Paper - Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex 4 (1918): Difference between revisions

From Embryology
Line 38: Line 38:
Ten Charts  
Ten Charts  


==I. Introduction==
Embryology
Navigation
Teaching
Movies
Embryonic
Systems
Abnormal
Explore


In my second study in this series (Sugita, '17a), I described
in detail the postnatal growth of the cortex in thickness in the
brain of the albino rat. With the same purpose and by the
same technique, I have examined also the growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, the wild form from which the
albino rat has been derived. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) have
been interested in a comparison of the wild Norway with the
albino rats in respect of their body measurements and the size
of the central nervous system. They have concluded that on
account of domestication the albino rat grows less well than
the wild Norway rat, from which it has been derived, and especially that the relative weight of the brain of the adult albino
rat is about 16 per cent less than that of the Norway rat of like
body weight. It has been assumed as probable that the greater
weight of the brain in the Norway rat is due to an enlargement
of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their
number. The percentage of water appears to be nearly the
same in the central nervous system of both forms during the
period of active growth, but after this period it remains slightly
higher in the Norway rat. From these differences between
the two forms as regards the weight and the water content of
their brains, it is also inferred that there will be some structural


1]
Paper - Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex 4 (1918)
Jump to:navigation, search
ExpandEmbryology - 17 May 2020    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate 
Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 11-.


ExpandOnline Editor 
ExpandHistoric Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages


Contents
1 Comparative Studies on the Growth of the Cerebral Cortex
1.1 IV. On the Thickness of the Cerebral Cortex of the Norway Rat (Mus Norvegicus) and a Comparison of the Same with the Cortical Thickness in the Albino Rat
1.2 I. Introduction
1.2.1 Table 1
1.2.2 Table 2
Comparative Studies on the Growth of the Cerebral Cortex[edit]
IV. On the Thickness of the Cerebral Cortex of the Norway Rat (Mus Norvegicus) and a Comparison of the Same with the Cortical Thickness in the Albino Rat[edit]
Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949)
Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949)
Naoki Sugita


12 NAOKI SUGITA
From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology


differences in the cerebral cortex. Consequently, it became
Ten Charts
desirable for me to compare in these two forms, one wild and
aggressive and -the other gentle and domesticated, the course
of the growth of the cerebral cortex.


Using my previous studies on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) and  
I. Introduction[edit]
on the form of the Norway brain (Sugita, '18) as a point of de-.  
In my second study in this series (Sugita, '17a), I described in detail the postnatal growth of the cortex in thickness in the brain of the albino rat. With the same purpose and by the same technique, I have examined also the growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, the wild form from which the albino rat has been derived. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) have been interested in a comparison of the wild Norway with the albino rats in respect of their body measurements and the size of the central nervous system. They have concluded that on account of domestication the albino rat grows less well than the wild Norway rat, from which it has been derived, and especially that the relative weight of the brain of the adult albino rat is about 16 per cent less than that of the Norway rat of like body weight. It has been assumed as probable that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat is due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number. The percentage of water appears to be nearly the same in the central nervous system of both forms during the period of active growth, but after this period it remains slightly higher in the Norway rat. From these differences between the two forms as regards the weight and the water content of their brains, it is also inferred that there will be some structural
parture, I will present in this paper the data on the cortical thickness of the Norway rat and will compare these with the data
for the Albino. In this comparison of the brains of the two  
forms, the data, other than those on cortical thickness, are all
quoted from Donaldson and Hatai ('11, '15).


II. MATERIAL
1]


The Noxway rats used in this study, were all supplied through
the courtesy of The Wistar Institute and were trapped alive in
Philadelphia and its vicinity, between April and November,
1916. There were 36 males and 18 females, representing every
stage of growth between 17 and 394 grams in body weight.
In the preparation of the material and the arrangement of the
data, the same methods as those described in my former study
on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) were followed. For the discrimination of a Ncfway group from an albino group of the same
tabular number, the Norway records carry the capital letter N
before their group number.


The following tables, tables 1 and 2, give the sex, body and
tail lengths, and body and brain weights of the Norway rats
used in this study, grouped according to their brain weights and
averaged for each group. Table 1 contains the material used
for the sagittal and frontal sections and table 2 that for the
horizontal sections.


Comparing the body measurements of this series with those
12 NAOKI SUGITA
given in table 85 in ''The Rat" (Donaldson, '15), it is found
that the average values for my material by groups correspond
fairly well with the table values.


The increase in the body measurements of the Norway rat
differences in the cerebral cortex. Consequently, it became desirable for me to compare in these two forms, one wild and aggressive and -the other gentle and domesticated, the course of the growth of the cerebral cortex.
according to age is imperfectly known, so that we can not infer the age from the body measurements with any exactness.  


===Table 1===
Using my previous studies on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) and on the form of the Norway brain (Sugita, '18) as a point of de-. parture, I will present in this paper the data on the cortical thickness of the Norway rat and will compare these with the data for the Albino. In this comparison of the brains of the two forms, the data, other than those on cortical thickness, are all quoted from Donaldson and Hatai ('11, '15).


TABLE 1
II. MATERIAL


Showing the sex, body weight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway
The Noxway rats used in this study, were all supplied through the courtesy of The Wistar Institute and were trapped alive in Philadelphia and its vicinity, between April and November, 1916. There were 36 males and 18 females, representing every stage of growth between 17 and 394 grams in body weight. In the preparation of the material and the arrangement of the data, the same methods as those described in my former study on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) were followed. For the discrimination of a Ncfway group from an albino group of the same tabular number, the Norway records carry the capital letter N before their group number.
rats used in this study (sagittal and frontal sections) accompanied by the averages
for each brain weight group  


NO.  
The following tables, tables 1 and 2, give the sex, body and tail lengths, and body and brain weights of the Norway rats used in this study, grouped according to their brain weights and averaged for each group. Table 1 contains the material used for the sagittal and frontal sections and table 2 that for the horizontal sections.


Comparing the body measurements of this series with those given in table 85 in The Rat" (Donaldson, '15), it is found that the average values for my material by groups correspond fairly well with the table values.


LITTER
The increase in the body measurements of the Norway rat according to age is imperfectly known, so that we can not infer the age from the body measurements with any exactness.
NO.  


Table 1[edit]
TABLE 1


SEX
Showing the sex, body weight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway rats used in this study (sagittal and frontal sections) accompanied by the averages for each brain weight group


NO.


BODY WEIGHT


LITTER NO.


BODY LENGTH


SEX


TAIL LENGTH


BODY WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


grams
BODY LENGTH




mm.
TAIL LENGTH




7)1 m.
BRAIN WEIGHT


grams


grams  
 
mm.
 
 
7)1 m.
 
 
grams




NXI b  
NXI b




(1)  
(1)




m  
m




19.8  
19.8




84  
84




41  
41




1.155  
1.155




a  
a




(1)  
(1)




m  
m




20.8  
20.8




86  
86




44  
44




1.160  
1.160




i  
i




(2)  
(2)




m  
m




17.8  
17.8




85  
85




65  
65




1.175  
1.175






19.5  
19.5




85  
85




50  
50




1.164  
1.164




NXII  
NXII




N XIII a  
N XIII a




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




35.3  
35.3




110  
110




66  
66




1.369  
1.369




Line 254: Line 238:




35.3  
35.3




110  
110




86  
86




1.369  
1.369




NXIVb  
NXIVb




(4)  
(4)




m  
m




33.1  
33.1




104  
104




84  
84




1.407  
1.407




g  
g




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




37.5  
37.5




112  
112




88  
88




1.429  
1.429




a  
a




(4)  
(4)




m  
m




33.8  
33.8




113  
113




94  
94




1.431  
1.431




i  
i




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




36.3  
36.3




107  
107




86  
86




1.431  
1.431




e  
e




(5)  
(5)




m  
m




43.6  
43.6




124  
124




108  
108




1.437  
1.437




k  
k




(3)  
(3)




f  
f




36.1  
36.1




112  
112




87  
87




1.445  
1.445




36.7  
36.7




112  
112




91  
91




1.430  
1.430




NXVc  
NXVc








m  
m




42.6  
42.6




122  
122




102  
102




1.517  
1.517




e  
e








m  
m




66.7  
66.7




135  
135




114  
114




1.557  
1.557


54.7  
54.7




129  
129




108  
108




1.537  
1.537




NXVI a  
NXVI a








m  
m




74.8  
74.8




137  
137








1.619  
1.619




g  
g








m  
m




54.8  
54.8




130  
130




107  
107




1.632  
1.632




e  
e








m  
m




56.3  
56.3




128  
128




105  
105




1.636  
1.636




62.0  
62.0




132  
132




106  
106




1 .'629  
1 .'629




N XVII e  
N XVII e








f  
f




81.0  
81.0




152  
152




120  
120




1.710  
1.710




g  
g








m  
m




57.0  
57.0




137  
137




113  
113




1.721  
1.721




a  
a








f  
f




118.5  
118.5




172  
172




136  
136




1.738  
1.738




c  
c








f  
f




104.0  
104.0




164  
164




132  
132




1.788  
1.788




Line 612: Line 596:




90.1  
90.1




156  
156




125  
125




1.739  
1.739




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c








f  
f




136.9  
136.9




157  
157




147  
147




1.825  
1.825




a  
a








m  
m




128.1  
128.1




177  
177




142  
142




1.833  
1.833




132.5  
132.5




167  
167




145  
145




1.829  
1.829




NXIX b  
NXIX b








m  
m




160.7  
160.7




177  
177




158  
158




1.962  
1.962




a  
a








f  
f




251.0  
251.0




210  
210




174  
174




1.981  
1.981




205.9  
205.9




194  
194




166  
166




1.972  
1.972






14  
14








TABLE I — Coitinnol  
TABLE I — Coitinnol






NO.  
NO.




LITTER  
LITTER NO.
NO.  




SEX  
SEX




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BODY LENGTH  
BODY LENGTH




TAIL LENGTH  
TAIL LENGTH




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




NXX c  
NXX c








f  
f




254.0  
254.0




215  
215




180  
180




2.015  
2.015




a  
a




(1)  
(1)




f  
f




253.1  
253.1




213  
213


2.089  
2.089




253.6  
253.6




2H  
2H




180  
180




2.052  
2.052




NXXI g  
NXXI g








m  
m




331.0  
331.0




215  
215




195  
195




2.156  
2.156




d  
d m
m  




231.8  
231.8




215  
215




174  
174




2.187  
2.187


281.4  
281.4




215  
215




185  
185




2.172  
2.172




NXXII  
NXXII






N XXIII a  
N XXIII a








m  
m




394.0  
394.0




256  
256




202  
202




2.345  
2.345




3H.0  
3H.0




256  
256




202  
202




2.345  
2.345




===Table 2===


TABLE 2  
Table 2[edit]
TABLE 2


Showing the sex, body tveight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway  
Showing the sex, body tveight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway rats used in this study (horizontal sections) accompanied by the averages for each brain weight group
rats used in this study (horizontal sections) accompanied by the averages for each  
brain weight group  






NO.  
NO.




LITTER  
LITTER NO.
NO.  




SEX  
SEX




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BODY LENGTH  
BODY LENGTH




T.\IL LENGTH  
T.\IL LENGTH




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT


grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




NXI d  
NXI d




(1)  
(1)




m  
m




20.0  
20.0




85  
85




42  
42




1.133  
1.133




h  
h




(2)  
(2)




m  
m




17.0  
17.0




83  
83




64  
64




1.160  
1.160




c  
c




(1)  
(1)




m  
m




20.7  
20.7




87  
87




41  
41




1.199  
1.199


19.2  
19.2




85  
85




49  
49




1.164  
1.164




NXII  
NXII


N XIII b  
N XIII b




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




35.7  
35.7




lOS  
lOS




87  
87




1.343  
1.343


35.7  
35.7




108  
108




87  
87




1.343  
1.343




N XIV c  
N XIV c




(4)  
(4)




m  
m




31.7  
31.7




103  
103




83  
83




1.407  
1.407




h  
h




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




38.7  
38.7




111  
111




87  
87




1.428  
1.428




J  
J




(3)  
(3)




m  
m




38.4  
38.4




115  
115




88  
88




1.443  
1.443




f  
f




(5)  
(5)




f  
f




43.8  
43.8




126  
126




102  
102




1.475  
1.475




d  
d




(4)  
(4)




m  
m




34.7  
34.7




108  
108




87  
87




1.481  
1.481






37.1  
37.1




113  
113




89  
89




1.447  
1.447




NXV b  
NXV b








m  
m




48.5  
48.5




121  
121




100  
100




1.511  
1.511




d  
d


m  
m




54.1  
54.1




122  
122




101  
101




1.529  
1.529


51.3  
51.3




122  
122




101  
101




/ 520  
/ 520




TABLE 2— Contmued  
TABLE 2— Contmued






NO.  
NO.




LITTER  
LITTER NO.
NO.  




SEX  
SEX




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BODY LENGTH  
BODY LENGTH




TAIL LENGTH  
TAIL LENGTH




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT


grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




NXVIf  
NXVIf








f  
f




56.7  
56.7




129  
129




109  
109




1.613  
1.613




h  
h








f  
f




73.9  
73.9




148  
148




132  
132




1.666  
1.666




d  
d








f  
f




66.7  
66.7




138  
138




112  
112




1.674  
1.674




b  
b








m  
m




98.3  
98.3




156  
156




141  
141




1.699  
1.699




Line 1,344: Line 1,322:




73.9  
73.9




H3  
H3




m  
m




1.663  
1.663




N XVII f  
N XVII f








m  
m




71.8  
71.8




140  
140




112  
112




1.717  
1.717




b  
b








m  
m




95.4  
95.4




155  
155




130  
130




1.718  
1.718




d  
d








m  
m




125.0  
125.0




180  
180




150  
150




1.773  
1.773




h  
h








f  
f




97.7  
97.7




152  
152




139  
139




1.779  
1.779


97.5  
97.5




157  
157




133  
133




1.747  
1.747




N XVIII b  
N XVIII b








f  
f




128.5  
128.5




168  
168




153  
153




1.815  
1.815




d  
d








f  
f




134.0  
134.0




163  
163




148  
148




1.870  
1.870




Line 1,493: Line 1,471:




131.3  
131.3




166  
166




151  
151




1.843  
1.843




NXIXc  
NXIXc








m  
m




167.6  
167.6




175  
175




160  
160




1.953  
1.953


167.6  
167.6




175  
175




160  
160




1.953  
1.953




NXXe  
NXXe








f  
f




321.8  
321.8




230  
230




188  
188




2.008  
2.008




b  
b




(4)  
(4)




f  
f




227.0  
227.0




206  
206




178  
178




2.028  
2.028




Line 1,586: Line 1,564:




218  
218




183  
183




2.018  
2.018




NXXIf  
NXXIf








m  
m




339.4  
339.4




244  
244




190  
190




2.150  
2.150




i  
i








f  
f




282.3  
282.3




216  
216




195  
195




2.162  
2.162




Line 1,641: Line 1,619:




310.9  
310.9




230  
230




193  
193




2.156  
2.156




NXXII  
NXXII




N XXIII a  
N XXIII a








m  
m




394.0  
394.0




256  
256




202  
202




2.345  
2.345






394.0  
394.0




256  
256




202  
202




2.345  
2.345






But, according to the authors cited above, the marked difference  
But, according to the authors cited above, the marked difference between the two forms in body size does not appear during the period of rapid growth, but later, so that at maturity the Norway rat has a body weight 25 to 40 per cent above that of the Albino rat of hke age. For the same age however, the percentages of water in the central nervous system is just a trifle higher in the case of the Norway. Relative to the body weight, the Norway rat at maturity has a heavier brain than the albino rat, the difference being about 16 per cent in favor of the Norway.
between the two forms in body size does not appear during the  
period of rapid growth, but later, so that at maturity the Norway rat has a body weight 25 to 40 per cent above that of the  
Albino rat of hke age. For the same age however, the percentages of water in the central nervous system is just a trifle higher  
in the case of the Norway. Relative to the body weight, the  
Norway rat at maturity has a heavier brain than the albino rat,  
the difference being about 16 per cent in favor of the Norway.  






On the basis of these rough data, the approximate age of the  
On the basis of these rough data, the approximate age of the individuals in tables 1 and 2 can be inferred.
individuals in tables 1 and 2 can be inferred.  


To my regret, I did not obtain material under 17 grams in  
To my regret, I did not obtain material under 17 grams in body weight. I could, therefore, not make a complete study of the postnatal growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat from birth on and must in consequence be content to present in this paper the data beginning with material probably from 10 to 12 days old. It may, however, be noted here, that, among the rats trapped, the following were evidently members of the same litter and still following the mother.
body weight. I could, therefore, not make a complete study of  
the postnatal growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat  
from birth on and must in consequence be content to present in  
this paper the data beginning with material probably from 10 to  
12 days old. It may, however, be noted here, that, among the  
rats trapped, the following were evidently members of the same  
litter and still following the mother.  


(1) NXIa, NXIb, NXIc, N XI d, with their mother  
(1) NXIa, NXIb, NXIc, N XI d, with their mother N XX a, and three other young which were used for another purpose.
N XX a, and three other young which were used for another  
purpose.  


(2) N XI i, N XI h, and four others.  
(2) N XI i, N XI h, and four others.


(3) N XIII a, N XIII b, N XIV g, N XIV h, N XIV i,  
(3) N XIII a, N XIII b, N XIV g, N XIV h, N XIV i, NXIVj,NXIVk.
NXIVj,NXIVk.  


(4) N XIV e, N XIV f, and two others.  
(4) N XIV e, N XIV f, and two others.


(5) NXIVa, NXIVb, NXIV.c, N XIV d and two others,  
(5) NXIVa, NXIVb, NXIV.c, N XIV d and two others, with their mother N XX b.
with their mother N XX b.  


This suggests that the Norway rats whose brain weighs less  
This suggests that the Norway rats whose brain weighs less than 1.5 grams or whose body weighs less than about 40 grams are not yet independent of their mothers.
than 1.5 grams or whose body weighs less than about 40 grams  
are not yet independent of their mothers.  


III. TECHNIQUE  
III. TECHNIQUE


For the technique of fixation and imbedding and the making  
For the technique of fixation and imbedding and the making and staining of the sections, the same procedures which have been already described (Sugita, '17 a) were followed. Thirteen different localities were measured on sections in three planes corresponding to those used in the former study of the Albino cortex (cf. figs. 2, 4 and 6 in the paper cited).
and staining of the sections, the same procedures which have  
been already described (Sugita, '17 a) were followed. Thirteen  
different localities were measured on sections in three planes corresponding to those used in the former study of the Albino cortex (cf. figs. 2, 4 and 6 in the paper cited).  


As to the cortical cell-lamination of the Norway rat, two sets  
As to the cortical cell-lamination of the Norway rat, two sets of figures with explanations were given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a) reproduced from Lewis (^1881) and Fortuyn ('14) and to those I would like to call attention on this occasion. There does not appear to be any important difference between the Norway and the albino rats in the cell-lamination of the cerebral cortex.
of figures with explanations were given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a) reproduced from Lewis (^1881) and Fortuyn ('14) and  
to those I would like to call attention on this occasion. There  
does not appear to be any important difference between the  
Norway and the albino rats in the cell-lamination of the cerebral  
cortex.  






IV. OBSERVED DATA GIVEN IN TABLE AND CHART  
IV. OBSERVED DATA GIVEN IN TABLE AND CHART


As in the case of the albino rat, the measurement of the cortical thickness of the Norway brain was made at the localities  
As in the case of the albino rat, the measurement of the cortical thickness of the Norway brain was made at the localities I-XIII by the direct measurement of the sections as prepared and was then recorded without correction. The results thus obtained are condensed in table 3.
I-XIII by the direct measurement of the sections as prepared  
and was then recorded without correction. The results thus obtained are condensed in table 3.  


Table 3 shows for each brain weight group the average  
Table 3 shows for each brain weight group the average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat as directly observed in each of the three sections and the general average obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections. The average brain weight corresponding to the average thickness of the cortex is obtained by doubling the weight of the brain, from which the sagittal and frontal sections were taken, adding the weight of the brain from which the horizontal sections were taken, and dividing the sum by three.
thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat as directly  
observed in each of the three sections and the general average  
obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the sagittal, frontal and  
horizontal sections. The average brain weight corresponding to  
the average thickness of the cortex is obtained by doubling the  
weight of the brain, from which the sagittal and frontal sections  
were taken, adding the weight of the brain from which the horizontal sections were taken, and dividing the sum by three.  


Chart 1 is based on table 3 and shows the increase in the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat,  
Chart 1 is based on table 3 and shows the increase in the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat,


TABLE 3  
TABLE 3


Showin.g the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to brain xveight groups, also the average thickness in the sagittal, frontal  
Showin.g the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to brain xveight groups, also the average thickness in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections. Observations on slide, without correction
and horizontal sections. Observations on slide, without correction  






BR.«N  
BR.«N




SAGITT.VL SECTION  
SAGITT.VL SECTION




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL SECTION
SECTION  




HORIZONTAL SECTION  
HORIZONTAL SECTION




GENERAL  
GENERAL AVERAGE
AVERAGE  




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Line 1,801: Line 1,739:




GROUP  
GROUP




Number  
Number




Brain  
Brain




Line 1,814: Line 1,752:
Thick
Thick


Number  
Number




Brain  
Brain




Thick
Thick


Brain  
Brain




Line 1,829: Line 1,767:




of cases  
of cases




weight  
weight




ness  
ness




ness  
ness




of cases  
of cases




weight  
weight




ness  
ness




weight  
weight




ness  
ness




Line 1,860: Line 1,798:




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.








grams  
grams




m m .  
m m .




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




NXI  
NXI




3  
3




1.164  
1.164




1.34  
1.34




1.43  
1.43




3  
3




1.164  
1.164




1.44  
1.44




1.164  
1.164




1.40  
1.40




NXII  
NXII




Line 1,924: Line 1,862:




NXIII  
NXIII




1  
1




1.369  
1.369




1.35  
1.35




1.50  
1.50




1  
1




1.343  
1.343




1.50  
1.50




1.360  
1.360




1.45  
1.45




NXIV  
NXIV




6  
6




1.430  
1.430




1.43  
1.43




1.48  
1.48




5  
5




1.447  
1.447




1.54  
1.54




1.436  
1.436




1.48  
1.48




NXV  
NXV




2  
2




1.537  
1.537




1.40  
1.40




1.50  
1.50




2  
2




1.520  
1.520




1.58  
1.58




1.532  
1.532




1.49  
1.49




N XVI  
N XVI




3  
3




1.629  
1.629




1.41  
1.41




1.54  
1.54




4  
4




1.663  
1.663




1.63  
1.63




1.640  
1.640




1.53  
1.53




NXVII  
NXVII




4  
4




1.739  
1.739




1.51  
1.51




1.56  
1.56




4  
4




1.747  
1.747




1.59  
1.59




1.742  
1.742




1.55  
1.55




N XVIII  
N XVIII




2  
2




1.829  
1.829




1.51  
1.51




1.64  
1.64




2  
2




1.843  
1.843




1.63  
1.63




1.834  
1.834




1.59  
1.59




NXIX  
NXIX




2  
2




1.972  
1.972




1,56  
1,56




1.5S  
1.5S




1  
1




1.953  
1.953




1.68  
1.68




1.965  
1.965




1.61  
1.61




NXX  
NXX




2  
2




2.052  
2.052




1.49  
1.49




1.48  
1.48




2  
2




2.018  
2.018




1.58  
1.58




2.041  
2.041




1.52  
1.52




NXXI  
NXXI




2  
2




2.172  
2.172




1.53  
1.53




1.53  
1.53




2  
2




2.156  
2.156




1.75  
1.75




2.166  
2.166




1.60  
1.60




NXXII  
NXXII




N XXIII  
N XXIII




1  
1




2.345  
2.345




1.60  
1.60








1  
1




2.345  
2.345




1.73  
1.73




2.345  
2.345




1.67  
1.67






THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGV, VOL. 29, NO. 1  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGV, VOL. 29, NO. 1






18  
18






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






as directly observed, and without correction and also the average  
as directly observed, and without correction and also the average values for the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, according to the increase of the brain weight.
values for the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, according  
to the increase of the brain weight.  


V. CORRECTED DATA PRESENTED IN TABLES AND CHARTS  
V. CORRECTED DATA PRESENTED IN TABLES AND CHARTS


Using the detailed observed values which were all carefully  
Using the detailed observed values which were all carefully tabulated, although they have not been published, a series of
tabulated, although they have not been published, a series of  








iO 11 12 J3 14 15 16 IT 18 19 ^0 2t 22 23 J-'  
iO 11 12 J3 14 15 16 IT 18 19 ^0 2t 22 23 J-'






Chart 1 Giving the average thickness of the cortex on slide (not corrected)'  
Chart 1 Giving the average thickness of the cortex on slide (not corrected)' in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections and the general average thickness
in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections and the general average thickness  


on brain weight group in the Norway rat. Based on table 3. S Average  
on brain weight group in the Norway rat. Based on table 3. S Average


thickness of the cortex in sagittal section. Measured on slide. F Average  
thickness of the cortex in sagittal section. Measured on slide. F Average


thickness of the cortex in frontal section. Measured on slide. H Average  
thickness of the cortex in frontal section. Measured on slide. H Average


thickness of the cortex in horizontal section. Measured on slide. • "A General average thickness of the cortex of three kinds of sections. Measured on slide.  
thickness of the cortex in horizontal section. Measured on slide. • "A General average thickness of the cortex of three kinds of sections. Measured on slide.






correction-coefficients, obtained in exactly the same manner as  
correction-coefficients, obtained in exactly the same manner as for the albino rat, were found and applied to the observations on the Norway cortex. The corrected values are those entered in tables 4, 5 and 6. The tables also contain in each case the measurements from which the correction-coefficient was obtained and for each brain weight group the average value of the correction-coefficient for that group.
for the albino rat, were found and applied to the observations  
on the Norway cortex. The corrected values are those entered  
in tables 4, 5 and 6. The tables also contain in each case the  
measurements from which the correction-coefficient was obtained  
and for each brain weight group the average value of the correction-coefficient for that group.  


Table 7 shows the corrected values for the average thickness of  
Table 7 shows the corrected values for the average thickness of the cortex, obtained in the same way as were the uncorrected
the cortex, obtained in the same way as were the uncorrected  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






19  
19






TABLE 4  
TABLE 4 Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the sagittal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given loilh the average for each group
Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the sagittal section for each  
individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients  
are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given loilh the average  
for each group  




Line 2,304: Line 2,228:




THICKNESS OF  
THICKNESS OF




THE CORTEX  
THE CORTEX




Line 2,314: Line 2,238:




BRAIN  
BRAIN




COEFFICIENT  
COEFFICIENT








(SAGITTAL  
(SAGITTAL




section)  
section)




Line 2,332: Line 2,256:




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




Line 2,351: Line 2,275:




GROUP  
GROUP




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Diam.  
Diam.


L. F  
L. F


on fresh  
on fresh


brain  
brain




Diam.  
Diam.


L. F  
L. F


on slide  
on slide




Loc. I  
Loc. I




Loc. II  
Loc. II




Log. Ill  
Log. Ill




Loc. IV  
Loc. IV




Loc. V  
Loc. V




Avera«e  
Avera«e








grams  
grams




myn.  
myn.




m TO .  
m TO .




m m .  
m m .




TO TO.  
TO TO.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




NXIb  
NXIb




1.155  
1.155




11.75  
11.75




10.40  
10.40




2.18  
2.18




1.73  
1.73




1.44  
1.44




1.21  
1.21




1.05  
1.05




1.52  
1.52




a  
a




1.160  
1.160




12.10  
12.10




10.15  
10.15




2.40  
2.40




1.83  
1.83




1.63  
1.63




1.32  
1.32




1.07  
1.07




1.65  
1.65




i  
i




1.175  
1.175




12.55  
12.55




9.80  
9.80




2.61  
2.61




1.83  
1.83




1.61  
1.61




1.26  
1.26




1.04  
1.04




1.67  
1.67








i.m  
i.m




1.  
1.




20  
20




2.40  
2.40




1.80  
1.80




1.56  
1.56




1.26  
1.26




1.05  
1.05




1.61  
1.61




NXII  
NXII




Line 2,560: Line 2,484:




N XIII a  
N XIII a




1.369  
1.369




12.95  
12.95




10.10  
10.10




2.47.  
2.47.




1.87  
1.87




1.72  
1.72




1.33  
1.33




1.27  
1.27




1.73  
1.73








1.369  
1.369




1.  
1.




28  
28




2.47  
2.47




1.87  
1.87




1.72  
1.72




1.33  
1.33




1.27  
1.27




1.73  
1.73




NXIVb  
NXIVb




1.407  
1.407




13.45  
13.45




10.50  
10.50




2.76  
2.76




2.04  
2.04




1.73  
1.73




1.59  
1.59




1.36  
1.36




1.90  
1.90




g  
g




1.429  
1.429




13.05  
13.05




10.10  
10.10




2.56  
2.56




1.82  
1.82




1.72  
1.72




1.40  
1.40




1.32  
1.32




1.76  
1.76




a  
a




1.431  
1.431




13.15  
13.15




10.40  
10.40




2.64  
2.64




2.01  
2.01




1.82  
1.82




1.56  
1.56




1.34  
1.34




1.87  
1.87




i  
i




1.431  
1.431




13.05  
13.05




10.25  
10.25




2.56  
2.56




1.90  
1.90




1.71  
1.71




1.48  
1.48




1.31  
1.31




1.79  
1.79




e  
e




1.437  
1.437




12.80  
12.80




10.05  
10.05




2.47  
2.47




1.87  
1.87




1.73  
1.73




1.40  
1.40




1.24  
1.24




1.74  
1.74




k  
k




1.445  
1.445




13.35  
13.35




10.30  
10.30




2.83  
2.83




2.03  
2.03




1.78  
1.78




1.64  
1.64




1.38  
1.38




1.93  
1.93








14^0  
14^0




1.  
1.




28  
28




2.64  
2.64




1.95  
1.95




1.75  
1.75




1.51  
1.51




1.33  
1.33




1.84  
1.84




NXVc  
NXVc




1.517  
1.517




12.70  
12.70




10.10  
10.10




2.56  
2.56




1.92  
1.92




1.72  
1.72




1.38  
1.38




1.20  
1.20




1.76  
1.76




e  
e




1.557  
1.557




13.75  
13.75




10.25  
10.25




2.83  
2.83




1.93  
1.93




1.72  
1.72




1.49  
1.49




1.44  
1.44




1.88  
1.88








1.537  
1.537




1.  
1.




30  
30




2.70  
2.70




1.93  
1.93




1.72  
1.72




1.44  
1.44




1.32  
1.32




1.82  
1.82




NXVIa  
NXVIa




1.619  
1.619




13.50  
13.50




10.25  
10.25




2.68  
2.68




2.04  
2.04




1.77  
1.77




1.46  
1.46




1.34  
1.34




1.86  
1.86




g  
g




1.632  
1.632




13.45  
13.45




10.00  
10.00




2.86  
2.86




2.17  
2.17




1.84  
1.84




1.53  
1.53




1.21  
1.21




1.92  
1.92




e  
e




1.636  
1.636




13.55  
13.55




10.10  
10.10




2.73  
2.73




1.98  
1.98




1.77  
1.77




1.49  
1.49




1.31  
1.31




1.86  
1.86








1.629  
1.629




1.  
1.




33  
33




2.76  
2.76




2.06  
2.06




1.79  
1.79




1.49  
1.49




1.29  
1.29




1.88  
1.88




N XVII e  
N XVII e




1.710  
1.710




13.70  
13.70




10.50  
10.50




2.84  
2.84




2.09  
2.09




1.95  
1.95




1.55  
1.55




1.42  
1.42




1.97  
1.97




g  
g




1.721  
1.721




13.40  
13.40




10.35  
10.35




2.78  
2.78




2.13  
2.13




1.98  
1.98




1.63  
1.63




1.38  
1.38




1.98  
1.98




a  
a




1.738  
1.738




13.60  
13.60




10.70  
10.70




2.72  
2.72




2.00  
2.00




1.76  
1.76




1.40  
1.40




1.21  
1.21




1.82  
1.82




c  
c




1.788  
1.788




14.20  
14.20




11.20  
11.20




2.93  
2.93




2.15  
2.15




1.92  
1.92




1.65  
1.65




1.33  
1.33




2.00  
2.00








1.739  
1.739




1.  
1.




29  
29




2.82  
2.82




2.09  
2.09




1.90  
1.90




1.56  
1.56




1.34  
1.34




1.94  
1.94




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c




1.825  
1.825




14.30  
14.30




10.85  
10.85




2.91  
2.91




2.07  
2.07




1.88  
1.88




1.49  
1.49




1.28  
1.28




1.93  
1.93




a  
a




1.833  
1.833




14.20  
14.20




11.50  
11.50




2.89  
2.89




2.06  
2.06




1.69  
1.69




1.51  
1.51




1.48  
1.48




1.93  
1.93








1.829  
1.829




1.27  
1.27




2.90,  
2.90,




2.07  
2.07




1.79  
1.79




1.50  
1.50




1.38  
1.38




1.93  
1.93






20  
20






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 4— Continued  
TABLE 4— Continued




Line 3,288: Line 3,212:




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




thickness op the cortex  
thickness op the cortex (sagittal section)
(sagittal section)  




GROUP  
GROUP




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Diam.  
Diam.


L.F  
L.F


on fresh  
on fresh


brain  
brain




Diam.  
Diam.


L.F  
L.F


on slide  
on slide




Loc. I  
Loc. I




Loc. II  
Loc. II




JLoc. Ill  
JLoc. Ill




Loc. IV  
Loc. IV




Loc. V  
Loc. V




Average  
Average








grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




v\ m .  
v\ m .




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




vim.  
vim.




mrn.  
mrn.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




N XIX b  
N XIX b




1.962  
1.962




14.70  
14.70




11.50  
11.50




2.98  
2.98




2.12  
2.12




1.97  
1.97




1.54  
1.54




1.46  
1.46




2.01  
2.01




a  
a




1.981  
1.981




14.40  
14.40




11.50  
11.50




2.83  
2.83




2.08  
2.08




1.75  
1.75




1.54  
1.54




1.44  
1.44




1.93  
1.93








1.972  
1.972




1.  
1.




26  
26




2.91  
2.91




2.10  
2.10




1.86  
1.86




1.54  
1.54




i.45  
i.45




1.97  
1.97




NXXc  
NXXc




2.015  
2.015




14.55  
14.55




11.50  
11.50




2.86  
2.86




2.00  
2.00




1.81  
1.81




1.55  
1.55




1.43  
1.43




1.93  
1.93




a  
a




2.089  
2.089




14.95  
14.95




12.00  
12.00




2.75  
2.75




1.93  
1.93




1.67  
1.67




1.34  
1.34




1.30  
1.30




1.80  
1.80








2.052  
2.052




1.  
1.




25  
25




2.81  
2.81




1.97  
1.97




i.74  
i.74




1.45  
1.45




i.ST'  
i.ST'




1.87  
1.87




NXXIg  
NXXIg




2.156  
2.156




15.15  
15.15




11.90  
11.90




3.01  
3.01




2.15  
2.15




1.82  
1.82




1.58  
1.58




1.40  
1.40




1.99  
1.99




d  
d




2.187  
2.187




15.30  
15.30




11.50  
11.50




2.94  
2.94




2.09  
2.09




1.85  
1.85




1.60  
1.60




1.41  
1.41




1.98  
1.98








2.172  
2.172




1.  
1.




30  
30




2.98  
2.98




^..?^  
^..?^




1.84  
1.84




1.59  
1.59




/.4i  
/.4i




^.SS  
^.SS




NXXII  
NXXII




Line 3,652: Line 3,575:




N XXIII a  
N XXIII a




2.345  
2.345




14.50  
14.50




12.50  
12.50




2.74  
2.74




2.07  
2.07




1.75  
1.75




1.38  
1.38




1.33  
1.33




1.86  
1.86








2.345  
2.345




1.16  
1.16




2.74  
2.74




2.07  
2.07




1.75  
1.75




1.38  
1.38




1.33  
1.33




.1.86  
.1.86






values shown in table 3. This table (table 7) serves as a standard for discussing the actual thickness of the fresh cortex of the  
values shown in table 3. This table (table 7) serves as a standard for discussing the actual thickness of the fresh cortex of the Norway rat. The average thickness in the adult Norway rat is 2.06 mm., as obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the cortex in Groups N XV-N XXIII, in which stages the cortex may be considered to have reached its full thickness.
Norway rat. The average thickness in the adult Norway rat is  
2.06 mm., as obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the cortex  
in Groups N XV-N XXIII, in which stages the cortex may be  
considered to have reached its full thickness.  


Charts 2 to 7 show graphically the data given in tables 4 to 6  
Charts 2 to 7 show graphically the data given in tables 4 to 6 respectively, and chart 8, which is based on table 7 giving the average values, presents a general picture of the growth changes in the cortex according to brain weight.
respectively, and chart 8, which is based on table 7 giving the  
average values, presents a general picture of the growth changes  
in the cortex according to brain weight.  


Charts 2, 4 and 6 show the individual determinations for the  
Charts 2, 4 and 6 show the individual determinations for the thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, respectively, plotted according to the brain weight. Chart 2 gives the individual records for locality I and locality V with the average for all localities from I to V in the sagittal sections. In a like manner, chart 4 gives the values for localities VIT and VIII with the average of localities VI to VIII for the
thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, respectively, plotted according to the brain weight.  
Chart 2 gives the individual records for locality I and locality V  
with the average for all localities from I to V in the sagittal  
sections. In a like manner, chart 4 gives the values for localities  
VIT and VIII with the average of localities VI to VIII for the  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






21  
21






TABLE 5  
TABLE 5






Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the frontal section for each  
Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the frontal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given with the average for each group
individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given with the  
average for each group  




Line 3,751: Line 3,660:




COEFFICIENT  
COEFFICIENT




thickness of the cortex  
thickness of the cortex (frontal section)
(frontal section)  








BRAIN ■^EIGHT  
BRAIN ■^EIGHT




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 3,777: Line 3,684:




GROUP  
GROUP




Diam. W. D  
Diam. W. D


on  
on fresh brain
fresh brain  




Diam. W. D  
Diam. W. D on slide
on slide  




Loc. VI  
Loc. VI




Log. VII  
Log. VII




Loc. VIII  
Loc. VIII




Average  
Average








grams  
grams




7nm.  
7nm.




Tnm.  
Tnm.




m7n.  
m7n.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




NXIb  
NXIb




1.155  
1.155




13.00  
13.00




9.90  
9.90




2.05  
2.05




2.11  
2.11




1.68  
1.68




1.95  
1.95




a  
a




1.160  
1.160




12.70  
12.70




10.00  
10.00




1.94  
1.94




1.92  
1.92




1.62  
1.62




1.83  
1.83




i  
i




1.175  
1.175




12.50  
12.50




9.20  
9.20




1.96  
1.96




1.99  
1.99




1.62  
1.62




1.86  
1.86








1.164  
1.164




1.  
1.




31  
31




1.98  
1.98




2.01  
2.01




1.64  
1.64




1.88  
1.88




NXII  
NXII




Line 3,937: Line 3,842:




N XIII a  
N XIII a




1.369  
1.369




13.00  
13.00




10.00  
10.00




2.07  
2.07




2.21  
2.21




1.59  
1.59




1.96  
1.96








1.369  
1.369




1.  
1.




30  
30




2.07  
2.07




2.21  
2.21




1.59  
1.59




1.96  
1.96




NXIVb  
NXIVb




1.407  
1.407




13.05  
13.05




9.90  
9.90




2.27  
2.27




2.13  
2.13




1.71  
1.71




2.04  
2.04




g  
g




1.429  
1.429




13.20  
13.20




9.50  
9.50




2.18  
2.18




2.29  
2.29




1.71  
1.71




2.06  
2.06




a  
a




1.431  
1.431




12.85  
12.85




10.70  
10.70




2.04  
2.04




2.00  
2.00




1.73  
1.73




1.92  
1.92




i  
i




1.431  
1.431




13.40  
13.40




10.30  
10.30




1.90  
1.90




2.06  
2.06




1.57  
1.57




1.84  
1.84




e  
e




1.437  
1.437




13.25  
13.25




9.80  
9.80




1.89  
1.89




2.13  
2.13




1.56  
1.56




1.86  
1.86




k  
k




1.445  
1.445




13.30  
13.30




9.90  
9.90




2.12  
2.12




2.15  
2.15




1.65  
1.65




1.97  
1.97








1.430  
1.430




1.32  
1.32




2.07  
2.07




2.13  
2.13




1.66  
1.66




1.9S  
1.9S




NXVc  
NXVc




1.517  
1.517




13.20  
13.20




10.00  
10.00




1.98  
1.98




2.21  
2.21




1.62  
1.62




1.94  
1.94




e  
e




1.557  
1.557




13.50  
13.50




9.60  
9.60




2.28  
2.28




2.39  
2.39




1.76  
1.76




2.14  
2.14








1.537  
1.537




/.  
/.




36  
36




2.13  
2.13




2.30  
2.30




1.69  
1.69




2.04  
2.04




NXVIa  
NXVIa




1.619  
1.619




13.80  
13.80




10.80  
10.80




2.01  
2.01




2.13  
2.13




1.72  
1.72




1.95  
1.95




g  
g




1.632  
1.632




13.70  
13.70




9.90  
9.90




2.24  
2.24




2.57  
2.57




1.83  
1.83




2.21  
2.21




e  
e




1.636  
1.636




13.80  
13.80




10.00  
10.00




2.14  
2.14




2.36  
2.36




1.75  
1.75




2.08  
2.08








1.629  
1.629




1.  
1.




35  
35




2.13  
2.13




2.35  
2.35




1.77  
1.77




2.08  
2.08




N XVII e  
N XVII e




1.710  
1.710




13.80  
13.80




10.00  
10.00




2.15  
2.15




2.31  
2.31




1.68  
1.68




2.05  
2.05




g  
g




1.721  
1.721




13.60  
13.60




10.40  
10.40




2.20  
2.20




2.35  
2.35




1.75  
1.75




2.10  
2.10




a  
a




1.738  
1.738




14.10  
14.10




10.60  
10.60




2.01  
2.01




2.17  
2.17




1.66  
1.66




1.95  
1.95




c  
c




1.788  
1.788




13.95  
13.95




10.60  
10.60




2.35  
2.35




2.40  
2.40




1.82  
1.82




2.19  
2.19








1.739  
1.739




1.  
1.




33  
33




2.18  
2.18




2.31  
2.31




1.73  
1.73




2.07  
2.07




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c




1.825  
1.825




14.45  
14.45




10.70  
10.70




2.20  
2.20




2.35  
2.35




1.73  
1.73




2.09  
2.09




a  
a




1.833  
1.833




13.95  
13.95




11.70  
11.70




2.18  
2.18




2.22  
2.22




1.80  
1.80




2.07  
2.07








1.829  
1.829




1.27  
1.27




2.19  
2.19




2.29  
2.29




1.77  
1.77




2.08  
2.08






22  
22






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 5— Concluded  
TABLE 5— Concluded






BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




GROUP  
GROUP








grams  
grams




NXIXb  
NXIXb




1.962  
1.962




a  
a




1.981  
1.981








1.972  
1.972




NXXc  
NXXc




2.015  
2.015




a  
a




2.089  
2.089








2.052  
2.052




NXXIg  
NXXIg




2.156  
2.156




d  
d




2.187  
2.187








2.172  
2.172




NXXII  
NXXII








N XXIII  
N XXIII




Line 4,591: Line 4,495:




COEFFICIENT  
COEFFICIENT






Diam.W'.D  
Diam.W'.D


on  
on fresh brain
fresh brain  






14.60  
14.60 13.95
13.95  






T>is.m.W. D  
T>is.m.W. D on slide
on slide  






11.60  
11.60 10.80
10.80  






1.26  
1.26






14.30  
14.30 14.50
14.50  






10.50  
10.50 11.20
11.20  






1.33  
1.33






14.75  
14.75 15.05
15.05  






11.10  
11.10 10.80
10.80  






1.36  
1.36






thickness of the cortex  
thickness of the cortex (frontal section)
(frontal section)  






Loc. VI Loc. VII  
Loc. VI Loc. VII






2.08  
2.08


2.04  
2.04 2.06
2.06  


2.14  
2.14 1.80 1.97
1.80  
1.97  


2.03  
2.03 2.19 2.11
2.19  
2.11  






2.28  
2.28 2.21 2.25
2.21  
2.25  


2.32  
2.32


2.08  
2.08 2.20
2.20  


2.24  
2.24 2.54
2.54  


2.39  
2.39






Loc. VIII  
Loc. VIII






1.68  
1.68 1.72 1.70
1.72  
1.70  


1.73  
1.73 1.66 1.70
1.66  
1.70  


1.69  
1.69 1.77 1.73
1.77  
1.73  






Average  
Average






2.01  
2.01 1.99 2.00
1.99  
2.00  


2.06  
2.06 1.85 1.96
1.85  
1.96  


1.99  
1.99 2.17
2.17  


2.08  
2.08






frontal sections. Chart 6 does the same for locahties IX and XIII  
frontal sections. Chart 6 does the same for locahties IX and XIII with the average of localities IX to XIII in the horizontal sections. Charts 3, 5 and 7 show the average values of the cortical thickness in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, for each brain weight group. Further, on each chart is shown the change in thickness at each one of the localities measured in that section.
with the average of localities IX to XIII in the horizontal sections. Charts 3, 5 and 7 show the average values of the cortical  
thickness in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, for each  
brain weight group. Further, on each chart is shown the change  
in thickness at each one of the localities measured in that  
section.  


Chart 8 is based on table 7 and shows the general average (corrected) thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to the brain weight and also the average thickness in each of  
Chart 8 is based on table 7 and shows the general average (corrected) thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to the brain weight and also the average thickness in each of the sections.
the sections.  


VI. DISCUSSION  
VI. DISCUSSION


The relations existing between each of the several localities  
The relations existing between each of the several localities measured in this study of the Norway are quite similar to the relations found in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. Individual variations appear, but these are no higher than ±6 per cent, compared with the average values of the group. No sex differ
measured in this study of the Norway are quite similar to the  
relations found in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. Individual  
variations appear, but these are no higher than ±6 per cent,  
compared with the average values of the group. No sex differ




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






23  
23






TABLE 6  
TABLE 6






Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the horizontal section for  
Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the horizontal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correctioncoefficients are indicated separately for each brain and. the coefficient is given with the average for each group
each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correctioncoefficients are indicated separately for each brain and. the coefficient is given with  
the average for each group  






BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  






NXI d  
NXI d


h  
h c
c  






NXII  
NXII






N XIII b  
N XIII b






X XIV c  
X XIV c


h  
h


J  
J f d
f  
d  






NXVb  
NXVb d
d  






NXVIf  
NXVIf


h  
h d b
d  
b  






NXVII f  
NXVII f b d h
b  
d  
h  






N XVIII b  
N XVIII b d
d  






BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  






1.133  
1.133 1.160 1.199 1.164
1.160  
1.199  
1.164  






1.343  
1.343


1.S4S  
1.S4S


1.407  
1.407 1.428 1.443
1.428  
1.443  


1.475  
1.475 1.4S1 1.447
1.4S1  
1.447  


1.511  
1.511 1.529 1.520
1.529  
1.520  


1.613  
1.613 1.666 1.674 1.699 1.663
1.666  
1.674  
1.699  
1.663  


I. in  
I. in


1.718  
1.718 1.773 1.779 i.747
1.773  
1.779  
i.747  


1.815  
1.815 1.870 1.843
1.870  
1.843  






COEFFICIEXT  
COEFFICIEXT






Diam.  
Diam. W. B on
W. B on  


fresh  
fresh brain
brain  






13.80  
13.80 13.80 13.90
13.80  
13.90  






Diam.  
Diam.


W.B  
W.B


on slide  
on slide






11.00  
11.00 10.10 10.80
10.10  
10.80  






30  
30






14.20 10.30  
14.20 10.30 1
1  






14.20  
14.20 14.35 14.35 14.55 14.60 1.
14.35  
14.35  
14.55  
14.60  
1.  


14.65  
14.65 14.50
14.50  


1 .  
1 .






10.60  
10.60 10.70 10.50 10.90 10.25
10.70  
10.50  
10.90  
10.25  






10.10  
10.10 10.50
10.50  






41  
41






14  
14




90  
90




15.00 j  
15.00 j




15  
15




15  
15




14  
14




75  
75






11.00  
11.00 10.95 11.30 11.05
10.95  
11.30  
11.05  






1.35  
1.35






15.45  
15.45 14.60 15.10 15.40
14.60  
15.10  
15.40  


1.  
1.


15.00  
15.00 15.40
15.40  


1.  
1.






11.45  
11.45 11.30 10.75 11.35
11.30  
10.75  
11.35  






35  
35






11.00  
11.00 10.85
10.85  






Loc.  
Loc. IX
IX  






2.52  
2.52 2.85 2,52 2.63
2.85  
2,52  
2.63  






2.91  
2.91 2.91
2.91  


2.57  
2.57 3.19 2.96 2.92 2.91 2.91
3.19  
2.96  
2.92  
2.91  
2.91  


3.19  
3.19 3.11
3.11  


3.15  
3.15


3.25  
3.25 2.95 2.93 3.33
2.95  
2.93  
3.33  


3.12  
3.12


2.89  
2.89 2.73
2.73  


2.77  
2.77 3.27 2.92
3.27  
2.92  


3.06  
3.06 3.60
3.60  


3.33  
3.33






THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX  
THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX (HORIZON r.\L SEr;TION)
(HORIZON r.\L SEr;TION)  






Loc.  
Loc. X
X  






1.91  
1.91 1.99 1.84 1.91
1.99  
1.84  
1.91  






2.02  
2.02


2.02  
2.02


2.06  
2.06 2.14 2.22
2.14  
2.22  


2.08  
2.08 2.22 2.14
2.22  
2.14  


2.32  
2.32 2.21
2.21  


2.27  
2.27


2.34  
2.34 2.23 2.14 2.36
2.23  
2.14  
2.36  


2.27  
2.27


2.18  
2.18 2.17 2.23 2.31
2.17  
2.23  
2.31  


2.22  
2.22


2.21  
2.21


2.38  
2.38 2.30
2.30  






XI  
XI






1.72  
1.72 1.92 1.75 1.80
1.92  
1.75  
1.80  






2.03  
2.03


2.03  
2.03


1.93  
1.93


2.08  
2.08 2.24 2.03
2.24  
2.03  


1.88  
1.88 2.03
2.03  


2.15  
2.15 2.12
2.12  


2.14  
2.14


2.10  
2.10 2.22 2.12 1.92
2.22  
2.12  
1.92  


2.09  
2.09


2.16  
2.16 2.04 2.13 2.18
2.04  
2.13  
2.18  


2.13  
2.13


2.08  
2.08 2.14
2.14  


2.11  
2.11






Loc.  
Loc. XII
XII  






1.56  
1.56 1.69 1.62 1.62
1.69  
1.62  
1.62  






1.85  
1.85 1.85
1.85  


1.72  
1.72 1.82 1.95 1.81 1.74 1.81
1.82  
1.95  
1.81  
1.74  
1.81  


1.97  
1.97 1.91
1.91  


1.94  
1.94


1.96  
1.96 1.94 1.85 1.76 1.88
1.94  
1.85  
1.76  
1.88  


1.93  
1.93 1.80 1.84 2.02 1.90
1.80  
1.84  
2.02  
1.90  






Loc.  
Loc. XI IJ
XI IJ  






1.31  
1.31 1.50 1.33
1.50  
1.33  


1.38  
1.38






1.57  
1.57


1.57  
1.57


1.48  
1.48 1.57 1.69 1.55 1.56 1.57
1.57  
1.69  
1.55  
1.56  
1.57  


1.78  
1.78 1.62 1.70
1.62  
1.70  


1.66  
1.66 1.76 1.52 1.48 1.61
1.76  
1.52  
1.48  
1.61  


1.62  
1.62 1.41 1.51 1.72
1.41  
1.51  
1.72  


1.57  
1.57






1.84 1.57  
1.84 1.57 1.96 1.76 1.90 1.67
1.96 1.76  
1.90 1.67  






.A verage  
.A verage






1.80  
1.80 1.99 1.81 1.87
1.99  
1.81  
1.87  






2.08  
2.08 2.08
2.08  


1.95  
1.95 2.16 2.21 2.08 2.06 2.09
2.16  
2.21  
2.08  
2.06  
2.09  


2.28  
2.28 2.19
2.19  






2.26  
2.26 2.22 2.12 2.17 2.19
2.22  
2.12  
2.17  
2.19  


2.16  
2.16 2.03 2.10 2.30
2.03  
2.10  
2.30  


2.15  
2.15


2.15  
2.15 2 37
2 37  






24  
24






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA




Line 5,301: Line 5,000:




TABLE 6— Concluded  
TABLE 6— Concluded




Line 5,314: Line 5,013:




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




COEFFICIEXT  
COEFFICIEXT




THICKXESS OF THE CORTEX  
THICKXESS OF THE CORTEX (HORIi,OXT.U. section)
(HORIi,OXT.U. section)  




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  




Diam.  
Diam. W. B on
W. B on  


fresh  
fresh brain
brain  




Diam.  
Diam. W. B
W. B  


on slide  
on slide




Loc.  
Loc. IX
IX  




Loc.  
Loc. X
X  




Loc.  
Loc. XI
XI  




Lof.  
Lof. XII
XII  




Loc.  
Loc. XIII
XIII  




Average  
Average








grams  
grams




m m .  
m m .




m m .  
m m .




m VI .  
m VI .




711 m.  
711 m.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm..  
mm..




mm.  
mm.




NXIX c  
NXIX c




1.953  
1.953




15.65  
15.65




11.70  
11.70




3.14  
3.14




2.17  
2.17




2.14  
2.14




2.01  
2.01




1.81  
1.81




2.25  
2.25








1.95S  
1.95S




1.34  
1.34




3.U  
3.U




2.17  
2.17




2.14  
2.14




2.01  
2.01




1.81  
1.81




^.^5  
^.^5




NXXe  
NXXe




2.008  
2.008




15.55  
15.55




11.90  
11.90




3.10  
3.10




2.28  
2.28




2.09  
2.09




1.87  
1.87




1.52  
1.52




2.17  
2.17




b  
b




2.028  
2.028




15.85  
15.85




12.00  
12.00




2.78  
2.78




2.05  
2.05




1.97  
1.97




1.71  
1.71




1.43  
1.43




1.99  
1.99








2.018  
2.018




1.31  
1.31


1  
1




2.H  
2.H




2.17  
2.17




2.03  
2.03




1.79  
1.79




i.4S  
i.4S




2.08  
2.08




NXXIf  
NXXIf




2.150  
2.150




16.55  
16.55




12.10  
12.10




3.30  
3.30




2.66  
2.66




2.22  
2.22




1.94  
1.94




1.57  
1.57




2.34  
2.34




J  
J




2.162  
2.162




16.25  
16.25




12.40  
12.40




3.60  
3.60




2.38  
2.38




2.16  
2.16




1.98  
1.98




1.57  
1.57




2.34  
2.34








2.156  
2.156




1.34  
1.34


1  
1




3.45  
3.45




2.52  
2.52




2.19  
2.19




1.96  
1.96




1.57  
1.57




^.54  
^.54




NXXII  
NXXII




Line 5,647: Line 5,335:




N XXIII a  
N XXIII a




2.345  
2.345




16.55  
16.55




12.90  
12.90




3.14  
3.14




2.58  
2.58




2.17  
2.17




1.69  
1.69




1.54  
1.54




2.22  
2.22








2.3j^5  
2.3j^5




1.28  
1.28




3.14  
3.14




2.58  
2.58




2.17  
2.17




1.69  
1.69




i.54  
i.54




2.22  
2.22






ence in cortical thickness is recognizable when the brain weights  
ence in cortical thickness is recognizable when the brain weights are similar.
are similar.  


In the sagittal sections, the cortex attains nearly its full thickness when the brain weighs 1.63 grams (Group N XVI), while in  
In the sagittal sections, the cortex attains nearly its full thickness when the brain weighs 1.63 grams (Group N XVI), while in the frontal and horizontal sections, this is attained somewhat earlier, that is, in the brains weighing 1.53 grams (Group N XV) (cf. charts 3, 5, 7, 8). In the general average thickness of the cortex of the Norway rat, the full thickness is attained in the brains w^eighing about 1.53 grams, at which phase the body weight observed is about 55 grams (tables 1 and 2) (chart 8). In the full grown Norway rat at brain weights between 1.6 and 2.4 grams, the average cortical thickness ranges between 1.97 and 2.14 mm., with a mean value for Groups N XVI-N XXIII (table 7) of 2.06 mm. The average thickness for each locality is given in table 8 for the Norway rat, together with the corresponding values for the Albino, thus making it possible to compare the cortical thickness in the two forms.
the frontal and horizontal sections, this is attained somewhat  
earlier, that is, in the brains weighing 1.53 grams (Group N XV)  
(cf. charts 3, 5, 7, 8). In the general average thickness of the  
cortex of the Norway rat, the full thickness is attained in the  
brains w^eighing about 1.53 grams, at which phase the body weight  
observed is about 55 grams (tables 1 and 2) (chart 8). In the  
full grown Norway rat at brain weights between 1.6 and 2.4  
grams, the average cortical thickness ranges between 1.97 and  
2.14 mm., with a mean value for Groups N XVI-N XXIII (table  
7) of 2.06 mm. The average thickness for each locality is given  
in table 8 for the Norway rat, together with the corresponding  
values for the Albino, thus making it possible to compare the  
cortical thickness in the two forms.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






25  
25






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7






Showing the average corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat for  
Showing the average corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat for each brain weight group.
each brain weight group.  




Line 5,743: Line 5,416:




SAGITTAL  
SAGITTAL




SECTION  
SECTION




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL




HORIZONTAL SECTION  
HORIZONTAL SECTION




GENER.\L  
GENER.\L




.AVERAGE  
.AVERAGE




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




Line 5,780: Line 5,453:




Brain  
Brain


weight  
weight




Thickness  
Thickness




Thickness  
Thickness




Brain  
Brain weight
weight  




Thickness  
Thickness




Brain  
Brain weight
weight  




Thickness  
Thickness








grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




NXI  
NXI




1.164  
1.164




1.61  
1.61




1.88  
1.88




1.164  
1.164




1.87  
1.87




1.164  
1.164




1.79  
1.79




NXII  
NXII




Line 5,869: Line 5,540:




N XIII  
N XIII




1.369  
1.369




1.73  
1.73




1.96  
1.96




1.343  
1.343




2.08  
2.08




1.360  
1.360




1.92  
1.92




NXIV  
NXIV




1.430  
1.430




1.84  
1.84




1.95  
1.95




1.447  
1.447




2.09  
2.09




1.436  
1.436




1.96  
1.96




NXV  
NXV




1.537  
1.537




1.82  
1.82




2.04  
2.04




1.520  
1.520




2.24  
2.24




1.532  
1.532




2.03  
2.03




NXVI  
NXVI




1.629  
1.629




1.88  
1.88




2.08  
2.08




1.663  
1.663




2.19  
2.19




1.640  
1.640




2.05  
2.05




NXVII  
NXVII




1.739  
1.739




1.94  
1.94




2.07  
2.07




1.747  
1.747




2.15  
2.15




1.742  
1.742




2.05  
2.05




N XVIII  
N XVIII




1.829  
1.829




1.93  
1.93




2.08  
2.08




1.843  
1.843




2.26  
2.26




1.834  
1.834




2.09  
2.09




NXIX  
NXIX




1.972  
1.972




1.97  
1.97




2.00  
2.00




1.953  
1.953




2.25  
2.25




1.965  
1.965




2.07  
2.07




NXX  
NXX




2.052  
2.052




1.87  
1.87




1.96  
1.96




2.018  
2.018




2.08  
2.08




2.041  
2.041




1.97  
1.97




NXXI  
NXXI




2.172  
2.172




1.99  
1.99




2.08  
2.08




2.156  
2.156




2.34  
2.34




2.166  
2.166




2.14  
2.14




NXXII  
NXXII




Line 6,102: Line 5,773:




N XXIII  
N XXIII




2.345  
2.345




1.86  
1.86








2.345  
2.345




2.22  
2.22




2.345  
2.345




2.04  
2.04






Within the limits of our material, the course of development  
Within the limits of our material, the course of development of the cortical thickness in every locality seems, in general, similar to that in the corresponding locality of the albino rat, the descriptions of which were given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a, pp. 574-577).
of the cortical thickness in every locality seems, in general, similar to that in the corresponding locality of the albino rat, the  
descriptions of which were given in the former paper (Sugita,  
'17 a, pp. 574-577).  


VII. A COMPARISON OF THE NORWAY RAT WITH THE ALBINO RAT  
VII. A COMPARISON OF THE NORWAY RAT WITH THE ALBINO RAT IN RESPECT OF CORTICAL THICKNESS
IN RESPECT OF CORTICAL THICKNESS  


The main object of the present paper is to compare the data  
The main object of the present paper is to compare the data from the Norway with those from the albino rat, in respect of the cortical thickness, a comparison of much interest, since the two forms are so closely related genetically and at the same time show differences in body size and in absolute brain weight which have been already noted.
from the Norway with those from the albino rat, in respect of  
the cortical thickness, a comparison of much interest, since the  
two forms are so closely related genetically and at the same time  
show differences in body size and in absolute brain weight which  
have been already noted.  


Comparing the mature brains, which weigh alike, of the both  
Comparing the mature brains, which weigh alike, of the both forms (table 8), the Norway cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups NXVI to NXX (brain weight average 1.844 grams) is 2.05 mm., surpasses by 0.15 mm. or 8 per cent the albino cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups XVI to XX
forms (table 8), the Norway cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups NXVI to NXX (brain weight average 1.844  
grams) is 2.05 mm., surpasses by 0.15 mm. or 8 per cent the albino  
cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups XVI to XX  






26  
26






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






(brain weight average 1.815 grams) is 1.90 mm. Here the albino cortex is taken as the standard for the determination of  
(brain weight average 1.815 grams) is 1.90 mm. Here the albino cortex is taken as the standard for the determination of the percentage difference. For the comparison of each locaUty and the averages of each section, table 8 is to be consulted. It is remarkable that both in the sagittal and horizontal sections the
the percentage difference. For the comparison of each locaUty  
and the averages of each section, table 8 is to be consulted. It is  
remarkable that both in the sagittal and horizontal sections the  






12  
12 JO
JO  


Z8  
Z8 Z6 2+
Z6  
2+  


aj  
aj


10  
10 48
48  


i.b  
i.b


1412  
1412 10 aS a6
10  
aS  
a6  


+  
+ Oi
Oi  




Line 6,260: Line 5,908:




.  
.




,  
,




-.  
-.




.  
.




.  
.




•  




Line 6,294: Line 5,942:




'.  
'.




Line 6,301: Line 5,949:




•  




Line 6,326: Line 5,974:




.  
.




*




Line 6,430: Line 6,077:




.'.  
.'.








"  
"




•  




Line 6,447: Line 6,094:




.  
.




Line 6,460: Line 6,107:




•  




••  
••




Line 6,490: Line 6,137:




•  




Line 6,507: Line 6,154:




.  
.




Line 6,530: Line 6,177:




'<  
'<




Line 6,629: Line 6,276:




—  




—  




Line 6,740: Line 6,387:




10 H 12 1.5 1+ 15 16 17  
10 H 12 1.5 1+ 15 16 17






19 2,0 2,1 22 23 2+ fs.  
19 2,0 2,1 22 23 2+ fs.






Chart 2 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the sagittal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities I and V, and the average thickness of the sagittal section (localities I, II,  
Chart 2 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the sagittal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities I and V, and the average thickness of the sagittal section (localities I, II, III, IV and V) are given. Based on table 4. ° Cortical thickness at locality I. Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality V. Corrected. • Average thickness of the sagittal section. Corrected.
III, IV and V) are given. Based on table 4. ° Cortical thickness at locality I.  
Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality V. Corrected. • Average thickness of the sagittal section. Corrected.  






percentage differences follow in the same order from the frontal  
percentage differences follow in the same order from the frontal to the occipital pole, rising towards the occipital pole.- The occipital parts, represented by the pair of localities V and XIII, are the most developed in the Norway, surpassing the corresponding parts of the Albino by 15 and 28 per cent respectively. The pair of localities IV and XII, whose positions are adjoining, show also a marked excess in thickness, that is, 10 and 11 per cent
to the occipital pole, rising towards the occipital pole.- The occipital parts, represented by the pair of localities V and XIII, are  
the most developed in the Norway, surpassing the corresponding  
parts of the Albino by 15 and 28 per cent respectively. The  
pair of localities IV and XII, whose positions are adjoining, show  
also a marked excess in thickness, that is, 10 and 11 per cent  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






27  
27






respectively. The only other large difference is 15 per cent at  
respectively. The only other large difference is 15 per cent at locality VI.
locality VI.  


Accordingly, in the mature rats, the average thicknesses in the  
Accordingly, in the mature rats, the average thicknesses in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections are respectively 6.7, 9.1
sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections are respectively 6.7, 9.1  




Line 6,827: Line 6,465:




1  
1




Line 6,858: Line 6,496:




J  
J




^—  
^—




-
-


y^  
y^




^x  
^x




Line 6,890: Line 6,528:
-'-
-'-


'"  
'"




Line 6,905: Line 6,543:




^ 1  
^ 1




Line 6,918: Line 6,556:




__/  
__/




Line 6,995: Line 6,633:




...-.,  
...-.,




Line 7,004: Line 6,642:




-,i  
-,i




Line 7,019: Line 6,657:




'ZJ  
'ZJ




"^^  
"^^




Line 7,031: Line 6,669:




.,^  
.,^




Line 7,040: Line 6,678:




■~^s  
■~^s








l^-^-..  
l^-^-..




Line 7,060: Line 6,698:
^
^


--.  
--.




--'  
--'




Line 7,074: Line 6,712:




^ '  
^ '




Line 7,084: Line 6,722:




1  
1




Line 7,103: Line 6,741:




—  








7'\  
7'\








'"  
'"




Line 7,128: Line 6,766:




—  


■"'^■  
■"'^■




-
-


--  
--


--
--
Line 7,151: Line 6,789:




-v  
-v




Line 7,162: Line 6,800:




^''■"  
^■"




Line 7,331: Line 6,969:




j  
j




Line 7,348: Line 6,986:




i  
i




1  
1




i 1  
i 1




2 1  
2 1




3 1  
3 1




+ 1  
+ 1




5 J  
5 J




6 1  
6 1




r 1  
r 1




8 1  
8 1




9 2  
9 2




2  
2




1 2  
1 2




2 2  
2 2




3 'it  
3 'it




t r  
t r






Chart 3 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight  
Chart 3 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities I, II, III, IV and V in the sagittal section and the average thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in sagittal section. Based on table 4. ■ — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality I.
group at localities I, II, III, IV and V in the sagittal section and the average  
thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in sagittal section. Based  
on table 4. ■ — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality I.  


Corrected. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality II.  
Corrected. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality II.


Corrected. • — ■ — • — (near the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality III.  
Corrected. • — ■ — • — (near the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality III.


Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality IV.  
Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality IV.


Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality V.  
Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality V.


Corrected. • 'S Average thickness of the sagittal section by each brain  
Corrected. • 'S Average thickness of the sagittal section by each brain


weight group.  
weight group.


and 8.0 per cent greater and the general average thickness is,  
and 8.0 per cent greater and the general average thickness is, consequently, 8 per cent greater in the Norway than in the albino rat, while the brain weights are almost the same (about 1.8 grams) .
consequently, 8 per cent greater in the Norway than in the albino rat, while the brain weights are almost the same (about 1.8  
grams) .  


As regards the differences in cortical thickness here found a  
As regards the differences in cortical thickness here found a few comments may be made. Possibly all of the larger differ
few comments may be made. Possibly all of the larger differ




28  
28






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA




Line 7,436: Line 7,068:




1  
1




Line 7,453: Line 7,085:




1  
1




Line 7,488: Line 7,120:




.  
.




Line 7,499: Line 7,131:




.  
.




Line 7,516: Line 7,148:




.•  
.•








•.  
•.




/  
/




%  
%




Line 7,534: Line 7,166:




*




Line 7,541: Line 7,172:




■.  
■.








*




t  
t




•  




•  




Line 7,564: Line 7,194:




.  
.




Line 7,579: Line 7,209:




■\  
■\




Line 7,606: Line 7,236:




^  
^




Line 7,677: Line 7,307:




—  




—  




—  




Line 7,726: Line 7,356:




—  




Line 7,801: Line 7,431:




10 1.1 12 13 M is J6 17 18 19 20 21 22 %"■  
10 1.1 12 13 M is J6 17 18 19 20 21 22 %"■


Chart 4 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the frontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities VII and VIII, and the average thickness of the frontal section (localities VI,  
Chart 4 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the frontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities VII and VIII, and the average thickness of the frontal section (localities VI, VII and VIII) are given. Based on table 5. ° Cortical thickness at locality VII. Corrected >< Cortical thickness at locality VIII. Corrected. • Average thickness of the frontal section. Corrected.
VII and VIII) are given. Based on table 5. ° Cortical thickness at locality VII.  
Corrected >< Cortical thickness at locality VIII. Corrected. • Average thickness of the frontal section. Corrected.  




Line 7,881: Line 7,509:




-~  
-~




—  




—  




^ /  
^ /




/  
/




Line 7,904: Line 7,532:




^-'  
^-'




T..-
T..-


^.Z'  
^.Z'




"^  
"^




Line 7,925: Line 7,553:




^'^  
^'^




Line 7,934: Line 7,562:




'  
'




Line 7,946: Line 7,574:




-^  
-^




Line 7,959: Line 7,587:




■-<-'  
■-<-'




Line 7,978: Line 7,606:
^__
^__


-^  
-^




' ~~  
' ~~








'" —  
'" —




1  
1




Line 8,228: Line 7,856:




10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 20 21 U ^^  
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 20 21 U ^^


Chart 5 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group  
Chart 5 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities VI, VII and VIII in the frontal section and the average thickness at three localities for each brain weight group in frontal section. Based on table 5.
at localities VI, VII and VIII in the frontal section and the average thickness at  
three localities for each brain weight group in frontal section. Based on table 5.  


Cortical thickness at locality VI. Corrected. Cortical  
Cortical thickness at locality VI. Corrected. Cortical


thickness at locality VII. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality VIII.  
thickness at locality VII. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality VIII.


Corrected. • 'F Average thickness of the frontal section by each brain  
Corrected. • 'F Average thickness of the frontal section by each brain


weight group.  
weight group.






ences noted may be correlated with differences in function, but  
ences noted may be correlated with differences in function, but at present we shall consider only those which appear in the occipital cortex, that is, at localities IV, V, XII, and XIII. There is reason to think that the eye and the visual apparatus in general are less well developed in the Albino than in the Norway rat.
at present we shall consider only those which appear in the occipital cortex, that is, at localities IV, V, XII, and XIII. There  
is reason to think that the eye and the visual apparatus in general are less well developed in the Albino than in the Norway rat.  




Line 8,253: Line 7,877:




Chart 6 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex of the Norway rat in  
Chart 6 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex of the Norway rat in the horizontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities IX and XIII and the average thickness of the horizontal section (localities IX, X, XI, XII and XIII) are given. Based on table 6. ° Cortical thickness at locality IX. Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected. • Average thickness of the horizontal section. Corrected.
the horizontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities  
IX and XIII and the average thickness of the horizontal section (localities IX, X,  
XI, XII and XIII) are given. Based on table 6. ° Cortical thickness at locality  
IX. Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected. • Average  
thickness of the horizontal section. Corrected.  


The visual cortex of the rat is at the occipital end of the brain  
The visual cortex of the rat is at the occipital end of the brain (Ferrier, '86) and would probably be underdeveloped in the Albino in which vision was less perfect. The relatively less thickness of the cortex in the localities IV, V, XII and XIII in the Albino brain would therefore fit with the diminished visual function in this form.
(Ferrier, '86) and would probably be underdeveloped in the Albino in which vision was less perfect. The relatively less thickness of the cortex in the localities IV, V, XII and XIII in the  
Albino brain would therefore fit with the diminished visual function in this form.  








If, during the growing period, a comparison of cortical thickness in brains of Hke weight is made, the result is somewhat puzzling, as seen in chart 9, which gives the thickness of the cortices  
If, during the growing period, a comparison of cortical thickness in brains of Hke weight is made, the result is somewhat puzzling, as seen in chart 9, which gives the thickness of the cortices of the Norway and the albino rats in brains of the same weight.
of the Norway and the albino rats in brains of the same weight.  




Line 8,275: Line 7,891:




^  
^




'\  
'\




Line 8,287: Line 7,903:




•^-.n  
•^-.n




1  
1


1  
1




Line 8,301: Line 7,917:




_^  
_^




^  
^




Line 8,319: Line 7,935:




V^  
V^




■^~  
■^~








^m  
^m




Line 8,358: Line 7,974:




Chart 7 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight  
Chart 7 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities IX, X, XI, XII and XIII in the horizontal section and the average thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in horizontal section. Based on table 6. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality
group at localities IX, X, XI, XII and XIII in the horizontal section and the  
average thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in horizontal section. Based on table 6. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality  


IX. Corrected. — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality  
IX. Corrected. — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality


X. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality XI. Corrected.  
X. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality XI. Corrected.


(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XII. Corrected.  
(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XII. Corrected.


(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected.  
(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected.


• •!! Average thickness of the horizontal section for each brain weight group.  
• •!! Average thickness of the horizontal section for each brain weight group.






Generally the cortical thickness of the Norway rat, whose brain  
Generally the cortical thickness of the Norway rat, whose brain weighs more than 1.3 grams, is clearly higher than that of the albino rat of like brain weight, while in brains weighing less than 1.2 grams the relation is reversed. This seems surprising, but
weighs more than 1.3 grams, is clearly higher than that of the  
albino rat of like brain weight, while in brains weighing less than  
1.2 grams the relation is reversed. This seems surprising, but  






has its reason,. If the data are treated as follows, which seems  
has its reason,. If the data are treated as follows, which seems to me quite a rational treatment, the reason will be disclosed." The brain of the Norway rat at birth weighs usually somewhat more than that of the newborn albino rat, and the final brain weight in the full grown Norway is ca. 2.5 grams or 25 pe*r cent higher than that in the mature albino rat of like age, which weighs about 2.0 grams. As already shown by Donaldson and
to me quite a rational treatment, the reason will be disclosed."  
The brain of the Norway rat at birth weighs usually somewhat  
more than that of the newborn albino rat, and the final brain  
weight in the full grown Norway is ca. 2.5 grams or 25 pe*r cent  
higher than that in the mature albino rat of like age, which  
weighs about 2.0 grams. As already shown by Donaldson and  


Chart 8 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal  
Chart 8 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections and the general average thickness for each brain weight group. Based on table 7. Nbrway rat. • — • — ■ — S Average thickness of the
and horizontal sections and the general average thickness for each brain weight  
group. Based on table 7. Nbrway rat. • — • — ■ — S Average thickness of the  


cortex in sagittal section. Corrected. F Average thickness of the cortex in  
cortex in sagittal section. Corrected. F Average thickness of the cortex in


frontal section. Corrected. H Average thickness of the cortex in  
frontal section. Corrected. H Average thickness of the cortex in


horizontal section. Corrected • "A General average thickness of the cortex  
horizontal section. Corrected • "A General average thickness of the cortex


of three kinds of sections. Corrected.  
of three kinds of sections. Corrected.


Hatai ('11), the span of life is probably the same in both the  
Hatai ('11), the span of life is probably the same in both the forms, extending to about three years. So, if throughout this span of life the developmental course of the brains was quite similar for both forms, the brains which have like weights would not represent the same stage of the development, but on the contrary, a brain of the Norway rat would be under these conditions, in a younger stage.
forms, extending to about three years. So, if throughout this  
span of life the developmental course of the brains was quite  
similar for both forms, the brains which have like weights would  
not represent the same stage of the development, but on the contrary, a brain of the Norway rat would be under these conditions,  
in a younger stage.  


Table 9 gives the percentage of water in the brains of the Norway and of the albino rats. The comparison of the data of the  
Table 9 gives the percentage of water in the brains of the Norway and of the albino rats. The comparison of the data of the






TABLE 8  
TABLE 8


A comparison of the cortical thicknesses at each locality ayid on the average, in the  
A comparison of the cortical thicknesses at each locality ayid on the average, in the adult Norway and the albino brains of the same absolute weight. The measurements used here are average values of Groups N XVI-N XX and Groups XVI-XX respectively, taken from tables 4 to 6 of this paper and tables 6 to 8 (Sugita, '17a). The Gorresponding brain iveights are 1.844 grams in the Norway and 1.815 grams in the Albino. The thickness of the Albino cortex is ahoays taken as the standard for computing the percentage differences
adult Norway and the albino brains of the same absolute weight. The measurements used here are average values of Groups N XVI-N XX and Groups XVI-XX  
respectively, taken from tables 4 to 6 of this paper and tables 6 to 8 (Sugita, '17a).  
The Gorresponding brain iveights are 1.844 grams in the Norway and 1.815 grams  
in the Albino. The thickness of the Albino cortex is ahoays taken as the standard for computing the percentage differences  




Line 8,426: Line 8,020:




THICKNESS OF  
THICKNESS OF




THE CORTEX  
THE CORTEX




CORTEX OP THE  
CORTEX OP THE




SECTIONS  
SECTIONS




LOCALITIES  
LOCALITIES




Line 8,449: Line 8,043:




Norway rat  
Norway rat




Albino rat  
Albino rat




CEEDS BT  
CEEDS BT




Line 8,462: Line 8,056:




■mvi.  
■mvi.




mm.  
mm.




per cent  
per cent








Locality I  
Locality I




2.84  
2.84




2.80  
2.80




1.4  
1.4








II  
II




2.06  
2.06




1.92  
1.92




7.3  
7.3




Sagittal  
Sagittal




III  
III




1.82  
1.82




1.74  
1.74




4.6  
4.6








IV  
IV




1.51  
1.51




1.36  
1.36




10.0  
10.0








V  
V




1.37  
1.37




1.19  
1.19




15.1  
15.1








Average  
Average




1.92  
1.92




1.80  
1.80




6.7  
6.7








Locality VI  
Locality VI




2.11  
2.11




1.84  
1.84




14.8  
14.8




Frontal  
Frontal




VII  
VII




2.28  
2.28




2.18  
2.18




4.6  
4.6








VIII  
VIII




1.73  
1.73




1.59  
1.59




8.9  
8.9








Average  
Average




2.04  
2.04




1.87  
1.87




9.1  
9.1








Locality IX  
Locality IX




3.09  
3.09




3.08  
3.08




0.3  
0.3








X  
X




2.23  
2.23




2.06  
2.06




8.2  
8.2




Horizontal  
Horizontal




XI  
XI




2.10  
2.10




2.04  
2.04




3.0  
3.0








XII  
XII




1.90  
1.90




1.71  
1.71




11.1  
11.1








XIII  
XIII




1.63  
1.63




1.27  
1.27




28.3  
28.3








Average  
Average




2.19  
2.19




2.03  
2.03




8.0  
8.0




General avers  
General avers




lore  
lore




2.05  
2.05




1.90  
1.90




8.0  
8.0




Line 8,718: Line 8,312:




two forms is made so as to bring those of approximately the  
two forms is made so as to bring those of approximately the same age on the same hue of the table. It will be seen by these comparisons that the Norway rat brain, if paired with the albino rat brain of like age, shows almost the same value of the percentage of water, while the brain weight differs by 16 to 20 per cent in favor of the Norway rat brain, the weight of the Norway brain being taken as the standard.
same age on the same hue of the table. It will be seen by these  
comparisons that the Norway rat brain, if paired with the albino  
rat brain of like age, shows almost the same value of the percentage of water, while the brain weight differs by 16 to 20 per cent  
in favor of the Norway rat brain, the weight of the Norway brain  
being taken as the standard.  


So, from the point of view of age, a Norway rat brain should  
So, from the point of view of age, a Norway rat brain should be in the same phase of development with an albino brain,
be in the same phase of development with an albino brain,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






33  
33






TABLE 9  
TABLE 9


Giving the percentage of water in the brain of the Norway and of the albino rats of the  
Giving the percentage of water in the brain of the Norway and of the albino rats of the same age. The comparison of the data of the two forms is made so as to bring those of approximately the same age on the same line of the table. Based principally on tables 10 and 12, given by Donaldson and' Hatai {'11) on pp. 439-443, Jour, of Comp. Neur., vol. 21
same age. The comparison of the data of the two forms is made so as to bring those  
of approximately the same age on the same line of the table. Based principally on  
tables 10 and 12, given by Donaldson and' Hatai {'11) on pp. 439-443, Jour, of  
Comp. Neur., vol. 21  




Line 8,750: Line 8,334:




STORWAY RAl  
STORWAY RAl




(males)  
(males)








ALBINO RAT (mALES) OF LIKE  
ALBINO RAT (mALES) OF LIKE




AGE  
AGE




AGE  
AGE




BODY  
BODY WEIGHT OBSERVED
WEIGHT  
OBSERVED  




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




PERCENTAGE OP WATER  
PERCENTAGE OP WATER ON BRAIN
ON BRAIN  




BODY  
BODY WEIGHT
WEIGHT  


CALCULATED  
CALCULATED




BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT


CALCULATED  
CALCULATED




LESS THAN  
LESS THAN


NORWAY  
NORWAY


BRAIN  
BRAIN








Observed  
Observed




Calculated  
Calculated




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




days  
days




grafns  
grafns




grams  
grams




per cent  
per cent




per cent  
per cent




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




per cent  
per cent




1  
1




5.1  
5.1




0.2361  
0.2361




88.2  
88.2




88.00  
88.00




4.7  
4.7




0.217  
0.217




8  
8




10  
10




12.2  
12.2




0.859  
0.859




86.9  
86.9




87.05  
87.05




11.8  
11.8




0.840  
0.840




2  
2




13  
13




18.1  
18.1




1.245  
1.245




85.3  
85.3




85.39  
85.39




14.9  
14.9




1,011  
1,011




19  
19




15  
15




17.7  
17.7




1.195  
1.195




84.5  
84.5




84.58  
84.58




16.1  
16.1




1.057  
1.057




12  
12




16  
16




26.1  
26.1




1.368  
1.368




82.8  
82.8




84.19  
84.19




16.7  
16.7




1.077  
1.077




21  
21




19  
19




25.5  
25.5




1.423  
1.423




81.5  
81.5




83.12  
83.12




18.7  
18.7




1.131  
1.131




21  
21




25  
25




32.6  
32.6




1.498  
1.498




80.9  
80.9




81.39  
81.39




23.9  
23.9




1.237  
1.237




17  
17




40  
40




35.83  
35.83




1.525  
1.525




79.2  
79.2




79.39  
79.39




42.5  
42.5




1.434  
1.434




6  
6




47  
47




38. 5»  
38. 5»




1.522  
1.522




79.3*  
79.3*




79.24  
79.24




54.1  
54.1




1.507  
1.507




1  
1




106  
106




68.63  
68.63




1.878  
1.878




78.4  
78.4




78.50  
78.50




174.0  
174.0




1.830  
1.830




3  
3








200.0  
200.0




2.152  
2.152




78.7  
78.7




78.59  
78.59




160.0  
160.0




1.807  
1.807




16  
16








215.0  
215.0




2.17  
2.17




78.8  
78.8




78.53  
78.53




170.0  
170.0




1.824  
1.824




16  
16








231.0  
231.0




2.20  
2.20




78.6  
78.6




78.45  
78.45




180.0  
180.0




1.838  
1.838




16  
16








248.0  
248.0




2.23  
2.23




78.7  
78.7




78.38  
78.38




190.0  
190.0




1.854  
1.854




17  
17








267.0  
267.0




2.25  
2.25




78.2  
78.2




78.32  
78.32




200.0  
200.0




1.866  
1.866




17  
17








287.0  
287.0




2.28  
2.28




78.2  
78.2




78.24  
78.24




210.0  
210.0




1.879  
1.879




18  
18








308.0  
308.0




2.31  
2.31




78.9  
78.9




78.18  
78.18




220.0  
220.0




1.890  
1.890




18  
18








331.0  
331.0




2.33  
2.33




78.2  
78.2




78.12  
78.12




230.0  
230.0




1.903  
1.903




18  
18








355.0  
355.0




2.33  
2.33




78.3  
78.3




78.11  
78.11




240.0  
240.0




1.913  
1.913




19  
19








380.0  
380.0




2.38  
2.38




78.2  
78.2




78.10  
78.10




250.0  
250.0




1.923  
1.923




19  
19








406.0  
406.0




2.41  
2.41




78.0  
78.0




78.06  
78.06




260.0  
260.0




1.933  
1.933




19  
19








434.0  
434.0




2.43  
2.43




78.2  
78.2




77.96  
77.96




270.0  
270.0




1.944  
1.944




20  
20








463.0  
463.0








77.9  
77.9




77.50  
77.50




280.0  
280.0




1.954  
1.954




Line 9,374: Line 8,953:




494.0  
494.0








78.0  
78.0








290.0  
290.0




Line 9,393: Line 8,972:




525.0  
525.0








78.0  
78.0








300.0  
300.0




Line 9,411: Line 8,990:




^ The data given in this column below this entry are based on unpublished observations of Donaldson and Hatai, the records of which are kept in the Wistar  
^ The data given in this column below this entry are based on unpublished observations of Donaldson and Hatai, the records of which are kept in the Wistar Institute.
Institute.  


- The data given in this column below this entry were obtained by calculation  
- The data given in this column below this entry were obtained by calculation according to body weight.
according to body weight.  


3 As the result of confinement, the body growth in the Norway is remarkably  
3 As the result of confinement, the body growth in the Norway is remarkably retarded.
retarded.  


THE JOURNAL OF COMPAR.\TIVB NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 1  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPAR.\TIVB NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 1






34  
34






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






which weighs 16 to 20 per cent less. With this relation in view,  
which weighs 16 to 20 per cent less. With this relation in view, I reduced by 18 per cent — which is the mean value of 16 to 20 per cent (see table 9) — the weight of the Norway rat brains in table 7, and assumed that I thus obtained brain weights which represent the corresponding brain weights of the albino ra,'t in respect to the cortical development. I have plotted the values for the actual cortical thickness on the reduced brain weights by
I reduced by 18 per cent — which is the mean value of 16 to 20  
per cent (see table 9) — the weight of the Norway rat brains in  
table 7, and assumed that I thus obtained brain weights which  
represent the corresponding brain weights of the albino ra,'t in  
respect to the cortical development. I have plotted the values  
for the actual cortical thickness on the reduced brain weights by  




Line 9,754: Line 9,324:




•  




Line 9,926: Line 9,496:




0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Q6 0.7  
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Q6 0.7






0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 L5 16 1.7  
0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 L5 16 1.7




Line 9,938: Line 9,508:




Chart 9 Giving a comparison of the thickness of the Norway cortex with that  
Chart 9 Giving a comparison of the thickness of the Norway cortex with that


of] the albino cortex, on brain weight. • 'N General average thickness of the  
of] the albino cortex, on brain weight. • 'N General average thickness of the


Norway cortex according to the actual brain weight group. AL General  
Norway cortex according to the actual brain weight group. AL General


average thickness of the Albino cortex according to the brain weight group.  
average thickness of the Albino cortex according to the brain weight group. Smoothed. Taken from chart 9 of the second paper of this series. • — • — • N' General average thickness of the Norway cortex entered according to the reduced brain weight representing the albino brain weight of the corresponding age.
Smoothed. Taken from chart 9 of the second paper of this series. • — • — •  
N' General average thickness of the Norway cortex entered according to the reduced brain weight representing the albino brain weight of the corresponding age.  






the dot and dash line in chart 9, in which the smoothed graph for  
the dot and dash line in chart 9, in which the smoothed graph for the cortical thickness of the albino rat is represented by a dotted Une. Glancing at the chart, my assumption appears to be justified as both the graphs for the reduced Norway and the Albino are found to run a similar course. This relation is acceptable, since, as shown in the tables given by Donaldson and Hatai ('11), and also by Miller ('11), the relative weight of the brain in the mature albino rat is 12 to 16 per cent less than in the Norway rat of like body weight, and, furthermore, the relative weight of the
the cortical thickness of the albino rat is represented by a dotted  
Une. Glancing at the chart, my assumption appears to be justified as both the graphs for the reduced Norway and the Albino  
are found to run a similar course. This relation is acceptable,  
since, as shown in the tables given by Donaldson and Hatai ('11),  
and also by Miller ('11), the relative weight of the brain in the  
mature albino rat is 12 to 16 per cent less than in the Norway rat  
of like body weight, and, furthermore, the relative weight of the  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 35  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 35


body in the Albino is about 20 to 40 per cent less than in the  
body in the Albino is about 20 to 40 per cent less than in the Norway rat of like age (table 9). Accordingly, the albino brain should be about 18 per cent or more, less than the Norway brain of like age, and the data for the thickness of the cortex in the two forms show a fairly constant relation, when plotted as in chart 9 in accordance with this assumption (see also table 3, Sugita, '17 a).
Norway rat of like age (table 9). Accordingly, the albino brain  
should be about 18 per cent or more, less than the Norway brain  
of like age, and the data for the thickness of the cortex in the  
two forms show a fairly constant relation, when plotted as in  
chart 9 in accordance with this assumption (see also table 3,  
Sugita, '17 a).  


As stated, Norway rats under about 10 days of age have not  
As stated, Norway rats under about 10 days of age have not been studied, but a comparison of the graph for the thickness of the cortex in the normal albino rat with the graph for the Norway cortex displaced for age makes it reasonable to assume that a Norway brain which weighs 1.16 grams (Group N XI) corresponds to an albino brain which weighs about 0.95 grams (Group IX), at which stage the cerebral cortices of the both forms have nearly completed their active growth in thickness and are going over to the second phase, during which the cortical area keeps pace with the increase in brain volume. It may be assumed also (see later) that, in the Norway rat, with a brain weight of about 1.4 grams the cortical myelination is beginning to take place.
been studied, but a comparison of the graph for the thickness of  
the cortex in the normal albino rat with the graph for the Norway  
cortex displaced for age makes it reasonable to assume that a  
Norway brain which weighs 1.16 grams (Group N XI) corresponds to an albino brain which weighs about 0.95 grams (Group  
IX), at which stage the cerebral cortices of the both forms have  
nearly completed their active growth in thickness and are going  
over to the second phase, during which the cortical area keeps  
pace with the increase in brain volume. It may be assumed  
also (see later) that, in the Norway rat, with a brain weight of  
about 1.4 grams the cortical myelination is beginning to take  
place.  


Thus in the postnatal life of the Norway rat, the first phase of  
Thus in the postnatal life of the Norway rat, the first phase of the development of the cerebral cortex covers the period during which the brain weight increases to 1.16 grams from birth, when the brain weight is about 0.25 grams, and the second phase of the cortical development covers the period, during which the brain weight increases from 1.16 grams to about 1.44 (Group N XIV) when the cortex attains within 4 per cent the full thickness. By the middle of the second phase the process of myelination is active, and before the end of this phase the cortex has already attained nearly its full thickness.
the development of the cerebral cortex covers the period during  
which the brain weight increases to 1.16 grams from birth, when  
the brain weight is about 0.25 grams, and the second phase of  
the cortical development covers the period, during which the  
brain weight increases from 1.16 grams to about 1.44 (Group  
N XIV) when the cortex attains within 4 per cent the full thickness. By the middle of the second phase the process of myelination is active, and before the end of this phase the cortex has  
already attained nearly its full thickness.  


This assumption, that the completion of the cortical development in thickness coincides with the period of active myelination,  
This assumption, that the completion of the cortical development in thickness coincides with the period of active myelination, is supported by another set of facts. Table 10 gives the absolute weights of the dry substance in the brain of the Norway rat, arranged according to brain weight. These values were calculated by me from tables originally given by Donaldson and Hatai ('11). The data are plotted in chart 10, which also gives the corresponding data for the albino rat, in a dotted curve.
is supported by another set of facts. Table 10 gives the absolute weights of the dry substance in the brain of the Norway rat,  
arranged according to brain weight. These values were calculated by me from tables originally given by Donaldson and  
Hatai ('11). The data are plotted in chart 10, which also gives  
the corresponding data for the albino rat, in a dotted curve.  






36  
36






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 10  
TABLE 10






Giving the weight of the dry substances in the brain of the Norway rat according to  
Giving the weight of the dry substances in the brain of the Norway rat according to brain weight. Based on the observed data given by Donaldson and Hatai {'11), in p. 448, Jour. Camp. Neur., vol. 21. Both sexes averaged. *Males only.
brain weight. Based on the observed data given by Donaldson and Hatai {'11),  
in p. 448, Jour. Camp. Neur., vol. 21. Both sexes averaged. *Males only.  




Line 10,021: Line 9,552:




WEIGHT OF THE  
WEIGHT OF THE








WEIGHT OF THE  
WEIGHT OF THE




TOTAL BRAIN WEIGHT  
TOTAL BRAIN WEIGHT




DRY SUBSTANCES IN  
DRY SUBSTANCES IN




TOTAL BR.UN WEIGHT  
TOTAL BR.UN WEIGHT




DRY SUBSTANCES IN  
DRY SUBSTANCES IN








THE BRAIN  
THE BRAIN








THE BRAIN  
THE BRAIN




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




0.25  
0.25




0.041  
0.041




1.55  
1.55




0.309  
0.309




0.35  
0.35








1.65  
1.65




0.339  
0.339




0.45  
0.45








1.75  
1.75




0.377  
0.377




0.55  
0.55








1.85  
1.85




0.400  
0.400




0.65  
0.65




0.067*  
0.067*




1.95  
1.95




0.407  
0.407




0.75  
0.75




0.100  
0.100




2.05  
2.05




0.445  
0.445




0.85  
0.85




0.100  
0.100




2.15  
2.15




0.460  
0.460




0.95  
0.95








2.25  
2.25




0.498  
0.498




1.05  
1.05








2.35  
2.35




0.500  
0.500




1.15  
1.15




0.155  
0.155




2.45  
2.45




0.540  
0.540




1.25  
1.25




0.210  
0.210




2.55  
2.55




0.534  
0.534




1.35  
1.35




0.229  
0.229




2.65  
2.65




0.575  
0.575




1.45  
1.45




0.291  
0.291




2.75  
2.75




0.600*  
0.600*






Q6  
Q6




Line 10,234: Line 9,765:




1  
1




Line 10,271: Line 9,802:




/  
/








as  
as




Line 10,301: Line 9,832:




/  
/




r^  
r^




Line 10,331: Line 9,862:




y  
y




/  
/




Line 10,343: Line 9,874:




01+  
01+




Line 10,364: Line 9,895:




J  
J




V  
V




Line 10,394: Line 9,925:




,/  
,/




Line 10,409: Line 9,940:




as  
as




Line 10,426: Line 9,957:




/}  
/}




'^  
'^




Line 10,474: Line 10,005:




az  
az




Line 10,489: Line 10,020:




'/  
'/




Line 10,518: Line 10,049:




..•'  
..•'




l>.  
l>.




Line 10,540: Line 10,071:




ai  
ai




Line 10,551: Line 10,082:




■<^  
■<^




^  
^




Line 10,561: Line 10,092:




^  
^




Line 10,580: Line 10,111:




^  
^




y  
y




Line 10,612: Line 10,143:




^"'  
^"'




Line 10,642: Line 10,173:




02 a4 06  
02 a4 06






10 tZ W M> 18 ZO II 24 26 2,8 /«.  
10 tZ W M> 18 ZO II 24 26 2,8 /«.






Chart 10 Giving the absolute weights of the dry substance in the -Norway  
Chart 10 Giving the absolute weights of the dry substance in the -Norway brain, arranged according to brain weight, based on the observations of Donaldson and Hatai ('11), accompanied by the corresponding data for the albino rat, in a dotted line. ^ and * show the turning points of the curves.
brain, arranged according to brain weight, based on the observations of Donaldson and Hatai ('11), accompanied by the corresponding data for the albino rat,  
in a dotted line. ^ and * show the turning points of the curves.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 37  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 37


This chart shows clearly that the solids in the Norway brain  
This chart shows clearly that the solids in the Norway brain increase rapidly after the brain weight has reached something more than 1.2 grams (see x). This turning point of the graph corresponds to 0.95 grams of brain weight in the Albino (see *). It was found in the albino rat that, when the brain weight has surpassed 1.15 grams, namely 0.95 plus 0.20 grams, myelination of the cortical fibers is active. Hence, in the Norway brain, the myelination in the cortex should be active when the brain weight has reached 1.44 grams, namely somewhat more than 1.2 plus 0.2 grams. Furthermore, as we have seen that in the albino rat the beginning of myelination in the cortex coincides with the phase when the cortex has nearly attained its full thickness, so we see the same relations in the Norway rat also.
increase rapidly after the brain weight has reached something  
more than 1.2 grams (see x). This turning point of the graph  
corresponds to 0.95 grams of brain weight in the Albino (see *).  
It was found in the albino rat that, when the brain weight has  
surpassed 1.15 grams, namely 0.95 plus 0.20 grams, myelination  
of the cortical fibers is active. Hence, in the Norway brain, the  
myelination in the cortex should be active when the brain weight  
has reached 1.44 grams, namely somewhat more than 1.2 plus  
0.2 grams. Furthermore, as we have seen that in the albino rat  
the beginning of myelination in the cortex coincides with the  
phase when the cortex has nearly attained its full thickness, so  
we see the same relations in the Norway rat also.  


From these facts we conclude that the brains of the both forms  
From these facts we conclude that the brains of the both forms pass through the same course of cortical development according to age, as the span of life is the same in the two. The weights of the brains which are in the same stage of development, are however not the same in the both forms, being in the Norway rat about 18 per cent — the Norway brain weight being taken as the standard — heavier than in the albino rat. The statement of Donaldson which was expressed in the paper cited, to wit: "If in the animals compared the brain weights are the same, then the Norway rat has a smaller body weight and a higher percentage of water in the central nervous system," might be rewritten as follows : When ages are the same, the Norway rat has a greater body weight, a heavier brain (18 per cent more in weight), a tlTicker cortex and nearly the same percentage of water in the central nervous system.
pass through the same course of cortical development according to  
age, as the span of life is the same in the two. The weights of  
the brains which are in the same stage of development, are however not the same in the both forms, being in the Norway rat  
about 18 per cent — the Norway brain weight being taken as  
the standard — heavier than in the albino rat. The statement of  
Donaldson which was expressed in the paper cited, to wit: "If  
in the animals compared the brain weights are the same, then  
the Norway rat has a smaller body weight and a higher percentage of water in the central nervous system," might be rewritten  
as follows : When ages are the same, the Norway rat has a greater  
body weight, a heavier brain (18 per cent more in weight), a  
tlTicker cortex and nearly the same percentage of water in the  
central nervous system.  


A comparison of the cortical development in the two forms  
A comparison of the cortical development in the two forms can be made adequately only by first reducing by 18 per cent the actual brain weight of the Norway rat and then comparing the cortex in both forms according to the corrected brain weight. Since mature Norway brains have only a slightly greater volume than the Albino brains of Uke weight (see table 4 A, Sugita, '18), but at the same time have a cerebral cortex on the average 8 per cent thicker, it follows that in the Norway brain the proportion of gray substance is greater. This difference apparently accounts for the higher percentage of water found in the Norway brain.
can be made adequately only by first reducing by 18 per cent  
the actual brain weight of the Norway rat and then comparing  
the cortex in both forms according to the corrected brain weight.  
Since mature Norway brains have only a slightly greater volume  
than the Albino brains of Uke weight (see table 4 A, Sugita, '18),  
but at the same time have a cerebral cortex on the average 8 per  
cent thicker, it follows that in the Norway brain the proportion  
of gray substance is greater. This difference apparently accounts  
for the higher percentage of water found in the Norway brain.  






38 NAOKI SUGITA  
38 NAOKI SUGITA


VIII. SUMMARY  
VIII. SUMMARY


1. The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat has  
1. The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat has been systematically investigated, employing as material 36 males and 18 females, all over 17 grams in body weight, and using uniformly the methods w^hich were adopted by me for the investigation of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat.
been systematically investigated, employing as material 36 males  
and 18 females, all over 17 grams in body weight, and using uniformly the methods w^hich were adopted by me for the investigation of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat.  


2. The observed data are first given and later are corrected to  
2. The observed data are first given and later are corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material. The corrected data are given fully in tables and in charts.
the values for the fresh condition of the material. The corrected  
data are given fully in tables and in charts.  


3. The relations of the cortical thicknesses at the several localities measured are quite similar among themselves to those  
3. The relations of the cortical thicknesses at the several localities measured are quite similar among themselves to those found in the albino rat. The average thickness of the cortex in the adult Norway rat is always higher (1 to 28 per cent) than that of the corresponding locality in the adult albino rat. The occipital cortex is better developed (thicker) in the Norway rat. This is to be associated with the more perfect visual apparatus in the Norway rat.
found in the albino rat. The average thickness of the cortex in  
the adult Norway rat is always higher (1 to 28 per cent) than  
that of the corresponding locality in the adult albino rat. The  
occipital cortex is better developed (thicker) in the Norway rat.  
This is to be associated with the more perfect visual apparatus  
in the Norway rat.  


4. As to the phases of development of the cortical thickness, a  
4. As to the phases of development of the cortical thickness, a Norway brain of a given age corresponds to an albino brain, which weighs about 16 to 20 per cent less. The Norway brain weighing 0.25 to 1.16 grams (Groups N II to N XI) is in its first phase of active development which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing 0.25 to 0.95 grams. The Norway brain weighing 1.16 to 1.44 grams (Groups N XI to N XIV) is in its second phase of development of the cortex corresponding to the albino brain weighing 0.95 to 1.15 grams.
Norway brain of a given age corresponds to an albino brain,  
which weighs about 16 to 20 per cent less. The Norway brain  
weighing 0.25 to 1.16 grams (Groups N II to N XI) is in its  
first phase of active development which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing 0.25 to 0.95 grams. The Norway brain  
weighing 1.16 to 1.44 grams (Groups N XI to N XIV) is in its  
second phase of development of the cortex corresponding to the  
albino brain weighing 0.95 to 1.15 grams.  


5. The cortex of the Norway rat attains nearly its full thickness at th-e time when the brain weighs somewhat more than 1.44  
5. The cortex of the Norway rat attains nearly its full thickness at th-e time when the brain weighs somewhat more than 1.44 grams, corresponding to the age of twenty days and to a body weight of something more than 36 grams. At this phase probably the rapid myelination of the fibers in the cerebral cortex is taking place.
grams, corresponding to the age of twenty days and to a body  
weight of something more than 36 grams. At this phase probably  
the rapid myelination of the fibers in the cerebral cortex is taking  
place.  


6. The general average thickness of the cortex in the mature  
6. The general average thickness of the cortex in the mature Norway rat is 2.06 mm., exceeding by about 8 per cent that of the albino rat brain of the same weight.
Norway rat is 2.06 mm., exceeding by about 8 per cent that of  
the albino rat brain of the same weight.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 39  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 39


7. Owing to the greater thickness of the cerebral cortex the  
7. Owing to the greater thickness of the cerebral cortex the mature Norway brain contains more gray matter than does the albino brain of like weight and this excess of gray matter explains the somewhat higher percentage of water found in the Norway brain.
mature Norway brain contains more gray matter than does the  
albino brain of like weight and this excess of gray matter explains the somewhat higher percentage of water found in the  
Norway brain.  


LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with  
Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.
the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord  
weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord.  
Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.  


Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. No. 6.  
Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. No. 6.


Ferrier, David 1886 The functions of the brain. 2nd ed. Smith, Elder &  
Ferrier, David 1886 The functions of the brain. 2nd ed. Smith, Elder & Co., London, pp. 261-262.
Co., London, pp. 261-262.  


FoRTUYN, A. B. D. 1914 Cortical cell-lamination of the hemispheres of some  
FoRTUYN, A. B. D. 1914 Cortical cell-lamination of the hemispheres of some rodents. Arch. Neurol., Path. Lab. London County Asyl., vol. 6, pp. 221-354. Mus decumanus (Pall), p. 260.
rodents. Arch. Neurol., Path. Lab. London County Asyl., vol. 6,  
pp. 221-354. Mus decumanus (Pall), p. 260.  


Lewis, Bevan 1881 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents.  
Lewis, Bevan 1881 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents. Phil. Trans., 1882, pp. 699-749.
Phil. Trans., 1882, pp. 699-749.  


Miller, Newton 1911 Reproduction in the brown rat (Mus norvegicus).  
Miller, Newton 1911 Reproduction in the brown rat (Mus norvegicus). Am. Naturalist, vol. 45, pp. 625-635.
Am. Naturalist, vol. 45, pp. 625-635.  


Sugita, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increases in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28,  
Sugita, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increases in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, pp. 495 510.
pp. 495 510.  


SuGiTA, Naoki 1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
SuGiTA, Naoki 1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29.
III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus  
norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29.  






author's abstract of this paper i«sued by  
author's abstract of this paper i«sued by the bibliographic service, february 16
the bibliographic service, february 16  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM


II. THE PARTITION OF NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN IN THE BRAIN OF.  
II. THE PARTITION OF NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN IN THE BRAIN OF.


THE GRAY SNAPPER (nEOMAENIS GRISEUS) AND ALSO THE  
THE GRAY SNAPPER (nEOMAENIS GRISEUS) AND ALSO THE


BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO THE BODY  
BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO THE BODY


LENGTH OF THIS FISH  
LENGTH OF THIS FISH


SHINKISHI HATAI  
SHINKISHI HATAI


The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, and Department of Marine Biology,  
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, and Department of Marine Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Carnegie Institution of Washington  


ONE CHART  
ONE CHART


The prime object of the present investigation was to extend  
The prime object of the present investigation was to extend some observations made recently concerning the metabolic activity of the central nervous system of the albino rat (Hatai, '17) to the nervous system of lower vertebrates. It was my hope that such a comparative study might yield valuable data for an understanding of the complex phenomena of metabolism in this important organ.
some observations made recently concerning the metabolic activity of the central nervous system of the albino rat (Hatai,  
'17) to the nervous system of lower vertebrates. It was my  
hope that such a comparative study might yield valuable data  
for an understanding of the complex phenomena of metabolism  
in this important organ.  


