Paper - The nature of the malformations of the rectum and urogenital passages

From Embryology
Revision as of 12:17, 19 June 2020 by Z8600021 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Embryology - 14 Jun 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Woods-Jones F. The nature of the malformations of the rectum and urogenital passages. (1904) Br. Med. J. 1630-1634.

Online Editor  
Mark Hill.jpg
This 1904 paper by Woods-Jones is a historic description of rectum and urogenital passage malformations.

Modern Notes:

GIT Links: Introduction | Medicine Lecture | Science Lecture | endoderm | mouth | oesophagus | stomach | liver | gallbladder | Pancreas | intestine | mesentery | tongue | taste | enteric nervous system | Stage 13 | Stage 22 | gastrointestinal abnormalities | Movies | Postnatal | milk | tooth | salivary gland | BGD Lecture | BGD Practical | GIT Terms | Category:Gastrointestinal Tract
GIT Histology Links: Upper GIT | Salivary Gland | Smooth Muscle Histology | Liver | Gallbladder | Pancreas | Colon | Histology Stains | Histology | GIT Development
Historic Embryology - Gastrointestinal Tract  
1878 Alimentary Canal | 1882 The Organs of the Inner Germ-Layer The Alimentary Tube with its Appended Organs | 1884 Great omentum and transverse mesocolon | 1902 Meckel's diverticulum | 1902 The Organs of Digestion | 1903 Submaxillary Gland | 1906 Liver | 1907 Development of the Digestive System | 1907 Atlas | 1907 23 Somite Embryo | 1908 Liver | 1908 Liver and Vascular | 1910 Mucous membrane Oesophagus to Small Intestine | 1910 Large intestine and Vermiform process | 1911-13 Intestine and Peritoneum - Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 5 | Part 6 | 1912 Digestive Tract | 1912 Stomach | 1914 Digestive Tract | 1914 Intestines | 1914 Rectum | 1915 Pharynx | 1915 Intestinal Rotation | 1917 Entodermal Canal | 1918 Anatomy | 1921 Alimentary Tube | 1932 Gall Bladder | 1939 Alimentary Canal Looping | 1940 Duodenum anomalies | 2008 Liver | 2016 GIT Notes | Historic Disclaimer
Human Embryo: 1908 13-14 Somite Embryo | 1921 Liver Suspensory Ligament | 1926 22 Somite Embryo | 1907 23 Somite Embryo | 1937 25 Somite Embryo | 1914 27 Somite Embryo | 1914 Week 7 Embryo
Animal Development: 1913 Chicken | 1951 Frog

Genital Links: genital | Lecture - Medicine | Lecture - Science | Lecture Movie | Medicine - Practical | primordial germ cell | meiosis | endocrine gonad‎ | Genital Movies | genital abnormalities | Assisted Reproductive Technology | puberty | Category:Genital
Female | X | X inactivation | ovary | corpus luteum | oocyte | uterus | vagina | reproductive cycles | menstrual cycle | Category:Female
Male | Y | SRY | testis | spermatozoa | ductus deferens | penis | prostate | Category:Male
Historic Embryology - Genital 
General: 1901 Urinogenital Tract | 1902 The Uro-Genital System | 1904 Ovary and Testis | 1912 Urinogenital Organ Development | 1914 External Genitalia | 1921 Urogenital Development | 1921 External Genital | 1942 Sex Cords | 1953 Germ Cells | Historic Embryology Papers | Historic Disclaimer
Female: 1904 Ovary and Testis | 1904 Hymen | 1912 Urinogenital Organ Development | 1914 External Genitalia | 1914 Female | 1921 External Genital | 1927 Female Foetus 15 cm | 1927 Vagina | 1932 Postnatal Ovary
Male: 1887-88 Testis | 1904 Ovary and Testis | 1904 Leydig Cells | 1906 Testis vascular | 1909 Prostate | 1912 Prostate | 1914 External Genitalia | 1915 Cowper’s and Bartholin’s Glands | 1920 Wolffian tubules | 1935 Prepuce | 1935 Wolffian Duct | 1942 Sex Cords | 1943 Testes Descent | Historic Embryology Papers | Historic Disclaimer
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

The Nature of the Malformations of the Rectum and Urogenital Passages

Frederic Wood Jones (1879–1954)

Scientific Grants Committee of the British Medical Assoclatlon.

Br F. Wood-Jones, M.B., B.Sc.Lond., M.R.C.S.Enc.

