its outer edge. On its surface one finds even in newborn animals roundish or angular pits or grooves, which impressions are cell contours. In older individuals it is the teeth and ridges of Corti's organ which give the markings to the surface. The second zone is thick and has strong striation, and it reaches to the vicinity of the pillars of Corti. In the embryo it lies upon the large epithelial ridge. It grows thinner outwards, ending in fibrous prolongations that are continuous with (enter into connection with) the mcmbrana reticularis, its whole outer border being divided up into ribs by means of vertical parallel incisions. Each rib sends downwards a fibrous, later divided process, a branch from which goes to the inner hair cell, whereas the other passes out over the three rows of Corti's cells and gives off to each an abruptly descending branch and then connects with the neighboring epithelial cells.

Corti's membrane is also in continuity by means of fibrous processes with the upper inner as well as with the outer descending hair cells. Whether these processes penetrate further into the cells cannot be determined. The hairs or rods of the auditory cells are consequently artifacts originating in the tear

g6 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

ing away of Corti's membrane. The third zone of the membrane is sharply marked off and begins with a hyaline border ; then follows a network of fine trabeculae with regular openings. The membrana tectoria is not, as Boettcher at first thought, united with the ligamentum spirale.

Boettcher correctly describes how the tectorial membrane develops with reference to the length of the cochlea. In pig embryos of 7 cm. length he found the membrane well developed in the second half of the first and in the first half of the second spiral turns, while both above and below this it gradually fades out, and is thus in harmony with the stage of development of the hair cells of these parts of the cochlea.

Winniwarter (1870, 292) says Corti's membrane shows three zones, the innermost thin, resting on the auditory ridge, very delicate, faintly striate, from occasional perforations presenting an imperfect netlike appearance and occasionally marked on its under surface by the outlines of epithelial cells which seem to be like those of the auditory ridge. The second zone begins at the end of the teeth, is striated diagonally from within and above, downwards and outwards, the striation being due to separable fibres. This zone ends outwardly in a border, rounded below, which is characterized by a hyaline edge. In the middle of this zone a dark line runs through the fibrous mass. The outer zone is composed of a network of structureless, anastomosing, hyaline meshes, the fibres of which arise from a hyaline edge. A more profusely branching plexus passes centrad over the surface of the membrana tectoria, extending far over the middle of the middle zone. The membrane is very resistant and elastic. It extends outwards certainly to the outer border of the three rows of the outer cells of Corti. The connection of the inner and outer pillars {Stege und Saiten) is a very firm one. There are about twenty-nine inner to thirty-eight outer.

Grimm (1870, 105) found the length of the hairs of the cristae acusticae to be 0.035 mm., while the cells were only 0.025 mm. high. The nerve fibre passes to base of cell ; the axis cylinder pierces the wall, runs to the nucleus, on to the hair cap membrane, which it passes through, and ends in the base of the hair as a knob of stainable substance (black in osmic).

Hensen (1871, 129) corroborated Boettcher's observation that the inner and outer pillars of Corti are composed of fibres. He


regards the fibres passing out from the hair cells, or more strictly the cylinder cells of the large epithelial ridge, as artifacts, but believes most decidedly that the rods on the tops of the "hair cells'* are genuine auditory hairs. He showed that the membrana Cortii cannot have the relations which Boettcher attributes to it, — is not so placed ; that the third zone as a continuation of the membrane of Corti does not exist, for, on account of the migration of the pillar fibres, the pillars and the lamina reticularis would be shoved under the striated portion of the membrana tectoria. In the guinea-pig and rabbit he found in the several spiral turns of cochleae treated with osmic acid that the outer boundary of Corti's membrane was exactly one-quarter of a cell breadth outside of the outermost hair cell. The third zone of Boettcher's is equivalent to the (co-extensive with the) fibrous network on the dorsal surface of the membrana tectoria as described by Loewenberg. The fibres of this zone cross the membrane fibres, and passing over onto the first zone appear to end in a sharp border.

This fibrous layer arises as Boettcher describes it, and always lies thrown back. The bars {Balken) from which it arises is the least elastic portion of Corti's membrane. As concerns his earlier view, that the membrana Cortii filled the sulcus spiralis during life, Hensen is unable to decide, and leaves the question open. He is uncertain whether the embryonic cells separate from the membrana Cortii with which they are so closely bound at first, but he has never seen the membrane with body large enough to fill the sulcus. Finally, Hensen describes a row of knobs on the lower surface of the membrane. It is always present in guinea-pig and rabbit, and is placed exactly above the inner hair cells.

Based on considerations of the anatomy and function of the cochlea, Hensen considers it certain that the nerve fibres end in the hair cells.

Hensen discovered in the outer cells a peculiar structure in the form of an oval capsule around which fibres were spirally coiled — they reminded him of sense buds (tactile corpuscles). Their normal position in the cell appeared to be directly underneath the cell cap. He found the capsules in other parts of the cell, but concluded they belonged in the top, and had been accidentally misplaced. As to their function, he favored the

98 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

view that they formed an end apparatus for the perception of pressure stimuli, in harmony with his view that the stiff hairs of the hair cells were bumped against or mto the membrana tectoria, which rests upon them like a foreign body, by the vibrations of the membrana basilaris. In the case of the inner cell hairs they strike against the rows of knobs above described.

Hensen formerly thought the membrana Cortii was very soft and almost mucous in nature ; he now thinks it to possess a resistance comparable to that of a pillow stuffed with feathers. Its stickiness is due to the fibrous net on its dorsal surface (Loewenberg's net), as well as to the fibrous nature of the membrane itself.

Gottstein (1872, 103): In man the membrana Cortii begins about the middle, between the attachment of the membrana Reissneri and the labium vestibulare. Within from this line is a continuous layer of epithel cells ; but no trace of a tectorial membrane. The fibrous bodies of the pillars of Corti are composed of fibres which run into the basilar membrane. Protoplasmic remains have been found around their upper ends, and Waldeyer saw nuclei there in young animals.

The membrane of Corti is divided into three zones, and ends free in the neighborhood of the outermost hair cells. In the little epithelial ridge of the embryo there arises a triangular cell, which soon divides into two, in each of which a fibrous body appears, the first traces of the pillars of Corti.

The outer hair cells arise by the fusion (soldering) of two cells, an upper and a lower.

In animals the membrana tectoria begins near the line of insertion of Reissner's membrane ; in man, further out (as above stated). The innermost zone reaches from this line to the labium vestibuli cristas spiralis, thin and structureless ; in man it is relatively thicker. The middle zone is separated from the first by a fine spiral line ; it extends to the inner hair cells, and is especially thick and fibrous radially. The outer zone is separated from the middle by a slender hyaline spiral seam, and forms a fine-meshed network. The processes described by Boettcher, connecting hair cells and membrana tectoria, and the knobs on the lower surface of the membrana tectoria which Hensen saw, Gottstein could not find. Gottstein did not agree with Boettcher that the hairs occupy only a curved line on the


top of the cell, instead of taking in the whole cap, which latter view Gottstein adopted and figured the hair cells accordingly.

Retzius (1872, 238) found the cells of the cristas and maculae to be of two sorts, supporting cells and sense cells. The latter are flask-shaped, hair-bearing structures, which carry upon their thickened end plates tufts of hairs, ten to fifteen in number, and not infrequently even a larger number. These may be only the fibrils of a single large hair, and they are found of various lengths in maceration preparations. The auditory cells are directly continuous with the nerve fibres.

Nuel (1872, 207) gives an account of the tectorial membrane, but as it is reproduced in his later account, it will be given in a succeeding paragraph.

Boettcher (1872, 36) : In the cat and the dog the Corti's pillars develop during the period shortly before and after birth. The hairs on the upper end of the hair cells are arranged in a curved line, not in a tuft, as Waldeyer thought.

He defends his views as to the nature of the membrana tectoria, viz. that the fibres of this plate are connected with the hair cells, and that the hairs of the latter are consequently artifacts. *

In a young hare Boettcher found that the third zone (as Hensen found in rabbit) was formed entirely of a perforated membrane, which lies on the dorsal surface of the membrana tectoria propria and forms the inner part of the membrane, i.e, third zone. It is a genuine membrana fenestrata, and lies directly upon the cartilaginous spiral ridge. Further outward it lies over the striated portion, and reaches to the processes found on the outer border of the second zone. Adherent to these processes he found in the cat a row of fine fibres at very regular distances from each other, and a second row of similar ones nearer the ventral surface of the membrane. The membrane in hares is much thinner than in cats and dogs, and begins about the middle of the distance between the vestibular wall and the free border of the auditory teeth. The conditions in the rabbit and hare are unlike those in the dog and cat. In these latter there are fibres and outline figures upon the upper surface of the membrane.

These fibres are, so far as position is concerned, the equivalent of the fenestrated membrane of the rabbit. This is not

lOO AVERS. [Vol. VI.

true of the third zone which unites with the border process further outward. Hensen's knobs are considered by Boettcher to be the remains of the connection of the membrana tectoria with the inner hair cells. Boettcher claims still in defending his earlier view that the membrana tectoria is tensely drawn in a radial direction, and calls attention to a homogeneous interfibrillar substance which lies between the isolable fibres. The membrane is elastic in a direction perpendicular to the course of the fibres and must be much more so in a radial direction. The only certain knowledge we have of nerve endings in the cochlea was gained from cross-sections in which the nerve fibres were seen to fuse with the inner hair cells. Of the longitudinal nerve fibres, he says : " Die longitudinalen Fasern werden nicht eher anerkannt werden, als sie auf den Duichschnitt demonstrirt sein werden. Das hat noch Niemand gethan, ja es hat an einen solchen sogar noch Niemand die Stelle angeben konnen, wo sie liegen." He calls attention to the possibility of confusing these spiral nerve fibres with the cell elements on the lower surface of membrana basilaris.

Hensen (1873, 33) concluded, after an examination of Boettcher's preparations, ♦that his supposition was incorrect, that Loewenberg's reticulate lamella played a r61e in the formation of the membrana tectoria.

In Boettcher's preparations taken from embr}'OS of the cat there extended from the membrana Cortii (which did not lie upon the membrana reticularis), out over the small ridge, a thin membranous plate. Below this membrane were fibrous structures, which were doubtless artifacts. This membrane, present in embryos, disappears later. The reticular membrane found over Corti's membrane (discovered first by Loewenberg) has nothing to do with the inner zone in guinea-pig and rabbit, but simply passes out over it, becomes very thin, and ends freely. Concerning the physical peculiarities of the membrana Cortii, Hensen does not agree with Boettcher that it is very elastic in radial direction, especially since we know nothing of its elasticity. He contradicts Boettcher's observations that the membrana tectoria is radially tensely stretched and that it contracts when broken loose.

After experiments instituted for the purpose, Hensen concludes that the consistency of the membrana tectoria lies


somewhere between that of contracted muscle and adipose tissues. It probably has the consistency of fresh brain tissue, and is much more resistant than the cells of the ridge, which have a consistency much like that of embryonic brain. Hensen concludes that he is certain that the longitudinal fibres are nerve fibres. He nevertheless admits that with the greatest care it is oftentimes impossible to tell nerve fibres from protoplasmic processes. He could not find Nuel's fibres.

Lavdowsky (1876, 178) : The hair cells have the hairs always arranged in a horseshoe on the top of the cell. They are short, glassy bacilli, often rounded on the end, which in the fully grown animal are not organically connected with the membrane of Corti.

Lavdowsky found that some of the nerve fibres were not connected with ganglion cells, and that some of the nerves, after they had entered into the cochlear organ, end, not in the hair cells, but in the ordinary epithelium of the zona pectinata.

Corti's membrane begins near the root of Reissner's membrane as a very thin structure, but rapidly grows thicker. It extends with these relations through the whole of Corti's canal. It covers over the sulcus spiralis, Corti's arch, outer hair cells, and ends abruptly exactly over the last row of the outer hair cells, having decreased somewhat in thickness from its middle outward. Lavdowsky disagrees with Waldeyer that the membrana tectoria begins in mammals or in man midway between the root of Reissner's membrane and the labium vestibulare. Neither could he agree with Boettcher in this matter. In silver preparations Lavdowsky always found the point of origin very near Reissner's membrane. It can by no manner of means extend beyond the outer row of hair cells. As the membrane passes by the cells, it certainly does not enter into the kind of union with them figured by Boettcher, but simply applies itself closely to the hair cap of these cells.

" As regards structure, the first and last zones, i.e, the inner and outer, are homogeneous as I have found them, but I consider the homogeneity of the first zone different from other authors, since I find that the fibres of the middle zone narrow themselves inwards and not outwards ; consequently the first zone is merely a modification of the middle one, whose fibres after narrowing down fuse with each other into a continuous

I02 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

plate." He was not able to find any sort of cavities within the middle zone such as Waldeyer described. The figures on its lower surface, stripes, polygonal figures, are without doubt impressions of the surface of the structures on which it lies. The major part of the membrane of Corti is contained in the middle zone, which is fibrous. Its fibres are of very peculiar composition, long, for the most part undulating (in surface view), and very fine. They are especially soft, extensible, and very elastic in nature, so that the whole membrane has the nature of a soft, elastic mass.

Corti's membrane is, notwithstanding the contrary views of Hensen and Waldeyer, very elastic, and this peculiarity agrees well with its probable physiological function as a damping membrane. Its elasticity as a mass is due mainly to the interfibrillar substance, which Boettcher saw, and which Lavdowsky found was composed of inter-fibrillar granules. This substance easily swells up, and in so doing small vacuoles appear, in which condition Corti*s membrane presents the appearance of a gelatinous, almost mucous mass. This substance is not found in the other parts of the membrane, e.g, in the outer zone. This zone is entirely homogeneous, still more elastic than the middle, which explains its more frequent distortion and displacement and rolling together. He could not accept Hen sen's view as correct for the normal position of the membrane. He had nothing to add to Hensen's account of the hyaline border net nor the row of knobs.

Krause (1876) described the inner hair cells as bearing extremely finely pointed hairs. The outer hair cells differ from the inner in that they have an oval capsule entwined in a spiral nerve fibre, placed between the nucleus and hair-bearing cell cap. ^

Pritchard (1878, 217). In his account of the development of the organ of Corti, Pritchard says that, on the whole, Corti's pillars, the membrana reticularis, and the vertical trabeculae have been developed out of the walls of the epithelial cells, while the hair-beariftg and all other cells have developed from the contents of the original epithelial cells.

The membrana tectoria is a cuticular secretion of these cells.

Pritchard (1881, 216) described the auditory apparatus of Ornithorhynclms platypus and compared it with that of ordinary


birds and mammals. Our author concluded that the Platypus possesses a genuine organ of Corti, with two rows of the pillars of Corti ; but the organ is in general not so well developed as in higher mammals, and greatly resembles the avian cochlea. The lagena with its sense organ is still present.

Nuel (1878, 206) accepts Boettcher's views, for the most part, with reference to the structure of the membrane of Corti, but does not agree with him in considering the hairs of the hair cells artifacts. He considered the membrane to be soft and non-elastic, and thought the polygonal depressions on its lower surface were derived from the membrana reticulata. The inner zone he found homogeneous, and is tunnelled by channels for the reception of the apices of habenula perforata. The membrana tectoria scarcely covers the membrana reticularis. Its outer zone is covered by a system of relatively large (coarse) anastomosing fibres. Nuel could not decide whether a considerable space was included between the membrane of Corti and the epithelium of the sulcus spiralis.

Although agreeing in the main with Boettcher regarding the structure of the membrane of Corti, Nuel adds a few new facts which his studies enable him to give beyond the former's account. The membrane of Corti is thrown like a plate or wing upon the habenula sulcata and the organ of Corti. It thus covers the habenula sulcata, the sulcus spiralis, and the organ of Corti in a radial direction.

In the spiral direction it extends throughout the whole length of the cochlear canal. It begins as a thin plate on the habenula sulcata, not far from the line of insertion of the Reissner's membrane, and in this region is composed of a homogeneous substance, and perforated by large holes which permit the passage of the processes of the habenula perforata, which are consequently not covered by the membrane. One might say that the membrane of Corti commences as a system of anastomosing trabcculae lodged in the grooves of the habenula perforata.

At the extremity of the teeth of the first row, the membrane thickens considerably and passes out over the open space of the sulcus spiralis, from whence it passes on to the summit of the arch of Corti, but is there applied to the membrana reticularis.

At the apex of the organ of Corti it sustains a considerable

I04 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

thinning, which approaches the plane of the reticular membrane. It extends scarcely beyond this membrane, but little is known concerning its true external termination. On its external border it is furnished with a system of quite large hyaline fibres, which by anastomosing form a sort of net, which for its beauty is not surpassed by the membrana reticularis and which Boettcher has well represented in his figures. This network reaches at least to the niveau of the external supporting cells, but its relation to the latter is not known. These trabeculae of the outer border are in isolated membranes of Corti, usually bent inward over one or the other of its faces. Between the two systems of trabeculae, internal and external, the membrana Cortii shows in a radial course a fibrous structure, fine but quite apparent. The constituent filaments, which are easily isolated in preparations, are undulating and lightly interlacing. The membrane tears readily in radial courses, following the direction of its constituent fibrillae.

" Does there exist between the epithelium of the sulcus spiralis and the membrane of Corti a considerable open space ? It is impossible for me to answer this question categorically. On the inferior face of this membrane one notices quite frequently polygonal depressions, which are in all probability produced by cellular elements. They may also correspond to the membrana reticularis."

According to Boettcher the membrane of Corti gives off branches of considerable size, which implant themselves upon the plateau of the cells of Corti and of the inner auditory cells. The rods carried by the cells are supposed to be remains of these processes which have been broken off in the preparation a little abpve the reticulate membrane. The description which we have given of these rods or hairs, and above all their regularity, renders, it seems to us, Boettcher's view inadmissible, at least as regards the significance of the rods.

The physical properties of the membrane of Corti merit all our attention. Hensen has announced, and I have many times verified the fact, that in the fresh state it is a soft substance, somewhat gelatinous and almost without elasticity. It takes and preserves all the shapes which one forces upon it with the instruments, and it rolls up without the least resistance. If we consider that such a pasty mass, as we may say, rests upon the reticular membrane, it will allow o£ our making an hypothesis as to its physiological ro1e. It there comes into contact with the rods of Corti's cells ; quite probably the latter are plunged into its mass in a manner similar to the acoustic hairs which in the ampulla are thrust into the otoliths. The membrane of Corti will thus, very properly, annihilate the vibrations communicated to the acoustic cells (by the fibres of the basilar membrane probably), and thus play with respect to them the r61e of damper. The membrane itself is not capable of being put into vibration. It is a very poor resonator.

Embryological researches prove that the membrane of Corti is derived, not from the cells which constitute the embryonic acoustic papilla, but from the epithelium which covers the habenula perforata.

Retzius (1884, 237). In his extended monograph on the vertebrate ear, Retzius describes the membrana tectoria as extending from the insertion of Reissner's membrane to the outer hair cells. It is fixed to the tissue of the spiral blade, from its origin at the root of Reissner's membrane to inner edge of limbus lamina spiralis, but not structurally. This zone (the outer) is very thin, especially its inner border, growing thicker inwards. When the membrane is released from its position, which is readily done, the upper layer of the flat epithel of the limbus often pulls off with it, and gives rise to the polygonal areas or markings so often observed on its under surface.

Where the membrane leaves the free edge of the limbus it is marked by a fine line. From here it extends freely across the cochlear space, covering over the sulcus spiralis internus and the papilla acustica basilaris quite to its outer border — i.e, to the third row of hair cells — without, however, coming in contact with these cells.

The membrane closes in the relatively narrow space of the sulcus spiralis, which communicates with the other larger endolymphatic space only at the outer border of the membrane.

In this submembranous space the hairs of the auditory cells freely project. Whether they are in any way in contact with the membrane is extremely difficult to determine. In most preparations it appears as if they were not, since the lower surface of the membrane stands somewhat above them. In a few cases I saw it resting on the upper surface of the hairs. The

I06 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

freely projecting membrane, however, scarcely allows of crosssection without dislocation, and the question is only to be decided by cross-sections. A good embedding method will probably answer it sometime.

On the under surface of the membrane in the rabbit there is no spiral ridge such as Hensen lately described. The membrane grows thicker rapidly after leaving the limbus, and the upper surface is convex in a radial direction.

In the middle spiral, the membrane is thickest at its outer border, and the upper and lower surfaces are here bound together by a relatively broad, convex edge plate. On the upper surface, somewhat within the edge, is a thick shining string or cord, that appears somewhat circular in cross-section, runs spirally, and is intimately bound to the surface. From it there passes out over the membrane a net of fine fibres running diagonally inwards, or really, with reference to the cochlear apex, from without and above downward and inward. The meshes of this fibre net of Loewenberg are oval fissures in its substance. In sections of the membrana tectoria this net appears as scattered granules over the surface of the membrane. This net does not extend further inward than to about the middle of the free zone ; here the fibres become pointed and end themselves.

Of what is this membrane composed }

When one studies it fresh in aqueous humor, it is clear, transparent, gelatinous, firmly soft, somewhat elastic, so that it may be slightly stretched. When released, it contracts ; when drawn too strongly, it splits diagonally and transversely, i.e, in the direction of the fibres of which it is composed. It appears while fresh to be striated diagonally from above and outward toward its inner and lower border, and under higher power it is seen to be made up of uncountable fibres which run in the given direction. Stained with fuchsin, the fibres appear sharper, rose-red, and they are separable by teasing. With gentle pressure the membrane is compressible, but returns to its normal shape on removal of pressure. Chromic and osmic acids make its substance firmer, but its composition out of fine fibres is just as distinct. Although these fibres stick closely to each other and are separable only with difficulty, one cannot distinguish a cement substance between them. But a minimum amount of such a substance is to be predicated as present


though not visible. The whole membrane is composed of such fibres, and they are apparent in radial sections, in which they are seen to run as arcs downward.

It has been proposed several times to distinguish zones in the membrane. In the rabbit, however, there are only two zones distinguishable, — the zone of the inner portion, fixed to the limbus spirale, and the free zone, both of which pass insensibly into one another, since the boundary between the two is confined to the stripe present on the lower surface. The two zones are also characterized by their different thicknesses.

Retzius (1884, 237) : Membrana tectoria of the cat. This structure accompanies as usual the papilla basilaris from its base to the apex of the cochlea, />. throughout its entire length.

One can best distinguish two zones, an inner and an outer. These are bounded on the tympanal surface by the stripe, which is formed along the line of attachment of the membrane to the free edge of the labium vestibulare of the limbus spiralis. The outer zone extends from this free edge quite to, or perhaps somewhat beyond, the third row of hair cells. The inner zone extends from the free edge of the limbus to near the line of origin of the membrana Reissneri. The breadth of the inner zone of the membrana tectoria is different in the three spirals of the cochlea. It decreases in radial breadth gradually from the base to the apex, thereby decreasing the breadth of the whole structure. The membrane is consequently of different widths in the three spiral turns of the canal. The outer zone, however, gains in breadth from the base to the apex of the cochlea.

On the outer free zone of the tympanal surface of this membrane in the cat the striae discovered by Hensen run in spiral direction. In perpendicular radial section it appears refractive, and, as Hensen stated, it lies almost directly over the row of inner hair cells. In the basal and spiral turn this Hensen s ridge lies nearer the edge of the limbus spiralis and is less distinct, and appears more or less serrated and broken up into papillx, and is located about midway between the edge of the limbus (the bounding line between the two zones) and the outer edge of the membrane, consequently about the middle of the outer zone. In the apical spiral turn it appears again less sharply defined, and approaches nearer to the outer border of the mem

I08 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

brane. In several old cats I found Hensen*s ridge as a very narrow stripe. Outside of Hensen's ridge, especially in the basal turn, one finds several projecting, irregular lines. Finally, one finds on the outer free border of the membrane a peculiar, refractive cord, which appears to represent the third zone of Boettcher. It is best developed in the basal turn, and is composed of parallel, refractive, and close-set fibres, whose direction is from within and below outwards and upwards (i.e. upwards towards the apex of the spire). These fibres seem to be collected into a single cord at the lower edge of the structure. In the middle turn this cord is single or only ribbed, and in the apical turn it is similarly constituted or else dissolved into branching fibres. On the vestibular surface of the membrane there are as a rule no fibrous structures present. Occasionally I saw, however, in old animals especially, in the middle turn, a faint indication of Loewenberg's net.

This face arches high above the edge of the limbus to fall again towards the outside. In the basal turn, consequent on the height of the lamina spiralis and the limbus, the direction of the membrane is towards the scala tympani. In the middle and apical turns, however, it is practically parallel with the basilar membrane. The tectorial membrane is thinner in the basal turn and thicker in the other two. The structure of the membrane is very similar to that of the rabbit. It shows in both zones an oblique striation, which runs from within and below outwards and upwards, which is due to the fine fibres of which it is composed. The course and other characters of these fibres, as well as the reactions and consistency of the entire membrane, agree with what has already been given for the rabbit.

Retzius (ib.) : The membrana tectoria is present in the cochlea of man, as in the rabbit and cat, as a flattened, band-shaped, soft, elastic structure, which runs along the whole of the papilla, is somewhat narrower in the basal turn, but broader in the middle and apical turns. Two zones are to be distinguished. The inner very thin zone is closely applied to the surface of the epithelium of the limbus spiralis, and is fastened by means of a thin, irregular, net-like cement-substance. The inner border of this zone does not reach quite to the root of the membrana Reissneri, but lies nearly midway between this and the edge of


the labium vestibulare. At this place one finds on the lower surface of the membrane a fine spiral stripe. The second zone of the stripe is suspended free over the sulcus spiralis intcrnns and the papilla, rises towards the vestibular scala in the middle and apical turns, and thickens in the middle of its body, but remains thin in* its free border, which here reaches scarcely to the outer row of hair cells. At the free border of the outer zone in the basal turn is found a thick, refractive marginal cord, which bends inward as it passes upwards. In the middle turn it forms a coarse-fibred, and in the apical turn a thin-fibred net, whose fibres project outwards free over the outermost hair cells. Occasionally one finds in the adult, especially in the apical turn, on the upper plates of the outermost Deiters*s cells, the fibre piece, which is evidently a rudiment of the fibres which in embryonic life serve to attach the membrana tectoria.

Retzius did not find Loewenberg*s net, or its equivalent, in man. About the middle of the lower (tympanal) surface of the membrane one finds Hensen*s stripe. In the basal turn it lies somewhat nearer the inner border of the zone, in the middle and apical turns nearer the middle of this zone. In man this structure appears in the form of a somewhat refractive, relatively broad and flat plate with parallel contours, which lie over the inner hair cells, or more correctly immediately within this row. Both zones of the membrane are composed, as in the rabbit and cat, of innumerable extremely fine fibres, which withstand the action of acetic acid very well. Their course is from the base and within, outwards and upwards.

Retzius (1884, 237) says of Boettchcr s observations in criticism of that observer's views : —

"Die membrana tectoria erstreckt sich mit dicker gewordner ausserer Zone bis uber die gegcnd der ausseren Haarzellen ; in der Spitzcnwindung abcr kaum bis zur zwciten Rcihe, wahrend ihre Fascrn {vicf.) zwischcn den mit frei ausragenden Haaren vcrschenen Haarzellenoberflachen zu den Phalangen der Dciterschen Zellcn gehcn. In der Mittcl- und der Basalwindung sind diese Fasern abgebrochen und nur Rcste von ihnen bewahrt ; an der dritten Phalangcnreihe sieht man hclle Fasern (wf/.) aufragen, und nach oben-innen vom Membranrande nimmt man andere Particn der gleichsam zuriickgeschnellten abgcbrochenen Fasern wahr. Es ist diese Thatsache

no AVERS. [Vol. VI.

interressant fiir das Verstehen der Boettcher'schen Angaben iiber den Zusammenhang der Membran mit den Haaren der Haarzellen ; mit diesen Haaren hat die Membran und ihre Fasem nichts zu thun — II, p. 305, PI. XXII, D, i.

Barth (1889, 17) describes a homogeneous layer of substance separating the two fibrous layers of the membrana tectoria of the mammalian cochlea. He thinks that this membrane is much more important than usually supposed, and considers that it serves to fix the organ of Corti in its place.

The membrana tectoria of the mammalian ear has been described as a more or less gelatinous plate which, owing to its position overhanging the organ, is supposed to act as a damper upon the vibratory action of the sensory hairs.

The plate is continuous, and of course follows the windings of the cochlear organ. It is said to be firmly fixed (by adhesion, Retzius) to the limbus spiralis of the cochlea, and although easily removed from its position, not unfrequently brings away with it some of the pavement epithelium forming the covering of this portion of the limbus. The membrana tectoria has been described by Boettcher alone as possessing attachments to the organ of Corti itself, though more often so figured, and it is usually considered as a subsidiary structure, a mere cuticular secretion of the epithelial ridge known as the organ of Corti.

In the views which have been restated above, most of the investigators have described the minute structure of the- membrane as distinctly fibrous, divided by certain inadequately known structural characters into inner and outer zones. There has been more general agreement upon these two points than upon any others. The striations of the body produced by its component fibres are continued, as I find, without hindrance through these zones. The fibrous striation of the organ is drawn outwards, toward the apex of the cochlea, and appears to pass from the inner edge (the so-called fixed edge) outward toward the outer side of the cochlear tube (free edge of the plate). We have been entirely in the dark as to the significance of this structure, its physiological function not having the least foundation in the actual structure of the organ. What is the phylogenetic origin of the tectorial membrane } This is a question which has proved up to date, under the prevailing views of its physiological importance, an insoluble puzzle.


When, however, we review the history of the controversy of the nature of the cupula tertninalis and the gelatinous mass said to inclose the otoliths of the macula utriculi and macula sacculi, we find that the older view, according to which these structures were constant and normal organs of the internal ear, was forced to give way to the demonstration of their artificial nature brought by Hensen, and when we consider the view which I have endeavored to establish, viz. that the cochlear organ of the mammalian ear is morphologically but a transformed row of lateral line sense organs, each of which inherits the capacity to produce a structure in every way like the cupula terminalis, and when we examine the minute structure and relation of the parts of the membrana tcctoria in this connection, I feel confident that it will be apparent to every one that the membrana tectoria of the mammalian ear is but a cupula terminalis-like structure produced by the gluing together of the hairs of the sensory cells of the organ of Corti and the breaking away of the whole from the cells which bear them, as in the case of the cupula hairs. This membrana tectoria, as it is found in ordinary microscopical preparations of the mammalian cochlea, is, then, an artifact produced by the use of reagents. In his later studies Retzius was converted to Hcnscn*s view of the cupulas tcrminales, and recognized two very definite forms in his own preparations which he called the osmium and Miillerian cupuloe respectively, since he was satisfied their peculiarities and distinguishing characters were due entirely to the reagents used. The eflfect of the following reagents are the only ones I have specially noted during my work, but any one who will test the matter and compare his results with the published figures will find the influence of reagents distinctly marked in the conceptions of the nature and relations of the membrana tectoria.

Hydrochloric acid swells the hairs, causing them to fuse and the boundaries to disappear. It shortens the length of the hairs correspondingly, so that in transverse sections the membrane is usually homogeneous and club-shaped when this reagent is used.

Nitric acid acts much in the same way as the hydrochloric, though it contracts the hairs much more strongly. This is especially true of the higher per cents (10-20) used in dccal

112 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

cifying. In combination with chromic and bichromic solutions it is very destructive of the fibres if left long in the solution.

Kleinenberg's salt picric and all aqueous picric solutions have little, if any, contracting effect on the hairs, and preserve the band in its normal relation, but render it easily separable from the ridge of Corti.

Solutions of copper salts above i % in strength contract the hairs too much, and cause rupture between the band and the hair cells. In weaker solutions, and especially in combination with I to S % of alcohol and of glycerine, the hairs are preserved in the normal condition.

Flemming*s solution, if allowed to act on the entire embryo for a short time only, seems to have a good preservative effect on the hairs, and may be followed by alcohol and glycerine with advantage. Alcohol alone, unless cautiously employed during the first stage of the water-extracting process, causes ruptures and contractions in the hairs.

Chromic salts are useful if their action is not too violent or continued too long, for they readily bring about distortions in the hair band.

Essential oils almost invariably cause much distortion even of the carefully hardened hair band, and the paraffine bath usually adds something to the action of the clarifying medium.

Ether and strong alcohol, when acting for a protracted period, cause peculiar changes in the hair band, while

Aqueous solutions of gum arabic leave the hair band, as well as the organ of Corti, in very near their original form and relations.

The hairs of the organ of Corti while individually distinct, are so close together as to necessitate their cohesion into a long, relatively thin and narrow band. Its length in man is about 3.3 cm; in the cat, 2.3 cm.; in the rabbit, 1.5 cm. Its breadth in man is 0.5 mm. ; in the ox, 0.48 mm. ; and in the rabbit, 0.39 mm. The band is slightly broader in the middle than at either end, and somewhat broader at its upper than at its lower end.

In thickness it varies in different parts of cross-section, which tapers gradually from the origin of the component hairs from their cells to the inner free border, which lies on or above the limbus spiralis, where it fades away to a very thin edge. This edge, though composed of the extremely fine tips of the inner


hairs, appears very often in microscopic preparations under a low power to be homogeneous and glassy, but I have not yet seen a hair band whose inner edge was not resolvable into striation (the hairs) under adequate magnifying power. The densest part of the membrane is near the middle of its transverse section, and this coincides with the line of inner hair cells. The thickest part of the membrane is at the same time the most open, owing to the fact that it includes the origin of the hairs from all the sensory cells of Corti*s organ, and of course the relatively large interspaces between the cell tops project up into the hair band, though continually narrowing until they fade out near the middle of the band. The band rises from the cochlear hair cells and with a gentle and graceful curve sweeps upwards and inwards, when, after reaching the height of its course, it slopes down to near the junction of the membrane of Reissner with the floor of the cochlear tube, where it ends. It declines on its inner face more gradually than it rises on its outer face. During life it is not attached to the limbus spiralis, as has been commonly believed, and, although I cannot say positively that it does not come in contact with this surface ever during life, I am sure that for the most part the hairs end free in the endolymph. The hair ends are to be seen on the surface of the band all along its course beyond the outer two-thirds of its breadth, projecting slightly above the surface of the band.

The band is composed of five (more or less) rows of bundles of hairs. Each bundle is the product of a single cell. The bundles remain distinct for a short part of their course, then apparently soon merging into a common structure. The spaces between the rows are greater than the spaces between the cells of the same row in the inner row of hair cells and the first row and, for the most part, the second row of outer hair cells, but often in the third and fourth rows of outer hair cells the interspaces between the neighboring cells of the same row are quite as great as the space between the rows. This circumstance renders the structure of this zone of the hair band looser and more irregular than the first-mentioned zones (PI. XII).

The weakest part of the hair band is along the line of insertion of the hairs into the hair-cell caps, more strictly their origin therefrom. This condition is due mainly to the isolation

114 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

of the bundles, which throws greater strain upon a few hairs at a time, whereas in other parts of the band the cohesion of the elementary hairs and their practically even distribution in the band lends a strength to the whole structure such that a strain brought to bear upon any part of it, equal in area to a bundle of hairs rising from a cell, though sufficient to rupture the hair bundle, does not interrupt the continuity of the plate.

A further arrangement lending strength to the hair band is the crossing of the fibres ; for the hairs from different rows of hair cells do not run parallel, but cross each other at varying angles. There are two main courses of hairs, an upper and a lower. The lower, from the inner hair cells, is more oblique to the radius than the upper, thicker layer, from the outer hair cells.

The readiness with which the hair band is torn away from its natural attachments and its frequent fixation to the spiral plate by its other edge, explain why this structure has so long been misunderstood, both in its make-up and in its purpose.

In transverse section the hair band is " clef "-shaped, the figure being much thicker at one end than at the other. There are two surfaces, two edges, and two ends. The morphologically dorsal surface has a convexity (that occurring in the thickened region) over the hair cells of the ridge of Corti, and this convexity may be said to be, in general, but a repetition in the hair band of the convexity of the ridge of Corti. In sloping downwards and inwards toward the root of Reissner's membrane, the surface of the band may form a shallow depression, in which case the usual "cleff "-form of the cross-section is attained ; sometimes the hairs seem to run nearly straight to their ends, and then the section is ( ^ ) comma-shaped. The lower surface follows these outlines in the main. The inner edge is excessively thin, and in bands which have been treated with reagents they usually present a glassy appearance, the longer the treatment with reagents or the more active the reaction, the greater the amount of changed tissue in the band, effected in all cases by the penetration of the reagent, which of course has made equal penetration over all the surface of the band, and caused equal chemical change in the fibres, but, owing to the thickness of the outer edge, the fibres in its central portion are unchanged and show through the more transparent parts, obscuring the


actual condition of the surface. On this account many observers have described the so-called inner zone of the membrana tectoria as homogeneous, glassy in transparency, and consequently of entirely different structure from the outer zone. However, as previously stated, even this inner edge when thus modified by reagents may be seen to be composed of fibres under proper manipulations of light and a sufficient magnifying power, unless it is completely melted down by the reagents.

The outer edge is thickest, and appears much thicker from the outside than it is in reality. The apparent edge when the band is in place is of course that part of its dorsal surface presented at right angles to the major part of this surface. The actual outer edge is that part of the structure composed of the basal ends of the long hairs, and its thickness equals the distance between the outer ed'ge of the row of outer hair cells and the inner edge of the inner row of hair cells. When broken off from their respective rows the hairs are drawn closer together by capillary attraction, and the other forces at work altering the relations of the structures of the cochlea.

The two ends of the cochlear hair band are somewhat rounded, since the hairs at the extreme ends of the band are shorter than in any other part of the organ. The reason for this is the reduction in size and number of the hair cells at the ends of the organ of Corti, and, as we shall have occasion to notice further on, the membrana basilaris itself ends in rounded borders. The hair band is consequently thinner at its ends, and fades out quite suddenly at the limits of the hair-cell rows.

The individual hairs run entirely free and unsupported for their whole length, and are consequently completely bathed by the endolymph. Their extremely fine tips are specially free and well situated for the reception of the wave motions propagated through the endolymph. The space between the hairs is necessarily very small, and although difficult of measurement, I judge them to be less than the diameter of a hair in the middle, more massive part of the band. The hairs as they leave the top of the sensory cells are placed close together on the cell cap, but not always do they enter the cell cap with perfect regularity, which often appears concave from without inwards, though in many preparations the cap seems to be a simple plate

Il6 A VERS. [Vol. VI.

thickened and characteristically striate somewhat after the fashion of the ^* Randsautn " of the intestinal epithelial cells.

The number of hairs to a cell varies within considerable limits. The limits as I have found them up to the present are ten as a minimum and thirty as a maximum. Of the whole number of counts made twenty-five was the average. These figures are for the ox, pig, and rabbit. I am not sure that a variation in the size of the hairs is connected with the variation in number, nor do my observations suffice to determine whether the smaller cells bear the smaller number of hairs, and the larger cells the greater number of hairs. The hairs borne by the same cell appear to vary in size at their bases, but in objects so minute it is hazardous to draw conclusions from other than very extensive series of observations. The hairs themselves when seen free from the cell cap do not show noticeable variations in size, so that I am inclined to the opinion that the apparent variation in size, as seen on the cell cap, is due to optical conditions, e.g. such as the greater or less refraction of light by the hair bases depending upon their position.

In glycerine preparations of the cochlear sense organ of a young calf, and in similar ones of a new-born rabbit, the membrana tectoria is easily resolvable into its component layers. Two plates are specially easy to be distinguished, and they include between them the canal of Corti and the pillar cells, in that they arise from the outer and inner hair cells respectively and fuse together above the cochlear organ, but only after they have arched beyond the median line of the canal of Corti and its pillar cell rows.

Each plate as it passes down to the cells of the inner and outer hearing cells splits up into portions which end one in each sensory hair cell. The number of hairs passing into a cell I could not determine, but it is safe to say it is above eight. Owing, however, to the fact that the hairs appear to have the power of splitting up indefinitely, it is almost impossible to get accurate and trustworthy data of the number of hairs connected with a single cell.

The whole course of the individual hairs is very difficult to follow. In radial sections the hairs are invariably cut across, owing to their oblique course in the band, a single hair crossing obliquely a space measuring 0.013+ mm. Hairs do not ascend


or descend out of the layer from the cell row to which they belong, and in any given transverse section the hairs from the different rows appear to be of about equal length, so that the hairs of the outer row of sensory cells end on the upper surface before those of the next succeeding row by about the same interval that separates the rows of cells, and so for all the rows. In this manner the middle of the plate must necessarily be the thickest, while the inner edge of the band would be composed of only those hairs reaching inward from the inner row of cells.

Most previous authors have maintained, as I have shown in the historical introduction to this chapter, that the membrana tectoria was composed of isolable fibres held together by a common, more or less gelatinous matrix, the " Zwischensubstanz " or ground substance. I have examined many hair bands with the greatest care, using all the chemical and physical tests known to me, but have failed to detect a tissue, stuff, or deposit of any kind in the hair band between the hairs which was at all general in its occurrence or could possibly come under the head of a matrix for the fibres of the membrana tectoria as described by the older authors. According to my view of the nature of the hair band, and according to anatomical facts as I have found them, the hair band would not have a capillary matrix under normal conditions. It is true an excessive secretion of mucus in the ear might in a supposable case so coagulate as to imbed the hairs in a common mass, but I have never met with such a case, and I do not think mucus or any other albuminoids are produced inside the ear canals as they exist in living vertebrates, in sufficient quantities to give rise to such appearances in histological preparations.

The only conclusion admissible is that observers who have recorded the presence of such a matrix have had to do with pathological conditions, or post mortem changes, largely due perhaps to the reagents used.

It is a matter of importance as well as great interest to determine as nearly as may be the exact physical conditions of the parts of the nerve-end apparatus which are concerned in transmitting the physical energy, in the common acceptation of the term, into nerve energy.

Retzius, among others, and with more complete data than

Il8 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

most writers, has estimated the number of hair cells in the cochlear organ of man and other mammals. His figures, given in round numbers, are the following : —

The inner hair-cell row contains in man 3»500 cells.

cat 2,600

" rabbit 1,600

The 4 outer hair-cell rows contain in man 12,000

3 ** ** ** " ** ** cat 9,900

4 *• ** " ** " " rabbit 6,200

i( i« (« (« «( it it

(i ii <« ii it «« 

he 4 outer hair-cell rows cont

tt t ii it H tt ii ti

As I have shown above, each hair cell bears a number of hairs which make up its bundle of percipient elements ; and from the estimates which I have made up to the present time on the several species of domestic mammals mentioned before, the average number of hairs borne by the cells is twenty-five.

The inner hair-cell row in man would consequently

support 85,000 auditory hairs.

The 4 outer hair-cell rows in man would consequently

support 300,000

ii ii

According to Retzius's estimate, there are about 24,000 fibres in the tympanic layer of the basilar membrane in man's ear, while the cat possesses 15,700, and the rabbit 10,500.

These fibres were, according to the generally accepted Hensen-Helmholtz basilar membrane theory, the percipient elements par excellcfue ; for on them, fixed as they are at both ends and supposedly tensely drawn, depended the transmission of the undulations of the endolymph to the hair cells. In place of these fibres of the basilar membrane I would substitute the 385,000 percipient capillary processes floating freely in the endolymph and connected directly with the sensory cell transmission apparatus, about which as yet we know so little, as the parts of Corti's organ which are sympathetically affected by sonorous waves entering the ear.

It is evident that the apparatus, which I have thus inadequately described, is far superior from a physical standpoint to the system of basilar membrane fibres for the work of picking up minute undulations, and the sequence of the physiological steps, which all our knowledge of sensory apparatuses lead us to accept as the normal condition, is maintained by this apparatus if it works as all investigators who have studied on the parent organs — the lateral line organs of fishes — suppose it does.


while the Hensen-Helmholtz theory introduces strange processes unknown elsewhere in animal physiology.

Retzius and most of the authors who had dealt with this topic before his time have maintained that the auditory hairs of the cochlear cells were not only short thick rods and quite stiff, but were inserted into the cell cap in a more or less crescentic line. Waldcyer and Gottstein, while agreeing with Retzius as to the length of the auditory rods or bacilli, do not agree with him as to the manner of insertion, claiming that the rods are certainly distributed over the entire surface of the cell end, and that with a nearly even spacing. They consider these rods to be distinct each for itself. When, however, we come to the auditory hairs of the other parts of the ear, all authors who mention the structure of the basal portion of the hairs describe a striated appearance due to fibrilloe, as Hensen claimed, and in this he was corroborated by Retzius.

These hair fibrillae were found to number 18-20 per cell on cells of the ampullar sense organs of fishes, and a single fibrilla measured at its base 0.7/i in diameter ; they were the constituent elements, as Retzius agreed, of round hairs. Their terminal ends were not described by these authors. Retzius has figured the hair cells (and several other authors have done the same, notably Hasse, Paul Meyer, and Hensen) from all sense organs of the ear other than the cochlear organ, as surmounted by a bundle of more or less broken fibrillar, which he explains are the ultimate fibrillae of the auditory hairs, but in every case attributes their individuality to the effect of reagents or mechanical injury. In Proteus the fibrillar, or, at least, the striations indicative of their existence, were traced to near the tips of the auditory hairs. I think there can be no doubt as to the accuracy of these observations so far as they go, but the question arises. Do these fibrilte remain compacted into bundles as is the case with the auditory hairs of the majority of the auditory sense organs, or are they separated during life t In the case of the organ of Corti, where the auditory cells are much more closely set than in the other sense organs, the fibrillar or ultimate hairs certainly are independent of each other to a degree not found in preparations of the other sense hairs. Compare the cochlear hair cell from the opossum (PI. VIII, Fig. 9) with the hair cells from the mocking-bird's ear (PI. VI, Fig. 9).



[Vol. VI.

A further question arises. Have we not here to do with a progression, a further differentiation, of the auditory hair in response to increased physiological demands ? I think this





Publication. (LUt No.)


Sense Organ.

Length of Hair in mm.


of Hairs

to Cell.


Schulze, F. E.

254, 255


Cristae ac.




236, 237


it ((





«« t*





Mac. utric.





H ((





Cristae ac. (cupula termin.)





Cristae ac.





(i t« 





All other organs










Cristae ac.





Mac. utric. and sac.





Mag. neg.





Mac. utnc.





I ^gena





Cristae ac.














Cat embryo







.008 (.005)



131. 132



Cristae ac.

. 1 9-.2 apparent





(i it

.4 actual




(( ti

.12 apparent


Ayers, H.


^t it

.2 actual

1 891




















































Between pillar feet . . .

< .104

► .102

< .09


( .066




Height of Corti's tunnel .





Length of inner pillars . .





Vert, length of pap. basilaris

at 3d row of outer hair cells





Length inner hair cells . .










hairs, inner hair cells








♦* outer








• outer pillars . . .






The vertebrate ear is then composed of canal organs and their canals ; and since it existed at one time in its phylogenetic, as well as in its ontogenetic history in a superficial position, its nerves, like the other cranial nerves which supply the canal sense organs at the present day, must have been either (i) an entire cranial nerve or (2) branches of one or more such nerves. It can be shown, I think, that the ear is supplied by two distinct nerves which have widely different origins in the brain, and are in reality branches froni two nerves^ and so not a discrete cranial nerve, as has formerly been supposed to be the case. In our anatomies the auditory nerve is recognized, following the classification of Sommering, as a distinct cranial nerve, the eighth in number of a series of twelve. However,


embryologists and comparative anatomists are familiar with the very intimate relation existing between the auditory and facial nerves, and many are inclined to consider the two, parts of a single cranial nerve. The majority of those holding such .ideas probably favor the view that the auditory nerve is the dorsal sensory root of the nerve of which the facial is the ventral motor root.

No final conclusions can be drawn from the evidence disclosed by the investigations in this field alone. There are a few facts which stand out with clearness, however, and they tend to show how very intimate the connection is between the VII, VIII, and IX nerves.

I have shown above that the auditory vesicle is marked off into anterior and posterior portions very early in life ; but we do not know of any facts which lead to the conclusion that the vertebrate ear was ever functional in the vesicular stage with a single sense organ. As soon as we can recognize the auditory nerve, it is made up of two diverging portions which are never related in their central connections, but arise from widely separated tracts. Each nerve root is provided with an independent ganglion applied to the two divisions of the auditory vesicle which show two sense organs, the maculae utriculi and sacculi. There is no extensive anastomosis between the two roots of the auditory nerve.

They arise from separate tracts ; they run in separate paths ; they end in separate organs. Could there possibly be any completer evidence that these two nerves are distinct structures, and that the parts of the ear which they supply are simply associated organs of different pedigrees }

This conclusion is based on present anatomical conditions, and does not speculate on possible ancestral relations of the nerves.

If, on the one hand, the two roots of the auditory do not anastomose with each other, they do, on the other hand, enter into anastomosis, or more truly, perhaps, they retain their primitive anastomoses, with their parent branches. The anterior root or utricular nerve anostomoses with the facial nerve, while the posterior branch either runs entirely independent to its peripheral territory or anastomoses in some few Elasmobranch forms with the so-called anterior root of the ninth or glossopharyngeal nerve.

I30 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

Although the ontogenetic evidence on this subject is not by any means as complete as the importance of the subject demands, since no special attention has been paid to the relation of the facial nerve to the auditory invagination, except by Kupfifer, nor to the relations of the rest of the nerve supply of the ear at this stage of growth, which is usually considered the wltole auditory nerve, there are certain facts which point to the conclusion that the auditory organ has arisen from the transformation of two originally distinct sense organs, which have been sunk below the surface in a common pit.

In order to adequately understand the relation of the auditory canal complex to its nerve supply, it will be necessary to examine three nerv^es usually classed as distinct cranial nerves, with respect to their central origin, their ganglionic connections, and their peripheral distribution ; viz. the VII or facial, VIII or auditory, and the IX or glossopharyngeal. When we examine the knowledge of the external origin and distribution of these three nerves in the light of recent work, we find that so far as the auditory nerve is concerned the distinctly separate external relations are but reflections of central relations equally distinct and separate.

The innervation of the auditory sense organs in the Cyclostome fishes is manifestly a matter of importance, if, as I believe, the known representatives of the group are to be regarded as retaining, on the whole, ancestral conditions of structure.

In Myxine and Petromyzon we find the N. acusticus divided into two very distinct rami, — the anterior and posterior or utricular and saccular rami, respectively, — whose peripheral distribution is strictly confined to the chamber to which it runs. This is not only true of the Cyclostomes, but, with very slight chahges, is true of all the Gnathostomata, and is consequently a fundamental fact whose full significance we are not yet in a position to fully appreciate.

According to Retzius, in the Hagfish {Myxine glutinosd) the auditory nerve arises from the brain, posterior to the origin of the V with two ganglion-bearing roots on either side. These ganglia are flattened bodies which lie close together, but are entirely separate structures. They give ofif several branches to the sense organs of the ear. From the larger, anterior ganglion two branches pass off to the crista ampullae anterioris and one


to the anterior end of the macula acustica communis. From the smaller, posterior ganglion there is given off an anterior branch to the middle of the macula acustica communis, a posterior branch to the region between the middle and posterior end of the macula acustica communis, as well as to the crista acustica ampullae posterioris. Both these branches are band-like and relatively small.

Of the nerve branches passing to the maculae, that of the anterior ramus appears to be equivalent to the ramus recessus utriculi, so that the anterior end of the macula communis would be equivalent to the macula acustica recessus utriculi. The anterior branch of the posterior ramus is the equivalent of the ramulus sacculi, and its posterior branch, the ramulus lagenae, so that the middle part of the macula communis equals the macula acustica sacculi, while its posterior end equals the papilla acustica lagenae.

From the figures of the auditory nerve published by Ketel (160, 1872) and Retzius (237, 1881), X\iQ smaller posterior ganglion sends off two long, slender, flat branches, of which the anterior bifurcates and ends in the anterior part of the posterior half, of the macula utriculo-sacculi. The posterior branch of the posterior ramus bifurcates ; the anterior branch turns inward and divides again and supplies the posterior portion of the posterior half of the macula utriculo-sacculi. The largest and most posterior branch runs direct to the posterior ampulla.

The nerves pierce the membranous cover of the ear by a row of holes running nearly in the long axis of the ear and below its middle. The following table gives in parallel columns the branches of the auditory nerve which I recognize in the Cyclostome ear and those given by Retzius. I maintain that a splitting of the trunk of a nerve supplying the auditory organs indicates the division of the sense organ supplied.

In Petromyzon the rami anterior and posterior of the auditory nerve pass directly from the auditory foramen to the ampullae, and as they approach the ampullar walls, they both divide into two branches each, which end in the cristas acusticae of the ampullae.

The posterior ramus gives off a branch near the place where it separates from the anterior ramus, and this branch supplies the lagenar organ. The ramus anterior sends many fibres to the utricular sense organ and to the organ in the recessus utriculi.

The so-called ramus accessorius acustici accompanies the VIII through the auditory foramen and is closely bound up with it. According to Johannes Miiller, the accessory branch is a part of the VII nerve, and from its distribution the facial nerve, as I find, supplies directly and independently two of the auditory sense organs and possibly also the ciliated epithelium, though there is no sufficient reason for doubting that the auditory proper may supply the ciliate epithelium in the parts of the ear to which it is distributed. It must not be forgotten, however, that the innervation of the ciliate epithelium has never been determined. It is usually stated that this unique lining of the Lamprey's auditory organ is innervated by the accessory nerve, and while I think this highly probable for the part of the ear within reach of this nerve, I believe the two branches of the auditory take part in the control of ciliate epithelium. This would call for motor fibres in the auditory nerve of Petromyzon, — not equivalent to musculo-motor nerves, perhaps, but none the less motor.

Ahlborn (1883, i), p. 269, says of the auditory roots inside of the brain : " Alle die Elemente, welche in der beschriebenen Weise mit einander den Gehomerven konstituiren, gelangen nun theils durch die obere theils durch die untere Wurzel aus dem Hirn, wie es in den einzelnen Fallen angegeben ist ; dennoch ist die Trennung der beiden Wurzeln im Innern des Gehirns keine principiclle, und gerade so wie die beiden Nervenkerne in einander iibergehen, so treten auch einzelne Faserstrange des unteren Kernes mit der oberen Wurzel aus dem Hirn, und umgekehrt solche des oberen Kernes mit der unteren Wurzel. Beide Wurzeln vereinigen sich wieder in Ganglion Nervi acustici, durch dessen Vermittlung sie endlich in das Gehororgan eingefuhrt werden."

Ahlborn (1884, i), p. 300, says of the acusticc-facial group in Petromyzon : " Die Acusticus-Facialis-Gruppe besitzt am Gehirn wie schon Wiedersheim zeigte drei iibereinander dorsale Wurzeln, von denen die beiden unteren [anterior and posterior auditory rami] etwas naher zusaramengeriickt sind und den Acusticus ausmachen, wahrend die obere Wurzel den Facialis bildet. Beide treten bekannter Weise in die Ohrkapsel ein, wo der Facialis das spinalartige Acusticus ganglion durchsetzt, um durch eine Oeffnung in der vorderen inneren Ecke der Kapsel auszutreten und das seitliche Horn des Ganglion Gasseri zu bilden, das er in lateraler Richtung wieder verlasst. Der Facialis steht mit dem Trigeminus so wie mit dera Vagus in enger peripherischer Verknupfung.*'

Ahlborn says of the spinal group of the cranial nerves (loc, cit p. 306) : " Alle peripherischen sensiblen Bahnen dieser Nerven mit dem centralen Ursprungsgebiete des Acusticus in direkter Oder indirekter Verbindung stehen, und das wir demnach in dem vordersten dorsalen Abschnitte der Medulla oblongata, welcher zur Seite der grossten Ausweitung der Fossa rhomboidalis liegt, das eigentliche Centrum aller dieser Nerven zu suchen haben." This central region of the spinal group of nerves is scarcely connected with the anterior region of the brain, and consequently, as Ahlborn states, this region must be pre-eminently one of reflex phenomena.

"Niemals wird es nach meiner ansicht, ohne willkiirlichen Zwang gelingen, diesen Hirntheil und was aus ihm hervorgeht auf ein einfaches Ruckenmarksschcma zuruckzufiihren, und man wird sich endlich cntschlisscn miissen, so unbequem es auch scin mag, von der Anwcndung des Beirscher Gesetzs auf die hicr in Frage kommender Nerven abzusehen.

"Man kann im Ursprugsgebeit der VIII-VII gruppe drei mehr oder weniger deutlich getrennte oder in einander iibergehende Nervenkcrne untcrscheiden, von denen der obere am mcisten gesondert erscheint und als Fascialiskerne zu bezcichnen ist, wahrend die beiden unteren weniger bestimmt abgegrenzt sind und die beiden Wurzeln des Gehornerven aus sich her\'or gchen lasscn."

With the Gnathostome condition there is in the simplest members of the group at our disposal for study already an increase from four to eight distinctly individual nerve branches.

134 A VERS. [Vol. VI.

The rami maculi and sacculi are further divided peripherally into numerous small branches, arranged in comate or pectinate order as the case may be.

This breaking up of these important nerve branches is in harmony with the growth of the sense organs to which they run. As Retzius has shown, the nerve branches to the maculae acusticae utriculi and sacculi are broken up into several or many branchlets almost as soon as they become distinct from the main trunk ; nevertheless, they are to be considered together as forming a single branch. Retzius has not mentioned, however, that in some of the lower forms (Elasmobranchs) the nerve continues its trunk out to the distal portion of the sense organ it supplies, and gives off a series of branchlets all the way along. This mode of branching is to be considered the primitive one, since it agrees with the method followed by the nerves supplying long canals on the surface of the body, and the form described by Retzius is doubtless a secondary modification of it.

The form I have just described is produced in ontogeny by the rapid division of the sense organ in a linear direction and the breaking up of the nerve to supply the individual sense organs, which have thus become separated by short intervals from each other. This method of nerve branching is, so far as essentials are concerned, found in both the large, compound sense organs of the ear, viz. the macula utriculi and the cochlear organ.

Taking the groups serially, we find many interesting variations, which are, however, relatively unimportant from the morphological standpoint.

The auditory nerve in this group of fishes has the usual two branches which pass to the canal complexus at its inner anterior and inner posterior ends. The first-named branch is the ramus utricularis, and supplies the anterior division of canal organs. It divides into two main branches, the anterior ampullar and the utricular nerves. The former divides into two portions, one of which supplies the anterior canal sense organ, while the other passes on to that of the external canal. The secondnamed branch passes to the utricular sense organ and divides into as many discrete branchlets as there are sense organs in the group. The posterior branch is the ramus saccularis, and supplies the macula acustica sacculi and gives off a branch to the posterior ampulla, which, by its division, has caused a division in the nerve, one twig of which supplies the crista acustica ampullae posterioris, and another of which passes to the crista acustica abortiva division. The saccular ramulus, by a second division, has given rise to a ramulus lagenae, which supplies the papilla acustica lagenx, the parent of the cochlear organ.

As regards the relation of the auditory nerve to the facial and glossopharyngeal, we know the following facts. According to Stannius (268, 1849), ^1^^ auditory nerve in Raja batis and clavata^ in Myliobatis aquila^ and in some few other forms, but by no means regularly among the Elasmobranchs, gives off a branch to the IX, which in turn sends a branch to the ampulla of the posterior canal.

In Spinax acanthias and Carcliarias glaucus the ramus dorsalis of the glossopharyngeal nerve proves to be a very interesting branch, which arises from the nerve during its transit through the cartilaginous wall of the ear capsule. After leaving the IX, the ramus dorsalis curves dorsad behind the posterior canal, runs along on the top of the skull, underneath the muscles, until it reaches the region of the porus acusticus, where it breaks up into cutaneous branches to the sense organs of the canal communicating with the porus acusticus. This branch is not present in Batoid forms.

Scarpa (250, 1800) found the auditory nerve to be composed of two parts, a portio mollis, which he thought was a branch of the V, the VIII of later investigators, and a portio dura, the IX of more recent workers. The first of these supplied the anterior and external ampullx and the anterior portion of the ear sac ; the second part supplied the posterior ampullar and occasionally the small otolithic sac, or what is now designated the sacculus. But this nerve always anastomosed with the anterior one before sending branches to the ear sense organs.

Weber (285, 1820) describes this anastomosis as made up of a branch of the nervus auditorius accessorius, which receives a small branch from the auditory proper and sends a relatively large one to the posterior ampulla.

Max Schultze (1858, 256) studied the anastomosis between the VIII and IX nerves, and concluded that there was certainly an interchange of fibres between the two nerves and not merely a contact of the two trunks.

As Allis (1889, 4) has shown (loc. cit p. 513), "the facial nerve is the first one of the cranial nerves that takes any part in supplying the regular organs of the lateral canals."

"The R. ophthalmicus superficialis facialis supplies all the organs of the supra-orbital canal, a separate branch being sent from the main nerve to each group of organs [italics mine]. This branch pierces the bony canal of the line immediately below the central organ of the group, and after entering the canal, sends a branch to each organ. This is the method of innervation in all the canals."