In the course of the? present investigation I was able to accumulate a considerable amount of data on the weight of the  
In the course of the? present investigation I was able to accumulate a considerable amount of data on the weight of the brain together with its water content, a study which has revealed several interesting facts which have not been yet fully appreciated, so that I have decided to present these data also in the following pages. In connection with this work, it is a pleasure to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr. A. G. Mayer, Director of the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Dr. Mayer not only granted me the privileges of the laboratory at the Dry Tortugas, but gave me encouragement and many helpful suggestions throughout the cour&e of this work.
brain together with its water content, a study which has revealed several interesting facts which have not been yet fully  
appreciated, so that I have decided to present these data also  
in the following pages. In connection with this work, it is a  
pleasure to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr. A. G. Mayer,  
Director of the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie  
Institution of Washington. Dr. Mayer not only granted me  
the privileges of the laboratory at the Dry Tortugas, but gave  
me encouragement and many helpful suggestions throughout  
the cour&e of this work.  


41  
41






42 SHINKISHI HATAI  
42 SHINKISHI HATAI


MATERIAL USED  
MATERIAL USED


The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was chosen for this  
The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was chosen for this investigation not only because these fish are abundant in subtropical seas, but also because they possess numerous virtues for experimental purposes. The snapper may be kept in the laboratory for a long period, and in captivity as well as when free, takes almost any kind of food, cooked or raw, animal or .vegetable. The fish is well known for sagacity and boldness and is suited for various kinds of experimentation. Indeed the snapper has already been carefully studied by Reighard ('08) as to its behavior. Thus, with the hope that the gray snapper may in future prove to be a suitable form for certain lines of experimental work, I have utilized all the brains which have been used for chemical investigation, together with some others, for studying the growth of the brain in weight with respect to body length. Most of the fish were secured by netting them, but on account of the difficulty of getting the larger fish by this method, I have also used dynamite as well as the hook and line. I have noted in table 1 the method adopted for catching each individual.
investigation not only because these fish are abundant in subtropical seas, but also because they possess numerous virtues  
for experimental purposes. The snapper may be kept in the  
laboratory for a long period, and in captivity as well as when  
free, takes almost any kind of food, cooked or raw, animal or  
.vegetable. The fish is well known for sagacity and boldness  
and is suited for various kinds of experimentation. Indeed the  
snapper has already been carefully studied by Reighard ('08)  
as to its behavior. Thus, with the hope that the gray snapper  
may in future prove to be a suitable form for certain lines of experimental work, I have utilized all the brains which have been  
used for chemical investigation, together with some others, for  
studying the growth of the brain in weight with respect to body  
length. Most of the fish were secured by netting them, but on  
account of the difficulty of getting the larger fish by this method,  
I have also used dynamite as well as the hook and line. I  
have noted in table 1 the method adopted for catching each  
individual.  


TECHINQUE EMPLOYED  
TECHINQUE EMPLOYED


The fish w^ere examined as soon as they were brought into  
The fish w^ere examined as soon as they were brought into the laboratory. However, as in the case, of netting them, when too many were caught at once some were kept in a live box for not more than two days, except in a few cases in which they were kept for special purposes for several days. When the fish were kept in a live box for more than two days it is so stated in table 1.
the laboratory. However, as in the case, of netting them, when  
too many were caught at once some were kept in a live box for  
not more than two days, except in a few cases in which they  
were kept for special purposes for several days. When the fish  
were kept in a live box for more than two days it is so stated  
in table 1.  


In every instance the length of body was recorded in the following way. The fish was laid on its side and the length was  
In every instance the length of body was recorded in the following way. The fish was laid on its side and the length was determined by means of calipers from the tip of the snout to the middle of the caudal edge of the tail. The body weights of the fish were also taken in a few instances. Although I reahzed the desirability of recording the body weight in all cases, yet it was not always possible to make this measurement.
determined by means of calipers from the tip of the snout to the  
middle of the caudal edge of the tail. The body weights of the  
fish were also taken in a few instances. Although I reahzed  
the desirability of recording the body weight in all cases, yet it  
was not always possible to make this measurement.  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM






43  
43






TABLE 1  
TABLE 1 Shoiving the brain weights according to various body lengths, together with the percentage of ivater in the brain, of the gray snapper. Arranged according to increasing body length
Shoiving the brain weights according to various body lengths, together with the percentage of ivater in the brain, of the gray snapper. Arranged according to increasing body length  






BODY  
BODY




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




WATER IN  
WATER IN




REMARKS  
REMARKS








Length  
Length




Weight  
Weight








BRAIN  
BRAIN




Line 10,905: Line 10,320:




7/1 m.  
7/1 m.




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




per cent  
per cent




Line 10,921: Line 10,336:




88  
88




12  
12




0.122  
0.122




78.85  
78.85




Net  
Net








137  
137




43  
43




0.234  
0.234




78.63  
78.63




Net  
Net








155  
155




59  
59




0.284  
0.284




79.33  
79.33




Net  
Net








215  
215








0.622  
0.622




79.52  
79.52




Net  
Net








216  
216




140  
140




0.628  
0.628




81.12  
81.12




Dynamited  
Dynamited








217  
217








0.483  
0.483




78.34  
78.34




Net  
Net








225  
225








0.670  
0.670




79.05  
79.05




Net  
Net








227  
227




173  
173




0.627  
0.627




80.43  
80.43




Dynamited  
Dynamited








237  
237








0.575  
0.575




78.19  
78.19




Net  
Net








• 238  
• 238




197  
197




0.660  
0.660




79.91  
79.91




Hook  
Hook








240  
240








0.711  
0.711




79.92  
79.92




Net  
Net








245  
245




220  
220




0.732  
0.732




81.48  
81.48




Dynamited  
Dynamited








249  
249




218  
218




0.723  
0.723




80.69  
80.69




Dynamited  
Dynamited








252  
252








0.748  
0.748




79.55  
79.55




Net  
Net








252  
252








0.762  
0.762




78.64  
78.64




Net  
Net








253  
253




229  
229




0.897  
0.897




80.65  
80.65




Dynamited  
Dynamited








256  
256








0.748  
0.748




77.51  
77.51




Net  
Net








258  
258








0.828  
0.828




79.47  
79.47




Net  
Net








259  
259








0.844  
0.844




78.32  
78.32




Net  
Net








262  
262








0.833  
0.833




78.75  
78.75




Net  
Net








262  
262








0.882  
0.882




77.85  
77.85




Net  
Net








263  
263








0.864  
0.864




77.29 9  
77.29 9




Net  
Net








'263  
'263




269  
269




0.803  
0.803




80.08  
80.08




Hook  
Hook








263  
263




261  
261




0.816  
0.816




79.68  
79.68




Hook  
Hook








268  
268








0.859  
0.859




79.74  
79.74




Net  
Net








269  
269








0.781*  
0.781*




77.49  
77.49




Net  
Net








271  
271








0.921  
0.921




78.78 cf  
78.78 cf




Net  
Net








277  
277








0.816  
0.816




78.57  
78.57




Net  
Net








278  
278








0.843  
0.843




78.32  
78.32




Net  
Net








278  
278




311  
311




0.871  
0.871




82.91  
82.91




Hook  
Hook








285  
285








0.985  
0.985




79.17 9  
79.17 9




Net  
Net








293  
293








1.006  
1.006




77.28 d"  
77.28 d"




Net  
Net








294  
294








0.861  
0.861




78.86 d"  
78.86 d"




Net  
Net








295  
295








0.925  
0.925




77.56 d"  
77.56 d"




Dynamited  
Dynamited








296  
296








0.900  
0.900




78.07  
78.07




Net  
Net








298  
298








0.982  
0.982




78.49 d  
78.49 d




Kept in live box  
Kept in live box




4 days  
4 days




300  
300








0.907  
0.907




79.21 d  
79.21 d




Dynamited  
Dynamited








300  
300








0.971  
0.971




78.17 9  
78.17 9




Net  
Net








301  
301








0.952  
0.952




77.10 o^  
77.10 o^




Net  
Net




Line 11,559: Line 10,974:




44  
44






SHINKISHI HATAI  
SHINKISHI HATAI




Line 11,571: Line 10,986:




TABLE  
TABLE




1 — Continued  
1 — Continued




Line 11,581: Line 10,996:




BODY  
BODY




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




WATER IN  
WATER IN BRAIN
BRAIN  




REMARKS  
REMARKS








Length  
Length




Weight  
Weight








mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




grajiis  
grajiis




per cent  
per cent




Line 11,620: Line 11,034:




302  
302








1.042  
1.042




77.87 9  
77.87 9




Net  
Net








302  
302








1.042  
1.042




77.06 d"  
77.06 d"




Net  
Net








303  
303








0.776  
0.776




75.40 9  
75.40 9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








306  
306








1.079  
1.079




79.17 9  
79.17 9




Kept in live box  
Kept in live box








317  
317








0.974  
0.974




78.03 d"  
78.03 d"




Net  
Net








318  
318








1.072  
1.072




79.57 9  
79.57 9




Net  
Net








330  
330








1.124  
1.124




76.51 c?  
76.51 c?




Net  
Net








335  
335




681  
681




1.164  
1.164




80.07 9  
80.07 9




Kept several days in  
Kept several days in




box  
box




336  
336








1.124  
1.124




77.67 9  
77.67 9




Kept several days in  
Kept several days in




box  
box




340  
340




908  
908




1.126  
1.126




76.16 9  
76.16 9




Net  
Net








345 ,  
345 ,








1.061  
1.061




79.15 9  
79.15 9




Net  
Net








348  
348




iHbs.  
iHbs.




1.141  
1.141




77.46 9  
77.46 9




Net  
Net








353  
353




2 lbs.  
2 lbs.




1.117  
1.117




76.63 9  
76.63 9




Net  
Net








353  
353




2 lbs.  
2 lbs.




1.169  
1.169




77.81 9  
77.81 9




Net  
Net








360  
360








1.178  
1.178




77.88 d  
77.88 d




Net  
Net








362  
362








1.257  
1.257




78.65 d  
78.65 d




Net  
Net








367  
367




781  
781




1.262  
1.262




76.67 d  
76.67 d




Hook  
Hook








369  
369








1.286  
1.286




77.08 9  
77.08 9




Net  
Net








374  
374




2 lbs.  
2 lbs.




1.249  
1.249




76.24 d  
76.24 d




Net  
Net








380  
380




3 lbs.  
3 lbs.




1.281  
1.281




75.33 cf  
75.33 cf




Net  
Net








385  
385








1.418  
1.418




d"  
d"




Net  
Net








390  
390








1.336  
1.336




77.59 d  
77.59 d




Net  
Net








392  
392








1.353  
1.353




79.67 d  
79.67 d




Net  
Net








392  
392








1.644  
1.644




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








401  
401








1.584  
1.584




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








408  
408








1.618  
1.618




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited




•  




416  
416








1.632  
1.632




d^  
d^




Dynamited  
Dynamited








424  
424








1.369  
1.369




78.54 9  
78.54 9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








430  
430








1.400  
1.400




' 9  
' 9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








432  
432








1.424  
1.424




79.97 d  
79.97 d




Dynamited  
Dynamited








438  
438








1.530  
1.530




d  
d




Dynamited  
Dynamited








439  
439








1.400  
1.400




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








439  
439








1.499  
1.499




83.00 9  
83.00 9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








441  
441








1.601  
1.601




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited








448  
448








1.591  
1.591




9  
9




Dynamited  
Dynamited




Line 12,192: Line 11,606:




As soon as the brain was exposed by means of a small bone  
As soon as the brain was exposed by means of a small bone forceps, it was separated from the spinal cord between the firstvertebra and the base of the skull. It was not practicable to find the first spinal nerve or to determine the caudal end of the fourth ventricle, methods which are usually adopted in separat
forceps, it was separated from the spinal cord between the firstvertebra and the base of the skull. It was not practicable to  
find the first spinal nerve or to determine the caudal end of the  
fourth ventricle, methods which are usually adopted in separat




METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM






45  
45






ing the brain from the spinal cord in the mammalian nervous  
ing the brain from the spinal cord in the mammalian nervous system. Anteriorly the olfactory nerves were cut close to the olfactory bulbs. The saccus vasculosus was not included with the brain. The brain which was thus removed was placed in a small bottle which had been previously weighed, and this was weighed again to a milligram. After the fresh weight of the brain was determined, the bottle with its contents was placed in a steam oven at a temperature of 80°-90°C. for several days (Tortugas laboratory) and then later dried at the Wistar Institute under better laboratory conditions at 96°C. The various other methods used for the analysis of the brain will be described later.
system. Anteriorly the olfactory nerves were cut close to the  
olfactory bulbs. The saccus vasculosus was not included with  
the brain. The brain which was thus removed was placed in  
a small bottle which had been previously weighed, and this was  
weighed again to a milligram. After the fresh weight of the  
brain was determined, the bottle with its contents was placed  
in a steam oven at a temperature of 80°-90°C. for several days  
(Tortugas laboratory) and then later dried at the Wistar Institute under better laboratory conditions at 96°C. The various  
other methods used for the analysis of the brain will be described later.  






THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO BODY LENGTH  
THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO BODY LENGTH


Altogether observations on 74 brains of the gray snapper have  
Altogether observations on 74 brains of the gray snapper have been made.
been made.  


From table 1 the average brain weight of the sanpper for  
From table 1 the average brain weight of the sanpper for several values of the body length has been calculated and the results are given in table 2.
several values of the body length has been calculated and the  
results are given in table 2.  


In order to show the general distribution of the brain weights  
In order to show the general distribution of the brain weights in relation to the body length, I have prepared a chart based on the data given in tables 1 and 2.
in relation to the body length, I have prepared a chart based  
on the data given in tables 1 and 2.  


In the chart males and females are not distinguished. As will  
In the chart males and females are not distinguished. As will be seen from chart 1, the distribution of brain weight in respect
be seen from chart 1, the distribution of brain weight in respect  


TABLE 2  
TABLE 2


Shoiving the average brain iveight of the gray snapper for the several values of the body  
Shoiving the average brain iveight of the gray snapper for the several values of the body


length  
length




Line 12,247: Line 11,643:




BRAIN  
BRAIN




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT








BODY LENGTH  
BODY LENGTH




BODY LENGTH  
BODY LENGTH OBSERVED
OBSERVED  




Line 12,266: Line 11,661:




NUMBER OF  
NUMBER OF




HANGE  
HANGE




Observed  
Observed




Calculated by  
Calculated by formula
formula  




SNAPPERS  
SNAPPERS




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Line 12,294: Line 11,688:




200-250  
200-250




231  
231




0.643  
0.643




0.667  
0.667




10  
10




250-300  
250-300




271  
271




0.860  
0.860




0.840  
0.840




23  
23




300-350  
300-350




319  
319




1.037  
1.037




1.048  
1.048




15  
15




350-400  
350-400




373  
373




1.296  
1.296




1.282  
1.282




12  
12




400-450  
400-450




428  
428




1.513  
1.513




1.520  
1.520




11  
11




Average  
Average




1.070  
1.070




1.071  
1.071




Line 12,385: Line 11,779:




46  
46






SHINKISHI HATAI  
SHINKISHI HATAI






to the increasing body length from 150 mm. upward is practically linear. This linear relation between these two characters  
to the increasing body length from 150 mm. upward is practically linear. This linear relation between these two characters is better shown by the positions of the averaged values, which are also plotted. It is well known that in the adult stage the relation between brain weight and body length or body weight is practically linear, even in the case of some mammals (see for instance growth of brain in weight in the albino rat in respect to body length or body weight, Donaldson, '09) but it is remarkable to find the linear relation in fish when they are so small. This linearity during the period of early growth probably means that in the gray snapper the brain reaches its struc
is better shown by the positions of the averaged values, which  
are also plotted. It is well known that in the adult stage the  
relation between brain weight and body length or body weight  
is practically linear, even in the case of some mammals (see for  
instance growth of brain in weight in the albino rat in respect  
to body length or body weight, Donaldson, '09) but it is remarkable to find the linear relation in fish when they are so  
small. This linearity during the period of early growth probably means that in the gray snapper the brain reaches its struc




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




Line 12,418: Line 11,805:




_j •  
_j •








• ' -c-^^ u  
• ' -c-^^ u




1.5  
1.5




. . •. _i-- t-_  
. . •. _i-- t-_








^^^^ '  
^^^^ '








^^*  
^^*








^i^L^  
^i^L^








^-.i"^ '  
^-.i"^ '




1.0  
1.0




^^^l5fL*  
^^^l5fL*








^^11 '  
^^11 '




iT J^'l M n 1 1 1 1 1 1 M M 1 1 M 1 1  
iT J^'l M n 1 1 1 1 1 1 M M 1 1 M 1 1




^v>  
^v>




Line 12,475: Line 11,862:




.5 "*  
.5 "*




Line 12,492: Line 11,879:




n 1 1 — 1 1 — 1 \ — 1 — 1 — ^ — ' — ' — 1 — 1 — ' — ' — ' — ' —  
n 1 1 — 1 1 — 1 \ — 1 — 1 — ^ — ' — ' — 1 — 1 — ' — ' — ' — ' —




1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 -L  
1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 -L




Line 12,503: Line 11,890:




50  
50






100  
100






150  
150






200  
200






250  
250






.^00  
.^00






350  
350






400  
400






450  
450






Chart 1 Showing the weight of the brain of the gray snapper according to  
Chart 1 Showing the weight of the brain of the gray snapper according to body length. The observed weights are represented by 74 fish. • = observed weight — o — o — = average observed weight (table 2).
body length. The observed weights are represented by 74 fish. • = observed  
weight — o — o — = average observed weight (table 2).  






tural maturity early, and that the subsequent increase in weight  
tural maturity early, and that the subsequent increase in weight indicates merely a uniform swelling of the nervous system as a whole. The maturity of the brain at a relatively early stage of growth may be inferred also from practical constancy of the percentage of water in the brain from the very small to the very large fish in this series (page 48).
indicates merely a uniform swelling of the nervous system as  
a whole. The maturity of the brain at a relatively early stage  
of growth may be inferred also from practical constancy of the  
percentage of water in the brain from the very small to the very  
large fish in this series (page 48).  


It is to be regretted that it was not possible to obtain data on  
It is to be regretted that it was not possible to obtain data on smaller specimens, though every effort was made to obtain such specimens while I was at the Tortugas Laboratory. We were even unable to find any of the gray snapper fry, though the fry of the school master (Neomaenis apodus) which is most closely
smaller specimens, though every effort was made to obtain such  
specimens while I was at the Tortugas Laboratory. We were  
even unable to find any of the gray snapper fry, though the fry  
of the school master (Neomaenis apodus) which is most closely  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 47  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 47


related to the gray snapper, was abundant everywhere. Possibly the months of June and July were not a proper season to  
related to the gray snapper, was abundant everywhere. Possibly the months of June and July were not a proper season to find them, or the fry of the gray snapper may not live in the open seas or along the beach, but may be in hiding under the intricate roots of mangroves, a tree not found on the Tortugas Islands.
find them, or the fry of the gray snapper may not live in the  
open seas or along the beach, but may be in hiding under the  
intricate roots of mangroves, a tree not found on the Tortugas  
Islands.  


On account of the scantiness of the data on the gray snapper  
On account of the scantiness of the data on the gray snapper less than 200 mm. in body length, I am unable to present a complete record of the growth of the brain. However it appears from the general trend of the growth curve that, with the possible exception of the very early period, the relation between the brain weight and body length does not deviate much from linearity.
less than 200 mm. in body length, I am unable to present a complete record of the growth of the brain. However it appears  
from the general trend of the growth curve that, with the possible  
exception of the very early period, the relation between the  
brain weight and body length does not deviate much from  
linearity.  


Kellicott ('08) who studied the growth of the brain in the  
Kellicott ('08) who studied the growth of the brain in the smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill) in respect to the body weight, found the graph to resemble that for the mammalian brain; that is the graph shows a rapid rise at the early period which is followed by a slower rate of growth. The form of the curve suggests a logarithmic formula such as was used to represent the growth of the brain in the albino rat (Hatai, '09). In other words the form of the graph for the gray snapper is strikingly different from that for the dogfish. This difference may be due to the fact that in the dogfish the brain possesses a voluminous cerebellum, as well as olfactory bulbs, and the combined weights of these two structures may be greater than that of the rest of the brain, while these two structures in the gray snapper are very small and the latter was not included. It appears that these two parts, olfactory bulbs and cerebellum, of the dogfish brain grow very rapidly during the earlier period, thus giving the form of the graph similar to that for the mammal.
smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill) in respect to the body  
weight, found the graph to resemble that for the mammalian  
brain; that is the graph shows a rapid rise at the early period  
which is followed by a slower rate of growth. The form of the  
curve suggests a logarithmic formula such as was used to represent the growth of the brain in the albino rat (Hatai, '09). In  
other words the form of the graph for the gray snapper is strikingly different from that for the dogfish. This difference may be  
due to the fact that in the dogfish the brain possesses a voluminous  
cerebellum, as well as olfactory bulbs, and the combined weights  
of these two structures may be greater than that of the rest of  
the brain, while these two structures in the gray snapper are  
very small and the latter was not included. It appears that  
these two parts, olfactory bulbs and cerebellum, of the dogfish  
brain grow very rapidly during the earlier period, thus giving  
the form of the graph similar to that for the mammal.  


Since the brain weight of the gray snapper shows a linear  
Since the brain weight of the gray snapper shows a linear relation to the body length through a wide range, and since the fish which are usually caught fall within this range, I have devised the following formula for brain weight on body length, in hopes that it may prove useful for some future investigation.
relation to the body length through a wide range, and since the  
fish which are usually caught fall within this range, I have devised the following formula for brain weight on body length,  
in hopes that it may prove useful for some future investigation.  


Brain weight (gms.) = 0.00433 Body length (mm.) - 0.333.  
Brain weight (gms.) = 0.00433 Body length (mm.) - 0.333.


The results of the calculation are given in table 2 and there  
The results of the calculation are given in table 2 and there






48 SHINKISHI HATAI  
48 SHINKISHI HATAI


contrasted with the observed values. The agreement is highly  
contrasted with the observed values. The agreement is highly satisfactory, and thus the formula may be employed when the probable brain weight of the gray snapper in which body length is known, is desired. I may point out that the absolute amount of increment of the weight of the brain following every millimeter increase of the body length is slightly over four milligrams (4,33 milligrams).
satisfactory, and thus the formula may be employed when the  
probable brain weight of the gray snapper in which body length  
is known, is desired. I may point out that the absolute amount  
of increment of the weight of the brain following every millimeter increase of the body length is slightly over four milligrams  
(4,33 milligrams).  


PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN THE BRAIN  
PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN THE BRAIN


Altogether 64 snappers were examined to determine the water  
Altogether 64 snappers were examined to determine the water content in the brain, and the results have been already given n table 1. An examination of the table reveals several striking relations in regard to the percentage of water. The percentage of water given by the smallest fish is 78.85 per cent while that of the larger fish, having a body length of 424 mm. and ranking in length third from the largest in which the water determination was made, gives 78.54 per cent. The frequency distribution of the percentage of water gives the following results.
content in the brain, and the results have been already given  
n table 1. An examination of the table reveals several striking relations in regard to the percentage of water. The percentage of water given by the smallest fish is 78.85 per cent while  
that of the larger fish, having a body length of 424 mm. and  
ranking in length third from the largest in which the water determination was made, gives 78.54 per cent. The frequency  
distribution of the percentage of water gives the following  
results.  


TABLE 3  
TABLE 3


Showiny the frequency distribution of the percentage of water in the brain of the  
Showiny the frequency distribution of the percentage of water in the brain of the


gray snapper  
gray snapper






PER CENT OF WATER  
PER CENT OF WATER




NUMBER OF CASES  
NUMBER OF CASES




75-76  
75-76




2  
2




76-77  
76-77




5  
5




77-78  
77-78




15  
15




78-79  
78-79




17  
17




79-80  
79-80




16  
16




80-81  
80-81




6  
6




81-82  
81-82




2  
2




82-83  
82-83




1  
1




Total number  
Total number




64  
64




Line 12,694: Line 12,033:




Despite the fact of a wide range in the percentage o" water,  
Despite the fact of a wide range in the percentage o" water, the distribution of the frequencies is practically normal, and furthermore the high and low values are well mingled, when these
the distribution of the frequencies is practically normal, and furthermore the high and low values are well mingled, when these  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 49  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 49


values are arranged according to the body length of the snapper  
values are arranged according to the body length of the snapper (table 1) and there is no noticeable tendency for the lower values of the percentage of water to occur more frequently among larger fish, or vice versa. From this we infer that so far as the present data are concerned, the percentage of water in the small and large fish is nearly identical within a wide range of body length, and therefore the percentage of water does not vary regularly with the length or size of the fish. The average of 64 determinations gives the percentage of water as 78.61 per cent.
(table 1) and there is no noticeable tendency for the lower values  
of the percentage of water to occur more frequently among larger  
fish, or vice versa. From this we infer that so far as the present  
data are concerned, the percentage of water in the small and  
large fish is nearly identical within a wide range of body length,  
and therefore the percentage of water does not vary regularly  
with the length or size of the fish. The average of 64 determinations gives the percentage of water as 78.61 per cent.  


This wide variation in the percentage of water I am unable  
This wide variation in the percentage of water I am unable to explain at the present moment. It was thought at first that the method of capture, particularly the use of dynamite, might be responsible for it. Careful examination however (see remarks in table 1) of the table shows at once that such is not the case, and these wide variations are not correlated with the method of capture. It is true that the cranial cavity of the fish contains liquid as well as a jellylike substance, and the adhesion of particles of this substance may alter to some extent the percentage of water, but this factor is too insignificant to cause the wide variations shown in the table.
to explain at the present moment. It was thought at first that  
the method of capture, particularly the use of dynamite, might  
be responsible for it. Careful examination however (see remarks in table 1) of the table shows at once that such is not  
the case, and these wide variations are not correlated with the  
method of capture. It is true that the cranial cavity of the fish  
contains liquid as well as a jellylike substance, and the adhesion  
of particles of this substance may alter to some extent the percentage of water, but this factor is too insignificant to cause the  
wide variations shown in the table.  


One other factor, though it appears to be important, cannot  
One other factor, though it appears to be important, cannot be readily tested, namely, masked age; that is a failure of the size and weight of the fish to indicate the age. We have no way to determine the age of the gray snapper. It may be that the size of the fish shows a wide range of variation for any given age. If size was positively correlated with age, then the low percentage of water would be given by the older fish, and vice versa. Therefore should we be able to arrange the data according to the ages of the fish, not the size of the fish as has been done, the values for the water should arrange themselves in a regular descending order with increasing age. This is, however, a mere speculation and must wait the test of future investigation.
be readily tested, namely, masked age; that is a failure of the  
size and weight of the fish to indicate the age. We have no way  
to determine the age of the gray snapper. It may be that the  
size of the fish shows a wide range of variation for any given age.  
If size was positively correlated with age, then the low percentage  
of water would be given by the older fish, and vice versa. Therefore should we be able to arrange the data according to the ages  
of the fish, not the size of the fish as has been done, the values  
for the water should arrange themselves in a regular descending  
order with increasing age. This is, however, a mere speculation  
and must wait the test of future investigation.  


Still another possible factor is the low grade of organization  
Still another possible factor is the low grade of organization of the fish brain compared with that of the higher vertebrates. It is conceivable that owing to this low grade of organization, the structural maturity, or especially the process of myelination, may not progress regularly, and that within the same size or at
of the fish brain compared with that of the higher vertebrates.  
It is conceivable that owing to this low grade of organization,  
the structural maturity, or especially the process of myelination,  
may not progress regularly, and that within the same size or at  


THE JOURNAX, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO, 1  
THE JOURNAX, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO, 1






50 SHINKISHI HATAI  
50 SHINKISHI HATAI


the same age, a wide range of variation might exist in respect  
the same age, a wide range of variation might exist in respect to the degree of myehnation, according to the environment of the fish or to the general nutritional conditions. Whether or not this suggestion has a value, only further investigation can determine.
to the degree of myehnation, according to the environment of  
the fish or to the general nutritional conditions. Whether or  
not this suggestion has a value, only further investigation can  
determine.  


Scott ('12) found that the percentage of water in the brain of  
Scott ('12) found that the percentage of water in the brain of the smooth dogfish differs very little between small and large specimens, and gives on the average 78.5 per cent. Donaldson ('05) who examined the brains of the summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) noted also but slight variation in the percentage of water in the brains of large and small individuals. The average from sixteen flounders in which the body weight ranges from 539 grams to 1290 grams, is 78.45 per cent. Thus the average percentages of water obtained by Donaldson, Scott and by myself are 78.45 per cent (flounder), 78.5 per cent (dogfish) and 78.61 per cent (gray snapper) respectively. For the purpose of comparison I gave the percentages of water in the brain of several fish, as determined by various investigators.
the smooth dogfish differs very little between small and large  
specimens, and gives on the average 78.5 per cent. Donaldson  
('05) who examined the brains of the summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) noted also but slight variation in the percentage of water in the brains of large and small individuals. The  
average from sixteen flounders in which the body weight ranges  
from 539 grams to 1290 grams, is 78.45 per cent. Thus the  
average percentages of water obtained by Donaldson, Scott and  
by myself are 78.45 per cent (flounder), 78.5 per cent (dogfish)  
and 78.61 per cent (gray snapper) respectively. For the purpose  
of comparison I gave the percentages of water in the brain of  
several fish, as determined by various investigators.  


As will be seen from table 4 despite the widely different sizes  
As will be seen from table 4 despite the widely different sizes and probably wide differences in the age of fish, the percentages of water in the brains are very close to one another, and further interest lies in the fact that the values given by the fish brains are not much different from the percentage of water in the adult mammalian brain.
and probably wide differences in the age of fish, the percentages  
of water in the brains are very close to one another, and further  
interest lies in the fact that the values given by the fish brains  
are not much different from the percentage of water in the adult  
mammalian brain.  


Since the reduction in the water in the brain is induced by the  
Since the reduction in the water in the brain is induced by the deposition of the so called 'myelin substance' (Donaldson, '16) we may infer that the process of myelin ation in the fish brain attains its mature form at a very early period' thus permitting but very slight variation from small to large individuals. Scott ('12) also concludes from his observations on the water content
deposition of the so called 'myelin substance' (Donaldson, '16)  
we may infer that the process of myelin ation in the fish brain  
attains its mature form at a very early period' thus permitting  
but very slight variation from small to large individuals. Scott  
('12) also concludes from his observations on the water content  


' In a private communication Dr. G. W. Bartelmez informs me that in Ameiurus melas, larvae 10 to 12 mm. long show already well advanced myelination of  
' In a private communication Dr. G. W. Bartelmez informs me that in Ameiurus melas, larvae 10 to 12 mm. long show already well advanced myelination of the roots of all the cranial nerves, as well as of the fasciculus longitudinalis medialis. The age of the larvae, according to Dr. Bartelmez 's estimate, is about ten to twelve days after fertilization. The largest adults measure as much as 120 mm. or nearly ten times the length of the larvae in which the myelination is already well advanced. From the above we may safely assume that myelination takes place in the fish at an early stage of development.
the roots of all the cranial nerves, as well as of the fasciculus longitudinalis medialis.  
The age of the larvae, according to Dr. Bartelmez 's estimate, is about ten to  
twelve days after fertilization. The largest adults measure as much as 120 mm.  
or nearly ten times the length of the larvae in which the myelination is already  
well advanced. From the above we may safely assume that myelination takes  
place in the fish at an early stage of development.  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM






51  
51






of the dogfish that the differences in the reduction of water in the  
of the dogfish that the differences in the reduction of water in the two cases is that "the nervous (and body) changes which occur in the mammal are post-embryonic and extra-utero. In the
two cases is that "the nervous (and body) changes which occur  
in the mammal are post-embryonic and extra-utero. In the  


TABLE 4  
TABLE 4


Showing the percentage of ivater in thebrainsof several fish. Data compiled from  
Showing the percentage of ivater in thebrainsof several fish. Data compiled from


various sources  
various sources




Line 12,810: Line 12,087:




X  
X




Line 12,823: Line 12,100:




SPECIES  
SPECIES




BODY  
BODY WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




o "  
o "




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




PER  
PER CENT OF WATER
CENT OF  
WATER  




HOLETHER  
HOLETHER


EXTRACT  
EXTRACT




SEX  
SEX




OBSERVER  
OBSERVER




Cyprinus carpio  
Cyprinus carpio




Line 12,862: Line 12,135:




77.50  
77.50




8.33  
8.33








Von Bibra (1854)  
Von Bibra (1854)




Cyprinus barbus  
Cyprinus barbus




Line 12,882: Line 12,155:




78.00  
78.00




9.37  
9.37








Von Bibra (1854)  
Von Bibra (1854)




Salmo farco  
Salmo farco




Line 12,902: Line 12,175:




78.92  
78.92




8.42  
8.42








Von Bibra (1854)  
Von Bibra (1854)




Line 12,921: Line 12,194:




-80.00  
-80.00




Line 12,930: Line 12,203:




Lucius esox  
Lucius esox




Line 12,939: Line 12,212:




81.93  
81.93




7.25  
7.25 9.10
9.10  








Von Bibra (1854)  
Von Bibra (1854)




Fish  
Fish




Schlossberger  
Schlossberger


(1856)  
(1856)




Line 12,973: Line 12,245:




Cyprinus auratus  
Cyprinus auratus




Line 12,982: Line 12,254:




77.80  
77.80




Line 12,989: Line 12,261:




Bezold (1857)  
Bezold (1857)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




539  
539




393  
393




0.253  
0.253




78.05  
78.05




Line 13,011: Line 12,283:




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




540  
540




397  
397




0.305  
0.305




79.06  
79.06








C^  
C^




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




540  
540




386  
386




0.351  
0.351




78.00  
78.00








<f  
<f




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




560  
560




411  
411




0.338  
0.338




78.70  
78.70




Line 13,079: Line 12,351:




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




630  
630




409  
409




0.279  
0.279




78.06  
78.06








&  
&




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




640  
640




404  
404




0.293  
0.293




78.43  
78.43








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




682  
682




405  
405




0.288  
0.288




79.56  
79.56




Line 13,147: Line 12,419:




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




834  
834




440  
440




0.311  
0.311




78.60  
78.60








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




840  
840




462  
462




0.358  
0.358




78.98  
78.98








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




860  
860




453  
453




0.406  
0.406




78.37  
78.37








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




880  
880




459  
459




0.381  
0.381




77.11  
77.11








cf  
cf




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




890  
890




459  
459




0.417  
0.417




77.98  
77.98








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




1010  
1010




460  
460




0.355  
0.355




78.22  
78.22








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




1010  
1010




447  
447




0.369  
0.369




78.72  
78.72








cf  
cf




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




1080  
1080




478  
478




0.412  
0.412




79.06  
79.06








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Summer flounder  
Summer flounder




1290  
1290




505  
505




0.391  
0.391




78.27  
78.27








9  
9




Donaldson (1905)  
Donaldson (1905)




Average  
Average




78.45  
78.45








Mustelus canis^  
Mustelus canis^




Line 13,374: Line 12,646:




78.5  
78.5




Line 13,381: Line 12,653:




Scott (1912)  
Scott (1912)




Barracuda  
Barracuda




12 lbs.  
12 lbs.




1047  
1047




1.554  
1.554




79.39  
79.39 78.61
78.61  








d'  
d'




Hatai (1917)  
Hatai (1917)




Neomaenis griseus^  
Neomaenis griseus^




Hatai (1917)  
Hatai (1917)




Cherna americana:  
Cherna americana:




Line 13,431: Line 12,702:




Red Grouper  
Red Grouper




14i lbs.  
14i lbs.




807  
807




1.230  
1.230




78.80  
78.80




Line 13,450: Line 12,721:




Hatai (1917)  
Hatai (1917)




Shark Sp?  
Shark Sp?




160 lbs.  
160 lbs.








32.593  
32.593




80.07  
80.07








d"  
d"




Hatai (1917)  
Hatai (1917)




Line 13,480: Line 12,751:




1 Average of 97 determinations from very small to very large.  
1 Average of 97 determinations from very small to very large. Percentage of water shows very slight variation.
Percentage of water shows very slight variation.  


2 Average of 51 gray snappers. Range of variation is shown in table (1).  
2 Average of 51 gray snappers. Range of variation is shown in table (1).






52  
52






SHINKISHI HATAI  
SHINKISHI HATAI






dogfish they take place in utero." He, however, has not determined the water content in the brain of the dogfish in utero.  
dogfish they take place in utero." He, however, has not determined the water content in the brain of the dogfish in utero. From the foregoing it is clearly important to determine the water content in the brain of the fish at very early stages in order to discover the period of rapid reduction which must take place in consequence of the appearance of myelin in the brain. It is the hope of the writer to do this in the near future.
From the foregoing it is clearly important to determine the  
water content in the brain of the fish at very early stages in  
order to discover the period of rapid reduction which must take  
place in consequence of the appearance of myelin in the brain.  
It is the hope of the writer to do this in the near future.  






CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIN (GRAY SNAPPER)  
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIN (GRAY SNAPPER)


Utilizing the materials which were employed for the determination of the percentage of water, I have determined the  
Utilizing the materials which were employed for the determination of the percentage of water, I have determined the nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the amount in the etheralcohol soluble fraction extracted from the total solids. The results of these determinations are shown in table 5.
nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the amount in the etheralcohol soluble fraction extracted from the total solids. The  
results of these determinations are shown in table 5.  


TABLE 5  
TABLE 5


Showing the amount of the ether-alcohol soluble and insoluble fractions in the brain  
Showing the amount of the ether-alcohol soluble and insoluble fractions in the brain of the gray snapper; also the amount of nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the nitrogen in the ether alcohol fraction
of the gray snapper; also the amount of nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the  
nitrogen in the ether alcohol fraction  




Line 13,520: Line 12,781:




BRAINS  
BRAINS




Line 13,529: Line 12,790:




WEIGHT OF  
WEIGHT OF




NITROGEN IN  
NITROGEN IN




Line 13,555: Line 12,816:




SERIES  
SERIES




a  
a


m  
m


D  
D Z
Z  




m  
m K
K  




SOLIDS  
SOLIDS




W.^TER  
W.^TER




NITROGEN  
NITROGEN




Residue  
Residue




Alcoholether  
Alcoholether Extract
Extract  




Residue  
Residue




Alcoholether  
Alcoholether Extract
Extract  




Line 13,597: Line 12,854:




weight  
weight








per cent  
per cent




mgms.  
mgms.




gins.  
gins.




gms.  
gms.




mgms.  
mgms.




711 gms.  
711 gms.




1  
1




28  
28




27.303  
27.303




5.665  
5.665




79.14  
79.14




462  
462




2.707  
2.707




2.958  
2.958




364  
364




98  
98




Line 13,660: Line 12,917:




8.15%  
8.15%




47.79%  
47.79%




52.21%  
52.21%




78.79%  
78.79%




21.21%  
21.21%




2  
2




19  
19




20.013  
20.013




4.588  
4.588




77.07  
77.07




334  
334




1.938  
1.938




2.650  
2.650




269  
269




65  
65




Line 13,715: Line 12,972:




7.28%  
7.28%




42.24%  
42.24%




57.75%  
57.75%




80.54%  
80.54%




19.46%  
19.46%




Ave  
Ave




rage . .  
rage . .








78.11  
78.11




7.72%  
7.72%




45.02%  
45.02%




54.98%  
54.98%




79.67%  
79.67%




20.33%  
20.33%




Line 13,761: Line 13,018:




To carry out the determinations presented in table 5, I have  
To carry out the determinations presented in table 5, I have divided the entire materials into two groups in which group 1 gives for the brain a percentage of water which ranges between 78 per cent and 80 per cent, while in group 2 the percentage of water ranges between 76 per cent and 77 per cent. All the other brains which gave percentages of water beyond these limits were excluded. Since all these data for the fish may be discussed conveniently by comparing them with similar data obtained
divided the entire materials into two groups in which group 1  
gives for the brain a percentage of water which ranges between  
78 per cent and 80 per cent, while in group 2 the percentage of  
water ranges between 76 per cent and 77 per cent. All the other  
brains which gave percentages of water beyond these limits were  
excluded. Since all these data for the fish may be discussed  
conveniently by comparing them with similar data obtained  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 53;  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 53;


from the rat brain, I may state simply that the values for the  
from the rat brain, I may state simply that the values for the alcohol-ether soluble fraction obtained in this series of fish are similar to those obtained by Von Bibra ('54) and by Schlossberger ('56) in other forms of fish (table 3).
alcohol-ether soluble fraction obtained in this series of fish are  
similar to those obtained by Von Bibra ('54) and by Schlossberger ('56) in other forms of fish (table 3).  


CONTENT OF 'NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN' IN THE BRAIN  
CONTENT OF 'NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN' IN THE BRAIN


Altogether 44 snappers of medium size were used for the  
Altogether 44 snappers of medium size were used for the purpose of determining the various extractive nitrogenous substances in the brain. These brains were divided into three samples, each giving nearly the same amount of moist brain weight. One additional sample was obtained from the brains of the schoolmaster (Neomaenis apodus) which is a species most closely related to the gray snapper.
purpose of determining the various extractive nitrogenous substances in the brain. These brains were divided into three samples, each giving nearly the same amount of moist brain weight.  
One additional sample was obtained from the brains of the schoolmaster (Neomaenis apodus) which is a species most closely related  
to the gray snapper.  


The fresh brains of each sample were ground finely and then  
The fresh brains of each sample were ground finely and then preserved in 150 cc. of 2.5 per cent solution of trichloracetic acid in water. - The ground brains were transferred to a bottle by means of 50 cc. water, thus making altogether 200 cc. of solution. The filtrates from this mixture were brought back to the Wistar Institute for analysis. The methods used for the determination of various nitrogen fractions were as follows:
preserved in 150 cc. of 2.5 per cent solution of trichloracetic  
acid in water. - The ground brains were transferred to a bottle  
by means of 50 cc. water, thus making altogether 200 cc. of  
solution. The filtrates from this mixture were brought back  
to the Wistar Institute for analysis. The methods used for the  
determination of various nitrogen fractions were as follows:  


1. Total non-protein nitrogen. Micro method of FoTin and  
1. Total non-protein nitrogen. Micro method of FoTin and Farmer as modified by Benedict and Bock.
Farmer as modified by Benedict and Bock.  


2. Amino-acid nitrogen. Van Slyke's nitrous acid method.  
2. Amino-acid nitrogen. Van Slyke's nitrous acid method. Also the same author's micro apparatus.
Also the same author's micro apparatus.  


3. Urea nitrogen. Urease method.  
3. Urea nitrogen. Urease method.


4. Ammonia nitrogen. By the usual aerat on method.  
4. Ammonia nitrogen. By the usual aerat on method.


In all cases, except the case of the amino acid, the nitrogen  
In all cases, except the case of the amino acid, the nitrogen content was determined by means of the DuBoscq colorimeter. The results obtained from these determinations are given in table 6. i
content was determined by means of the DuBoscq colorimeter.  
The results obtained from these determinations are given in  
table 6. i  


Since it is my intention to discuss this subject later in comparison with the similar data recently obtained from the brain  
Since it is my intention to discuss this subject later in comparison with the similar data recently obtained from the brain of the albino rat, I shall merely direct attention to the fact that these three samples give results very close to each other. - Furthermore the results obtained from the sample of the schoolmaster also agree with those found in the case of the gray snapper.
of the albino rat, I shall merely direct attention to the fact that  
these three samples give results very close to each other. - Furthermore the results obtained from the sample of the schoolmaster also agree with those found in the case of the gray snapper.  






54  
54






SHINKISHI HATAI  
SHINKISHI HATAI






TABLE 6  
TABLE 6






Showing nitrogen content in terms of the 7io7i-proteins, the amino acids, the urea  
Showing nitrogen content in terms of the 7io7i-proteins, the amino acids, the urea and the ammonia, in the brains of the gray snapper and of the 'schoolmaster.'
and the ammonia, in the brains of the gray snapper and of the 'schoolmaster.'  






Number  
Number






Weight  
Weight






MILLIGRAMS NITROGEN PER 100 GRAMS OF FRESH BRAIN  
MILLIGRAMS NITROGEN PER 100 GRAMS OF FRESH BRAIN






NonProtein  
NonProtein






Anino  
Anino acids
acids  






Urea  
Urea






Ammonia  
Ammonia






"Undetermined  
"Undetermined nitrogen
nitrogen  




Line 13,869: Line 13,098:




Neomaenis griseus  
Neomaenis griseus




Line 13,882: Line 13,111:




gms.  
gms.




Line 13,895: Line 13,124:




1  
1




16  
16




13.166  
13.166




204  
204




101.8  
101.8




13.2  
13.2




17.7  
17.7




71.3  
71.3




2  
2




13  
13




10.713  
10.713




224  
224




125.0  
125.0




17.8  
17.8




18.9  
18.9




62.3  
62.3




3  
3




15  
15




12.048  
12.048




203  
203




121.2  
121.2




15.8  
15.8




17.4  
17.4




48.6  
48.6




Average  
Average




11.976  
11.976




210  
210




116.0  
116.0




15.6  
15.6




18.0  
18.0




60.7  
60.7






Neomaenis apodus  
Neomaenis apodus






10  
10




11.195  
11.195




225  
225




126.0  
126.0




17.3  
17.3




17.2  
17.2






64.5  
64.5






This agreement in the various substances might also be taken  
This agreement in the various substances might also be taken to support the behef of the systematists that these two species are closely related.
to support the behef of the systematists that these two species  
are closely related.  






COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GRAY SNAPPER AND THE ALBINO RAT  
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GRAY SNAPPER AND THE ALBINO RAT IN REGARD TO THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE BRAIN
IN REGARD TO THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE BRAIN  


In order to compare the data on the chemical composition of  
In order to compare the data on the chemical composition of the brain in the gray snapper with those for the brain of the albino rat, table 7 was prepared. The entries for the fish are based on tables 5 and 6, while the data on the albino rat were obtained from an earlier paper (Hatai, '17).
the brain in the gray snapper with those for the brain of the  
albino rat, table 7 was prepared. The entries for the fish are  
based on tables 5 and 6, while the data on the albino rat were  
obtained from an earlier paper (Hatai, '17).  


When comparison is made between the fish brain and the entire brain of the albino rat, we find a distinct difference in regard  
When comparison is made between the fish brain and the entire brain of the albino rat, we find a distinct difference in regard to the content of the total nitrogen and of the nitrogen in the lipoids, as well as in the total amount of the ether-alcohol extractive materials. These differences must undoubtedly be correlated with anatomical differences 'n the two forms of the brains. In the rat we find a well developed cerebrum and cerebellum in which the myelinated nerve fibers are relatively less than in the stem, while the cell bodies are more abundant. On the other hand in these fish brains we find a mere trace of the
to the content of the total nitrogen and of the nitrogen in the  
lipoids, as well as in the total amount of the ether-alcohol extractive materials. These differences must undoubtedly be  
correlated with anatomical differences 'n the two forms of the  
brains. In the rat we find a well developed cerebrum and cerebellum in which the myelinated nerve fibers are relatively less  
than in the stem, while the cell bodies are more abundant. On  
the other hand in these fish brains we find a mere trace of the  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM






55  
55






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7


Showing the comparison of the gray snapper with the albino rat in regard to the chemical composition of their brains  
Showing the comparison of the gray snapper with the albino rat in regard to the chemical composition of their brains






Water in brain, per cent  
Water in brain, per cent


Total nitrogen in fresh tissue, per cent  
Total nitrogen in fresh tissue, per cent


Total nitrogen in solids, per cent  
Total nitrogen in solids, per cent


Alcohol-ether extract in solids, per cent  
Alcohol-ether extract in solids, per cent


Nitrogen in alcohol-ether soluble fraction, per cent  
Nitrogen in alcohol-ether soluble fraction, per cent Percentage of water in lipoid-free tissue, per cent. . . Milligrams of non-protein nitrogen per 100 grams
Percentage of water in lipoid-free tissue, per cent. . .  
Milligrams of non-protein nitrogen per 100 grams  


of fresh tissue, milligrams '.  
of fresh tissue, milligrams '.


Partition of nitrogen in milligrams of nitrogen per  
Partition of nitrogen in milligrams of nitrogen per


gram of solids  
gram of solids


[Non-pro tein-N  
[Non-pro tein-N


JAmino-acids-N  
JAmino-acids-N


|Urea-N  
|Urea-N


[Ammonia-N  
[Ammonia-N


Partition of non-protein nitrogen in percent of protein nitrogen  
Partition of non-protein nitrogen in percent of protein nitrogen I Non-proteins Amino acids Urea Ammonia
I Non-proteins  
Amino acids  
Urea  
Ammonia  






GR.^Y  
GR.^Y




ALBINO R.\T  
ALBINO R.\T




SNAPPER  
SNAPPER




STEM OF  
STEM OF




ENTIRE  
ENTIRE




ENCEPH.i
ENCEPH.i


BRAIN  
BRAIN




LON  
LON




78.11  
78.11




75.16  
75.16




1.69  
1.69




1.89  
1.89




7.72  
7.72




7.75  
7.75




54.98  
54.98




55.03  
55.03




20.60  
20.60




19.90  
19.90




88.80  
88.80




87.06  
87.06




225  
225




150  
150




9.6  
9.6




6.0  
6.0




5.3  
5.3




2.9  
2.9




0.7  
0.7




0.7  
0.7




0.8  
0.8




0.6  
0.6




13.04  
13.04




9.72  
9.72




7.20  
7.20




4.68  
4.68




0.97  
0.97




1.05  
1.05




1.11  
1.11




1.04  
1.04






ALBINO RAT  
ALBINO RAT ENTIRE BR.^IN
ENTIRE  
BR.^IN  






77.96  
77.96 1.95 8.98 47-. 14 18.20 87.00
1.95  
8.98  
47-. 14  
18.20  
87.00  


159  
159






7.6  
7.6 3.5 0.7 0.7
3.5  
0.7  
0.7  






10.37  
10.37 4.60 0.95 1.01
4.60  
0.95  
1.01  






cerebrum and cerebellum compared with the size of the stem  
cerebrum and cerebellum compared with the size of the stem in which the myelinated nerve fibers are abundant. Consequently we should expect a higher value of the total nitrogen in the rat brain than in the fish brain, since the former possesses relatively a much greater number of cell bodies in those two well developed parts, the cerebrum and cerebellum. At the same time the rat brain ought to give relatively a less amount of hpoids, owing to tjhe great,er abundance of the gray matter in the predominant parts. In the fish brain the insignificant growth of the cerebrum and cerebellum makes the stem of the brain relatively predominant in the quantitative relations, and since the stem is the portion of the brain in which the myehnated fibers are mostly found, we should expect the percentage value of the lipoid fraction in the fish brain to be relatively higher than in the rat.
in which the myelinated nerve fibers are abundant. Consequently we should expect a higher value of the total nitrogen  
in the rat brain than in the fish brain, since the former possesses  
relatively a much greater number of cell bodies in those two  
well developed parts, the cerebrum and cerebellum. At the  
same time the rat brain ought to give relatively a less amount  
of hpoids, owing to tjhe great,er abundance of the gray matter  
in the predominant parts. In the fish brain the insignificant  
growth of the cerebrum and cerebellum makes the stem of the  
brain relatively predominant in the quantitative relations, and  
since the stem is the portion of the brain in which the myehnated  
fibers are mostly found, we should expect the percentage value  
of the lipoid fraction in the fish brain to be relatively higher  
than in the rat.  






56 SHINKISHI HATAI  
56 SHINKISHI HATAI


If we compare now the entire brain of the snapper with the  
If we compare now the entire brain of the snapper with the stem of the albino rat brain (table 7) we notice a surprisinglyclose similarity. This we should expect since as was already stated the fish brain is practically represented by the stem, since the cerebral and cerebellar portions are relatively insignificant. Thus we notice the practical identity in the percentage values of the total nitrogen, hpoid nitrogen, and the amount of the Upoids. The percentage of water in the stem of the rat is however far less than in the entire brain of the fish which may be accounted for by the fact that in the brain of the fish the cerebrum and the cerebellum, though small ia relative quantity,* nevertheless are composed of structures rich in water, and thus bring the value of the water higher in the fish than in the stem alone of the albino rat brain.
stem of the albino rat brain (table 7) we notice a surprisinglyclose similarity. This we should expect since as was already  
stated the fish brain is practically represented by the stem, since  
the cerebral and cerebellar portions are relatively insignificant.  
Thus we notice the practical identity in the percentage values  
of the total nitrogen, hpoid nitrogen, and the amount of the  
Upoids. The percentage of water in the stem of the rat is however far less than in the entire brain of the fish which may be  
accounted for by the fact that in the brain of the fish the cerebrum and the cerebellum, though small ia relative quantity,*  
nevertheless are composed of structures rich in water, and thus  
bring the value of the water higher in the fish than in the stem  
alone of the albino rat brain.  


The nitrogen content of the Upoid is sUghtly higher in the fish  
The nitrogen content of the Upoid is sUghtly higher in the fish brain than in the albino rat brain, though almost identical with that in the stem. This difference may be due to the quantitative difference in the proportion of various lipoids in which the nitrogen content is not the same.
brain than in the albino rat brain, though almost identical with  
that in the stem. This difference may be due to the quantitative difference in the proportion of various lipoids in which the  
nitrogen content is not the same.  


I now wish to consider the partition of the non-protein nitrogen in the fish brain compared with the brain of the albino rat. As  
I now wish to consider the partition of the non-protein nitrogen in the fish brain compared with the brain of the albino rat. As will be seen from table 7 the content of the non-protein nitrogen is considerably greater in the fish than in the rat brain. We also notice that the greater part of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the nitrogen of the amino acids. The nitrogen values given by both the urea and ammonia are small and are practically identical both in the fish and rat. The greater amount of non-protein nitrogen found in the fish brain in comparison to the rat is interesting, though I am unable to explain this difference satisfactorily. I wish however to call attention to two factors which may have some bearing on the difference just noted.
will be seen from table 7 the content of the non-protein nitrogen is  
considerably greater in the fish than in the rat brain. We also  
notice that the greater part of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the nitrogen of the amino acids. The nitrogen values  
given by both the urea and ammonia are small and are practically identical both in the fish and rat. The greater amount of  
non-protein nitrogen found in the fish brain in comparison to the  
rat is interesting, though I am unable to explain this difference  
satisfactorily. I wish however to call attention to two factors  
which may have some bearing on the difference just noted.  


1. It seems probable that on account of the low grade of organization of the fish brain the physical consistence of the nervous  
1. It seems probable that on account of the low grade of organization of the fish brain the physical consistence of the nervous system may not be as stable as that of the more highly organized mammalian nervous system, and thus the wear and tear process may be greater and produce a correspondingly greater amount of waste products in the fish brain.
system may not be as stable as that of the more highly organized  
mammalian nervous system, and thus the wear and tear process  
may be greater and produce a correspondingly greater amount  
of waste products in the fish brain.  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 57  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 57


2. According to Folin and Denis ('14) the normal human blood  
2. According to Folin and Denis ('14) the normal human blood contains, on the average of four cases, 32 milligrams of nonprotein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood, while Wilson and Adolph ('17) found in the blood of various fresh water fish much higher values for the non-protein nitrogen (42 mgms. per 100 cc.) than in the human blood, and furthermore these investigators found a greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen was represented by the nitrogen of amino acids (23 mgms. per 100 cc. or about 55 per cent of the total non-protein nitrogen). Thus my own observations on the fish brain closely agree with those of Wilson and Adolph on the fish blood, so far as the relative abundance of the non-protein nitrogen is concerned, as well as in the relation of the amino acid nitrogen to the total non-protein nitrogen.
contains, on the average of four cases, 32 milligrams of nonprotein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood, while Wilson and Adolph  
('17) found in the blood of various fresh water fish much higher  
values for the non-protein nitrogen (42 mgms. per 100 cc.) than  
in the human blood, and furthermore these investigators found  
a greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen was represented  
by the nitrogen of amino acids (23 mgms. per 100 cc. or about  
55 per cent of the total non-protein nitrogen). Thus my own  
observations on the fish brain closely agree with those of Wilson  
and Adolph on the fish blood, so far as the relative abundance  
of the non-protein nitrogen is concerned, as well as in the relation  
of the amino acid nitrogen to the total non-protein nitrogen.  


Denis ('13-' 14) found also a considerably greater amount of  
Denis ('13-' 14) found also a considerably greater amount of non-protein nitrogen in the blood of marine fishes when contrasted with human blood. Denis found 62 mgms. of non-protein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood (average of 10 species of teleosts) and as high as 1087 mgms. in the case of the elasmobranchs (average of three species). Thus the greater abundance of the non-protein nitrogen in the fish blood, accompanied by a slow circulation, might be largely responsible for a greater accumulation of the non-protein nitrogenous extractive substances in the fish brain.
non-protein nitrogen in the blood of marine fishes when contrasted with human blood. Denis found 62 mgms. of non-protein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood (average of 10 species of teleosts)  
and as high as 1087 mgms. in the case of the elasmobranchs  
(average of three species). Thus the greater abundance of the  
non-protein nitrogen in the fish blood, accompanied by a slow  
circulation, might be largely responsible for a greater accumulation of the non-protein nitrogenous extractive substances in  
the fish brain.  


SUMMARY  
SUMMARY


The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was mainly used for  
The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was mainly used for the present investigation. The following are the more important facts brought out.
the present investigation. The following are the more important facts brought out.  


1. The relation between brain weight and body length is practically linear. This linear relation appears in the fish as small  
1. The relation between brain weight and body length is practically linear. This linear relation appears in the fish as small as 150 mm. in length. The fish smaller than 150 mm. were not studied because they could not be obtained.
as 150 mm. in length. The fish smaller than 150 mm. were not  
studied because they could not be obtained.  


2. The percentage of water in the brain varies very little from  
2. The percentage of water in the brain varies very little from small to large (body length : 88 mm. to 448 mm.). A similar relation was observed by Donaldson ('05) in the brain of the summer flounder and by Scott ('12) in the brain of the smooth dogfish. The probable explanation is that the process of mye
small to large (body length : 88 mm. to 448 mm.). A similar  
relation was observed by Donaldson ('05) in the brain of the  
summer flounder and by Scott ('12) in the brain of the smooth  
dogfish. The probable explanation is that the process of mye




58 SHINKISHI HATAI  
58 SHINKISHI HATAI


lination is completed in the fish brain relatively earlier than in  
lination is completed in the fish brain relatively earlier than in the mammalian brain.
the mammalian brain.  


3. With respect to the total nitrogen, nitrogen in ether-alcohol extract, and the lipoid content, the fish brain closely resembles  
3. With respect to the total nitrogen, nitrogen in ether-alcohol extract, and the lipoid content, the fish brain closely resembles the stem of the rat brain, but significantly differs from the entire rat brain. This is explained by the fact that the mature fish brain resembles essentially the stem of the mammalian brain owing to the small growth of cerebrum and cerebellum.
the stem of the rat brain, but significantly differs from the entire  
rat brain. This is explained by the fact that the mature fish  
brain resembles essentially the stem of the mammalian brain  
owing to the small growth of cerebrum and cerebellum.  


4. The non-protein nitrogen is considerably greater (42 per  
4. The non-protein nitrogen is considerably greater (42 per cent) in amount in the fish brain than in the rat brain. The suggestions were made that probably on account of unstable physical consistence of the fish nervous system, the wear and tear of the neurons may be greater than in the more highly organized mammalian nervous system, thus producing a larger quantity of the waste products, and also that on account of higher nonprotein nitrogen content of the fish blood, accompanied by a slow circulation, the deposition of the waste products might become greater, and at the same time a less vigorous removal further tends to increase the accumulation.
cent) in amount in the fish brain than in the rat brain. The  
suggestions were made that probably on account of unstable  
physical consistence of the fish nervous system, the wear and tear  
of the neurons may be greater than in the more highly organized  
mammalian nervous system, thus producing a larger quantity  
of the waste products, and also that on account of higher nonprotein nitrogen content of the fish blood, accompanied by a  
slow circulation, the deposition of the waste products might  
become greater, and at the same time a less vigorous removal  
further tends to increase the accumulation.  


5. The greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the amino acid nitrogen in both the fish and the rat.  
5. The greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the amino acid nitrogen in both the fish and the rat.


6. The amounts of urea nitrogen and of ammonia nitrogen  
6. The amounts of urea nitrogen and of ammonia nitrogen are closely similar to those found in the rat braiuc
are closely similar to those found in the rat braiuc  






METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 59  
METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 59


LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


Be?old, a. von 1857 Untersuchungen liber die Vertheilung von Wasser, organisdher Materie und anorganischen Verbindungen im Thierreiche.  
Be?old, a. von 1857 Untersuchungen liber die Vertheilung von Wasser, organisdher Materie und anorganischen Verbindungen im Thierreiche. Zeitschr. f. wiss. ZooL, vol. 8.
Zeitschr. f. wiss. ZooL, vol. 8.  


BiBRA, Ernest von 1854 Vergleichende Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn  
BiBRA, Ernest von 1854 Vergleichende Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn des Menschen und der Wirbelthiere. Verlag von Basserman u. Mathy. Mannheim.
des Menschen und der Wirbelthiere. Verlag von Basserman u. Mathy.  
Mannheim.  


Denis, W. 1913-1914 Metabolism studies on cold-blooded animals. 2, The  
Denis, W. 1913-1914 Metabolism studies on cold-blooded animals. 2, The blood and urine of fish. J. Biol. Chem., vol. 16, pp. 389-393.
blood and urine of fish. J. Biol. Chem., vol. 16, pp. 389-393.  


Donaldson, H. H. 1905 On the percentage of water in the brain of the summer  
Donaldson, H. H. 1905 On the percentage of water in the brain of the summer flounder, according to body weight. Not published — in manuscript. 1909 On the relation of the body length to the body weight and to the weight of the brain and of the spinal cord in the albino rat (Mus norvegicus var. albus). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 155-167.
flounder, according to body weight. Not published — in manuscript.  
1909 On the relation of the body length to the body weight and to  
the weight of the brain and of the spinal cord in the albino rat (Mus  
norvegicus var. albus). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 155-167.  


1915 The Rat. Reference tables and data for the albino rat (Mus  
1915 The Rat. Reference tables and data for the albino rat (Mus norvegicus albinus) and the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus). Memoirs of the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.
norvegicus albinus) and the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus). Memoirs  
of the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.  


1916 A preliminary determination of the part played by myelin in  
1916 A preliminary determination of the part played by myelin in reducing the water content of the mammalian nervous system (albino rat). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 26, pp. 443-451.
reducing the water content of the mammalian nervous system (albino  
rat). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 26, pp. 443-451.  


FoLiN, Otto and Denis, W. 1914 On the creatinine and creatine content of  
FoLiN, Otto and Denis, W. 1914 On the creatinine and creatine content of


blood. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 17, pp. 487-491.  
blood. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 17, pp. 487-491. Hatai, S. 1909 Note on the formulas used for calculating the weight of the
Hatai, S. 1909 Note on the formulas used for calculating the weight of the  


brain in the albino rats. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 169-173.  
brain in the albino rats. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 169-173.


1917 Metabolic activity of the nervous system. I. Amount of nonprotein nitrogen in the central nervous system of the normal albino  
1917 Metabolic activity of the nervous system. I. Amount of nonprotein nitrogen in the central nervous system of the normal albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, pp. 361-378.
rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, pp. 361-378.  


Kellicott, W. E. 1908 The growth of the brain and viscera in the smooth  
Kellicott, W. E. 1908 The growth of the brain and viscera in the smooth


dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill). Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 8, pp.  
dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill). Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 8, pp.


319-353.  
319-353. Reighard, J. 1908 An experimental field study of warning coloration in coral
Reighard, J. 1908 An experimental field study of warning coloration in coral  


reef fishes. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Inst.  
reef fishes. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Inst.


Washington, vol. 2.  
Washington, vol. 2. Schlossberger, J. E. 1856 Allegemeinen und vergleichenden Thierchemie.
Schlossberger, J. E. 1856 Allegemeinen und vergleichenden Thierchemie.  


Leipzig u. Heidelberg.  
Leipzig u. Heidelberg. Scott, G. G. 1912 The percentage of water in the brain of the dogfish. Proc.
Scott, G. G. 1912 The percentage of water in the brain of the dogfish. Proc.  


Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., vol. 9, no. 3.  
Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., vol. 9, no. 3. Wilson, D. W. and Adolph, E. F. 1917 The partition of non-protein nitrogen
Wilson, D. W. and Adolph, E. F. 1917 The partition of non-protein nitrogen  


in the blood of fresh water fish. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 29, pp. 405
in the blood of fresh water fish. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 29, pp. 405 41L
41L  






author's abstract of this paper issued  
author's abstract of this paper issued


BY the bibliographic SERVICE, FEBRUARY 2  
BY the bibliographic SERVICE, FEBRUARY 2






COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE  
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
CEREBRAL CORTEX  


V. PART I. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER  
V. PART I. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE ALBINO RAT BRAIN, TOGETHER WITH THE CHANGES IN THESE CHARACTERS ACCORDING TO THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN
OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL  
AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE ALBINO RAT BRAIN, TOGETHER  
WITH THE CHANGES IN THESE CHARACTERS ACCORDING TO THE  
GROWTH OF THE BRAIN  


V. PART II. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER  
V. PART II. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), compared WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ALBINO RAT
OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL  
AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT  
(mUS NORVEGICUS), compared WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA  
FOR THE ALBINO RAT  


NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biologij
From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biologij  


THREE FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS  
THREE FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS


PART I  
PART I


I. INTRODUCTION  
I. INTRODUCTION


The present study is an extension of an earlier one on the  
The present study is an extension of an earlier one on the thickness of the cerebral cortex in the albino rat (Sugita, '17 a) and aims to present the extent of the actual area occupied by the cortical cells, as seen in sections which were taken from the fixed levels of the albino brain, and also to follow the changes in this area during the postnatal growth of the brain. In the course of this investigation, the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume of a fixed locahty in the frontal i section was counted and the changes in this number with advancing age were ascertained. Furthermore the relation between the cell number and the cortical area was critically examined.
thickness of the cerebral cortex in the albino rat (Sugita, '17 a)  
and aims to present the extent of the actual area occupied by  
the cortical cells, as seen in sections which were taken from  
the fixed levels of the albino brain, and also to follow the  
changes in this area during the postnatal growth of the brain.  
In the course of this investigation, the number of nerve cells  
contained in a unit volume of a fixed locahty in the frontal i  
section was counted and the changes in this number with advancing age were ascertained. Furthermore the relation between the cell number and the cortical area was critically  
examined.  


For this study, the sections, which had been previously used  
For this study, the sections, which had been previously used for the investigation of the thickness of the cortex of the albino rat brain, were again utilized. The material, amounting to 78
for the investigation of the thickness of the cortex of the albino  
rat brain, were again utilized. The material, amounting to 78  


61  
61


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2 APRIL, 1918
APRIL, 1918  






62 NAOKI SUGITA  
62 NAOKI SUGITA


albino rats, sexes combined, which was used in the present study,  
albino rats, sexes combined, which was used in the present study, is identical with that listed in table 1 of the former paper (Sugita, '17 a), to which the reference should be made for this studyalso.
is identical with that listed in table 1 of the former paper (Sugita,  
'17 a), to which the reference should be made for this studyalso.  


These studies were made during the winter semester of 19161917.  
These studies were made during the winter semester of 19161917.


II. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS  
II. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS


A. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section  
A. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section


As previously described (Sugita, '17 a), the sagittal section  
As previously described (Sugita, '17 a), the sagittal section (fig. 1) was taken in a plane passmg through the frontal pole afid parallel to the mesial surface of the hemisphere. This section from each individual brain was projected on a sheet of paper by the Leitz-Edinger Projection apparatus, at a magnification of exactly twenty diameters, and the outline of the image then accurately traced on the sheet. At the transitional part of the cortex at the frontal pole to the olfactory bulb and at the subiculum, where the cortex goes over into the structure of the cornu Ammonis, the borderlines were drawn along the radiation of the cells in those parts (fig. 1). The anterior borderline (a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. The posterior borderline (p-p') is clearly located, because this was drawn at the point where the thickness of the ganglionic layer abruptly diminishes at the beginning of the ganglion cell band characteristic for the cornu Ammonis. The area of the cortex, including the lamina zonalis, which contains no proper nerve cells, was then repeatedly measured to a square millimeter on the drawing, using the Ott Compensating Planimeter. The values obtained were then averaged, and 1/400 of the value, which corresponds to the cortical area on the slide, was recorded. This value was then converted into that for the fresh condition of the material, by the following procedure.
(fig. 1) was taken in a plane passmg through the frontal pole  
afid parallel to the mesial surface of the hemisphere. This  
section from each individual brain was projected on a sheet of  
paper by the Leitz-Edinger Projection apparatus, at a magnification of exactly twenty diameters, and the outline of the image  
then accurately traced on the sheet. At the transitional part  
of the cortex at the frontal pole to the olfactory bulb and at the  
subiculum, where the cortex goes over into the structure of the  
cornu Ammonis, the borderlines were drawn along the radiation  
of the cells in those parts (fig. 1). The anterior borderline  
(a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal  
surface of the olfactory bulb. The posterior borderline (p-p')  
is clearly located, because this was drawn at the point where  
the thickness of the ganglionic layer abruptly diminishes at the  
beginning of the ganglion cell band characteristic for the cornu  
Ammonis. The area of the cortex, including the lamina zonalis,  
which contains no proper nerve cells, was then repeatedly  
measured to a square millimeter on the drawing, using the Ott  
Compensating Planimeter. The values obtained were then  
averaged, and 1/400 of the value, which corresponds to the  
cortical area on the slide, was recorded. This value was then  
converted into that for the fresh condition of the material, by  
the following procedure.  


On the outline, which was taken from the section on the slide,  
On the outline, which was taken from the section on the slide, the diameter from frontal pole to the occipital pole (L. F) was measured and reduced, and, according to the formula given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a), which reads
the diameter from frontal pole to the occipital pole (L. F) was  
measured and reduced, and, according to the formula given in  
the former paper (Sugita, '17 a), which reads  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






63  
63






Correction-coefficient =  
Correction-coefficient =






The diameter L. F in fresh cerebrum  
The diameter L. F in fresh cerebrum






The diameter L. F on the shde  
The diameter L. F on the shde the correction-coefficient was determined. The value for the area obtained by the (first) direct measurement from the slide was then corrected to the corresponding value for the fresh condition of the material, by multiplying by the square of the correction-coefficient. The corrected values thus obtained are given in the last column of table 1.
the correction-coefficient was determined. The value for the  
area obtained by the (first) direct measurement from the slide  
was then corrected to the corresponding value for the fresh  
condition of the material, by multiplying by the square of the  
correction-coefficient. The corrected values thus obtained are  
given in the last column of table 1.  


The values for the cortical areas in the respective sagittal  
The values for the cortical areas in the respective sagittal sections of each individual were then grouped according to the
sections of each individual were then grouped according to the  








Fig. 1 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the sagittal section of the albino rat brain. The anterior borderline ((a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. The  
Fig. 1 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the sagittal section of the albino rat brain. The anterior borderline ((a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. The posterior borderline {p-p') is drawn at the point where the ganglionic layer goes over abruptly to the ganglion cell band in the cornu Ammonis.
posterior borderline {p-p') is drawn at the point where the ganglionic layer goes  
over abruptly to the ganglion cell band in the cornu Ammonis.  


brain weight, into twenty groups, as in the other studies of this  
brain weight, into twenty groups, as in the other studies of this series, and the average value for each group was found. The average areas of the cortex in the sagittal section for each group (table 1) were plotted in chart 1 (graph s), which shows the increase in area according to the increase in brain weight.
series, and the average value for each group was found. The average areas of the cortex in the sagittal section for each group  
(table 1) were plotted in chart 1 (graph s), which shows the increase in area according to the increase in brain weight.  


B. Area of the cortex in the frontal section  
B. Area of the cortex in the frontal section


The frontal section (fig. 2) was cut in the plane passing through  
The frontal section (fig. 2) was cut in the plane passing through approximately the middle point of the mesial surface of the
approximately the middle point of the mesial surface of the  






64  
64






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 1  
TABLE 1


Shoiving the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the  
Shoiving the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correctioncoefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum
sagittal section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correctioncoefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group.  
L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum  




Line 14,575: Line 13,613:




BRAIX WEIGHT  
BRAIX WEIGHT




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED


AREA  
AREA OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  




CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT  
CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




GROUP  
GROUP




L. F in fresh  
L. F in fresh brain
brain  




The same on  
The same on slide
slide  




AREA  
AREA OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  








grams  
grams




mm.
mm.


mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm."^  
mm."^




la  
la




0.153  
0.153




3.2  
3.2




5.50  
5.50




4.97  
4.97




4.1  
4.1




c  
c




0.154  
0.154




3.0  
3.0




5.60  
5.60




4.80  
4.80




4.1  
4.1




b  
b




0.177  
0.177




4.0  
4.0




5.70  
5.70




5.13  
5.13




4.9  
4.9








0.161  
0.161




5.4  
5.4




1.  
1.




13^  
13^




4.4  
4.4




II a  
II a




0.213  
0.213




4.0  
4.0




5.80  
5.80




5.13  
5.13




5.1  
5.1




b  
b




0.221  
0.221




3.9  
3.9




6.00  
6.00




5.43  
5.43




4.8  
4.8




c  
c




0.261  
0.261




4.8  
4.8




6.60  
6.60




5.60  
5.60




6.7  
6.7




d  
d




0.271  
0.271




4.8  
4.8




6.75  
6.75




5.80  
5.80




6.5  
6.5




e  
e




0.288  
0.288




4.5  
4.5




6.70  
6.70




5.75  
5.75




6.1  
6.1




■ (Birth)  
■ (Birth)




0.251  
0.251




4.4  
4.4




1.  
1.




15-^  
15-^




5.8  
5.8




III a  
III a




0.311  
0.311




6.1  
6.1




7.35  
7.35




6.45  
6.45




7.9  
7.9




1)  
1)




0.322  
0.322




6.3  
6.3




7.20  
7.20




6.40  
6.40




8.0  
8.0




g  
g




0.374  
0.374




8.1  
8.1




7.40  
7.40




7.40  
7.40




8.1  
8.1




c  
c




0.390  
0.390




6.7  
6.7




7.50  
7.50




6.70  
6.70




8.4  
8.4




i  
i




0.395  
0.395




7.4  
7.4




7.95  
7.95




7.20  
7.20




9.0  
9.0








0.S58  
0.S58




6.9  
6.9




1.  
1.




10^  
10^




8.3  
8.3




IV b  
IV b




0.400  
0.400




6.7  
6.7




7.70  
7.70




6.65  
6.65




9.0  
9.0




a  
a




0.402  
0.402




8.4  
8.4




7.75  
7.75




7.30  
7.30




9.4  
9.4




e  
e




0.420  
0.420




8.2  
8.2




7.95  
7.95




7.20  
7.20




10.0  
10.0




i  
i




0.443  
0.443




10.6  
10.6




8.30  
8.30




8.10  
8.10




11.1  
11.1




d  
d




0.459  
0.459




8.8 •  
8.8 •




8.05  
8.05




7.60  
7.60




9.9  
9.9




e  
e




0.466  
0.466




9.6  
9.6




8.40  
8.40




7.80  
7.80




11.1  
11.1








0.^32  
0.^32




8.6  
8.6




/.  
/.




082  
082




10.1  
10.1




Vi  
Vi




0.501  
0.501




10.2  
10.2




8.35  
8.35




7.90  
7.90




11.4  
11.4




a  
a




0.525  
0.525




12.7  
12.7




8.55  
8.55




8.45  
8.45




12.9  
12.9




b  
b




0.528  
0.528




11.1  
11.1




8.50  
8.50




8.05  
8.05




12.4  
12.4




c  
c




0.534  
0.534




9.0  
9.0




8.65  
8.65




7.60  
7.60




11.6  
11.6




d  
d




0.537  
0.537




10.1  
10.1




8.30  
8.30




7.70  
7.70




11.7  
11.7




e  
e




0.555  
0.555




12.3  
12.3




9.25  
9.25




8.65  
8.65




14.0  
14.0




f  
f




0.558  
0.558




11.0  
11.0




9.20  
9.20




8.50  
8.50




12.9  
12.9




g  
g




0.564  
0.564




11.4  
11.4




8.85  
8.85




8.40  
8.40




12.7  
12.7




h  
h




0.579  
0.579




11.5  
11.5




9.10  
9.10




8.35  
8.35




13.6  
13.6








0.542  
0.542




11.0  
11.0




1.07'^  
1.07'^




12.6  
12.6






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






65  
65






TABLE 1— Continued  
TABLE 1— Continued




Line 15,223: Line 14,257:




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED


ARE.\  
ARE.\ OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  




CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT  
CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




GROUP  
GROUP




L. F in fresh  
L. F in fresh brain
brain  




Th  
Th




e same on  
e same on slide
slide  




AREA  
AREA OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  








(/rams  
(/rams




mm."  
mm."




m m .  
m m .








??i m .  
??i m .




?« m .2  
?« m .2




VI c  
VI c




0.610  
0.610




12.0  
12.0




9.35  
9.35








8.35  
8.35




14.9  
14.9




a  
a




0.617  
0.617




10.7  
10.7




9.25  
9.25








7.95  
7.95




14.4  
14.4




e  
e




0.090  
0.090




15.0  
15.0




9.60  
9.60








9.00  
9.00




17.1  
17.1








0.639  
0.639




12.6  
12.6




1.  
1.




Line 15,350: Line 14,380:




15.5  
15.5




VII a  
VII a




0.740  
0.740




15.7  
15.7




10.50  
10.50








9.80  
9.80




18.1  
18.1




b  
b




0.760  
0.760




11.5  
11.5




10.65  
10.65








8.50  
8.50




18.1  
18.1








0.750  
0.750




13.6  
13.6




Line 15,405: Line 14,435:




18.1  
18.1




VIII a  
VIII a




0.800  
0.800




14.4  
14.4




10.50  
10.50








9.25  
9.25




18.5  
18.5




h  
h




0.805  
0.805




13.8  
13.8




10.90  
10.90








9.20  
9.20




19.4  
19.4




b
b


0.822  
0.822




16.2  
16.2




10.45  
10.45








9.60  
9.60




19.2  
19.2




c  
c




0.849  
0.849




18.0  
18.0




10.50  
10.50








9.70  
9.70




21.1  
21.1




k  
k




0.870  
0.870




15.1  
15.1




10.95  
10.95








9.40  
9.40




20.5  
20.5




d  
d




0.898  
0.898




17.0  
17.0




11.45  
11.45








10.15  
10.15




21.6  
21.6








0.841  
0.841




15. S  
15. S




1.13^
1.13^ 1
1  








20.1  
20.1




IX d  
IX d




0.959  
0.959




17.9  
17.9




11.60  
11.60








10.50  
10.50




21.8  
21.8




e  
e




0.960  
0.960




16.9  
16.9




11.40  
11.40








9.85  
9.85




22.5  
22.5




a  
a




0.972  
0.972




15.4  
15.4




11.30  
11.30








9.70  
9.70




20.9  
20.9




(10 days)  
(10 days)




0.964  
0.964




16.7  
16.7




/.  
/.




W  
W








21.7  
21.7




X a  
X a




1.033  
1.033




13.9  
13.9




11.90  
11.90








9.40  
9.40




22.3  
22.3




b  
b




1.036  
1.036




15.9  
15.9




11.85  
11.85








9.85  
9.85




23.1  
23.1




e  
e




1.051  
1.051




17.5  
17.5




12.05  
12.05








10.05  
10.05




25.0  
25.0








1.040  
1.040




15.8  
15.8




1.  
1.




Line 15,699: Line 14,728:




23.5  
23.5




XI a  
XI a




1.107  
1.107




17.3  
17.3




12.00  
12.00








10.00  
10.00




25.2  
25.2




b  
b




1.189  
1.189




18.8  
18.8




12.50  
12.50








10.25  
10.25




28.0  
28.0




c  
c




1 . 193  
1 . 193




19.1  
19.1




12.65  
12.65








10.50  
10.50




27.8  
27.8




d  
d




1.195  
1.195




16.0  
16.0




12.60  
12.60








10.00  
10.00




25.4  
25.4




(20 days)  
(20 days)




1.171  
1.171




17.8  
17.8




1.22'  
1.22' 1
1  








26.6  
26.6




'XII c  
'XII c




1.234  
1.234




18.4  
18.4




12.30  
12.30








10.35  
10.35




26.0  
26.0




a  
a




1.273  
1.273




15.7  
15.7




12.45  
12.45








9.65  
9.65




26.2  
26.2








1.253  
1.253




17.1  
17.1




1.  
1.




2J,'  
2J,'








26.1  
26.1




XIII a  
XIII a




1.301  
1.301




18.7  
18.7




13.00  
13.00








11.10  
11.10




25.7  
25.7




g  
g




1.307  
1.307




15.6  
15.6




12.95  
12.95








10.00  
10.00




26.2  
26.2




b  
b




1.327  
1.327




17.2  
17.2




13.20  
13.20








10.50  
10.50




27.2  
27.2




c  
c




1.346  
1.346




17.8  
17.8




13.00  
13.00








10.10  
10.10




29.5  
29.5




h  
h




1.392  
1.392




21.9  
21.9




13.45  
13.45








11.60  
11.60




29.5  
29.5








1.335  
1.335




18.2  
18.2




Line 15,971: Line 14,999:




27.6  
27.6






66  
66






naoki sugita  
naoki sugita






TABLE \— Concluded  
TABLE \— Concluded




Line 15,989: Line 15,017:




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED AREA CORTEX
AREA  
CORTEX  




CO RRECTION-COEFFICIENT  
CO RRECTION-COEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




GROUP  
GROUP




L. F in fresh  
L. F in fresh brain
brain  




The same on  
The same on slide
slide  




AREA  
AREA OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  








grams.  
grams.




mm.''
mm.




mm.  
mm.








mm.  
mm.




mm. 2  
mm. 2




XIV a  
XIV a




1.412  
1.412




17.5  
17.5




13.40  
13.40








10.40  
10.40




29.1  
29.1




e  
e




1.441  
1.441




15.2  
15.2




13.25  
13.25








10.10  
10.10




26.2  
26.2




b  
b




1.483  
1.483




21.1  
21.1




13.30  
13.30








11.30  
11.30




29.3  
29.3








1.U5  
1.U5




17.9  
17.9




1.  
1.




26^  
26^








28.2 ■  
28.2 ■




XV a  
XV a




1.530  
1.530




17.4  
17.4




13.70  
13.70








10.80  
10.80




28.1  
28.1




b  
b




1.542  
1.542




19.6  
19.6




13.50  
13.50








11.40  
11.40




27.5  
27.5




c  
c




1.552  
1.552




17.2  
17.2




13.70  
13.70








10.65  
10.65




28.6  
28.6




d  
d




1.573  
1.573




20.0  
20.0




13.70  
13.70








11.15  
11.15




30.1  
30.1




e  
e




1.574  
1.574




18.9  
18.9




13.75  
13.75








11.05  
11.05




29.3  
29.3








1.554  
1.554




18.6  
18.6




l.£  
l.£




4'  
4'








28.7  
28.7




XVI a  
XVI a




1.642  
1.642




18.9  
18.9




14.10  
14.10








11.30  
11.30




29.4  
29.4




g  
g




1.643  
1.643




18.7  
18.7




14.65  
14.65








11.60  
11.60




29.7  
29.7




c  
c




1.647  
1.647




18.7  
18.7




13.75  
13.75








11.05  
11.05




29.0  
29.0




e  
e




1.690  
1.690




17.5  
17.5




13.65  
13.65








10.70  
10.70




28.6  
28.6








1.656  
1.656




18.4  
18.4




1.  
1.




26^  
26^








29.2  
29.2




XVII f  
XVII f




1.720  
1.720




18.3  
18.3




14.90  
14.90








11.60  
11.60




30.2  
30.2




a  
a




1.721  
1.721




18.4  
18.4




13.90  
13.90








10.90  
10.90




29.8  
29.8




b  
b




1.730  
1.730




23.5  
23.5




13.85  
13.85








11.70  
11.70




32.8  
32.8




c  
c




1.731  
1.731




20.8  
20.8




14.30  
14.30








11.60  
11.60




31.7  
31.7








1.726  
1.726




20.2  
20.2




1.  
1.




u^  
u^








31.1  
31.1




XVIII c  
XVIII c




1.817  
1.817




18.5  
18.5




15.20  
15.20








11.50  
11.50




32.4  
32.4




a  
a




1.844  
1.844




24.7  
24.7




14.00  
14.00








12.10  
12.10




33.0  
33.0




e  
e




1.855  
1.855




21.6  
21.6




15.05  
15.05








12.15  
12.15




33.1  
33.1








1.839  
1.839




21.6  
21.6




1.  
1.




24^  
24^








32.8  
32.8




XIX a  
XIX a




1.924  
1.924




20.6  
20.6




15.40  
15.40








12.30  
12.30




32.3  
32.3








i.m  
i.m




20.6  
20.6




1.  
1.




25^  
25^








32.3  
32.3




XX a  
XX a




2.039  
2.039




22.6  
22.6




15.10  
15.10








12.60  
12.60




32.5  
32.5




b  
b




2.069  
2.069




25.1  
25.1




15.55  
15.55








13.20  
13.20




34.8  
34.8








2.054  
2.054




23.9  
23.9




Line 16,603: Line 15,626:




33.7  
33.7






hemisphere and cutting the corpus callosum, the conunissura  
hemisphere and cutting the corpus callosum, the conunissura anterior and the chiasma opticum (Sugita, '17 a). On the drawing of the outhne of the frontal section (fig. 2), which was traced
anterior and the chiasma opticum (Sugita, '17 a). On the drawing of the outhne of the frontal section (fig. 2), which was traced  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






67  
67






in the same manner as that for the sagittal section, the dorsal  
in the same manner as that for the sagittal section, the dorsal and the ventral borderlines of the cortical are^ were drawn. The dorsal border (d) was determined by the ectal borderline of the corpus callosum, which lies under the tip of the cortex at the bottom of the fissura sagittalis, and the ventral border {v-v') was drawn perpendicular to the surface at the basal end of the cell group which is found under the cortex proper just below the region of the fissura rhinalis, latero-basal to the cap
and the ventral borderlines of the cortical are^ were drawn.  
The dorsal border (d) was determined by the ectal borderline  
of the corpus callosum, which lies under the tip of the cortex  
at the bottom of the fissura sagittalis, and the ventral border  
{v-v') was drawn perpendicular to the surface at the basal end  
of the cell group which is found under the cortex proper just  
below the region of the fissura rhinalis, latero-basal to the cap






Fig. 2 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the frontal section of the albino rat brain. The dorsal border (d) is chosen at the borderline  
Fig. 2 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the frontal section of the albino rat brain. The dorsal border (d) is chosen at the borderline of the corpus callosum. The ventral border (v-v') was drawn perpendicular to the surface at the basal end of the cell group found near the fissura rhinalis, latero-basal to the capsula externa. The double shaded part, locality VII, indicates the area where the cell number and cell size were determined.
of the corpus callosum. The ventral border (v-v') was drawn perpendicular  
to the surface at the basal end of the cell group found near the fissura rhinalis,  
latero-basal to the capsula externa. The double shaded part, locality VII,  
indicates the area where the cell number and cell size were determined.  


sula externa. This latter border is not so sharply defined, but  
sula externa. This latter border is not so sharply defined, but we could not find any better marking point than this cell group. The area of the cortex, thus bounded, was then measured and recorded. In making the measurement, the area of the cortex was at first measured and then the total area of the frontal section, — of one hemicerebrum — excluding the cavity of the lateral ventricle and the tractus opticus, was measured. The ratio of the cortical area to the total area of the section was then computed. Correction of the observed values to those for the
we could not find any better marking point than this cell group.  
The area of the cortex, thus bounded, was then measured and  
recorded. In making the measurement, the area of the cortex  
was at first measured and then the total area of the frontal section, — of one hemicerebrum — excluding the cavity of the lateral  
ventricle and the tractus opticus, was measured. The ratio  
of the cortical area to the total area of the section was then  
computed. Correction of the observed values to those for the  






68  
68






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






fresh condition of the material was made in the same manner  
fresh condition of the material was made in the same manner as for the sagittal cortex, by multiplying by the square of the value of the correction-coefficient. This latter was obtained by the formula given in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), as follows:
as for the sagittal cortex, by multiplying by the square of the  
value of the correction-coefficient. This latter was obtained  
by the formula given in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), as follows:  


The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum  
The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum






Correction-coefficient =  
Correction-coefficient =






The diameter W. D on the slide  
The diameter W. D on the slide






li  
li 70 (,5 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
70  
(,5  
60  
55  
50  
45  
40  
35  
30  
25  
20  
15  
10  
5  




Line 16,770: Line 15,757:




..-T  
..-T




Line 16,811: Line 15,798:




/  
/




/'  
/'




Line 16,849: Line 15,836:




^  
^




'  
'




~y  
~y




Line 16,886: Line 15,873:




-;>-'  
-;>-'




>  
>




Line 16,926: Line 15,913:




i^  
i^




Line 16,963: Line 15,950:
^^
^^


^'  
^'




Line 17,010: Line 15,997:




i  
i




Line 17,017: Line 16,004:




'  
'




Line 17,024: Line 16,011:




1  
1


t  
t




Line 17,035: Line 16,022:




i  
i








■■/^  
■■/^




Line 17,063: Line 16,050:




^,.--'  
^,.--'




i 1 !  
i 1 !




Line 17,093: Line 16,080:
^
^


-^j  
-^j




.--'  
.--'




-'—  
-'—




Line 17,109: Line 16,096:




---^  
---^




! i  
! i




Line 17,121: Line 16,108:




,y.  
,y.




y  
y




Line 17,135: Line 16,122:




^.^  
^.^




^^  
^^




Line 17,159: Line 16,146:




s  
s




Line 17,166: Line 16,153:




/f  
/f




Line 17,173: Line 16,160:




^'^  
^'^




^  
^




■^  
■^




Line 17,208: Line 16,195:




/  
/




i  
i








^  
^




■>^  
■>^




Line 17,246: Line 16,233:




i  
i




Line 17,253: Line 16,240:




^  
^




^  
^




'^  
'^




Line 17,290: Line 16,277:




1 ■  
1 ■




Line 17,297: Line 16,284:
s=
s=


j  
j i
i  




Line 17,333: Line 16,319:




\  
\ 1
1  






'O 0.1 Q2 0.3 Q4 Q5 06 07 Q8 Q9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT 18 19 2.0 ^s.  
'O 0.1 Q2 0.3 Q4 Q5 06 07 Q8 Q9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT 18 19 2.0 ^s.


Chart 1 Showing the corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal  
Chart 1 Showing the corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal


and the frontal sections and the area of the whole frontal section, all according  
and the frontal sections and the area of the whole frontal section, all according


to the brain weight, accompanied by the theoretical value of the last which is  
to the brain weight, accompanied by the theoretical value of the last which is


assumed to be proportional to the square of the cube root of the brain weight.  
assumed to be proportional to the square of the cube root of the brain weight.


Albino rat. X— • — ■ — • X, Cortical area in the sagittal section, o oof  
Albino rat. X— • — ■ — • X, Cortical area in the sagittal section, o oof


Cortical area in the frontal section. • 'F, Area of the whole frontal section.  
Cortical area in the frontal section. • 'F, Area of the whole frontal section.


T, Theoretical area of the frontal section, i.e., the square of the  
T, Theoretical area of the frontal section, i.e., the square of the


cube root of the brain weight. All graphs are based on the data in tables 1  
cube root of the brain weight. All graphs are based on the data in tables 1 and 2.
and 2.  


These data are all entered in table 2, in which the average  
These data are all entered in table 2, in which the average measurements for each brain weight group are also given. The graphs for the total area of the frontal section (graph F) and for the area of the frontal cortex (graph f) in chart 1 are based on the corrected data given in table 2.
measurements for each brain weight group are also given. The  
graphs for the total area of the frontal section (graph F) and  
for the area of the frontal cortex (graph f) in chart 1 are based  
on the corrected data given in table 2.  






TABLE 2  
TABLE 2


Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex and of  
Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex and of the total frontal section and the percentage of the cortical area to the total frontal section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum
the total frontal section and the percentage of the cortical area to the total frontal  
section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. W. D  
is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum  




Line 17,378: Line 16,355:




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




PERCENTAGE OF  
PERCENTAGE OF








BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 17,406: Line 16,382:




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




GROUP  
GROUP




Area  
Area of cortex
of cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total section
section  




W. D  
W. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




The same  
The same on slide
on slide  




Area  
Area of cortex
of cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total section
section  




AREA IN  
AREA IN


TOTAL  
TOTAL


c SECTION  
c SECTION








grams  
grams




mm. 2  
mm. 2




mTO.2  
mTO.2




mm .  
mm .




m m .  
m m .




»i m .2  
»i m .2




vim.^  
vim.^




per cent  
per cent




la  
la




0.153  
0.153




2.8  
2.8




9.2  
9.2




6.45  
6.45




5.65  
5.65




3.7  
3.7




12.0  
12.0




34  
34




c  
c




0.154  
0.154




2.6  
2.6




8.2  
8.2




6.35  
6.35




5.40  
5.40




3.6  
3.6




11.4  
11.4




34  
34




b  
b




0.177  
0.177




3.5  
3.5




9.9  
9.9




6.95  
6.95




6.26  
6.26




4.3  
4.3




12.2  
12.2




35  
35








0.161  
0.161




3.0  
3.0




9.1  
9.1




1.  
1.




W  
W




3.9  
3.9




11.9  
11.9




35  
35




II a  
II a




0.213  
0.213




4.4  
4.4




13.0  
13.0




8.40  
8.40




7.35  
7.35




5.7  
5.7




17.0  
17.0




34  
34




b  
b




0.221  
0.221




3.6  
3.6




11.9  
11.9




7.95  
7.95




6.50  
6.50




5.4  
5.4




17.8  
17.8




30  
30




c  
c




0.261  
0.261




4.6  
4.6




13.0  
13.0




7.80  
7.80




7.10  
7.10




5.6  
5.6




15.7  
15.7




36  
36




d  
d




0.271  
0.271




4.4.  
4.4.




13.1  
13.1




7.75  
7.75




6.80  
6.80




5.7  
5.7




16.9  
16.9




34  
34




e  
e




0.288  
0.288




4.1  
4.1




11.8  
11.8




8.55  
8.55




7.05  
7.05




6.0  
6.0




17.4  
17.4




35  
35




(Birthj  
(Birthj




0.251  
0.251




4.2  
4.2




12.6  
12.6




1.  
1.




16"
16"


5.7  
5.7




17.0  
17.0




34  
34




III a  
III a




0.311  
0.311




5.1  
5.1




15.3  
15.3




8.50  
8.50




7.65  
7.65




6.3  
6.3




18.9  
18.9




33  
33




b  
b




0.322  
0.322




5.1  
5.1




13.0  
13.0




8.70  
8.70




6.80  
6.80




8.3  
8.3




21 .2  
21 .2




39  
39




g  
g




0.374  
0.374




7.2  
7.2




19.0  
19.0




8.95  
8.95




8.40  
8.40




8.2  
8.2




21.6  
21.6




38  
38




c  
c




0.390  
0.390




6.5  
6.5




15.9  
15.9




8.85  
8.85




7.60  
7.60




8.8  
8.8




21.5  
21.5




39  
39




i  
i




0.395  
0.395




7.5  
7.5




17.8  
17.8




9.10  
9.10




8.60  
8.60




8.4  
8.4




20.0  
20.0




42  
42








0.358  
0.358




6.3  
6.3




16.2  
16.2




1.13^  
1.13^




8.0  
8.0




20.6  
20.6




39  
39




IV b  
IV b




0.400  
0.400




7.6  
7.6




19.4  
19.4




9.00  
9.00




8.50  
8.50




8.5  
8.5




21.7  
21.7




39  
39




a  
a




0.402  
0.402




6.8  
6.8




16.7  
16.7




9.10  
9.10




7.90  
7.90




9.0  
9.0




22.2  
22.2




41  
41




c  
c




0.420  
0.420




6.7  
6.7




17.9  
17.9




9.00  
9.00




8.15  
8.15




8.2  
8.2




21. g  
21. g




38  
38




i  
i




0.443  
0.443




8.0  
8.0




19.0  
19.0




9.15  
9.15




8.40  
8.40




9.4  
9.4




22.3  
22.3




42  
42




cl  
cl




0.459  
0.459




6.9  
6.9




17.2  
17.2




9.50  
9.50




7.95  
7.95




9.8  
9.8




24.5  
24.5




40  
40




e  
e




0.466  
0.466




9.4  
9.4




21.8  
21.8




9.30  
9.30




9.25  
9.25




9.5  
9.5




22.1  
22.1




43  
43








o.m  
o.m




7.6  
7.6




18.7  
18.7




l.W
l.W


9.1  
9.1




22.4  
22.4




41  
41




Vi  
Vi




0.501  
0.501




9.0  
9.0




22.3  
22.3




9.80  
9.80




9.20  
9.20




10.2  
10.2




25.3  
25.3




40  
40




a  
a




0.525  
0.525




9.8  
9.8




22.4  
22.4




9.65  
9.65




9.10  
9.10




11.0  
11.0




25.2  
25.2




44  
44




b  
b




0.528  
0.528




8.7  
8.7




19.6  
19.6




9.90  
9.90




8.60  
8.60




11.5  
11.5




26.0  
26.0




44  
44




c  
c




0.534  
0.534




7.6  
7.6




18.6  
18.6




10.30  
10.30




8.25  
8.25




11.4  
11.4




29.0  
29.0




39  
39




d  
d




0.537  
0.537




8.8  
8.8




20.1  
20.1




10.00  
10.00




8.80  
8.80




11.4  
11.4




26.0  
26.0




44  
44




e  
e




0.555  
0.555




9.9  
9.9




22.5  
22.5




9.90  
9.90




9.00  
9.00




12.0  
12.0




27.2  
27.2




44  
44




f  
f




0.558  
0.558




9.2  
9.2




20.0  
20.0




10.00  
10.00




8.55  
8.55




12.6  
12.6




27.4  
27.4




46  
46




g  
g




0.564  
0.564




10.2  
10.2




22.9  
22.9




10.10  
10.10




9.15  
9.15




12.4  
12.4




28.0  
28.0




44  
44




h  
h




0.579  
0.579




10.1  
10.1




22.1  
22.1




10.10  
10.10




9.05  
9.05




12.8  
12.8




27.6  
27.6




46  
46








0.542  
0.542




9.3  
9.3




21.2  
21.2




1.13''
1.13


11.7  
11.7




26.9  
26.9




u  
u






69  
69






TABLE 2~Continued  
TABLE 2~Continued




Line 18,363: Line 17,333:




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED




CORRECTIONCOEFriCIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFriCIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




PERCENTAGE OP  
PERCENTAGE OP








BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 18,391: Line 17,360:




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




GROUP  
GROUP




Area  
Area of cortex
of cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total


section  
section




W. D  
W. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




The same  
The same on slide
on slide  




Area  
Area of cortex
of cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total section
section  




AREA IN  
AREA IN


TOTAL  
TOTAL SECTION
SECTION  








grams  
grams




WOT .2  
WOT .2




invi.^  
invi.^




mm.  
mm.




7)1 m.  
7)1 m.




TOOT.2  
TOOT.2




mm.
mm.


per cent  
per cent




Vie  
Vie




0.610  
0.610




9.9  
9.9




21.7  
21.7




10.15  
10.15




8.50  
8.50




14.1  
14.1




31.0  
31.0




46  
46




a  
a




0.617  
0.617




9.6  
9.6




21.6  
21.6




10.55  
10.55




8.65  
8.65




14.3  
14.3




32.2  
32.2




44  
44




e  
e




0.690  
0.690




11.6  
11.6




23.7  
23.7




10.60  
10.60




9.40  
9.40




14.8  
14.8




30.2  
30.2




49  
49




N  
N




0.639  
0.639




10.4  
10.4




22.3  
22.3




1.  
1.




19'
19'


14.4  
14.4




31.1  
31.1




46  
46




Vila  
Vila




0.740  
0.740




11.1  
11.1




22.1  
22.1




11.00  
11.00




9.20  
9.20




15.9  
15.9




31.6  
31.6




50  
50




b  
b




0.760  
0.760




10.2  
10.2




20.3  
20.3




11.20  
11.20




8.70  
8.70




16.9  
16.9




33.6  
33.6




50  
50








0.750  
0.750




10.7  
10.7




21.2  
21.2




1.,  
1.,




24'  
24'




16. 4  
16. 4




32.6  
32.6




50  
50




Villa  
Villa




0.800  
0.800




10.6  
10.6




21.8  
21.8




11.15  
11.15




8.60  
8.60




18.8  
18.8




36.7  
36.7




51  
51




h  
h




0.805  
0.805




11.3  
11.3




23.6  
23.6




10.60  
10.60




8.30  
8.30




18.5  
18.5




38.6  
38.6




48  
48




b  
b




0.822  
0.822




13.6  
13.6




28.5  
28.5




11.85  
11.85




10.20  
10.20




18.4  
18.4




38.5  
38.5




48  
48




c  
c




0.849  
0.849




13.7  
13.7




28.8  
28.8




11.40  
11.40




9.90  
9.90




18.2  
18.2




38.3  
38.3




48  
48




k  
k




0.870  
0.870




13.4  
13.4




27.7  
27.7




11.45  
11.45




9.60  
9.60




19.1  
19.1




39.5  
39.5




48  
48




d  
d




0.898  
0.898




13.1  
13.1




31.2  
31.2




11.75  
11.75




10.20  
10.20




17.4  
17.4




41.5  
41.5




42  
42








0.841  
0.841




12.6  
12.6




26.9  
26.9




1.  
1.




202  
202




18. 4  
18. 4




38.9  
38.9




48  
48




IX d  
IX d




0.959  
0.959




13.5  
13.5




28.4  
28.4




11.80  
11.80




9.70  
9.70




20.0  
20.0




42.0  
42.0




48  
48




e  
e




0.960  
0.960




13.8  
13.8




29.4  
29.4




12.15  
12.15




10.10  
10.10




20.0  
20.0




42.6  
42.6




47  
47




a  
a




0.972  
0.972




14.3  
14.3




28.4  
28.4




11.95  
11.95




9.80  
9.80




21.3  
21.3




42.4  
42.4




50  
50




(10 days)  
(10 days)




0.964  
0.964




13.9  
13.9




28.7  
28.7




1.  
1.




2P  
2P




20.4  
20.4




42. 3  
42. 3




48  
48




Xa  
Xa




1.033  
1.033




14.1  
14.1




30.3  
30.3




12.40  
12.40




10.30  
10.30




20.4  
20.4




44.0  
44.0




46  
46




b  
b




1.036  
1.036




13.4  
13.4




30.5  
30.5




12.40  
12.40




10.15  
10.15




20.0  
20.0




45.5  
45.5




44  
44




e  
e




1.051  
1.051




13.2  
13.2




25.9  
25.9




12.10  
12.10




9.40  
9.40




21.8  
21.8




43.0  
43.0




51  
51








1.040  
1.040




13.6  
13.6




28.9  
28.9




1.  
1.




23'
23'


20.7  
20.7




44.2  
44.2




47  
47




XI a  
XI a




1.107  
1.107




13.7  
13.7




28.7  
28.7




12.90  
12.90




10.20  
10.20




21.8  
21.8




45.7  
45.7




48  
48




b  
b




1.189  
1.189




13.3  
13.3




27.8  
27.8




13.15  
13.15




10.30  
10.30




21.7  
21.7




45.4 '  
45.4 '




48  
48




c  
c




1 . 193  
1 . 193




14.6  
14.6




30.8  
30.8




12.70  
12.70




10.30  
10.30




22.2  
22.2




47.0  
47.0




47  
47




d  
d




1.195  
1.195




12.8  
12.8




27.2  
27.2




12.50  
12.50




9.80  
9.80




21.0  
21.0




44.5  
44.5




47  
47




(20 days)  
(20 days)




1.171  
1.171




13.6  
13.6




28.6  
28.6




1.  
1.




26^  
26^




21.7  
21.7




45.7  
45.7




48  
48




XII c  
XII c




1.234  
1.234




15.0  
15.0




31.9  
31.9




12.95  
12.95




10.70  
10.70




22.0  
22.0




46.8  
46.8




47  
47




a  
a




1.273  
1.273




11.9  
11.9




23.6  
23.6




12.90  
12.90




9.10  
9.10




24.0  
24.0




47.5  
47.5




50  
50








1.25S  
1.25S




13.5  
13.5




27.8  
27.8




1.  
1.




3r
3r


23.0  
23.0




47.2  
47.2




49  
49




XIII a  
XIII a




1.301  
1.301




13.9  
13.9




28.3  
28.3




13.20  
13.20




10.25  
10.25




23.0  
23.0




47.1  
47.1




49  
49




g  
g




1.307  
1.307




13.9  
13.9




29.9  
29.9




12.70  
12.70




10.00  
10.00




22.5  
22.5




48.3  
48.3




47  
47




b  
b




1.327  
1.327




12.2  
12.2




28.2  
28.2




13.35  
13.35




9.70  
9.70




23.2  
23.2




53.3  
53.3




43  
43




c  
c




1.346  
1.346




13.3  
13.3




29.0  
29.0




13.15  
13.15




9.85  
9.85




23.7  
23.7




51.8  
51.8




46  
46




h  
h




1.392  
1.392




16.3  
16.3




34.8  
34.8




13.10  
13.10




10.90  
10.90




23.6  
23.6




50.3  
50.3




47  
47








1.335  
1.335




13.9  
13.9




30.0  
30.0




1.29^  
1.29^




23.2  
23.2




50.2  
50.2




46  
46






70  
70






TABLE 2—Co7icluded  
TABLE 2—Co7icluded




Line 19,433: Line 18,396:




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




PERCENTAGE OF  
PERCENTAGE OF








BHAIN  
BHAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 19,461: Line 18,423:




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




GROUP  
GROUP




Area  
Area of cortex
of cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total


section  
section




W. D.  
W. D.


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




The same  
The same on slide
on slide  




Area  
Area of corte.x
of corte.x  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total section
section  




AREA IN  
AREA IN


TOTAL  
TOTAL SECTION
SECTION  








grams  
grams




mm. 2  
mm. 2




m m .
m m .


171 m.  
171 m.




mm.  
mm.