This paper is a brief summary of the clinical side of a paper on the development and Musculature of the Visceral Openings of the Hind End, accepted by the London University for the Degree of B.Sc., by Research, October, 1903.

When the details of human embryology have merely. an academic interest they are of little utility in a medical education, and serve no useful purpose in the object of all medical training—practical medicine and surgery.

To be of any value at all to the medical man, embryology must help him to understand how, and. why, the adult organs become developed, it must furnish him a ready explanation of the abnormalities and imperfections of development with which he meets, and it should afford some guide to him in the treatment he must undertake for their relief. Regarded in this light, much that is taught of the development of the human body must be admitted to be of little practical value in medicine.

In many cases the teachings of embryology furnish no real explanation of the abnormalities that are met with clinically, and in very few do they afford any guide for the artificial repair of these abnormalities.

The generally acce ted view of the development of the human hind end 0 ers no explanation of some _of the abnormalities which are commonly found clinically in 'thl8' situation. The growth of septa and partition walls, which is so often invoked—and often wrongly invoked—as an explanation of various abnormal conditions, is, founded on a misinterpretation of developmental changes, and, it would be urged, does not here occur, at any rate in the manner and to the extent that is usually described. It is therefore necessary to inquire if the present account of the development of the human hind end is a correct interpretation of the various stages that have been seen in the human embryo, if some stages have been overlooked, or some stages seen in other animals have been wrongly read into the early chapters of human development. That some stages are‘ wrongly interpreted, and some are wrongly described, and that some abnormal conditions are capable of more practical and more clinically useful explanation, will I believe, be found from a further study of the development of the hind end of the human embryo.

In order to test the shortcomings of the present theory, and to estimate any advantages that some modification of it may possess, it is necessary to see, in outline at any rate, what are the problems that require solution. Most of the malformations of the rectum and urogenital passages that are commonly met with fall into a few well-recognized groups, and it is an outstanding fact in regard to these abnormalities that the are wonderfully constant in their anatomical arrangement. eir very constancy demands that their explanation should be definitely furnished by reference to their development. The visceral openings of the hind end are subject to two classes of malformations. In the first class a terminal septum closes the orifice, and in the second class there may be an actual absence of a portion of the tube which should normally open to the outside at one of the visceral orifices. In the first class come such abnormalities as imperforate anus, imperforate hymen, and urethral septum. In the second class come the more grave conditions of imperforate rectum, atresia vaginae, and atresia urethrae.

The extent of the deformity may not be limited to the actual developmental error, but may be increased and altered b secondary changes that this condition produces, and one suc example of this more complex deformity is ectopia vesicae.

The anatomical condition of most of these abnormalities is simple; all those which are included in Class I are alike in possessing a terminal septum, and no discussion of their anatomical features is required. Some of those conditions that have been included in Class II, however, require some further notice, and the common anatomical features of imperforate rectum will be considered in some detail, for it is a condition usually not well described.

When this malformation exists ‘a very definite anatomical abnormality is found; there is an actual loss—or as we shall see a non-development—of a definite portion of the gut. The child may or may not possess a proctodeal depression, and, even if this degression does exist, no pervious gut is found at its bottom, an it is not until some depth has been reached in a dissection from the perineum that the lumen of the rectum is found. Now, it is the rule that this ending of the pervious gut takes place at a definite point just below the peritoneal reflection, in the neighbourhood of Houston’s main fold, and it is also commonly found to end in a communication with the urogenital passages in the prostatic urethra in the male and in the vagina in the female.

In Curling’s statistics of imperforate rectum 26 per cent. of the cases end in the urethra, and it is likely, as he himself points out, that since the opening is small, were the dissection fiiono carefully performed the percentage would be much higher.

In 9 cases at the London Hospital 7 showed a communication between the termination of the pervious gut and the urethra. This condition of imperforate rectum is not in any way explained by the generally-accepted septal division of the cloaca, and is obviously one which by its frequent occurrence and its constancy should admit of easy explanation.

Fig. 1. Diagram of the condition of imperforate anus, the type of malformation in which a. septum blocks the visceral orifice. The constriction at the peritoneal reflection from the gut is Houston’s main fold.

Fig. 2. Diagram of the condition of imperforate rectum, the type of malformation in which there is failure of development of a portion of the tube. The cloacal opening of the hind gut persists, the post-allantoic gut having failed to develop.