(P. 514.) "The R. buccalis facialis supplies the first thirteen organs of the infra-orbital line, and the R. oticus facialis the next three, making sixteen organs in all of this line supplied by the facial, or all those in front of the line of the opercular canal. The remaining organs of the infra-orbital line are innervated by the glossopharyngeal and vagus. This alone, or together with the branch to organ of supra-orbital, which leaves the main nerve close to it, probably represents the branch which, according to Wright (p. 513), supplies the organs of the transverse commissure in Mustelus. Wright is inclined to consider this most posterior of the dorsal twigs of the seventh in Mustelus as homologous with the ramus oticus in Ganoids and Teleosts."

" The sixteen infra-orbital organs supplied by the facial are separated by their innervation into four distinct groups. The . . . organs Nos. 14, 15, and 16 form the fourth group of the line, and vary somewhat in their method of innervation. Organs 15 and 16 are always supplied by branches of the R. oticus facialis. Organ 14 is sometimes supplied by a branch given off by the ramus oticus after it makes its exit on top of the cranium ; but oftener, in specimens examined, it was innervated by a branch which left the nerve close to its origin, or even from the facial ganglion itself, near the root of the oticus, but a little in front of it."

(P. 516.) "Organ 17 is supplied by the dorsal branch of the glossopharyngeal. This branch arises by a separate root. . . . On this root a separate ganglion is formed, . . . and from it the dorsal nerve mentioned by Wright arises."

(P. 517.) "The remaining organs of the infra-orbital canal and those of the supra-temporal cross-commissure, as well as the organs of the lateral line, are all supplied by branches arising from the ganglion formed on the root of the N. lineae lateralis or from that nerve itself. The root of the N. lineae lateralis receives its most anterior fibres at this age close to and a little above and behind the root of the N. acousticus."

"Piercing the membranes that separate the cranial cavity from the labyrinth, it runs directly backward, close to their outer surface and just above the posterior branch of the N. acusticus, in which there are numerous ganglion cells. It passes through the upper part of the main root of the glossopharyngeal, receiving there an important addition to its fibres, and, continuing backward immediately external to the origins of the anterior roots of the organs, it issues through the main foramen of that nerve."

In several instances the same nerve supplies sense organs which have had a divergent differentiation, as canal and pit organs.

The essential features of the innervation of the sense organs and their relation to the canals of the head region are clearly shown in Cut 25, which is reproduced from Fig. 49, PI. XLII, of Allis's paper. The sense organs 16 and 17 of the infra-orbital system are neighbors in the now continuous canal formed by the union of the facial and glossopharyngeal sections of the canal system, which, as a comparison of Figs. 23-28, PL XXXVII, with the views of heads given in previous plates of Allis's paper and with the figure here produced, very clearly show, have grown together from independent sources. These figures also illustrate the interlocking of the territories supplied by independent nerves unusually well, for by their aid we are enabled to follow step by step the approach and final overlapping of neighboring territories. For example, the canal systems of the VII and IX nerves, although beginning their growth at entirely separated centres, grow towards each other and finally unite, the two systems opening out upon the surface at the junction by a common pore. (See stages of this growth on PL XXXVII, and the adult condition as illustrated in Cut 25.) As shown in cut, although the canals fuse to a continuous channel and the sense organs are approached nearer to each other, the nerves and organs are as distinctly separated as though the surface structures were entirely independent. The two nerves supplying this region of the common canal are classed by morphologists as two distinct cranial nerves. As I have already stated, it is generally believed that these canal organs subserve a function akin to audition.

In the case of organs i6 and 17, their centrally distinct nerves run by separate paths and end peripherally in separate organs, having different pedigrees. The two organs, however, are inclosed in a common canal, which communicates with the surface by a single pore. Let us suppose these two organs with their incipient canals sunk below the surface of the head in a common depression, such as AUis describes for the organs themselves, early in development ; the thickened plate of ectoderm out of which they were forming would represent not only the sensory epithelium, but also the epithelial lining of the canals^ which would normally form were they to remain on the surface of the body. These canals would be represented by some growth after thus sinking below the surface. Thus, in the act of sinking, a common canal would arise, vesicular in shape, on account of the mechanical conditions of the deep involution. This common canal would open on the surface of the body by a pore, and this region of the canal, as the sense organs sank deeper into the head, would be drawn out into a tube. In thus going further below the surface of the head than usual, so far indeed that the connection with the surface canals would be broken, the sense organs would jiot lose their tendency to multiply as they normally multiplied on the surface of the body, and as they divided, their nerves would also be broken up into as many peripheral branchlets as there were sense organs. The increase in number of the organs, and especially their increase in functional importance, would lead to an alteration of the relation of the nerve branches supplying them. The two primary branches would become more and more independent of their parent trunks, the VII and IX, respectively, and would, on account of the compactness of the territory supplied by them, be drawn more and more together, until they apparently formed a single large nerve passing directly from the brain to the organ complex supplied by them.

This process would influence the central origin, but in much less degree. However, as functional differentiation progressed, there would be a greater and greater separation from the parental ganglionic centres of those cells receiving the now specialized fibres from the sense organs of this now highly modified canal complex. This same process occurs in the ontogeny of the auditory organ of the ElasmobrancJis as the nortnal one.

Thus we see that the conditions exist to-day in such forms as Teleosts and Ganoids, from which a second set of ear organs might readily be produced with a repetition of all the essential processes now occurring in the more ancestral Elasmobranchs, including the nerve supply, and the relative position of the organ with respect to the VII and IX nerves. Showing thus how it might again take place, aids us in comprehending how it has taken place in time past, and clears up many obscure points in the ontogenetic processes of existing Elasmobranchs, in so far as the auditory organ is concerned.

Goronowitsch found that both the dorsal branch of the VII and the anterior (dorsal) branch of the IX arose in common from the so-called dorso-lateral tract of Acipenser, which gives rise from its ventral portion to the auditory nerve, although a portion of its fibres arise from the posterior longitudinal. tract.

He says (p. 511, loc. cit.) : "Der Acusticus wird durch Fasem eines und desselben Charakters gebildet. Sie sind um etwas feiner als die Fasem des N. 1. lateralis und betrachtlich dicker als die Fasem der dorsalen Wurzel des Facialis und des Trigeminus II.'* The nuclear connection Goronowitsch describes

Cut 12. — The branches of the auditory nerve of Ostracion cornutus and their

distribution : tr.a.^ <./., ir.e.^ the nerves of the three ampullar sense orj^ans. iw j.,

the nerve supply of the sacculus. m.u.^ the nerve supply of the utriculus. r7., the ramulus }a^en;e.

as follows: "Eincn andercn Fascranthcil bckommt der Nerv aus der ZcUgruppc Az, wclchc vcntralwarts vom Facialis (Radix dorsalis) liegt/' though the bundle of fibres from this source is relatively a small one. There is a distinct cerebellar connection.

According to Dr. Kuhn, after the auditory nerve in Esox lucius leaves the medulla, it runs a short distance in company with the facial, and then divides into two branches, the utricular and saccular. It is the utricular side of the auditory trunk that goes out with the facial, and this branch supplies the macula utriculi cristas acusticae anterioris and externalis. The saccular branch fuses with the glossopharyngeal for a short distance, and, according to F. E. Schulze, there is an exchange of fibres between them. The saccular branch supplies the macula sacculi, the papilla lagenae, and the posterior canal organ crista acustica posterioris, with its offspring, the crista acustica abortiva.

According to Wright, loc. cit,y in Amiurus the dorsal branch of the facial arises in the tuberculum acusticum, from which also arises the anterior root of the IX.

The discrete external origin of the two branches of the VIII is most plainly seen in Teleosts, where the two roots are not infrequently separated by a considerable interspace. In Plagiostomes this matter of origin is much obscured, and, as above stated, the unified acoustic trunk may give off a branch to fuse with the glossopharyngeal nucleus. In some Cottids the nerve leaves the medulla by three branches, which have the following distribution in Coitus scorpius : —

\st root. This is the largest branch, and it issues from the medulla in close company with the motor root of the facial. It divides at once into several branches (three }) for the ampullae of the anterior and horizontal semicircular canals and the utriculus.

2d root. This branch is very short, and runs straight from the medulla to the utriculus, receiving on its way a branch from the third root.

3^ root. This is the saccular root, and almost immediately on leaving the medulla it gives off the anastomotic branch to the second root and then divides into two short branches, one of which supplies the sacculus, and the other ends in the crista of the posterior ampulla.

Stannius was in error in considering the third branch as forming a part of the (vestibular) utricular trunk of other forms.

His error was the one commonly accepted at the present time ; viz. that the three canals spring from the utriculus.

In studying the Cyprinoid brain, Mayser (1881, 191) found a very remarkable condition of things in the way of an intimate connection between the sense organ nerves and the auditory nerve. He says (Joe, cit, p. 310): " Beriicksichtigt man aber, dass die Nervcn \i.e, lateral line nerves] aus dem Tuberculum acusticum, also einem zweifellosen Acusticuskern kommen, dass ihre Wurzel der eigentlichen (vorderen) Acusticuswurzel histologisch durchaus ahnlich ist, dass nach Stannius' Untersuchungen bipolare Ganglienzellen in die Fasern eingeschoben sind, wie es Fritsch im Anschluss an M. Schultze fiir den Stamm des Acusticus angiebt, so hat man gewiss alles Recht, hier zunachst an ein accessorisches Gehororgan zu denken. Diese Vermuthung erhalt eine bedeutende Stiitzedurch den eigenthiimlichen histologischen Bau der Schleimkanale, von welchen Leydig sagt 'Schon eine einfache vergleichende Beobachtung zwischen eincm Bogcngang des Gehororgans mit seiner Ampulle und einer sogennantcn Schleimrohre muss die wesentlich ahnlichen Beziehungcn, die bcidc Organe mit einander gemein haben, anerkennen. Hier wie dort haben wir Rohren aus Bindegewebe bestehend mit zahlrcichen Gefassen, und die von mir entdeckten Nervenknopfchen entsprcchen Vollkommcn der Ausbreitung des Gehornervcn in der Ampulle/

" Endlich spricht fiir die Auffassung der Schleimkanale als Organe des Gchorsinns ihre Verbindung mit knochernen Rinnen und Kaniilen (am Schadel die ossa nasal ia, infraorbitalia und Supratcmporalia, Cuvier). Zwar ist Leydig der Ansicht, dieselben dicnten bloss als *Stutzen und Schutz * fiir die Nervenausbreitung, allcin man kann auch geltend machcn, dass sic beim Aufcnthalt im Wasser, also bei ausgcschlossener direkter Luftleitung die Schallleitung bcsser iibcrnehmen als z. B. die schr elastische Ledcrhaut. Ja, gerade diese Ansicht erklart wenigstcns einigcrmasscn ungczwungen die von Leydig wicdcrholt ausgcsprochene Bcmcrkung, dass man cs hier mit einem speciell fiir den Wasseraufenthalt berechneten Sinnesorgan zu thun habe."

Sofptit sprcchc uh die Ansicht auSy dass die Schleimkanale der Fischc nichts Anderes sind als ein wcit iibcr die Korproberfldche ausgcbreitttes accessorisches Gehororgan^ von dem ich gerade nicht behauplen will, doss es SchalUmpfindungen ztt verviitteln habe, dessert Funktion aber in den Bereich des zur Zeit nock unvollkommen erkannten Gekorsinns fallen wird." I think we may fairly conclude that Mayser was much nearer the full truth than he ever realized when he arrived at the conclusion above quoted.



Cul 13. — The nerve supply of the e«r of Pntepitrut aHruetem after Relziui. {r.a., nerve of the anterior ampullar lense organ, (r.p., nerve of the posterior ampullar sense organ, cr.e., nerve of the external ampullar sense organ, r./., ramulua lagenx. tnj., nerve to the macula sacculi. n.u., nerve supply of the macula utriculi.

Relying on the nerve supply, we find in Protopterus a condition of the macula neglecta with reference to its nerve supply which indicates that the whole of the sense organ originally budded off from the parent posterior canal organ has not left the parental home, so that the well-defined nerve ramulus neglectus is split about the middle of its course, one half passing to the separate in. ab. and the other apparently to the cr. post., and there can be no doubt that the branchlet supplies a portion of the macula abortiva which has remained near the parent organ group to form a part of it. In many fishes the macula abortiva is divided into two very distinct sense organs, which receive each its own nerve supply ; the macula abortiva is thus seen to be not merely a single sense organ, but a pair, the product of a bipartition. The primary macula neglecta does not always carry away from the parent posterior canal organ sufficient energy to enable it to multiply.

The auditory nerve may be traced, according to Villy, in the larval Rana temporaria, long before the medulla is closed, from the neural ridge to the flat plate of thickened epithelial cells that later on is formed into the auditory vesicle.

In Tadpoles 1 1 mm, in length the auditory vesicle is completed, and the VIII nerve passing from the brain ends in contact with nearly the whole inner face of the vesicle, in the form of a ganglionic swelling. During this time " the auditory nerve is absolutely continuous with the facial nerve."

Cut 14. — The branchei ol the auditory nerve and Iheir distribution in Ampkiuma mtans, after Retiiu!. fr.o,, the nerve lupply of the anterior ampullar organ, cr.p., the nerve supply of the posterior ampullar organ, crj., the nerve supply of the externa] ampnllai orgatii. I, 2, 3, the three trunks of the audilury nerve external tu the brain. mjib,, the nerve lupply of the abortive ampullar sense organ. tJ., the ramulu* Ugenx of the posterior branch, mj., the nerve supply of the macula sacculi. fi.u., the nerve supply of the macula utricuU. r.n., the anterior branch of the auditory nerve.

Strong {1890, 274) has stated (p. 600) : "The facial of the Amphibia is divisible into two parts, very different from each other: A ventral part which persists in the higher vertebrates and corresponds, in part at least, to the facial of Mammalia; and a dorsal part representing in Chorophilus and Tadpoles the diminished remnant of a nerve, or group of ner\'es, which are much more important in the Urodela and remaining Ichthyopsida."

The dorsal branch of the VII, as defined by Strong, is given off immediately above the auditory; it soon divides into two branches, both of which are sensory. This branch of the VII is largest in Urodela and disappears entirely in the adult Rana and Bufo. It will thus be seen that the facial may arise (apparent origin) dorsal or ventral to the VIII.

(P. 606.) "That the large sensory root of the facial, dorsal to the auditory (dorsal VII), together with the anterior root of the glossopharyngeal^ form a distinct group by themselves, differentiated from the others by their internal origin and by the characters of their fibres, and belonging distinctly to the organs of the lateral canals.^ It is possible that the auditory may have some relation to this system of nerves.**

The so-called anterior root of the IX, according to Strong, usually arises some distance cephalad of the other roots, and also much more dorsally ; its fibres are apparently all sensory, and its deep origin is not determined definitely, though its fibres go through the nuclei of the IX and X. " It is to be regarded as the lateral nerve, and, in respect to the origin of its fibres, their character and distribution, it agrees with the dorsal VII.'*

Strong concludes: "It is obvious that the connection of the dorsal VII with the lateral sense organs affords an explanation of its disappearance in adult Anura.**

In Cryptobranchus, according to Osborn (Joe, cit. p. 65, and PI. V, Fig. 21), "the glossopharyngeus arises from four sources : I. The fasciculus communis. 2. The large sensory nucleus. 3. A nucleus of doubtful motor cells. 4. A motor nucleus in the floor of the fourth ventricle. In Fig. 21 are shown the two nuclei belonging to the auditory nerve. Cne of these, the pale nucleus, lies dorsad and anterior to the other, which is placed more ventrally and internally, and is in close relation with the anterior glossopharyngeal nucleus.**

Our author says {loc. cit. p. 66) : " It is seen that whatever may prove to be the peripheral distribution of the fibres of the fasciculus communis and posterior longitudinal fasciculus, whether to the 7th or 8th, two facts remain : first, that the 8th arises ventral to the 7th, although a purely sensory nerve ; second, it is inserted in the centre of the facial-trigeminal system^ with no apparent homology in the arrangement of its nuclei to either." As regards the branching of the nerves on the utriculus and sacculus in the lower Amphibia, e.g, Proteus, it takes place much the same as has been described for Elasmobranchs, except that the group of branchlets supplying the sacculus leave the acoustic nerve as a trunk, almost immediately divide into two, and then each branch breaks up into a bundle of branchlets. Among the Anura, however, there appears a new branchlet from the cochlear nerve, which supplies the now discrete pars basilaris, the nerve having been split off from the lagenar branch in connection with the budding off of the pars basilaris.

^ See Recapitulation B.


ramului papilbe rve supply of the

—The detail* of the nerre wpply ii (T.f., er.e., the nerve branches of the i leipectively., nerve lo the crista aciutica abortiva bMiluis. nt.t., Ihc nerve supply of the macula tacculi. m.i macula atricalL

Among the Rcptilia and Aves we notice a greater complication of the sense organ called pars basilaris, indeed of the whole cochlea, which involves the increase in size and the modification of the distribution of its nerve.

Here we begin to observe that fateful distortion of the ear chambers which has perhaps more than anything else retarded our progress in the knowledge of the significance of the parts of the ear and their actual relations to each other. The great development of the cochlea drags the posterior half downwards, backwards, and outwards in such a way as to give one the impression that the ear is divided primatively into superior and inferior portions. The division into anterior and posterior portions, which I have shown above to exist in the Cyclostomes and Elasmobranchs, obtains also in the Reptiles and Birds.

Among the higher Reptilia and the Birds the cochlear nerve has become the largest branch. The branchlet to the crista abortiva in the Reptiles has grown noticeably smaller in connection with the regressive development of this sense organ, while among Birds the organ and its nerve are still further reduced.

The auditory ganglion, after the separation has taken place between it and the facial ganglion, divides, as Hoffmann states {loc, cit, p. 2015), "in zwei Theile, einen vorderen und einen kinteren [italics mine], Der vordere Theil entlasst in der Gegend, wo der Facialisstamm abgeht, den Ramus anterior, s. vestibularis, der sich in drei Aeste theilt : i) in einen Ast fiir die sagittale oder vordere Ampulle, der Ramus ampullae anterioris ;

2) in einen Ast fiir die horizontale oder aussere Ampulle, der Ramulus ampullae extemae, und 3) in einen Ast fiir den Recessus utriculi, den Ramulus recessus utriculi. Der hintere Theil des Ganglion acustici riickt innerhalb des knorpeligen Labyrinths und bildet dort das sogenannte Ganglion cochleare. Von demselben entspringen : i) ein Zweig, welcher sich nach dem Sacculus begiebt, der Ramus sacculi ; 2) ein sehr starker Ast, der Ramus cochlearis, der nach der Cochlea geht und sich in einen Ramulus basilaris und in einen Ramulus lagenae theilt ;

3) ein Ast fiir die hintere oder frontale Ampulle, der Ramulus

Cut 16, — The right internal ear of the European Adder (^Tropidonotus na/Hx), seen from the inside. Figure after Dr. Kuhn. This ear shows very distinctly the division into anterior and posterior chambers, especially in the arrangement of its sense organs.

a Anterior ampulla.

ca Anterior canal.

cA External canal.

c> Posterior canal.

a Ductus endolymphaticus.

/ Lagena.

ma Macula acustica neglecta of Retzius.

ms Macula acustica sacculi.

m' Crista acustica ampullarum.

/ Ampulla posterior.

/3 Pars basilaris cochlea auct.

M Utriculus.

ampullae frontalis, der den Ramulus neglectus abgibt fur die Macula acustica neglecta an den Sinus utriculi posterior. Ausser dem finde ich noch, dass von der dorsalen Wand des Ganglion cochleare ein sehr diinnes Zweigchen abgeht, welches sich, wie mir schien, nach der Wand des innerhalb des knorpeligen Labyrinths verlaufenden Theiles des Ductus endolymphaticus begiebt, spater abortirt dasselbe wieder."

Kuhn's account of the innervation in adult Reptiles (Turtles and Ophidia) agrees with the later embryological evidence given by Hoffmann (cf. 172, 1882).

Retzius has called attention to the fact that Breschet (loc. cit. p. 89) had long ago (1833) correctly described the innervation of the parts of the human ear. Of late years, however, anatomists have neglected Breschet's investigations and adopted the erroneous statement that the three ampullae of the semicircular canals are supplied by the vestibular {i.e, utricular) branch of the auditory nerve. Retzius was led to renewed investigations on this point by finding that all other vertebrates than the Mammalia, although agreeing among themselves as to the innervation of the parts of the internal ear, differed in this one thing from the mammals. The results of his studies form another contribution toward the demonstration of the intimate genetic relationship of all vertebrates above Amphioxus.

As we have just shown, the Ganoids, Dipnoids, Telcosts, Amphibia, and all the Reptilia and Birds agree in essential particulars with the Elasmobranchs ; and many forms from the larger groups, and several from each of the smaller groups, have been accurately studied in this respect. The relations of the parts in man and the Mammalia had long been in a confused state. We now know, thanks to the painstaking and skilful investigations of Retzius, that man forms no exception to the general law governing the development of the ear in other animals, and that he has no parts not represented in Elasmobranchs in some condition. The distinctive features of the human car as a type of the mammalian class is the great differentiation of the cochlear region with the consequent distortion and more complete separation of the parts of the canal complex. It is with regret that one finds these misleading errors diligently perpetuated in our text-books of science. In revising the chapters on the nervous system for the fifth edition of his text-book of Physiology, Foster has retained the erroneous account of the innervation of the auditory organ, on which he bases certain conclusions with reference to the functions of parts of the ear which are entirely untenable, owing to the false anatomical premises. He says {loc, cit, p. 957) : "When we come to study the ear we shall find that one division of the auditory nerve is distributed to the cochlea alone^ and is called the nervus cochlearis, the rest of the nerve being distributed to the utricle saccule and semicircular canals as the nervus vestibularis [italics mine]. As we shall see, there are reasons for thinking that the vestibular nerve carries up to the brain from the semicircular canals impulses other than those, or besides those, which give rise to the sensations of sound, whereas (he continues) the cochlear nerve appears to be exclusively concerned in hearing ; and in some structural details these two divisions of the auditory nerve differ from each other. Hence it is important to note that according to careful investigations the cochlear nerve is the continuation of the dorsal root, and the vestibular nerve the continuation of the ventral root.

The latter statement is correct when the previous error is corrected, for that the cochlear nerve supplies the cochlea^ the sacculuSy and X.\\ft posterior ampulla in the human subject is a fact beyond dispute, and since physiologists lay such weight of speculation on the nerve relations, it is desirable that the anatomical basis should be as exact as possible.

In his account of a 16 mm. sheep embryo, Boettcher, in his extensive monograph (31, 1869), p. 15, says: "Untersucht man die mehr nach vorn gelegenen Querschnitte so findet man noch eine zweite betrachtliche Gruppe von Ganglienzellen ((?'), welche durch ein starkes Btindel Nervenfasern mit dem Nachhirn in Verbindung stehen (Fig. 9, N), Dieses Ganglion liegt dem mittlern Theil der Labyrinthblase an und befindet sich, wie bemerkt, vor dem Ganglion cochleare. Dasselbe gehort unzweifelhaft, wie spater genauer erortert werden soil, zum grossen Theil dem Nervus vestibuli an ; inwieweit der facialis mit seiner ganglionalen Anschwellung dabei betheiligt ist, lasst sich in diesem Entwicklungsstadium nicht scharf entscheiden ; es scheint, dass eine Abgrenzung beider um diese Zeit iiberhaupt nicht moglich ist."

In an embryo 2.0 cm. long Boettcher found the following condition of the nerve apparatus (loc, cit.) : " Ausserdem bilden sie eine continuirliche Reihe, welche mit der Hauptmasse des Ganglion cochleare zusammenhangt. Dieses findet sich weiter nach vorn an der Spitze des Schneckenkanals angehauft und tritt auch hier hart an denselben heran. Diese Hauptmasse des Ganglions steht, wie weiter nach vorn f allenden Querschnitte lehren, ohne scharfe Grenze in Zusammenhang mit einer andern Nervenzellengruppe, welche, dem mittlern Theil der Ohrblase anliegend, den grossten Theil des Raumes zwischen dieser und dem Him ausfiillt und letzterem nach oben zu Fasem zusendet.

'* Diese nervosen Bestandtheile gehoren zum Theil dem Fascialis, zum Theil dem N. Acusticus an ; eine scharfe Scheidung der einzelnen Faserbiindel sowie der ihnen zugehorigen Ganglien tritt erst spater ein.**

The acoustic nerve is composed of loosely bound nerve bundles, which may be separated in the nerve trunk (and do farther on actually separate) into two branches, the ramus anterior and ramus posterior. The first lies in front and above and runs beside, and later outside of and below the facial, passing outwards, forwards, and upwards to enter the utricular chamber through the so-called macula cribrosa superior.

The ramus posterior passes outwards, backwards, and downwards, and divides into two main portions, (a) ramulus cochlearis and (p) ramulus sacculi, which gives off the elongated ramulus ampullae postcrioris.

There is not the slightest trace of a ramulus maculae neglectae, though there is an anastomotic branch given off from the ramulus ampullae postcrioris to the ramus anterioris^ a condition of things of frequent occurrence in vertebrates. If the macula neglecta did occur, it would in all probability be found on the floor of the posterior ampulla. It is needless to say that the ramulus cochlearis forms the greater portion of the posterior branch. The number of discrete divisions of the ramulus basilaris has reached in the human ear at least 100 to 125.

In a short paper on the histology of the medulla, KoUiker has recently (163, 1891) called attention to the relation of the sensory nerves to the brain first established by His. He says (loc, cit.) : " Alle scnsiblen und centripetal leitenden Elemcnte des X, IX, VII, und V Nerven, sowie des Acusticus entspringen nicht im Gchim, viclmehr sind die Ansammlungen grauer Substanz, die man bisher als Kerne dicscr Nerven bctrachtete, Endstationcn dcrselbcn, die ich schon in einer friihcren Arbeit mit His als Endkerne bezeichnete. Die wirklichen Urspriinge dieser Nerven liegen wie His zuerst nachwies, in den Ganglien derselben, ausserhalb des Gehirns (Ganglion jugulare und petrosum, Ganglion nervi Cochleare et vestibuli, Ganglion geniculi, G. Gasseri)." This constitutes another important proof of the great similarity existing between the auditory organ and the other sensory structures of the surface of the head supplied by the nerves mentioned above, and proves conclusively that so far as innervation is concerned they all belong in the same category.

Before entering into a tabulation of the central relations of the branches of the auditory nerve and the relations of the roots outside of the brain proximal of the superficial ganglia, let us examine some of the features of the development as given by His, Jr. {loc. cit p. 5): "Die Ganglienanlage besteht also in diesem Stadium der Entwickelung [3^—4 weeks] aus einem ausserlich ungegliederten Complexe von Zellen, in welchem aber bereits mehrere Abtheilungen sich deutlich erkennen lassen :

" I. Die mediale Abtheilung, mit der lateralen Acusticus Wurzel und den in ihr aufsteigenden Zellen.

' 2. Die laterale Abtheilung, mit der medialen V^urzel. " 3. Die ventrale Abtheilung, in Verbindung mit dem Nervous facialis.

" Peripher von dieser Ganglienanlage ist ein Stamm des Acusticus nicht zu erkennen ; dieselbe liegt vielmehr der vorderen Wand der Gehorblase (mit Ausnahme des Aquaeductus vestibuli) auf das Engste an ; nirgend ist eific Mesodcnnsc/iic/it zwischen beide Gebilde eingelagcrt [italics mine].

" Es gehen nun aus dieser vorderen Wand a lie diejenigen Tlieile des Labyrintkes hervory welche spdter Nervenendstellen erhalten^ und es erhellt daraus, dass alle diese Theile zu einer gewissen Zeit zum Ganglion in directer Beziehung stehen. Ausgenommen ist allein die Ampulle des hint ere n Bogengafiges : diese er/idlt Hire Innervation erst se/ir viel spdter [italics mine]. Obwohl ich meine Aufmerksamkeit auf diesen Punkt richtete, ist es mir nicht gelungen bei Embryonen unter 6 Wochen einen Ast zur hinteren Ampulle aufzufinden. Mit dieser einzigen Ausnahme ist aber durch die beschriebene Anordnung die Ausbreitung der Nerven auf die verschiedenen Theile des Labyrinthes in voraus bestimmt.'*


In Man


VIII nerve

' Leaves the brain from the groove between the pons and restiform body as two cords containing between them from one to several small ^ nerves, the portio intermedia Wrisbergii.

Ramus Anterior




Portio Intermedia, Wrisbergii, N. VIII.

Ramus Postcriur,




VENTRAL, anterior, median, superior.








The nucleus of this nerve lies medial from the corpus restiforme; its fibres ascend to the cerebellum (Bechterew) ; in part it runs into the lateral nucleus Gegenbaur. It is connected with the nL of Deiters, and the gang, geniculi (portio inteimedia). It passes into the brain along the ventral face of the corpora restiformia, reaches further dorsad and caudad than the dorsal root. The portio intermedia passes out of the brain a little in front of the ventral root : it arises in the accessory nucleus.

This root passes to the median side of the restiform body, between it and the ascending root of V, and so reaches the lateral ^ (division of the) nucleus among the large cells of which most of its fibres end : the others are continued on to the cerebellum along with the fibres of the restiform body; possibly these fibres run into cells of the nucleus before passing on to the cerebellum.

The portio intermedia is a sensory facial branch homodynamous with the utricular branch, and both belong to the VII.

The nucleus of this ner\'e lies laterad from the corpus restiforme. None of these fibres have direct connections with the cerebellum. Most of the fibres end in the nucleus inferior (f.^. accessorius) which is connected with the trapezoid body (Bechterew). This nl. is intimately connected with the nl. of the IX.

As it enters the brain it winds round to the dorsal surface of the corpora restiformia, reaches further ventrad and cephalad than the ventral root. The major portion of the dorsal root ends in the accessory' nucleus and in the nuclear mass just dorsad of it (tul)erculum acusticum), from whence it cur\'es around the corpora restiformia and ends partly in the median nucleus after causing the iXxxx acusticx. The connection with the median nucleus is an association relation.

The anterior nucleus overlaps that of the VII.

The posterior nucleus overlaps that of the IX.

The saccular nerve is a branch of the gloiso phar>'ngeus.

Thix in the dorsal nucleus of Eilinger. ' ThU in the ventral nuclcuB of Kdinser.

According to HofTmann and Rauber, the anterior portion of the nucleus of the IX nerve, i,e, the very anterior end of the glossopharyngeus nucleus, is regarded by Duval and others as the nucleus of origin of the chorda tympani and of the portio intermedia Wrisbergii of the auditory nerve; however, the mass of evidence seems to favor the view of a closer connection with the anterior root and the facial than with the posterior root and the glossopharyngeal.

C. Sense Organs

Development in Amia according to Allis.

Development in Elasmobranchs in connection with the ear organ. Development in bony Fishes. Development in Amphibia. Development in the Sauropsida and Mammalia.

Views previously held of the function of these sense organs and of their relation to the ear, both analogical and homological.

The Development of the Sense Organs in Amia,

A knowledge of the development of the lateral line sense organs (e.g. as it has been worked out in Ganoids) enables us to understand the development of the internal ear, and is absolutely essential to such understanding. I give the account of the development of these superficial organs in Amia in Allis's own words. He says {/oc. cit. p. 523 et seg.) : "The inclosing of the lateral canals and the formation of the ninety-three normal primary pores and tubes is essentially a simple and regular process, but in most parts of the head marked abbreviations take place, which greatly obscure it. Where the process is regularly and fully carried out^ the canals arise in separate sectionSy each of which contains a single sense organ^ and hence corresponds to the part between two primary tubes in the developed canal [italics mine].

"In young Amia, in which the canals have not yet begun to develop, the organs of the lateral system, still below the surface, appear as whitish spots, with indistinct outlines, strung along more or less continuous whitish lines. These lines mark general and extensive surface depressions. After a developing canal organ has reached the surface at the bottom of one of these depressions^ it begins to sink^ carrying with it the surrounding tissueSy thus forming a small pity at the bottom of which the organ lies [italics mine]. A series of changes now begin, which, on an exaggerated scale, are a repetition of those which lead to the division of a pore. Lips grow upward and inward front the edges of the pit ^ and, meeting above the organ, fonn a short section of canaly the openings of which are iticlincd to the general surface, and give to the canal a tunnel-like appearance, A narrow shallow channel, pigmented like the rest of the outer surface, has meantime formed between the organs along the bottom of the general depression. It is deepest near the newly formed section of canal ; and into it the canal opens, the sides of the openings passing gradually into the walls of the channel. The limits of the canal are clearly defined by a sharp change in direction of the bottom of the channel, the canal leading inward at something of an angle, the walls of the canals and pits always being much lighter in color than the outer surface. The openings of these short sections of canal may be called half pores, because, with a few exceptions, all tlie primary pores in the developed system are fonned by the fusion of two of them [italics mine]. After its formation the short canal increases in length by the continued coalescing of the edges of the channel immediately beyond it, and the two half pores are pushed apart along the line of the canal tozuard other pores, which are in a similar way approaching them from adjoining sections. This process in Amia is continued until the pores meet and unite, thus forming a continuous canal with a primary pore and tube between every two consecutive organs ; but it may be arrested, in which case an interrupted canal will be formed. At each end of a continuous canal formed in this manner it is evident there must b(*a pore, which, if it cannot unite with a pore of some other line to form a double system, must always remain a half-pore or terminal opening.

"These two processes are continuous and essentially similar; for even in the adult, two pores if forced together from want of space, fuse."

The little that is known of the development of the canals and their organs in the bony fishes agrees essentially with this account of their development, but we have no such complete history of canal development among other ichthyopsoid types.

Let us now turn to the embryology of the vertebrate auditory organs and examine the facts which have been accumulating for many years, contributed from many different sources. Some of the conclusions now accepted will doubtless change in time but the majority of the facts of the development of this complexus have been so often studied and the results of the earlier observers so often confirmed that as regards the mode of development there can be little question. It will be noticed, I think, in the accounts which I shall give of the ontogeny of the ear in the various types, and which I shall endeavor to make as complete as possible, that there is a remarkable absence of any attempt to account for the phylogeny of the vertebrate ear with the facts derived either from ontogeny alone or from comparative anatomy and development combined.

The ontological history of the lateral line organs of Sharks and Skates is up to the present but partially recorded, and the subject is one demanding thorough investigation, both from its intrinsic interest and the very great importance of its relation to the morphology and physiology of sense organs in general. I have not the necessary material for a complete history, and shall attempt here only a brief sketch of some of the important stages of the development of the lateral line organs of the head, in so far as they have a direct bearing upon the question of ear production and an anatomical connection with the specialized canal complex known as the internal ear. The early stages of these organs have been studied by many investigators, notably Balfour, Beard, Mitrophanow, and Semper. The later stages have been almost completely neglected. As is well known, the auditory thickening, soon converted into a cup or pit (PL I, Fig. 6, Cuts 17, 18, 19), appears long before the other parts of the lateral line system are established, but as it sinks below the surface it retains its connection with the surface of the body by means of a canal, the endolymphatic duct of later stages. This canal opens out into a groove on the surface of the head which is lined by a peculiar and characteristic epithelium. Owing to the concomitant growth of the head and the closure of the auditory groove, the first of which is the main cause, while the latter is mainly a result of the transposition of the ear complex already well below the surface of the head and surrounded by a semi-fluid mesodermic tissue, the ear hole, or orificium ductus endolymphatici, travels forward, the epithelium of the groove increasing to an extent sufficient to maintain the anatomical connection of the sunken ear with the sensory epithelium on the surface of the body, which later events prove to have only been partly used up in the formation of the ear. A glance at Figs. 15, 16, PI. I, and Fig. 4, PL IX, will show how beautifully and completely this connection is kept through the vicissitudes of the ontogenetic changes.

When the lateral line organs have made their appearance, the auditory grooves communicate with their line at points equidistant from the median line on either side of the head. The preservation of the anatomical continuity of the internal ear with the surface organs of the lateral line system is sufficient evidence to establish the thesis on my title page were no other evidence forthcoming. This structural continuity is broken later on in most Elasmobranch species, though it persists in a few forms throughout adult life. In the young Torpedo (PI. I, Fig. 16) the relation of the end of the auditory groove to the aural sense organ canal is still plainly visible. The groove ends between two sense organs and marks the place from which the original sense organ of the ear migrated.

Development of the Organs of the Lateral Line in Ichthy aphis

according to the Brothers Sarasin,

The first traces of the lateral line organs appear very early in development. They are first indicated by a thickening of the epidermis in more or less circular patches, which thickening is due to a lengthening of the epithelial cells of both layers, but most noticeably of the outer layer. The apex of the organ sinks inward, while at the same time the cells of the lower layer grow longer in a narrow circle which surrounds the central depression, thereby making its walls higher and the pit deeper. One or more of the cells of the outer layer which lie in the centre of the depression grow larger and rapidly assume the form of the adult sense cells. They soon occupy the entire thickness of the epithelial layer from the bottom of the pit to the basement membrane. The Sarasin brothers believed that all other sensory cells of an organ were produced by the division of a single cell, the ** Sinnesurzelle."

The epidermal cells of the second layer, which lie immediately underneath the sense cells, are shoved to one side and begin to lengthen, sending a prolongation upwards around and among the sense cells ; when fully developed, they form the long staves or supporting cells of the completed organ.

They recognize three forms of this kind of sense organ, which they designate as

1. Sinnesurzelle = Stiftchenzelle.

2. Becherorgan.

3. Geschmacksknospe.

In this account of the surface sense organs of Ichthyophis, the Sarasin brothers (1890, 248) describe a second kind of organ found by them, which they call an " Accessory ear " or " Flaskshaped " sense organ. The body of such a sense organ is more or less flask-shaped with a central lumen which has to a greater or less degree the shape of the organ. Within this cavity freely suspended, perhaps supported on the ends of the sensory hairs, is a club-shaped, highly refractive body, which is largest at its inner end and gradually tapers outward, ending just at the level of the surface of the skin, never projecting beyond it. This body the authors call the "keulenformiger Korper," and suppose it to be composed of a homogeneous and coagulable secretion.

The walls of the organ are divisible into two very distinct parts, an upper and outer or communicating tubular portion, and an inner or basal sensory portion. The walls of the former are composed of ordinary epithelial cells, while the latter is composed of the thickened sensory epithelium — some of the cells of which are hair bearing. These sense cells are probably derived from a division and aggregation of primitively isolated nerve end cells (Sinnesurzellen), which by the development of surrounding and supporting cells produces the taste bud or associated sense organ.

The innermost layer of cells is composed of pear-shaped sense cells, each of which bears a distinct, stiff, refractive hair which runs to the surface of the club-shaped mass and inserts in it. Consequently the club rests upon the points of the hairs of the sensory cells. A boundary between hair and sense cells the Sarasin brothers were unable to find.

The ganglion below the sense organ develops only after the larva enters the water. The function of these organs is doubtless that of hearing. The little club which rests on the hairs they designate the auditory club. The organ itself is the accessory ear of the Ichthyophis larva.

In this organ we have represented all the essential parts of the canal organ, leaving out of consideration the canal itself ; but as I have already shown, the only unusual structure, or the auditory club, present in the organ is without doubt an artifact, produced by the transforming action of the reagents used in preserving the larvae.

Ley dig (1850, 179) was probably the first author to connect in thought the surface canals (knowing their structure) with those of the ear. In this paper he calls attention to the similarity of the so-called mucous canals with the ampullae of the ear, but later he was inclined to consider the lateral line organs as tactile organs possessing a function unlike all others, and which he suggested might be a sixth special sense.

The idea advanced by F. E. Schulze (254) in 1861, that the lateral line organs were probably affected by the water waves of longer wave lengths, and also by the movements of masses of water, had the advantage of being specific ; and to-day the mass of evidence sustains his view.

Derciivi (1879, 71) considered the sense organs of the lateral line so similar to the maculae of the ears, that he applied the term maculae laterales to the former, and instituted a comparison of parts between car and lateral canals more detailed than had previously been attempted.

Emery first described the cupula terminalis in the lateral canals of Fierasfer, and compared these structures with those of the ear.

Maysers views I have already partly given. The posterior root of the VIII together with the recurrens superior form the nervus lateralis. The second branch of the V supplying the

Nervenhugcr* is given off from the VIII. Mayser concludes that while it will be impossible to state definitely that these organs transmit sound waves, yet their function undoubtedly falls within the province of the auditory sense still so incompletely known.

Bodenstein^ (1882) went further and compared the lateral canals with the membranous canals of the ear ; the endolymph he found represented by the fluid in the lateral canal ; the bony canal was present as the denser investment of the lateral canal ; and he concludes that the lateral canal system is probably an ontogenetically later appearing repetition of the auditory organ !

1 Zeitschr, fUr wiss. ZooL XXXVII, 1882.

Wright (293, 1884) has described the sense organs of the Catfish (Amiurus) with histological detail, and he concludes that they are organs for the perception of wave motion.

Fritsch (93*, 1889) found an astonishing agreement between the structure of the sense organs of the lateral line and those of the ear, and found the hairs of the former of considerable length, but failed to find a cupula, although he thought one probably existed.

The Sarasin brothers thought to have found three sorts of sense organs which form a graded series of auditory organs from the simplest condition up to the stage represented by the vertebrate ear, on the surface of the body, and in the head of the larval Ichthyophis gltitinosus. They classified them as

1. Naked Nerve Hillocks.

2. Accessory Ears or Nebenohren.

3. The Ear.

They recall the fact that all the lower forms possessing the lateral line organs lack the cochlea ; but as they lose the lateral line organs, the cochlea grows more and more in size, becoming ultimately the most important section of the ear.

The " Seitensinnorgane,'* as described by Krause (1885, 169), have much in common with taste buds, but must be separated from them for the present. They are dermal nerve end organs composed of elongated epithelial cells, and are found in AviphioxiiSy Tel costs, and aquatic Urodela and Anuran larvae. Among these forms they occur abundantly. They are placed on the head, follow the course of the rami laterales n. vagus over the trunk, and probably on to the tail. These have received very numerous significations. Merkel (1880, 295) separates them from taste buds or terminal buds (Endknospen), which likewise occur on the bodies of fishes ; they are, nevertheless, tactile organs. I cannot enter here upon the tracing of these organs among the phylogenetically older fish species.

The simplest of these organs are probably tactile organs, but fishes do not "feel" with their bodies, endeavoring merely to prevent any contact with bodies denser than water. F. E. Schulze designated them organs for the perception of wave motion (Wellensinnesorgane). But waves do not occur in the deep waters, and the resistance of the water is apprehended by the muscle sense. Considering their extreme likeness to taste buds, it is most probable that they serve to give notice of chemical and physical changes in the surrounding water (Krause, 1875). Fishes are very sensitive to lack of oxygen in water, die readily from such cause, and seek to avoid such water, but they probably possess little sensibility to alkaline water.

From the foregoing statements it is evident that the similarity of many structural details between surface organs and subdermal ear organs has been recognized by many writers, and the functions of the two sets of organs been connected analogically, but no one has yet claimed, much less produced, the proof that these structures are genetically related in the very intimate manner I have shown them to be. The importance of these facts for the unravelling of the tangled skein of ear development can hardly be overestimated.

F. E. Schulze (1870) says, p. 63: "Ausdem ebenen oderleicht concavcn Gipfclfeldc cincr solchen, wesentlich aus cylindrischen Epithelzcllcn bestehendcn hiigeligen Hauterhebung, in welche von untcn her ein Nerv eintritt, sah ich eine Anzahl feiner starrer Haarc rcchtwinklig zur Oberflache parallel ins Wasser hinausragcn, sehr ahnlich den auf der Crista acustica der Ampullcn gefundenen, nur bedeutend kiirzer als jene. Dicsc starrcn Harchen liessen sich mit einer geringen conischen Verbreitung in gcwissc helle den Hiigcl selbst durchsetzendc, andcrerseits aber mit den aufsteigenden Nervenfasem in Verbindung stehcnde Ziige vcrfolgen, so dass auf einen direkten Zusammenhang der Haare mit den Nervenfasem geschlossen werden durfte. Ferner beschrieb ich eine zarte hclle Rohre, welche von dem obercn, die haartragende Flache des Hu*;cls umgrenzendcn Randsaum entspringt, das Haarbundcl umschliesst und dasselbc mehrmals an Lange iiberragend, an dcm aiisseren Ende offcn und quer abgcstutzt, rcchtwinklig zur Oberflache des Thiers frci ins Wasser hinaussteht.'*

The sensory cells were about o.or mm. long, while the hairs they bore measured, in the " Kaulbarsch," from 0.012 to 0.014 mm. long. Schulze followed the nerves as fine non-mcduUated fibres up into the cells and considered the hair to be continuous with the nerve.

(P. 84.) " So wenig nun auch daran gedacht werden kann, die Seitenorgane als wahre Horapparate anzuschcn, nicht allein deshalb weil Fische wie Amphibien schon ein entwickeltes, durchaus nach demselben Typus wie bei den Wirbelthieren gebautes Gehororgan besitzen, sondern besonders deshalb, weil sich immerhin noch erhebliche Unterschiede in den Bauverhaltnissen zwischen beiden Organsystemm finden — so werden wir doch von einer Vergleichung mit den Gehorsinneseinrichtungen unter Beriicksichtigung der bestehenden Unterschiede ausgehen miissen. Der wesentlichste Unterschied besteht aber meiner Ansicht nach darin, dass die Nervenendhaare der Seitenorgane nicht wie die Horhaare in eine allseitig eingeschlossene Flussigkeit, wie es die Endolympha ist, sondern frei in das dussere Wasser hineinragen und, was mir besonders wichtig erscheint, weit kiirzer und etwas derber sind als jene, welche bekanntlich in eine lange, ausserst feine Spitze auslaufen. Wie nun die Horhaare durch gewisse Bewegungen des Mediums, in dem sie sich befinden, der Endolympha, namlich durch die Schallwellen in Mitbewegung versetzt eine Nervenerregung veranlassen, welche zum Gehirn fortgeleitet dort zur Sinnesempfindung des Horens fuhrt — so werden auch die Sinneshaare der Seitenorgane sicherlich durch gewisse Bewegungen der Flussigkeit, in welche sie hineinragen, namlich des dusseren WasserSy in Mitbewegung versetzt die Erregung der zuf iihrenden Nervenfasern und mittelst dieser eine Sinneswahrnehmung herbeirufen"; and he concluded that these sense organs perceived only the motion of masses of water and the heavier, longer, water waves, i.e, those which would not suffice to give rise to sensations of sound. This conclusion was reached on the basis of the shorter and stiffer hair, which he claims to have found regularly on the external organs. In the ampullae of the ear the greater length and delicacy of the hairs would permit of a greater delicacy of perception.

Fritsch (1887, 93**), in describing the lateral line organs of Malopterurus, says of the sense organs which he discovered in the lateral canals (p. 48) : " Ein hochst bemerkenswerther Punkt, der mir, wenn auch gelegentlich angedeutet, doch nicht geniigend hervorgehoben scheint, ist die erstaunliche Aehnliclikeit des histologischen Banes der Endhiigel mit demjenigen der Maculae acusticce im Gehororgan der Fische

"Vergleicht man die ebenso griindlich ausgefiihrten, wie prachtig illustrirten Arbeiten von Hrn. Gustav Retzius uber den Gegenstand, so ist man fast in Verlegenheit, wesentliche Unterschiede namhaft zu machen, wenigstens gilt dies fiir den hier behandelten Fisch." On p. 49, our author continues : "Ein Moment, wodurch die Endhiigel des Zitterwelses den Maculae acusticae noch besonders ahnlich werden, ist die starke Ausbildung der haarformigen Verlangerung auf den Sinneszellen, welche hier eine betrachtliche Lange erreichen, wahrend sie bei anderen Fischen gewohnlich nur die Gestalt kiirzerer Borsten zeigen soUen. Der auch sonst beschriebene breite, basale Ansatz des Haares auf der Zelle kommt hier gleichfalls zur Beobachtung."

" Zur VervoUstandigung des Bildes wiirde es dienen wenn die Sinneshaare bedeckt gefunden waren mit einer sogenannten Cupula; eine solche ist aber mit Rucksicht auf die Conservirung ohne Anwcndung von Osmium nicht wohl zu erwarten [italics mine]. Was die Auffassung dieser merkwiirdigen, die Sinneshaare wie eine strcifige Kappe bedeckenden Formation anlangt, so schliesse ich mich ganz an Hrn. Retzius an, welcher das Zustandekommen der auffallenden Bilder im Praparat durch die unter Osmiumeinwirkung erfolgende Gerinnung einer schon bei Lebzeiten zwischen den Haaren befindlichen, fein gestreiften Substanz erklart. Danach ist also nur die Form unter welcher sie in den Praparaten erscheint, durch die Behandlung hervorgerufcnes Kunstproduct, und es ist durchaus wahrscheinlich, dass durch ahnliche Methoden der Conservirung, wie sie zur DarstcUung der Cupula in Anwendung kamen, auch an den Seitcnorganen des Zitterwelses eine solche Umhiillung der Sinneshaare sichtbar zu machen ware."

This investigator studied Savi's vesicles, and writes of them, p. 83:

" Nach Durchbohrung des Polsters [the basal plate of Savi's vesicle, which is homologous with the floor of the ampullar organ] pflegt der Ncrv in drci Theile zu zerfallen, von denen der mittelste der starkste ist, die bciden anderen aber ausnahmslos in der Langsrichtung der ganzen Blaschenschnur angeordnct gefunden werden," and each nerve bundle ends in a well-formed sense organ. Fritsch characterizes this condition further by saying that ** jedes der drei Aestchen eine Art Sohle ausbildet " ; and ** Eine vollstandig ausgestattete Blase hat also drei Sinnesinseln, an deren Grenzen mit den Nerven auch die Sohle sofort verschwindet, das Epithel aber einen ganz abgeplatteten, Endothelartigen Charakter annimmt so dass es auf der fibrosen Blaschenwand im Durchschnitt nur als ein schmaler Saum erscheint.

' Die langen haarformigen Anhange der Sinneszellen sind sehr verganglich und lassen sich nur am frischen Praparat . . . erkennen."

" Zu den mancherlei Analogien, die sich zwischen den in Rede stehenden Organen und Theilen des Gehors finden, kommt als weiteres Moment hinzu, dass die Haaranhange der Zellen sich bei beiden Anlagen leicht in der langsrichtung spalten, wie es besonders Hr. Retzius von den Haaren der Horzellen genau beschreibt und abbildet."

" Dabei findet jedenfalls auch ein Durchtritt von Secret sowie von lymphoiden Zellen zwischen den Elementen des Sinnesepithels statt ; dasselbe zeigt sich von jener eigenthiimlichen Kappe bedeckt, welche von den Autoren die Bezeichnung * Cupula terminalis ' erhielt. Sie wurde in den SAvfschen Blaschen, wie es scheint, vollig iibersehen, obwohl sie gerade hier besonders kraftig entwickelt ist und schone Gelegenheit bietet, die Art ihres Aufbaues zu studiren."

Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung sprechen durchaus dafiir, dass die Cupula ein Secret der Stiitzzellen unter Betheiligung durchtretender lymphoider Elemente, die sich zuruckbilden oder auflosen, darstellt. Eine ahnliche Ansicht hat auch bereits, wie mir spater bekannt wurde, Hr. Solger ausgesprochen und in neuster Zeit sind die Hrrn. Sarasin in ihren schonen Untersuchungen iiber ceylonische Blindwuhlen in Betreff der Cupula auf den Seitenorganen zu derselben Ueberzeugung gelangt, welche auch von Hrn.^Fr. Eilhard Schulze vertreten wird.**

"Es entspricht dieser Vorstellung, dass die eigenthiimliche, im frischen Zustande glasshelle Kappe in verschiedener Hohe iiber dem Epithel erheblich abweichende Bildung erkennen lasst. In dem Bereich der Sinneshaare, wo das Secret zugleich das frischeste sein muss, tragt es einen mehr diinnfliissigen Charakter, so dass die einzelnen Haare in cylindrischen Hohlraumen der Cupula frei spielen konnen, und die ganze Kappe von unten betrachtet ein wabiges Ansehen darbietet. Die iiber den Stiitzzellen aufsteigenden Secretmassen gewinnen also erst in einigem Abstand eine zahere Beschafifenheit und geben der Masse von der Seite betrachtet das bekannte streifige Aussehn."

Selbstverstandlich wird die Cupula durch die vorgenommene Behandlung der Objecte beeinflusst, aber ebenso sicher ist es auch, dass man aus dem bestimmten, der Umgebung angepassten Verhalten dieses so verbreiteten Aufsatzstuckes auf den Sinneshiigeln schliessen muss, die Natur liefere dafiir schon eine Grundlage, welche gewiss nicht ohne Bedeutung fur die Function ist." Our author was not able to find the cupula in the lateral canals, if we except a single instance when he observed " nur ein unregelmassiges, faseriges Gerinnsel," and he accounts for this condition by assuming that the cupula secretion is too thin to stick to the sense organ. It is important to note, however, that he did find the hairs much longer in the sense organs of the lateral canal than in the other structures, where he found the cupulae well developed.

If, as he assumes, in harmony with the rest of the cupula defenders, this is a secretion of compound nature poured out between the hairs and surrounding them with a jelly-like sheath, it is fair to ask what becomes of the older portions of the cupula as additions are made to its base. For it is evident that this secretion must go on continuously if secretory cells, as holders of this view claim, are present among the sensory cell group. It would be necessary to assume a constant resorption of such mucoid secretion. Now, while there is no question that some mucus is present in all cases (all in which exact analyses have yet been made), there is no evidence to show that in a state of nature it exists as a dome-shaped mass covering the sense organ. On the other hand, it is clearly proven that the most typical cupulae yet studied are products of the action of reagents, and that so far as fibrous structures in the channels occupied by sense organs (whether ear organs or those of the lateral line system) are concerned, they have in every thoroughly studied case shown themselves to be hairs more or less unchanged. Fritsch concludes by explaining that the free access of water to the lateral canals would wash out the mucoid cupula which, in the case of the vesicles of Savi and of the ear, would be retained.

The special form of sense organs, known under the name of Savi*s vesicles, have a peculiar interest for us at this time, since they are without doubt descendants of the canal organs. Fritsch has traced their development sufficiently to give us assurance that they are transformed from the canal type during ontogeny.

Fritsch describes the processes of growth which determine whether the canal line which, in the majority of Batoid forms, occupies the place, and has the other anatomical relations, of the line of Savi's vesicles in the Torpedinidae is to grow into Savi's vesicles or to remain a canal line. He says, "Verschmelzen die dunnwandigen,aberfestenbindegewebigen Haute, welche den Lymphraum begrenzen, da miteinander, wo sie zwischen den Sinneshiigeln an einander stossen, in vorwiegend sagittaler Richtung, so werden Canale daraus, Verschmelzen sie allzeitig an den Grenzen der Ausbuchtungen fiir die Sinneshiigel, so werden aus diesen SAvi'sche Blasen."

As to the identity of position in the two groups of Batoids, he observes, " Wie die Reihen der SAVi'schen Blasen von der Ventralseite vorn an der Schnauzenkante zur Dorsalseite tret en, so treten an gleicher Stelle die ventralen Kopfcanale der gemeinen Rochen in die Riickencanale iiber.'* Our author mentions transitional stages between the open canal and the closed vesicular organs, and after stating that in histological characters the two sets of organs likewise agree, concludes that " Aus alien diesen Vergleichungen ergiebt sich, dass die SAVi'schen Blaschen abgerundete und ganzlich abgeschlossene Stlicke haiitiger Kopfcanale anderer Rochen darstellcn," and that we need no longer be surprised that the Torpedoes possess a system of organs which is lacking in all other Batoids, but which is represented in these forms by the more primitive canal type.

The special interest which Savi*s vesicles have for us at this time is due to the fact that they constitute a second closed system of organs derived from the wide-spread, open canal type, and which in this respect have advanced along the same line of differentiation as the auditory organs, and must be subject to the same conditions as the ear hairs in the reception of sound waves, he adds (p. 133): **Die unter verschiedenen Namen, wie Seitenkanalsystem, SAVi'sche Blaschen, und LoRENZiNi'sche Ampullen, bezeichneten Canale unter der Haut der Torpedineen stellen verschiedene Glieder eines in der Uranlagef einheitlichen Systems mit specieller Anpassung an die Function im Sinne der Arbeitstheilung dar. Von diesen Gliedem sind das Seitencanalsystem und die SAVi'sche Blaschen mit Sinnesepithelien ausgestattet, die LoRENZiNi'schen Ampullen nicht : vielmehr dienen letztere secretorischen Functionen." And he concludes, on p. 92 : *' Ich schliesse mich daher in vollster Ueberzeugung denjenigen Forschern an, welche die Meinung vertreten, dass die Uebereinstimmung des ganzen Aufbaus der Seitenorgane mit Gehororgancn auch zur Annahme einer wenigstens ahnlichen Function bcrechtigt, d. h. dass die Nervenhiigel bestimmt sind durch das Medium fortgeleitete Schwingungcn wahrzunchmen, wic unter Anderen auch von Fr. Eilhard Schulze angenommen wordcn ist. Die Entgegnung, dass die Fische ja so schon Gehororgane bcsitzen und daher anderer, verwandter Sinnesorgane nicht bediirften, vermoge ihrer giinstigen Lage Schwingungen, die noch nicht als Ton wahrgenommen werden, Oder sclbst einfache Erschiitterungen des Mediums rait grosser Scharfe crfasst werden konnten, wahrend die eigentlichcn Ohren noch nicht oder wenigstens nicht in gleicher Weise darauf reagirten."

The physiological process takes place in the epithelium of the sensory organs of the lateral line organs of fishes, according to Dercum (1879, 71), loc, cit, pp. 152-154, in this manner: "The true detailed action of these organs is probably as follows : Let us suppose any disturbing cause to set up in the water a wave of long period. It impinges, first, on the membranous interspaces or drum heads before spoken of, and with the greatest intensity, of course, on those which are most nearly placed at right angles to its direction. The wave is thus communicated to the liquid in the canals, which transmits it to the adjacent masses of jellylike mucus covering the disks. The quivering of these little masses probably excites and intensifies vibrations of the hairs of the perceptive cells. The fish probably judges of the direction of the disturbing cause by the portion of the apparatus most strongly excited. The membranous spaces or drum heads, when the apparatus is well developed, are so arranged as to favor the perception of vibrations from almost all directions.** In view of the structural resemblance of the sensory disks to the macular acusticx, he calls them macula) laterales.^

^ Sec Recapitulatiun C.

D. Embryological

An account of the successive stages in the early development of the internal ear in the following vertebrate types : —

1. Pisces. Petromyzon, Galeus, Acipenser, Salmo.

2. Amphibia. Rana.

3. Reptilia. Lacerta, Tropidonotus.

4. Aves. Gallus.

5. Mammalia. Lepus, Ovis, Bos, Sus, Felis, Homo.

The Ontogeny of the Ear in the Several Classes of Vertebrates,

Valentine (1839, 279) first described the formation of the semicircular canals of the vertebrate ear. He states that they form by the growth of blind pockets of the utriculus, in a semicircular manner, out from the parent cavity, through the tissue of the head, until they come again in contact with the utricular wall, when they break through the walls at the point of contact, and by a fusion of the edges of the parts thus brought together establish communication by the curved channels between the two ends of the utriculus. This outgrowth of the tubular processes was followed by a wave of reduction of the bore of the canals, which stopped short of the end of the canals and thus left enlargements, the ampullae, which, of course, represented the original size of the canals. According to Valentine, the posterior canal was first to form, the anterior following it. Our author did not observe the formation of the external canal.

Rathke (1839, 223), from his studies on the Adder {Tropidonotus natrix), could not trace the development of the semicircular canals as Valentine had described it ; but found that each canal was formed independently by the closing over of the edges of a groove formed in the wall of the utriculus. The edges of the grooves or folds united first near the middle of the length of the groove and grew each way toward the ends of the utriculus. It is at the point of contact that the separation of the canal from the utriculus first takes place by the resorption of the tissue composing the fused folds. The canals grow rapidly in extent after separation begins. Three years later his results were confirmed by Gunther (1842, 107) for mammals, and by Bischoff (1842) for birds.


Vogt (1842^) agrees with neither Valentine nor Rathke, but was not certain that he had rightly interpreted the processes of canal production. He thought they were produced by the growth of the cartilaginous capsule forcing in the walls of the auditory vesicle until the folds thus formed met and produced the canals. He did not observe the development of the sensory epithelial structures.

Reissner (1851, 228) and Rosenberg (1868, 242) agreed in all essential particulars with Rathke. Their observations were made on mammals.

Boettcher (1869, 31) was the first accurately to describe the origin of the two vertical canals in mammals from a common furrow.

Goette (1875^ described the development of the Amphibian ear in his studies on Bombinater. And his account of the development of the semicircular canals shows that they developed in the same manner as in mammals according to Boettcher's account.

Von Noorden (1883, 205) devotes much care to working out the transformations of the auditory vesicle in bony fishes, and by means of direct observations on the transparent living embryo, by means of sections, and also by means of models reconstructed from serial sections, he was able to give us the most accurate as well as the most detailed account of the morphological changes which the ear undergoes in development, that we have of the Teleosts. His observations were made upon eight species, including the European trout, salmon, and herring.