»»m.2  
»»m.2




mm. 2  
mm. 2




■per cent  
■per cent




XIV a  
XIV a




1.412  
1.412




13.9  
13.9




29.4  
29.4




13.65  
13.65




10.30  
10.30




24.4  
24.4




51.6  
51.6




47  
47




e  
e




1.441  
1.441




12.4  
12.4




25.7  
25.7




13.10  
13.10




9.20  
9.20




25.2  
25.2




51.0  
51.0




49  
49




b  
b




1.483  
1.483




15.2  
15.2




33.3  
33.3




13.80  
13.80




10.80  
10.80




24.8  
24.8




54.4  
54.4




46  
46








1445  
1445




13.8  
13.8




29.5  
29.5




1.34""  
1.34""




24.8  
24.8




52.3  
52.3




47  
47




XV a  
XV a




1.530  
1.530




14.4  
14.4




33.6  
33.6




13.80  
13.80




10.80  
10.80




23.5  
23.5




54.8  
54.8




43  
43




b  
b




1.542  
1.542




13.9  
13.9




30.5  
30.5




13.70  
13.70




10.40  
10.40




24.2  
24.2




53.0  
53.0




46  
46




c  
c




1.552  
1.552




14.2  
14.2




31.7  
31.7




13.50  
13.50




10.30  
10.30




24.4  
24.4




54.4  
54.4




45  
45




d  
d




1.573  
1.573




14.2  
14.2




30.8  
30.8




13.90  
13.90




10.60  
10.60




24.4  
24.4




53.1  
53.1




46  
46




e  
e




1.574  
1.574




14.8  
14.8




32.2  
32.2




13.70  
13.70




10.50  
10.50




25.2  
25.2




54.8  
54.8




46  
46








1.554  
1.554




14-3  
14-3




31.8  
31.8




l.l  
l.l




?02  
?02




24-3  
24-3




54.0  
54.0




45  
45




XVI a  
XVI a




1.642  
1.642




16.4  
16.4




37.0  
37.0




13.80  
13.80




11.20  
11.20




24.9  
24.9




56.2  
56.2




44  
44




g  
g




1.643  
1.643




11.6  
11.6




27.4  
27.4




13.40  
13.40




9.50  
9.50




23.2  
23.2




54.7  
54.7




42  
42




c  
c




1.647  
1.647




14.3  
14.3




29.8  
29.8




14.00  
14.00




10.50  
10.50




25.5  
25.5




53.2  
53.2




48  
48




e  
e




1.690  
1.690




13.0  
13.0




30.7  
30.7




13.45  
13.45




10.00  
10.00




23.5  
23.5




55.3  
55.3




42  
42








1.656  
1.656




13.8  
13.8




31.2  
31.2




l.t  
l.t




J32  
J32




24.3  
24.3




54.9  
54.9




44  
44




XVII f  
XVII f




1.720  
1.720




12.5  
12.5




28.7  
28.7




13.50  
13.50




9.60  
9.60




24.8  
24.8




56.8  
56.8




44  
44




a  
a




1.721  
1.721




14.8  
14.8




34.5  
34.5




14.00  
14.00




11.00  
11.00




24.0  
24.0




56.0  
56.0




43  
43




b  
b




1.730  
1.730




17.5  
17.5




40.4  
40.4




14.70  
14.70




12.35  
12.35




24.8  
24.8




57.2  
57.2




43  
43




c  
c




1.731  
1.731




17.5  
17.5




39.2  
39.2




14.40  
14.40




12.10  
12.10




24.8  
24.8




55.6  
55.6




45  
45








1.726  
1.726




15.6  
15.6




35.7  
35.7




l.i  
l.i




W  
W




24.6  
24.6




56.4  
56.4




44  
44




XVIII c  
XVIII c




1.817  
1.817




13.3  
13.3




31.1  
31.1




14.00  
14.00




10.10  
10.10




25.6  
25.6




59.8  
59.8




43  
43




a  
a




1.844  
1.844 1.855
1.855  




17.4  
17.4




38.1  
38.1




15.00  
15.00




12.10  
12.10




26.7  
26.7




58.5  
58.5




46  
46




e  
e




14.2  
14.2




32.0  
32.0




14.30  
14.30




10.60  
10.60




25.8  
25.8




58.3  
58.3




44  
44








1.839  
1.839




15.0  
15.0




33.7  
33.7




l.t  
l.t




?^2  
?^2




26.0  
26.0




58.9  
58.9




44  
44




XIX a  
XIX a




1.924  
1.924




14.8  
14.8




33.9  
33.9




14.10  
14.10




10.90  
10.90




24.8  
24.8




57.0  
57.0




44  
44








1.924  
1.924




U.8  
U.8




33.9  
33.9




l.i  
l.i




w
w


2^.8  
2^.8




57.0  
57.0




44  
44




XX a  
XX a




2.039  
2.039




16.8  
16.8




42.7  
42.7




■ 14.80  
■ 14.80




12.10  
12.10




25.2  
25.2




63.9  
63.9




39  
39




b  
b




2.069  
2.069




15.7  
15.7




40.3  
40.3




14.60  
14.60




11.70  
11.70




24.5  
24.5




62.8  
62.8




39  
39








2.054  
2.054




16.3  
16.3




41.5  
41.5




1.23'
1.23'


24-9  
24-9




63.4  
63.4




39  
39






C. Number of nerve cells  
C. Number of nerve cells


On the frontal sections used for the measurement of the cortical area, the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume  
On the frontal sections used for the measurement of the cortical area, the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume at a fixed locality in the cortex was counted. The locality selected was at the middle part of the cortical band (fig. 2, VII), designated as locality VII in figure 4 in a former paper (Sugita,
at a fixed locality in the cortex was counted. The locality  
selected was at the middle part of the cortical band (fig. 2, VII),  
designated as locality VII in figure 4 in a former paper (Sugita,  


71  
71






72 NAOKI SUGITA  
72 NAOKI SUGITA


'17 a). To represent the cortex, the lamina pyramidaHs and the  
'17 a). To represent the cortex, the lamina pyramidaHs and the lamina ganglionaris were selected. By the use of the ocular net-micrometer (with Zeiss Comp. Ocular 6 and Zeiss objectives 2 mm. and 4 mm.), the number of nerve cells in five adjoining squares along the cortical band, each square 100 micra on a side, was counted in a given location. The numbers obtained were added together and then, by multiplying by two, was converted to the number in a unit area of 0.1 mm.- on the section. This value, the number of nerve cells in a slice of cortex, 0.1 mm." in area and 10 micra thick (the thickness of the section) or 0.001 mm.^ in volume, was then reduced to the number in this volume in the fresh condition of the brain. To make this reduction, I used as the correction-coefficient the cube of the reciprocal of the correction-coefficient obtained by the for The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum , . , , , ,
lamina ganglionaris were selected. By the use of the ocular  
net-micrometer (with Zeiss Comp. Ocular 6 and Zeiss objectives 2 mm. and 4 mm.), the number of nerve cells in five adjoining squares along the cortical band, each square 100 micra  
on a side, was counted in a given location. The numbers obtained were added together and then, by multiplying by two,  
was converted to the number in a unit area of 0.1 mm.- on the  
section. This value, the number of nerve cells in a slice of cortex, 0.1 mm." in area and 10 micra thick (the thickness of the  
section) or 0.001 mm.^ in volume, was then reduced to the number  
in this volume in the fresh condition of the brain. To make  
this reduction, I used as the correction-coefficient the cube of  
the reciprocal of the correction-coefficient obtained by the for
The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum , . , , , ,  


mula: =- v-. -— — 7r\ ' which had been  
mula: =- v-. -— — 7r\ ' which had been


1 he diameter W . D on the slide  
1 he diameter W . D on the slide


previously employed, because the section on the slide was assumed to have shrunken in all three dimensions equally at the  
previously employed, because the section on the slide was assumed to have shrunken in all three dimensions equally at the rate of the correction-coefficient and therefore a unit volume in the fresh condition would correspond to the volume of the unit on the slide multiplied by the cube of the reciprocal of the correction-coefficient.
rate of the correction-coefficient and therefore a unit volume  
in the fresh condition would correspond to the volume of the  
unit on the slide multiplied by the cube of the reciprocal of the  
correction-coefficient.  


In the lamina pyramidalis, the pyramids are more densely  
In the lamina pyramidalis, the pyramids are more densely crowded at the ectal than at the ental part of the lay?r, which adjoins the lamina granulans interna. I adjusted the upper line of the net-micrometer squarely on the border between the lamina zonalis and the lamina pyramidalis and counted the cell number included in a square, 100 micra on each side, at the ectal part of the layer, where the cells are crowded densely. If large blood vessels appeared in the microscopic field, I gave up such a field and counted an adjoining one where no large vessels were present.
crowded at the ectal than at the ental part of the lay?r, which  
adjoins the lamina granulans interna. I adjusted the upper  
line of the net-micrometer squarely on the border between the  
lamina zonalis and the lamina pyramidalis and counted the cell  
number included in a square, 100 micra on each side, at the ectal  
part of the layer, where the cells are crowded densely. If large  
blood vessels appeared in the microscopic field, I gave up such  
a field and counted an adjoining one where no large vessels  
were present.  


In the lamina ganglionaris the large ganglion cells are mixed  
In the lamina ganglionaris the large ganglion cells are mixed with a number of small pyramids, almost equal in size to, or somewhat smaller than, the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. At first, the number of all the nerve cells, the large and small combined, was counted. Then the large ganglion cells, which
with a number of small pyramids, almost equal in size to, or  
somewhat smaller than, the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis.  
At first, the number of all the nerve cells, the large and small  
combined, was counted. Then the large ganglion cells, which  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 73  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 73


surely represent a group distinct from the small pyramids, were  
surely represent a group distinct from the small pyramids, were counted alone. So, by subtraction, the number of small pyramids only in the lamina ganglionaris was obtained. In counting the ganglion cells, I adjusted the lower line on the net-micrometer accurately on the border between the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina multiformis, because between the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina granulans interna there is found a pale band poor in cells and therefore it was not convenient to adjust the upper line of the net-micrometer at this border. The number of cells observed, in a slice of 0.1 mm.'- in area and 10 micra thick on the slide, were in the similar manner recorded and by the use of the same correction-coefficients, as were used in the case of the pyramidal cells, were reduced to the number for the fresh condition of the brain.
counted alone. So, by subtraction, the number of small pyramids only in the lamina ganglionaris was obtained. In counting  
the ganglion cells, I adjusted the lower line on the net-micrometer accurately on the border between the lamina ganglionaris and  
the lamina multiformis, because between the lamina ganglionaris  
and the lamina granulans interna there is found a pale band  
poor in cells and therefore it was not convenient to adjust the  
upper line of the net-micrometer at this border. The number  
of cells observed, in a slice of 0.1 mm.'- in area and 10 micra  
thick on the slide, were in the similar manner recorded and  
by the use of the same correction-coefficients, as were used  
in the case of the pyramidal cells, were reduced to the number  
for the fresh condition of the brain.  


Out of the total number of cells, which came in view in the  
Out of the total number of cells, which came in view in the microscopic field, about one-third does not contain the nucleoli in the cell nuclei. This means that the nucleoli in question lie outside of the section. Nevertheless I counted the cells having nuclei without nucleoli together with those in which nucleoli were to be seen, because my object was to ascertain the cell density in the locality chosen and not to determine the total number of nerve cells in a series of sections. In the latter case, the double counting of one and the same cell must be necessarily avoided. On the other hand, the cells which were represented in the section by only fractions of the cell bodies without nuclei were omitted from the counting. The number of such cells was small. Neuroglia nuclei, which were to be easily distinguished by their smaller size, and the intima cells of the capillaries, if they came in view, were not counted.
microscopic field, about one-third does not contain the nucleoli  
in the cell nuclei. This means that the nucleoli in question lie  
outside of the section. Nevertheless I counted the cells having  
nuclei without nucleoli together with those in which nucleoli  
were to be seen, because my object was to ascertain the cell  
density in the locality chosen and not to determine the total  
number of nerve cells in a series of sections. In the latter case,  
the double counting of one and the same cell must be necessarily  
avoided. On the other hand, the cells which were represented  
in the section by only fractions of the cell bodies without nuclei  
were omitted from the counting. The number of such cells  
was small. Neuroglia nuclei, which were to be easily distinguished by their smaller size, and the intima cells of the capillaries, if they came in view, were not counted.  


Table 3 shows the results of these enumerations.  
Table 3 shows the results of these enumerations.


III. DISCUSSION  
III. DISCUSSION


D. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section  
D. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section


Examinmg table 1 and chart 1 (graph s), which give the area  
Examinmg table 1 and chart 1 (graph s), which give the area of the cortex in the sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, it is seen that the area increases steadily with increasing brain weight.
of the cortex in the sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, it is  
seen that the area increases steadily with increasing brain weight.  






TABLE 3  
TABLE 3


Giving for each individual and for each brain weight group the number of nerve  
Giving for each individual and for each brain weight group the number of nerve cells in 0.001 vim.^ in volume of the cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglio7iaris, and also the mimber of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris, all counted at the middle part of the cortex in the frontal section, as shown in figure 2. Albino rat
cells in 0.001 vim.^ in volume of the cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the  
lamina ganglio7iaris, and also the mimber of the ganglion cells in the lamina  
ganglionaris, all counted at the middle part of the cortex in the frontal section, as  
shown in figure 2. Albino rat  




Line 20,403: Line 19,299:




BRAINWEIGHT  
BRAINWEIGHT




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




NUMBED  
NUMBED




OF CELLS  
OF CELLS




IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX, 0.001 MM.^  
IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX, 0.001 MM.^




GROUP  
GROUP




\V. D  
\V. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




W.D  
W.D on slide
on slide  




Lam. pyramid.  
Lam. pyramid.




Lam. ganglion.  
Lam. ganglion.




Ganglion cells in  
Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.
lam. gangl.  








Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected








grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




m m .  
m m .




Line 20,484: Line 19,377:




la  
la




0.153  
0.153




6.45  
6.45




5.65  
5.65




1150  
1150




775  
775




Line 20,510: Line 19,403:




c  
c




0.154  
0.154




6.35  
6.35




5.40  
5.40




1130  
1130




695  
695




Line 20,536: Line 19,429:




b  
b




0.177  
0.177




6.95  
6.95




6.26  
6.26




945  
945




690  
690




Line 20,564: Line 19,457:




0.161  
0.161




(1/1  
(1/1




14)'  
14)'




1075  
1075




720  
720




Line 20,587: Line 19,480:




II a  
II a




0.213  
0.213




8.40  
8.40




7.35  
7.35




830  
830




556  
556




370  
370




248  
248




91  
91




61  
61




b  
b




0.221  
0.221




7.95  
7.95




6.50  
6.50




930  
930




509  
509




393  
393




215  
215




114  
114




62  
62




c  
c




0.261  
0.261




7.80  
7.80




7.10  
7.10




735  
735




554  
554




322  
322




242  
242




104  
104




78  
78




d  
d




0.271  
0.271




7.75  
7.75




6.80  
6.80




726  
726




490  
490




358  
358




242  
242




114  
114




77  
77




e  
e




0.288  
0.288




8.55  
8.55




7.05  
7.05




715  
715




402  
402




424  
424




238  
238




120  
120




67  
67




(Birth)  
(Birth)




0.251  
0.251




(1/1  
(1/1




ley  
ley




787  
787




502  
502




373  
373




237  
237




109  
109




69  
69




Ilia  
Ilia




0.311  
0.311




8.50  
8.50




7.65  
7.65




625  
625




456  
456




330  
330




241  
241




112  
112




82  
82




b  
b




0.322  
0.322




8.70  
8.70




6.80  
6.80




730  
730




348  
348




415  
415




198  
198




122  
122




58  
58




g  
g




0.374  
0.374




8.95  
8.95




8.40  
8.40




504  
504




417  
417




270  
270




223  
223




98  
98




82  
82




c  
c




0.390  
0.390




8.85  
8.85




7.60  
7.60




493  
493




312  
312




312  
312




197  
197




104  
104




66  
66




i  
i




0.395  
0.395




9.10  
9.10




8.60  
8.60




401  
401




337  
337




262  
262




220  
220




90  
90




76  
76








0.358  
0.358




(1/1.13)^  
(1/1.13)^




551  
551




374  
374




318  
318




216  
216




105  
105




73  
73




IV b  
IV b




0.400  
0.400




9.00  
9.00




8.50  
8.50




410  
410




345  
345




258  
258




217  
217




94  
94




79  
79




a  
a




0.402  
0.402




9.10  
9.10




7.90  
7.90




473  
473




309  
309




267  
267




175  
175




^5  
^5




62  
62




c  
c




0.420  
0.420




9.00  
9.00




8.15  
8.15




451  
451




334  
334




240  
240




178  
178




74  
74




55  
55




i  
i




0.443  
0.443




9.15  
9.15




8.40  
8.40




424  
424




327  
327




227  
227




176  
176




73  
73




56  
56




d  
d




0.459  
0.459




9.50  
9.50




7.95  
7.95




440  
440




258  
258




250  
250




146  
146




77  
77




45  
45




e  
e




0.466  
0.466




9.30  
9.30




9.25  
9.25




355  
355




348  
348




186  
186




182  
182




59  
59




58  
58








0.432  
0.432




(1/i  
(1/i




loy  
loy




426  
426




320  
320




238  
238




179  
179




79  
79




59  
59




Vi  
Vi




0.501  
0.501




9,80  
9,80




9.20  
9.20




371  
371




307  
307




199  
199




165  
165




69  
69




57  
57




a  
a




0.525  
0.525




9.65  
9.65




9.10  
9.10




362  
362




303  
303




183  
183




154  
154




67  
67




56  
56




b  
b




0.528  
0.528




9.90  
9.90




8.60  
8.60




365  
365




240  
240




205  
205




134  
134




77  
77




51  
51




c  
c




0.534  
0.534




10.30  
10.30




8.25  
8.25




432  
432




222  
222




228  
228




117  
117




78  
78




40  
40




d  
d




0.537  
0.537




10.00  
10.00




8.80  
8.80




412  
412




281  
281




210  
210




143  
143




71  
71




48  
48




e  
e




. 555  
. 555




9.90  
9.90




9.00  
9.00




368  
368




277  
277




164  
164




123  
123




62  
62




47  
47






74  
74






TABLE Z— Continued  
TABLE Z— Continued




Line 21,343: Line 20,236:




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF  
NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF




:ORTBX, 0.001 MM.'


ORTBX, 0.001 MM.'


GROUP  
GROUP




W.D  
W.D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




W.D  
W.D


on slide  
on slide




Lam. pyramid.  
Lam. pyramid.




Lam. ganglion.  
Lam. ganglion.




Ganglion cells in  
Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.
lam. gangl.  








Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




,  
,




grams  
grams




m m .  
m m .




mm.  
mm.




Line 21,424: Line 20,314:




Vf  
Vf




0.558  
0.558




10.00  
10.00




8.55  
8.55




357  
357




223  
223




182  
182




114  
114




79  
79




49  
49




g  
g




0.564  
0.564




10.10  
10.10




9.15  
9.15




326  
326




242  
242




178  
178




132  
132




62  
62




46  
46




h  
h




0.579  
0.579




10.10  
10.10




9.05  
9.05




318  
318




229  
229




194  
194




140  
140




64  
64




46  
46








0.542  
0.542




{1/1  
{1/1




i3y  
i3y




368  
368




258  
258




194  
194




136  
136




70  
70




49  
49




Vic  
Vic




O.GIO  
O.GIO




10.15  
10.15




8.50  
8.50




325  
325




190  
190




182  
182




106  
106




65  
65




38  
38




a  
a




0.617  
0.617




10.55  
10.55




8.65  
8.65




322  
322




177  
177




200  
200




110  
110




60  
60




33  
33




e  
e




0.690  
0.690




10.60  
10.60




9.40  
9.40




286  
286




199  
199




191  
191




133  
133




58  
58




40  
40








0.639  
0.639




(.1/1  
(.1/1




19)^  
19)^




311  
311




189  
189




191  
191




116  
116




61  
61




37  
37




Vila  
Vila




0.740  
0.740




11.00  
11.00




9.20  
9.20




277  
277




186  
186




149  
149




100  
100




48  
48




32  
32




b  
b




0.760  
0.760




11.20  
11.20




8.70  
8.70




300  
300




140  
140




188  
188




88  
88




47  
47




22  
22








0.750  
0.750




(1/1  
(1/1




24)'  
24)'




289  
289




163  
163




169  
169




94  
94




48  
48




27  
27




VIII a  
VIII a




0.800  
0.800




11.15  
11.15




8.60  
8.60




302  
302




138  
138




170  
170




78  
78




43  
43




20  
20




h  
h




0.805  
0.805




10.60  
10.60




8.30  
8.30




293  
293




140  
140




168  
168




80  
80




48  
48




23  
23




b  
b




0.822  
0.822




11.85  
11.85




10.20  
10.20




266  
266




170  
170




138  
138




88  
88




38  
38




24  
24




c  
c




0.849  
0.849




11.40  
11.40




9.90  
9.90




242  
242




158  
158




140  
140




92  
92




37  
37




24  
24




k  
k




0.870  
0.870




11.45  
11.45




9.60  
9.60




257  
257




151  
151




152  
152




90  
90




45  
45




26  
26




d  
d




0.898  
0.898




11.75  
11.75




10.20  
10.20




255  
255




167  
167




138  
138




90  
90




38  
38




25  
25








0.841  
0.841




(1/1  
(1/1




20y  
20y




269  
269




154  
154




151  
151




86  
86




42  
42




24  
24




IX d  
IX d




0.959  
0.959




11.80  
11.80




9.70  
9.70




241  
241




133  
133




156  
156




86  
86




40  
40




22  
22




e  
e




0.960  
0.960




12.15  
12.15




10.10  
10.10




224  
224




130  
130




147  
147




85  
85




39  
39




23  
23




a  
a




0.972  
0.972




11.95  
11.95




9.80  
9.80




220  
220




122  
122




150  
150




83  
83




41  
41




23  
23




(10 days)  
(10 days)




0.964  
0.964




(1/1. 2iy  
(1/1. 2iy




228  
228




128  
128




151  
151




85  
85




40  
40




23  
23




Xa  
Xa




1.033  
1.033




12.40  
12.40




10.30  
10.30




223  
223




128  
128




153  
153




88  
88




45  
45




26  
26




b  
b




1.036  
1.036




12.40  
12.40




10.15  
10.15




212  
212




116  
116




136  
136




75  
75




41  
41




23  
23




e  
e




1.051  
1.051




12.10  
12.10




9.40  
9.40




244  
244




115  
115




149  
149




70  
70




43  
43




20  
20








1.040  
1.040




(1/1 ■  
(1/1 ■




23y  
23y




226  
226




120  
120




142  
142




78  
78




43  
43




23  
23




XI a  
XI a




1.107  
1.107




12.90  
12.90




10.20  
10.20




234  
234




116  
116




150  
150




74  
74




44  
44




22  
22




b  
b




1.189  
1.189




13.15  
13.15




10.30  
10.30




229  
229




110  
110




148  
148




71  
71




49  
49




24  
24




c  
c




1.193  
1.193




12.70  
12.70




10.30  
10.30




220  
220




118  
118




144  
144




77  
77




42  
42




23  
23




d  
d




1 . 195  
1 . 195




12.50  
12.50




9.80  
9.80




222  
222




107  
107




142"  
142"




68  
68




44  
44




21  
21




(20 days)  
(20 days)




1.171  
1.171




(1/1.  
(1/1.




26)^  
26)^




226  
226




lis  
lis




146  
146




73  
73




45  
45




23  
23




XII c  
XII c




1.234  
1.234




12.95  
12.95




10.70  
10.70




210  
210




118  
118




136  
136




76  
76




48  
48




27  
27




a  
a




1.273  
1.273




12.90  
12.90




9.10  
9.10




248  
248




■ 87  
■ 87




171  
171




60  
60




55  
55




19  
19








1.253  
1.253




(1/1. 3iy 1  
(1/1. 3iy 1




229  
229




103  
103




154  
154




68  
68




52  
52




23  
23






TABLE 3— Concluded  
TABLE 3— Concluded




Line 22,439: Line 21,329:




BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




NU.MBER  
NU.MBER




OF CELLS  
OF CELLS




IN .V VOLUME OF CORTE.X, 0.001 MM. 3  
IN .V VOLUME OF CORTE.X, 0.001 MM. 3




GROUP  
GROUP




W.D  
W.D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




W. D  
W. D on slide
on slide  




Lam. pyramid.  
Lam. pyramid.




Lam. ga  
Lam. ga




nglion.  
nglion.




Ganglion cells in  
Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.
lam. gangl.  








Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected








grams  
grams




m in .  
m in .




m m .  
m m .




Line 22,525: Line 21,412:




XIII a  
XIII a




1.301  
1.301




13.20  
13.20




10.25  
10.25




212  
212




99  
99




177  
177




83  
83




56  
56




26  
26




g  
g




1.307  
1.307




12.70  
12.70




10.00  
10.00




205  
205




100  
100




163  
163




80  
80




52  
52




25  
25




b  
b




1.327  
1.327




13.35  
13.35




9.70  
9.70




243  
243




94  
94




180  
180




69  
69




60  
60




23  
23




c  
c




1.346  
1.346




13.15  
13.15




9.85  
9.85




218  
218




92  
92




174  
174




73  
73




57  
57




24  
24




h  
h




1.392  
1.392




13.10  
13.10




10.90  
10.90




190  
190




110  
110




140  
140




81  
81




50  
50




29  
29








1.335  
1.335




(1/i  
(1/i




29)3  
29)3




214  
214




99  
99




167  
167




77  
77




55  
55




25  
25




XIV a  
XIV a




1.412  
1.412




13.65  
13.65




10.30  
10.30




212  
212




91  
91




164  
164




71  
71




58  
58




25  
25




e  
e




1.441  
1.441




13.10  
13.10




9.20  
9.20




248  
248




86  
86




176  
176




61  
61




63  
63




22  
22




b  
b




1.483  
1.483




13.80  
13.80




10.80  
10.80




218  
218




105  
105




172  
172




82  
82




60  
60




29  
29








1.U5  
1.U5




U/1  
U/1




■ 34)'  
■ 34)'




226  
226




94  
94




171  
171




71  
71




60  
60




25  
25




XV a  
XV a




1.530  
1.530




13.80  
13.80




10.80  
10.80




185  
185




88  
88




134  
134




64  
64




47  
47




23  
23




b  
b




1.542  
1.542




13.70  
13.70




10.40  
10.40




207  
207




90  
90




144  
144




63  
63




49  
49




22  
22




c  
c




1.552  
1.552




13.50  
13.50




10.30  
10.30




183  
183




81  
81




152  
152




67  
67




52  
52




23  
23




d  
d




1.573  
1.573




13.90  
13.90




10.60  
10.60




184  
184




82  
82




130  
130




58  
58




53  
53




24  
24




e  
e




1.574  
1.574




13.70  
13.70




10.50  
10.50




204  
204




93  
93




134  
134




60  
60




52  
52




23  
23








1.55i  
1.55i




(1/1  
(1/1




.30)3  
.30)3




193  
193




87  
87




139  
139




62  
62




51  
51




23  
23




XVI a  
XVI a




1.642  
1.642




13.80  
13.80




11.20  
11.20




170  
170




91  
91




127  
127




68  
68




50  
50




27  
27




g  
g




1.643  
1.643




13.40  
13.40




9.50  
9.50




225  
225




81  
81




148  
148




53  
53




56  
56




20  
20




c  
c




1.647  
1.647




14.00  
14.00




10.50  
10.50




186  
186




79  
79




134  
134




57  
57




55  
55




23  
23




e  
e




1.690  
1.690




13.45  
13.45




10.00  
10.00




207  
207




84  
84




148  
148




61  
61




63  
63




26  
26








1.656  
1.656




(1/1.33)3  
(1/1.33)3


1  
1




197  
197




84  
84




139  
139




60  
60




56  
56




24  
24




XVII f  
XVII f




1.720  
1.720




13.50  
13.50




9.60  
9.60




208  
208




75  
75




151  
151




54  
54




60  
60




22  
22




a  
a




1.721  
1.721




14.00  
14.00




11.00  
11.00




178  
178




86  
86




132  
132




64  
64




55  
55




27  
27




b  
b




1.730.  
1.730.




14.70  
14.70




12.35  
12.35




142  
142




84  
84




118  
118




70  
70




44  
44




26  
26




c  
c




1.731  
1.731




14.40  
14.40




12.10  
12.10




144  
144




85  
85




106  
106




63  
63




42  
42




25  
25








1.726  
1.726




(1/1  
(1/1




.26)3  
.26)3




16%  
16%




83  
83




127  
127




63  
63




50  
50




25  
25




XVIII c  
XVIII c




1.817  
1.817




14.00  
14.00




10.10  
10.10




188  
188




71  
71




142  
142




53  
53




54  
54




20  
20




a  
a




1.844  
1.844




15.00  
15.00




12.10  
12.10




170  
170




89  
89




126  
126




66  
66




48  
48




25  
25




e  
e




1.855  
1.855




14.30  
14.30




10.60  
10.60




192  
192




78  
78




139  
139




57  
57




60  
60




24  
24








1.839  
1.839




(.1/1  
(.1/1




.32)3  
.32)3




183  
183




79  
79




136  
136




59  
59




54  
54




23  
23




XIX a  
XIX a




1.924  
1.924




14.10  
14.10




10.90  
10.90




174  
174




81  
81




110  
110




51  
51




52  
52




24  
24








1.924  
1.924




(1/1  
(1/1




.29)3  
.29)3




174  
174




81  
81




110  
110




51  
51




52  
52




24  
24




XX a  
XX a




2.039  
2.039




14.80  
14.80




12.10  
12.10




150  
150




82  
82




95  
95




52  
52




38  
38




27  
27




b  
b




2.069  
2.069




14.60  
14.60




11.70  
11.70




151  
151




78  
78




96  
96




49  
49




37  
37




19  
19








2.054  
2.054




(i/i.23y'  
(i/i.23y'




151  
151




80  
80




96  
96




51  
51




38  
38




20  
20






76  
76






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 77  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 77


As already shown (Sugita, '17, '17 a), the longitudinal diameter  
As already shown (Sugita, '17, '17 a), the longitudinal diameter of the sagittal section (from the frontal pole to the occipital pole), that is L. F, as well as the cortical thickness, are both steadily increasing as the brain weight increases. The thickness of the cortex is one component of its area in the section, the other being obtained by dividing the area by the thickness, and the length thus found is correlated with the longitudinal diameter of the section (L. F) as defined above. The increase of the cortical area will therefore depend on the increase in cortical thickness and the increase in the longitudinal diameter of the section (L. F). Table 4 shows these relations. Column B gives the average brain weight by groups, column C the average corrected area of the cortex (taken from table 1), column D the cortical thickness (Tg) and column F the diameter L. F, all in the fresh condition of the brain and the last two quoted from the data already pubHshed (Sugita, '17, '17 a). In column E is given the ratio C/D or the computed length of the long side, when the cortical area is reduced to a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness. If these computed lengths are compared with the actual longitudinal diameters of the cerebrum (L. F), given in column F, it is of interest to note that, in brains weighing more than 0.5 gram, the ratios, given in column G as E/F, are quite similar, ranging between 1.16 and 1.25 (average 1.22).i In the newborn or before birth (Group I), the ratio is somewhat higher. So, if necessary, the cortical area in the* sagittal sections may be obtained by the following formula
of the sagittal section (from the frontal pole to the occipital  
pole), that is L. F, as well as the cortical thickness, are both  
steadily increasing as the brain weight increases. The thickness  
of the cortex is one component of its area in the section, the other  
being obtained by dividing the area by the thickness, and the  
length thus found is correlated with the longitudinal diameter  
of the section (L. F) as defined above. The increase of the  
cortical area will therefore depend on the increase in cortical  
thickness and the increase in the longitudinal diameter of the  
section (L. F). Table 4 shows these relations. Column B gives  
the average brain weight by groups, column C the average  
corrected area of the cortex (taken from table 1), column D  
the cortical thickness (Tg) and column F the diameter L. F,  
all in the fresh condition of the brain and the last two quoted from  
the data already pubHshed (Sugita, '17, '17 a). In column E is  
given the ratio C/D or the computed length of the long side,  
when the cortical area is reduced to a rectangle with the short  
side equal to the cortical thickness. If these computed lengths are  
compared with the actual longitudinal diameters of the cerebrum  
(L. F), given in column F, it is of interest to note that, in brains  
weighing more than 0.5 gram, the ratios, given in column G  
as E/F, are quite similar, ranging between 1.16 and 1.25 (average  
1.22).i In the newborn or before birth (Group I), the ratio is  
somewhat higher. So, if necessary, the cortical area in the*  
sagittal sections may be obtained by the following formula  


L.F X T^X 1.22 (L. F and T„ in millimeters)  
L.F X T^X 1.22 (L. F and T„ in millimeters)


As the. sagittal cortical thickness in brains weighing more than  
As the. sagittal cortical thickness in brains weighing more than 1.17 grams increases only slowly, the cortical area in the sagittal section in brains older than twenty days is approximately proportional to the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F).
1.17 grams increases only slowly, the cortical area in the sagittal  
section in brains older than twenty days is approximately  
proportional to the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F).  


E. The area of the cortex in the frontal section  
E. The area of the cortex in the frontal section


Reviewing table 2 and chart 1 (graph f), we see that the  
Reviewing table 2 and chart 1 (graph f), we see that the cortical area in the frontal section increases in the same manner
cortical area in the frontal section increases in the same manner  


1 In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the  
1 In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average is 1.21.
average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average  
is 1.21.  


THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






78  
78






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 4  
TABLE 4


Showing the relations of the cortical area in the sagittal section to the longitudinal  
Showing the relations of the cortical area in the sagittal section to the longitudinal diameter (L. F) of the cerebrum and the cortical thickness. All values for the fresh condition. Albino rat.
diameter (L. F) of the cerebrum and the cortical thickness. All values for the  
fresh condition. Albino rat.  






A  
A




B  
B




c  
c




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




GBOTTP  
GBOTTP




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL


AREA  
AREA


IN SAGITTAJ.,  
IN SAGITTAJ.,


SECTION  
SECTION




CORTJCAL  
CORTJCAL THICKNESS
THICKNESS  


IN  
IN SAGITTAL SECTION
SAGITTAL  
SECTION  




c  
c


D  
D




L.F  
L.F


IN FflESH  
IN FflESH BRAIN
BRAIN  




E  
E F
F  








grams  
grams




m m .
m m .


mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.








r  
r




0.161  
0.161




AA  
AA




0.52  
0.52




8.5  
8.5




5.6  
5.6




1.52  
1.52




II (birth)  
II (birth)




0.251  
0.251




5.8  
5.8




0.67  
0.67




8.7  
8.7




6.4  
6.4




1.36  
1.36




III  
III




0.358  
0.358




8.3  
8.3




0.90  
0.90




9.2  
9.2




7.4  
7.4




1.24  
1.24




IV  
IV




0.432  
0.432




10.1  
10.1




0.99  
0.99




10.2  
10.2




8.0  
8.0




1.27  
1.27




V  
V




0.542  
0.542




12.6  
12.6




1.14  
1.14




11.0  
11.0




8.9  
8.9




1.24  
1.24




VI  
VI




0.639  
0.639




15.5  
15.5




1.29  
1.29




12.0  
12.0




9.6  
9.6




1.25  
1.25




VII  
VII




0.750  
0.750




18.1  
18.1




1.43  
1.43




12.7  
12.7




10.4  
10.4




1.22  
1.22




VIII  
VIII




0.841  
0.841




20.1  
20.1




1.48  
1.48




13.6  
13.6




11.0  
11.0




1.24  
1.24




IX (10 days)  
IX (10 days)




0.964  
0.964




21.7  
21.7




1.55  
1.55




14.0  
14.0




11.6  
11.6




1.21  
1.21




X  
X




1.040  
1.040




23.5  
23.5




1.59  
1.59




14.8  
14.8




12.0  
12.0




1.23  
1.23




XI (20 days)  
XI (20 days)




1.171  
1.171




26.6  
26.6




1.72  
1.72




15.5  
15.5




12.5  
12.5




1.24  
1.24




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253




26.1  
26.1




1.75  
1.75




14.9  
14.9




12.8  
12.8




1.16  
1.16




XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




27.6  
27.6




1.72  
1.72




16.0  
16.0




13.0  
13.0




1.23  
1.23




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




28.2  
28.2




1.70  
1.70




16.6  
16.6




13.3  
13.3




1.25  
1.25




XV  
XV




1.554  
1.554




28.7  
28.7




1.76  
1.76




16.3  
16.3




13.7  
13.7




1.19  
1.19




XVI  
XVI




1.656  
1.656




29.2  
29.2




1.77  
1.77




16.5  
16.5




14.1  
14.1




1.17  
1.17




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




31.1  
31.1




1.79  
1.79




17.4  
17.4




14.3  
14.3




1.22  
1.22




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




32.8  
32.8




1.86  
1.86




17.6  
17.6




14.7  
14.7




1.20  
1.20




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




32.3  
32.3




1.80  
1.80




17.9  
17.9




15.0  
15.0




1.19  
1.19




XX  
XX




2.054  
2.054




33.7  
33.7




1.80  
1.80




18.7  
18.7




15.3  
15.3




1.22  
1.22




Average (Groups V
Average (Groups V


-XX)  
-XX)




Line 24,144: Line 22,992:




1.22  
1.22




Line 24,159: Line 23,007:




Average (Groups X  
Average (Groups X




III-XX) .  
III-XX) .




Line 24,173: Line 23,021:




1.21  
1.21




Line 24,187: Line 23,035:




as in the sagittal section though more slowly. The cortical area  
as in the sagittal section though more slowly. The cortical area in the frontal section is a product of the cortical thickness (7",,) and the length of the cortex along the cerebral surface. This surface line of the cortex in the frontal section may be regarded as a part of a circle and its length may be taken as proportional to the length of the radius or the measurement W. D (the frontal diameter of the cerebrum), which was measured across the section horizontally (Sugita, '17). As shown in table 5,
in the frontal section is a product of the cortical thickness (7",,)  
and the length of the cortex along the cerebral surface. This  
surface line of the cortex in the frontal section may be regarded  
as a part of a circle and its length may be taken as proportional to the length of the radius or the measurement W. D (the  
frontal diameter of the cerebrum), which was measured across  
the section horizontally (Sugita, '17). As shown in table 5,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 79  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 79


which is comparable with table 4, the relative value C/D or  
which is comparable with table 4, the relative value C/D or


-, — and the ratio of this value to W. D were  
-, — and the ratio of this value to W. D were


Cortical thickness  
Cortical thickness


calculated. The ratio, given in column G, table 5, falls between  
calculated. The ratio, given in column G, table 5, falls between


0.85 and 0.99 (average 0.91)^ in brains weighing more than 0.5  
0.85 and 0.99 (average 0.91)^ in brains weighing more than 0.5


gram, but shows a tendency to gradually increase as the brain  
gram, but shows a tendency to gradually increase as the brain


weight increases. In the newborn or before birth (Group I)  
weight increases. In the newborn or before birth (Group I)


it is somewhat higher. If the average ratio be taken as usable  
it is somewhat higher. If the average ratio be taken as usable


for all groups, as in the case of the sagittal section, the cortical  
for all groups, as in the case of the sagittal section, the cortical


area in the frontal section may be approximately obtained by  
area in the frontal section may be approximately obtained by


the following formula:  
the following formula:


If. D X T^ XO.91 (W. D and T^, in millimeters)  
If. D X T^ XO.91 (W. D and T^, in millimeters)


As, in brains weighing more than 0.95 gram, the cortical thickness in the frontal section (Tp) varies only slightly, the cortical  
As, in brains weighing more than 0.95 gram, the cortical thickness in the frontal section (Tp) varies only slightly, the cortical area in the frontal section in these brains will be practically proportional to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D). The agreement of the calculated with the observed values is however not so good as in the case of the sagittal section.
area in the frontal section in these brains will be practically  
proportional to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D).  
The agreement of the calculated with the observed values is  
however not so good as in the case of the sagittal section.  


F. The area of the entire frontal section  
F. The area of the entire frontal section


In chart 1, the graph F, representing the total area of the  
In chart 1, the graph F, representing the total area of the frontal section, is accompanied by a dotted line T, which represents the value of the square of the cube root of the brain weight (in grams). Theoretically, under the assumption that the specific gravity of the brain remains the same throughout the life, the latter should run a similar course to the former, if the brain enlarges proportionally in all dimensions as it grows. Between Groups II to XIV, both curves take nearly the same course, if some slight discrepancies in the observed values are neglected. But in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams, the differences become so distinct, that they can no longer be regarded as due to errors in measurement. This is probably due to the fact that the brain is not enlarging proportionally in all diameters,
frontal section, is accompanied by a dotted line T, which represents the value of the square of the cube root of the brain weight  
(in grams). Theoretically, under the assumption that the specific gravity of the brain remains the same throughout the life,  
the latter should run a similar course to the former, if the brain  
enlarges proportionally in all dimensions as it grows. Between  
Groups II to XIV, both curves take nearly the same course, if  
some slight discrepancies in the observed values are neglected.  
But in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams, the differences  
become so distinct, that they can no longer be regarded as due  
to errors in measurement. This is probably due to the fact  
that the brain is not enlarging proportionally in all diameters,  


- In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the  
- In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average is 0.93.
average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average  
is 0.93.  






80  
80






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 5  
TABLE 5


Showing, in columns A to E, the relations of the cortical area in the frontal section  
Showing, in columns A to E, the relations of the cortical area in the frontal section to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW . D) and the cortical thickness, and, in columns H to J, the relations of the total area of the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum. All values for the fresh condition. Albino rat.
to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW . D) and the cortical thickness, and,  
in columns H to J, the relations of the total area of the frontal section and the  
frontal diameter of the cerebrum. All values for the fresh condition. Albino rat.  






A  
A




B  
B




c  
c




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




H  
H




I  
I




J  
J




GROUP  
GROUP




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL AREA
AREA  


INFRONTAL  
INFRONTAL SECTION
SECTION  




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL THICKNESS INFRONTAL SECTION
THICKNESS INFRONTAL  
SECTION  




D  
D




W. D  
W. D


IN  
IN


FRESH  
FRESH MRAIN
MRAIN  




E  
E F
F  




TOTAL  
TOTAL AREA
AREA  


OF  
OF FRONTAL SECTION
FRONTAL  
SECTION  




SQUARE  
SQUARE


OF  
OF


W. D  
W. D




Line 24,349: Line 23,162:




gra7ns  
gra7ns




irim.'^  
irim.'^




m m .  
m m .




mm.  
mm.




m m .  
m m .








mm.^  
mm.^




7)1 m."  
7)1 m."








I  
I




0.161  
0.161




3.9  
3.9




0.56  
0.56




7.0  
7.0




6.6  
6.6




1.06  
1.06




11.9  
11.9




43.6  
43.6




0.27  
0.27




Ilfbirth)  
Ilfbirth)




0.251  
0.251




5.7  
5.7




0.78  
0.78




7.3  
7.3




7.7  
7.7




0.95  
0.95




17.0  
17.0




59.3  
59.3




0.29  
0.29




III  
III




0.358  
0.358




8.0  
8.0




1.02  
1.02




7.9  
7.9




8.7  
8.7




0.91  
0.91




20.6  
20.6




75.7  
75.7




0.27  
0.27




IV  
IV




0.432  
0.432




9.1  
9.1




1.11  
1.11




8.2  
8.2




9.3  
9.3




0.88  
0.88




22.4  
22.4




86.5  
86.5




0.26  
0.26




V  
V




0.542  
0.542




11.7  
11.7




1.33  
1.33




8.7  
8.7




10.1  
10.1




0.86  
0.86




26.9  
26.9




102.0  
102.0




0.26  
0.26




VI  
VI




0.639  
0.639




14.4  
14.4




1.55  
1.55




9.3  
9.3




10.6  
10.6




0.88  
0.88




31.1  
31.1




112.4  
112.4




0.28  
0.28




VII  
VII




0.750  
0.750




16.4  
16.4




1.74  
1.74




9.5  
9.5




11.2  
11.2




0.85  
0.85




32.6  
32.6




125.4  
125.4




0.26  
0.26




VIII  
VIII




0.841  
0.841




18,4  
18,4




1.82  
1.82




10.1  
10.1




11.6  
11.6




0.87  
0.87




38.9  
38.9




134.6  
134.6




0.29  
0.29




IX (10 days)  
IX (10 days)




0.964  
0.964




20.4  
20.4




1.86  
1.86




11.0  
11.0




12.1  
12.1




0.91  
0.91




42.3  
42.3




146.4  
146.4




0.28  
0.28




X  
X




1.040  
1.040




20.8  
20.8




1.82  
1.82




11.4  
11.4




12.4  
12.4




0.92  
0.92




44.2  
44.2




153.8  
153.8




0.29  
0.29




XI (20 days)  
XI (20 days)




1.171  
1.171




21.7  
21.7




1.91  
1.91




11.4  
11.4




12.7  
12.7




0.90  
0.90




45.7  
45.7




161.3  
161.3




0.28  
0.28




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253




23.0  
23.0




1.91  
1.91




12.0  
12.0




13.0  
13.0




0.92  
0.92




47.2  
47.2




169.0  
169.0




0.28  
0.28




XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




23.2  
23.2




1.94  
1.94




12.0  
12.0




13.2  
13.2




0.91  
0.91




50.2  
50.2




174.2  
174.2




0.29  
0.29




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




24.8  
24.8




1.99  
1.99




12.5  
12.5




13.4  
13.4




0.93  
0.93




52.3  
52.3




179.6  
179.6




0.29  
0.29




XV  
XV




1.554  
1.554




24.3  
24.3




1.97  
1.97




12.3  
12.3




13.5  
13.5




0.91  
0.91




54.0  
54.0




182.3  
182.3




0.30  
0.30




XVI  
XVI




1.656  
1.656




24.3  
24.3




1.94  
1.94




12.5  
12.5




13.7  
13.7




0.91  
0.91




54.9  
54.9




187.7  
187.7




0.29  
0.29




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




24.6  
24.6




1.90  
1.90




12.9  
12.9




13.8  
13.8




0.94  
0.94




56.4  
56.4




190.4  
190.4




0.30  
0.30




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




26.0  
26.0




1.97  
1.97




13.2  
13.2




14.1  
14.1




0.94  
0.94




58.9  
58.9




198.8  
198.8




0.30  
0.30




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




24.8  
24.8




1.83  
1.83




13.5  
13.5




14.3  
14.3




0.94  
0.94




57.0  
57.0




204.5  
204.5




0.28  
0.28




XX  
XX




2.054  
2.054




24.9  
24.9




1.72  
1.72




14.5  
14.5




14.6  
14.6




0.99  
0.99




63.4  
63.4




213.2  
213.2




0.30  
0.30




Average (Groups ''
Average (Groups




^-XX)  
^-XX)




Line 24,988: Line 23,801:




0.91  
0.91








0.28  
0.28




Line 25,006: Line 23,819:




Average (Groups ]  
Average (Groups ]




^111-5  
^111-5




:x) . . . .


x) . . . .




Line 25,021: Line 23,834:




0.93  
0.93




Line 25,041: Line 23,854:




the increase in the frontal diameter being retarded relative to  
the increase in the frontal diameter being retarded relative to the sagittal diameter in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams (Sugita, '17).
the sagittal diameter in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams  
(Sugita, '17).  


If, as given in columns H and I, table 5, the area of the total  
If, as given in columns H and I, table 5, the area of the total frontal section is compared with the square of W. D of the corresponding brain group, the above inference will be supported by the fact that the ratio, given in column J of the same table,
frontal section is compared with the square of W. D of the corresponding brain group, the above inference will be supported  
by the fact that the ratio, given in column J of the same table,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 81  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 81


is almost equal throughout all brain weight groups, swinging  
is almost equal throughout all brain weight groups, swinging within the narrow limits of 0.26 to 0.30.
within the narrow limits of 0.26 to 0.30.  


G. Percentage of the area of cortex in the total area of the frontal  
G. Percentage of the area of cortex in the total area of the frontal section (one hemicerehrum)
section (one hemicerehrum)  


Figure 2 shows the outline of the frontal section. In the  
Figure 2 shows the outline of the frontal section. In the section we see as the principal divisions the cortex, the striatum, the thalamus, the capsula externa and the lateral ventricle, and, among these, the cortex and the striatum stand in marked contrast. In the young brains, the lateral ventricle is wide. This cavity was not included in the measurement of the area. In the wall of it, especially at the dorso-lateral corner, there are seen masses of dividing cells and of neuroblasts, which are due to migrate into the cortex. But in the older brains weighing more than 1.1 grams, the ventricular wall is almost free from dividing cells and the cortex is no longer receiving new cells. By determining the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the frontal section, we may obtain some clue as to mass relation of the cortex to the other structures seen in the frontal section.
section we see as the principal divisions the cortex, the striatum,  
the thalamus, the capsula externa and the lateral ventricle,  
and, among these, the cortex and the striatum stand in marked  
contrast. In the young brains, the lateral ventricle is wide.  
This cavity was not included in the measurement of the area.  
In the wall of it, especially at the dorso-lateral corner, there  
are seen masses of dividing cells and of neuroblasts, which are  
due to migrate into the cortex. But in the older brains weighing more than 1.1 grams, the ventricular wall is almost free  
from dividing cells and the cortex is no longer receiving new  
cells. By determining the percentage of the cortical area to  
the total area of the frontal section, we may obtain some clue  
as to mass relation of the cortex to the other structures seen in  
the frontal section.  


As previously given in table 2, the cortical area in the frontal  
As previously given in table 2, the cortical area in the frontal section amounts to 34 per cent of the total area at birth. It increases from birth up to bi'ains weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams, when the percentage reaches its highest figure, that is, 50 or sometimes 51, on the average 48 per cent. After this stage, the percentage slowly diminishes as the brain weight increases, and, at full maturity, it reaches 44 per cent or less; even 39 per cent in an old brain weighing more than 2.0 grams. This means clearly that the cortical area increases rapidly by receiving new cells from the matrix and at the same time by the enlargement and separation of the cell bodies, during the first phase, covering the first ten days after birth.
section amounts to 34 per cent of the total area at birth. It  
increases from birth up to bi'ains weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams,  
when the percentage reaches its highest figure, that is, 50 or  
sometimes 51, on the average 48 per cent. After this stage,  
the percentage slowly diminishes as the brain weight increases,  
and, at full maturity, it reaches 44 per cent or less; even 39 per  
cent in an old brain weighing more than 2.0 grams. This means  
clearly that the cortical area increases rapidly by receiving  
new cells from the matrix and at the same time by the enlargement and separation of the cell bodies, during the first phase,  
covering the first ten days after birth.  


In this phase, as a matter of fact, the remainder of the section is for the most part composed of the matrix and migrating  
In this phase, as a matter of fact, the remainder of the section is for the most part composed of the matrix and migrating cells, the central nuclei being not yet so largely developed. The transitional layers, or the areas previously occupied by the
cells, the central nuclei being not yet so largely developed.  
The transitional layers, or the areas previously occupied by the  






OZ NAOKI SUGITA  
OZ NAOKI SUGITA


transitional layers, which will be replaced by the capsula externa, are relatively wide during this phase.  
transitional layers, which will be replaced by the capsula externa, are relatively wide during this phase.


After twenty daj^s, when the brain has attained nearly the  
After twenty daj^s, when the brain has attained nearly the weight of 1.17 grams, the remainder of the section (the central nuclei and the white substance) increases more rapidly than the cortical area and the group of proliferating cells in the ventricular wall disappears. The percentage of the cortical area to that of the whole section consequently decreases under these conditions, though the absolute value of the cortical area is steadily increasing.
weight of 1.17 grams, the remainder of the section (the central  
nuclei and the white substance) increases more rapidly than  
the cortical area and the group of proliferating cells in the ventricular wall disappears. The percentage of the cortical area  
to that of the whole section consequently decreases under these  
conditions, though the absolute value of the cortical area is  
steadily increasing.  


From the mode of the changes in the percentage value of the  
From the mode of the changes in the percentage value of the cortical area, we may conclude that, in the albino rat, at least, the period during which the brain weight increases from 0.25 gram (birth) to 1.2 grams (about 20 daj^s), is the period when the cortical elements are principally produced, matured and arranged, and that the cortex is precocious in its construction. The growth or construction of the remaining parts in the frontal section, so far at least as this is expressed by increase in volume, is relatively retarded or delayed until the cortex has acquired all its characteristic elements.
cortical area, we may conclude that, in the albino rat, at least,  
the period during which the brain weight increases from 0.25  
gram (birth) to 1.2 grams (about 20 daj^s), is the period when  
the cortical elements are principally produced, matured and  
arranged, and that the cortex is precocious in its construction.  
The growth or construction of the remaining parts in the frontal  
section, so far at least as this is expressed by increase in volume,  
is relatively retarded or delayed until the cortex has acquired  
all its characteristic elements.  


H. The volume of the entire cortex  
H. The volume of the entire cortex


The true volume of the entire cerebral cortex can not be  
The true volume of the entire cerebral cortex can not be measured by the methods here used. It will require a special study for that purpose. My present object is to obtain relative values for the cortical volume and a record of the change in these relative values according to brain growth. If the data for the area of the cerebral cortex as measured by me in the two typical sections be reduced to a simple geometrical form, it will be very easy to compare the changes in the computed volume in successive brain weight groups. As already mentioned, the cortical area in the sagittal and the frontal sections, which sections cross one another at right angles, may be reduced to rectangles which have as the long side the lengths proportional respectively to the sagittal and the frontal diameters of the cerebrum (L. F and W. D), and as the short side the cortical
measured by the methods here used. It will require a special  
study for that purpose. My present object is to obtain relative  
values for the cortical volume and a record of the change in  
these relative values according to brain growth. If the data  
for the area of the cerebral cortex as measured by me in the two  
typical sections be reduced to a simple geometrical form, it will  
be very easy to compare the changes in the computed volume in  
successive brain weight groups. As already mentioned, the  
cortical area in the sagittal and the frontal sections, which  
sections cross one another at right angles, may be reduced to  
rectangles which have as the long side the lengths proportional  
respectively to the sagittal and the frontal diameters of the  
cerebrum (L. F and W. D), and as the short side the cortical  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






83  
83






thicknesses {T^ and Tp). For the present purpose, the mean  
thicknesses {T^ and Tp). For the present purpose, the mean cortical thickness (T) may be substituted for both the foregoing values of the cortical thickness, when the brain weight is the same, because T falls at the mean of the T^ and T^, so that the gain in T^ would be compensated by the loss in T^ (fig. 3). As a consequence the volume of the cortex may be represented by an index value, the formula for which follows.^
cortical thickness (T) may be substituted for both the foregoing  
values of the cortical thickness, when the brain weight is the  
same, because T falls at the mean of the T^ and T^, so that  
the gain in T^ would be compensated by the loss in T^ (fig. 3).  
As a consequence the volume of the cortex may be represented  
by an index value, the formula for which follows.^  






L.FX W. D XT  
L.FX W. D XT






(all in millimeters)  
(all in millimeters)








CKNES5 OF CORTEX  
CKNES5 OF CORTEX






Fig. 3 The solid lines show the simplified geometrical form used to indicate  
Fig. 3 The solid lines show the simplified geometrical form used to indicate the volume of the entire cortex, which is assumed to be proportional to the rectangular form designated by dotted lines in the figure. The volume of the rectangular figure, which was obtained by the value: L. F y, W . F X T, has been tabulated in column F, table 6, and plotted as graph LWT in chart 2.
the volume of the entire cortex, which is assumed to be proportional to the rectangular form designated by dotted lines in the figure. The volume of the rectangular figure, which was obtained by the value: L. F y, W . F X T, has been  
tabulated in column F, table 6, and plotted as graph LWT in chart 2.  


The values thus obtained — which mean the actual volume of  
The values thus obtained — which mean the actual volume of the rectangle denoted by dotted lines in figure 3 — stand in a fixed relation to the true cortical volume which is denoted by solid lines in the same figure, as far as the latter retains a similar form during growth.
the rectangle denoted by dotted lines in figure 3 — stand in a  
fixed relation to the true cortical volume which is denoted by  
solid lines in the same figure, as far as the latter retains a similar  
form during growth.  


5 In this formula, the coefficients 1.22 and 0.91, which were empirically determined, were eliminated, because these coefficients are fixed throughout all  
5 In this formula, the coefficients 1.22 and 0.91, which were empirically determined, were eliminated, because these coefficients are fixed throughout all the groups to be compared. For Groups XIII to XX, the coefficients are respectively 1.21 and 0.93, and these will be taken into consideration when comparison is made between the Albino and the Norway rats.
the groups to be compared. For Groups XIII to XX, the coefficients are respectively 1.21 and 0.93, and these will be taken into consideration when comparison is made between the Albino and the Norway rats.  






8-i  
8-i






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 6  
TABLE 6


Giving for each brain weight group the average brain weight, ratio in cerebral volume,  
Giving for each brain weight group the average brain weight, ratio in cerebral volume, computed cortical volume and the data used to obtain the computed cortical volume, and ratio in cortical volume
computed cortical volume and the data used to obtain the computed cortical volume,  
and ratio in cortical volume  




Line 25,198: Line 23,937:




A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




RATIO  
RATIO


OF  
OF


VOLUME  
VOLUME


OF  
OF


CEREBRUM  
CEREBRUM




L.F  
L.F


IN FRESH  
IN FRESH BRAIN
BRAIN  




W. D  
W. D


IN FRESH  
IN FRESH BRAIN
BRAIN  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS
CORTICAL  
THICKNESS  




L. FX  
L. FX W. DXT,
W. DXT,  


COMPUTED  
COMPUTED VOLUME
VOLUME  


OF  
OF CORTEX
CORTEX  




RATIO OF  
RATIO OF


COMPUTED  
COMPUTED


VOLUME  
VOLUME


OF  
OF COKTEX
COKTEX  








grams  
grams








m m .  
m m .




m m .  
m m .




m m .  
m m .




?n»i.'  
?n»i.'








I  
I




0.161  
0.161








5.6  
5.6




6.6  
6.6




0.54  
0.54




19.96  
19.96








II (birth)  
II (birth)




0.251  
0.251




1.00  
1.00




6.4  
6.4




7.7  
7.7




0.73  
0.73




35.97  
35.97




1.00  
1.00




III  
III




0.358  
0.358




1.34  
1.34




7.4  
7.4




8.7  
8.7




0.96  
0.96




61.81  
61.81




1.72  
1.72




IV  
IV




0.432  
0.432




1.66  
1.66




8.0  
8.0




9.3  
9.3




1.10  
1.10




81.84  
81.84




2.28  
2.28




V  
V




0.542  
0.542




2.12  
2.12




8.9  
8.9




10.1  
10.1




1.24  
1.24




111.46  
111.46




3.10  
3.10




VI  
VI




0.639  
0.639




2.53  
2.53




9.6  
9.6




10.6  
10.6




1.42  
1.42




144.50  
144.50




4.02  
4.02




VII  
VII




0.750  
0.750




3.12  
3.12




10.4  
10.4




11.2  
11.2




1.58  
1.58




184.04  
184.04




5.12  
5.12




vni  
vni




0.841  
0.841




3.50 '~  
3.50 '~




11.0  
11.0




11.6  
11.6




1.65  
1.65




210.54  
210.54




5.85  
5.85




IX (10 days)  
IX (10 days)




0.964  
0.964




4.04  
4.04




11.6  
11.6




12.1  
12.1




1.71  
1.71




240.02  
240.02




6.67  
6.67




X  
X




1.040  
1.040




4.10  
4.10




12.0  
12.0




12.4  
12.4




1.72  
1.72




255.94  
255.94




7.12  
7.12




XI (20 days)  
XI (20 days)




1.171  
1.171




4.61  
4.61




12.5  
12.5




12.7  
12.7




1.82  
1.82




288.93  
288.93




8.03  
8.03




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253




4.80  
4.80




12.8  
12.8




13.0  
13.0




1.8S  
1.8S




304.51  
304.51




8.47  
8.47




XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




5.17  
5.17




13.0  
13.0




13.2  
13.2




1.83  
1.83




314.03  
314.03




8.73  
8.73




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




5.40  
5.40




13.3  
13.3




13.4  
13.4




1.85  
1.85




329.71  
329.71




9.17  
9.17




XV  
XV




1.554  
1.554




5.89  
5.89




13.7  
13.7




13.5  
13.5




1.87  
1.87




345.86  
345.86




9.62  
9.62




XVI  
XVI




1.656  
1.656




6.05  
6.05




14.1  
14.1




13.7  
13.7




1.86  
1.86




359.30  
359.30




9.99  
9.99




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




6.44  
6.44




14.3  
14.3




13.8  
13.8




1.85  
1.85




365.08  
365.08




10.15  
10.15




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




6.72  
6.72




14.7  
14.7




14.1  
14.1




1.92  
1.92




397.96  
397.96




11.06  
11.06




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




6.91  
6.91




15.0  
15.0




14.3  
14.3




1.82  
1.82




390.39  
390.39




10.85  
10.85




XX  
XX




2.054  
2.054




7.85  
7.85




15.3  
15.3




14.6  
14.6




1.76  
1.76




393.15  
393.15




10.93  
10.93






1 T, here entered, is the mean value of Ts and T^, previously given in tables  
1 T, here entered, is the mean value of Ts and T^, previously given in tables 4 and 5 and is not the general average thickness of the cortex of the sagittal, frontal add horizontal sections formerly presented in my second paper in this series (Sugita, '17 a) .
4 and 5 and is not the general average thickness of the cortex of the sagittal,  
frontal add horizontal sections formerly presented in my second paper in this  
series (Sugita, '17 a) .  


Table 6 shows the values for the cortical volume computed by  
Table 6 shows the values for the cortical volume computed by the above method and the ratios, the cortical volume at birth being taken as the unit of the comparison.
the above method and the ratios, the cortical volume at birth  
being taken as the unit of the comparison.  


Chart 2 (graph LWT) shows graphically the ratios obtained  
Chart 2 (graph LWT) shows graphically the ratios obtained (table 6, column G), accompanied by the graph (graph LWH) which shows the increase in volume of the cerebrum (table 6, column B). The volume of the cerebrum was computed according to my previous procedure (Sugita, '17). From this
(table 6, column G), accompanied by the graph (graph LWH)  
which shows the increase in volume of the cerebrum (table 6,  
column B). The volume of the cerebrum was computed according to my previous procedure (Sugita, '17). From this  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






86  
86






chart we see that the cortical volume increases more rapidly  
chart we see that the cortical volume increases more rapidly than the entire cerebral volume, until the brain attains the weight of 1.17 grams (20 days) (see crosses in chart 2), If we take these marks as the starting points, then the cerebral volume increases to about 1.7 times at full maturity and in the same way the cortical volume increases to about 1.4 times compared with the value at twenty days (table 6). So, it may be stated that after twenty days the increase in cortical volume becomes
than the entire cerebral volume, until the brain attains the weight  
of 1.17 grams (20 days) (see crosses in chart 2), If we take  
these marks as the starting points, then the cerebral volume  
increases to about 1.7 times at full maturity and in the same  
way the cortical volume increases to about 1.4 times compared  
with the value at twenty days (table 6). So, it may be stated  
that after twenty days the increase in cortical volume becomes  




Line 25,851: Line 24,566:




^2  
^2


n  
n


10  
10 9
9  




Line 25,959: Line 24,673:




X  
X








y—  
y—




~-«v,_  
~-«v,_




Line 25,974: Line 24,688:




-:^  
-:^




'°N.  
'°N.




■ L\A  
■ L\A




T  
T




Line 25,998: Line 24,712:




-^  
-^




y^"  
y^"




-■  
-■


^^  
^^








"~tf'  
"~tf'








^'^  
^'^




"^s^  
"^s^




"°"  
"°"








■  




■Tiu  
■Tiu




VT°  
VT°




Line 26,046: Line 24,760:




_^-'  
_^-'




Line 26,057: Line 24,771:




x^  
x^




^•^  
^•^




-^^  
-^^




Line 26,080: Line 24,794:




6  
6




Line 26,087: Line 24,801:




\  
\




/  
/




/'"  
/'"




Line 26,106: Line 24,820:




y  
y




/  
/




Line 26,126: Line 24,840:




^'^  
^'^




f  
f




6  
6


5  
5


4  
4




Line 26,143: Line 24,857:




-^  
-^




A  
A




Line 26,157: Line 24,871:




y  
y




y  
y




Line 26,175: Line 24,889:




,,,  
,,,




'-"  
'-"




•'■  
•'■




Line 26,192: Line 24,906:




/  
/




\  
\




\  
\




Line 26,205: Line 24,919:




/  
/




/•'  
/•'




Line 26,219: Line 24,933:




,..„  
,..„




'-'''
'-




'  
'




Line 26,246: Line 24,960:




\  
\




\  
\




/  
/




/  
/




Line 26,264: Line 24,978:
,
,


'-'■'  
'-'■'




"■"  
"■"




Line 26,296: Line 25,010:




>  
>




\  
\




__,  
__,




,-'  
,-'




'  
'




Line 26,343: Line 25,057:




/  
/




^'  
^'




V  
V




^-^  
^-^




~^.-_  
~^.-_




Line 26,390: Line 25,104:




^  
^




Line 26,409: Line 25,123:




— »—  
— »—




-" —  
-" —




-.-_  
-.-_




Line 26,440: Line 25,154:




'  
'




N  
N








^  
^




^  
^




Line 26,493: Line 25,207:




0.1 0.2 B 0.3 0.4 05 0.6 0.7  
0.1 0.2 B 0.3 0.4 05 0.6 0.7






09 10 11 12 13 14- 15 ife i? 18 19 2.0 Jmi  
09 10 11 12 13 14- 15 ife i? 18 19 2.0 Jmi






Chart 2 Showing the ratios of the values for the cortical volume, the volume  
Chart 2 Showing the ratios of the values for the cortical volume, the volume of the cerebrum, the cell density in two unit volumes and the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the albino rat, according to the
of the cerebrum, the cell density in two unit volumes and the computed number  
of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the albino rat, according to the  


brain weight. • • LWT, The ratios of the computed volume of the cerebral  
brain weight. • • LWT, The ratios of the computed volume of the cerebral


cortex, the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data in table  
cortex, the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data in table


6. . • LWH, The ratios of the volume of the entire cerebrum,  
6. . • LWH, The ratios of the volume of the entire cerebrum,


the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data presented in a  
the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data presented in a former paper (Sugita, '17) and given also in table 6. X XN, The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Based on the data given in column C, table 7, as N", and plotted here according to the values corresponding to one onehundredth of the number given in column C, table 7. •■ — •" * NLWT, The ratios of the computed number of nerve ce»lls in the entire cortex, the value at birth being taken as the unit. Here the unit chosen on the ordinate is 5. The data are given in column E, table 7.
former paper (Sugita, '17) and given also in table 6. X XN, The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Based on the data given in column C,  
table 7, as N", and plotted here according to the values corresponding to one onehundredth of the number given in column C, table 7. •■ — •" * NLWT, The  
ratios of the computed number of nerve ce»lls in the entire cortex, the value at  
birth being taken as the unit. Here the unit chosen on the ordinate is 5. The  
data are given in column E, table 7.  






86 NAOKI SUGITA  
86 NAOKI SUGITA


slower and is somewhat less in rate than the increase in cerebral volume or brain weight, as is also seen in the graphs given  
slower and is somewhat less in rate than the increase in cerebral volume or brain weight, as is also seen in the graphs given in chart 2.
in chart 2.  


/. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex  
/. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex


In the lamina pyramidalis of the newborn Albino brain, at a  
In the lamina pyramidalis of the newborn Albino brain, at a dorso-lateral part of the pallium, where, in the frontal section, the cell count was irfade (fig. 2, VII), there were in the fresh condition about 500 pyramids crowded in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^' This number decreases, as the brain grows, and falls to 110 in a brain weighing about 1.2 grams (20 days) (table 3). In a brain weighing about 1.5 grams (50 days), the number has dropped nearly to 90, from which it is only slightly reduced in the heavier brains. In an old rat, whose brain weighs more than 2.0 grams, the number is about 80, or less than one-sixth the number at birth. According to another study, which will be published later, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, measured at this same locality, increases very rapidly during the first ten days after birth, till the brain has attained 0.9 gram in weight, when these structures reach their maximum size (Cell body 16/x X 20ju; Nucleus 14;u X 15m). After this stage the cell body and the nucleus ar'e mature in their nucleus-plasma relation, but still changing their chemical composition, as revealed by the stains, while the neuron as a whole is still growing as shown by the developing axon and the dendrites.' This fact is in accord with the observation that the number of pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis decreases rapidly after birth, until the brain weight reaches about 0.9 gram (10 days), after which the rate of decrease becomes slow.
dorso-lateral part of the pallium, where, in the frontal section,  
the cell count was irfade (fig. 2, VII), there were in the fresh  
condition about 500 pyramids crowded in a unit volume of 0.001  
mm.^' This number decreases, as the brain grows, and falls to  
110 in a brain weighing about 1.2 grams (20 days) (table 3).  
In a brain weighing about 1.5 grams (50 days), the number has  
dropped nearly to 90, from which it is only slightly reduced in  
the heavier brains. In an old rat, whose brain weighs more  
than 2.0 grams, the number is about 80, or less than one-sixth  
the number at birth. According to another study, which will  
be published later, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus  
of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, measured at this  
same locality, increases very rapidly during the first ten days  
after birth, till the brain has attained 0.9 gram in weight, when  
these structures reach their maximum size (Cell body 16/x X 20ju;  
Nucleus 14;u X 15m). After this stage the cell body and the  
nucleus ar'e mature in their nucleus-plasma relation, but still  
changing their chemical composition, as revealed by the stains,  
while the neuron as a whole is still growing as shown by the  
developing axon and the dendrites.' This fact is in accord with  
the observation that the number of pyramidal cells in the lamina  
pyramidalis decreases rapidly after birth, until the brain weight  
reaches about 0.9 gram (10 days), after which the rate of decrease  
becomes slow.  


The change in cell number in a given volume of the cortex  
The change in cell number in a given volume of the cortex during the growth of the brain is determined by two main factors: (1) the enlargement of the cell body proper and the growth of the cell branches and (2) the development of the intercellular structures (that is, incoming nerve fibers, neuroglia, blood vessels) and myelin formation, separating the cells more and more from each other.
during the growth of the brain is determined by two main  
factors: (1) the enlargement of the cell body proper and the  
growth of the cell branches and (2) the development of the  
intercellular structures (that is, incoming nerve fibers, neuroglia,  
blood vessels) and myelin formation, separating the cells more  
and more from each other.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 87  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 87


As to the cells in the lamina ganglionaris, the relation is  
As to the cells in the lamina ganglionaris, the relation is somewhat different from that just described. The total number of cells, including both the small and large pyramids, decreases relatively rapidly after birth, until the brain weight reaches 1.25 grams (25 days). It then shows a slight increase (table 3, Groups XIII and XIV), but decreases again by slow steps and remains almost fixed after 35 days (brain weight 1.4 grams) at 60. Finally, in old rats, only 50 cells were counted in a unit volume of 0.001 mm. ,3 or about one-fifth the number at birth.
somewhat different from that just described. The total number  
of cells, including both the small and large pyramids, decreases  
relatively rapidly after birth, until the brain weight reaches  
1.25 grams (25 days). It then shows a slight increase (table 3,  
Groups XIII and XIV), but decreases again by slow steps and  
remains almost fixed after 35 days (brain weight 1.4 grams)  
at 60. Finally, in old rats, only 50 cells were counted in a unit  
volume of 0.001 mm. ,3 or about one-fifth the number at birth.  


If the number of the large pyramids alone is considered, then  
If the number of the large pyramids alone is considered, then the number decreases rapidly from birth to a brain weight of 0.8 gram (9 days). After this, it decreases slightly and remains almost fixed at 23 up to a brain w^eighing 1.2 grams. In brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams it shows a tendency to increase slightly for a time — corresponding to the increase in total number of cells in this layer (above mentioned) — but finally becomes fixed again at 23 to 24 throughout maturity. In old age, it has diminished to 20 or about two-sevenths the number at birth. The large ganglion cells attain nearly their full size (Cell bod}^ 21^ X 28m; Nucleus 18m X 19m) at 0.9 gram in brain weight (10 days), almost at the same time as the small pyramids.
the number decreases rapidly from birth to a brain weight of  
0.8 gram (9 days). After this, it decreases slightly and remains  
almost fixed at 23 up to a brain w^eighing 1.2 grams. In brains  
weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams it shows a tendency to increase slightly  
for a time — corresponding to the increase in total number of  
cells in this layer (above mentioned) — but finally becomes fixed  
again at 23 to 24 throughout maturity. In old age, it has  
diminished to 20 or about two-sevenths the number at birth.  
The large ganglion cells attain nearly their full size (Cell bod}^  
21^ X 28m; Nucleus 18m X 19m) at 0.9 gram in brain weight  
(10 days), almost at the same time as the small pyramids.  


I can not, from the data at hand, satisfactorily explain the  
I can not, from the data at hand, satisfactorily explain the increase in cell number in the lamina ganglionaris in the period during which the brain grows from 1.2 grams to 1.4 grams in weight. This fact might however have some connection with the chemical structure of the cells and consequently be related to a change in reaction to the reagents used, so that the size of the large pyramids, after having attained a maximum (21m X 28m) at a brain weight of 0.9 gram, diminishes slightl}^ at the same time that their response to the stain changes somewhat, measuring only 20m X 27m at a brain weight of 1.3 to 1.4 grams, after which they again enlarge to a full size of the cell body (sometimes over 23m X 30m). In the carbol-thionine staining the sections from brains weighing less than 1.0 gram show a violet tone, those from brains weighing more than 1.2 grams a blue tone while those from brains weighing 1.0 to 1.2 grams are intermediate in tone. We shall pass over this question now,
increase in cell number in the lamina ganglionaris in the period  
during which the brain grows from 1.2 grams to 1.4 grams in  
weight. This fact might however have some connection with  
the chemical structure of the cells and consequently be related  
to a change in reaction to the reagents used, so that the size of  
the large pyramids, after having attained a maximum (21m X 28m)  
at a brain weight of 0.9 gram, diminishes slightl}^ at the same  
time that their response to the stain changes somewhat, measuring only 20m X 27m at a brain weight of 1.3 to 1.4 grams,  
after which they again enlarge to a full size of the cell body  
(sometimes over 23m X 30m). In the carbol-thionine staining  
the sections from brains weighing less than 1.0 gram show a  
violet tone, those from brains weighing more than 1.2 grams a  
blue tone while those from brains weighing 1.0 to 1.2 grams are  
intermediate in tone. We shall pass over this question now,  






88 NAOKl SUGITA  
88 NAOKl SUGITA


as a detailed description of the size of each cell type and its  
as a detailed description of the size of each cell type and its mode of enlargement according to age will be the theme of a later paper.
mode of enlargement according to age will be the theme of a later  
paper.  


To represent the relative cell density in the cerebral cortex  
To represent the relative cell density in the cerebral cortex for each brain weight group, the sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, given in table 3, was used, in order to balance, in some measure, the inequality of the cell distribution. These values are given in table 7, column C, and in chart 2 (graph N). Both table and chart show that the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cortex decreases verj^ rapidly during the first ten days after birth (up to the brain weight of 0.95 gram) and after that time it decreases slowly but steadily as the age advances. The cell number at maturity is nearly one-fifth the value at birth.
for each brain weight group, the sum of the cell numbers in the  
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, given in table  
3, was used, in order to balance, in some measure, the inequality  
of the cell distribution. These values are given in table 7,  
column C, and in chart 2 (graph N). Both table and chart  
show that the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cortex decreases verj^ rapidly during the first ten days after birth  
(up to the brain weight of 0.95 gram) and after that time it  
decreases slowly but steadily as the age advances. The cell  
number at maturity is nearly one-fifth the value at birth.  


J . Values for the co7nputed yiumher of nerve cells in the entire  
J . Values for the co7nputed yiumher of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex, according to brain weight
cerebral cortex, according to brain weight  


The number of nerve cells given in table 3 does not means the  
The number of nerve cells given in table 3 does not means the actual volume of complete cells contained in a unit volume, because the parts of cells which showed a nucleus but no nucleolus in the section were also counted. In spite of this, the number in the table indicates fairly the relative number of cells or the relative cell density at different ages in the localities examined, and from this we may be able to get some indication as to the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex.
actual volume of complete cells contained in a unit volume,  
because the parts of cells which showed a nucleus but no nucleolus in the section were also counted. In spite of this, the  
number in the table indicates fairly the relative number of cells  
or the relative cell density at different ages in the localities  
examined, and from this we may be able to get some indication  
as to the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex.  


If the actual number of cells in a unit volume be proportional  
If the actual number of cells in a unit volume be proportional to the number of cells counted, the number of cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be indicated (theoretically) by this number multiplied by the number obtained by dividing the volume of the entire cerebral cortex by the unit volume.
to the number of cells counted, the number of cells in the entire  
cerebral cortex may be indicated (theoretically) by this number  
multiplied by the number obtained by dividing the volume of  
the entire cerebral cortex by the unit volume.  


The actual volume of the cortex was not measured, but the  
The actual volume of the cortex was not measured, but the computed volume is indicated by the following formula, as explained already.
computed volume is indicated by the following formula, as  
explained already.  


L.F XW.D XT (all in millimeters)  
L.F XW.D XT (all in millimeters)


So, if N means the cell number in a unit volume (for example,  
So, if N means the cell number in a unit volume (for example,






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 89  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 89


N is 240 for Group VIII, as shown in table 7, column C), the  
N is 240 for Group VIII, as shown in table 7, column C), the relative value of the number of nerve cells in the entire cortex may be computed by the following formula.^
relative value of the number of nerve cells in the entire cortex  
may be computed by the following formula.^  


NxL.FxW.DxT (L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters)  
NxL.FxW.DxT (L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters)


The results of this computation are shown in table 7 and in  
The results of this computation are shown in table 7 and in chart- 2 (graph NLWT), where the necessary data were all taken from the present or former papers and the relative value of N X L. F X W. D X T is calculated. For N, the corrected sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris, given in table 3, was used (table 7, column C). The results are quite interesting. As seen from table 7, columns D and E, and chart 2 (graph NLWT based on column E,), the relative value of the computed number of cells in the entire cortex increases rapidly from birth to a brain weighing 0.9 gram (about 10 days), and then for a while the increase becomes slow up to a brain weight of 1.17 grams (20 days), attaining at this time nearly the complete number of nerve cells (see graph NLWT, mark X in chart 2) . After having passed this phase, the value for the number of cells remains almost constant throughout the life. The average of the values for Groups XI-XX in table 7 is 530, so that between birth and maturity the number of cells counted has increased two times, but nearly al^ of this increase has taken place during the first ten days of life. These results coincide v.ery well with the conclusions of Allen ('12), that in the cerebrum mitosis continues with diminishing activity to the 20th day after birth.
chart- 2 (graph NLWT), where the necessary data were all taken  
from the present or former papers and the relative value of  
N X L. F X W. D X T is calculated. For N, the corrected  
sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and in the  
lamina ganglionaris, given in table 3, was used (table 7, column  
C). The results are quite interesting. As seen from table 7,  
columns D and E, and chart 2 (graph NLWT based on column  
E,), the relative value of the computed number of cells in the  
entire cortex increases rapidly from birth to a brain weighing  
0.9 gram (about 10 days), and then for a while the increase  
becomes slow up to a brain weight of 1.17 grams (20 days),  
attaining at this time nearly the complete number of nerve  
cells (see graph NLWT, mark X in chart 2) . After having passed  
this phase, the value for the number of cells remains almost  
constant throughout the life. The average of the values for  
Groups XI-XX in table 7 is 530, so that between birth and maturity the number of cells counted has increased two times,  
but nearly al^ of this increase has taken place during the first  
ten days of life. These results coincide v.ery well with the conclusions of Allen ('12), that in the cerebrum mitosis continues  
with diminishing activity to the 20th day after birth.  


'^ By this computation the number of cells in the entire cortex will be equal  
'^ By this computation the number of cells in the entire cortex will be equal to the number of times the unit of volume, 0.001 mm.' in which the cells were counted, is contained in the entire volume of the cortex, multiplied by the number of cells in a unit volume. The number of cells designated by N is however the sum of the numbers in two unit volumes, that is, the number in one unit volume of the lamina pyramidalis plus the number in one unit volume of the lamina ganglionaris.
to the number of times the unit of volume, 0.001 mm.' in which the cells were  
counted, is contained in the entire volume of the cortex, multiplied by the number of cells in a unit volume. The number of cells designated by N is however  
the sum of the numbers in two unit volumes, that is, the number in one unit  
volume of the lamina pyramidalis plus the number in one unit volume of the  
lamina ganglionaris.  


Since the numbers of cells used, N, is that in two unit volumes, the foregoing product must be divided by two. As dividing the volume of the cortex  
Since the numbers of cells used, N, is that in two unit volumes, the foregoing product must be divided by two. As dividing the volume of the cortex by 0.001 is equivalent to multiplying it by 1000, and as the product must be divided by two, the operation may be expressed as follows:
by 0.001 is equivalent to multiplying it by 1000, and as the product must be  
divided by two, the operation may be expressed as follows:  


N X L. F X W. D X T X oOO = Number of cells  
N X L. F X W. D X T X oOO = Number of cells






90  
90






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7


Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex, obtained on  
Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex, obtained on the basis of the measurements given in this series of studies. The ratio of the mimber of cells of each later group to that of Group 11 (birth) is also given
the basis of the measurements given in this series of studies. The ratio of the  
mimber of cells of each later group to that of Group 11 (birth) is also given  




Line 26,712: Line 25,301:




A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




Line 26,735: Line 25,324:




COMPUTED  
COMPUTED








BRAI.V WEIGHT GROUP  
BRAI.V WEIGHT GROUP




BRAIX  
BRAIX WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




COMPUTED  
COMPUTED


VOLUME OF  
VOLUME OF


CORTEX  
CORTEX


L.FX ir. D  
L.FX ir. D X T
X T  




SUM OF XOS.  
SUM OF XOS. OF CELLS I.V L.\M. PYR. AXD ■LAM. GAXG. IX TWO UNIT
OF CELLS I.V  
L.\M. PYR. AXD  
■LAM. GAXG.  
IX TWO UNIT  




NUMBER OF  
NUMBER OF


CELLS  
CELLS IN CORTEX,'
IN CORTEX,'  


A XL.FX  
A XL.FX W. D XT
W. D XT  




RATIO  
RATIO


OF NU.MBER  
OF NU.MBER


OF CELLS  
OF CELLS




Line 26,784: Line 25,365:




VOLUMES, K  
VOLUMES, K




^ 100  
^ 100




Line 26,794: Line 25,375:




gra m s  
gra m s




mrn.^  
mrn.^




Line 26,806: Line 25,387:




II fbirthi  
II fbirthi




0.251  
0.251




35.97  
35.97




739  
739




265.8  
265.8




1.00  
1.00




III  
III




0.358  
0.358




61.81  
61.81




590  
590




364.7  
364.7




1.37  
1.37




IV  
IV




0.432  
0.432




81.84  
81.84




499  
499




408.4  
408.4




1.54  
1.54




^'  
^'




0.542  
0.542




111.46  
111.46




394  
394




439.2  
439.2




1.65  
1.65




VI  
VI




0.639  
0.639




144.50  
144.50




305  
305




440.8  
440.8




1.66  
1.66




VII  
VII




0.750  
0.750




184.04  
184.04




257  
257




473.0  
473.0




1.78  
1.78




VIII  
VIII




0.841  
0.841




210.54  
210.54




240  
240




505.3  
505.3




1.90  
1.90




IX flO days)  
IX flO days)




0.964  
0.964




240.02  
240.02




213  
213




511.2  
511.2




1.92  
1.92




X  
X




1.040  
1.040




255.91  
255.91




198  
198




506.8  
506.8




1.91  
1.91




XI (20 davs)  
XI (20 davs)




1.171  
1.171




288.93  
288.93




186  
186




537.4  
537.4




2.02  
2.02




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253




304.51  
304.51




171  
171




520.7  
520.7




1.96  
1.96




XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




314.03  
314.03




176  
176




552.7  
552.7




2.08  
2.08




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




329.71  
329.71




165  
165




544.0  
544.0




2.05  
2.05




XV  
XV




1,554  
1,554




345.86  
345.86




149  
149




515.3  
515.3




1.94  
1.94




XVI  
XVI




1.656  
1.656




359.30  
359.30




144  
144




517.4  
517.4




1.95  
1.95




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




365.08  
365.08




146  
146




533.0  
533.0




2.01  
2.01




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




397.96  
397.96




138  
138




549.2  
549.2




2.07  
2.07




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




390.39  
390.39




132  
132




515.3  
515.3




1.94  
1.94




XX  
XX




2.854  
2.854




393.15  
393.15




131  
131




515.0  
515.0




1.94  
1.94




Average (Groups !X  
Average (Groups !X




:i-xx) ....


i-xx) ....




Line 27,158: Line 25,739:




530.0  
530.0




2.00  
2.00




Line 27,172: Line 25,753:




Average (Groups ^  
Average (Groups ^




:iii-xx) ..


iii-xx) ..




Line 27,182: Line 25,763:




530.2  
530.2




2.00  
2.00




Line 27,197: Line 25,778:




1 As explained in a footnote (footnote 4j, the actual number of cells contained  
1 As explained in a footnote (footnote 4j, the actual number of cells contained in the computed volume of the cortex should be N X L. F X W. D X T X 500, but, for the convenience, 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T, or 1/50,000 of the actual numbet of cells contained in the computed volume, was given here as the computed number of cells in the cortex.
in the computed volume of the cortex should be N X L. F X W. D X T X 500,  
but, for the convenience, 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T, or 1/50,000 of the  
actual numbet of cells contained in the computed volume, was given here as  
the computed number of cells in the cortex.  


The above statement that between birth and maturity the  
The above statement that between birth and maturity the nmnber of nerve cells in the entire cortex has increased twofold, does not necessarily mean that the additional cells have been all newly formed after birth. As a matter of fact, we see,
nmnber of nerve cells in the entire cortex has increased twofold, does not necessarily mean that the additional cells have  
been all newly formed after birth. As a matter of fact, we see,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 91  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 91


in the sections of the newborn brains, many immature cells,  
in the sections of the newborn brains, many immature cells, the indifferent cells and the neuroblasts, crowded densely together in the ventricular wall and in the transitional layers and these are all migrating to the cortex. The number of cells in the cortex is increased after birth by receiving these cells already formed but lying at birth still outside of the cortex proper, besides by receiving the cells which are newly formed after birth. So the nerve cells, destined for the cortex, are largely present in immature form in the cerebrum at birth, but lie outside of the cortex proper, while the actual number of cells formed after birth may amount only to a small fraction of the total number of nerve cells in the cortex at maturity, though there is active mitosis during the first days after birth.
the indifferent cells and the neuroblasts, crowded densely together in the ventricular wall and in the transitional layers  
and these are all migrating to the cortex. The number of cells  
in the cortex is increased after birth by receiving these cells  
already formed but lying at birth still outside of the cortex proper,  
besides by receiving the cells which are newly formed after birth.  
So the nerve cells, destined for the cortex, are largely present in  
immature form in the cerebrum at birth, but lie outside of the  
cortex proper, while the actual number of cells formed after  
birth may amount only to a small fraction of the total number  
of nerve cells in the cortex at maturity, though there is active  
mitosis during the first days after birth.  


I have previously recognized three developmental phases in  
I have previously recognized three developmental phases in the growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17a), as f ollow^s :
the growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17a), as f ollow^s :  


First phase, from birth to the 10th day.  
First phase, from birth to the 10th day.


Second phase, from the 10th to the 20th day.  
Second phase, from the 10th to the 20th day.


Third phase, from the 20th to the 90th day.  
Third phase, from the 20th to the 90th day.


The first and the second phases here given may also be applied,  
The first and the second phases here given may also be applied, without any modification, to the changes in cell number in the cerebral cortex, while the third phase does not appear in this connection.
without any modification, to the changes in cell number in the  
cerebral cortex, while the third phase does not appear in this  
connection.  


IV. CONCLUSIONS  
IV. CONCLUSIONS


In an earlier study on the cerebral cortex of the albino rat  
In an earlier study on the cerebral cortex of the albino rat (Sugita, '17 a), I stated that the cerebral cortex attains nearly its full thickness at the age of twenty days, before myelination in the cortex had begun, and that the organization of the cerebral cortex might be considered as precocious, having been provided with all its mechanisms at the time of weaning. At this age, the brain weight is only a little more than one-half the weight at maturity. Size, volume and weight of the entire brain are^ all midway in their growth, but there have appeared no striking changes by which we might guess from the gross appearance of the brain anything about the numerical completeness of its cortical elements. Just at this stage, however, cell division in the cerebrum has almost ceased (Allen, '12).
(Sugita, '17 a), I stated that the cerebral cortex attains nearly  
its full thickness at the age of twenty days, before myelination  
in the cortex had begun, and that the organization of the cerebral  
cortex might be considered as precocious, having been provided  
with all its mechanisms at the time of weaning. At this age,  
the brain weight is only a little more than one-half the weight  
at maturity. Size, volume and weight of the entire brain are^  
all midway in their growth, but there have appeared no striking  
changes by which we might guess from the gross appearance of  
the brain anything about the numerical completeness of its  
cortical elements. Just at this stage, however, cell division in  
the cerebrum has almost ceased (Allen, '12).  






92 NAOKI SUGITA  
92 NAOKI SUGITA


From the data now available, I conclude that, in the albino  
From the data now available, I conclude that, in the albino rat, the cerebral cortex exhibits the complete number of nerve cells at about the 20th day after birth, at which age some of the cells have attained their full size. The area of the cortex in the sagittal and in the frontal sections has shown a continuous increase throughout life and no radical change in rate occurs at this time. But, if the thickness of the cortex be taken into consideration and the volume of the entire cortex be calculated, it becomes clear that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex has stopped the more active increase, which it made earlier, at about the 20th day, and after that the increase becomes slow, and lower in rate than the increase in the volume of the cerebrum. If, further, the' cell density in the cortex be considered, it is found that the number of cells as computed for the cerebral cortex (table 7, column E) increases rapidly, especially during the first ten days after birth, but exhibits nearly its complete number at the age of twenty daj^s, after which it shows no significant change.
rat, the cerebral cortex exhibits the complete number of nerve  
cells at about the 20th day after birth, at which age some of the  
cells have attained their full size. The area of the cortex in the  
sagittal and in the frontal sections has shown a continuous  
increase throughout life and no radical change in rate occurs at  
this time. But, if the thickness of the cortex be taken into  
consideration and the volume of the entire cortex be calculated,  
it becomes clear that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex  
has stopped the more active increase, which it made earlier,  
at about the 20th day, and after that the increase becomes  
slow, and lower in rate than the increase in the volume of the  
cerebrum. If, further, the' cell density in the cortex be considered, it is found that the number of cells as computed for  
the cerebral cortex (table 7, column E) increases rapidly,  
especially during the first ten days after birth, but exhibits  
nearly its complete number at the age of twenty daj^s, after  
which it shows no significant change.  


We may conclude therefore that the cerebral cortex has been  
We may conclude therefore that the cerebral cortex has been completely organized at the age of about twenty days, and that the further development of the cortex does not involve an increase in cell number, but involves mainly the maturing of elements already provided. The education of the cerebral cortex as a whole might properly be said to begin after this age, the preceding period having been largely one of preparation or construction. It is of interest to note that this epoch corresponds to the weaning time of the rat.
completely organized at the age of about twenty days, and that  
the further development of the cortex does not involve an increase in cell number, but involves mainly the maturing of elements already provided. The education of the cerebral cortex  
as a whole might properly be said to begin after this age, the  
preceding period having been largely one of preparation or  
construction. It is of interest to note that this epoch corresponds to the weaning time of the rat.  


According to the study of Donaldson ('08) on the comparison  
According to the study of Donaldson ('08) on the comparison of the albino rat and man, the rat grows thirty times as fast as man. When however the brain of the rat is to be compared with that of man, it must be remembered that at birth the human brain is somewhat more mature and corresponds in organization not with the rat brain at birth but at five days of age (Donaldson MS.). This being the case, the rat cortex at the 20th day of postnatal life probably corresponds with the human cortex at the 15th month (20 less 5). This conclusion has not yet been tested.
of the albino rat and man, the rat grows thirty times as fast as  
man. When however the brain of the rat is to be compared  
with that of man, it must be remembered that at birth the human  
brain is somewhat more mature and corresponds in organization not with the rat brain at birth but at five days of age (Donaldson MS.). This being the case, the rat cortex at the 20th  
day of postnatal life probably corresponds with the human  
cortex at the 15th month (20 less 5). This conclusion has not  
yet been tested.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAI CORTEX 93  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAI CORTEX 93


V. SUMMARY  
V. SUMMARY


1. Empl-oying the sagittal and the frontal sections of 78  
1. Empl-oying the sagittal and the frontal sections of 78 albino rats, which were formerly used for the investigation on the thickness of the cerebral cortex (Sugita, '17 a), I made further measurements on the area of the cortex in these sections and counted at a fixed locality the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume of 0.001 mm,,^ in brains from birth to maturity.
albino rats, which were formerly used for the investigation on  
the thickness of the cerebral cortex (Sugita, '17 a), I made  
further measurements on the area of the cortex in these sections  
and counted at a fixed locality the number of nerve cells contained  
in a unit volume of 0.001 mm,,^ in brains from birth to maturity.  


2. The observed data were all corrected to the values for the  
2. The observed data were all corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material, by the use of the correctioncoefficients based on the observations. The results were grouped and averaged according to the brain weight groups and the postnatal growth changes systematically analysed.
fresh condition of the material, by the use of the correctioncoefficients based on the observations. The results were grouped  
and averaged according to the brain weight groups and the  
postnatal growth changes systematically analysed.  


3. The area of the cortex shown in the sagittal section is found  
3. The area of the cortex shown in the sagittal section is found to be proportional to the value L. F X T^, where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is the average thickness of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section. The actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the formula: L. F X T^ X 1.22 (L. F and T^, in millimeters), where 1.22 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (see table 4, column G).
to be proportional to the value L. F X T^, where L. F is the  
longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is the average  
thickness of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section. The  
actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the  
formula: L. F X T^ X 1.22 (L. F and T^, in millimeters),  
where 1.22 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (see table 4, column G).  


4. The area of the cortex shown in the frontal section (of one  
4. The area of the cortex shown in the frontal section (of one hemicerebrum) is found to be proportional to the value W.D X T^, where W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is the average thickness of the cortex in the frontal section. The actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the formula: W.D xT^ X 0.91 {W.D and T^, in millimeters), where 0.91 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (table 5, column G).
hemicerebrum) is found to be proportional to the value W.D X T^,  
where W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is  
the average thickness of the cortex in the frontal section. The  
actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the  
formula: W.D xT^ X 0.91 {W.D and T^, in millimeters),  
where 0.91 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (table 5, column G).  


5. The percentage of the total' area of that frontal section  
5. The percentage of the total' area of that frontal section which is represented by the cortical area is least at birth (34 per cent) and increases as the age advances till it reaches the maximum (50 per cent) at the period of 7 to 20 days (brain weight 0.75 to 1.25 grams). It then decreases, slowly and at maturity is less than 44 per cent (table 2). This means that durihg the first 7 days the cortex is increasing in area more rapidly than the remainder of the section, while during the
which is represented by the cortical area is least at birth (34  
per cent) and increases as the age advances till it reaches the  
maximum (50 per cent) at the period of 7 to 20 days (brain  
weight 0.75 to 1.25 grams). It then decreases, slowly and at  
maturity is less than 44 per cent (table 2). This means that  
durihg the first 7 days the cortex is increasing in area more  
rapidly than the remainder of the section, while during the  


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






94 NAOKI SUGITA  
94 NAOKI SUGITA


following 13 days its rate of increase is similar to that of the remainder. After 20 days the rate of increase for the remainder  
following 13 days its rate of increase is similar to that of the remainder. After 20 days the rate of increase for the remainder surpasses that for the cortex.
surpasses that for the cortex.  


6. The actual volume of the cortex could not be obtained by  
6. The actual volume of the cortex could not be obtained by the use of the data now available, but the cornputed volumes of the cerebral cortex at different ages (comparable among themselves), may be found by the use of the formula: L. F X W.D xT (all in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum and T is the average thickness of the cortex. The volume increases most rapidly during the first ten days after birth and the rate of increase in the cortical volume continues to surpass the rate of increase in the entire cerebral volume, during the first twenty days. After twenty days the cortex increases at a somewhat lower rate than the increase of the entire cerebrum in volume (chart 2).
the use of the data now available, but the cornputed volumes  
of the cerebral cortex at different ages (comparable among  
themselves), may be found by the use of the formula: L. F X  
W.D xT (all in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal  
diameter of the cerebrum, W. D is the frontal diameter of the  
cerebrum and T is the average thickness of the cortex. The  
volume increases most rapidly during the first ten days after  
birth and the rate of increase in the cortical volume continues to  
surpass the rate of increase in the entire cerebral volume, during the first twenty days. After twenty days the cortex increases  
at a somewhat lower rate than the increase of the entire cerebrum in volume (chart 2).  


7. The number of cells contained in a unit volume of 0.001  
7. The number of cells contained in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.-^ of the cortex indicates the cell density of the locality where the count was made. In the lamina pyramidalis the pyramids are most crowded at birth and the number in the unit volume decreases rapidly during the first ten days after birth. After twenty days it decreases slowly but steadily, the number at maturity being about one-sixth the number at birth. As for the lamina ganglionaris, the total cell number in the unit volume (the small and the large pyramids taken together), is at its highest value at birth. It decreases relatively rapidly during the first twenty-five days after birth, then is slightly increased for a time, after which it decreases again slowly and at full maturity it shows about one-fifth the number present at birth. Taking the large ganglion cells alone, we find that the number decreases rapidly during the first eight to ten days, then remains the same up to twenty days, after which it decreases again, showing two-sevenths the initial number at full maturity. The decrease in cell density according to brain growth is due to the enlargement of cell bodies, the deA'elopment of cell attachments, the separation of cells from each other through myelination, ingrowing fibers and other changes. The average cell density,
mm.-^ of the cortex indicates the cell density of the locality where  
the count was made. In the lamina pyramidalis the pyramids  
are most crowded at birth and the number in the unit volume  
decreases rapidly during the first ten days after birth. After  
twenty days it decreases slowly but steadily, the number at  
maturity being about one-sixth the number at birth. As for  
the lamina ganglionaris, the total cell number in the unit volume  
(the small and the large pyramids taken together), is at its  
highest value at birth. It decreases relatively rapidly during  
the first twenty-five days after birth, then is slightly increased  
for a time, after which it decreases again slowly and at full  
maturity it shows about one-fifth the number present at birth.  
Taking the large ganglion cells alone, we find that the number  
decreases rapidly during the first eight to ten days, then remains  
the same up to twenty days, after which it decreases again,  
showing two-sevenths the initial number at full maturity. The  
decrease in cell density according to brain growth is due to the  
enlargement of cell bodies, the deA'elopment of cell attachments,  
the separation of cells from each other through myelination,  
ingrowing fibers and other changes. The average cell density,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 95  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 95


*
represented by the sum of the numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gariglionaris, given as A^ in table 7, decreases rapidly during the first ten days and after that the decrease becomes very slow and steady, showing at maturity a density of about one-fifth of that at birth.


represented by the sum of the numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gariglionaris, given as A^ in table 7, decreases rapidly during the first ten days and after that the decrease becomes very slow and steady, showing at maturity a
8. The computed value for the number of cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be determined by the formula: N X L. F X W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, all in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, W. D the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T the average thickness of the sagittal and frontal cortex and A^ the average number of the nerve cells in two unit volumes of the cortex, at the particular locality (locality VII) where the counts were made. This computed value for the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex increases rapidly during the first ten days, at the end of which period it attains nearly 1.9 times the value at birth. During the following ten days, it increases slowly but steadily, and it attains its complete number at the age of twenty days (brain weight 1.17 grams). After this age the number of nerve cells is almost constant. The number of cells at maturity is twice the number at birth.
density of about one-fifth of that at birth.  


8. The computed value for the number of cells in the entire
It is recognized that this conclusion concerning the number of nerve cells in the cortex at various ages is based on enumerations in only two cortical layers at but one locality, and that on this ground its general value might be questioned. When it is recalled however that table 11 in a preceding study on the growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17 a) shows all the localities measured in the cortex to undergo the same relative increase in thickness between birth and maturity, and always to stand in the same relation to one another, the doubts with regard to the general value of these particular results are largely removed.
cerebral cortex may be determined by the formula: N X L. F X
W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, all in millimeters), where L. F
is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, W. D the frontal
diameter of the cerebrum, T the average thickness of the sagittal and frontal cortex and A^ the average number of the
nerve cells in two unit volumes of the cortex, at the particular
locality (locality VII) where the counts were made. This computed value for the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral
cortex increases rapidly during the first ten days, at the end of
which period it attains nearly 1.9 times the value at birth.
During the following ten days, it increases slowly but steadily,  
and it attains its complete number at the age of twenty days
(brain weight 1.17 grams). After this age the number of nerve
cells is almost constant. The number of cells at maturity is
twice the number at birth.  


It is recognized that this conclusion concerning the number
9. Considered all together, the data on the development of the cerebral cortex indicate that it has been completely organized in the albino rat at the age of twenty days. The further development after this age represents a maturing of the elements. The completion of the cerebral organization corresponds to the
of nerve cells in the cortex at various ages is based on enumerations in only two cortical layers at but one locality, and that  
on this ground its general value might be questioned. When
it is recalled however that table 11 in a preceding study on the  
growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17 a) shows all the  
localities measured in the cortex to undergo the same relative
increase in thickness between birth and maturity, and always
to stand in the same relation to one another, the doubts with
regard to the general value of these particular results are largely
removed.


9. Considered all together, the data on the development of
the cerebral cortex indicate that it has been completely organized in the albino rat at the age of twenty days. The further
development after this age represents a maturing of the elements.
The completion of the cerebral organization corresponds to the




96 NAOKI SUGITA


96 NAOKI SUGITA
weaning time of the rat.. If the cerebral organization of the rat brain at five days of age is similar to that of the man at birth, and the growth processes in the rat are thirty times as rapid as in man, then the completion of the cortex which occurs in the rat brain at twenty days should occur in the human brain at about fifteenth month of age.


weaning time of the rat.. If the cerebral organization of the rat
brain at five days of age is similar to that of the man at birth,
and the growth processes in the rat are thirty times as rapid as
in man, then the completion of the cortex which occurs in the
rat brain at twenty days should occur in the human brain at
about fifteenth month of age.




PART II


PART II
ON THE AREA OF THE, CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), AND COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ALBINO RAT


ON THE AREA OF THE, CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS
VI. INTRODUCTION
IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL
SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), AND COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR
THE ALBINO RAT


VI. INTRODUCTION
In the Part I of this paper, I have presented the data on the area of the cerebral cortex measured on the sagittal and the frontal sections of the Albino rat brain and on the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cerebral cortex, and, by calculations based on these data, I have come to the conclusion that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex is increasing most rapidly during the first ten days after birth, while from twenty days onwards it increases at a lower rate than the entire cerebral volume. Further, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex also increases very rapidly during the first ten days after birth and attains nearly its complete number at the age of twenty days.


In the Part I of this paper, I have presented the data on the
I now wish to compare these relations in the Albino with those in the Norway rat, in the same manner as I have already done in the matter of the growth of the brain in size (Sugita, '18) and of the thickness of the cortex (Sugita, '18 a).
area of the cerebral cortex measured on the sagittal and the
frontal sections of the Albino rat brain and on the number of
nerve cells in a unit volume of the cerebral cortex, and, by calculations based on these data, I have come to the conclusion
that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex is increasing most
rapidly during the first ten days after birth, while from twenty
days onwards it increases at a lower rate than the entire cerebral
volume. Further, the computed number of nerve cells in the
entire cerebral cortex also increases very rapidly during the first
ten days after birth and attains nearly its complete number at
the age of twenty days.  


I now wish to compare these relations in the Albino with
Employing for the Norway brains the sections on which the cortical thickness was measured earlier and for which the individual body measurements have been already given in table 1 in mj^ fourth paper (Sugita, '18 a), I have measured the area
those in the Norway rat, in the same manner as I have already  
done in the matter of the growth of the brain in size (Sugita,  
'18) and of the thickness of the cortex (Sugita, '18 a).


Employing for the Norway brains the sections on which the
cortical thickness was measured earlier and for which the individual body measurements have been already given in table
1 in mj^ fourth paper (Sugita, '18 a), I have measured the area




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 97


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 97
of the cortex in the sagittal and the frontal section, following methods of measurement just described (part I) in the case of the Albino rat. Correction of the observed values to the values in the fresh condition of the material was also made by the use of the correction-coefficients obtained in the same way as those used for the Albino.


of the cortex in the sagittal and the frontal section, following
This study was made between March and May, 1917, at the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.
methods of measurement just described (part I) in the case of  
the Albino rat. Correction of the observed values to the
values in the fresh condition of the material was also made
by the use of the correction-coefficients obtained in the same
way as those used for the Albino.  


This study was made between March and May, 1917, at the
VII. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS
Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.  


VII. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS
A'. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section {Nonvay rat)


A'. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section {Nonvay rat)  
Table 8 shows the observed and corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the Norway brain, also the data for the correction-coefficient for each individual, and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. The method of measurement and the positions of the borderlines of the measured area have been already described in part I of this paper, so that the explanations need not be repeated here (fig. 1). Chart 3 (graph s) has been plotted on the basis of table 8.


Table 8 shows the observed and corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the Norway brain, also the
L. Area of the cortex in the frontal section {Nonvay rat)
data for the correction-coefficient for each individual, and the
correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. The method
of measurement and the positions of the borderlines of the
measured area have been already described in part I of this
paper, so that the explanations need not be repeated here (fig.
1). Chart 3 (graph s) has been plotted on the basis of table 8.


L. Area of the cortex in the frontal section {Nonvay rat)  
Table 9 gives the observed and corrected areas of the cortex and the total area of the frontal section (one hemicerebrum) of the Norway brain with the data for the correction-coefficient for each individual and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. It gives also the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section. Chart 3 shows also in graphs (graphs F and f) the corrected data given in table 9.


Table 9 gives the observed and corrected areas of the cortex
M. Number of nerve cells (Norway rat)
and the total area of the frontal section (one hemicerebrum) of
the Norway brain with the data for the correction-coefficient
for each individual and the correction-coefficient for each brain
weight group. It gives also the percentage of the cortical area
to the total area of the section. Chart 3 shows also in graphs
(graphs F and f) the corrected data given in table 9.