The anatomical conditions presented by atresia vaginae and atresia urethrae require no explanation, and the tlletformity presented by ectopia vesicae will be considered.

We may now turn to a brief consideration of the development of the rectum and the urogenital canal.

It must throughout be borne in mind that in the early stages of development the hind end is the site of a very rapid and very peculiar growth. The hind end of the embryo in its early stages is the body stalk - the body stalk in the later stages becomes a part of the umbilical cord; in fact, the um ilicus of the adult is the hind end of the embryo. In picturing the development of these parts, therefore, this very remarkable change must be constantly remembered.

Another predominating feature in the picture of the development of the human hind end is the condition of the allantois. Much that is misleading in human embryology is brought about by the grafting of stages seen in the wellstudied development of the chick, into the knowledge gained from the study of the little-known stages of the human embryo. To adopt the condition of a fetal organ, such as the allantois, found in a creature, that carries out its physiology inside an egg-shell, into the life-history of the human embryo, whose early stages are spent so differently, and whose physiological requirements are so different, is only to cause confusion.

The allantois of the human embryo differs widely from the allantois of birds. The allantois of birds is an outgrowth of the hind gut; the allantois of the human embryo of 12 somites) is the continuation and termination of the hindgut. It is impossible to say at this stage which portion of the tube posterior to the yolk sac should be called allantois and which should be called hind gut; it is impossible to determine where one begins and the other ends. This, then, is an imortant stage to be noted, and it is one that is entirely overlooked when the idea of a well-developed, well-defined, ventrally-situated allantois is made the predominant one in the picture.

The hindermost end of the allantois is situated in the body stalk, and is the posterior termination of the hypoblastic canal. The body stalk, as the embryo grows, becomes ventral, the termination of the allantois becomes ventral with it, and so a U-shaped bend is formed in the posterior part of the tube, the dorsal limb, or hind gut, having the mesoblastic somites dorsal to it, the ventrally-bending limb, or allantois, having no mesoblastic somites accompanying it. The apex of the curve that is thus produced in the tube becomes now the site of a dilatation, so that there is produced a posterior chamber, into which opens (1) dorsally and anteriorly, the hind gut, and (2) ventrally and anteriorly, the allantois.

The stage now arrived at is. therefore, the. well-known one in which there is a common chamber into which both gut and allantois open.

The terminal dilatation of the U-shaped bend becomes the cloaca, and in the transformations that bring about the change from the cloacal condition to the adult specialized condition some stages must certainly be reconsidered before an account of the development of the hind end will fit in with clinically-observed facts, or give a true picture of the various changes that take place in the embryo. In reconsidering these transformations the rapid backward growth of the hind end must still be borne in mind. The previously-determined site of the umbilical termination of the allantois, formerly the extreme hind end_ of the embryo> must be kept as a fixed point, and, lI1.addition, a new land‘ mark may be taken. In the stage in which the U-shaped bend occurs, the concavity of the curve marks the posterior limit of the body cavity; in the fetus the«posterior limit of the body cavity becomes the recto-vesical pouch; this posterior limit of the body cavity may, therefore, serve as a further guide.

Fig. 4. The hind end of the embryo has grown back past the body stalk, and the postallantoic gut growing back with the growing h_ind end. The communication with the anterior portion of the terminal dilatation is still large.

In the commonly-accepted account of the development of the adult specialized condition of the visceral openings of the hind end, the cloacal cavity becomes subdivided by the growth of the septa, and the wide opening becomes thus split into the secondary channels that we find in the fully-developed condition.

The facts of embryology are only gathered by arresting the process of development at various stages, and putting forward the most probable explanation of the means by which the various conditions seen at these different stages were changed the one into the other.

In the process by which one cavity becomes divided into two or more secondary cavities, a change which appears to be due to the active grewth of a septum or septa may, in reality,'be due to an active growth of the cavities themselves, and a passive relative diminution. of the openings that connect them. It is ‘probable that in various organs this active growth of cavities and passive growth of septa is the more probable explanation ‘of the process by which the fully developed condition is arrived at ;. in the formation of the rectum there is, I think, no doubt of it.