Riidinger (1888, 244) returned to the old theory of Valentine. This he somewhat modified. He says {loc, cit.) :

" I. Die Bogengange entstehen durch epitheliale Knospung Oder Sprossung aus der Ohrblase.

"2. Fur jeden einzelnen Bogengang treten zwei Sprossen auf.

" 3. Die Vereinigung der beiden Sprossen kommt zu Stande durch die Grossenunterschiede der Zellen materials an der convexen und concaven Seite eines Bogengangs.** Riidinger claims to have found the canals in their first stages of growth as blind pockets leading out of the utriculus.

His (1889, 137) describes the formation of the canals in the

Embryohgie dez Saimones. Neuchatel. Entwicklungi^eschichtt der Unke. Leipzig.

1 68 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

human embryo in a manner entirely in harmony with Rathke's account.

Villy (1890, 281) described the development of the frog ear, and devoted especial attention to the early stages of the formation of the canals and the division of the sense organs.

Krause (1890, 169**) criticises Riidinger's observations, and proves that Riidinger had mistaken the ductus endolymphaticus in his sections for the external canal. Krause has thoroughly worked out the history of the ear canals, and he is the first to recognize that, in the Mammalia, the ampullae are marked out before the canals are formed. They are formed, as I can state, as sense-organ pockets. He, however, does not recognize the significance of his discovery in its bearing upon the phylogeny of the ear sense organs.

During this time the study of the adult anatomy of the internal ear was making great progress. Our knowledge in this department was very incomplete until about the year 1865, which, though only an approximate date, may serve to mark the beginning of the more recent movement in the study of the vertebrate ear which has culminated in that magnificent outcome of the united labors of many of the keenest scientific minds of the last quarter of the century, brought together, critically revised and combined with a very large number of original observations, remarkable for their accuracy and completeness of detail, — entitled Z?^.r Gehororgan der Wirbelthiere by Gustav Retzius.

Development of the Ear in Cyclostomes,

The developing auditory vesicle of Petromyzon fluviatilis presents many interesting characters which have been only recently made known to us by Kupffer in his beautiful study of this form. The capsule invaginates from the ectoderm as one of a series of invaginations occurring along the side of the head in connection with the formation of the cranial ganglia of the lateral group. The Trigeminus invaginations are most conspicuous, and give one the impression that we have to deal with the formation of similar structures. Kupffer calls attention to this resemblance, but does not conclude that these are strictly homologous. He says (loc, cit, p. 522): "Das Verhalten der Epidermis zu dem massiven Ganglion [/>. the ganglion


of the Trigeminus nerve] ist in Zeitpunkte der Abschnurung beider Gebilde ganz iibereinstimmendy These invaginations are connected by a ridge of thickened epithelial cells. I regard this as proof of the strict homology of the ear sense organs with the sense organs belonging to the Trigeminus and Vagus groups of nerves. Soon after the invagination, the internal ear of Petromyzon presents a round appearance, and by the sixth day has assumed a somewhat hemispherical shape. With a dorsomedian portion of the auditory flask one of the branches of the dorsal root of the auditory nerve has come in contact. Later on there appears a fissure in the part of the wall of the auditory vesicle, and the auditory nerve makes its way into its future internal territory of distribution.

In Shipley's (1887, 261) paper on the development of Petromyzon, he describes the growth of two thickenings of the epithelial wall which arise from the anterior and posterior inner angles (if one may speak of these portions of the curved walls as angles) of the auditory vesicle. The formation of the canals is a later phenomenon, and they are first marked off, as Scott has found, by the outgrowth of two folds from the outer and inner walls of the vesicle which grow toward each other. The inner process is situated higher up and just external to the recessus labyrinthi. In the next stage the two processes are in contact, artd then coalesce, dividing the vesicle by means of an oblique partition into two chambers. In the middle of the dorsal wall the partition is incomplete, and here the two chambers communicate.

Kupffer found in the larvae of Petromyzon Planeri (Ammocoetes) that irf its earliest stage the auditory involution is represented by "eine etwas unregelmassige Einsenkung der Epidermis, deren Zellen hier etwas verlangert sind und durch den Vorgang, der sich voUzieht, eine Aenderung ihrer Gestalt erfahren. Dadurch wird der eingesenkte Abschnitt etwas dicker, als die nachste Umgebung.

" Ventralwarts hiervon erscheint eine neue Epidermisleiste, die sich durch Verlangerung der Zellen und mitotische Figuren bemerklich macht.

Die Nervenanlage besteht aus einer Reihe dicht an einander gelagerten Zellen, die aus der Decke des Hinterhims hervorgeht und ein freies Ende hat, denn die letzte konisch gestaltete Zelle liegt frei zwischen der Seitenwand des Hirns und dem Boden der Labyrinthgrube. Am Ursprunge der Reihe sieht man die erste Zelle eingeklemmt zwischen den Cylinderzellen der Hirndeckes. Hier kann gar kein Zweifel iiber den Ursprung dieser Bildung bestehen, dieselbe wachst aus der dorsalen Region des Hirns hervor und stellt die Anlage des Acusticofacialis dar."

Later on the pit assumes hemispherical shape and " die dorsale Wurzel hat sich gespalten, der eine Zweig verbindet sich intim mit der dorsalen Wand der Horgrube, der andere Zweig umgreift die Grube an ihrer medialen Seite, verbindet sich einerseits mit den dorsalen Kantenzellen des Mesoderm, und zieht dann weiter zu einer Zellengruppe (Ganglion), die ventral von der Horgrube gelegen ist, und sich an die Epidermisleiste anlehnt, deren Entstehung sich bereits fruher ankiindigte."

Kupffer found the relations of the acustico-facial complex more complicated than those of the V. The auditory cup in involution presses against the brain wall, and the auditory nerve divides into two branches, an anterior and a posterior one. Kupffer does not recognize the formation of a nerve to the endolymphatic duct or describe it as the facial accessory nerve.

Kupffer found a great similarity between the ganglia of the V and X and auditory involution of the VH.

When the auditory involution assumes an oval form its- long axis is nearly vertical, and the ventral wall is composed of much larger cells than the rest of it, and it is open at the top, and into this wedge-shaped cleft the fibres of the auditory nerve make their way to end in small oval bodies in contact with the inner wall of the vesicle. This nerve is the equivalent of the r. duct, endolymphatici, for the acustico-facial ganglion supplies the rest. Our author says further {loc. cit, p. 523) : " Jedenfalls ergeben diese Thatsachen, dass die Verbindung der Nervenfibrillen mit der Gehorblase sich nicht in der Weise vollzieht, dass das Fibrillenbiindel, welches die Anlage des Acusticus darstellt, sich mit den ausseren Basen der die Wand der Gehorblase bildenden Epithelzellen in Verbindung setzt, sondern diese Zellen weichen an der Verbindungsstelle aus einander und schaffen so einen Kanal fur ein tieferes eindringen der Elemente der Wurzel bis zur Hohle selbst.*'

Kupffer was certain that not all of the fibres of the dorsal root went to the gap in the auditory vesicle, but that some of them went on by to connect with the facial ganglion, from which other nerves were given off. This facial ganglion, owing to its intimate relation to the wall of the ear vesicle and the constitution of the wall in this part, ** gestatten den Schluss, das mindestens dieser Theil des Facialisganglions in derselben Weise aus der epithelialen Wand der Horblase entsteht, wie andere Ganglien aus der Epidermis."

The posterior wall of the auditory sac lies in a vertical plane with the second gill pocket and above a ridge of epithelium which separates the two. " In dieser Region tritt ganz symmetrisch eine stark ausgepragte Epithelleiste hervor, die medialwarts einspringt, auf ihrer oberen Flache die Gehorblase tragt und mit der unteren Flache die dorsale Wand der Kiementasche beriihrt. Hart vor der Tasche entsendet die Leiste eine einfache Zellenreihe zwischen Epidermis und Mesoderm ventralwarts. . . . Diese Verhaltnisse sind nicht anders zu denten, als dass es sich hierbei um die Anlage eines Nerven der Vagusgruppe handelt. Ob diese Anlage jetzt bereits Verbindung mit dem Fascials oder dem Vagusganglion hat und wie diese Verbindung sich vollzieht, kann ich nicht mit Sicherheit entscheiden. Es scheint aber als wenn dass vordere Ende der Leiste von Zellen tangirt wiirde, die zu dem sichelformigen Belag der Unteren Wand der Gehorblase gehoren und die ich zum Facialisganglion rechne."

Kupffer recognizes differences between the ganglionic Anlage of the V and that of the VII, VIII, but concludes that they are nevertheless essentially the same.

The auditory sac remains single layered after complete separation from epidermis and the wedge-shaped split in its top closes, and develops in its place the endolymphatic duct (reces. labyrinthi)^ and in its neighborhood the nerve fibres end in the cells of the wall.

" Als Acusticus kann nach dem Mitgetheilten in vorliegender Entwicklungsperiode nur das Biindel von Fibrillen aufgefasst werden, welches die dorsale Region des Hirns mit der eben bczeichneten Stelle der Gehorblase verbindet und dabei muss noch besonders hervorgehoben werden, dass cine als Acusticusganglion aufzufassende Zellengruppe znr Zcit nicht existirt'* ; and, so far as it is known, never does develop in the course of this bundle of fibres, which supplies only the dorsal part of the sac and the sense organ developed there, i.e. the two sense organs which have been described in a previous chapter as occupying places in one of the endolymphatic ducts and in the commissure of the semicircular canals.

" Unter Beriicksichtigung dieser Umstande glaube ich annehmen zu diirfen, dass auch dem Facialisganglion ein spinaler und ein lateraler Antheil zukommen.

" Aber die Bildung des letzteren lasst sich von der Gehorblase nicht trennen, beide entstehen durch einen einheitlich zusammenhangenden Process, der in seiner Gesammtheit der Bildung der iibrigen lateralen Ganglien zu vergleichen ist. Ich glaube, es lasst sich die Auflassung nicht abweisen, dass das Gehorblaschen in die Kategorie dieser Ganglien gehort. Dann wiirde dem Acusticus die Bedeutung einer spinalen Ganglienwurzel zukommen." From what has been said above it follows that the lower nervous structure connected with the auditory sac furnishes the material for the auditory nerve so-called — that is, all except the accessorius ; and this view I am inclined to believe is the true one.

From our present knowledge of the development of the ear of Petromyzon as a typical representative of the Cyclostomous vertebrates, we may conclude that the sensory Anlage which lies in the auditory vesicle remains a unit until after the ear is well inclosed. It then buds off from both anterior and posterior ends a sense organ, which at once proceeds in the work of producing two ampuUiferous canals. We know from the adult anatomy that the canals are completely distinct in both Petromyzon and Myxine.

The remaining portion of the sense organ Anlage is incompletely separated into two parts, but it is uncertain whether this separation had taken place before the canal organs of the anterior and posterior ampullae were budded off. These two sense organs which remain in the utriculo-sacculus are the maculae acusticae utriculi et sacculi, respectively. The division of the parent sense organ leads to a partial division of the common chamber or canal, which is effected by the ingrowth of a median raphe dividing the auditory vesicle into utriculus and sacculus. There are some considerations which I have presented in connection with the discussion of the nerve supply that point strongly to the conclusion that the sense organ at the time of invagination was a double one derived from two sources.

Later on, without, however, dividing completely, these two portions of the sensory apparatus give off each a bud which remains in structural continuity with the parent organ, but which comes to lie in a pocket formed by the pushing out of the anterior median and posterior median portions, respectively, of the utriculo-saccular cavity. These two buds are the sense organs of the recessus utriculi and lagenar pocket, and in this condition the Petromyzon ear remains throughout life, so far as these sense organs are concerned. The nerve supply to these sense organs is derived from the two branches, the ramus anterior or utriculi and the ramus posterior or sacculi. These nerves seek two widely separated brain centres, the ramus utriculi running forwards and the ramus sacculi backwards, for their central connections.

The commissural chamber is of course only a portion of the semicircular canals. Seen from above, the canals run obliquely from the middle of the inner edge of the vesicle to its outer comers, with but very slight curvature. In what manner and at what time the sense organ makes its appearance here is totally unknown, and there is urgent need of information on the ontogeny of this organ and its nerve.

The Development of the Ear in Elasmobranchs,

Balfour (1876, 1 5) was the first author who began investigations on the ear of the Elasmobranch type, but his observations are very few in number and do not extend over any but the earliest stages of ontogeny. He closes his remarks on the embryology of the ear by observing (loc. cit, p. 188) that "with reference to the development of the organ of hearing, I have very little to say. Opposite the interval between the seventh and glossopharyngeal nerves, the external epiblast becomes thickened and eventually involuted as a vesicle which remains, however, in communication with the exterior by a narrow duct. Towards the close of stage K, the auditory sac presents three protuberances, one pointing forwards, a second backwards, and a third outwards. These are respectively the rudiments of the anterior and posterior vertical and external horizontal semicircular canals. These rudiments are readily visible from the exterior."

His two figures are taken from embryos rendered transparent and sketched through the tissues from the side.

Mitrophanow (1S90, 196), who has worked upon the lateral line system of Elasmobranch fishes, has recently announced that the auditory saucers and the sense organs of the lateral line system in the auditory region of the head have a common origin from a thickened band of epithelium, which begins in the spinal suture and takes in on both sides of the body the regions supplied by the VII + VIII and the IX + X nerves from where it descends to the gill region. First of all, the ear saucer separates from the sensory band which is thus cut in two parts, an anterior belonging to the VII, and a posterior lying in the territory of the IX, This separation is indicative of an earlier condition of independence, which has been obliterated by the shortening and modifying in other ways of the ontogenetic processes. This investigator observed epithelial ridges similar to those described by Kupffer in Petromyzon in the territory of the V, but he concluded that they were not related to the canal organs of the Cul ij. — The head of an embryo atJult

nat"Vi^'i^t^ ^'"^mei' 1^" '^^^ ^^^ history of the develop, figure shows ihe saucer-shaped de- ""cnt of the Elasmobranch auditory prcssion containing the insinking capsUle does not differ materially from that of other forms except in the rate of growth. In this respect it is a much more favorable object for the study of the development of the internal ear than any other vertebrate with which I am acquainted. Cut 17 shows the auditory area of the skin after it has assumed the saucer shape, this condition of the organ following on the preliminary thickening of the ectoderm and its sinking to the bottom of the saucer-like depression. The whole process of the formation of this cup is an exact repetition of the formation of a canal organ, and its canal as seen in Amia, or of the formation of an ampulla and its canal in the Salmon. As the saucer sinks below the surface, the opening on the surface grows smaller, the bottom of the saucer increases in size, and the resulting structure is an auditory vesicle distinctly flask-shaped. The neck of the flask grows longer, and finally appears bent backwards and inwards by the increase in size and length of the head region which carries the auditory capsule forward and outwards. During this lengthening of the neck of the flask, which is the endolymphatic duct of the adult ear, the body of the flask is much changed in shape. First of all it becomes compressed laterally, then it is drawn out in an anteroposterior direction, and concomitant with this elongation the anterior part points outward and the posterior part inward towards the median line. There may now be seen several changes in the shape of the vesicle, which, while not conspicuous, are very important, since they usher in a succession of transformations which ultimately produce the three semicircular canals and the rudiments of the cochlea. These changes are visible on the outer and upper faces of the vesicle as slight ridge-like elevations of the surface, and on the posterior ventral end of the vesicle as a knob-like prominence. Of the former there are two, of the latter a single one. The former structures seen from the inner face of the vesicle are merely depressed grooves in the wall of the vesicle, and the latter a sunken but broadly open pit. These grooves and pit grow deeper, the lips of the grooves come closer together, and finally in contact along the middle part of their course the edges of the pit are drawn closer together, narrowing its mouth. The lips of the grooves finally come in contact, fuse, and the grooves are converted into canals, opening into the auditory vesicle at each end. The auditory vesicle has become indistinctly divided into two parts by the formation of a constriction which arises somewhat obliquely off from both of the vesicles, and marks an anterior and a posterior chamber of the vesicle. From the lower part or sacculus the outgrowing pit or rudimentary cochlea has now become a deep pocket or blind canal, one side of which grows faster than the other, causing it to curve on its own axis. The canals which empty into the upper part of the vesicle or the utriculus are more distinctly marked oflf from the vesicle, and each presents at both its ends an enlargement, one of which contains a nerve end organ or a portion of the auditory sense apparatus. This is the so-called ampulla.

The other enlargement is non-nervous, and is the pseudoampulla, or, as I shall designate it, the Ama, With the formation of the three canals, their ampullae and amae, the cochlear canal and the more sharply defined separation of the utriculus

Cut /5. — The head of the embryo Smooth Dogfish (^Galeus cam's), seen from the left side. Figure drawn from nature, magnified about 20 times. The flask-shaped auditory vesicle is shown prominently placed above the gill region. Letters as in the preceding figure.

a.v Auditory flask.

Cut rg. — The head of an older Shark of the same species, viewed from the left side. The figure, which was drawn from the living fish, shows the internal ear well advanced in its development. The rudiments of the semicircular canals and lagena are seen pushing out from the auditory sac (respectively the utriculo-sacculus, which has sunk far below the surface, with which it is, however, still connected by its sickle-shaped ductus endolymphaticus).

a.v Auditory vesicle. c Anterior canal. d Ductus endolymphaticus. e Eye. / Fore-brain. ck External canal.

cp Posterior canal.

/ Lagena.

m Mid-brain.

k Hind-brain.

n Nose.

u Umbilical cord.

from the sacculus, the Shark ear assumes the conditions and proportions which characterize it in the adult. The ductus endolymphaticus retains its connection with the exterior throughout life, and places the internal ear in communication with the sea-water. In many forms of Elasmobranchs the ear contains scarcely any crystals, and not unfrequently sand grains are found within the ear. The sea-water undoubtedly plays a considerable part in removing the otoliths that are found in all species, by dissolving them.

The mechanical forces active in the modelling of the ear are for the most part the inherited tendencies of cell growth acquired as legacy from the canal organs of the surface of the body. The other forces are the pressures due to enlargement of ear and the concomitant reduction of space in which it has come to lie, the growth of the nerves into the ear, and the

Cut 20, — Diagram to illustrate the relations of sense organs of the ear when the ear vesicle is spread upon the surface of the head.

establishment of the vascular supply. The cochlear tube begins as a straight evagination, and curves soon after it comes in contact with the body wall. Inherited tendencies suffice to bring about the division of the primitive sensory area, the formation of the ampullae, and the canals, except so far as the canals have a more or less curved outline. The canals are curved for the reason that they are formed as flattened pockets given off from a curved surface, and by the fusion of the edges of the fold along the whole mouth of the pocket, except at the two ends, where the tube thus formed opens into the utricular cavity at both ends. More clearly to understand that this is so, suppose the auditory vesicle with canals well formed be again drawn to the surface of the head and caused to spread itself out flat. The inner face of its wall would thus form the surface of the head over the area covered. The canals would then appear as surface canals arranged somewhat as is shown in Cut 20. Here we find the canals inclined at varying angles to the long axis of the body. They form a group such as one may find on the head of any fish having the canal organs well developed ; i,e, there is no essential difference between the relations of the parts as here projected and the canal organs on the surface of the body.

The Development of the Ear in Ganoids and Teleosts.

Salensky describes the development of the Sturgeon ear as follows {loc. cit. p. 307): —

" L'organe de TouTe, qui apparatt assez t6t, est repr6sent6 par les otocystes, situ^s de chaque c6t6 de la moelle allong^e, et resultant d'une invagination de la couche inferieure de I'exoderme. II est probable que cette couche s'^paissit prealablement, car, apr^s la formation des fossettes auditives, nous la trouvons plus 6paisse autour de Torifice de ces derni^res. D6j4 avant sa transformation en otocyste, la fossette auditive est pyriforme. Ses parois form^es de cellules cylindriques sont ^paisses dans le fond de la depression, et sa cavity a la forme d'une fente triangulaire." "Vers la fin du d^veloppement, I'organe de I'ouTe a la forme d'une v^sicule ovalaire, 4 parois assez minces form^es de cellule cylindriques. Sous cet aspect, il repr^sente T^bauche du labyrinthe, aux d^pens du quel se d^velopperont dans la suite, les recessus labyrinthi, les canaux semi-circulaires et le canal cochliaire, toutes parties qui n'atteignent leur d^veloppement complet que pendent la periode post-embryonaire."

The auditory vesicle of the bony fish arises below the surface of the skin and does not present, as in the Shark, a genuine involution. There is, however, at a stage antecedent to the formation of the solid auditory sac, a thickening of the superficial epithelium behind the eye over the region occupied a little later by the auditory vesicle. It has not been ascertained whether this epithelial thickening is a superficial sense organ or not, and we know nothing of its fate or relation to the auditory organ within the head. The outer opening of the vesicle, i,e, the distal portion of the endolymphatic duct, places the cavity of the vesicle in communication with the lymph space formed below the outer ectodermic layer. The vesicle is developed entirely from the nervous layer of the ectoderm, and agrees in this with the condition found in the Frog. The vesicle appears as a solid bulb of cells which pushes its way backward and inward towards the brain. Very early a cavity appears in the centre of the bulb and quickly extends up into the neck of the now flask-shaped structure. This prolongation of the vesicular cavity is the first stage in the development of the ductus endolymphaticus.

When the vesicular cavity has assumed a round oval shape, the cells forming its boundary walls, which, so long as the cavity bore the character of a split in the midst of the cell mass, were irregularly placed, arrange themselves regularly as a lining layer of epithelium, and thus pave the cavity smoothly.

Soon, however, the vesicle is compressed from side to side, and in connection with this folding process the epithelium thickens over three spots in the bottom of three depressed circumscribed areas, and long before there are canals formed these epithelial knobs have become provided with sensory hairs and constitute the three cristas of the ampullary enlargements of the semicircular canals. Von Noorden describes this process as it occurs in the embryos of the Salmon and Herring. He says (loc, cit. p. 239) : " Bald nach dem die Otolithen angelegt sind, beginnt auch an anderen Stellen das Epithel besondcre Mcrkmale anzunehmen. An bestimmten Stellen bildet es sich wescntlich dicker als an der ubrigen Blasenwand. Durch diese Dickcnzunahme, welche durch ein Wachsthum der einzelnen Zellen in die Lange erzcugt wird, entstehen Wiilste, welche in die Blase hineinragcn und von vorn herein eine ovale Form haben. Die eine dieser Stellen liegt an dem Uebcrgang der ausseren Blasenwand in xlie vordere, die zweite an dem Uebergang der ausseren Wand in die hintere und die dritte an dem Uebergang der ausseren in die untcre und zwar ist die Langsrichtung dcs Ovals bei den beiden ersten in einer Frontalebene, die Langsrichtung des Ovals bei der letzteren in cine Transversalebcne des Fisches gelegen. Diese drei ovalen Epithelwiilste bedeutcn das erste Auftrcten der Cristae acusticae. Die Crist (By spdtcr gelegen in den Ampul left der Bogengdnge^ treten also bei den Knochenfischen stets auf^ eke von den Bogengdngen eine Spur vorhanden ist,**

The transformation of the flattened, egg-shaped vesicle into the adult utriculus, sacculus, canals, etc., proceeds relatively slowly, and during this time the sensory tracts of the utriculus sacculus and lagena make their appearance as thickened areas of the walls of their respective chambers. In the Herring the ampullary crista acquire their sense hairs and are in every way as perfect as in the adult before the walls of the ampullce close over them; while in the Salmon the canals are fully formed before the sensory hairs appear. The auditory hairs make their appearance on the inner ends of the now much elongated epithelial cells as minute conical protuberances, and by rapid growth assume the form of delicate threads. The thickening and stiffening of these delicate threads complete the growth of the hairs.

The hairs do not arise over the whole surface of the crest at once, but each cell as soon as ripe for the effort puts forth the capillary process. The further development of the canals and labyrinth our author describes in the following words : —

"Ohne dass die aussere Gestalt der Blase in irgend einer Weise geandert wird, beginnt an der lateralen Wand des Organs und zwar an dem dorsalwarts gelegenen Abschnitt derselben eine Gewebsmasse sich dergestalt anzuhaufen, dass sie vom Epithel bedeckt als mehr weniger breiter Streifen oder Wulst von aussen oben in die Blase hereinragt. Diese Substanzanhaufung oder Wandverdickung, wie ich mich zunachet vorurtheilslos ausdriicken will, hat beim Haring eine langlich ovale Form, bei den Salmoniden dagegen tritt sie von vorn herein in exquisit dreizipfeliger Gestalt (Fig. 4) auf und zwar verstreichen 2 zipfel nach dem vorderen und hinteren Ende der ausseren Blasenwand, der dritte Zipfel verlauft uber die Mitte der dorsalen Wand. Schon friih zeigt dieser Wulst an drei ' Stellen ein besonderes Dickenwachsthum. So kommt es, dass schon bald die freie epithelbedeckte in das Lumen der Blase einragende Flache nicht mehr glatt und eben erscheint, sondem dass sich auf dem schon im Allgemeinen erhohten Terrain gleichsam drei besondere Hiigel bilden. Diese besonderen Hiigel entstehen immer auf den Breitseiten der dreizipfeligen Figur (bei den Salmoniden). Es muss daher entstehen ein vorderer, ein hinterer und ein unterer Wulst. (Fig. 6 w. 7 : W. Vy W. hy W. w) Dieselben sind nun auch gerichtet nach vorne. hinten, unten, alle drei zugleich mit einer mehr weniger starken Neigung^ nach der medialen Wand zu. Noch ehe diese Hugelbildung an der ausseren Blasenwand iiber die ersten Spuren des Entstehens gediehen ist, haben sich diesen spateren Stumpfen gegeniiber an drei verschiedenen Stellen ganz gleichartige, nur viel kleinere Wiilste (Gegenwiilste, Fig. 5-7 \ G, W, v^ G, IV. A, G. W, w) erhoben, welche schon friih das Bestreben zeigen den genannten Stumpfen der aussen oben entstandenen Bildung entgegenzuwachsen. Zwei dieser kleineren Wiilste, entspringen von den medianwartsgelegenen Partien der vorderen und hinteren Blasenwand, der dritte entsteht auf dem Grunde der Blase zwischen der an dem Uebergang zur Aussenwand gelegenen Crista acustica und der in Nachbarschaft der Chorda dorsalis gelegenen Macula acustica mit ihren Otolithen (Fig. 8). Alts dieser Stellung der Wiilste geht hervor, doss imtner je ein selbstdndig entstehender und ein je aus der gemeinsamen, an der ausseren Wand entstandenen Substanzanhdufung sich abgrenzender Stumpf die Tendenz Itaben, sich entgcgenzuwacfisen undgerade iiber je eine Crista acustica hinweg sich zu vereinigen. Das geschieht in der TItat (cf. Fig. 8)." [Italics mine.] " Einmal angelegt nehmen namentlich bei dem Haring diese Wiilste rasch an Grosse zu ; die erst hiigelartig vortretenden Bildungen haben beim Haring schon nach wenigen Stunden mehr fingerformige Gestalt angenommen. Bis zur Vereinigung der Stiimpfe zu vollstandigen Balken vergehen beim Haring dann noch circa 24 Stunden/* There could not be a more complete agreement between two developmental processes, occurring in different animals, than there is between the formation of the canals on the surface of the body in Amia and the formation of the canals of the internal ear in the Herring and Salmon as given by von Noorden. Of the correctness of the account for the latter I am certain, for I have observed the same process both in the whole embrj'o and serial sections. From our present knowledge of the development of the labyrinth in the bony fishes we have only agreement with the type of growth of the surface organs.

"Die Wiilste verdanken ihre Entstehung der Anhaufung einer nahezu homogenen nur von einzelnen dichteren Streifen (Lamellen) durchzogenen Masse, welche eingeschoben ist zwischen Epithel und Bindegewebe, d. h. diese ganze Masse ist anatomisch gleichwertig der Basalmembran, einem Ausscheidungs-produkt epithelialer Zellen."

In these words von Noorden distinctly shows that he has utterly failed to grasp the significance of the formation of the primary and secondary folds, and the histological differentiation which he looks upon as the cause of the canal formation is certainly only a secondary matter, a concomitant of the erection of the folds.

The further development of the labyrinth is brought about by the continuous growth of the arches formed in the manner described above into broad sheets, which convert the archways into canals. It is important to note that von Noorden found in a majority of cases that the two processes uniting to form the posterior canal usually came together last, though he thinks he has observed this pair to unite first of the three, and he concludes that there is no regularity in the process, especially as he had oftentimes observed the right and left capsules to be in widely separated stages of development, the right labyrinth being much more advanced than the left. The portion of the canal first formed is its ampulla, since the folds first meet over the sense organ or crista. We shall see later on that this fact has an important bearing on the solution of the difficult problem of the origin of the part in question in the higher forms, — the mammals especially.

The size of the processes forming the rudimentary canals varies considerably in the different species, but there are no fundamental variations in the relations of the parts.

The Development of the Ear in the Amphibia,

In the frog the early history of the auditory vesicle is in all essentials, save one, a repetition of the development as given for the Shark. The exceptional condition is that the auditory vesicle develops entirely from the nervous layer of the ectoderm, and is always closed over by the epidermal layer. The endolymphatic duct consequently never opens on the surface of the head. This condition is retained by all the Sauropsida, and is certainly a secondary modification of the developmental process.

According to Villy (1890, 281), who has recently worked out the early stages of the development of the ear in the frog very carefully : " The earliest stage at which the auditory involution can be readily recognized occurs soon after the closure of the neural groove in the fore part of the embryo." It may be recognized as a perfectly distinct though shallow invagination, lined by a columnar epithelium belonging exclusively to the nervous layer of the ectoderm. At first the edge of the saucer is nearly circular, but soon becomes irregular and narrowed as the saucer is converted into the flask condition. Van Bambeke has figured and described these stages for Pelobates fuscus^ and these two amphibious forms agree very closely in the details of the process. In sections Villy claims to have traced the auditory nerve into continuity with the somewhat thickened plate of cells before it has commenced the formation of the saucer. The flask stage is not so perfect as in the Elasmobranchs, and does not long persist, as the mouth of the involution is soon closed and the auditory vesicle loses its connection with the nervous layer of the ectoderm. Villy was not able to describe from his study of this process the details of the closing of the mouth of the flask with exactness, and there remains still some doubt as to the completeness of the closure. This dorsal region or neck of the flask is much smaller than the ventral portion and becomes ultimately the recessus labyrinthi. Villy says (loc, cit. p. 525) : " The outer wall of the vesicle, being the latest formed, consists of cells at first indistinct in outline, but soon they assume, more or less completely, the columnar character of the opposite wall, though the two parts never agree exactly, as the older contains more pigment than the younger. It is from the old pigmented parts that the sensory tracts of the adult ear are formed." The cells of the older part are also more elongated than the others. The vesicle now becomes surrounded by the mesoblast in the usual manner. By the time the larvae have grown to the length of 12-14 mm., the canals begin to appear, but already a separation has been effected between the two parts of the sensory patch, and thus the two chambers of the ear are marked off. They are the utriculus and sacculus, and this part of the ear is now in the Cyclostome stage of development. The appearance of the utriculo-saccular partition belongs to the stage of development when the animal has reached a length of about 1 1 mm. This partition first appears as a ridge, which by broadening finally divides the auditory vesicle into an upper, inner, anterior chamber, — the utriculus, and lower, outer, posterior chamber, — the sacculus.

When fully formed this partition runs obliquely across the auditory vesicle, and as the ear approaches its adult conditions, grows more and more oblique to the original axis of the vesicle. The semicircular canals of the Frog form, in the manner already described, for the surface canals in Amia and the auditory canals of the Elasmobranchs and Teleosts.

Relative to the time of appearance there are variations worthy of mention. The anterior and the external canals develop simultaneously, while the posterior is perfected only later. Nevertheless, the sense organ of the latter canal is cut off from the macula sacculi before those of the anterior and external canals are formed. Villy adopts the view that, on account of the later development of canalis posterioris, the older idea that the two vertical canals are older structures is not correct. The posterior canal appears before the folds of the other canals have united, and it forms exactly like the others. The two vertical canals continue to grow until they meet and their two half -pores unite into a primary pore, which opens on the inner surface of the utriculo-sacculus. On account of the late appearance of the posterior canal, Villy unfortunately concluded that the deduction from the comparative anatomical evidence bearing on the case, which holds the Cyclostome ear to be an ancestral structure, from which the Gnathostome vertebrates have derived their auditory organ, to have insufficient foundation ; and he says (loc, cit. p. 529), "This doctrine is very much shaken by the results arrived at in this paper.*' Villy distinctly says that the early appearance of the sense organ cannot be considered as showing that the posterior canal forms first. In this view he shows that he has totally failed to appreciate the significance of the relation existing between the sense organ and its canal.

Our author says (p. 532) : "The fact that this epithelial tract is the first to develop might be taken to show that though the posterior vertical canal actually forms later than the others, nevertheless it is indicated earlier than they are. This early specialization may, however, possibly be explained as a convenience due to the out-of-the-way position occupied by the organ concerned, and to the early formation of the septum between the utriculus and sacculus, which in its growth plays an important part in separating this patch from the rest. Besides, I do not think that the time of specialization of the sensory tracts of the ampullae is a safe guide to the relative times of evolution of the canals, as there is no rule of development common to all three. If the ampulte were actually homologous structures, and their development had not been interfered with, they would form in the same way ; but as they do not do so, it is safer to assume that the original course of development has been modified, than that the ampullae are not homologous. This would seem to show that the order of the evolution of these epithelial patches has not been preserved."

The sensory epithelium invaginated into the vesicle covers the whole length of the floor, at the time of the appearance of the utriculo-saccular septum, and passes up on to the inner wall. It also laps over the anterior, lower, outer angle of the utriculus. The sensory epithelium passes without sharp demarcation into the remaining pavement epithelium of the utriculus. As already described, the utriculo-saccular septum divides this patch into two, from the posterior of which the macula sacculi and the crista acustica posterioris is budded off. Soon after this the macula utriculi buds off a single small patch, which soon divides into the cristae acusticae anterioris and horizontalis. The macula sacculi lengthens, but for a long time remains continuous with its bud, the cochlear organ. The lagena appears early after the formation of the canals. The endolymphatic duct grows out from the utriculo-saccular wall, and makes its way into the cranial cavity, early establishing the relations characterizing it in the adult. The manner of the division of the cochlear sense organ into pars basilaris and lagena is not thoroughly understood ; and I have not been able from my preparations to decide whether it arises from the macula sacculi or from the papilla lagcnae. Villy erroneously includes the macula neglecta, i.e, macula abortiva, in his list of cochlear sense organs : as I have shown elsewhere, it really belongs to the sense organ of the posterior ampulla.

The Developmcnt of the Ear in Reptiles,

Hoffmann (1889^) has worked out the development of the parts of the ear in Laeerta viridis, and has confirmed Rathke's account of the development in Tropidonotus natrixy to which he has added much in the way of detail.

1 llronn*s KUisen m. Ordnungen^ VII, 3, 1889.

After a very short account of the early transformation processes in Lacerta, in which Hoffmann merely confirms the prevalent ideas of the origin, mode of growth, and early relations of the auditory vesicle, he passes on to a more detailed account of the later transformations of the growing ear. He states (p. 2012) that the auditory vesicle rests on the large auditory facial ganglion as on a cushion, the inner face being covered by the ganglionic mass, which also reaches around onto the anterior, posterior, and ventral faces of the vesicle.

The auditory flask has been so displaced with reference to its original position that its originally relatively large opening, now very much reduced and on the verge of closure, appears as though pushed dorsad. After the closure of the external pore of the endolymphatic duct it remains for a time connected with the epidermis. The separation is finally completed, but only after the canals have begun to form, and the whole structure has been pushed ventrad to near its final position at the side of the medulla.

The closed endolymphatic duct reaches dorsad by a much narrowed portion quite to the ectoderm. This process is the recessus labyrinthi or aquaeductus vestibuli of the authors.

Hoffmann observes that "Es scheint mir denn auch wohl nicht zweifelhaft, dass dieser Anhang oder dieser stielformige Fortsatz dem langen, dunnen Rohr entspricht, welches bei den Selachiern das knorpelige Primordialcranium durchbohrt, dorsalwarts mit der Epidermis der Korperoberflache in verbindung steht und dort eine offene Ausmiindung besitzt, wo dem zufolge eine Verbindung des zum Labyrinth sich umwandelden Hohrblaschens mit der Korperoberflache dauernd fortbestehen bleibt," a conclusion justified by the facts of development and adult structure, not alone for the Reptilia, but as well for all other vertebrates in which the primitive endolymphatic duct closes early in development or appears only relatively late in ontogeny as an outgrowth of the utriculo-sacculus. In the latter case it is an atavistic phenomenon, and is an excellent illustration of the great degree of persistency of structures which, although no longer possessing important functions, at the same time do not in any way prevent the functional perfection of the organ or endanger the life of the animal. Hoffmann's account of the differentiation of the ear sac is in harmony with the prevailing ideas, that the sac first divides into superior and inferior portions before the former gives rise to the canals and the adult utriculus, while the latter is converted into the adult sacculus (receiving the endolymphatic duct) and the cochlear tube. For his account of the development of the semicircular canals, he quotes Rathke's observations and applies them to Lacerta. The sensory epithelium soon makes its appearance by the growth in length of its cells and the formation of sensory hairs on the hair cells, and the distinction between sensory and non-sensory areas is still further increased by the flattening of the cells of the latter.

In respect to the nerve-end organs, he says (p. 2015) : "Dadurch, dass das Gehohrblaschen sich in die verschiedenen Abtheilungen sondert, wird auch das Hohrepithel in eben so viele einzelne Flecke zerlegt, zu denen sich dann der Nervus acusticus begiebt. Das Hohrepithel zerfallt mithin bekanntlich in : i) Eine Macula acustica recessus utriculi; 2) eine Macula acustica sacculi ; 3) eine Macula s. papilla acustica basilaris ; 4) eine Macula s. papilla acustica lagenoe ; 5) eine Macula acustica neglecta ; 6, 7, 8) drei Maculae s. cristae acusticae ampuUarum."

Developnent in the Birds

Although so many authors have studied the embryology of the Chick, no one seems to have followed the development of its auditory organ beyond the very earliest stage, and there are no observations known to me on the division of its sense organs. I have seen the sense organ which is invaginated before it has gone below the surface and while still in the saucer stage, but further than this I have not followed its development. His^ (foe, cit. p. 107) says: "Jede Gehorblase erscheint als eine dem Nachhirn seitlich anliegende Grube, welche nach innen, nach vorn und nach hinten von einer scharfcn, doppelten Contour umsaumt ist, wahrend die aussere Granze in* unbestimmter Weise sich in die Seitenwande des Kopfes verliert. Ihr durchmesser betragt zu der Zeit ca. o.i mm. Etwas friiher sieht man in der Flachenansicht nur einen vierseitigen Flecken

Untersuch. u, d, ErsU Anlagt dtr IVirbeithiersleibts. Leipzig, 1868.

von grosserem Umfang aJs die spatere Grube, und die Granzen des Fleckens verlieren sich nach alien Seiten hin in ziemlich unbestimmter Weise.*' Balfour's observations do not go further than this, so that we must rely on the adult anatomy for our conclusions as to the probable course of development of the integral parts of the bird's ear. The structure of the adult internal ear of birds is so very similar to that of the reptilian type that there can be little doubt of the essential agreement of the phases of its development with those of the reptilian ear given above.

Development of the Ear in Mammals other than Man.

Krause, who has recently studied the development of the mammalian internal ear, finds that in the Pig and Sheep, when

Cut 21. — The car of a very young Rabbit embryo, 1 1 mm. long. Figure after Krause.

a Anterior canal.

am Ampulla.

d Ductus endolymphaticus.

/ Lagena.

t Sacculus.

u Utriculus.

Cut 22. — The internal ear of a somewhat older Pig embryo, ^^ mm. long. Figure after Krause.

a Anterior canal.

am Ampulla.

d Ductus endolymphaticus.

/ Lagena.

/ Posterior canal.

X Sacculus.

H Utriculus.

fully cut off from the exterior (and this occurs in embryos 6 mm. long), the auditory vesicle forms a compressed sac, having an irregular quadrangular shape. The utricular and saccular divisions are readily distinguished, and already the semicircular canals have begun to differentiate by the formation of two shallow depressions in the wall of the utriculus (of authors) (Cut 2i); both the pocket common to the vertical canals and the pocket for the horizontal canal are present. Below the pocket for the horizontal canal is seen the larger and deeper evagination for the cochlea. When the embryo has reached a length of 8 mm., the cochlea has so far developed as to stand out distinctly from the sacculus, and is at the same time somewhat bent.

At both ends of the common pocket for the verticals, and at one end of the horizontal depressions, are slight enlargements, the future ampullae. From now on the parts rapidly acquire individuality. The anterior canal is completed first, then the posterior, then the horizontal. The whole vesicle undergoes a marked change during this period, for owing to the growth of the ductus endolymphaticus from the utricular part and of the cochlear tube from the saccular division, the labyrinth has now the appearance of being extended in a dorso-ventral direction. The cochlear canal has now one-half turn, and a long groove has appeared on the inside of its wall (fold on the outside), from which the nerve-end organ, Corti's organ, arises.

In embryos of 30 mm. length the canals are all well formed, and the ampullae prominent. The two verticals, which from their mode of development have up to this time occupied the same plane, now begin to diverge, and the planes of the canals now meet in the middle of the common arm which unites them. Their angle is 150®. This method of origin is most interesting and important in its bearing on the spatial relations of the adult ear canals. The cochlea has now nearly one spiral turn.

Krause failed to observe the separate formation and was in error with reference to the origin of the two canals — anterior and posterior verticals, from the fact that at the time when the evagination to form the canals has become well marked the two grooves have run together and hence appear as a single fold. The truth is that there are two ampullar depressions which give rise to outgrowing canals. These canals having their separate origins are to be regarded as distinct, though they fuse at so early a period.^ Krause looks upon the resorption of the intervening tissue as a necessary step in the formation of the semicircular canals. Notwithstanding Krause's assertion that the ampullae form at the same time as the canals, I am certain that the ampullar depressions make their appearance before the canals begin to form. This process is true of all forms yet studied with this matter in view.^

1 See Recapitulation D.

I go AVERS, [Vol. VI.

It is not my purpose to give at this time an exhaustive account of the development of the cochlea. All that I shall attempt to do here will be to present in essentials the condition of our knowledge as established by the investigations of Huschke, Remak, Reissner, KoUiker, Hensen, Middendorp, A. Rosenberg, Gottstein, Pritchard, and Retzius, and to give a short account of the few additional, but as I believe important, facts which I am able to add to our previous fund of knowledge, and to point out the modifications in the older views where these new facts seem to necessitate fundamental change in our conceptions of the pedigree of this organ and its present morphological significance.

The comparative ontogenetic history of this organ shows us conclusively that the cochlea was not created after a cut-anddried plan, and having once been established among mammals has gone on serenely ever since reproducing itself ; but, on the contrary, embryological evidence shows that there has been a struggle for existence among the parts of a growing organ, the struggle ending in the annihilation of the unsuccessful candidates for the privilege of existing. The antagonism began quite as soon as the original differentiation of parts took place, somewhere far back in the line of the sauropsid ancestral stock, and has continued ever since in that group. In the passage from Sauropsid to Mammal (the manner and the means of the accomplishment of the change are as yet hidden from us) there occurred a selection of the fittest (probably), which gives us the mammalian organ of Corti of the adult ; but even to-day the unsuccessful candidates are developed in the young of Man as in all other mammals up to the functional perfection, so far as we may judge on the basis of the structure, only to be reabsorbed, to fade away entirely as organs, soon after, leaving only the faintest traces of their previous strength and perfection of development ; for, strange as it may seem, the apparently physically strongest organ is the one which disappears, leaving the smaller organ, which at the same time seems to have acquired a higher degree of cell differentiation, to occupy the field alone. The story of the ** Rise and Fall " of organs, of cell communities, is repeated within the cochlea, nor is it by any means all told yet. The organ of Corti, as it exists to-day in the higher Mammalia and in Man, is in a state of flux ; and although change in any direction is undoubtedly very slow, yet there is a tendency to increase in size and complexity very manifest in this structure. The present organ has a future before it ; but annihilation will remove it out of the way for the better adapted successor among the future mammalian descendants, just as the sauropsid organ has disappeared before the present mammalian organ of Corti.

  • The earliest account of the ontogeny of the cochlea is given by Ibsen, according to whose observations the cochlear canal is formed from the large otolith sac by the gradual recession of the otolith from the wall on which it lies {i.e. the inner wall carrying the sense organ). During its transition, it draws the wall of the chamber along with it, and by contact with the other side or wall of the chamber divides the tube into two scabe, while the triangular (in section) canal left between them becomes Corti's canal. The nerve supply runs across in the partition thus formed. The otoliths have disappeared as such, having been converted into the lamina spiralis accessoria.

It took a long time and much study for the older investigators to arrive at correct conceptions of the relations of the cellular elements of the organ of Corti to the floor on which it rests, even in the adult ear. The Marquis Corti had only the faintest conception of the actual condition of the cellular elements in the organ discovered by him, and none, of the significance of the morphological relations of this cochlear organ to other parts of the ear. His original view was that the cells forming the organ followed one another in an even layer, much as in any layer of columnar epithelium. They were thus spread out evenly, he thought, on the basilar membrane, and this conception of the relation of the parts in the adult affected powerfully the ideas of its course of development.

Claudius (1855, 53) first saw that the arches of Corti raised the mass of the organ of Corti above the basilar membrane.

Bocttcher (1856, 29) and Deiters (1859, 66), who worked little with cross-sections, thought the cells of Cli^udius followed directly on the hair cells without a break in the surface.

The structure called papilla spiralis by Huschke (1835, 148), and Organon Kollikeri by Hensen (1864, 127), formed that part of the epithelial thickening of the floor of the cochlear tube in which the whole of the auditory nerve was supposed by these earlier investigators to end. In this epithelial ridge, or papilla acustica, as Hensen also called it, he found four kinds of cells — {a) rods, {b) hair cells, (c) elongate peripheral cells (supporting cells), (d) Corti's and Deiters's cells (Stabchenzellen of Leydig, Haarzellen of Kolliker).

In tracing the development of these parts of the adult Corti's organ in the embryo, Hensen started with the epithelial ridge as the basis of all ; and since in the adult a membrana tectoria had been described, he searched for it in the embryo, but could not find it ; and, considering the methods then in vogue, one is not surprised at his lack of success.

Hensen concluded that the perforate membrana tectoria of the bird's ear was the analogue of the striated membrana of the mammal ear, and he considered both to be the product of the secretion of the cells of the epithelial ridge. By the growth of the basilar membrane and the lengthening of the rods of Corti, the papilla acustica, or that part of it which represents hair cells of the organ of Corti in the adult, was pushed out under the edge of the tectorial membrane, which by this time had separated from the surface which secreted it as a permanent gelatinous mass floating freely, except the attachment of its inner edge, in the endolymph above the short hairs of the hair cells.

The few facts given above were about all that had been obtained relative to the organ of Corti by the observers down to Boettcher*s time.

Boettcher*s great service consists in his having given us a very extended account of the development of the auditory apparatus in several species of mammals. The stages he studied were sufficiently close together to allow of tracing all the changes with certainty, and in this way his monograph contains the completest and most accurate account of the growth of the mammalian internal ear of any author down to this time ; for Retzius's studies of the development in the Rabbit, Cat, and Man may fairlj^be considered to be contributions to Boettcher's exposition of the ontogenesis of the mammal ear, as I think the author himself considered them. Retzius confined his embryological studies almost entirely to the ontogeny of the cochlear duct.

According to Boettcher (31, 1869) the cochlear tube arises as a bulb-like pocket from the sacculus, and soon turns inwards and forwards, growing in the direction indicated by this spiral twist ; i,e, downwards, forwards, and outwards. The cochlear ganglion accompanies it with its nerve cells in intimate contact with the columnar epithelial cells of the thickened floor of the canal. All these parts ^ nervous and sensory ^ develop consecutively from the base to the apex by interstitial as well as apical growth. There is an interstitial increase in length, due to increase in size of the elements composing the organ, and new elements are added throughout the growing organ. The apical portion is always much younger and more immature than the other parts, as, for example, in an 8.5 cm. Sheep embryo the cochlea has made two and one-half turns. The scalae tympani and vestibuli are beginning to develop. The apical end of Corti's organ is in the epithelial ridge stage, while the basal part of the cochlea has already developed its rods, hair cells, and other structures characteristic of the adult condition.

In cross-section the cochlear tube is at first flat, with a slitshaped lumen, but the canal soon enlarges and becomes irregularly oval, the shape of the outline of the cross-section varying in different parts of the canal in any given period of growth.

There is a great difference in thickness between the epithelium of the floor and roof of the canal in the embryo without sharp separation from the side walls, but this character is greater in adults, when also the separation of the thickened floor from the walls becomes more evident. The epithelial ridges, as they grow, become separated by a distinct groove between them.

At this stage (PI. Ill, Fig. i) the organ has reached very nearly its mature condition as regards the presence of the essential features of its anatomy in the adult, but certain parts still remain which form the most positive evidence of its derivation from a more extensive and less specialized plate of sensory cells or macula acustica. This evidence is seen in the persistence of the primitive hair plate, and the division of the nerve supply between the Sauropsid organ remnant and Corti'» organ. It may with appropriateness be called the saurian stage, owing to its great resemblance to the cochlear organ of the adult Alligator. In a transverse section of the cochlear organ of this stage, we have a repetition, part for part, of the Alligator's cochlear organ, and an essential agreement of the histological characters of the latter, although the mammal is bom and is exercising its mammalian intuitions. The cochlear organ of the Alligator is not a genuine organ of Corti, but is the cochlear organ of the saurian type of reptilian ear developed along the line of histological differentiation laid down in the simpler members of the group. By this I do not wish to say that the saurian cochlear organ is the strict homologue of the macula acustica or papilla basilaris of the Amphibia and lower groups of reptiles.

The inner hair cells are well developed and are already separated from the outer hair cells, not only by the developing pillars of Corti, but also histologically by the appearance of individual characters which persist and are increased in later life. Some of these characters are, briefly, a different shape of cell body, different length of the hairs, a different relation to the nerve fibres and supporting cells, and to the basilar membrane and arch of Corti.

The main process met with in the transformation of the epithelium of the floor of the embryonic cochlear tube consists in the rapid increase in size and number of the cells along certain lines parallel with the long axis of the cochlea. There are two such ridges which need our special attention : I. The large epithelial ridge ; II. The small epithelial ridge.

Th^firsty or large, ridge begins near the habenula perforata, and extends outwards, covering about two-thirds of the basilar membrane in radial direction ; on its outer slope it passes immediately into the

Second^ or the small, ridge which extends outward, i,e, in transverse direction to about the beginning of the zona pectinata. It equals in length the large ridge, but is inferior in height and breadth.

According to Boettcher the whole of Corti*s organ is developed from the small epithelial fold, while the large ridge gradually undergoes reduction until it disappears as a structure of the cochlear canal ; its cells form the lining of the sulcus spiralis internus. The first cell of the small ridge develops into the inner hair cell. Boettcher holds that each inner hair cell is composed of three cells. The second cell of the small ridge develops into the pillars of Corti. The third cell of the small ridge develops in the first row of outer hair cells. The fourth cell of the small ridge develops in the second row of outer hair cells. The fifth cell of the small ridge develops in the third row of outer hair cells. The sixth cell of the small ridge develops in the fourth row of outer hair cells.

Gottstein, however, concluded that in the Dog the last cell of the large ridge developed into the inner hair cell, and that the nerve fibres, which enter the habenula perforata, must necessarily force their way upward through the cells of this ridge, since they cover over the openings. The nerve fibres become connected with the cells of the large ridge which undergo atrophy, and later on are reduced to the so-called granular cells (Komershicht, Gottstein).

The sulcus internus arises by the growth of the basilar membrane between the inner edge of the large ridge and of the crista spiralis, and not alone by the disappearance of the mass of the ridge itself, as Boettcher believed.

The cells forming the acoustic apparatus outside the outer hair cells in Man, Boettcher supposed were derived from the zona pectinata. Hensen called them supporting cells, while Gottstein was inclined to look upon them as being the remaining cells of the small ridge which had not reached a full development. He speaks of three rows of hair cells for mammals other than Man, and of four rows for Man as developing out of these cells. The evidences which led him to this conclusion were the similarity in the rounding off of the embryonic and adult ridges, and the presence in Man of a greater number of rows of hair cells than is present in most mammals (the latter statement has been shown by Retzius to be incorrect, and as my own preparations show, the Pig, Cat, Ox, and Man have equally the four, and even five, rows of hair cells of the external group), and the presence along the outer border of the membrana reticularis of additional elements beyond the region of the hair cells.

The inner hair cells were first well figured by Deiters, but Boettcher claims to have discovered them. He says (loc. cit. p. 94) with reference to the hairs borne by these cells : " Wie aus meincn Untersuchungen hervorgeht sind die Haare oder Stabchcn, welche an der Oberflache sowohl dieser innern, als auch der spater zu nennenden aussern Haar-oder Stabchenzellen an vielen Praparaten sichtbar sind, kiinstlich durch Abrcissen der Corti'schen Membran erzeugt. Ich habe mich dahcr aus diesem Grunde veranlasst gesehen beide Namcn zu verwerfen."

According to Boettcher, the hair cells at first are simple, but later on they acquire two nuclei, and then divide transversely, in each case producing an upper or surface hair cell and a lower or buried auditory cell, which is not hair-bearing. The former is Boettcher's "absteigende Horzelle," which is fixed to the membrana reticulata, in whose separate existence Boettcher fully believed, while the latter cells were called by him the "aufsteigenden Horzellen " or supporting cells, and were fixed to the basilar membrane. Their most rapid development takes place about the time of birth. In some animals it begins before birth, but in the majority the impulse to special growth is not received until after they come into the air. The cells then begin to elongate rapidly and soon divide. Their protoplasm acquires a complication of structure not yet fully worked out, and only partially understood. Boettcher found that in hair cells immersed in aqueous humor there was to be seen only a transparent protoplasm evenly but finely granular, but in cells killed in other reagents this transparent protoplasm was shown to possess a very complicated structure. My observations on the continuity of the capillo-nuclear fibres in the adult cells were made before I had seen Boettcher*s paper, and his observations are the only ones in the literature of the subject which give us any details of the development of these fibres. These cells contain a glassclear central fibre or cord which incloses the cell nucleus, and is itself inclosed in a very delicate pale sheath. Henle, the only other observer who has noticed this, supposed it was due to coagulation by HCl ; but Boettcher has shown that most reagents produce it. Boettcher thinks that a similar process occurs in both rods and cells to produce these fibres, which he considers perhaps identical. This central thread passes directly into the thread from the membrana tectoria. When all the rest of the cell is destroyed, one sees it as a naked bundle of fibrils united to the nucleus.

Although the cells of the large epithelial ridge are resorbed without having shown the tendency to change their shapes or sizes, the cells of the small epithelial ridge early undergo a series of changes which transform them into the organ of Corti. The row of cells lying in contact with the outer border of the large epithelial ridge are changed into the row of inner hair cells (they are from a very early period hair-bearing cells), and bear long, strong hairs of the kind described in a preceding paragraph. The nuclei of these cells lie near their upper ends, and their lower ends are in contact in any case with the nerve fibres : no actual penetration was observed.

The outer hair cells are similar in histological characters ; they are, however, longer, and at first rise nearly perpendicularly from the basilar membrane. On account of the fact that they are further away from the entrance of the nerve, the fibres reach the cells only after passing across the intervening space by threading their way among the cells forming this part of the organ. The nerve fibres appear to end on the sides as well as the bases of these cells.

Kolliker (1867, 167) was the first to give us information on the development of the rods of Corti. He says, in his Gewebelehre (4th ed., 1863, p. 709; Sth ed., 1867, p. 727), in describing the growth of the organ of Corti: **Die erste Zelle erhebt sich unmittelbar nach aussen von den Lochern der H. perforata auf breiter dreieckigcr kernhaltiger Grundflache und ist mit ihrem in der Seitenansicht verschmalerten Ende stark schief nach aussen gerichtet. Die zweite Zelle kehrt sich mit dem schmalern freien Ende gegen die erste und wendet die breitere kernhaltige Grundflache nach aussen. Diese beiden Zellen halte ich fiir die aussere und innere Corti'sche Fasem die jetzt noch ganz steil stehen, spater aber mit ihren Grundflachen auseinanderriicken, was von einem Langenwachsthum der Zellen selbst, mit Verschiebung ihrer Basis, oder ihrer Grundlage, der M.b., abhangen kann." Hensen and Middendorp both were convinced that each rod rises from a single cell, but for the rest agree with Kolliker. Boettcher found, on the contrary, that both rods rise from one cell, which by longitudinal division separates into the two rod cells. After a detailed account (of which Retzius*s II gives a good excerpt), Boettcher says {loc, ciL p. 85) : " Der ganze Entwicklungsvorgang, durch welchen die Stabchen sich bilden, ist als Theilungsprocess einer Zelle aufzufassen. Aus jcder Halfte geht ein Stabchen mit der ihm zugehorigen Bodenzellen hcrvor. Das Stabchen und die Bodenzellen bilden ein Ganzes und sind als eine einzige Zelle zu betrachten, deren Substanz sich zum grossten Theil in feine Fasem verwandclt hat, wahrend, nur ein kleiner Rest am Boden und im Winkel des Stiibchcns in seiner urspriinglichcn Bcschaflfenheit sich erhalt. Es ist dahcr nicht richtig, diesen allein fur sich als besondere Zelle (Bodenzelle) hinzustellen ; er gehort zum Stabchen, wie auch KoUiker behauptet hat und wie ich noch genauer fiir erwachsene Individuen nachweisen will."

From my own observations I am confident that division begins below and works upward into the heads. In some cases, these never become completely separated, and thus is given firmer union to the two elements of the arch of Corti. The undivided part is in all cases only the cell wall which incloses the fibres of Corti's rods.

The view which all previous authors have held with reference to the nature and origin of the membrana tectoria (so-called) is that this structure was a cell secretion and was poured out by and upon the upper ends of the cells forming the surface of the organ of Corti. Boettcher, however, more consistent than other observers, maintained that this was the only product of the cell activity, while others claimed that besides the membrana tectoria the cells, by a process unknown, or similar, produced the short rod-like structures known as auditory hairs (Gehorstabschen). These hairs were supposed to be formed in such a way that they projected into the membrana tectoria's substance in holes either preformed or produced by the growth of the hairs into it.

According to Boettcher's observations on the Sheep (and my preparations of the Pig confirm his statements so far as the time of appearance of the hair band is concerned) the first trace of this structure is to be seen in the 5.5 mm. embryo. The epithelial ridges are not yet distinctly formed, and the membrana tectoria simply lies over the thickest part of the floor as a thin radiately striated plate.

After working over preserved material without satisfactory results, Boettcher says (loc, cit, p. 123): "Auch an der mit Vorsicht in Humor aqueus isolirten Corti*schen Haut lasst sich kein befriedigendes Resultat iiber die ganze Ausdehnung derselben gewinnen. Sie erscheint weich, aber in hohem Grade elastisch. Der diinnere hyaline und der dickere streifige Theil konnen durch eine langsverlaufende Linie nicht gegeneinander abgegrenzt werden. An den Schnittrandern nimmt man gewohnlich nur ein seichtes Abschwellen und dann wieder ein Anschwellen der streifigen Zone wahr, bevor sie mit leicht abgerundetem Rande aufhort."

Boettcher describes this structure as he found it in the 15 cm. Calf and the four-week-old cat in the following words : " Die Corti'sche Haut steht demnach sowohl mit den obern innem Horzellen, als auch mit den aussern absteigenden Horzellen (den drei Corti'schen Zellenreihen) in Zusammenhang, indem an die obere Endflache jeder dieser Zellen ein faseriger Fortsatz ansetzt. Ob er weiter in die Zellen eindringe, oder bios mit ihrer Endflache oder mit den ihren obern Rand umschliessenden Ringen sich vereinige, kann nicht entschieden werden."

" Dieser Umstand erklart die an denselbcn bekannten haarartigen Fortsatze oder Stabchen, nach denen sie benannt worden (Haarzellen, Stabchenzellen). Die Haare oder Stabchen sind Kunstproducte die durch das Abreissen der Corti'schen Membran entstehen. Geschieht dieses, so losst sich der mit der Endflache der betrefifenden Zellen zusammenhangende verhaltnissmassig dicke und scheinbar solide Fortsatz in eine Anzahl feiner Fortsatze auf, die in Verbindung mit der Zelle wie an ihrer Oberflache befindliche Cilien erscheinen. Diese existiren aber in Wirklichkeit nicht. Es ist daher auch die Bezeichnung der Zellen als Haarzellen oder Stabchenzellen ungerechtf ertigt. "

After detailing Kolliker's observations, with which our author formerly agreed, and according to which the membrana tectoria arose as a cuticular secretion, first from the large epithelial ridge and later from the small epithelial ridge, Boettcher says (loc. ciL p. 137) : "Ob aber die Corti'sche membran als eine 'Ausscheidung ' dieser Zellen auftritt scheint mir doch fraglich.