M. Number of nerve cells (Norway rat)  
Table 10 gives the observed and corrected number of nerve cells in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.-^ (0.1 mm.- in area and 0.01 mm. in thickness) at a fixed locality (locality VII) of the cortex in the frontal section, for each individual and for each brain weight group. The locality was chosen at a middle part of the cortical band in the frontal section as shown in figure 2, VII,


Table 10 gives the observed and corrected number of nerve
cells in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.-^ (0.1 mm.- in area and 0.01
mm. in thickness) at a fixed locality (locality VII) of the cortex
in the frontal section, for each individual and for each brain
weight group. The locality was chosen at a middle part of the
cortical band in the frontal section as shown in figure 2, VII,




9.8


9.8




NAOKI SUGITA


NAOKI SUGITA




for the Albino rat. The numbers of cells in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris respectively and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris in five adjoining squares, each 100 micra on each side, were counted and the numbers in the unit volume of 0.001 mm. computed (see part I) and recorded in table 10. The relative cell density


for the Albino rat. The numbers of cells in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris respectively and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris in five
adjoining squares, each 100 micra on each side, were counted
and the numbers in the unit volume of 0.001 mm.'' computed
(see part I) and recorded in table 10. The relative cell density




Line 27,542: Line 25,928:




^


^


F


F




Line 27,564: Line 25,950:




/


/


^


^


— ^


— ^


/^


/^




Line 27,592: Line 25,978:




^


^


.^


.^


^y


^y




Line 27,621: Line 26,007:




/


/




Line 27,644: Line 26,030:




 
^
^  




-^'  
-^'




Line 27,725: Line 26,110:




._.  
._.




Line 27,740: Line 26,125:




__.  
__.




Line 27,765: Line 26,150:




■■"""  
■■"""




r^-—  
r^-—




-^  
-^








1  
1




-^/  
-^/




Line 27,790: Line 26,175:




■ —  
■ —




Line 27,868: Line 26,253:




■  




Line 27,924: Line 26,309:




1  
1 1 1
1 1  






10 11 1.2 13 14- 15 16 IT 1& 1.9 2.0 2.1 22 23 jws.  
10 11 1.2 13 14- 15 16 IT 1& 1.9 2.0 2.1 22 23 jws.


Chart 3 Showing the areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal and the  
Chart 3 Showing the areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal and the frontal sections and the areas of the whole frontal section according to the brain weight. Norway rat. This chart is comparable with chart 1, which gives the corresponding graphs for the albino rat. X — . — . — Xs Cortical area in the
frontal sections and the areas of the whole frontal section according to the brain  
weight. Norway rat. This chart is comparable with chart 1, which gives the  
corresponding graphs for the albino rat. X — . — . — Xs Cortical area in the  


sagittal section. • 'f, Cortical area in the frontal section. •——•F, Area of  
sagittal section. • 'f, Cortical area in the frontal section. •——•F, Area of


the whole frontal section. All graphs were based on the data in tables 8 and 9.  
the whole frontal section. All graphs were based on the data in tables 8 and 9.


represented by the sum of the numbers of nerve cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris is tabulated in table  
represented by the sum of the numbers of nerve cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris is tabulated in table 16, column D, and plotted in chart 4 as graph N' .
16, column D, and plotted in chart 4 as graph N' .  


VIII. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON  
VIII. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON


The foregoing data, treated in a manner similar to that adopted  
The foregoing data, treated in a manner similar to that adopted in the case of the Albino (part I), may now be used for discussion and comparison.
in the case of the Albino (part I), may now be used for discussion and comparison.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






99  
99






TABLE 8  
TABLE 8


Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the  
Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum
sagittal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for each  
brain weight group. L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum  




Line 27,972: Line 26,349:




CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT  
CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT




Line 27,979: Line 26,356:




BR.\IN WEIGHT  
BR.\IN WEIGHT




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED


.\RE.\^  
.\RE.\^ OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  




Line 27,992: Line 26,368:




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




GROUP  
GROUP




L.F  
L.F


on fresh brain  
on fresh brain




The same  
The same on slide
on slide  




.\RE.4.  
.\RE.4. OP CORTEX
OP CORTEX  








aravix  
aravix




mm.'
mm.'


m m .  
m m .








m m .  
m m .




Hi m .2  
Hi m .2




N XI b  
N XI b




1.155  
1.155




18.4  
18.4




11.75  
11.75








10.40  
10.40




23.5  
23.5




a  
a




1.160  
1.160




17.0  
17.0




12.10  
12.10








10.15  
10.15




24.2  
24.2




i  
i




1.175  
1.175




14.2  
14.2




12.55  
12.55








9.60  
9.60




24.3  
24.3








1.163  
1.163




16.5  
16.5




l.'A  
l.'A




?P  
?P








24.0  
24.0




NXII  
NXII




Line 28,123: Line 26,497:




N XIII a  
N XIII a




1.369  
1.369




16.7  
16.7




12.95  
12.95








10.10  
10.10




27.5  
27.5








1.369  
1.369




16.7  
16.7




l.i  
l.i




W  
W








27.5  
27.5




NXIVb  
NXIVb




1.407  
1.407




18.2  
18.2




13.45  
13.45








10.50  
10.50




29.8  
29.8




g  
g




1.429  
1.429




16.3  
16.3




13.05  
13.05








10.10  
10.10




27.2  
27.2




a  
a




1.431  
1.431




19.1  
19.1




13.15  
13.15








10.40  
10.40




30.6  
30.6




i  
i




1.431  
1.431




18.1  
18.1




13.05  
13.05








10.25  
10.25




29.4  
29.4




e  
e




1.437  
1.437




15.8  
15.8




12.80  
12.80








10.05  
10.05




25.7  
25.7




k  
k




1.445  
1.445




19.2  
19.2




13.35  
13.35








10.30  
10.30




32.3  
32.3








1.430  
1.430




17.8  
17.8




l.i  
l.i




W  
W








29.2  
29.2




N XV c  
N XV c




1.517  
1.517




16.4  
16.4




12.70  
12.70








10.10  
10.10




26.0  
26.0




e  
e




1.557  
1.557




17. 3  
17. 3




13.75  
13.75








10.30  
10.30




30.8  
30.8








1.537  
1.537




16.9  
16.9




l.t  
l.t




w  
w








28.4  
28.4




N XVI a  
N XVI a




1.619  
1.619




17.2  
17.2




13.50  
13.50








10.20  
10.20




30.2  
30.2




g  
g




1.632  
1.632




16.8  
16.8




13.45  
13.45








9.75  
9.75




32.0  
32.0




e  
e




1.636  
1.636




15.9  
15.9




13.55  
13.55








10.00  
10.00




29.2  
29.2








1.629  
1.629




16.6  
16.6




l.t  
l.t




w  
w








30.5  
30.5




N XVII e  
N XVII e




1.710  
1.710




18.8  
18.8




13.70  
13.70








10.40  
10.40




32.6  
32.6




g  
g




1.721  
1.721




18.7  
18.7




13.40  
13.40








10.20  
10.20




32.3  
32.3




a  
a




1.738  
1.738




16.8  
16.8




13.60  
13.60








10.40  
10.40




28.8  
28.8




c  
c




1.788  
1.788




20.1  
20.1




14.20  
14.20








11.00  
11.00




33.5  
33.5








1.739  
1.739




18.6  
18.6




l.i  
l.i




w  
w








31.8  
31.8




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c




1.825  
1.825




18.1  
18.1




14.30  
14.30








10.70  
10.70




32.4  
32.4




a  
a




1.833  
1.833




22.0  
22.0




14.20  
14.20








11.50  
11.50




33.5  
33.5








1.829  
1.829




20.1  
20.1




Line 28,590: Line 26,964:




33.0  
33.0






100  
100






NAOKl SUGITA  
NAOKl SUGITA


TABLE S— Continued  
TABLE S— Continued




Line 28,606: Line 26,980:




BRAIN- WEIGHT  
BRAIN- WEIGHT




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED


AHE.\  
AHE.\ OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  




C ORRECTION-COEFFICIEXT  
C ORRECTION-COEFFICIEXT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




GROUP  
GROUP




L.F  
L.F on fresh brain
on fresh brain  




The same  
The same on slide
on slide  




ARE.\  
ARE.\ OF CORTEX
OF CORTEX  








grains  
grains




mm.
mm.


mm.  
mm.








mm.  
mm.




m m .
m m .


N XIX b  
N XIX b




1.962  
1.962




19.9  
19.9




14.70  
14.70








11.25  
11.25




34.1  
34.1




a  
a




1.981  
1.981




19.5  
19.5




14.40  
14.40








11.00  
11.00




33.5  
33.5








1.972  
1.972




19.7  
19.7




1.31-'  
1.31-'








33.8  
33.8




NXXc  
NXXc




2.015  
2.015




20.6  
20.6




14.55  
14.55








11.30  
11.30




34.2  
34.2




a  
a




2.089  
2.089




20.7  
20.7




14.95  
14.95








11.80  
11.80




33.3  
33.3








2.052  
2.052




20.7  
20.7




Line 28,761: Line 27,131:




33.8  
33.8




NXXIg  
NXXIg




2.156  
2.156




21.1  
21.1




15.15  
15.15








11.90  
11.90




34.2  
34.2




d  
d




2.187  
2.187




20.2  
20.2




15.30  
15.30








11.50  
11.50




35.7  
35.7








2.172  
2.172




20.7  
20.7




l.t  
l.t




Line 28,819: Line 27,189:




35.0  
35.0




NXXII  
NXXII




Line 28,837: Line 27,207:




N XXIII a  
N XXIII a




2.345  
2.345




22.4  
22.4




14.50  
14.50








11.50  
11.50




35.7  
35.7








2.345  
2.345




22.4  
22.4




Line 28,869: Line 27,239:




35.7  
35.7






N. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section. Norway rat  
N. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section. Norway rat compared with the Albino
compared with the Albino  


Table 11 shows the relations between the cortical area in the  
Table 11 shows the relations between the cortical area in the sagittal section and the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F). Column B gives the average brain weight by groups, column C the average area of the cortex in the sagittal section, column D the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section {T ), column F the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F), all of these being the corrected values. In column E the value C ; D or relative length of the long side, when the cortical area was reduced to a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness, appears. iVs shown in column G a.s E IF. these computed lengths show similar ratios when divided by the actual diameters L.F (column F), that is, 1.16 to 1.24 or on the average 1.20 for Groups N XI-N XXIII, but 1.19 for Groups N XIIIJN^ XX.- If necessary, therefore, the cortical area in the sagittal
sagittal section and the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum  
(L. F). Column B gives the average brain weight by groups,  
column C the average area of the cortex in the sagittal section,  
column D the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section  
{T ), column F the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F),  
all of these being the corrected values. In column E the value  
C ; D or relative length of the long side, when the cortical area  
was reduced to a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness, appears. iVs shown in column G a.s E IF. these  
computed lengths show similar ratios when divided by the actual  
diameters L.F (column F), that is, 1.16 to 1.24 or on the average  
1.20 for Groups N XI-N XXIII, but 1.19 for Groups N XIIIJN^ XX.- If necessary, therefore, the cortical area in the sagittal  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






101  
101






TABLE 9  
TABLE 9


Showing the observed and corrected value's of the area of the cerebral cortex and of  
Showing the observed and corrected value's of the area of the cerebral cortex and of the total section in the frontal section and the -percentage of the cortical area in the total frontal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum,
the total section in the frontal section and the -percentage of the cortical area in the  
total frontal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the  
correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the  
group. W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum,  




Line 28,913: Line 27,267:




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




PERCENTAGE OP  
PERCENTAGE OP








BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 28,941: Line 27,294:




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




GROUP  
GROUP




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Area of  
Area of total section
total  
section  




W.D  
W.D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




The  
The


same on  
same on


slide  
slide




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total section
section  




AREA  
AREA IN TOTAL SECTION
IN TOTAL  
SECTION  








gra ms  
gra ms




vim.
vim.


»jm.2  
»jm.2




mm .  
mm .




m m .  
m m .




mm.
mm.


mm .2  
mm .2




per cent  
per cent




NXIb  
NXIb




1.155  
1.155




13.8  
13.8




28.1  
28.1




13.00  
13.00




10,00  
10,00




23.4  
23.4




47.5  
47.5




49  
49




a  
a




1.160  
1.160




12.8  
12.8




27.9  
27.9




12.70  
12.70




9.80  
9.80




21.5  
21.5




47.0  
47.0




46  
46




i  
i




1.175  
1.175




10.9  
10.9




23.6  
23.6




12.50  
12.50




8.80  
8.80




22.1  
22.1




47.7  
47.7




. 46  
. 46








1.163  
1.163




12.5  
12.5




26.5  
26.5




1..  
1..




u
u


22.3  
22.3




47.4  
47.4




47  
47




NXII  
NXII




Line 29,133: Line 27,478:




N XIII a  
N XIII a




1.369  
1.369




13.7  
13.7




27.9  
27.9




13.00  
13.00




9.80  
9.80




24.2  
24.2




49.2  
49.2




49  
49








1.369  
1.369




13.7  
13.7




27.9  
27.9




l.i  
l.i




?32  
?32




24.2  
24.2




49.2  
49.2




49  
49




N XIV b  
N XIV b




1.407  
1.407




14.0  
14.0




27.8  
27.8




13.05  
13.05




9.50  
9.50




26.5  
26.5




52.7  
52.7




!o  
!o




g  
g




1.429  
1.429




14.0  
14.0




28.5  
28.5




13.20  
13.20




9.50  
9.50




27.1  
27.1




55.0  
55.0




49  
49




a  
a




1.431  
1.431




14.6  
14.6




30.4  
30.4




12.85  
12.85




10.20  
10.20




23.2  
23.2




48.4  
48.4




48  
48




i  
i




1.431  
1.431




14.9  
14.9




29.6  
29.6




13.40  
13.40




10.30  
10.30




25.3  
25.3




50.2  
50.2




50  
50




e  
e




1.437  
1.437




12.6  
12.6




28.7  
28.7




13.25  
13.25




9.60  
9.60




24.1  
24.1




54.1  
54.1




44  
44




k  
k




1.445  
1.445




13.2  
13.2




28.4  
28.4




13.30  
13.30




9.50  
9.50




26.0  
26.0




55.8  
55.8




47  
47








1.430  
1.430




13.9  
13.9




28.9  
28.9




1.35-^  
1.35-^




25.4  
25.4




52.7  
52.7




48  
48




NXVc  
NXVc




1.517  
1.517




13.0  
13.0




29.0  
29.0




13.20  
13.20




9.60  
9.60




24.7  
24.7




55.0  
55.0




45  
45




e  
e




1.557  
1.557




12.7  
12.7




25.7  
25.7




13.50  
13.50




9,20  
9,20




27.4  
27.4




55.4  
55.4




49  
49




a  
a




1.564  
1.564




14.1  
14.1




29.0  
29.0




13.50  
13.50




9.80  
9.80




. 26.8  
. 26.8




55.0  
55.0




49  
49








1.546  
1.546




13.3  
13.3




27.9  
27.9




lA  
lA




.0=  
.0=




26.3  
26.3




55.1  
55.1




48  
48




N XVI a  
N XVI a




1.619  
1.619




14.7  
14.7




31.3  
31.3




13.80  
13.80




10.50  
10.50




25.4  
25.4




54.2  
54.2




47  
47




g  
g




1.632  
1.632




13.8  
13.8




27.6  
27.6




13.70  
13.70




9.50  
9.50




28.8  
28.8




57.6  
57.6




50  
50




e  
e




1.636  
1.636




13.2  
13.2




28.2  
28.2




13.80  
13.80




9.60  
9.60




27.3  
27.3




58.2  
58.2




47  
47








1.629  
1.629




13.9  
13.9




29.0  
29.0




1.^  
1.^




.0'  
.0'




27.2  
27.2




56.7  
56.7




48  
48




N XVII e  
N XVII e




1.710  
1.710




13.4  
13.4




29.5  
29.5




13.80  
13.80




9.70  
9.70




27.2  
27.2




59.8  
59.8




.44  
.44




g  
g




1.721  
1.721




15.7  
15.7




32.1  
32.1




13.60  
13.60




10.10  
10.10




28.5  
28.5




58.4  
58.4




49  
49




a  
a




1.738  
1.738




15.2  
15.2




33.2  
33.2




, 14.10  
, 14.10




10.60  
10.60




27.0  
27.0




58.8  
58.8




46  
46




c  
c




1.788  
1.788




15.0  
15.0




30.7  
30.7




13.95  
13.95




10.10  
10.10




28.6  
28.6




58.6  
58.6




49  
49








1.739  
1.739




U.8  
U.8




31.4  
31.4




1.37-^  
1.37-^




27.8  
27.8




58.9  
58.9




47  
47






102  
102






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 9— Continued  
TABLE 9— Continued




Line 29,731: Line 28,076:




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




OBSERVED  
OBSERVED




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




CORRECTED  
CORRECTED




PERCENTAGE OF  
PERCENTAGE OF CORTICAL
CORTICAL  








Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Area of  
Area of total section
total  
section  




W. D  
W. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




The  
The


same on  
same on


slide  
slide




Area of  
Area of corte.x:
corte.x:  




Area of  
Area of


total  
total


section  
section




AREA  
AREA IN TOTAL SECTION
IN TOTAL  
SECTION  








grams  
grams




Line 29,797: Line 28,133:
mm .
mm .


m m .  
m m .




mm.  
mm.




Line 29,807: Line 28,143:
mm.
mm.


per cent  
per cent




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c




1.825  
1.825




15.0  
15.0




32.3  
32.3




14.45  
14.45




10.30  
10.30




29.6  
29.6




63.7  
63.7




47  
47




a  
a




1.833  
1.833




19.0  
19.0




39.2  
39.2




13.95  
13.95




11.20  
11.20




29.5  
29.5




61.0  
61.0




49  
49








1.829  
1.829




17.0  
17.0




35.8  
35.8




1.32''
1.32


29.6  
29.6




62.4  
62.4




48  
48




NXIXb  
NXIXb




1.962  
1.962




16.6  
16.6




36.6  
36.6




14.60  
14.60




11.20  
11.20




28.3  
28.3




62.3  
62.3




44  
44




a  
a




1.981  
1.981




15.3  
15.3




32.9  
32.9




13.95  
13.95




10.30  
10.30




28.1  
28.1




60.5  
60.5




47  
47








1.972  
1.972




16.0  
16.0




34.8  
34.8




1.33'  
1.33'




28.2  
28.2




61. 4  
61. 4




46  
46




NXXc  
NXXc




2.015  
2.015




14.6  
14.6




33.1  
33.1




14.30  
14.30




10.20  
10.20




28.7  
28.7




65.2  
65.2




44  
44




a  
a




2.089  
2.089




15.7  
15.7




35.5  
35.5




14.50  
14.50




10.95  
10.95




27.6  
27.6




62.3  
62.3




44  
44








2.052  
2.052




15.2  
15.2




3^.3  
3^.3




1.36^
1.36^


28.2  
28.2




63.8  
63.8




u  
u




N XXI g  
N XXI g




2.156  
2.156




15.1  
15.1




35.1  
35.1




14.75 10.70  
14.75 10.70




28.7  
28.7




67.0  
67.0




43  
43




d  
d




■2.187  
■2.187




15.3  
15.3




34.0  
34.0




15.05 10.70  
15.05 10.70




30.3  
30.3




67.4  
67.4




45  
45




Line 30,090: Line 28,426:




2.172  
2.172




15.2  
15.2




3J^.6  
3J^.6




1.39-^  
1.39-^




29.5  
29.5




67.2  
67.2




44  
44






section may be calculated by the following formula, in which  
section may be calculated by the following formula, in which Ts denotes the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section.
Ts denotes the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section.  






L. F X T^X 1.20  
L. F X T^X 1.20






(L. F and T^,, in millimeters)  
(L. F and T^,, in millimeters)






The corresponding coefficient was found to be 1.22 in the  
The corresponding coefficient was found to be 1.22 in the Albino brains weighing more than 0.5 gram (table 4), but 1.20 for brains weighing more than 1.3 grams (Groups XIII-XX). The coefficients in the two forms may therefore be considered similar, that for the Albino being a trifle the larger.
Albino brains weighing more than 0.5 gram (table 4), but 1.20  
for brains weighing more than 1.3 grams (Groups XIII-XX).  
The coefficients in the two forms may therefore be considered  
similar, that for the Albino being a trifle the larger.  


If comparison is made between the absolute values of the cortical areas in the sagittal sections of the Norway and the Albino  
If comparison is made between the absolute values of the cortical areas in the sagittal sections of the Norway and the Albino brains of like weight, no great difference appears (table 12). In the pair of Groups N XI and XI, the Norway is 10 per cent smaller in the area. This may be explained by the fact that the Norway brain weighing 1.16 grams is in a younger stage of cortical development, as compared with the Albino brain of like weight, the cortex of which is already provided with nearly all its nerve elements. But, in the pairs of Groups N XIII-XIII
brains of like weight, no great difference appears (table 12). In  
the pair of Groups N XI and XI, the Norway is 10 per cent  
smaller in the area. This may be explained by the fact that the  
Norway brain weighing 1.16 grams is in a younger stage of cortical development, as compared with the Albino brain of like  
weight, the cortex of which is already provided with nearly all  
its nerve elements. But, in the pairs of Groups N XIII-XIII  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






103  
103






TABLE 10  
TABLE 10 Giving for each individual and for each hrain weight group the number of nerve cells in 0.001 mm.^ of the cerebral cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris , and also the number of the ganglion cells only in the same volume of the lamina ganglionaris, counted at locality VII in the frontal section, as shown in fig. 2. Norway rat
Giving for each individual and for each hrain weight group the number of nerve  
cells in 0.001 mm.^ of the cerebral cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the  
lamina ganglionaris , and also the number of the ganglion cells only in the same  
volume of the lamina ganglionaris, counted at locality VII in the frontal section,  
as shown in fig. 2. Norway rat  




Line 30,160: Line 28,480:




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORRKCriOXCOEFFICIENT  
CORRKCriOXCOEFFICIENT




XU.MBER OF CELLS IX .\ VOLU.MB  
XU.MBER OF CELLS IX .\ VOLU.MB 0.001 MM.-"
0.001 MM.-"  




OF CORTEX,  
OF CORTEX,




GROUP  
GROUP




ir. D  
ir. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




W.D  
W.D


on slide  
on slide




Lam. p.  
Lam. p.




•raniid.  
•raniid.




Lam. ganglion.  
Lam. ganglion.




Ganglion cells  
Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.
in lam. gangl.  








Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected








grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Line 30,244: Line 28,560:




N XI b  
N XI b




1.155  
1.155




13.00  
13.00




10.00  
10.00




253  
253




115  
115




170  
170




78  
78




44  
44




20  
20




a  
a




1.160  
1.160




12.70  
12.70




9.80  
9.80




242  
242




111  
111




164  
164




76  
76




41  
41




19  
19




i  
i




1 . 175  
1 . 175




12.50  
12.50




8.80  
8.80




271  
271




95  
95




199  
199




69  
69




48  
48




17  
17








1 . 163  
1 . 163




(1/1  
(1/1




34)'  
34)'




255  
255




107  
107




178  
178




74  
74




44  
44




19  
19




NXII  
NXII




Line 30,384: Line 28,700:




N XIII a  
N XIII a




1.369  
1.369




13.00  
13.00




9.80  
9.80




225  
225




96  
96




164  
164




70  
70




45  
45




19  
19








1.369  
1.369




{1/1.33)^  
{1/1.33)^




225  
225




96  
96




164  
164




70  
70




45  
45




19  
19




N XIV b  
N XIV b




1.407  
1.407




13.05  
13.05




9.50  
9.50




243  
243




94  
94




174  
174




67  
67




46  
46




18  
18




g  
g




1.429  
1.429




13.20  
13.20




9.50  
9.50




227  
227




85  
85




176  
176




65  
65




48  
48




18  
18




a  
a




1.431  
1.431




12.85  
12.85




10.20  
10.20




200  
200




100  
100




142  
142




71  
71




40  
40




20  
20




i  
i




1.431  
1.431




13.40  
13.40




10.30  
10.30




222  
222




101  
101




175  
175




79  
79




47  
47




21  
21




e  
e




1.437  
1.437




13.25  
13.25




9.60  
9.60




225  
225




86  
86




165  
165




63  
63




49  
49




19  
19




k  
k




1.445  
1.445




13.30  
13.30




9.50  
9.50




230  
230




84  
84




178  
178




65  
65




51  
51




19  
19








1430  
1430




il/l  
il/l




35)^  
35)^




225  
225




92  
92




168  
168




68  
68




47  
47




19  
19




NXVc  
NXVc




1.517  
1.517




13.20  
13.20




9.60  
9.60




235  
235




90  
90




169  
169




65  
65




52  
52




20  
20




e  
e




1.557  
1.557




13.50  
13.50




9.20  
9.20




250  
250




79  
79




176  
176




56  
56




58  
58




IS  
IS




a  
a




1.564  
1.564




13.50  
13.50




9.80  
9.80




208  
208




79  
79




166  
166




63  
63




55  
55




21  
21








1.546  
1.546




{l/l  
{l/l




40)'  
40)'




231  
231




83  
83




170  
170




61  
61




55  
55




20  
20




NXVIa  
NXVIa




1.619  
1.619




13.80  
13.80




10.50  
10.50




203  
203




90  
90




143  
143




63  
63




50  
50




22  
22




g  
g




1.632  
1.632




13.70  
13.70




9.50  
9.50




235  
235




78  
78




159  
159




56  
56




60  
60




20  
20




e  
e




1.636  
1.636




13.80  
13.80




9.60  
9.60




214  
214




72  
72




164  
164




55  
55




57  
57




19  
19








1.629  
1.629




{1/1  
{1/1




40)^  
40)^




217  
217




80  
80




155  
155




58  
58




56  
56




20  
20




N XVII e  
N XVII e




1.710  
1.710




13.80  
13.80




9.70  
9.70




213  
213




74  
74




155  
155




54  
54




58  
58




20  
20




g  
g




1.721  
1.721




13.60  
13.60




10.10  
10.10




182  
182




75  
75




147  
147




60  
60




54  
54




22  
22




a  
a




1.738  
1.738




14.10  
14.10




10.60  
10.60




190  
190




81  
81




131  
131




56  
56




54  
54




23  
23




c  
c




1.788  
1.788




13.95  
13.95




10.10  
10.10




192  
192




73  
73




142  
142




54  
54




53  
53




20  
20








1.739  
1.739




{1/1. 37Y  
{1/1. 37Y




194  
194




76  
76




lU  
lU




56  
56




55  
55




21  
21






104  
104






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 10— Continued  
TABLE 10— Continued






'  
'




BRAINWEIGHT  
BRAINWEIGHT




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX,  
NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX, 0.001 MM. 3
0.001 MM. 3  




■ GROUP  
■ GROUP




\V. D  
\V. D


in fresh  
in fresh brain
brain  




W.D  
W.D on slide
on slide  




Lam. pyramid.  
Lam. pyramid.




Lam. ganglion.  
Lam. ganglion.




Ganglion cells  
Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.
in lam. gangl.  








Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




Observed  
Observed




Corrected  
Corrected




N XVIII c  
N XVIII c


a  
a


NXIX b  
NXIX b


a  
a


NXXc  
NXXc


a  
a


NXXIg  
NXXIg


d  
d




grams  
grams


1.825  
1.825 1.833
1.833  


1.829  
1.829


1.962  
1.962 1.981 1.972
1.981  
1.972  


2.015  
2.015 2.089 2.052
2.089  
2.052  


2.156  
2.156


2.187  
2.187 2.172
2.172  




mm.  
mm.


14.45  
14.45 13.95
13.95  


(1/1  
(1/1


14.60  
14.60 13.95
13.95  


(1/1  
(1/1


14.30  
14.30 14.50
14.50  


(1/1  
(1/1


14.75  
14.75 15.05
15.05  


(.1/1  
(.1/1




?nm.  
?nm.


10.30  
10.30 11.20
11.20  


32)^  
32)^


11.20  
11.20 10.30
10.30  


33y  
33y


10.20  
10.20 10.95
10.95  


36y  
36y


10.70  
10.70 10.70
10.70  


39y  
39y




200  
200 147 174
147  
174  


164  
164 176
176  


170 ■  
170 ■


189  
189 170
170  


180  
180


180  
180 186
186  


183  
183




• 73  
• 73


76  
76


75  
75


74  
74 71 73
71  
73  


69  
69


74  
74


72  
72


69  
69 67 68
67  
68  




146  
146


114  
114


130  
130


120  
120 134
134  


127  
127


140  
140 116
116  


128  
128


118  
118 120
120  


119  
119




53  
53 59 56
59  
56  


54  
54


54  
54 54
54  


51  
51 50
50  


51  
51


45  
45 43
43  


u  
u




55  
55 42
42  


49  
49


45  
45


48  
48 47
47  


49  
49 44
44  


47  
47


45  
45 46
46  


46  
46




20  
20


22  
22


21  
21


20  
20 19
19  


20  
20


18  
18 19 19
19  
19  


17  
17


17  
17


17  
17






to N XX-XX the Norway shows a sHght excess in the area ;  
to N XX-XX the Norway shows a sHght excess in the area ; on the average 2 per cent.
on the average 2 per cent.  


In spite of the fact that an adult Norway brain has a thicker  
In spite of the fact that an adult Norway brain has a thicker cortex (by about 6.7 per cent in the sagittal section) than the Albino brain of the same weight, yet between the two a smaller difference in the area of the cortex in the sagittal section is found, because of the shorter longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F) in the Norway (Sugita, '18).
cortex (by about 6.7 per cent in the sagittal section) than the  
Albino brain of the same weight, yet between the two a smaller  
difference in the area of the cortex in the sagittal section is found,  
because of the shorter longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum  
(L. F) in the Norway (Sugita, '18).  






0. The area of the cortex in the frontal section,  
0. The area of the cortex in the frontal section, pared with ihe Albino
pared with ihe Albino  




Line 31,333: Line 29,600:




bust as in the case of the sagittal section, table 13 shows relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the  
bust as in the case of the sagittal section, table 13 shows relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW. D). As a result, we see
frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW. D). As a result, we see  


that the relative value C/D or ^ ,.- i -, • , stands almost  
that the relative value C/D or ^ ,.- i -, • , stands almost


' Cortical thickness  
' Cortical thickness


in a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter TF. D, that is, from 0.94  
in a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter TF. D, that is, from 0.94






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






105  
105






TABLE 11  
TABLE 11


Shotving relations between the cortical area in the sagittal section and the sagittal  
Shotving relations between the cortical area in the sagittal section and the sagittal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F). Column E gives the relative lengths of the long side when the area is reduced to. a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the sagittal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F) in each group, the average being 1.20. For the ex-planation see the text
diameter of the cerebrum (L. F). Column E gives the relative lengths of the long  
side when the area is reduced to. a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical  
thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the sagittal diameter of the  
cerebrum (L. F) in each group, the average being 1.20. For the ex-planation see  
the text  






A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




P  
P




G  
G




' BRAIN WEIGHT  
' BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL AREA IN
AREA IN  


S.^GITTAL  
S.^GITTAL SECTION
SECTION  




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL


THICKNESS  
THICKNESS


IN SAGITTAL  
IN SAGITTAL


SECTION  
SECTION




c  
c


D  
D




L.F  
L.F




E  
E F
F  








grams  
grams




TO?«2  
TO?«2




mm.  
mm.




mm..  
mm..




mm.  
mm.








NXI  
NXI




1.163  
1.163




24.0  
24.0




1.61  
1.61




14.9  
14.9




12.2  
12.2




1.22  
1.22




NXII  
NXII




Line 31,475: Line 29,731:




NXIII  
NXIII




1.369  
1.369




27.5  
27.5




1.73  
1.73




15.9  
15.9




13.1  
13.1




1.21  
1.21




NXIV  
NXIV




1.430  
1.430




29.2  
29.2




1.84  
1.84




15.9  
15.9




13.2  
13.2




1.21  
1.21




NXV  
NXV




1.537  
1.537




28.4  
28.4




1.82  
1.82




15.6  
15.6




13.5  
13.5




1.16  
1.16




NXVI  
NXVI




1.629  
1.629




30.5  
30.5




1.88  
1.88




16.2  
16.2




13.6  
13.6




1.19  
1.19




NXVII  
NXVII




1.739  
1.739




31.8  
31.8




1.94  
1.94




16.4  
16.4




13.9  
13.9




1.18  
1.18




N XVIII  
N XVIII




1.829  
1.829




33.0  
33.0




1.93  
1.93




17.1  
17.1




14.3  
14.3




1.20  
1.20




NXIX  
NXIX




1.972  
1.972




33.8  
33.8




1.97  
1.97




17.2  
17.2




14.6  
14.6




1.18  
1.18




NXX  
NXX




2.052  
2.052




33.8  
33.8




1.92  
1.92




17.6  
17.6




14.7  
14.7




1.17  
1.17




NXXI  
NXXI




2.172  
2.172




35.0  
35.0




1.99  
1.99




17.6  
17.6




15.1  
15.1




1.17  
1.17




NXXII  
NXXII




Line 31,679: Line 29,935:




N XXIII  
N XXIII




2.345  
2.345




35.7  
35.7




1.86  
1.86




19.2  
19.2




15.5  
15.5




1.24  
1.24




Average (Groups N XI-N XXIII)  
Average (Groups N XI-N XXIII)




Line 31,709: Line 29,965:




1.20  
1.20








'  
'




Line 31,721: Line 29,977:




Average (Groun.s N XIIT-N XX^  
Average (Groun.s N XIIT-N XX^




1.19  
1.19




Line 31,742: Line 29,998:




to 1.00 or on the average 0.97 for Groups N XI-N XXI, so  
to 1.00 or on the average 0.97 for Groups N XI-N XXI, so that the cortical area in the frontal section may be obtained by the following formula, in which T^ denotes the average cortical thickness in the frontal section:
that the cortical area in the frontal section may be obtained by  
the following formula, in which T^ denotes the average cortical  
thickness in the frontal section:  


W. D X T^ X 0.97 (W. D and T,-, in millimeters)  
W. D X T^ X 0.97 (W. D and T,-, in millimeters)


For Groups N XIII-N XX, the coefficient is 0.98 (table 13).  
For Groups N XIII-N XX, the coefficient is 0.98 (table 13). The corresponding coefficient in the Albino, Groups XIII-XX, is about 0.93, as shown in table 5. Comparing the absolute values of the cortical area in the frontal sections in two forms of like brain weight group (Groups N XIII-N XX to Groups XIII-XX), we find that in the Norway it is on the average larger by about 10 per cent (table 12).
The corresponding coefficient in the Albino, Groups XIII-XX,  
is about 0.93, as shown in table 5. Comparing the absolute  
values of the cortical area in the frontal sections in two forms of  
like brain weight group (Groups N XIII-N XX to Groups  
XIII-XX), we find that in the Norway it is on the average  
larger by about 10 per cent (table 12).  






106  
106






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 12  
TABLE 12


Com/parison of the Norway rat brain with the Albino rat brain of like weight in the  
Com/parison of the Norway rat brain with the Albino rat brain of like weight in the areas of the cortex^ in the sagittal and the frontal sections and in the area of the total frontal section. The data were taken fram tables 1, 2, 8 and 9
areas of the cortex^ in the sagittal and the frontal sections and in the area of the  
total frontal section. The data were taken fram tables 1, 2, 8 and 9  






BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP




BRAIX  
BRAIX




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




AREA OF  
AREA OF CORTEX INSAGITTAL SECTIOX
CORTEX INSAGITTAL  
SECTIOX  




AREA OF  
AREA OF


CORTEX IN  
CORTEX IN


FRONTAL  
FRONTAL


SECTION  
SECTION




AREA OF  
AREA OF


TOTAL FRONTAL  
TOTAL FRONTAL


SECTION  
SECTION








Albino  
Albino




Norway  
Norway




Albino  
Albino




Norway  
Norway




Albino  
Albino




Norway  
Norway




Albino  
Albino




Norway  
Norway








gram s  
gram s




grams  
grams




mm.
mm.


TOm.2  
TOm.2




7mn .2  
7mn .2




mm.^  
mm.^




mm. 2  
mm. 2




TO TO. 2  
TO TO. 2




XI  
XI




1.171  
1.171




1.163  
1.163




26.6  
26.6




24.0  
24.0




21.7  
21.7




22.3  
22.3




45.7  
45.7




47.4  
47.4




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253








26.1  
26.1








23.0  
23.0








47.2  
47.2








XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




1.369  
1.369




27.6
27.6


27.5  
27.5




23.2  
23.2




24.2  
24.2




50.2  
50.2




49.2  
49.2




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




1.430  
1.430




28.2  
28.2




29.2  
29.2




24.8  
24.8




25.4  
25.4




52.3  
52.3




52.7  
52.7




XV  
XV




1.554  
1.554




1.542  
1.542




28.7  
28.7




28.4  
28.4




24.3  
24.3




26.3  
26.3




54.0  
54.0




55.1  
55.1




XVI  
XVI




1.656  
1.656




1.629  
1.629




29.2  
29.2




30.5  
30.5




24.3  
24.3




27.2  
27.2




54.9  
54.9




56.7  
56.7




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




1.739  
1.739




31.1  
31.1




31.8  
31.8




24.6  
24.6




27.8  
27.8




56.4  
56.4




58.9  
58.9




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




1.829  
1.829




32.8  
32.8




33.0  
33.0




26.0  
26.0




29.6  
29.6




58.9  
58.9




62.4  
62.4




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




1.972  
1.972




32.3  
32.3




33.8  
33.8




24.8  
24.8




28.2  
28.2




57.0  
57.0




61. 4  
61. 4




XX  
XX




2.054  
2.054




2.052  
2.052




33.7  
33.7




33.8  
33.8




24.9  
24.9




28.2  
28.2




63.4  
63.4




63.8  
63.8




XXI  
XXI








2.172  
2.172








35.0  
35.0








29.5  
29.5








67.2  
67.2




XXII  
XXII




Line 32,163: Line 30,406:




XXIII  
XXIII








2.345  
2.345








35.7  
35.7




Line 32,202: Line 30,445:




XX  
XX




1.692  
1.692




1.695  
1.695




30.5  
30.5




31.0  
31.0




24.6  
24.6




27.1  
27.1




55.9  
55.9




57.5  
57.5






The total area of the frontal section is also slightly in favor  
The total area of the frontal section is also slightly in favor of the Norway (table 12).
of the Norway (table 12).  


P. Percentage of the urea of the cortex to the lotal area of the frontal  
P. Percentage of the urea of the cortex to the lotal area of the frontal


section (one hemicerehrum) . Norway rat compared  
section (one hemicerehrum) . Norway rat compared


with the Albino  
with the Albino


As for the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of  
As for the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section, a comparison between the two forms is interesting. In the Albino this percentage value increases from birth to a brain weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams when it attains the value of about 48 per cent (table 2), but in the Norway the highest percentage is attained in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.8 grams. This indicates that the cortical organization is more retarded in the Norway, if the brain weight be taken as the basis of comparison. In a fully mature Norway brain (from Group N XX onwards,
the section, a comparison between the two forms is interesting.  
In the Albino this percentage value increases from birth to a  
brain weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams when it attains the value of  
about 48 per cent (table 2), but in the Norway the highest percentage is attained in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.8 grams. This  
indicates that the cortical organization is more retarded in the  
Norway, if the brain weight be taken as the basis of comparison.  
In a fully mature Norway brain (from Group N XX onwards,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






107  
107






TABLE 13  
TABLE 13 Showing relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D). Column E gives relative lengths of the long side ivhen the area is reduced to a rectangle toith the short side equal to the cortical thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D) in each group, the average being 0.97. For the detailed explanation see also the text. Norway rat
Showing relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the frontal  
diameter of the cerebrum {W. D). Column E gives relative lengths of the long  
side ivhen the area is reduced to a rectangle toith the short side equal to the cortical  
thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter of the  
cerebrum {W. D) in each group, the average being 0.97. For the detailed explanation see also the text. Norway rat  






A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




Line 32,292: Line 30,522:




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




CORTICAL  
CORTICAL




Line 32,304: Line 30,534:




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




B BAIN
B BAIN


AREA IN  
AREA IN




THICKNESS  
THICKNESS




C  
C




ir D  
ir D




E  
E




GROUP  
GROUP




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL SECTION
SECTION  




IN FRONT.\^L  
IN FRONT.\^L SECTION
SECTION  




D  
D








F  
F








grams  
grams




mm.
mm.


vim.  
vim.




vim.  
vim.




mm.  
mm.








NXI  
NXI




1.163  
1.163




22.3  
22.3




1.88  
1.88




11.9  
11.9




12.7  
12.7




0.94  
0.94




NXII  
NXII




Line 32,400: Line 30,628:




NXIII  
NXIII




1.369  
1.369




24.2  
24.2




1.96  
1.96




12.3  
12.3




13.0  
13.0




0.95  
0.95




NXIV  
NXIV




1.430  
1.430




25.4  
25.4




1.95  
1.95




13.0  
13.0




13.2  
13.2




0.98  
0.98




NXV  
NXV




1.546  
1.546




26.3  
26.3




2.04  
2.04




12.9  
12.9




13.4  
13.4




0.96  
0.96




NXVI  
NXVI




1.629  
1.629




27.2  
27.2




2.08  
2.08




13.1  
13.1




13.7  
13.7




0.96  
0.96




N XVII  
N XVII




1.739  
1.739




27.8  
27.8




2.07  
2.07




13.4  
13.4




13.9  
13.9




0.96  
0.96




N XVIII  
N XVIII




1.829  
1.829




29.6  
29.6




2.08  
2.08




14.2  
14.2




14.2  
14.2




1.00  
1.00




NXIX  
NXIX




1.972  
1.972




28.2  
28.2




2.00  
2.00




14.1  
14.1




14.3  
14.3




0.99  
0.99




NXX  
NXX




2.052  
2.052




28.2  
28.2




1.96  
1.96




14.4  
14.4




14.4  
14.4




1.00  
1.00




NXXI  
NXXI




2.172  
2.172




29.5  
29.5




2.08  
2.08




14.2  
14.2




14.9  
14.9




0.95  
0.95




Average (Gro  
Average (Gro




ups N XI
ups N XI


N XXI) . . .  
N XXI) . . .




Line 32,603: Line 30,831:




0.97  
0.97




Line 32,616: Line 30,844:




Average (Gro  
Average (Gro




ups N XIIT-N XX)  
ups N XIIT-N XX)




Line 32,628: Line 30,856:




0.98  
0.98




Line 32,644: Line 30,872:




table 9) this percentage amounts to 44 per cent, which is equal  
table 9) this percentage amounts to 44 per cent, which is equal to that seen in the mature Albino brain (Groups XVI to XIX, table 2), if we disregard one case of advanced age (Group XX).
to that seen in the mature Albino brain (Groups XVI to XIX,  
table 2), if we disregard one case of advanced age (Group XX).  






Q. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex,  
Q. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex, compared with the Albino
compared with the Albino  






Norway rat  
Norway rat






Reviewing table 10 which gives separately the numbers of  
Reviewing table 10 which gives separately the numbers of nerve cells in the unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at a fixed locality m the frontal section of the cerebrum and counted by the same method used for the Albino rat and comparing these numbers with those in table 3 in part I, it is easily seen that, if the like brain weight groups of the two forms are paired, the number of cells in the unit volume of both layers is slightly lower in the Norway rat.
nerve cells in the unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at a fixed locality m the  
frontal section of the cerebrum and counted by the same method  
used for the Albino rat and comparing these numbers with those  
in table 3 in part I, it is easily seen that, if the like brain weight  
groups of the two forms are paired, the number of cells in the  
unit volume of both layers is slightly lower in the Norway rat.  






108  
108






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






These relations are shown in table 14. As for the number of the  
These relations are shown in table 14. As for the number of the ganghon cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, it is always lower by 2 to 6 in the Norway and the highest figure (21) in the Norway is seen in Groups N XVII and N XVIII, while in the Albino the highest figure (25) is attained in Groups- XIII and XIV and again in Group XVII. In the Albino a temporary increase of cell number in the lamina ganglionaris was seen in Groups XIII and XIV, and in my Norway sections a similar phenomenon is indicated in Groups N XVII and N XVIII. Generally speaking, therefore, the cell densit}^ in the cerebral cortex, as far as represented by my observations, is slightly
ganghon cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, it is always lower  
by 2 to 6 in the Norway and the highest figure (21) in the Norway is seen in Groups N XVII and N XVIII, while in the  
Albino the highest figure (25) is attained in Groups- XIII and  
XIV and again in Group XVII. In the Albino a temporary increase of cell number in the lamina ganglionaris was seen in  
Groups XIII and XIV, and in my Norway sections a similar  
phenomenon is indicated in Groups N XVII and N XVIII.  
Generally speaking, therefore, the cell densit}^ in the cerebral  
cortex, as far as represented by my observations, is slightly  






600  
600 ■i'in
■i'in  




Line 32,699: Line 30,909:




X  
X




Line 32,728: Line 30,938:




•r^  
•r^




.---'  
.---'




--''°''
--°




'•^  
'•^




^o—  
^o—




-o —  
-o —




.^  
.^








■- -0^  
■- -0^




-.
-.


— .r  
— .r




iLwr  
iLwr




Line 32,766: Line 30,976:




tsn  
tsn




Line 32,791: Line 31,001:




/'  
/'




,wr  
,wr




Line 32,817: Line 31,027:




■^  
■^




Line 32,824: Line 31,034:




-~.y  
-~.y




Line 32,835: Line 31,045:




350  
350 300
300  




Line 32,851: Line 31,060:




^  
^




Line 32,876: Line 31,085:




^.=^  
^.=^




""'  
""'




Line 32,904: Line 31,113:




^  
^




Line 32,930: Line 31,139:




-LV\  
-LV\




H'  
H'




200  
200




Line 32,955: Line 31,164:




_  
_




Line 32,976: Line 31,185:
rr
rr


^:  
^:




^  
^




Line 33,000: Line 31,209:




100  
100




Line 33,015: Line 31,224:




"~"  
"~"




—  




—  




—  








— ~-r  
— ~-r




M  
M




Line 33,039: Line 31,248:




50  
50




Line 33,083: Line 31,292:




1  
1




Line 33,103: Line 31,312:




do 11 12 1.3 14 d.5 1.6 L7  
do 11 12 1.3 14 d.5 1.6 L7






1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4  
1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4






yns.  
yns.






Chart 4 Showing the computed values for the cortical volume, the volume  
Chart 4 Showing the computed values for the cortical volume, the volume of the cerebrum, the cenn density in two unit volumes and the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex of the Norway rat, according to the brain weight. This chart is equivalent to, but not directly comparable with chart 2, which gives the similar data in the Al'bino in ratios of the values at birth. • •LWT', The computed volume of the cerebral cortex, based on table 15.
of the cerebrum, the cenn density in two unit volumes and the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex of the Norway rat, according to the brain  
weight. This chart is equivalent to, but not directly comparable with chart 2,  
which gives the similar data in the Al'bino in ratios of the values at birth.  
• •LWT', The computed volume of the cerebral cortex, based on table 15.  


hWH' , The relative volume of the entire cerebrum, based on the data  
hWH' , The relative volume of the entire cerebrum, based on the data


presented in a former paper (Sugita, '18) and given also in table 15. X— — XN',  
presented in a former paper (Sugita, '18) and given also in table 15. X— — XN', The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Graph based on the data
The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Graph based on the data  


given as N in column D, table 16. -" — ^NLWT', The computed number of  
given as N in column D, table 16. -" — ^NLWT', The computed number of


nerve cells in the entire cortex, based on the figures given in column E, table 16.  
nerve cells in the entire cortex, based on the figures given in column E, table 16. Mark X shows the phase in growth corresponding to that indicated by the same mark in chart 2, which shows the end of the second developmental phase in the Albino.
Mark X shows the phase in growth corresponding to that indicated by the same  
mark in chart 2, which shows the end of the second developmental phase in the  
Albino.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






109  
109






TABLE 14.  
TABLE 14. Comparison of the Norway rat brain with the albino rat brain of lilie weight for the nuvibers of nerve cells in the lamina pijramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^, and also for N, which is the sum of the numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and in, the lamina ganglionaris. The data were taken from tables 3 and 10
Comparison of the Norway rat brain with the albino rat brain of lilie weight for the  
nuvibers of nerve cells in the lamina pijramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris  
and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, in a unit volume  
of 0.001 mm.^, and also for N, which is the sum of the numbers in the lamina  
pyramidalis and in, the lamina ganglionaris. The data were taken from tables  
3 and 10  




Line 33,157: Line 31,352:




NUMBER OF  
NUMBER OF




CELL.S  
CELL.S




IX .4 UNIT VOLUME  
IX .4 UNIT VOLUME




N,  
N,




Line 33,175: Line 31,370:




OF  
OF




ORTEX  
ORTEX




0.001  
0.001




MM. 3  
MM. 3




THE SUM OF  
THE SUM OF








DRAIN  
DRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




Line 33,206: Line 31,400:




NUMBERS  
NUMBERS




DRAIN WEIGHT GROUP  
DRAIN WEIGHT GROUP




Lam.  
Lam.




pyrani .  
pyrani .




Lam .  
Lam .




gangl.  
gangl.




Ganglion  
Ganglion


cells in lam.  
cells in lam.


gangl.  
gangl.




OF CELLS IN  
OF CELLS IN


L.iM. PYR.  
L.iM. PYR.


AND IN  
AND IN


LAM. GANG.  
LAM. GANG.




Line 33,264: Line 31,458:




bino  
bino




way  
way




bino  
bino




way  
way




bino  
bino




way  
way




bino  
bino




way  
way




bino  
bino




way  
way








grams  
grams




grams  
grams




Line 33,318: Line 31,512:




XI  
XI




1.171  
1.171




1.163  
1.163




113  
113




107  
107




73  
73




74  
74




23  
23




19  
19




186  
186




181  
181




XII  
XII




1.253  
1.253








103  
103








68  
68








23  
23








171  
171








XIII  
XIII




1.335  
1.335




1.369  
1.369




99  
99




96  
96




77  
77




70  
70




25  
25




19  
19




176  
176




166  
166




XIV  
XIV




1.445  
1.445




1.430  
1.430




94  
94




92  
92




71  
71




68  
68




25  
25




19  
19




165  
165




160  
160




XV  
XV




1.554  
1.554




1.546  
1.546




87  
87




83  
83




62  
62




61  
61




23  
23




20  
20




149  
149




144  
144




XVI  
XVI




1.65G  
1.65G




1.629  
1.629




84  
84




80  
80




60  
60




58  
58




24  
24




20  
20




144  
144




138  
138




XVII  
XVII




1.726  
1.726




1.739  
1.739




83  
83




76  
76




63  
63




56  
56




25  
25




21  
21




146  
146




132  
132




XVIII  
XVIII




1.839  
1.839




1.829  
1.829




79  
79




75  
75




59  
59




56  
56




23  
23




21  
21




138  
138




131  
131




XIX  
XIX




1.924  
1.924




1.972  
1.972




81  
81




73  
73




51  
51




54  
54




24  
24




20  
20




132  
132




127  
127




XX  
XX




2.054  
2.054




2.052  
2.052




80  
80




72  
72




51  
51




51  
51




20  
20




19  
19




131  
131




123  
123




XXI  
XXI








2.172  
2.172








68  
68








44  
44








17  
17








112  
112




Average for Groups  
Average for Groups




Line 33,694: Line 31,888:




XIII-XX  
XIII-XX




1.Q92 1. 695  
1.Q92 1. 695




86  
86




81  
81




62  
62




60  
60




24  
24




20  
20




148  
148




140  
140




Line 33,733: Line 31,927:




lower in the Norway rat, if the brain weight be selected as a  
lower in the Norway rat, if the brain weight be selected as a standard of comparison.
standard of comparison.  






/?. The computed volume of the entire cerebral cortex,  
/?. The computed volume of the entire cerebral cortex, compared with the Albino
compared with the Albino  






Norumij rat  
Norumij rat






The computed volume of the cerebral cortex for the Norway  
The computed volume of the cerebral cortex for the Norway may also be obtained and expressed in values comparable among themselves, by the use of the formula: L. F X W. D X T (where T denotes the mean thickness of the cortices in the sagittal and the frontal sections), as already explained in detail in part I (see p. 82). But for a comparison between the cortical volumes of the Norway and of the Albino brains, the direct comparison
may also be obtained and expressed in values comparable among  
themselves, by the use of the formula: L. F X W. D X T (where  
T denotes the mean thickness of the cortices in the sagittal and  
the frontal sections), as already explained in detail in part I  
(see p. 82). But for a comparison between the cortical volumes  
of the Norway and of the Albino brains, the direct comparison  






THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






110 NAOKI SUGITA  
110 NAOKI SUGITA


of the values obtained by the above fonnuhxs is not allowable,  
of the values obtained by the above fonnuhxs is not allowable, since, comparing the areas in the Albino among themselves, the fixed coefficients"' 1.21 and 0.93 were ehminated from the formula, as already stated, and similarly in the Norway the corresponding coefficients'^ 1.19 and 0.98 were also eliminated from the formula. In order to compare the areas in these two forms, the coefficients must be taken into consideration. As the product 1.19 X 0.98 is higher by 3.6 per cent than theproduct 1.21 X 0.93, the value of L. F X W.D X T for the Norway should be raised by 3.(3 per cent to be directly comparable with the \'alue of L. F X
since, comparing the areas in the Albino among themselves, the  
fixed coefficients"' 1.21 and 0.93 were ehminated from the formula, as already stated, and similarly in the Norway the corresponding coefficients'^ 1.19 and 0.98 were also eliminated from  
the formula. In order to compare the areas in these two forms,  
the coefficients must be taken into consideration. As the product  
1.19 X 0.98 is higher by 3.6 per cent than theproduct 1.21 X 0.93,  
the value of L. F X W.D X T for the Norway should be raised by  
3.(3 per cent to be directly comparable with the \'alue of L. F X  


1 1 Q V 98  
1 1 Q V 98 IF. D X T for the Albino. The ratio =,','! r^L (= 1-03(3)
IF. D X T for the Albino. The ratio =,','! r^L (= 1-03(3)  


1.21 X 0.93 ^  
1.21 X 0.93 ^


being represented by C, the comparable value of the cortical  
being represented by C, the comparable value of the cortical


volume for the Norway may be obtained by the corrected formula  
volume for the Norway may be obtained by the corrected formula


as follows:  
as follows:


L. F X W. D X T XC (C ^ 1.036)  
L. F X W. D X T XC (C ^ 1.036)


Table 15 gives the computed cortical volume of the Norway  
Table 15 gives the computed cortical volume of the Norway brain, obtained according to the above corrected formula, and this is shown graphically in chart 4 (graph LWT').
brain, obtained according to the above corrected formula, and  
this is shown graphically in chart 4 (graph LWT').  


As the available data in the Norway do not extend to the  
As the available data in the Norway do not extend to the earlier ages, I could not determine the early increase in the cortical volume of the Norway, but our data show that the cortical volume is increasing somewhat more rapidly during the period when the brain weight is increasing from 1.16 to 1.54 grams and after that it increases more slowly but steadily as the entire cerebral volume increases, as shown in table 15 and in chart 4 (graph LWH'). In the Albino, as has been shown, the cortical volume increases relatively rapidly until the brain attains 1.17 grams in weight, a phase which probably corresponds to the phase in the Norway of 1.43 grams in brain weight.
earlier ages, I could not determine the early increase in the  
cortical volume of the Norway, but our data show that the cortical  
volume is increasing somewhat more rapidly during the period  
when the brain weight is increasing from 1.16 to 1.54 grams and  
after that it increases more slowly but steadily as the entire  
cerebral volume increases, as shown in table 15 and in chart 4  
(graph LWH'). In the Albino, as has been shown, the cortical  
volume increases relatively rapidly until the brain attains 1.17  
grams in weight, a phase which probably corresponds to the  
phase in the Norway of 1.43 grams in brain weight.  


To compare the cortical volume in the Norway rat with that  
To compare the cortical volume in the Norway rat with that of the Albino, I have paired, in table 15, the Norway data {L. F XW. D X T X C] directly with the corresponding Albino
of the Albino, I have paired, in table 15, the Norway data  
{L. F XW. D X T X C] directly with the corresponding Albino  


* For a proper (;onii)arisoii, the eoeflficieuts here used are those for the same  
For a proper (;onii)arisoii, the eoeflficieuts here used are those for the same
brain weight groups compared in both forms, l)eing respectively the averages  
brain weight groups compared in both forms, l)eing respectively the averages for Groups XIII to XX and for Groups N XIII to N XX, taken from tables 4, 5, 11 and 13.
for Groups XIII to XX and for Groups N XIII to N XX, taken from tables 4,  
5, 11 and 13.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






111  
111






TABLE 15  
TABLE 15


Showing the computed volume for the entire cerebral cortex of the N'orway rat hraiii,  
Showing the computed volume for the entire cerebral cortex of the N'orway rat hraiii, calculated by the formula: L.F X W. D X T X C for each brain iveight group, C being a fixed coefficient used to convert the computed volume of the Norway cortex so as to make it comparable with that of the Albino {C = 1.036). The computed volume of the cerebrum is quoted from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18). These values are paired ivith the corresponding values for the cortical volume of the Albino and the ratios between them, calculated
calculated by the formula: L.F X W. D X T X C for each brain iveight group,  
C being a fixed coefficient used to convert the computed volume of the Norway  
cortex so as to make it comparable with that of the Albino {C = 1.036). The  
computed volume of the cerebrum is quoted from my previous presentation (Sugita,  
'18). These values are paired ivith the corresponding values for the cortical  
volume of the Albino and the ratios between them, calculated  






NORWAY RATS  
NORWAY RATS




ALBINO RATS  
ALBINO RATS




A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




H  
H




I  
I




Brain weight  
Brain weight group
group  




Brain  
Brain


wciglit  
wciglit




Computed  
Computed


volume  
volume


of  
of


cerelirum  
cerelirum


L.G X  
L.G X W.DXHt.
W.DXHt.  




L.F  
L.F


in fre.sli  
in fre.sli


brain  
brain




\V. D  
\V. D


in fresh  
in fresh


brain  
brain




average  
average cortical
cortical  


thickness  
thickness




L.FX  
L.FX W. D XT
W. D XT  


XC  
XC


Computed  
Computed


volume  
volume


of corte\  
of corte\




Corresponding  
Corresponding computed volume of the Albino cortex, of the same group number
computed  
volume  
of the  
Albino  
cortex, of  
the same  
group  
number  




Ratio  
Ratio


of cortical  
of cortical


volume  
volume


of the  
of the


Norwav  
Norwav


to that of  
to that of


the  
the


Albino  
Albino








grams  
grams




)H tn .3  
)H tn .3




mm .  
mm .




)// m .  
)// m .




m m .  
m m .




mm .^  
mm .^




7)1 m.^  
7)1 m.^








NXI  
NXI




1.163  
1.163




156  
156




12.2  
12.2




12.7  
12.7




1.75  
1.75




281.00  
281.00




288.93  
288.93




0.973  
0.973




NXII  
NXII




Line 34,013: Line 32,157:




304.51  
304.51








NXIII  
NXIII




1.369  
1.369




182  
182




13.1  
13.1




13.0  
13.0




1.85  
1.85




326.51  
326.51




314.03  
314.03




1.040  
1.040




NXIV  
NXIV




1.430  
1.430




185  
185




13.2  
13.2




13.2  
13.2




1.90  
1.90




343.09  
343.09




329.71  
329.71




1.040  
1.040




NXV  
NXV




1.537  
1.537




194  
194




13.5  
13.5




13.4  
13.4




1.93  
1.93




361.83  
361.83




345.86  
345.86




1.046  
1.046




NXVI  
NXVI




1.629  
1.629




203  
203




13.6  
13.6




13.7  
13.7




1.98  
1.98




382.32  
382.32




359.30  
359.30




1.064  
1.064




NXVII  
NXVII




1.739  
1.739




218  
218




13.9  
13.9




13.9  
13.9




2.01  
2.01




402.47  
402.47




365.08  
365.08




1.102  
1.102




N XVIII  
N XVIII




1.829  
1.829




226  
226




14.3  
14.3




14.2  
14.2




2.01  
2.01




423.00  
423.00




397.96  
397.96




1.063  
1.063




NXIX  
NXIX




1.972  
1.972




241  
241




14.6  
14.6




14.3  
14.3




1.99  
1.99




430.57  
430.57




390.39  
390.39




1.103  
1.103




NXX  
NXX




2.052  
2.052




249  
249




14.7  
14.7




14.4  
14.4




1.94  
1.94




425.59  
425.59




393.15  
393.15




1.0S3  
1.0S3




NXXI  
NXXI




2.172  
2.172




264  
264




15.1  
15.1




14.9  
14.9




2.04  
2.04




475.66  
475.66




Line 34,259: Line 32,403:




Average  
Average




(Groups  
(Groups




N XIII
N XIII


N XX) .  
N XX) .




Line 34,274: Line 32,418:




386.92  
386.92




361.94  
361.94




1.069  
1.069




Line 34,292: Line 32,436:




1 T, here entered, is the mean value of T, and Tp, previously given in tables  
1 T, here entered, is the mean value of T, and Tp, previously given in tables 11 and 13 and is not the general average thickness of the corte.x of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections formerly presented in my fourth paper in this series (Sugita, '18 a).
11 and 13 and is not the general average thickness of the corte.x of the sagittal,  
frontal and horizontal sections formerly presented in my fourth paper in this  
series (Sugita, '18 a).  






data (L. F X W. D X T) according to the brain weight groups,  
data (L. F X W. D X T) according to the brain weight groups, quoted from part I. In table 15 the ratios show the volume of the cortex in the Norway to be greater (1.040 to 1.103) in all the comparisons for brain weights above Groups XIII (brain weight 1.87 grams). The average value is about 1.07. In Group XI (brain weight 1.17 grams), the ratio for the Norway is less than 1. At this weight the Norway brain is regarded as less mature than
quoted from part I. In table 15 the ratios show the volume of  
the cortex in the Norway to be greater (1.040 to 1.103) in all the  
comparisons for brain weights above Groups XIII (brain weight  
1.87 grams). The average value is about 1.07. In Group XI  
(brain weight 1.17 grams), the ratio for the Norway is less than 1.  
At this weight the Norway brain is regarded as less mature than  






112 NAOKI SUGITA  
112 NAOKI SUGITA


the corresponding Albino brain. The ratio tends to increase as  
the corresponding Albino brain. The ratio tends to increase as the brain weight increases, showing roughly the relative growth in the Norway cortex.
the brain weight increases, showing roughly the relative growth  
in the Norway cortex.  


Since, as has been shown (Sugita, '18 a), the cortex in the  
Since, as has been shown (Sugita, '18 a), the cortex in the mature Norw^ay is about 8 per cent thicker (average of the sagittal and frontal sections) than in the Albino, and since this value enters as T into the formula under discussion, this would tend to give a greater \'olume of the cortex in the Norway than in the Albino. The mean value found for the ratio of the cortical volume — 1.07 — is about that to be expected, in view of the relatively smaller value of L. F in the Norway.
mature Norw^ay is about 8 per cent thicker (average of the sagittal  
and frontal sections) than in the Albino, and since this value  
enters as T into the formula under discussion, this would tend  
to give a greater \'olume of the cortex in the Norway than in the  
Albino. The mean value found for the ratio of the cortical  
volume — 1.07 — is about that to be expected, in view of the  
relatively smaller value of L. F in the Norway.  


>S. Computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex. Norway  
>S. Computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex. Norway rat compared with the Albino
rat compared with the Albino  


As described in part I, the computed number of nerve cells  
As described in part I, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be obtained by the following formula :^
in the entire cerebral cortex may be obtained by the following  
formula :^  


NXL.FX W. D X T XC (L.F, ]V. D and T, in miUimeters)  
NXL.FX W. D X T XC (L.F, ]V. D and T, in miUimeters) where L. F X W. D X T X C is the computed volume of the Norway cortex made comparable directly with the corresponding volume for the Albino, as explained in the foregoing chapter, and A^ is the cell density, represented by the sum of the numbers of cells in a unit volume in the lamina pjTamidalis and in a unit volume in the lamina ganglionaris (two unit volumes altogether), given separately in table 10 and combined in table 16.
where L. F X W. D X T X C is the computed volume of the  
Norway cortex made comparable directly with the corresponding volume for the Albino, as explained in the foregoing chapter,  
and A^ is the cell density, represented by the sum of the numbers of cells in a unit volume in the lamina pjTamidalis and in a  
unit volume in the lamina ganglionaris (two unit volumes altogether), given separately in table 10 and combined in table 16.  


Table 16 gives the computed value of the cell number in the  
Table 16 gives the computed value of the cell number in the entire cerebral cortex for each brain weight group of the Norway rats (column E), calculated by the use of the above formula, and also in the corresponding case of the Albino (column G).
entire cerebral cortex for each brain weight group of the Norway  
rats (column E), calculated by the use of the above formula,  
and also in the corresponding case of the Albino (column G).  


On examining table 16, column E, w^e find the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex to be nearly completed in a brain  
On examining table 16, column E, w^e find the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex to be nearly completed in a brain weighing 1.37 grams (Group N XIII), while in the Albino this condition was reached in a brain weighing 1.17 grams (Group XI). The value of the completed cell number is indicated in
weighing 1.37 grams (Group N XIII), while in the Albino this  
condition was reached in a brain weighing 1.17 grams (Group  
XI). The value of the completed cell number is indicated in  


''' The formula for the total number of nerve cells in the Norway cortex is  
The formula for the total number of nerve cells in the Norway cortex is like that for the Albino cortex with the addition of the factor C (footnote 4) .
like that for the Albino cortex with the addition of the factor C (footnote 4) .  






GROWTH OP THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OP THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






113  
113






TABLE 16  
TABLE 16


Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the Norivay rat brain, obtained on the basis of the m.easurements given in this series of  
Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the Norivay rat brain, obtained on the basis of the m.easurements given in this series of studies. These values are made to be comparable ivith the corresponding values of the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex of the albino rat brains of like brain weight groups
studies. These values are made to be comparable ivith the corresponding values  
of the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex of the albino rat brains of  
like brain weight groups  






NORW.W R.\TS  
NORW.W R.\TS




ALBINO RATS  
ALBINO RATS




A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




Brain weight  
Brain weight group
group  




Brain weight  
Brain weight




Computed  
Computed


volume of  
volume of


cortex  
cortex


L.FX n'. D  
L.FX n'. D


XT XC  
XT XC




Sum of  
Sum of numbers of
numbers of  


cells  
cells in lam. pyr.
in lam. pyr.  


and lam.  
and lam. gang, in two
gang, in two  


unit  
unit volumes, N
volumes, N  




Computed  
Computed


number of cells  
number of cells


in entire  
in entire


cortex,!  
cortex,!


X XL.F  
X XL.F


X It'. DXT  
X It'. DXT


x^'x'iTo  
x^'x'iTo




Ratio of  
Ratio of number of
number of  


cells in  
cells in the Norway
the Norway  


to that  
to that in the Albino
in the Albino  




Corresponding  
Corresponding


computed  
computed number of cells
number of cells  


in the  
in the


Albino, of the  
Albino, of the


same group  
same group


number  
number




NXI  
NXI


NXII  
NXII


NXIII  
NXIII


NXIV  
NXIV


NXV  
NXV


NXVI  
NXVI


N XVII  
N XVII


N XVIII  
N XVIII


NXIX  
NXIX


NXX  
NXX


NXXI  
NXXI




grams  
grams


1.163  
1.163


1.369  
1.369 1.430 1.537 1.629 1.739 1.829 1.972 2.052 2.172
1.430  
1.537  
1.629  
1.739  
1.829  
1.972  
2.052  
2.172  




m m .3  
m m .3


281.00  
281.00


326.51  
326.51 343.09 361.83 382.32 402.47 423.00 430.57 425.59 475.66
343.09  
361.83  
382.32  
402.47  
423.00  
430.57  
425.59  
475.66  




181  
181


166  
166 160 144 138 132 131 127 123 112
160  
144  
138  
132  
131  
127  
123  
112  




508.6  
508.6


542.0  
542.0 548.9 521.0 527.6 531.3 554.1 546.8 523.5 532.7
548.9  
521.0  
527.6  
531.3  
554.1  
546.8  
523.5  
532.7  




0.946  
0.946


0.981  
0.981 1.009 1.011 1.020 0.997 1.009 1.061 1.016
1.009  
1.011  
1.020  
0.997  
1.009  
1.061  
1.016  




537.4  
537.4 520.7 552.7 544.0 515.3 517.4 533.0 549.2 515.3 515.0
520.7  
552.7  
544.0  
515.3  
517.4  
533.0  
549.2  
515.3  
515.0  




Average (Groups N XIII-N XX)  
Average (Groups N XIII-N XX)




536.9  
536.9




1.013  
1.013




530.2  
530.2






1 As remarked in a note to table 7, the number given in this column corresponds to 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T,or 1/50,000 of the actual number of  
1 As remarked in a note to table 7, the number given in this column corresponds to 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T,or 1/50,000 of the actual number of cells contained in the computed volume of the cortex.
cells contained in the computed volume of the cortex.  


the Norway by about 537 (the average of Groups N XIIIN XX) or about 1 per cent more than that of the Albino, which  
the Norway by about 537 (the average of Groups N XIIIN XX) or about 1 per cent more than that of the Albino, which has been indicated by about 530 (the average of Groups XIIIXX, see table 7), so that the number of nerve cells in the entire cortex of the mature Norway and of the Albino rats may be regarded as practically the same, as suggested by Donaldson (Donaldson and Hatai, '11).
has been indicated by about 530 (the average of Groups XIIIXX, see table 7), so that the number of nerve cells in the entire  
cortex of the mature Norway and of the Albino rats may be regarded as practically the same, as suggested by Donaldson  
(Donaldson and Hatai, '11).  






114 NAOKI SUGITA  
114 NAOKI SUGITA


IX. CONCLUSIONS  
IX. CONCLUSIONS


Putting together the foregoing observations, we come to the  
Putting together the foregoing observations, we come to the conclusion that in the case of the Norway rat brain the entire volume of the cerebral cortex is actively increasing up to a brain weight of something more than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV) and that the number of nerve cells in the cortex is completed in a brain weighing something less than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV) (chart 4). After this, the increase in cortical volume keeps pace with the enlargement of the entire cerebrum, showing that the cortical mass and the remainder of the cerebrum are growing at the same rate. So, the end of the short period during which the brain has attained 1.37 to 1.54 grams in weight (Groups N XIII to N XV) marks an epoch in the development of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, at which the structural completion of the cortex has been acquired and the full preparation for the functional education has been established. This period corresponds approximately to the age of twenty days.
conclusion that in the case of the Norway rat brain the entire  
volume of the cerebral cortex is actively increasing up to a  
brain weight of something more than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV)  
and that the number of nerve cells in the cortex is completed in  
a brain weighing something less than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV)  
(chart 4). After this, the increase in cortical volume keeps  
pace with the enlargement of the entire cerebrum, showing that  
the cortical mass and the remainder of the cerebrum are growing  
at the same rate. So, the end of the short period during which  
the brain has attained 1.37 to 1.54 grams in weight (Groups  
N XIII to N XV) marks an epoch in the development of the  
cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, at which the structural completion of the cortex has been acquired and the full preparation for the functional education has been established. This  
period corresponds approximately to the age of twenty days.  


In the Albino, the same degree of development is reached  
In the Albino, the same degree of development is reached when the brain attains a weight of 1.17 grams or is twenty days old. As I suggested in an earlier paper (Sugita, '18 a), a Norway brain corresponds in the development of the cortex to an Albino brain weighing about 18 per cent less. This assumption has held true in the present examinations of the cortical volume and cell number, because an Albino brain weighing 1.17 grams just corresponds to a Norway brain weighing 1.43 grams.
when the brain attains a weight of 1.17 grams or is twenty days  
old. As I suggested in an earlier paper (Sugita, '18 a), a Norway brain corresponds in the development of the cortex to an  
Albino brain weighing about 18 per cent less. This assumption  
has held true in the present examinations of the cortical volume  
and cell number, because an Albino brain weighing 1.17 grams  
just corresponds to a Norway brain weighing 1.43 grams.  


The number of cells in the Norway cortex has been shown to  
The number of cells in the Norway cortex has been shown to be but slightly (1 per cent) different from that in the Albino rat cortex and may be regarded as the same in both forms. This fact justifies at the same time a conclusion reached by Donaldson in his former comparison of the Norway with the Albino rats, that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat, compared with the Albino of the same body weight or of the same age, is probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number (Donaldson and Hatai, '11). The results of my study regarding the cell size in the cortex in these two forms will be discussed in a forthcoming paper and will support the statement just made.
be but slightly (1 per cent) different from that in the Albino rat  
cortex and may be regarded as the same in both forms. This  
fact justifies at the same time a conclusion reached by Donaldson in his former comparison of the Norway with the Albino rats,  
that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat, compared  
with the Albino of the same body weight or of the same age, is  
probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather  
than to an increase in their number (Donaldson and Hatai, '11).  
The results of my study regarding the cell size in the cortex in  
these two forms will be discussed in a forthcoming paper and  
will support the statement just made.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 115  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 115


X. SUMMARY  
X. SUMMARY


1. On the sagittal and the frontal sections from 28 Norway  
1. On the sagittal and the frontal sections from 28 Norway rats, whose brain weights fall between 1.1 and 2.4 grams and which were formerly used for the investigation on the cortical thickness (Sugita, '18 a), the area of the cortex was measured and the number of nerve cells, in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ at a fixed locality of the cortex, was counted. These values were all later corrected to the corresponding values in the fresh condition of the material, using the correction- coefficients devised for this purpose. These results have been grouped and averaged according to the brain weight and then compared with the corresponding data in the Albino, which were presented in part I of this paper.
rats, whose brain weights fall between 1.1 and 2.4 grams and  
which were formerly used for the investigation on the cortical  
thickness (Sugita, '18 a), the area of the cortex was measured  
and the number of nerve cells, in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ at  
a fixed locality of the cortex, was counted. These values were  
all later corrected to the corresponding values in the fresh condition of the material, using the correction- coefficients devised  
for this purpose. These results have been grouped and averaged according to the brain weight and then compared with the  
corresponding data in the Albino, which were presented in part I  
of this paper.  


2. The actual area of the cortex in the sagittal section may  
2. The actual area of the cortex in the sagittal section may be obtained by the formula: L. F X T^X 1.20 (L. F and T^, in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the sagittal section and 1.20 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (table 11, column G).
be obtained by the formula: L. F X T^X 1.20 (L. F and T^, in  
millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the  
cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the sagittal section and 1.20 is a constant coefficient which was empirically  
determined (table 11, column G).  


3. The actual area of the cortex in the frontal section may be  
3. The actual area of the cortex in the frontal section may be obtained, though less precisely, by the formula: W. D xT^ X 0.97 {W. D and T^ in millimeters), where W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the frontal section and 0.97 is a constant coefficient which was determined empirically (table 12, column G).
obtained, though less precisely, by the formula: W. D xT^ X 0.97  
{W. D and T^ in millimeters), where W. D is the frontal diameter  
of the cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the frontal  
section and 0.97 is a constant coefficient which was determined  
empirically (table 12, column G).  


4. The percentage of the cortical area to the area of the whole  
4. The percentage of the cortical area to the area of the whole frontal section is highest (48 per cent) in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.8 grams. In a fully mature brain it has fallen to 44 per cent.
frontal section is highest (48 per cent) in brains weighing 1.1 to  
1.8 grams. In a fully mature brain it has fallen to 44 per cent.  


5. The computed value for the volume of the entire cortex,  
5. The computed value for the volume of the entire cortex, indicated by the formula: L. F X W. D X T X C (L. F, W. D and T, in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter, W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T is the average thickness of the cortex in the two sections and C a theoretically determined coefficient necessary to make the values directly comparable with the corresponding values for the albino rat, shows that the cortex is increasing relatively rapidly in the
indicated by the formula: L. F X W. D X T X C (L. F, W. D  
and T, in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter,  
W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T is the average  
thickness of the cortex in the two sections and C a theoretically  
determined coefficient necessary to make the values directly  
comparable with the corresponding values for the albino rat,  
shows that the cortex is increasing relatively rapidly in the  






116 NAOKI SUGITA  
116 NAOKI SUGITA


Norway brains weighing less than 1.43 grams. After that stage  
Norway brains weighing less than 1.43 grams. After that stage its increase nearly keeps pace with the increase in the volume of the entire cerebrum.
its increase nearly keeps pace with the increase in the volume  
of the entire cerebrum.  


6. In Norway brains weighing from 1.1 to 2.2 grams, the cell  
6. In Norway brains weighing from 1.1 to 2.2 grams, the cell density or the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, in a fixed locality of the cortex, decreases slowly but steadily as the brain weight advances. It has proved sHghtly less than that in the Albino (compare table 16, column D, with table 7, column C). In the lamina ganglionaris the number of ganglion cells onl}^ in a unit volume is at its highest in the brains weighing 1.7-1.8 grams (table 14).
density or the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the  
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, in a fixed locality of the cortex, decreases slowly but steadily as the brain  
weight advances. It has proved sHghtly less than that in the  
Albino (compare table 16, column D, with table 7, column C).  
In the lamina ganglionaris the number of ganglion cells onl}^ in a  
unit volume is at its highest in the brains weighing 1.7-1.8 grams  
(table 14).  


7. The value for the computed number of nerve cells in the  
7. The value for the computed number of nerve cells in the entire Norway cortex, indicated by the formula: A*^ X L. F X Wl D XT XC (L. F, W. D and T, in millimeters), where A^ is the number of cells in two unit volumes and L.F x W. D X T X C is the computed volume of the cortex, shows that it is almost completed in a brain weighing something more than .37 grams.
entire Norway cortex, indicated by the formula: A*^ X L. F X  
Wl D XT XC (L. F, W. D and T, in millimeters), where A^  
is the number of cells in two unit volumes and L.F x W. D X  
T X C is the computed volume of the cortex, shows that it is  
almost completed in a brain weighing something more than .37  
grams.  


8. Comparisons in respect of the above characters between  
8. Comparisons in respect of the above characters between the Norway and the Albino brains of the like weight show that, in the cortical areas in the sagittal and the frontal sections and in the volume of the entire cortex, the Norway rat surpasses the albino rat, but the number of cells as computed for the entire cortex may be regarded as the same in both forms. We conclude therefore that the difference in absolute brain weight between the two forms is not correlated with a difference in the number of nerve cells in the cerebral cortex. In a Norway brain weighing 1.4 to 1.5 grams, which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing 1.17 grams and is about twenty days in age, the elemental organization of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat is considered to be almost completed.
the Norway and the Albino brains of the like weight show that,  
in the cortical areas in the sagittal and the frontal sections and  
in the volume of the entire cortex, the Norway rat surpasses the  
albino rat, but the number of cells as computed for the entire  
cortex may be regarded as the same in both forms. We conclude  
therefore that the difference in absolute brain weight between the  
two forms is not correlated with a difference in the number of  
nerve cells in the cerebral cortex. In a Norway brain weighing  
1.4 to 1.5 grams, which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing  
1.17 grams and is about twenty days in age, the elemental organization of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat is considered  
to be almost completed.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 117  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 117


LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of  
Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.
the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.  


Donaldson, H. H. 19 8 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect  
Donaldson, H. H. 19 8 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 18, pp. 345-392.
to the growth of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur.  
and Psychol., vol. 18, pp. 345-392.  


1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and  
1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.
Biology, no. 6.  


Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with  
Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.
the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord  
weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and the spinal  
cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.  


Stjgita, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during  
Stjgita, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.
the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur.,  
vol. 28, no. 3.  


1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.
II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the  
postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol.  
28, no. 3.  


1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III.  
1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters  
in the Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.  


1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus  
norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in  
the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.  






AUTHOR S ABSTRACT OP THIS PAPER ISSUED  
AUTHOR S ABSTRACT OP THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 2.
BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 2.  






COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE  
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
CEREBRAL CORTEX  


VI. PART I. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE AND ON THE DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL  
VI. PART I. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE AND ON THE DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE ALBINO RAT DURING THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN
CORTEX OF THE ALBINO RAT DURING THE GROWTH OF THE  
BRAIN  


VI. PART II. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS  
VI. PART II. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES IN THE ALBINO RAT
IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES  
IN THE ALBINO RAT  


NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA


From the Wislar Institute of Anatomy and Biology  
From the Wislar Institute of Anatomy and Biology


WITH SIX FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS  
WITH SIX FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS


PART I  
PART I


I. PRELIMINARY STUDIES  
I. PRELIMINARY STUDIES


As a preliminary to the study of cell size, I made a comparison  
As a preliminary to the study of cell size, I made a comparison of effects of several fixatives and imbedding media on the size and shape of the cortical nerve cells in a small number of albino rats. These studies were made after considering the results of King ('10) and Allen ('16), both of whom were endeavoring to find methods which caused the minimum alteration in the nerve cells.
of effects of several fixatives and imbedding media on the size and  
shape of the cortical nerve cells in a small number of albino rats.  
These studies were made after considering the results of King  
('10) and Allen ('16), both of whom were endeavoring to find  
methods which caused the minimum alteration in the nerve cells.  


For this comparison, ten kinds of preparations were made from  
For this comparison, ten kinds of preparations were made from albino rat brains of like age: thus, as the fixative, (1) Bouin's fluid, (2) 4 per cent formaldehyde, (3) 95 per cent alcohol, (4) Muller's or Orth's fluid, and (5) Ohlmacher's fluid were successively^ tried, and each sample was inbedded in (A) parafine and in (B) celloidin.
albino rat brains of like age: thus, as the fixative, (1) Bouin's  
fluid, (2) 4 per cent formaldehyde, (3) 95 per cent alcohol, (4)  
Muller's or Orth's fluid, and (5) Ohlmacher's fluid were successively^ tried, and each sample was inbedded in (A) parafine  
and in (B) celloidin.  


119  
119






120 NAOKI SUGITA  
120 NAOKI SUGITA


Formaldehyde fixation and paraffine imbedding (2A) causes  
Formaldehyde fixation and paraffine imbedding (2A) causes considerable shrunkage of nuclei and cell bodies, especially in young brains, but material so prepared takes any aniline dye excellently well (fig. l,b). Fixation in Miiller's or Ortti's fluid and paraffine imbedding (4A) causes also shrinkage and deformation of the cell bodies and nuclei, the contours of which become zigzag. Formaldehyde fixation and celloidin imbedding (2B) give good figures of cell bodies, which stain excellently with any aniline dye. The shrinkage of cells and nuclei which was seen after paraffine imbedding of the material similarly fixed (2A) is no longer observed. But the size of cell bodies and nuclei seems to have suffered some diminution. Miiller or Orth fixation and celloidin imbedding (4B) causes considerable deformation of the contours of the cells and nuclei, which is probably an affect of the potassium bichromate.
considerable shrunkage of nuclei and cell bodies, especially in  
young brains, but material so prepared takes any aniline dye excellently well (fig. l,b). Fixation in Miiller's or Ortti's fluid and  
paraffine imbedding (4A) causes also shrinkage and deformation  
of the cell bodies and nuclei, the contours of which become zigzag.  
Formaldehyde fixation and celloidin imbedding (2B) give good  
figures of cell bodies, which stain excellently with any aniline  
dye. The shrinkage of cells and nuclei which was seen after  
paraffine imbedding of the material similarly fixed (2A) is no  
longer observed. But the size of cell bodies and nuclei seems to  
have suffered some diminution. Miiller or Orth fixation and  
celloidin imbedding (4B) causes considerable deformation of the  
contours of the cells and nuclei, which is probably an affect of the  
potassium bichromate.  


In material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol, the brain is subject to  
In material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol, the brain is subject to much shrinkage, and consequently the cell size and cortical thickness diminish also, though, after paraffine imbedding (3A), the contours of cells and nuclei are preserved pretty well (fig. 1,a). Alcohol fixation only or alcohol fixation and celloidin imbedding (3B) is ideal for the study of the cytoplasmic strticture as originally emphasized by Nissl. The cell bodies stain very well with aniline dyes, but the section shrinks so that the individual cells must have been more or less reduced in size. Fixation in Ohlmacher's fluid and paraffine imbedding (5A) or celloidin imbedding (5B) proved to be most excellent for cell study, as pointed out by King ('10), but it is followed after fixation by a considerable reduction in the volume of the total brain and some change in shape.
much shrinkage, and consequently the cell size and cortical  
thickness diminish also, though, after paraffine imbedding (3A),  
the contours of cells and nuclei are preserved pretty well (fig. 1,a). Alcohol fixation only or alcohol fixation and celloidin imbedding (3B) is ideal for the study of the cytoplasmic strticture as  
originally emphasized by Nissl. The cell bodies stain very well  
with aniline dyes, but the section shrinks so that the individual  
cells must have been more or less reduced in size. Fixation in  
Ohlmacher's fluid and paraffine imbedding (5A) or celloidin imbedding (5B) proved to be most excellent for cell study, as  
pointed out by King ('10), but it is followed after fixation by a  
considerable reduction in the volume of the total brain and some  
change in shape.  


After a number of tests, I decided to use as the fixative Bouin's  
After a number of tests, I decided to use as the fixative Bouin's fluid, which is composed of:
fluid, which is composed of:  


cc.  
cc.


Picric acid, saturated aqueous solution 75  
Picric acid, saturated aqueous solution 75


40 per cent formaldehyde (formalin) 25  
40 per cent formaldehyde (formalin) 25


Glacial acetic acid 5  
Glacial acetic acid 5


Fixed in this fluid the total weight or ^'olume of the brain  
Fixed in this fluid the total weight or ^'olume of the brain suffers no significant change after complete fixation and preserves its original shape quite well, though a slight shrinkage occurs,
suffers no significant change after complete fixation and preserves  
its original shape quite well, though a slight shrinkage occurs,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






121  
121






no matter what the age of the brain is. It takes only a couple  
no matter what the age of the brain is. It takes only a couple of hours to complete fixation in this fluid, if the fluid is kept in the oven at 37C., but, as a matter of convenience, I left each brain in 20 cc. of this fluid for 24 hours at the room temperature. By this treatment the form of the cells was well preserved, even after imbedding in paraffine (lA) (figs. 3 and 4).
of hours to complete fixation in this fluid, if the fluid is kept in  
the oven at 37''C., but, as a matter of convenience, I left each  
brain in 20 cc. of this fluid for 24 hours at the room temperature.  
By this treatment the form of the cells was well preserved, even  
after imbedding in paraffine (lA) (figs. 3 and 4).  


Comparing this w^ith the material which was fixed in the same  
Comparing this w^ith the material which was fixed in the same fluid but imbedded in celloidin (IB), the contours of cell bodies were, in the former, somewhat indistinct and the size of the nuclei somewhat larger (fig. 1, c). But after paraffine imbedding the nuclei have yet good contours which are not zigzag and the
fluid but imbedded in celloidin (IB), the contours of cell bodies  
were, in the former, somewhat indistinct and the size of the  
nuclei somewhat larger (fig. 1, c). But after paraffine imbedding  
the nuclei have yet good contours which are not zigzag and the  




Line 34,868: Line 32,767:




Fig. 1 Showing pj'ramids from the lamina pyramidalis at a fixed locality  
Fig. 1 Showing pj'ramids from the lamina pyramidalis at a fixed locality (locality VII) of the cerebral cortex of Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams. Magnification of about 950 diameters, measured directly on the slide, a = from a brain imbedded in paraffine after fixation in 95 per cent alcohol, b = from a brain imbedded in ])araffine after fixation in 4 per cent formaldehyde, c = from a brain imbedded in celloidin after fixation in Bouin's fluid.
(locality VII) of the cerebral cortex of Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams.  
Magnification of about 950 diameters, measured directly on the slide, a = from  
a brain imbedded in paraffine after fixation in 95 per cent alcohol, b = from a  
brain imbedded in ])araffine after fixation in 4 per cent formaldehyde, c = from  
a brain imbedded in celloidin after fixation in Bouin's fluid.  


so-called Nissl bodies are also well stained. Since paraffine was  
so-called Nissl bodies are also well stained. Since paraffine was used exclusively for the imbedding medium, Bouin's fluid proved to be the best fixative for the albino rat brain, when it is required to follow the growth changes of the cortex by the measurements of the cells of the cortex.
used exclusively for the imbedding medium, Bouin's fluid proved  
to be the best fixative for the albino rat brain, when it is required to follow the growth changes of the cortex by the measurements of the cells of the cortex.  


Figure 1 shows a comparison of the effects of several fixatives  
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the effects of several fixatives on the shape and contours of the cell bodies and the nuclei when applied to albino rat brains of like age. The examples are all from Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams and represent pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis taken near the locality VII in frontal sections, being comparable with VII in figure 2, a and h.
on the shape and contours of the cell bodies and the nuclei when  
applied to albino rat brains of like age. The examples are all  
from Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams and represent  
pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis taken near the locality VII  
in frontal sections, being comparable with VII in figure 2, a  
and h.  






122  
122






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






II. MATERIAL  
II. MATERIAL


For the present study on cell size in the cerebral cortex, the  
For the present study on cell size in the cerebral cortex, the frontal and horizontal sections of the Albino brains which were used earlier for studies on the cortical thickness, cortical areas, and cell density (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b) were alone taken. No locahty in the sagittal sections was examined. These sections were from 128 individuals, sexes combined. The data for these 128 rats appear in tables 1 and 2 in a previous paper (Sugita, '17 a) and it is not thought necessary to repeat the tables here. This study was begun in January, 1916, and carried on with interruptions till Fel)ruary, 1917, at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.
frontal and horizontal sections of the Albino brains which were  
used earlier for studies on the cortical thickness, cortical areas,  
and cell density (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b) were alone taken. No  
locahty in the sagittal sections was examined. These sections  
were from 128 individuals, sexes combined. The data for these  
128 rats appear in tables 1 and 2 in a previous paper (Sugita,  
'17 a) and it is not thought necessary to repeat the tables here.  
This study was begun in January, 1916, and carried on with interruptions till Fel)ruary, 1917, at The Wistar Institute of  
Anatomy and Biology.  






/^f  
/^f








a  
a








Fig. 2 Showing on tlie brain surface the localities at which the sizes of the  
Fig. 2 Showing on tlie brain surface the localities at which the sizes of the pyramids and the ganglion cells were measured. FF' indicates the level from which the frontal section was taken and HH' indicates the level from which the horizontal section was taken. VII = locality \TI;X = locality X. a = the dorsal view of an Albino brain weighing 1.5 grams. Enlarged l.S diameters, b = the lateral view of the same.
pyramids and the ganglion cells were measured. FF' indicates the level from  
which the frontal section was taken and HH' indicates the level from which  
the horizontal section was taken. VII = locality \TI;X = locality X. a = the  
dorsal view of an Albino brain weighing 1.5 grams. Enlarged l.S diameters,  
b = the lateral view of the same.  






III. TECHNIQUE  
III. TECHNIQUE


The nerve cells have been measured at fixed localities in the  
The nerve cells have been measured at fixed localities in the sections; that is, in the frontal sections at locality VII (fig. 4, Sugita, '17 a) and in the horizontal sections at locality X (fig. 6, Sugita, '17 a). For convenience, these locahties are here shown on two corresponding figures (fig. 2, a and b). From the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at each of these localities, ten of the largest cells were selected and measured. The cells in the other layers were not systematically investigated,
sections; that is, in the frontal sections at locality VII (fig. 4,  
Sugita, '17 a) and in the horizontal sections at locality X (fig. 6,  
Sugita, '17 a). For convenience, these locahties are here shown  
on two corresponding figures (fig. 2, a and b). From the lamina  
pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at each of these localities, ten of the largest cells were selected and measured. The  
cells in the other layers were not systematically investigated,  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 123  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 123


but in several stages of growth, a few were measured, in order  
but in several stages of growth, a few were measured, in order to be able to make some comparisons.
to be able to make some comparisons.  


The study of the cells under the microscope was made with a  
The study of the cells under the microscope was made with a Zeiss Comp. Ocular no. (3 with a micrometer, combined with the objective 2 mm., oil immersion. Each division in the micrometer scale was equal to two micra. The measurement of the cell size was executed in the following way : the transverse diameter of the cell body (the greatest width of the cell body) was measured on a line, parallel to the base line, which crossed about the middle of the nucleus. For the longitudinal diameter the measurement was made \'ertical to the trans\'erse diameter from the base of the cell body to the beginning of the apical dendrite. This last limit was assumed to be at the point where the Nissl bodies are no more to be seen and the side lines of the apical dendrite begin to run nearly parallel to each other. Sometimes this upper limit was very hard to determine, especially in fully grown cells, because of the irregularity of the cell outline and the relatively slow transition from cell bod}- to the apical dendrite. In these latter cases, the upper limit was somewhat arbitrarily fixed, but this procedure has apparently been without much effect on the results.
Zeiss Comp. Ocular no. (3 with a micrometer, combined with the  
objective 2 mm., oil immersion. Each division in the micrometer  
scale was equal to two micra. The measurement of the cell  
size was executed in the following way : the transverse diameter  
of the cell body (the greatest width of the cell body) was measured on a line, parallel to the base line, which crossed about the  
middle of the nucleus. For the longitudinal diameter the measurement was made \'ertical to the trans\'erse diameter from the  
base of the cell body to the beginning of the apical dendrite.  
This last limit was assumed to be at the point where the Nissl  
bodies are no more to be seen and the side lines of the apical  
dendrite begin to run nearly parallel to each other. Sometimes  
this upper limit was very hard to determine, especially in fully  
grown cells, because of the irregularity of the cell outline and  
the relatively slow transition from cell bod}- to the apical dendrite. In these latter cases, the upper limit was somewhat arbitrarily fixed, but this procedure has apparently been without  
much effect on the results.  


The measurements of the ten largest cells of the same kind  
The measurements of the ten largest cells of the same kind from within the fixed locality in the same individual were then averaged for each diameter and recorded on cards without any correction. The average measurements from the frontal section and the horizontal section are denoted in the records by the letters F and H, respectively. The individual averages for each series of ten cells in each section have all been tabulated and the respective averages for the brain-weight groups found. The values for the individuals in each brain-weight group are so well correlated with their respective indi\ddual brain weights that it has seemed necessary to publish only the averages for the successive brain-weight groups. Table 1 contains the cell measurements on the frontal section averaged for each brainvk^eight group. The results of the measurements on the horizontal sections, which were taken from the other individuals,
from within the fixed locality in the same individual were then  
averaged for each diameter and recorded on cards without any  
correction. The average measurements from the frontal section  
and the horizontal section are denoted in the records by the  
letters F and H, respectively. The individual averages for each  
series of ten cells in each section have all been tabulated and  
the respective averages for the brain-weight groups found. The  
values for the individuals in each brain-weight group are so  
well correlated with their respective indi\ddual brain weights  
that it has seemed necessary to publish only the averages for the  
successive brain-weight groups. Table 1 contains the cell  
measurements on the frontal section averaged for each brainvk^eight group. The results of the measurements on the horizontal sections, which were taken from the other individuals,  






124 NAOKI SUGITA  
124 NAOKI SUGITA


are given in table 2, and here also only the averages for the  
are given in table 2, and here also only the averages for the brain-weight groups are given. ^
brain-weight groups are given. ^  


The maximal diameters of the nuclei of the same cells were  
The maximal diameters of the nuclei of the same cells were measured in the two directions in which the cell measurements were made. The nuclei have sharp contours, so that it was always easy to find the border points of the diameters. The results of the nuclear measurements ha\'e been treated in the same manner as the cell-body measurements and the average values are recorded also in the same way — ^without any correction — in tables 1 and 2.
measured in the two directions in which the cell measurements  
were made. The nuclei have sharp contours, so that it was always easy to find the border points of the diameters. The results of the nuclear measurements ha\'e been treated in the same  
manner as the cell-body measurements and the average values  
are recorded also in the same way — ^without any correction — in  
tables 1 and 2.  


In table 3 the final average diameters of the cell bodies and  
In table 3 the final average diameters of the cell bodies and their nuclei for each brain-weight group are given for each section. These final average values were obtained by multiplying the values of the transverse and longitudinal diameters together and by extracting the square root of the product, thus assuming the cell- and nucleus-figures to form a plane instead of a solid body. By this treatment, the results for the nucleus do not differ much from those which would be obtained by using a planimeter, because the nucleus has a nearly spherical or ellipsoidal form. The cell body, on the contrary, appears as a somewhat irregular cone or pyramid in the outline. Nevertheless, its relative volume may be denoted by a^fe, or its area by ah, in which a is the transverse and h the longitudinal diameter. Accordingly, the relative values of the average diameter may be represented by 's/ab, but these values should not be compared directly with the average diameter of the nucleus, because the forms of the cell body and of the nucleus are quite different. The size of cell bodies and their nuclei was assumed to have shrunken in the same proportion as the total brain volume during the procedure of fixation, imbedding and mounting and the values observed were therefore corrected for the fresh condition of the material by the use of the correction-coefficient which was formerly used for the correction of the cortical thickness or other measurements made on the same section. The cell bodies and nuclei were assumed to have shrunken similarly in transverse and
their nuclei for each brain-weight group are given for each section. These final average values were obtained by multiplying  
the values of the transverse and longitudinal diameters together  
and by extracting the square root of the product, thus assuming  
the cell- and nucleus-figures to form a plane instead of a solid  
body. By this treatment, the results for the nucleus do not differ  
much from those which would be obtained by using a planimeter,  
because the nucleus has a nearly spherical or ellipsoidal form.  
The cell body, on the contrary, appears as a somewhat irregular  
cone or pyramid in the outline. Nevertheless, its relative volume may be denoted by a^fe, or its area by ah, in which a is the  
transverse and h the longitudinal diameter. Accordingly, the  
relative values of the average diameter may be represented by  
's/ab, but these values should not be compared directly with  
the average diameter of the nucleus, because the forms of the cell  
body and of the nucleus are quite different. The size of cell  
bodies and their nuclei was assumed to have shrunken in the  
same proportion as the total brain volume during the procedure  
of fixation, imbedding and mounting and the values observed  
were therefore corrected for the fresh condition of the material  
by the use of the correction-coefficient which was formerly used  
for the correction of the cortical thickness or other measurements made on the same section. The cell bodies and nuclei  
were assumed to have shrunken similarly in transverse and  


^ The detailed data for tables 1 and 2 and also for tables 6 and 7 have all  
^ The detailed data for tables 1 and 2 and also for tables 6 and 7 have all been tabulated and are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.
been tabulated and are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.  






GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






125  
125






TABLE I  
TABLE I Giving the average uibcorrecled diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality VII) on the frontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are given for each brain iveight group only
Giving the average uibcorrecled diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the  
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality  
{locality VII) on the frontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are given  
for each brain iveight group only  






BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  






I  
I


II (B)  
II (B)


III  
III


IV  
IV


V  
V


VI  
VI


VII  
VII


VIII  
VIII


IX  
IX


X  
X


XI  
XI


XII  
XII


XIII  
XIII


XIV  
XIV


XV  
XV


XVI  
XVI


XVII  
XVII


XVIII  
XVIII


XIX  
XIX


XX  
XX






NO. OF  
NO. OF




BRAIN  
BRAIN




TASKS  
TASKS




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT








grams  
grams




3  
3




0.161  
0.161




5  
5




0.251  
0.251




5  
5




0.358  
0.358




6  
6




0.432  
0.432




9  
9




0.542  
0.542




3  
3




0.639  
0.639




2  
2




0.750  
0.750




6  
6




0.841  
0.841




3  
3




0.964  
0.964




3  
3




1.040  
1.040




4  
4




1.171  
1.171




2  
2




1.253  
1.253




5  
5




1.335  
1.335




3  
3




1.445  
1.445




5  
5




1 554  
1 554




4  
4




1.656  
1.656




4  
4




1.726  
1.726




3  
3




1.839  
1.839




1  
1




1.924  
1.924




2  
2




2.054  
2.054






LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit.  
Transv. Longit.






7.5  
7.5 10.3 11.9 14.1 14.4 15.0 15.2 16.5 16.9 16.6 16.8 16.2 16.0 15.4 15 5 15.0 15.7 14.7 15.6 15.2
10.3  
11.9  
14.1  
14.4  
15.0  
15.2  
16.5  
16.9  
16.6  
16.8  
16.2  
16.0  
15.4  
15 5  
15.0  
15.7  
14.7  
15.6  
15.2  






M  
M


10.7  
10.7


13.0  
13.0


15.5  
15.5


17  
17


17  
17


17  
17


18.  
18.


19.  
19.


20.2  
20.2


20.1  
20.1


20.6  
20.6


20.7  
20.7


20.7  
20.7


20 4  
20 4


20.0  
20.0


19.6  
19.6


19.9  
19.9


19.4  
19.4


19.9  
19.9


19.5  
19.5






Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit.  
Transv. Longit.






6.6  
6.6 9.2 10.7 12.4 12.4 12.9 13.5 14.0 15.7 14.8 14.7 14.6 14.6 14.3 14.2 13.8 14 3 13.6 14.0 13.5
9.2  
10.7  
12.4  
12.4  
12.9  
13.5  
14.0  
15.7  
14.8  
14.7  
14.6  
14.6  
14.3  
14.2  
13.8  
14 3  
13.6  
14.0  
13.5  






7.6  
7.6 10.3 12.4 13.5 13.4 13.9 14.2 14.8 16.4 15.3 16.1 15.4 15.2 15.1 14.8 14.7 15.2 14.5 14.3 14.3
10.3  
12.4  
13.5  
13.4  
13.9  
14.2  
14.8  
16.4  
15.3  
16.1  
15.4  
15.2  
15.1  
14.8  
14.7  
15.2  
14.5  
14.3  
14.3  






LAMINA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMINA GANGLIONARIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  




Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




M  
M




M  
M




A*  
A*




M  
M




10.1  
10.1




14.1  
14.1




8.7  
8.7




10.5  
10.5




14.4  
14.4




18.2  
18.2




12.0  
12.0




13.6  
13.6




16.1  
16.1




20.6  
20.6




13.5  
13.5




15.0  
15.0




18.4  
18.4




23.3  
23.3




15.5  
15.5




ir.i  
ir.i




19.5  
19.5




23.4  
23.4




16.2  
16.2




ir.4  
ir.4




19.4  
19.4




23.7  
23.7




16.2  
16.2




17.2  
17.2




20.2  
20.2




25.7  
25.7




16.1  
16.1




16.9  
16.9




20.8  
20.8




26.7  
26.7




17.4  
17.4




18.3  
18.3




21.4  
21.4




28.6  
28.6




19.1  
19.1




19.6  
19.6




21.0  
21.0




27.7  
27.7




17.8  
17.8




18.6  
18.6




21.5  
21.5




28.6  
28.6




18.2  
18.2




19.4  
19.4




21.1'  
21.1'




27.7  
27.7




18.0  
18.0




18.6  
18.6




20.4'  
20.4'




26.8  
26.8




17.8  
17.8




18.4  
18.4




20.1'  
20.1'




27.0  
27.0




17.5  
17.5




18.3  
18.3




21 2  
21 2




27.4  
27.4




18.0  
18.0




18.6  
18.6




21.7  
21.7




29.1  
29.1




18.1  
18.1




19.4  
19.4




22.0  
22.0




28.0  
28.0




18.7  
18.7




19.5  
19.5




22.3  
22.3




28.5  
28.5




18.4  
18.4




19.0  
19.0




22.7  
22.7




29.3  
29.3




18.8  
18.8




19.4  
19.4




23.2  
23.2




31.4  
31.4




19.3  
19.3




20.2  
20.2






' The uncorrected measurements of the cell body and the nucleus of the  
' The uncorrected measurements of the cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells in these groups (Groups XII-XIV) show a slight decrease, while in the corrected measurements (see table 3) no diminution in cell size has occurred in this stage. This slight decrease in size on the slide is probably due to some chemical changes which takes place in cytoplasm during this phase of development. The same phenomenon is to be seen also in the ganglion cells measured on the horizontal section, given in table 2, in Groups XII-XVI.
ganglion cells in these groups (Groups XII-XIV) show a slight decrease, while  
in the corrected measurements (see table 3) no diminution in cell size has occurred in this stage. This slight decrease in size on the slide is probably due to  
some chemical changes which takes place in cytoplasm during this phase of  
development. The same phenomenon is to be seen also in the ganglion cells  
measured on the horizontal section, given in table 2, in Groups XII-XVI.  






longitudinal diameters and in the same proportion as the  
longitudinal diameters and in the same proportion as the width of the brain has shrmiken. As in the other measurements (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b), the correction-coefficient was
width of the brain has shrmiken. As in the other measurements (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b), the correction-coefficient was  






based on  
based on






W. D in fresh brain  
W. D in fresh brain W. D. on the slide
W. D. on the slide  






for the frontal section and on  
for the frontal section and on






THE JOURN.\L OF COMP.VRATtVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 2  
THE JOURN.\L OF COMP.VRATtVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 2






126  
126






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 2  
TABLE 2


Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the  
Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality X) on the horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are given for each brain weight group only
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality  
{locality X) on the horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are  
given for each brain weight group only  




Line 35,683: Line 33,418:




NO. OF  
NO. OF


CASES  
CASES




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS




LAMINA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMINA GANGLIONARIS




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  








Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




Transv.  
Transv.




Longit.  
Longit.




