|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Lab Attendance Week 2== | | ==Week 2: Lab Attendence== |
|
| |
|
| ===Individual Assessment=== | | ===Individual Assessment=== |
| | {{StudentPage2014}} |
Revision as of 23:16, 12 August 2014
Week 2: Lab Attendence
Individual Assessment
Welcome to the 2014 Embryology Course!
- Links: Timetable | How to work online | One page Wiki Reference Card | Moodle
- Each week the individual assessment questions will be displayed in the practical class pages and also added here.
- Copy the assessment items to your own page and provide your answer.
- Note - Some guest assessments may require completion of a worksheet that will be handed in in class with your student name and ID.
Lab 12 - Stem Cell Presentation Assessment
|
More Info
|
Group
|
Comment
|
Mark (10)
|
1/8
|
- Lots of effort to place article in larger context
- Slide lay out could be improved: lots of empty space, use larger images and talk through them
- Results presentation a bit convoluted. Try to finish discussion of each experiment with a clear conclusion.
- Repetition of information towards the end
- One presenter had an unprofessional style of presentation
|
7
|
2
|
- Good well-structured presentation
- Good introduction
- Methods discussed separately. Try to avoid this, and incorporate in discussion of experiments. Not sure if technology was understood very well.
|
7.5
|
3
|
- Good well-structured presentation
- Do not discuss methods as a separate section
- Discussion of results not always very clear, comprehension?
|
7.5
|
4
|
- Good well-structured presentation
- Lots of text on slides, improve talking through images, blow up images
- Good discussion
|
8.5
|
5
|
- Good well-structured presentation, amount of text on slides relatively good.
- Figures too small, discussion bit convoluted
- Slightly over time
|
8.5
|
6
|
- Good comprehension and well-structured presentation.
- Too much text on slides
- Experiments discussed in a lot of detail. Try to be more concise and discuss aim of experiment, approach, summarize results, conclude.
- No talking through figures
|
8.5
|
7
|
- Good well-structured presentation, great introduction, inclusion of images in presentation done relatively well.
- Methods discussed separately. Incorporate methods in discussion of the experiments in the results section.
- Try not to depend too much on text on your slides
- Talking through results images was not very clear, comprehension?
|
7.5
|