"Ich habe lange der Auffassung Kolliker's Beifall gezollt, dann machten sich aber Zweifel geltend, die ich noch nicht iibcrwunden habe. Veranlassung giebt mir dazu eine Beobachtung, die sich mir an Durchschnitten embryonaler Schnecken sehr haufig und immer in derselben Weise darbot. Ich finde an Praparaten, an denen die Corti'sche Membran abgefallen ist» nicht nur dass aus den inneren und den absteigenden ausseren Horzellen (innere und aussere Haarzellen Kolliker's) haarartige Fortsatze sich erheben, welche ungewohnlich fein und lang sind und in dieser Bcziehung den bei altern Thieren an ihnen beobachtcten scheinbaren Cilienbesatz iibertreffen, sonden auch dass aus den obern Enden der hohen cylindrischen Zellen des grossen Epithelialwulstes ebensolche haarartige Fortsatze hervorragcn, die meist eine bedeutende Lange erreichen. Diese Fortsatze wachsen unzweifelhaft aus den Zellen heraus ; die des grossen Epithelial wulstes scheinen mir eine Richtung nach aussen, die des kleinen nach oben und innen einzuschlagen. Auf diese Weise treten sie einander entgegen und ware eine Aneinanderlagerung resp. Vereinigung derselben moglich. Es liegt daher der Gedanke nicht fern, die ganze Corti'sche Membran als die Summe der von den Cylinderzellen hervortretenden feinen Fasern oder haarartigen Fortsatze zu betrachten.

"Wie diese mit einander sich verbinden, um eine zusammen hangende Membran zu bilden, vermag ich nicht zu sagen ; viellicht findet gleichzeitig auch eine Ausscheidung aus den Zellen statt.

" Sehr bedeutungsvoll fiir die ganze Sache erscheint mir, dass auch bei erwachsenen Thieren eine Zerlegung der Corti'schen Haut in feinste Fibrillen moglich ist."

It will be remembered that Kolliker maintained that there were no fibres in the membrana tectoria ; it being on the contrary a strictly homogeneous cuticular mass, while Hensen, on the other hand, described distinct fibres and a " Zwischensubstanz " as the component parts of the tectorial plate.

Regarding the structure originally described by Loewenberg as lying like a net upon the surface of the membrana tectoria or the hair band, Boettcher says he never found Loewenberg's net as Henle had described it, nor could he find any such structure as Hensen had described as forming a constituent part of the tectorial superstructures of Corti's organ. The development of the net was not determined with certainty, but was supposed to be the result of the impress of neighboring cellheads upon the surface of the growing membrana tectoria, or at least its free surface layer.

The observations made by our author upon another of the little-understood structures, the so-called membrana reticulata, enabled him to make a valuable addition to our knowledge of Corti's organ. His observations have not, however, received deserved acceptance from the anatomists of the times {loc. cit p. 139) : "Wenn ich die Membrana reticularis wie iiblich hier noch als ein besonderes Gebilde auffiihre so mag es dadurch entschuldigt werden, das diese durchbrochene Lamelle nach ihrer Trennung von der Membrana Corti einerseits und von den unter ihr befindlichen Zellen andererseits eine gewisse Selbst standigkeit zu besitzen scheint und durch die Eigenthiimlichkeit ihres Baues das Interesse in hohem Grade in Anspruch nimmt. Sie ist jedoch kein einheitliches Gebilde, insofern an ihrer Zusammensetzung ganz verscheidene Formelemente Antheil haben."

Boettcher never saw Deiters's transverse nerve fibres in the cochlea, which are equivalent to Kolliker's longitudinal system of cochlear nerves. He thus criticises the view (p. 169) : "Abgesehen davon ist ihr Vorkommen zwischen den Bogenfasern, wie schon E. Rosenberg, angegeben hat, mit der Entwicklung dieser nicht gut vereinbar und was die longitudinalen Ziige betrifft, welche weiter nach aussen zwischen den ausseren absteigenden Horzellen verlaufen sollen, so ist auch deren Existenz aus thcoretischen Griinden zu bestreiten, weil der Raum zwischen ihncn von den aufsteigenden Zellen ganz ausgef iillt ist."

Pritchard (1878, 217) gives the following account of the development of the organ of Corti. Outside of the group of long cells which fill the sulcus spiralis in the embryo there lie five somewhat shorter cells (his primary cells), of which No. i (counting from in, outwards) divides itself transversely into 2. Nos. 3, 4, 5 acquire two nuclei each by the division of the parent nucleus. The outer four (2, 3, 4, 5) form the four hair cells of the outer rows from their upper parts, and the Deiters cells of their lower parts. From each Corti's cell shoots up a process which later splits into the hairs. Cell No. 2 becomes more triangular (in perpendicular section of the organ) by the broadening of its base. Its nucleus grows and divides between the two ; a vacuole appears in the common protoplasm — the rudimentary tunnel. The lateral walls of the cell (/>. inner and outer walls) have developed into the rods of Corti. The membrana reticularis originates out of the union of the upper ends of the primitive cylindrical epithelial cells. In the same way that the walls of these cells develop into the trabeculce or perpendicular fibres which stretch from the membrana reticularis, to the membrana basilaris, and are homologous with the MuUerian fibres of the retina. Pritchard concludes that Corti's arches, the trabecule, the membrana reticularis, develop out of the walls of the primitive epithelium, the hair cells out of the cell contents, while the membrana tectoria is a secretion from them. The views here expressed show that this author did not add anything to the facts already discovered by the German anatomists. In the following paragraphs I give the main features of the cochlear ontogeny of the Rabbit as given by Retzius, with whom I agree, except in the cases noted further on.

Development of Rabbit's Ductus Cochlearis,

I. In the Embryo,

The papilla acustica basilaris develops in the first ten days after birth — . it acquires its maturity, and for the main part ends its development during this time. From the beginning on the canal is strongly depressed on its vestibular side. The ductus cochlearis consequently forms throughout most of the embryonic life a flattened epithelial tube whose walls are composed of cylindrical cells, the whole tube being inclosed in connective tissue (the so-called mucous tissue or Schleimgewebe of the Germans). At first there is no distinction to be noted in the structure of its walls. The floor, or neural wall, however, thickens early, and soon thereafter develops the so-called epithelial ridges. The manner of growth of the organ has not been satisfactorily made out, but the organ of Corti, as well as the tube, grows progressively away from the basal portion. Interstitial growth is certainly not proven to occur.

Retzius found the first trace of Corti*s pillars and their inner neighbor cells to reach upward from the basilar membrane as two triangular cells whose bases are below, while their narrowly truncate upper ends lie in border angle between the large and small folds or epithelial ridges.

Just within from these occur the inner hair cells already laid down and provided with hairs. These cells, then, belong to the larger fold, and are placed in its outer border. The direction of these cells is, as in the adult animal, oblique from below and within upward and outward. The three rows of outer cells lie without the pillars and belong to the smaller epithelial fold. They are already in the embryo, i.e. before birth, laid down as hair-bearing cells in all of the spires. They are bottle-shaped, granufer cells, carrying their nuclei in the lower parts of their cells. Their hairs are short and more or less perpendicular. The hairs of the third row are slightly inclined inward and upward.

The supporting, or Deiters's, cells project upwards among the hair cells from their broad basilar ends, and end pointedly between the cells at the surface of the papilla. They stand nearly perpendicularly upon the basilar membrane, and at this stage resemble the pillar cells in shape and histological features.

The membrana tectoria lies upon the limbus spiralis and the larger epithelial fold, and sometimes may be seen to reach as far as the rows of the outer hair cells, though usually its edge is found (especially in osmic and chromic acid preparations) over the inner hair cells, thus leaving the outer hair cells and the rows of pillar cells uncovered.

The nervus cochlearis varies in its relations to the cochlea with the increasing spiral twisting, which bends the ganglion more and more, and thus displaces the cochlear fibres. The fibres at this stage are mostly non-medullated, and are not to be traced beyond their entrance into the sense organ except with difficulty.

2. In the New Born,

The large epithelial fold of the papilla acustica basilaris is not raised from the wall of the ductus cochlearis. Its curved surface declines gradually inwards, where it passes at an obtuse angle into the surface of the small epithelial fold. The very long cells of the large epithelial fold incline inwards within, stand perpendicularly in the middle, and incline outwards in the outer part of the sense organ.

Corti's pillars grow larger and broader very rapidly after birth. They form two closely placed cell rows, which, however, are completely separate and disunited. Their nuclei are large and lie at bases of cells. The tunnel has not made its appearance between them.

The inner and outer hair cells are somewhat larger than in the embryo ; otherwise they are the same as before birth. The histological features of the cell protoplasm in the adult have not yet begun to make their appearance.

The membrana tectoria covers with its thicker portion the large epithelial ridge, lying very close to the surface, and passing over (as yet there is no trace of sulcus spiralis intemus) the large ridge, hangs free over the outer and inner hair cells, sending fibrous prolongations to the hair cells of the papilla acustica basilaris ; but these processes are not in any way connected with the hairs of the hair cells ; on the contrary, the latter project freely between the processes. In later stages of development it is demonstrable that these processes are fixed to the upper end plates of Deiters's cells, ue. the phalanges.

In the basal and middle spires the lamina spiralis is much more developed than in the apical, and the peculiar transformation of the large ridge has begun, the cells of the ridge disappear from within outwards, their places being taken by cubical epithelial cells. By this means a split appears between the membrana tectoria and the epithelial surface, which grows progressively towards the cochlear apex. The large ridge is highest in the apical turn, and is at this time in the height of its development.

The inner hair cells lie more inclined outwards than before and have increased in size, at the same time taking on more of the adult appearance.

The pillar cells are in a very interesting stage of their development. In the apical turn they are closely placed and do not show signs of separation. They are both inclined outwards ; they have grown much in radial breadth, especially the inner pillar,. which has sent a process of its foot quite to the habenula perforata. In the middle turn they have grown more than in the apical spire. The inner cell has grown the most, and traces of the head have formed, and the tunnel has made its appearance as a narrow split between the cells, about the middle of their length, just above the spiral bundle of nerve fibres. In the basal turn the tunnel is much better developed and the pillars of Corti are nearer their adult condition, for the pillar fibres have appeared in the cells as a clear refractive stripe. The inner hair cells have a different inclination for each turn of the cochlea, and their disposition is shared by the cells of Deiters. Hensen's supporting cells are fewer in the basal turn than in the middle turn, where they are most numerous. The nerves are better developed than in the last stage, they having gained in number and in amount of medullated tissue. The membrana tectoria is as in previous stage. It is connected by the processes from its outer zone with the Deiters cells, and the hairs of the hair cells project freely upward between the processes. The vas spirale is disappearing, while the basilar membrane is growing broader and becoming more like the adult in the character of its fibres.

3. In the Rabbit One Week Old.

The large epithelial ridge is disappearing in the apical turn, and it is much reduced elsewhere. The membrana tectoria lies only on the crown of the large ridge, and a space has appeared between it and the epithelial surface which becomes the sulcus spiralis internus.

The pillar cells have developed their pillars and separated from each other, forming the tunnel, except at the very apex of the cochlea. Nuel's space is now more fully developed than at any previous time, and is relatively as well developed as in the adult. Hensen's supporting cells have developed and they form the highest part of the small ridge, which appears much larger than the now much reduced large ridge. Hensen's supporting cells are best developed in the middle turn at this stage.

The membrana tectoria reaches outward to a point above the outer hair cells, and its outer zone has grown thicker. In the apical turn it hardly reaches to the second row, whereas its fibrous processes reach downwards to the Deiters cells, as before described. In the middle and basal turns these fibres are broken off, and one finds only remnants preserved in their attachment to the hair cells.

4. In the Ten Days Embryo.

The organ of Corti is now nearly complete. All that remains of the large epithelial ridge is the inner supporting cells, and they are lower now than those of the small ridge, which forms the highest part of the papilla acustica basilaris. The pillar cells are almost fully developed. The tunnel of Corti and Nuel's spaces are fully developed, as are also the inner and outer hair cells, and they have taken their adult positions. Hensen's body is to be seen near the upper end of the outer hair cells. Deiters's cells have grown much longer and carried the nerve end cells upward. The membrana tectoria reaches to the outer hair cell row and shows traces of the broken fixation fibres present in earlier condition, partly on the upper ends of the third row of Deiters's cells, and partly on the border of the membrane itself. The vas spirale is recognizable by the reduced rudiments of its walls.

By the fourteenth day the cochlea of the young Rabbit has reached its permanent condition, and in the main subsequent changes affect its size only.

The Boettcher cells, which are developed in the bottom of the sulcus spiralis externus, are simply the undeveloped remainder of the low epithelial ridge which formerly occupied this region. They disappear after the first month.

There is no difficulty in harmonizing Retzius's story of cochlear ontogeny with the views which I have sufficiently set forth in preceding pages, when it is remembered that he has described the appearance en masse of the sensory hairs, the whole membrana tectoria as a unit, not having recognized the individual hairs. The same is true of the spiral nerve fibres.

Hensen showed by measurements on the Ox the amount of translation of these structures during development, and found that the inner cells travelled quite up to the habenula perforata, while the outer row remained (with exception of the apical cells) practically in the same position. Hensen considered this spreading or diverging ot the pillars of Corti as a process by means of which the hair cells of the small ridge were transported under the membrana Cortii. Middendorp concurred in this view. Boettcher found that the pillar structures moved outwards. In the adult the space between the feet of the pillars decreases continually from above downward, while in the embryo the space between the feet of the pillars increases continuously from above downwards.

The inner pillar is at first longer than the outer, then for a time they are of equal size, but soon the outer pillar grows longer and remains so ever after.

Hensen in 1873 again took up the subject and concluded that the translation of the papilla from without, under the membrana tectoria, was fully proven in the case of the Ox.

In embryos the pillars are perpendicular and close together. The upper end of the arch is inclined outwards.

Retzius further studied the development of the cochlea in the Cat, selecting the following stages: embryos of 8, 12, and 15 cm. in length, and the new-born foetus, for the embryonic or early development, and the three-days, seven, eleven, and thirty-days old Kittens. He found the development essentially the same as the Rabbit, with the exception that the new-born Cat is much farther advanced than the new-born Rabbit.

3. In the Rabbit One Week Old,

The large epithelial ridge is disappearing in the apical turn, and it is much reduced elsewhere. The membrana tectoria lies only on the crown of the large ridge, and a space has appeared between it and the epithelial surface which becomes the sulcus spiralis internus.

The pillar cells have developed their pillars and separated from each other, forming the tunnel, except at the very apex of the cochlea. Nuel's space is now more fully developed than at any previous time, and is relatively as well developed as in the adult. Hcnsen*s supporting cells have developed and they form the highest part of the small ridge, which appears much larger than the now much reduced large ridge. Hensen's supporting cells are best developed in the middle turn at this stage.

The membrana tectoria reaches outward to a point above the outer hair cells, and its outer zone has grown thicker. In the apical turn it hardly reaches to the second row, whereas its fibrous processes reach downwards to the Deiters cells, as before described. In the middle and basal turns these fibres are broken off, and one finds only remnants preserved in their attachment to the hair cells.

4. In the Ten Days Embryo,

The organ of Corti is now nearly complete. All that remains of the large epithelial ridge is the inner supporting cells, and they are lower now than those of the small ridge, which forms the highest part of the papilla acustica basilaris. The pillar cells are almost fully developed. The tunnel of Corti and Nuel's spaces are fully developed, as are also the inner and outer hair cells, and they have taken their adult positions. Hensen's body is to be seen near the upper end of the outer hair cells. Deiters's cells have grown much longer and carried the nerve end cells upward. The membrana tectoria reaches to the outer hair cell row and shows traces of the broken fixation fibres present in earlier condition, partly on the upper ends of the third row of Deiters's cells, and partly on the border of the membrane itself. The vas spirale is recognizable by the reduced rudiments of its walls.

By the fourteenth day the cochlea of the young Rabbit has about the fifth week the parts of the adult ear are all well marked out. The two primary canals, anterior and posterior verticals, inclose between them an angle of i6o** and open into the utriculo-sacculus by a short common tube, while all three present the S-shaped curvings so characteristic of the canals in many fishes. The horizontal canal remains still a shallow groove in the utricular wall.

The nerve end organs of the utriculus lie very close together, and at this time one cannot distinguish separate nerve branches. The fibres of the utricular branch spring from the whole surface of the utricular ganglion and pass in the form of a loose bundle to the inner face of the utriculus, its sense organ having divided. The fold has appeared in the cochlea, which later development proves to be the beginning of the organ of Corti, i.e, the forerunner and parent organ.

About the second month the parts of the internal ear have assumed' their adult condition, with the exception of the epithelial sensory end cells, which have not as yet been perfected, though very distinctly modified from the remaining cells of the ampullae and utriculus and sacculus. The canals and ampullae are well formed, and each canal has a well-developed ama. The ama of the external canal is the only one to persist in the adult. The utriculus and sacculus are connected only by the split endolymphatic duct, i.e. by the divided surface canal, and the cochlea has nearly separated from the sacculus, retaining only the slender canalis reuniens as a tubular communication. The cochlea is at this time spirally twisted one and a half turns, the most important change in the form of the canal since the last stage.

The trunk of the acoustic nerve lies very closely applied to the anterior wall of the auditory capsule (excepting the aquaeductus vestibuli). One cannot find a layer of mesoderm cells between the ear capsule in Man. This antero-mesial portion of the ear capsule contains the entire amount of the thickened epithelial plate that later is to form the nerve end apparatus of the adult internal ear, and consequently all these parts are held to have direct relations to the auditory ganglion at this stage. The posterior semicircular canal forms an exception to this, for it receives its nerve supply at a relatively late period of life. His was unable to find a nerve branch running to the posterior ampulla earlier than the sixth week. This condition of things recalls the entirely similar method of development, described by Villy, for the Frog, a member of the Ichthyopsida. Here, however, the canal itself does not develop until after the anterior and horizontal canals have made their appearance, so that the conditions of development are even more modified.

When judged on the basis of the adult conditions found in the members of the mammalian group, the ontogenetic development of the cochlear tube progresses much more rapidly than the differentiation of the sense organs contained. Phylogenetically the organ of Corti is well developed before the tube has made its first spiral turn ; i.e, while still in the Sauropsidan condition, as exemplified in Echidna and Ornithorhynchus, but ontogenetically this is not the case ; for in the ears of the embryos of Man, Ox, Pig, Rabbit, Mouse, and Cat, the org^n has scarcely begun its histological differentiation at the time when the adult condition, as regards number and form of the spiral turns of the cochlear tube, has been attained.

Mainly on account of the great development of the brain in the human species more than in any other Mammal, and the consequent altered relations of the cranial bones, the vertical axis of the lower vertebrate car is shoved to one side, so that in Man, for example, it is directed from within, below, and in front — outwards, upwards, and backwards. In keeping with this change is the alteration in the direction of the horizontal axis of the lower vertebrate ear, so that in Mammals it comes to nearly coincide with the vertical axis ; in other words, there has been a revolution of the ear on two of its axes, the main change having taken place by a revolution of nearly 90® in the plane of the vertical axis.

Cut 24, — See explanation of PI. IX, tig- 3

2IO AVERS. [Vol. VI.

The nerve end organs of the human ear are six in number.

1. Macula acustica recessus utriculi.

2. Crista acustica ampullae anterioris.

3. Crista acustica ampullae extemalis.

4. Crista acustica ampullae posterioris.

5. Macula acustica sacculi.

6. The mammalian cochlear organ, or Corti's organ.

The two nerve end organs possessed by most all Vertebrates from the fish up to Mammals are thus seen to be wanting in these latter, — viz. macula acustica neglecta and papilla acustica lagenae cochleae,^ — while the important sense organ of the cochlea of Saurians has disappeared in the adult, though fully developed in the embryo, and functionally perfected before the completion of Corti's organ, which supplants it.

E. Phylogenetic Considerations

" Ich sagte, es sei mir gelungen, einen Grundplan des GehSrorganes der Wirbelthiere, das Wesen des Baues desselben festzustellen. Dieser einfache Plan muss nun nach dem grossen in die Wissenschaft eingefiihrten Principe wenigstens annaherungs> weise am meisten in der niedersten Wirbelthierclasse hervortreten und sich zugleich auf das strengste an die jiingsten Entwicklungsformen des Organes bei den Wirbelthieren iiberhaupt anschlies3en " (Hasse, 1873).

After an examination of all the evidence bearing on this question, both from the embryological and the anatomical sides, I propose the following solution of the problem of the morphological value of the parts of the internal ear and their interrelationships. I believe there can be no doubt that the internal ear develops from superficial canal organs, and this belief has led me to the discovery of the very simple law which governs their origin and succession. Stated in few words their origin and sequential relations are as follows : —

The primitive auditory sense organ is invaginated from the surface of the body, and may be said at this time to be in the vesicular stage (Cut 25, A). So far as we know, this condition is not retained by any adult living vertebrate. And it is quite possible that the auditory saucer may contain the rudiments of the two primary sense organs of the Cyclostome ear. The parent sense organ soon divides transversely into two nearly equal parts, which are the anterior and posterior sense organs respectively. The auditory vesicle is at the same time partly separated into two chambers (incomplete canals) to accommodate them. These chambers are the utriculus and sacculus.

  • The papilla acustica basilaris has also disappeared as such, and is represented by only one of its descendants, the organ of Corti.

Each of the two sense organs of the second generation after a while divides into two unequal parts in such a manner that the smaller sense organ appears as a bud from the parent. There are thus formed within the two chambers of the ear four canal sense organs belonging to the third generation. The two external organs are soon inclosed within the ampulla of two complete and relatively large canals, which are now formed about them, — an anterior vertical and a posterior vertical, formed in the manner already fully described. Up to this time the organs have retained the primitive relations to each other — a serial arrangement along a line running in an antero-posterior direction. Now there begins a distortion of the structure as a whole, which continues ever after, and reaches its greatest development in the Mammals ; viz. a process of sinking and drawing out ventrally of the posterior chamber of the ear, so that hereafter we might speak of a superior chamber and an inferior chamber. The sense organs of the third generation play the leading rdle in these changes, and by means of four sets of divisions, viz. by the bipartition of each sense organ present in the Cyclostome stage nearly simultaneously, there is produced a fourth generation of canal sense organs.

To this fourth generation belong all the sense organs of the internal ear of the higher vertebrates which in the diagram are numbered 8 to 15 consecutively.

During this process of sense-organ differentiation, the canals have been variously modified, and to show the relationship of the third generation to the fourth let us examine the diagrams shown in PI. IX, Figs. 2 and 3, in the construction of which I have ignored the ventral distortion spoken of (Cut 25).

The sense organ numbered 6 in the Cyclostome stage (the crista acustica anterior, or anterior canal organ, of Myxine and Petromyzon) has divided to produce sense organs 10 and 12 of the Gnathostome stage, i.e, the cristas acusticae anterioris et horizontalis, of the human ear.

i4 Auditory ▼esicle.

^ Utriculo-sacculus.

C Utricular sacculus + two ampullary canals.

D Utriculo-sacculus + two ampullary canals and lagenar canal.

Cut 2£. — Stage A represents the undivided superficial sense organ of the vertebrate ancestor, as it is invaginated from the surface and inclosed within the auditory vesicle to function as the macula acustica vesiculi; the only auditory sense organ of this stage. It is but little removed from the canal organs as they exist in, e^. Amia, and differs from it mainly in size. This condition is not represented in the adult of living Vertebrates.

Stage B represents the first division of the macula vesiculi, into its two offspring, the maculae acusticse utriculi et sacculi. This stage is likewise not represented among living forms.

Stage C is so characteristic of the Cyclostomata, so far as we know them, that we will call it the Cyclostome stage. Here the cristae acusticae anterioris et posterioris have made their appearance.

Stage D shows the condition of the organs in the Gnathostomata, hence its name, the Gnathostome stage. The cristae acustioe anteriores, horizontales, posteriores, and abortivae are all developed by the division of the two parent ampullary organs of the Cyclostome ancestral stage, while the macuUe utriculi et sacculi undergo division, giving rise to the parents of the utricular and saccular complexes of sense organs. These latter reach their highest differentiation in some Rodentia and porcine species.

The sense organ numbered 4 of the Cyclostome stage (the macula utriculi of Myxine and Petromyzon) divides into the sense organ 8 and sense organ complex 14 of the Gnathostome stage, the macula utriculi of the human ear, which is, as I stated when describing the Torpedo ear, a compound organ composed of the parent organ and its numerous progeny, all of which remain close together.

The sense organ numbered 7 of the Cyclostome stage is the sense organ of the posterior canal of Myxine and Petromyzon, and has divided to produce sense organs 11 and 13 of the Gnathostome stage, or the crista acustica posterioris, or the canal sense organs of the posterior canal of the human ear, and the so-called macula acustica neglecta of Retzius, which is the abortive second horizontal canal organ of the internal ear of man.

Sense organ 5 of the Cyclostome stage has divided to produce the sense organ 9, and the sense organ complex 15 of the Gnathostome stage, or the macula sacculi and the lagenar organ respectively, the organ of Corti of the human ear.

With the exception of the generalization that the vertebrate internal ear is derived from branchial sense organs — ue, organs of the lateral line system — a generalization which we owe to Beard, but which he did not attempt to establish by any detailed anatomica or embryological investigations, the phylogenesis of the vertebrate ear has been studied only on the basis of the adult structure.^ Such structures as the semicircular canals and the divisions of the body of the auditory vesicle have been used alone as the basis for proofs of the genetic connection of the types of internal ear — even the nerve supply has been excluded from its just share in forming the conclusions generally accepted hitherto.

The following table gives the genetic relation of the several sense organs of the ear, the group of animals in which each organ made its appearance, the length of time it persisted or whether it still persists, measured in terms of geological time, the fluctuations undergone by organs during their term of existence, whether of increase or decrease, and the time of death together with the group suffering such loss. In the case of the papilla basilaris, although it rises in the Reptilia into the form of the Sauropsid organ, it is only among the higher members of the class of Saurians that it is found, while among the birds the organ is not so fully dififerentiated as it is in the Saurians, and it is not intended to show by the diagram that the Sauropsid organ increases in value or is even present in birds in such perfection as it exists in the higher Reptilia.

^ See Recapitulation D.

Retzius finally came to the conclusion that this nerve end organ had arisen from the posterior, ampullar sense organ, and that among the higher forms, especially the Mammalia, it was no longer produced, or, as he expressed it, the macula neglecta in these forms had disappeared in the crista acustica posterior.

These canal structures had no special phylogenetic significance for investigators in this field ; for although it was known that the auditory vesicle was invaginated from the surface of the body, the connection of the sensory part of the invagination with the superficial canal organs was not understood. Now that we know that there is a genetic connection, many of the intricate problems receive their solutions, and the genetic relationships appear clear and certain for all the types. The demonstration of these facts deals another blow, and a fatal one, at the degeneration hypothesis which has been so persistently applied to the elucidation of Cyclostome anatomy and development, with such pernicious morphological results. (This will apply equally to Amphioxus, though only indirectly in this particular instance.) This solution relieves us from the necessity of explaining away the vertebrate ear on every occasion, when we seek to establish a relationship between the vertebrate and the invertebrate types ; for we are led to see the value of very §imple, superficial sense organs in an undifferentiated group of animals, for the building up of structures of great complexity, and of intricate relations to other parts of the animal body in the members of higher forms, and also to recognize the manner in which the structure and functions of organs may be profoundly changed in the course of time. And it also enables us to understand how a primitive central nervous system like that of Amphioxus may be altered by the development, the high specialization of circumscribed areas of the periphery necessitating specialization of the central apparatus.

Now, while it is not known that Amphioxus is provided with an organ of hearing, the next higher forms do possess an internal ear of such structure that not only does it help us to understand the more complex Gnathostome type, but proves conclusively that, so far as the ear is concerned, the Cyclostomes have not suffered degradation of structure. In his paper on the development of Petromyzon, Scott (1887, 259), lac. cit. p. 297, says : " It is a question as to whether these peculiarities are to be regarded as primitive or as the result of degeneration. The much greater simplification of the ear in Myxine suggests strongly of degeneracy, but, on the other hand, the entire absence of the horizontal semicircular canal may very well be a primitive feature. It is plain that the auditory organ of the Lamprey is derived from the same primitive type as that of the higher vertebrates ; but whether in the differentiation of the Lamprey it has passed through stages higher than the present condition, and more like that of the typical fishes, cannot from present evidence be decided."

"Regarded as a whole, the sense organs of Petromyzon do not show degeneracy, but rather a retardation of development." As this quotation shows, Scott was well satisfied from his studies of the development of the Lamprey that it could not have descended from more highly organized ancestors, but he was not able to decide what relationship (to descend to particulars) the ear of Myxine bears to that of Petromyzon, nor the genetic connections of the Cyclostome ear with the higher fish type.

Scott's conclusion {loc, cit, 300) that "the epidermal sense organs of the head and the lateral line are not developed in connection with the ganglia of the cerebral nerves, or with the lateral nerves, but at a later stage " has been shown by Kupff er to be erroneous. And the light which the latter's researches have thrown upon the relation of the superficial sense organs to ganglion formation on the one hand, and to the internal ear on the other hand, is most welcome and important.

The walls of auditory vesicle are converted only in part into the labyrinth of the ear, the other part forming a ganglion ; and since the relations of the invaginations in connection with the ganglia of the V and X nerves bear the same relation to these ganglia that the auditory involution does to the acusticofacial ganglia, and since we know the latter to be an involution of an organ of the lateral line system of canal organs, it follows that all these invaginations are intimately connected with production of the sense organs of this system. That the canals are not found in the Cyclostomes, save in the case of the auditory organs, is due to a secondary modification of the process of development ; the process of canal formation going no further than the primitive invagination, which soon disappears.

Kupfifer's objection that, in the case of the V and X ganglia, he was unable to detect anything like a sensory epithelium is hardly valid ; for, in the case of the auditory vesicle, a relatively long period elapses after it is invaginated before it forms the isolated sensory epithelial patches ; and considering that the V and X (auct.) do supply the sense organs of the lateral line throughout their territory, we cannot hesitate to accept such important testimony for its full value. Kupffer calls attention to the fact that these structures have the following things in common. First, they arise from a common Anlage. Second, they arise in the same horizon in the dorsal region of the body. Third, they have fundamentally the same mode of formation. Fourth, they have the same relations to the dorsal roots of their respective nerves.

Relative to the kinship between Cyclostomes and Gnathostomes, I quote Gegenbaur's opinion as expressed in a notice of Retzius's work (98, 1885) p. 127: —

"Von grossem Interesse ist es, zu sehen, wie die jeweilige Organisationsstufe des Labyrinthes im Wesentlichen mit der iibrigen Organisation harmonirt, indem sie innerhalb einer gewissen Grenze sich halt. Unsere Vorstellungen von der Phylogenie der Wirbelthiere finden damit eine neue Bestatigung. So stellen sich die Cyclostomen von den iibrigen Vertebraten, den Gnathostomen — so weit entfernt dass nicht einmal deren Bogengange eine strenge Vergleichung mit denen des letzteren zulassen. Dieses bestatigt nur die grosse Bedcnklichkeit der Schliisse, die von der Organisation der Cyclostomen auf jene der Gnathostomen ohne Weiteres gezogen zu werden pflegen." It is not the least service which the anatomical facts brought together here have rendered, that they have proved that so far as the ear is concerned there is a direct relation between these two groups of animals, and that the former stand as the ancestors of the Gnathostomes. Whence, instead of rendering the phylogeny of the Gnathostomes more difficult, and isolating the Cyclostomes into unknown relations, the facts of auditory anatomy so far as yet worked out indicate the contrary in a very instructive manner. As we now know their auditory anatomy, the differences between Myxine and Pctromyzon are in many respects as great as between Pctromyzon and the fishes, and yet the two former undoubtedly belong to the same group, which, so far as existing forms are concerned, is a very small one.

With the Elasmobranchs appear the third canal organ and its canal, the so-called horizontal, external or lateral canal. We know from the development that its sense organ arose by the division of the crista acustica ampullae anterioris of the Cyclostome type. We are also in position to say that the older view advocated by morphologists, that the two verticals are the older, and the horizontal the younger canal, is the true one, while the view advanced recently by Villy is entirely erroneous — the reverse of the truth, and rests not upon a fundamental fact of development, but upon a variation, an ontogenetic departure from phylogenesis, such as not infrequently occurs in the development of all organs, especially in the higher animals.

Against the view that the completed canal of the canal system is the primitive condition of the system, so far as existing vertebrates are concerned, one may oppose the very plausible objection that, since all of the Holocephala and some Teleosts have the canal incomplete as a more or less open groove on the surface of the body, and since the Cyclostomes do not retain the canals in any form during adult life, and further, since the closed canal may be easily formed by the fusion of the borders of such open grooves as are present in, e.g. Chimaera, and Tetrodon, it is only reasonable to suppose that the open groove is the primitive condition and constitutes a phylogenetic stage passed through in the development of the higher type of closed canal. When, however, we consider that the internal ear is a very ancient structure, and that in all known cases the sense organs developed in it become inclosed in complete canals by a process exactly similar to that discovered in the formation of the sense organs and their canals in the admittedly primitive ganoid type, we are compelled to admit that such a process could hardly have arisen within the closed capsule after its separation from the surface and its removal away from external influences, and that consequently there must be a genetic relationship between the canal organs of the internal ear and the superficial canal organs ; and since there is not the slightest doubt that the superficial canal organs are the original or parent organs, we are brought to the unavoidable conclusion that the vertebrate ear is a transformed canal organ. By the involution of the auditory vesicle the organs are inclosed in a protecting vesicle, and a development of further protective structures would be, to say the least, a superfluity. If, then, the only rational view to take of the whole matter of the further differentiation and great complication of the auditory sense organ after inclosure necessitates the conclusion that all vertebrate forms possessing an internal ear, provided with canals and canal organs, must have descended from ancestors possessing a closed canal system on the surface of the body, I think that there is no escape from this conclusion, that the three distinct types of lateral line organs found in the Cyclostomes, the Elasmobranchs, and the Holocephala, Ganoids, Teleosts, and Amphibia are modified from the. simple type of canal organs as they are still found in bony Ganoids, most Teleosts, and many of the Urodele Amphibia. As a somewhat parallel case where intricate structures are developed instead of the simple ones as had been supposed on a priori grounds to have preceded and led up to the formation of the complicated conditions, we have the phenomena of karj'okinesis, or indirect cell division. It is now known that karyokinetic complications occur in the division of the unicellular forms of the organic world, and it would seem that direct cell division, whenever it occurs, is a shortening of the ancient and, so far as we can now see, original method of cell division. This view, as regards the homology of the canal organs in the several vertebrate groups, is the one which most recent writers who have dealt with the surface organs of the Ichthyopsida have advocated on the basis of very different facts from those which I have given here.

It follows from what has been said above that the system of canal sense organs is a very ancient one, since it must have antedated the origin of the internal ear of the Cyclostomes. For although absent from Amphioxus, it is proven to have existed in the Cyclostomes by the presence of the canal organs of the ear. The Cyclostomes do not now possess the canals during adult life, though there is good reason to believe that they are laid down in the young larvae.

The Elasmobranch group shows many important and extensive modifications of this system in both the development and adult relations of these organs, and Balfour has pointed out the probable cause of the changes.

It is only among the Ganoids and their descendants the Teleosts that we get the most perfect preservation of the original mode of canal formation.

Although for the most part closed, Allis has shown {loc, cit p. 491) that the lateral canal may for a part of its length remain an open groove.

Sagemehrs view, according to which the Teleost condition is derived directly from the Ganoid condition as typified in Amia, is, I believe, the correct view.

Balfour states (loc, cit. p. 445, II) : ** It is clear that the canal of the lateral line is secondary, as compared with the open groove of Chimaera or the segmentally arranged sense bulbs of young Teleostii ; and it is also clear that the phylogenetic mode of formation of the canal consisted in the closure of a primitively open groove. The abbreviation of this process in the Elasmobranchii was probably acquired after the appearance of foodyolk in the egg, and the consequent disappearance of the free larval stage." Allis is evidently inclined to take the same view of the relation of these two forms of sense-organ channels, for he says (loc, cit, p. 530) : "These different conditions both in the Teleosts and in the Ganoids would also be obtained if the development, as shown in Amia, was simply arrested instead of undergoing retrogression ; that is, by supposing that the Teleosts had never attained the Amia condition, instead of having passed through it as indicated by Sagemehl." The modification in the development of the canals in Elasmobranchs is paralleled by the modified manner in which the auditory involution is formed in Amphibia and Teleosts, where the vesicle does not open on to the surface of the body in any stage of its growth, being formed as an involution of the nervous layer of the ectoderm in the Frog and in the Teleost as a solid ingrowth of this layer, in which the auditory cavity only later makes its appearance. Here we have an ancient structure lost from the ontogenetic history, and although an attempt to reproduce this structure is made by the embryonic cells, they are prevented by changed conditions. I think it cannot now be reasonably doubted that so far as existing forms are concerned the closed canal preceded all the various modifications which have been described.

Why should the territory within the bounds of the superficial, common zone of the VII and IX have developed the ear.^ Why not some other part of the canal system because plainly enough the sense organs in this zone were the most suitable structures for natural selection to seize hold of and develop further, both physiologically and morphologically, for the simple but sufficient reason that any sensory impulses striking this single region, so sharply circumscribed, would be propagated into two separated centres of the brain simultaneously, and thereby " ring in " a multiple alarm, and this single zone contained the only territory so provided. Owing to the peculiarities of the propagation of wave motion, one part of the head would have been as good for this as another, but it was necessary for the organs to be confined to small space. There exist in vertebrates to-day (most fishes and aquatic amphibia) similar arrangements which have been produced by the renewal of the sensory structures over the gap left by the insinking ear, and we thus have an incipient, superficial ear, which may in future, if the animals so provided should ever send up another growing stock capable of reaching the degree of differentiation represented by the descendants of ancient fishes, — the mammals of to-day, — I say this surface ear may be carried below and produce a second internal ear of the essential characteristics of the existing one. Animals higher than fishes have lost this potentiality, and are in danger of being compelled to give way to some new tribe of creatures which may sometime spring from the more generalized fishes armed with greater powers for the struggle of life, which may mean simply that they will be provided with more perfect sense organs.

We must not think of the fish type as a cold and fast, immutable thing, but as something plastic, in ceaseless agitation and strife toward greater perfection of organization, or in other words these vertebrates are still subject to the necessities of variation and survival of the fittest.

It is unnecessary to argue at great length to show that two neighboring sense organs receiving their nerve supply from two cranial nerves having distinct sets of central connections would be on this account specially suited to give the animal the greatest possible amount of information about what was going on outside, at the same time permitting the apparatus to occupy the least possible space. The ear Anlage was so placed that it might be housed inside the head, leaving the surface of the body free for sense organs of another degree of specialization.

No other area of equal size on any other part of the body could give the animal such good physiological service. Hence this area with its sense organs was specially suited to be differentiated by natural selection, and its early and sufficient involution and burial within the tissues of the head have ever since afforded protection to it, while all other organs of its kind have disappeared from the surface of terrestrial animals. The process of involution has enabled the animal to preserve primitive conditions — the necessary conditions of existence for such hairbearing structures. Although the ear sense organs lie on the morphological surface of the body, yet they are kept immersed in a watery fluid.

Cut i6. — This dia^im illastialM Ihe reklire position of the surface sense oi^an* find their canals with Iheic nerve connections in the Ganoid Dughsh. After AUii (4), PI.XLII, Fig.49.

The so-called semicircular canals develop as more or less curved structures, because they are formed out of a portion of the external surface of the body, which- has been inclosed within the head. Since on the surface of the body, in the typical and usual process of development, the canals always open at both ends on the surface, so inside the auditory vesicle they open at bofh ends. Since they are laid down as curved grooves, they naturally hold that form as canals. The mechanical conditions of their development would alone cause them to assume the semicircular or curved shape. It must not be supposed that an exact semicircular shape is the usual form of these canals, for such is far from being the case, and I have very great doubts that the mathematically accurate canal, or even a near approach to it, ever occurs in the whole vertebrate group. Usually the canals have the shape of segments of ellipses, parabolas, or hyperbolas ; when simple or when complex or irregular, a repetition of one or more of these curves. As has often been noted, the canals do not lie in the plane passing through the centre of the two ends and the centre of the middle portion (usually the apex) of the curve, but quite frequently one half the curve lies above, the other below, this plane. In man this is regularly so. In the bird the canals appear to be much more perfectly semicircular than in any other group save some of the fishes.

The canals do not even form about the same patch of sensory cells. For, according to some observations on the embryo fish and amphibian, the posterior canal originates about the cochlear patch of cells, while the anterior arises about a part of the utricular patch, the horizontal in its turn being formed by a division of the anterior sense organ. The adult ear preserves traces of this mode of development, as members of every vertebrate group whose anatomy has been studied clearly prove. In Myxine we have the simplest condition, the posterior canal, arising from the end of the vesicle opposite to the anterior canal, the former innervated by the cochlear, the latter by the vestibular branch of the auditory nerve. Between Myxine and the Elasmobranch the anterior canal organ divided, giving off the external canal organ. The saccular organ became separated from the utricular, but its offspring, the posterior canal organ, remained within the saccular territory. The cochlear organ, later, divides again. I have not yet worked out the full details of the development of the sensory patches of the ear above the fishes, but there can be no doubt that they all arise in the typical manner now known for the most important auditory sense organs. From the phylogenetic standpoint, then, the ear canals, both in their development and in their adult condition, certify to descent from surface canals ; or strictly speaking, they cotulusively show themselves to be the surface canals of a submerged superficial area, whichy owing to its more or less flask-like form, permits only a mediate communication of its canals with the circumnatant fluid. Even this communication is lost in most existing forms, and the inner surface of the ear chamber becomes the true mother surface of the ear canals. One very important matter I have left over from the anatomical description, because a proper knowledge of the embryological stages is very necessary to its proper appreciation, indeed, for its demonstration. Ever since the discovery by Retzius of the "macula acustica neglecta " this auditory sense organ has been a source of discussion and investigation. Retzius, Hasse, Kuhn, and others have paid especial attention to it, and Retzius especially has investigated its occurrence and relations in numerous species of all the large groups of vertebrates. After giving the evidence he had gathered from such extended studies, Retzius sums up his researches and concludes as follows {ioc, cit, p. 238) : " Im Ganzen geht nur aus Obigem hervor, dass die fragliche Nervenendstelle weder, wie ich selbst fur die Fische zuerst angenommen habe, die Pars basilaris cochleae bildet, noch, wie Hasse und A. fiir die Amphibien meinten, einen, 'Anfangsteil der Schnecke ' (Pars initialis Cochleae) darstellt. Wir haben es hier hingegen mit einer ganz besonderen Bildung, einem eigenen und in der That sehr eigenthiimlichen Endorgan zu thun, welches zuerst bei den Fischen auftretend bei den Amphibien, besonders den Anuren, seine hochste Entwickelung erfahrt, bei den Reptilien wieder verkiimmert, um bei den Vogeln und den Saugethieren immer mehr zii verschwinden^ gewissermasscn in die Crista acustica der frontalen Ampulie, aus welcher sie moglicher Weise von Anfang an durch Abtrennung entstatideft isty zuletst aufgehend. Die bisherigen Namen dieser Nervenendstelle, sowohl Pars basilaris cochleae als Pars initialis cochleae, miissen also aufgegeben werden. Es ist nicht eben leicht, fur sie einen guten neuen Namen zu finden.

Macula acustica utriculi posterior * wiirde fiir die Meisten Falle richtig sein, nicht aber fiir alle. Ich habe deswegen einen indifferenten Namen gewahlt, und nenne nunmehr diese Endstelle * Macula acustica neglecta' als Erinnerung des Uebersehens, welches ihr so lange Zeit zu Theil wurde." The sense organ thus described by Retzius is the product of the division of the posterior ampullar sense organ, as Retzius suspected on morphological grounds from his comparative studies of so many forms. The ontogeny of the organ in the Amphibia clearly proves its origin.

As regards the macula abortiva (macula neglecta, Retzius) in the Mammalia, there are two views ; though there can be little doubt that Retzius is essentially correct in his conclusion that this sense organ has disappeared from the mammalian ear. Hasse objects to this view, on the ground that such important structures as sense organs, when once they have been fully formed, are not likely to disappear again ; and since Henle and Reichert had described a small branch of the saccular nerve which they traced to what was supposed by them to be a small macula located in the sacculus near the dividing line between it and the utriculus, he concluded that the crista abortiva was really present in the mammalian ear. Retzius has more recently instituted a systematic search for this nerve branch and end organ in preparations of the human ear as well as in dissections of other mammalian ears made especially for this purpose, and has failed to find the slightest trace of such structures. He consequently concludes that the earlier observers were in error, and that this sense organ has disappeared from the mammalian ear.

Although I have shown that the crista abortiva is never a fully developed sense organ, being an abortive organ from its first appearance in the vertebrate series among the fishes until the waning powers of the parent organ fail to give birth to the organ at all (as in the mammalian group), it is not impossible that this sense organ may still occur in members of the lower mammalian groups, — e,g, the Monotremata, — or even that it may occasionally appear as an atavism in individuals of the higher orders. At the present time, however, we do not know of such instances, unless the observations of Henle and Reichert are correct. Admitting that such atavism may occur, Retzius's conclusion still remains essentially true. In either case the plan of the distribution of the nerves remains the same. It is evident from the history of this part of the ear that there is from the first a tendency toward the reduction of the parts first to appear in favor of the cochlear region, which steadily increases in functional importance and receives an ever-growing nerve supply. This ner\'e branchlct is not the only one which has disappeared during the transformation of the piscine into the mammalian ear ; for we know of another branchlct occurring in forms as high as the reptiles which has ceased to be developed, and there may be still another. The one first mentioned is given off from the utricular nerve, while the second branchlet belongs to the saccular nerve.

The papilla lagenae, which is so important in fishes, amphibia, reptiles, and birds, has disappeared from mammalian anatomy — disappeared in the same sense that the macula neglecta or crista abortiva has disappeared, by failing to appear in the development as a discrete sense organ. The Monotremes, it is true, are said to still retain the lagena, but they are hardly to be accepted as typical mammals. The subject receives added interest, however, from the fact of their still retaining the organ beside a genuine reptilian (saurian) cochlear organ. I think, by reviewing the matter in this light, that the views of Hasse and Retzius, apparently antagonistic, are made harmonious, and both are correct in the sense here indicated.

The new auditory sense organ, which the brothers Sarasin think to have discovered in the ear of Ichthyophis glutinosus^ and which they propose to call the "macula fundi utriculi," is in all probability no other than the macula neglecta. I may say that Retzius's observations seem to me quite conclusive on this point. The spot is evidently an offspring of the saccular macula through the posterior canal organ, and so, in any case, belongs to the posterior division of the auditory chamber.

The proof is conclusive, I think, to show that Corti's organ is not, as Retzius supposed, the homologue of the papilla basilaris of the Ichthyopsida and Sauropsida, but only a descendant of this ancient organ. The differences of structure between the embryonic and adult cochlear organ in the mammals that have as yet been studied, are so great that we are justified in speaking of Corti's organ as an entirely new organ, which arose in the ear of the differentiating reptile in connection with those changes which produced the profound modifications of other organs of the body culminating in the mammalian type. The growth of the organ has been such that a fragment of the cochlear organ invisible to the unaided eye is sufficient to enable us to determine whether it was from a reptile, or a marsupial or placental mammal. The changes that have occurred in this organ in a microscopic way are then characteristic of what we commonly speak of as changes in type of structure as applied to gross anatomy, and they direct our attention to the fact that deep-seated, ue, thoroughly protected, organs are subjected to destructive changes in most unaccountable manner in correlation with changes affecting concomitantly all other parts of the body in greater or less degree. I must admit that it is by no means clear to me what has been the gain to mammals in changing from the sauropsid to the mammalian type of cochlear organ, for I can see no physical reasons why the reptilian organ should in great part be destroyed after having once acquired the degree of development it had attained in the immediate ancestors of the mammals and birds, as illustrated by the condition present in such a reptile as the Alligator.

Having found from my own investigations in three groups of birds, Rasores (Gallus), Columbinae (Columba), and Passeres (Mimus), that the development of the cochlea is not so far advanced as in the hydrosaurian reptilia, it will be necessary to change the view advocated by Hasse, according to which the saurian reptilia stand as transitional forms between the amphibia and the lower reptilia and the birds, for it is obvious that in cochlear anatomy the birds hold a place apart from the direct line of descent as typified in the mammalia'n cochlea. As this is a matter of great importance, not alone as concerns the ear, but for the general problem of the phylogeny of the avian group as well, I quote the following account which our author gives of his views of the phylogenetic relationship of birds to reptiles as shown in the quotation from page 35 of his final digest of auditory anatomy.

" Das Gehororgan der Crocodile bildet nun den unmittelbarstcn Uebergang zu dem der Vogel, wie das von Siredon den schonstcn Uebergang von den Fischen, namentlich den Teleostiern, zu dem der Amphibien zeigt und die Aehnlichkeit, namentlich in dem wichtigen Bestandtheile der Schnecke, ist so gross, wie sonst nirgends zwischen zwei Wirbelthierclassen, mit Ausnahme vielleicht zwischen Vogeln und Monotremen, welche Ictztere zu untersuchen ich leidcr keine Gelegcnhcit hatte. Ich finde, wie das iiberhaupt aus dem Vcrhalten der iibrigen Organe bci den Vogeln zu erwarten, im Ganzen nur geringfugige Unterschiede in der Gestalt des hautigen Labyrinthes, die sich wohl dahin pracisiren lassen, das diejenigen Vogel, welche ein offincs foramen rotundum besitzen (Natatores), also diejenigen, die wir als tiefer stehend erkannt haben, eine relative kiirzere, weniger entwickelte, schwacher gekriimmte Schnecke zeigen, als die mit geschlossenen (Grallatores, Columbae, e.g.), und da die Schnecke gerade der Theil des Gehororganes ist, der durch die Wirbelthierreihe hindurch allmahlig immer hoher sich ausbildet, niemals aber Riickschritte in der Entwicklung macht, so ist auch dieses Verhaltniss fiir den Rang unter den Vogeln wichtig. Im iibrigen begegnen wir hier wieder denselben Hauptbestandtheilen, wie bei den iibrigen Wirbelthieren, der pars superior, dem eigentlichen Labyrinthe oder Bogenapparate und der pars inferior (sacculus und Schnecke), und beide besitzen an derselben Stelle, wie bei den iibrigen Vertebraten, eine enge Communication in Gestalt einer engen, am aiisseren Theile der Unterflache der Vereinigung der Bogengangcommissur mit dem utriculiis und der Verbindungsrohre der hinteren, alleinstehenden AmpuUe befindlichen Rohre."

Hasse describes (ii8, p. 34) the morphological features of the Crocodile's cochlea (116, 1870) as determined by him, and, with little if any modification, what he says is true of the cochlea of the Mississippi Alligator. His statements are confined to the framework and cochlear walls and to the general form and features of this tube. As he does not describe the sense organs of the cochlea, I have endeavored to supply this want in a previous chapter. It should be borne in mind that this quotation really describes the ancestral fonn or type of the mammalian cochlear organ.

" Eine unendlich viel grossere Selbstandigkeit bekommt die Schnecke, und namentlich die machtig ausgewachsene/^rj basilaris gegentiber dem sacculus bei den Crocodilen. Die cochlea communicirt nicht langer mittelst einer einfachen Oeffnung mit dem hinteren unteren Theile des Sacklumen, sondern die Schnecke ist in alien ihren Theilen vollkommen von ihm abgeschniirt, die Verbindung der oberen Vereinigung der beiden Schneckenknorpel (Vorhofsblindsack) mit der Sackinnenwand, der membrana Reissneri mit der Sackaussenwand also vollkommen gelost und nur indireckt vorhanden und zwar durch Vermittlung der communication, die zu einer vom hinteren unteren Theile des sacculus ausgchenden, horizontalen, nach aussen und etwas nach hinten gevvandten Rohre, dem canalis reuniens, geworden ist, und die von jetzt an bei den Wirbelthieren als constante Bildung auftritt. In diese gehen die Sackaussen-, -innen-, -ober- und -unterwand gleichmassig iiber, sich verdiinnend, respective verdickend. Die Schnecke selbst, die bereits bei den iibrigen Reptilien mit der Spitze, der lagena, eine leichte hakenformigc Biegung nach hinten zeigt, somit in der unteren Partie schwach nach vorne convex, nach hinten leicht concav ist, zeigt bei den Crocodilen diese Kriimmung auf das deutlichste in der ganzen Ausdehnung, allein gleichzeitig eine spiralige Drehung (Halbspirale) und zwar derartig, dass wenn die membrana Rcissneri, wie bei den iibrigen Reptilien, in dcm oberen Theile der Schnecke nach aussen sehend gedacht wird, sie an dem unteren mit der Aussenwand der lagena nach hinten sieht. Nun bekommt freilich die sichelformig nach hinten unten gckriimmte Schnecke nicht diese so ausgepragte, der der iibrigen Reptilien entsprechende Stellung (membrana Reissneri aussen, membrana basilaris innen, Nervenknorpel vorne und vicreckiger Knorpel, ligamentum spirale, hinten), sondern wegen der Kriimmung des canalis reuniens statt nach hinten unten, nach aussen wird wenigstens der obere Theil der membrana basilaris nach aussen hinten, der untere mit der Innenwand der lagena gerade nach hinten gedreht, wahrend dem entsprechend der obere Theil der membrana Reissneri, die hier als qucrgefaltete Membran, tegmentum vasculosum, erscheint, nach vorne innen, der untere mit der Aussenwand der lagena nach vorne gekehrt, wahrend der Nervenknorpel, der limbus spiralis cartilagineus wesentlich hinten innen, der dreicckige, das Spiral ligament, vorne aussen liegt. Die pars basilaris ist betrachtlich langcr geworden dem entsprechend auch die Basilar membran. Diese ist aber auch relativ breiter, wie bei den Schildkroten und beginnt an der Einmiindung des canalis reuniens, unterhalb dessen die Vereinigung der Knorpel zur Bildung der erstcn Andeutung eines Vorhofsblindsackes vor sich geht, und endet an der lagena, die jedoch an Grosse nicht zugenommcn hat. Gleichzeitig mit der Ausdehnung der pars basilaris und somit des Nervenknorpcls hat dann auch natiirlich die Ausdehnung des Nerven und der macula, die auch hier das anschlicssende Drittel der Basilar membran einnimt, zugenommcn, und diese setzt sich in die lagena fort, dcrcn Nervgegcniibcr dcm der pars basilaris jctzt selbstandiger erscheint." Keeping in mind the hydrosaurian type while examining the mammalian cochlea, we shall have no trouble to follow the main phylogenetic steps of development of the latter, especially if we begin with the monotreme cochlea as the first mammalian stage.

I am in full agreement with Hasse's views of the relationships of the cochlea in the two groups as given below, except in so far as it relates to the lagena, where I am sure our author has fallen into a serious error in supposing that the lagena sense organ persists in the mammalia as a part of the organ of Corti. Of course he has not distinguished between the several derivatives of the primitive cochlear organ, and he consequently applies to the mammalian cochlear organ the old term, " papilla basilaris."

Hasse writes (ii8, p. 42) : "Die beiden Knorpel wiirden also, wenn das Gehororgan wie bei den niederen Reptilien senkrecht, statt von oben hinten nach unten vome stande, wie bei ihnen vorne (limbus spiralis cartilagineus) und hinten (ligamentum spirale) liegen. Naturlich andern sich wegen der ausgepragten spiraligen Windungen der iibrigen Theile des Schneckenrohres diese Lagerungsverhaltnisse, doch sind diese leicht zu abstrahiren, so dass ich darauf keine Rucksicht zu nehmen brauche. Das sich die Schneckenrohre der Sauger und des Menschen in eine pars basilaris und in eine lagena theilt, brauche ich wohl kaum zu erwahnen, ebensowenig dass erstere vorzugsweise ausgewachsen ist. Die lagena hat sich dagegen nicht bios nicht fortgebildet, sie ist auch nicht einmal in ihrer Ausbildung stationar geblieben, sondern wir finden dieselbe einmal hautig geworden (hautiger Kuppelblindsack) und dann scheinbar reducirt. Sie ist hier nicht ampullenformig erweitert, sondern stellt mehr das einfach blindgeschlossene Ende des cylindrischen Schneckenrohres dar.

" Die pars basilaris bildet auch bei den Saugern und Menschen, wie bereits angedeutet, einen Knorpelrahmen mit einem anfanglich vorne oben gelegenen Nervenknorpel oder limbus spiralis cartilagineus und einem hinteren, unteren, dreieckigen, dem ligamentum spirale, die sich wie bei den Vogeln und Crocodilen am oberen Schneckenende vereinigen."

" In der Lichtung desselben gegen die scala tympani, also nach innen gewandt, spannt sich die vom Anfange der Schnecke bis zum Ende derselben, dem Kuppelblindsacke, allmahlig und gleichmassig an Breite zunehmende membrana basilaris, wahrend nach aussen, zwischen den ausseren Theilen des Nervenund dreieckigen Knorpels, dem limbus cartilagineus und dem ligamentum spirale, an der scala vestibuli sich die nicht langer quergefaltete, sondern in der ganzen Ausdehnung glatte, zarte membrana Reissneri ausspannt."

"Was nun die macula acustica des Schneckenrohres, des organon Corti der Autoren, betrifft, so finden wir dass dieselbe nicht wie bei den iibrigen hoheren Wirbelthieren, von den Schlangen angefangen, theilweise auf der membrana basilaris, theilweise auf dem Nervenknorpel, dem limbus spiralis cartilagineus ruht sondern wir sehen, dass sie den grossten Theil der membrana basilaris, vom Ansatze an den Nervenknorpel angefangen, einnimmt und das ist ein interessantes Verhalten, da wir wissen, dass von den Schlangen bis zu den Vogeln ein immer grosserer Theil der Basilar-membran die Nervenendapparate tragt, die sich nun nicht bis in den Grund des Kuppelblindsackes, der lagena, wie bei den iibrigen Vertebraten, sondern nur bis an die Grenze desselben erstreckt, so dass also die lagena der Sauger und der Menschen im Gegensatzc zu der der ubrigen Wirbelthiere nicht von Zweigen des acusticus versorgt wird."

The evidence of comparative anatomy leaves no doubt of the direct descent of the mammalian cochlea from the reptilian type. The relationship of the birds to the reptilia needs further investigation before any satisfactory conclusions can be reached. But I think that we are no longer entitled to place the birds next the mammals and higher than the saurian reptiles in respect to the degree of development of their auditory organs.

Although ontogenetic evidence seems to lead to the conclusion that the auditory organ arose by the invagination of a single superficial sense organ^ it is by no means certain that this is true ; for there are certain facts of comparative anatomy and certain phylogcnctic considerations which point to the conclusion that the auditory organ has arisen by the bringing together of two originally distinct sense organs which were together sunk below the surface. The main facts at present in favor of this view are these : —

  1. In all eared vertebrates the auditory organ is supplied from two distinct brain centres {ie. the ear nerves run from the cells of origin in the ear to the so-called nuclei in the brain), one lying in close connection with the facial nuclei, the other intimately related with the glossopharyngeal nucleus.
  2. In all eared vertebrates the so-called auditory nerve is composed of two distinct roots — an anterior and a posterior — which supply the anterior and posterior chambers respectively.
  3. In all these forms the anterior root is external to the brain, united with the facial nerve.
  4. In some fishes the nerve to the posterior ampulla is derived from the glossopharyngeal nerve, between which nerve and the posterior root of the auditory there exists, however, a more proximal connection.
  5. The auditory vesicle is always developed between the facial and glossopharyngeal nerve roots.
  6. The endolymphatic ducts are supplied on their mesial faces by branches of the utricular and saccular nerves, while the distal end of the saccular duct, in some fishes, opens into a canal containing sense organs innervated by the glossopharyngeal nerve.
  7. The so-called eighth cranial or the auditory nerve must have arisen from branches of two distinct cranial nerves, and is not homodynamous with such cranial nerves as the fifth or tenth, as we now understand them. This is true (a) because the auditory sense organs thus supplied were primarily only a portion of the canal sense organs innervated by the original nerves of the pre-auditory condition of these sense organs ; {b) because the auditory nerve is clearly not a complete nerve, and is not even equivalent to a dorsal root of a cranial nerve, for its two divisions are probably merely branches of the dorsal roots of the seventh and ninth nerves, since they draw off only a portion of the sensory fibres from these two nerves.

The primitive division of the auditory chamber and its nerve supply into two so sharply marked portions is thus phylogenetically accounted for, and at the same time the early ontogenetic changes in the auditory vesicle receive their explanation. »

The two sense organs, the maculae acusticae of the utriculus and sacculus, are thus derived from two organs terminating two separate canal systems which had, as they may still be seen in Amia, become confluent on the surface of the body midway between the roots of the facial and glossopharyngeal nerves as they issue from the brain. At the point of junction the two half-pores united into a single pore, which in some fish forms {e.g. Torpedo) persists as the outer opening of the endolymphatic duct, and the only persisting indications of the separate origin of these organs and their canals is their nerve supply. It is a necessary consequence of the great functional differentiation which the ear organs have suffered that their nerves should also become much increased in size, and instead of appearing now as nerve branches they have become really larger than the parent nerves from which they arose. (Cuts i and 25, PL I, Figs. I, 15, and 16, and PI. IX, Figs. 2, 3, and 4.)