Line 35,748: Line 33,477:




grams  
grams




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




fJ
fJ


M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




11(B)  
11(B)




2  
2




0.292  
0.292




9.9  
9.9




12.7  
12.7




8.5  
8.5




9.8  
9.8




15.4  
15.4




19.3  
19.3




13.0  
13.0




14.2  
14.2




III  
III




3  
3




0.317  
0.317




10.6  
10.6




13.8  
13.8




9.4  
9.4




10.9  
10.9




14.6  
14.6




19.0  
19.0




12.7  
12.7




14.4  
14.4




IV  
IV




3  
3




0.419  
0.419




13.0  
13.0




14.0  
14.0




10.2  
10.2




12.9  
12.9




16.0  
16.0




21.4  
21.4




14.2  
14.2




16.3  
16.3




V  
V




5  
5




0.546  
0.546




13.9  
13.9




16.5  
16.5




12.5  
12.5




13.5  
13.5




18.7  
18.7




23.5  
23.5




16.0  
16.0




17.5  
17.5




VI  
VI




2  
2




0.631  
0.631




15.6  
15.6




18.1  
18.1




13.8  
13.8




15.2  
15.2




19.7  
19.7




23.7  
23.7




17.2  
17.2




18.3  
18.3




VII  
VII




2  
2




0.761  
0.761




15.6  
15.6




18.5  
18.5




14 3  
14 3




15.7  
15.7




19.4  
19.4




24.9  
24.9




17.6  
17.6




19.0  
19.0




VIII  
VIII




4  
4




0.848  
0.848




15.5  
15.5




19.1  
19.1




14.4  
14.4




15.8  
15.8




20.1  
20.1




26.3  
26.3




18.1  
18.1




19.3  
19.3




IX  
IX




2  
2




939  
939




15.9  
15.9




19.8  
19.8




14.8  
14.8




16.0  
16.0




20.9  
20.9




28.1  
28.1




18.8  
18.8




19.6  
19.6




X  
X




.3  
.3




1.054  
1.054




16.1  
16.1




20.6  
20.6




14.9  
14.9




15.7  
15.7




20.7  
20.7




28.5  
28.5




18.8  
18.8




19.8  
19.8




XI  
XI




1  
1




1.121  
1.121




16.5  
16.5




21.2  
21.2




15.6  
15.6




16.6  
16.6




20.8  
20.8




28.8  
28.8




19.1  
19.1




19.9  
19.9




XII  
XII




3  
3




1.240  
1.240




16.0  
16.0




20.5  
20.5




14.7  
14.7




15.9  
15.9




19.51  
19.51




27.8  
27.8




17.6  
17.6




19.2  
19.2




XIII  
XIII




3  
3




1.351  
1.351




15.9  
15.9




20.9  
20.9




14.6  
14.6




15.5  
15.5




20.31  
20.31




29.1  
29.1




17.6  
17.6




19.0  
19.0




XIV  
XIV




2  
2




1.455  
1.455




15.1  
15.1




20.1  
20.1




13.9  
13.9




14.9  
14.9




20.7  
20.7




28.4  
28.4




18.1  
18.1




19.1  
19.1




XV  
XV




2  
2




1.566  
1.566




15.3  
15.3




20.8  
20.8




14.0  
14.0




15.1  
15.1




20.7  
20.7




29.5  
29.5




18.2  
18.2




19.4  
19.4




XVI  
XVI




4  
4




1.678  
1.678




15.2  
15.2




19.9  
19.9




14.0  
14.0




15.0  
15.0




20.4  
20.4




27.9  
27.9




17.8  
17.8




19.3  
19.3




XVII  
XVII




2  
2




1.730  
1.730




15.3  
15.3




20.3  
20.3




14.1  
14.1




15.1  
15.1




20.8  
20.8




29.6  
29.6




18.2  
18.2




19.5  
19.5




XVIII  
XVIII




2  
2




1.823  
1.823




15.5  
15.5




20.5  
20.5




14.3  
14.3




15.1  
15.1




21.1  
21.1




29.9  
29.9




18.4  
18.4




19.6  
19.6




XX  
XX




1  
1




2.004  
2.004




14.6  
14.6




19.3  
19.3




13.5  
13.5




14.0  
14.0




21.5  
21.5




31.0  
31.0




18.4  
18.4




19.6  
19.6






1 See note on table 1.  
1 See note on table 1.






W. B in fresh brain  
W. B in fresh brain




Line 36,380: Line 34,109:




W. B on the sKde  
W. B on the sKde rectly to the final average diameters for the cell bodies and the nuclei. The corrected results, with the average correctioncoefficient for each brain-weight group, taken from previous papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), are tabulated in table 3, accompanied with the averages of all the diameters in both sections for each brain-weight group.
rectly to the final average diameters for the cell bodies and the  
nuclei. The corrected results, with the average correctioncoefficient for each brain-weight group, taken from previous  
papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), are tabulated in table 3, accompanied with the averages of all the diameters in both sections  
for each brain-weight group.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






127  
127






TABLE 3  
TABLE 3 Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and the horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The average values of the two for each brain iveight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each brain weight group was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b). F = the frontal sectio7i. H = the horizontal section.
Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei of the  
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and the  
horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The average values of the two for  
each brain iveight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each brain  
weight group was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b). F = the  
frontal sectio7i. H = the horizontal section.  




Line 36,412: Line 34,131:




LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS




L.\MINA GANGLIONARIS  
L.\MINA GANGLIONARIS




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




BRAINWEIGHT  
BRAINWEIGHT




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




Line 36,435: Line 34,154:




OROUP  
OROUP




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nuc'eus  
Nuc'eus diameter
diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  








grams  
grams








M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




i"  
i"




FI  
FI




0.161  
0.161




1.14  
1.14




10.3 •  
10.3 •




8.1  
8.1




13.6  
13.6




10.9  
10.9




HI  
HI




—  




—  




• —  
• —




—  




—  




—  








0.161  
0.161








10.3  
10.3




8.1  
8.1




13.6  
13.6




10.9  
10.9




FII  
FII




0.251  
0.251




1.16  
1.16




13.5  
13.5




11.2  
11.2




18.8  
18.8




14.8  
14.8




HII  
HII




0.292  
0.292




1.10  
1.10




12.3  
12.3




10.0  
10.0




18.9  
18.9




15.0  
15.0




(Birth)  
(Birth)




0.272  
0.272








12.9  
12.9




10.6  
10.6




18.9  
18.9




14-9  
14-9




Fill  
Fill




0.358  
0.358




1.13  
1.13




15.4  
15.4




13.0  
13.0




20.6  
20.6




16.0  
16.0




HIII  
HIII




0.317  
0.317




1 21  
1 21




14.6  
14.6




12.2  
12.2




20.1  
20.1




16.3  
16.3








0.338  
0.338








15.0  
15.0




12.6  
12.6




20.4  
20.4




16.2  
16.2




FIV  
FIV




0.432  
0.432




1.10  
1.10




17.2  
17.2




14.2  
14.2




22.8  
22.8




17.9  
17.9




HIV  
HIV




0.419  
0.419




1.30  
1.30




17.5  
17.5




14.8  
14.8




24.0  
24.0




19.6  
19.6








0.426  
0.426








17.4  
17.4




14-5  
14-5




23.4  
23.4




18.8  
18.8




FV  
FV




0.542  
0.542




1.13  
1.13




17.9  
17.9




14.6  
14.6




24.2  
24.2




19.0  
19.0




H V  
H V




0.546  
0.546




1.22  
1.22




18.5  
18.5




15.9  
15.9




25.6  
25.6




20.4  
20.4








0.5U  
0.5U








18.2  
18.2




15.3  
15.3




24.9  
24.9




19.7  
19.7




F VI  
F VI




0.639  
0.639




1.19  
1.19




19.4  
19.4




16.0  
16.0




25.4  
25.4




19.9  
19.9




H VI  
H VI




0.631  
0.631




1 24  
1 24




20.4  
20.4




18.0  
18.0




26.8  
26.8




21.9  
21.9








0.635  
0.635








19.9  
19.9




17.0  
17.0




26.1  
26.1




20.9  
20.9




F VII  
F VII




0.750  
0.750




1.24  
1.24




21.0  
21.0




17.2  
17.2




28.2  
28.2




20.5  
20.5




HVII  
HVII




0.761  
0.761




1.27  
1.27




21.6  
21.6




19.0  
19.0




28.0  
28.0




23.2  
23.2








0.756  
0.756








21.3  
21.3




18.1  
18.1




28.1  
28.1




21.9  
21.9




FVIII  
FVIII




0.841  
0.841




1.20  
1.20




21.5  
21.5




17.3  
17.3




28.3  
28.3




21.4  
21.4




H VIII  
H VIII




0.848  
0.848




1.38  
1.38




23.7  
23.7




20.8  
20.8




31.8  
31.8




25.8  
25.8








0.845  
0.845








22.6  
22.6




19.1  
19.1




30.1  
30.1




23.6  
23.6




FIX  
FIX




0.964  
0.964




1.21  
1.21




22.4  
22.4




19.4  
19.4




29.9  
29.9




23.4  
23.4




HIX  
HIX




0.939  
0.939




1.31  
1.31




23.2  
23.2




20.2  
20.2




31.7  
31.7




25.2  
25.2




(10 days)  
(10 days)




0.952  
0.952








22.8  
22.8




19.8  
19.8




30.8  
30.8




24.3  
24.3






128  
128






NAOKl SUGITA  
NAOKl SUGITA






TABLE 3— Continued  
TABLE 3— Continued




Line 37,043: Line 34,758:




LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS




LAMINA GANGLIONARI8  
LAMINA GANGLIONARI8




BRAIN- WEIGHT  
BRAIN- WEIGHT




BRAINWEIGHT  
BRAINWEIGHT




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




Line 37,066: Line 34,781:




GROUT  
GROUT




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  








grams  
grams








At  
At




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




FX  
FX




1 040  
1 040




1.23  
1.23




22.5  
22.5




18.6  
18.6




29.6  
29.6




22.4  
22.4




HX  
HX




1.054  
1.054




1.36  
1.36




24.8  
24.8




20.8  
20.8




33.0  
33.0




26.3  
26.3








1.047  
1.047








23.7  
23.7




19.7  
19.7




31.3  
31.3




24-4  
24-4




FXI  
FXI




1.171  
1.171




1.26  
1.26




23.4  
23.4




19.4  
19.4




31.4  
31.4




23.8  
23.8




HXI  
HXI




1.121  
1.121




1.26  
1.26




23.7  
23.7




20.4  
20.4




31.0  
31.0




24.6  
24.6




(20 days)  
(20 days)




1.146  
1.146




•  




23.6  
23.6




19.9  
19.9




31.2  
31.2




24.2  
24.2




FXII  
FXII




1 253  
1 253




1.31  
1.31




24.0  
24.0




19.6  
19.6




31.6  
31.6




24.0  
24.0




HXII  
HXII




1.240  
1.240




1.36  
1.36




24.6  
24.6




20.0  
20.0




31.7  
31.7




25.9  
25.9








1.247  
1.247








24.3  
24.3




20.3  
20.3




31.7  
31.7




24.5  
24.5




FXIII  
FXIII




1.335  
1.335




1.29  
1.29




23.4  
23.4




19.2  
19.2




30.2  
30.2




23.4  
23.4




HXIII  
HXIII




1.351  
1.351




1.34  
1.34




24.4  
24.4




20.2  
20.2




32.6  
32.6




24.5  
24.5








1.343  
1.343








23.9  
23.9




19.7  
19.7




31.4  
31.4




24.0  
24.0




FXIV  
FXIV




1.445  
1.445




1.34  
1.34




23.8  
23.8




19.7  
19.7




31.2  
31.2




24.0  
24.0




HXIV  
HXIV




1.455  
1.455




1.31  
1.31




22.8  
22.8




18.9  
18.9




31.7  
31.7




24.4  
24.4








1.450  
1.450








23.3  
23.3




19.3  
19.3




31.5  
31.5




24.2  
24.2




FXV  
FXV




1.554  
1.554




1.30  
1.30




22.9  
22.9




18.9  
18.9




31.4  
31.4




23.8  
23.8




HXV  
HXV




1.566  
1.566




1.28  
1.28




22.9  
22.9




18.6  
18.6




31.6  
31.6




24.1  
24.1








1.560  
1.560








22.9  
22.9




18.8  
18.8




31.5  
31.5




24.0  
24.0




FXVI  
FXVI




1.656  
1.656




1.33  
1.33




22.9  
22.9




19.0  
19.0




33.4  
33.4




24.8  
24.8




H XVI  
H XVI




1.678  
1.678




1.32  
1.32




23.0  
23.0




19.2  
19.2




31.4  
31.4




24.4  
24.4








1.667  
1.667








23.0  
23.0




19.1  
19.1




32.4  
32.4




24.6 .  
24.6 .




FXVII  
FXVII




1.726  
1.726




1.26  
1.26




22.3  
22.3




18.6  
18.6




31.3  
31.3




24.1  
24.1




H XVII  
H XVII




1.730  
1.730




1.36  
1.36




23.9  
23.9




19.8  
19.8




33.7  
33.7




25.6  
25.6








1.728  
1.728








23.1  
23.1




19.2  
19.2




32.5  
32.5




24-9  
24-9




F XVIII  
F XVIII




1.839  
1.839




1.32  
1.32




22.3  
22.3




18.5  
18.5




33.2  
33.2




24.7  
24.7




H XVIII  
H XVIII




1.823  
1.823




1.29  
1.29




23.0  
23.0




19.0  
19.0




32.4  
32.4




24.5  
24.5








1.831  
1.831








22.7  
22.7




18.8  
18.8




32.8  
32.8




24.6  
24.6




FXIX  
FXIX




1.924  
1.924




1.29  
1.29




22.7  
22.7




18.2  
18.2




33.2  
33.2




24.6  
24.6




HXIX  
HXIX




—  




—  




—  




—  




—  




—  








1.924  
1.924








22.7  
22.7




18.2  
18.2




33:2  
33:2




24.6  
24.6




FXX  
FXX




2.054  
2.054




1.23  
1.23




21 .2  
21 .2




17.1  
17.1




33.2  
33.2




24.2  
24.2




HXX  
HXX




2.004  
2.004




1.31  
1.31




22.0  
22.0




17.9  
17.9




33.8  
33.8




24.9  
24.9








2.029  
2.029








21.6  
21.6




17.5  
17.5




33.5  
33.5




24.6  
24.6






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






129  
129






IV. GROWTH IN THE DIAMETERS OF THE CELL BODY AND OF THE  
IV. GROWTH IN THE DIAMETERS OF THE CELL BODY AND OF THE


NUCLEUS  
NUCLEUS


Chart 1 shows graphically the data given in table 3. As ordinates the average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus  
Chart 1 shows graphically the data given in table 3. As ordinates the average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus of the pyramids (lamina pyramidalis) and of the ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) are jDlotted on the abscissa for the aveiage brain weights.
of the pyramids (lamina pyramidalis) and of the ganglion cells  
(lamina ganglionaris) are jDlotted on the abscissa for the aveiage  
brain weights.  


D iameter in micra  
D iameter in micra




Line 37,869: Line 35,577:




^^_  
^^_




,^  
,^




.-0 — '^  
.-0 — '^








GC  
GC




Line 37,899: Line 35,607:




x^  
x^




..—
..—


XX.,  
XX.,




—  




— „  
— „




_.o—  
_.o—




~"^  
~"^




Line 37,941: Line 35,649:




/  
/




/  
/




Line 37,981: Line 35,689:




y  
y




Line 38,020: Line 35,728:




.y  
.y




r  
r




Line 38,030: Line 35,738:




X  
X








XX  
XX




Line 38,048: Line 35,756:




- —  
- —




Line 38,056: Line 35,764:




_,  
_,




Line 38,063: Line 35,771:




/  
/




/■''
/■




Line 38,073: Line 35,781:




/  
/




Line 38,080: Line 35,788:
-„
-„


^.o—  
^.o—




--^  
--^




Line 38,090: Line 35,798:




--»-.  
--»-.




Line 38,097: Line 35,805:
-0
-0


--.  
--.




.-,—  
.-,—




-».  
-».




Line 38,116: Line 35,824:




y  
y




/<  
/<




Line 38,148: Line 35,856:




PC  
PC








1  
1








r^  
r^




/  
/




/  
/




y  
y




l^  
l^




Line 38,177: Line 35,885:




-n  
-n








^5""  
^5""




~^  
~^




Line 38,192: Line 35,900:




—  




Line 38,202: Line 35,910:




i  
i


1  
1




/  
/




a^''
a^








^  
^




Line 38,244: Line 35,952:




Tti  
Tti




/  
/




/  
/




/  
/




/'  
/'




^  
^




Line 38,292: Line 36,000:




/  
/




//  
//




/  
/




Line 38,335: Line 36,043:




/  
/




/  
/




/  
/




Line 38,378: Line 36,086:




/  
/




/  
/




Line 38,581: Line 36,289:




O.i OZ B 03 Q4 Q5 Q6 07  
O.i OZ B 03 Q4 Q5 Q6 07






0.9 10 \\ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 %()  
0.9 10 \\ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 %()






^s  
^s






Chart 1 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the  
Chart 1 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the albino rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 3. Graph GC, average diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph GN, average diameter of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph PC, average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. Ciraj^h PN, average diameter of the nuclei of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. X, 10 days of age. XX and *, 20 days of age. **, 30 days of age.
nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the albino rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 3. Graph GC, average diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph GN,  
average diameter of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris.  
Graph PC, average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. Ciraj^h PN, average diameter of the nuclei of the pyramids in the  
lamina pyramidalis. X, 10 days of age. XX and *, 20 days of age. **, 30 days  
of age.  






130 NAOKI SUGITA  
130 NAOKI SUGITA


If the length of the average diameters represents relatively the  
If the length of the average diameters represents relatively the cube root of the volume of the cell body or of the nucleus, the actual volume of them may be comparable among themselves by the cube of the diameters. It is clearly seen from the chart that the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the Albino cortex attain their maximum size in a brain weighing from 1.1 to 1.3 grams or 20 to 30 days in age, the curve showing the maximum size in a brain weighing about 1.25 grams, and after that they diminish slightly but steadily in size as the age (brain weight) advances, while, on the other hand, the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris attain nearly their full size in a brain weighing about 0.95 gram or ten days in age; that is, earlier than the pyramids, and after that slowly but steadily increase their size as the brain weight increases. The nuclei in the pyramids and in the ganglion cells change their sizes in much the same way as the cell bodies to which they belong, the graphs for the cell body and that for the nucleus for each kind of cell running nearly similar courses (chart 1).
cube root of the volume of the cell body or of the nucleus, the  
actual volume of them may be comparable among themselves  
by the cube of the diameters. It is clearly seen from the chart  
that the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the Albino cortex  
attain their maximum size in a brain weighing from 1.1 to 1.3  
grams or 20 to 30 days in age, the curve showing the maximum  
size in a brain weighing about 1.25 grams, and after that they  
diminish slightly but steadily in size as the age (brain weight)  
advances, while, on the other hand, the ganglion cells in the  
lamina ganglionaris attain nearly their full size in a brain weighing about 0.95 gram or ten days in age; that is, earlier than the  
pyramids, and after that slowly but steadily increase their size  
as the brain weight increases. The nuclei in the pyramids and  
in the ganglion cells change their sizes in much the same way  
as the cell bodies to which they belong, the graphs for the cell  
body and that for the nucleus for each kind of cell running nearly  
similar courses (chart 1).  


As shown in chart 1, the graphs suggest that both kinds of cells  
As shown in chart 1, the graphs suggest that both kinds of cells increase in size very rapidly during the first ten days after birth, and then the rate diminishes rather abruptly during the following ten days (0.95 to 1.15 grams in brain weight) or more, at the end of which phase the pyramids reach the maximum size, after which they decrease slowly, while the ganglion cells still continue to increase somewhat even after this phase.
increase in size very rapidly during the first ten days after birth,  
and then the rate diminishes rather abruptly during the following  
ten days (0.95 to 1.15 grams in brain weight) or more, at the  
end of which phase the pyramids reach the maximum size,  
after which they decrease slowly, while the ganglion cells still  
continue to increase somewhat even after this phase.  


On examining all the sections which I made, it was seen that  
On examining all the sections which I made, it was seen that the ground tone of the sections uniformly stained with the carbol-thionine has been gradually changing as the age of the brain, from which the sections were taken, increases. In successfully stained sections — even if stained by decoloration — of brains from birth to those weighing less than 1.0 gram, the ground tone is rather purple or violet, when viewed Avith the naked eye by transmitted light. On the other hand, the sections from brains weighing more than 1.3 grams have a rather distinctly blue tone. The intercellular tissue takes more easily the pale blue color — owing to a less decoloration — in older brains, while in younger brains the intercellular tissue remains
the ground tone of the sections uniformly stained with the  
carbol-thionine has been gradually changing as the age of the  
brain, from which the sections were taken, increases. In successfully stained sections — even if stained by decoloration — of  
brains from birth to those weighing less than 1.0 gram, the  
ground tone is rather purple or violet, when viewed Avith the  
naked eye by transmitted light. On the other hand, the sections from brains weighing more than 1.3 grams have a rather  
distinctly blue tone. The intercellular tissue takes more easily  
the pale blue color — owing to a less decoloration — in older  
brains, while in younger brains the intercellular tissue remains  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 131  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 131


quite unstained. The period during which the brain weiglit increases from 1.1 to 1.3 grams coincides with a transitional phase  
quite unstained. The period during which the brain weiglit increases from 1.1 to 1.3 grams coincides with a transitional phase of the color. I regret that I have not been able to reproduce these distinctions of color for the illustration of this paper.
of the color. I regret that I have not been able to reproduce  
these distinctions of color for the illustration of this paper.  


These changes in color suggest that at the 20 to 30 day phase  
These changes in color suggest that at the 20 to 30 day phase some chemical changes in the structure of the cell body and the nucleus have been occurring.'- At this phase of growth, the cells having attained nearl}^ the full size, the rate of increase in size abruptly diminishes, suggesting that during this phase important changes have occurred. Myelination is proceeding very activel}^ after the brain has attained the weight of 1.0 gram (Sugita, '17 a), and the fact that the cell bodies and nuclei of the pyramids decrease in size as the brain weight passes 1.3 grams while the growth of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells become very slow may have some connection with the myelin formation.
some chemical changes in the structure of the cell body and the  
nucleus have been occurring.'- At this phase of growth, the cells  
having attained nearl}^ the full size, the rate of increase in size  
abruptly diminishes, suggesting that during this phase important  
changes have occurred. Myelination is proceeding very activel}^  
after the brain has attained the weight of 1.0 gram (Sugita, '17 a),  
and the fact that the cell bodies and nuclei of the pyramids decrease in size as the brain weight passes 1.3 grams while the  
growth of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells  
become very slow may have some connection with the myelin  
formation.  


Table 3 enables us to examine the measurements for the frontal  
Table 3 enables us to examine the measurements for the frontal and for the horizontal sections separately. Generally speaking, at the locality VII, measured in the frontal section (lines denoted by F in table 3) and at the locality X measured in the horizontal section (see lines denoted by H in table 3), the corrected sizes of the cell body and of the nucleus show some differences in the younger brains, but the sizes may be regarded on the whole as practically the same in these two localities in mature brains. If stated more minutely according to the data presented in table 3, the pyramids and the ganglion cells at locality VII (frontal section) grow in size somewhat more slowly as compared with those at locahty X (horizontal section), so that in Groups IV to X the diameters are all smaller for the frontal section than for the horizontal section, in averaged values (see table 3). But if these slight discrepancies be not
and for the horizontal sections separately. Generally speaking,  
at the locality VII, measured in the frontal section (lines denoted by F in table 3) and at the locality X measured in the  
horizontal section (see lines denoted by H in table 3), the corrected sizes of the cell body and of the nucleus show some differences in the younger brains, but the sizes may be regarded on  
the whole as practically the same in these two localities in  
mature brains. If stated more minutely according to the data  
presented in table 3, the pyramids and the ganglion cells at  
locality VII (frontal section) grow in size somewhat more slowly  
as compared with those at locahty X (horizontal section), so  
that in Groups IV to X the diameters are all smaller for the  
frontal section than for the horizontal section, in averaged  
values (see table 3). But if these slight discrepancies be not  


2 As noticed in tables 1 and 2, the size of the ganglion cells directly measured on the slides shows a slight decrease during this phase (1.0 to 1.3 grams  
2 As noticed in tables 1 and 2, the size of the ganglion cells directly measured on the slides shows a slight decrease during this phase (1.0 to 1.3 grams in brain weight), while, in corrected measurements given in table 3, there cannot be detected any diminution in cell size during the same phase. This decrease in size of the ganglion cells on the slide may have some connection with the chemical changes occurring in the cytoplasm and karyoplasm, which cause different reactions to the reagents used for fixation.
in brain weight), while, in corrected measurements given in table 3, there cannot be detected any diminution in cell size during the same phase. This decrease in size of the ganglion cells on the slide may have some connection with the  
chemical changes occurring in the cytoplasm and karyoplasm, which cause  
different reactions to the reagents used for fixation.  






132  
132






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






taken too seriously, it may be stated that on the average the  
taken too seriously, it may be stated that on the average the cell bodies and the nuclei of the pyramids attain their maximum size at about tAventy-five days (brain weight, 1.25 grams) and those of the ganglion cells attain nearly the full size at about ten days of age (brain weight, 0.95 gram).
cell bodies and the nuclei of the pyramids attain their maximum  
size at about tAventy-five days (brain weight, 1.25 grams) and  
those of the ganglion cells attain nearly the full size at about ten  
days of age (brain weight, 0.95 gram).  


The largest ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral  
The largest ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral cortex of the adult albino rat brain are found in the middle part of the sagittal section, denoted by locality III (Sugita, '17 a). The size of these largest cells at different ages was not systematically investigated by me, but a careful comparison of them with the ganglion cells at localities VII and X, tabulated in this study, show them to be on the average (in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams) 4 to 7 micra greater in the transverse diameter, 7 to 10 micra greater in the longitudinal diameter of the cell body, and 3 to 5 micra greater in both diameters of the nucleus — all in corrected values — than the corresponding diameters of the ganglion cells in localities VH and X, as shown in the following summary :
cortex of the adult albino rat brain are found in the middle part  
of the sagittal section, denoted by locality III (Sugita, '17 a).  
The size of these largest cells at different ages was not systematically investigated by me, but a careful comparison of them  
with the ganglion cells at localities VII and X, tabulated in this  
study, show them to be on the average (in brains weighing more  
than 1.3 grams) 4 to 7 micra greater in the transverse diameter,  
7 to 10 micra greater in the longitudinal diameter of the cell  
body, and 3 to 5 micra greater in both diameters of the nucleus —  
all in corrected values — than the corresponding diameters of the  
ganglion cells in localities VH and X, as shown in the following  
summary :  


Average corrected diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells  
Average corrected diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris {Groups XIII-XX)
in the lamina ganglionaris {Groups XIII-XX)  






Cell body.  
Cell body. Nucleus. . .
Nucleus. . .  






LOCALITIES VII AND X  
LOCALITIES VII AND X






28 X 37 M (average 32.4 ju)  
28 X 37 M (average 32.4 ju) 24 X 25 ;u (average 24.4 ;u)
24 X 25 ;u (average 24.4 ;u)  






LOCALITY III  
LOCALITY III






33 X 46 M (average 39.0 m)  
33 X 46 M (average 39.0 m) 28 X 30 yu (average 29.0 m)
28 X 30 yu (average 29.0 m)  






The size of the cell bodies and their nuclei in the other layers  
The size of the cell bodies and their nuclei in the other layers of the Albino cortex will be considered in a later chapter in this paper.
of the Albino cortex will be considered in a later chapter in this  
paper.  


Figures 3 and 4 give the typical appearance of the pyramids  
Figures 3 and 4 give the typical appearance of the pyramids and the ganglion cells, respectively, for each brain-weight group (with a few omissions), all drawn proportional in size to the uncorrected diameters and magnified about 950 times.
and the ganglion cells, respectively, for each brain-weight group  
(with a few omissions), all drawn proportional in size to the uncorrected diameters and magnified about 950 times.  






V. MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE CORTICAL NERVE CELLS  
V. MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE CORTICAL NERVE CELLS


DURING GROWTH  
DURING GROWTH


Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the typical pyramids and the ganglion  
Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the typical pyramids and the ganglion cells from each brain-weight group, as seen in the sections pre
cells from each brain-weight group, as seen in the sections pre




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






133  
133






pared by me, from the material fixed in Bouin's fluid, imbedded  
pared by me, from the material fixed in Bouin's fluid, imbedded in paraffine, stained with the carbol-thionine, and projected and enlarged by a fixed number of diameters. The size of the pictures, therefore, corresponds to the uncorrected measurements given in tables 1 and 2.
in paraffine, stained with the carbol-thionine, and projected and  
enlarged by a fixed number of diameters. The size of the pictures,  
therefore, corresponds to the uncorrected measurements given in  
tables 1 and 2.  


Though they are increasing in volume very rapidly after birth,  
Though they are increasing in volume very rapidly after birth, the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis retain up to a brain weight of 0.6 gram (VI, 6 days in age) the characteristics of the
the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis retain up to a brain  
weight of 0.6 gram (VI, 6 days in age) the characteristics of the  




Line 38,776: Line 36,392:




Fig. 3 Showing somi-diagrammatically the increase in size and the morphological changes, in the typical pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the cerebral  
Fig. 3 Showing somi-diagrammatically the increase in size and the morphological changes, in the typical pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. The Roman nmnber by each cell figure indicates the brain weight group from which the typical pyramid was selected and the drawing made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according to the uncorrected measurements.
cortex of the albino rat. The Roman nmnber by each cell figure indicates the  
brain weight group from which the typical pyramid was selected and the drawing  
made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according  
to the uncorrected measurements.  






134  
134






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA








Fig. 4 Showing scmi-diagraminatically the increase in size and the morphological changes in the typical ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris of the  
Fig. 4 Showing scmi-diagraminatically the increase in size and the morphological changes in the typical ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. The Roman number by each cell figure indicates the brain-weight group from which the typical ganglion cell was selected and the drawing made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according to the uncorrected measurements.
cerebral cortex of the albino rat. The Roman number by each cell figure indicates  
the brain-weight group from which the typical ganglion cell was selected and  
the drawing made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according to the uncorrected measurements.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 135  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 135


fetal form of the cells, ^ represented by a relatively large, round  
fetal form of the cells, ^ represented by a relatively large, round nucleus thinly enveloped by a small amount of homogeneous cytoplasm and with processes from both poles. The Nissl bodies begin to appear first in a brain weighing 0.8 gram (VIII), showing first in a part of cytoplasm adjoining the nucleus at the apical pole and forming the so-called 'Kernkappe.' The cytoplasm matures rapidly in structure as the brain weight increases from 0.8 to 1.2 grams. As the measurements show, the nucleus attains nearly the full size when the brain weighs 0.95 gram (10 days), but at that phase the cytoplasm has not yet been fully developed. It is meagre in mass, enveloping the nucleus thinly,
nucleus thinly enveloped by a small amount of homogeneous  
cytoplasm and with processes from both poles. The Nissl  
bodies begin to appear first in a brain weighing 0.8 gram (VIII),  
showing first in a part of cytoplasm adjoining the nucleus at the  
apical pole and forming the so-called 'Kernkappe.' The cytoplasm matures rapidly in structure as the brain weight increases  
from 0.8 to 1.2 grams. As the measurements show, the nucleus  
attains nearly the full size when the brain weighs 0.95 gram (10  
days), but at that phase the cytoplasm has not yet been fully  
developed. It is meagre in mass, enveloping the nucleus thinly,  








Fig. 5 iShowing the cerebral cortex proper at the locality II (fig. 2, Sugita,  
Fig. 5 iShowing the cerebral cortex proper at the locality II (fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a) on a fetal brain of the albino rat. Body weight about 1.0 gram, body length (neck-rump) about 19.5 mm., eighteenth day of gestation. Magnification of about 500 diameters, measured directly on the slide.
'17 a) on a fetal brain of the albino rat. Body weight about 1.0 gram, body length  
(neck-rump) about 19.5 mm., eighteenth day of gestation. Magnification of  
about 500 diameters, measured directly on the slide.  


the Nissl bodies not being yet fully differentiated, but only suggesting the 'Kernkappe.' The cell continues to grow very  
the Nissl bodies not being yet fully differentiated, but only suggesting the 'Kernkappe.' The cell continues to grow very slowly up to a brain weight of 1.1 to 1.3 grams or about 20 to 30 days in age. Then, as the age advances, the sizes of both the cell body and of the nucleus slowly diminish, while within the cytoplasm the differentiation of the Nissl bodies progresses. As the differentiation progresses, the general tone of color of the section
slowly up to a brain weight of 1.1 to 1.3 grams or about 20 to 30  
days in age. Then, as the age advances, the sizes of both the cell  
body and of the nucleus slowly diminish, while within the cytoplasm the differentiation of the Nissl bodies progresses. As the  
differentiation progresses, the general tone of color of the section  


^ The form of the fetal nerve cells from the locality II of the cerebral cortex  
^ The form of the fetal nerve cells from the locality II of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat is shown diagrammatically in figure 5, which was taken from an Albino fetus of 1.0 gram in body weight, 19.5 mm. in body length at the eighteenth day of gestation. The cortex proper, not regarding the transitional layer, consists of four or five rows of cells with scanty cytoplasm. The average diameter of the nucleus is about 5 to 7 micra on the slide and the thickness of the cortex at this age is about 0.06 mm. on the slide.
of the albino rat is shown diagrammatically in figure 5, which was taken from  
an Albino fetus of 1.0 gram in body weight, 19.5 mm. in body length at the  
eighteenth day of gestation. The cortex proper, not regarding the transitional  
layer, consists of four or five rows of cells with scanty cytoplasm. The average diameter of the nucleus is about 5 to 7 micra on the slide and the thickness  
of the cortex at this age is about 0.06 mm. on the slide.  






136 NAOKI SUGITA  
136 NAOKI SUGITA


changes from violet to blue, owing to the deeper staining of the  
changes from violet to blue, owing to the deeper staining of the Nissl bodies and of the intercellular tissue with the carbolthionine. The apical dendrite thickens rapidly during the period in which the brain weight increases from 1.0 to 1.3 grams, but the basal dendrites are not clearly stained until the brain attains 1.6 grams in weight. Throughout the later life, the cytoplasm is slowly but continuously decreasing in the absolute mass as the age advances, and the size of the nucleus is also diminishing. The nucleolus in the nucleus attains also its full size (the diameter is somewhat less than 2 micra) at the time when the nucleus has attained the maximum size, but it tends to grow shghtly in late rages, w^hile the nucleus show some decrease in size.
Nissl bodies and of the intercellular tissue with the carbolthionine. The apical dendrite thickens rapidly during the period  
in which the brain weight increases from 1.0 to 1.3 grams, but  
the basal dendrites are not clearly stained until the brain attains 1.6 grams in weight. Throughout the later life, the cytoplasm is slowly but continuously decreasing in the absolute mass  
as the age advances, and the size of the nucleus is also diminishing. The nucleolus in the nucleus attains also its full size (the  
diameter is somewhat less than 2 micra) at the time when the  
nucleus has attained the maximum size, but it tends to grow  
shghtly in late rages, w^hile the nucleus show some decrease in size.  


The structure of the nucleus of the pyramids is not clearly  
The structure of the nucleus of the pyramids is not clearly demonstrable with this stain. As far as can be judged from the present preparations, the chromatin substance in the nucleus begins to develop notably only after the brain has attained the weight of 1.0 gram, and after the nucleus has passed its phase of rapid enlargement.
demonstrable with this stain. As far as can be judged from the  
present preparations, the chromatin substance in the nucleus  
begins to develop notably only after the brain has attained the  
weight of 1.0 gram, and after the nucleus has passed its phase of  
rapid enlargement.  


From the foregoing it will be seen that up to a brain weight of  
From the foregoing it will be seen that up to a brain weight of 0.95 gram, the pyramids may be regarded as in the preparatory stage of structural development, attaining at the end of this period nearly the full size of the cell body and of the nucleus. And after this stage increase and differentiation in the cytoplasm and the nucleus chromatin continue slowly until a brain weight of 1.1 to 1.3 grams. After that time they begin rather to diminish in size, but nevertheless, to advance more and more in differentiation, which latter change probably indicates the maturing of the function of the pyramids. Morphologically, the pyramids first attain their fully mature aspects at a brain weight of about 1.6 grams (about 50 days in age).
0.95 gram, the pyramids may be regarded as in the preparatory  
stage of structural development, attaining at the end of this  
period nearly the full size of the cell body and of the nucleus.  
And after this stage increase and differentiation in the cytoplasm  
and the nucleus chromatin continue slowly until a brain weight  
of 1.1 to 1.3 grams. After that time they begin rather to diminish in size, but nevertheless, to advance more and more in  
differentiation, which latter change probably indicates the maturing of the function of the pyramids. Morphologically, the  
pyramids first attain their fully mature aspects at a brain weight  
of about 1.6 grams (about 50 days in age).  


In my previous studies on the development of the cortex  
In my previous studies on the development of the cortex (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), I named three phases of cortical growth in the early life of the albino rat; the first phase: from birth to the tenth day; the second phase: from the tenth to the twentieth day, and the third phase: from the twentieth to the ninetieth day. Applying this series of phases to the cytological development of the pyramids, the following appears.
(Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), I named three phases of cortical growth in  
the early life of the albino rat; the first phase: from birth to the  
tenth day; the second phase: from the tenth to the twentieth  
day, and the third phase: from the twentieth to the ninetieth  
day. Applying this series of phases to the cytological development of the pyramids, the following appears.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 137  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 137


In the first phase occurs the rapid enlargement of the cell  
In the first phase occurs the rapid enlargement of the cell body and the nucleus, the cell retaining still the fetal form, and not showing any significant differentiation in the internal structure. The Nissl bodies first appear as the so-called ' Kernkappe' at the end of this phase. The tone of color of the sections stained with the carbol-thionine is rather violet.
body and the nucleus, the cell retaining still the fetal form, and  
not showing any significant differentiation in the internal structure. The Nissl bodies first appear as the so-called ' Kernkappe'  
at the end of this phase. The tone of color of the sections stained  
with the carbol-thionine is rather violet.  


In the second phase, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus  
In the second phase, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus continues to increase, but very slowly, and both attain their maximum sizes at the end of this phase. The differentiation in cytoplasm goes slowly on and the chromatin in the nucleus begins also to differentiate. The tone of the stain is transitional from violet to blue.
continues to increase, but very slowly, and both attain their  
maximum sizes at the end of this phase. The differentiation in  
cytoplasm goes slowly on and the chromatin in the nucleus begins also to differentiate. The tone of the stain is transitional  
from violet to blue.  


Throughout the third phase and afterwards, the size of the cell  
Throughout the third phase and afterwards, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus decreases slowly from the maximum values attached at the end of the second phase. But the differentiations of the cytoplasm and the nucleus chromatin steadily continue as the age advances. The apical dendrites gain in diameter and the basal dendrites begin to take the stain. The nucleus sometimes shows the 'Kernfalte.' The tone of the stain is rather blue and the contour of the pyramids clear cut.
body and of the nucleus decreases slowly from the maximum  
values attached at the end of the second phase. But the differentiations of the cytoplasm and the nucleus chromatin steadily  
continue as the age advances. The apical dendrites gain in  
diameter and the basal dendrites begin to take the stain. The  
nucleus sometimes shows the 'Kernfalte.' The tone of the  
stain is rather blue and the contour of the pyramids clear cut.  


The ganglion cells of the lamina ganglionaris enlarge very  
The ganglion cells of the lamina ganglionaris enlarge very rapidly and attain nearly their full size at the age of ten days — somewhat earlier than do the pyramids. But the morphological changes which take place in the ganglion cell body and the nucleus are similar to those just described in the pyramids. In the lamina ganglionaris there can be recognized two distinct kinds of nerve cells, one the smaller-sized pyramids, which seem to be very like the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, and the other, the larger-sized neurons, which are usually called ganglion cells or giant cells and which characterize the layer. Some of the cells found in the lamina ganglionaris and which grow to be the ganglion cells are from the first somewhat large-sized. These develop more rapidly than the other small cells in this layer, which are intermingled with them. In earlier stages the ganglion cells manifest no structural difference or characteristics marking them off from the smaller cells, but differ only in the size of the cell body and of the nucleus. They retain their fetal
rapidly and attain nearly their full size at the age of ten days —  
somewhat earlier than do the pyramids. But the morphological  
changes which take place in the ganglion cell body and the nucleus  
are similar to those just described in the pyramids. In the  
lamina ganglionaris there can be recognized two distinct kinds  
of nerve cells, one the smaller-sized pyramids, which seem to be  
very like the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, and the other,  
the larger-sized neurons, which are usually called ganglion cells  
or giant cells and which characterize the layer. Some of the  
cells found in the lamina ganglionaris and which grow to be the  
ganglion cells are from the first somewhat large-sized. These  
develop more rapidly than the other small cells in this layer,  
which are intermingled with them. In earlier stages the ganglion cells manifest no structural difference or characteristics  
marking them off from the smaller cells, but differ only in the  
size of the cell body and of the nucleus. They retain their fetal  






138 NAOKI SUGITA  
138 NAOKI SUGITA


appearance, that is, an ovoid form with a relatively large nucleus  
appearance, that is, an ovoid form with a relatively large nucleus also ovoid or ellipsoid in form and a small amount of envelop-: ing cytoplasm, which seems almost homogeneous in its staining, together with slender processes, until a brain weight of 0.75 gram. The Nissl bodies begin at first to appear in a brain weighing 0.9 gram, as the 'Kernkappe' covering the apical part of the nucleus. The differentiation of the cytoplasm becomes more and more distinct as the brain weight increases and, in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams, the section as a whole takes a blue tone. This change in color tone is probably due to the development of the Nissl bodies in the cytoplasm and the structural changes in the intercellular tissue. The apical dendrites rapidly thicken in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams and, in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams, we see distinctly some relatively thick basal dendrites and the axis-cylinder becomes visible. The mass of the cytoplasm and the differentiation of the Nissl bodies proceeds steadily as the age advances. In the fully grown brain we see very often small satellite cells surrounding or indenting the cytoplasm of the ganglion cells, though satellite cells appear in relation to some other types of neurons also. Whatever the significance of these satellite cells, it is to be noted that in younger brains they are very rarely seen. The outline of the ganglion cell body is not necessarily sharp nor is the form regularly pyramidal, being sometimes indeed quite irregular and often appearing ovoid or ellipsoid in shape. Lipochrome or fat pigment, usually seen in the adult human cells of this type, is never seen in those of the adult albino rat, even in old age.
also ovoid or ellipsoid in form and a small amount of envelop-:  
ing cytoplasm, which seems almost homogeneous in its staining,  
together with slender processes, until a brain weight of 0.75 gram.  
The Nissl bodies begin at first to appear in a brain weighing 0.9  
gram, as the 'Kernkappe' covering the apical part of the nucleus.  
The differentiation of the cytoplasm becomes more and more  
distinct as the brain weight increases and, in brains weighing  
more than 1.3 grams, the section as a whole takes a blue tone.  
This change in color tone is probably due to the development  
of the Nissl bodies in the cytoplasm and the structural changes  
in the intercellular tissue. The apical dendrites rapidly thicken in  
brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams and, in brains weighing more  
than 1.3 grams, we see distinctly some relatively thick basal  
dendrites and the axis-cylinder becomes visible. The mass of  
the cytoplasm and the differentiation of the Nissl bodies proceeds  
steadily as the age advances. In the fully grown brain we see  
very often small satellite cells surrounding or indenting the  
cytoplasm of the ganglion cells, though satellite cells appear in  
relation to some other types of neurons also. Whatever the significance of these satellite cells, it is to be noted that in younger  
brains they are very rarely seen. The outline of the ganglion  
cell body is not necessarily sharp nor is the form regularly pyramidal, being sometimes indeed quite irregular and often appearing ovoid or ellipsoid in shape. Lipochrome or fat pigment,  
usually seen in the adult human cells of this type, is never seen  
in those of the adult albino rat, even in old age.  


The nucleus of the young ganglion cell seems quite simple in  
The nucleus of the young ganglion cell seems quite simple in structure and it attains nearly the full size in a brain weighing 0.95 gram. After passing this stage, the chromatin structure of the nucleus begins to appear. The size of the nucleus may be said to remain practically the same after this stage, while the cytoplasmic development continues relatively rapidly. The 'Kernfalte' is sometimes visible in brains weighing more than 1.5 grams. The nucleolus in the nucleus of the ganglion cells attains also nearly the full size (diameter is somewhat less than 4 micra) at the phase when the nucleus has reached nearly
structure and it attains nearly the full size in a brain weighing  
0.95 gram. After passing this stage, the chromatin structure  
of the nucleus begins to appear. The size of the nucleus may be  
said to remain practically the same after this stage, while the  
cytoplasmic development continues relatively rapidly. The  
'Kernfalte' is sometimes visible in brains weighing more than  
1.5 grams. The nucleolus in the nucleus of the ganglion cells  
attains also nearly the full size (diameter is somewhat less  
than 4 micra) at the phase when the nucleus has reached nearly  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 139  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 139


the full size (10 days), but continues to grow steadily, though  
the full size (10 days), but continues to grow steadily, though slightly, throughout later life. The size of the nucleolus in the ganglion cells is relatively much larger than in the pyramids.
slightly, throughout later life. The size of the nucleolus in the  
ganglion cells is relatively much larger than in the pyramids.  


As for the developmental phases of the ganglion cells according to age, a statement similar to that made concerning the pyramids of the lamina pyramidalis holds true, though in the ganglion  
As for the developmental phases of the ganglion cells according to age, a statement similar to that made concerning the pyramids of the lamina pyramidalis holds true, though in the ganglion cells the size development seems to be accomphshed in general somewhat earlier. In a brain under 1.2 grams in weight, more mature ganglion cells are seen mixed up with those less mature, indicating that the development of the ganglion cells is not uniform, but that some progress more slowly. In a brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, all the ganglion cells seem to have already passed the first phase of development in size, and all the cells are now of full size and probably fully functional.
cells the size development seems to be accomphshed in general  
somewhat earlier. In a brain under 1.2 grams in weight, more  
mature ganglion cells are seen mixed up with those less mature,  
indicating that the development of the ganglion cells is not uniform, but that some progress more slowly. In a brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, all the ganglion cells seem to have  
already passed the first phase of development in size, and all the  
cells are now of full size and probably fully functional.  


One observation which I think it important to notice here is  
One observation which I think it important to notice here is that cells in the same layer but in different parts of the cortex do not always show a like degree of development at a given age. Some cells or some cell groups are more precocious or more retarded than their neighbors. My observations apply only to the size and morphology of the most developed cells found together in a selected locality, regardless of the relative maturity of that locality. So the statement that the ganglion cells attain full size at ten days does not necessarily mean that the lamina ganglionaris is completely mature at that age, but it only applies to the size or morphology of the most advanced cells found in the layer. As a matter of fact, the lamina ganglionaris matures in toto earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams all the ganglion cells found in the lamina ganglionaris are apparently completely mature, while at the same age the lamina pyramidalis still contains many immature cells among the mature ones, and the full maturity of the latter layer is attained only in a brain weighing more than 1.6 grams (more than 50 days in age).
that cells in the same layer but in different parts of the cortex  
do not always show a like degree of development at a given age.  
Some cells or some cell groups are more precocious or more retarded than their neighbors. My observations apply only to the  
size and morphology of the most developed cells found together  
in a selected locality, regardless of the relative maturity of that  
locality. So the statement that the ganglion cells attain full  
size at ten days does not necessarily mean that the lamina ganglionaris is completely mature at that age, but it only applies to  
the size or morphology of the most advanced cells found in the  
layer. As a matter of fact, the lamina ganglionaris matures in  
toto earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams all the ganglion cells found in the lamina ganglionaris are apparently completely mature, while at the same age the lamina pyramidalis  
still contains many immature cells among the mature ones, and  
the full maturity of the latter layer is attained only in a brain  
weighing more than 1.6 grams (more than 50 days in age).  


In respect of cell size and morphological changes, the lamina  
In respect of cell size and morphological changes, the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina multiformis are the earliest to mature all the elements in them, while the lamina pramidalis matures more slowly, for example, and in a section from a brain twenty days old, we can still see many immature cells mixed with the mature ones in this latter layer.
ganglionaris and the lamina multiformis are the earliest to mature  
all the elements in them, while the lamina pramidalis matures  
more slowly, for example, and in a section from a brain twenty  
days old, we can still see many immature cells mixed with the  
mature ones in this latter layer.  






140 NAOKI SUGITA  
140 NAOKI SUGITA


VI. ON THE NERVE CELLS IN OTHER LAYERS OF THE CEREBRAL  
VI. ON THE NERVE CELLS IN OTHER LAYERS OF THE CEREBRAL


CORTEX  
CORTEX


Figure 6 shows a diagram of cell-lamination of the adult albino  
Figure 6 shows a diagram of cell-lamination of the adult albino rat brain, taken from locality II of the sagittal section (fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a). In comparison with the data on the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (III) and the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (V), the measurements of the cells found in the lamina granulans interna (IV) and the lamina multiformis (VI) show nothing peculiar. Generally speaking, the cell body and the nucleus of the granules do not take the stain as well as in the case of the pyramids and remain rather pale in color. The cells of the lamina multiformis, on the other hand, generally stain deeply. Especially the cytoplasm of the cells forming the inner (ental) sublayer of the lamina multiformis tints very well, so that this sublayer is easily distinguished even at a low magnification by the deep staining of the elements.
rat brain, taken from locality II of the sagittal section (fig. 2,  
Sugita, '17 a). In comparison with the data on the pyramids in  
the lamina pyramidalis (III) and the ganglion cells in the lamina  
ganglionaris (V), the measurements of the cells found in the  
lamina granulans interna (IV) and the lamina multiformis (VI)  
show nothing peculiar. Generally speaking, the cell body and the  
nucleus of the granules do not take the stain as well as in the case  
of the pyramids and remain rather pale in color. The cells of  
the lamina multiformis, on the other hand, generally stain  
deeply. Especially the cytoplasm of the cells forming the inner  
(ental) sublayer of the lamina multiformis tints very well, so  
that this sublayer is easily distinguished even at a low magnification by the deep staining of the elements.  


The granules in the lamina granulans interna (IV) are smaller  
The granules in the lamina granulans interna (IV) are smaller in size and lie more crowded than do the pyramids. This layer is not clearly differentiated in brains weighing less than 0.6 gram or less than six days of age, at which stage the immature cells of fetal form prevail in both the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina granularis interna and no characteristic granules are shown. On the sections from a brain weighing 0.5 to 0.6 gram, which had been fixed in formaldehyde and imbedded in paraffine, I could see distinctly a dark band due to the deep staining of the ground substance and characteristic for the adult lamina granularis interna (cf. Sugita, '17 a, p. 526), though the contained cells do not show any of the characteristics of the granules. This is probably the first step in the differentiation of the granular layer. Later we see that the cells lying near the lamina ganglionaris become more and more crowded and somewhat small in size compared with the cells lying in the lamina pyramidalis. In an adult brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, a distinct band of smallersized cells (the lamina granularis interna) appears above the lamina ganglionaris.
in size and lie more crowded than do the pyramids. This layer is  
not clearly differentiated in brains weighing less than 0.6 gram or  
less than six days of age, at which stage the immature cells of  
fetal form prevail in both the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina  
granularis interna and no characteristic granules are shown.  
On the sections from a brain weighing 0.5 to 0.6 gram, which had  
been fixed in formaldehyde and imbedded in paraffine, I could  
see distinctly a dark band due to the deep staining of the ground  
substance and characteristic for the adult lamina granularis interna (cf. Sugita, '17 a, p. 526), though the contained cells do  
not show any of the characteristics of the granules. This is  
probably the first step in the differentiation of the granular layer.  
Later we see that the cells lying near the lamina ganglionaris  
become more and more crowded and somewhat small in size compared with the cells lying in the lamina pyramidalis. In an adult  
brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, a distinct band of smallersized cells (the lamina granularis interna) appears above the  
lamina ganglionaris.  






GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






141  
141






Fig. 6 Diagram of cell-lamination of  
Fig. 6 Diagram of cell-lamination of the frontal cerebral cortex (locality II, fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a) of the adult albino rat brain weighing 1.8 grams, schematically enlarged 66 diameters. I = lamina zonalis, III = lamina pyramidalis, IV = lamina granularis interna, V = lamina ganglionaris, VI = lamina multiformis, which is divided into two sublayers at * by a.band poor in cells.
the frontal cerebral cortex (locality II,  
fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a) of the adult albino  
rat brain weighing 1.8 grams, schematically enlarged 66 diameters. I = lamina  
zonalis, III = lamina pyramidalis, IV =  
lamina granularis interna, V = lamina  
ganglionaris, VI = lamina multiformis,  
which is divided into two sublayers at *  
by a.band poor in cells.  




Line 39,059: Line 36,499:




Mm  
Mm




Line 39,070: Line 36,510:




J'o V *  
J'o V *






■A . f  
■A . f






o»^  
o»^






Mil  
Mil






>VI  
>VI






SaJt- fc'^Jc ^ VT^ ' C jag  
SaJt- fc'^Jc ^ VT^ ' C jag








THE JOTIRNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOTIRNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






142  
142






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 4  
TABLE 4 Giving both corrected and the uncorrected values for the two diameters of the cell body and the nucleus respectively, of the granule cells in the lamina granularis interna {IV, fig. 6) for several brain weight groups
Giving both corrected and the uncorrected values for the two diameters of the cell  
body and the nucleus respectively, of the granule cells in the lamina granularis  
interna {IV, fig. 6) for several brain weight groups  






BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP






Group II (birth)  
Group II (birth)


Group III  
Group III


Group V  
Group V


Groups VI-VIII  
Groups VI-VIII


Groups X-XIII  
Groups X-XIII


Groups XIII-XV  
Groups XIII-XV


Groups XVI and above  
Groups XVI and above






CELL BODY  
CELL BODY






Corrected  
Corrected






M  
M


12x15  
12x15 14x16 15x18 16x20 19x21 16x20 15x20
14x16  
15x18  
16x20  
19x21  
16x20  
15x20  






On the slide  
On the slide






M  
M (10 X 12) (11 X 13) (12 X 14) (13 X 16) (15 X 17) (13 X 16) (12 X 16)
(10 X 12)  
(11 X 13)  
(12 X 14)  
(13 X 16)  
(15 X 17)  
(13 X 16)  
(12 X 16)  






Corrected  
Corrected






11 xl2  
11 xl2 12x14 14x15 15x16 16x19 15x16 14x16
12x14  
14x15  
15x16  
16x19  
15x16  
14x16  






On the slide  
On the slide






M  
M


(9 X 10)  
(9 X 10)


(10 X 11)  
(10 X 11)


(11 X 12)  
(11 X 12) (12 X 13) (13 X 15) (12 X 13) (11 X 13)
(12 X 13)  
(13 X 15)  
(12 X 13)  
(11 X 13)  






The average size of the granules measured on the sections here  
The average size of the granules measured on the sections here used is given in table 4. In brain-weight Groups II-V, at which stages the layer is not yet clearly differentiated, the measurements were made on the small cells which lie nearest to the lamina ganglionaris and the cells were assumed to be the future granules.
used is given in table 4. In brain-weight Groups II-V, at which  
stages the layer is not yet clearly differentiated, the measurements were made on the small cells which lie nearest to the lamina  
ganglionaris and the cells were assumed to be the future granules.  


So, in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams (Group XVI), the  
So, in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams (Group XVI), the size of the granules diminishes shghtly as the age advances. Most of the nuclei of the granules are more or less elongated or elliptical in shape and the cytoplasm is very scanty, so that sometimes there can be seen only a thin envelope of the cytoplasm around the nucleus.
size of the granules diminishes shghtly as the age advances.  
Most of the nuclei of the granules are more or less elongated or  
elliptical in shape and the cytoplasm is very scanty, so that  
sometimes there can be seen only a thin envelope of the cytoplasm  
around the nucleus.  


In short, the granules at the earlier age are ahnost equal to  
In short, the granules at the earlier age are ahnost equal to the growing pyramids in size, but they increase in size somewhat less rapidly as compared with the pyramids, among which they are interspersed at first. They reach their maximum size in a grain weighing between 1.2 and 1.4 grams, and after that period the size decreases as the age advances, showing ^ somewhat compact nucleus.
the growing pyramids in size, but they increase in size somewhat  
less rapidly as compared with the pyramids, among which they  
are interspersed at first. They reach their maximum size in a  
grain weighing between 1.2 and 1.4 grams, and after that period  
the size decreases as the age advances, showing ^ somewhat compact nucleus.  


As already indicated in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), the  
As already indicated in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), the lamina multiformis is divided by a pale band (fig. 6,*), poor in cells, into two sublayers. The polymorphous cells in the ectal sublayer have the shapes indicated by their name, but in general they are pyramidal in form, the apex directed ectally, being somewhat flattened and rich in cytoplasm, as compared with the
lamina multiformis is divided by a pale band (fig. 6,*), poor in  
cells, into two sublayers. The polymorphous cells in the ectal  
sublayer have the shapes indicated by their name, but in general  
they are pyramidal in form, the apex directed ectally, being  
somewhat flattened and rich in cytoplasm, as compared with the  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 143  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 143


pyramids. The density of the polymorphous cells in this sublayer is greatest at the earlier ages. During the early ages the  
pyramids. The density of the polymorphous cells in this sublayer is greatest at the earlier ages. During the early ages the most densely crowded pyramids are in the lamina pyramidalis, while by contrast the lamina multiformis seems rather poor in cells. But in adults the cell population of the ectal sublayer of the lamina multiformis appears to be only slightly less than that of the lamina pyramidalis and the size of the polymorphous cells appears nearly equal to that of the pyramids, though, by an exact measurement, they prove to be slightly larger (fig. 6). The shape of polymorphous cells is not uniform and they show many dendritic processes, irregularly arranged. Some, though pyramidal, lie obliquely or transversely, while some hold a reversed position, with the apical dendrite directed entally (Martinotti's cells).
most densely crowded pyramids are in the lamina pyramidalis,  
while by contrast the lamina multiformis seems rather poor in  
cells. But in adults the cell population of the ectal sublayer of  
the lamina multiformis appears to be only slightly less than that  
of the lamina pyramidalis and the size of the polymorphous cells  
appears nearly equal to that of the pyramids, though, by an  
exact measurement, they prove to be slightly larger (fig. 6).  
The shape of polymorphous cells is not uniform and they show  
many dendritic processes, irregularly arranged. Some, though  
pyramidal, lie obliquely or transversely, while some hold a reversed position, with the apical dendrite directed entally (Martinotti's cells).  


The cells of the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are  
The cells of the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are quite different in their appearance. They are polygonal or spindle-shaped and generally lie with their long axis in the plane of the lamina. The cytoplasm of the cells is massive and takes the stain well. The Nissl bodies, however, are not well differentiated. Though not always pyramidal in shape, the assumed apex of the cells appears to be directed towards the occipital pole in the sagittal and the horizontal sections or towards the ventral surface in the frontal section, thus indicating the direction of the migration of the nerve cells from the matrix to the cortex proper. As already stated by me (Sugita, '17a), this sublayer probably serves as a secondary station for cells migrating from the matrix at the ventricular wall to their final destination in the cortex and the number of cells in this sublayer diminishes as the age of the brain advances. So one has some reason to think that a fraction of the cells found in this sublayer are still in transit, at least during the early ages. It should be noted at least that the cells of this sublayer have a morphology in respect of the mass and the staining reaction of their cytoplasm which indicates the stage of migration.
quite different in their appearance. They are polygonal or  
spindle-shaped and generally lie with their long axis in the plane  
of the lamina. The cytoplasm of the cells is massive and takes  
the stain well. The Nissl bodies, however, are not well differentiated. Though not always pyramidal in shape, the assumed apex of the cells appears to be directed towards the occipital pole in the sagittal and the horizontal sections or towards  
the ventral surface in the frontal section, thus indicating the  
direction of the migration of the nerve cells from the matrix  
to the cortex proper. As already stated by me (Sugita, '17a),  
this sublayer probably serves as a secondary station for cells  
migrating from the matrix at the ventricular wall to their final  
destination in the cortex and the number of cells in this sublayer diminishes as the age of the brain advances. So one has  
some reason to think that a fraction of the cells found in this  
sublayer are still in transit, at least during the early ages. It  
should be noted at least that the cells of this sublayer have a  
morphology in respect of the mass and the staining reaction of  
their cytoplasm which indicates the stage of migration.  


The neuroglia nuclei are abundantly scattered in the ental  
The neuroglia nuclei are abundantly scattered in the ental cortical layers (that is, in the lamina multiformis and the lamina ganglionaris) as compared with the ectal layers (that is, in the
cortical layers (that is, in the lamina multiformis and the lamina  
ganglionaris) as compared with the ectal layers (that is, in the  






144  
144






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 5  
TABLE 5


Giving the cubes of the average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of both  
Giving the cubes of the average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of both the pyramids {lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) at birth, 10 days, 20 days and 90 days, the ages indicating respectively the beginning of each developmental phase. The values given represent merely the relative volumes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei. Ratios based on the initial value taken as unity are given for each column. The data, on the basis of which the calculations were made, were taken from table 3
the pyramids {lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris)  
at birth, 10 days, 20 days and 90 days, the ages indicating respectively the beginning of each developmental phase. The values given represent merely the relative volumes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei. Ratios based on the initial value  
taken as unity are given for each column. The data, on the basis of which the  
calculations were made, were taken from table 3  




Line 39,286: Line 36,651:




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
WEIGHT  
GROUP  




PYRAMIDS IN THE LAMINA  
PYRAMIDS IN THE LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS
PYRAMIDALIS  




GANGLION CELLS I.N THE L.tMINA  
GANGLION CELLS I.N THE L.tMINA GANGLIONARIS
GANGLIONARIS  




THE BEGINNING OF  
THE BEGINNING OF EACH
EACH  




Cell  
Cell




body  
body




Nucleus  
Nucleus




Cell body  
Cell body




Nucleus  
Nucleus




DEVELOPMENTAL  
DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE
STAGE  




S5 >  
S5 >




la  
la




> o  
> o


M  
M




o  
o




> <o  
> <o


Pi >  
Pi >




_0  
_0




^ 3  
^ 3 Ph >
Ph >  




.2  
.2


1  
1




Birth  
Birth




II  
II


IX  
IX


XI  
XI


XVIII  
XVIII




m3  
m3


215  
215 1185 1315 1170
1185  
1315  
1170  




1.00  
1.00 5.51 6.12 5.44
5.51  
6.12  
5.44  




m3  
m3


119  
119


775  
775 790 665
790  
665  




1.00  
1.00 6.50 6.63
6.50  
6.63  


5.58  
5.58




m3  
m3


675  
675 2925 3070 3530
2925  
3070  
3530  




1.00  
1.00 4.33 4.55 5.23
4.33  
4.55  
5.23  




m3  
m3


330  
330 1440 1415 1490
1440  
1415  
1490  




1.00  
1.00




10 days  
10 days




4.36  
4.36




20 days  
20 days




4.29  
4.29




90 days  
90 days




4.52  
4.52




Line 39,443: Line 36,782:




lamina granulans interna and the lamina pyramidalis) (see fig.  
lamina granulans interna and the lamina pyramidalis) (see fig. 6). At earlier ages, neuroglia nuclei are comparatively scarce in the lamina pyramidalis, but at maturity they are well distributed in this layer, though in the lamina multiformis they are found always abundantly. With the method of . staining here used, we can distinguish two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei, one staining a relatively deep blue, which is the smaller in size (2 to 5 micra in diameter on the slide) , with crowded granules in the chromatin sometimes arranged radially ('Radkern'), and surrounded by evident cytoplasm, and the other staining rather paler and with a violet tone, vesicular ('blasig') in appearance, somewhat larger in size (3 to 6 micra in diameter on the slide) , with scanty chromatin and enveloped by a small amount of cytoplasm. This metachromatism in the staining of the two kinds is very remarkable. Both kinds are found intermingled. In the white matter glia cells are distributed in rough chains, while in the cortex they are, under normal conditions, less well distnbuted than in the white matter. Sometimes, especially in old age, the glia cells are found gathered around the ganghon cells or the pyramids or near the blood-vessels. The satelhte cells which are attached to or
6). At earlier ages, neuroglia nuclei are comparatively scarce  
in the lamina pyramidalis, but at maturity they are well distributed in this layer, though in the lamina multiformis they are found  
always abundantly. With the method of . staining here used,  
we can distinguish two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei, one staining  
a relatively deep blue, which is the smaller in size (2 to 5 micra  
in diameter on the slide) , with crowded granules in the chromatin  
sometimes arranged radially ('Radkern'), and surrounded by  
evident cytoplasm, and the other staining rather paler and with a  
violet tone, vesicular ('blasig') in appearance, somewhat larger in  
size (3 to 6 micra in diameter on the slide) , with scanty chromatin  
and enveloped by a small amount of cytoplasm. This metachromatism in the staining of the two kinds is very remarkable.  
Both kinds are found intermingled. In the white matter glia  
cells are distributed in rough chains, while in the cortex they are,  
under normal conditions, less well distnbuted than in the white  
matter. Sometimes, especially in old age, the glia cells are  
found gathered around the ganghon cells or the pyramids or near  
the blood-vessels. The satelhte cells which are attached to or  






GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 145  
GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 145


even invade the cytoplasm of the nerve cells, are usually regarded  
even invade the cytoplasm of the nerve cells, are usually regarded as neuroglia cells.
as neuroglia cells.  


vThe method here used, of staining with the carbol-thionine the  
vThe method here used, of staining with the carbol-thionine the material fixed in Bouin's fluid and imbedded in paraffine, reveals clearly only the size and shape of the nerve cells in the cerebral cortex. The more detailed structure of the cytoplasm and of the nucleus or the structure of the axis-cylinder and dendrites is not brought out by this method, and for the investigation of these characters other methods are required.
material fixed in Bouin's fluid and imbedded in paraffine, reveals  
clearly only the size and shape of the nerve cells in the cerebral  
cortex. The more detailed structure of the cytoplasm and of the  
nucleus or the structure of the axis-cylinder and dendrites is not  
brought out by this method, and for the investigation of these  
characters other methods are required.  


VII. DISCUSSION  
VII. DISCUSSION


According to the foregoing observation, the full size of the  
According to the foregoing observation, the full size of the largest pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (about 25 daj^s in age)^ is about 21 x 27 /x for the cell body and 19 x 21 n for the nucleus, and the measurement of those largest atbirth^ is 11 x 15 /x for the cell body and 10 x 11 m for the nucleus, in the fresh condition of the material. The full size of the largest ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (at localities VII and X, about 25 days, for example)"* is 27 x 37 /j. for the cell body and 24 x 25 fx for the nucleus, and the measurement of the largest ganglion cells at birth^ is 17x21 /x for the cell body and 14x16 /x for the nucleus, all in the fresh condition of the brain.
largest pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (about 25 daj^s in  
age)^ is about 21 x 27 /x for the cell body and 19 x 21 n for the  
nucleus, and the measurement of those largest atbirth^ is 11 x 15 /x  
for the cell body and 10 x 11 m for the nucleus, in the fresh condition of the material. The full size of the largest ganglion cells  
in the lamina ganglionaris (at localities VII and X, about 25  
days, for example)"* is 27 x 37 /j. for the cell body and 24 x 25 fx  
for the nucleus, and the measurement of the largest ganglion cells  
at birth^ is 17x21 /x for the cell body and 14x16 /x for the  
nucleus, all in the fresh condition of the brain.  


If the volume of the cell bodies or of the nuclei be comparable  
If the volume of the cell bodies or of the nuclei be comparable among themselves according to the cubes of their average diameters, the figures given in table 5 "vvhich presents the cubes of the average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the nerve cells at different ages, and which were calculated from the data in table 3, may be used as the basis of discussions on the volume development of the cells. It will be seen from table 5, by a
among themselves according to the cubes of their average diameters, the figures given in table 5 "vvhich presents the cubes of the  
average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the nerve  
cells at different ages, and which were calculated from the data  
in table 3, may be used as the basis of discussions on the volume  
development of the cells. It will be seen from table 5, by a  


■* To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body  
■* To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body and the nucleus in Groups XI-XIII in the frontal and the horizontal sections (tables 1 and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected b^ multiplying by the mean correction-coefficient of Groups XI-XIII for the frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).
and the nucleus in Groups XI-XIII in the frontal and the horizontal sections  
(tables 1 and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected b^  
multiplying by the mean correction-coefficient of Groups XI-XIII for the  
frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).  


* To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body  
To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body
and the nucleus in Group II in the frontal and the horizontal sections (tables 1  
and the nucleus in Group II in the frontal and the horizontal sections (tables 1 and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected by multiplying by the mean correction-coefficient of Group II for the frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).
and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected by multiplying  
by the mean correction-coefficient of Group II for the frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).  






146 NAOKI SUGITA  
146 NAOKI SUGITA


simple calculation, that at birth the largest ganglion cells are  
simple calculation, that at birth the largest ganglion cells are almost 3.1 times as voluminous, at 20 days about 2.3 times, and at 90 days 3.0 times, as the pyramids of the same stage, and the nuclei of the ganglion cells are at birth 2.8 times as voluminous, at 20 days 1.8 times, and at 90 days, 2.2 times as the nuclei of the pyramids of the same stage, if both kinds of cells are assumed to have the similar forms throughout their enlargement.^ It is also seen that, using the same method, the cell body of the pyramids has increased from birth 6.1 times in volume at 20 days and 5.4 times at 90 days, and the nuclei 6.6 times at 20 days and 5.6 times at 90 days, while the cell body of the ganglion cells has increased only 4.6 times at 20 days, 5.2 times at 90 days and the nuclei of the ganglion cells 4.3 times at 20 days and 4.5 times at 90 days, as compared with their initial volumes at birth.
almost 3.1 times as voluminous, at 20 days about 2.3 times, and  
at 90 days 3.0 times, as the pyramids of the same stage, and the  
nuclei of the ganglion cells are at birth 2.8 times as voluminous,  
at 20 days 1.8 times, and at 90 days, 2.2 times as the nuclei of  
the pyramids of the same stage, if both kinds of cells are assumed  
to have the similar forms throughout their enlargement.^ It is  
also seen that, using the same method, the cell body of the pyramids has increased from birth 6.1 times in volume at 20 days and  
5.4 times at 90 days, and the nuclei 6.6 times at 20 days and 5.6  
times at 90 days, while the cell body of the ganglion cells has  
increased only 4.6 times at 20 days, 5.2 times at 90 days and the  
nuclei of the ganglion cells 4.3 times at 20 days and 4.5 times  
at 90 days, as compared with their initial volumes at birth.  


It may therefore be concluded that, throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells after birth, the rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nuclei and in the cell bodies of both  
It may therefore be concluded that, throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells after birth, the rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nuclei and in the cell bodies of both kinds of cells, though the rate is slightly higher in the pyramids than in the ganglion cells in both the cell body and the nucleus during the first twenty days after birth, because the initial volume of the pyramids is small at birth.
kinds of cells, though the rate is slightly higher in the pyramids  
than in the ganglion cells in both the cell body and the nucleus  
during the first twenty days after birth, because the initial  
volume of the pyramids is small at birth.  


As the shape of the cell body is different from that of the  
As the shape of the cell body is different from that of the nucleus, it is not proper' to compare directly their respective volumes as determined by the foregoing use of their diameters, but they must be first reduced to forms which are comparable as
nucleus, it is not proper' to compare directly their respective  
volumes as determined by the foregoing use of their diameters,  
but they must be first reduced to forms which are comparable as  


• Here the nucleus was considered as an ellipsoid, the volume of which is to be  
• Here the nucleus was considered as an ellipsoid, the volume of which is to be calculated by the formula ^ira'^b, when b is the long radius and a is the short radius of the body. As the transverse diameter (n.i) of the nucleus is equal to 2a and the longitudinal diameter (n^) is equal to 26 the volumes of the nuclei may be compared among themselves simply by the factor a-b or ni^nj.
calculated by the formula ^ira'^b, when b is the long radius and a is the short  
radius of the body. As the transverse diameter (n.i) of the nucleus is equal to  
2a and the longitudinal diameter (n^) is equal to 26 the volumes of the nuclei  
may be compared among themselves simply by the factor a-b or ni^nj.  


On the other hand, if the volume of the cell body was considered as a circular  
On the other hand, if the volume of the cell body was considered as a circular cone, in which the diameter of the basic circle is equal to the transverse diameter (ci) of the cell body and the height of the cone is equal to the longitudinal diameter (C2) of the cell body, then the volume of the cell body will be
cone, in which the diameter of the basic circle is equal to the transverse diameter (ci) of the cell body and the height of the cone is equal to the longitudinal diameter (C2) of the cell body, then the volume of the cell body will be  


Jtt ( ^ yc2, and the values for the relative volumes of the cell bodies may be compared on the basis of the factor Ci-Cj.  
Jtt ( ^ yc2, and the values for the relative volumes of the cell bodies may be compared on the basis of the factor Ci-Cj.


As the average diameters given in table 3 are respectively the square roots  
As the average diameters given in table 3 are respectively the square roots of the products nin-i and CiCo, the cubes of the average diameters will be approximately proportional to the values nihi2 and ci^c-2, respectively.
of the products nin-i and CiCo, the cubes of the average diameters will be approximately proportional to the values nihi2 and ci^c-2, respectively.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 147  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 147


explained in the accompanying note and then table 5 may be consulted again. ^ It is seen from table 5 that at birth the entire  
explained in the accompanying note and then table 5 may be consulted again. ^ It is seen from table 5 that at birth the entire cell has almost double the volume of the nucleus, so that the cytoplasm and the nucleus have nearly the same volume. The nucleus-plasm relation changes according to the brain weight. In the pyramids, the total cell body comes to 1.7 times at 20 days and to 1.8 times at 90 days, compared with the volume of the nucleus at the same age. This is owing to the relatively rapid growth of the nucleus. In the ganglion cells, on the other hand, the total cell body is 2.2 times at 20 days and 2.4 times at 90 days, compared with the volume of the nucleus at the same stage. As the pyramids decreases in size after 30 days, the cell size of the pyramids in old age (brain weight more than 2.0 grams) becomes almost equal to that at 8 days of age, but the nucleus-plasm relation is quite different at the two stages. At 8 days the nucleus is relatively large (total cell body is 1.7 or less times the nuclear volume), but in old age the volume of cytoplasm has increased somewhat in relation to the nuclear volume (total cell body is nearly 2.0 times the nuclear volume). These values for comparison were taken from the data here used alone, but, as already noted, sections which were taken from material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol or in Bouin's fluid and imbedded in celloidin show a nucleus which is relatively smaller. In series of sections which have been prepared by methods other than that used by me, the volume relations between the cell body and the nucleus (nucleus-plasm relation) would probably be different from those which I have reported here, but I think it will be fair to assume that the growth changes in the cell body on
cell has almost double the volume of the nucleus, so that the  
cytoplasm and the nucleus have nearly the same volume. The  
nucleus-plasm relation changes according to the brain weight.  
In the pyramids, the total cell body comes to 1.7 times at 20  
days and to 1.8 times at 90 days, compared with the volume  
of the nucleus at the same age. This is owing to the relatively  
rapid growth of the nucleus. In the ganglion cells, on the  
other hand, the total cell body is 2.2 times at 20 days and 2.4  
times at 90 days, compared with the volume of the nucleus at  
the same stage. As the pyramids decreases in size after 30  
days, the cell size of the pyramids in old age (brain weight more  
than 2.0 grams) becomes almost equal to that at 8 days of age,  
but the nucleus-plasm relation is quite different at the two stages.  
At 8 days the nucleus is relatively large (total cell body is 1.7  
or less times the nuclear volume), but in old age the volume of  
cytoplasm has increased somewhat in relation to the nuclear  
volume (total cell body is nearly 2.0 times the nuclear volume).  
These values for comparison were taken from the data here  
used alone, but, as already noted, sections which were taken  
from material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol or in Bouin's fluid and  
imbedded in celloidin show a nucleus which is relatively smaller.  
In series of sections which have been prepared by methods other  
than that used by me, the volume relations between the cell body  
and the nucleus (nucleus-plasm relation) would probably be different from those which I have reported here, but I think it will  
be fair to assume that the growth changes in the cell body on  


^ If the cell body were considered as having an ellipsoidal form with diameters equal to Ci and c^ which denote respectively the transverse longitudinal diameters measured on the cell body the volume, would be \t^( ^ )'{ ^ ) ^'^ ^t^Cx^CiAnd if, on the other hand, the same cell body were considered as a circular cone,  
^ If the cell body were considered as having an ellipsoidal form with diameters equal to Ci and c^ which denote respectively the transverse longitudinal diameters measured on the cell body the volume, would be \t^( ^ )'{ ^ ) ^'^ ^t^Cx^CiAnd if, on the other hand, the same cell body were considered as a circular cone, the volume may be calculated by 57r( -^ \ ^co, or ^-kc-cCi. As the difference between
the volume may be calculated by 57r( -^ \ ^co, or ^-kc-cCi. As the difference between  


these two formulas is not higher than ^ of crC2, I have here compared the  
these two formulas is not higher than ^ of crC2, I have here compared the


volumes of the cell body and of the nucleus under the assumption that both have  
volumes of the cell body and of the nucleus under the assumption that both have the ellipsoidal form, employing once more the figures given in table 5 as the basis of comparison.
the ellipsoidal form, employing once more the figures given in table 5 as the  
basis of comparison.  






148 NAOKI SUGITA  
148 NAOKI SUGITA


one hand and in the nucleus on the other would probably be similar by the use of any uniform method, even if the absolute values  
one hand and in the nucleus on the other would probably be similar by the use of any uniform method, even if the absolute values differed for the different methods, and none of them gave exactly the fresh values.
differed for the different methods, and none of them gave exactly  
the fresh values.  


It is remarkable that both the cell body and the nucleus of the  
It is remarkable that both the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical cells attain nearly their full size at an early stage of development (at about ten days of age) and then continue to undergo cytomorphic development, without much change in cell size (chart 1). As already pointed out in former papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), the elementary completeness of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat is attained at the age of twenty days, the final thickness of the cortex and the total number of the cortical nerve cells being apparently reached at this age. .\fter this age, the volume of the cortex increases as the age ad\'ances nearly in proportion to, or at a slightly slower rate than, the total volume of the cerebrum. As noted, the size of the pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis attains the maximum size in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams and the volume of the cell body and the nucleus becomes slightly less during later phases, while the size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris increases slightly as the age advances, even after the above-named stage. It must be concluded, therefore, that the subsequent increase in cortical volume is effected by changes in structures other than the cell bodies themselves. And, as a consequence, in mature brains, the cell density in the cortex diminishes more and more, as has been already pointed out in a previous paper (table 3, Sugita, '18 b).
cortical cells attain nearly their full size at an early stage of  
development (at about ten days of age) and then continue to  
undergo cytomorphic development, without much change in cell  
size (chart 1). As already pointed out in former papers (Sugita,  
'17 a, '18 b), the elementary completeness of the cerebral cortex  
of the albino rat is attained at the age of twenty days, the final  
thickness of the cortex and the total number of the cortical nerve  
cells being apparently reached at this age. .\fter this age, the  
volume of the cortex increases as the age ad\'ances nearly in proportion to, or at a slightly slower rate than, the total volume of  
the cerebrum. As noted, the size of the pyramidal cells in the  
lamina pyramidalis attains the maximum size in brains weighing  
1.1 to 1.3 grams and the volume of the cell body and the nucleus  
becomes slightly less during later phases, while the size of the  
ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris increases slightly as the  
age advances, even after the above-named stage. It must be  
concluded, therefore, that the subsequent increase in cortical  
volume is effected by changes in structures other than the cell  
bodies themselves. And, as a consequence, in mature brains,  
the cell density in the cortex diminishes more and more, as has  
been already pointed out in a previous paper (table 3, Sugita,  
'18 b).  


It is very interesting to find that the thickness of the cortex,  
It is very interesting to find that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells all have reached nearly their maximum at the same age of twenty days, which is the weaning time of the rat. These relations appear also in the mouse. According to the results obtained by Isenschmid ('11), the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the mouse, measured at a fixed locality — corresponding to locality VII in my sections — attains nearly its full value something before seventeen days in age. And according to the systematic work of Stefanowska ('98), who has studied the devel
the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the  
cortical cells all have reached nearly their maximum at the same  
age of twenty days, which is the weaning time of the rat. These  
relations appear also in the mouse. According to the results  
obtained by Isenschmid ('11), the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the mouse, measured at a fixed locality — corresponding to  
locality VII in my sections — attains nearly its full value something before seventeen days in age. And according to the  
systematic work of Stefanowska ('98), who has studied the devel




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 149  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 149


opment of the cortical nerve cells by the method of silver impregnation of Golgi, the cortical nerve cells of the mouse have  
opment of the cortical nerve cells by the method of silver impregnation of Golgi, the cortical nerve cells of the mouse have completed their development in respect of their attachments at the age of fifteen days, and the age of fifteen days is the weaning time of the mouse. It appears, therefore, that the completion of certain features of cortical development in relation to the weaning time, the time when the j^oung become independent of the mother, is similar in both the albino rat and the mouse.
completed their development in respect of their attachments at  
the age of fifteen days, and the age of fifteen days is the weaning  
time of the mouse. It appears, therefore, that the completion  
of certain features of cortical development in relation to the  
weaning time, the time when the j^oung become independent  
of the mother, is similar in both the albino rat and the mouse.  


VIII. SUMMARY  
VIII. SUMMARY


1. The size of the nerve cells most advanced in development  
1. The size of the nerve cells most advanced in development from a fixed locality of the cerebral cortex was systematically^ measured and the developmental changes during postnatal growth studied on the material represented by the grains of 128 albino rats of different ages. The data have been averaged for each brain-weight group and then corrected for the fresh condition of the material, using the correction-coefficients devised for this purpose. The results are given in tables and charts.
from a fixed locality of the cerebral cortex was systematically^  
measured and the developmental changes during postnatal growth  
studied on the material represented by the grains of 128 albino  
rats of different ages. The data have been averaged for each  
brain-weight group and then corrected for the fresh condition  
of the material, using the correction-coefficients devised for this  
purpose. The results are given in tables and charts.  


2. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis  
2. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII) is cell body 21 x 27 /j. and nucleus 19 x 21 n and the largest size at birth is cell body 11 x 15 m and nucleus 10 x 11 /x. The size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris at the same stage (about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII) is cell body 27 x 37^ and nucleus 24 x 25 fx, while the largest size at birth is cell body 17 x 21 ix and nucleus 14 x 16 n.
(about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII)  
is cell body 21 x 27 /j. and nucleus 19 x 21 n and the largest size  
at birth is cell body 11 x 15 m and nucleus 10 x 11 /x. The size  
of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris at the same stage  
(about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII)  
is cell body 27 x 37^ and nucleus 24 x 25 fx, while the largest size  
at birth is cell body 17 x 21 ix and nucleus 14 x 16 n.  


In the full-grown albino rat (Groups XVI-XX), the average  
In the full-grown albino rat (Groups XVI-XX), the average size of the pyramids is cell body 20 x 26 fj., nucleus 18x19 m and the average size of the ganglion cells is cell body 28 x 38 /jl, nucleus 24 x 25 //.
size of the pyramids is cell body 20 x 26 fj., nucleus 18x19 m and  
the average size of the ganglion cells is cell body 28 x 38 /jl,  
nucleus 24 x 25 //.  


3. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their  
3. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age (1.1 to 1.3 grams in brain weight) . Up to the tenth day of age they retain their fetal morphology. After having passed the maximum at twenty to thirty days, they diminish in size, but the internal structure matures more and more as the age advances.
maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age (1.1 to 1.3 grams  
in brain weight) . Up to the tenth day of age they retain their  
fetal morphology. After having passed the maximum at twenty  
to thirty days, they diminish in size, but the internal structure  
matures more and more as the age advances.  






150 NAOKI SUGITA  
150 NAOKI SUGITA


4. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain  
4. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain nearly their full size at ten days (0.95 gram in brain weight), when they still show the fetal appearance. After this stage, the size of the cell body increases slowly but steadily as the age advances, while the nucleus remains nearly unchanged in size throughout life.
nearly their full size at ten days (0.95 gram in brain weight),  
when they still show the fetal appearance. After this stage,  
the size of the cell body increases slowly but steadily as the age  
advances, while the nucleus remains nearly unchanged in size  
throughout life.  


5. Both the pyramids and the ganglion cells retain clearly  
5. Both the pyramids and the ganglion cells retain clearly the fetal character of form until the brain weighs 0.6 gram or more. The differentiation of the cytoplasm and the Nissl bodies begins to appear in my preparations first in a brain weighing something more than 0.9 gram, the latter showing first as the 'Kernkappe' at the apex of the nucleus. The cells exhibit the mature appearance in a brain weighing more than 1 .4 grams.
the fetal character of form until the brain weighs 0.6 gram or  
more. The differentiation of the cytoplasm and the Nissl bodies  
begins to appear in my preparations first in a brain weighing  
something more than 0.9 gram, the latter showing first as the  
'Kernkappe' at the apex of the nucleus. The cells exhibit the  
mature appearance in a brain weighing more than 1 .4 grams.  


6. As for the maturation of the several layers, in general, disregarding the maturation of the individual cells in them, the  
6. As for the maturation of the several layers, in general, disregarding the maturation of the individual cells in them, the lamina ganglionaris is completed earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams (thirty days in age) all the ganglion cells in this layer are apparently mature, while at the same age the lamina pyramidalis is less mature as it contains relatively many immature cells mingled with the others. The full maturity of the lamina pyramidalis is attained, probably, in a brain weighing 1.6 grams (more than fifty days in age).
lamina ganglionaris is completed earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams (thirty days in age) all the ganglion cells in this  
layer are apparently mature, while at the same age the lamina  
pyramidalis is less mature as it contains relatively many immature cells mingled with the others. The full maturity of the  
lamina pyramidalis is attained, probably, in a brain weighing  
1.6 grams (more than fifty days in age).  


7. Throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells, the  
7. Throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells, the rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nucleus and in the cell body in both the pyramids and the ganglion cells ; but when the pyramids are compared with the ganglion cells it appears that' the rate is more rapid in the pyramids than in the ganglion cells in both the cell body and the nucleus during the first ten days after birth.
rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nucleus and in the cell  
body in both the pyramids and the ganglion cells ; but when the  
pyramids are compared with the ganglion cells it appears that' the  
rate is more rapid in the pyramids than in the ganglion cells in  
both the cell body and the nucleus during the first ten days  
after birth.  


8. The lamina granulans interna is first differentiated in brains  
8. The lamina granulans interna is first differentiated in brains weighing more than 0.6 gram. In younger brains it is confused with the pyramidal layer and cannot be clearly discriminated. The granules attain their maximum size in brains weighing 1.0 to 1.3 grams and then diminish slightly. The final size ( orrected) of the granules in Groups XVI and above, is cell body 15 X 20 // and nucleus 14 x 16 ix.
weighing more than 0.6 gram. In younger brains it is confused  
with the pyramidal layer and cannot be clearly discriminated.  
The granules attain their maximum size in brains weighing 1.0  
to 1.3 grams and then diminish slightly. The final size ( orrected) of the granules in Groups XVI and above, is cell body  
15 X 20 // and nucleus 14 x 16 ix.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 151  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 151


9. The polymorphous cells in the ectal sublayer of the lamina  
9. The polymorphous cells in the ectal sublayer of the lamina multiformis are slightly larger than the pyamids of the same age. The polymorphous cells in the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are somewhat larger than those of the ectal sublayer, but are irregular in shape and rich in cytoplasm.
multiformis are slightly larger than the pyamids of the same age.  
The polymorphous cells in the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are somewhat larger than those of the ectal sublayer,  
but are irregular in shape and rich in cytoplasm.  


10. Two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei are found in the cortex.  
10. Two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei are found in the cortex. One staining deep blue with the carbol-thionine, smaller in size (2 to 5 micra in diameter on the slide) and having a radiating structure of the chromatin, and the other staining paler, swollen ('blasig') and somewhat larger in size (3 to 6 micra in diameter on thp slide).
One staining deep blue with the carbol-thionine, smaller in size  
(2 to 5 micra in diameter on the slide) and having a radiating  
structure of the chromatin, and the other staining paler, swollen  
('blasig') and somewhat larger in size (3 to 6 micra in diameter  
on thp slide).  


11. Taking a general view of the d^ta already presented in  
11. Taking a general view of the d^ta already presented in this series of studies, it is very interesting to note that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells all attain nearly their full values at the same age of twenty days (1.15 grams in brain weight) ; that is, at the weaning time of the albino rat.
this series of studies, it is very interesting to note that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells,  
and the size of the cortical cells all attain nearly their full  
values at the same age of twenty days (1.15 grams in brain  
weight) ; that is, at the weaning time of the albino rat.  


PART II  
PART II


ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL  
ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS) COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES IN THE ALBINO RAT
CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS) COMPARED  
WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES IN THE ALBINO RAT  


To compare with the results of the preceding study on the  
To compare with the results of the preceding study on the growth in size of the cortical nerve cells in the albino rat brain, data were gathered for the cortical cells of the Norway rat also. According to my previous studies (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b), the measurements of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat in thickness, in total number of cells, etc., have shown some interesting relations to the corresponding measurenients for the Albino. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) made a comparison of these two animals in respect of their body measurements and the size of the central nervous system, and concluded that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat is probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number. As my former study (Sugita, '18 b) has de
growth in size of the cortical nerve cells in the albino rat brain,  
data were gathered for the cortical cells of the Norway rat also.  
According to my previous studies (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b),  
the measurements of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat in  
thickness, in total number of cells, etc., have shown some interesting relations to the corresponding measurenients for the  
Albino. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) made a comparison of these  
two animals in respect of their body measurements and the size  
of the central nervous system, and concluded that the greater  
weight of the brain in the Norway rat is probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase  
in their number. As my former study (Sugita, '18 b) has de




152  
152






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 6  
TABLE 6


Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the  
Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gangi.ionaris measured at the fixed, locality {locality VII) on the frontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are given for each brain iveight group only. This table is comparable with table 1
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gangi.ionaris measured at the fixed, locality  
{locality VII) on the frontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are given  
for each brain iveight group only. This table is comparable with table 1  




Line 39,775: Line 36,905:




XO. OF  
XO. OF




BRAIN  
BRAIN




BRAIN- WEIGHT  
BRAIN- WEIGHT




GROUP  
GROUP




CASES  
CASES




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Line 39,797: Line 36,927:




grams  
grams




NXI  
NXI




3  
3




1.164  
1.164




NXIII  
NXIII




1  
1




1.369  
1.369




NXIV  
NXIV




6  
6




1.430  
1.430




NXV  
NXV




3  
3




1.546  
1.546




NXVI  
NXVI




3  
3




1.629  
1.629




N XVII  
N XVII




4  
4




1.739  
1.739




N XVIII  
N XVIII




2  
2




1.829  
1.829




NXIX  
NXIX




2  
2




1,972  
1,972




NXX  
NXX




2  
2




2.052  
2.052




NXXI  
NXXI




2  
2




2.172  
2.172




N XXIII  
N XXIII




1  
1




2.345  
2.345






LAMIN'.^ PYR.AMIDALIS  
LAMIN'.^ PYR.AMIDALIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






15.2  
15.2 15.5 15.4 14.8 14.6 14.9 15.0 14.8 14.5 14.3 14.6
15.5  
15.4  
14.8  
14.6  
14.9  
15.0  
14.8  
14.5  
14.3  
14.6  






20.8  
20.8 20.9 20.6 19.8 19.8 20.4 20.7 19.4 19.8 20.0 21.0
20.9  
20.6  
19.8  
19.8  
20.4  
20.7  
19.4  
19.8  
20.0  
21.0  






Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






14.5  
14.5 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.4 13.8 14.1 13.9 13.6 13.3 13.3
14.4  
14.2  
13.8  
13.4  
13.8  
14.1  
13.9  
13.6  
13.3  
13.3  






15.5  
15.5 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.1 14.7 14.8 14.3 14.3 14.2 13.9
15.5  
15.1  
15.1  
14.1  
14.7  
14.8  
14.3  
14.3  
14.2  
13.9  






LAMIXA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMIXA GANGLIONARIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






20.5  
20.5 20.6
20.6  


21.6  
21.6 20.5 21.2 21.9 23.5 24.3 23.9 23.9 25.0
20.5  
21.2  
21.9  
23.5  
24.3  
23.9  
23.9  
25.0  






29.0  
29.0 29.9 29.6 28.9 29.0 29.8 32.8 33.7 33.2 34.0 36.0
29.9  
29.6  
28.9  
29.0  
29.8  
32.8  
33.7  
33.2  
34.0  
36.0  






Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






18.1  
18.1 18.3 18.4 17.8 17.8 18.9 20.7 20.3 20.3 19.4 18.51
18.3  
18.4  
17.8  
17.8  
18.9  
20.7  
20.3  
20.3  
19.4  
18.51  






19.3  
19.3 20.2 19.4 19.6 19.2 20.2 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.0 20.51
20.2  
19.4  
19.6  
19.2  
20.2  
21.5  
21.6  
21.6  
21.0  
20.51  






1 In this group the size of the nucleus of the ganglion cells has fallen down  
1 In this group the size of the nucleus of the ganglion cells has fallen down remarkably (see also chart 2), which fact was not seen in the Albino (Group XX). Whether this is due to an actual change in old age or due to incidental variation cannot be definitely affirmed here.
remarkably (see also chart 2), which fact was not seen in the Albino (Group  
XX). Whether this is due to an actual change in old age or due to incidental  
variation cannot be definitely affirmed here.  


termined that in both fornivS the total number of the nerve cells  
termined that in both fornivS the total number of the nerve cells in the cerebral cortex is practically the same, it becomes desirable to compare the size of the nerve cells in the two animals in order to test the assumption of the above authors.
in the cerebral cortex is practically the same, it becomes desirable to compare the size of the nerve cells in the two animals in  
order to test the assumption of the above authors.  


The material used in. this study comprised 54 Norway rats,  
The material used in. this study comprised 54 Norway rats, sexes combined, the data for which are given in tables 1 and 2 in a former paper (Sugita, '18 a) and which are the same material that was formerly employed for the other measurements on the cortex. It seems unnecessary to repeat these tables here. »
sexes combined, the data for which are given in tables 1 and 2  
in a former paper (Sugita, '18 a) and which are the same material that was formerly employed for the other measurements  
on the cortex. It seems unnecessary to repeat these tables  
here. »  


In the selection of the localities in which the largest cells in the  
In the selection of the localities in which the largest cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris were measured and in making the measurements, the same procedure was followed as has been described minutely for the albino rat in part I of this paper.
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris were measured  
and in making the measurements, the same procedure was followed as has been described minutely for the albino rat in part  
I of this paper.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






153  
153






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7


Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the  
Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality X) on the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are given for each brain weight group only. This table is comparable with table 2
lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality  
{locality X) on the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are  
given for each brain weight group only. This table is comparable with table 2  






BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  






NXI  
NXI


NXIII  
NXIII


NXIV  
NXIV


NXV  
NXV


NXVI  
NXVI


NXVII  
NXVII


X XVIII  
X XVIII


NXIX  
NXIX


NXX  
NXX


NXXI  
NXXI


X XXIII  
X XXIII






NO. OF  
NO. OF




BRAIN  
BRAIN




CASES  
CASES




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT








grams  
grams




3  
3




1.164  
1.164




1  
1




1.343  
1.343




5  
5




1.447  
1.447




2  
2




1.520  
1.520




4  
4




1.663  
1.663




4  
4




1.747  
1.747




2  
2




1.843  
1.843




1  
1




1.953  
1.953




2  
2




2.018  
2.018




2  
2




2.156  
2.156




1  
1




2.345  
2.345






LAMIN.l. PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMIN.l. PYRAMIDALIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit.  
Transv. Longit.






15.4  
15.4 15.2 15.4 14.8 14.9 14.8 14.5 15.1 15.5 14.7 15.0
15.2  
15.4  
14.8  
14.9  
14.8  
14.5  
15.1  
15.5  
14.7  
15.0  






20.3  
20.3 19.9 20.6 20.2 20.0 20.0 20.2 20.8 21.1 20.9 20.8
19.9  
20.6  
20.2  
20.0  
20.0  
20.2  
20.8  
21.1  
20.9  
20.8  






Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






14.1  
14.1 14.1
14.1  


14.4  
14.4 13.9 13.8 13.7 13.8 14.5 14.2 13.8 13.4
13.9  
13.8  
13.7  
13.8  
14.5  
14.2  
13.8  
13.4  






15.4  
15.4 15.1 15.3 15.1 14.9 15.0 14.7 15.3 14.7 14.4 14.0
15.1  
15.3  
15.1  
14.9  
15.0  
14.7  
15.3  
14.7  
14.4  
14.0  






LAMINA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMINA GANGLIONARIS






Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






20.6  
20.6 20.4 20.8 20.5 21.0 20.9 20.2 23.5 23.5 23.0 25.8
20.4  
20.8  
20.5  
21.0  
20.9  
20.2  
23.5  
23.5  
23.0  
25.8  






29.3  
29.3 28.2 29.0 28.8 29.8 29.5 29.4 30.5 31.0 29.4 32.0
28.2  
29.0  
28.8  
29.8  
29.5  
29.4  
30.5  
31.0  
29.4  
32.0  






Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  






Transv. Longit  
Transv. Longit






18.0  
18.0 17.8 18.4 18.2 18.3 18.5 18.0 19.5 18.8 18.8 18.41
17.8  
18.4  
18.2  
18.3  
18.5  
18.0  
19.5  
18.8  
18.8  
18.41  






19.2  
19.2 19.0 19.7 19.0 19.3 19.5 19.5 20.3 19.0 20.0 19.21
19.0  
19.7  
19.0  
19.3  
19.5  
19.5  
20.3  
19.0  
20.0  
19.21  






1 See note on table 6.  
1 See note on table 6.






The results of the measurements aire presented in tables 6 and  
The results of the measurements aire presented in tables 6 and 7 arranged in the same way as in the corresponding tables 1 and 2 for the Albino. Chart 2 shows graphically the data presented in table 8 which gives the average diameters of the cell bodies and the nuclei for each brain-weight group, corrected for the fresh condition of the material, by multiplying by the correctioncoefficient for the group, which is cited from my previous paper (Sugita, '18 a) and explicitly given in table 8 also. Charts 3 and 4 show some comparisons in cell sizes in the two forms. Chart 3 was plotted according to the actual brain weights of the two forms, and chart 4 was plotted, using the same data for the Norway, but entering these according to the brain weights reduced by 18 per cent, which presumably correspond to the brain weights of the Albino at the same age (see Sugita, '18 a), while the data of the Albino were plotted according to the actual brain weight.
7 arranged in the same way as in the corresponding tables 1 and  
2 for the Albino. Chart 2 shows graphically the data presented  
in table 8 which gives the average diameters of the cell bodies  
and the nuclei for each brain-weight group, corrected for the  
fresh condition of the material, by multiplying by the correctioncoefficient for the group, which is cited from my previous paper  
(Sugita, '18 a) and explicitly given in table 8 also. Charts 3  
and 4 show some comparisons in cell sizes in the two forms.  
Chart 3 was plotted according to the actual brain weights of the  
two forms, and chart 4 was plotted, using the same data for  
the Norway, but entering these according to the brain weights  
reduced by 18 per cent, which presumably correspond to the  
brain weights of the Albino at the same age (see Sugita, '18 a),  
while the data of the Albino were plotted according to the actual  
brain weight.  






154  
154






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 8  
TABLE 8


Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the  
Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the laynina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The average values of the two for each brain weight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each brain weight group ^ was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '18 a, '18 b). F = frontal section. H — horizontal section.
lamina pyramidalis and the laynina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and  
the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The average values of the two  
for each brain weight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each  
brain weight group ^ was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '18 a, '18 b).  
F = frontal section. H — horizontal section.  




Line 40,413: Line 37,342:




LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS




LAMINA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMINA GANGLIONARIS




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




Line 40,437: Line 37,365:




GROUP  
GROUP




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  








grams  
grams








M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




FN XI  
FN XI




1.164  
1.164




1.34  
1.34




23.8  
23.8




20.1  
20.1




32.7  
32.7




25.0  
25.0




HNXI  
HNXI




1.164  
1.164




1.30  
1.30




23.0  
23.0




19.1  
19.1




31.8  
31.8




24.2  
24.2








1.164  
1.164








23.4  
23.4




19.6  
19.6




32.3  
32.3




24.6  
24.6




F N XIII  
F N XIII




1.369  
1.369




1.33  
1.33




23.9  
23.9




19.8  
19.8




33.0  
33.0




25.5  
25.5




H N XIII  
H N XIII




1.343  
1.343




1.39  
1.39




24.2  
24.2




20.3  
20.3




33.4  
33.4




25.6  
25.6








1.356  
1.356








24-1  
24-1




20.1  
20.1




33.2  
33.2




25.6  
25.6




FN XIV  
FN XIV




1.430  
1.430




1.35  
1.35




24.0  
24.0




19.7  
19.7




34.2  
34.2




25.5  
25.5




HNXIV  
HNXIV




1.447  
1.447




1.36  
1.36




24.2  
24.2




20.3  
20.3




33.5  
33.5




25.9  
25.9








H39  
H39








24-1  
24-1




20.0  
20.0




33.9  
33.9




25.7  
25.7




FN XV  
FN XV




1.546  
1.546




1.40  
1.40




23.9  
23.9




20.2  
20.2




34.2  
34.2




26.2  
26.2




HNXV  
HNXV




1.520  
1.520




1.42  
1.42




24.5  
24.5




20.5  
20.5




34.5  
34.5




26.4  
26.4








1.533  
1.533








24-2  
24-2




20.4  
20.4




34.4  
34.4




26.3  
26.3




F N XVI  
F N XVI




1.629  
1.629




1.40  
1.40




23.8  
23.8




19.3  
19.3




34.7  
34.7




25.9  
25.9




HNXVI  
HNXVI




1.663  
1.663




1.34  
1.34




23.2  
23.2




19.2  
19.2




33.5  
33.5




25.2  
25.2








1.646  
1.646








23.5  
23.5




19.3  
19.3




34.1  
34.1




25.6  
25.6




F N XVII  
F N XVII




1.739  
1.739




1.37  
1.37




23.8  
23.8




19.5  
19.5




35.1  
35.1




26.7  
26.7




H N XVII  
H N XVII




1.747  
1.747




1.35  
1.35




23.4  
23.4




19.3  
19.3




33.5  
33.5




25.7  
25.7








1.743  
1.743








23.6  
23.6




19.4  
19.4




34.3  
34.3




26.2  
26.2




F N XVIII  
F N XVIII




1.829  
1.829




1.32  
1.32




23.2  
23.2




19.0  
19.0




36.7  
36.7




27.8  
27.8




H N XVIII  
H N XVIII




1.843  
1.843




1.39  
1.39




23.8  
23.8




19.7  
19.7




34.0  
34.0




26.0  
26.0








1.836  
1.836








23.5  
23.5




19.4  
19.4




35.4  
35.4




26.9  
26.9




FN XIX  
FN XIX




1.972  
1.972




1.33  
1.33




22.5  
22.5




18.8  
18.8




38.0  
38.0




27.9  
27.9




HNXIX  
HNXIX




1.953  
1.953




1.34  
1.34




23.6  
23.6




19.8  
19.8




35.7  
35.7




26.5  
26.5








1.963  
1.963








23.1  
23.1




19.3  
19.3




36.8  
36.8




27.2  
27.2




FN XX  
FN XX




2.052  
2.052




1.36  
1.36




23.1  
23.1




18.9  
18.9




38.3  
38.3




28.5  
28.5




HNXX  
HNXX




2.018  
2.018




1.32  
1.32




23.9  
23.9




19.0  
19.0




35.6  
35.6




25.0  
25.0








2.035  
2.035








23.5  
23.5




19.0  
19.0




37.0  
37.0




26.8  
26.8






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






155  
155




Line 41,037: Line 37,961:




TABLE 8— Continued  
TABLE 8— Continued




Line 41,050: Line 37,974:




L.\MINA PYRAMIDALIS  
L.\MINA PYRAMIDALIS




LAMINA GANGLIONARI8  
LAMINA GANGLIONARI8




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT  
CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT




Line 41,074: Line 37,997:




GROUP  
GROUP




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body diameter
diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameter
diameter  








grams  
grams








M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




FN XXI  
FN XXI




2.172  
2.172




1.39  
1.39




23.5  
23.5




19.2  
19.2




39.6  
39.6




28.1  
28.1




HNXXI  
HNXXI




2.156  
2.156




1.34  
1.34




23-. 5  
23-. 5




18.9  
18.9




34.8  
34.8




26.0  
26.0








2.164  
2.164








23.5  
23.5




19.1  
19.1




37.2  
37.2




27.1  
27.1




F N XXIII  
F N XXIII




2.345  
2.345




1.26  
1.26




22.0  
22.0




17.2  
17.2




37.8  
37.8




24.6  
24.6




H N XXIII  
H N XXIII




2.345  
2.345




1.28  
1.28




22.6  
22.6




17.4  
17.4




36.8  
36.8




24.1  
24.1








2.345  
2.345








22.3  
22.3




17.3  
17.3




37.3  
37.3




244'  
244'






^See note on table 6.  
^See note on table 6.






Chart 2 shows for the Norway also that the gangHon cells are  
Chart 2 shows for the Norway also that the gangHon cells are enlarging slowly but steadily throughout life, while the pyramids rather decrease in size slightly in later life, after having attained the maximum size in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams. So, in the Norway as in the case of the Albino, the pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis undergo some diminution in the adult brain.
enlarging slowly but steadily throughout life, while the pyramids  
rather decrease in size slightly in later life, after having attained  
the maximum size in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams. So, in  
the Norway as in the case of the Albino, the pyramidal cells in  
the lamina pyramidalis undergo some diminution in the adult  
brain.  


Chart 3 gives a comparison of the cell sizes in brains of like  
Chart 3 gives a comparison of the cell sizes in brains of like weight in the two forms. In Group N XI, the sizes of the cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids are slightly smaller in the Norway than in the Albino. This is probably explicable by the fact that the Norway brain at this stage is still immature and younger than the Albino brain of like weight. Such a relation has been revealed in other measurements also; for example, in the cortical thickness, the cortical area, etc. (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b). The ganglion cells in the Norway are larger than in the Albino and the difference in the size of the ganglion cells in the two forms increases somewhat as the brain weight advances.
weight in the two forms. In Group N XI, the sizes of the cell  
body and the nucleus of the pyramids are slightly smaller in the  
Norway than in the Albino. This is probably explicable by the  
fact that the Norway brain at this stage is still immature and  
younger than the Albino brain of like weight. Such a relation  
has been revealed in other measurements also; for example, in  
the cortical thickness, the cortical area, etc. (Sugita, '17 a,  
'18 b). The ganglion cells in the Norway are larger than in the  
Albino and the difference in the size of the ganglion cells in the  
two forms increases somewhat as the brain weight advances.  


In Groups above N XIII, the ceU size (pyramidal and ganglion  
In Groups above N XIII, the ceU size (pyramidal and ganglion cells) in the Norway proved to be generally larger than that in the Albino of the same brain weight.
cells) in the Norway proved to be generally larger than that in  
the Albino of the same brain weight.  


The summary in table 9 gives the average diameters for the  
The summary in table 9 gives the average diameters for the adult Albino (Groups XIII to XX) and the adult Norway (Groups N XIII to N XX).
adult Albino (Groups XIII to XX) and the adult Norway  
(Groups N XIII to N XX).  