The cloaca has, in the stage to which it has been described, two openings in it: the_ cloacal opening of the hind gut dorsally, the eloacal opening of the allantois ventrally. The cloacal opening of the hind gut -has normally, however, a temporary existence, only, its _ connexion; with the cloaca becomes lost by the relative diminution in the.size of its cloacalopening, and also probably by the lateral infolding of the cloacal wall that Kiebel has described. and which is seen in a sli ht degree in ‘the embryo of i2 somites. Meanwhile, the bin end is continuing its backward growth, the growth of the dorsal surface being more rapid than that of the ventral surface. With this growth the hind gut keeps pace, and it -buds backwards ast its cloacal opening, past its old termination in the a lantois, and _forms the portion of the hind gut distal to the allantois, which portion I propose to call the post-allantoic gut. It will be seen that this portion of the gut is new. It. is the new bacligrowth of the hind gut in the rapidly growing hind end of the embryo; and in those animals in which the posterior part of the vertebral ‘column becomes prolonged it of course reaches a very considerable length. The cloacal opening_of the hind gut is now normally lost; originally a small opening in the embryo of i2 somites (which is about 2 mm. in total length), the rapid growth of the hind gut, the post-allantoic gut, and of the allantois itself, together with the lateral infolding of the wall described by Kiebel, serve to close the opening of the hind gut (into the cloaca. The hind gut and its continuation— the post - allantoic ,gut—are now without any communication with the. exterior, and when this communication is made, it is at the site of the permanent anus, and is formed by the proctodeum meeting ventrally the post-allantoic gut. The permanent anus is therefore a new opening, forming a communication with the post-allantoic gut, and is wholly distinct from the cloacal opening of the hind gut. The portion of the post-allantoic gut distal to the ventrally invaginating proctodeum forms the post-anal gut. The posterior portion of the large intestine in the adult therefore contains three embryonic portions: (1) the hind gut, (2) the post-allantoic gut, and (3) the proctodeum. The limitations of these separate embryonic portions must now be determined.

Fig. 3. Condition of hind gut, cloaca, and allantois in the human embryo of 12 somites. Shows the u-shaped bend of the posterior:d1latation. The body stalk is still practically the hind end of the embryo.

Fig. 5. The hind gut has still its cloacal opening. The postallantoic gut has continued its backward growth. The opening of the Mullerian ducts on the concavity of the u-shaped bend is shown.

Fig. 6. The hind gut has lost its cloacal opening. The postallantoic gut has continued its growth, and is about to meet the proctodeal depression.

The second landmark taken—that is, the posterior limit of the body cavity or recto-vesical pouch—serves to mark roughly the site of the junction of hind gut and allantois, and subse«quently the junction of the hind gut and terminal dilatation or cloaca. The reflection of peritoneum from the anterior surface of the rectum will therefore serve to mark, within at any rate fairly narrow limits, the site of the former cloacal openin of the hind gut, and the site of the origin of the post-al antoic gut. The posterior limit of the post allantoic gut is the recess formed by the anal sinuses, the proctodeum invaginating the post-allantoic gut in such a manner that its anterior limit becomes the free edge of the anal valves, and, since the proctodeum invaginates the post-allantoicgut from a somewhat ventral position, the anal sinuses on the posterior gvallli of the gut are deeper than those on the anterior wall see ig. ). ' Having thus briefly reviewed the stages of the development of the adult rectum, and having determined the various parts which enter into its formation and fixed their limits, it is necessary to study the abnormal conditions that are found clinically and to make some attempt at their explanation. The conditions that require consideration are these : (1) Im rforate rectum and its varieties. (2) Imperforate anus -an its varieties. Imperforation of the rectum is a condition the treatment of which is difficult and unsatisfactory, and part of the difficulty no doubt arises from the generally reesent idea that if the gut is not found ending at the procto eal depression, then it may end anywhere. As a matter of fact Houston’s main fold—and here it usually occurs.

the ending of the gut is, in the great majority of cases, situated at a definite point,_and this for,_the reason that in imperforate rectum a_definite embryolpgical portion of the gut is missing—the missing portion being the post-allantoic u . g From what has been said with regard to the limits of this portion of the gut, it will be seen that the termination of the pervious gut should be somewhere near the peritoneal reflection from its anterior surface-—this is, in the region of Again, from what has been said as to the cloacal opening of the hind gut, it will be seen that should this opening persist (and it frequently does persist in these cases) it should be situated at a definite point—that is, the peritoneal reflection to the allantois—and here in the region of the prostatic urethra it usually occurs in the male. The constancy of the opening between the imperforate rectum _and the urinary passages in the neighbourhood of the prostatic urethra, is very striking in the male. In the female the opening is into the vagina, and the level of its opening is frequently just below the cervix; it may, however, be lower.