The vertebrate and invertebrate auditory organs, although parallel and analogous developments, are in no sense homologous structures, notwithstanding the apparent homology of the embryonic organs at one stage of their development in vertebrates with those of the invertebrates.

The only attempt to utilize the facts of embryology to obtain a solution of the phylogenetic questions of the vertebrate semicircular canals is that made by von Noorden, and illustrates how completely he failed to comprehend the significance of the transformation processes within the ear of the bony fish, which he had so clearly seen and described. Our author gives a purely teleological explanation of the processes he studied, and makes no attempt to bring them into harmony with the processes of canal development, of which he was cognizant in other forms — mammals especially. In conclusion, von Noorden expressed a conviction that the study in other forms of the processes he had described for bony fishes would, to use his words, "manchcs neu und interresante zu Tage bringen."

I quote his explanation mainly because it is unique in the literature of the subject, and because it serves to show how far away from a comprehension of the significance of the details of auditory development even the investigators in this field have been.

"Dcr Weg, den die Natur einschlagt, um zum Ziele zu gclangen, ist ein ausserordentlich einfacher. Das Problem, welches sie zu losen hatte, war : aus einer einfachcn Hohlkugel eincn Raum mit mehreren Abtheilungcn herzustellen. Die Natur umgeht cs, die einmal angelegte Wand, wclche den Hohlraum von der Umgebung scheidct, in ihrer Form zu andem, Rinnen in derselben anzulegen, die spater zu Rohren abgeschniirt werden. Ein solches Unternehmen ware vergleichbar dem Beginnen eines Baumeisters, der einen Raum auf alien Seiten mit Wanden umgiebt und nachher einen Theil der Wande wieder einreisst, um dadurch eine Verbindung jenes Raumes mit ringsumher befindlichen Raumen herzustellen. In vielen Fallen verfahrt die Natur in solcher Weise. Wie viel einfacher gelangt sie hier zum Ziel ! Zunachst stellt sie die ausseren Wande des gesammten Raumes, dessen sie bedarf, her. Dann treibt sie spitzenformige Auswuchse von der Blasenwand in das innere, die zu Balken sich vereinend, sich wie Lehnen in einer Hohlkugel verhalten und von vorn herein durch ihre Richtung die Richtung der Bogengange bestimmen. Das Material, auf welchem sie diese herstellt, ist das einfachste, welches im thierischen Korper vorkommt. Es scheint der Natur zunachst nur darauf anzukommen, in moglichster Eile ein Model zu schafifen, welches sie spater durch vollkommeneres Baumaterial ersetzt. Der morphologische und histologische Entwicklungsprocess, den ich fur das Gehohrorgan der Knochenfische beschrieb, ist so eigenthiimlicher Art, das man mit Recht fragen kann ob ahnliche Vorgange nicht, auch bei der Entwickelung des Gehohrs der Amphibien, Vogel und Saugethiere sich abspielen. Es ware sehr wunderbar, wenn eine derartige originelle Entwickelungsart nur auf die Fische beschrankt ware."

After bringing together the results of the many years of work on the vertebrate ear which he and other students working under his direction had obtained, Carl Hasse tells us that having carried out his plan of studying the morphology of the ear through the whole vertebrate series, he will attempt to solve the problems of the phylogeny of the vertebrate ear. The axiom governing the ideas which he puts forth in this connection is that of the continuity of the animal series. He formulated a ground plan of the animal auditory organ on the basis of the invertebrate organs, more especially those of the Mollusca. But to go still further back, he says {loc. cii, p. 5) : " Als einfachste Form des Gehororgans ware wohl eine an der Korper oberflache befindliche, mit einem oder mehreren cuticularen, starren, nur durch Schallwellen ewegbaren, frei in das den Korper umgebende Medium ragenden Harchen versehene Zelle zu denken, an deren centrales Ende eine von einer Ganglienzelle ausgehende Ncrvenfaser trate, die dann Entweder wie mir am wahrscheinlichsten durch das Innere der Zelle, oder iiber die oberflache derselben bis an die Basis des Haarcs oder der Harchen, vielleicht unter Theilung verliefe und hier mit einem leicht veranderlichen Korperchen ende." With this as a basis he passes on to a survey of the auditory organs of the main divisions of the animal kingdom. It is unnecessary to follow further in this direction, for it is not possible at the present time — much less so than when Hasse wrote — to homologize the various so-called auditory organs of the invertebrates even among themselves, and as the evidence accumulates we are carried further and further away from the conception of a genetic relationship of the vertebrate to the invertebrate auditory organs of any group. Hasse's basis for the origin of the auditory organs of all animals, — i,e. the hair-bearing nerve-end cell is doubtless true, — but the same may be said of all sense organs, and it is most probable now that the auditory function as such was not assumed or acquired until after such sensory cells became aggregated into groups or sense organs proper.

I think that the views here briefly outlined, while certainly not to be considered final or as all of them completely demonstrated, may, nevertheless, serve to point out to us the salient features of the future mammalian ear, since they are not without an extensive morphological foundation.

From the beginning the vertebrate auditory organ as a single one (or a pair of) canal organs through modifications which it (they) have suffered in the descent of the phylum, the canal organ has been gradually losing ground and has been more and more replaced by modified descendants, the most complicated and peculiarly modified of which is the chain of transformed organs known as the organ of Corti among the Mammalia, which has descended from the papilla basilaris of the lower vertebrate forms.

The organ thus modified is typical, I think, of the future ear, which will not retain much else than the cochlea. The semicircular canals will disappear, the maculae sacculi and utriculi will gradually atrophy and their chambers become much modified or entirely aborted.

The typical mode of disappearance of these organs is, I think, foreshadowed in the disappearance of the crista abortiva and the papilla lagenae, both of which "disappear" by failing to appear in the development Qf the ear of those forms lacking them, and they consequently are to be counted in as members of the organ complexes forming these so-called auditory maculae. Now extending this process further, guided by abundant indications found in the mammalian ear, we find the cristae acusticae anterioris and horizontalis failing to bud off from the macula acustica utriculi and the crista acustica posterioris remaining in the macula acustica sacculi along with its abortive sister organ. Thus the sense organs of the ear located in the parts first developed in point of time and present in even the lowest forms above the Cyclostomes are reduced to the Cyclostome type, and unless some new need of the organism calls upon the declining maculae and revivifies them, we may expect them to become more and more undeveloped, until finally the cochlear organ alone will seem to be a product of the auditory involution as represented in the adult anatomy, while for a time the rudiment of the canals and later of the sacculus and utriculus in something of their pristine independence will appear as ontogenetic structures whose significance will hardly be understood if our literature shall have failed our descendants. That this condition of things is in the remote future goes without saying, but that in essentials the above picture is trustworthy cannot be doubted by those who believe in the law of evolution and the manifestations of its workings presented to us in the story of the origin of the vertebrate ear and its manifold transformations down to the present time.

As regards the modifications of the accessory acoustic apparatus, I have nothing to add to the little already given. I have paid but slight attention to its history, mainly because it is not essential to the acoustic function and also because it lies beyond the limits of, and in no way influences the conclusions of this study.

F. Physiological

Eine hdchst wichtige Betrachtung in der Geschichte der Wissenschafl ist die, dass sich aus den ersten Aniangen einer Entdeckung Manches in den Gang des Wissens heran und durchzieht, welches den Fortschritt hindert, sogar ofters lahmt. So hat auch jeder Weg, durch den wir zu einer neuen Entdeckung gelangen, Einfluss auf Ansicht und Theorie. Was warden wir von einem Architecten sagen, der durch eine Seitenthiire in einen Palast gekommen wftre, und nun, bei Beschreibung und Darstellung eines solchen Gebaudes, AUes auf diese erste untergeordnete Seite beziehen wollte?

Und doch geschiet dies in den Wissenschaft jeden Tag. — Goethb.

1. Introduction.

2. The equilibration and other theories of the function of the semicir cular canals.

3. Theories of audition.

4. The canal organ theory of the function of the auditory sense organs of existing vertebrates : physical, physiological, and psychical acoustics.

In reconsidering the functions of the vertebrate ear from the canal-organ standpoint, a new theory of audition will be developed in harmony, not only with my discoveries in the anatomy of the ear, but also with the generally accepted ideas of the processes involved in sense perception by hair-bearing sensory cells. I believe, however, that we have very slender foundation for forming final judgments of the functional relations of any parts of the internal ear, and that at present what we imperatively need is not speculation, but experimentation. Careful, extended, and unbiassed experiments on the sense organs of the lateral line system of the lower vertebrates, to determine what is their function and how it is carried out, and then more experiments on the ear of the less differentiated representatives of our type, to determine what functional changes have arisen during the transformation process, and then finally the combination of the knowledge thus gained with the results of experiments upon the human subject. If proof is demanded for the statement that most of the speculation and experimentation on the auditory function, especially as regards its different phases, has led for the most part to ephemeral results, it is easily forthcoming, for there are few investigators who during the last half-century have written on this subject but regret the paucity of facts and the evident insufficiency of the prevailing theories.

In Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologies III, 1879, P- ^S^* Hensen, in writing on the auditory function, says: "Trotz ausgiebigen Studiums der Literatur und trotz eigener, seit 10 Jahren gemachter Erfahrungen kann ich fiir eine Schlussfolgerung geniigende Basis nicht gewinnen." Although this was written in connection with his essay on the functions of the semicircular canals, I think it would need very slight, if any, modification in order to extend it to all other parts of the auditory canal complex and the contained sense organs. As Hasse had found the lack of a sufficient basis for generalization the one characteristic common to all the works on the morphology of the ear, so Hensen has found a similar lack of a basis of facts sufficient for satisfactory conclusions the ever-present character of the literature of the physiology of the ear.

Under the circumstances one is hardly to be pardoned for writing more words on the subject unless he shall add to a foundation of fact, and not merely to one of speculation.

Most physiological laboratories contain an ever-increasing quantity of apparatus and experimental devices which, having served their purpose, are laid aside. They have, perhaps, been instrumental in making important advances in knowledge, but are now no longer useful, owing to, it may be, the very advances they themselves have been instrumental in bringing about. As a rule, however, so far as any future advance in the physiological domain is concerned, this apparatus is useless. It may have an historical value, it is true, and is often preserved for this reason alone.

I think it cannot be gainsaid that all of the theories with reference to the physiology of audition are so entirely inadequate that to continue their use is to hinder the progress of knowledge. Hence these theories stand in the same relation to the literature of this subject that the antiquated apparatus does to the newer investigations of the laboratory. If what has been written about audition is in the main inoperative, the only promising way to the light is a return to first principles. We must experiment for facts and relations on which to build up a consistent theory.

If our predecessors had only begun with the alpha, and learned the auditory alphabet morphologically as it is displayed in nature, instead of learning the form of the omega of the series alone, and endeavoring from their very imperfect knowledge of its morphological relations to understand its physiological laws, we would, doubtless, be much nearer than we are today to an adequate understanding of human audition. More than four centuries before Christ, Empedocles is said to have referred the auditory impressions to the cochlea. In our year, a.d. 1891, we are not able to do much more, notwithstanding our accumulations of anatomical details.

About all we know of audition is: ist, That the ear is the auditory organ ; 2d, That the sensory hair cells (auditory nerve origin cells) of the ear are in some way instrumental in transforming wave motions into auditory sensations.

The amount of experimental knowledge of the functions of the lateral line organs is very limited indeed. Wiedersheim summarizes the contributions to the subject in the following words {loc, cit. p. 363) : ** Was nun die Wirkungswcise der Nervenhiigel und ihre verschiedenen Modificationen bei Fischen und Amphibien anbelangt so kann ich fiiglich absehen von einer Erorterung der von den verschiedensten Seiten dariiber aufgestellten Hypothesen. Mit voller Sicherheit lasst sich dariiber nichts behaupten, die grosste Wahrscheinlichkeit hat jedoch die von Merkel aufgcstellte Ansicht, nach welcher es sich keinesfalls um einen chemise/ten^ sondcrn nur um eincn meclianischcn Reiz (Erschiitterung des umgebcnden Wassers }) handeln kann." " VVir batten also Tastorgane vor uns. . . .*' Mayser and Emery consider the organs of the lateral line system to form an accessory organ of hearing, whose function, even if not strictly that of the perception of sound wave motion, nevertheless comes within the territory of the auditory function.

Mayser found that the central terminations of the nerves originating in these organs were intimately related to the auditory centre in the medulla, and based his conclusions as to their function mainly on this anatomical connection.

We are thus enabled to understand how the organs of the lateral line system, especially those in the head region, must have a function analogous, if not identical, with that of the auditory sense organs ; for they both take up vibrations from a circumnatant liquid medium and transmit them to the nerve ends, and both have, likewise, the same origin ontogenetically.

While one set of organs has retained its primitive adult relations, even in the adult forms of the present day, the other has been modified so as to form the internal ear in the manner already described.

The lateral line organs take up their wave motions from a more limpid fluid than the ear organs, since the endolymph contains a quantity of mucin and earthy matter in solution, which not only increases its specific gravity, but gives it a certain viscidity. This denser medium of the internal ear is more favorable to the rapid transmission of auditory stimuli than water, and it may be that in this fact we have an explanation of the origin of the mucous canals of Elasmobranchs.

The lateral line organs also perform an important function indirectly as organs of equilibration^ since they convey to the centres of co-ordination information of the direction in which matter in space surrounding the animal is moving.

Suppose a fish to have its body rotated about the long axis ; it is evident that this motion will cause two currents to be produced, setting in opposite directions. Thus, if the rotation is from the right to the left, or with the hands of the watch, the current on the left side will be upward and the current on the right side will be downward, when judged from the fish's standpoint ; for though the water moves not at all, the fish would refer the movement to the water, since the sensation of motion would be taken up from or caused by the water.

These organs are also auditory in a sense ; for they are like the special auditory organs in their structure and central nerve relations, and since the ear organs have been derived from, and what is more important still, since at least three of the sense organs of the auditory apparatus retain all the characteristics of the superficial organs, we may reverse the line of argument, and say that all the external organs are primarily auditory in function though in an undifferentiated degree.

After a brief resume of the main historical features of the semicircular canal question, we will pass to a consideration of the function of these famous tubes and their inclosed sense organs, the cristas acusticae, in the light of new facts brought forward by a series of experiments recently carried out by Professor Steiner of Heidelberg University, and of the new morphological considerations already given in this paper.

The semicircular canals have been the subject of untold numbers of experiments, and hundreds of vertebrates, high and low, have lost their lives on the altar of science (the protests of the anti-vivisectionists notwithstanding), without the attainment of the results hoped for, since the object of this sacrifice — the determination of the function of the semicircular canals — had become more and more difficult with the increase of physiological experiments.

This result was mainly due to the firm belief which had become the basis of most attempts to solve the questions relating to the ear canals ; viz. that the canals must have some function of a peculiar and special nature, which, owing to their spatial relations, must be closely connected with the equilibration of the body. This view was supported by the fact that with two exceptions all species of vertebrates had the same sort of apparatus. The ear as a whole was treated as something unique in the animal body, with no genetic relations to other structures, and the canals, highly specialized portions of the ear organs. It was perhaps impossible to make much progress so long as this belief was allowed to dominate all conclusions from speculation or experiment, but more might have been done had physiologists earlier taken hold of the sadly neglected field — comparative physiology.

The first experimentalist to take up the subject of the function of the semicircular canals seems to have been Flourens, who in 1828 found that Pigeons with resected semicircular canals were unable to control the movements of their heads, and his observations were later repeated by Cyon (62, 63, 64), who described the phenomena attending the division of the canals as follows. After section of the external semicircular canal the Pigeon moves its head from side to side around an axis passing vertically through the head as the bird stands.

After section of the posterior canal the movements are up and down around a horizontal axis passing through both ears, but after section of the anterior semicircular canal the movements are diagonal components of the two just described. These pendular movements cease after a time when the section is one-sided, but they are more intense and persist longer when they are bilateral.

Flourens and Cyon maintained that the movements always occurred around an axis at right angles to the plane of the sectioned canal. Although hearing did not appear to be destroyed, the locomotion of the birds was seriously impaired, and not infrequently indications of muscular paralysis made their appearance. To Flourens the explanation, that these disturbances were due to injury to the fibres of the nerve of hearing, was not satisfactory, and he was led to the view that the cochlear nerve was composed of two sorts of nerve fibres. One set composing the cochlear nerve subserves the function of audition, while the other set composing the vestibular nerve subserves the equilibrious function and is distributed to the semicircular canals. Injury to the former produced deafness, while injury to, or destruction of, the latter was followed by the phenomena described above. Similar results with more details were obtained on repetition of these experiments and with some variations of the conditions by Czermak, Harless, Brown-Sequard, and Vulpian ; and although it was generally agreed that injury to the semicircular canals of birds and mammals (the animals mostly experimented on were Pigeons and Rabbits) or the vestibular nerve was followed by disturbances resembling very closely those following operations on the cerebellum ; and although Flourens had advanced the view that the vestibular nerve was the peripheral extension of the cerebellar peduncles, these later observers did not agree with Flourens that the disturbances following operations for canal section were due solely, or in great degree, to the section of the canals. Brown-Sequard explained the phenomena by assuming the existence of special sensory fibres in the vestibular nerve which by reflexes caused the muscular contractions producing the motor disturbances.

Vulpian, on the other hand, sought the cause of the trouble in an "auditory tumult," caused by continued abnormal stimulation or irritation of the auditory nerves.

Loewenberg (1872, 186) experimented with Pigeons after removing their forebrains, and concluded that section of the semicircular canals produced the motor disturbances by irritating the membranous canals, not by laming their sense organs ; and the disturbances were entirely reflex without the least participation of consciousness.

Up to this time the subject had not been advanced beyond the condition in which Flourens had left it; but in 1870 Goltz gave a new aspect to the problem by explaining the observed phenomena in the following manner. This author recognizing the great similarity between the motor disturbances in Pigeons whose heads are fixed in abnormal positions and those whose semicircular canals have been cut, concluded that since when the canals are injured the animal loses control of its head (and body), and since when it is forced to lose control of its head with canals intact it likewise loses control of its body, it was evident that the semicircular canals form an apparatus subserving the equilibrious function, and the cristae acusticae were in reality the equilibrious sense organs of the head and mediately of the body entire.

Goltz assumed that the sense organs in the ampullae were capable of being stimulated by pressure or other mechanical change similar to the nerves of the skin. The stimulation necessary for perception of spatial relations was supplied by the column of endolymph contained in the canal. Since this fluid would press most strongly on the lower parts of the canals, and since with variation in the position of the head one or other of the three canals would serve as vertical canal or horizontal canal, Goltz thought to have discovered the modus operandi of the canal function.

Each position of the head would be represented by a specific nerve stimulation from which the animal would be able to judge of its position in space. If, however, the canals were injured, these nerve stimuli, on which the animal depends for regulating its body, are due to injury, and consequently convey false information ; the co-ordinating apparatus making use of these stimuli induces false movements, or, as we say, co-ordination of movement is destroyed, and equilibrium of the body is lost. In 1872, Cyon re-examined Goltz's hypothesis and formulated a theory embodying the same ideas, and the same view was accepted on experimental evidence by Mach (1875, i88**), Breuer (1875, 41), Crum Brown (1874, 43**), Spamer, and some few others. About the only difference of views between these later observers and Goltz is the assumption by the former that in the movements of the head currents are set up in the canals whose flow will depend upon the amount and rate of the motions of the head. Thus they sought to establish the so-called dynamical theory of the semicircular canals as expressing more of the truth than Goltz's statical theory. This latter theory could only be maintained by assuming that the motions of the head and sensations of giddiness on canal section were due entirely to the injury inflicted on the canals, and Goltz recognized three essential structures, the injury to any one of which would be sufficient to cause the disturbances observed on what was supposed to be simple canal sections : the central organ, the peripheral end organs and their connecting fibres with the central apparatus, and the motor apparatus and connections. If, then, the disturbances were due solely to the section of the canals, it must be true that no injury to the brain has taken place. Goltz believed that injury to the brain was rigorously excluded in his operations on the canals.

Goltz, Brown-Sequard, and Flourens all agree that there must be other nervous elements present in the auditory nerve besides those ordinarily recognized apd to whose irritation the phenomena of giddiness were due, an assumption which the investigations of Magendie, Valentine, and Schiff contradict. Schiff (1859, 252) says : " Die Hypothese, dass der Acusticus in zwei Nerven zerfalle, von denen der eine dem Gehor diene, wahrend der andere die eigenthiimlichen Bewegungen des Kopfes verniittle, die Flourens nach der Durchschneidung der halbzirkelformigen Kanale beschrieb, entbehrt aller Begrundung."

Let us examine how far Goltz's view has been sustained. Pathologists believed that the evidence from pathology was not in favor of Goltz's view, and Boettcher by careful experimental investigations on Pigeons proved that Goltz's hypothesis rested on false conclusions drawn from incomplete knowledge of the results of the so-called canal section. It is not true that motor disturbances of the body are direct consequences of the abnormal position of the head following canal section, but, on the other hand, the abnormal position of the head is a consequence of injury to the brain as a result of the operation of canal section as carried out by Goltz. Boettcher concluded that all disturbances of the motor apparatus after canal section were referable to brain lesions, especially to the cerebellar peduncles, since he was able to section the canals without the appearance of the motions attributed to them.

Boettcher's observations were thoroughly substantiated by the experiments of Fraulein Tomaszewicz (1877, 276). As Boettcher had already resected the horizontal and vertical canals in the Frog without producing the least disturbance of equilibrium, so Tomaszewicz was able in her experiments on bony fishes to remove the semicircular canals without the fish showing the slightest traces of a disturbance of equilibrative power. These results agree entirely with those obtained by Kiesselbach in his successful operations. Finally, Cyon demonstrated that these motions and equilibrious conditions could not be due to the functiofts of the canals, since the same phenomena occurred after section of the auditory nerve^ and that rotation of a mammal in this condition brought on vertigo the same as in entire animals, completely exploding the dynamical theory.

Notwithstanding these investigations, Helmholtz (1877, 120), in the last edition of his Tonempfindungeny p. 249, practically adopts Goltz's view. Older experiments by Valentin and Schiff, in which these investigators had been successful in cutting the canals without bringing on motor disturbances, remained unnoticed while the work of Flourens, Brown-Sequard, Breuer, Mach, and Crum Brown, who had not succeeded in cutting the nerves or canals without such disturbances appearing, were given more weight than was their due. Cyon*s experiments in 1878 on Petromyzon were always followed by motor disturbances, but such a result was to have been expected, owing to the compactness of the parts and the practical impossibility of isolating the canals in such an operation.

The following observations, cited by Baginski, to whose account I am indebted for these important facts, were made by H. Munk on a Dog which had for several months suffered with dizziness and malposition of the head. Examination showed that the trouble was caused by a distension of the tympanic cavity with a liquid exudation. This fluid had not entered the canal complex, and apparently had not caused lesion of the latter nor of the brain. Here was a case showing symptoms similar in all respects to those following the experiments of Flourens and Cyon on resection of canals in mammals.

A solution of the ear canal problem might be possible if the relation of the ear canals in this case to the abnormal symptoms could be determined, but this could not be done owing to the impossibility of operating upon the canals in mammals without at the same time injuring the cerebellum, owing to its closeness to the ear and the very intimate relation of both structures to the bony wall separating them. Search was made for some means of arriving at the same goal experimentally. This pathological condition suggested trying if increase of pressure in the tympanic cavity would not produce the same symptoms as had been observed in the two sets of cases detailed above. Salt water of three-fourths per cent strength and varying in temperature from 9® to 15® C. was injected into the tympanic cavity and produced with increase of pressure malposition of the head and nystagmus.

These symptoms continued to increase in intensity with the increase in pressure. Most of the animals thus operated upon recovered after unilateral injection ; the majority of those subjected to bilateral injection usually died after a few days from, what the symptoms and post mortems proved to be inflammation of the brain. Vi^ith water at 38® C. the pressure required to produce these symptoms was greater than when colder water was used, and most of the bilaterally injected animals lived, only a few dying of inflammation of the brain. Other fluids were used, e.g, concentrated salt solution, ammonia solutions, etc., and they all produced the same symptoms, with rolling movements. In these experiments the symptoms were the more intense, the greater the chemical activity, and the greater the pressure or the more rapid the injection. The death of the animal operated upon usually followed in these cases on the same or the following day, and post portem examination usually showed hyperaemia or oedema of the brain, with inflammation or hemorrhages of the parts of the brain subjacent to the ear. These observations did not allow of any other interpretation than that the fluids had penetrated to the brain, and the careful examination showed that the membrana fenestrae rotunda was always ruptured, allowing penetration of the liquids from this foramen through the perilymphatic spaces into the subdural space, and from here on to the brain. As I have already shown, the endolymphatic and perilymphatic spaces both communicate with the cranial cavity, but in Munk*s experiments the communication was largely increased by rupture. Hydrostatic pressure obtained by introducing a glass tube into the tympanic cavity and filling it with water induced the same symptoms ; but if the symptoms did not make their appearance after a certain pressure was reached, they remained permanently absent. Wherever the symptoms appeared the membrane of the round window was found ruptured and the liquid found in the subdural space, about the brain, and especially abundant at the mouth of the aquaeductus cochleae in the jugular fossa. These results are in harmony with those obtained by Brown-Sequard, Magendie, Schiflf, and Schwan, who, by direct mechanical stimulation of that portion of the corpus restiforme lying on the fossa jugularis, had previously produced similar motor disturbances. Giddiness is then a result of irritation of the brain, complicated in these experiments with an irritation of the ear channels. In order to obtain a more precise answer to the problem, it was necessary to find a method of irritating the ear channels alone with the complete protection of the brain. By an easy operation on the Dog, following Haidenhain's method, the position of the internal ear may be exposed for operation by a removal of a piece of the ventral wall of the tympanic bulla. According as this operation is carried out, uni- or bi-laterally, is the animal made deaf in one or both ears. The animals thus operated on never show any trace of motor disturbances or of loss of the power of equilibrium.

If such an animal is killed some months after the operation, the entire internal ear is found in an advanced state of fatty degeneration. The sacculus and utriculus are frequently not recognizable, while the cochlea is transformed into a cicatricial tissue. If instead of destroying with the instrument only the utriculo-sacculus and the canals, the cochlea as well is broken up or removed, nystagmus and malposition of the head are the immediate symptoms, and they are accompanied by deafness. Post mortems of such cases always showed that in removing the cochlea the porus acusticus in tern us was exposed or injured, and by the rupture of the auditory nerve the cranial cavity was opened ; consequently in this operation the cerebro-spinal fluid must always escape. That in rupturing the auditory nerve the brain tissue is injured is quite apparent. Whereas such lesions are always followed by dizziness and equilibrative disturbances, such disturbances do not appear when the cochlea is preserved, and only the utriculo-saccular and canal end organs are destroyed and resorbed by the healing of the wounds. Giddiness does not result from the destruction of the auditory organs, but only from lesions of the brain ; and since the semicircular canals can thus be destroyed even in mammals without producing equilibrative disturbances, there is no question that the disturbances seen to follow canal section in Pigeons are not due simply to the section of the canals.

The disturbances appearing after canal section are of two kinds, — those appearing immediately after the operation and those which make their appearance some time (usually several days) after the operation, e.g. malposition of the head, on which Goltz laid so much stress. Pigeons thus operated on and showing the characteristic disturbances, when studied (dissected) five to eight days later, showed conditions similar to those just described for dogs. The injured ear was found to present a bony scar, within which the semicircular canals were hardly discernible. The larger ear chambers were entirely degenerated and converted into pus, and the inflammatory process had affected the brain, especially the vermis, which was usually found degenerate. While in such cases the abnormal symptoms only appear slowly as the cerebellar inflammation progresses, they may be brought on suddenly by deeper lesions ; and in all such cases blood was found in the medulla near the entrance to the fourth ventricle, and small hemorrhages were found in the cerebellum and pons. Since injury to the vermis is followed by malposition of the head, we must conclude that the inflammation and hemorrhages in the same parts cause the motor disturbances, and that these are due always to an affection of the brain, which either appears immediately after canal section or else later, induced by the inflammatory processes. Goltz's ideas are thus proven to be incorrect and his deductions refuted.

Baginski was never able to confirm the results obtained by Flourens, Goltz, Cyon, according to which there existed a constant relation of the motions of the head to the plane of the canal (or canals) cut. He found, on the contrary, no constancy in the symptoms after the same operation on different animals, and he concludes that after careful and exact observation he is certain that the assumed relation between the position of the semicircular canals and equilibrative disturbances following their section does not exist. The co-ordination disturbances of the body are not in any way subject to the spatial relations of the canals. The falling and pitching movements occurred in the same direction indifferently, whether the horizontal or vertical canals were cut.

Although there is a certain dependence of the disturbance on the direction of the canal sectioned in the pendular movements of the head on section of two canals, there are frequent enough undeniable variations. It is especially to be noted that the pendular motions of the head may be entirely absent, as happens most frequently, and at the same time often, in section of the posterior canal, and they may be replaced by others : the malposition of the head is such as usually only occurs after several days. Hensen has likewise pointed out that when motion follows canal section it is apparently due to the current of escaping lymph flowing on through the ear, which of course would cause irritation of the sense organ belonging to the canal, and thus give rise to the sensation of pain, the feeling of being wounded, which is also sufficient to account for all the motions observed. When one remembers in this connection that the malposition of the head may persist for a month or two and then give way to a return of the pendular motions, it is apparent that the latter have their cause also in the central disturbances. This deduction finds weighty substantiation in the configuration of the parts and in the very intimate connection between the brain and the semicircular canals. In Pigeons, the aquaductus vcstibiili^ after passing through the apertura aquaeductus vestibuli, according to the investigations of Hasse and Boettcher, opens into the subdural space. Consequently the endolymphatic fluid is continuous with the cerebro-spinal liquid, as Schwalbe and F. E. Weber have proven. In each operation of canal section there is thus brought about a change within the cranial cavity which has direct influence on the brain. Since the cranial cavity is opened on canal section, the pressure conditions of the brain are at once altered, owing to the escape of endolymphatic fluid and cerebro-spinal liquid. The pressure is of course suddenly lowered, and Magendie has shown that the usual consequences of tapping these liquids is the so-called "Taumelerscheinungen."

Thus the primary symptoms are explained, which, so far as motor disturbances of the body are concerned, are only different in degree, as one or both sides are operated upon. The pendular motions of the head are more difficult of explanation, following the sections of two like canals of two sides of the head, since a certain relation of the direction of the pendular motions to the canals cut had been noticed. Although the evidence thus gathered together is still insufficient to explain wholly the phenomena under consideration, it nevertheless points unmistakably to the central origin of these disturbances. All the phenomena following canal section in mammals and in birds are nothing more than the results of brain lesions such as are entirely adequate to explain the phenomena.

Baginski concludes from his own observations that " Sovielsteht indess fest, dass die meisten vorliegenden Untersuchungen fiir die Behauptung, dass die Bogengange die peripheren Organe des Gleichgewichtunns sind, dessen Centrum in Kleinhirn sich befindet, den Beweis nicht nur nicht erbracht haben, sondern dass im Gegentheil dieselben ganz und gar gegen diese Annahme sprechen " ; and further that " Wir wissen, ja iiber die Funktion der Bogengange trotzt aller bisherigen Untersuchungen iiberhaupt nichts."

Retzius had already called attention to Breschet's discovery that the auditory nerve was divided into two branches, each of which supplied semicircular canal organs. But the canal experimentalists have very generally been ignorant of this important fact, and Baginski (1883, 12) introduces it for the first time into this discussion.

Steiner's (270, 1886) experiments were at first, as he himself has shown, of a nature not likely to give unmixed results, and both in operation and in result were very much like Sewall's.

However, by improvements in the surgical operations necessary to effect the separation of the canals without disturbance to other branches of the auditory nerve than those ending in the ampullae, the experiments were finally made completely demonstrative.

Stciner was thus able to remove all six semicircular canals from the ears of the Sharks operated upon without causing the least apparent disturbame to the motor apparatus of these fishes. This experiment he repeated many times with the uniform result of seeing the fish^ when replaced in water ^ swim off as though anatomically perfect. In this conclusive way is the question settled, — the question of the part played by the semicircular ear canals in the function of equilibrating the body ; and it I clearly shown that these canals have no special or controlling influence on the spatial relations of the body.

It is manifestly important to determine what Sewall's and Steiner's first results were due to, and Steiner carried on experiments in the endeavor to answer the question. He observed that in any Shark operated upon, whether the semicircular canals were removed or not, when the instrument disturbed the calcareous crystals covering the utricular sense organ, the animal immediately executed reflex motions or *' Rollbewegungen," and as a rule the fish rolls toward the side thus disturbed.

When, however, both ears are thus injured, although the " Rollbewegungen " set in, they are too complex to be analyzed.

This investigator experimented with the utriculus by filling the whole auditory cavity with melted parafifine of low meltingpoint, and he found that such a procedure caused no disturbance of equilibration. He concludes from this that, contrary to what might have been expected, after the experiments on the otolithic mass of the utricular sense organ, where rolling motions followed each injury, that the function of equilibration resides not in the ear in any part. As it was advisable, if possible, to determine what causes produced the disturbance following displacement of the utricular otoliths and possibly injury to the nerve end cells of the utricular sense organ, Steiner carried on experiments to that end, and found that the disturbance in the motor mechanism is due to slight but certain and potent injury of the acustico-facial nucleus in the medulla. The injury produces motions that are not to be distinguished from those produced by section in this region of the medulla. Steiner concludes that, everything considered, we do not need a special explanation to account for the fact that careful cutting of the ampullar nerves or any injury to the ampullar sense organs which does not manage to reach the central nucleus, does not call forth rolling motions.

It is evident that Steiner's results cannot be due to a difference in character between the ampullary and utriculo-saccular nerves, for each of the two branches of the auditory nerve supply ampullar sense organs and otolith-covered auditory sense organs {e.g. the maculae utriculi and sacculi) ; and since it is injury to the latter alone which apparently causes the equilibrative disturbances and not of the nerves alone, it would seem

252 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

that we have here to deal with a disturbance of the relations of the otoliths to the sensory hairs. The otoliths when disturbed in the normal relations would cause many kinds of distortions of the sensory hairs, such as bending, crushing, or even breaking, and in this way irritate the central end cells by a stream of abnormal impulses in such manner as to cause confusion in the auditory co-ordinating apparatus, or if continued beyond the limit of reaction it would produce exhaustion of the apparatus so used and by sympathetic relations the motor disturbances. Owing to the absence of otoliths from the ampullae these disturbances would not be kept up after the first injury had been accomplished. Be this as it may.

Steiner has shown that medullary lesions of a light nature are within certain bounds capable of producing greater disturbance than the more extensive section of half the cord. Consequently the slight injury to the medullary acustico-facial nucleus caused by the dissection of the utriculo-sacculus and the injury of the sense organs contained gave rise to no unusual or exceptional phenomena; Steiner found also that the neighborhood of the acustico-facial nucleus was the most sensitive region of the whole medulla in sharks, and I am able to confirm his conclusion from my own experiments on frogs by means of the electric current ; other points on the floor and side walls vary a great deal in their relative sensitiveness.

The final conclusion is as follows : " Nehmen wir Alles zusammen, so folgt, dass die halbzirkelformigen Canale der Haifische so wenig wie der N. acusticus zu den Bewegungen resp. deren Gleichgegwicht in irgend welcher unmittelbaren Beziehung stehen, und dass die Storungen, welche Man nach mechanischem Angriff auf den Vorhof thatsachlich beobachtet, Zwangs bewegungen sind, welche ihre Ursache in einer mittelbaren Lasion des Nackenmarkes an der centralen Ursprungstelle des Hornerven haben."

This demonstration is as definite in result as it is decisive of the canal question so far negating the assumed functions. Considering the ease with which it is performed, we can hardly understand why it had been so long postponed.

As Foster has shown, in those experiments involving the use of several special senses^ the organs supposed to be special organs of equilibration are found to be less potent in this regard


than the eyes. If the canals were specially charged with the equilibrative control of the body, why do they not overcome the abnormal but powerful and for the time being controlling sensations induced by rotating the body with the eyes open }

It seems to me that there can be no question that all the theories and the supporting experiments have, not only not proved that the semicircular canals have any function whatsoever, but that they have, on the contrary, proved conclusively that providing they have a function, it is not either statically or dynamically equilibrative nor in any way connected with the spatial relations of the canals. The favorite and certainly one of the very best arguments to be brought forward as proof of the function of an organ is that the morphological relations not only favor or are entirely in harmony with the assumed physiological action of the organ, but are such as render the function ascribed the only available or the most highly probable function.

This argument from structure to function has been applied to the ear canals from the time when the theory, according them the function of determining the directions in space, was put forward by Scarpa, and the justice of the application no one has questioned, and the argument has retained its ascendency in the minds of physiologists above and beyond all negative testimony heretofore adduced.^

Although at present there are no more important facts to be brought out, an examination of the views of a few more anatomists will prove instructive. In the last edition of his Text-book on Physiology^ Foster says (p. 1013) : ** . . . that afferent

Since Scarpa's time the physiology of the car has been furnished with the •* direction" theory of the semicircular canals. Autenrieth, and later Kerner (1808), accepted and again propounded the same views, which had been generally accepted by English, French, and Italian anatomists since Scarpa's time. Johannes Milller raised objections to this view, and since his time the evidence has grown so steadily that to-day there is no longer any adequate foundation for the explanation. It has been generally discarded for many years, although several years ago Ogston again attempted to prove Scarpa's position to be the correct one. Hasse accepted no theory as applicable throughout the vertebrate series, but thought the ear might be connected indirectly with the orientation of the body. Hensen concluded that among the Mammalia, especially man, there was little probability that such a function was exercised by the canals. He attributed the perception of direction of sound to the differential action of the cars of the two sides of the head, and to the work of sensations other than the auditory. Meyer accepts this view as concerns the Sauropsida and Mammalia at least. According to Manilin (190, 1866) the semicircular canals serve to annihilate the sonorous vibrations.

254 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

impulses other than those of sight, touch, and the muscular sense do reach the brain and afford a basis of judgment as to the position of the body, does not by itself prove that those impulses come from the semicircular canals ; the arrangement of the canals is undoubtedly suggestive [italics mine] ; but it is quite possible that the afferent impulses may be generated by one or other of various changes, vaso-motor and others, of the tissues of the body which are involved in a change of position." "It cannot, therefore, be regarded as settled that the canals are the source of normal impulses, or that our conscious appreciation of the position of the head, and so of the body in space, is based on such impulses.** ** But such a view is not disproved ; and in any case it remains true that injury to the canals does in some way or other, either by generating new impulses or by altering pre-existing ones, so modify the flow of afferent impulses into the machinery of co-ordination as to throw that machinery out of gear."

M'Kendrick (1889) on p. 701 says, after stating Cyon's position in 1872, according to which the latter investigator considered the cristDe acusticae to be the peripheral spatial sense organs, the cristas of each set of canals, e,g, the two externals, controlling a dimension of space, that " the weakness of Cyon's theory is that it offers nd explanation of the mechanism of the canals."

We now come to the colophon. P. McBride, M.P., has published his views of the functions of the semicircular canals, obtained, it would seem, "durch eine Seitenthiire," if Goethe was just in asserting that science has daily to suffer from such architects. McBride's plan of the structural relations of the semicircular canals is constructed in the following manner. After showing to his satisfaction that the Cyon-Mach-BreuerCrum Brown theory, according to which they (the canals) are the peripheral organs enabling us to estimate our position in space, is insufficient and inconsistent, he says we should admit

nothing in life is superfluous," and that ** every physiological apparatus is the best possible for the well-being of the organism," and that in the animal economy ** there is reason for every anatomical detail." The first of these statements is so extensive in its application as to overwhelm any but the greatest intellects, and is for the most part left undecided by experimentalists, while the second proposition is certainly not to be classed


among those questions that have been definitely decided in the affirmative either by morphologists or physiologists. As to the third thesis, our author is undoubtedly correct, but if I do him no injustice, unintentionally so ; for his reasons, according to which the semicircular canals form a part of vertebrate anatomy, are not those which appear to find expression in the phylogenesis of these beautiful structures.

After stating that vertigo can only be produced by pressure on or disturbance of the ampullar nerves (an assumption which is well known to be incorrect), he says that if the canals were for equilibration only, they would probably have been put by themselves instead of being connected with the auditory apparatus, and the semicircular canals would not have been so unnecessarily exposed were this their only function, since they would thus present a striking contrast to all other physiological arrangements. " On the other hand, if they be so placed, as I believe, for some useful purpose, the most probable explanation is that while some sonorous vibrations are conveyed by the cochlear nerve to the true auditory centre, an afferent impulse is at the same time sent to the various motor centres through the ampullar nerves.**

Of a truth both cochlear and ampullar nerves, as representative of the two roots of the auditory, do connect through the auditory nuclei with the motor centres, but there is no reason at present for holding that the ampullae are specially connected with the motor apparatus.

Finally, to come to the main point for which this historical introduction is intended to serve as a preliminary and a preparatory, for the conclusion which I wish to draw, that the semicircular canals are so innocent of all the functions which have been heaped upon them that now that I have shown, by giving the results of the physiological experiments of other investigators, to what conclusion they have been forced to come by depriving themselves by experiment, one after another, of all the assumed facts concerning the assumed functions of the semicircular canals, it only remains for me to bring forward the architectural reasons for the semicircular canals to prove beyond doubt that they as canals have no participation in the physical processes leading up to auditory or other afferent sensory stimulations, and hence are in nowise auditory or

256 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

equilibrative in function. No part of the ear then constitutes a special organ of equilibration, of spatial sense, or of special motor control. The ear as a whole — and only because it contains sense organs, and they only because of their hair-bearing, nerve-connected cells — shares with other sense organs these important functions because of common association with motor and other centres, and has as its special function the perception of wave motion {i,e, changes in stress) in the circumambient water or other aqueous fluid, never of any other medium. Where the transformation of the motions thus transmitted to the auditory hairs takes place will be considered further on.

If the reader accepts this conclusion as to the function of the semicircular canals, he will certainly recognize in it an excellent illustration of the results which physiologists may hope to get from the careful study, not alone of adult structure, but of ontogenetic changes of structure. More than half a century of physiological experiment had failed to give the solution of the canal problem which the first study of their phylogenesis in connection with their comparative ontogeny at once revealed.

3. Theories of Audition.

It is proposed to restate in this chapter some of the problems of auditory physiology and to consider how much and in what manner they are affected by the additions to our morphological knowledge already treated of in chapter B. Hensen wrote, in 1879, "Helmholtz hat die Physiologic des Ohrs so tief und zugleich so umfassend bearbeitet, dass seine Lehren dies Gebiet mit Recht beherrschen," and one may readily satisfy himself that they are generally accepted by an inspection of the text-books and special papers on the subject.

Since I consider the outer and middle ear to be mere accessory structures acquired by the higher vertebrates in ever-increasing complexity for the sole purpose of enabling the animal to preserve in the aerial ocean^ on or near the bottom of which they live, the necessary aquatic conditions in which they were born {phylogenetically) and which they must preserve or lose their auditory organ completely, it follows that it will be unnecessary to enter into an account of them in a discussion concerning the essentials of the auditive processes, and I may as well say at once, that according to my view of their functions, every sense organ in the


ear executes an auditory function^ as regards essentials^ in the same manner as its prototype the lateral line sense organ ^ and there exist between the auditory sense organs differences only in degree^ not in kindy of the function subserved.

Likewise, the perilymphatic parts of the ear are not essential to the correct understanding of the auditory processes ; they are simply the enlarged lymphatic spaces always developed below and around these sense organs, from the lateral line condition increasingly up to the mammalian ear.

In 1838 Duges arrived at conclusions with respect to the functions of the parts of the internal ear which were later accepted by Helmholtz. According to this view the utriculosaccular chambers subserved the functions of perceiving noises and measuring the intensities of all auditory stimuli, while the cochlea alone was capable of the perception of tone and its timbre.

Carl Hasse (1873, 118) concludes his comparative studies on the vertebrate ear with a summary of his physiological ideas in these words (Joe, cit, p. 95) : " Thus we find also in mammals and in man masses which cover the macula (Corti's organ), into which the hairs of the hair cells freely penetrate, whose innermost layer, the membrana reticularis, adheres firmly to the cells of Corti, and consequently must follow the movements of the basilar membrane.

Should such a fibre of the membrana basilaris be thrown into vibration by the proper tone, in reptiles and birds, all of the isolation and hair cells lying on the fibre would move with it.

" They with the hairs would be moved against the membrana tectoria, whereby the stimulation of the nerve fibre which projects into the hair would be caused. The same is true of mammals and man, but in a more complete degree. The motion is propagated through modified isolation cells, attached to the fibre, which form an elastic arch, up to the auditory cells with the hairs and the membrana reticularis which are moved against the membrana tectoria.

"Thus we find that motion of the superposed groups of isolation and auditory cells is connected with the vibrations of the single fibres of the basilar membrane, while the neighboring ones do not participate, and by this means the vibration of such a cord reaches consciousness in isolation ; it calls forth a special

2S8 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

quantitative auditory sensation, the sensation of a tone. As I indicated before, it is not thereby rendered impossible that a simple auditory sensation may arise by means of the totality of the auditory cells of the cochlea ; contrariwise, this goes on concomitantly, since we know that the entire endolymph in the scala media may be set into motion through the membrana Reissneri, which then moves the entire membrana tectoria which covers all of the auditory cells and their hairs, and thus calls forth, in all, a nerve stimulation which receives no special localization characters, as in the case of the vibrations of the individual fibres of the membrana basilaris." The further details of Hasse's physiological ideas are given in the following extracts. All of Hasse's physiological ideas, which are the direct outcome of his view of the division of the ear into a pars superior and a pars inferior, are not pertinent to the present discussion, and after refuting the morphological basis on which they rested, it is unnecessary to enter into a discussion of them.

" Jede Bewegung also im cavum perilymphaticum muss sich durch die ganze scala vestibuli, an der ganzen Schneckenaussenwand, iiber den hautigen Kuppelblindsack (helicotrema), in die ganze scala tympani, an die gesammte Schneckeninnenwand und somit die Basilarmembran fortspflanzen, und die Zahl der Schwingungen der Knochelchen, speciell der basis columellas s. stapedis muss sich an der ganzen Basilarmembran und in der Endolymphe wiederholen und sich somit auch an der membrana tympani secundaria geltend machen, und das ist ja auch bis zu einem gewissen Grade unter der Voraussetzung eines bestimmten Druckes, unter dem die Perilymphe stehen muss, unter Helmholtz's Leitung von Burnett direkt bei Saugethieren und den Menschen nachgewiesen. Excessive Bewegungen werden auch hier entweder durch den ductus perilymphaticus und den peripherischen Abfluss desselben, durch das foramen rotundum, oder, wie bei den Saugern und den Menschen, durch den aquaeductus cochleae, wenn auch wegen der Enge des Abflussrohres kaum so vollkommen, wie bei den niederen Thieren, ihr Correktiv finden, ganz abgesehen von dem Muskelapparate, der sich bei Vogeln und Saugern an die Gehorknochelchen anheftet. Die Bewegung der Gehorknochelchen wird also eine Bewegung langs der ganzen membrana basilaris, die ja bei den Saugern und Menschen nahezu den ganzen hautigen Kuppelblindsack


absorbirt, und an der darauf befindlichen macula acustica auslosen, andererseits wird sich aber auch die Bewegung durch die membrana Reissneri, da sie auch langs dieser verlauft und diese Haut immerhin zart erscheint, am zartesten bei den Saugern und Menschen, etwas weniger bei Reptilien und Vogeln, bei denen sie moglicherweise ein Bewegungshinderniss sein kann, in der Endolymphe und somit an den Nervenendapparaten der macula und durch die Otolithenmasse der lagena der Crocodile und Vogel an den Nervenendapparaten der macula dieses Schneckentheils, in ihrer Gesammtheit geltend machen. Die letztere Bewegung, die der Endolymphe der scala cochlearis, wird demnach, da sie die Gesammtheit der Nervenendapparate wie im sacculus trifft, gegeniiber der durch die membrana basilaris vermittelten, die wir spater besonders betrachten wollen, eine einfache Gehorempfindung veranlassen. Keine kann sich aber in irgendwie nennenswerther Weise nach oben hin gegen den sacculus fortpflanzen, da die Communication des canalis reunicns, wie wir wissen, ausserordentlich eng und hochstens in Verbindung mit dem ductus perilymphaticus als eine Art Sicherheitsventil betrachtet werdcn konnte." "Somit ragen die Gehorhaare nirgends direkt in den mit Endolymphe angefiillten Binnenraum der Ampullcn hinein und die Bewegung muss sich erst der membrana tectoria mittheilen. Diese wird dann auf die Gesammtheit der Gehorhaare der crista acustica, die sie dcckt, wirken. Die Bewegung der Endolymphe trifft immer nahezu senkrecht auf das gewolbte, obere Ende derselben und auf die demselben aufruhende membrana tectoria und ich glaube, es wird einmal dadurch die Deckmembran auf die Gehorhaare geprcsst, dann aber auch wohl ein wenig auf ihnen verschoben, und somit wird die durch die Bewegung der Endolymphe hervorgerufene Bewegung der Gehorleiste und der membrana tectoria eine Bewegung der Gehorhaare und somit den Nervenvorgang auslosen. Diese membrana tectoria zeigt bei alien Wirbelthieren iibereinstimmende Verhaltnisse, nur die Cyclostomcn bildcn in dieser Beziehung eine Ausnahme. Es ist wohl moglich Oder sogar wahrscheinlich, dass dieselbe wahrend des cmbryonalcn Lebens auch bei ihnen als einfache Cuticularmembran existirt, allein im erwachsenen zustande erscheint sie verkalkt als eine Otolithenplatte, die sehr leicht in einzelne kugel — Oder schalenformige Elemente zerbrockclt, und wcnn

26o AVERS. [Vol. VI.

ich auch nicht glaube, dass das Verhaltniss derselben zum Nervenepithel und zu den Horhaaren desselben ein anderes, als bei den iibrigen Vertebraten, so bedarf dieser Punkt doch noch weiterer Untersuchungen."

In stating Helmholtz's view, let us begin with an account of what takes place when the stapes is forced into the oval window. According to his generally accepted views, when the tympanum is vibrating under the influence of aerial undulations, the stapes, owing to its mechanical connection with that membrane, executes to-and-fro movements which transfer the tympanic vibrations to the perilymph, in the form of delicate blows delivered against the surface of the fluid by the foot of the stapes. The fluid in the perilymphatic spaces, being bounded by bony walls, has only one means of escape, — the round window with its yielding membrane.

To reach it, the fluid of the labyrinth must either pass through the helicotrema, flowing over from the scala vestibuli into the scala tympani, or, as it would probably not have time to do so in the case of sonorous vibrations, press the membranous partition of the cochlea against the scala tympani. The converse action must take place when the air in the auditory passage is rarefied.

" When ^ the pressure of the fluid in the scala tympani is increased by driving the foot of the stirrup against the oval window, the membrane at the base of the arches (of Corti) will sink downwards {i.e. the membrana basilaris), the fibres of the second series of Corti's arches be more tightly stretched, and perhaps the corresponding places of the fibres of the first series be bent a little downwards. It does not, however, seem probable that the fibres of the first series themselves move to any great extent, for their lateral connections are strong enough to make them hang together in masses, like a membrane, when they have been released from their attachment in anatomical preparations. On reviewing the whole arrangement, there can be no doubt that Corti's organ is an apparatus adapted for receiving the vibrations of the membrana basilaris, and for vibrating of itself ; but our present knowledge is not sufficient to determine with accuracy the manner in which these vibrations take place.

1 Helmholtz, ed. 1877, or Eng. ed. 1885.


" Now Corti's fibres (pillars) are wound round and covered over with a multitude of very delicate, frail formations, — fibres and cells of various kinds, partly the finest nerve terminal fibres with appended cells, and partly fibres of ligamentous tissue, which appear to serve as a support for fixing and suspending the nerve formations. They are grouped, like a pad of soft cells, on each side of and within Corti's arches. The most important of them appear to be cells which are furnished with hairs, precisely resembling the ciliated cells in the ampullae and utriculus. They appear to be directly connected by fine varicose nerve fibres, and constitute the most constant part of the cochlean formations ; for with birds and reptiles, where the structure of the cochlea is much simpler, and even Corti's arches are absent, these little ciliated cells are always to be found, and their hairs are so placed as to strike against Corti's membrane during the vibration of the membrana basilaris."

" The essential result of our description of the ear may consequently be said to consist in having found the terminations of the auditory nerves everywhere connected with a peculiar auxiliary apparatus, partly elastic, partly firm, which may be put in sympathetic vibration, under the influence of external vibration, and will then probably agitate and excite the mass of nerves. Now it was shown . . . that the process of sympathetic vibration was observed to differ according as the bodies put into sympathetic vibration were such as, when once put in motion, continued to sound for a long time or soon lost their motion. Bodies which, like tuning-forks, go on sounding for a long time, are susceptible of sympathetic vibration in a high degree, notwithstanding the difficulty of putting their mass in motion, because they admit of a long accumulation of impulses, in themselves minute, produced in them by each separate vibration of the exciting tone. But, precisely for this reason, there must be the exactest agreement between the pitches of the proper tone of the fork and of the exciting tone, because otherwise subsequent impulses, given by the motion of the air, could not constantly recur in the same phase of vibration and thus be suitable for increasing the subsequent effect of the preceding impulses. On the other hand, if we take bodies for which the tone rapidly dies away, such as stretched membranes, or thin, light strings, we find that they are not only susceptible of sympathetic vibra



[Vol. VI.

tion when vibrating air is allowed to act on them, but that this sympathetic vibration is not so limited to a particular pitch as in the other case, and they can therefore be easily set in motion by tones of different kinds. For if an elastic body, on being once struck and allowed to sound freely, loses nearly the whole of its motion after ten vibrations, it will not be of much importance that any fresh impulses received after the expiration of this time should agree exactly with the former, although it would be of great importance in the case of a sonorous body, for which the motion generated by the first impulse would remain nearly unchanged up to the time that the second impulse was applied. In the latter case, the second impulse could not increase the amount of motion unless it came upon a phase of the vibration which has precisely the same direction of motion as itself. The connection between these two relations can be calculated independently of the nature of the body put into sympathetic vibration, and, as the results are important to enable us to form a judgment on the state of things going on in the ear, a short table is annexed : —

Diflerence of Pitch in terms of an equally tempered tone, necessary to reduce the intensity of sympathetic vibration to |\f of that produced by perfect unisonancc.

1. One-eighth of a tone

2. One-quarter of a tone

3. One semitone

4. Three-quarters of a tone

5. A whole tone

6. A tone and a quarter

7. A tempered minor third or a tone and a half

8. A tone and three-quarters

9. A tempered major third or two whole tones .

Number of vibrations after which the intensity of tone in a sonorous body whose sound is allowed to die out, reduces to ^ of its original amount.





4.75 3.80

3'7 2.71


" Suppose that a body that vibrates sympathetically has been set into its state of maximum vibration by means of an exact unison, and that the exciting tone is then altered till the sympathetic vibration is reduced to one-tenth of its former amount. The amount of the required difference of pitch is given in the first column in terms of an equally tempered tone (which is onesixth of an octave). Now let the same sonorous body be struck, and let the sound be allowed to die away gradually. The num


ber of vibrations which it has made by the time that its intensity is reduced to one-tenth of its original amount, is noted and given in the second column. Now, although we are not able exactly to discover how long the ear and its individual parts, when set in motion, will continue to sound, yet well-known experiments allow us to form some sort of judgment as to the position which the parts of the ear must occupy in the scale exhibited in this table. Thus there cannot possibly be any parts of the ear which continue to sound so long as a tuningfork, for that would be patent to the commonest observation. But even if there were any parts in the ear answering to the first degree of our table, — that is, requiring thirty-eight vibrations to be reduced to one-tenth of their force, — we should recognize this in the deeper tones, because thirty-eight vibrations last onethird of a second for A^ one-sixth for a^ one-twelfth for a\ etc., and such a long endurance of sensible sound would render rapid musical passages impossible in the unaccented and onceaccented octaves. Such a state of things would disturb musical effect as much as the strong resonance of a vaulted room, or as raising the dampers on a piano.

"When making a shake we can readily strike eight to ten notes in a second, so that each tone separately is struck from four to five times per second. If, then, the sound of the first tone had not died off in our ear before the end of the second sound, at least to such an extent as not to be sensible when the latter was sounding, the tones of the shake, instead of being individually distinct, would merge into a continuous mixture of both. Now shakes of this kind, with ten tones to a second, can be clearly and sharply executed throughout almost the whole scale, although it must be owned that from A downwards, in the great and contra-octaves, they sound bad and rough, and their tones begin to mix.

" Yet it can easily be shown that this is not due to the mechanism of the instrument. Thus if we execute a shake on the harmonium, the keys of the lower notes are first as accurately constructed and just as easy to move as those of the higher ones. Each separate tone is completely cut off with perfect certainty at the moment the valve falls on the air passage, and each speaks at the moment the valve is raised, because during so brief an interruption the tongues remain in a state of vibration.

264 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

Similarly for the violoncello. At the instant when the finger which makes the shake falls on the string the latter must commence a vibration of a different periodic time, due to its length, and the instant the finger is removed the vibration belonging to the deeper tone must return. And yet the shake in the base is as imperfect on the violoncello as on any other instrument.

" Runs and shakes can be relatively best executed on a pianoforte, because, at the moment of striking, the new tone sounds with great but rapidly decreasing intensity ; hence, in addition to the inharmonic noise produced by the simultaneous continuance of the two tones, we also hear a distinct prominence given to each separate tone. Now, since the difficulty of shaking in the base is the same for all instruments, and for individual instruments is demonstrably independent of the manner in which the tones are produced, we are forced to conclude that the difficulty lies in the ear itself [italics mine]. We have, then, a plain indication that the vibrating parts of the ear are not damped with sufficient force and rapidity to allow of successfully affecting such a rapid alteration of tones. Nay, more, this fact further proves that there must be different parts of the ear which are set in vibration by tones of different pitch and which receive the sensation of these tones,

"We may on the whole assume that the parts of the ear which vibrate sympathetically have an amount of damping power corresponding to the third degree of our table. Of course there can be no question of exact determinations, but it is important for us to be able to form at least an approximate conception of the influence of damping on the sympathetic vibration of the ear, as it has great significance in the relations of consonance."

Helmholtz means by the expression " sympathetic vibration " the vibratory response of a given structure to a determinate tone primarily, and to over and under tones secondarily. Physicists have shown that a vibrating body is sympathetically affected by tones both above and below its own proper tone, but that the sympathetic susceptibility decreases very rapidly as the scale is ascended or descended from the given note.

Helmholtz materially modifies his views from time to time as to the parts of the internal ear which vibrate sympathetically. In the first edition of his Die Lehre von den Tonempfindun' gen, he put forward the view that it was the rods of Corti


which were thus sympathetically affected, but in the fourth edition of his work he substitutes the fibres of the membrana basilaris, which, according to the measurements of Hensen and C. Hasse, he held to be admirably suited for the work. The membrane is composed of radial fibres in two or more sheets, but the fibres do not extend through the whole breadth. of the basilar membrane. These sheets are covered above and below by cellular and connective tissue of no inconsiderable mass as compared with the mass of the fibres of the membrane, but which most writers, following Helmholtz, have ignored as not affecting the result. Corti's arches are now considered by Helmholtz to be merely the ways along which the vibrations are transmitted from the basilar membrane to the nerve end cells.

According to Helmholtz, the long, stiff hairs of the ampullae are extremely well adapted for vibrating sympathetically with the motion of the fluid, and hence for producing mechanical irritation in the free nerve fibres which lie in the soft epithelium betivcen their roots, as he supposed.

In the utriculus and sacculus, on the other hand, the short sensory hairs, according to Helmholtz, project into the concavoconvex covers formed of otoliths and some undetermined matter, where they are stimulated by contact with the otoliths. Helmholtz appeared to lay greater stress upon the direct action of the otolithic mass upon the bare uenrs ; for he says {/oc. cit. p. 139) : ** Close to these surfaces {i.e. the epithelial surfaces of the maculae utriculi and sacculi), which are covered with nerves, lie the calcareous concretions called auditory stones. In human beinj^s the otoliths are free {i.e. not inclosed in a solid mass). These otoliths are also extremely well suited for producing mechanical irritation of the nerves whenever the fluid in the labyrinth is suddenly agitated. The fine light membrane with its interwoven nerves probably instantly follows the motion of the fluid, whereas the heavier crystals are set more slowly in motion, and hence also yield up their motion more .slowly, and thus partly drag and partly squeeze the adjacent nerves. This would satisfy the same conditions of exciting ner\'es, as Heidenhain's tctanomotor, which consists of a rapidly oscillating ivory hammer, which at every blow squeezes without bruising the nerve."

266 ^ y'ERS. [Vol. VI .