156  
156






NAOKl SUGITA  
NAOKl SUGITA






TABLE 9  
TABLE 9


Comparison of diameters of cortical cells in the Norway and the albino rats. The  
Comparison of diameters of cortical cells in the Norway and the albino rats. The data used here are the averages in Groups XIII to XX and in Groups N XIII to N XX, taken from tables 3 and 8. Differences in diameter and in volume are calcxilated here, the data of the Albino being taken as the standard of comparison
data used here are the averages in Groups XIII to XX and in Groups N XIII  
to N XX, taken from tables 3 and 8. Differences in diameter and in volume are  
calcxilated here, the data of the Albino being taken as the standard of comparison  




Line 41,288: Line 38,184:




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN WEIGHT  




PYR.\MIDS  
PYR.\MIDS




GANGLION CELLS  
GANGLION CELLS








Cell body  
Cell body




Nucleus  
Nucleus




Cell body  
Cell body




Nucleus  
Nucleus




Albino  
Albino


Norway  
Norway




grams  
grams


1.691  
1.691 1.694
1.694  




22.9  
22.9 23.7
23.7  




18.8  
18.8


19.6  
19.6




32.4  
32.4 34.9
34.9  




24.9  
24.9 26.3
26.3  




Difference in diameter  
Difference in diameter


Difference in volume  
Difference in volume




3.5%  
3.5% 10.9%
10.9%  




4.2%  
4.2% 13.1%
13.1%  




7.7%  
7.7% 24.9%
24.9%  




5.6%  
5.6% 17.8%
17.8%  






This summary shows that in mature brains of like weight, the  
This summary shows that in mature brains of like weight, the pyramids (cell body and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those in the Albino in average diameters by about 4 per cent and in volume by about 12 per cent, and the ganglion cells (cell body and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those in the Albino in average diameters by about 7 per cent and in volume by about 20 per cent, if the Albino be taken as the standard of comparison. It may be said, therefore, that in the Norway the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris exceed much in size those in the Albino, while the pyramids in the Norway are only somewhat greater than those in the Albino.
pyramids (cell body and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those  
in the Albino in average diameters by about 4 per cent and in  
volume by about 12 per cent, and the ganglion cells (cell body  
and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those in the Albino in average diameters by about 7 per cent and in volume by about 20  
per cent, if the Albino be taken as the standard of comparison.  
It may be said, therefore, that in the Norway the ganglion cells  
in the lamina ganglionaris exceed much in size those in the Albino,  
while the pyramids in the Norway are only somewhat greater  
than those in the Albino.  


In chart 4, which gives a comparison of the nerve-cell sizes  
In chart 4, which gives a comparison of the nerve-cell sizes between brains of presumably the same age in the two forms, it is shown clearly that the changes in sizes of cell body and the nucleus according to age are quite similar in both forms. The pyramids attain the maximum size at about twenty to thirty days (in the Albino in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams, in the Norway in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, which both come to the same relative position in the curves), and after that they decrease slowly. The ganglion cells in the Norway grow more rapidly than those in the Albino, even in later life. In the latter the ganglion cells remain almost unchanged in size in brains weighing 1.0 to 1.6 grams, while those in the Norway increase in size rather steadily as the age advances.
between brains of presumably the same age in the two forms, it is  
shown clearly that the changes in sizes of cell body and the  
nucleus according to age are quite similar in both forms. The  
pyramids attain the maximum size at about twenty to thirty  
days (in the Albino in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams, in the  
Norway in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, which both come to  
the same relative position in the curves), and after that they decrease slowly. The ganglion cells in the Norway grow more  
rapidly than those in the Albino, even in later life. In the  
latter the ganglion cells remain almost unchanged in size in  
brains weighing 1.0 to 1.6 grams, while those in the Norway  
increase in size rather steadily as the age advances.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






157  
157






I  
I


40  
40




)iame  
)iame




;er in


er in


micra  
micra




I  
I




Line 41,435: Line 38,302:




38  
38 36
36  




Line 41,451: Line 38,317:




•  




Line 41,460: Line 38,326:




-o—  
-o—




_-^  
_-^








""GC  
""GC




.  
.




Line 41,504: Line 38,370:




34  
34




Line 41,517: Line 38,383:




,— o— -.  
,— o— -.




Line 41,523: Line 38,389:




__</^  
__</^




Line 41,544: Line 38,410:




__.  
__.




0^'  
0^'




"  
"




Line 41,573: Line 38,439:




32  
32


30  
30 28
28  




Line 41,639: Line 38,504:




26  
26




Line 41,652: Line 38,517:




— -^  
— -^




Line 41,659: Line 38,524:
_.^-
_.^-


"^  
"^








—  




'n  
'n




Line 41,680: Line 38,545:




^^^  
^^^




-"—  
-"—




"•'  
"•'








■-.--■  
■-.--■




Line 41,710: Line 38,575:




24  
24




Line 41,739: Line 38,604:




s  
s




Line 41,746: Line 38,611:




■^'l  
■^'l




Line 41,755: Line 38,620:




■~-°— '  
■~-°— '




-^
-^


-.-.  
-.-.




— -- o-
— -- o-


r-"  
r-"




— ^  
— ^




.^  
.^




Line 41,778: Line 38,643:




22  
22 20
20  








1  
1




Line 41,807: Line 38,671:




~„  
~„




Line 41,822: Line 38,686:




^^  
^^




Line 41,839: Line 38,703:




PC'  
PC'




Line 41,856: Line 38,720:




■\, [_.  
■\, [_.




,  
,




Line 41,868: Line 38,732:




^  
^




Line 41,875: Line 38,739:




48  
48




Line 41,888: Line 38,752:




— •  
— •




*^


^




Line 41,920: Line 38,784:




^.  
^.








.< 1  
.< 1




Line 41,950: Line 38,814:




PN'  
PN'








' 1  
' 1




Line 41,984: Line 38,848:




i2 ^  
i2 ^




Line 42,043: Line 38,907:




s  
s




Line 42,076: Line 38,940:




i i  
i i 6 !
6 !  




Line 42,104: Line 38,967:




/i  
/i




Line 42,113: Line 38,976:




1  
1


1  
1




Line 42,134: Line 38,997:




„ 1 i  
„ 1 i








1  
1 i
i  




Line 42,162: Line 39,024:




i 1  
i 1




i ! '  
i ! '




Line 42,183: Line 39,045:




10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 2.0 21 2.2 23 24 yns.  
10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 2.0 21 2.2 23 24 yns.






Chart 2 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the  
Chart 2 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the Norway rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 7. Graph GC, average diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph GN ', average diameter of the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph PC', average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. Graph PN', average diameter of the nucleus of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis.
nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the Norway rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 7. Graph GC, average  
diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph  
GN ', average diameter of the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph PC', average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the  
lamina pyramidalis. Graph PN', average diameter of the nucleus of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis.  






THE JOURNAL OF COMPAE.^^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPAE.^^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






158  
158






NAOKI SUGTTA  
NAOKI SUGTTA






Diaineterinmicra  
Diaineterinmicra




Line 42,259: Line 39,117:




/^  
/^




—-  
—-


—  


—  




GC  
GC




Line 42,284: Line 39,142:




.^..  
.^..




Line 42,303: Line 39,161:




1 ^.  
1 ^.




,."  
,."




-^'^  
-^'^




Line 42,318: Line 39,176:




.. —  
.. —




-r  
-r




•• —  
•• —




GC  
GC




Line 42,415: Line 39,273:




— -t —  
— -t —


"X  
"X




Line 42,426: Line 39,284:




__^  
__^




==^I  
==^I




Line 42,438: Line 39,296:




-—  
-—








^ ! GM  
^ ! GM








\  
\




N  
N




Line 42,460: Line 39,318:




I  
I




Line 42,484: Line 39,342:




2b  
2b




Line 42,491: Line 39,349:




i !  
i !




Line 42,504: Line 39,362:




1  
1




Line 42,513: Line 39,371:




24  
24 22
22  




Line 42,521: Line 39,378:




-•-i  
-•-i








_^_  
_^_




Line 42,547: Line 39,404:




''■■  
■■




.
.


■"  
■"








-•—^.  
-•—^.




- —  
- —




ri:!:^  
ri:!:^




~
~


- —  
- —




— — ■  
— — ■




--0  
--0




— -"-^  
— -"-^




--.  
--.




^^  
^^




Line 42,590: Line 39,447:




1  
1




Line 42,607: Line 39,464:




"pc  
"pc




Line 42,614: Line 39,471:




PC  
PC




Line 42,621: Line 39,478:




1 ■  
1 ■




""f^  
""f^




Line 42,631: Line 39,488:




b--^  
b--^




-r:q- 1 — ^  
-r:q- 1 — ^




-.  
-.




7— V  
7— V




Line 42,649: Line 39,506:




18  
18




Line 42,664: Line 39,521:




^^~^>-,^^  
^^~^>-,^^




Line 42,671: Line 39,528:




^•V^  
^•V^




Line 42,706: Line 39,563:




^^  
^^




Line 42,727: Line 39,584:




rpri!  
rpri!








PM'  
PM'








i4  
i4




Line 42,762: Line 39,619:




1  
1




Line 42,797: Line 39,654:




1  
1




Line 42,806: Line 39,663:




1  
1








: 1 (


1 (




Line 42,836: Line 39,693:




8  
8




Line 42,893: Line 39,750:




1  
1








6  
6


4  
4 2 o
2  
o  




Line 42,929: Line 39,784:




1  
1




Line 42,958: Line 39,813:




1  
1




Line 43,011: Line 39,866:




!  
!




Line 43,017: Line 39,872:




JO it 12 1.3 14- 1.5 16 iT 18 19 2.0 21 12 33 24 yns.  
JO it 12 1.3 14- 1.5 16 iT 18 19 2.0 21 12 33 24 yns.






Chart 3 Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei  
Chart 3 Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to the actual brain weights. The data are taken from tables 3 and 7. The chart has been divided and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent confusion among graphs for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC, and the graphs for the nuclei of the ganglion cells, GN and GN'. In the upper chart: Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Albino. Graph GN', nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino. In the lower chart: Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.
of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina  
pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to the actual brain  
weights. The data are taken from tables 3 and 7. The chart has been divided  
and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent confusion among graphs  
for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC, and the graphs for the nuclei  
of the ganglion cells, GN and GN'. In the upper chart: Graph GC, cell body  
of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells  
in the Albino. Graph GN', nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph  
GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino. In the lower chart: Graph  
PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PC, cell body of the  
pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway.  
Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.  






GROWTH OF THE CEEEBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEEEBRAL CORTEX






159  
159






Diameter in micra.  
Diameter in micra.




Line 43,085: Line 39,928:




/  
/




o^
o^


—  








-fee  
-fee




Line 43,110: Line 39,953:




-^'  
-^'




y  
y




Line 43,128: Line 39,971:




^.  
^.




^■'
^■'


o^"  
o^"




Line 43,144: Line 39,987:




,  
,




Line 43,151: Line 39,994:




--—  
--—




-"be  
-"be








^ -"  
^ -"




f"  
f"




--
--


"  
"




Line 43,188: Line 40,031:




/  
/




Line 43,229: Line 40,072:




.-—  
.-—




-^.
-^.


—N  
—N




\,  
\,




Line 43,250: Line 40,093:




•  




Line 43,261: Line 40,104:




^^.-'  
^^.-'




Line 43,267: Line 40,110:




\  
\




k  
k








i V».»  
i V».»








/  
/




Line 43,332: Line 40,175:




^  
^




":;  
":;




^  
^




Line 43,347: Line 40,190:




! — ' —  
! — ' —




^r-jn  
^r-jn




OS  
OS




1-.:^.  
1-.:^.




=i-.  
=i-.








1  
1




Line 43,371: Line 40,214:




^^.  
^^.




Line 43,380: Line 40,223:




\  
\








PC  
PC




"pc  
"pc








^i="  
^i="




Line 43,402: Line 40,245:




"^  
"^




Line 43,409: Line 40,252:




:=>-«=


=>-«=


=— V  
=— V




'^^  
'^^




Line 43,426: Line 40,269:




h~^.J  
h~^.J




Line 43,449: Line 40,292:




pre  
pre




"PN  
"PN




Line 43,561: Line 40,404:




1  
1




Line 43,636: Line 40,479:




1  
1




Line 43,642: Line 40,485:




a9 LO 1.1 32 13 14 15 16 IT IS 19 20 ^s.  
a9 LO 1.1 32 13 14 15 16 IT IS 19 20 ^s.






Chart 4 J Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei  
Chart 4 J Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to age. The Norway brain weight was reduced by 18 per cent and entered at the corresponding brain weight of the Albino. The data were taken from tables 3 and 7. The chart has been divided and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent confusion among the graphs for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC, and the graphs for the nuclei of the ganglion cells, GN and ON'. In the upper chart: Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Albino. Graph GN ', nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino. In'the lower chart : Graph PC ', cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.
of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina  
pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to age. The  
Norway brain weight was reduced by 18 per cent and entered at the corresponding brain weight of the Albino. The data were taken from tables 3 and 7. The  
chart has been divided and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent  
confusion among the graphs for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC,  
and the graphs for the nuclei of the ganglion cells, GN and ON'. In the upper  
chart: Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC,  
cell body of the ganglion cells in the Albino. Graph GN ', nucleus of the ganglion  
cells in the Norway. Graph GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino.  
In'the lower chart : Graph PC ', cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph  
PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.  






160 NAOKI SUGITA  
160 NAOKI SUGITA


My study of the Norway cortex did not extend to the early life  
My study of the Norway cortex did not extend to the early life of the animal, but, from the courses of the curves shown in chart 4, it seems probable that, in early life, before ten days after birth, the developmental changes in the cell size would be quite similar to those in the Albino, which have been minutely described in part I, and that we may therefore apply to the Norway rat also the same developmental phases as were formerly applied to the Albino.
of the animal, but, from the courses of the curves shown in chart  
4, it seems probable that, in early life, before ten days after birth,  
the developmental changes in the cell size would be quite similar  
to those in the Albino, which have been minutely described in  
part I, and that we may therefore apply to the Norway rat also  
the same developmental phases as were formerly applied to the  
Albino.  


Morphological changes in the cytoplasmic and nuclear structures in the Norway rat cells are similar to those in the Albino,  
Morphological changes in the cytoplasmic and nuclear structures in the Norway rat cells are similar to those in the Albino, if the comparison is made at like ages, so that figures 3 and 4 in part I of this paper may be considered to represent Norway cells as well.
if the comparison is made at like ages, so that figures 3 and 4  
in part I of this paper may be considered to represent Norway  
cells as well.  


Briefly stated, in the case of the Norway rat, the maximum size  
Briefly stated, in the case of the Norway rat, the maximum size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams) is cell body 21 x 28 m and nucleus 20x21 n; values only slightly larger than those in the Albino. The final size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (in brains weighing 1.9 to 2.3 grams) is cell body 32x43 n and nucleus 26 X 27 n, which is much larger than the corresponding measurements for the Albino.
of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (in brains weighing  
1.3 to 1.5 grams) is cell body 21 x 28 m and nucleus 20x21 n;  
values only slightly larger than those in the Albino. The final  
size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (in brains  
weighing 1.9 to 2.3 grams) is cell body 32x43 n and nucleus  
26 X 27 n, which is much larger than the corresponding measurements for the Albino.  


Nissl bodies are already seen in brains weighing 1.13 grams —  
Nissl bodies are already seen in brains weighing 1.13 grams — the youngest case in my material — but these bodies assume their mature appearance first in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams.. As regards other developmental changes both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, the statements made for the Albino are all applicable to the Norway, if the comparison is made at like ages.
the youngest case in my material — but these bodies assume their  
mature appearance first in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams..  
As regards other developmental changes both in the cytoplasm  
and in the nucleus, the statements made for the Albino are all  
applicable to the Norway, if the comparison is made at like ages.  


SUMMARY  
SUMMARY


1. In the full-grown Norway rat (Groups N XIX to N XXIII),  
1. In the full-grown Norway rat (Groups N XIX to N XXIII), the average size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is cell body 20 x 27 ii, nucleus 18x19 m, and the average size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body 32 x 43 n, nucleus 26 x 27 At.
the average size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is cell  
body 20 x 27 ii, nucleus 18x19 m, and the average size of the  
ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body 32 x 43 n,  
nucleus 26 x 27 At.  


2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their  
2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size (cell body 21 x 28 m, nucleus 20 x 21 m) in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, and after that they slightly diminish
maximum size (cell body 21 x 28 m, nucleus 20 x 21 m) in brains  
weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, and after that they slightly diminish  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 161  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 161


in size, but the internal structure matures progressively as the  
in size, but the internal structure matures progressively as the brain weight increases. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells increases in size continuously throughout life. The last entry for the nucleus of the ganglion cells is an exception to this statement.
brain weight increases. The cell body and the nucleus of the  
ganglion cells increases in size continuously throughout life.  
The last entry for the nucleus of the ganglion cells is an exception  
to this statement.  


3. As compared with the corresponding cells in the albino rat,  
3. As compared with the corresponding cells in the albino rat, the pyramids in the adult Norway rat (Groups N XIII to N XX) exceed those in the Albino in diameter on the average by 4 per cent and in volume by 12 per cent and the ganglion cells also exceed in diameter on the average by 7 per cent and in volume by 20 or more per cent.
the pyramids in the adult Norway rat (Groups N XIII to N XX)  
exceed those in the Albino in diameter on the average by 4 per  
cent and in volume by 12 per cent and the ganglion cells also  
exceed in diameter on the average by 7 per cent and in volume  
by 20 or more per cent.  


4. The course of development and the morphological changes  
4. The course of development and the morphological changes in the Norway cells are similar to those in the albino rat, if compared at like ages. At the same age, the Norway brain weight, less 18 per cent, is taken as equal to the brain weight of the Albino.
in the Norway cells are similar to those in the albino rat, if compared at like ages. At the same age, the Norway brain weight,  
less 18 per cent, is taken as equal to the brain weight of the  
Albino.  






162 NAOKT SUGITA  
162 NAOKT SUGITA


LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


Allen, Ezra 1916 Studies in cell division in the Albino rat (Mus norvegicus  
Allen, Ezra 1916 Studies in cell division in the Albino rat (Mus norvegicus var. alba). II. Experiments on technique, with description of a method for demonstrating the cytological details of dividing cells in brain and testis. Anat. Rec, vol. 10, pp. 565-586.
var. alba). II. Experiments on technique, with description of a  
method for demonstrating the cytological details of dividing cells in  
brain and testis. Anat. Rec, vol. 10, pp. 565-586.  


Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.  
Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.


Donaldson, H. H., and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with  
Donaldson, H. H., and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.
the albino in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight  
and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord. Jour.  
Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.  


IsENSCHMiD, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abhandl. der Konigl. Preussischen Akad. d. Wissenschaften.  
IsENSCHMiD, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abhandl. der Konigl. Preussischen Akad. d. Wissenschaften.


King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the  
King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material for a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 213-244.
albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material  
for a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 213-244.  


Stefanowska, Michelinb 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales  
Stefanowska, Michelinb 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales chez las souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Soc. Royale des Sciences nied. et naturelles de Bruxelles,, vol. 7.
chez las souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Soc. Royale des  
Sciences nied. et naturelles de Bruxelles,, vol. 7.  


SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral  
SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growl-h of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Oomp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3. 1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
cortex. II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex  
during the postnatal growl-h of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Oomp.  
Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.  
1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  


III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus  
III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.  


1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus  
IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness  
in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.  


1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a  
V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal section of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.
unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the  
albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the  
cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the  
frontal and sagittal section of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus  
norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat.  
Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.  






author's abstract of this paper issued  
author's abstract of this paper issued by the bibliographic service, march 30.
by the bibliographic service, march 30.  






ON TACTILE RESPONSES OF THE DE-EYED HAMLET  
ON TACTILE RESPONSES OF THE DE-EYED HAMLET (EPINEPHELUS STRIATUS)i
(EPINEPHELUS STRIATUS)i  


W. J. CROZIER  
W. J. CROZIER


1 . The observations herein discussed grew out of a first attempt  
1 . The observations herein discussed grew out of a first attempt to examine the physiology of excitation of the ' common chemical' sense in a teleost bearing a well-developed investment of scales. The work contemplated was rendered impossible, for reasons which will shortly appear, but the cause of the failure has a distinct bearing upon the original problem and a certain significance in several other directions as well.
to examine the physiology of excitation of the ' common chemical'  
sense in a teleost bearing a well-developed investment of scales.  
The work contemplated was rendered impossible, for reasons  
which will shortly appear, but the cause of the failure has a distinct bearing upon the original problem and a certain significance in several other directions as well.  


Epinephelus striatus Bloch, the 'hamlet' or 'grouper,' was  
Epinephelus striatus Bloch, the 'hamlet' or 'grouper,' was used in these experiments. The tests which were contemplated involved the local application of solutions to the skin of the hamlet, and it was necessary to employ fishes in which the chance of visual response had been eliminated. Recourse was had to the removal of the eyes rather than to the use of temporary blinding devices. Hamlets are exceedingly handy, and the removal of one or both eyes, usually while under chloretone anaesthesia, was followed, by quick recovery. Blinded individuals lived in the laboratory for more than four months.
used in these experiments. The tests which were contemplated  
involved the local application of solutions to the skin of the  
hamlet, and it was necessary to employ fishes in which the  
chance of visual response had been eliminated. Recourse was  
had to the removal of the eyes rather than to the use of temporary  
blinding devices. Hamlets are exceedingly handy, and the removal of one or both eyes, usually while under chloretone anaesthesia, was followed, by quick recovery. Blinded individuals  
lived in the laboratory for more than four months.  


In preliminary tests different regions of the surface of de-eyed  
In preliminary tests different regions of the surface of de-eyed hamlets were examined by applying to them from a pipette small volumes of acid and other solutions. Control experiments quickly demonstrated, however, that these fishes were reactive to the mere presence (or near approach) of the undischarged pipette, even when it contained only sea-water. A thoroughly cleaned glass rod, when carefully brought near a de-eyed hamlet, also induced responses of a deliberate and well-defined character.
hamlets were examined by applying to them from a pipette small  
volumes of acid and other solutions. Control experiments quickly  
demonstrated, however, that these fishes were reactive to the  
mere presence (or near approach) of the undischarged pipette,  
even when it contained only sea-water. A thoroughly cleaned  
glass rod, when carefully brought near a de-eyed hamlet, also  
induced responses of a deliberate and well-defined character.  


A very pronounced degree of sensitivity is manifest in these  
A very pronounced degree of sensitivity is manifest in these responses, and the source of stimulation is rather precisely located
responses, and the source of stimulation is rather precisely located  


^ Contributions from the Bermuda Biological Station for Research. No. 86.  
^ Contributions from the Bermuda Biological Station for Research. No. 86.


163  
163






164 W. J. CROZIER  
164 W. J. CROZIER


by the blind fish. When a clean glass rod is carefully and very  
by the blind fish. When a clean glass rod is carefully and very slowly brought near one side of the head, say to within 4.5 or 5 cm. of the gill cover, the fish bends in the opposite direction and swims slowly backward; or it may back deliberately away for 10 or 15 cm., then abruptly turn away from the side stimulated and assume a position at right angles to that held before being stimulated. When one side of the caudal peduncle is stimulated in this way, the tail is caused to bend away from that side, and the fish swims forward and usually turns in a complete half-circle away from the area of activation.
slowly brought near one side of the head, say to within 4.5 or 5  
cm. of the gill cover, the fish bends in the opposite direction and  
swims slowly backward; or it may back deliberately away for  
10 or 15 cm., then abruptly turn away from the side stimulated  
and assume a position at right angles to that held before being  
stimulated. When one side of the caudal peduncle is stimulated  
in this way, the tail is caused to bend away from that side, and the  
fish swims forward and usually turns in a complete half-circle  
away from the area of activation.  


Unblinded fishes, when not resting on the bottom, usually give  
Unblinded fishes, when not resting on the bottom, usually give somewhat similar responses, although rarely so if any region other than the anterior end is being 'stimulated' by the near approach of a glass rod. With de-eyed individuals the best results are obtained when the fish is quietly swimming or is stationary in mid-water. As noted by Jordan ('17, p. 447), the normal hamlet usually lies on the bottom of an aquarium, particularly in the angle between a wall and the base of the container. When in the latter position, the hamlet does not usually react by body movements to the close approach of a glass or metal rod, although eye movements and increased vibrations of the pectoral or other fins may show that the foreign object is seen and perhaps also sensed in some additional manner. It frequently happened that responses of the kind described were not obtained from totally blinded hamlets when they were in a similar position; that is, when they were resting in a corner of the aquarium.
somewhat similar responses, although rarely so if any region  
other than the anterior end is being 'stimulated' by the near  
approach of a glass rod. With de-eyed individuals the best results are obtained when the fish is quietly swimming or is stationary in mid-water. As noted by Jordan ('17, p. 447), the  
normal hamlet usually lies on the bottom of an aquarium, particularly in the angle between a wall and the base of the container. When in the latter position, the hamlet does not usually  
react by body movements to the close approach of a glass or  
metal rod, although eye movements and increased vibrations of  
the pectoral or other fins may show that the foreign object is  
seen and perhaps also sensed in some additional manner. It  
frequently happened that responses of the kind described were  
not obtained from totally blinded hamlets when they were in a  
similar position; that is, when they were resting in a corner of  
the aquarium.  


This applies also to hamlets from which only one eye had  
This applies also to hamlets from which only one eye had been removed; animals so prepared characteristically seek a corner of the aquarium- — a dark corner, if such be available — and for long periods remain in a fixed position with the side
been removed; animals so prepared characteristically seek a  
corner of the aquarium- — a dark corner, if such be available —  
and for long periods remain in a fixed position with the side  


- The aquarium used in most of these experiments was that already described  
- The aquarium used in most of these experiments was that already described in Jordan's paper ('17). It had solid wooden ends and plane glass sides. In working with hamlets having one or both eyes functional the arrangements were such that the experimenter was screened from the fish, and the glass, or other, rod was suspended from above and moved about by an appropriate arrangement of strings.
in Jordan's paper ('17). It had solid wooden ends and plane glass sides. In  
working with hamlets having one or both eyes functional the arrangements were  
such that the experimenter was screened from the fish, and the glass, or other,  
rod was suspended from above and moved about by an appropriate arrangement  
of strings.  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 165  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 165


carrying the intact eye pressed against the confining wall. They  
carrying the intact eye pressed against the confining wall. They seldom, if ever, moved in any way as the result of a solid object being brought near them on the hlmd side, although when actually touched on that side, however lightly, they made exceedingly violent escaping movements — much more vigorous movements, in fact, than are ordinarily evidenced by the normal seeing fish.
seldom, if ever, moved in any way as the result of a solid object  
being brought near them on the hlmd side, although when actually touched on that side, however lightly, they made exceedingly violent escaping movements — much more vigorous movements, in fact, than are ordinarily evidenced by the normal  
seeing fish.  


Whether or not the delicate form of sensitivity described for  
Whether or not the delicate form of sensitivity described for the completely blinded hamlet is present and actively functional in the unblinded animal cannot be decided from the facts so far given; but it can be shown that the responses in question are not the result of special sensory alterations determined by or during anaesthesia, since 1) different anaesthetics (chloroform, ether, chloretone) and various degrees of narcosis could be used for the de-eying operation without affecting the result in any way;
the completely blinded hamlet is present and actively functional  
in the unblinded animal cannot be decided from the facts so far  
given; but it can be shown that the responses in question are  
not the result of special sensory alterations determined by or  
during anaesthesia, since 1) different anaesthetics (chloroform,  
ether, chloretone) and various degrees of narcosis could be used  
for the de-eying operation without affecting the result in any way;  


2) there is no discernible increase in sensitivity after a fish previously de-eyed has recovered from a second anaesthetization ;  
2) there is no discernible increase in sensitivity after a fish previously de-eyed has recovered from a second anaesthetization ;


3) a non-de-eyed fish does not give responses of the character  
3) a non-de-eyed fish does not give responses of the character under discussion after recovery from (chloretone) anaesthesia;
under discussion after recovery from (chloretone) anaesthesia;  


4) several hamlets from which the eyes were removed without  
4) several hamlets from which the eyes were removed without anaesthesia, gave well-defined reactions of this nature.
anaesthesia, gave well-defined reactions of this nature.  


Inasmuch as the reactions to the careful approximation of solid  
Inasmuch as the reactions to the careful approximation of solid bodies were secured very shortly after the operation, and were evident almost to their maximal extent within twenty-four hours, it is doubtful if the inere absence of the eyes has produced this form of sensitivity; the following results, as well as the studies upon normal individuals, support such a conclusion:
bodies were secured very shortly after the operation, and were  
evident almost to their maximal extent within twenty-four  
hours, it is doubtful if the inere absence of the eyes has produced  
this form of sensitivity; the following results, as well as the  
studies upon normal individuals, support such a conclusion:  


a) When the eyes of a medium-sized hamlet were covered by a  
a) When the eyes of a medium-sized hamlet were covered by a cap of black velvet, the fish became very restless (owing to mechanical irritation of the harness required to fasten the cap) ; but after about ten hours, good 'avoiding reactions' were obtained upon the careful approach of a glass rod, both at the snout and at the caudal peduncle.
cap of black velvet, the fish became very restless (owing to mechanical irritation of the harness required to fasten the cap) ;  
but after about ten hours, good 'avoiding reactions' were obtained upon the careful approach of a glass rod, both at the  
snout and at the caudal peduncle.  


b) In several hamlets the cornea of either eye, or of both  
b) In several hamlets the cornea of either eye, or of both eyes, was rendered opaque by searing with a hot iron. The fishes so treated behaved respectively as did those with one or both eyes removed.
eyes, was rendered opaque by searing with a hot iron. The  
fishes so treated behaved respectively as did those with one or  
both eyes removed.  






166 W. J. CROZTER  
166 W. J. CROZTER


The delicate sensitivity manifested in the responses of the  
The delicate sensitivity manifested in the responses of the bhnd hamlet upon the near approach of foreign objects is therefore not induced by the absence of the eyes or by procedures incidental to their removal; it is present in the normal seeing fish, although reactions to which it might give rise are largely inhibited through visual and coarse mechanical stimulations (touch). It is obvious that this form of irritability, if present but unrecognized, might lead to serious errors in the interpretation of different phases of behavior not only in the hamlet, but also in other, fishes where it may occur.
bhnd hamlet upon the near approach of foreign objects is therefore not induced by the absence of the eyes or by procedures incidental to their removal; it is present in the normal seeing fish,  
although reactions to which it might give rise are largely inhibited through visual and coarse mechanical stimulations (touch).  
It is obvious that this form of irritability, if present but unrecognized, might lead to serious errors in the interpretation of different phases of behavior not only in the hamlet, but also in other,  
fishes where it may occur.  


" 2. De-eyed hamlets, stationary in mid-water or slowly swimming, but not in contact with the bottom or walls of the aquarium,  
" 2. De-eyed hamlets, stationary in mid-water or slowly swimming, but not in contact with the bottom or walls of the aquarium, were found to show the following regional distribution of sensitivity to the gentle approach of the rounded end of a clean glass rod (3 mm. diameter) : tip of the snout, side of head, caudal peduncle, top of head, side of body (especially in the region covered by the pectoral fin w^^hen it is folded back on to the body), anterior edge of the erect spinous dorsal fin, soft dorsal fin, caudal fin (except near its distal extremity).
were found to show the following regional distribution of sensitivity to the gentle approach of the rounded end of a clean  
glass rod (3 mm. diameter) : tip of the snout, side of head, caudal  
peduncle, top of head, side of body (especially in the region covered by the pectoral fin w^^hen it is folded back on to the body),  
anterior edge of the erect spinous dorsal fin, soft dorsal fin,  
caudal fin (except near its distal extremity).  


The parts are arranged in the foregoing list according to the  
The parts are arranged in the foregoing list according to the vigor of the reactions induced. No well-defined responses could be secured from the ventral surface of the animal nor from the pectoral or pelvic fins. The nature of the response varies with the different regions of the animal; thus, the spinous dorsal was pulled down close to the body when its anterior edge was approached, while the soft dorsal responded by vibratory movements.
vigor of the reactions induced. No well-defined responses could  
be secured from the ventral surface of the animal nor from the  
pectoral or pelvic fins. The nature of the response varies with  
the different regions of the animal; thus, the spinous dorsal was  
pulled down close to the body when its anterior edge was  
approached, while the soft dorsal responded by vibratory  
movements.  


About twenty-five individuals were carefully studied to determine the distribution of this sensitivity to 'contact at a distance.' The critical tests were made in filtered 'outside' seawater (the circulating water of the laboratory being less alkaline  
About twenty-five individuals were carefully studied to determine the distribution of this sensitivity to 'contact at a distance.' The critical tests were made in filtered 'outside' seawater (the circulating water of the laboratory being less alkaline than normal sea-water), and the conditions were so arranged that no shadows from the body of the experimenter or from the glass rod fell upon the surface of the fish. These tests were made upon single isolated fishes in non-running water.
than normal sea-water), and the conditions were so arranged  
that no shadows from the body of the experimenter or from the  
glass rod fell upon the surface of the fish. These tests were  
made upon single isolated fishes in non-running water.  


Rods or wires of a number of different materials were found to  
Rods or wires of a number of different materials were found to induce reactions of this type. In all cases the rods were well
induce reactions of this type. In all cases the rods were well  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 167  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 167


cleaned; metal rods or wires were brightly polished and the  
cleaned; metal rods or wires were brightly polished and the strips of wood were freshly planed. Tests were made with rods immediately after cleaning and also when they had lain in seawater for an hour or more. The substances used were:
strips of wood were freshly planed. Tests were made with rods  
immediately after cleaning and also when they had lain in seawater for an hour or more. The substances used were:  


Metals: copper, platinum, gold, zinc, cadmium, aluminum,  
Metals: copper, platinum, gold, zinc, cadmium, aluminum, wrought iron, steel, galvanized iron, and brass.
wrought iron, steel, galvanized iron, and brass.  


Woods: 'cedar,' spruce, oak, elm and cypress.  
Woods: 'cedar,' spruce, oak, elm and cypress.


Miscellaneous: glass, hard rubber, sealing-wax, soft rubber  
Miscellaneous: glass, hard rubber, sealing-wax, soft rubber (red, white, and black tubing), porcelain, hard paraffin, sandstone, and compressed carbon.
(red, white, and black tubing), porcelain, hard paraffin, sandstone, and compressed carbon.  


The great variety of materials which induced the same response is sufficient to show that the process of stimulation did  
The great variety of materials which induced the same response is sufficient to show that the process of stimulation did not depend upon the diffusion of chemical excitants nor (in the case of the metals) upon any 'action at a distance,' either primarily electrical or through the escape of charged atoms of metal (cf. Mathews, '07). The cadmium stick and the wires of platinum used in the tests were particularly pure, and no difference in the response they induced could be detected after they had been covered with neutral paraffin. The reactions are somewhat variable, and it is conceivable that some substance may stimulate in this fashion (i.e., 'chemically') more than others, but I could find no evidence of it in the hamlet. This point was tested with some care, because I had learned from Prof. G. H. Parker of reactions found by him with the catfish when approached by metal rods. Nor could I find anything of this sort in Amphioxus, Balanoglossus, sea-anemones, crabs (blinded), the 'rhinophores' of nudibranchs, or several teleosts that were examined.
not depend upon the diffusion of chemical excitants nor (in the  
case of the metals) upon any 'action at a distance,' either primarily electrical or through the escape of charged atoms of  
metal (cf. Mathews, '07). The cadmium stick and the wires of  
platinum used in the tests were particularly pure, and no difference in the response they induced could be detected after they  
had been covered with neutral paraffin. The reactions are somewhat variable, and it is conceivable that some substance may  
stimulate in this fashion (i.e., 'chemically') more than others,  
but I could find no evidence of it in the hamlet. This point  
was tested with some care, because I had learned from Prof.  
G. H. Parker of reactions found by him with the catfish when  
approached by metal rods. Nor could I find anything of this  
sort in Amphioxus, Balanoglossus, sea-anemones, crabs (blinded),  
the 'rhinophores' of nudibranchs, or several teleosts that were  
examined.  


Rods of brass, iron, glass, or wood of different diameters and  
Rods of brass, iron, glass, or wood of different diameters and shapes were then tried. Fishes of fairly uniform size (about 30 cm. length) were used in comparative experiments. To avoid, as far as possible, communicating undesired trembling movements to the rods, and thus to the water, the rods were in many tests clamped firmly in the middle of the aquariuni and the behavior of the blinded hamlet when approaching them during slow swimming movements was compared witlj the result when a rod was carefully brought near a part of the body. The result was in
shapes were then tried. Fishes of fairly uniform size (about 30  
cm. length) were used in comparative experiments. To avoid,  
as far as possible, communicating undesired trembling movements  
to the rods, and thus to the water, the rods were in many tests  
clamped firmly in the middle of the aquariuni and the behavior  
of the blinded hamlet when approaching them during slow swimming movements was compared witlj the result when a rod was  
carefully brought near a part of the body. The result was in  






168 W. J. CROZIER  
168 W. J. CROZIER


either case the same; when slowly swimming the de-eyed hamlet  
either case the same; when slowly swimming the de-eyed hamlet will most often neatly avoid contact with a rod or wire situated in its path, but more successfully if the end or edge of the rod presents a sharp corner. Similarly, in many cases, the fish is somewhat better stimulated by a thin wire (less than 1 mm. in diameter) than by a thicker one and by a rod of square cross section than by one of similar size (several centimeters in diameter) but with a smoothly rounded end and circular cross section.
will most often neatly avoid contact with a rod or wire situated in  
its path, but more successfully if the end or edge of the rod presents a sharp corner. Similarly, in many cases, the fish is somewhat better stimulated by a thin wire (less than 1 mm. in diameter) than by a thicker one and by a rod of square cross section  
than by one of similar size (several centimeters in diameter)  
but with a smoothly rounded end and circular cross section.  


The inference from these tests is, unavoidably, that mechanical  
The inference from these tests is, unavoidably, that mechanical deformations in the water, of a somewhat irregular character, are the means of stimulation. It was shown by appropriate elimination experiments that the nostrils and lateral-line organs could not be concerned, and this is further made obvious from a consideration of the local nature and manner of distribution of these reactions over the body of the fish.^
deformations in the water, of a somewhat irregular character, are  
the means of stimulation. It was shown by appropriate elimination experiments that the nostrils and lateral-line organs could  
not be concerned, and this is further made obvious from a consideration of the local nature and manner of distribution of these  
reactions over the body of the fish.^  


The mode of excitation in these reactions is in certain particulars significantly different from that in some reactions which  
The mode of excitation in these reactions is in certain particulars significantly different from that in some reactions which have previously been attributed to tactile excitation of the skin in teleosts (cf. Parker, '04, pp. 61, 62; Jordan, '17). A current from a pipette or ripples at the water surface frequently failed to induce any perceptible reaction in a de-eyed hamlet, although immediately after this, or immediately before, a slender rod or wire slowly brought to within 5 cm. of the snout or caudal peduncle led to well-defined reactions. Moreover, it was often possible to get good reactions to a thin rod in water much disturbed by a current of relatively large volume.
have previously been attributed to tactile excitation of the skin  
in teleosts (cf. Parker, '04, pp. 61, 62; Jordan, '17). A current  
from a pipette or ripples at the water surface frequently failed  
to induce any perceptible reaction in a de-eyed hamlet, although immediately after this, or immediately before, a slender  
rod or wire slowly brought to within 5 cm. of the snout or caudal  
peduncle led to well-defined reactions. Moreover, it was often  
possible to get good reactions to a thin rod in water much disturbed by a current of relatively large volume.  


The snout and lips of the hamlet were the most sensitive regions of the animal's surface. There is thus a general parallelism  
The snout and lips of the hamlet were the most sensitive regions of the animal's surface. There is thus a general parallelism between the distribution of this delicate tactile sensitivity and that of skin sensitivity to currents, as described by Jordan ('17). Whether or not this indicates the actvity of the tactile corpuscles in the reactions herein discussed, I am not sure; but I suspect that the tactile corpuscles may not be involved, although con ^ It may be suggested that the reactions of Amoebae to insoluble substances, as described by Schaeffer ('16), are possibly due to some such form of irritability as that herein considered. Certain peculiar phenomena obtainable with human erythrocytes (Oliver, '14; Kite) are also suggestive in this connection.
between the distribution of this delicate tactile sensitivity and  
that of skin sensitivity to currents, as described by Jordan ('17).  
Whether or not this indicates the actvity of the tactile corpuscles  
in the reactions herein discussed, I am not sure; but I suspect  
that the tactile corpuscles may not be involved, although con
^ It may be suggested that the reactions of Amoebae to insoluble substances,  
as described by Schaeffer ('16), are possibly due to some such form of irritability  
as that herein considered. Certain peculiar phenomena obtainable with human  
erythrocytes (Oliver, '14; Kite) are also suggestive in this connection.  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 169  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 169


elusive evidence for this belief cannot be adduced. The higher  
elusive evidence for this belief cannot be adduced. The higher sensitivity of the anterior end of the de-eyed hamlet was not occasioned by the presence of freshly exposed tissue surfaces in the orbits or by other injuries, since in several cases the animals were kept in aquaria for more than four months, long after the orbit surfaces had cleanly healed, and their reactions were as distinct as those of recently de-eyed fishes.
sensitivity of the anterior end of the de-eyed hamlet was not  
occasioned by the presence of freshly exposed tissue surfaces in  
the orbits or by other injuries, since in several cases the animals  
were kept in aquaria for more than four months, long after the  
orbit surfaces had cleanly healed, and their reactions were as  
distinct as those of recently de-eyed fishes.  


The relatively acute sensitivity of the region behind each  
The relatively acute sensitivity of the region behind each pectoral fin, as judged by the reactions obtained when it was approached by a rod, is probably a secondary condition, due to the fact that the pectoral fins are usually in slight motion, creating in the water waves which impinge upon tl^se surfaces; any disturbance of these wave fronts or fin currents would result in a greater stimulus than that afforded by the near approach of a rod or wire to a stationary part.
pectoral fin, as judged by the reactions obtained when it was  
approached by a rod, is probably a secondary condition, due to  
the fact that the pectoral fins are usually in slight motion, creating in the water waves which impinge upon tl^se surfaces; any  
disturbance of these wave fronts or fin currents would result  
in a greater stimulus than that afforded by the near approach  
of a rod or wire to a stationary part.  


3. I have ventured to describe these tactile reactions of the  
3. I have ventured to describe these tactile reactions of the de-eyed hamlet at some length, because the fine, 'epicritic' nature of the sensitivity evidenced toward minute mechanical disturbances in the water is of particular use for the purposes of certain critical experiments regarding chemical stimulation of the skin of fishes. It will be observed that crude tests made by applying solutions from a ffipette to the skin of Epinephelus would be quite pointless, since the blinded fish reacts with precision to the presence of the undischarged pipette. The degree of sensitivity in these delicate tactile reactions is nevertheless rather definitely fixed at a uniform level, as seen in the more than twenty-five individuals I have examined. The speed, vigor, and amplitude of these reactions give them a perfectly definite character. It is conceivable that this tactile sensitivity might be enhanced or diminished under various conditions and that such variations would be reflected in the behavior of the de-eyed fishes, and that, in fact, a good opportunity would be offered for discovering the way in which tactile terminals may be influenced by such treatment of the skin as is involved in the local application of chemical excitants. If, as is supposed by Coghill ('14, p. 197; '16, p. 302), those responses of fishes and amphibians usually regarded as being initiated through excitation of ter
de-eyed hamlet at some length, because the fine, 'epicritic' nature  
of the sensitivity evidenced toward minute mechanical disturbances in the water is of particular use for the purposes of certain critical experiments regarding chemical stimulation of the  
skin of fishes. It will be observed that crude tests made by  
applying solutions from a ffipette to the skin of Epinephelus  
would be quite pointless, since the blinded fish reacts with precision to the presence of the undischarged pipette. The degree  
of sensitivity in these delicate tactile reactions is nevertheless  
rather definitely fixed at a uniform level, as seen in the more than  
twenty-five individuals I have examined. The speed, vigor,  
and amplitude of these reactions give them a perfectly definite  
character. It is conceivable that this tactile sensitivity might  
be enhanced or diminished under various conditions and that  
such variations would be reflected in the behavior of the de-eyed  
fishes, and that, in fact, a good opportunity would be offered  
for discovering the way in which tactile terminals may be influenced  
by such treatment of the skin as is involved in the local application of chemical excitants. If, as is supposed by Coghill ('14,  
p. 197; '16, p. 302), those responses of fishes and amphibians  
usually regarded as being initiated through excitation of ter




170 W. J. CROZIER  
170 W. J. CROZIER


minals representing a 'common chemical sense/ are in realitj'^  
minals representing a 'common chemical sense/ are in realitj'^ due to the heterologous activation of tactile and pain terminals/ owing to destruction of the epithelium, then it would be expected that the local application of irritants to the skin of the hamlet would produce one of two effects; either tactile sensitivity would be noticeably increased immediately thereafter or, following relatively severe treatment, it would be found more difficult to bring about tactile activation. In the former case it might be held that excitants for the 'common chemical' sense are capable of acting upon tactile receptors in a sensory way.
due to the heterologous activation of tactile and pain terminals/  
owing to destruction of the epithelium, then it would be expected  
that the local application of irritants to the skin of the hamlet  
would produce one of two effects; either tactile sensitivity would  
be noticeably increased immediately thereafter or, following  
relatively severe treatment, it would be found more difficult to  
bring about tactile activation. In the former case it might be  
held that excitants for the 'common chemical' sense are capable  
of acting upon tactile receptors in a sensory way.  


In testing this matter, my experiments dealt mainly with the  
In testing this matter, my experiments dealt mainly with the areas of skin on QJther side of the caudal peduncle, although other regions were also examined, notably, the lips and giU-covers.
areas of skin on QJther side of the caudal peduncle, although other  
regions were also examined, notably, the lips and giU-covers.  


In different individuals these areas were treated with solutions  
In different individuals these areas were treated with solutions of cocaine hydrochloride in sea-water by painting the surface in question (held out of water) with a brush. The dermal chromatopores in the region cocainized quickly contract and remain contracted for some hours. The area treated is sharply outlined by the blanching of the skin. The narcotized area is thus clearly delimited for reference in stimulation trials.
of cocaine hydrochloride in sea-water by painting the surface in  
question (held out of water) with a brush. The dermal chromatopores in the region cocainized quickly contract and remain contracted for some hours. The area treated is sharply outlined  
by the blanching of the skin. The narcotized area is thus  
clearly delimited for reference in stimulation trials.  


Even slight cocainization causes a complete suppression of the  
Even slight cocainization causes a complete suppression of the sensitivity to rods or wires, as well* as to water currents; slightly stronger narcosis obliterates all responses to touch. Even then, however, the anaesthetized surface is fully active in the reception of stimulation from acid and alkaline solutions (HCl, NaOH, NH4OH, n/20-n/40) or from dilute solutions of quinine. The sensitivity to delicate mechanical stimulation in these experiments returns with equal rapidity whether or not the narcotized area has been stimulated chemically while under anaesthesia.
sensitivity to rods or wires, as well* as to water currents; slightly  
stronger narcosis obliterates all responses to touch. Even then,  
however, the anaesthetized surface is fully active in the reception  
of stimulation from acid and alkaline solutions (HCl, NaOH,  
NH4OH, n/20-n/40) or from dilute solutions of quinine. The  
sensitivity to delicate mechanical stimulation in these experiments returns with equal rapidity whether or not the narcotized  
area has been stimulated chemically while under anaesthesia.  


The hamlet, normal or de-eyed, reacts to local treatment with  
The hamlet, normal or de-eyed, reacts to local treatment with n/20 NaOH or NH4OH on the caudal peduncle after the spinal cord has been transected, but this operation obliterates the sensitivit}^ to minute mechanical disturbances at all levels posterior to the cut and decreases the amplitude of responses of this nature in other regions.
n/20 NaOH or NH4OH on the caudal peduncle after the spinal  
cord has been transected, but this operation obliterates the sensitivit}^ to minute mechanical disturbances at all levels posterior to the cut and decreases the amplitude of responses of this  
nature in other regions.  


■* A view suggested also hy Watson ('14, pp. 419) and apparentfj^ accepted in  
■* A view suggested also hy Watson ('14, pp. 419) and apparentfj^ accepted in some degree by Herrick ('16, pp. 85).
some degree by Herrick ('16, pp. 85).  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 171  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 171


By several stimulations in rapid succession the vigor of the  
By several stimulations in rapid succession the vigor of the response elicited upon the near approach of a glass rod may be to some extent heightened. Such reactions are never so vigorous as those called forth by acid or alkali. If, however, tactile stimulation by this means be induced immediately after relatively severe chemical irritation (n/10 HCl from apippette), it is found either that the local irritability is quite unaffected or that it is slightly decreased. With weaker acid, inducing, nevertheless, very vigorous reactions, no effect could be detected upon subsequent excitability by the near presence of glass rods or wires.
response elicited upon the near approach of a glass rod may be to  
some extent heightened. Such reactions are never so vigorous as  
those called forth by acid or alkali. If, however, tactile stimulation by this means be induced immediately after relatively  
severe chemical irritation (n/10 HCl from apippette), it is found  
either that the local irritability is quite unaffected or that it is  
slightly decreased. With weaker acid, inducing, nevertheless,  
very vigorous reactions, no effect could be detected upon subsequent excitability by the near presence of glass rods or wires.  


The results of the test thus briefly outlined are uniformly in  
The results of the test thus briefly outlined are uniformly in agreement with the idea that (within physiological limits) the excitation of the 'common chemical sense' has nothing to do with tactile receptors or with the destruction of the epithelium, since the delicate form of 'touch at a distance' employed in the de-eyed hamlet shows no specific effects of a sort otherwise to be expected when the receptive areas of this sense are bathed with chemical excitants. These results make it impossible to suppose that acid, for example, could disorganize the skin (as suggested by Coghill) sufficiently to induce violent painful excitation and yet at the same time leave sensitivity to minute mechanical disturbances practically unaffected.
agreement with the idea that (within physiological limits) the  
excitation of the 'common chemical sense' has nothing to do  
with tactile receptors or with the destruction of the epithelium,  
since the delicate form of 'touch at a distance' employed in the  
de-eyed hamlet shows no specific effects of a sort otherwise to  
be expected when the receptive areas of this sense are bathed with  
chemical excitants. These results make it impossible to suppose that acid, for example, could disorganize the skin (as suggested by Coghill) sufficiently to induce violent painful excitation and yet at the same time leave sensitivity to minute mechanical disturbances practically unaffected.  


And if acid acted directly upon tactile receptors, it would be  
And if acid acted directly upon tactile receptors, it would be expected that organs of delicate tactile receptivity would behave toward subsequent mechanical activation as if they had recently been activated; as previously described, this is apparently not the case. It might be objected that the source of stimulation could not, in the 'tactile' experiments with wires and rods, be localized with sufficient precision for critical use. Yet this would be incorrect, as could very nicely be shown in tests made upon small narcotized areas of the skin. Regions (on the caudal peduncle) not more than 2 cm. in diameter were painted with cocaine, and when the pale anaesthetized part was approached with the end of a thin rod, no reactions followed, although similar spots 3 cm. away were of fully normal sensitivity.
expected that organs of delicate tactile receptivity would behave  
toward subsequent mechanical activation as if they had recently  
been activated; as previously described, this is apparently not  
the case. It might be objected that the source of stimulation  
could not, in the 'tactile' experiments with wires and rods, be  
localized with sufficient precision for critical use. Yet this would  
be incorrect, as could very nicely be shown in tests made upon  
small narcotized areas of the skin. Regions (on the caudal peduncle) not more than 2 cm. in diameter were painted with cocaine,  
and when the pale anaesthetized part was approached with the  
end of a thin rod, no reactions followed, although similar spots  
3 cm. away were of fully normal sensitivity.  


This result confirms the conclusion which I supported in a previous paper ('16), to which Coghill ('16) has made further and (it  
This result confirms the conclusion which I supported in a previous paper ('16), to which Coghill ('16) has made further and (it






172 W. J. CROZIER  
172 W. J. CROZIER


seems to me) quite miwarranted objection. According to a  
seems to me) quite miwarranted objection. According to a conception first formally advanced by Botezat ('10) and later applied by Parker ('12) to the general chemical irritability of moist surfaces in vertebrates, the stimulation of epithelial free nerve terminals is accomplished secondarily through the activity of substances diffusing from the more external epithelial cells (some of which may be supposed to be in a special receptive state, although this is not necessary) to deeper parts. There is obviously no necessity that the nerve terminals concerned be situated near the surface immediately exposed to the activating agent. The cells primarily activated by acid or alkali in the 'common chemical sense' experiments are undoubtedly those of the very outermost layer of the skin. A study of the conditions of chemical activation in primary receptors (of the earthworm) shows, or seems to show, that a chemical reaction occurs between the activating agent and some receptor constituent.^
conception first formally advanced by Botezat ('10) and later  
applied by Parker ('12) to the general chemical irritability of  
moist surfaces in vertebrates, the stimulation of epithelial free  
nerve terminals is accomplished secondarily through the activity  
of substances diffusing from the more external epithelial cells  
(some of which may be supposed to be in a special receptive state,  
although this is not necessary) to deeper parts. There is obviously no necessity that the nerve terminals concerned be situated near the surface immediately exposed to the activating agent.  
The cells primarily activated by acid or alkali in the 'common  
chemical sense' experiments are undoubtedly those of the very  
outermost layer of the skin. A study of the conditions of chemical activation in primary receptors (of the earthworm) shows,  
or seems to show, that a chemical reaction occurs between the  
activating agent and some receptor constituent.^  


This means that the acid or other agent stimulates after union  
This means that the acid or other agent stimulates after union with, or penetration of, the surface of the superficial cells. The acid or other substance does not act directly upon deeper layers of the skin, for the good and sufficient reason that the stimulation time is utterly inadequate for any such process, even though the changed condition in the cell primarily affected can obviously be transmitted from cell to cell through the whole depth of the epidermis in a very brief time.^ The fact that one small area of the skin may be excited repeatedly by acid or by alkali shows that no destructive action is wrought by these excitants (within reasonable limits of concentration).
with, or penetration of, the surface of the superficial cells. The  
acid or other substance does not act directly upon deeper layers  
of the skin, for the good and sufficient reason that the stimulation time is utterly inadequate for any such process, even though  
the changed condition in the cell primarily affected can obviously  
be transmitted from cell to cell through the whole depth of the  
epidermis in a very brief time.^ The fact that one small area  
of the skin may be excited repeatedly by acid or by alkali shows  
that no destructive action is wrought by these excitants (within  
reasonable limits of concentration).  


It is becoming more and more necessary to recognize that receptor organs depend for their differential irritability upon the  
It is becoming more and more necessary to recognize that receptor organs depend for their differential irritability upon the possession of specific substances which enter into excitation reactions. There is reason to suppose that in mechanical stimulation surfaces (intracellular, intercellular, or both) are tempo ^ Some of the results of this investigation are in course of publication.
possession of specific substances which enter into excitation reactions. There is reason to suppose that in mechanical stimulation surfaces (intracellular, intercellular, or both) are tempo
^ Some of the results of this investigation are in course of publication.  


*^ This primary effect may or may not be an increase in cell permeability, but  
^ This primary effect may or may not be an increase in cell permeability, but
it undoubtedly does involve an alteration in the relations between ions at the  
it undoubtedly does involve an alteration in the relations between ions at the surfaces of the stimulated cells; hence the violent stimulating effect of distilled water under certain circumstances, as Loeb long ago found in the case of the frog's foot.
surfaces of the stimulated cells; hence the violent stimulating effect of distilled  
water under certain circumstances, as Loeb long ago found in the case of the  
frog's foot.  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 173  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 173


rarily broken down, to a certain extent, so that substances normally kept apart are free to intermix and react. There is no  
rarily broken down, to a certain extent, so that substances normally kept apart are free to intermix and react. There is no reason to expect that the products of the chemical activation of epithelial cells should be able to bring about a specific action upon tactile nerve endings or upon the specialized accessory end organs of the tactile sense. Tactile organs, 'corpuscles,' or what not may obviously be (and in fact frequently are) situated at some distance from the outer epithelial surface; it is probable, however, that the 'epicritic' form of irritability described in the hamlet depends upon very superficial structures; hence their particular value for the present research.
reason to expect that the products of the chemical activation of  
epithelial cells should be able to bring about a specific action  
upon tactile nerve endings or upon the specialized accessory end  
organs of the tactile sense. Tactile organs, 'corpuscles,' or what  
not may obviously be (and in fact frequently are) situated at  
some distance from the outer epithelial surface; it is probable,  
however, that the 'epicritic' form of irritability described in the  
hamlet depends upon very superficial structures; hence their  
particular value for the present research.  


These considerations may enable one to see why it w^ould be  
These considerations may enable one to see why it w^ould be somewhat surprising to find tactile organs in fishes capable of being normally excited by acids, for example.
somewhat surprising to find tactile organs in fishes capable of  
being normally excited by acids, for example.  


It is easily seen that differential anaesthesia is, by itself, in  
It is easily seen that differential anaesthesia is, by itself, in many cases a poor criterion of sensory differentiation ; and yet, in the case of cocaine, when the results obtained by this method agree perfectly with other and quite independent methods of analysis, the results must perforce be accepted. In the present case it is rendered probable that the production of stimulation by chemical irritants applied to the general surface of Epinephelws has nothing to do with tactile receptors, and that the obliteration of tactile ('epicritic') sensitivity by cocaine is not an 'artifact' due to the specifically more intense action of the chemical irritants. Even in coelenterates there are indications that irritant chemicals and mechanical agencies respectively act in a sensory way upon differentiated receptors having diverse internal connections (Parker, '17), and the present observations confirm the idea that these agencies have modes of action in lower vertebrates as separate as they are in man.
many cases a poor criterion of sensory differentiation ; and yet, in  
the case of cocaine, when the results obtained by this method  
agree perfectly with other and quite independent methods of analysis, the results must perforce be accepted. In the present case  
it is rendered probable that the production of stimulation by  
chemical irritants applied to the general surface of Epinephelws  
has nothing to do with tactile receptors, and that the obliteration of tactile ('epicritic') sensitivity by cocaine is not an 'artifact' due to the specifically more intense action of the chemical  
irritants. Even in coelenterates there are indications that irritant chemicals and mechanical agencies respectively act in a  
sensory way upon differentiated receptors having diverse internal connections (Parker, '17), and the present observations confirm the idea that these agencies have modes of action in lower  
vertebrates as separate as they are in man.  


4. Responses similar to those described for the de-eyed hamlet are exhibited by the normally blind cave fishes, according to  
4. Responses similar to those described for the de-eyed hamlet are exhibited by the normally blind cave fishes, according to Eigenmann (cited by Whitman, '99, p. 303). The parallehsm is striking, since in both cases the direction from which a rod is being brought near is accurately located, while vibrations of a coarser order may not be responded to. In^the blind fishes, however, this form of sensitivity is said to be more active in younger individuals than in adults.
Eigenmann (cited by Whitman, '99, p. 303). The parallehsm  
is striking, since in both cases the direction from which a rod is  
being brought near is accurately located, while vibrations of a  
coarser order may not be responded to. In^the blind fishes, however, this form of sensitivity is said to be more active in younger  
individuals than in adults.  


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2






174 W. J. CROZIER  
174 W. J. CROZIER


Inasmuch as tactile sensitivity of a very highly developed  
Inasmuch as tactile sensitivity of a very highly developed character is present in the hamlet possessing well-developed functional eyes, there is no reason to believe that a similar superior degree of tactile irritability has been developed in the blind cave fishes as the result of their lack of vision."
character is present in the hamlet possessing well-developed functional eyes, there is no reason to believe that a similar superior  
degree of tactile irritability has been developed in the blind cave  
fishes as the result of their lack of vision."  


Concerning the function of this sense in Epinephelus, it may be  
Concerning the function of this sense in Epinephelus, it may be suggested that it is useful at night or when the fish is maneuvering in darkened crannies of the 'coral reefs.'
suggested that it is useful at night or when the fish is maneuvering in darkened crannies of the 'coral reefs.'  


SUMMARY  
SUMMARY


The de-eyed hamlet (Epinephelus striatus) gives well-defined  
The de-eyed hamlet (Epinephelus striatus) gives well-defined reactions to the near approach of solid bodies. In the seeing fish this form of sensitivity is present, but motor effects which it might induce are almost completely inhibited. Mechanical deformations in the water of very minute amplitude and of a somewhat irregular nature are the source of stimulation in these responses, which cannot be attributed to chemical or to electrical disturbances. The presence of this exceedingly delicate form of sensitivity, generally distributed over the surface of the fish and leading to deliberate reactions of a well-defined character, has been used to discover any influence of chemical excitants, locally applied, upon the end organs of tactile sensitivity. Although the existence of this 'epicritic' form of irritabilit}^ interferes with any direct study of the mode of excitation in 'common chemical sense' reactions, it can nevertheless be shown, with its aid, that the generally distributed 'common chemical' irritability of this fish does not involve tactile receptors. Since the hamlet with well-developed eyes exhibits a high degree of tactile discrimination, such as has been described for blind cave fishes, — although the existence of this sensitivity would be quite overlooked unless
reactions to the near approach of solid bodies. In the seeing  
fish this form of sensitivity is present, but motor effects which it  
might induce are almost completely inhibited. Mechanical deformations in the water of very minute amplitude and of a somewhat irregular nature are the source of stimulation in these responses, which cannot be attributed to chemical or to electrical  
disturbances. The presence of this exceedingly delicate form of  
sensitivity, generally distributed over the surface of the fish and  
leading to deliberate reactions of a well-defined character, has  
been used to discover any influence of chemical excitants, locally  
applied, upon the end organs of tactile sensitivity. Although  
the existence of this 'epicritic' form of irritabilit}^ interferes with  
any direct study of the mode of excitation in 'common chemical  
sense' reactions, it can nevertheless be shown, with its aid, that  
the generally distributed 'common chemical' irritability of this  
fish does not involve tactile receptors. Since the hamlet with  
well-developed eyes exhibits a high degree of tactile discrimination, such as has been described for blind cave fishes, — although  
the existence of this sensitivity would be quite overlooked unless  


^ It should be added that after living in the laboratory for more than four  
^ It should be added that after living in the laboratory for more than four months after the removal of the eyes, three hamlets were cai-efuUy compared with several others recently de-eyed as regards their comparative 'tactile' irritability; no differences could be detected. Hence continued lack of vision does not lead to an increased development of the hamlet's 'epicritic' tactile irritability.
months after the removal of the eyes, three hamlets were cai-efuUy compared  
with several others recently de-eyed as regards their comparative 'tactile'  
irritability; no differences could be detected. Hence continued lack of vision  
does not lead to an increased development of the hamlet's 'epicritic' tactile  
irritability.  






TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 175  
TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 175


blinded animals were studied, — it is unnecessary to suppose that  
blinded animals were studied, — it is unnecessary to suppose that sensory structures appropriate to this type of irritability have been determined either by blindness or by life in caves. Agar's Island. Bermuda.
sensory structures appropriate to this type of irritability have  
been determined either by blindness or by life in caves.  
Agar's Island. Bermuda.  


LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


BoTEZAT, E. 1910 tJber Sinnesdriisenzellen und die Funktion von Sinnesap
BoTEZAT, E. 1910 tJber Sinnesdriisenzellen und die Funktion von Sinnesap paraten. Anat. Anz., Bd. 37, pp. 513-530. CoGHiLL, G. E. 1914 Correlated anatomical and physiological studies of the
paraten. Anat. Anz., Bd. 37, pp. 513-530.  
CoGHiLL, G. E. 1914 Correlated anatomical and physiological studies of the  


growth of the nervous system of Amphibia. I. The afferent system  
growth of the nervous system of Amphibia. I. The afferent system


of the trunk of Amblystoma. .Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 24, pp. 161
of the trunk of Amblystoma. .Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 24, pp. 161 233.
233.  


1916 II. The afferent system of the head of Amblystoma. Ibid.,  
1916 II. The afferent system of the head of Amblystoma. Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 247-340.
vol. 26, pp. 247-340.  


Crozier, W. J. 1916 Regarding the existence of the 'common chemical sense'  
Crozier, W. J. 1916 Regarding the existence of the 'common chemical sense'


in vertebrates. Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 1-8.  
in vertebrates. Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 1-8. Herrick, C. J. 1916 An introduction to neurology. Phila., 355 pp. Jordan, H. 1917 Rheotropic responses of Epinephelus striatus Bloch. Amer.
Herrick, C. J. 1916 An introduction to neurology. Phila., 355 pp.  
Jordan, H. 1917 Rheotropic responses of Epinephelus striatus Bloch. Amer.  


Jour. Physiol., vol. 43, pp. 438-454.  
Jour. Physiol., vol. 43, pp. 438-454. Mathews, A. P. 1907 An apparent pharmacological 'action at a distance' by
Mathews, A. P. 1907 An apparent pharmacological 'action at a distance' by  


metals and metalloids. Ibid., vol. 18, pp. 39-46.  
metals and metalloids. Ibid., vol. 18, pp. 39-46. Oliver, W. W. 1914 The crenation and flagellation of human erythrocytes.
Oliver, W. W. 1914 The crenation and flagellation of human erythrocytes.  


Science, N. S., vol. 40, pp. 645-648.  
Science, N. S., vol. 40, pp. 645-648. OsTERHouT, W. J. V. 1916 The nature of mechanical stimulation. Proc. Nat.
OsTERHouT, W. J. V. 1916 The nature of mechanical stimulation. Proc. Nat.  


Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 237-239.  
Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 237-239. Parker, S. H. 1904 Hearing and allied senses in fishes. Bull. U. S. Fish.
Parker, S. H. 1904 Hearing and allied senses in fishes. Bull. U. S. Fish.  


Comm., vol. 22 (for 1902), pp. 45-64.  
Comm., vol. 22 (for 1902), pp. 45-64.


1912 The relation of smell, taste, and the common chemical sense  
1912 The relation of smell, taste, and the common chemical sense


in vertebrates. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ser. 2, vol. 15, pp. 221
in vertebrates. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ser. 2, vol. 15, pp. 221 234.
234.  


1917 Nervous transmission in the actinians. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol.  
1917 Nervous transmission in the actinians. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 22, pp. 87-94.
22, pp. 87-94.  


ScHAEFFER, A. A. 1916 On the behavior of Ameba toward fragments of glass  
ScHAEFFER, A. A. 1916 On the behavior of Ameba toward fragments of glass and carbon and other indigestible substances, and toward some very soluble substances. Biol. Bull., vol. 31, pp. 303-326.
and carbon and other indigestible substances, and toward some very  
soluble substances. Biol. Bull., vol. 31, pp. 303-326.  


Watson, J. B. 1914 Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology.  
Watson, J. B. 1914 Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. New York, xii + 439 pp., ills.
New York, xii + 439 pp., ills.  


Whitman, C. O. 1899 Animal behavior. Biol. Lect., Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods  
Whitman, C. O. 1899 Animal behavior. Biol. Lect., Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods Hole (1898). Boston, pp. 285-338.
Hole (1898). Boston, pp. 285-338.  






author's abstract of this paper issued  
author's abstract of this paper issued bt the bibliographic service, march 30
bt the bibliographic service, march 30  






COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE  
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
CEREBRAL CORTEX  


VII. ON THE INFLUENCE OF STARVATION AT AN EARLY AGE UPON  
VII. ON THE INFLUENCE OF STARVATION AT AN EARLY AGE UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX. ALBINO RAT
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX. ALBINO RAT  


NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA


From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology  
From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology


TWO CHARTS  
TWO CHARTS


1. INTRODUCTION  
1. INTRODUCTION


Investigations on the influence of partial or complete starvation upon the growth of the body under various conditions have  
Investigations on the influence of partial or complete starvation upon the growth of the body under various conditions have been made by many authors, and it has long been known that of all the organs the brain is least affected in weight by underfeeding while, in younger animals in active growth, the brain weight may even increase during severe underfeeding. These facts were early observed by Chossat ('43) in pigeons, Falck ('54) in dogs and Voit ('66) in cats, later by Bechterew ('95) in kittens and puppies and Lassarew ('97) in guinea-pigs, and recently by Hatai ('04, '08, '15), Donaldson ('11), Jackson ('15 a, '15 b), and others working in the albino rat. Jackson made experiments with complete and partial starvation on adult albino rats and also held the young albino rats at constant body weight for a considerable period by partial underfeeding, and in all his experiments the brain was found to be only slightly affected in weight. Hatai underfed young rats so as to cause a reduction of 30 per cent in total body weight, while the average loss in brain weight was only 5 per cent. According to Donaldson's experiments on the young albino rats (thirty days old) under moderate underfeeding for three weeks, it was found that the underfed are on the average 41.2 per cent less in body weight than the controls and nevertheless only 7.7 per cent less in brain weight.
been made by many authors, and it has long been known that of  
all the organs the brain is least affected in weight by underfeeding  
while, in younger animals in active growth, the brain weight may  
even increase during severe underfeeding. These facts were  
early observed by Chossat ('43) in pigeons, Falck ('54) in dogs  
and Voit ('66) in cats, later by Bechterew ('95) in kittens and  
puppies and Lassarew ('97) in guinea-pigs, and recently by  
Hatai ('04, '08, '15), Donaldson ('11), Jackson ('15 a, '15 b), and  
others working in the albino rat. Jackson made experiments  
with complete and partial starvation on adult albino rats and  
also held the young albino rats at constant body weight for a  
considerable period by partial underfeeding, and in all his experiments the brain was found to be only slightly affected in weight.  
Hatai underfed young rats so as to cause a reduction of 30 per  
cent in total body weight, while the average loss in brain weight  
was only 5 per cent. According to Donaldson's experiments on  
the young albino rats (thirty days old) under moderate underfeeding for three weeks, it was found that the underfed are on the  
average 41.2 per cent less in body weight than the controls and  
nevertheless only 7.7 per cent less in brain weight.  


177  
177


THE JOURNAL OF COJIPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3  
THE JOURNAL OF COJIPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3


JUNE. 1018  
JUNE. 1018






178 NAOKI SUGITA  
178 NAOKI SUGITA


According to lYiy previous studies on the normal development  
According to lYiy previous studies on the normal development of the cerebral cortex during the period of most active growth (Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c), it was found that the growth of the cortex is precocious and that its elementary organization (that is, the cortical thickness, the cortical cell number and cell size, etc.) is nearly completed at the time of weaning, when the albino rat is twenty days of age. The investigations by the several authors cited above were, however, made mostly on animals which were already weaned, because, of course, feeding experiments necessitate a strict food control. But at this stage (after weaning), the elementary organization of the cerebral cortex is already completed. For my object, which was to determine the effect of starvation on the early development of the cerebral cortex, it was necessary to use animals in which the growth of the cerebral cortex was still in active progress and to note the influence upon the organization of the cortex of longer and shorter periods of inadequate feeding.
of the cerebral cortex during the period of most active growth  
(Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c), it was found that the  
growth of the cortex is precocious and that its elementary organization (that is, the cortical thickness, the cortical cell number  
and cell size, etc.) is nearly completed at the time of weaning,  
when the albino rat is twenty days of age. The investigations  
by the several authors cited above were, however, made mostly  
on animals which were already weaned, because, of course, feeding  
experiments necessitate a strict food control. But at this stage  
(after weaning), the elementary organization of the cerebral  
cortex is already completed. For my object, which was to  
determine the effect of starvation on the early development of the  
cerebral cortex, it was necessary to use animals in which the  
growth of the cerebral cortex was still in active progress and to  
note the influence upon the organization of the cortex of longer  
and shorter periods of inadequate feeding.  


For this it is necessary to use the very young animals, still dependent on the mother. During this period the growth impulse  
For this it is necessary to use the very young animals, still dependent on the mother. During this period the growth impulse in the brain is especially strong and the results of underfeeding are somewhat peculiar, as the brain weight may even increase under severe underfeeding. In complete starvation, growth is stopped and the brain weight remains constant. Thus, von Bechterew ('95) studied on new-born kittens and puppies the influence of complete starvation upon the brain w^eight. His results were that the brain weight, at the time of death after three or four days of starvation, was like the initial weight of the organ at birth. The brain had not grown, but also it had not lost in weight.
in the brain is especially strong and the results of underfeeding  
are somewhat peculiar, as the brain weight may even increase  
under severe underfeeding. In complete starvation, growth is  
stopped and the brain weight remains constant. Thus, von  
Bechterew ('95) studied on new-born kittens and puppies the  
influence of complete starvation upon the brain w^eight. His  
results were that the brain weight, at the time of death after three  
or four days of starvation, was like the initial weight of the organ  
at birth. The brain had not grown, but also it had not lost in  
weight.  


By applying severe starvation to the albino rat immediately  
By applying severe starvation to the albino rat immediately after birth, it has been my object in the present study to obtain answers to the following questions:
after birth, it has been my object in the present study to obtain  
answers to the following questions:  


1. How far will the growth of the body and of the brain be  
1. How far will the growth of the body and of the brain be arrested?
arrested?  


2. Will the normal relation between body weight, body length,  
2. Will the normal relation between body weight, body length, and tail length be modified?
and tail length be modified?  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 179  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 179


3. What will be the relation between body weight and brain  
3. What will be the relation between body weight and brain weight in the underfed rats?
weight in the underfed rats?  


4. How far will the size and shape of the cerebrum be influenced?  
4. How far will the size and shape of the cerebrum be influenced?


5. Will the thickness of the cortex of the stunted rats be  
5. Will the thickness of the cortex of the stunted rats be different from that of the standard?
different from that of the standard?  


6. How far will the Volume of the cerebral cortex be modified?  
6. How far will the Volume of the cerebral cortex be modified?


7. Will the number of the cortical cells increase normally  
7. Will the number of the cortical cells increase normally according to age?
according to age?  


8. Will the development in the size of the nerve cells be influenced by starvation?  
8. Will the development in the size of the nerve cells be influenced by starvation?


9. What will be the effect of the starvation on the percentage  
9. What will be the effect of the starvation on the percentage of water and on the alcohol extractives?
of water and on the alcohol extractives?  


2. THE TEST ANIMALS  
2. THE TEST ANIMALS


After several preliminary tests on producing underfed young, I  
After several preliminary tests on producing underfed young, I adopted the following three procedures, which are fairly reliable:
adopted the following three procedures, which are fairly reliable:  


I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for a  
I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for a maximum period each day.
maximum period each day.  


II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of young  
II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of young and thus reducing the amount of milk available for each of the young.
and thus reducing the amount of milk available for each of the  
young.  


III. Underfeeding the nursing mother and thus reducing the  
III. Underfeeding the nursing mother and thus reducing the quantity of milk secreted.
quantity of milk secreted.  


I treated five litters by the first method (Series I), two litters  
I treated five litters by the first method (Series I), two litters by the second method (Series II), and one litter by the third method (Series III). The detailed records of these experiments are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. All the material, consisting of forty-six test individuals and fourteen controls, from the above eight litters, was supplied from the rat colony at The Wistar Institute. They are all from mothers of standard size which were kept throughout the experiment under good sanitary conditions.
by the second method (Series II), and one litter by the third  
method (Series III). The detailed records of these experiments  
are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.  
All the material, consisting of forty-six test individuals and fourteen controls, from the above eight litters, was supplied from the  
rat colony at The Wistar Institute. They are all from mothers of  
standard size which were kept throughout the experiment under  
good sanitary conditions.  


This study was carried on from October, 1916 to July, 1917, at  
This study was carried on from October, 1916 to July, 1917, at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.  






180 ■ NAOKI SUGITA  
180 ■ NAOKI SUGITA


3. MATERIAL  
3. MATERIAL


Series I (Litters A, B, C, D, and E, table 1)  
Series I (Litters A, B, C, D, and E, table 1)


Procedure. In each litter, half of the young were selected for  
Procedure. In each litter, half of the young were selected for the experiment and marked with hectograph ink on the back and the remaining individuals were used as the controls. The young under experiment were taken away from 'the mother each day and kept packed in cotton in a warm place, but without any food or water, for the time which had been determined. Table 1 contains the records of the number of hours during which each test individual in this series was isolated each day.
the experiment and marked with hectograph ink on the back and  
the remaining individuals were used as the controls. The young  
under experiment were taken away from 'the mother each day  
and kept packed in cotton in a warm place, but without any food  
or water, for the time which had been determined. Table 1  
contains the records of the number of hours during which each  
test individual in this series was isolated each day.  


Litter A {horn October 16, 1916) was composed of nine young.  
Litter A {horn October 16, 1916) was composed of nine young. Five (c, a, d, f, and h) were subjected to experiment and were separated from the mother daily beginning on the very day of birth, the f oodless interval being increased day by day, as recorded in table 1. Sundays were excluded from any experimentation. The duration of starvation, daily and total, and the age at which the animals were killed is recorded also in table 1. Four controls (b, e, g, and i) were also killed one by one at the same' ages as the test animals. The total hours of isolation, the average per day, and the percentage of hours isolated during the total life of the individual in hours, are given in the lower part of the table. As the young are not fed continuously, even when they were with the mother, this percentage will but roughly indicate the grade of underfeeding to which the young were subjected. They were killed for examination at the ages of 3, 4, 9, 11, and 15 days (see X in table 1).
Five (c, a, d, f, and h) were subjected to experiment and were  
separated from the mother daily beginning on the very day of  
birth, the f oodless interval being increased day by day, as recorded  
in table 1. Sundays were excluded from any experimentation.  
The duration of starvation, daily and total, and the age at which  
the animals were killed is recorded also in table 1. Four controls  
(b, e, g, and i) were also killed one by one at the same' ages as the  
test animals. The total hours of isolation, the average per day,  
and the percentage of hours isolated during the total life of the  
individual in hours, are given in the lower part of the table.  
As the young are not fed continuously, even when they were  
with the mother, this percentage will but roughly indicate the  
grade of underfeeding to which the young were subjected. They  
were killed for examination at the ages of 3, 4, 9, 11, and 15 days  
(see X in table 1).  


Litter B {born October 15, 1916) consisted of ten young. Five  
Litter B {born October 15, 1916) consisted of ten young. Five (a, c, e, f and i) were separated daily from their mother, as in the case of Litter A, and the remaining young (b, d, g, h, and j) were used as controls. The experiment was begun at the age of one day in Litter B, a day later than in the case of Litter A. They were killed for examination at the ages of 4, 8, 11, 12, and 19 days.
(a, c, e, f and i) were separated daily from their mother, as in the  
case of Litter A, and the remaining young (b, d, g, h, and j) were  
used as controls. The experiment was begun at the age of one  
day in Litter B, a day later than in the case of Litter A. They  
were killed for examination at the ages of 4, 8, 11, 12, and 19 days.  


Litter A and B represent groups in which mild starvation was  
Litter A and B represent groups in which mild starvation was instituted from a very early age.
instituted from a very early age.  


Litter C {born October 18, 1916) was composed of seven young,  
Litter C {born October 18, 1916) was composed of seven young, of which four (a, c, d, and f) were used for experiment and three
of which four (a, c, d, and f) were used for experiment and three  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 181  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 181


(b, e, and g) for control. The experiment was begun five days  
(b, e, and g) for control. The experiment was begun five days after birth. One test rat (f) and one control (g) were killed by the mother. For the first three days mild starvation was tried, and then, from the age of nine days, severe starvation was instituted. They were killed for examination at the ages of '15, 17, and 28 days.
after birth. One test rat (f) and one control (g) were killed by  
the mother. For the first three days mild starvation was tried,  
and then, from the age of nine days, severe starvation was  
instituted. They were killed for examination at the ages of '15,  
17, and 28 days.  


Litter D {horn October 23, 1916) consisted initially of eight  
Litter D {horn October 23, 1916) consisted initially of eight young, of which five (a, c, d, e, and g) were used for experiment and three (b, f, and h) for control. One underfed (g) and one control (h) were killed by the mother. In this litter severe starvation was begun at the age of three days. The animals were killed at the ages of 9, 10, 16, and 18 days.
young, of which five (a, c, d, e, and g) were used for experiment  
and three (b, f, and h) for control. One underfed (g) and one  
control (h) were killed by the mother. In this litter severe  
starvation was begun at the age of three days. The animals  
were killed at the ages of 9, 10, 16, and 18 days.  


Litter E {horn Novernher 4, 1916\ was composed of eight rats,  
Litter E {horn Novernher 4, 1916\ was composed of eight rats, of which six (a, b, c, d, g, and h) were selected for experiment and two (e and f) for control. Severe starvation with some intervals of feeding was begun at the age of three days. In this litter pairs of test rats of the same age were killed for examination (on the 7th, 10th, and 17th days of the experiment) to determine individual variations.
of which six (a, b, c, d, g, and h) were selected for experiment and  
two (e and f) for control. Severe starvation with some intervals  
of feeding was begun at the age of three days. In this litter pairs  
of test rats of the same age were killed for examination (on the  
7th, 10th, and 17th days of the experiment) to determine individual variations.  


Litters D and E represent groups in which relatively severe  
Litters D and E represent groups in which relatively severe starvation was begun at an early age.
starvation was begun at an early age.  


Series II {Litters F and H)  
Series II {Litters F and H)


Procedure. In this series one nursing mother was placed in  
Procedure. In this series one nursing mother was placed in charge of an excessive number of young. The results were not very good, because some relatively lucky or strong ones always got more than their share of milk, while the others were in a condition of severe underfeeding.
charge of an excessive number of young. The results were not  
very good, because some relatively lucky or strong ones always  
got more than their share of milk, while the others were in a condition of severe underfeeding.  


Litter F {horn Octoher 15, 1916). To a young small primipara,  
Litter F {horn Octoher 15, 1916). To a young small primipara, which had just given birth to ten young, were entrusted ten more young from two other litters which had been born on the same day. Unhappily, the young from three different litters were not separately marked. The rate of growth among them was later found to be unequal, owing probably partly to litter characteristics and partly to the inequality of the milk ration. Individuals were selected arbitrarily and killed for examination at intervals of one to three days (at the ages of 11, 14, 17, 19,
which had just given birth to ten young, were entrusted ten more  
young from two other litters which had been born on the same  
day. Unhappily, the young from three different litters were  
not separately marked. The rate of growth among them was  
later found to be unequal, owing probably partly to litter characteristics and partly to the inequality of the milk ration. Individuals were selected arbitrarily and killed for examination at  
intervals of one to three days (at the ages of 11, 14, 17, 19,  






S S e  
S S e


2 e  
2 e






Sj  
Sj






5' _  
5' _






»j tii g  
»j tii g






5 o S  
5 o S






w  
w




c  
c




t*  
t*




^  
^




hJ  
hJ




=c  
=c




"^l^  
"^l^




>»  




<  
<




•^.f^  
•^.f^




e  
e




H  
H




™»  
™»








*5


5






C5  
C5




cs  
cs




■^  
■^




Line 44,626: Line 40,959:




H e  
H e




Line 44,636: Line 40,969:




t. >  
t. >


CD O  
CD O






o  
o




COOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOv  
COOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOv




o  
o




cococoooooooo- OOOv  
cococoooooooo- OOOv








OOCOOOOOy  
OOCOOOOOy




o  
o




0<300000000v/  
0<300000000v/




•b  
•b


SI  
SI




s ?, = = r, X  
s ?, = = r, X




03  
03




g"=g?, ° = f5X  
g"=g?, ° = f5X






in  
in




30  
30




Line 44,694: Line 41,027:




(M^"  
(M^"




b  
b




+^ CD  
+^ CD








C<M  
C<M








OJ t^  
OJ t^




ii  
ii




e ^  
e ^








o  
o




^.a  
^.a








^i?  
^i?




r^  
r^




><C3  
><C3




Line 44,741: Line 41,074:




ij  
ij
 
 
CQ




CQ








C




C




3to




3to








L.




02
L.




02


OOOOOOCSOOO'MfM




OOOOOOCSOOO'MfM


:<: o o o o o o




<: o o o o o o


c^ o o o o


(M (M (M
c^ o o o o


(M (M (M




o ^


o ^




p—


p—




!:DC0OOGCOOOC5iOOC5O>OOC^C-)OO
1— '<M C<JC^C^C<I<M (MMMC^J


!:DC0OOGCOOOC5iOOC5O>OOC^C-)OO 1— '<M C<JC^C^C<I<M (MMMC^J




ciOOOOOOOOOOOOO
^ CS (N (M CVJ C^J


ciOOOOOOOOOOOOO ^ CS (N (M CVJ C^J




COCDOO«:000


COCDOO«:000




c g


c g




— ^CO^t--OOC:0'*'r~'0'^OOOOOCOO \^
CI -r^ C^M C<IC^-nC^A


— ^CO^t--OOC:0'*'r~'0'^OOOOOCOO \^ CI -r^ C^M C<IC^-nC^A




Line 44,818: Line 41,146:




■^■tO'^t^coo^o-yr^O^y


■^■tO'^t^coo^o-yr^O^y


■b


■b






•^COCDt^GCClO-^r^ON^


•^COCDt^GCClO-^r^ON^








■* to CO 1- cc C-. ^


■* to CO 1- cc C-. ^




o a to
o <b2


o a to o <b2




totor^ooo30"^f^cjooooO(3CD


totor^ooo30"^f^cjooooO(3CD




Line 44,848: Line 41,175:




^cotot--cjCc;0'<rr^ccoG\/


^cotot--cjCc;0'<rr^ccoG\/






-^tOtOt^COOiO-^r^^


-^tOtOt^COOiO-^r^^








•^ CO to t^ S/


•^ CO to t^ S/




*-<c^co-^^«or^acciC«— iM


-<c^co-^^«or^acciC«— iM




coi-oocrio»-<c^ec  
coi-oocrio»-<c^ec






182  
182




Line 44,893: Line 41,220:




_  
_




Line 44,922: Line 41,249:




O  
O




Line 44,933: Line 41,260:




o  
o




Line 44,948: Line 41,275:




"  
"








■*  
■*




Line 44,962: Line 41,289:




^  
^








~  
~




Line 44,976: Line 41,303:




■*  
■*




M  
M




?q  
?q








""  
""








OO  
OO








"  
"








■^  
■^




Line 45,011: Line 41,338:




OO  
OO








OO  
OO








o  
o








5!  
5!




O  
O




Line 45,036: Line 41,363:




o  
o








o  
o








^  
^








(M  
(M




OO  
OO




OS  
OS




Line 45,066: Line 41,393:




o  
o




Line 45,075: Line 41,402:




-^  
-^




2  
2




O  
O




Line 45,102: Line 41,429:




00  
00








«^  
«^








o  
o








(M  
(M








O  
O




00  
00




Line 45,134: Line 41,461:




CD  
CD




Line 45,145: Line 41,472:




00  
00




o  
o




Line 45,169: Line 41,496:




OO  
OO








1^  
1^








o  
o


00  
00








^  
^








00  
00




00  
00




o  
o




Line 45,218: Line 41,545:




OS  
OS




Line 45,239: Line 41,566:




00  
00








00  
00








^  
^








2  
2








CO  
CO




o  
o




Line 45,285: Line 41,612:




OO  
OO




Line 45,318: Line 41,645:




'^  
'^








m  
m




r^  
r^




00  
00








"^  
"^








00  
00




Line 45,352: Line 41,679:




o  
o




Line 45,373: Line 41,700:




£?  
£?








t^  
t^








Oi  
Oi








2  
2








00  
00




S  
S




Line 45,419: Line 41,746:




CO  
CO




Line 45,448: Line 41,775:




OO  
OO








"  
"








■^  
■^




CO  
CO




o  
o




Line 45,485: Line 41,812:




»o  
»o




Line 45,506: Line 41,833:




o  
o




o o  
o o




O C5 V CO  
O C5 V CO C<J -^ d
C<J -^ d  




Line 45,522: Line 41,848:




IM  
IM








o  
o




I^  
I^




Line 45,559: Line 41,885:




(M  
(M




Line 45,573: Line 41,899:




"■  
"■




Line 45,594: Line 41,920:




o  
o








(M  
(M








o  
o








_  
_








IC  
IC




f^  
f^




o  
o








"  
"








CO  
CO








"  
"








■^  
■^




o  
o




Line 45,666: Line 41,992:




o  
o








o  
o








o  
o








05  
05








00  
00




o  
o




Line 45,698: Line 42,024:




o:*  
o:*




Line 45,709: Line 42,035:




CO  
CO




Line 45,732: Line 42,058:




"55  
"55




Line 45,757: Line 42,083:




CO  
CO




Line 45,772: Line 42,098:




r^  
r^




o  
o




Line 45,784: Line 42,110:




^  
^








""  
""








M<  
M<




Line 45,819: Line 42,145:




"oO  
"oO




Line 45,852: Line 42,178:




o  
o








o  
o








cc  
cc








"  
"








2  
2




Line 45,881: Line 42,207:




Ml  
Ml




CO  
CO




CJ  
CJ








o  
o




Line 45,901: Line 42,227:




~  
~








-*  
-*




<M  
<M




g~  
g~




Line 45,921: Line 42,247:




00  
00




Line 45,930: Line 42,256:




CO  
CO




OO  
OO




o  
o




Line 45,957: Line 42,283:




CO  
CO








^^  
^^








o  
o








CO  
CO








■*  
■*




o  
o




Line 45,989: Line 42,315:




-*  
-*




Line 46,002: Line 42,328:




o  
o




Line 46,023: Line 42,349:




cs  
cs








m  
m








^  
^








■o  
■o








s  
s




CO  
CO




".  
".




Line 46,068: Line 42,394:




UO  
UO




o  
o




Line 46,092: Line 42,418:




^  
^




Line 46,125: Line 42,451:




o  
o




Line 46,134: Line 42,460:




o  
o








"  
"








t3  
t3




Line 46,153: Line 42,479:




-<**  
-<**




CO  
CO




Line 46,179: Line 42,505:




"36  
"36




Line 46,200: Line 42,526:




t^  
t^




Line 46,217: Line 42,543:




^  
^








OO  
OO








"  
"








"  
"








"  
"




Line 46,244: Line 42,570:




o  
o




o  
o




Line 46,268: Line 42,594:




~CD  
~CD




Line 46,297: Line 42,623:




CO  
CO




Line 46,306: Line 42,632:




n  
n




o  
o




o  
o




Line 46,333: Line 42,659:




§  
§








•w  
•w








IM  
IM








CO  
CO








■^  
■^ M
M  




»c  
»c




•*  
•*




Line 46,381: Line 42,706:




T}<  
T}<








CO  
CO








CO  
CO








U5  
U5








c^  
c^




00  
00




CO  
CO




Line 46,416: Line 42,741:




"  
"




Line 46,425: Line 42,750:




<N  
<N




•*  
•*




o  
o




Line 46,456: Line 42,781:




"i  
"i




Line 46,489: Line 42,814:




J3  
J3




j3  
j3




Line 46,503: Line 42,828:




L^  
L^








Ut  
Ut








bD  
bD




bc  
bc




■^ lo  
■^ lo




s  
s


CO f^ OO "^  
CO f^ OO "^








>  
>




01  
01








0)  
0)


a  
a








'S  
'S




'S  
'S








w  
w




^  
^




1  
1




t^  
t^




>)  
>)




£  
£




0)  
0)




>>  
>>




a  
a








>,  
>,




3  
3




3  
3




C3  
C3




3  
3




-^  
-^




'3  
'3








C3  
C3




O  
O








O  
O




■a  
■a




O  
O




Line 46,628: Line 42,953:




Q M  
Q M








tc  
tc








a:  
a:








P3  
P3




Line 46,650: Line 42,975:




183  
183






184 NAOKI SUGITA  
184 NAOKI SUGITA


20, 23, 24, 26, 30, and 40 days). Those killed were replaced  
20, 23, 24, 26, 30, and 40 days). Those killed were replaced by individuals of like age from other litters, so as to keep the number in this litter always above thirteen. After twenty days, the mother was removed and the young fed with a small amount of ordinary food. The last eight young, which survived beyond the age of forty days, were rejected as too old for the purpose of this study.
by individuals of like age from other litters, so as to keep the  
number in this litter always above thirteen. After twenty days,  
the mother was removed and the young fed with a small amount  
of ordinary food. The last eight young, which survived beyond  
the age of forty days, were rejected as too old for the purpose of  
this study.  


Litter H {born January 2, 1917). A mother having just given  
Litter H {born January 2, 1917). A mother having just given birth to eight young was entrusted with nine more young from another litter which had been born on the same day. The underfed young of this litter were all employed for the study on the percentage of water and for the histological study of myelination in the brain and not included in the study of the cerebral cortex.
birth to eight young was entrusted with nine more young from  
another litter which had been born on the same day. The  
underfed young of this litter were all employed for the study on  
the percentage of water and for the histological study of myelination in the brain and not included in the study of the cerebral  
cortex.  


Series III {Litter G)  
Series III {Litter G)


Litter G (born October 23, 1916). In this series a nursing mother  
Litter G (born October 23, 1916). In this series a nursing mother was severely underfed immediately after the parturition. This litter consisted of eleven young. Only a fraction (one-tenth to one-twentieth) of the ordinary diet with unlimited water was supplied daily to the mother. She was found to lose slowly in body weight day by day. The amount of milk was consequently much reduced, but not completely stopped, as could be determined by examining daily the stomach contents of the young. By this method I was able to get a series of young which were very poorly developed. The young were killed for examination at the ages of 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, and 25 days.
was severely underfed immediately after the parturition. This  
litter consisted of eleven young. Only a fraction (one-tenth to  
one-twentieth) of the ordinary diet with unlimited water was  
supplied daily to the mother. She was found to lose slowly  
in body weight day by day. The amount of milk was consequently much reduced, but not completely stopped, as could be  
determined by examining daily the stomach contents of the  
young. By this method I was able to get a series of young which  
were very poorly developed. The young were killed for examination at the ages of 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, and 25 days.  


Table 2 contains the observed body weight and brain weight of  
Table 2 contains the observed body weight and brain weight of the young in Litters F, G, and H, when examined, for a comparison with table 1.
the young in Litters F, G, and H, when examined, for a comparison with table 1.  


•4. BODY WEIGHT, BODY LENGTH AND TAIL LENGTH  
•4. BODY WEIGHT, BODY LENGTH AND TAIL LENGTH


Table 3a (not published, because of its complexity, but on file  
Table 3a (not published, because of its complexity, but on file at The Wistar Institute), gives for each individual in this study the sex, age, observed body length, tail length, and brain weight. The standard tail length and the standard brain weight for the observed body length were also entered for comparison, the
at The Wistar Institute), gives for each individual in this study  
the sex, age, observed body length, tail length, and brain weight.  
The standard tail length and the standard brain weight for the  
observed body length were also entered for comparison, the  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






185  
185






TABLE 2  
TABLE 2


Showing for each test individual in Series II and III (Litters F, G, and H) the  
Showing for each test individual in Series II and III (Litters F, G, and H) the sex, age, and body and brain loeights, at time of examination
sex, age, and body and brain loeights, at time of examination  






LITTER (series  
LITTER (series II AND III)
II AND III)  




SEX  
SEX




AGE OF KILLING  
AGE OF KILLING




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




Line 46,731: Line 43,030:




days  
days




grams •  
grams •




grains  
grains




Fa  
Fa




m  
m




11  
11




8.5  
8.5




0.709  
0.709




b  
b




f  
f




14  
14




9.8  
9.8




•0.954  
•0.954




c  
c




f  
f




17  
17




13.5  
13.5




1.106  
1.106




d  
d




f  
f




19  
19




13.3  
13.3




1.218 •  
1.218 •




e  
e




m  
m




20  
20




12.4  
12.4




1.148  
1.148




f  
f




m  
m




23  
23




11.2  
11.2




1.230  
1.230




g  
g




f  
f




• 23  
• 23




14.2  
14.2




1.224  
1.224




h  
h




m  
m




24  
24




13.5  
13.5




1.170  
1.170




i  
i




f  
f




26  
26




17.0  
17.0




1.197  
1.197




J  
J




f  
f




30  
30




24.2  
24.2




1.219  
1.219




k  
k




m  
m




30  
30




18.7  
18.7




1.222  
1.222




1  
1




f  
f




40  
40




40.0  
40.0




1.310  
1.310




Ga  
Ga




m  
m




8  
8




7.5  
7.5




0.679  
0.679




b  
b




f  
f




8  
8




7.4  
7.4




0.703  
0.703




c  
c




f  
f




10  
10




10.3  
10.3




0.864  
0.864




d  
d




m  
m




11  
11




9.8  
9.8




0.929  
0.929




e  
e




f  
f




12  
12




8.8  
8.8




0.907  
0.907




f  
f




m  
m




15  
15




7.3  
7.3




0.881  
0.881




g  
g




in  
in




16  
16




7.3  
7.3




0.948  
0.948




h  
h




m  
m




18  
18




9.6  
9.6




1.119  
1.119




i  
i




f  
f




22  
22




12.2  
12.2




1.110  
1.110




J  
J




m  
m




25  
25




17.2  
17.2




1.234  
1.234




Ha  
Ha




f  
f




13  
13




8.8  
8.8




0.880  
0.880




b  
b




f  
f




17  
17




10.8  
10.8




1.024  
1.024




c  
c




f  
f




23  
23




14.7  
14.7




1.135  
1.135




d •  
d •




f  
f




28  
28




17.2  
17.2




1.166  
1.166




e  
e




m  
m




32  
32




20.0  
20.0




1.215  
1.215




f  
f




f  
f




37  
37




19.3  
19.3




1.101  
1.101




g  
g




m  
m




43  
43




21.1  
21.1




1.295  
1.295






values having been calculated for each individual by the use of  
values having been calculated for each individual by the use of formulas given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15). Here the body length was chosen as the basis for comparison, because the increase in body length has proved less variable than body weight. Table 3 was condensed from the original complete table (table 3a) by dividing the individuals, the tests, and controls within each litter into two groups, according to the observed brain
formulas given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15). Here the body  
length was chosen as the basis for comparison, because the increase in body length has proved less variable than body weight.  
Table 3 was condensed from the original complete table (table  
3a) by dividing the individuals, the tests, and controls within  
each litter into two groups, according to the observed brain  






186 NAOKI SUGITA  
186 NAOKI SUGITA


weight and taking averages for each group. Group I consists  
weight and taking averages for each group. Group I consists of those which have brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and presumably still in the first phases of cortical development (Sugita, '17 a) and Group II those which have brains weighing more than 1.0 gram and probably in the second or third phase of cortical development. So, one litter in Series I was divided into four groups, the tests having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (T. I), the tests having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (T. II), the controls having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (C. I) and the controls having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (C. II). This grouping prevails throughout all condensed tables (tables 3 to 13, 16 and 17) published in this paper. The average values were all obtained according to individual measurements, and the average standard values were also obtained by averaging from the full tables, which give the individual cases. As the standard values were not based on the average measurements given in the condensed tables, those standards given in the condensed tables sometimes deviate slightly from the standard values which would be directly obtained for the given average measurements.
of those which have brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and presumably still in the first phases of cortical development (Sugita,  
'17 a) and Group II those which have brains weighing more than  
1.0 gram and probably in the second or third phase of cortical  
development. So, one litter in Series I was divided into four  
groups, the tests having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (T. I),  
the tests having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (T. II), the  
controls having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (C. I) and the  
controls having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (C. II).  
This grouping prevails throughout all condensed tables (tables  
3 to 13, 16 and 17) published in this paper. The average values  
were all obtained according to individual measurements, and the  
average standard values were also obtained by averaging from the  
full tables, which give the individual cases. As the standard  
values were not based on the average measurements given in the  
condensed tables, those standards given in the condensed tables  
sometimes deviate slightly from the standard values which  
would be directly obtained for the given average measurements.  


On comparing, in table 3, the observed measurements with the  
On comparing, in table 3, the observed measurements with the corresponding standards, no significant difference between them has been detected, either in the underfed or in the controls. Only the body weight in the underfed is slightly lower as compared with the standard for the same body length, but it amounts to no more than 8 per cent.
corresponding standards, no significant difference between them  
has been detected, either in the underfed or in the controls.  
Only the body weight in the underfed is slightly lower as compared with the standard for the same body length, but it amounts  
to no more than 8 per cent.  


This comparison indicates that, though the underfed young  
This comparison indicates that, though the underfed young show a considerable retardation in total growth according to age (see table 4), yet the relation between the body and the tail lengths and the body weight is but little affected, at least during the early period of active growth. So the only marked difference between the underfed and the controls of the same body length or body weight would be the age, if their brain weights are disregarded. The effect on the brain weight will be discussed in the next chapter.
show a considerable retardation in total growth according to age  
(see table 4), yet the relation between the body and the tail  
lengths and the body weight is but little affected, at least during  
the early period of active growth. So the only marked difference between the underfed and the controls of the same body  
length or body weight would be the age, if their brain weights are  
disregarded. The effect on the brain weight will be discussed  
in the next chapter.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






187  
187






TABLE 3  
TABLE 3


Giving for each litter group in this sttidy the average age, body length, tail length,  
Giving for each litter group in this sttidy the average age, body length, tail length, and body weight, the last two compared with the corresponding standard measurements for the observed body length, calculated according to sex by the use of formulas given in 'The Rat' 'Donaldson, '15). The general averages for the test and the control groups are given at the foot of the table. T = test, C = control.
and body weight, the last two compared with the corresponding standard measurements for the observed body length, calculated according to sex by the use of formulas  
given in 'The Rat' 'Donaldson, '15). The general averages for the test and the control groups are given at the foot of the table. T = test, C = control.  




Line 47,241: Line 43,505:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




SEX  
SEX




AVERAGE AGE  
AVERAGE AGE




BODY  
BODY


LENGTH  
LENGTH




TAIL LENGTH  
TAIL LENGTH




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Observed  
Observed




standard  
standard


aocord
aocord ina to
ina to  


body  
body


length  
length




Observed  
Observed




Standard  
Standard according to bodylength
according to  
bodylength  




Series 1  
Series 1


A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f


h  
h


b, e, g  
b, e, g i
i  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




1 m, 3 f  
1 m, 3 f 1 f
1 f  


3 m  
3 m 1 f
1 f  




days  
days


715  
715


8  
8 17
17  




ni m .  
ni m .


56.3  
56.3 74.0
74.0  


66.7  
66.7 96.0
96.0  




mm.  
mm.


26.5  
26.5 48.0
48.0  


31.7  
31.7 62.0
62.0  




mm.  
mm. 26.3 47 .0
26.3  
47 .0  


37.0  
37.0


71.0  
71.0




grams  
grams


7.2  
7.2


13.9  
13.9


11.7  
11.7 30.1
30.1  




grams  
grams 7.1
7.1  


13.9  
13.9


10.2  
10.2 26.3
26.3  




Series I  
Series I


B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f


i  
i


b, d  
b, d g, h, j
g, h, j  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




3 m, 1 f  
3 m, 1 f 1 m
1 m  


2f  
2f 3f
3f  




919  
919


6  
6


18
18


59.8  
59.8 75.0
75.0  


57.0  
57.0 86.3
86.3  




27.8  
27.8 50.0
50.0  


25.5  
25.5 53.3
53.3  




29.8  
29.8 46.0
46.0  


27.5  
27.5 61 3
61 3  




7.3  
7.3 12.7
12.7  


7.1  
7.1 20.5
20.5  




7.9  
7.9 13.6
13.6  


7.0  
7.0 20.3
20.3  




Series I  
Series I C a, c, d
C a, c, d  


b, e  
b, e




T. II  
T. II C. II
C. II  




2 m, 1 f  
2 m, 1 f 2 f
2 f  




20  
20 22 —
22 —  




82.0  
82.0 98.5
98.5  




51.7  
51.7 71.5
71.5  




54.3  
54.3 73.5
73.5  




15.1  
15.1


27.6  
27.6




17.5  
17.5 29.4
29.4  




Series I  
Series I


D a, c, d  
D a, c, d


e  
e


b  
b


f  
f




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




1 m, 2 f  
1 m, 2 f 1 m
1 m  


1 m  
1 m 1 m
1 m  




12
12 18
18  


9  
9 22
22  




61.0  
61.0


78.0  
78.0


69.0  
69.0 91.0
91.0  




39.0  
39.0 54.0
54.0  


39.0  
39.0 65.0
65.0  




31.7  
31.7 49.0
49.0  


40.0  
40.0 63.0
63.0  




6.9  
6.9 13.0
13.0  


11.2  
11.2 24.0
24.0  




8.2  
8.2 15.0
15.0  


1.0  
1.0


21.9  
21.9




Series I  
Series I


E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d


g, h  
g, h


e, f  
e, f




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. II  
C. II




3 m, 1 f  
3 m, 1 f 2 f
2 f  


1 m, 1 f  
1 m, 1 f




1220  
1220


17
17


65.8  
65.8 82.0
82.0  


87.0  
87.0




35.0  
35.0 58.0
58.0  


56.5  
56.5




36.8  
36.8 56.0
56.0  


60.0  
60.0




9.7  
9.7 16.2
16.2  


21.6  
21.6




9.9  
9.9 17.9
17.9  


0.4  
0.4




Series II  
Series II


Fa, b  
Fa, b


c-1  
c-1




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




1 m, I'f  
1 m, I'f 4 m, 6 f
4 m, 6 f  




13
13 25+
25+  




63.5  
63.5 83.9
83.9  




33.0  
33.0 61.5
61.5  




34.5  
34.5 57.1
57.1  




9.2  
9.2 18.1
18.1  




9.1  
9.1 19.4
19.4  






188  
188






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE Z— Continued  
TABLE Z— Continued




Line 47,645: Line 43,837:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




SEX  
SEX




AVE RAGE AGE  
AVE RAGE AGE




BODY  
BODY LENGTH
LENGTH  




TAIL LENGTH  
TAIL LENGTH




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Ob
Ob


Standard  
Standard accord
accord


Ob
Ob


Stsadard  
Stsadard accord
accord




Line 47,691: Line 43,878:




served  
served




ing to  
ing to body length
body  
length  




served  
served




ing to  
ing to body length
body  
length  




Line 47,715: Line 43,898:




days  
days




mm.  
mm.




7)1 m.  
7)1 m.




mm.  
mm.