The alteration in the level of the opening in the female, admits of easy explanation, which will be considered when the development of the vagina is discussed. In some cases in which the rectum is imperforate—that is, in which the post-allantoic gut has not grown back in the growing hind end—the cloacal opening does not persist. In these cases, however, the old connexion of the hind gut and allantois will be found on dissection as a fibrous cord binding the rectum to the prostatic urethra in the male, or the posterior vaginal wall in the female.

Fig. 7. The urogenital sinus and post-allantoic gut have both opened to the outside. The urogenital sinus opening of the Mullerian ducts is still retained.

Fig. 8. The Mullerian ducts have lost their urogenital sinus opening, and the new solid vagina has grown down. This solid vagina later becomes canalized. It is this stage that persists as atresia vaginae.

It will therefore be seen that in those cases in which the gut does not end at the proctodeal depression, its disposition within the child’s pelvis is, as a rule, such a one as admits of deliberate and ordered search, via the perineum, with a good chance of success. And further, as the cloacal opening of the hind gut’ is distal to the posterior limit of the body coelom, the pervious gut will be found osterior to peritoneal cavity. Imperforate rectum admitte of no explanation by a reasonable interpretation of a septal subdivision of a wide open cloaca; nor did that theory in any way account for the communications that are so commonly found between the rectum and the urethra and vagina (fig. 6).

On the other hand, the explanation of imperforate anus on the present lines differs in no way from the generally- accepted account, with the excefption that the varying thicknesses of anal septum which are ound in practice are perhaps easier to explain when it is known that both cavities—the post anal gut and the proctodeum—are actively growing.

This modification of the description of the development of the human rectum must of course necessitate some alteration in the account of the rocesses by which the other visceral openings are formed. t therefore becomes necessary to consider the development of the urinary and genital passages, and to see what explanation it will afford of the many abnormalities that are metwith clinically. That the clinical observations fall in line with the changes to be described in the development of the other visceral orifices, which this modification of the formation and differentiation of the cloaca demands, is some argument for their utility. Since it is seen that there is in the adult rectum no real part of the cloaca, it becomes necessary to inquire what becomes of the remains of this embryonic cavity in the adult. The hind gut, as has been seen, early loses its connexion with the cloaca, but the other cloacal orifice—that is, the allantoic openingpersists; and at this stage the allantois, now enlarged, opens. by . its original opening into the cloacal chamber.

This chamber elongates with the growth of the hind gut end, and now represents that passage, the urogenital sinus, which is usually described as being the anterior part of the cloaca, split off from the posterior part by the down growth of the septum. Since, as ‘we have seen, there is no growth of the septum—-but a growth of a cavity (the post-allantoic gut)—it is obvious that the urogenital sinus is the true remnant of the cloaca—the cloaca of the embryo becomes the urethra (fig. 7).

In the generally-accepted account of the development and ‘fate of the urogenital sinus a further septal growth is called in, in the female, to split the single chamber into two chambers — the urethral and vaginal.

The common abnormalities of the vagina receive no explanation from embryology if this septal downgrowth be accepted as the means by which the urethra and vagina are formed. No true conception of the formation of the channels is gained from this theory, and no hint is given of the pathology of many conditions of urethra and vagina that are capable of rational and helpful explanation. N ow there is not the slightest doubt that no septum grows down to separate the vagina from the urethra in the human embryo. The Mullerian ducts open on the concavity of the U-shape bend of the terminal dilatation (cloaca), the opening being situated between the cloacal opening of the hind gut be hind and the cloacal opening of the allantois in front (see fig. 5).

The site of the opening explains their occasional malformation that is presented in such cases as those described by Evanson and Maunsell and others, in which the uterus opens ‘into the rectum. Again, since this is the site of their opening in the embryo, and since in the male they retain this embryonic position, it is not surprising that when the post-allantoic gut fails to develop and the hind gut retains its cloacal—or, as we have now seen, its urethral—opening, this opening should be found in the immediate neighbourhood of the remnants of the Mullerian ducts—that is, in the prostatic urethra (see fig. i).