Our author further says (p. 151) : "If we maintain that every nervous fibre hears in its own special pitch, we should have to conclude that the vibrating parts of the ear, which convey these sensations of the highest tones to the ear, are much less sharply defined in their capabilities of resonance than those for deeper tones.

" This means that they lose any motion excited in them comparatively soon, and are also comparatively more easily brought into a state of motion necessary for sensation. This last assumption must be made, because for parts which are so strongly damped the possibility of adding together many separate impulses is very limited, and the construction of the auditory cilia in the little bags of otoliths seems to me to be more suited for this purpose than that of the shortest fibres of the basilar membrane. If this hypothesis is confirmed, we should have to regard the auditory cilia as the bearers of squeaking, hissing, chirping, crackling sensations of sound, and to consider their reaction as differing only in degree from that of the cochlear fibres."

The vibrations of the membrana basilaris cochleae Helmholtz describes in the following manner : —

"The mechanical problem here attempted is to examine whether a connected membrane with properties similar to those of the membrana basilaris in the cochlea could vibrate as Herr Hensen has supposed this particular membrane to do ; that is, in such a way that every bundle of nerves in the membrane could vibrate sympathetically with a tone corresponding to its length and tension, without being sensibly set in motion by the adjacent fibres. For this investigation we may disregard the spiral expansion of the basilar membrane and assume it to be stretched between the legs of an angle of the magnitude of 277."

Here follows an extended mathematical computation of the amount of vibration of such a membrane, for which the reader is referred to Helmholtz*s treatise.

The membrane assumed is perfectly uniform in structure in all its parts, is tensely stretched in one direction, its transverse, but not so in its longitudinal direction. Under the conditions of the calculations (which Helmholtz assumes may be those conditioning the cochlear organ), each simple tone sets in vibration only some narrow strips of the membrane in the direction


at right angles to the plane of the membrane, every fibre of any strip vibrating practically independently. He claims to show by this mathematical analysis that every excitement of a bundle of transverse fibres by the respective fundamental tone must be accompanied by weaker excitements of the unevenly numbered harmonic undertones, the intensity of which would be

multiplied by the factors ^, ^, and generally — =• This hypothe sis, advanced by Riemann in his Musikalische Logik, is considered by Helmholtz to be tenable, though nothing of the kind is observable in the ear. Helmholtz states that probably the appendages of the basilar membrane greatly impede the formation of tones with nodes.

Paul Meyer has given special attention to the structure of the basilar membrane among the Sauropsida, and he finds that among most reptiles it is composed not of a series of parallel fibres, but of a homogeneous plate of substance, and he is sure that in no case will it allow of the interpretation placed on this structure in the Mammalia ; and he concludes after this study of the basilar membrane in reptiles and birds and a consideration of the facts and theories of other writers, Helmholtz especially, that *' une membrane fort peu 61astique d'une ^paisseur tris appreciable superficiellement stride, composte de diverses couches, dont, disons-le en passant, Tdpaisseur relative varie avec Tige, tel est, en derni^re analyse, Tappareil aquel on voudrait rapporter nos plus fine sensations auditives.** " Ainsi done, pas plus que Torgane de Corti que la membrane de recouvrement, la membrane basilaire ne ripond aux conditions necessaire pour servir de base."

Owsjannikow (p. 11) did not find (in .his studies on Petromyzon) that the hair cells were nerve-end cells, but concluded that the nerve fibres ended freely in the basement membrane under the sensory epithelial cells. This concerns us here only in so far as it influenced his physiological conceptions of the modus of the transmission of the vibratory motion from the cndolymph to the nerve fibre. Owsjannikow believed that the sensory cells {i.e. in Pctromyzon) did not possess auditory hairs.

" Ein solchcr Zusammenhang [i.e, between nerve and hair cell] ist kaum nothig. Nehmen wir an, dass durch irgend eincn Ton die Endolymphe in Bewegung gesetzt wird und die Wellen

268 AVE/iS. [Vol. VI.

an das Cylinderepithel anschlagen, so werden sie unstreitig durch den Stoss erschiittert. Die Erschiitterung pflanzt sich weiter fort von den Cylinderzellen auf die Grundmembran und von dieser auf den Nerv, der mit seiner Spitze unmittelbar an dieselbe sich anlegt." In this way, says the author, the transmission of a tone to the nerve would occur in a very simple manner without the necessity of recourse on the part of nature to a more complicated structure.

In 1876, Lavdowsky (178) published his physiological conclusions, which were based not on actual physiological experiments, since, says he, microphysiological experiments on the cochlea of warm-blooded animals are almost impossible, but on a careful analysis of the structure and composition of the organs in question ; while the only experimental basis to serve as guiding light was the well-known experiments of Hensen's on the Decapod ear, and Ranke's on the otocysts of Pterotrachea, with the demands which the physiological acoustics make on the auditory organs of tone perception. The demands of acoustics, according to Lavdowsky, may be stated under three heads. In order to account for audition there must exist in the auditory organ, as our author conceives it, three mechanisms. They are

1st. A vibration mechanism, capable of responding to and very sensitive to vibrations of the surrounding medium.

2d. A percipient mechanism.

3d. A regulation mechanism or damping apparatus.

Since, however, it is impossible to separate the cochlea from the rest of the canal complex when considering the physiology of audition, it necessarily follows that one must use hypotheses to satisfy the demands of acoustics.

This investigator considers that the cochlea performs one function, the rest of the ear the other of the two functions assumed to belong to this organ ; and the former, he says, is the most important one belonging to the ear.

The whole of the ear, save the cochlea, subserves the function of simple auditory perceptions, while the cochlea subserves the double function of a tone differentiator or analyzer, as well as that of sound perception. The utriculo-sacculus and semicircular canals perceive the qualitative differences existing between various forms of motion, e.^-. light and sound waves, but cannot perceive, except in the most general way, the character of a mass of tones or a musical picture.


The cochlea, on the other hand, thanks to its more differentiated and complicated structure, is able to separate a musical picture into its several parts, to perceive the tonal differences, such as pitch and timbre, and it is probably the place where rustling sounds are distinguished.

These functions are performed by the following parts. In the utriculo-sacculus and ampullae, by the auditory hairs and the parts they are supported by. In the cochlea, by the associated fibres of the basilar membrane and hair-bearing cells and arches of Corti, the percipient elements being the hair cells which are directly continuous with the nerves. The indispensable sensitiveness or delicacy of perception in the cochlea finds a suitable physical basis in the capsules of Hensen, which, like sense buds, represent organs which are sensitive in the highest degree to the purely mechanical stimuli of sound waves.

A special analysis of the other parts of the cochlea shows us that in the basilar membrane, from its position, its character, and composition, — being made of straight, elastic fibres somewhat like strings tensely drawn between the two scalae, — we have a vibration mechanism, which, as Helmholtz has already shown, is highly capable of vibrating. The vibrations of its fibres must be very regular, though naturally in different parts of its course they would be of varying intensity — that portion on which the hair cells lie being the most active in its movements, />. having the greatest amplitude, since this part is least loaded and has freest motion. This motion is sufficient to communicate to the hair cells the requisite stimuli for hearing. The abundance of basilar fibres, of which five hundred are allotted to a half-tone in the human ear, compels us to assume that they fall naturally into smaller or larger groups. This, as we know, agrees with their anatomical relations, which are responsive to various tones, the lowest of which are found near the apex of the cochlea, while the highest tones are perceived at the base. This calculation is based solely upon their length, their varying thickness and the amount of load in the shape of surrounding tissue carried being left out of consideration.

However these things may be, we have in the cochlea, as everything leads us to believe, the basilar membrane as the vibration apparatus demanded by physiological acoustics, and the hair cells with their capsules as Xh^ percipient elements.

2JO AVERS. [Vol. VI.

Nevertheless there are observers who will not admit that such can be the function of the basilar membrane, e,g, Paul Meyer, who calls attention that among the lower vertebrates, — viz. among the Reptilia, — the basilar membrane has the structure of a homogeneous plate ; and besides, the membrane is too thick and not elastic enough among the Mammalia to serve the purposes intended. According to Meyer, the hairs alone perform this function.

If this was correct, it was argued that it would be impossible to account for the formation of the basilar membrane. Keeping the gradual development of the auditory sense in mind, it follows that we must look for greater perfection of the anatomical basis, for the two must go hand in hand. Most of the perfecting changes have taken place in the cochlea. The arch of Corti appears first among mammals, and the second row of strings as well as the fourth row of hair cells, and perhaps many other things which have remained undiscovered. The hair covering of these cells is very different from what is found among lower vertebrates (the same is true of the auditory hairs of the rest of the canal complex). When one remembers that in such animals (fishes, Amphibia, and in part also birds), in contradistinction to the weak development of the basilar membrane, the hairs show a very prominent development {e.g. cupula terminalis, etc.), when we consider all these things, Meyer's objections are satisfied, and furthermore, it is not too much to hold that the basilar membrane and auditory hair cells undergo reverse processes of growth and are perhaps dependent upon each other to a certain extent.

But what is the significance of the hairs in the auditory apparatus as a whole, and specially in the cochlea }

Considered in organic continuity with their bearers, the cells, they can hardly be separated from the latter in their significance as percipient elements ; but in the case of the cochlea, where only bars — bacilli^ and no hairs in the proper sense — are presenty it is necessary to limit the amount of their sensitiveness to sound waves. One is forced to conclude that owing to their unusual shortness and relative thickness they are scarcely capable of regular vibrations. Helmholtz assumed that structures strongly damped would be relatively more strongly affected by blows of short periods and streamings of the endolymph than by musical tones.


The third demand of physiological acoustics is satisfied by the membrane of Corti, which acts as a damping apparatus. Its constitution and position and all its peculiarities speak for this view of its function. It is a most delicate damping apparatus. By each change in the endolymph the damper is pressed down upon the ends of the hair cells, and in this manner regulates above everything else the rustling noises, which might impair the purity of the musical tones.

We hear with the vestibule ; we understand with the cochlea. The cochlea is, then, not so much an organ for simple audition, but more for the complicated processes of the dififerentiation and perception of musical tones.

The part played by the central nervous system in audition is not considered by Lavdowsky, since it lies beyond the scope of his paper.

Meyer is thoroughly convinced that the hair-bearing cells, and they alone, subserve the auditory function by being sensitive to vibrations and transmitting them to the central nervous system, as he explains in the following words, already referred to in the account of Lavdowsky's views : —

Ces cils (les crins des ampoules et les pinceaux du saccule) relativement assez 6pais, raides, vitreux, cassants, semblables en quelque sorte i des verges de verre ou d'acier, formant par leur insertion ^ peu pris liniaire des faisceux minces, euxm^mes fix6s sur une sorte de plateau du m^me nature, ind^pendant du protoplasma de la cellule qui les porte, ces cils ne doivent-ils pas presenter au plus haut degr6 la propriit^ de vibrer pour leur compte, de vibrer par influence pour un ton ditermin^.^ ne constituent-ils pas, en un mot, un apparcil de resonance presque mathimatique, une sorte de diapaison, infinimcnt superieur dans tous les cas i ces cordes basilaires auxquelles la theorie de Hensen voulait faire jouer le m^me r61e } i une theorie solide de la perception des sons, et deji, par exclusion nous arrivons ^ chercher la clef du probl6me dans le seul ^16ment du lima^on que nous n'ayons pas encore soumis i une 6tude physiologique rigoureuse, dans les cellules auditives elles-mdmcs."

Hensen, while agreeing in general with Helmholtz's account of the auditory physiological processes, gave the following description of the manner in which he conceived the parts of the

2/2 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

organ of Corti to act during the perception of auditory stimuli that is under the mechanical influences of the transmitted wave motions : —

" Wenn Abschnitte der Basilarmembran durch, ihren Breitenverhaltnissen entsprechende, Tone in Transversalschwingungen kommen, wird nothwendig die Papilla sich entsprechend bevvegen. Die membrana Corti dagegen kann von der Schwingung nicht beriihrt werden, denn sie ruhrt nur denjenigen Zellen direct auf, die sich der Lamina ossea stiitzen. Es werden also die Stabchen lockerer oder fester (zuerst die der ausseren Zelle }) trotzt ihrer schwachen, fast fedemden Unterlage gegen die Masse der Corti'schen Membran gepresst werden. Es fragt sich aber weiter, namentlich meinen Erfahrungen an Krebsen gegeniiber, wie durch das Anpressen oder Entlasten der Stabchen eine Empfindung erzcugt werden kann. In dieser Beziehung ist an das auffallende Verhalten der Corti'schen Zellen zu erinnern, die so leicht aus der Lamina reticularis sich scheinbar intact loslosen und doch dabei ihre Endplatte mit den Stabchen darauf in der Lamina reticularis zuriicklassen. Diese Endplatte scheint demnach so selbstandig zu sein, dass sie auf den Inhalt der unterliegenden Zelle einen Druck ausiiben kann. Ist nun die Corti'sche Zelle eine Endganglie, so ist zugegeben, dass die wechselnde Spannung ihres Inhaltes zu einer Empfindung Anlass geben kann."

As already explained in the section on the morphology of the cochlear organ, Hensen found an ovoid body in the upper end of the hair cells which he considered as the nerve end organ within the hair cell. He was inclined to compare this structure with the touch corpuscles, end knobs, and Pacinian bodies of other tissues so far as generalities were concerned.

He considered the function of this mechanism, which, according to his view, is the percipient element par excellence y to be brought into play in this manner. The hair cells over a certain number of basilar membrane fibres — the number and location of the fibres being determined by the pitch of the tones transmitted to the ear — were moved up and down with and by the length of the excursions of the basilar fibres. The hair cells are thus thrust abruptly against the membrana tectoria, and the short auditory bacilli driven forcibly into the cell and against the ovoid nerve end body, which thus stimulated transmitted the impulse, causing an auditory perception.


As IS well known, sound waves falling on a telephone plate cause it to vibrate. An electric current is propagated to the distant plate and causes it to repeat the vibrations of the first plate. There is fw analysis of sound waves by the second plate. With these fundamental facts of the action of the electric telephone in mind, Rutherford (1886, 246) invented what he terms his "Telephone Theory of Hearing." I give below the gist of his statement of the theory.

The hairs of the cochlea do not vibrate sympathetically, but they, all of them, vibrate to every tone which enters the cochlear canal, as does the tympanum. There is no analysis of tone produced by complex vibration, either in the cochlea or the part of the external ear. The hair cells transform sound vibration into nerve vibration similar in frequency and amplitude to sound vibrations, and these simple and compound vibrations of nerve energy arrive in the sensory cells of the brain and there produce not sound again, of course, but sensations of sound, the nature of which depends not on the stimulation of different sensory cells, but on the frequency, amplitude, and form of the vibrations coming into the cells, probably through all the fibres of the auditory nerve.

This theory carries the physical cause of discord and harmony into the brain, and the mathematical principles of acoustics find entrance into the obscure region of consciousness.

Now if nerve energy were only electricity, we might accept this theory at once, but nerve energy is very sluggish as compared with electricity. Rutherford tells us that he kept back his theory for five years because he thought there was no possibility of sending a rapid series of vibrations along a nerve.

If we give to a motor nerve of a Frog 10 electrical shocks per second, there will be produced 10 contractions in the muscle per second ; if 40 shocks, not 40 contractions, but one continuous contraction^ on account of the fusion of the several contractions.

Now if we listen to such a muscle, we hear a musical note having the pitch of 40 vibrations per second. Each sound vibration results from the sudden shock of a chemical discharge, due to the arrival of each nerve impulse in the muscular substance. If we stimulate with a rapidity of 200 times per second (by means of a tuning-fork apparatus) the pitch of the muscle

274 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

note corresponds. Our author sent as many as 352 shocks per second into a nerve, and hence sent 352 pulses along the nerve, and got the note 352 V^ per second, which equals F on lowest treble clef. He could not get higher notes than this, only noise.

Bees' wings go at rate of 460 vibrations per second ; hence their muscles contract the same number of times per second ; this would give us A in treble clef.

Rutherford says if his theory was accepted, it would lead to a reconstruction of the physiology of the other sense organs.

Pritchard states his views of the function of the rods of Corti and of the parts of the ear in the following manner. After saying, " It appears evident that those investigators had not suspected, much less discovered, the fact that the rods are most exquisitely graduated ; for otherwise they could surely never have doubted that as beautiful and suitable an apparatus could have any other ostensible purpose than that of appreciating the various sounds," our author concludes that " this uniform graduation of the rods presents to my mind so plausible and reasonable a key to their use that there can scarcely be a doubt as to their real function. I consider that the cochlea as a whole represents a finely constructed musical instrument, similar in nature to a harp or musical box, the strings of one and the teeth of the other being represented by the rods of Corti. The spiral, bony lamina is nothing more nor less than a natural sounding-board, in connection with the end of which are arranged the rods." The course of the vibratory stimuli from the endolymph to the brain is, according to Pritchard, the subjoined. The vibrations are taken up from the endolymph by the rods of Corti, and transmitted to the nerve end cells, which he considers are present in the form of the so-called Deiters's and Corti's (as well as others) cells. From these the motion makes its way down the nerve to the brain. After entering the ear from without, Pritchard thought all sounds were perceived by the vestibular portion of the labyrinth, but merely as sounds, the direction discovered by the semicircular canals ; but the pitch and timbre, or, as he says, the ** note," of the sound is perceived by the cochlea alone. Here the motion, after passing through the fluid of the cochlea, " probably strikes the lamina spiralis, which, acting as a sounding-board, intensifies and trans


mits the vibration to the system of rods. There is doubtless a rod, not only for each tone, or semitone, but even for much more minute divisions of the same, so that every sound causes its own particular rod to vibrate.

As the foregoing amply indicates, students of auditory physiology, especially that of the cochlea, have thus thought along two sharply defined lines, the one school holding that the rods of Corti, the fibres of the basilar membrane or other of the nonsensory structures, were the percipient elements, while the other school claimed that the nerve end hair cells, by means of the hairs which they put forth, are alone the percipient elements. The rods of Corti were made to do duty as the percipient structures by Helmholtz in his earlier studies, because the hair cells, as such, had not been discovered by Corti or his immediate successors, and they looked upon the rods as the essential elements of the organ. The basilar membrane (fibres) was afterwards substituted by Hensen and at once adopted by Helmholtz, because from their insufficient knowledge of its structure, it appeared not only admirably suited but apparently specially designed for this very function. Hasse for the lower vertebrates, and Meyer for the whole group, denied this function to the basilar membrane, because they found animals with a cochlea without a suitable basilar membrane, but supplied with hair cells.

The subject has never been explained with lucidity from the comparative anatomical standpoint, and so the Hensen-Helmholtz "piano-string" theory has held the field against all comers. Although some students, like Foster, considered it inadequate, and others, like Rutherford, not content to leave matters as they were, offered new solutions of the difficulty, it is not probable that any general advance could have been made in physiological ideas in this field until a broader view of the whole matter had been taken, based upon increased anatomical and embryological knowledge.

It is a necessary consequence of the canal organ parentage of the car sense organs, that they inherit functions similar to those of the parent organ, modified only in individual ways, as offspring always are modified in some degree.

The great similarity, on the other hand, of the offspring, among themselves and to their parent, would enable any one of them to take on the functions of one or more of its fellows —

276 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

more especially nearest kin — in case it or they were in any way hindered from performing the proper function to its full or even a sufficient extent, — e.g. as when the sensory hairs are loaded down with otoliths. Indeed, so far as the auditory function is concerned, one sense organ might be made to serve all the auditory needs of the animal ; and, had not the inherited tendency to divide compelled the primitive vertebrate ear to progress by the further division- of its auditory sense organs, in all probability no such canal complex as exists in most forms would ever have been produced ; but the enlarging physiological necessities might have been met by the differentiation of the original establishment, after much the same plan we find followed by the mammalian cochlear organ in its development, or of the retina in the eye. As an instance of the moulding influence which the view heretofore held of the relation of the two prime chambers of the ear to each other, exercised not alone on morphological ideas, but physiological as well, I may cite Paul Meyer's statements, made in harmony with the earlier ones of Hasse, that the accepted division of the auditory vesicle into superior and inferior parts was no less important for physiology than for anatomy. The superior part had, by entering into more intimate relations with the bony walls of the cranium and the reduction of its perilymphatic spaces, acquired the (or restricted its) function to the perception of vibrations transmitted through the bone, while the inferior part, by entering into intimate relation with the tympanic transmission apparatus, and by the enlargment of its perilymphatic spaces, has acquired the (or enlarged its) function to the perception of vibrations coming through the tympanic apparatus. This differentiation has become the more perfect by the almost complete separation of the two parts from one another.

Such are Hasse's and Meyer's views ; but I have shown that in vertebrates as low as the Elasmobranchs, the utriculus and sacculus are nearly as completely isolated as in mammals, and furthermore, after the general consideration of the relation of canal organs to the surface of the body (their relation to the close investment by membrane bones, as in fishes, included), it does not seem to be a specially pregnant idea that the sense organs of the semicircular canals and the utriculus are only capable of, or are restricted to, the perception of vibrations


transmitted through the investing cranial bones. Not that it is denied that such transmission of vibrations through the cranial bones may take place, but there is neither physical nor morphological basis for the conclusion that the two parts of the ear are not subject to all vibrations affecting the ear from whatever source, in quite equal degree. It is certainly not made clear on physical grounds by Meyer nor his predecessors in this view, Hasse, Lucae, Mach, Politzer, and others, nor by his successors, more especially and recently Hensen, how the vibrations affecting the cranial bones are transmitted to the utricular section of the canal complex more than to the saccular section, and there is no mention of anatomical arrangement of the parts adequate to the work of insulating the cochlea or any other part of the saccular region from these vibrations. So far as our knowledge extends at the present day, the only conditions affecting the activity of the sense organs is the greater or less perfection or specialization of the sense organs themselves, in the direction of greater or less sensitiveness to stimuli, differing in pitch, intensity, and other qualities, if such there are.

As Hasse had already shown, and as Meyer notes as an interesting condition, the perilymphatic spaces of Chelonians is so large and extensive that any vibration whatsoever, arriving at any part of the surface of this sac, would be transmitted equally well to all parts of the internal ear.

From a general standpoint, it is evident that there is no peculiar or special kind of wave motion (vibration, undulation) which alone is entitled to be called sound wave ; for all so-called sound waves may (produce) give rise to sensations other than those of hearing. And those vibrations of the atmosphere which serve to cause the sensations of hearing in the ears of one individual may entirely fail of that effect in the pars of another. We have a so-called musical scale within whose limits all possible sounds must fall, as far as concerns their pitch ; but since some ears are not sensitive to low notes, and others deaf to high-pitched notes, it follows that there is no rigid auditory scale, and consequently no sharp line .of demarcation between genuine auditory and tactile stimuli when caused by disturbances in the supernatant fluid of the sense organs of the ear on the one hand, and of the surface of the skin on the other.

All sound waves are taken up from the endolymphatic liquid ;

278 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

and it is just as incorrect to speak of our hearing the vibrations of the air as it would be to say that we hear the vibrations of the string or bar or tongue or other music (sound) producing instrument without mediation. At all times and under all circumstances vertebrate animals have heard^ if at all, by means of disturbance of sensory hairs projecting from the morphological surface of the body into the water in which they lived. Now, in the lower forms, e,g, some fishes, the essentially saclike ear is open to sea-water, and when the outer opening was finally closed, it must have been in some form whose ear was at one time open to the supernatant water ; so that it is more than a figure of speech to say that before emerging upon land the vertebrate type fitted its ear for the step by shutting up the outer opening of the endolymphatic duct, thereby retaining and perpetuating an aquatic condition essential for the surviving sense organs of the auditory type. Indeed, these auditory organs owe their survival to such closing up of the auditory sac and to a sufficient and permanent supply of a watery medium for the support of the sensory hairs. This is due to the fact that it is impossible to construct so delicate a mechanism to operate in the air. The organ arose in aquatic ancestors, and the physical requirements remaining the same, the organ must of necessity acquire a liquid chamber in the head to replace that originally supplied by the sea.

Wherein does the difference in the physiological function of the auditory sense organs consist } Does it lie entirely in the structural differences between the various organs of the auditory complex or entirely in the structural differences of the central terminations, or in both combined }

The general consensus of physiological opinion at the present day is in favor of the third view. As every one knows, the sense organ may be cut off from its central connection, and still the characteristic sensation be felt, and the central organ may be so destroyed that although the sense organ and its centripetal conductors are intact, still under stimulation no sensation may be aroused. It is evident, I think, that we shall never be quite certain that a difference in structure of the sense organ necessitates a difference in physiological functions until we shall succeed in grafting on to the nerve of one special sense the sense organs belonging to another special sense, as, for example, in


graft the nose of a fish upon the auditory nerve, and determine if the fish may not be able to hear through the mediation of the liair cells of the nasal epithelium^ — a feasible operation, which promises valuable information to the successful operator. The grafting of the ear upon the nasal nerve would in all probability not be a success, on account of the protected condition of the sensory cells. This protected condition of the auditory hair cells may be in part due to an attempted exclusion of all sensory impulses, save those of vibratory motion of the water ; at any rate, such exclusion follows as a consequence of the inclosure of the organ.

Foster (1891, 92), loc, cit. p. 1213 : "If the organ of Corti is the means by which we appreciate tones, it is evident that by it also we must be able to estimate loudness, /^r the quality of a musical sound is dependent on the relative intensity ^ as well as on the nature^ of the overtones [italics mine]. And since noise is at best but confused music, the cochlea must be a means of appreciating noises as well as sounds. But this would leave nothing whatever for the rest of the labyrinth to do in respect to the appreciation of sound, save so far as the difference in structure between the hair cells of Corti, with their short thick rods, and the hair-bearing structures in the maculae and cristae, with their thin delicate hairs, may possibly indicate a difference of function, the latter being more susceptible to the irregular vibrations of noises."

The physiological r61e of the utricular sense organs is very inadequately understood, but owing to the primitiveness of the histological characters of the sensory plate and its entire agreement in structural details with the ampullar sensory epithelium, it is probable that they retain their primitive function ; at least such a view is allowable until it is shown that the function has changed more than the apparent structure. I have nothing to add to what has been written on this subject by Hasse, Hcnsen, Meyer, and Rctzius, except to offer the view that the otoliths do not play so important a part in the function of this sensory apparatus as has been commonly held, and to insist upon the proper allowance being made for the increasing refinement and sensitiveness to given stimuli that the auditory nuclei of the brain must undergo in connection with the ever-growing association mechanism. Granting this fact its full and proper influ

28o AVERS. [Vol. VI.

ence, it does not become necessary to add a morphological increment to the nerve end organs each time the functional powers of the sense is increased ; for just as the trained eye can separate the component colors and forms and correctly judge of their relations in a picture, or as the trained nose can separate the several odors of a compound perfume and may correctly judge of the relative proportions in which the ingredients are mixed, unaided by any other sense, or just as the trained ear can resolve a musical chord into its notes without having gained during the training any morphological increment in the end organ ; so it is entirely possible to build up the complex auditory function of a bird, for example, without modifying the structure of the end organ in any considerable degree. In this direction we may look for the explanation of the wonderful acoustic powers of the thrushes with their undifferentiated cochlear organs.

It certainly cannot be true, as Paul Meyer states, that the macula utriculi is the only acoustic organ of his " pars superior," nor that it is in any sense the physiological centre of this group of sense organs.

The sacculus, although belonging to the pars inferior auct., has never been the subject of experimentation, as have the canals, utriculus and cochlea. Its function has always been assumed to be that of the perception of noises, in common with the utriculus. So far as its morphological relations are concerned, it is perfectly evident that its function in any given group of animals must be practically identical with that of the utriculus, unless — and here is the density of our ignorance exposed — unless the central end connections in the case of the two organs are so different as to cause different psycho-physiological phenomena from identical stimuli. I think the nerve connections indicate the latter view as nearer the truth.

As for the larger question of the function of the utriculosaccular organs and their derivatives throughout the vertebrate series, Milne-Edwards grasped the subject in its entirety and pointed out the only possible way to a solution many years ago. He said, in his great storehouse of facts {loc. cit. p. 76 et seq.) : " Ainsi que je Tai A€]k dit, les Poissons sont ^galement d^pourvus de la portion cochlienne de I'oreille interne, dont le r61e parait ^tre des plus importants chez les Vertebres dans Tappr^ciation


des intervalles musicaux et du timbre des sons. II serai t par consequent int^ressant d'examiner si les Poissons sont sensibles au bruit seulement, ou si ces Animaux sont capables de distinguer les differences de ton et de timbre ; mais je connais aucun fait qui nous pennette de trancher la question " [italics mine].

The field for experiment is as open to-day as when MilneEdwards reviewed the subject.

Although Exner believed that the organ of Corti was capable of perceiving not only tones but all other noises as well, Hensen held to the doctrine advanced by Helmholtz, according to which the cochlear organ was capable of perceiving tones only. As to Topler's experiments with the electric spark, which gives only a single, short, sharp impulse to the air, or it snaps, as we say, Helmholtz concluded that such a snap could not possibly give rise to an irritation of the cochlear apparatus ; indeed, a series of such snaps would not give rise to a tone unless they followed each other with a considerable degree of rapidity. But it is found that an increase in the rate at which the electric sparks followed each other caused a like elevation of the pitch of the sound, and as Hensen truly says, "Diese Erfahrung wiirde entweder dcnn doch auf die Betheiligung des klangempfindenden Apparatcs dcuten, oder sie wiirde auf einen zwciten Apparat, der glcichfalls Hohcn — und Tiefenempfindung hervorzurufen vermag, zu bczichen sein. Zwei verschiedene Endapparate von Sinnesnerven, welche beide die gleiche Empfindung der Tonhohe hervorrufcn, stimmcn nicht mit unseren Kenntnissen von den Sinncsorganen iibcrein und widersprechen den ' Gesetzen der specifischen Sinncsenergie.' " Hensen then proceeds to explain how the basilar membrane fibres might take part in the perception of such snaps. After what I have said in the morphological part, it needs no special explanation to make clear that there is no such sharp and fundamental separation of the auditory sense organs, as regards their functions, as Hensen here assumes.

Whatever differences in the powers of tone perception there may be between the various sense organs of the ear, there can only be differences of degree, and not of kind. In my mind there exists no doubt that the cochlear organs perceive all kinds of sounds.

When Hensen asserts that the perception of the pitch of tones docs not necessarily immediately concern the cochlear organ

282 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

(Klangapparat), it seems to me he contradicts important statements made in the preceding pages of his work. For he holds

— as almost every one else does — that there are three determining physical conditions to the production of tone stimuli ; viz. the pitch, or rate of vibration ; the intensity, or amplitude of vibration ; and the timbre, or the complexity of vibration ; and furthermore, it is the essential part of his theory that the basilar membrane fibres repeat as near as may be the rate, intensity, and complexity of the waves which cause any given tone sensation. For how could the basilar membrane otherwise analyze tonal waves, and would our author have us look for another apparatus to perceive the very thing that determines the selection of the waves in the cochlea 1 To say, then, that the rate

— or the condition which determines whether a tone is a "low " or a "high" one — does not immediately concern the cochlear apparatus is to deny that the basilar membrane vibrates sympathetically to tone stimuli, which contradicts the corner-stone of the Helmholtz theory.

Hensen cites J. Miiller's dictum that " Jeder Ton erweckt sein besonderes Gefiihl," and says that the tonal pitch does not play any inunediate part in awakening this special sensation. He says, further on, "Ob daher die Hohe und Tiefe des Tons eine einfache Empfindung und nicht vielmehr ein complicirterer Act, bei dem das Gedachtniss wesentlich mitwirkt, eine Vi^ahrnehmung ist, erscheint noch zweifelhaft."

In this conclusion our author begs the question ; for while there is not the slightest doubt that the inadequately understood cerebral operations play an important part in all auditory perceptions, we must, while we are considering the physical basis of sound, confine ourselves to this alone ; for the moment the co-ordinating apparatus is introduced into the problem it becomes altogether too complex to deal with at this time ; on the other hand, we may reasonably expect to get some important facts by studying the effects of physical auditory stimuli from the physical standpoint.

Hensen feels compelled to seek for two distinct apparatuses in the ear : one for tone perception, another for other forms of sound, and the theory of the analysis of sound waves is at the bottom of it all.


The Organ of Corti^ or the Mammalian Cochlear Organ,

The development of the cochlear tube precedes that of the ultimate cochlear organ by a long space of time. The continuous but very gradual differentiation of the cochlear organ in the vertebrate series above the fishes would, from the morphological standpoint, argue a gradual increase in the physiological function, and the rapid acquisition of length by the canal, as well as the wonderful complication of structure in the sense organ contained, certainly points to an important functional activity ; but when we attempt to determine the character of the function and its mechanical execution, we meet with almost insuperable difficulties. As I have indicated, none of the theories yet put forward are sufficient to explain the facts, and every one of them is antagonistic to some important morphological relation, which must invalidate the arguments in greater or less degree.

The ability which many animals with a simple type of cochlear organ display in appreciation of the value of the musical quality of sounds, noises, tones, and their remarkable facility in perceiving the minutest variations in the intensity, pitch, timbre, and other tonal qualities, render any arguments as to the increase of physiological activity, based on a greater complexity in structure of the cochlear organ, not only valueless, but misleading. Our knowledge, especially of the function of this part and the nerve-end relations, is very imperfect — more so, I fear, than most students appreciate ; but I do think that it is a subject which proper experimentation may and will overcome in the, let us hope, near future. Much depends upon our ability to decide definitely what the function of the canal sense organs is, for on the determination of this problem depends the solution of all the physiological problems of the internal ear. The direct connection of the tympanic conducting apparatus to the perilymphatic spaces which surround the saccular chamber or its derivatives in varying degree in the different groups of vertebrates, is a character of considerable physiological importance, but not deserving of such weight as Hasse and Meyer are inclined to attribute to it. For although in the Amphibia the whole saccular perilymphatic chamber is directly connected with the columella, and in reptiles the sacculus and the base of the cochlea are thus connected, and in the birds and mam

284 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

mals the cochlear chamber alone has this relation to the auditory chain of bones ; still, when we consider the high rate of transmission of sound waves in liquid, all parts of the ear must receive the stimulus of any given set of sound waves at practically the same time.

The rate of transmission in water, which is certainly less than that of the endolymph, is five times as great as that in air.

It has been very generally assumed that when a sound wave strikes the tympanum, with the mechanical consequence that the membrane of the fenestra ovalis is forced in, the membrane closing the scala vestibuli at the fenestra rotunda is forced outward, owing to the propagation of the wave motion from one scala, through the helicotrema, into the other.

In this explanation it is entirely overlooked that the endolymphatic duct places the ear in communication with the lymph spaces about the brain, and that consequently wave motion, propagated either through the scala vestibuli or tympani, either singly or together, does not necessarily in the first case, and cannot in the second case, be transmitted beyond the helicotrema ; for any pressure increase in the endolymph is at once relieved by the progression of the stress through the endolymphatic duct into pericerebral lymph spaces. As we ascend from the lower to the higher animals, the blood pressure increases progressively ; and since the ear lies within the tissues of the animal, in fact within a lymph space, and its walls are sufficiently thin to allow of ready transmission of pressure changes, it follows that the endolymph is always subject to a stream of rhythmically variable pressures, travelling from within outward — which must be overcome by the sensory waves from without.^ I do not refer to the rapid vibrations which occur in the body with every heart-beat and muscular contraction, and which for the most part give rise to veritable sounds to be heard by attention to them, but only to the condition of a varying pressure in the lymph space (which of course is not so great, either in its amount or its variations, as in the arteries or the veins), which must affect the entrance of sound waves from the lighter medium, the air. I find no better explanation of the perfection of the tympanic transmitting apparatus than the physical neces 1 See Recapitulation F.


sity of overcoming these changed conditions of pressure in the ear by thus artificially increasing the intensity of the external stimuli.

The auditory impressions gain access to the sensory structures only by the propagation of the wave impulses through the wall of the cochlear tube ; and since the membrana Reissneri is much the thinner and less resistant of the two walls through which it is possible for the stimuli to pass, it is probable that it is upon the surface of this membrane only that the waves impinge which are to give rise to auditory impressions.

This is rendered all the more probable from the fact that the auditory hairs are directed upwards, inwards, and backwards (with reference to the axis of the cochlear tube), and are thus disposed in positions very favorable for the reception of wave motion progressing up the cochlear tube.

The basilar membrane, owing to the fact that it is heavily loaded on both sides and tensely drawn, does not in all probability vibrate under the influence of such delicate stimuli, i.e, permit their passage into the endolymph. For the moment let us admit for the sake of the older view that the basilar membrane may vibrate. It is still just as true that the stimuli are sent into the sensory apparatus from the wrong side, from within and not without, as is the case with all other known sense organs where the stimulation progresses from the sensory hair or rod through the cell into the nerve. Again, the auditory hairs of the cochlea, as I have proved them to exist, are incalculably more delicate agents for the picking up of and transmission of mechanical stimuli such as audible undulations of the endolymph from any source whatsoever.

In order to determine the physical characteristics of the hair band as a structure capable of sympathetic vibration, we tried a series of experiments on the ears of the Pig and Cat. The OS petrosum was removed from the skull immediately after death and transferred to aqueous humor until it could be opened. This was done in each case as soon as possible. The cochlear eminence was removed from the petrous mass and the roofs of the several spires removed, thus exposing the membranous ductus cochlearis entire. The dorsal and outer walls were then cut away, the lower cut being made along the outer edge of the sulcus spiralis cxternus, and the upper cut along the insertion

286 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

of the dorsal edge of the membrana Reissneri. The whole of the stria vascularis and the membrana Reissneri are thus easily removed, leaving freely exposed the cochlear organ intact. The limbus spiralis is then easily detached with needles by puncturing along the course of Rosenberg's canal, so that the spiral papilla on the basilar membrane may be transferred to slide and cut into pieces more or less complete circles. The whole under one cover is mounted in serum and the edges of the cover glass painted with cement to hinder evaporation. The microscope with this preparation is placed in a position favorable to the transmission of vibrations to the liquid, and it is then seen that the fibres of the hair band vibrate under the influence of tones given off by the piano or a tuning-fork.

Our experiments were successful in showing that the hair band as a whole is violently agitated by loud tones, but not conclusive as to localization of tones of different pitches in different parts of the hair band. Owing to the conditions of the experiment it could not be determined that the basilar membrane was affected by the vibrations.

When such a preparation is placed on the stage of a microscope isolated in such a manner that sonorous undulations can reach the slide surface from the air alone, we have placed the hairs under conditions which severely test the delicacy of their powers of responding to the slight disturbances of the atmosphere produced by musical instruments such as the piano, violin, or horn. All of our experiments were performed with the aid of a piano.

The microscope was isolated by means of several cushions in the middle of a room in such a way that only vibrations from the piano strings affecting the air and reflected directly towards the open space between slide and cover glass, which was occupied by the organ of Corti and its supernatant fluid, could noticeably affect the hairs — probably by direct transmission from the air to the liquid, since undulatory and other disturbances of the atmosphere are much more readily given up to or transferred from a gas to liquids than to solids. And since the thinner of the two glass plates was supported by wax feet resting upon the other, the motion of both would by this means be more or less damped.

The motion, at any rate, could arrive only by transfer from the


air and not from the vibrations of the solid body of the microscope transferred from the piano through the floor.

It was found that vibrations of the intensity of loud notes on the piano were only with difficulty transferred to the liquid medium on the slide and to the hairs of the cochlea. They were, however, transferred in sufficient degree to set in motion the hairs while not affecting the basilar membrane fibres. Reissner's membrane also accompanied the hair band in vibration, as might have been expected, but in these experiments was present only as loose filaments floating on the liquid.

The vibrations were immensely increased by placing the stand of the microscope on the framework of the piano ; in fact, so great was the degree of motion that the hair band disappeared from focus as a body, leaving a faint haze to indicate its presence. Just as the vibrations of a steel rod fixed at one end, when set in rapid motion, are not individually distinguishable, and the rod itself not visible, but appear blended into a hazy band or fan-shaped body, so when the hairs vibrate to a tone, as Cy the agitation is so powerful and the oscillation so rapid that the hairs are not visible and the individual excursions not distinguishable. As the tone is allowed to die out, the haze disappears more and more, and finally the hairs return to rest and focus.

That the hairs of the band vibrate individually we are assured by repeated experiment, but that they are differential in their responsive action to various wave lengths or periods we have not been able to satisfy ourselves by direct observation ; but we doubt that such is the case, for reasons to be presented later. This much may be said, however : the hairs of the middle and outer end of the hair band are longer than those of the lower end, and the shortest hairs are in the end sections, so that theoretically we would expect the end sections, both proximal and distal, to respond to the higher notes, on the assumption that there is a differential action in the cochlear hair band regarded as a purely physical body, while the centre of the mid-region would be responsive to the lowest notes, grading off towards the higher in both directions. When we remember that high notes are much more valuable to the animal economy than the low ones, and that the tones of the middle group of the commonly used musical sounds are the most powerful in their effect (not the

288 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

most intense, penetrating, or irritating) on the nervous system, we recognize that the old idea of a gradual ascent from the lower to the higher notes, or vice versa, as the case might be, is probably incorrect, for it would give as much prominence to the low notes as to the high ; in fact, the relation of the dififerent tone-perceptive structures was supposed to be very like the relation of the keys of a piano. If, however, the length of the auditory hair determines the selection of the stimulus to be transmitted, then, as it is certainly an anatomical fact that the length of the hairs of the organ of Corti vary from the middle towards both ends, — growing shorter each way, — it follows that it must be a physiological fact that the waves productive of the lowest audible sound affect the hairs of the centre of the organ, while those affecting the hairs of the two ends of the organ of Corti as surely are the highest audible tones, the intermediate portions of the organ being affected by the audible intermediate tones. Thus we find an explanation in the anatomy of the ear for the long-known but never explained or understood fact that the lower end of the tone series falls off very rapidly in the distinctness and separateness of its audible tones (because it has only one-half as many perceptive structures for its lowest tones), while the higher end of the tone series disappears much more slowly for a similar reason.

The vibrations are taken up from the fluid by the free ends of the auditory hairs, and transmitted in the form of undulations to the basal plate of the hair cells ; but since I have shown the basal plate to be not a homogeneous structure, but merely a perforated cell end wall, there is no break in the continuity of the undulatory motion, but only a transformation of the form of the wave, i.e. a reduction in the extent of the excursion, with the consequent result of an increase in the energy of the undulations transmitted through the perforations of the end plate and the cell protoplasm, to the, and perhaps through the, nucleus, to the nerve ends at the base of the cell. It is not likely that the hair fibrilli are changed in their progress through the nucleus. The undulations are passed down the hairs in several ways, the most common and perhaps powerful being as waves, causing the hairs to bend in a plane perpendicular to the surface of the organ of Corti, at the point of insertion of the hair cells. There are


Other means of introducing the undulations to the cochlear duct — among which the diagonal penetration through Reissner's membrane and the penetration through the round window are the most important.

The height of the undulations of the hairs is directly proportional to the intensity of the disturbance in the endolymph. The undulations equal in number the impulses of the endolymph.

The action of the intracellular fibrilli is probably intermediate between that of the hairs and of the nerve fibres ; in other words, they serve to transform the physical undulations of the hairs into the physiological stimulation of the nerve fibrils. The nerve fibrils which enter into connection with the cells are, as is well known, non-medullated, varicose, and in some cases apparently branched at their ends. The branching, however, I do not consider to be of special or great physiological importance. The normal, i.e. most common, mode of the nerve end in connection with the cell seems to be the fusion of the nerve fibril with the base of the cell, though the point of fusion often appears to be placed high up on the side of the cell. Such a transposition does not indicate that the fibre has entered the cell on its lateral surface, as originally situated, but merely that, in the process of the conversion of the papilla basilaris into the cochlear organ, the cell has been distorted or changed in shape to accommodate itself to its new surroundings, and that its base is no longer directed squarely towards the basement membrane, but at a greater or less angle to it. The inner or outer face, as the case may be, in consequence, becomes in part the base of the cell, but the nerve fibre retains its primitive connection with the cell.

When once the stimulus has been transmitted to the endolymph, the propagation through this fluid produces a concomitant propagation of the undulatory motion along the hair4>and as a whole, just as a wind blowing across the free and open prairie or a field of standing grain produces undulatory movements of the surface as a whole. A considerable portion of this undulatory motion is taken up by the individual stalks in the case of the grass and by the individual hairs in the case of the cochlea, and is transmitted to the fixed end of the slender structure. Now since physical analogies compel us to assume that all

290 A VERS. [Vol. VI .

the hairs cannot have the same dimensions — length,^ the same relations of reduction in size to the length of the filament and identical basal relations — it necessarily follows that the hairs, like the stalks of grass, will be afifected dififerently by the same vibrational energy, and that consequently many, or perhaps under powerful stimuli all, of the hairs will be affected sequentially by the same impulse, though the stimulation of the nerve ends of different cells, and perhaps of any single cell, would necessarily be different ; for our argument it matters not whether the stimulus be a simple, powerful pendular vibration or a composition of pendular vibrations. In the former case, the simple pendular vibration would cause a simple undulation to flow over the surface of the hair band of the cochlea with a regular, even flow, so that the single hairs in transverse groups would be successively affected, and thereby produce a continuous flow of stimulation toward the brain centres, giving rise to concomitant stimulations of the central end organs.

The hairs, however, would not act or react all alike ; for the shorter ones, being struck down by the wave motion, would react more quickly than the longer ones, and would consequently not send the same kind of impulse through their end cell, and hence not produce the same nervous disturbance or irritation in the brain as would be produced by the long hairs. This process would be repeated for every segment of the cochlear organ. In the latter case, the hairs would send stimuli of still greater differences, owing to the increased inequality of motion transmitted to the individual hairs.

Since we have found that the cochlear organ is divisible into a series of sense-organ units, we are compelled by all organic analogies to assume that there is at least some small physiological differentiation among the organs.

At any rate, beginning at the base of the cochlear tube and progressing toward the summit, we would have a sequence of stimuli sent into the brain from the sense organ, beginning at No. I and progressing to No. 125 (taking a medium number for convenience' sake) ; and since the nerves of the sense organ, from No. i to No. 125, are successively longer, and since the

We know that in different parts of the cochlea they have different lengths, but it is also probable that the hairs borne by a single cell vary in size and length (compare Fig. 9, Plate VIII).


time of propagation of the stimulus, from No. i to No. 125, increases the difiference of time of the reception of the stimulations in the central end organ, we recognize that there are two sources of variation of the stimulative process of the external or surface organs which must make a great impression on the central end organs, and lend themselves to the formation of suitable associative and co-ordinative processes or the processes of judgment, especially to the recognition of time differences between the stimuli applied.^ It follows from this that one and the same pendular vibration will send a series of stimuli to the brain, and that the stimuli from one source are not necessarily of the same kind ; but in all cases the sequence will be the same and the variations the same for any given undulation or series of undulations.

As I have already shown, the hairs end not in identical manner on the top of each cell, and as physical measurements, which I have carried out with all the care possible for the purpose of excluding sources of error, proves the hairs are not of the same size at their basal ends, nor have they the same lineal dimensions. The end cells vary somewhat in size, length, and in the relative position of the nucleus and the manner in which the nerve fibre enters the cell.

Now, these with other frequent modifications of the typical hair cells, or, better expressed, these ever-increasing individualities of the structural relation of the cells comprising the hair band, necessitate the conclusion that each hair cell is somewhat individual in its physiological processes. For example, a cell with long capillo-nuclear filaments will be affected most powerfully by wave motions transmitted to them in time and form, most easily propagated through their substance, and this selection process, having been already applied by the hair itself to the undulation that swept down the hair plate, results in a still finer physical selection, which must still further be modified as it is transferred from the capillo-nuclear filaments to the nucleus, and from the nucleus transmitted through the nucleo-neural filament to the extra-cellular nerve. The modification of the stimulus, during its passage from the nerve through the cochlear

^ The most essential quality of music rests on the perception of time diflferencet according to some accepted law, to the reco^piition of which and acquiescence in, the individual lends himself or is structurally inclined.

292 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

ganglion cells and the long (relatively) stretch of nerve fibre between the ganglion and the brain nuclei, are, of course, still unknown to us.

Enough has been said, I think, to show that the processes of selection and of propagation of undulations of different wave lengths is an extremely difficult one to follow out in all its detail, and that, although we have gained some new insight into the methods of cell action, the field is practically untouched experimentally and lies before the modern advanced physiologist, an inviting and very promising field for research in neuro-sensory physiology, holding, in fact, the same place in physiology of neuro-sensory processes that the nerve and striated muscle preparations do to neuro-motor physiology, — all of this because of the easily (relatively) controllable physical basis of the sensory processes ; the physical basis of smell and sight being so much more difficult of measurement as to practically exclude the acquisition of quantitative results from experimental research in their fields.

From the physical constitution of the cochlea and from the experiments on the hair band it follows that the action of undulatory stimuli in the cochlea leads to very different results from those taught by the Hensen-Helmholtz school (p. 263 et seq.). It is certain that only those wave motions are effective in the stimulation of the nerve end organ which succeed in passing all barriers and enter and are propagated in the cochlear canal as discrete wave motions of the endolymph, causing undulations of all the auditory hairs. Any sounding body which gives forth a simple tone as a fundamental accompanied by other simple tones, as overtones, etc., must produce for each tone propagated through the ear to the brain, a discrete series of undulation, which of its own energy stimulates the hairs of the cochlea, and all of them in greater or less degree. It does so in its period entirely independent of the other tones in process of propagation down the cochlear apparatus. A musical or tonal effect produced as Helmholtz conceived in his " compound wave," requiring an analysis by the hair band, does not occur in nature, unless the term "compound wave" is used to designate a group of discrete stresses, any one of which might go on and produce its effect, though all the rest were annihilated. If this is the interpretation of the term, the use of the word


" analysis *' in connection with it is not only useless but misleading, since there can be no analysis of the discrete waves when each produces its own effect, no matter what has gone before or is to succeed it. That this term " compound wave " is generally understood in a different sense, the following quotation from Foster clearly proves.

Foster (1891, 92) says on this subject (loc, ciL p. 12 11): " The vibrations of a musical sound as they pass through the air or other medium are not discrete; the vibrations corresponding to the fundamental tone and overtones do not travel as so many separate waves ; they all together form one complex disturbance of the medium; and it is as one composite wave that sound falls on the membrana tympani, and passing through the auditory meatus, breaks on the terminations of the auditory nerve. And when two or more musical sounds are heard at the same time, the same fusion of the waves occurs. Since we can distinguish several tones reaching our ear at the same time, it is clear that we must possess in our minds or in our ears [italics mine] some means of analyzing these composite waves of sound which fall on our acoustic organs, and of sorting out their constituent vibrations.*' Our author, then, continues with an explanation of how the strings of a piano analyze the compound note of the human voice into its component simple tones, saying, "The note sung reaches the strings as a complex wave [italics mine], but these strings are able to analyze the wave into its constituent vibrations, each string taking up those vibrations, and those vibrations only, which belong to the tone given forth by itself when struck." The following opinion is equally decisive of the sense of the term analysis as used by physiologists : " The cochlea of the ear resembles a series of differentially toned resonators, an analyzing apparatus which works in strict accordance with Fourier's law, and practically solves the problem in this simple manner. The organ of 440 vibrations selects the fundamental tone, that of 440 x 2 the first harmonic, that of 440 X 3 the second, and so on. Further, each sympathetic apparatus vibrates with an intensity corresponding with the intensity of the harmonics of the note produced ; and in this manner the whole note is analyzed into a number of simple tones, in a manner as perfect as any we can conceive.

"After this process of analysis, however, there follows a

294 ^ VERS. [Vol. VI .

process of combination, which takes place in other organs. The fundamental tone, and each of the harmonics severally, irritate a distinct nerve fibre, and each nerve fibre transmits its irritation separately to the brain. Here, however, where the mysterious processes of sensation take place, the several sensations are, in an equally incomprehensible {sic) manner, combined into a general one, which gives rise to the sensation of a compound tone. Our perception, therefore, of tones of different pitch is produced entirely by an irritation of different fibres of the auditory nerve. Through the auditory nerve the brain receives from different fibres an intimation of tones of different pitch, which intimation enables it to distinguish the sympathetic vibratory organs which have answered to the tone."

It does not follow that because one is able under certain conditions, as by the use of resonators, careful attention, and selected experiments, to hear overtones and audibly prove their presence in company with a fundamental, that such an overtone modifies the quality of the fundamental tone unless it is strong enough to produce a discrete set of undulations in the hair band, and all undulations of the air, whether they are overtones or not, unless they are strong enough to call forth such discrete undulations and succeed in reaching the hair band, are not perceived and do not help to make the " timbre " of sounds.

Should we construct a series of "pure tone" tuning-forks, vibrating from 15 to 40,000 times per second, having a separate fork for each one-eighth of a tone difference, — on setting these forks in vibration one after another, we should find, providing our ears were properly educated, that we experienced a distinct sensation, which we call a simple tone, owing to the constant difference between the periods and intensities of the pendular vibrations thus set up. It will be, for the present at least, allowable to assume that the proportions of the aerial stresses will be maintained in the endolymph, no matter how much the periods and intensities are modified during transmission to the hairs of the nerve end cells. We should thus have a series of tones ranging from i to x. Confining our attention to the cochlear hair cell rows, we are led to look for the physical cause — the sensation of tone (or sound) — in the periodicity, and not in the wave length, as in the case of light waves. One of Koenig's experiments illustrates this very well. Two simple forks are


set in vibration, one having 512 vibrations per second, and the other 100 vibrations per second. Each of these periods is recognized by the brain, as near as we can measure simultaneously, as a distinct tone. Without, however, introducing any other vibrating body into the experiment, we may, under proper conditions, hear two other sounds, one of which we recognize as a tone, the other as a sound. These two sounds are due to the production of maxima and minima of stress, by the presence of the two series of vibrations of periodicity 512 and 100 respectively, journeying in the same direction through the air, but with unequal steps. The tone is the same as that produced by a fork having 88 vibrations per second, and the sound the same as one having only 12 vibrations per second; and it is found that these two sounds are produced by "beats" in the two streams of sonorous vibrations.

The ear may thus recognize at one time three distinct tones, propagated through the same mass of air and endolymph. This individual perception may be due to the presence in the hair band of filaments which respond only to special wave lengths ; it may be due to the successive response of all the hairs to all the varying stresses of the uneven stream, as illustrated by a wheat-field in a gusty wind ; or it may be due to a combination of both these factors ; and to the latter view I incline, giving preponderance to the second condition.

Analysis of sound (or sound waves) is then, according to my conception of the auditory function, a process which does not occur in the way in which it has been previously supposed to take place. From a study as complete as we can yet make it, the auditive process is seen to be so different from the Helmholtz-Hensen conception that the use of the word analysis is not admissible. There is in reality never an attalysis, either in the end organ or in the central apparatus ; but each external physical variation that succeeds in producing an alteration of the end organ (practically superficial, i.e, lying on the bounds between the mass of the sentient matter and the external) is propagated simply, it may be in more or less converted form, but still a direct and continuous transmission of a variation of previous relations of external matter. While journeying in company with other undulations, a sonorous undulation is subject, not only to change, but to annihilation as well Only after

296 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

reception within the cochlea and its transmission to the brain does it become transformed in a manner yet unknown to us, but which we express roughly by the terms association and co-ordination, so as to produce something else than a mere propagation of auditory stimuli. When this stage is reached, we have, instead of an analysis^ a synthesis of stimuli. There is, then, in the auditory processes never analysis, but always, as the final resultant of the always sequential stimulation of the auditory apparatus, a synthesis of auditory stimuli.

It must be admitted on physical grounds alone that vibrational impulses affecting the tympanum may, and under ordinary conditions of the middle ear must, affect the membrana fenestras rotundas by transmission across the middle ear, by means of the contained air, and that the impulses so produced in the cochlear organ must either be propagated or destroyed. In this connection I wish to make an addition to the previous conceptions of the processes taking place in the cochlear tubes while undulations are propagating themselves through the contained liquid. It has not, so far as I have been able to discover from the literature, ever been considered that the increase of tension, which has been assumed for the cochlear liquid to take place and to be transferred to successive parts of the liquid during the passage of undulations, could be relieved in any other way than by the bulging out (/>. into the tympanic chamber) of the membrane of the fenestra rotunda. The readiness with which such increased tension could be relieved, through the endolymphatic duct on the one hand, and by the propagation of the undulations through the perilymph from the endolymph on the other hand, has not been in the least recognized, so far as I can learn. The pressure stress in the perilymph is, with the greatest readiness, conducted out of the ear ; and since the undulations of the air are so very slow, as compared to those of the liquid (as i to 5), that they are readily and successively annihilated before the succeeding stimuli are received, I do not think any sufficient objection can be brought against the view that auditory stimuli may be propagated through both of the fenestrae simultaneously. // is most certainly true that impulses going through both openings simultaneously are not necessarily antagonistic ; and it is also equally true that, owing to the greater rapidity of transmission of the waves through solids


than through gases, the transmission through the tympanocochlear chain of bones tends to be more rapid than that through the air to the round window ; but it is at the same time counterbalanced somewhat by process of transfer, owing to the lost motion (under certain conditions of the osseous chain), which is a disturbing feature of the process of transmission to the oval window.

There are three phases in the result of the stimulation of the auditory cell : first, the period of preparation occupied in the propagation of the stimulus through tlie cell protoplasm, i,e, through the capillo-nuclear and the nucleo-neural filaments of the nerve end cell ; second, the period of excitation during which the filaments are transforming the stimuli received into the nerve stimuli ; and, third, the relaxation period occupied in regaining the normal condition of repose and cell activity, during which time the accumulated stimuli have passed over into the nerve and left it as before.

In dealing with the differences of sounds y physiologists are generally agreed that there are three distinct conditions inherent in the physical constitution of sounds which give them their individuality. They are the intensity ^ th^pitchf and the timbre.

The intensity or force of sound depends upon the amplitude of vibration of the sound wave, and there can be no doubt that this is strictly a differential quality inherent in the physical basis alone.

The pitch of a sound depends upon the number of whole vibrations (complete aerial undulations alone referred to) executed by the auditory wave in a given period of time, as Mersenne discovered in 1636. This, also, is easily proven to be a differential quality of sound entirely dependent upon the physical condition of the aerial undulation.

The quality, klangfarbe^ or timbre of sound, depends, according to Hclmholtz, upon the form of the sound ivave as caused by either the quality or fonn of the sounding body ; such quality or form of the sounding body influencing the timbre of the produced sound by varying the number, pitch, and intensity of the subdivisional tones and harmonies.

This so-called third property or individual quality of sounds cannot be shown to be due to a third physical condition of the aerial undulations ; on the contrary, it is caused by action of the

298 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

two qualities already considered, and to them alone, acting upon or conditioning numerous secondary vibrations which always accompany musical sounds, especially those produced by ordinary means. It is also true that the klangfarbe is due more to education than to anything else, for to ordinary ears the finer qualities of klangfarbe are unperceived.

Consequently the tonal differentiation which has been previously referred to the klangfarbe as form of the acoustic wave must be referred to the two primary and only modifying influences. Timbre is due to the sequential propagation of the same (or nearly the same) accented series of sonorous undulations up the cochlear hair band. The accent may occur either before or after the arrival of the other member ; i.e. the recurrence of the series may be marked by the accent or fundamental tone, or the latter may occur in any part of the series, provided it recurs in the same (or nearly the same) relative position with reference to the other tones.

Ordinarily these tones follow each other with a rapidity, when their faint ness is considered, which prevents their being recognized as separate tones, but this is by no means always the case ; for some of the partial and harmonic tones accompanying the fundamental note, eg, of a piano string, are readily distinguishable as independent tones when attention is paid to them alone. It is also true that other tones of the harmonic series stand in the same relation to the main partials that these occupy with reference to the fundamental.

It should be borne in mind that the perception of sound by the ear does not follow with mathematical accuracy the laws of physical acoustics.

The rhythm of intensities is, then, the cause of the timbre of tones. We may illustrate in a crude way how the same nerve fibres may send sequential stimuli of different intensities, and give rise by increase of rate into blended sensations.

Suppose we fill a sufficiently long glass tube of small calibre with liquids of sweet, sour, bitter taste in the order given, each taste occupying a few millimetres' length of the tube and strong enough to give rise to the special sensation, yet weak, evanescent enough not to fatigue the nerve or persist in the tongue to the detriment of the experiment. Starting slowly, cause the liquid to flow in a stream over the tongue, and there will follow sue


cessively sensations of sweet, sour, bitter, at a rate corresponding with the length of the section of each taste in the tube and the rapidity of the flow. By increasing the rapidity of the flow, the sensations become less distinct and finally blend into a mixed sensation of bitter sweet, sweet sour, or any of the other possible combinations of these flavors, depending upon the relative predominence of any single one of the liquids. But the nerves of taste do not analyze this compound sensation. It is analyzed in the brain, but even there only on the basis of education as to what constitutes the peculiarities of the sweet, sour, and bitter taste used.

The same character of experiment may be tried, with about the same results, in the case of the nose, except gases are preferable to liquids.