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




Series III  
Series III




Line 47,754: Line 43,937:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




T.  
T.




I  
I




4 m, 3 f  
4 m, 3 f




11 +  
11 +




63.0  
63.0




32.9  
32.9




33.7  
33.7




8.3  
8.3




8.8  
8.8




h-j  
h-j




T.  
T.




II  
II




2m, If  
2m, If




22
22


7i.O  
7i.O




48.7  
48.7




46.7  
46.7




13.0  
13.0




14.1  
14.1




Series II  
Series II




Line 47,834: Line 44,017:




H a  
H a




T.  
T.




I  
I




1 f  
1 f




13  
13




63.0  
63.0




33.0  
33.0




34.7  
34.7




8.8  
8.8




9.  
9.




b-g  
b-g




T.  
T.




II  
II




2 m, 4 f  
2 m, 4 f




30  
30




81.7  
81.7




64.0  
64.0




53.8  
53.8




17.2  
17.2




17.1  
17.1




Average 1  
Average 1




T.  
T.




I  
I




Line 47,907: Line 44,090:
11
11


61.8  
61.8




32.5  
32.5




32.5  
32.5




8.2  
8.2




8.6  
8.6




.(Series I-III)J  
.(Series I-III)J




T.  
T.




II  
II








21+  
21+




79.0  
79.0




54.5  
54.5




51.2  
51.2




14.9  
14.9




16.1  
16.1




Average )  
Average )




C.  
C.




I  
I




Line 47,964: Line 44,147:
8
8


64.2  
64.2




32.1  
32.1




34.8  
34.8




10.0  
10.0




9.4  
9.4




(Series I)/  
(Series I)/




C.  
C.




II  
II








19+  
19+




91.8  
91.8




61.7  
61.7




65.8  
65.8




24.8  
24.8




23.7  
23.7






5. BODY WEIGHT AND BRAIN WEIGHT  
5. BODY WEIGHT AND BRAIN WEIGHT


Table 4 was condensed from table 4 a (unpublished), which  
Table 4 was condensed from table 4 a (unpublished), which gives data for each individual in this study, and shows for each group, in the three series, the sexes, average age, average duration of starvation (denoted by percentage value of the hours of isolation), and the observed body and brain weights, accompanied by the average values for the group of the individual standard weights, for the same ages, and of the individual standard brain weights for the same ages and for the same body weights. For the calculation of the standard values for each individual the sex was regarded, because in body and brain weights the sex difference is clear ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The average differences of the observed values from the standards are given for each group in percentage, the standards being taken, respectively, as the norms for comparison.
gives data for each individual in this study, and shows for each  
group, in the three series, the sexes, average age, average duration  
of starvation (denoted by percentage value of the hours of isolation), and the observed body and brain weights, accompanied  
by the average values for the group of the individual standard  
weights, for the same ages, and of the individual standard brain  
weights for the same ages and for the same body weights. For  
the calculation of the standard values for each individual the sex  
was regarded, because in body and brain weights the sex difference is clear ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The average differences of the observed values from the standards are given for each  
group in percentage, the standards being taken, respectively,  
as the norms for comparison.  


A glance at the table reveals three differences which are clearly  
A glance at the table reveals three differences which are clearly marked :
marked :  


1. The underfed rats have, as a rule, body weights considerably less than the standard values for the same age.  
1. The underfed rats have, as a rule, body weights considerably less than the standard values for the same age.






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 189  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 189


2. The underfed rats have brain weights somewhat less than the  
2. The underfed rats have brain weights somewhat less than the standard values for the same age.
standard values for the same age.  


3. The underfed rats have brain weights mar" edly higher than  
3. The underfed rats have brain weights mar" edly higher than the standard values for their observed body weight.
the standard values for their observed body weight.  


It was already noted in the introduction that the central  
It was already noted in the introduction that the central nervous system as represented by the brain suffers little or no loss of initial weight even in the case of severe starvation. In my series-T-underfeeding of the albino rat at an early age — the body weight of the rats stunted by starvation, as compared with the standards for the same age, were deficient (on the average by litters, table 4) by from 19 to 44 per cent. On the other hand, the brain weights were less than the standards for the same age by from 4 to 12 per cent (for litters, table 4, but by from 3 to 17 per cent for individuals, table 4 a), while for the same body weights they were from 15 to 29 per cent (for litters, table 4, but up to 65 per cent for individuals, table 4 a) above the standard values.
nervous system as represented by the brain suffers little or no  
loss of initial weight even in the case of severe starvation. In  
my series-T-underfeeding of the albino rat at an early age — the  
body weight of the rats stunted by starvation, as compared with  
the standards for the same age, were deficient (on the average by  
litters, table 4) by from 19 to 44 per cent. On the other hand,  
the brain weights were less than the standards for the same age  
by from 4 to 12 per cent (for litters, table 4, but by from 3 to 17  
per cent for individuals, table 4 a), while for the same body weights  
they were from 15 to 29 per cent (for litters, table 4, but up to 65  
per cent for individuals, table 4 a) above the standard values.  


Considering together all the five litters (A to E) of Series I,  
Considering together all the five litters (A to E) of Series I, in which the young were starved by separating them at an early age from the mother daily, it appears that the underfed rats at the end of the first twenty days after birth (during the suckling period) are about 29 per cent (average of A, T. I and II, B, T. I and II, C, T. II, D, T. I and II, and E, T. I and II) behind the standards in body weight, while they are only 8 per cent (averge of the above-cited cases) behind in the brain weight. In Series II and III, in both of which the young were subjected to early and continuous underfeeding, increasing in intensity, by the method of reducing the ration of milk, but without removal from the nest, the underfed young have shown a slightly better development in brain weight (in relation to body weight), the average being also 8 per cent (average of F, T. I and II, G, T. I and II, and H, T. I and II) less than the standard for the same age, while the body weight is on the average as much as 39 per cent (average of the above-cited cases) below the standard value. Whether removing the young from the nest increases the relative effect of underfeeding on the brain, as these results suggest, can be determined only by experiments with that question as the main point in view.
in which the young were starved by separating them at an early  
age from the mother daily, it appears that the underfed rats at  
the end of the first twenty days after birth (during the suckling  
period) are about 29 per cent (average of A, T. I and II, B, T.  
I and II, C, T. II, D, T. I and II, and E, T. I and II) behind  
the standards in body weight, while they are only 8 per cent  
(averge of the above-cited cases) behind in the brain weight.  
In Series II and III, in both of which the young were subjected to  
early and continuous underfeeding, increasing in intensity, by  
the method of reducing the ration of milk, but without removal  
from the nest, the underfed young have shown a slightly better  
development in brain weight (in relation to body weight), the  
average being also 8 per cent (average of F, T. I and II, G, T.  
I and II, and H, T. I and II) less than the standard for the same  
age, while the body weight is on the average as much as 39 per  
cent (average of the above-cited cases) below the standard value.  
Whether removing the young from the nest increases the relative  
effect of underfeeding on the brain, as these results suggest, can  
be determined only by experiments with that question as the  
main point in view.  






190 NAOKI SUGITA  
190 NAOKI SUGITA


In connection with the underfeeding, as practiced in Series I,  
In connection with the underfeeding, as practiced in Series I, some interesting results of overfeeding have been noticed in the control animals ; overfeeding having taken place in the case of the controls of Litters A to E on account of the periodic isolation of a number of the members of the litter. The controls have shown generally, as seen in table 4 a (unpublished) and also in table 4, some excess in body and brain weights, as compared with the standard values for the same age. The excess in body weight is on the average 19 per cent (average of A, C. I and II, B, C. I and II, C, C. II, D, C. I and II, and E, C. II), while the brain weight is on the average 6 per cent (average of the above-cited cases) higher than the standard for the same age and 2 per cent higher than the standard for the same body weight. Thus, by moderate overfeeding, the growth in body weight is definitely accelerated and, at the same time, the growth in brain weight is also accelerated, nearly in proportion to the increase in body weight.
some interesting results of overfeeding have been noticed in the  
control animals ; overfeeding having taken place in the case of the  
controls of Litters A to E on account of the periodic isolation of a  
number of the members of the litter. The controls have shown  
generally, as seen in table 4 a (unpublished) and also in table 4,  
some excess in body and brain weights, as compared with the  
standard values for the same age. The excess in body weight is  
on the average 19 per cent (average of A, C. I and II, B, C. I and  
II, C, C. II, D, C. I and II, and E, C. II), while the brain weight  
is on the average 6 per cent (average of the above-cited cases)  
higher than the standard for the same age and 2 per cent higher  
than the standard for the same body weight. Thus, by moderate  
overfeeding, the growth in body weight is definitely accelerated  
and, at the same time, the growth in brain weight is also accelerated, nearly in proportion to the increase in body weight.  


If the observed brain weights are compared with the standard  
If the observed brain weights are compared with the standard brain weights for the observed body weight, it is clearly seen that the observed brain weights are higher than the standard by 24 per cent (average of all eight litters T. groups only). Of course, the younger the individual, the higher is the percentage, because the standard brain weight is smaller in the young animals and they are not increasing in direct proportion to the body weight, but nearly as the logarithm of the latter value. So it may be roughly stated that the brain weights in the underfed young albino rats have values below the standard weights for the same age and above those for the same body weights, but always falling nearer to the standard age values.
brain weights for the observed body weight, it is clearly seen  
that the observed brain weights are higher than the standard by  
24 per cent (average of all eight litters T. groups only). Of  
course, the younger the individual, the higher is the percentage,  
because the standard brain weight is smaller in the young animals  
and they are not increasing in direct proportion to the body  
weight, but nearly as the logarithm of the latter value. So it  
may be roughly stated that the brain weights in the underfed  
young albino rats have values below the standard weights for the  
same age and above those for the same body weights, but always  
falling nearer to the standard age values.  


6. THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM  
6. THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM


The five diameters of the cerebrum of the underfed young were  
The five diameters of the cerebrum of the underfed young were measured and recorded according to the procedure already described in my first paper of this series (Sugita, '17, figs. 1 and 2). The measurement W.B, represents the greatest frontal diameter; the measurement W.D, the frontal diameter passing the middle point of the fissura sagittalis; the measurement L.G, the greatest distance from the frontal pole to the occipital
measured and recorded according to the procedure already  
described in my first paper of this series (Sugita, '17, figs. 1 and  
2). The measurement W.B, represents the greatest frontal  
diameter; the measurement W.D, the frontal diameter passing  
the middle point of the fissura sagittalis; the measurement  
L.G, the greatest distance from the frontal pole to the occipital  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






191  
191






TABLE 4  
TABLE 4 Shuiv ng for each litter group in this study the average age, duration of isolation denoted by the percentage of the life span, observed body weight, compared with the standard body weight for the same age, and observed rain weight, compared with the standard values for the same age and the observed body weight, respectively. Standard values were all calculated by the use of the formulas given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15). Within each litter the starved animals were divided nto two groups, T I having brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and T. II having brains weighing more than 1.0 gram. The control animals were also grouped in the same way into two groups, C. I and C. II. Averages ivere taken within each group. In lines designated 'percentage difference' (abbreviated 'per. diff.'), the deviations of the observed measuremmts from the standard values were given in percentage, the respective standard values being taken as standards of comparison. At the foot of the table, the average as to the test and control groups are given and the percentage differences from the standards are also ca'culated
Shuiv ng for each litter group in this study the average age, duration of isolation  
denoted by the percentage of the life span, observed body weight, compared with the  
standard body weight for the same age, and observed rain weight, compared with  
the standard values for the same age and the observed body weight, respectively.  
Standard values were all calculated by the use of the formulas given in 'The Rat'  
(Donaldson, '15). Within each litter the starved animals were divided nto two  
groups, T I having brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and T. II having brains  
weighing more than 1.0 gram. The control animals were also grouped in the same  
way into two groups, C. I and C. II. Averages ivere taken within each group.  
In lines designated 'percentage difference' (abbreviated 'per. diff.'), the deviations of the observed measuremmts from the standard values were given in percentage, the respective standard values being taken as standards of comparison.  
At the foot of the table, the average as to the test and control groups are given and  
the percentage differences from the standards are also ca'culated  




Line 48,144: Line 44,240:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




SEX  
SEX




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




a a w  
a a w


d fc  
d fc


K «  
K « Eh 1
Eh 1  




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Observed  
Observed




Standard according  
Standard according to age
to age  




Ob  
Ob served
served  




Stanflard according  
Stanflard according to age
to age  




Standard according  
Standard according to observed body weight
to observed  
body  
weight  




Line 48,200: Line 44,286:




days  
days




per cent  
per cent




gramf  
gramf




(jrains  
(jrains




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




grams  
grams




Series I  
Series I




Line 48,242: Line 44,328:




A 0, a, d, f  
A 0, a, d, f




T. I  
T. I




1 m, 3 f  
1 m, 3 f




t —  
t —




32  
32




7.2  
7.2




.9.7  
.9.7




0.584  
0.584




0.6U  
0.6U




0.441  
0.441




h  
h




T. II  
T. II




1 f  
1 f




15  
15




44  
44




13.9  
13.9




16.5  
16.5




1.C24  
1.C24




1.048  
1.048




0.952  
0.952




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,315: Line 44,401:




(-19)  
(-19)








(- 5)  
(- 5)




(+15)  
(+15)




b, e, g  
b, e, g




C. I  
C. I




3 m  
3 m




S  
S








11.7  
11.7




10.9  
10.9




0.740  
0.740




0.750  
0.750




0.790  
0.790




i  
i




C. II  
C. II




1 f  
1 f




17  
17








30.1  
30.1




18.1  
18.1




1.278  
1.278




1.099  
1.099




1.301  
1.301




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,397: Line 44,483:




(+44)  
(+44)








(+ 9)  
(+ 9)




(- 4)  
(- 4)




Series I  
Series I




Line 48,429: Line 44,515:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T. I  
T. I




3 m, 1 f  
3 m, 1 f




9
9


30  
30




7.3  
7.3




in  
in




0.644  
0.644




0.775  
0.775




0.468  
0.468




i  
i




T. II  
T. II




1 m  
1 m




19  
19




44  
44




12.7  
12.7




18.7  
18.7




1.052  
1.052




1 .131  
1 .131




0.901  
0.901




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,501: Line 44,587:




(-34)  
(-34)








(-11)  
(-11)




(+24)  
(+24)




b, d  
b, d




C. I  
C. I




2 f  
2 f




6  
6








7.1  
7.1




8.6  
8.6




0.543  
0.543




0.559  
0.559




0.437  
0.437




g. h, J  
g. h, J




C. II  
C. II




3 f  
3 f




Line 48,554: Line 44,640:




20.5  
20.5




18.7  
18.7




1.144  
1.144




1.112  
1.112




1.148  
1.148




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,582: Line 44,668:




(+ 1)  
(+ 1)








(+ 1)  
(+ 1)




(+ 6)  
(+ 6)




Series I  
Series I




Line 48,614: Line 44,700:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T. II  
T. II




2 in, 1 f  
2 in, 1 f




20  
20




44  
44




15.1  
15.1




20.4  
20.4




1.105  
1.105




1.146  
1.146




0.946  
0.946




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,657: Line 44,743:




(-26)  
(-26)








(- 4)  
(- 4)




(+17)  
(+17)




b, e  
b, e




C. II  
C. II




2 f  
2 f




Line 48,681: Line 44,767:




27.6  
27.6




22.6  
22.6




1.307  
1.307




1.165  
1.165




1.234  
1.234




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 48,709: Line 44,795:




(+22)  
(+22)








(+12)  
(+12)




+ 6)  
+ 6)






192  
192






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE i— Continued  
TABLE i— Continued




Line 48,735: Line 44,821:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




SEX  
SEX




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




;5 H H


;3 2; b  
5 H H
3 2; b
Q 0. 1=


Q 0. 1=
« 2 > a


« 2
K > 6, CO
> a


K > 6,
CO


BODT WEIGHT


BODT WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


SERIES, LITTER AND
GROUP


Observed


Observed


Standard according to age


Standard according
to age


Observed


Observed


Standard according to age


Standard according
to age


Standard according to observed body weight


Standard according
to observed
body
weight


Series I D a, c, d


Series I
e (per. diff.)
D a, c, d


e
b
(per. diff.)
 
b  


f  
f


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




Im, 2f  
Im, 2f


1 m  
1 m


1 m  
1 m 1 m
1 m  




days  
days


12
12 18
18  


9  
9 22
22  




per cent  
per cent


57  
57 65
65  




grams  
grams


6.9  
6.9 13.0
13.0  


11.2  
11.2 24.0
24.0  




grams  
grams


14.0  
14.0


18.0  
18.0


(-38)  
(-38)


11.8  
11.8 21.1 (+ 7)
21.1  
(+ 7)  




grams  
grams


0.778  
0.778 1.089
1.089  


0.870  
0.870 1.220
1.220  




grams  
grams 0.943
0.943  


1.112  
1.112 (- 9)
(- 9)  


0.840  
0.840 1.184
1.184  


(+ 3)  
(+ 3)




grams .  
grams . 0.437
0.437  


0.921  
0.921


(+37)  
(+37)


0.782  
0.782 1.237 (+ 4)
1.237  
(+ 4)  




Series I  
Series I E a, b, c, d
E a, b, c, d  


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)


e. f  
e. f (per. diff.)
(per. diff.)  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. II  
C. II




3m, If  
3m, If 2f
2f  


Im, If  
Im, If




1220  
1220


17
17


46  
46 44
44  




9.7  
9.7 16.2
16.2  


21.6  
21.6




14.3  
14.3 20.7 (-26)
20.7  
(-26)  


17.S  
17.S (+25)
(+25)  




0.835  
0.835 1.122
1.122  


1.179  
1.179




0.977  
0.977 1.159
1.159  


(- 8)  
(- 8)


1.077  
1.077 (+ 9)
(+ 9)  




0.664  
0.664


1.042  
1.042


(+15)  
(+15)


1.171  
1.171 (+ 1)
(+ 1)  




Series II  
Series II


Fa, b  
Fa, b


c-1  
c-1


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




Im, If  
Im, If 4 m, 6 f
4 m, 6 f  




13
13 25+
25+  








9.2  
9.2 18.1
18.1  




14.9  
14.9 25.6 (-33)
25.6  
(-33)  




0.832  
0.832 1.204
1.204  




1.000  
1.000 1.231 (- 9)
1.231  
(- 9)  




0.631  
0.631 1.046
1.046  


(+21)  
(+21)




Series III  
Series III


Ga-g  
Ga-g


h-j  
h-j


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




4 m, 3 f  
4 m, 3 f 2m, If
2m, If  




11+  
11+ 22
22






8.3  
8.3 13.0
13.0  




13.6  
13.6 21.5 (-39)
21.5  
(-39)  




0.844  
0.844 1.154
1.154  




0.914  
0.914 1.181
1.181  


(- 5)  
(- 5)




0.561  
0.561 0.871 (+39)
0.871  
(+39)  




Series II  
Series II


H a  
H a


b-g  
b-g (per. diff.)
(per. diff.)  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




1 f  
1 f 2 m, 4 f
2 m, 4 f  




13  
13 30
30  








8.8  
8.8 17.2
17.2  




15.1  
15.1 31.5
31.5  


(-44)  
(-44)




0.880  
0.880 1.156
1.156  




1.003  
1.003 1.298 (-12)
1.298  
(-12)  




0.600  
0.600 1.045 (+24)
1.045  
(+24)  




Average 1  
Average 1


(Series I-III)J  
(Series I-III)J


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)


Average }  
Average }


(Series I-III)j  
(Series I-III)j


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  








11
11 21 +
21 +  








8.2  
8.2 14.9
14.9  




13.3  
13.3 (-38)
(-38)  


21.6  
21.6 (-31)
(-31)  




0.771  
0.771 1.113
1.113  




0.895  
0.895


(-14)  
(-14)


1 . 163  
1 . 163


(- 4)  
(- 4)




0.543  
0.543 (+42)
(+42)  


0.966  
0.966


(+15)  
(+15)






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






193  
193






TABLE i— Continued  
TABLE i— Continued




Line 49,166: Line 45,170:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




SEX  
SEX




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




. !Z H W  
. !Z H W O O fa
O O fa  


p. K  
p. K




BODY WEIGHT  
BODY WEIGHT




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Observed  
Observed




Standard according  
Standard according to age
to age  




Observed  
Observed




Standar 1 according  
Standar 1 according to age
to age  




Standard according  
Standard according to observed boily weight
to observed  
boily  
weight  




Average 1  
Average 1


(Series I) J  
(Series I) J


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




C. I  
C. I








days  
days


8
8


per cent  
per cent




grn7ns  
grn7ns


10.0  
10.0




grams  
grams


10.4  
10.4


(- 4)  
(- 4)




grams  
grams


0.718  
0.718




grains  
grains 0.716
0.716  


(+ 0)  
(+ 0)




grams  
grams


0.670  
0.670


(+7)  
(+7)




Average \  
Average \


(Series I) /  
(Series I) /


(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




C. II  
C. II








19+  
19+








24.8  
24.8




19.6  
19.6


(+27)  
(+27)




1.226  
1.226




1.127  
1.127 (+ 9)
(+ 9)  




1.218  
1.218


(+ 1)  
(+ 1)






pole; the measurement L.F, the sagittal diameter from the frontal  
pole; the measurement L.F, the sagittal diameter from the frontal to the occipital pole running parallel to the sagittal fissure, and the measurement Hi. is the greatest vertical height at the stalk of the hypophysis. In table 5, which was condensed from table 5 a (unpubhshed) for each individual, the average brain weight, the average measurements W.B, L.G and Ht. are given for each group, both test and control, compared with the corresponding standard measurements for the brains of the same weight, which were originally calculated for each individual using the formulas formerly presented by me (Sugita, '17), and then condensed. The measurements L.F and W.D are given, also condensed for each group, in table 9.
to the occipital pole running parallel to the sagittal fissure, and  
the measurement Hi. is the greatest vertical height at the stalk  
of the hypophysis. In table 5, which was condensed from  
table 5 a (unpubhshed) for each individual, the average brain  
weight, the average measurements W.B, L.G and Ht. are given for  
each group, both test and control, compared with the corresponding  
standard measurements for the brains of the same weight, which  
were originally calculated for each individual using the formulas  
formerly presented by me (Sugita, '17), and then condensed.  
The measurements L.F and W.D are given, also condensed for  
each group, in table 9.  


On examining table 5, it appears that the measurement W.B  
On examining table 5, it appears that the measurement W.B of the underfed is smaller on the average by 2 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only) than standard for the brains of the same weight, while the measurement L.G of the underfed is greater on the average by 2 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only). The height in the underfed seems to be slightly less, by about 1 per cent on the average. On the other hand, if the controls be considered in the same way, they show also slight deviations from the calculated standard values, thus, on the average (Litters A to E, C. groups only), W.B is smaller by 1 per cent, L.G greater by 0.8 per cent and Ht. smaller by about 3 per
of the underfed is smaller on the average by 2 per cent (average  
of all eight litters, T. groups only) than standard for the brains  
of the same weight, while the measurement L.G of the underfed  
is greater on the average by 2 per cent (average of all eight litters,  
T. groups only). The height in the underfed seems to be slightly  
less, by about 1 per cent on the average. On the other hand, if  
the controls be considered in the same way, they show also slight  
deviations from the calculated standard values, thus, on the  
average (Litters A to E, C. groups only), W.B is smaller by 1 per  
cent, L.G greater by 0.8 per cent and Ht. smaller by about 3 per  






THE JOURNAL OF COMP.^R.^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3  
THE JOURNAL OF COMP.^R.^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3






194 NAOKI SUGITA  
194 NAOKI SUGITA


cent in the controls. As a matter of fact, the measurement of  
cent in the controls. As a matter of fact, the measurement of Ht. could not be so accurate on' account of difficulty in fixing the dorsal limit, so that these slight differences in Ht. should not be taken too seriously. The measurement of L.G and W.G can be made accurately so that these results are trustworthy.
Ht. could not be so accurate on' account of difficulty in fixing the  
dorsal limit, so that these slight differences in Ht. should not be  
taken too seriously. The measurement of L.G and W.G can be  
made accurately so that these results are trustworthy.  


Taking these deviations in the controls into account, the  
Taking these deviations in the controls into account, the general statement may be made that underfeeding alters the shape of the cerebrum, so that it becomes slightly elongated, when compared with the normal cerebrum of the same weight. This difference is probably due to the fact that, although the underfed cerebrum is arrested in growth, it nevertheless tends to enlarge normally and, as already determined (Sugita, '17) becomes more and more elongated as the age advances.
general statement may be made that underfeeding alters the  
shape of the cerebrum, so that it becomes slightly elongated,  
when compared with the normal cerebrum of the same weight.  
This difference is probably due to the fact that, although the  
underfed cerebrum is arrested in growth, it nevertheless tends to  
enlarge normally and, as already determined (Sugita, '17) becomes more and more elongated as the age advances.  


If, for the brains of like weight, the width-length indices  
If, for the brains of like weight, the width-length indices


obtained bv the formula ^^^ are compared between  
obtained bv the formula ^^^ are compared between


L.t  
L.t


the underfed and the controls (compare table 9) or the standard  
the underfed and the controls (compare table 9) or the standard values (based on table 3, Sugita, '17), it will be seen that the index value tends to be lower in the underfed, especially in the members of Litters F and G which were underfed continuously and rather severely. In the latter litters the index values for each individual are smaller by 2 to 7 points than the index values for the standard brains of like weights (the data for these calculations are contained in table 9 a, not here published). The average index values in Litters F and G are 102 (for T. I groups) and 97 (for T. II groups), while the corresponding standard values are, respectively, 106 and 103 (Sugita, '17).
values (based on table 3, Sugita, '17), it will be seen that the  
index value tends to be lower in the underfed, especially in the  
members of Litters F and G which were underfed continuously  
and rather severely. In the latter litters the index values for  
each individual are smaller by 2 to 7 points than the index values  
for the standard brains of like weights (the data for these calculations are contained in table 9 a, not here published). The  
average index values in Litters F and G are 102 (for T. I groups)  
and 97 (for T. II groups), while the corresponding standard  
values are, respectively, 106 and 103 (Sugita, '17).  


7. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
7. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


Tables 6 a, 6 b, and 6 c (all unpublished) were originally prepared to give the cortical thickness for each individual as measured  
Tables 6 a, 6 b, and 6 c (all unpublished) were originally prepared to give the cortical thickness for each individual as measured at the localities I to VIII in the sagittal and frontal sections and to give the average cortical thickness in each section and the general average thickness, to be compared with the respective standards presented in a former paper (Sugita, '17a). Table 6, which follows, contains in condensed form the corrected data for the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the underfed Albinos and that of
at the localities I to VIII in the sagittal and frontal sections and  
to give the average cortical thickness in each section and the general  
average thickness, to be compared with the respective standards  
presented in a former paper (Sugita, '17a). Table 6, which follows, contains in condensed form the corrected data for the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the underfed Albinos and that of  






TABLE 5  
TABLE 5


Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight and the average  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight and the average tneasurements L.G, W.B and Hi. of the cerebrum, each corn-pared with the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight, calculated by the use of the for7nulas given by. me (Sugita, '17). The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table.
tneasurements L.G, W.B and Hi. of the cerebrum, each corn-pared with the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight, calculated by the use of the  
for7nulas given by. me (Sugita, '17). The averages for the test and control groups  
are given at the foot of the table.  






SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




W.  
W.




B.  
B.




L.  
L.




G.  
G.




Ht.  
Ht.








Observed  
Observed




Standard  
Standard




Observed  
Observed




Standard  
Standard




Observed  
Observed




Standard  
Standard




Line 49,436: Line 45,379:




grams  
grams




turn.  
turn.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Tnm.  
Tnm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Series I  
Series I




Line 49,478: Line 45,421:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T.  
T.








0.584  
0.584




10.79  
10.79




10.94  
10.94




9.69  
9.69




9.20  
9.20




6.99  
6.99




7.06  
7.06




h  
h




T.  
T.








1.024  
1.024




13.05  
13.05




13.00  
13.00




12.30  
12.30




12.30  
12.30




8.45  
8.45




8.70  
8.70




b, e, g  
b, e, g




C.  
C.








0.740  
0.740




11.63  
11.63




11.90  
11.90




10.73  
10.73




10.63  
10.63




7.50  
7.50




7.68  
7.68




i  
i




C.  
C.








1.278  
1.278




13.85  
13.85




14-00  
14-00




13.15  
13.15




13.25  
13.25




8.95  
8.95




9.30  
9.30




Series I  
Series I




Line 49,615: Line 45,558:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.








0.644  
0.644




11.11  
11.11




11.38  
11.38




10.25  
10.25




9.96  
9.96




7.36  
7.36




7.38  
7.38




i  
i




T.  
T.








1.052  
1.052




13.20  
13.20




13.15  
13.15




12.35  
12.35




12.40  
12.40




8.50  
8.50




8.75  
8.75




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.








0.543  
0.543




10.50  
10.50




10.78  
10.78




9.73  
9.73




9.18  
9.18




6.90  
6.90




6.95  
6.95




g., h, j  
g., h, j




C.  
C.








1.144  
1.144




13.47  
13.47




13.48  
13.48




12.75  
12.75




12.77  
12.77




8.68  
8.68




9.00  
9.00




Series I  
Series I




Line 49,752: Line 45,695:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.








1.105  
1.105




13.10  
13.10




13.35  
13.35




12.72  
12.72




12.62  
12.62




8.70  
8.70




8.88  
8.88




b, e  
b, e




C.  
C.








1.307  
1.307




13.78  
13.78




14-10  
14-10




13.63  
13.63




13.33  
13.33




8.83  
8.83




9.40  
9.40




Series I  
Series I




Line 49,831: Line 45,774:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.








0.778  
0.778




11.67  
11.67




12.17  
12.17




11.25  
11.25




10.80  
10.80




7.98  
7.98




7.92  
7.92




e  
e




T.  
T.








1.089  
1.089




12.90  
12.90




13.30  
13.30




12.75  
12.75




12.55  
12.55




8.60  
8.60




8.85  
8.85




b  
b




C.  
C.








0.870  
0.870




12.25  
12.25




12.60  
12.60




11.40  
11.40




11.65  
11.65




8.00  
8.00




8.20  
8.20




f  
f




C.  
C.








1.220  
1.220




13.95  
13.95




13.80  
13.80




13.30  
13.30




13.05  
13.05




8.80  
8.80




9.20  
9.20




Series I  
Series I




Line 49,968: Line 45,911:




E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d




T.  
T.








0.835  
0.835




12.08  
12.08




12.41  
12.41




11.35  
11.35




11.16  
11.16




8.29  
8.29




8.10  
8.10




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.








1.122  
1.122




13.35  
13.35




13.40  
13.40




12.68  
12.68




12.70  
12.70




8.98  
8.98




8.95  
8.95




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.








1.179  
1.179




13.55  
13.55




13.60  
13.60




12.78  
12.78




12.85  
12.85




8.88  
8.88




9.05  
9.05




Series II  
Series II




Line 50,076: Line 46,019:




F a, b  
F a, b




T.  
T.








0.832  
0.832




12.00  
12.00




12.53  
12.53




11.50  
11.50




11.13  
11.13




7.95  
7.95




8.05  
8.05




c-1  
c-1




T.  
T.








1.204  
1.204




13.30  
13.30




13.73  
13.73




13.11  
13.11




12.98  
12.98




9.30  
9.30




9.15  
9.15




Series III  
Series III




Line 50,155: Line 46,098:




Ga-g •  
Ga-g •




T.  
T.








0.844  
0.844




12.22  
12.22




12.46  
12.46




11.46  
11.46




11.32  
11.32




8.13  
8.13




8.69  
8.69




h-j  
h-j




T.  
T.








1.154  
1.154




13.27  
13.27




13.53  
13.53




13.03  
13.03




12.80  
12.80




8.95  
8.95




9.00  
9.00




Average 1  
Average 1




T.  
T.








0.753  
0.753




11.65  
11.65




11.98  
11.98




10.92  
10.92




10.60  
10.60




7.78  
7.78




7.87  
7.87




(Ser. I-III)J  
(Ser. I-III)J




T.  
T.








1.107  
1.107




13.17  
13.17




13.35  
13.35




12.71  
12.71




12.62  
12.62




8.78  
8.78




8.90  
8.90




Average 1  
Average 1




C.  
C.








0.718  
0.718




11.46  
11.46




11.76  
11.76




10.62  
10.62




10.49  
10.49




7.47  
7.47




7.61  
7.61




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C.  
C.




II.  
II.




1.226  
1.226




13.72  
13.72




13.80  
13.80




13.12  
13.12




13.05  
13.05




8.83  
8.83




9.19  
9.19






195  
195






196 NAOKI SUGITA  
196 NAOKI SUGITA


the controls from the same litter, and it gives for each group,  
the controls from the same litter, and it gives for each group, underfed and controls, the average brain weight and the corrected cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections of the brain, together with the average thickness. The data for obtaining the correction-coefficient are given in the full table for each individual, but in the condensed table 6 orily the average values of the correction-coefficients for each group appear. The application of the correction-coefficient was made in the way formerly described (Sugita, '17 a). The horizontal sections of underfed brains were not prepared for this study.
underfed and controls, the average brain weight and the corrected cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections of  
the brain, together with the average thickness. The data for  
obtaining the correction-coefficient are given in the full table for  
each individual, but in the condensed table 6 orily the average  
values of the correction-coefficients for each group appear.  
The application of the correction-coefficient was made in the  
way formerly described (Sugita, '17 a). The horizontal sections  
of underfed brains were not prepared for this study.  


Table 6 shows also a comparison of the average thickness of  
Table 6 shows also a comparison of the average thickness of the cortex in the underfed young with that for the standard Albino of the same brain weights. As the present study was not extended to the horizontal sections, the average thickness of the cortex was determined from only the two kinds of sections from the same individual and it was compared with the corresponding average for the standards. In the standards, these values proved to be within 0.5 per cent of the general average thickness of the cortex based on the three kinds of sections. Here, in table 6, the standard values were obtained from the somewhat smoothed curve based on the data formerly presented (table 9 and chart 9, Sugita, '17a).
the cortex in the underfed young with that for the standard  
Albino of the same brain weights. As the present study was not  
extended to the horizontal sections, the average thickness of the  
cortex was determined from only the two kinds of sections from  
the same individual and it was compared with the corresponding  
average for the standards. In the standards, these values  
proved to be within 0.5 per cent of the general average thickness  
of the cortex based on the three kinds of sections. Here, in table  
6, the standard values were obtained from the somewhat smoothed  
curve based on the data formerly presented (table 9 and chart  
9, Sugita, '17a).  


Table 6 a (unpubhshed) for the sagittal section showed for the  
Table 6 a (unpubhshed) for the sagittal section showed for the underfed that the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality I) is evidently very much greater than that of the controls or the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight, comparison having been made on the basis of the data given formerly (table 6 and chart 4, Sugita, '17 a). Locality II was the next which exceeds in the cortical thickness on the side of the underfed. Localities III and IV stand in general slightly in favor of the underfed, but at locality V, the occipital pole, there was found no notable difference in the cortical thickness between the underfed and the standard. As a rule, the cortical thickness of the normal Albino diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole — from locality I to locality V — and the cortex at the frontal pole increases most rapidly in the early age. This is also just the order of the excesses in the cortical thickness of the underfed
underfed that the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality  
I) is evidently very much greater than that of the controls or  
the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight,  
comparison having been made on the basis of the data given  
formerly (table 6 and chart 4, Sugita, '17 a). Locality II was  
the next which exceeds in the cortical thickness on the side of the  
underfed. Localities III and IV stand in general slightly in  
favor of the underfed, but at locality V, the occipital pole, there  
was found no notable difference in the cortical thickness between  
the underfed and the standard. As a rule, the cortical thickness  
of the normal Albino diminishes from the frontal to the occipital  
pole — from locality I to locality V — and the cortex at the frontal  
pole increases most rapidly in the early age. This is also just the  
order of the excesses in the cortical thickness of the underfed  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 197  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 197


when compared with the standard values for the brains weighing  
when compared with the standard values for the brains weighing the same. The cortical thickness at each locality of the controls was on the average fairly in accord with the standard (the detailed evidence for these conclusions is contained in table 6 a, not here published).
the same. The cortical thickness at each locality of the controls  
was on the average fairly in accord with the standard (the detailed  
evidence for these conclusions is contained in table 6 a, not here  
published).  


In table 6 b (unpublished), in which the cortical thickness at  
In table 6 b (unpublished), in which the cortical thickness at localities VI, VII, and VIII of the frontal section was given, it was also clearly seen that the localities VI and VII are much greater in the cortical thickness, compared with those of the controls or the standard values of the same brain weight. The excess amounts on the average to more than 10 per cent. The locality VIII, at which the cortex is heterogeneous in laminar structure, did not show any significant difference in the cortical thickness, compared with the normal, though in some cases here and there it was found somewhat thicker in the underfed (the evidence for these determinations is contained in table G b, not here published).
localities VI, VII, and VIII of the frontal section was given, it  
was also clearly seen that the localities VI and VII are much  
greater in the cortical thickness, compared with those of the  
controls or the standard values of the same brain weight. The  
excess amounts on the average to more than 10 per cent. The  
locality VIII, at which the cortex is heterogeneous in laminar  
structure, did not show any significant difference in the cortical  
thickness, compared with the normal, though in some cases here  
and there it was found somewhat thicker in the underfed (the evidence for these determinations is contained in table G b, not here  
published).  


One more notable thing found in the cerebral cortex of the  
One more notable thing found in the cerebral cortex of the underfed was that, while in the controls and standards the locality VII is always somewhat greater in thickness than the locality VI, the relation has, in many cases (18 out of 44) of the underfed, proved to be reversed (A a, h; B i; C a, c; D d, e; E c, h; F b, c, f, h; G a, c, g, e and h).
underfed was that, while in the controls and standards the  
locality VII is always somewhat greater in thickness than the  
locality VI, the relation has, in many cases (18 out of 44) of the  
underfed, proved to be reversed (A a, h; B i; C a, c; D d, e;  
E c, h; F b, c, f, h; G a, c, g, e and h).  


Generally considered, the localities which are situated nearer  
Generally considered, the localities which are situated nearer to the ventricular wall, the locus of the cell division, seem to have gained much more in the cortical thickness in the case of the underfed, while the localities remote from the matrix (for example, locality V) or the part constructed heterogeneousl}^ (for example, locality VIII) appear to be modified but little by underfeeding.
to the ventricular wall, the locus of the cell division, seem to have  
gained much more in the cortical thickness in the case of the  
underfed, while the localities remote from the matrix (for example, locality V) or the part constructed heterogeneousl}^ (for  
example, locality VIII) appear to be modified but little by underfeeding.  


As is to be seen in table 6, the average thickness of the cortex  
As is to be seen in table 6, the average thickness of the cortex is in favor of the underfed Albinos. If compared with the standard values for the same brain weight, the average cortical thickness in the underfed young (table 6) is greater than tjie standard on the average by 7 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only), while t^e controls are greater on the average by only 1.8 per cent (average of Litters A to E^ C. groups only). According
is in favor of the underfed Albinos. If compared with the standard values for the same brain weight, the average cortical thickness in the underfed young (table 6) is greater than tjie standard  
on the average by 7 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups  
only), while t^e controls are greater on the average by only 1.8  
per cent (average of Litters A to E^ C. groups only). According  






198  
198






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 6  
TABLE 6 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, and the average cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections. The general average cortical thickness was obtained and compared with the standard value for the same brain weight, quoted from a previous paper (Sugita, '17a). The data for each individual and for each locality of the cortex were originally tabulated in three full tables (tables 6a, 6b and 6c) which are on file at The Wistar Institute and from which this table 6 was condensed. The correction-coefficients are given in averages for each litter group for each kind of section. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the end of the table.
Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, and the  
average cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections. The general average  
cortical thickness was obtained and compared with the standard value for the same  
brain weight, quoted from a previous paper (Sugita, '17a). The data for each  
individual and for each locality of the cortex were originally tabulated in three full  
tables (tables 6a, 6b and 6c) which are on file at The Wistar Institute and from which  
this table 6 was condensed. The correction-coefficients are given in averages for  
each litter group for each kind of section. The averages for the test and control  
groups are given at the end of the table.  




Line 50,442: Line 46,316:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




SAGITTAL  
SAGITTAL SECTION
SECTION  




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL SECTION
SECTION  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GRODP
GRODP  




Correction  
Correction coefficient
coefficient  




Cortical  
Cortical thickness
thickness  




Correction  
Correction


coefficient  
coefficient




Cortical  
Cortical


thickness  
thickness




Cortical  
Cortical


thickness  
thickness




Standard for  
Standard for the same brain weight
the  
same  
brain  
weight  




Line 50,506: Line 46,367:




days  
days




grams  
grams








mm.  
mm.








mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Series I  
Series I




Line 50,551: Line 46,412:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T.  
T.




Line 50,561: Line 46,422:
7
7


0.584  
0.584




1.16  
1.16




1.24  
1.24




1.18  
1.18




1.47  
1.47




1.35  
1.35




1.'9  
1.'9




h  
h




T.  
T.








15  
15




1.024  
1.024




1.21  
1.21




1.64  
1.64




1.28  
1.28




2.05  
2.05




1.85  
1.85




1.73  
1.73




> b, g  
> b, g




C.  
C.




Line 50,624: Line 46,485:
8
8


0.688  
0.688




1.09  
1.09




1.34  
1.34




1.14  
1.14




1.46  
1.46




1.40  
1.40




1.38  
1.38




i  
i




C.  
C.








17  
17




1.278  
1.278




1.23  
1.23




1.77  
1.77




1.26  
1.26




2.00  
2.00




1.89  
1.89




1.84  
1.84




Series I  
Series I




Line 50,700: Line 46,561:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.




Line 50,710: Line 46,571:
9
9


0.644  
0.644




1.12  
1.12




l..;3  
l..;3




1.17  
1.17




1.53  
1.53




1.43  
1.43




1.40  
1.40




i  
i




T.  
T.








19  
19




1.052  
1.052




1.20  
1.20




1.66  
1.66




1.37  
1.37




2.15  
2.15




1.91  
1.91




1.74  
1.74




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.








6  
6




0.543  
0.543




1.08  
1.08




1.18  
1.18




1.09  
1.09




1.32  
1.32




1.25  
1.25




1.25  
1.25




g, h, j  
g, h, j




C.  
C.




Line 50,805: Line 46,666:
18
18


1.144  
1.144




1.24  
1.24




1.74  
1.74




1.31  
1.31




2.01  
2.01




1.88  
1.88




1.80  
1.80




Series I  
Series I




Line 50,849: Line 46,710:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.








20  
20




1.105  
1.105




1.17  
1.17




1.74  
1.74




1.25  
1.25




2.08  
2.08




1.91  
1.91




1.77  
1.77




b, e  
b, e




C.  
C.




Line 50,891: Line 46,752:
22
22


1.307  
1.307




1.17  
1.17




1.76  
1.76




1.16  
1.16




1.97  
1.97




1.87  
1.87




1.85  
1.85




Series I  
Series I




Line 50,935: Line 46,796:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.




Line 50,945: Line 46,806:
12
12


0.778  
0.778




1.15  
1.15




1.54  
1.54




1.24  
1.24




1.89  
1.89




1.72  
1.72




1.61  
1.61




e  
e




T.  
T.








18  
18




1.089  
1.089




1.17  
1.17




1.73  
1.73




1.28  
1.28




2.10  
2.10




1.92  
1.92




1.77  
1.77




b  
b




C.  
C.








9  
9




0.870  
0.870




1.13  
1.13




1.55  
1.55




1.22  
1.22




1.87  
1.87




1.71  
1.71




1.67  
1.67




f  
f




C.  
C.








22  
22




1.220  
1.220




1.14  
1.14




1.78  
1.78








—  




—  




1.82  
1.82




Series I  
Series I




Line 51,078: Line 46,939:




*








E b, c, d ,  
E b, c, d ,




T.  
T.








12  
12




0.867  
0.867




1.11  
1.11




1.53  
1.53




1.23  
1.23




1.95  
1.95




1.74  
1.74




1.66  
1.66




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.








20  
20




1.122  
1.122




1.20  
1.20




1.81  
1.81




1.26  
1.26




2.15  
2.15




1.98  
1.98




1.79  
1.79




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.




II  
II




17
17


1.179  
1.179




1.10  
1.10




1.68  
1.68




1.21  
1.21




1*94  
1*94




1.81  
1.81




1.79  
1.79






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






199  
199




Line 51,194: Line 47,054:
TABLE 6
TABLE 6


-Continued  
-Continued




Line 51,207: Line 47,067:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




SAGITTAL  
SAGITTAL SECTION
SECTION  




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL SECTION
SECTION  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Correction  
Correction coefficient
coefficient  




Cortical  
Cortical thickness
thickness  




Correction  
Correction coefficient
coefficient  




Cortical  
Cortical


thickness  
thickness




Cortical  
Cortical thickness
thickness  




Standard for  
Standard for the same brain weight
the  
same  
brain  
weight  




Line 51,267: Line 47,112:




days  
days




grams  
grams








mm.  
mm.








mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Series II  
Series II




Line 51,310: Line 47,155:




Fa, b  
Fa, b




T. I  
T. I




13
13


0.832  
0.832




1.17  
1.17




1.57  
1.57




1.21  
1.21




1.8  
1.8




1.72  
1.72




1.62  
1.62




c-1  
c-1




T. II  
T. II




25+  
25+




1.204  
1.204




1.24  
1.24




1.81  
1.81




1.32  
1.32




2.15  
2.15




1.98  
1.98




1.82  
1.82




Series III  
Series III




Line 51,390: Line 47,235:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




T. I  
T. I




11 +  
11 +




0.844  
0.844




1.14  
1.14




1.55  
1.55




1.24  
1.24




1.89  
1.89




1.72  
1.72




1.63  
1.63




h-j  
h-j




T. II  
T. II




22
22


1.154  
1.154




1.19  
1.19




1.78  
1.78




1.26  
1.26




2.15  
2.15




1.97  
1.97




1.80  
1.80




Average 1  
Average 1




T. I  
T. I




11
11


0.758  
0.758




1.14  
1.14




1.46  
1.46




1.21  
1.21




1.77  
1.77




1.61  
1.61




1.54  
1.54




(Her. I-III) j  
(Her. I-III) j




T. II  
T. II




20
20


1.107  
1.107




1.20  
1.20




1.74  
1.74




1.29  
1.29




2. 2  
2. 2




1.93  
1.93




1.77  
1.77




Average 1  
Average 1




C. I  
C. I




8
8


0.700  
0.700




1.10  
1.10




1.36  
1.36




1.15  
1.15




.55  
.55




1.45  
1.45




US  
US




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C. II  
C. II




19+  
19+




1.226  
1.226




1.18  
1.18




1.75  
1.75




1. 4  
1. 4




1.98  
1.98




1.86  
1.86




1.82  
1.82






to table 6 c (unpublished), which gives comparisons of cortical  
to table 6 c (unpublished), which gives comparisons of cortical thickness of the underfed with the standard in each section, the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section of the underfed exceeds the standard on the average by 5.3 per cent and that in the frontal section of the underfed on the average by 8.7 per cent.
thickness of the underfed with the standard in each section, the  
average cortical thickness in the sagittal section of the underfed  
exceeds the standard on the average by 5.3 per cent and that in  
the frontal section of the underfed on the average by 8.7 per cent.  


8. AREA OF THE CORTEX IN THE SAGITTAL AND FRONTAL SECTIONS  
8. AREA OF THE CORTEX IN THE SAGITTAL AND FRONTAL SECTIONS


Following the procedures which have been described earlier  
Following the procedures which have been described earlier for the measurement of the area of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sections of the Albino brains (Sugita, '18 b), the data for the underfed Albinos were obtained. Table 7 presents in condensed form for each group the averaged data on the corrected area of the cortex together with the average correction-coefficient for each group, in the sagittal and frontal sections, respectively. The observed data, as measured on the slides, and the data for correction-coefficient for each individual were tabulated in tables 7 a and 7 b (unpublished), on the basis of which table 7 was made. In table 7 (and in table 7 b) the total areas of the frontal sections (one hemicerebrum) and the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section are also entered.
for the measurement of the area of the cortex in the sagittal and  
frontal sections of the Albino brains (Sugita, '18 b), the data  
for the underfed Albinos were obtained. Table 7 presents in  
condensed form for each group the averaged data on the corrected  
area of the cortex together with the average correction-coefficient  
for each group, in the sagittal and frontal sections, respectively.  
The observed data, as measured on the slides, and the data for  
correction-coefficient for each individual were tabulated in tables  
7 a and 7 b (unpublished), on the basis of which table 7 was  
made. In table 7 (and in table 7 b) the total areas of the  
frontal sections (one hemicerebrum) and the percentage of the  
cortical area to the total area of the section are also entered.  






200  
200






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7


Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the corrected areas  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the corrected areas of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sect'ons, and the total area of the frontal section and the average correction-coefficients for each group for each kind of section. The percentage values of the cortical area to the area of the total section in the frontal section are also given for each group. This table was condensed from two detailed tables for individual observed data and the data for the correction-coefficients. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table
of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sect'ons, and the total area of the frontal  
section and the average correction-coefficients for each group for each kind of section. The percentage values of the cortical area to the area of the total section in the  
frontal section are also given for each group. This table was condensed from two  
detailed tables for individual observed data and the data for the correction-coefficients. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table  




Line 51,611: Line 47,436:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE


BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




SAGITTAL SECTION  
SAGITTAL SECTION








FRONTAL  
FRONTAL




SECTION  
SECTION








SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Correction-coefficient  
Correction-coefficient




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Correction-coefficient  
Correction-coefficient




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Total  
Total area of section
area of  
section  




Percentage of  
Percentage of cortical area to the total
cortical  
area to  
the total  




Line 51,679: Line 47,494:




area  
area




Line 51,686: Line 47,501:




grams  
grams








mm."  
mm."




Line 51,700: Line 47,515:
mm.
mm.


per cent  
per cent




Series I  
Series I




Line 51,722: Line 47,537:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T. I  
T. I




0.584  
0.584




1.16  
1.16




14.6  
14.6




1.18  
1.18




13.4  
13.4




28.8  
28.8




45  
45




h  
h




T. II  
T. II




1.024  
1.024




1.21  
1.21




22.2  
22.2




1.28  
1.28




22.8  
22.8




45.0  
45.0




51  
51




b, g  
b, g




C. I  
C. I




0.688  
0.688




1.09  
1.09




17.4  
17.4




1.14  
1.14




15.2  
15.2




31.9  
31.9




46  
46




i  
i




C. II  
C. II




1.278  
1.278




1.23  
1.23




27.4  
27.4




1.26  
1.26




21.7  
21.7




43.6  
43.6




50  
50




Series I  
Series I




Line 51,849: Line 47,664:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T. I  
T. I




0.644  
0.644




1.12  
1.12




16.9  
16.9




1.17  
1.17




15.0  
15.0




31.6  
31.6




47  
47




i  
i




T. II  
T. II




1.052  
1.052




1.20  
1.20




23.3  
23.3




1.37  
1.37




23.4  
23.4




45.7  
45.7




51  
51




b, d  
b, d




C. I  
C. I




0.543  
0.543




1.08  
1.08




9.1  
9.1




1.09  
1.09




11,6  
11,6




25.1  
25.1




46  
46




g, h, j  
g, h, j




C. II  
C. II




1.144  
1.144




1.24  
1.24




24.6  
24.6




1.31  
1.31




21.7  
21.7




45.3  
45.3




47  
47




Series I  
Series I




Line 51,974: Line 47,789:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T. II  
T. II




1 . 105  
1 . 105




1.17  
1.17




24.5  
24.5




1.25  
1.25




22.0  
22.0




43.6  
43.6




50  
50




1), e  
1), e




C. II  
C. II




1.307  
1.307




1.17  
1.17




27.8  
27.8




1.16  
1.16




22.2  
22.2




46.0  
46.0




48  
48




Series I  
Series I




Line 52,047: Line 47,862:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T. I  
T. I




0.778  
0.778




1.15  
1.15




19.4  
19.4




1.24  
1.24




17.9  
17.9




36.1  
36.1




50  
50




e  
e




T. II  
T. II




1.089  
1.089




1.17  
1.17




24.2  
24.2




1.28  
1.28




20.0  
20.0




41.0  
41.0




49  
49




b  
b




C. I  
C. I




0.870  
0.870




1.13  
1.13




20.6  
20.6




1.11  
1.11




18.7  
18.7




38.8  
38.8




48  
48




f  
f




C. II  
C. II




1.220  
1.220




1.14  
1.14




26.7  
26.7




—  




—  




—  




—  




Series I  
Series I




Line 52,168: Line 47,983:




•  




Line 52,175: Line 47,990:




E b, c, d  
E b, c, d




T. I  
T. I




0.867  
0.867




1.11  
1.11




19.9  
19.9




1.23  
1.23




19.8  
19.8




38.4  
38.4




52  
52




g. h  
g. h




T. II  
T. II




1.122  
1.122




1.20  
1.20




25.9  
25.9




1.26  
1.26




23.4  
23.4




45.9  
45.9




51  
51




e, f  
e, f




C. II  
C. II




1.179  
1.179




1.10  
1.10




24.2  
24.2




1.21  
1.21




22.2  
22.2




45.2  
45.2




49  
49




Series II  
Series II




Line 52,275: Line 48,090:




F a, b  
F a, b




T. I  
T. I




0.832  
0.832




1.17  
1.17




20.8  
20.8




1.21  
1.21




18.6  
18.6




38.0  
38.0




50  
50




c-I  
c-I




T. II  
T. II




1.204  
1.204




1.24  
1.24




26.0  
26.0




1.32  
1.32




23.4  
23.4




47.3  
47.3




50  
50






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






201  
201






TABLE l^Continued  
TABLE l^Continued




Line 52,344: Line 48,159:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE


BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




SAGITTAL  
SAGITTAL




SECTION  
SECTION








FRONTAL  
FRONTAL




SECTION  
SECTION








SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Qorrection-coefficient  
Qorrection-coefficient




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Correction-coefficient  
Correction-coefficient




Area of  
Area of cortex
cortex  




Total  
Total area of section
area of  
section  




Percentage of  
Percentage of


cortical  
cortical


area to  
area to


the total  
the total




Line 52,420: Line 48,228:




area  
area




Line 52,429: Line 48,237:




grams  
grams








mm 2  
mm 2




Line 52,441: Line 48,249:
mm.
mm.


mm .  
mm .


per cent  
per cent




Series III  
Series III




Line 52,467: Line 48,275:




G a-ig  
G a-ig




T.  
T.




I  
I




0.844  
0.844




1.14  
1.14




20.1  
20.1




1.24  
1.24




19.2  
19.2




38.5  
38.5




50  
50




h-j  
h-j




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.154  
1.154




1.19  
1.19




25.6  
25.6




1.26  
1.26




22.9  
22.9




46.2  
46.2




50  
50




Average 1  
Average 1




T.  
T.




I  
I




0.758  
0.758




1.14  
1.14




18.6  
18.6




1.21  
1.21




17.3  
17.3




35.2  
35.2




49  
49




(Ser. I-III)j  
(Ser. I-III)j




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.107  
1.107




1.20  
1.20




24.5  
24.5




1.29  
1.29




22.6  
22.6




45.0  
45.0




50  
50




Average \  
Average \




C.  
C.




I  
I




0.700  
0.700




1.10  
1.10




15.7  
15.7




1.15  
1.15




15.2  
15.2




31.9  
31.9




48  
48




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.226  
1.226




1.18  
1.18




26.1  
26.1




1.24  
1.24




22.0  
22.0




45.0  
45.0




49  
49






The above-mentioned corrected data for each individual were  
The above-mentioned corrected data for each individual were separately paired with the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight, quoted from my previous study (Sugita, '18 b) in table 8 a (unpul)lished) and from this latter table 8 was condensed, giving only the averages for each group.
separately paired with the corresponding standard values for the  
same brain weight, quoted from my previous study (Sugita, '18 b)  
in table 8 a (unpul)lished) and from this latter table 8 was condensed, giving only the averages for each group.  


Briefly stated, the area of the cortex in the sagittal section of  
Briefly stated, the area of the cortex in the sagittal section of the underfed is on the average greater by 1.4 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only) than in the standard, while the controls are on the average about 1.9 per cent less than the standard.
the underfed is on the average greater by 1.4 per cent (average  
of all eight litters, T. groups only) than in the standard, while  
the controls are on the average about 1.9 per cent less than the  
standard.  


The average area of the total frontal section is in the underfed  
The average area of the total frontal section is in the underfed greater than that of the standard by 2.4 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only), while the controls are less by 3.8 per cent (average of Litters A to E, C. groups only) than the standard, and the area of the cortex in the frontal section is in the . underfed greater on the average by 5.0 per cent, while in the controls less by 2.1 per cent, than the standard (table 8). From these observations, it may be easily concluded that in the underfed the proportion of the cortex to the total section is higher than in the standard or control, as shown by the percentage values directly calculated for each brain (table 7 b) and given in a condensed form in the last column of table 7, where the values are
greater than that of the standard by 2.4 per cent (average of all  
eight litters, T. groups only), while the controls are less by 3.8  
per cent (average of Litters A to E, C. groups only) than the  
standard, and the area of the cortex in the frontal section is in the .  
underfed greater on the average by 5.0 per cent, while in the controls less by 2.1 per cent, than the standard (table 8). From  
these observations, it may be easily concluded that in the underfed the proportion of the cortex to the total section is higher than  
in the standard or control, as shown by the percentage values  
directly calculated for each brain (table 7 b) and given in a condensed form in the last column of table 7, where the values are  






202  
202






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 8  
TABLE 8


Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain iveight, the corrected areas  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain iveight, the corrected areas of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sections, and the area, of the entire frontal section, respectively, compared tvith the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight. The standard values are all entered according to my previous presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original complete table 8a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the end of the table.
of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sections, and the area, of the entire frontal  
section, respectively, compared tvith the corresponding standard values for the  
same brain weight. The standard values are all entered according to my previous  
presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original complete  
table 8a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups are given  
at the end of the table.  




Line 52,695: Line 48,482:
AVER
AVER


SAGITTAL SECTION  
SAGITTAL SECTION




FRONTAL SECTION  
FRONTAL SECTION








Area of cortex  
Area of cortex




Tota  
Tota




area  
area




Area of cortex  
Area of cortex




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




AGE  
AGE


BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Line 52,739: Line 48,526:




GROUP  
GROUP




Corrected  
Corrected




Stan^^ard  
Stan^^ard




Area  
Area




Corrected  
Corrected




Standard  
Standard




Corrected  
Corrected




Standard  
Standard




Area  
Area




Line 52,780: Line 48,567:




ness  
ness




Line 52,791: Line 48,578:




ness  
ness








grams  
grams




Line 52,803: Line 48,590:
mm.
mm.


mm.  
mm.




mm. 2  
mm. 2




mm.
mm.


wm.2  
wm.2




mm.'  
mm.'




mm.  
mm.




Series I  
Series I




Line 52,841: Line 48,628:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




0.584  
0.584




14.6  
14.6




13.8  
13.8




11.4  
11.4




28.8  
28.8




28.3  
28.3




13.4  
13.4




12.9  
12.9




8.9  
8.9




h  
h




1.024  
1.024




22.2  
22.2




23.0  
23.0




13.5  
13.5




45.0  
45.0




42.0  
42.0




22.8  
22.8




20.7  
20.7




11.1  
11.1




b, g  
b, g




0.688  
0.688




17.4  
17.4




16.0  
16.0




12.6  
12.6




31.9  
31.9




31.8  
31.8




. 15.2  
. 15.2




15.0  
15.0




10.1  
10.1




i  
i




1.278  
1.278




27.4  
27.4




26.7  
26.7




15.5  
15.5




43.6  
43.6




48.5  
48.5




21.7  
21.7




23.0  
23.0




10.9  
10.9




Series I  
Series I




Line 52,982: Line 48,769:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




0.644  
0.644




16.9  
16.9




15. Jt  
15. Jt




12.5  
12.5




31.6  
31.6




30.4  
30.4




15.0  
15.0




14.2  
14.2




9.6  
9.6




i  
i




1.052  
1.052




23.3  
23.3




23.6  
23.6




14.0  
14.0




45.7  
45.7




43.0  
43.0




23.4  
23.4




21.0  
21.0




10.9  
10.9




b, d  
b, d




0.543  
0.543




13.1  
13.1




13.0  
13.0




11.0  
11.0




25.1  
25.1




28.3  
28.3




11.6  
11.6




11.9  
11.9




8.6  
8.6




g, h, j  
g, h, j




1.144  
1.144




24.6  
24.6




25.2  
25.2




14.1  
14.1




45.3  
45.3




45.2  
45.2




21.7  
21.7




21.7  
21.7




10.8
10.8


Series I  
Series I




Line 53,122: Line 48,909:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




1.105  
1.105




24.5  
24.5




2Jt.h  
2Jt.h




14.0  
14.0




43.6  
43.6




44.1  
44.1




22.0  
22.0




21.5  
21.5




10.6  
10.6




b, e  
b, e




1.307  
1.307




27.8  
27.8




27.1  
27.1




15.8  
15.8




46.0  
46.0




49.3  
49.3




22.2  
22.2




23.3  
23.3




11.3  
11.3




Series I  
Series I




Line 53,203: Line 48,990:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




0.778  
0.778




19.4  
19.4




18.9  
18.9




12.6  
12.6




36.1  
36.1




34-8  
34-8




17.9  
17.9




17.0  
17.0




9.5  
9.5




e  
e




1.089  
1.089




24.2  
24.2




24.5  
24.5




14.0  
14.0




41.0  
41.0




44-0  
44-0




20.0  
20.0




21.3  
21.3




9.5  
9.5




b  
b




0.870  
0.870




20.6  
20.6




20.5  
20.5




13.3  
13.3




38.8  
38.8




38.0  
38.0




18.7  
18.7




18.8  
18.8




10.0  
10.0




f  
f




1.220  
1.220




26.7  
26.7




26.0  
26.0




15.0  
15.0




—  




47.0  
47.0




—  




22.5  
22.5




—  




Series I  
Series I




Line 53,344: Line 49,131:




E b, c, d  
E b, c, d




0.867  
0.867




19.9  
19.9




20.3  
20.3




13.0  
13.0




38.4  
38.4




37.5  
37.5




19.8  
19.8




18.7  
18.7




10.1  
10.1




g, h  
g, h




1.122  
1.122




25.9  
25.9




25.0  
25.0




14.3  
14.3




45.9  
45.9




44.5  
44.5




23.4  
23.4




21.5  
21.5




10.9  
10.9




e, f  
e, f




1.179  
1.179




24.2  
24.2




25.3  
25.3




14.4  
14.4




45.2  
45.2




46.0  
46.0




22.2  
22.2




23.6  
23.6




11.4  
11.4






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 203  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 203


TABLE 8— Continued  
TABLE 8— Continued




Line 53,445: Line 49,232:
AVER
AVER


SAGITTAL SECTION  
SAGITTAL SECTION








FRONTAL SECTION  
FRONTAL SECTION




Line 53,457: Line 49,244:




Area of cortex  
Area of cortex




Tota  
Tota




area  
area




Area of cortex  
Area of cortex




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




AGE  
AGE


BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




Line 53,491: Line 49,278:




GROUP  
GROUP




Corrected  
Corrected




Sttt7ld
Sttt7ld ard
ard  




Area  
Area




Corrected  
Corrected




Standard  
Standard




Corrected  
Corrected




Standard  
Standard




Area  
Area




Line 53,533: Line 49,319:




ness  
ness




Line 53,544: Line 49,330:




ness  
ness








grams  
grams




mm. 2  
mm. 2




nim.
nim.


mm.  
mm.




m,m.'  
m,m.'




mm."  
mm."




mm. 2  
mm. 2




m.m.
m.m.


TOTO.  
TOTO.




Series II  
Series II




Line 53,595: Line 49,381:




F a, b  
F a, b




0.832  
0.832




20.8  
20.8




19.4  
19.4




13.2  
13.2




38.0  
38.0




36.5  
36.5




18.6  
18.6




17.9  
17.9




9.9  
9.9




c-1  
c-1




1.204  
1.204




26.0  
26.0




25.9  
25.9




14.4  
14.4




47.3  
47.3




46.7  
46.7




23.4  
23.4




22.3  
22.3




10.9  
10.9




Series III  
Series III




Line 53,676: Line 49,462:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




0.844  
0.844




20.1  
20.1




19.8  
19.8




13.0  
13.0




38.5  
38.5




36.9  
36.9




19.2  
19.2




18.2  
18.2




10.2  
10.2




h-j  
h-j




1.154  
1.154




25.6  
25.6




25.7  
25.7




14.3  
14.3




46.2  
46.2




45.3  
45.3




22.9  
22.9




21.9  
21.9




10.7  
10.7




Average 1 (T. I)  
Average 1 (T. I)




0.758  
0.758




18.6  
18.6




17.9  
17.9




12.6  
12.6




35.2  
35.2




34-1  
34-1




17.3  
17.3




16.5  
16.5




9.7  
9.7




(Ser. I-III)/ (T.II)  
(Ser. I-III)/ (T.II)




1.107  
1.107




24.5  
24.5




24.6  
24.6




14.1  
14.1




45.0  
45.0




44-2  
44-2




22.6  
22.6




21.5  
21.5




10.7  
10.7




Average\ (C. I)  
Average\ (C. I)




0.700  
0.700




15.7  
15.7




16.5  
16.5




12.3  
12.3




31.9  
31.9




32.7  
32.7




15.2  
15.2




15.2  
15.2




9.6  
9.6




(Ser. I) / (C. II)  
(Ser. I) / (C. II)




1.226  
1.226




26.1  
26.1




26.1  
26.1




15.0  
15.0




45.0  
45.0




47.2  
47.2




22.0  
22.0




22.8  
22.8




11.1  
11.1






higher on the average by 3 per cent (1 to 4 per cent in individual  
higher on the average by 3 per cent (1 to 4 per cent in individual cases) than the standard or controls. These results fit with the observation that in the underfed the cortical thickness in the frontal section is 8.7 per cent greater than for the standard (chapter 7).
cases) than the standard or controls. These results fit with the  
observation that in the underfed the cortical thickness in the  
frontal section is 8.7 per cent greater than for the standard  
(chapter 7).  


9. COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CORTEX  
9. COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CORTEX


In a former paper (Sugita, '18 b), it was assumed that, as the  
In a former paper (Sugita, '18 b), it was assumed that, as the form of the cerebrum of the albino rat is relatively simple and nearly constant, the relative volumes occupied by the cortical cells could be computed, and compared among themselves, by reducing the data obtained by measurement to a simple geometrical form, since the cortical areas in the sagittal and frontal sections stand in fixed relations to the respective diameters L.F and W.D and to the cortical thickness of the sections from the same brain. These relations have been expressed as follows (Sugita, '18 b):
form of the cerebrum of the albino rat is relatively simple and  
nearly constant, the relative volumes occupied by the cortical  
cells could be computed, and compared among themselves, by  
reducing the data obtained by measurement to a simple geometrical form, since the cortical areas in the sagittal and frontal  
sections stand in fixed relations to the respective diameters  
L.F and W.D and to the cortical thickness of the sections from  
the same brain. These relations have been expressed as follows  
(Sugita, '18 b):  






204 NAOKI SUGITA  
204 NAOKI SUGITA


Cortical area (mm.-) in sagittal section  
Cortical area (mm.-) in sagittal section






L.F (mm.) ^ constant (1)  
L.F (mm.) ^ constant (1)






Cortical thickness (mm.) in the same  
Cortical thickness (mm.) in the same


Cortical area (mm.-) in frontal section ^rr t^ / x , , .^s  
Cortical area (mm.-) in frontal section ^rr t^ / x , , .^s


-7s — T- — 1 xi- r } w — Til -=- **^ Mimm..) = constant (2)  
-7s — T- — 1 xi- r } w — Til -=- **^ Mimm..) = constant (2)


Cortical thickness (mm.) m the same ^ ^  
Cortical thickness (mm.) m the same ^ ^


And the computed volume of the cortex should be obtained  
And the computed volume of the cortex should be obtained simply by the following formula :
simply by the following formula :  


L.F X W.D X T (ah in millimeters), (3)  
L.F X W.D X T (ah in millimeters), (3)


where T gives the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex  
where T gives the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the same brain.
of the same brain.  


As shown in table 9, which has been condensed from table 9 a  
As shown in table 9, which has been condensed from table 9 a (unpublished) for each individual, the constant ratios obtained by the above formulas (1) and (2) fall between 1.10 and 1.29 for the sagittal sections and between 0.80 and 0.95 for the frontal sections, throughout both the underfed and the control groups. The averages of the ratios for the sagittal and frontal sections of the underfed are, respectively, 1.18 and 0.88, and those of the controls are, respectively, 1.20 and 0.88. I have previously given the figures 1.22 and 0.91, respectively, as these ratios of the standard albino rat brains weighing more than 0.5 gram. So it may be assumed that the ratios are nearly the same in both the underfed and the controls; slight differences in the underfed from the standard may be regarded as due to the facts that the cerebrum of the underfed is slightly more elongated and the cortical thickness is somewhat greater than in the standard. As the product of the coefficients in the underfed (I'.IS X 0.88) falls somewhat lower than that in the standard (1.22 X 0.91), the results of L.F X W.D X T should be about 5 per cent higher in the underfed than in the standard.
(unpublished) for each individual, the constant ratios obtained  
by the above formulas (1) and (2) fall between 1.10 and 1.29 for  
the sagittal sections and between 0.80 and 0.95 for the frontal  
sections, throughout both the underfed and the control groups.  
The averages of the ratios for the sagittal and frontal sections of  
the underfed are, respectively, 1.18 and 0.88, and those of the  
controls are, respectively, 1.20 and 0.88. I have previously  
given the figures 1.22 and 0.91, respectively, as these ratios of the  
standard albino rat brains weighing more than 0.5 gram. So  
it may be assumed that the ratios are nearly the same in both the  
underfed and the controls; slight differences in the underfed  
from the standard may be regarded as due to the facts that the  
cerebrum of the underfed is slightly more elongated and the cortical thickness is somewhat greater than in the standard. As  
the product of the coefficients in the underfed (I'.IS X 0.88) falls  
somewhat lower than that in the standard (1.22 X 0.91), the  
results of L.F X W.D X T should be about 5 per cent higher in  
the underfed than in the standard.  


The relative volumes of the cortex, obtained by the formula (3),  
The relative volumes of the cortex, obtained by the formula (3), are computed and given in table 11 (without any special correction), compared with the corresponding standard values for brains of the same age, instead of for brains of the same weight. The relative volume of the cortex in the underfed brains, which are considerably retarded in total weight development, is greater than for the standard brains of the .same weight, which are necessarily younger and less developed as regards the cortical elements than the underfed brains of like weight.
are computed and given in table 11 (without any special correction), compared with the corresponding standard values for  
brains of the same age, instead of for brains of the same weight.  
The relative volume of the cortex in the underfed brains, which  
are considerably retarded in total weight development, is greater  
than for the standard brains of the .same weight, which are necessarily younger and less developed as regards the cortical elements  
than the underfed brains of like weight.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 205  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 205


Since in the underfed the average cortical thickness in the  
Since in the underfed the average cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections was used in place of the standard T, based on the thickness of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections (compare Sugita, '17 a), therefore corresponding values of T have been used in calculating the standard values for the present comparison.
sagittal and frontal sections was used in place of the standard T,  
based on the thickness of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal  
sections (compare Sugita, '17 a), therefore corresponding values  
of T have been used in calculating the standard values for the  
present comparison.  


For this comparison, the test animals may be considered in two  
For this comparison, the test animals may be considered in two groups, T. I and T. II. In T. I groups, in which all test rats have a brain weight less than 1.0 gram, the average computed volume of the cortex is less than the standard by 16 per cent, while in T. II groups, which contain the test rats with brains weighing above 1.0 gram, it is more than the standard on the averagfe by 1 per cent. On the other hand, the cortical volume in C. I groups, which embraces the controls having brain weights less than 1.0 gram, is on the average 2.4 per cent less, and in C. II groups, the controls with brain weights above 1.0 gram, it is on the average 7.5 per cent more than the standard for the same age (table 11, last lines). As these comparisons are based on the numbers obtained by calculation and not on the direct measurement, slight discrepancies cannot be regarded as significant, and, as already noted, the results in the underfed are open to special correction of a few per cent for an accurate comparison.
groups, T. I and T. II. In T. I groups, in which all test rats have  
a brain weight less than 1.0 gram, the average computed volume  
of the cortex is less than the standard by 16 per cent, while in  
T. II groups, which contain the test rats with brains weighing  
above 1.0 gram, it is more than the standard on the averagfe by 1  
per cent. On the other hand, the cortical volume in C. I groups,  
which embraces the controls having brain weights less than 1.0  
gram, is on the average 2.4 per cent less, and in C. II groups, the  
controls with brain weights above 1.0 gram, it is on the average  
7.5 per cent more than the standard for the same age (table 11,  
last lines). As these comparisons are based on the numbers  
obtained by calculation and not on the direct measurement, slight  
discrepancies cannot be regarded as significant, and, as already  
noted, the results in the underfed are open to special correction of  
a few per cent for an accurate comparison.  


The underfed brains are much retarded in the weight development and the brains weighing up to 1.0 gram include those of  
The underfed brains are much retarded in the weight development and the brains weighing up to 1.0 gram include those of ages up to sixteen days, at which age the normal rats have a brain weight 10 per cent heavier than the test rats (chapter V). We conclude, therefore, that, calculated by the formula L.F X W.D X T, the relative volumes of the cortex in the underfed are nearly the same as in the standard in the brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (T. II groups), while, on the contrary, they are considerably smaller than the standard in the case of the brains weighing under 1.0 gram or under the age of sixteen days, if the age be taken as the standard of comparison.
ages up to sixteen days, at which age the normal rats have a brain  
weight 10 per cent heavier than the test rats (chapter V). We  
conclude, therefore, that, calculated by the formula L.F X W.D  
X T, the relative volumes of the cortex in the underfed are  
nearly the same as in the standard in the brains weighing more  
than 1.0 gram (T. II groups), while, on the contrary, they are  
considerably smaller than the standard in the case of the brains  
weighing under 1.0 gram or under the age of sixteen days, if the  
age be taken as the standard of comparison.  


It appears, therefore, that in rats underfed severely the cortical  
It appears, therefore, that in rats underfed severely the cortical volume is considerably retarded in growth during the early period of development, but this is probably fairly compensated later when the brain attains a weight of more than 1 .0 gram or an age
volume is considerably retarded in growth during the early period  
of development, but this is probably fairly compensated later  
when the brain attains a weight of more than 1 .0 gram or an age  






206  
206






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 9  
TABLE 9


Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the measurements  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the measurements L.F and W.D, the quotient of the cortical area divided by the cortical thickness {given also in table 8), and the ratio of the latter to the measurement L.F or W .D, for the sagittal and frontal sections. The width-length index which is obtained by {W .D X 100)/L.F is also given. This table was condensed from an U7ipublished table 9a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table. The ratios given in this table 9 are based on the average of the individual ratios a7id not on those obtained directly from the average L.F or W.D and the average quotients
L.F and W.D, the quotient of the cortical area divided by the cortical thickness  
{given also in table 8), and the ratio of the latter to the measurement L.F or W .D,  
for the sagittal and frontal sections. The width-length index which is obtained  
by {W .D X 100)/L.F is also given. This table was condensed from an U7ipublished table 9a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups  
are given at the foot of the table. The ratios given in this table 9 are based on the  
average of the individual ratios a7id not on those obtained directly from the average  
L.F or W.D and the average quotients  




Line 54,003: Line 49,713:




H  
H




Line 54,010: Line 49,720:




CORT.  
CORT.




Line 54,017: Line 49,727:




CORT.  
CORT.




Line 54,026: Line 49,736:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




<  
<


m  
m a <
a  
<  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




L.F  
L.F




.\REA  
.\REA




RATIO  
RATIO




W. D  
W. D




AREA  
AREA




RATIO  
RATIO




z  
z




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROrP
GROrP  




CORT.  
CORT.


THICKN.  
THICKN.


IN  
IN


SAGITTAL  
SAGITTAL




CORT.  
CORT. THICKN.
THICKN.  


IN  
IN FRONTAL
FRONTAL  




is  
is




Line 54,092: Line 49,794:




•<:  
•<:




Line 54,099: Line 49,801:




SECTION  
SECTION




Line 54,106: Line 49,808:




SECTION  
SECTION








^  
^




Line 54,120: Line 49,822:




days  
days




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




7nm.  
7nm.








mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




Line 54,144: Line 49,846:




Series I  
Series I




Line 54,169: Line 49,871:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T.  
T.








7 —  
7 —




0.584  
0.584




9.28  
9.28




11.4  
11.4




1.23  
1.23




9.88  
9.88




8.9  
8.9




0.89  
0.89




106  
106




h  
h




T.  
T.




II  
II




15  
15




1.024  
1.024




11.85  
11.85




13.5  
13.5




1.14  
1.14




12.00  
12.00




11.1  
11.1




0.93  
0.93




101  
101




b, g  
b, g




c.  
c.




Line 54,250: Line 49,952:
8
8


0.688  
0.688




9.90  
9.90




12.6  
12.6




1.27  
1.27




10.60  
10.60




10.1  
10.1




0.95  
0.95




107  
107




i  
i




c.  
c.




II  
II




17  
17




1.278  
1.278




12.95  
12.95




15.5  
15.5




1.20  
1.20




12.85  
12.85




10.9  
10.9




0.84  
0.84




-99  
-99




Sey-ies I  
Sey-ies I




Line 54,333: Line 50,035:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.




Line 54,343: Line 50,045:
9
9


0.644  
0.644




9.70  
9.70




12.5  
12.5




1.29  
1.29




10.46  
10.46




9.6  
9.6




0.92  
0.92




108  
108




i  
i




T.  
T.




II  
II




19  
19




1.052  
1.052




12.10  
12.10




14.0  
14.0




1.16  
1.16




12.45  
12.45




10.9  
10.9




0.88  
0.88




103  
103




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.








6  
6




0.543  
0.543




8.78  
8.78




, 11.0  
, 11.0




1.24  
1.24




9.85  
9.85




8.0  
8.0




0.88  
0.88




112  
112




g, h, J  
g, h, J




C.  
C.




II  
II




18
18


1.144  
1.144




12.28  
12.28




14.1  
14.1




1.16  
1.16




12.40  
12.40




10.8  
10.8




0.87  
0.87




101  
101




Series I  
Series I




Line 54,498: Line 50,200:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




1.105  
1.105




12.32  
12.32




14.0  
14.0




1.14  
1.14




12.17  
12.17




10.6  
10.6




0.87  
0.87




99  
99




h, e  
h, e




C.  
C.




II  
II




22
22


1.307  
1.307




13.30  
13.30




15.8  
15.8




1.19  
1.19




12.98  
12.98




11.3  
11.3




0.87  
0.87




98  
98




Series I  
Series I




Line 54,590: Line 50,292:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.




Line 54,600: Line 50,302:
12
12


0.778  
0.778




10.90  
10.90




12.6  
12.6




1.15  
1.15




10.77  
10.77




9.5  
9.5




0.88  
0.88




99  
99




e  
e




T.  
T.




II  
II




18  
18




1.089  
1.089




12.25  
12.25




14.0  
14.0




1.14  
1.14




11.85  
11.85




9.5  
9.5




0.80  
0.80




97  
97




b  
b




C.  
C.








9  
9




0.870  
0.870




10.95  
10.95




13.3  
13.3




1.21  
1.21




11.45  
11.45




10.0  
10.0




0.82  
0.82




104  
104




f _  
f _




C.  
C.




II  
II




22  
22




1.220  
1.220




12.40  
12.40




15.0  
15.0




1.21  
1.21




12.80  
12.80




—  




—  




103  
103




Series I  
Series I




Line 54,756: Line 50,458:




E b, c, d  
E b, c, d




T.  
T.








12  
12




0.867  
0.867




10.65  
10.65




13.0  
13.0




1.22  
1.22




11.30  
11.30




10.1  
10.1




0.90  
0.90




106  
106




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




.1.122  
.1.122




12.10  
12.10




14.3  
14.3




1.19  
1.19




12.35  
12.35




10.9  
10.9




0.88  
0.88




102  
102




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.




II  
II




17
17


1.179  
1.179




12.23  
12.23




14.4  
14.4




1.18  
1.18




12.48  
12.48




11.4  
11.4




0.92  
0.92




102  
102






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






207  
207






TABLE Q— Continued  
TABLE Q— Continued




Line 54,881: Line 50,583:




»  
»




Line 54,888: Line 50,590:




CORT.  
CORT.




Line 54,895: Line 50,597:




CORT.  
CORT.




Line 54,902: Line 50,604:




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




o  
o


<;  
<;


H  
H


<  
<




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




L.F  
L.F




AREA  
AREA


CORT.  
CORT.


THICKN.  
THICKN.


IN  
IN SAGITT.\L
SAGITT.\L  




RATIO  
RATIO




W. D  
W. D




AREA  
AREA COKT.
COKT.  


THICKN.  
THICKN. IN
IN  


FRONTAL  
FRONTAL




RATIO  
RATIO




m  
m 1 X
1 X  


Q 2  
Q 2




Line 54,967: Line 50,661:




>  
>


<  
<




Line 54,976: Line 50,670:




SECTION  
SECTION




Line 54,983: Line 50,677:




SECTION  
SECTION








?  
?




Line 54,997: Line 50,691:




days  
days




grams  
grams




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.








mm.  
mm.




mm..  
mm..




Line 55,021: Line 50,715:




Series II  
Series II




Line 55,046: Line 50,740:




F a, b  
F a, b




T.  
T.




I  
I




13
13


0.832  
0.832




11.18  
11.18




13.2  
13.2




1.19  
1.19




11.23  
11.23




9.9  
9.9




0.88  
0.88




101  
101




c-1  
c-1




T.  
T.




II  
II




25+  
25+




1.204  
1.204




12.66  
12.66




14.4  
14.4




1.14  
1.14




12.30  
12.30




10.9  
10.9




0.88  
0.88




97  
97




Series III  
Series III




Line 55,142: Line 50,836:




Ba-g  
Ba-g




T.  
T.




I  
I




11 +  
11 +




0.844  
0.844




10.99  
10.99




13.0  
13.0




1.18  
1.18




11.22  
11.22




10.2  
10.2




0.90  
0.90




102  
102




h-j  
h-j




T.  
T.




II  
II




22
22


1.154  
1.154




12.58  
12.58




14.3  
14.3




1.14  
1.14




12.20  
12.20




10.7  
10.7




0.87  
0.87




97  
97




Average 1  
Average 1




T.  
T.




I  
I




11
11


0.758  
0.758




10.45  
10.45




12.6  
12.6




1.21  
1.21




10.81  
10.81




9.7  
9.7




0.90  
0.90




104  
104




(Ser. I-III)/  
(Ser. I-III)/




T.  
T.




II  
II




20
20


1.107  
1.107




12.27  
12.27




14.1  
14.1




1.15  
1.15




12.19  
12.19




10.7  
10.7




0.87  
0.87




99  
99




Average \  
Average \




C.  
C.




I  
I




8
8


0.700  
0.700




9.88  
9.88




12.3  
12.3




1.24  
1.24




10.63  
10.63




9.6  
9.6




0.88  
0.88




108  
108




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C.  
C.




II  
II




19+  
19+




1.226  
1.226




12.63  
12.63




15.0  
15.0




1.19  
1.19




12.70  
12.70




11.1  
11.1




0.88  
0.88




101  
101






of more than sixteen days, so that after this period there is no  
of more than sixteen days, so that after this period there is no longer any significant difference in the cortical volumes between the test and the standard animals.
longer any significant difference in the cortical volumes between  
the test and the standard animals.  


10. NUxMBER OF NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX •  
10. NUxMBER OF NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX •


The actual number of nerve cells in the frontal cortex in a  
The actual number of nerve cells in the frontal cortex in a unit volume of 0.001 mm,^, or 0.1 mm.^ in area on the shde by 10 micra in thickness, was counted in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris at locality VII, the middle part of the cortical band of the frontal section. The procedure for counting the cell number, adopted by me for the standard values and described in my previous paper (Sugita, '18 b), has been strictly followed here also. The number of cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris and the number of the ganglion cells in a unit volume have been recorded and then converted into the number of cells in the same unit volume in the fresh condition of the brain by the use of the correction-coefficients based on observations. All the data have been tabulated in table 10 a (unpublished) and condensed in table 10 for each group. The
unit volume of 0.001 mm,^, or 0.1 mm.^ in area on the shde by  
10 micra in thickness, was counted in the lamina pyramidalis and  
in the lamina ganglionaris at locality VII, the middle part of the  
cortical band of the frontal section. The procedure for counting  
the cell number, adopted by me for the standard values and  
described in my previous paper (Sugita, '18 b), has been strictly  
followed here also. The number of cells in the lamina pyramidalis  
and the lamina ganglionaris and the number of the ganglion cells  
in a unit volume have been recorded and then converted into the  
number of cells in the same unit volume in the fresh condition  
of the brain by the use of the correction-coefficients based on  
observations. All the data have been tabulated in table 10 a  
(unpublished) and condensed in table 10 for each group. The  






208  
208






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 10  
TABLE 10


Givitig for each litter group in. this study the average age, hraiti, weight, correctioncoefficient, and the corrected number of nerve cells in a unit volume {0.001 mm.^)  
Givitig for each litter group in. this study the average age, hraiti, weight, correctioncoefficient, and the corrected number of nerve cells in a unit volume {0.001 mm.^) in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris and the corrected number of ganglion cells only in the same volume, measured at locality VII. This table was condensed from a detailed table, table 10a (unpublished), which gives the same data for the individual cases. The averages for the test and qpntrol groups are given at the foot of the table.
in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris and the corrected number  
of ganglion cells only in the same volume, measured at locality VII. This table  
was condensed from a detailed table, table 10a (unpublished), which gives the same  
data for the individual cases. The averages for the test and qpntrol groups are  
given at the foot of the table.  




Line 55,399: Line 51,073:




TEST  
TEST




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE




CORRECTION  
CORRECTION




NUMBER OF CELLS IN  
NUMBER OF CELLS IN




0.001 mm.'  
0.001 mm.'




Line 55,425: Line 51,099:




GROUP  
GROUP




CONTROL  
CONTROL




AGE  
AGE




WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




COEFFI
COEFFI


Lamina  
Lamina




Lamina  
Lamina




Ganglion  
Ganglion




Line 55,454: Line 51,128:




CIENT  
CIENT




Line 55,461: Line 51,135:
gansjlio
gansjlio


cells in  
cells in




Line 55,474: Line 51,148:




dalis  
dalis




nans  
nans




lam. gangl.  
lam. gangl.




Line 55,487: Line 51,161:




days  
days




grams  
grams




Line 55,501: Line 51,175:




Series I  
Series I




Line 55,512: Line 51,186:




•  




Line 55,519: Line 51,193:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T. I  
T. I




7 —  
7 —




0.584  
0.584




1.18  
1.18




271  
271




167  
167




47  
47




h  
h




T. II  
T. II




15  
15




1.024  
1.024




1.28  
1.28




120  
120




86  
86




21  
21




b, g  
b, g




C. I  
C. I




8
8


0.688  
0.688




1.14  
1.14




224  
224




131  
131




40  
40




i  
i




C. II  
C. II




17  
17




1.278  
1.278




1.26  
1.26




107  
107




75  
75




20  
20




Series I  
Series I




Line 55,631: Line 51,305:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T. I  
T. I




-9
-9


0.644  
0.644




1.17  
1.17




232  
232




132  
132




39  
39




i  
i




T. II  
T. II




19  
19




1.052  
1.052




1.37  
1.37




117  
117




77  
77




19  
19




b, d  
b, d




C. I  
C. I




6  
6




0.543  
0.543




1.09  
1.09




268  
268




177  
177




58  
58




g, h, i  
g, h, i




C. II  
C. II




18
18


1.144  
1.144




1.31  
1.31




109  
109




76  
76




21  
21




Series I  
Series I




Line 55,742: Line 51,416:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T. II  
T. II




20  
20




1.105  
1.105




1.25  
1.25




109  
109




73  
73




20  
20




b, e  
b, e




C. II  
C. II




22
22


1.307  
1.307




1.16  
1.16




109  
109




79  
79




26  
26




Series  
Series




Line 55,806: Line 51,480:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T. I .  
T. I .




12
12


0.778  
0.778




1.24  
1.24




152  
152




90  
90




21  
21




e  
e




T. II  
T. II




18  
18




1.089  
1.089




1.28  
1.28




118  
118




81  
81




18  
18




b  
b




C. I  
C. I




9  
9




0.870  
0.870




1.22  
1.22




152  
152




93  
93




27  
27




f  
f




C. II  
C. II




22  
22




1.220  
1.220




1.14  
1.14




111  
111




75  
75




22  
22




Series I  
Series I




Line 55,918: Line 51,592:




E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d




T. I  
T. I




12
12


0.835  
0.835




1.21  
1.21




144  
144




101  
101




25  
25




g, h  
g, h




T. II  
T. II




20  
20




1.122  
1.122




1.26  
1.26




116  
116




79  
79




21  
21




e, f  
e, f




C. II  
C. II




17
17


1.179  
1.179




1.21  
1.21




116  
116




79  
79




23  
23




Series II  
Series II




Line 56,005: Line 51,679:




Fa, b  
Fa, b




T. I  
T. I




13
13


0.832  
0.832




1.21  
1.21




162  
162




98  
98




29  
29




c-1  
c-1




T. II  
T. II




25+  
25+




1.204  
1.204




1.32  
1.32




105  
105




74  
74




19  
19






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






209  
209






TABLE 10— Continued  
TABLE 10— Continued




Line 56,067: Line 51,741:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE


BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




CORRECTION  
CORRECTION COEFFICIENT
COEFFICIENT  




ND.MBER OP CELLS IN 0.001 mm.^  
ND.MBER OP CELLS IN 0.001 mm.^




GROUP  
GROUP




Lamina  
Lamina


pyrami
pyrami dalis
dalis  




Lamina  
Lamina


ganglio
ganglio naris
naris  




Ganglion  
Ganglion


cells in  
cells in


lam.gangl  
lam.gangl




Series III  
Series III Ga-g
Ga-g  




days  
days


T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




grams  
grams 11 +
11 +  


22
22


0.844  
0.844


1.154  
1.154




1.24  
1.24 1.26
1.26  




149  
149 108
108  




94  
94 80
80  




24  
24 20
20  




Average )  
Average ) (Ser. I-III)/
(Ser. I-III)/  


Average )  
Average ) (Ser. I) /
(Ser. I) /  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




1120
1120 819+
819+  




0.753  
0.753 1.107
1.107  


0.700  
0.700 1.226
1.226  




1.21  
1.21 1.29
1.29  


1.15  
1.15 1.24
1.24  




185  
185 113
113  


215  
215 110
110  




, 114  
, 114


79  
79


134  
134


77  
77




31  
31 20
20  


42  
42 22
22  






sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina  
sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, which may be regarded as representing the average cell density in the cerebral cortex, are also given in table 11, as A^, and compared with the corresponding standard values for the brains of the same age, taken from a former paper (Sugita, '18 b). When compared in this way, it is seen that the observed cell number in a unit volume is generally higher than the standard in brains which weigh less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups). The excess in cell number in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups) is on the average 17 per cent, and that of the control brains weighing less than I.O gram (C. I groups) is on the average about 7 per cent. On the other hand, the average cell number of the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (T. II groups) is almost equal to, while that of the control brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (C. II groups) is less by 4 per cent than, the standard for the same age. The underfed brains are underdeveloped in weight and the brains weighing less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups) contain those of ages up to sixteen days. These relations lead me to conclude that, in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram or under sixteen days in age, the cell density denoted by A^ (the average cell number in two unit volumes) is distinctly high, when compared with the normal brains of the same age, probably because the brain size or weight
ganglionaris, which may be regarded as representing the average  
cell density in the cerebral cortex, are also given in table 11, as  
A^, and compared with the corresponding standard values for the  
brains of the same age, taken from a former paper (Sugita, '18 b).  
When compared in this way, it is seen that the observed cell  
number in a unit volume is generally higher than the standard in  
brains which weigh less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups). The excess  
in cell number in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram  
(T. I groups) is on the average 17 per cent, and that of the control brains weighing less than I.O gram (C. I groups) is on the  
average about 7 per cent. On the other hand, the average cell  
number of the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram  
(T. II groups) is almost equal to, while that of the control brains  
weighing more than 1.0 gram (C. II groups) is less by 4 per cent  
than, the standard for the same age. The underfed brains are  
underdeveloped in weight and the brains weighing less than 1.0  
gram (T. I groups) contain those of ages up to sixteen days.  
These relations lead me to conclude that, in the underfed brains  
weighing less than 1.0 gram or under sixteen days in age, the cell  
density denoted by A^ (the average cell number in two unit  
volumes) is distinctly high, when compared with the normal  
brains of the same age, probably because the brain size or weight  






THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3






210 NAOKI SUGITA  
210 NAOKI SUGITA


or the cortical volume is relatively undeveloped in comparison  
or the cortical volume is relatively undeveloped in comparison with the cell number (see above) . In older brains weighing more than 1.0 gram or of ages above sixteen days, these discrepancies have been somewhat balanced, but, when compared with the controls, the underfed brains remain generally slightly higher in the cell density even in rats of sixteen days or older.
with the cell number (see above) . In older brains weighing more  
than 1.0 gram or of ages above sixteen days, these discrepancies  
have been somewhat balanced, but, when compared with the  
controls, the underfed brains remain generally slightly higher in  
the cell density even in rats of sixteen days or older.  


Considered in relation to the facts presented in the previous  
Considered in relation to the facts presented in the previous chapter showing that the computed volume of the cortex is below the standard in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram, it may inferred that the underfed brains, underdeveloped in weight and size, have a relatively higher cell density, because the normal number of cells is crowded into a cortex of smaller total volume.
chapter showing that the computed volume of the cortex is  
below the standard in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0  
gram, it may inferred that the underfed brains, underdeveloped  
in weight and size, have a relatively higher cell density, because  
the normal number of cells is crowded into a cortex of smaller  
total volume.  


11. RELATIVE VALUE OF THE COMPUTED NUMBER OF CELLS IN  
11. RELATIVE VALUE OF THE COMPUTED NUMBER OF CELLS IN THE ENTIRE CORTEX
THE ENTIRE CORTEX  


As previously shown (Sugita, '18 b), the computed number of  
As previously shown (Sugita, '18 b), the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex may be obtained and the values compared among themselves by the use of the following formula :
nerve cells in the entire cortex may be obtained and the values  
compared among themselves by the use of the following formula :  


N X L.F X W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters),  
N X L.F X W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters),


where N means the relative cell density represented by the sum  
where N means the relative cell density represented by the sum of the cell numbers in the unit volume in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris (that is, the number in two unit volumes), given in table 11, based on table 9, and L.F X W.D X T is the computed volume of the cortex, as already given in the foregoing chapter.
of the cell numbers in the unit volume in the lamina pyramidalis  
and in the lamina ganglionaris (that is, the number in two unit  
volumes), given in table 11, based on table 9, and L.F X W.D X T  
is the computed volume of the cortex, as already given in the  
foregoing chapter.  


In table 11, these relative values for the volume of the cortex  
In table 11, these relative values for the volume of the cortex and for the cell number in the cortex in the underfed Albinos are given for each group, each paired with the corresponding standard values for brains of the same age, all condensed from table 11a (unpublished), which gives the corresponding data for each individual. Every standard value was taken from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18 b). Throughout the underfed and the controls, these pairs of figures seem to be nearly in accord, showing on the average only 1.7 per cent excess in the underfed and 3,4 per cent excess in the control brains (average
and for the cell number in the cortex in the underfed Albinos  
are given for each group, each paired with the corresponding  
standard values for brains of the same age, all condensed from  
table 11a (unpublished), which gives the corresponding data for  
each individual. Every standard value was taken from my  
previous presentation (Sugita, '18 b). Throughout the underfed  
and the controls, these pairs of figures seem to be nearly in  
accord, showing on the average only 1.7 per cent excess in the  
underfed and 3,4 per cent excess in the control brains (average  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 211  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 211


of all groups), as compared with the standards. As alreadynoted in chapter 9, the results obtained by the use of formulas  
of all groups), as compared with the standards. As alreadynoted in chapter 9, the results obtained by the use of formulas are open to some error, and in addition the results in the underfed are subject to special correction of a few per cent for a fair comparison, so that the differences recorded may be regarded as probably insignificant and the computed cell number in the entire cortex of the underfed may presumably be considered as equal to the standard number for brains of the same age. If this is so, the process of the cell division in the cerebrum during early life must have been going on undistui"bed even by the severe underfeeding, though both the size and the weight of the brain have been arrested in development by this, in some cases very considerably.
are open to some error, and in addition the results in the underfed  
are subject to special correction of a few per cent for a fair comparison, so that the differences recorded may be regarded as  
probably insignificant and the computed cell number in the entire  
cortex of the underfed may presumably be considered as equal  
to the standard number for brains of the same age. If this is so,  
the process of the cell division in the cerebrum during early life  
must have been going on undistui"bed even by the severe underfeeding, though both the size and the weight of the brain  
have been arrested in development by this, in some cases very  
considerably.  


12. SIZE OF NERVE CELLS  
12. SIZE OF NERVE CELLS


The standard size of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis)  
The standard size of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral cortex of the albino rats at different ages was presented in my sixth paper (Sugita, '18 c). In the present study on the influence of the severe underfeeding upon the growth of the cerebral cortex, the size of the nerve cells in the cortex was also determined bj^ the measurement of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the cell body and the nucleus in the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and in the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris) at locality VII in the frontal section, in the same manner as for the standard determinations (Sugita, '18 c). The results have been tabulated in table 12 a (unpublished) and condensed in table 12 for each group. The average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus are obtained by extracting the square roots of the respective products of the transverse by the longitudinal diameters, and these have been corrected, by applying the correction-coefficient, to the fresh condition of the brain. The corrected average diameters have been tabulated in table 13 a (unpublished), compared respectively with the corresponding standard values for the brains of the same age, and condensed in table 13. The correction-coefficients which were used are given in table 12.
and the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral  
cortex of the albino rats at different ages was presented in my  
sixth paper (Sugita, '18 c). In the present study on the influence  
of the severe underfeeding upon the growth of the cerebral cortex,  
the size of the nerve cells in the cortex was also determined bj^  
the measurement of the transverse and longitudinal diameters  
of the cell body and the nucleus in the pyramids (in the lamina  
pyramidalis) and in the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris)  
at locality VII in the frontal section, in the same manner as for  
the standard determinations (Sugita, '18 c). The results have  
been tabulated in table 12 a (unpublished) and condensed in  
table 12 for each group. The average diameters of the cell body  
and of the nucleus are obtained by extracting the square roots  
of the respective products of the transverse by the longitudinal  
diameters, and these have been corrected, by applying the correction-coefficient, to the fresh condition of the brain. The  
corrected average diameters have been tabulated in table 13 a  
(unpublished), compared respectively with the corresponding  
standard values for the brains of the same age, and condensed  
in table 13. The correction-coefficients which were used are  
given in table 12.  






212  
212






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 11  
TABLE 11


Giving for each litter group in this study the average hrain weight, the age, the computed cortical volume, the cell density and the computed number of cells in the entire  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average hrain weight, the age, the computed cortical volume, the cell density and the computed number of cells in the entire cortex, as based on the observed measurements presented in this paper, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. Standard values were taken from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original full table 11a {unpublished) , which gives the data for each individual. At the end of the table the averages for the test and control groups are given.
cortex, as based on the observed measurements presented in this paper, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. Standard values  
were taken from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original full table 11a {unpublished) , which gives the data for each  
individual. At the end of the table the averages for the test and control groups are  
given.  




Line 56,336: Line 51,902:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVER
AVER AGE
AGE  


BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




CORTICAL volume:  
CORTICAL volume:


L.F X W.D X T  
L.F X W.D X T




cell density:  
cell density:


N  
N




CELL number:  
CELL number: N XL.FX W.D XT
N XL.FX  
W.D XT  




GEO UP  
GEO UP




Starved  
Starved


and  
and control^
control^  




Standard  
Standard


for the  
for the same age
same  
age  




Starved  
Starved


and  
and controls
controls  




Standard  
Standard


for the  
for the same age
same  
age  




Starved  
Starved


and  
and controls
controls  




Standard  
Standard for the same age
for the  
same  
age  




Line 56,414: Line 51,965:




days  
days




grams  
grams




mm J  
mm J




OTTO. 3  
OTTO. 3




Line 56,434: Line 51,985:




Series I  
Series I




Line 56,457: Line 52,008:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T.  
T.




I  
I




7 —  
7 —




0.584  
0.584




134.4  
134.4




151.8  
151.8




437  
437




375  
375




482.9  
482.9




450.8  
450.8




h  
h




T.  
T.




II  
II




15  
15




1.024  
1.024




263.1  
263.1




265.0  
265.0




206  
206




202  
202




542.0  
542.0




535.0  
535.0




b, g  
b, g




C.  
C.




I  
I




8
8


0.688  
0.688




159.9  
159.9




165.0  
165.0




355  
355




354  
354




452.4  
452.4




467.5  
467.5




i  
i




C.  
C.




II  
II




17  
17




1.278  
1.278




314.5  
314.5




275.0  
275.0




182  
182




198  
198




572.4  
572.4




545.0  
545.0




Series I  
Series I




Line 56,611: Line 52,162:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.




I  
I




9
9


0.644  
0.644




151.6  
151.6




187.0  
187.0




364  
364




298  
298




489.1  
489.1




479.2  
479.2




i  
i




T.  
T.




II  
II




19  
19




1.052  
1.052




287.7  
287.7




285.0  
285.0




194  
194




191  
191




558.1  
558.1




544-0  
544-0




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.




I  
I




6  
6




0.543  
0.543




112.4  
112.4




126.5  
126.5




445  
445




388  
388




457.8  
457.8




44s. 5  
44s. 5




g, h, j  
g, h, j




C.  
C.




II  
II




18
18


1.144  
1.144




285.5  
285.5




278.3  
278.3




184  
184




195  
195




526.2  
526.2




543.3  
543.3




Series I  
Series I




Line 56,764: Line 52,315:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




1.105  
1.105




287.3  
287.3




284.7  
284.7




182  
182




191  
191




521.6  
521.6




542.0  
542.0




b, e  
b, e




C.  
C.




II  
II




22
22


1.307  
1.307




320.9  
320.9




289.5  
289.5




188  
188




188  
188




603.4  
603.4




540.5  
540.5




Series I  
Series I




Line 56,852: Line 52,403:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.




I  
I




12
12


0.778  
0.778




201.1  
201.1




238.3  
238.3




242  
242




213  
213




486.4  
486.4




505.3  
505.3




e  
e




T.  
T.




II  
II




18  
18




1.089  
1.089




278.7  
278.7




280.0  
280.0




199  
199




195  
195




554.6  
554.6




546.0  
546.0




b  
b




C.  
C.




I  
I




9  
9




0.870  
0.870




214.4  
214.4




207.0  
207.0




245  
245




230  
230




525.3  
525.3




476.0  
476.0




Series I  
Series I




Line 56,973: Line 52,524:




E b, c, d  
E b, c, d




T.  
T.




I  
I




12  
12




0.867  
0.867




210.3  
210.3




249.3  
249.3




238  
238




207  
207




497.1  
497.1




516.7  
516.7




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




1.122  
1.122




295.9  
295.9




290.0  
290.0




194  
194




188  
188




574.0  
574.0




545.0  
545.0




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.




II  
II




17
17


1.179  
1.179




278.0  
278.0




272.5  
272.5




195  
195




197  
197




535.9  
535.9




535.0  
535.0






GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






213  
213






TABLE n— Continued  
TABLE n— Continued




Line 57,086: Line 52,637:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVER
AVER AGE
AGE  


BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




CORTICAL VOLUME  
CORTICAL VOLUME


L.F X W.D X T  
L.F X W.D X T




CELL density:  
CELL density:


N  
N




CELL number:  
CELL number:


NXL,FX  
NXL,FX


W.D X T  
W.D X T




GROUP  
GROUP




Starved  
Starved


and  
and controls
controls  




Standard  
Standard for the same
for the  
same  




Starved  
Starved


and  
and controls
controls  




standard  
standard for the same
for the  
same  




Starved  
Starved


and  
and controls
controls  




standard  
standard for the same
for the  
same  




Line 57,167: Line 52,706:




age  
age








age  
age








age  
age




Line 57,186: Line 52,725:




days  
days




grams  
grams




rnm.^  
rnm.^




mm.^  
mm.^




Line 57,206: Line 52,745:




Series II  
Series II




Line 57,229: Line 52,768:




Fa, b  
Fa, b




T.  
T.




I  
I




13
13


0.832  
0.832




218.7  
218.7




252.5  
252.5




260  
260




206  
206




550.4  
550.4




520.0  
520.0




c-1  
c-1




T.  
T.




II  
II




25+  
25+




1.204  
1.204




307.9  
307.9




SOS 4  
SOS 4




178  
178




180  
180




548.7  
548.7




545.7  
545.7




Series III  
Series III




Line 57,317: Line 52,856:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




T.  
T.




I  
I




11 +  
11 +




0.844  
0.844




213.2  
213.2




229.1  
229.1




248  
248




225  
225




520.4  
520.4




504.1  
504.1




h-j  
h-j




T.  
T.




II  
II




22
22


1.154  
1.154




302.2  
302.2




294.7  
294.7




189  
189




186  
186




570.3  
570.3




546.7  
546.7




Average 1  
Average 1




T.  
T.




I  
I




11
11


0.758  
0.758




188.2  
188.2




218.0  
218.0




298  
298




254  
254




504.4  
504.4




496.0  
496.0




(Ser. I-III)/  
(Ser. I-III)/




T.  
T.




II  
II




20
20


1.107  
1.107




289.0  
289.0




286.1  
286.1




192  
192




190  
190




552.8  
552.8




543.5  
543.5




Average 1  
Average 1




C.  
C.




I  
I




8
8


0.700  
0.700




162.2  
162.2




166.2  
166.2




348  
348




S24  
S24




478.5  
478.5




^62.3  
^62.3




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C.  
C.




II  
II




19
19


1.227  
1.227




299.7  
299.7




278.8  
278.8




187  
187




195  
195




559.5  
559.5




541.0  
541.0






By comparing the corrected values in the underfed with the  
By comparing the corrected values in the underfed with the standard values, the average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus in the underfed brains are found to be generally smaller, on the average, by 9.8 per cent (cell body by 8.6 per cent and nucleus by 11.0 per cent) than the standard value. At the end of the following table 13 appears a summary of the comparisons, arranged as in the earlier tables in this study.
standard values, the average diameters of the cell body and of  
the nucleus in the underfed brains are found to be generally  
smaller, on the average, by 9.8 per cent (cell body by 8.6 per cent  
and nucleus by 11.0 per cent) than the standard value. At the  
end of the following table 13 appears a summary of the comparisons, arranged as in the earlier tables in this study.  