This embryological site of the opening of the Mullerian ducts is not, however, retained by the female for long, and it is necessary to follow the steps by which the adult female condition is arrived at the cloacal opening of the hind gut is lost, the post-allantoic gut has grown back, and now the cloaca is the urogenital sinus. Into this sinus open, in front, the bladder; behind, the Mullerian ducts; both openings being situated at the upper end of the sinus. The Mullerian ducts now migrate towards the posterior surface of the body, and this migration is the most striking embryological process in the whole of the transformation of the hind end.

It is customary to describe and picture the fetal vagina as an open tube having very much the characters of the vagina of the adult—that is to say, it is a canal separated by a septum in front from another canal. This idea of a wide open vagina, formed by the growth of a discrete septum, is the cause of the failure of embryology to explain the most common abnormalities, and is also the cause of ascribing to infantile fevers and septic conditions of childhood the production of abnormalities, which really admit of simple and clinically useful explanation by a study of the development of the part.

The vagina is for a great part of fetal life a solid rod, and not an open canal at all. The Mullerian opening into the urogenital sinus becomes early lost, and its com fiunication with the exterior is only made again late in fetal life.

The whole subject of the development of the vagina is exceedingly complex, and it would be better to reserve for some future time any discussion as to the precise morphological elements that take part in its strange growth. The developmental process involved is, however, clear: Early in the history of the embryo the Mullerian ducts open into the urogenital sinus at its upper part; late in its history they open at the hind end by the vagina, and for a considerable interval they have no opening at all—the old one being lost and the new one not yet formed. No septal division is employed in this change, but as the hind gut, when its cloacal opening is lost, re-establishes communication with the exterior by a new downgrowth, so the Mullerian ducts, when their cloacal opening becomes obliterated, tunnel a new passage to the hind end.

The active agents in this strange growth are two epithelial masses that have been described by Berry Hart as the Wolffian bulbs, but to give this name to them is to give a definite idea as to their origin, and this seems to be by no means clear.

The active migration of the Mullerian opening is not an unparalleled fact in the animal kingdom, as Dr. Arthur Keith has pointed out to me; for James Hill has shown that in peramele the median vagina is formed at delivery by an active rupture of the Mullerian ducts into the urogenital sinus.

The actual significance of this extraordinary process does not, however, concern us here; but the fact that the vagina is formed as a solid structure, that becomes canalized only late in development, is. of extreme practical importance. Without going further into the development of the vagina, it will be seen that such statements as “congenital atresia in the sense of a vitium primae formationis does not occur. The embryological development of the vagina furnishes no explanation to transverse vaginal septa (Henrotin and Harris), are not correct when the development of the vagina is rightly understood.

The active downgrowth of the vagina will now serve to explain the varied levels at which, in imperforate rectum, the cloacal opening of the hind gut is found, and it will also serve to explain why—as is the usual case—it is a larger opening than is the persistent cloacal opening of the hind gut in the male.

One word may here be said as to the development of the hymen. The vagina is an active downgrowth like the ostallantoic gut, and the amount of tissue that is left soli between the downgrowth and the cavity, towards which it grows, is the hymen; it is not formed by Berry Hart’s “ Wolflian bulbs,” but is the tissue these bulbs do not penetrate. Its varying thicknesses can, therefore, be easily understood (Fig. ??).

It will be seen from this account that the urethra of the adult is the real representative of the cloaca; but some additional points in its development must be noted, inasmuch as they have a clinical interest.

The female urethra is the cloacal remnant in its simplest form, but it does not arrive at its adult condition by any means in the way that it is usually supposed to do, by remaining throughout fetal life as a simple tube. The wonderful growth that brings about the migration of the Mullerian ducts has its effects also on the urethra. The human urethra in the female is, for a time at any rate, obliterated, more or less completely, by the proliferation of the vaginal bulbs.

In serial transverse sections and in longitudinal sections of the urethra and vagina at this sta e a curious condition is seen. The urethra becomes occlu ed, and appears to be regenerated by active epithelium in very much the same way that the vagina is. The vaginal rods give off‘, in addition, lateral buds similar to, though smaller than, the vaginal bulbs; and so in serial sections many islands of epithelial cells are seen stranded in mesoblastic tissue,_and entirely isolated from vagina or urethra. That these active epithelial inclusions may be the starting-point of vaginal and urethral cysts seems not at all unlikely.

The male urethra ‘as far as the bulb is the analogue of the entire female urethra, for it, too, is the cloacal remnant. The penile urethra is formed by closure of the genital folds and by central desquamation of the invading plug of cells, as Dr. Berry Hart has demonstrated, and it is for some time during development also blocked.