Or, again, the sense of touch may be experimented upon in a similar manner by causing an endless rod whose succeeding sections of a few millimetres in length are alternately cool and warm, to pass over any temperature-sensitive surface of the body. The sequence of varying temperatures may have any arrangement desired, and the result is not essentially altered. The sensations, when following each other with a rate sufficiently slow, are transmitted individually to the brain by the same nerves ; but when the rate is increased beyond a certain limit, they become more or less blended into a single temperature sensation. There is no analysis of the sensations here either in the end organ or in the brain, unless previous experience enables the person to determine, on general grounds, that the sensation is produced by a sequence of stimuli of varying temperatures. Again, the eye and the brain fail to analyze the sensation due to a rapid succession of colors into the component colors. And yet a wr;///?/ analysis is possible on the basis of previous experience and education in the composition of colors.

After explaining at length his view that the quality of a tone is due to the /^r;/i of the sound wave (foe, cit. Chap. I, "Form of Sound Wave "), Helmholtz comes to the consideration of " Apprehension of Qualities of Tone,*' Chap. VI, p. 1 19, and concludes from a series of experiments that ** the quality of the musical portion of a compound tone depends solely on the number and relative strength of its partial simple tones, and in no respect on their differences of phase." Or, in other words, the

30O AVERS. [Vol. VI.

timbre of a tone is due to the sequence of certain simple tones, and not on the form of the wave compounded of them.

Or, as Bernstein states it, " the sensation of a note is caused by the irritation of a certain fibre of the nerve of the cochlea, which is produced by the fundamental tone, and also by the more or less feeble irritation, of certain other nerve fibres, the terminal organs of which have been irritated by the harmonics." On the supposition, of course, that each hair cell received from its supporting basilar membrane fibres stimuli due to a given frequency.

Koenig has, I think, conclusively proven that timbre is due to the presence of what he calls the sounds of subdivision (Helmholtz's " oberpartialtone,*' translated by Tyndall into "overtones "), which are not identical with the " harmonics." These subdivisional sounds are produced by «(7«-periodic as well as periodic waves, and hence the quality, pleasing or otherwise, of the tone may be due to non-periodic undulations as well as the periodic, to which alone Helmholtz restricted them. Helmholtz was led by experimental results to hold the view that timbre was due to Xhtform of the sonorous wave, and that in the succession of upper and lower partial tones or tones of subdivision, the form of these wavelets must necessarily remain constant. Koenig has shown that Helmholtz's error lay primarily in the apparatus which he used, and that as a fact, although the fonn of the wavelets is constantly changing^ the car nevertheless does under normal conditions ** group the result as a unitafy sensation!' These experiments of Koenig's prove the correctness of the view I had already arrived at ; viz. that there are in reality but two conditioning physical relations of the tone wave, — its rapidity and its kinetic energy.

The sound wave, strictly speaking, has no form ; it is not a discrete thing, but only a condition of the matter gaseous, liquid, or solid, which in all cases partakes in the physical basis of sound. And from the external vibrating body to the nerve end cell the vibration is transmitted without assuming form : such, at least, is true of all the acoustic undulations which produce the sensation of sound in the brain of man. It is demonstrable, as Helmholtz claims, that two notes of the same pitch and intensity, but from different sources (e.g. middle C from the piano and violin) reaching the ear simultaneously, do not


strike upon the tympanum as two distinct impacts so far as their fundamental tones are concerned, but as single condensations and rarefactions or pressures and relaxations as the motion is transferred mechanically from the air to the ear drum. This main (combinational) pressure and relaxation is accompanied by minor ones of different pitches and varying, but in all cases less, intensities. When these are further transmitted and produce the sensations of tone, how does the ear separate the subdivisional tones and harmonics of the piano note from those of the violin note } As Koenig has clearly shown, " if the ear could always separate the pure harfnonic or absolutely inharmonic partials from their fundamental tone, or if it always heard pure harmonics as an indistinguishable part of the unity of the timbre of a fundamental tone, then we might draw a hard and fast line between mere mixtures of sound and timbre." Such, however, is not the case. We cannot perceive these minute distinctions without special care and physical aid ; for often the ear cannot detect the inharmonious partials when present, and does, on the other hand, often separate out the harmonious partials (Koenig), and, besides, in the last analysis, timbre is simply due to a rapid accented sequence of tones, and not to a mixing of simple tones.

Here, as elsewhere, however, much depends upon the sensitiveness and delicacy of the ear and central association apparatus. The passage of sound through the ear of one person is much the same as the passage of light through a plate of glass, while in the ear of another (or perhaps the brain) the same apparently simple unitary sound would be drawn out in a harmonious chord much as white light is separated into its spectrum of component colors by passing through a prism. Koenig concludes from his experiments that melody is associative rather than physical.

That the appreciation of sound is a mental act has long been recognized, and Foster cautions us to bear it in mind. This being true, and allowing for the moment that there is an analysis of the compound sound wave by the fibres of the basilar membrane, or any other auditory structure, Foster does not make clear how this can be so, while at the same time, as he says {loc, cit p. 1 2 14), *' We do not receive a distinct series of specific auditory impulses resulting in a specific sensation for every

302 AVERS. [Vol. VI.

possible variation in wave length of sonorous vibrations, any more than we receive a distinct series of specific visual impulses for every possible wave length of luminous vibrations. In each case we probably have a number of primary sensations from the various mingling of which, in different proportions, our varied complex sensations arise ; the difference between the eye and the ear being that whereas in the former the number of the primary sensations appears to be limited to three or at least six, in the latter, thanks to the organ of Corti, the number is very large : what the exact number is we cannot at present tell." There could be no genuine analysis unless the ear did in some way respond to each vibration in wave length, and from the anatomy of the cochlear sense organs this is very probably the case. The manner in which this is carried out has already been indicated.

There is, however, on further consideration, another set of conditions which probably affect the appreciation of sound ; viz. the state of the sensorium into which the sound waves enter. This state is determined by previous and present sensations not from the ear alone, but from other sense organs as well, and is sufficient to determine the ultimate sensation due to a given stimulation by sound waves. This is, however, a subject of great obscurity and difficulty, but it should not be left unconsidered in any discussion of the qualities and conditions of psychical audition. These phenomena belong to the still unknown borderland between the external tone-generating physical universe and the internal psycho-physiological tone-perceiving apparatus, — the auditory hair and ganglion cells of the auditory centres with their numerous connections with other apparatuses of the brain. There is a gradation of phenomena from the purely physical and external to the purely subjective or internal auditory sensations. The latter are not primarily' dependent upon the former, and include phenomena of subjective music by mental effort and all involuntary subjective tone perceptions. As an example of the latter class of phenomena I give the following personal experience. I had been riding all night on the cars and was engaged in reading the morning paper, and as I sat but a few seats from the car door and facing it, I could hear distinctly the slamming of the door as trainmen passed in and out. As I had lost the night's rest, the quiet


attention to my newspaper favored my dozing into semiconsciousness, from which I was suddenly startled by what at first seemed to be a sharp blow upon the newspaper in front of me, but before I could open my eyes I was perfectly conscious that this was an illusion, and that the paper had not been struck and had not given forth the sound. This was confirmed by seeing the conductor coming from near the door, which he had just slammed, and by finding my paper in its former position. Now the sense organs whose attention had been last directed to the outer world were the eyes, and the stimulus entering the brain through the ears was referred to their field of vision, but the stimulation of the auditory centre had been so keen that the distinctive qualities of the sound of a slamming door at once corrected the illusion that it was the paper which had given forth the sound, notwithstanding the fact that the first impression had all the distinctive qualities of a sharp blow upon the paper. In this instance the timbre or tonal qualitatives distinctive of the slamming door were for the instant suppressed by the state of the co-ordinating mechanism, though they were soon recognized. We have to go but a step further to recognize that such internal modifications may become permanent.

The auditory perceptions are largely dependent upon education. This is true of the results of all sound stimuli ; thus, in the young child possessing auditory organs structurally perfected, as far as the microscope reveals, we find a great lack of the " proper" appreciation of sounds and tonal compositions, — a lack due to small experience, />. to a lack of co-ordinating powers in the central nervous system. We depend for our judgments of the direction on the constant relation maintained between the external ear and the auditory meatus to the surrounding air, and we are very liable to false judgments on any alteration of the normal relation. If, for instance, the hand or other solid body be placed close to the side of the head and in front of the car, the entrance of sound waves is modified much as it would be were the external ear to be revolved about the meatus as an axis, and hence the sound waves make their way in from behind with greater facility than from in front.

We are greatly assisted in recognizing the direction of sound by the position of the external ear on the side of the head, since it renders the perceptions of sounds of like intensity

304 AVERS, [Vol. VI.

easier from in front than from behind, from below than from above ; and this condition being ever present, the co-ordinating mechanism is adjusted to it, and thus our judgment of direction is rendered easier and more frequently correct than it would otherwise be. Sound is heard most distinctly when the auditory canal is in the same straight line with the direction of the sound waves, and for this reason we turn the head in various directions in order to ascertain the position in which the sound seems the loudest ; and the line passing through the centres of both ears will lie in the plane in which the most intense sound waves are propagated. This plane is of necessity at right angles to antero-posterior or sagittal plane or plane of direct vision. All judgments involving the use of the auditory apparatus for determining direction and relations of external bodies must necessarily start from this fundamental relation, which is so early recognized as to be during adult life passed over unnoticed. In the position of the ear above referred to one ear receives the greatest possible, the opposite ear the least possible, amount of sound, and the appreciation of this difference, i.e. the determination of the position of the head in which the greatest difference exists, is used directly in determining the direction of sound, the judgment being based upon a comparison of the intensities of stimuli. The necessity for making trial attempts in order to establish the position of a sounding body by the ear has been compared to the execution of movements in binocular vision, by means of which we estimate distance, determine direction, etc. The assistance gained from the eyes in determining direction in such a case is not slight, but is usually an unconscious effort, mainly unnoticed because there is a continued effort maintained by the nervous system for the proper orientation of the body in space such as is necessary for its perfect control. All sensations whatsoever going to the brain from the surface of the body likewise aid materially in its orientation.

Although the ordinary method of transmission is through the air, liquid and solid substances prove even better conductors when brought in contact with the hard parts of the head. When the head is immersed in water, all sounds that are transmitted to the water pass with increased facility and intensity to the internal ear, in part through the bones of the head direct, but also in part through the mediation of the tympanic membrane


with the cushion of air inclosed between it and the water, which may enter only part way into the meatus auditorius extemus and incompletely fill it. The inflow of many of the constant stimuli from without being prevented, the transmission of internal vibrations arising from the cardiac pulsations and the rush of blood through the blood-vessels, the rustling sounds due to the passage of air currents through the pulmonary passages and other respiratory ways, being greatly increased, one is able to hear with remarkable distinctness the great amount of noise of several kinds which these physical processes make.

The very remarkable noise produced, for example, by the contraction of the temporal and masseter muscles resembles very closely the incessant clatter of a large number of telegraphic instruments being operated simultaneously. There is a distinctive character possessed by these sounds, due entirely, I believe, to the greater intensity of the vibrations of liquid and solid media over those of gases.

It is said that the transmission of vibrations by means of the bones of the skull is of no importance to animals above the fishes, but that in these (possessing no external ear) the head bones play a very important part in the transmission of sound ; in fact, it is about the only means for the transfer of the sound waves. This is certainly true, so far as concerns the main uses to which the human ear is put, but we cannot doubt that the ear plays an important part in keeping the internal organs in normal condition of work by sending in a continuous stream of stimuli due to pulsations of the circulation, respiration, and all of the many processes which cause vibrations either in the lymph channels or the bone about the ear. The musical sense as it exists among civilized and cultivated races is a result of the association of ideas and of tone production, and not of a perfection in the apparatus for tone perception in the ear.

G. Recapitulation of Some of the Topics, with a Further Consideration of a Few Others

Recapitulation B,

I. Since the beginning of this century the idea that the lateral line of fishes was related in some way to the higher sense organs, nose, ear, and eye, one or all of them, has never been absent from the minds of morphologists ; and although, when first expressed, the lateral line was considered to be merely a series of mucous pockets more or less completely joined into a canal without even a suspicion that they had nervous attachments or contained sense organs, still it was believed and categorically stated that since these structures were in line on the side of the body with the higher sense organs on the head, and since they found their place between the dorsal and ventral groups of trunk muscles, they were in all probability related to the higher sense organs. Some authors thought that they were the parental forms ; others that they were derivatives of ancestral organs which were the parental type ; others, again, homologized the " mucous pockets " and canals of the lateral line with the tracheal canals and stigmata of insects, which were then quite generally believed to be auditory in function, and they claimed that the vertebrate ear was the greatly modified product of a mucous pocket which had somehow or other acquired the sensory structures and their accompanying nerves.

This idea has grown in strength in successive generations with each renewed investigation, until now, confining ourselves to the ear, it may be said to be fully established. The investigations of Leydig in demonstrating the nerve supply of the contained sense organs in these canals, or rather in their "mucous pockets,'* opened the way for the score or more of workers who have increased our knowledge, and among whom we find the names of Leydig, Ball, Bodenstein, Schulze, Solger, Emory, Dercum, Fritsch, and Allis, some dealing with the morphological data alone, others with the physiological side as well. The one point of general agreement among all has been the great resemblance of the canal sense organs to the maculae and cristas acusticae of the ear. The deep-seated existence of this belief is very impressively illustrated by the fact that when new facts have been discovered in the anatomy of the ear organs they have been found to be true of the canal organs, and vice versa. Likewise, the errors in our knowledge were common to both. The ontogeny of the ear has disclosed many new facts, and as fast as the ontogeny of the canal organs has been worked out they have been found to agree in the details of their ontogeny with the ear canal organs no less than in their adult anatomy.

The processes which I have described in the chapter dealing with the development of the ear canal complex were not known to occur in the development of the lateral line canals, and von Noorden's circumstantial account of the formation of the cristae acusticae and their ampullae and canals remained, like all previous accounts of ear anatomy and development, a series of dry facts, until leavened by the addition of AUis's germinal series of facts concerning the development of the surface sense organs and their canals. Then the slumbering idea, already a century old, arose in a concrete demonstrable form and became clothed in a garment of facts logically arranged and consequently easily grasped and understood. Indeed, so easily grasped, that already, before all the details are worked out, we have forgotten that there was any difficulty or uncertainty about the demonstration of the old, half-perceived idea, which was so uncertain in form that men were not quite sure that all this homology might not be mere parallelism.

2. In describing the Elasmobranch ear I have emphasized the necessity of keeping in mind the relation of the chambers and channels of the internal ear to each other as that of a complexus of surface sense organ canals sunk below the surface of the head with the dermal surface (from which the canals are generated), as the lining of the main chambers — the two coordinate and primary chambers of the ear. It was found that in Dasyatis the ear presents a remarkably symmetrical arrangement of parts which, taken as a typical form, permits of the union of all vertebrates according to a simple and logical plan of development (so far as the ear is concerned), and satisfies as well all the demands yet made by any anatomical facts, for the derivation of the ear from pre-existing surface canal organs.

3. It is proven that there is no essential difference between the sense organs of the internal ear of the vertebrate group and the superficial sense organs of the Ichthyopsida as they exist in the surface canals of these forms. Both consist of canals containing sense organs lying below the surface of the body, and they may (as in ordinary canals and the ear in some Elasmobranchs) or they may not (as in Savi's vesicles and the ear in the majority of vertebrates) communicate with the surface. Both forms may or may not be entirely inclosed in cartilage or in bone.

4. The semicircular canals of the ear are simply remnants of the canal system of the surface, and although bent into shapes more or less semicircular, they still retain their communication with the (morphological) exterior by means of their terminal {i.e, surface) pores or openings in the walls of the utriculo-sacculus, which in its turn often communicates with the surface of the head by the endolymphatic duct or surface canal.

5. The sense organs of the ampullae not infrequently divide without causing the division of the canal, and even the crista abortiva in some Elasmobranchs and Reptilia has divided, each sense organ resulting being supplied with a distinct nerve branch. The fact of the presence of two parts in his so-called macula neglecta was not understood by Retzius, who first observed it.

6. When the division of the sense organ has proceeded so far as to cause a separation of the previously unified nerve trunk supplying it, we are justified in concluding that the number of sense organs in the group is at least equal to the number of discrete nerve twigs supplied to the group.

7. Each offspring resulting from the division of a canal organ inherits a tendency to division and canal production. The auditory canal sense organs of the second generation divide symmetrically when considered in their mutual relations, but individually the division is an asymmetrical one. The third generation shows the same characteristics.

8. Thus it is true that the development of the semicircular canals in the ear is due to phylogenetic and mechanical causes, and is not in the least a response to physiological necessities or requirements, and conversely the canals have no active part in the auditory function. They serve merely as chambers to hold the liquid necessary to float the auditory sensory hairs.

9. The Cyclostomes and some Elasmobranchs possess two endolymphatic ducts, or surface canals, on each side of the head, one of which on either side bears a canal sense organ supplied, so far as our anatomical knowledge reaches, by the facial nerve, or more exactly by the so-called auditory accessory nerve, which is said to be a branch of the facial. In this connection Mayser's conclusions as to the relation of all canal organ nerves to the auditory proper should be borne in mind.

10. The otoliths in the ear chambers are to be considered as essentially foreign bodies which are tolerated because of the impossibility of getting rid of them. They are the result of the secretive action of the ectoderm cells, which in ancestral forms produced the surface scales. The higher we rise in the vertebrate series, and also the greater the auditory sensitiveness, the fewer the otoliths found in the ear.

Those sense organs whose condition indicates their predominance in auditory work have no otoliths.

11. It is found that the sense organs of the cochlea undergo a series of transformations heretofore overlooked and that there is an organ in the adult cochlea of the hydrosaurian Reptilia which makes its appearance in the embryonic mammal, but together with its nerve supply fades away before adult life is reached. Whereas the cochlear organ of birds, for all that we know to the contrary at present, seems to be of the form of an undifferentiated plate of sensory cells, in the Alligator and in mammals the organ of Corti becomes differentiated into a linear series of organs or cell groups, which are individually morphologically equivalent to the other simple sense organs of the ear, eg, the cristoe acusticoe. This segmentation of the organ of Corti is indicated by (a) the hair cells, {h) the supporting cells, (f) the blood-vessels, (d) the nerves, and consequently the skeleton (the lamina spiralis ossea) and the soft parts (the membrana basilaris) of the floor, transmitting these last two structures, c and d,

12. The cells which line the sulcus spiralis intcrnus in the adult are all that are left of the large epithelial ridge of the embryo. This ridge is composed of long columnar cells which grow shorter and disappear. It is not yet ascertained what the mode of disappearance is. It may be that the columnar cells are entirely absorbed, in which case the lining epithelium would be equivalent to the " Ersatzzellen " of Ketel (in Petromyzon), or it may as well be that the long columnar cells are simply reduced, on account of decreased nutrition, and appear as cubical or spherical cells. No explanation has yet been offered of the apparent fact that there are no small surface hair cells in the Sauropsid organ in the developing mammal such as exist alone as the sensory elements Q) in the hydrosauria. Where are these short cells or what represents them > How many of the long epithelial cells in the embryo mammal bear hairs, and where are the supporting cells at this stage }

13. The so-called membrana tectoria of previous authors is in reality a hair band or field of long slender hairs which spring from the tops of the hair cells and form a waving plume on the crest of the ridge of the organ of Corti. Each hair cell gives off a bundle of about two dozen hairs which spring from the whole surface of the cell cap (Didelphys, Mus, Bos, Sus, Homo), and each individual hair floats freely in the endolymph.

14. The membrana tectoria, the membrana reticularis, Loewenberg's net, and the three or four main trunks of the system of spiral nerves of the cochlea have no existence as such in the living mammalian ear, the first of them being the chemically and physically modified hair band ; the second one being an artifact produced by the separation of the cell caps of the organ of Corti from their cells, in the form of a continuous and more or less perforated plate ; the third structure being likewise an artifact produced by chemical and physical agents in ever-varying form ; while the fourth one of the artifacts mentioned is in all probability the product of the transformation of the walls of a lymph space with adherent and included nerve fibres, cell processes, and cell remnants.

15. The cochlear nerves end /;/ the hair cells and not freely between them, and they are probably continuous with the auditory hairs, as Hasse claimed, and as my own observations render almost certain. The continuity of the hairs with the nerve fibres is established by the protoplasmic ways inside the hair cells, which I have designated the capillo-nuclear and the nucleoneural filaments. Free nerve ends do not exist in the auditory epithelium, and consequently Helmholtz was entirely wrong in ascribing to the auditory otoliths the function of tetanomotors which stimulated the nerves by compressing them or delivering suitable blows on or near the ends of the fibres.

16. The membrana basilaris is far too complex a structure to permit of its use as a vibrating membrane capable of responding in its various parts quite independently to sound stimuli of varying wave lengths.

The membrane is composed of several superposed sheets of fibres and adnexed cell masses, and, as I have recently discovered, there is also a special vascular layer (Sus, Bos) or system of basilar capillary loops, which layer is placed between the fibrous layers and for the most part below the nerve fibre layer of the inner border of the membrane. This vascular layer is composed of numerous circuitous capillary channels which have been overlooked by previous investigators. The basilar membrane cannot possibly meet the physical demands made upon it by the Hensen-Helmholtz "piano-string" theory, and, as I have shown, its phylogenetic history proves it to be a modified portion of the skin of the head which forms first and last the floor upon which the sense organs rest.

17. If the ear originated from surface canal organs and their inclosing canals, it became evident that the older view of the segmental value of the so-called VIII or auditory nerve could not be true ; if the view of the morphological value of the VIII was indeed true, then the origin of the ear from surface canals could not be true in the sense claimed ; consequently this apparently fatal objection must be removed. An examination of the present state of our knowledge of the auditory nerve supply, together with a few additions I have been able to make to the subject of the innervation of the auditory sense organs in the Cyclostomes and Elasmobranchs, proves conclusively that throughout the vertebrate group the same plan of innervation is maintained which is laid down in the Cyclostomes and that a dual peripheral origin and a dual central termination of the auditory nerve fibres in intimate connection with the VII and IX respectively, is the first fundamental fact of ear nerve supply. The car organs are innervated by the nerves which supply surface canal sense organs. The genetic relationship of the VII and IX nerves to the VIII is shown by the entrance of the parental nerves into the auditory capsule, where they both give off nerve branchlets to supply ear sense organs and then pass on to the surface of the head, where they again supply canal organs of the lateral line system. The VII enters the auditory chamber and gives off nerves to ear sense organs in forms as high as the saurian Reptilia, and it is possible in the Mammalia as well, though the latter point has not been proven. The IX nerve enters the auditory chamber and gives off a nerve to the sensory apparatus of the ear in Elasmobranch fishes at least.

There has been great difference of opinion as to whether the facial nerve really gave off a branch to the ear in Petromyzon, and the whole matter has been summed up by Julin (1890), who says (p. 819), after showing that all the anatomists who have studied the facial in Petromyzon are agreed that this nerve makes its way into the auditory capsule to traverse it and pass out again from its anterior lower corner : " Pendant son trajet k travers la capsule auditive, le nerf facial fournirait, d'apris Schlemm et d* Alton au vestibule membraneux un petit rameau nerveux, qu*ils appellent nerf auditif accessoire, Cet fait a ensuite it€ confirm^ par Ketel. Ce rameau du facial a ^t^ ^galement mentionnd par J. Miiller comme existant chez les Myxinoids. Furbringer sans en nier Texistence, n'a pu cependant le d^couvrir, ni chez Myxine glntinosa^ ni chez les Petromyzons. Wiedersheim, qui n'a pu non plus en d^c^ler la presence chez Petromyzon, 6met Tid^e que ce nerf acoustique accessoire de Schlemm et d' Alton ne serait autre chose que le nerf oculomoteur externe (abducens). Enfin, Ahlborn n*a par non plus signal^ cette branche du nerf facial. Pas plus que ces auteurs, je n*ai pu en trouver la moindre trace chez rAmmocoetes." This branch is present in the ear, and it is more probable that those authors who have studied this nerve specially and who have followed it through its whole course have described it correctly than that those who have failed to find the nerve have really proven the absence of such a facial branch. We know from Ahlborn's studies that the recurrent branch sends facial fibres into both the glossopharyngeal and the lateral nerves.

According to His, Sr., the auditory nerve is purely a ganglionic nerve, and the same is true of the taste fibres of the IX. As is well known, the sensory fibres subserving the sense of taste in the anterior two-thirds of the tongue run through the chorda tympani, and the recent investigations of Sapolini make it fairly certain that the chorda tympani is a continuation of at least a portion of the fibres of the portio intermedia Wrisbergi, which pass through the ganglion geniculi to the chorda tympani. It follows from this that the taste nerves of the IX are ganglionic in origin and from the same source as the common acustico-facial trunk (of course by this term I include only the vestibular trunk of the VIII, which properly belongs to the VII. His does not make this distinction). Again, on p. 422 our author says : —

" Der acustico-f aciale Gangliencomplex bildet urspriinglich ein Ganzes und er scheidet sich nicht etwa bloss in zwei hinter einander liegende Segmente, in ein Facialis und ein Acusticusganglien, sondem es entstehen aus ihm vier bis fiinf in ihrer Lage eigenthiimlich sich verschrankende Theilstiicke. Es trennen sich einestheils die intracranialen Wurzelganglien ab, welche die Anatomic theilweise noch als Acusticuskerne (nl. acusticus inf. von Henle), accessorischer Kern (von Schwalbe) u.s.w. aufzahlt, anderntheils aber scheiden . sich Ganglion vestibuli, G. geniculi, und G. cochleae, von einander, von denen des G. geniculi swischen die beiden Acusticusganglien eingekeilt erscheint. Das dem Facialis bcsonders zugetheilte Stiick kann morphologisch von den beiden Acusticusganglien nicht getrennt werden, so gross auch der physiologische Gegensatz sein mag.*' As showing the deep significance of Mayser's original statement concerning Teleosts, that the lateral line nerves terminated in the brain in company with the auditory nerve, it is interesting to note that Strong has recently corroborated this fact for another group of the Ichthyopsida, viz. Amphibia.

18. In 18 1 7 Johan Fried. Meckel published a treatise on human anatomy in which he propounded certain views regarding the morphological value of the cranial nerves, which have not received due recognition from anatomists. He says (Bd. Ill, pp. 668 and 787): —

"Alle Hirnnerven sind einzelne Abtheilungen von Riickenmarksnerven, welche sich nicht wie diese zu einem Stamm vereinigt, sondern zu einzelnen Nerven entwickelt haben, und der Grund dieser Abanderung des urspriinglichen Typus ist theils die Entwickclung der Centralmasse des Nervcnsystems im Innern des Schadels, sowie des Schadels selbst, wodurch die einzelnen Abtheilung der Nervenwurzeln sowohl bei ihrem Entstehen als in ihrem Verlauf mechanisch auseinandergeriickt werden, theils die Eigenthiimlichkeit der Gebilde am Schadel, der Sinnesorgane, deren Wurzeln durch die Nerven, welche sich zu ihnen begeben, gebildet werden und deren Eigenthiimlichkeit der Entwickelung eigener Nerven parallel lauft."

" Dass sich wirklich nicht neue Nerven anbilden, sondem nur ganze Nerven zerfallen, einzelne Aeste derselben sich zu ganzen Stammen erheben und von eigenen Hirntheilen entspringen, ergiebt sich fiir manche derselben aus der vergleichenden Anatomic unwiederleglich, indem eigene Nerven, namentlich Sinnesnerven hoherer Thiere, bei den niedrigen Thieren nur untergeordnete Aeste anderen Nerven namentlich des dreigetheilten sind, dies um somehr, je tiefer das Thier ist.*' The direction of this differential process is, according to Meckel, a postero-anterior one. He says further: "An den hinteren Nerven spricht sie sich nur durch Nichtvereinigung der hinteren und der vorderen Wurzeln der Nerven aus, die vorderen dagegen scheinen dadurch zu entstehen^ dass sogar einzelne BUndel zti eigenen Nerven sich erheben."

Although Meckel stated thus distinctly the principle of structural differentiation of cranial nerves out of branches of previous spinal nerves, his classification shows that this generalization was not based on conclusive anatomical proof in the case of any single nerve or group of nerves.

Recapitulation C,

19. As Froriep has shown, the ectodermal thickenings which Beard described as giving rise to the lateral line organs have in fact another fate. The genuine lateral line organs escaped Beard's observation, and in consequence Beard's conclusions as to the homology of the vertebrate auditory organ are incorrect.

20. The detailed comparison of the anatomical characters of the surface sense organs (canal organs) of the existing Ichthyopsida and of the embryonic stages of the Sauropsida and Mammalia as well, fully sustains the conclusion that the ear is only a modified member of this group of sense organs, and that the cupulas, auditory clubs, and all such structures found in connection with the lateral line organs, are artifacts produced in the main from the auditory hairs of the sensory cells.

21. The above conclusion is rendered certain by my discovery that in Elasmobranchs the structural connection between the ear organs and the surface canal organs is for a long time vtaifitained after the ear has migrated to its internal home, and in some forms may be said with truth to persist during the life of the individual.

22. In the Mammalia the anterior and posterior canals, by uniting, fuse their two half-pores into one pore, which maintains the open communication of the semicircular canals with the morphological surface of the head. Thus we have in the human ear involution on involution ; for the main chambers of the ear, utriculus, and sacculus, are the result of an involution of a portion of the surface of the head into the tissue below, while the semicircular canals forming later are the result of involutions from this ear surface.

Recapitulation D,

23. The three semicircular canals arise in all cases which have been adequately studied from three depressions, and their upgrowing walls are formed in connection with the differentiation of the canal sense organs. They appear about the ampullary cristas first, and only later grow toward each other to produce a common pocket. Consequently the conclusions of Krause and others who state that the posterior and anterior canals arise from one pocket are to be accepted only after such modifications as will bring them into harmony with the course of development known for them in bony fishes.

24. The semicircular canals may be said to be completely formed so soon as the lips of the folds have met and fused. The separation of the canal body from the utriculo-sacculus is a secondary process due to the resorption of the fused part of the lips of the groove. In most vertebrates this condition is soon assumed after the lips meet, and persists throughout life ; but in Pctromyzon the tissue intervening between the utriculosaccular walls and the canals is not so soon nor so completely resorbed, which accounts for the closeness with which the canals are applied to the body of the ear in this animal.

25. A more exact determination of the absolute position of the ear with respect to the structures of the side of the head is now possible, and we find that the auditory vesicle is always developed between the facial and glossopharyngeal nerves. (For Elasmobranchs, cf. Beard, VIII, Rep. Scot. Fishery Bd., 1889, PI. X, Fig- 15 ; and for man, His, Arch f. Anat^ 1887, p. 376, Fig. 8.)

26. The ear progresses in its ontogeny according to the plan of development of the lateral line sense organs of the Ichthyopsida. There as here the appearance or disappearance of parts of the ear chamber are preceded, introduced, and governed by the division or death of the contained sense organs. The facts of development strengthen the conclusions drawn from comparative anatomy and show that the Cyclostome ear is the forerunner and an ancestral stage of the Gnathostome ear, and Retzius's idea that an impassable chasm exists between the ears of the two types is proven to be incorrect.

27. It is in the highest degree probable that the sense organ which I have discovered in the endolymphatic duct or surface ear canal of Petromyzon's ear exists also in the reptilian ear at least during ontogeny, for its nerve is well developed in the saurians and passes into the wall of the endolymphatic duct,

28. Hensen, among others, advocated the idea that the large epithelial ridge of the embryonic cochlea was the organ whose function it was to secrete the membrana tectoria, and most authors since his time have accepted this idea without question, notably Retzius. It has been taken for granted that all of the membrana tectoria of the embryo was converted into that of the adult, but that such a process does not occur is of course perfectly evident when one follows the resorption of the Sauropsid organ ; for as the latter disappears, its capillary structures disappear with it, and the adult mammalian hair band is made up of the hairs springing from the smaller epithelial ridge alone. The embryonic membrane of Corti is made up of hairs of both large and small epithelial ridges, while the adult membrane is the product of the small epithelial ridge alone or in terms of adult anatomy; the embryonic "membrane" includes the product of both the transient Sauropsid organ and the permanent organ of Corti, while the adult " membrane ** is of course the persistent portion of the embryonic membrane borne by the cells of the small ridge which constitute the hair cells of the adult organ of Corti.

Recapitulation E,

29. The vertebrate ear is a relatively late acquisition, phylogenetically speaking, and among the Sauropsida and Mammalia it offers the only remnant of the canal organs of their ichthyopsid ancestors.

30. The outcome of the survey of the anatomical and embryological fields is the conclusion that the surface territory out of which the ear developed was the best offered by the anatomical conditions of the ancestors of present vertebrates, and that the superiority of the territory chosen by natural selection over any other portion of the surface of the body lay in its combining in small space two, and that differently innervated, sensory apparatuses of a kind suitable for the further perfection of the function of the perception of wave motion. Among the higher forms the semicircular canals are degenerating, and one canal organ, the crista abortiva, has entirely disappeared. Corti's organ is not the papilla basilaris, as Retzius concludes, in agreement with Hasse and other anatomists, but only a small portion of it which has undergone peculiar modifications.

31. The auditory organs of invertebrates are not the forerunners or the ancestral forms of the vertebrate auditory organs, but they are differentiated structures which are confined strictly to the invertebrate group. It is of course possible that other sense organs of the invertebrate body have developed in the course of descent into the canal organs from which the vertebrate ear arose, but on this topic I have nothing to add to the opinions already expressed by other investigators.

Recapitulation K

32. The functions of the ampullar sense organs and their connected canals can hardly be different from the sense organs of the lateral line, except in refinement of function ; i.e. the difference can only be one of degree and not of kind. The highly modified line of cochlear organs has certainly carried the refinement of function much further, but it is not indicated anywhere that a different kind of function has been added to or substituted for the ancestral function.

The careful comparative study of the internal ear in its relations to the brain shows us that the semicircular canals do not now and never have possessed any special relations to the equilibrative function. In any case we cannot lose sight of the primitive function of the organs which gave rise to the ear organs. For the functions have probably not suffered greater alterations than the structure of the organs, and the changes in the latter have not been excessive, much less fundamental.

33. From all the evidence it appears that a vertebrate may live in perfect equilibrium without an internal ear. This is proven beyond question by Amphioxus, which has no ear, and by many forms among the lower vertebrates which may be deprived of their ears without destroying or even disturbing the powers of equilibration ; e.g, Boettcher's Frogy Tomascewicz's Carpy and Steiner's Sharks.

34. If there are still those who cling to the old idea of a localization of the equilibrative function in the semicircular canals of the ear, it should suffice for their conversion to remind them that in low vertebrates, canal organs are placed on the surface of the body in all three planes of space and in planes oblique to these, and that these canals and their inclosed sense organs are subject to much greater motion in the planes of space, owing to their greater distance from the axis about which the motions which affect them and the ear canals alike are executed, and further, the surface organs are more subject to external sensory impressions than the inclosed ear canals (not considering the probably greatly heightened sensitiveness of the latter), so that these forms would not need the ear canals as equilibrative organs ; but they are the very ones which have the ear canals the best developed !

35. As regards the canals themselves, they are not known to have any other function than the one inherited from their ancestors, viz. that of serving as mechanical protectors of the sense organs. The ear canals belong in the list of organs which continue to appear in ontogeny after the need which they were originated to fill has passed away. They are to be classed with such structures as valves in the horizontal veins of man's body, the vermiform appendix, coccygeal bones, atavistic muscles, and the rest of the considerable number of " normally " present but antiquated and functionless organs.

36. As a good example of how simple tactile corpuscles may be made to serve in place of the higher sense organs for the orientation of the body, we may take the nasal sensory apparatus of the common mole (Eimer, 79, 1871), or, better still, that of the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata). I have described in another place (6, 1885), the unusual nasal rays of this animal. This remarkable tactile apparatus is undoubtedly produced in response to needs of the animal, owing to its practical loss of sight, and it serves admirably to orient the body in the subterranean passages in which this mole lives.

Many more such facts might be brought forward to strengthen the view that the equilibration of the body is the product of the total of the activities of the nervous system acting over the whole periphery of the body, and is not the result of the activity of any special organ or group of organs such as the semicircular canals.

37. The filaments of the hair band meet the physical requirements of acoustics for the perception and transmission of the "waves'* of auditory stimuli.

38. Timbre or the tonal color of sounds is due to a combination of the stimuli or the effects of the excitation of a scries of vibrations of which the main or fundamental tone is most prominent, while the other vibrational impulses make themselves felt as "coloring" of this base. The combination is a psychical phenomenon, and there is no combined result of simultaneous, sympathetic vibrations transmitted from the ear ; on the contrary, each vibrational impulse is transmitted to the brain at its full value, and its effect in audition is due entirely to psychical processes.

39. In the dog, according to Foster, the average pressure in the cercbro-spinal fluid is equal to 10 mm. of mercury, i,c. about one-tenth to one-seventeenth of the carotid pressure ; and since the cercbro-spinal spaces communicate with the auditory channels (even though indirectly), this degree of pressure must be very near that under which the structures of the internal ear are called upon to carry out their functions, — a physical condition which should be kept in mind while dealing with the physiology of the ear sense organs in the Mammalia.

40. The function of the cochlea is carried out by the hair cells of the cochlea, which bear the long, slender, percipient hairs in such fashion that the waves of the endolymph are readily propagated down the filaments to the sentient protoplasm of the sensory cells, which are directly continuous with the nerve fibres of the cochlear nerve. These are the only structures of the cochlea directly concerned in the picking up and transmitting auditory stimuli to the brain. Waves of the endolymph are propagated continuously through the canal, and the auditory hairs are consecutively affected thereby, as a result of which the psychical phenomena of audition depend upon a series of stimuli from the sensorium varying in intensity and frequency and number with the sound waves which gain admittance to the endolymphatic fluid.

H. The Pertinent Literature

(Includes only papers contributing to the morphology or physiology of the membranous ear.)

(i) Ahlborn, F. — Untersuchungen liber das Gehirn der Petromyzonten. ^Zat.f. wiss. ZooL XXXIX, p. 191-294. PI. XIII.-XVII.

(2) Albarracin, Thos. — Mikrophotographien einiger fiir die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen wichtiger Telle des Ohres. — Sitzber, d, Kdis,Akad. d. IVissen Math.-Naturwiss. Klasse, Bd. XCIX. 1 890. Abth. 3, Hft. 3, p. 127-129. Mit 2 Lichtdrucktafeln.

(3) Allen, P. — On Some Functions of the Middle and Internal Ear and their Analogies. — Lancet. London, 1869.

(4) Allis, E. p., Jr. — The Anatomy and Development of the Lateral Line System in Amia calva. — Jour, Morphology, II, p. 463.

(5) Ayers, Howard. — Die Membrana tectoria — was sie ist, und die Membrana basilaris — was sie verrichtet. — Anat, Anzg, VI, 8, p. 219-220. April 30, 1 891.

(6) Ayers, H. — On the Structure and Development of the Nasal Rays in Condylura cristata. — Biol, Centralblatt, 1885. IV.

(7) Ayers, H. — On the Origin of the Internal Ear and the Functions of Semicircular Canals and Cochlea. Milwaukee, 1890.

(8) Ayers, H. — The Ear of Man: Its Past, its Present, and its Future. — Wood's Holt Biological Lectures. 1890.

(9) Vicq-d'Azyr. — Memoire sur la structure de Torgane de I'ouie des oiseaux, compart avec celui de Thomme, des quadrup^des, des reptiles et des poissons. CEuvres de Vicq-d^Azyr, 1805.

(10) Baer. — Uber das Verhaltniss des heutigen Standpunktes der Anatomic des Cortischen Organs zur Theorie der Tonempfindung. — Inaug, Diss. Breslau, 1872.

(11) Baginski. — Die Funktionen des Kleinhirns. — Biol. Centrlb. II, p. 725.

(12) Baginski. — Uber den Ursprung und Verlauf des Nervus acusticus des Kaninchens. — Biol. Centrlb. VI, p. 152.

(13) Baginski, Benno. — Die Funktion der Bogengange des Ohrlabyrinths. ^Biol. Centrlb, I, p. 438-446. 1881.

(14) Balfour, F. M. — Comparative Embryology. 2 vols. London, 1880-81.

(15) Balfour, F. M. — Embryology of Elasmobranchs. London, 1876.

(16) VAN Bambeke. — Recherches sur le d^veloppement du Pelobate brun. — Mem. Vacad, de belgique des Sci. XXXIV. 1868.

(17) Barth. — Beitrag zur Anatomie der Schnecke. — AncU, Anzg. IV, No. 20, p. 620-624. 1889.

(i8) Barth. — Ueber die Darstellung des hautigen Labyrinths. — Arch,f. Anat, u, Phys, Phys, Abth, p. 345-348. 1889.

(19) Beard, J. — On the Segmental Sense Organs of the Lateral Line and the Morphology of the Vertebrate Auditory Organ. — ZooL Anzg. VII. 1884.

(20) Beard, J. — On the Cranial Ganglia and the Segmental Sense Organs of Fishes, — ZooL Anzg, VIII. 1885.

(21) Beard, J. — The System of Branchial Sense Organs and their Associated Ganglia in Ichthyopsida : A Contribution to the Ancestral History of Vertebrates. — Studies from the BioL Labry, of Owens College^ Manchester, Vol. I, p. 170. 1880.

(22) Beard, J. — The Development of the Peripheral Nervous System of Vertebrates. — Q. J. M, S, October, 1888.

(23) B^RANECK, £dm. — Organes des sens branchiaux. — Bull. Soc, Set. JV, Neuchdiel. T. VI, 240-241. 1889.

(24) Berthold, E. — Uber die von Dr. V. Urbantschitsch aufgefundenen tauben Punkte des Ohres. — Monatschrift f Ohrenheilkunde. VI. 1872.

(25) Berthold. — Uber die Function der Bogengange des Ohrlabyrinthes. — Archivflir Ohrenheilkunde. IX, p. 77. 1875.

(26) Boll, F. — Die Lorenzini'schen Ampullen der Selachier. — Arch. fUr mikr. Anat. Bd. IV. 1868.

(27) Boll, F. — Die Savis'chen Blaschen von Torpedo. — Arch, fur AncU. und Phys. 1875.

(28) BoRNHARDT. — Centralblatt fur tned. Wissenschaften. 1875. 21. Also, Arch.f d.ges. Physiol. XII. 1876.

(29) Bottcher, a. — Observationes microscopicae de ratione qua nervus cochleae mammalium terminatur. — Dorpati Uv. 1856. Dissert.

(30) Bottcher, A. — Bau und Entwicklung der Schnecke. — Petersburg, medicin. Zeitschr. XIV. 1868.

(31) Bottcher. — Uber Entwicklung und Bau des Gehorlabyrinthes, nach Untersuchungen an Saugethieren. — Verhandlungen der K. Leopold. Carol, deutsch. Akad. der Natitr for scher. XXXV. 1869.

(32) Bottcher, A. — Uber den aquaeductus vestibuli bei Katzen und Menschen. — ReicherVs und Du Bois Reymond'^s Archiv. 1869.

(33) Bottcher, Gottstein, and Hensen. — Discussions on Bottcher's "Entwkl. u. Bau des Gehorlabyrinthes." — Archiv f. Ohrenheilkunde.

1873. '^^ f- I» I (34) Bottcher, A. — Uber die Durchschneidung der Bogengange des Gehorlabyrinthes und die sich daran kniipfenden Hypothesen. — Arch, fur Ohrenheilkunde. IX.

(35) Bottcher. — Weitere Beitrage zur Anatomic der Schnecke. — Virchow's Archiv. XVII. 1859.

(36) Bottcher, A. — Kritische Bemerkungen und neue Beitrage zur Litteratur des Gehorlabyrinthes. Dorpat, 1872.

(37) Bowman and Todd. — The Physiological Anatomy and Physiology of Man. II. London, 1859.

(38) Breschet, G. — Memoire sur la structure de I'organe de Touie dans les poissons. — Acad, des Science. Paris, 1829-30.

(39) Breschet, G. — Etudes anatomiquds et physiologiques sur Torgane de Touie et sur raudition dans Phomme et les animaux vertebres. 2d ed. Paris, 1836. V

(40) Breschet, G. — Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur Torgane de Touie des poissons. — Acad, des Sci, Savans Etrangers, V. 1838. 17 PI.

(41) Breuer. — Uber die Function der Bogengange des Ohrlabyrinths. — Wiener med, Jahrbucher, 1874, 1875.

(42) Breuer, J. — Ueber die Function der Otolithen Apparate. — Arch, fur d. ges. Physiologie, XLVIII. 1890. 3 taf .

(43) Crum Brown, Alex. — {a) Cyon's Researches on the Ear. — Nature, XVIII, No. 467, p. 633. No. 468, p. 657. 1878. Also {b) On the Sense of Rotation. — yourn, Anai, and Physiol, VIII.- 1874.

Brown-Sequard. — Course of Lectures on the Physiology and Pathology of the Central Nervous System. Philadelphia, i860.

Bruhl, C. B. — Schnecken Anatomie. Hft. I. 1888. Friedlander. 5 col. Taf. Id. folio.

Buchanan. — Philosophical Illustrations of the Organ of Hearing. London, 1828. p. 106. Meat. aud. ext. Galeus canis.

Budge. — P/l'iigers Archivfur gesammte Physiologie, IX.

Camper, Peter. — Memoire sur Forgane de Touie des poissons. — Mem, de math, et physique preslnth d t^acad, roy, de science, VI.

1774. Casserio (Julii Casserii Placentini). — De vocis auditusque or ganis, etc. Ferrarise, 1600.

Casserio. — Pentaestheseion hoc est de quinque sensibus liber est. Venetiis, 1609.

Cissow, A. — Das Gehfirorgan der Ganoiden. — Arch,f, mikr, Anat, XVIIl. 1880.

Clason, E. — Om aquseductus vestibuli membranaceus. — Upsala. Ldk"' are/, Forh. 1871. VI, 358-370.

{a) Claudius, M. — Bemerkungen Uber den Bau der hautigen Spiralleiste der Sch necke . — Zeit , f. iviss . Zool, VII. 1855.

(Jf) Claudius, M. — Physiologische Bemerkungen Uber das Gehororgan der Cetaceen und das Labyrinth der Saugethiere. Kiel, 1858.

(c) Claudius, M. — Das Gehorlabyrinth von Dinotherium giganteum nebst Bemerkungen Uber den Werth der Labyrinthformen fiir die Systcmatik der Saugethiere. Cassel, 1865.

{d) Claudius. — Das Gehororgan von Rhytina Stelleri. — Afem, de VAcad. imp. des sci. de St, Petersbourg, Sr. VII, T. XI, 5. 1867.

Claus, C. — Das Gehororgan der Heteropoden. Archiv, f, mikr, Anat, XII. 1875.

CoGGi, A. — Sacchetti calcari ganglionari e T acquedotto vestibolo nelle rane. — Atti d. Ace, Lincei, 1890. 16 pp. con i Tav.

C0.MPARETTI, Andr. — Observationes anatomicx de aure interna comp<irata. Patavii, 1789.

CoRTi, Alphonse. — Recherches sur TOrgane de Touie des mammif^res. I . Lima^on. — ZeU, f, wiss, Zool, III. 1 85 1 .

(58) Coyne, P. — Anat. et ddvel. des parties molles de Toreille interne. 8*^. Paris, 1876.

(59) Carrierjs, J. — Die postembryonale Entwick. d. Epidermis des Siredon pisdfonnis. — Arch.f. mikr, Anat, XXIV.

(60) CuviER, G., et Valenciennes, M. — Histoire naturelle des poissons. T. I. Paris, 1828.

(61) CzERNY, V. — Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss des subjectiven Horens wirklicher musicalischer Tone. — Arch, f, path, Anat, Berlin^ 1867. XLI, 299.

(62) Cyon, Elie de. — Recherches exp^rimentales sur les fonctions des canaux s^midrculaires et sur leur r61e dans la formation de la notion de Pespace. — Ann. d. Sc, natur, (6) T. 7, Art. 8, p. 1-88. 1878. Also Compt, rend, 1876-77.

63) Cyon, E. — Ueber die Function der halbzirkelformigen Canale. — Pfluger^s Archrvfur Physiologie. VIII, 306-327. 1874.

64) Cyon, E. de. — Recherches exp^rimentales sur les fonctions des canaux semidrculaires, etc. — Bibl, de Vlcole des hautes Hudes. Sect, des set, naturelles, T. XVIII. Paris, 1878. Consult also his text-book, Methodik der physiol. Experimente. Giessen, 1876. p. 540.

65) CzERMAK. — Verastelungen der Primitivfasem des Nervus acusticus. — Zeitschr,fUr wiss, Zool, II. 1850.

66) Deiters, O. — Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Lamina spiralis membranacea der Schnecke. — Zeitschr./ur wiss, Zool, X. 1859.

67) (a) Deiters, O. — Unters. iiber die Schnecke der Vogd. — Arch, fur Anat, u, Phys, i860.

67) (J>) Deiters, O. — Uber das innere Gehororgan der Amphibian. — Archivf. Anat. u. Physiol. 1862.

67) {c) Deiters. — Untersuchungen Uber die Lamina spiralis membranacea. Bonn, i860.

68) Du Bois, — M^m. sur le sens de Touie et sur les sensations auditives. — Bull, Acad, de med, Paris, 1837-38. II, 896.

69) Danhardt. — Endolymphe und Perilymphe. — Arbeit, d. Kieler physiol, Instituts. S. 103.

70) Dercum. — The Sensory Organs ; Suggestions, with a View to Generalization. — Amer. Nat. Philadelphia, 1878.

71) Dercum. — The Lateral Sensory Apparatus of Fishes. — Proc. Acad, Nat. Sci, Philadelphia, 1879.

72) DoGiEL, A. S. — Die Nervenendigung in Tastkorperchen. — Arch. f. Anat. u, Physiol, Anat, Abth, 1891.

73) DuMERiL, M. C. — Anatomic des lamproies. — Memoires d'^anatomie comparie, Paris, 1800.

74) DuvERNAY. — Traits de Torgane de Touie. Paris.

75) V. Ebner, V. — Das Nerven Epithel des Cristae acusticae. — Schrift. d. med.-nat. wiss, Vereins 2. Innsbruck. Ill Jahrg. 1872.

76) EcKER, Alex. — Uber die Flimmerbewegung im Gehororgan von Petromyzon und Ammocoetes. — Ecker's Unters. zur Ichthyologies 1857, und Muller's Archiv fiir Anat. u, Physiol., 1844.

77) EiCHLER, O. — Eine neue Methode zur Gewinnung von Korrosionspraparaten des Ohrlabyrinths. Phys. Inst. Leipzig. 2 abh. — In Arch, fur Ohrheilkunde. XXX. 1890. III.

(78) Engelmann, Th. W. — Geschmacksorgane. — In Strieker's Handbuch d. Gewebelehre. 1872.

(79) EiMER, Th. — Die Schnauze des Maiilwurfs als Tastwerkzeug. — Arch, fiir mikr. Anai. VII. 1 87 1 .

(80) EisiG, H. — Die Seitenorgane und becherfSrmigen Organe der Capitelliden. — MUtheilg. d. 200I. Stat, zu Neapd. I.

(81) Emery. — Fierasfer. — In Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel. 1880.

(82) Engel, J. — Entwickl. d. Auges u. d. Gehororgans. Wien, 1853.

(83) Everett. — Vibratory Motion and Sound. — Ginn & Co. 1891 . Woodcuts and plates. 8°, cloth. xii+ 135 pp.

(84) EwALD, J. R. — Uber motorische Storungen nach Verletzungen der Bogengange. — Centrlblt.f. d. med. wiss. 1890.

(85) EwALD, J. R. — Der Acusticusstamm ist durch Schall erregbar. — Berlin. Klin. Wochenschrift . 1890. No. 32.

(86) EwALD, J. R. — Die Abhangigkeit des galvanischen Schwindels vom inneren Ohr. — Centrlblt.f. d. med. wiss. 1890.

(87) ExNER, SiGMUND. — Zur Lehre von d. Gehorsempfindungen. — Pfliiger's Arch.f. Physiologic. Bd. XIII. 1876.

(88) Ferguson. John. — The Auditory Centre. — The Journal of Anat. and Phys. XXV (ns. V), p. 2, 1891, p. 292-293.

(89) FiCK. — Lehrbuch der Anatomie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane. Lahr., 1861.

(90) Flourens. — r.echerches expdrimentales sur les propridtds et les fonctions du syst6me nerveux. Paris, 1842. Earlier papers in Compt. rend. 1828, 1861.

(91) Foster, M. — A Text-Book of Physiology. New York, 1880.

(92) Foster, M. — A Text-Book of Physiology. 5th ed. Ill and IV, The Central Ner\-ous System and its Instruments. London and New York, 1890-91.

(93) {a) Fritsch, G. — Die aussere Haut und die Seitenorgane des Zitter^velses. (Malopterurus electricus.) — Sitzber. d. K. A had. der Wissenschaft. zu Berlin. XXII. 1886. {p) Die Electrischen Fische. I. Malopterurus electricus, 1887; II. Die Torpedineen, 1890. (r) Uber Bau und Bcdcutung der Canalsysteme unter der Haut der Selachier. Sitzber. d. IConigl. Akad. d. \ \ issen . 1 888 . VIII. S . 283 .

(94) Froriep, Aug. — Zur Entwickl. der Kopfncr\'en. Verhandl. Anat. Gesell. 1 89 1. And other papers by this author in Arch. f. Anat. Physiol. 1885-86.

(95) (iAMGHE, A. — A Text-Book Systematic and Practical of the Physiological Chemistry of the Animal Body. London. 1880.

(96) G ARIEL. — Des Phi5nom6nes physiques de Taudition. Paris, 1869.

(97) (iARMAN, S. — On the Lateral Canal System of the Selachia and Holocephala. — Bull. Mus. Coinp. Zool. Cambr. XVII, 2. 1888.

(98) Gegenbaur, Carl. — Gustaf Retzius, Das Gehiirorgan der Wirbelthicrc. Morj^hologisch-histologische Studien. — Morpholog. Jahrbuch. XI, p. 127. 1005.

(99) GoEFFROY. — Dissertations sur Torgane de Touie de rhomme, des reptiles et des poissons. Amsterdam and Paris, 1778.

(100) (a) GoLTZ. — Uber das Organ fur Erhaltung des Gleichgewichts bei Thieren. — Monaischrift f, Ohrenheilkunde. 10. 1869.

(100) (J>) GoLTZ. — Uber die physiologische Bedeutung der Bogengange des Gehorlabyrinths. — Pfliiger's Archivfur Physiologie, III. 1 870.

(loi) Gell^. — Etude sur la structure du ligament spirale ext. et les attaches de la membrane de Corti. — Gaz, med, de Paris. 1880. 6 Ser. II, 247.

(102) GOTTSTEIN, J. — Beitrage zum feineren Bau der Gehorschnecke. — Centralblatt f, die med, wissench, 1870.

(103) GoTTSTEiN. — Uber den feineren. Bau und die Entwicklung der Gehorschnecke der Saugethiere und des Menschen. — Arch. f. mikr. Anat. 1872. VIII, p. 100.

(104) Gray. — On the Development of the Retina and the Labyrinth. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 1850.

(105) V. Grimm, O. — Der Bogenapparat der Katze. — Bull. PAcad. imp, d. sci. de Si. Peter sbourg. XIV. 1 8 70 .

(106) Gruber, J. — Zur Entwickl. des Hororganes der Saugethiere und des Menschen. — Monatschr.f. Ohrenheilk. XII. Beriol. 1878.

(107) GuNTHER. — Beobachtungen iiber die Entwicklung des Gehororgans bei Menschen und hoheren Saiigethieren. Leipzig, 1842.

(108) Haller. — Elementa physiologia. IV. Lausanne, 1 763. (Contains a very complete list of literature of ear anatomy to that date.)

(109) Hannover, A. — Mikroskopiske Undersogelser af Nervessystemet. Kjdbenhavn, 1842.

(110) Hartmaxn, R. — Die Endigungsweise der Gehomerven im Labyrinth der Knochenfische. — Arch. f. Anat. n. Physiol. 1862.

(111) Hasse, C. — De Cochlea avium. — Inaugur. Kiliae, 1866.

(112) Hasse, C. — Die Endigungs weise des N. acusticus im Gehororgan der Vogel . — Got linger Nachrichten . 1 867 .

(113) Hasse, C. — Die Schnecke der Vogel, with two supplementary articles. — Zeitschr . fiir wiss . Zool. XVII. 1867.

(114) Hasse, C. — Zur Histologie des Bogenapparats und des Steinsackes der Frosche . — Zeitschr. f. wiss . Zool. XV 1 1 1 . 1 868 .

(115) Hasse, C. — Bemerkungen uber das Gehororgan der Fische. — Verhandl. der Phys. med. Gesell. in Wurzb. n. f. I. 1868.

(116) Hasse, C. — Anatomische Studien. 1870. (Contains several papers on the ear of vertebrates.)

(117) Hasse, C. — Das Gehororgane der Frosche. Leipzig, 1868.

(118) Hasse, C. — Die Vergleichende Morphologie und Histologie des hautigen Gehororgans der Wirbelthiere, nebst Anmerkungen zur vergleichende Physiologie. Leipzig, 1873.

(119) Haug. — Uber eine neue Modification der Phloroglucinentkalkungsmethode. — Centralblatt fur allg. Path. u. path. Anatomie. Bd. II. 1891. No. 5. 193-196. Also Die gebrauchlichsten Entkalkungsmethoden . — Zeitschr. f. wiss. Mikroskopie . VIII. 1 89 1 .

(120) Helmholtz, H. — DieLehrevon den Tonempfindungen, etc. p. 226 et seq. Braunschweig, 1877. (4te ed.) Eng. ed. Ellis, London, 1885.

(121) Helmholtz. — Die Mechanik der Gehorknochelchen. — Pfluger's Archiv fur Physiolo^e, I.

(122) Helmholtz. — Monaisberkht der Berliner Akademie, 1868.

(123) Helmholtz. — Uber die Schwingungen in der Schnecke des Ohres. — Verhandl, des Naturhistor, medicin, Vereins zu Heidelberg. V, 2.

(124) Henle, J. — Handbuch der systemat. Anatomie. II. Eingeweidelehre. 1866.

(125) Hennicke, Carl R. — Das Gehororgan der Vogel. — Monatschr, d. Ver, SchuizeVogelwelt, I4jahrg. No. 19. 1889.

(126) Hensen. — Studien liber das Gehororgan der Decapoden. — Zeit, f. wiss. ZooL XIII.

(127) Hensen. — Beitrag zur feineren Anatomie der Gehorschnecke des Menschen und der Saiigethiere. Berlin, 1864.

( 1 28) Hensen. — Physiologie des Gehors. — Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologie. Ill, (2). 1879.

(129) Hensen, V. — Ueber Boettcher's Entwicklung und Ban des Gehorlabyrinths nach eigenen Untersuchungen. — Arch, fur Ohrcnheilkunde. VI. 1871. Also n. f. I. 1873.

(130) Hensen, V. — Zur Morphologie d. Schnecke des Menschen u. der Saugethiere. — Zeit.f. wiss. Zool. Bd. XIII, p. 319. 1863.

(131) Hensen, V. — Bemerkungen gegen die Cupula terminalis (Lang). — Arch.f. Anat. u. Phys. Anat. Abth. 1878. p. 486.

(132) Hensen, V. — Nachtrag zu meinen ** Bemerkungen gegen die Cupula terminalis (Lang)." — Arch. f. Anal. u. Phys. Anat. Abth. 1881. p. 405. Taf. 17.

(133) Hertwig, O. — Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte. Jena, 1888.

(134) Hessler. — Beitrage zur Physiologie des Ohres. — Arch.f. Ohrenheilkunde. Leipzig, 1882. XVIII.

(135) Hildebrandt-Weber. — Anatomie des Menschen. (Contains a complete list of the older literature on the ear.)

(136) His, Wilhelm. — Zur Geschichte des Gehim^, u.s.w. — Abhandl. der maih. phys. Kl. der K. sachs. Gesell. der IVissenschafi . XIV, 7.

(137) His. Wilhelm, Jr. — Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Acustico-Facialgebietes beim Menschen. — Archiv fur Anal, und Physiol. 1889. Anat. Abth. Supplement Bd.

(138) Hoffmann, C. K. — Zur Ontogenie der Knochenfische. — Arch, fir mikr. Anal. 1883. XXIII.

(139) Hoffmann, C. K. — Over de entwikkelingsgeschiedenis van het gehoororgan an de morphologische bekenntniss van het. gehoorbeentje by de Reptilien. — Uitgeg. door de Kon. Akad. van Uelensch. lo Amslerdam. Urb. 3 pi. 4°. II, 30 pp. f. o. 75.

(140) Hoffmann, C. E. E., and Rauber, A. — Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. 1886.

(141) Home, E. — The Anatomy of Omithorhynchus hystrix. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 1802. I.

(142) Horbaczewski. J. — iJber den Nervus vestibuli. — Silsbericht. der K. Akad. der Wissenschafl. LXXI. Wien, 1875.

(143) HoussAY, F. — Analysis and Critique of P. Mitrophanow's Paper on the Metametric Significance of the Organs of the Lateral Line of Vertebrates. — Arch, de ZooL Exp, et Gen, 2ieme Ser. IX. 1891. No. I. Notes and Review, p. iv.