A word may be here said with regard to ectopia vesicae. It has been seen that during embryonic and fetal life the urethra in both sexes has a stage in which it is imperforate, and this stage may persist as a malformation. The pathology of ectopia is, it is here maintained, simply the bursting of the bladder and urethra from the internal pressure.

Not one of the various theories put forward to explain the formation of this condition is satisfactory. The theories of Bartels, Perls, Ahlfeld, Roglans, and Reichel may be put on one side, and there remain (1) the theory that it is due to rupture of the cloacal membrane, and (2) the theory that it is due to failure of the two sides of the primitive streak to meet in the middleline. Neither of these two last theories will fit in with the common features of the abnormality. If the cloacal membrane or the primitive streak be the site of the normal, as the canal is of no functional use till later life,


defect, more abnormality than that constantly found should be present. There is often a scrotum. This could not occur if the primitive streak or the cloacal membrane were open. There is always a perineum, often a perfect anus, and usually a normal vagina; none of these should be present should these theories be true, for by the curious backgrowth of the hind end the primitive streak in the adult is represented by the line from a point just below the umbilicus. to a point behind the anus, and all structures on this line should be cleft. The reasons why this condition is here considered to be a burst urinary canal are as follows: Urine is secreted by the fetus in utero, and when the urethra is imperforate (when the normal imperforation persists) all stages of distended bladder have been found.

The stage of distended bladder, of which there are many cases on record, being to ectopia vesicae as hydrocephaly is to anencephaly, or as syringomyelocele is to spina bifida. In this connexion the case of a woman in the London Hospital Maternity Charity may be mentioned, who at three successive labours gave birth to fetuses, of which the first suffered from anencephaly, the second from spina bifida, and the third from ectopia vesicae, the cause here being probably an abnormality of fetal secretion.

Again, when there is absence of kidneys or ureters, or there is an umbilical fistula, fetuses have been found with persistent urethral occlusion, and in well-recorded cases of ectopia vesicae an actual occlusion of the cleft urethra is reported. Signs of the distension stage are seen in cases of ectopia vesicae in the condition of the pelvis, which is exactly that which would be produced by internal force driving the symphysis pubis asunder, and splaying out the entire pelvis. There is no loss of middle-line development, but the two sides of the pelvis have been pushed aside from within, and the recti abdominis forced aside with them.

The view here briefly put forward as to the development of the visceral openings of the human hind end differs in many ways from the view that is generally held; but it is maintained that when the idea that these canals are new downgrowths, and not smaller subdivisions of wide open cavities, is rightly considered, it gives a truer picture of what takes place and a better explanation of the abnormalities that are found in practice.

A stage ofimperforation normally occurs in the developmental history of all the posterior vesical orifices; in all of these orifices the imperforation stage may persist as an abnormality. It is not uncommon for this condition to affect more than one orifice in one of these cases.

When the imperforation persists in the different canals varying results are produced. The persistence of the block in the urethra is the rarest condition, as a fetal use is made of the canal, for it is recognized that the kidneys are active during fetal life. When this block persists various abnormalities are met with — enormously distended bladder, umbilical fistula, epispadias, or ectopia vesicae—results caused by the different internal strains produced, and the different yielding points in the urinary canal; or, again, the kidneys may not develop and there may be no distension, but the block remains.

1n the rectum the terminal block is more common, as the canal is not normally used till at, or shortly after, birth, and when it persists imperforate anus is produced.

In the vagina the persistence of the terminal block is an here its persistence produces the hymen, or its abnormal persistence the imperforate hymen.

These conditions explain one set of clinically well-recognized abnormalities ; the failure of the downgrowing portion to be developed at all explains another set. Atresia vaginae is the consequence of the failure of development of the vaginal downgrowth to occur, or to become canalized as has been described; imperforate rectum is the consequence of the failure of the development of the post-allantoic gut.

It is by no means uncommon to find these abnormalities combined—atresia vaginae, imperforate rectum, and ectopia vaginae—in different combinations; and it is claimed as an argument in favour of the account given of the pathology of ectopia vesicae that it should occur in cases where, far: from the visceral orifices being too widely open, they are abnormally close.

  • Towards the expenses of this investigation a grant has been received from the British Medical Association.

REFERENCE. 1 Ballantyne, Antenatal Pathology,

Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, June 14) Embryology Paper - The nature of the malformations of the rectum and urogenital passages. Retrieved from

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G