(144) Howes, G. B. — The Presence of a Tympanum in the Genus Raja. — Journ , Anat, u . Physiol, XVII . 1 89 1 .

(145) Hunt, D. — A Comparative Sketch of the Early Development of the Ear and Eye in the Pig, together with a New Account of the Formation of the Meat. Ext., Tympanum, and Eustachian Tube. — Congress Intemat. Otological Soc, N.Y., 1876.

(146) Hunter, John. — An Account of the Organ of Hearing in Fishes. — In Observations on Certain Parts of the Animal Economy, London. 1792.

(147) HuscHKE. — Beitrage zur Physiologie und Naturgeschichte. Weimar, 1824.

(148) HusCHKE, E. — {a) Ueber die Gehorzahne, einen eigenthlimlichen Apparat in der Schnecke des Vogelohrs. — Arch, f, Physiol, u, wiss, Med, 1835. Pl\so Frorieps Nbtizeny 1832, and /j/j, 1833. (Jb) Beitrage zur Physiologie und Naturgeschichte. I Bd. — Ueber die Sinne, Weimar, 1824.

(149) Hyrtl, J. — Vergl. anat. Untersuch. liber die innere Gehbrorgan. Prag, 1845. Treats only of the osseous capsule of the internal ear of mammals.

(150) Ibsen, I. — Anatomiske Undersogelser over Orets Lab>'Tinth, afsluttet af Forfatteren i 1846. Nu udgivet paa Carlsbergfondets Bekostning ved Dr. P. L. Panum. Uebergegeben der Kgl. ddnischen Gesellsch. d. Wiss. 25 Juni, 1846. Pub. in Kopenhagen, 1881 (text), 1861 (plates), by H. Hagerup. 56 pp. 3 double plates and expl. pi., p. i-xiv. Cf. Biol. Cent rib. I, p. 686. Kiesselbach.

(151) Irvine, R., and Woodhead, G. S. — On the Secretion of Lime by Animals. — Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh. XV, p. 308. Part II, Secretion of Carbonate of Lime by Animals. Ib.y Vol. XVI, p. 324-354. 1889.

(152) Jendrassik. — Ein Klangzerlegsapparat zur schematischen Darstellung der Klanganalyse durch das Gehor. (Exposition universelle de Vienne.)

(153) Jenny, R. — Die Entwickl. des Gehororgans und das Horen. — Bericht uber die Thatigkeit d. St. Gallischen nat. wiss. Gesell. (1888-89), 1891.

(154) Kaensche, C. Conrad. — Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Metamorphose des Ammocoetes branchialis in Petromyzon. — Schneider^ s Zoologische Beitrage, II, 3. Phil. Jnang. Diss. Breslau, 1889. 32 pp. 8°.

(155) Kaiser, Otto. — Das Epithel der Cristae und Maculae acusticae. — Attat. Inst, Gottingen.y Arch. f. Ohrenheilk. Bd. XXXII. 1891.

(156) Katz, L. — Histologisches uber den Schneckenkanal, speziell die Stria vascularis. — Arch.f. Ohrenheilkunde. Bd. 31. 1890. 5 figs.

(157) Katz, L. — Uber einige Streitpunkte in der Histologie des Gehororganes. — Verhand. X. internal. med.-Kongress, Berlin, 1890. Bd. II, I, p. 70-72.

(158) Katz. — Uber die Endigung des Nervus cochleae im Cortischen Organ. — Zeit,f, Ohrenheilkunde, 29 Bd., p. 54-61.

(159) Kerner. — Beobachtungen liber die Function einzelner Theile des GehSrs. — Archiv fur Anat, u, PhysioL IX. 1808.

(160) Ketel, H. — Uber das Gehororgane der Cyclostomen. — Hasse, Anat, Studien, 1872 and separate.

(161) KiESSELBACH, W. — Zur function der halbzirkelfdrmigen Canale. — Archivfur Ohrenheilkunde, XVI 1 1 . 1 882 .

(162) KoENiG, R. — The Researches of Dr. Rudolph Koenig on the Physical Basis of Musical Sounds. — Nature, I, Vol. 43, 1105, p. 199. II, Vol. 43, 1 106, p. 224. Ill, Vol. 43, 1 107, p. 249.

(163) KoLLiKER, A. — Der finere Bau des verlangerten Markes. — Anat, Ansg, VI, p. 427-431. 1 891.

(164) VON KoLLiKER, A. — Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen und der hoheren Thiere. Leipzig, 1879.

(165) KoLLiKER, A. — Uber die letzten Endigungen des Nervus cochleae und die Function der Schnecke. — Zeitschrifl brim ^o-jdhrigen DoctorJubildum Fr, Tiedemann's, WUrzburg, 1854.

(166) K5LLIKER, A. — Der Embryonale Schneckenkanal und seine Beziehung zu den Theilen des fertigen Cochlea. — WUrzburg, naturwiss, Zeitschrift, II. 1861.

(167) V. KOLLIKER, A. — Handbuch der Gewebelehre. 3te Auflage, 1859; 4te, 1863; 5te, 1867.

(168) KoLLiKER, A. — Mikroskopische Anatomie. 2 Bde. Leipzig, 1854.

(169) {a) Krause, W. — Die Nervenendigung in der aussem Haut und den Schleimhauten. \\,—-Biolog. Centralblatt, IV. p. 211. 1885.

(169) (b) Krause, R. — Entwickl. der haiitigen Bogengange. — Arch, mikr, Anat. XXXV. 1890.

(170) Kriger. — De otolithis. — Dis,inaug, Berlin, 1840.

(171) {a) KuHN. — Uber das hautige Labyrinth der Knochenfische. — Arch, fiir mikr, Anat, XIV. 1877.

(171) {b) KuHN. — Uber das hautige Labyrinth der Amphibien. — Arch, fUr

mikr, Anat, XVII. 1880. (i 72) KuHN. — Uber das hautige Labyrinth der Reptilien. — Arch, fiir mikr,

Anat, XX, 1882.

(173) Kupffer. — Die Entwickelung von Petromyzon Planeri. — Arch, fir mikr, Anat, XXXV, 4. 1890. Taf. xxvii-xxxii. And Verhandl, d, Anat, Gesell, 1891.

(174) Lavdowskv. — Histology of the Nerve-end Apparatus of the Cochlea. In Russian. Dissertation. St. Petersburg, 1874.

(175) Lang, G. — Das Gehororgan der Cyprinoiden mit besonderer Berlicksichtigung des Ner\'en-Endapparates. — Zeit, fir wiss. Zool, XIII. 1 863.

(176) Langerhans, p. — Untersuchungen Uber Petromyzon Planeri. — Ber, der naturf Gesellsch, zu Frieburg-i,'Br, 1875.

(177) Langerhans, P. — Zur Anatomie des Amphioxus lanceolatus. — Arch, fiir mikr, Anat. XII. 1875.

(178) Lavdowskv, M. — Untersuchungen liber den accustischen Endapparat der Saugethiere. — Arch, f, mikr, Anat, XIII. 1876.

(179) Leydig, Fr. — Uber die Schleimkanale der Knochenfische. — MUUer'^s Archiv, 1850.

(180) Leydig, F. — Uber Organe eines sechsten Sinnes. — Nova acta acad. Caes. Leopold Carol, germ, nat, curios. 34. 1868.

(181) Leydig, Fr. — Beitrage zur mikr. Anat. u. Entwickl. der Rochen und Haie. Leipzig, 1852.

(182) LiNKE. — Monatschrift fiir Ohrenheilkunde. 1 870.

(183) LoEWENBERG, B. — La lame spirale du lima^on de Toreille de rhomme et des mammifbres. — Journ. de PAnat. et de la Physiologie. IIL 1866. V. 1868.

(184) LoEWENBERG, B. — Beitrage zur Anatomie der Schnecke. — Arch.f. Ohrenheilk. L

(185) LOEWENBERG, B. — Etudes sur les membranes et les canaux du lima9on. — Gaz. hebd, de med. et de chirurg. No. 42. 1864.

(186) LowENBERG. — Uber die nach Durchschneidung der Bogengange des Ohrlabyrinthes auftretendes Bewegungstorungen. — Arch. f. Augen- u. Ohrenkraknheiten. IIL 1872.

(187) M'DoxNELL, R. — The System of the Lateral Line in Fishes. 4 pi. 4to. Dublin, 1862.

(188) Mach. — {a) Physikalische Versuche iiber den Gleichgewichtssinn. — Wien Acad. Sitzungsber. 3 Abth. LXVIII. 1873. {b) Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungs Empfindungen. Leipzig, 1875. (0 ^^^ Theorie des Gehororganes. — Sitzber. d, K. Akad. d. Wissen. Wien. math. -nat urwissn. Kl.

(189) Malbranc, M. — Von der Seitenlinie und ihren Sinnesorganen bei Amphibien. — Zeit.f.wiss.Zool. XXVI. 1876.

(190) Manilin. — iJber die physiologische Rolle der hautigen Bogengange des Labyrinthes. — Vorldufige Mith. in medicin. Centralblatt . 1866.

(191) Mayser, p. — Vergl. anat. Studien uber das Gehirn der Knochenfische. — Zeit. f. wiss.^ Zool. Bd. XXXVI . 1 88 1 .

(192) Meyer, Paul. — Etudes histologiques sur le labyrinth membraneux et plus specialement sur le lima9on chez les reptiles et les oiseaux. Strasbourg, 1876.

(193) MiDDENDORP, H. W. — Het vliezig Slakkenhuis in zijne wording en in den ontvvikkelden toestand. Groningen, 1867. 3 pi. Excerpted in Monatsschr. f. Ohrenheilk. 1868, by Gruber, Voltolini, Rudinger, and Weber.

(194) Milne-Edwards, A. — Le9ons sur la Physiologie et TAnatomie compare de rhomme et des animaux. T. XII. Paris, 1876.

(195) MiTROPHANOW, P. — {a) Ueber die Erste Anlage der Seitenorgane bei Plagiostomen. Vorlanfige Mitteilung. — Warschatter Univ. Nachbrichten. 1889. S A., 16 pp., 8°. Also in Russian. (J>) Zur Entwickl -ges. und Innervation der Nervenhugel der Urodelenlarven. — Biol. Centralblatt. VII. 1887.

(196) MiTROPHANOW, P. J. — Uber die erste Anlage des Gehororgane bei niederen Wirbelthieren. — Centralblatt fur Biologic. Bd. X. 1890.

(197) Monro, Alex. — The Structure and Physiology of Fishes explained and compared with those of Man and other Animals. Edinburgh, 1785.

(198) Moon. — Uber die Function des membran. Labyrinthes und der Canales semicirculares. — Philos. Magaz. 1870.

(199) Moos. — Katalog der Sammlung mikroskopischer Praparate betrefFend die normale und pathologische Histologic des Gehororgans. 8°. Borgmann, Wiesbaden. SS. 39.

(200) MosELEY. — On Methods of preparing the Organ of Corti, etc. — Quart. Jour. Micros. Set. XLVIII.

(201) MuLLER, JOH. — Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden. Berlin, 1835.

(202) MiJLLER, JOH. — Uber den eigenthumlichen Bau des Gehororgans bei

den Cyclostomen. — Fortseis. d. ver^. Anatomie der Myxinoiden in AbhanH. d. K. Akad. d. Wissen. Berlin, 1836.

(203) Mygind, V. — Ubersicht liber die pathologisch-anatomischen Veranderungen der Gehororgane Taubstummer. — Arch, fur Ohrenheilk. XXX. 1890.

(204) Newton, I. — Philosophia naturalis principia mathematica. 1740. T. II. Dealing with the physical conditions of audition.

(205) VON NooRDEN, Carl. — Die Entwickelung des Labyrinthes bei Knochenfischen. — Archiv f. Anat. u. Entwicklungesgeschichte. 1883. P- 235.

(206) NuEL, J. -P. — Recherches Microscopiques sur TAnatomie du Lima^on des Mammif^res. — Memoirs couronnis et Mem. des savants itranger Acad. roy. des sci.^ etc., de Belgique, 1878.

(207) NuEL, J. -P. — Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Saugethiere Schnecke. — Arch.f. mikr. Anat. 1872. VIII, p. 200.

(208) Odenius, M. V. — Om Vestibular-sackames form och lage i menniskaus ora. — Acta univ. ludensis. Lunds univ. Ars-skriftyf. 1866. Lund, 1866-67.

(209) Odenius. — Ueber das Epithel der Maculae acusticse beim Menschen. — Arch.fiir. mikr. Anat. III. 1867.

(210) Ogston, M. D. — On the Function of the Semicircular Canals of the Internal Ear. — Monatschrift fiir Ohrenheilkunde. 1870.

(211) OsBORN, H. F. — Amphibian Brain Studies. — Journ.Morph. II. 1889.

(212) OwsjANNiKOW. — iJber das GehSrorgan von Petromyzon fluviatilis. — Mem. de VAcad. imp. de sci. de St. Petersbourg. Sr. VII, T. VIII, 7. 1864.

(213) Pappenheim. — Specielle Gewebelehre des Gehororgans. Breslau, 1840.

(214) PoHL, Chr. Ed. — Expositionem generalem anatomicam organi auditus per classes animalium. Vindobonse, 181 8.

(215) PoLiTZER, A. — Die Anatomische und histologische Zergleiderung des menschlichen Gehororganes. Stuttgart (Enke), 1889. 245 pp. Contains numerous anat. and histol. methods.

(216) Pritchard, U. — The Cochlea of the Orinothorhynchus platypus compared with that of Ordinary Mammals and of Birds. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Pt. II. 1881.

(217) Pritchard, Urban. — The Development of the Organ of Corti. — Journ. Anat. and Phys. Nom. and Path. XIII. October. 1878.

(218) Pritchard, U. — On the Structure and Function of the Rods of the Cochlea in Man and Other Mammals. — Jour. Roy. Micros. Soc. 1873.

(219) Pritchard, U. — The Termination of the Nerves in the Vestibule and Semicircular Canals of Mammals. — Q. Jour, Micr. Sci. N. S. LXIV. October, 1876.

(220) Randall, B. Alex. — The Corrosion Method in the Study of the Anatomy of the Ear. — Amer, Journ, Med. Sci, CI. 1891. No. i. p. 225, s. 58-61.

(221) Ranke. — Das Gehororgan und der Gehorvorgang bei Pterotrachea. — Zeit.f, wiss. Zool, Suppl. Bd. XXV. 1875.

(222) Ranvier. — Traitd Technique d^Histologie. Paris, 1886.

(223) Rathke, H. — Entwicklungsgeschichte der Natter. Konigsberg, 1839.

(224) Rathke, H. — Entwickelungsgeschichte der Wirbelthiere. Leipzig, 1 861.

(225) Reich. — Uber den feineren Bau des Gehororganes von Petromyzon u. Ammocoetes. — Ecker^s Untersuchungen zur Ichthyologie, Freiburg, 1857.

(226) Reichert, B. — Beitrag zur feineren Anatomie der Gehorschnecke des Menschen u.- der Saugethiere. — Abhandl, d, k, Akad. d. IViss, zu Berlin, I. 1864.

(227) Reichert, B. — Two papers in Miiller^s Archiv, 1856, smd Bull, de Vacad, d, sci, de St, Petersbourg, X, 1851.

(228) Reisner. — De auris intemae formatione. Dorpat, 1851.

(229) Reissner. — Zur kenntniss der Schnecke im Gehororgane der Saugethiere und des Menschen. — Mii/Ier'^s Archiv, 1854.

(230) Retzius, Anders. — Bidrag till Ader-och Nerfsystemets Anatomie hos Myxine glutinosa. — Kongl, Vet, -Akad. Handl, Stockholm, 1822.

(231) Retzius, Anders. — Ytterligare Bidrag till anatomien af Myxine glutinosa. — Kongl, Vet. 'Akad, Handl. Stockholm, 1824.

(232) Retzius, per Kiesselbach. — Das Gehororgane der Wirbelthiere. — Biol. Centrlb. II, p. 405 ; V, p. 42.

(233) Retzius, Gustaf. — Das Gehororgan von Caecilia annulata. — Anat. Amg. VI. No. 3. Feb. 14, 1891.

(234) Retzius, G. — Uber die peripherische Endigungsweise des Gehornerven. — Biolog. Untersuchungen. III. Stockholm, 1881.

(235) Retzius, G. — Die Gestalt des membranbsen Gehororgans des Menschen. — Biolog. Unters. II. Stockholm, 1882.

(236) Retzius, G. — Om horselnervens andningssatt i maculae och cristae acusticae . — Nordiskt Med. Archiv . 111,3.

(237) Retzius, Gustav. — Das Gehororgan der Wirbelthiere. 2 Bde. Stockholm, 1881-84. I. Das Gehororgan der Fische und Amphibien. II. Das Gehororgan der Reptilien, Vogel und Saugethiere.

(238) Retzius, Gustaf. — Studien Uber den Bau des Gehorlabyrinthes. I. Das Gehorlabyrinth der Knochenfische. — Anat, Untersuchungen, I. Stockholm, 1872.

(239) Retzius, Gustav. — Zur kenntniss von dem membrandsen Gehorlabyrinth bei den Knorpelfischen. — Arch, fur Anat. u. Physiol. II. and III. 1878.

(240) Retzius, Gustav. — Zur kenntniss der inneren Gehororgan der Wirbelthiere. — Arch, fiir Anat, u, Physiol, 1880.

(241) Roller, C. F. W. — True Origin of the Acoustic Nerve. — Arch,/, mikr, Anat, XVIII, p. 403. 1880.

(242) Rosenberg. — Untersuchung liber die Entwicklung der Canalis coch«  leans der Saugethiere. Dorpat, 1868.

(243) RuDiNGER. — iJber das runde Sackschen. — Sitzgber. der k, Akad, d. wissensch, zu Munchen. II. 1863.

(244) RuDiNGER, N. — Zur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der hautigen Bogengange des Ohres. Berlin, 1888.

(245) RuDiNGER. — Das hautage Lab>Tinth. — Strieker'* s Handbuch der Gewebelekre, II. 1 872 .

(246) Rutherford. — The Telephone Theory ot Hearing. — Journ, Anat. and Physiol, XXI . 1 886.

(247) Salensky, W. — Recherches surle d^veloppement du Sterlet Acipenser ruthenus . — Arch . de Biologie, II. 1 88 1 .

(248) Sarasin. — Ergebnisse zoolog. Reise auf Cylon. Anatomie der Blindwuhle (Epicrium glutinosum). II, 2. 1887.

(249) Sarasin, Paul and Fritz. — Das Gehororgan von Cxcilia annulata Ergeb. natunfv'iss Forschungen auf Ceylon. Bd. II, Hft. 4. 1890.

(250) Scarpa, Anton. — Anton Scarpa's anatomische Untersuchungen des Gehors und Geruchs. (German translation of Anatomica disquisitiones de auditu et olfcutu, Ticini, 1789.) Niimberg, 1800.

(251) Schenk, S. — Unters. liber die Erste Anlage d. Gehororganes d. Betrachier. — Sitzungsb, d, k, Acad. d. W, math.-naturw. CI. I. 1864.

(252) SCHIFF. — Lehrbuch der Physiologie. 1859.

(253) Schmidekam. — Experimentale Studien zur Physiologie des Gehororgans mit Zusatze von Hensen. Art. aus. d, Kieler physioL Inst, (1868), 1869. Rev. in Monatschr,/, Ohrenheilk. 1869. VI.

(254) Schulze, F. E. — iJber die becherformigen Organe der Fische. — Zeitschr, fur wiss, Zool, XII. 1863.

(255) Schulze, F. E. — Zur kenntniss der Endigungsweise der Homerven bei Fischen und Amphibien. — Arch,f, Anat. u, Physiol, 1862.

(256) Schultze, Max. — Uber die Endigungeweise d. Homerven im Labyrinth. — Af'/ill. Arch./. Anat. 1858. p. 343.

(257) Schwalbe. — Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Sinnesorgane. Erlangen, 1883.

(258) Schwalbe, G. — Cent r alblatt /ur d, medic, Wissensch, 1869. No. 30.

(259) "Bcott, W. B. — The Embryology of Petromyzon Planeri. — Journal 0/ Morphology. I. 1887.

(260) Sewall, H. — Experiments upon the Class of Fishes with Reference to the Function of Equilibrium. — Journal 0/ Physiology. IV. 1881-82.

(261) Shipley. — On Some Points in the Development of Petromyzon fluviatilis. — Q. J. Mic. Sci. XXXVII. 1887.

(262) Solger. — Uber functiondlle und phylogenetische Bezeihungen der Seitenorgane zum Gehororgan der Wirbelthiere. — KosmoSy 1886.

(263) SoLGFJ<, B. — {a) Zur kenntniss der Seitenorgane der Knochenfische. — Centralblatt /iir d. medicin. Wissenscha/t, 1877. {b) SoLGER and F. E. Schulze. — Uber die Cupula terminalis der Seitenorgane der Fische. — -^1^/. Centralblatt, VII, 18. 1887,

(264) SoLGER, B. — Neu Untersuchungen zur Anatomic der Seitenorgane der Fische. I. Die Seitenorgane von Chimaera. II. Die Seitenorgane der Selachier. — Arch, fur mikr, Anat, XVII. III. Die Seitenorgane der Knochen Fische (Dipnoer und Ganoiden) . — Archiv fur mikr. Amit, XVIII. 1879-1880. Compare, also, Bodenstein, E., Der Seitenkanal von Cottus gobio. — Zeitschr.fiir wiss, ZooL XXXVII. 1882.

(265) VON SOMMERiNG, S. T. — Lehre von den Eingeweiden und Sinnesorganen des menschlichen Korpers. Umgearbeitet und beendigt von £. Huschke. Leipzig, 1844.

(266) Spamer. — On Rotation produced by cutting the Semicircular Canals. — Pfluger's Archiv, XXI .

(267) Stannius, H. — Zootomie der Fische u. Amphibien. Berlin, 1854.

(268) Stannius, H. — Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische, anatomisch und physiologisch Untersucht. Rostok, 1849.

(269) VON Stein, St. — Ubersicht der anatomischen und physiologischen Litteratur liber das Gehororgan. Moskwa, 1890. i Abt. i-vii, u. 1-304, u. 1-128. (Russich.)

(270) {a) Steiner, J. — Uber das Centralnervensystem des Haifisches u. Amphioxus lanceolatus u. liber die Halbcirkelformigen Canale des Haifisches — Mitth.k. preuss.Akad.Wiss. Berlin, 1886. 6 pp.

(270) (J>) Steiner, J. — Die Functionen des Centralnervensystems, etc. II. Die Fische. pp. 11 2-1 23. Braunschweig, 1888.

(271) Stenonis, Nicolaus. — Ova viviparorum spectantes observationes £ictx jussu serenissimi Magni Ducis Hetruriae Thomae Bartholini. — Acta Med. et PhUosoph. Hafniensis. Hafniae, 1673. II.

(272) Streifensand, C. — Untersuch. iiber den Ampullen des Gehororgans der Wirbelthiere. — Arch, fiir Anat. u. Physiol. 1835.

(273) Stieda, L. — Studien Uber Amphioxus lanceolatus. — Mem. Acad. d. sci. St. Petersbourg. VII, 19. 1873.

(274) Strong, A. B. — The Structure and Homologies of the Cranial Nerves of the Amphibia as determined by their Peripheral Distribution and Internal Origin. — Zool. Anzg. November, 1890. XIII.

(275) Strumpf, C. — Tonpsychologie. I and II. 8 + 582 pp. Leipzig, Hirzel, 1890.

(276) ToMASZEWicz, Fraul. A. — Beitrage zur Physiologic des Ohrlabyrinthes. — Inaug. Dissertation. Zurich, 1877.

(277) ToDARO. — Contribuzione alia anatomia e all fisiologia de' tubi di senso de' plagiostomi. Messina, 1870.

(278) Treviranus, G. R. — Uber den inneren Bau der Schnecke des Ohrs der Vogel. — Zeitschr.f. Physiologie. Tiedemann u. Treviranus. 1,2. 1825.

(279) Valentine, G. — Handbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Berlin, 1835.

(280) ViETOR. — Uber den canalis ganglionaris der Schnecke der Saugethiere und des Menschen. — Zeitschr.f. rationelle vted. 3te Reihe, Bd. XXIII. 1865.

(281) ViLLV, Francis. — On the Development of the Internal Ear of the Frog. — Q. J. M. Sci. 1890.

(282) VoLTOLiNi, R. — Ueber die bisher verkannte Gestalt des hautigen Labyrinthes im Ohre des Menschen. — Virchow's Archivf, path, Anat, u, Physiol, u.f. klin, Afed. — XXVlll. 1863.

(283) VoLTOLiNi, R. — IJber die Bedeutung und den Werth des Gehororganes in Vergleich zum Sehorgan. — Monatschr, f, Ohrenheilk, Berlin, 1872.

(284) Waldeyer. — Hornerv. u. Schnecke. — Strieker's Handbuch der GewebeUhre, p. 943.

(285) Weber, E. H. — De aure et auditu hominis et animalium. Pars I. De aure animalium aquatilium. Lipsiae, 1820.

(286) Whitman, C. O. — Some New Facts about the Hirudinea. — Journal of Morphology. II. 1889.

(287) Whitman, C. O. — A Special Problem. — Woocf^s HoU Biological Lectures, 1890.

(288) Wiedersheim, R. — Uber den Ursprung des Nervus acustlcus. — ZooL Anzg. Ill, p. 495. 1880.

(289) Wiedersheim, R. — Der Aquaeductus vestlbuli von Phyllodactylus europasus. Wurzburg, 1875.

(290) WiEL. — Reflexwirkungen im Gebiete des Gehororganes. — Monatschr, f, Ohrenheilk, Berlin, 1878. XII.

(291) WiNDiscHMANN, C. J. H. — De penltlori auris in amphibils structura. Lipsiae, 1831.

(292) V. Winiwarter, A. — Unters. Uber die Gehorschnecke der Saugethiere. — Sitzungsb, der k, Akad, W, math. tuUurw, CI., LXI, i. 1870.

(293) Wright, R. R. — Cutaneous Sense Organs and Nervous System of Amiurus . — Proc, Canadian Institute, II. 1 884 .

(294) Wright, R. R. — Some Preliminary Notes on the Anatomy of Fishes. — Canadian Institute, Toronto, 1885.

(295) For a very complete literature of the nerve endings in surface sense organs, consult Meckel, J. F., Uber die Endigung der sensiblen nerven in der Haut der Wilbelthiere. Rostock, 1880.

I. Explanation of the Figures







acoustic nerve.


crista acustica.


auditory vesicle.


macula sacculi.


pars basilaris cochlese.


macula utriculi.






canal, anterior.


cristica acustica ampullae.


canal, horizontaL


macula neglecta, or crista acus


canal, posterior.

tica abortiva.


ductus endolymphaticus.


ampulla of posterior canal.




canal pore.

forebrain. branchial region.


h, and h'

, hind brain, lagena and pars lagenx





Explanation of Plate I

Fig. I. The left internal ear of Dasyatis centrums^ seen from the outside, slightly enlarged, x.^ the utricular canal or appendix from which the anterior and external canals are given off. Opposite the letter the channel of communication, s., the saccular appendix and connecting canal. The connecting canals are not symmetrically placed with reference to the endolymphatic duct, ab.^ nerve of the abortive canal organ which lies in s. r./., lagena nerve; r.j., saccular nerve, etc. The lagena and post, ampulla appear in the figure in contact. They are separated by a considerable space, which here disappears in perspective. Osmic acid preparation.

Fig. 2. The right internal ear of Carcharias littoralis^ seen from below and outside, to show the distribution of the nerves. Natural size. The cartilaginous case is partly dissected away, but sufficient remains to illustrate the relation of the membranous ear to the supporting structure. The relative sizes of the ear canals and the channels in the cartilage are clearly shown. Osmic acid preparation.

Fig. 3. The left ear of Torpedo occidentalism seen from below and outside, showing the nerve distribution. The dorsal portions of the ear are not represented, and only part of the nerve end organs. Natural size. The splitting of the saccular nerve into two parts, one of which supplies the lagenar organ, is shown. Osmic acid preparation.

Fig. 4. A view from below of the nerve supply of the ear of Petromyzon marinus in its main branches. ^ VIII -|- ac, the auditory ganglion with which the accessory nerve is closely connected; r.p. and r.a.^ the posterior and anterior branches of the so-called auditory with their two main branches. r.a.c. VIII, the accessory branch of the facial supplying the facial sense organ and the epithelial walls of the ear. The VII nerve appears in the figure to lie upon the VIII and its ganglion, but in reality lies between the observer and the VIII, and only traverses the auditory capsule.

Fig. 5. A sketch of the apparent origin and cranial exit of the V, VII, VIII, IX, and X nerves of Carcharias littoralis from the right side, seen from within. The brain has been raised and displaced to the left, so that only the ventral border of it is visible. The peripheral approach of the acustico-facial and the glossophar)'ngeal trunks is apparent even within the cranial wall.

Fk;. 6. A very young embryo of Acanthias vulgaris^ seen from the right side, illustrating the early appearance of the auditory saucer. The relation of the auditory sensor}' thickening to the remaining superficial sense organs is not here shown. X 20.

Fig. 7. Two figures of the internal ear of a 2.5 cm. embryo, Galetts canis. X 30. The ear sacs are compressed laterally. The separation of the sense organs is in progress, and all their important canal chambers are indicated at this early stage.

Fig. 8. Internal ear of a 2.5 cm. Galeus canis embryo, to illustrate the formation of the canals. X 35. The stage of development shown in this figure precedes by a short time the condition shown in Fig. 7, and the endolymphatic duct is relatively larger.

Fig. 9. Sketch of the internal car of the left side of a 63-day Salmo fario embryo, to illustrate the manner of the formation of the semicircular canals, after von Xoorden. The elliptical folds are al)out to fuse, thus completing the primary arch oyer the sense organs of the ampullae. The latter are well-formed hills of hairbearing sensory epithelium before they are thus inclosed, o.y otoliths, of which there are two groups of small and one large one present.

Fig. 10. Sketch of the nerve branches of the ramus anterior of the auditory nerve of an adult J^aja erinacea, X 5. The branching of the utricular nerve indicative of division of the original sensory patch is well shown. Osmic acid preparation.

Fig. II. The two rami of the auditory nerve of Afyxine gltttinosa and their branches, after Retzius. X 18. llie rami anterior and posterior supply respectively the utricular and saccular chambers of the ear, neither one crossing the line of separation marked out by the endolymphatic duct.

Fig. 12. Horizontal section through the auditory capsule of Lacerta embryo, after Ilofimann. X 50. The position of the vesicle is seen to be between the VII-VIII and the IX nerves, which come into immediate contact with the walls of the vesicle at this stage of development.

Fig. 13. Horizontal section through the car of Petromyzon marinus, to illustrate the relation of the ramus acccssorius of the facial nerve to the ventral walls of the ear. In sections dorsad of the one Bgured, the nerve rises nearly vertically in the sulcus frontalis, and gives off a branch to the sense organ in the commissural chamber, but its main portion is continued outward to the surface canal organ, which it supplies. For a considerable part of its course the nerve runs parallel and more or less closely applied to the ramus anterior of the auditory proper. X 70. c, the outer walls of the connective tissue sheath of the ear., VIII, the accessory branch of the facial.

Fig. 14. A transverse section through the ear of a young Petromyzon Planer i^ near the middle of its vertical diameter. The section passes through the two endolymphatic ducts, the canals and ampullae where the latter open into the utricular and saccular compartments. X 25. the sense organs of the anterior and posterior ampulUe. cc.^ the cartilaginous capsule.

Fig. 15. A surface view of the superficial sense organs of the lateral line s>'stem of the Dogfish (^Galeus cam's), illustrating their relation to the auditory sense organ canal or endolymphatic duct. The auditory organ is subject to a precocious development, l)ut retains its relation to the surface of the body and to its superficial relatives for a long time after disappearing from the surface; and, as shown in the figure, retains its place in the line of sense organs, connecting the lateral systems over the aural region. X 20. the obliquely placed mouth of the endolymphatic duct; au.g.f the groove of modified epidermal epithelium (ectoderm), which reaches to a.s.o., the point at which the auditory organ first made its appearance on the surface of the body.

Fig. 16. A dissection of the surface and ear canals of an Elasmobranch (^Rajoid) embryo, probably Torpedo. X lo. The ears are revolved somewhat inwards and backwards on their endolymphatic ducts, in order to show their canals to advantage, but otherwise the parts are in their relative positions as viewed from the dorsum. The ears communicate by means of their endolymphatic ducts with the large subdermal sac, and these by means of the tubes z/.^., ordinarily described as the continuation of the endolymphatic ducts, with the exterior opening on the surface of the head at the points^ or the pori acustici, from which points grooves are continued to t ii* the transverse line of sense organs, out of which the auditory organ migrated at the beginning of its involution. s.e,j endolymphatic sacs; o.c, occipita canal or line of sense organs; cj.o., canal sense organ. The pink elevations s.s. in endolymphatic sacs indicate the position of probable sense organs.

Fig. 17. The crista abortiva of an adult Raja ocellata showing a supernumerary bipartite sense organ with distinct nerve branch. X 3. Osmic preparation.

Fig. 18. A surface view of the external openings of the endolymphatic duct of Raja ocellata, X 2.

Explanation of Plate II

Fig. I. A horizontal section of the ear of Petromyzon marintiSf through the middle of the vertical diameter of the saccular appendix or lagcna, showing the bifurcate sense organ of the lagena, and the nerve supply. X 45. ^., the cupula; terminales of the sense organs.

Fig. 2. A vertical section through the posterior ampullar sense organ of the Petromyzon ear, to show the mutual relations of sensory ej)ithelium, canal wall, and nerve. X 140. ^., canal wall thickened where the nerve penetrates it to enter the sense cells, whose position is indicated by the pink shade, cr,ac,,, and ruicJ the accessory nerve in long and cross section.

Fig. 3. A transverse section (radial) of the cochlear organ and canal of the Rabbit, to show the usual relation of sensory hair band to the limbus sulcus spiralis in parafHnc preparations. *, the region from which Fig. 5 is taken, f, the caps of three hair cells, pulled off and still in connection with the hairs, r./., Corti*s pillars and the remnant nf the organ of Corti. m.r., membrana Rcissneri. j./., sulcus internis. cn.^ cochlear nerve, s.v., stria vascularis. mA, basilar membrane, vj.^ spiral or basilar blood-vessel. h.b., hair band. X 150.

Fig. 4. Sketch of a section of the net of Loewenberg of the Rabbit in its relation to the sensory hair band. From the region of the lower outer angle of the hair band in such a section as is shown in Fig. 3. r.w.t the thickened nm or edge of the hair band known as Ilenscn's " Randwulst," here seen to be composed of fibres. h.\ the hairs of the outer hair cells. X 1400.

Fig. 5. A surface view of the net of Loewenberg from the region ♦ of Fig. 3. X 850. The net appears to be composed of conls and threads of varying si/e, and the meshes are not only unequal, but also very irregular in size and shape, h.^ unchanged hairs of the outer hair cells.

Fig. 6. Perspective view of the region f of the section of the hair band shown in Fig. 3, and more highly magnified, ch.c.t one of the cai« <jf the outer hair cells which has remained in its normal attachment to the hair band, and which gives rise to 27 filaments or autlitory hairs. X 850.

Fig. 7. {n) Surface view of the *' Randkorpern " or " Randwulst " of the hair band, showing its reticulated structure, and {if) its relation to the sensory hairs in radial section. The preparation is taken from lo-inch Pig embryo. This appearance is not unusual, but the intermediate stages between this and the condition in which all traces of such structures are absent, as in the living and freshly prepared organs, are also abundant.

Fig. 8. The macula utriculi and the crista acustica of the anterior ampulla of the Opossum. X 30.

Fig. 9. Two supporting cells of the Sauropsid organ of the Alligator. X 440.

Fig. 10. Tangential (vertical) section of the endolymphatic sac of Dasyatis ecutrurus. X 15.

Explanation of Plate III

Fig. I. A view in perspective of the developing organ of Gjrti of a Pig embryo 8^ inches in length. X 825. /.^.r., the large epithelial ridge and its hair cells. The full complement of hairs to the cell is only indicated by the one hair, and only a small number of the hairs are drawn, for the sake of clearness. The figure illustrates the appearance of the organ during life. s,n., the Sauropsid organ. s.e.r., small epithelial ridge. The nerves and other parts are not indicated. For other detail of section, see Fig. i, PI. VI, and Fig. 2, this plate.

Fig. 2. A radial section of the cochlear canal and adjacent parts showing the relation of the developing organ of Corti to the canal and to its nerve. s.€,r. and i^.r,, small and large epithelial ridges respectively. The latter is the Sauropsid organ which disappears by the time adult life is reached. Both organs are composed of hair-bearing cells, which at this stage are very much alike, although the future organ of Corti has begun its differentiation out of the small epithelial fold.

Fig. 3. A fragment of a group of auditory hairs of the sensory hair band of the organ of Corti of the Ox, isolated from the band, and partly teased out. X 850. The figure illustrates the size and regularity of the capillary filaments, and the absence of an intermediate imbedding substance.

Fia 4. A view of the ventral surface of the hair band of the Ox, to illustrate the manner in which the plate breaks away from the hair cells. The crenulate line crossing the band from right to left is the inner half of the circular areas occupied by the hairs after being torn off the cells. Osmic-glycerine preparation. X 440. At cJi,c, the cap of one of the hair cells remains, and the hair ends may readily be counted.

Fig. 5. Surface view of Loewenberg's net in its relation to the dorsal surface of the sensory hair band of the Rabbit. X 180. The figure illustrates one extreme of the complicated structures arising out of the destruction of the normal relation of the surface layers of the hair band. iJi.b., inner border of the hair band, usually described as composed of amorphous substance.

Fig. 6. Transverse section of the cochlear canal of a 2^inch Pig embryo, to show the epithelial ridge (/.^.r.), out of which the organ of Corti is developed, and the other ridges, which for the most part disappear during later development in the mammal. X about 350.

Fig. 7. Side view of one rod of Corti of the Rabbit, showing the continuation of the cell protoplasm up to the ])illar head, and its penetration in between the spreading fibres of the foot plate. The small figure at the side represents a cross-section along the line ** ^," and shows that the bundle of fibres constituting the rod is inclosed in the common sheath of the protoplasm. X 865.

Fig. 8. A surface view of the outer end of an endolymphatic duct in Dasyatis centrurus.

Fig. 9. The two endolymphatic ducts of Sphyrna zygana. d.e.u., utricular duct. S.U., the sac of the utricular duct. d.e.s,j saccular duct. s.s»f its sac. c.a, and r./., anterior and posterior ear canals, k., cartilaginous auditory capsule.

Fig. 10. A small portion of one of the so-called spiral nerve bundles. The first or innermost one of the outer hair cell territory. X 8S0. Methyl blue.

Explanation of Plate IV.

Fig. I. Surface view of the apical turn of the cochlear spiral of the common Mouse, to illustrate the twisted condition of the cochlear organ. X 30. a^cc.^ apex of cochlear organ, its distal end. c.n., the cochlear nerve. ex., cochlear canal. b.m,, basilar membrane. h.b., hair band. 1.5.0., lamina spiralis ossca. st.v., stria vascularis. At c.n. and /i. the variation in the amount of spiral twist which the terminal bundles of the cochlear nerve suffer is well shown. The canal is not curved equally in all its parts. The figure sho\%-s three different degrees of cur\'ature.

Fig. 2. Transverse section of the cochlear canal and contained structures of a new-born Rabbit. X 85. I^.s., ligamcntum spirale. ScJ., scala tympani. sc.v., scala vcstibuli. The epithelial ridges are colored red; the hair band, brown. In the canal is seen the remains of hair structures from source unknown.

Fig. 3. Transverse section of the organ of Corti of new-born Rabbit, to show the relations of the cellular constituents of this stage of development. X 865. There are shown five rows of well-developed hair cells, and four rows of supporting cells, which at this stage are also hair-bearing. The hair cells of the Sauropsid organ are very numerous, c.p.c, embryonic Corti's pillar cells.

Fig. 4. Four figures of transverse sections through the auditory region of the head and through the auditory capsule of early embryos of Petromyzon Jiuviatilis, After Kuppfer.

a. Through the ingrowing ear cup and facial ganglion. The double lip of the

upper wall of the cup is well marked.

b. A later stage of the auditory involution, viewed in transsection through the

middle of its longitudinal diameter. The opening through the ectoderm is still persistent — endolymphatic duct. The " dorsal root " is seen to enter the gap in the top of the capsule.

c. Transverse section, to show the manner of nerve ending of the " dorsal root."

d. The same, more highly magnified.

Fig. 5. Three figures of transverse sections of Laceria viridis cmbn-os, through the internal ear in three stages of its development. After Hoffmann. The membranous car is colored red; the nerve, black.

<*. X 36. Through an early stage of canal formation and ampulla building. The cochlear nerve and ganglion are in contact with the outgrowing cochlear tube.

b. \ late stage of the developing ear, to show the manner of branching of the

nerve and its distribution to the parts of the ear. r.d.e., ramulus supplying the ductus cndolymphaticus.

c. A still later stage of the same.

Fig. 6. Camera sketch of the apex of the arch of Corti of the Dog, to show the relative sizes of the outer (upper in figure) and lower pillar heads. X 630.

Fig. 7. 'Ilie hair band of a young Virginia Opossum in transsection, to show the shape, breadth, and thickness, and also one condition of the appendix (Randwulst or Korper) to the outer edge. X 630.

Fig. 8. Horizontal section of the cochlear organ of Petromyzon mar inns, below its bifurcation. X 45>

Explanation of Plate V.

Fig. I. A surface view (dorsal) of the organ of Corti of the Virginia Opossum. o, X 630, b, X 3S0. a., the heads of the outer pillars of Corti prolonged into the apical beaks o./).h. and the outer face of the arch ca, s., spaces between the heads occupied by the first row of outer hair cells. 6., surface view of the hair band. The length and course of the hairs in four successive planes shown. A,c., hair cells. /., lumen in the inner edge of the band, — the so-called structureless edge. /Jk., outer edge of band.

Fig. 2. The caps of three hair cells from the organ of Corti of an adult Rabbit. The basal ends of the auditory hairs remain attached to the cap, and are shown in the figure only on one of the cell caps. Some of the hairs are much bent and curled, owing to elastic rebound after the breaking strain had been applied. X 1400. NaCl, glycerine preparation.

Fig. 3. A view from the dorsal surface of the organ of Corti of a Rabbit newly born, showing the long hairs of the organ of Corti in connection with their cells. The cells of the first two rows of outer hair cells are the only ones shown in the figure. X 850. The brown background represents the body of the hair band, and at /i.d. the course of the upper layer of fibres or hairs is shown. A.c., hair cells. In the figure " Cortis Hilars " should of course read " Corti's pillars," the double outline indicating the position of the row of pillar heads.

Fig. 4. A portion of a tangential section of the organ of Corti of an adult Rabbit, showing the manner in which the hairs of the hair cells pass off to the hair band. The structure of the hair cells is shon'n in two of them. X 1400. s.c, supporting cells, nlxi./., the nucleo-capillary fibres connecting the roots of the hairs with the nucleus.

Fig. 5. Three hair cells from the adult organ of Corti of the Rabbit, showing the '* Ilenscnschenktirper *' and its relation to the auditory hairs on the one hand and the nucleus on the other. X 1400. In a, at Jo is shown the manner of entrance or attachment of the nucleo-capillary filaments to the nucleus. They cross a shrinkage space in the protoplasm just before attaching.

Fn;. 6. A perspective view of the developing organ of Corti of a Pig embryo 10 inches in length. .Showing the manner in which the auditory hairs rise from the surface of the epithelial cells. X II4' Z.^.. and j.^.r., large and small epithelial ridges.

Fig. 7. An auditory cell from the organ of Corti of an adult Rabbit, showing the relation of the hairs to the cell, and especially its nucleus, as in Fig. 5. X 1400. The hair filaments are continued from without through the cell. The " Ilensen K«irpcr" lies at the base of the apical funnel of the cell. The nerve enters the si<!e of the cell. The figure does not intend to convey the idea that the nerve enters the nucleus.

Fit;. 8. A nucleus of an auditory cell from the same organ of Corti, showing the capillary filaments of the peripheral and neural poles of the nucleus and two lateral stainable l)odies. X 1400.

Fig. 9. Transverse section of the developing organ of Corti of a Pig embrvo 8^ inches in length. The pillar cell has not yet divided. X 380. The hairs of the cells of the large epithelial ridge are shown to form part of the hair band, and are well developed at this stage.

Fig. io. Surface view of the pillar heads of Corti's rods, showing the relative sizes and numbers. From the adult Rabbit. X 1400. i ., inner, 0., outer, pillar head.

Fig. II. A hair cell with short hair; basal remnants adhering to its cap. Rabbit X 850. This figure is very much like those published by Gottstein and Waldeyer. Chromic acid preparation.

Fig. 12. Transverse section of ear sac of Torpedo marmorata embryo i| cm. in length, showing the beginnings of canal development in the ear, and the relation of the endolymphatic duct to the sac. X ii4> m.i/., the utricular sense organ. e,c.^ external canal.

Fig. 13. One of the openings of the habcnula perforata and the transmitted nerve of the Dog, seen slightly obliquely. X 1065. The nerve, before it enters the membrana basilaris, stains red (its sheath). The rest of its distal portion unstained, and composed of axis cylinders only.

Explanation of Plate VI.

Fig. I. A transverse section of the cochlear organ of an 8}-inch Pig embryo. X 285. i.e.r.t Le.r., small and large epithelial ridges. ^.^., cochlear canal, j.r., supporting cells. h.b., hair band, c.n., cochlear nerve, gx,, cochlear ganglion. mA, membrana vasilaris. c.p.c.^ Corti's pillar cell, which has not divided into the inner and outer cells, j./., scala tympani.

Fig. 2. Transverse section (radial) of the cochlea of the house Mouse (adult). X 1 14. To show the length and relation of the hairs of the hair band, ox., organ of Corti. S.V., scala vestibuli. j./., seal?, tympani. s.v., stria vascularis. m.R., membrana Reissneri.

Fig. 3. The apical spire of the cochlea of a 19 cul Pig embryo, ox,, organ of Corti. €x,, Corti's canal; the arrow lies over the lamina spiralis ossea, magnified about 20 diameters. /., the apex of the epithelial ridge. No helicotrema is developed.

Fig. 4. The distal end of the cochlear tube of the Mocking-bird, with the lagenar bulb. Ix.f c, and cJ, the cartilaginous framework on which is stretched the membrana basilaris (mA). o.m., the otolithic mass lying over the lagenar sense organ.

X90 Fia 5. Surface view of three cochlear sense organs from the adult human ear.

ix., inner hair cells. ocA-oc.*, roll's of outer hair cells. The rows of sense cells are seen to be more and more incomplete the further they arc removed from the inner edge of the organ. Only the outlines of the hair-cell caps are drawn in. After Retzius.

Fig. 6. The lagcno-cochlear tube of the Mocking-bird seen from its neural face. n.p.b., n. papilla basilaris. b.v., blood-vessel. rJ., ramulus lagense n.p.b. cochlear nerve. o,m., the otolithic mass lying over the lagenar sense organ, r.r., cochlear canal. ^., the isolated otolithic mass, to show its zones and peculiar shield shape. c, to illustrate the tortuous course of the main vascular trunks in the roof of the cochlear canal or the stria vascularis. X 10.

Fig. 7. Surface view of the sensory hair cells of the basilar organ of the Mockingbird's car. X 1400. hx., hair cell, h,, one of the several hairs springing independently from the top of the cell, sx., supporting cell.

Fig. 8. Surface view of ampullar sense organ of the Mocking-bird. X 45. Showing the several crests composing the crista acustica. /.r., i)rojecting axial crests, ax.t apical crest, p.s., planium semilunatum. c.w., canal wall.

Fig. 9. A view of the auditory hairs from five hair cells of the papilla lagcnse of the Mocking-bird. X S50. a, the hairs, more or less torn and spread into a brush. b, c, and </, normal slender hairs, e, an exceptionally strong hair. Living preparation.

Fig. 10. An oblique view of a piece of the membrana tectoria or hair band of the Mocking-bird, e.p., epithelium, a, the general course of the striations and lines of lacunx. /., the perforating lacunale of the band. X 510. Chrom-osmic preparation.

FKkS. II and 12. The acustico-facial nerves and ganglia of a human embryo 22 mm. long. X 25. The figures are drawn from a model of these structures as found on the left side. After W. His, Jr.

Fta. II. Seen from in front

Fia la. Seen from behind.

a-4^ a piece of the brain cortex — at i, the medulla waU. The portion central

roots are 6gnred, eitending above this cortical strip. e^ lateral or cochlear root v., medial or vestibiilar root /, terminal portion of the facial root

I, trunk of the Yestibular nenre. a, vestibular ganglion.

3v the vestibular nerve branch common to the two ampulke. It bifurcates

4« into ramulus ampullae anterioris,

5» and ramulus ampuDsB extemse.

6^ the branch to the macuke recessns utriculi, showing its broadening out on the surfiice of the septum of the vestibule.

7, the cochlear ganglion.

8» trunk of the cochlear nerve; with t., the intercranial ganglion, shi, the intermediate ganglion. A^ ramulus ampullae posterioris. B^ ramulus maculae sacculL

9^ root of the fridal nerve above the (10) ganglion geniculL

10^ ganglion geniculL

II, trunk of the facial, cut through below the genu.

Explanation of Plate VII.

Fig. I. Seven.! but cells (ram the basilnr orgaii of Ihe Mocking-bird, to ihow tbe eflect of reagcnis upon tbe hnin. d, the average result of the action of alcohol and hardeoing acids apon Ihe haiis when care it exercised to preserve them. 6, a newly normal hair, with lip slightly melted down by the acid, c, mure modified bait. d, an apparent collar about tbe base of the hairs of one cell. X 1400.

Fig. 2. One of the cartilaginous bars and the attached membrana basibris from the cochlea of the Mocking-bird, showing the two very distincl libre layers of the membrane, v.s., spiral blood-vessel. ./,, a few of the epithelial cells of the sense organ covering the membrane. I and 2, (be lower and upper layers of the batiUr membrane. X 3S0.

Fig. 3. Three hsira from the papilla ligenx of the Mocking-bird, wilh their basal attachment, viewed in living condition in noimal salt solution, wilh optical secdons at a and t. X 850.

Fig. 4. The proximal end of the membrana basilaris and ils frame, from Ihe adult Mocking-bird. X 45- *.'-. hair cells of the basilar papilla. The shaded polygons have Ihe hairs indicated. 1, 2, 3, the three layers of Ibe basilar membrane, x, the inlermediite layer not shcnvn in Fig. z.

Fig. 5. Four hair cells from the papilla lagenx. a and b, after tbe use of hardening reagents, i and d, in Ihe normal condition. X 1400. From tbe adult Mocking-bird.

Fig. 6, A single hair cell isolated from the lagenar organ alter the usual hardening method. The hairs broken oH and separated- X 1400.

Fig. 7. The whole of Ihe cochlear lube of Ihe Mocking-bird, viewed from iu neural face, n^., cochlear nerve. r.p.k., ramus pipilLe basilaris. r.l,, ramulua lageme. e. and c.', carlilaginous frame, b.v., blood-vessel, s^., superior iransvenc cartilage. The left car from the inside.

Fig. 8. A single bait cell, alive in aqueous humor, a, terminal bulb of halt allixed to cover gloss, h, Ihe elastic hair, e, the cell cap.

Fig. 9. Tbe same cochlear tube seen from the outside, on its vascular face. Letters the same as in Fig, 7.

Fig. 10. A nearl/ vertical section of the developing ear of a 32-day Salma faria embryo, X 114. '^', duciui endolymphatic us. mJ., the floor of tbe medulla. M.D., the roof of the mouth, e.r.p., i.r^., and cr./., the three crisL-e acustics, posterior, anterior, and external, respectively, t., eye. The blood-vessels and lymph spaces below tbe cristx are distinctly seen, as well as the nerve lo the anterior ampullar sense organ, which appears in section.

Fig. 11. The crista acustica of the ampulla of tbe Mocking-bird, seen from the side. a.c., f.(., and I.e., Ihe apical, aiial, and lateral crests of Ihe structure, the latter pasting out into the planum semllunatum. X 45, The sensory hairs cover the whole surface of Ihe struclute, but appear in this Hgure only around the edges.

Fig. la. Three celU from the papilla basilaris of the Mocking-bird, to show the relation of Ibe sensory hair to the surface of the cell during the action of reagents. X a8oa In cell a two hairs have not yet been affected, while all others have been melted down at their tips, leaving a bead of varying shape as the representative of the slender hair.

Fig. 13. Otolithic crystals from the papilla lagen^e of the Mocking-bird, a, i, t, J, the several shapes and siies of the crystals observed. X S50.

Explanation of Plate VIII.

Fig. I. A transverse secnon of the head of Torpedo marmorata through the auditory region, showing the relation of the endolymphatic duct to the auditory involution and the surface of the body. X 85. ch.^ chorda dorsalis. car.^ carotid artery. md.^ medulla, d^e.^ ductus endolymphaticus. a.v,^ auditory vesicle. Embryo i\ cm. in length.

Fig. 2. A transverse section of the end of the endolymphatic duct taken from the same series as Fig. I, but caudad of Fig. i, showing the manner in which the ear canal opens on the surface of the body, sp.^ tissue above the superior lip of the duct (primitive opening of the involution of the ear), c.c.^ connective tissue cells, ect.^ unmodified ectoderm. X 540.

Fig. 3. The same, from the next section, cde., mouth of the duct. X 380.

Fig. 4. The same, from the section next behind Fig. 3, showing the wide-open mouth of the ear duct. X 285.

Fig. 5. Surface view of the basilar membrane of the Virginia Opossum, to show its composition. ^, w , f, h^ the transverse fibres of the membrane, b^ wi, yj /, the longitudinal fibres above and below the former, which is in consequence the middle layer. The superficial layer of longitudinal fibres is the layer figured and described in part by Nuel, Dciters, and others as one of the bundles of longitudinal nerve fibres of the organ of Corti. X 1065.

b. Some of the longitudinal superficial fibres. X 850. From another part of the same ear.

Fig. 6. Surface view of the keystone of the arch of Corti and the pillar head prolongations, k.o.p.t oJt.c.f the hair cells of the outer scries, , of the inner series, j., spaces between the pillar heads. From the Opossum.

Fig. 7. A few isolated superficial longitudinal basilar membrane fibres, or socalled longitudinal nerve fibres of Dciters. X 1065.

Fig. 8. A small segment of the hair band from the ear of an adult Virginia Opossum. X 380. The figure shows the appearance of the atifacts, or so-called " Rand Korpcr " of Ilensen, and the " Net of Locwenbcrg." h.b.y hair band. L.n,y net of I-,oewenberg. C/., Corti's pillars. r.k.^ " Rand Korper."

Fig. 9. A single hair cell of the outer series from the ear of an adult Virginia Opossum. To show the relation of the hairs to the cap of the cell. X about 1400.

Fig. 10. Surface view of four of the inner and four outer pillar heads from the Opossum's ear. X 1400.

a.c.f arch of Corti. i.p, and o.p., inner and outer pillar heads.

Fig. II. A transverse section of the sense organ in the larger surface canal of Petromyzon marinus. X 165.

Fig. 12. The nerve end in an epithelial (hair) cell from the same. X about loco. lagenar group are represented as separated from each other by an interval, whereas the actual relation in nature is much more intimate.

ca,f anterior canaL

cp.f posterior canaL eh.f external canal.

cab.t abortive canal.

u, utriculus.

rec.ufrU^ recessus utriculi.

recjac,^ recessus sacculi.

d,, ductus endolymphaticus.

J., sacculus.

ouie,t orifice of the same.

Fig. 4. A surface view of the relations of the invaginated ear to the. superficial canal sense organs, in the ontogeny of the Spiny Dogfish, Acanthias vu^aris. X 20. d.e., ear duct.^ mouth of same, opening through the skin into the ear groove, au^, aux,, the line of canal sense organs, crossing the head and connecting the two lateral systems, o.e.

Fig. 5. Surface view of the nerve plate which enters the membrana basilaris. From a preparation of the organ of Corti of the Dog, stained with alcohol carmine. X 1065. The nerve fibres are shdwn crossing the space arched over by the pillars of Corti, and reaching as far as the hair cells of the outer row. n.f,^ non-medullated nerve fibres. hb,p.^ line of the openings of the habenula perforata. v.j., spiral vessel.

Fig. 6. A series of the hair cells of the organ of Corti of the Virginia Opossum. X 1065. The hairs are in large part removed, only one cell showing the basal remnant of these structures.

Fig. 7. The lower end of the basilar membrane and its bony framework, from the adult human subject. X 380. ;/., the nerve fibres penetrating to the middle of the basilar membrane. lj.o^ lamina spiralis ossea.

Explanation of Plate X

Fig. I. A preparation of the organ of Corti of the Virginia Opossum in osmic acid, to demonstrate the course of the nerves across the arch of Curti. g,, ganglionic ( ?) varicosity of the nerve tibres, n. c.p.f., foot of Corti's pillar. tiLcp., nucleus of the pillar cell of the outer pillars. /., projection from the apex of the arch. X865.

Fig. 2. A view of the mtemal ear of Peiromyxon marinus^ from above and without, to show the relation of the sense organ to the commissural chaml>cr and the manner in which the two endolymphatic tubes pierce the walls of the utriculus and sacculus respectively, v., v,', the utricular and saccular chambers. c.a, and r./., the anterior and posterior semicircular canals, s.o., sense organ of the commissure. r., commissural chamber, in which it lies, d.ea,^ ductus endolymphaticus utriculi* dje,u.y ductus endolymphaticus sacculi. Owing to an inadvertence the d.ej, of the figure was placed on the sacculus. It should occupy a corresponding i)lace on the utriculus. OT.r., median raphe, but partly separating the two chambers of the oar. VIII ac.^ the auditor}' accessory nerve which supplies the commissural and surface canal sense organs. X 20.

Fig. 3. Transverse section of the cochlear organ of the Alligator (.'/. mississippiensis), to show the relation of the parts. CM-f.^ cochlear nerve fibres, c.n^.^ cochlear nerve ganglion cells, c.cjy cartilaginous bars framing the mcmbrana basilaris. l.e.r. and s.e,r,, large and small epithelial ridges of the Alligator ear £,eJ, two api)arently non-hair-bearing epithelial ridges, b.v., blood-vessels, s.t., scala tympani. s.v., scala vestibuli. c.c.^ cochlear canal. k.b., hair band, str.v., stria vascularis, a.h., auditory hairs, r.p.b,^ ramulus papilke basilaris n. cochle;v. V.J., spiral vessels, c.a.^ cochlear artery, sh.^ sheath of cochlear nerve. X 30.

Fig. 4. A small portion of the precciling figure more highly magnified, to show the hair band and its composition and relation to the short hairs still connected with the sensory cells, a^., auditory hairs, h.f.^ hair cells, sp.c, su])p<irting cells. h.b., hair band, ah J and </A.", the free ends of the auditory hairs projecting beyond the bounds of the hair band or membrana tectoria, which has been torn from its attachment to the hair cells, n., ner\'e fibres,^ basilar membrane.

Fig. 5. A horizimtal section of the sense organ of the commissure from the Petromyzon ear. j./., supporting stalk of the sense organ. A.r., hair cell. ^./., non-sensory epithelium. ^./., basement tissue of the head of the organ. ^./., connective tissue of its stalk. X 3S0.

Fig. 6. The figure represents the tortuous course of the non-medullate fibres (at least, as seen in preparations) of the cochlear nerve across the interspace between the habenula perforata and the hair cells. From the Pig. X 1065.

Fig. 7. Surface view of the epithelium of Rcissner's membrane in the Pig. The nuclei of the miiidle layer of cells shows through the outlines of the inner layer. X 440. Methyl blue.

Explanation of Plate XI

Fia I. A part of a vertical section of the crista acustica of the Cat's ear. X 140a To show the effect of reagents on the hairs, and the course of the nerves and the blood-vessels. The very large cupula terminalis is not drawn in. g^,^ varicosity of nerve fibre, if. h,v. and hjc,^ blood-vessel and contained corpuscles. m.r., mucous celL OT., mucus exuded therefrom, h., h, \ h, ', various forms of hair cells, — remnants, tp,^ non-sensory epithelium.

Fig. 2. A vertical section of the membrana tectoria, or hair band, of the Virginia Opossum. X 895. oXex,t cell cap of outer hair cell, with its hairs rising into the mass of the band. The entire absence of a " Rand Kdrper '* is noteworthy, r./., Corti*s pillars. oM.e,, body of outer hair cells, not drawn in detail.

Fig. 3. A bundle of lagenar hairs of the Alligator, to show the relation of the otoliths to the hairs. Hrtnk., ob, 8, oc. 2. Methyl blue.

Fig. 4. A cap of a hair cell from the cochlear organ of the Alligator. X 1400.

Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2020, February 23) Embryology Paper - Vertebrate cephalogenesis 2 (1892). Retrieved from

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2020, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G