As seen in this summary, both the pyramids and the ganglion  
As seen in this summary, both the pyramids and the ganglion cells are much retarded in development in size of the cell body in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram or of ages under sixteen days, the average diameters of the cell body being 11.5 per cent (in the pyramids 11.2 per cent and in the ganglion cells 11.8 per cent) smaller than the standard for the same age. But in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram, this arrest in size-development of nerve cells is no longer so notable, the average diameters of the cell body being smaller than the standard by only 5.7 per cent (in the pyramids by 8.3 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 3.1 per cent). The size of the
cells are much retarded in development in size of the cell body in  
the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram or of ages  
under sixteen days, the average diameters of the cell body being  
11.5 per cent (in the pyramids 11.2 per cent and in the ganglion  
cells 11.8 per cent) smaller than the standard for the same age.  
But in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram, this  
arrest in size-development of nerve cells is no longer so notable,  
the average diameters of the cell body being smaller than the  
standard by only 5.7 per cent (in the pyramids by 8.3 per cent  
and in the ganglion cells by 3.1 per cent). The size of the  






214  
214






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 12  
TABLE 12


Giving for each litter group in. this study the average brain iveight, the correctioncoefficient, and the observed {not corrected) diameters (transverse and longitudinal)  
Giving for each litter group in. this study the average brain iveight, the correctioncoefficient, and the observed {not corrected) diameters (transverse and longitudinal) of the cell body and the micleus of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and of the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris), measured at locality VII in the frontal section. This table was condensed from table 12a (tin published) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table
of the cell body and the micleus of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and of  
the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris), measured at locality VII in the  
frontal section. This table was condensed from table 12a (tin published) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot  
of the table  




Line 57,552: Line 53,072:




m  
m








%  
% o
o  


o  
o




CO  
CO < X
< X  


k2  
k2


<  
<








■z  
■z


o  
o


K S  
K S




LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS




LAMINA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMINA GANGLIONARIS




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




Cell body  
Cell body diameters
diameters  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameters
diameters  




Cell body  
Cell body diameters
diameters  




Nucleus  
Nucleus


diameters  
diameters








>  
>


s  
s 2
2  




C  
C


q  
q




>  
>


e  
e


03  
03


H  
H




bl  
bl 13 O
13  
O  




a  
a


OJ  
OJ




■a  
■a


J  
J




>  
>


1  
1




M  
M


a  
a o
o  








grams  
grams




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




li  
li




M  
M




n  
n




Series I  
Series I




Line 57,707: Line 53,218:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T.  
T.








0.584  
0.584




1.18  
1.18




11.5  
11.5




17.2  
17.2




10.5  
10.5




11.2  
11.2




14.8  
14.8




22.4  
22.4




13.0  
13.0




15.6  
15.6




h  
h




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.024  
1.024




1.28  
1.28




14.2  
14.2




19.5  
19.5




13.3  
13.3




15.1  
15.1




19.8  
19.8




29.2  
29.2




17.2  
17.2




19.8  
19.8




' b, g  
' b, g




C.  
C.








0.688  
0.688




1.14  
1.14




14.1  
14.1




19.0  
19.0




12.9  
12.9




14.3  
14.3




18.2  
18.2




25.8  
25.8




16.1  
16.1




18.2  
18.2




i  
i




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.278  
1.278




1.26  
1.26




15.2  
15.2




22.0  
22.0




14.1  
14.1




15.5  
15.5




20.1  
20.1




30.5  
30.5




18.0  
18.0




20.1  
20.1




Series I  
Series I




Line 57,888: Line 53,399:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.








0.644  
0.644




1.17  
1.17




13.3  
13.3




18.8  
18.8




12.0  
12.0




13.5  
13.5




17.2  
17.2




25.3  
25.3




16.0  
16.0




17.5  
17.5




i  
i




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.052  
1.052




1.37  
1.37




14.0  
14.0




20.4  
20.4




13.4  
13.4




15.7  
15.7




19.5  
19.5




28.3  
28.3




17.4  
17.4




19.6  
19.6




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.








0.543  
0.543




1.09  
1.09




13.9  
13.9




18.0  
18.0




12.4  
12.4




13.6  
13.6




18.6  
18.6




24.1  
24.1




15.6  
15.6




17.0  
17.0




g, h, j  
g, h, j




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.144  
1.144




1.31  
1.31




14.7  
14.7




20.8  
20.8




14.4  
14.4




15.4  
15.4




19.9  
19.9




30.3  
30.3




18.3  
18.3




19.6  
19.6




Series I  
Series I




Line 58,069: Line 53,580:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.105  
1.105




1.25  
1.25




14.6  
14.6




21.3  
21.3




13.9  
13.9




14.3  
14.3




18.8  
18.8




29.9  
29.9




17.7  
17.7




19.3  
19.3




b, e  
b, e




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.307  
1.307




1.16  
1.16




16.0  
16.0




21.1  
21.1




14.4  
14.4




15.3  
15.3




19.9  
19.9




30.4  
30.4




17.8  
17.8




19.6  
19.6




Series I  
Series I




Line 58,174: Line 53,685:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.








0.778  
0.778




1.24  
1.24




14.3  
14.3




19.4  
19.4




12.9  
12.9




13.8  
13.8




17.6  
17.6




27.7  
27.7




15.4  
15.4




17.2  
17.2




e  
e




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.089  
1.089




1.28  
1.28




14.0  
14.0




20.0  
20.0




12.2  
12.2




14.0  
14.0




18.3  
18.3




28.8  
28.8




16.2  
16.2




19.4  
19.4




b  
b




C.  
C.








0.870  
0.870




1.11  
1.11




16.1  
16.1




19.8  
19.8




14.5  
14.5




15.8  
15.8




21.1  
21.1




27.2  
27.2




18.2  
18.2




19.8  
19.8




f  
f




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.220  
1.220




1.14  
1.14




14.9  
14.9




21.5  
21.5




14.2  
14.2




14.8  
14.8




19.2  
19.2




28.6  
28.6




17.2  
17.2




18.0  
18.0




Series I  
Series I




Line 58,355: Line 53,866:




E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d




T.  
T.








0.835  
0.835




1.23  
1.23




13.5  
13.5




19.8  
19.8




12.8 14.3  
12.8 14.3




17.9  
17.9




28.3  
28.3




16.0  
16.0




18.2  
18.2




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.




II  
II




1.122  
1.122




1.26  
1.26




14.0  
14.0




20.7  
20.7




12.5 14.2  
12.5 14.2




19.7  
19.7




30.7  
30.7




16.5  
16.5




18.1  
18.1




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.




II  
II




1.179  
1.179




1.21  
1.21




15.1  
15.1




21.7  
21.7




13.9 15.4  
13.9 15.4




19.2  
19.2




30.6  
30.6




17.6  
17.6




19.2  
19.2






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






215  
215






TABLE 12— Continued  
TABLE 12— Continued




Line 58,477: Line 53,988:




o  
o


|i  
|i




<  
<


n  
n


w  
w -< K
-< K  


« 2  
« 2




fa  
fa


m  
m




u  
u


z  
z






e^  
e^


K H  
K H


§5  
§5




LAMINA PYRAMIDALI8  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALI8




LAMINA GANGLIONABIB  
LAMINA GANGLIONABIB




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




Cell body  
Cell body diameters
diameters  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameters
diameters  




Cell body  
Cell body diameters
diameters  




Nucleus  
Nucleus diameters
diameters  








>  
>


C  
C


2  
2




M  
M


C!  
C! O
O  


1-1  
1-1




>  
>


a  
a S
S  




s  
s o
o  




>  
>


c  
c




C  
C


o  
o




>  
>


H  
H




bC  
bC


C  
C


o  
o




Line 58,589: Line 54,091:




grams  
grams








M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




Series I7  
Series I7




Line 58,640: Line 54,142:




F a, b  
F a, b




T. I  
T. I




0.832  
0.832




1.21  
1.21




14.8  
14.8




19.7  
19.7




13.6  
13.6




14.7  
14.7




19.3  
19.3




28.6  
28.6




17.6  
17.6




19.3  
19.3




c-1  
c-1




T. II  
T. II




1.204  
1.204




1.32  
1.32




14.9  
14.9




21.0  
21.0




13.7  
13.7




14.8  
14.8




19.0  
19.0




30.0  
30.0




17.3  
17.3




19.1  
19.1




Series III  
Series III




Line 58,735: Line 54,237:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




T. I  
T. I




0.844  
0.844




1.24  
1.24




14.0  
14.0




19.8  
19.8




13.1  
13.1




14.3  
14.3




17.9  
17.9




28.4  
28.4




16.8  
16.8




18.4  
18.4




h-j  
h-j




T. II  
T. II




1.154  
1.154 0.753
0.753  




1.26  
1.26




13.9  
13.9




19.8  
19.8




12.6  
12.6




13.9  
13.9




18.3  
18.3




28.7  
28.7




16.2  
16.2




18.1  
18.1




Average \  
Average \




T. I  
T. I




1.21  
1.21




13.6  
13.6




19.1  
19.1




12.5  
12.5




13.6  
13.6




17.5  
17.5




26.8  
26.8




15.8  
15.8




17.7  
17.7




(Ser. I-III) /  
(Ser. I-III) /




T. II  
T. II




1.107  
1.107




1.29  
1.29




14.2  
14.2




20.4  
20.4




13.1  
13.1




14.6  
14.6




19.1  
19.1




29.4  
29.4




16.9  
16.9




19.1  
19.1




Average |  
Average |




C. I  
C. I




0.700  
0.700




1.15  
1.15




14.7  
14.7




18.9  
18.9




13.3  
13.3




14.6  
14.6




19.3  
19.3




25.7  
25.7




16.6  
16.6




18.3  
18.3




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C. II  
C. II




1.226  
1.226




1.22  
1.22




15.2  
15.2




21.4  
21.4




14.2  
14.2




15.3  
15.3




19.7  
19.7




30.1  
30.1




17.8  
17.8




19.3  
19.3






nucleus is much more affected by the underfeeding than that of  
nucleus is much more affected by the underfeeding than that of the cell body. In the underfed brains of T. I groups the average diameter of the nucleus is smaller by 13.9 per cent (in the pyramids by 15.3 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 12.5 per cent) and in those of T. II groups it is smaller by 8.0 per cent (in the pyramids by 11.0 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 5.1 per cent) than the standard for the same age. The deficiency in the average diameter of the cell body by 6 to 12 per cent and that of the nucleus by 8 to 14 per cent correspond to the inferiority in volume of about 20 to 45 per cent and 25 to 50 per cent, respectively.
the cell body. In the underfed brains of T. I groups the average  
diameter of the nucleus is smaller by 13.9 per cent (in the pyramids by 15.3 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 12.5 per cent)  
and in those of T. II groups it is smaller by 8.0 per cent (in the  
pyramids by 11.0 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 5.1 per  
cent) than the standard for the same age. The deficiency in the  
average diameter of the cell body by 6 to 12 per cent and that  
of the nucleus by 8 to 14 per cent correspond to the inferiority in volume of about 20 to 45 per cent and 25 to 50 per cent,  
respectively.  


On the other hand, in the control brains of all weights, the size  
On the other hand, in the control brains of all weights, the size of the cell body and of the nucleug have proved to be also somewhat smaller than the standards, but the deviations are not so much in comparison with the underfed, the deficiency in the average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus being on the average 5.3 per cent (table 13).
of the cell body and of the nucleug have proved to be also somewhat smaller than the standards, but the deviations are not so  
much in comparison with the underfed, the deficiency in the  
average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus being on the  
average 5.3 per cent (table 13).  






216  
216






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 13  
TABLE 13 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids {in the lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells {in the lamina ganglionaris), based on the condensed data in table 12, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age, taken from my former presentation {Sugita, '18c.) This table was condensed from table Ida {unpublished) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups and their percentage relations are given at the end of the table, {per. diff.) = percentage difference
Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids {in the lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells {in the lamina ganglionaris), based on the condensed  
data in table 12, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same  
age, taken from my former presentation {Sugita, '18c.) This table was condensed  
from table Ida {unpublished) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups and their percentage relations are given at the end of the table, {per. diff.)  
= percentage difference  




Line 58,987: Line 54,471:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




H  
H O <
O  
<  


m  
m o <
o  
<  


>  
> <
<  




»  
» <
<  


a  
a


B  
B


m  
m o <
o  
<  


>  
> <
<  




L.\MIN.\ PYR.A.MID.\.L1S  
L.\MIN.\ PYR.A.MID.\.L1S




L.\MIN.\*G.\NGLION.\^RIS  
L.\MIN.\*G.\NGLION.\^RIS




SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




Cell body  
Cell body Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  








1  
1 1
1  


!:  
!:


o  
o O
O  




u  
u


■a  
■a


a  
a


o3  
o3




s  
s






u  
u




-d  
-d


a  
a B
B  




Line 59,080: Line 54,547:




m  
m




T3  
T3 01
01  




Line 59,091: Line 54,557:




a  
a


S  
S 02
02  




Line 59,103: Line 54,568:




days  
days




grams  
grams




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




J"  
J"




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




Series I  
Series I




Line 59,160: Line 54,625:




Ac, a, d, f  
Ac, a, d, f




T.  
T.








7 —  
7 —




0.584  
0.584




16.6  
16.6




19.4  
19.4




13.3  
13.3




16.6  
16.6




21.6  
21.6




25.9  
25.9




16.8  
16.8




20.7  
20.7




h  
h




T.  
T.




II  
II




15  
15




1.024  
1.024




21.1  
21.1




23.7  
23.7




18.1  
18.1




19.8  
19.8




30.6  
30.6




31.3  
31.3




23.6  
23.6




24.4  
24.4




b, g  
b, g




C.  
C.




Line 59,247: Line 54,712:
8
8


0.688  
0.688




18.7  
18.7




19.6  
19.6




15.4  
15.4




16.9  
16.9




24.7  
24.7




26.7  
26.7




19.5  
19.5




21.2  
21.2




i  
i




C.  
C.




II  
II




17  
17




1.27  
1.27




23.1  
23.1




23.8  
23.8




18.7  
18.7




20.0  
20.0




31.2  
31.2




31.3  
31.3




2 .1  
2 .1




24.4  
24.4




Series I  
Series I




Line 59,338: Line 54,803:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T.  
T.




Line 59,348: Line 54,813:
9
9


0.644  
0.644




18.4  
18.4




20.7  
20.7




14.8  
14.8




17.8  
17.8




24.3  
24.3




27.9  
27.9




19.4  
19.4




22.1  
22.1




i  
i




T.  
T.




II  
II




19  
19




1.052  
1.052




23.2  
23.2




24.0  
24.0




19.8  
19.8




20.0  
20.0




32.1  
32.1




31.4  
31.4




25.1  
25.1




24.5  
24.5




b, d  
b, d




C.  
C.








6  
6




0.543  
0.543




17.4  
17.4




18.5  
18.5




14.3  
14.3




15.8  
15.8




23.3  
23.3




24.9  
24.9




17.8  
17.8




19.8  
19.8




g, h, j  
g, h, j




C.  
C.




II  
II




18
18


1.144  
1.144




23.1  
23.1




23.9  
23.9




19.7  
19.7




20.0  
20.0




32.4  
32.4




31.3  
31.3




25.0  
25.0




24.4  
24.4




Series I  
Series I




Line 59,517: Line 54,982:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




1.105  
1.105




22.1  
22.1




23.9  
23.9




17.6  
17.6




20.0  
20.0




29.7  
29.7




31.4  
31.4




22.9  
22.9




24-4  
24-4




b, e  
b, e




C.  
C.




II  
II




22
22


1.307  
1.307




21.4  
21.4




24.0  
24.0




17.4  
17.4




20.0  
20.0




29.1  
29.1




31.5  
31.5




21.8  
21.8




24.5  
24.5




Series I  
Series I




Line 59,617: Line 55,082:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T.  
T.




Line 59,627: Line 55,092:
12
12


0.778  
0.778




20.6  
20.6




22.9  
22.9




16.6  
16.6




19.5  
19.5




27.4  
27.4




30.1  
30.1




20.2  
20.2




23.8  
23.8




e  
e




T.  
T.




II  
II




18  
18




1.089  
1.089




21.4  
21.4




23.9  
23.9




16.8  
16.8




20.0  
20.0




29.5  
29.5




31.3  
31.3




22.8  
22.8




24.4  
24.4




b  
b




C.  
C.








9  
9




0.870  
0.870




21.8  
21.8




22.1  
22.1




18.4  
18.4




18.8  
18.8




29.3  
29.3




28.4  
28.4




23.2  
23.2




23.0  
23.0




f  
f




C.  
C.




II  
II




22  
22




1.220  
1.220




22.4  
22.4




24.1  
24.1




18.2  
18.2




20.1  
20.1




29.5  
29.5




31.6  
31.6




22.1  
22.1




24.5  
24.5




Series I  
Series I




Line 59,793: Line 55,258:




E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d




T.  
T.




Line 59,803: Line 55,268:
X2
X2


0.835  
0.835




19.8  
19.8




23.0  
23.0




16.4  
16.4




19.8  
19.8




27.1  
27.1




30.9  
30.9




20.7  
20.7




24-2  
24-2




g, h  
g, h




T.  
T.




II  
II




20  
20




1.122 21.5  
1.122 21.5




24-0  
24-0




16.8  
16.8




20.0  
20.0




31.0  
31.0




31.4  
31.4




21.7  
21.7




24.5  
24.5




e, f  
e, f




C.  
C.




II  
II




17
17


1.179 22.0  
1.179 22.0




23.7  
23.7




17.7  
17.7




19.9  
19.9




29.5  
29.5




31.3  
31.3




22.4  
22.4




24.5  
24.5






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






217  
217




Line 59,918: Line 55,383:




TABLE n— Continued  
TABLE n— Continued




Line 59,931: Line 55,396:




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  








O  
O <
<  


>  
> <
<  




s  
s


z  
z


a  
a o m o <
o  
m  
o  
<  




LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS  
LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS




LAMI.VA GANGLIONARIS  
LAMI.VA GANGLIONARIS




SERIES, LITTER  
SERIES, LITTER




Cell body  
Cell body Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Cell body  
Cell body Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  




Nucleus  
Nucleus Aver, diameter
Aver, diameter  








1  
1


6  
6








S  
S


5  
5


O  
O




3  
3




1  
1


o  
o


Q  
Q




-a  
-a c 5
c  
5  




o  
o




■E  
■E


-0  
-0


a  
a




Line 60,025: Line 55,477:




dans  
dans




grams  
grams




ij
ij


M  
M




At  
At




M  
M




M  
M




M  
M




Series II  
Series II




Line 60,073: Line 55,525:




F a, b  
F a, b




T. I  
T. I




13
13


0.832  
0.832




20.8  
20.8




2S.2  
2S.2




17.1  
17.1




19.8  
19.8




28.5  
28.5




31.1  
31.1




22.3  
22.3




H.4  
H.4




' c-1  
' c-1




T. II  
T. II




25+  
25+




1.204  
1.204




22.9  
22.9




23.9  
23.9




18.6  
18.6




20.0  
20.0




31.0  
31.0




31.5  
31.5




23.6  
23.6




H.4  
H.4




Series III  
Series III




Line 60,167: Line 55,619:




Fa-g  
Fa-g




T. I  
T. I




11 +  
11 +




0.844  
0.844




20.6  
20.6




22.5  
22.5




17.0  
17.0




19.2  
19.2




27.9  
27.9




29.9  
29.9




21.9  
21.9




23.5  
23.5




h-j  
h-j




T. II  
T. II




22
22


1.154  
1.154




21.0  
21.0




24.1  
24.1




16.7  
16.7




20.1  
20.1




29.0  
29.0




31.5  
31.5




21.7  
21.7




24.5  
24.5




Average  
Average




Line 60,263: Line 55,715:




(Ser. I-III)  
(Ser. I-III)




T. I  
T. I




11
11


0.753  
0.753




19.5  
19.5




22.0  
22.0




15.9  
15.9




18.8  
18.8




26.1  
26.1




29.3  
29.3




20.2  
20.2




23.1  
23.1




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 60,309: Line 55,761:




(-11.2)  
(-11.2)








(-15.3)  
(-15.3)








(-11.8)  
(-11.8)








(-12.5)  
(-12.5)




Average  
Average




Line 60,352: Line 55,804:




(Ser. I-III)  
(Ser. I-III)




T. II  
T. II




20
20


1.107  
1.107




21.9  
21.9




23.9  
23.9




17.8  
17.8




20.0  
20.0




30.4  
30.4




3H  
3H




23.1  
23.1




24.4  
24.4




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 60,398: Line 55,850:




(- 8.3)  
(- 8.3)








(-11.0)  
(-11.0)








(- 3.1)  
(- 3.1)








(- 5.1)  
(- 5.1)




Average  
Average




Line 60,441: Line 55,893:




- (Ser. I)  
- (Ser. I)




C. I  
C. I




8
8


0.700  
0.700




19.3  
19.3




20.1  
20.1




16.0  
16.0




17.2  
17.2




25.8  
25.8




26.7  
26.7




20.2  
20.2




21.3  
21.3




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 60,487: Line 55,939:




(- 3.8)  
(- 3.8)








(- 6.7)  
(- 6.7)








(- 3.2)  
(- 3.2)








(- 5.1)  
(- 5.1)




Average)  
Average)




Line 60,530: Line 55,982:




(Ser. I)  
(Ser. I)




C. II  
C. II




19+  
19+




1.226  
1.226




22.4  
22.4




23.9  
23.9




18.3  
18.3




20.0 30.3  
20.0 30.3




31.4  
31.4




23.1  
23.1




24.5  
24.5




(per. diff.)  
(per. diff.)




Line 60,574: Line 56,026:




(- 6.2)  
(- 6.2)








(- 8.5)j  
(- 8.5)j




(- 3.3)  
(- 3.3)








(- 5.5)  
(- 5.5)






It is also seen that by underfeeding the nucleus is more affected  
It is also seen that by underfeeding the nucleus is more affected than the entire cell body both in the pyramids (deficiency in diameters; T. I groups: cell body 11.2 per cent and nucleus 15.3 per cent, T. II groups: cell body 8,3 per cent and nucleus 11.0 per cent) and in the ganglion cells (deficiency in diameters; T. I groups: cell body 11.8 per cent and nucleus 12.5 per cent, T. II groups: cell body 3.1 per cent and nucleus 5.1 per cent) of brains of all weights, while the pyramids are more markedly affected than the ganglion cells both in the cell body (deficiency in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids 9.8 per cent and ganglion cells 7.5 per cent) and in the nucleus (deficiency
than the entire cell body both in the pyramids (deficiency in  
diameters; T. I groups: cell body 11.2 per cent and nucleus 15.3  
per cent, T. II groups: cell body 8,3 per cent and nucleus 11.0  
per cent) and in the ganglion cells (deficiency in diameters; T. I  
groups: cell body 11.8 per cent and nucleus 12.5 per cent, T. II  
groups: cell body 3.1 per cent and nucleus 5.1 per cent) of brains  
of all weights, while the pyramids are more markedly affected  
than the ganglion cells both in the cell body (deficiency in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids 9.8 per  
cent and ganglion cells 7.5 per cent) and in the nucleus (deficiency  






218 NAOKI SUGITA  
218 NAOKI SUGITA


in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids  
in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids 13.2 per cent and ganglion cells 8.8 per cent). In young brains which weigh less than 1.0 gram, the influence of the underfeeding is considerable, while in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram or of ages more than sixteen days we can not detect any large arrest in the size-development, especially of the ganglion cells (the sizes of the cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the T. II groups are quite equal to the corresponding sizes in C. II groups) (tables 12 and 13). These observations are in agreement with the conclusions reached by Morgulis Til).
13.2 per cent and ganglion cells 8.8 per cent). In young brains  
which weigh less than 1.0 gram, the influence of the underfeeding  
is considerable, while in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram or of  
ages more than sixteen days we can not detect any large arrest  
in the size-development, especially of the ganglion cells (the sizes  
of the cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the  
T. II groups are quite equal to the corresponding sizes in C. II  
groups) (tables 12 and 13). These observations are in agreement  
with the conclusions reached by Morgulis Til).  


13. PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN BRAIN  
13. PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN BRAIN


As stated earlier (in chapter III), Litter H in Series II, in which  
As stated earlier (in chapter III), Litter H in Series II, in which a young primipara mother was entrused with seventeen young in order to produce a series of underfed young, was used partly for the investigation of the percentage of water in the underfed brain and partly for a histological study of myelination (not considered at this time).
a young primipara mother was entrused with seventeen young in  
order to produce a series of underfed young, was used partly  
for the investigation of the percentage of water in the underfed  
brain and partly for a histological study of myelination (not considered at this time).  


In this Series II the development in brain weight is not so  
In this Series II the development in brain weight is not so greatly arrested, as compared with the arrest in body growth, as in Series I. As already shown, in Litter F, which was treated in a similar manner, the brain weight is on the average 9 per cent low, but in this Litter H it has been possible to arrest the brainweight growth on the average by about 12 per cent, compared with the standard of the same age (compare table 4) .
greatly arrested, as compared with the arrest in body growth, as  
in Series I. As already shown, in Litter F, which was treated in  
a similar manner, the brain weight is on the average 9 per cent  
low, but in this Litter H it has been possible to arrest the brainweight growth on the average by about 12 per cent, compared  
with the standard of the same age (compare table 4) .  


Table 14 gives for each individual examined in this litter the  
Table 14 gives for each individual examined in this litter the sex, the age, the brain weight, and percentage of water in the brain, each accompanied by the standard percentage of water contained in the brains of the same age and sex and also of the same weight and sex. The differences are given in special columns.
sex, the age, the brain weight, and percentage of water in the  
brain, each accompanied by the standard percentage of water  
contained in the brains of the same age and sex and also of the  
same weight and sex. The differences are given in special  
columns.  


By obtaining averages, it is found that the underfed brain  
By obtaining averages, it is found that the underfed brain contains slightly (0.48 per cent) more water, when compared with the normal brain of the same age and somewhat (1.4 per cent) less water, when compared with the normal brain of the same weight. This means in terms of the percentage of water.
contains slightly (0.48 per cent) more water, when compared  
with the normal brain of the same age and somewhat (1.4 per  
cent) less water, when compared with the normal brain of the  
same weight. This means in terms of the percentage of water.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






219  
219






TABLE 14  
TABLE 14


Showing for each brain in litter H the sex, the age, the brain weight, and the percentage value of water in the brain, accompanied with the standard values of percentage  
Showing for each brain in litter H the sex, the age, the brain weight, and the percentage value of water in the brain, accompanied with the standard values of percentage of water in brain for the same age and for the same brain weight. The differences between the observed percentages and the corresponding standard values are given in special columns, ivith their averages. *
of water in brain for the same age and for the same brain weight. The differences  
between the observed percentages and the corresponding standard values are given  
in special columns, ivith their averages. *  






NO.  
NO.




.SEX  
.SEX




AGE IN  
AGE IN


D.\ys  
D.\ys




BRAIN  
BRAIN WEIGHT
WEIGHT  




PERCENTAGE  
PERCENTAGE OF WATER
OF WATER  


BRAIN  
BRAIN OBSERVED
OBSERVED  




PERCENTAGE OF  
PERCENTAGE OF


WATER  
WATER


STANDARD FOR THE  
STANDARD FOR THE




PERCENTAGE OP  
PERCENTAGE OP


WATER  
WATER


STANDARD FOR THE  
STANDARD FOR THE








Same age  
Same age




Difference  
Difference in observed
in observed  




Same brain  
Same brain weight
weight  




Difference  
Difference in observed
in observed  




Line 60,723: Line 56,130:




grams  
grams




Line 60,736: Line 56,143:




H a  
H a




f  
f




13  
13




0.880  
0.880




86.39  
86.39




85.^0  
85.^0




+0.99  
+0.99




86.82  
86.82




-0.43  
-0.43




b  
b




f  
f




17  
17




1.024  
1.024




84.15  
84.15




83.82  
83.82




+0.33  
+0.33




85.08  
85.08




-0.93  
-0.93




c  
c




f  
f




23  
23




1 . 135  
1 . 135




82.00  
82.00




81.93  
81.93




+0.07  
+0.07




83.21  
83.21




-1.21  
-1.21




d  
d




f  
f




28  
28




1.166  
1.166




80.83  
80.83




80.74  
80.74




+0.09  
+0.09




82.70  
82.70




-1.87  
-1.87




e  
e




m  
m




32  
32




1.215  
1.215




80.31  
80.31




80.04  
80.04




+0.27  
+0.27




81.70  
81.70




-1.39  
-1.39




f  
f




f  
f




37  
37




1.101  
1.101




80.12  
80.12




79.55  
79.55




+0.57  
+0.57




83.78  
83.78




-3.66  
-3.66




g  
g




m  
m




43  
43




1.295  
1.295




80.24  
80.24




79.32  
79.32




+0.92  
+0.92




80.56  
80.56




-0.32  
-0.32




Line 60,933: Line 56,340:




Averag  
Averag




e  
e




+0.48  
+0.48








-1.40  
-1.40






that the underfed brain is shghtly underdeveloped for its age,  
that the underfed brain is shghtly underdeveloped for its age, but somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. Similar relations have been revealed by the comparisons already made. Normally about 0,5 per cent excess in percentage of water in the brain would mean at the early ages approximately one or two days' retardation in development (compare table 74 in 'The Rat/ Donaldson, '15).
but somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. Similar relations  
have been revealed by the comparisons already made. Normally  
about 0,5 per cent excess in percentage of water in the brain would  
mean at the early ages approximately one or two days' retardation in development (compare table 74 in 'The Rat/ Donaldson,  
'15).  


From the same litter (Litter H) I took with each of the above  
From the same litter (Litter H) I took with each of the above individuals a second rat for the study of the myelination, because it is known that the percentage of water in the brain is correlated with its myelination. The brains under seventeen days of age showed no fibers in the frontal sections, as stained with PalKultschitzky method. The twenty-eight-day brain showed only a few faintly stained fibers in the cortex, the fibers in the corona radiata (designated C. E. by Watson, '03) being already myelinated. Material above thirty-seven days was not examined. This passing examination of a small number of cases roughly indicates, therefore, that the first appearance of myelina
individuals a second rat for the study of the myelination, because  
it is known that the percentage of water in the brain is correlated  
with its myelination. The brains under seventeen days of age  
showed no fibers in the frontal sections, as stained with PalKultschitzky method. The twenty-eight-day brain showed  
only a few faintly stained fibers in the cortex, the fibers in the  
corona radiata (designated C. E. by Watson, '03) being already  
myelinated. Material above thirty-seven days was not examined. This passing examination of a small number of cases  
roughly indicates, therefore, that the first appearance of myelina




220 NAOKI SUGITA  
220 NAOKI SUGITA


tion in somewhat retarded, because, according to the investigation of Watson ('03), myelination in the corona radiata should  
tion in somewhat retarded, because, according to the investigation of Watson ('03), myelination in the corona radiata should have begun at eleven days and radiations into the cortex should have been recognized at twenty-four days. But a more detailed test for this j5rocess is required before any special use can be made of the results.
have begun at eleven days and radiations into the cortex should  
have been recognized at twenty-four days. But a more detailed  
test for this j5rocess is required before any special use can be  
made of the results.  


14. RELATIVE QUANTITIES OF THE ALCOHOL EXTRACTIVES  
14. RELATIVE QUANTITIES OF THE ALCOHOL EXTRACTIVES


In my former paper (Sugita, '17 a) a chart, based on the data  
In my former paper (Sugita, '17 a) a chart, based on the data given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), was presented to show the absolute quantity of sohds contained in the Albino brain according to the brain weight. For comparison with this, I calculated also the relative quantity of alcohol-extractive substances in the Albino brains, as shown by comparing the initial weight of the brain with its weight after extraction by 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure. As the brains were treated uniformly throughout the investigation, the results are comparable among themselves.
given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), was presented to show the  
absolute quantity of sohds contained in the Albino brain according to the brain weight. For comparison with this, I calculated  
also the relative quantity of alcohol-extractive substances in the  
Albino brains, as shown by comparing the initial weight of the  
brain with its weight after extraction by 80 per cent alcohol  
(for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four  
hours) according to a uniform procedure. As the brains were  
treated uniformly throughout the investigation, the results are  
comparable among themselves.  


The results from 120 normal albino rat brains, grouped in  
The results from 120 normal albino rat brains, grouped in twenty brain-weight groups (Groups I to XX), are given here in table 15 and plotted also in chart 1, in which the smooth curve (in a dotted line) represents the percentage weight of the extracted brain on the fresh brain weight. In chart 1, the graph which presents the absolute amounts of solids (in grams) according to the brain weight is also given in a solid line based on the chart in my former paper (chart 12, Sugita, '17 a). It was remarked previously (Sugita, '17 a) that in the Albino brains weighing between 0.95 gram and 1.4 grams, that is, between ten and thirty-five days of age, the rate of increase in solids is somewhat higher than in the periods before and after that phase, and this fact was formerly interpreted as indicating that, during this phase, the myelination in the brain had been proceeding very actively. This interpretation is now supported by the graph which gives the percentage weight of the brain. This graph varies inversely to the amount of the alcohol-extractives
twenty brain-weight groups (Groups I to XX), are given here in  
table 15 and plotted also in chart 1, in which the smooth curve  
(in a dotted line) represents the percentage weight of the extracted brain on the fresh brain weight. In chart 1, the graph  
which presents the absolute amounts of solids (in grams) according to the brain weight is also given in a solid line based on the  
chart in my former paper (chart 12, Sugita, '17 a). It was  
remarked previously (Sugita, '17 a) that in the Albino brains  
weighing between 0.95 gram and 1.4 grams, that is, between ten  
and thirty-five days of age, the rate of increase in solids is somewhat higher than in the periods before and after that phase,  
and this fact was formerly interpreted as indicating that, during  
this phase, the myelination in the brain had been proceeding  
very actively. This interpretation is now supported by the  
graph which gives the percentage weight of the brain. This  
graph varies inversely to the amount of the alcohol-extractives  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






221  
221






and, as it decreases relatively rapidly in the phase during which  
and, as it decreases relatively rapidly in the phase during which the brain grows in weight from 0.9 gram to 1.35 grams, or in the ages between nine and thirty-three days, it shows that during that phase the alcohol-extractives increased.
the brain grows in weight from 0.9 gram to 1.35 grams, or in the  
ages between nine and thirty-three days, it shows that during  
that phase the alcohol-extractives increased.  


The turning points in the both graphs marked with crosses  
The turning points in the both graphs marked with crosses X and XX) and asterisks (* and **), respectively, are in fair
X and XX) and asterisks (* and **), respectively, are in fair  






•/n  
•/n




Line 61,103: Line 56,467:




500  
500




78  
78




!.  
!.




Line 61,152: Line 56,516:




"■■—  
"■■—




-...  
-...




Line 61,182: Line 56,546:




y  
y




Line 61,189: Line 56,553:




400  
400




74  
74 72
72  




Line 61,206: Line 56,569:




--.'.._  
--.'.._




. ~  
. ~




c  
c




Line 61,227: Line 56,590:




>  
>




^  
^




y  
y




Line 61,254: Line 56,617:




^v  
^v




\  
\




Line 61,268: Line 56,631:




^  
^




Line 61,301: Line 56,664:




'^  
'^








*




Line 61,323: Line 56,685:




iou  
iou




68  
68 66 64 62 60
66  
64  
62  
60  




1  
1




Line 61,350: Line 56,708:




/  
/




/-'  
/-'




i'i"  
i'i"








•  




Line 61,374: Line 56,732:




200  
200




; !


!




Line 61,392: Line 56,750:




/  
/




Line 61,407: Line 56,765:




•  




Line 61,416: Line 56,774:




1  
1




Line 61,425: Line 56,783:




^  
^




^  
^




Line 61,453: Line 56,811:




)00  
)00




Line 61,464: Line 56,822:




-^  
-^




^  
^




Line 61,496: Line 56,854:




-^^  
-^^




Line 61,527: Line 56,885:




i  
i




Line 61,533: Line 56,891:




Q2 0.3  
Q2 0.3






0.5 Q6 QT  
0.5 Q6 QT






09 10 \\ i.2 13 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 19 2.0 W  
09 10 \\ i.2 13 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 19 2.0 W






Chart 1 The dotted line shows the ratio between the initial brain weight and  
Chart 1 The dotted line shows the ratio between the initial brain weight and the weight after its dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure, plotted on the brain weight. The data were taken from table 15. The graph was drawn connecting the middle points of each pair of entries, and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.
the weight after its dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform  
procedure, plotted on the brain weight. The data were taken from table 15.  
The graph was drawn connecting the middle points of each pair of entries,  
and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.  


The solid line shows the absolute weight of the solids in the brain according to  
The solid line shows the absolute weight of the solids in the brain according to the brain weight. The data were taken from table 74 in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15) and calculated by me. * and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.
the brain weight. The data were taken from table 74 in 'The Rat' (Donaldson,  
'15) and calculated by me. * and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.  


For the ratios of brain weight the scale is given on the left side of the chart and  
For the ratios of brain weight the scale is given on the left side of the chart and for the absolute weight of the solids the scale is given on the right side.
for the absolute weight of the solids the scale is given on the right side.  






coincidence, so that it may be concluded that the mass of the  
coincidence, so that it may be concluded that the mass of the alcohol-extractives would be in proportion to the grade of myelination in the brain, and by following the former the progress in myelination could be estimated roughly.
alcohol-extractives would be in proportion to the grade of myelination in the brain, and by following the former the progress in  
myelination could be estimated roughly.  


It must be emphatically stated that my figures given in table  
It must be emphatically stated that my figures given in table 15 do not represent the total quantity of the alcohol-extractives,
15 do not represent the total quantity of the alcohol-extractives,  






222  
222






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 15  
TABLE 15


Giving for each brain-iveight group of the normal albino rat the average initial  
Giving for each brain-iveight group of the normal albino rat the average initial brain-weight in the fresh condition and the brain weight after dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent (for twentyfour hours) by a uniform procedure. The ratio of the final brain weight to the ^initial weight is given in the last column as a percentage value. Based on observations on 120 albino rats, sexes combined.
brain-weight in the fresh condition and the brain weight after dehydration and  
extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent (for twentyfour hours) by a uniform procedure. The ratio of the final brain weight to the  
^initial weight is given in the last column as a percentage value. Based on observations on 120 albino rats, sexes combined.  




Line 61,592: Line 56,937:




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT








BRAIN-WEIGHT  
BRAIN-WEIGHT GROUP
GROUP  




NUMBER OF CASES  
NUMBER OF CASES




BRAIN WEIGHT  
BRAIN WEIGHT WHEN FRESH
WHEN FRESH  




AFTER  
AFTER


DEHYDRATION IN  
DEHYDRATION IN


80 AND 90  
80 AND 90


PER CENT ALCOHOL  
PER CENT ALCOHOL




RATIO TO THE  
RATIO TO THE


INITIAL  
INITIAL BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN WEIGHT  




Line 61,627: Line 56,969:




gravis  
gravis




grams  
grams




per cent  
per cent




II (birth)  
II (birth)




6  
6




0.271  
0.271




0.213  
0.213




78.6  
78.6




III  
III




8  
8




0.343  
0.343




0.267  
0.267




77.8  
77.8




IV  
IV




9  
9




0.428  
0.428




0.332  
0.332




77.5  
77.5




V  
V




14  
14




0.543  
0.543




0.416  
0.416




76.7  
76.7




VI  
VI




5  
5




0.636  
0.636




0.479  
0.479




75.4  
75.4




VII  
VII




4  
4




0.755  
0.755




0.571  
0.571




75.7  
75.7




VIII  
VIII




10  
10




0.844  
0.844




0.630  
0.630




74.7  
74.7




IX (10 days)  
IX (10 days)




5  
5




0.954  
0.954




0.714  
0.714




74.8  
74.8




X  
X




6  
6




1.047  
1.047




0.757  
0.757




72.3  
72.3




XI (20 days)  
XI (20 days)




5  
5




1.161  
1.161




0.820  
0.820




70.6  
70.6




XII  
XII




5  
5




1.245  
1.245




0.874  
0.874




70.2  
70.2




XIII  
XIII




8  
8




1.341  
1.341




0.921  
0.921




68.6  
68.6




XIV  
XIV




5  
5




1.449  
1.449




0.989  
0.989




68.2  
68.2




XV  
XV




7  
7




1.558  
1.558




1.074  
1.074




68.9  
68.9




XVI  
XVI




8  
8




1.667  
1.667




1.131  
1.131




67.9  
67.9




XVII  
XVII




6  
6




1.721  
1.721




1.170  
1.170




68.0  
68.0




XVIII (90 days)  
XVIII (90 days)




5  
5




1.832  
1.832




1 222  
1 222




66.7  
66.7




XIX  
XIX




1  
1




1.924  
1.924




1.317  
1.317




68.4  
68.4




XX  
XX




3  
3




2.037  
2.037




1.369  
1.369




67.2  
67.2






because the extraction was not complete. My figures are only  
because the extraction was not complete. My figures are only by-products in a study on histological technique, and to obtain the total quantity of the extractives the brain must have stayed much longer in alcohol of a higher concentration. My data therefore give merely the relative values for the quantity of the alcohol-extractives, but are comparable among themselves and with the values from the underfed brains treated in the same manner.
by-products in a study on histological technique, and to obtain  
the total quantity of the extractives the brain must have stayed  
much longer in alcohol of a higher concentration. My data  
therefore give merely the relative values for the quantity of the  
alcohol-extractives, but are comparable among themselves and  
with the values from the underfed brains treated in the same  
manner.  


In giving the ratio of the brain weight after extraction in alcohol  
In giving the ratio of the brain weight after extraction in alcohol (by this method) to its initial weight, no correction was made for the weight of water replaced by alcohol, because my object was
(by this method) to its initial weight, no correction was made for  
the weight of water replaced by alcohol, because my object was  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 223  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 223


only to compare the results among themselves and not to determined the exact quantity of the extractive substances.  
only to compare the results among themselves and not to determined the exact quantity of the extractive substances.


Table 16 gives for each group in this study the ratio of the  
Table 16 gives for each group in this study the ratio of the brain weight after dehydration in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and in 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) to its initial weight in the fresh condition, calculated in the same way as in table 15 and each paired with the standard ratio for the same age, quoted from table 15. Thus compared, the underfed brains show in general a higher ratio, the difference amounts to 1.0-4.3 per cent, on the average 1.9 per cent, while the difference in the control brains is generally low, on the average + 0.4 per cent.
brain weight after dehydration in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and in 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) to  
its initial weight in the fresh condition, calculated in the same  
way as in table 15 and each paired with the standard ratio for  
the same age, quoted from table 15. Thus compared, the underfed brains show in general a higher ratio, the difference amounts  
to 1.0-4.3 per cent, on the average 1.9 per cent, while the difference in the control brains is generally low, on the average  
+ 0.4 per cent.  


This examination tells us roughly that in the underfed brains  
This examination tells us roughly that in the underfed brains the alcohol-extractives are somewhat less in quantity than in the normal brain, if the age be taken as the standard of comparison, and, therefore, it may be concluded that they are somewhat retarded in the formation of alcohol-extractive substances and therefore in myelination. Reviewing tables 14 and 16 together, we see that during underfeeding the myelination process or the increase in the alcohol-extractives is retarded slightly, but is going on, not greatly affected by the outside influence, regularly according to its age. It is fair to say, however, that the differences thus determined by extraction are seemingly less than those shown by the histological tests,
the alcohol-extractives are somewhat less in quantity than in  
the normal brain, if the age be taken as the standard of comparison, and, therefore, it may be concluded that they are somewhat  
retarded in the formation of alcohol-extractive substances and  
therefore in myelination. Reviewing tables 14 and 16 together,  
we see that during underfeeding the myelination process or the  
increase in the alcohol-extractives is retarded slightly, but is  
going on, not greatly affected by the outside influence, regularly  
according to its age. It is fair to say, however, that the differences thus determined by extraction are seemingly less than those  
shown by the histological tests,  


15. A DISCUSSION OX THE RELATION BETWEEN THE BODY  
15. A DISCUSSION OX THE RELATION BETWEEN THE BODY


WEIGHT AND THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN THE UNDERFED  
WEIGHT AND THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN THE UNDERFED


ALBINO RATS  
ALBINO RATS


By examining table 4 it will be readily seen that under severe  
By examining table 4 it will be readily seen that under severe underfeeding at an early age, the increase in the body weight and the brain weight, according to the age, is notably reduced, and, as a consequence, the acutely underfed (Series I, chapter 5 and table 1) have lost, in the course of first twenty days after birth (during suckling period), about 29 per cent in body weight, but only 8 per cent in brain weight, when compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. By chronic starvation, during which the young (excessive in number) were left
underfeeding at an early age, the increase in the body weight and  
the brain weight, according to the age, is notably reduced, and, as  
a consequence, the acutely underfed (Series I, chapter 5 and  
table 1) have lost, in the course of first twenty days after birth  
(during suckling period), about 29 per cent in body weight, but  
only 8 per cent in brain weight, when compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. By chronic starvation, during which the young (excessive in number) were left  






224  
224






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 16  
TABLE 16


Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the initial brain weight in  
Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the initial brain weight in the fresh condition and the brain weight after extraction in 80 per cent alcohol {for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol {for twenty-four hours) by a uniform procedure, and the ratio of the latter to the initial weight. The corresponding standard values for the same age loere calculated 07i the basis of the data in table 15 and compared with each arid the difference between them given as an average for each group. This table %uas condensed from table 16a {unpublished) for individual cases. The averages for the test andcontrol groups are given at the end of the table.
the fresh condition and the brain weight after extraction in 80 per cent alcohol  
{for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol {for twenty-four hours) by a uniform  
procedure, and the ratio of the latter to the initial weight. The corresponding  
standard values for the same age loere calculated 07i the basis of the data in table  
15 and compared with each arid the difference between them given as an average for  
each group. This table %uas condensed from table 16a {unpublished) for individual  
cases. The averages for the test andcontrol groups are given at the end of the table.  






SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




AFTER EXTRACTION  
AFTER EXTRACTION IN 80 PER CENT AND 90 PER CENT , ALCOHOL
IN 80 PER CENT AND  
90 PER CENT  
, ALCOHOL  




standard  
standard ratio for the brain
ratio for  
the brain  


of the  
of the same age
same age  




DIFFERENCE  
DIFFERENCE




GROUP  
GROUP




Final  
Final brain weight
brain  
weight  




Ratio to  
Ratio to


the initial  
the initial


brain  
brain


weight  
weight




FROM THE  
FROM THE STANDARD
STANDARD  




Series I  
Series I


A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f


b  
b


b, g  
b, g


i  
i




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




days  
days


715  
715


817  
817




gram.1  
gram.1


0.584  
0.584 1.024
1.024  


0.688  
0.688 1.278
1.278  




grams  
grams


0.450  
0.450 0.779
0.779  


0.517  
0.517 0.928
0.928  




per cent  
per cent


77.2  
77.2 76.0
76.0  


75.7  
75.7 72.7
72.7  




per cent  
per cent


75.7  
75.7 72.8
72.8  


75. li.  
75. li. 72.3
72.3  




per cent  
per cent


+ 1.5  
+ 1.5 +3.2
+3.2  


+0.3  
+0.3 +0.4
+0.4  




Series I  
Series I


B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f


i  
i


b, d  
b, d




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




919  
919


6  
6 18
18


0.644  
0.644 1.052
1.052  


0.543  
0.543 1.144
1.144  




0.488  
0.488 0.799
0.799  


0.414  
0.414 0.826
0.826  




76.1  
76.1 76.0
76.0  


76.4  
76.4


72.2  
72.2




74.9  
74.9 71.7
71.7  


76.1  
76.1 72.1
72.1  




+ 1.2  
+ 1.2 +4.3
+4.3  


+0.3  
+0.3 +0.1
+0.1  




Series I  
Series I


C a, c, d  
C a, c, d


b, e  
b, e




T. II  
T. II C. II
C. II  




20  
20 22
22


1.105  
1.105 1.307
1.307  




0.816  
0.816 0.934
0.934  




73.9  
73.9 71.5
71.5  




72.9  
72.9 71.8
71.8  




+ 1.0  
+ 1.0 -0.3
-0.3  




Series I  
Series I


D a, c, d  
D a, c, d


e  
e


b  
b f
f  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




1218  
1218


9  
9 22
22  




0.778  
0.778 1.089
1.089  


0.870  
0.870 1.220
1.220  




0.584  
0.584 0.795
0.795  


0.656  
0.656 0.863
0.863  




75.1  
75.1 73.0
73.0  


75.4  
75.4 70.8
70.8  




73.7  
73.7 72.0
72.0  


74.5  
74.5 71.0
71.0  




+ 1.4  
+ 1.4 + 1.0
+ 1.0  


+0.9  
+0.9 +0.2
+0.2  




Series I  
Series I


Ea, b, c, d  
Ea, b, c, d


e  
e




T. I  
T. I C. II
C. II  




1213  
1213




0.835  
0.835 1.024
1.024  




0.626  
0.626 0.760
0.760  




75.0  
75.0 74.1
74.1  




73.7  
73.7 73.4
73.4  




+ 1.3  
+ 1.3 +0.7
+0.7  




Series II  
Series II


F a, b  
F a, b


c-k  
c-k




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




13
13 25+
25+  




0.832  
0.832 1.198
1.198  




0.636  
0.636 0.862
0.862  




76.7  
76.7 72.3
72.3  




73.4  
73.4 70.7
70.7  




+3.3  
+3.3 + 1.6
+ 1.6  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






225  
225






TABLE IQ— Continued  
TABLE IQ— Continued






SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT
BRAIN  
WEIGHT  




.AFTER EXTRACTON  
.AFTER EXTRACTON


IN 80 PER CENT AND  
IN 80 PER CENT AND


90 PER CENT  
90 PER CENT


ALCOHOL  
ALCOHOL


■n.- , Ratio to  
■n.- , Ratio to hr«i. the initial
hr«i. the initial  




Standard  
Standard ratio for the brain
ratio for  
the brain  


of the  
of the same age
same age  




DIFFERENCE  
DIFFERENCE FROM THE STANDARD
FROM THE  
STANDARD  




Series III  
Series III


Ga-g  
Ga-g


h-j  
h-j




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  




days  
days


11+  
11+


22
22


gra m s  
gra m s


0.844  
0.844 . 1.154
. 1.154  




gratnts  
gratnts


0.641  
0.641 0.833
0.833  




per cent  
per cent


76.0  
76.0


72.2  
72.2




per cent  
per cent


73.9  
73.9


71.2  
71.2




per cent  
per cent


+2.1  
+2.1 + 1.0
+ 1.0  




Average \  
Average \ (Ser. I-III)/
(Ser. I-III)/  


Average 1  
Average 1 (Ser. I) j
(Ser. I) j  




T. I  
T. I T. II
T. II  


C. I  
C. I C. II
C. II  




11+  
11+


20+  
20+


818+  
818+




0.753  
0.753 1.104
1.104  


0.700  
0.700 1.195
1.195  




0.571  
0.571 0.814
0.814  


0.529  
0.529 0.862
0.862  




76.0  
76.0 73.9
73.9  


75.8  
75.8 72.3
72.3  




74.2  
74.2 71.9
71.9  


75.3  
75.3


72.1  
72.1




+ 1.8  
+ 1.8 +2.0
+2.0  


+0.5  
+0.5 +0.2
+0.2  






continuously with the mothers (Series II and III, chapter 2 and  
continuously with the mothers (Series II and III, chapter 2 and table 2), the loss in the brain weight is relatively less, in some individual cases nothing, while the body weight suffers much more, compared with the acutely underfed groups (Series I).
table 2), the loss in the brain weight is relatively less, in some  
individual cases nothing, while the body weight suffers much  
more, compared with the acutely underfed groups (Series I).  


The observed body weight and the brain weight of each individual in this study are plotted separately for each litter in chart  
The observed body weight and the brain weight of each individual in this study are plotted separately for each litter in chart 2, A to H, according to the advancing age. Comparing the set of graphs both for the body weight and the brain weight within every litter, it is clearly seen at a glance that the courses of the graphs are similar, so that one, which advanced in age but has a smaller body weight, has also a relatively smaller brain weight, and vice versa. From this it is concluded that, though the brain, with a strong impulse to grow, regularly increases in weight with age and is only slightly affected by outside influence, yet it is controlled somewhat by the growth in the entire body. Thus, within certain limits, the brain weight may be said to be a function of the body weight: a rat reduced in body weight by starvation has a brain also reduced in weight and, on the other hand, a rat excessive in body weight for its age, through overfeeding, has an exces'S of brain weight for its age, as seen in the control groups shown in table 4. In the interrupted starvation tests (Series I), an average reduction of 29 per cent in the body weight
2, A to H, according to the advancing age. Comparing the set  
of graphs both for the body weight and the brain weight within  
every litter, it is clearly seen at a glance that the courses of the  
graphs are similar, so that one, which advanced in age but has a  
smaller body weight, has also a relatively smaller brain weight,  
and vice versa. From this it is concluded that, though the  
brain, with a strong impulse to grow, regularly increases in weight  
with age and is only slightly affected by outside influence, yet  
it is controlled somewhat by the growth in the entire body.  
Thus, within certain limits, the brain weight may be said to be a  
function of the body weight: a rat reduced in body weight by  
starvation has a brain also reduced in weight and, on the other  
hand, a rat excessive in body weight for its age, through overfeeding, has an exces'S of brain weight for its age, as seen in the control  
groups shown in table 4. In the interrupted starvation tests  
(Series I), an average reduction of 29 per cent in the body weight  


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3  
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3






226  
226






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA








yns, yni  
yns, yni




Line 62,542: Line 57,730:




"-^  
"-^




Line 62,555: Line 57,743:




JTli  
JTli




Line 62,581: Line 57,769:




,--y  
,--y




Line 62,596: Line 57,784:




^  
^




Line 62,611: Line 57,799:




-"  
-"




Line 62,626: Line 57,814:




15 20 25 <J.  
15 20 25 <J.






10 15 20 25 30 35 #0 ic^t  
10 15 20 25 30 35 #0 ic^t






Chart 2 Giving for each litter in this study the relation between the body  
Chart 2 Giving for each litter in this study the relation between the body weight and the brain weight of the individuals. The capital letters for each small chart designate the litter. The data given in table 3 were plotted according to the advancing age in days. • ■ ' '— '• Observed body weight of the underfed, in grams. %
weight and the brain weight of the individuals. The capital letters for each  
small chart designate the litter. The data given in table 3 were plotted according  
to the advancing age in days.  
• ■ ' '— '• Observed body weight of the underfed, in grams. %  


o o Observed brain weight of the underfed, in grams.  
o o Observed brain weight of the underfed, in grams.


Observed body weight of the controls, in grams.  
Observed body weight of the controls, in grams.


Observed brain weight of the controls, in grams.  
Observed brain weight of the controls, in grams.


For the body weight the scale is given on the left side and for the brain weight  
For the body weight the scale is given on the left side and for the brain weight the scale is given on the right side of the chart.
the scale is given on the right side of the chart.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 227  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 227


is accompanied by 8 per cent reduction in the brain weight in the  
is accompanied by 8 per cent reduction in the brain weight in the test rats, and an excess of 14 per cent in the body weight by an excess of 6 per cent in the brain weight in the controls. These relations indicate that the brain weight is affected in abnormal conditions of nutrition during early life so that its percentage is altered by about one-third the percentage of the change of the body weight, either plus or minus, as compared with the standard values. On the other hand, in chronic inanition (Series II and III) where the young rat is not disturbed, the brain-weight loss was also 8 per cent against a body weight loss of 39 per cent. It appears, therefore, that during the early helpless period the brain development is highly disturbed by the changes in the environmental conditions represented by removal from the nest, but that when the rats are not disturbed it is much less affected even by severe underfeeding.
test rats, and an excess of 14 per cent in the body weight by an  
excess of 6 per cent in the brain weight in the controls. These  
relations indicate that the brain weight is affected in abnormal  
conditions of nutrition during early life so that its percentage is  
altered by about one-third the percentage of the change of the  
body weight, either plus or minus, as compared with the standard  
values. On the other hand, in chronic inanition (Series II and  
III) where the young rat is not disturbed, the brain-weight loss  
was also 8 per cent against a body weight loss of 39 per cent.  
It appears, therefore, that during the early helpless period the  
brain development is highly disturbed by the changes in the  
environmental conditions represented by removal from the nest,  
but that when the rats are not disturbed it is much less affected  
even by severe underfeeding.  


Table 17 gives for each group in this study the brain weight —  
Table 17 gives for each group in this study the brain weight — body weight ratio, in percentage value, paired with the ratio obtained from the corresponding standard values for the same age and sex, calculated on the data given in table 4. The complete data for each individual are contained in table 17 a (unpublished) from which table 17 was condensed. In the underfed the above ratios are all higher than the standard, as was to be expected, while in the controls lower ratios are sometimes seen, which, in turn, means an overgrowth of the body. The average differences for each litter and group are given and the values are indicative of the severity of starvation combined with the special characteristics of the litter. Within each litter the range of the differences is narrow but the evidence for this statement is furnished by the unpublished detailed table 17 a.
body weight ratio, in percentage value, paired with the ratio  
obtained from the corresponding standard values for the same  
age and sex, calculated on the data given in table 4. The complete data for each individual are contained in table 17 a (unpublished) from which table 17 was condensed. In the underfed  
the above ratios are all higher than the standard, as was to be  
expected, while in the controls lower ratios are sometimes seen,  
which, in turn, means an overgrowth of the body. The average  
differences for each litter and group are given and the values are  
indicative of the severity of starvation combined with the special  
characteristics of the litter. Within each litter the range of the  
differences is narrow but the evidence for this statement is furnished by the unpublished detailed table 17 a.  


16. A DISCUSSION ON THE CHANGE IN SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM  
16. A DISCUSSION ON THE CHANGE IN SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM


In my first paper (Sugita, '17) it was stated that the Albino  
In my first paper (Sugita, '17) it was stated that the Albino cerebrum becomes relatively longer as the age advances. During starvation, the rate of increase in every dimension diminishes considerably, but the relations between the three dimensions remains nearly unchanged, so that, as a result, the underfed brain is somewhat elongated in shape in comparison with the standard
cerebrum becomes relatively longer as the age advances. During  
starvation, the rate of increase in every dimension diminishes  
considerably, but the relations between the three dimensions remains nearly unchanged, so that, as a result, the underfed brain  
is somewhat elongated in shape in comparison with the standard  






TABLE 17  
TABLE 17 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the sex, th
Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the sex, th  






brain weight —  
brain weight —


body weight ratio, compared with the same ratio for the standard rat of the same  
body weight ratio, compared with the same ratio for the standard rat of the same age and sex. The difference of the ratio for each group is given in the last column This table was condensed from table 17a (unpublished) for the indiAt the foot of the table the averages for the test and control groups
age and sex. The difference of the ratio for each group is given in the last column  
This table was condensed from table 17a (unpublished) for the indiAt the foot of the table the averages for the test and control groups  






of the table,  
of the table, vidual cases are given.
vidual cases  
are given.  






SERIES, LITTER AND  
SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP
GROUP  




TEST  
TEST CONTROL
CONTROL  




AVERAGE  
AVERAGE AGE
AGE  




SEX  
SEX




RATIO OF  
RATIO OF


BRAIN  
BRAIN


WEIGHT TO  
WEIGHT TO


BODY  
BODY


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT




The same  
The same


in standard  
in standard


rat of the  
rat of the


savie age  
savie age




DIFFERENCE FROM  
DIFFERENCE FROM THE STANDARD
THE  
STANDARD  




Line 62,754: Line 57,899:




days  
days








per cent  
per cent




per cent  
per cent




per cent  
per cent




Series I  
Series I




Line 62,783: Line 57,928:




A c, a, d, f  
A c, a, d, f




T. I  
T. I




7 —  
7 —




1 m, 3 f  
1 m, 3 f




7.9  
7.9




6.5  
6.5




+ 1.4  
+ 1.4




h  
h




T. II  
T. II




15  
15




a f  
a f




7.4  
7.4




6.3  
6.3




+ 1.1  
+ 1.1




b, e, g  
b, e, g




C. I  
C. I




8  
8




3 m  
3 m




6.4  
6.4




6.8  
6.8




-0.4  
-0.4




i  
i




C. II  
C. II




17  
17




1 f  
1 f




4.2  
4.2




6.1  
6.1




-1.9  
-1.9




Series I  
Series I




Line 62,882: Line 58,027:




B a, c, e, f  
B a, c, e, f




T. I  
T. I




9
9


3 m, 1 f  
3 m, 1 f




8.7  
8.7




6.7  
6.7




+2.0  
+2.0




i  
i




T. II  
T. II




19  
19




1 m  
1 m




8.3  
8.3




6.0  
6.0




+2.3  
+2.3




b, d  
b, d




C. I  
C. I




6  
6




2 f  
2 f




7.6  
7.6




6.5  
6.5




+ 1.1  
+ 1.1




g, h, J  
g, h, J




C. II  
C. II




18
18


3 f  
3 f




5.7  
5.7




6.0  
6.0




-0.3  
-0.3




Series I  
Series I




Line 62,979: Line 58,124:




C a, c, d  
C a, c, d




T. II  
T. II




20  
20




2 m, 1 f  
2 m, 1 f




7.7  
7.7




5.8  
5.8




+ 1.9  
+ 1.9




b, e  
b, e




C. II  
C. II




22  
22




2f  
2f




5.3  
5.3




5.6  
5.6




-0.2  
-0.2




Series I  
Series I




Line 63,036: Line 58,181:




D a, c, d  
D a, c, d




T. I  
T. I




12
12


1 m, 2 f  
1 m, 2 f




11.3  
11.3




6.8  
6.8




+4.5  
+4.5




e  
e




T. II  
T. II




18  
18




1 m  
1 m




8.4  
8.4




6.2  
6.2




+2.2  
+2.2




b  
b




C. I  
C. I




9  
9




1 m  
1 m




7.8  
7.8




7.1  
7.1




+0.7  
+0.7




f  
f




C. II  
C. II




22  
22




1 m  
1 m




5.1  
5.1




5.6  
5.6




-0.5  
-0.5




Series I  
Series I




Line 63,134: Line 58,279:




E a, b, c, d  
E a, b, c, d




T. I  
T. I




12
12


3 m, 1 f  
3 m, 1 f




8.6  
8.6




6.8  
6.8




+ 1.8  
+ 1.8




g, h  
g, h




T. II  
T. II




20  
20




2f  
2f




7,0  
7,0




5.6  
5.6




+ 1.4  
+ 1.4




e, f  
e, f




C. II  
C. II




17
17


Im, 1 f  
Im, 1 f




5.6  
5.6




6.4  
6.4




-0.8  
-0.8




Series II  
Series II




Line 63,210: Line 58,355:




F a, b  
F a, b




T. I  
T. I




13
13


1 m, 1 f  
1 m, 1 f




9.1  
9.1




6.8  
6.8




+2.3  
+2.3




c-1  
c-1




T. II  
T. II




25+  
25+




4 m, 6 f  
4 m, 6 f




7.5  
7.5




5.1  
5.1




+2.4  
+2.4




Series III  
Series III




Line 63,266: Line 58,411:




Ga-g  
Ga-g




T. I  
T. I




11 +  
11 +




4 m, 3 f  
4 m, 3 f




10.3  
10.3




6.9  
6.9




+3.4  
+3.4




h-j  
h-j




T. II  
T. II




22
22


2 m, 1 f  
2 m, 1 f




9.3  
9.3




5.5  
5.5




+3.8  
+3.8




Average 1  
Average 1




T. I  
T. I




Line 63,317: Line 58,462:




9.3  
9.3




6.8  
6.8




+2.5  
+2.5




(Ser. I-III)/  
(Ser. I-III)/




T. II  
T. II




21 +  
21 +








7.9  
7.9




5.8  
5.8




+2.1  
+2.1




Average 1  
Average 1




C. I  
C. I




Line 63,356: Line 58,501:




7.3  
7.3




6.8  
6.8




+ 0.5  
+ 0.5




(Ser. I) /  
(Ser. I) /




C. II  
C. II




19+  
19+








5.2  
5.2




5.9  
5.9




-0.7  
-0.7






228  
228






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 229  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 229


brain, which is the same in weight but younger. As shown in  
brain, which is the same in weight but younger. As shown in table 5, in the underfed brains the measurement L.G (the sagittal diameter) is on the average nearly 2 per cent (about 0.25 mm. in a brain weighing 1.0 gram) greater. than the standard, while, on the other hand, as shown in table 6 a (unpublished), in the underfed the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality I) .which was measured almost in the same direction w^ith L.G is also greater by 10 per cent (about 0.25 mm. in a brain weighing 1.0 gram) than the standard for the same brain weight, while the cortex at the occipital pole (locality V) is nearly equal to the standard in thickness. Considering together the above facts, the sagittal length of the central nuclei only, if measured between the frontal and occipital poles, would be supposedly about the same in both the underfed and the standard brains weighing alike. On the other hand, the width W .B is, in the underfed, less by nearly 2 per cent (about 0.3 mm. for 1.0 gram brain) than in the standard, and the cortical thickness at locality VII, which was measured at the side of the cerebrum, is thicker in the underfed by nearly 10 per cent (about 0.4 mm. for the both hemispheres in a 1.0 gram brain (based on the unpublished table 6 b for each locality) , and therefore the central nuclei in the underfed are less in width by about 0.7 mm. (for a 1.0 gram brain) than the standard for the same brain weight. In short the central nuclei are notably elongated in shape in the underfed brain compared with the normal brain of like weight.
table 5, in the underfed brains the measurement L.G (the sagittal diameter) is on the average nearly 2 per cent (about 0.25  
mm. in a brain weighing 1.0 gram) greater. than the standard,  
while, on the other hand, as shown in table 6 a (unpublished),  
in the underfed the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality  
I) .which was measured almost in the same direction w^ith L.G  
is also greater by 10 per cent (about 0.25 mm. in a brain weighing  
1.0 gram) than the standard for the same brain weight, while the  
cortex at the occipital pole (locality V) is nearly equal to the  
standard in thickness. Considering together the above facts,  
the sagittal length of the central nuclei only, if measured between  
the frontal and occipital poles, would be supposedly about the  
same in both the underfed and the standard brains weighing alike.  
On the other hand, the width W .B is, in the underfed, less by  
nearly 2 per cent (about 0.3 mm. for 1.0 gram brain) than in the  
standard, and the cortical thickness at locality VII, which was  
measured at the side of the cerebrum, is thicker in the underfed  
by nearly 10 per cent (about 0.4 mm. for the both hemispheres in  
a 1.0 gram brain (based on the unpublished table 6 b for each  
locality) , and therefore the central nuclei in the underfed are less  
in width by about 0.7 mm. (for a 1.0 gram brain) than the standard for the same brain weight. In short the central nuclei are  
notably elongated in shape in the underfed brain compared with  
the normal brain of like weight.  


17. A DISCUSSION ON THE THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX IN THE  
17. A DISCUSSION ON THE THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX IN THE


UNDERFED  
UNDERFED


As described in Chapter 7, the cortical thickness in the  
As described in Chapter 7, the cortical thickness in the starved brain is on the average markedly greater than the standard for the same brain weight. In the sagittal sections, the locality I surpasses the standard most, the localities II and III are the next, while the localities IV and V are almost equal in thickness to the standard (these statements are based on the unpublished table 6 a for each locality). This order in which the localities surpass the standard in thickness is the same as the order in rate of increase in the cortical thickness during the post
starved brain is on the average markedly greater than the standard for the same brain weight. In the sagittal sections, the locality I surpasses the standard most, the localities II and III are  
the next, while the localities IV and V are almost equal in thickness to the standard (these statements are based on the unpublished table 6 a for each locality). This order in which the  
localities surpass the standard in thickness is the same as the  
order in rate of increase in the cortical thickness during the post




230 NAOKI SUGITA  
230 NAOKI SUGITA


natal growth (Sugita, '17 a). The same statement is true for  
natal growth (Sugita, '17 a). The same statement is true for the iocahties VI, VII, and VIII in the frontal sections (based on the unpublished table 6 b). The order in the rate of increase in the cortical thickness is an index of the grade of intensity in cell migration to those localities and of the growth impulse of the elements there. From previous studies (Sugita, '17 a), it was found that, as a rule, the cortical thickness decreases from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect, and the nearer a locality is to the ventricular wall or the matrix the more rapid the rate of increase in the thickness of the cortex. In underfed brains, the localities which show normally the higher rate of increase in thickness are also greater in the cortical thickness when compared with the standard. So, in the underfed, the cerebral cortex is generally thicker than the standard for the same brain weight and thicker in each locality in proportion to the rate of increase in the thickness of that locality under normal conditions.
the iocahties VI, VII, and VIII in the frontal sections (based on  
the unpublished table 6 b). The order in the rate of increase in  
the cortical thickness is an index of the grade of intensity in cell  
migration to those localities and of the growth impulse of the  
elements there. From previous studies (Sugita, '17 a), it was  
found that, as a rule, the cortical thickness decreases from the  
frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral  
aspect, and the nearer a locality is to the ventricular wall or the  
matrix the more rapid the rate of increase in the thickness of the  
cortex. In underfed brains, the localities which show normally  
the higher rate of increase in thickness are also greater in the  
cortical thickness when compared with the standard. So, in the  
underfed, the cerebral cortex is generally thicker than the standard for the same brain weight and thicker in each locality in proportion to the rate of increase in the thickness of that locality  
under normal conditions.  


In short, the growth in the cortical thickness in the case of the  
In short, the growth in the cortical thickness in the case of the underfed is more advanced than that of the normall brain of the same weight, which is, of course, younger.
underfed is more advanced than that of the normall brain of the  
same weight, which is, of course, younger.  


18. A DISCUSSION ON THE RELATION BETWEEN CELL DENSITY AND  
18. A DISCUSSION ON THE RELATION BETWEEN CELL DENSITY AND THE COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
THE COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  


As stated earlier, the cell density of the cerebral cortex, represented by the number of nerve cells in two unit volumes (N), is,  
As stated earlier, the cell density of the cerebral cortex, represented by the number of nerve cells in two unit volumes (N), is, in the underfed Albino brain, under sixteen days in age, considerably higher than the standard for the same age, and accordingly the cell size in the underfed must be smaller than the standard size and, by inference, the cell attachments also underdeveloped for the age. The relations between these data will be examined now according to my measurements as presented in this paper.
in the underfed Albino brain, under sixteen days in age, considerably higher than the standard for the same age, and accordingly the cell size in the underfed must be smaller than the standard size and, by inference, the cell attachments also underdeveloped for the age. The relations between these data will be  
examined now according to my measurements as presented in this  
paper.  


The cortical area as measured in the sections from the underfed brains proves to be slightly greater than the standard values  
The cortical area as measured in the sections from the underfed brains proves to be slightly greater than the standard values for the same brain weight, but on the other hand, it is distinctly less in brains under sixteen days of age than the standard values
for the same brain weight, but on the other hand, it is distinctly  
less in brains under sixteen days of age than the standard values  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 231  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 231


for the same age, which belong to brain weights higher by about  
for the same age, which belong to brain weights higher by about 10 per cent.
10 per cent.  


Let us take as an example an underfed brain which weighs less  
Let us take as an example an underfed brain which weighs less than 1.0 gram for examination. The computed volume of the cerebral cortex is in the underfed smaller on the average by 16 per cent than the standard for the same age (chapter 9). As shown by calculation, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex is almost the same in both the standard and the underfed, throughout all ages, so that the process of cell division appears to have been going on undisturbed by the condition of underfeeding. The cell density, the cell size, and the cortical volume must therefore be regulated so as to provide the cerebral cortex with the number of cells fixed according to the age, regardless of the starvation.
than 1.0 gram for examination. The computed volume of the  
cerebral cortex is in the underfed smaller on the average by 16  
per cent than the standard for the same age (chapter 9). As  
shown by calculation, the computed number of nerve cells in the  
entire cortex is almost the same in both the standard and the  
underfed, throughout all ages, so that the process of cell division  
appears to have been going on undisturbed by the condition of  
underfeeding. The cell density, the cell size, and the cortical  
volume must therefore be regulated so as to provide the cerebral  
cortex with the number of cells fixed according to the age, regardless of the starvation.  


To present the relation, the formula A^ X L.F X W.D X T  
To present the relation, the formula A^ X L.F X W.D X T was used. The value. of iV X L.F X W.D X T has proved in my present material fro*n the underfed to have been 1,7 per cent higher than the standard, but as this is open to some correction, it may be regarded as approximately the same in both the underfed and the corresponding standard. To be less in the cortical volume, which was computed by the formula L.F X W.D X T, by about 16 per cent or more, the cell density must be increased by about 19 per cent or less theoretically. * This latter figure is fairly in accord with that obtained in my direct observation; that is, 17 per cent excess in the number of cells in a unit volume in the underfed brains (chapter 10). To be reduced in cortical volume by 16 per cent or more, the individual cell must theoretically be reduced in volume also in the same ratio, in order not to be reduced in total number. My results in cell-size measurement showed that the individual cells measured are reduced in average diameter by about 12 per cent, and accordingly in average volume by about 30 per cent or more. These figures appear somewhat higher than was to be expected, but it must be recalled that these figures apply only to the largest cells found in the measured locality, and this class of cells may suffer a disproportionate arrest, so that the figures do not indicate what has" taken place in the small cells and those of average size. Furthermore, in the
was used. The value. of iV X L.F X W.D X T has proved in  
my present material fro*n the underfed to have been 1,7 per cent  
higher than the standard, but as this is open to some correction,  
it may be regarded as approximately the same in both the underfed and the corresponding standard. To be less in the cortical  
volume, which was computed by the formula L.F X W.D X T,  
by about 16 per cent or more, the cell density must be increased  
by about 19 per cent or less theoretically. * This latter figure is  
fairly in accord with that obtained in my direct observation;  
that is, 17 per cent excess in the number of cells in a unit volume  
in the underfed brains (chapter 10). To be reduced in cortical  
volume by 16 per cent or more, the individual cell must theoretically be reduced in volume also in the same ratio, in order not to  
be reduced in total number. My results in cell-size measurement  
showed that the individual cells measured are reduced in average  
diameter by about 12 per cent, and accordingly in average volume  
by about 30 per cent or more. These figures appear somewhat  
higher than was to be expected, but it must be recalled that these  
figures apply only to the largest cells found in the measured  
locality, and this class of cells may suffer a disproportionate  
arrest, so that the figures do not indicate what has" taken place in  
the small cells and those of average size. Furthermore, in the  






232 NAOKI SUGITA  
232 NAOKI SUGITA


cerebral cortex the neuroglia, the intercellular tissue and the  
cerebral cortex the neuroglia, the intercellular tissue and the blood-vessels occupy considerable space and these may not be reduced in volume in the same proportion as the large nerve cells. These facts combined seem to furnish an explanation why the largest nerve cells, which have been here studied, deviate somewhat in size from the figures theoretically to be expected.
blood-vessels occupy considerable space and these may not be  
reduced in volume in the same proportion as the large nerve cells.  
These facts combined seem to furnish an explanation why the  
largest nerve cells, which have been here studied, deviate somewhat in size from the figures theoretically to be expected.  


The data here presented show, I think, that the relations  
The data here presented show, I think, that the relations betv/een the cell density and the cortical volume in the underfed fit with the formulas presented earlier and which represent the relations in the normal Albino brains.
betv/een the cell density and the cortical volume in the underfed  
fit with the formulas presented earlier and which represent the  
relations in the normal Albino brains.  


19. A DISCUSSION ON THE PROCESS OF MYELIN ATION  
19. A DISCUSSION ON THE PROCESS OF MYELIN ATION


Tables 14 and 16 supply the data on which the myelination  
Tables 14 and 16 supply the data on which the myelination process in the underfed Albino brain may be tentatively discussed.
process in the underfed Albino brain may be tentatively discussed.  


In Donaldson's series ('11), which consisted of twenty-two  
In Donaldson's series ('11), which consisted of twenty-two litters of albino rats in which the underfeeding was begun at 30 days of age and in which all were killed after three weeks and compared with the controls from the same litter, the average brain weight of the underfed was 1 .402 grams and the percentage of water 79.28, while the average brain weight of the controls was 1.519 grams and the percentage of water 79.39. Here the underfed had 0.11 per cent less water. By examining the sections from the underfed and the controls, the author could not discover any recognizable difference in myelination between them. Hatai ('04) made a partial starvation experiment, extending over three weeks, using the albino rats in the growing stage, about thirty days old. In this series, the final average brain weight was 1.341 grams and the percentage of water 79.15 or 0.21 per cent less than in the controls from the same litter and killed at the same age and in which the final brain weight was 1.508 grams and the percentage of water 79.36. In the same series, the solids extracted with alcohol and ether were determined. The average amount c f the extractives in the test brains was 46.7 per cent, or 0.9 per cent more than in the controls, in which it was 45.8 per cent. Though higher in percentage in the underfed.
litters of albino rats in which the underfeeding was begun at 30  
days of age and in which all were killed after three weeks and  
compared with the controls from the same litter, the average  
brain weight of the underfed was 1 .402 grams and the percentage  
of water 79.28, while the average brain weight of the controls  
was 1.519 grams and the percentage of water 79.39. Here the  
underfed had 0.11 per cent less water. By examining the sections from the underfed and the controls, the author could not  
discover any recognizable difference in myelination between them.  
Hatai ('04) made a partial starvation experiment, extending over  
three weeks, using the albino rats in the growing stage, about  
thirty days old. In this series, the final average brain weight was  
1.341 grams and the percentage of water 79.15 or 0.21 per cent  
less than in the controls from the same litter and killed at the  
same age and in which the final brain weight was 1.508 grams  
and the percentage of water 79.36. In the same series, the  
solids extracted with alcohol and ether were determined. The  
average amount c f the extractives in the test brains was 46.7 per  
cent, or 0.9 per cent more than in the controls, in which it was  
45.8 per cent. Though higher in percentage in the underfed.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX . 233  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX . 233


the absolute mass of the extractive substances is 0.065 gram  
the absolute mass of the extractive substances is 0.065 gram (about 5 per cent of the brain weight) less than in the controls of the same age. The absolute weights were in the underfed 0.626 gram and in the controls 0.691 gram. These extractives represent mainly the myelin which is contained in the sheaths of the nerve fibers, and the above results mean that the extractive substances are increasing at the same rate or slightly slower in the underfed than in the controls.
(about 5 per cent of the brain weight) less than in the controls  
of the same age. The absolute weights were in the underfed  
0.626 gram and in the controls 0.691 gram. These extractives  
represent mainly the myelin which is contained in the sheaths of  
the nerve fibers, and the above results mean that the extractive  
substances are increasing at the same rate or slightly slower in  
the underfed than in the controls.  


In my material as seen in table 14, the underfed brains contain  
In my material as seen in table 14, the underfed brains contain slightly more water (by 0.48 per cent on the average) than the standard of like age, and, as presented above (chapter 13), the frontal section showed a higher percentage in area of the cortex against the area of the central nuclei, which latter contain the bulk of the mj'elin sheaths. On the other hand, the underfed brains contain less water (by 1.4 per cent on the average) than the standards of the same brain weight. Comparisons of the absolute weight of the solids in the underfed brain with the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight and for the same age, based on data in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), are given in table 18. The underfed has shown as a rule considerably less in total solids than the standard for the same age, though it proved to be only slightly higher in percentage of water than the standard (also table 14). ■,
slightly more water (by 0.48 per cent on the average) than the  
standard of like age, and, as presented above (chapter 13), the  
frontal section showed a higher percentage in area of the cortex  
against the area of the central nuclei, which latter contain the  
bulk of the mj'elin sheaths. On the other hand, the underfed  
brains contain less water (by 1.4 per cent on the average) than  
the standards of the same brain weight. Comparisons of the  
absolute weight of the solids in the underfed brain with the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight and for the  
same age, based on data in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), are given  
in table 18. The underfed has shown as a rule considerably less  
in total solids than the standard for the same age, though it  
proved to be only slightly higher in percentage of water than the  
standard (also table 14). ■,  


From the above, the absolute mass of the solids in the underfed  
From the above, the absolute mass of the solids in the underfed brain seems to be more than in the standard for the same brain weight, but less than in the standard for the same age. So the increase in solid mass is somewhat retarded by starvation. It will be noted that in my series of rats the percentage of >vater in the underfed was 0.48 per cent above that in the standards of like age and this is the reverse of the results reported by Donaldson and by Hatai in the studies just cited. This discrepancy probably depends on the fact that my rats are absolutely much younger than those studied by the other authors, but the explanation must await further study.
brain seems to be more than in the standard for the same brain  
weight, but less than in the standard for the same age. So the  
increase in solid mass is somewhat retarded by starvation. It will  
be noted that in my series of rats the percentage of >vater in the  
underfed was 0.48 per cent above that in the standards of like  
age and this is the reverse of the results reported by Donaldson  
and by Hatai in the studies just cited. This discrepancy probably depends on the fact that my rats are absolutely much  
younger than those studied by the other authors, but the explanation must await further study.  


Since, as shown in chart 1, the relative values of the quantity  
Since, as shown in chart 1, the relative values of the quantity of the alcohol-extractives has a fixed relation to the absolute weight of the sohds in the brain, the above statement may be also
of the alcohol-extractives has a fixed relation to the absolute  
weight of the sohds in the brain, the above statement may be also  






234  
234






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 18  
TABLE 18


Giving for each individual in Litter H {Series II) the sex, the age, the observed brain  
Giving for each individual in Litter H {Series II) the sex, the age, the observed brain weight, percentage of water, and the calculated absolute weight of the solids in the brain, compared with the standards for the percentage of water and the mass of solids for the brains of the same weight and of the same age. Averages are given in the last line.
weight, percentage of water, and the calculated absolute weight of the solids in the  
brain, compared with the standards for the percentage of water and the mass of  
solids for the brains of the same weight and of the same age. Averages are given  
in the last line.  






STARVED  
STARVED




STANDARD  
STANDARD








Sex  
Sex




Age  
Age




Brain  
Brain weight
weight  




Percentage of  
Percentage of water
water  




Mass of  
Mass of solids
solids  




For the same  
For the same brain weight
brain weight  




For the same age  
For the same age




No.  
No.




Percentage of  
Percentage of water
water  




Mass of  
Mass of solids
solids  




Brain  
Brain weight
weight  




Percentage of  
Percentage of water
water  




Mass of  
Mass of solids
solids  




H a  
H a b c d e f g
b  
c  
d  
e  
f  
g  




f  
f


f  
f


f  
f


f  
f


m  
m


f  
f


m  
m




13  
13 17 23 28 32 37 43
17  
23  
28  
32  
37  
43  




grams  
grams


0.880  
0.880 1.024 1.135 1.166 1.215 1.101 1.295
1.024  
1.135  
1.166  
1.215  
1.101  
1.295  




per cent  
per cent


86.39  
86.39 84.15 82.00 80.83 80.31 80.12 80.24
84.15  
82.00  
80.83  
80.31  
80.12  
80.24  




grams  
grams


0.120  
0.120 0.162 0.204 0.224 0.239 0.219 0.256
0.162  
0.204  
0.224  
0.239  
0.219  
0.256  




per cent  
per cent


87.45  
87.45 85.08 83.21 82.60 81.70 83.78 80.51
85.08  
83.21  
82.60  
81.70  
83.78  
80.51  




grams  
grams


0.110  
0.110 0.153 0.191 0.203 0.222 0.179 0.252
0.153  
0.191  
0.203  
0.222  
0.179  
0.252  


0.187  
0.187




grams  
grams


1.003  
1.003 1.099 1.208 1.282 1.338 1.391 1.468
1.099  
1.208  
1.282  
1.338  
1.391  
1.468  




per cent  
per cent


85.40  
85.40 83.82 81.93 80.74 80.04 79.55 79.32
83.82  
81.93  
80.74  
80.04  
79.55  
79.32  




grams  
grams


0.146  
0.146 0.178 0.218 0.247 0.267 0.285 0.304
0.178  
0.218  
0.247  
0.267  
0.285  
0.304  




Average  
Average




28
28


1.117  
1.117




82.01  
82.01




0.203  
0.203




83.48  
83.48




1.256  
1.256




81.54  
81.54




0.235  
0.235






confirmed by the data given in table 16, in which it is clearly  
confirmed by the data given in table 16, in which it is clearly shown that in the underfed the alcohol-extractives are slightly less developed as compared with the standards for the same age.
shown that in the underfed the alcohol-extractives are slightly  
less developed as compared with the standards for the same age.  






20. SUMMARY  
20. SUMMARY


1. Young albino rats were experimentally starved throughout  
1. Young albino rats were experimentally starved throughout the suckling period, by one of the following methods :
the suckling period, by one of the following methods :  


Series I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for  
Series I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for the maximum time each day.
the maximum time each day.  


Series II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of  
Series II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of young (over seventeen) at the same time and thus reducing the amount of milk for each young one.
young (over seventeen) at the same time and thus reducing the  
amount of milk for each young one.  


Series III. Starving the nursing mother and thus reducing the  
Series III. Starving the nursing mother and thus reducing the quantity of milk secreted.
quantity of milk secreted.  


I employed five litters for Series I, two litters for Series II,  
I employed five litters for Series I, two litters for Series II, and one litter for Series III; in all forty-six individuals were subjected to experiment and there were fourteen controls.
and one litter for Series III; in all forty-six individuals were subjected to experiment and there were fourteen controls.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 235  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 235


2. The underfed and the controls were killed at different ages  
2. The underfed and the controls were killed at different ages (between three and forty days) and the body measurements and the brain weights recorded. The brain was fixed, sectioned, stained, and examined according to the standard procedure previously adopted for these studies (Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 b, '18 c) and the size of the cerebrum, the thickness of the cerebral cortex, the area of the cortex in the sections, the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cortex, and the size of the pyramidal and the ganglion cells, were all determined and then corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material, by the use of the correction-coefficients devised for these purposes.
(between three and forty days) and the body measurements and  
the brain weights recorded. The brain was fixed, sectioned,  
stained, and examined according to the standard procedure previously adopted for these studies (Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 b, '18 c)  
and the size of the cerebrum, the thickness of the cerebral cortex,  
the area of the cortex in the sections, the number of nerve cells in  
a unit volume of the cortex, and the size of the pyramidal and the  
ganglion cells, were all determined and then corrected to the  
values for the fresh condition of the material, by the use of the  
correction-coefficients devised for these purposes.  


Using these data, the relative volume of the cerebral cortex  
Using these data, the relative volume of the cerebral cortex and the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex were computed, employing the formulas already devised by me (Sugita, '18 b). All the observed and computed data were compared with the corresponding respective standard values for the normal Albino brain of the same weight or of the same age, as given in my previous papers (tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 and 13).
and the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex were  
computed, employing the formulas already devised by me  
(Sugita, '18 b). All the observed and computed data were compared with the corresponding respective standard values for the  
normal Albino brain of the same weight or of the same age, as  
given in my previous papers (tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 and 13).  


3. In Series I the underfed rats were found to be 29 per cent  
3. In Series I the underfed rats were found to be 29 per cent less in the body weight and 8 per cent less in the brain weight, than the standards for the same ages (between three and forty days). In Series II and III the underfed rats were 39 per cent less in the body weight while 8 per cent less in the brain weight. It appears from this that starvation without removal from the nest, and the corresponding disturbance to the young, retards the growth of the brain relatively less, despite the greater arrest in the body growth.
less in the body weight and 8 per cent less in the brain weight, than  
the standards for the same ages (between three and forty days).  
In Series II and III the underfed rats were 39 per cent less in the  
body weight while 8 per cent less in the brain weight. It appears  
from this that starvation without removal from the nest, and the  
corresponding disturbance to the young, retards the growth of  
the brain relatively less, despite the greater arrest in the body  
growth.  


The underfed brain weight was found on the average 24 per  
The underfed brain weight was found on the average 24 per cent higher than the standard for the same body weight. The brain weights in the underfed have values between the standards for the same age and those for the same body weight, but generally fall nearer to the former.
cent higher than the standard for the same body weight. The  
brain weights in the underfed have values between the standards  
for the same age and those for the same body weight, but generally  
fall nearer to the former.  


The brain weight is a function of the body weight : a rat which  
The brain weight is a function of the body weight : a rat which is more reduced in body weight by starvation has a more reduced brain weight. The brain weight — body weight ratio is always higher in the underfed than in the standard for the same age, and the difference between the ratios roughly indicates the severity of
is more reduced in body weight by starvation has a more reduced  
brain weight. The brain weight — body weight ratio is always  
higher in the underfed than in the standard for the same age, and  
the difference between the ratios roughly indicates the severity of  






236 NAOKI SUGITA  
236 NAOKI SUGITA


the starvation. Thus in those severely underfed the difference is  
the starvation. Thus in those severely underfed the difference is higher than in those less severely underfed.
higher than in those less severely underfed.  


4. The shape of the cerebrum in the underfed is slightly elongated as compared with that of the standard with the same brain  
4. The shape of the cerebrum in the underfed is slightly elongated as compared with that of the standard with the same brain weight and approximates that for the same age. As the result of underfeeding, the growth of the central nuclei seems to be more arrested in width than in length and the changes in the growth in the cortex in thickness matter little for the shape of the cerebrum.
weight and approximates that for the same age. As the result of  
underfeeding, the growth of the central nuclei seems to be more  
arrested in width than in length and the changes in the growth  
in the cortex in thickness matter little for the shape of the  
cerebrum.  


5. The thickness of the cortex is on the average 10 per cent  
5. The thickness of the cortex is on the average 10 per cent greater in the underfed in the localities I, II, VI, and VII than in the standards for the same brain weight. By averaging according to the entire section, the average thickness in the sagittal section of the underfed exceeds that of the standard by 5.3 per cent and in the frontal section by 8.7 per cent. The general average thickness of the cortex in the underfed is consequently greater by about 7 per cent than the standard for the brain of the same w^eight. The locahties which normally show the higher rate of increase in thickness during the postnatal growth are those which are notably greater in the cortical thickness in the underfed brains.
greater in the underfed in the localities I, II, VI, and VII than  
in the standards for the same brain weight. By averaging according to the entire section, the average thickness in the sagittal  
section of the underfed exceeds that of the standard by 5.3 per  
cent and in the frontal section by 8.7 per cent. The general  
average thickness of the cortex in the underfed is consequently  
greater by about 7 per cent than the standard for the brain of the  
same w^eight. The locahties which normally show the higher  
rate of increase in thickness during the postnatal growth are  
those which are notably greater in the cortical thickness in the  
underfed brains.  


6. The relative volume of the cerebral cortex, computed by the  
6. The relative volume of the cerebral cortex, computed by the formula L.F X W .D X T, is generally smaller in the underfed than in the standard for the same age. In the underfed brains weighing up to 1.0 gram (that is, under sixteen days of age), it is on the average less by 16 per cent or more, while in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram it is 6 per cent greater than the standard. So it may be said that, in rats underfed severely, the cortical volume is considerably retarded in growth in early period of development, but this is somewhat compensated or overcompensated later when the brains attain the weight of more than 1.0 gram or in age of more than sixteen days.
formula L.F X W .D X T, is generally smaller in the underfed  
than in the standard for the same age. In the underfed brains  
weighing up to 1.0 gram (that is, under sixteen days of age), it is  
on the average less by 16 per cent or more, while in the underfed  
brains weighing more than 1.0 gram it is 6 per cent greater than  
the standard. So it may be said that, in rats underfed severely,  
the cortical volume is considerably retarded in growth in early  
period of development, but this is somewhat compensated or  
overcompensated later when the brains attain the weight of more  
than 1.0 gram or in age of more than sixteen days.  


7. The cell density in the cerebral cortex, represented by the  
7. The cell density in the cerebral cortex, represented by the sum of the number of pyramids in the lamina pyramidahs and the number of nerve cells in the lamina ganglionaris in two unit volumes of 0.001 mm.^, is considerably higher in the underfed than in the standard rat for the same age. The excess in cell
sum of the number of pyramids in the lamina pyramidahs and  
the number of nerve cells in the lamina ganglionaris in two unit  
volumes of 0.001 mm.^, is considerably higher in the underfed  
than in the standard rat for the same age. The excess in cell  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 237  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 237


density in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is on the  
density in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is on the average 17 per cent, and that in underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram is almost equal to the standard for the same age. As in the underfed brains weighing less than 1,0 gram, the relative volume of the cortex is smaller than in the standard, it follows that the underfed brains, if they contain the same number of cells, must have a relatively higher cell density in a unit volume to balance the smaller total volume of the cortex.
average 17 per cent, and that in underfed brains weighing more  
than 1.0 gram is almost equal to the standard for the same age.  
As in the underfed brains weighing less than 1,0 gram, the relative  
volume of the cortex is smaller than in the standard, it follows  
that the underfed brains, if they contain the same number of cells,  
must have a relatively higher cell density in a unit volume to  
balance the smaller total volume of the cortex.  


8. The relative value of the computed number of the nerve  
8. The relative value of the computed number of the nerve cells in the entire cortex, calculated by the formula A^ X L.F X W.D X T, in the underfed was compared with the corresponding standard value for the same age and the former was found to be only slightly higher than the latter, so that they may be regarded as practically the same. If so, the process of the cell division in the cerebrum must have progressed according to the advancing age, in spite of the starvation.
cells in the entire cortex, calculated by the formula A^ X L.F X  
W.D X T, in the underfed was compared with the corresponding  
standard value for the same age and the former was found to be  
only slightly higher than the latter, so that they may be regarded  
as practically the same. If so, the process of the cell division  
in the cerebrum must have progressed according to the advancing  
age, in spite of the starvation.  


9. The size of the nerve cells was studied on the pyramids in the  
9. The size of the nerve cells was studied on the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis and on the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. The cell body of the pyramids in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller by 11.2 per cent in average diameter and that in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram smaller by 8.3 per cent than the standards for the same age. The corresponding figures for the nuclei of the pj^ramids are 15.3 per cent and 11.0 per cent.
lamina pyramidalis and on the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. The cell body of the pyramids in the underfed brains  
weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller by 11.2 per cent in average  
diameter and that in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram smaller  
by 8.3 per cent than the standards for the same age. The corresponding figures for the nuclei of the pj^ramids are 15.3 per cent  
and 11.0 per cent.  


The cell body of the ganglion cells in the underfed brains  
The cell body of the ganglion cells in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller in average diameter by 11.8 per cent, and that in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram is smaller by 3.1 per cent than the standards for the same age. The corresponding values for the nuclei of the ganglion cells are less by 12.5 per cent and 5.1 per cent, respectively. So, on the average, the nerve cells in the cortex of the underfed of all weights are smaller in average diameter by about 9 per cent (for the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram by about 12 per cent and for those weighing more than 1.0 gram only by about 6 per cent), and consequently smaller in volume by about 25 per cent than the standard cells of the same age. These determinations apply only to the largest cells found at the measured locality.
weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller in average diameter by  
11.8 per cent, and that in the underfed brains weighing more than  
1.0 gram is smaller by 3.1 per cent than the standards for the  
same age. The corresponding values for the nuclei of the ganglion cells are less by 12.5 per cent and 5.1 per cent, respectively.  
So, on the average, the nerve cells in the cortex of the underfed of  
all weights are smaller in average diameter by about 9 per cent  
(for the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram by about  
12 per cent and for those weighing more than 1.0 gram only  
by about 6 per cent), and consequently smaller in volume by  
about 25 per cent than the standard cells of the same age. These  
determinations apply only to the largest cells found at the  
measured locality.  






238 NAOKI SUGITA  
238 NAOKI SUGITA


10. The underfed brains (Series II) contain on the average  
10. The underfed brains (Series II) contain on the average sUghtly (0.48 per cent) more water, if compared with the normal brain of the same age, and somewhat (1.4 per cent) less water, if compared with the normal brain of the same weight. This means probably that, in terms of the percentage of water, the underfed brain is slightly underdeveloped for its age and somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. If the absolute weight of the soHd mass be calculated and compared with the standard for the same brain weight and sex, the solids are found to be somewhat more in the underfed and if the same compared with the standard for the same age and sex the solids are always less in the underfed. The relative value of the alcohol-extractives, obtained by comparing the initial brain weight with its weight after dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure, shows that in the underfed brains the amount of the alcohol-extractives is somewhat smaller than in the normal of the same age.
sUghtly (0.48 per cent) more water, if compared with the normal  
brain of the same age, and somewhat (1.4 per cent) less water, if  
compared with the normal brain of the same weight. This means  
probably that, in terms of the percentage of water, the underfed  
brain is slightly underdeveloped for its age and somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. If the absolute weight of the soHd  
mass be calculated and compared with the standard for the same  
brain weight and sex, the solids are found to be somewhat more  
in the underfed and if the same compared with the standard for  
the same age and sex the solids are always less in the underfed.  
The relative value of the alcohol-extractives, obtained by comparing the initial brain weight with its weight after dehydration  
and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours)  
and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a  
uniform procedure, shows that in the underfed brains the amount  
of the alcohol-extractives is somewhat smaller than in the normal  
of the same age.  


The above observations indicate that in thie underfed the myelination process in the brain is somewhat retarded for the age.  
The above observations indicate that in thie underfed the myelination process in the brain is somewhat retarded for the age. This assumption was supported in a general way by the direct examination on the sections obtained from the underfed brains.
This assumption was supported in a general way by the direct  
examination on the sections obtained from the underfed brains.  


11. Briefly, we conclude that by starvation in the early days  
11. Briefly, we conclude that by starvation in the early days the brain suffers much in its development in toto, but the cell division is going on quite normally according to its age. The growth of the cells in size is retarded and the formation of myelinated fibers somewhat diminished by inanition. So the smaller weight and size of the underfed brain is due to an arrest in the growth and development of the constituent neurons and not to a decrease in their number.
the brain suffers much in its development in toto, but the cell  
division is going on quite normally according to its age. The  
growth of the cells in size is retarded and the formation of myelinated fibers somewhat diminished by inanition. So the smaller  
weight and size of the underfed brain is due to an arrest in the  
growth and development of the constituent neurons and not to a  
decrease in their number.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 239  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 239






LITERATURE CITED  
LITERATURE CITED


Bechterew, W. von 1895 Uber den Einfluss des Hungerns auf die neugeborenen  
Bechterew, W. von 1895 Uber den Einfluss des Hungerns auf die neugeborenen Tiere, insbesondere auf das Gewicht und die Entwicklung des Gehirns. Neurol. Centralbl., Bd. 14, pp. 810-817.
Tiere, insbesondere auf das Gewicht und die Entwicklung des Gehirns.  
Neurol. Centralbl., Bd. 14, pp. 810-817.  


Chossat, Charles 1843 Recherches experimentales sur Tinanition. Memoire  
Chossat, Charles 1843 Recherches experimentales sur Tinanition. Memoire auquel I'Academie des Sciences a decerne en 1841 le prix de physiologie experimentale. Extrait des memoires de I'academie royale des sciences. Tome 8 des savants etrangers. Paris, Imprimiere Royal.
auquel I'Academie des Sciences a decerne en 1841 le prix de physiologie  
experimentale. Extrait des memoires de I'academie royale des sciences.  
Tome 8 des savants etrangers. Paris, Imprimiere Royal.  


Donaldson, H. H. 1911 The effect of underfeeding on the percentage of water,  
Donaldson, H. H. 1911 The effect of underfeeding on the percentage of water, on the ether-alcohol extract, and on medullation in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, no. 2. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology no. 6.
on the ether-alcohol extract, and on medullation in the central nervous  
system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, no. 2. 1915  
The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology  
no. 6.  


Falck, C. p. 1854 Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Wachstumsgeschichte des Tierkorpers. Virchow's Archiv, Bd. 7.  
Falck, C. p. 1854 Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Wachstumsgeschichte des Tierkorpers. Virchow's Archiv, Bd. 7.


Hatai, S. 1904 The effect of partial starvation on the brain of the white rat.  
Hatai, S. 1904 The effect of partial starvation on the brain of the white rat. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 12, no. 1.
Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 12, no. 1.  


1908 Preliminary note on the size and condition of the central nervous  
1908 Preliminary note on the size and condition of the central nervous system in albino rats experimentally stunted. Jour. Comp. Near., vol. 18, no. 2.
system in albino rats experimentally stunted. Jour. Comp. Near.,  
vol. 18, no. 2.  


1915 Growth of the body and organs in albino rats fed with a lipoidfree ration. Anat. Record, vol. 9, pp. 1-20.  
1915 Growth of the body and organs in albino rats fed with a lipoidfree ration. Anat. Record, vol. 9, pp. 1-20.


Jackson, C. M. 1915 a Effect of acute and chronic inanition upon the relative weights of the various organs and systems of adult albino rats.  
Jackson, C. M. 1915 a Effect of acute and chronic inanition upon the relative weights of the various organs and systems of adult albino rats. Amer. Jour. Anat., vol. 18, pp. 75-116.
Amer. Jour. Anat., vol. 18, pp. 75-116.  


1915 b Changes in the relative weights of the various parts, systems  
1915 b Changes in the relative weights of the various parts, systems and organs of young albino rats held at constant body weight by underfeeding for various periods. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 19, pp. 99-156.
and organs of young albino rats held at constant body weight by underfeeding for various periods. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 19, pp. 99-156.  


Lasarew, N. 1895 Zur Lehre von der Veranderung des Gewichts und der  
Lasarew, N. 1895 Zur Lehre von der Veranderung des Gewichts und der zelligen Elemente einiger Organe und Gewebe in verschiedenen Perioden des vollstandigen Hungerns. Dissertation, Wasschau (cited by Miihlmann, '99).
zelligen Elemente einiger Organe und Gewebe in verschiedenen Perioden des vollstandigen Hungerns. Dissertation, Wasschau (cited by  
Miihlmann, '99).  


Morgulis, S. 1911 Studies of inanition in its bearing upon the problem of  
Morgulis, S. 1911 Studies of inanition in its bearing upon the problem of growth. I. Archiv f. Entw., Bd. 32, Heft 2.
growth. I. Archiv f. Entw., Bd. 32, Heft 2.  


MtJHLMANN, M. 1899 Russische Literatur liber die Pathologie des Hungerns  
MtJHLMANN, M. 1899 Russische Literatur liber die Pathologie des Hungerns (der Inanition). Sammelreferat. Centralbl. f. allg. Pathologie, Bd.
(der Inanition). Sammelreferat. Centralbl. f. allg. Pathologie, Bd.  


10, pp. 160-220; 240-242.  
10, pp. 160-220; 240-242.


SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3. 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the  
postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol.  
28, no. 3.  
1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  


11. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the  
11. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.
postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol.  
28, no. 3.  






240 NAOKI SUGITA  
240 NAOKI SUGITA


1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus  
IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness  
in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.  


1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a  
V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections, of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.
unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections, of the albino  
rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to  
the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the  
number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal  
sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared  
with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur.,  
vol. 29, no. 2.  


1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


VI. Part I. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes  
VI. Part I. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.
of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the  
growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve  
cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp.  
Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.  


VoiT, Carl 1866 t'ber die Verschiedenheiten der Eiweisszersetzung beira  
VoiT, Carl 1866 t'ber die Verschiedenheiten der Eiweisszersetzung beira


Hungern. Zeitschrift fiir Biologie, Bd. 2.  
Hungern. Zeitschrift fiir Biologie, Bd. 2. Watson, John B. 1903 Animal education. Con. from the Psychol. Lab.
Watson, John B. 1903 Animal education. Con. from the Psychol. Lab.  


Univ. of Chicago, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. .5-122.  
Univ. of Chicago, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. .5-122.






ADTHOR S ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER ISSUED  
ADTHOR S ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 30
BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 30  






COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE  
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
CEREBRAL CORTEX  


VIII. GENERAL REVIEW OF DATA FOR THE THICKNESS OF THE  
VIII. GENERAL REVIEW OF DATA FOR THE THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX AND THE SIZE OF THE CORTICAL CELLS IN SEVERAL MAMMALS, TOGETHER WITH SOME POSTNATAL GROWTH CHANGES IN THESE STRUCTURES
CEREBRAL CORTEX AND THE SIZE OF THE CORTICAL CELLS IN  
SEVERAL MAMMALS, TOGETHER WITH SOME POSTNATAL GROWTH  
CHANGES IN THESE STRUCTURES  


NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA


From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology  
From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology


THREE FIGURES AND TWO CHARTS  
THREE FIGURES AND TWO CHARTS


I. INTRODUCTION  
I. INTRODUCTION


Years ago Schwalbe ('81) pointed out as characteristic somatic  
Years ago Schwalbe ('81) pointed out as characteristic somatic expressions, which might be taken to indicate the grade of intelhgence of a species of animals, the following four measurements on the brain: 1) total weight of the brain; 2) total number of nerve cells in the brain; 3) total area of the surface of the hemispheres of the brain, and 4) the thickness of the cerebral cortex. Since then he and many other neurologists have endeavored to gather data on the morphological evidence for the development of mental ability. Donaldson and Hatai ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15) have made systematic observations on the growth changes in the central nervous system as well as in other organs and systems, using exclusively the albino rat. As a result of their investigations, the postnatal growth of the brain and the spinal cord, in gross measurements, and the relations of these to the other systems during growth have been determined. In line with these studies, I also made further researches on the growth in the thickness of the cerebral cortex, the size and shape of the cortical nerve cells and the relative number of the cortical cells in both the Norway and albino rats. The results of these researches have been already presented (Sugita, '17,, '17 a, '18, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c, '18 d), with references
expressions, which might be taken to indicate the grade of intelhgence of a species of animals, the following four measurements on the brain: 1) total weight of the brain; 2) total number of nerve cells in the brain; 3) total area of the surface of the  
hemispheres of the brain, and 4) the thickness of the cerebral  
cortex. Since then he and many other neurologists have endeavored to gather data on the morphological evidence for the  
development of mental ability. Donaldson and Hatai ('The  
Rat,' Donaldson, '15) have made systematic observations on  
the growth changes in the central nervous system as well as in  
other organs and systems, using exclusively the albino rat. As  
a result of their investigations, the postnatal growth of the brain  
and the spinal cord, in gross measurements, and the relations of  
these to the other systems during growth have been determined. In line with these studies, I also made further researches on the growth in the thickness of the cerebral cortex,  
the size and shape of the cortical nerve cells and the relative  
number of the cortical cells in both the Norway and albino rats.  
The results of these researches have been already presented  
(Sugita, '17,, '17 a, '18, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c, '18 d), with references  


241  
241


THE JODRNAI, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3  
THE JODRNAI, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3






242 NAOKI SUGITA  
242 NAOKI SUGITA


to some similar studies by other authors. These data give us a  
to some similar studies by other authors. These data give us a general idea of the postnatal development of the cerebral cortex in a representative mammal (albino rat), and we may fairly infer that similar changes occur in other mammals during the growth of the brain. To test how^ far my conclusions on the mode of the development of the cerebral elements during postnatal life may be extended, I shall review and summarize in the present paper the results obtained by several authors on the development of the cortex in other mammals and make a comparison of their results with the data obtained by me.
general idea of the postnatal development of the cerebral cortex  
in a representative mammal (albino rat), and we may fairly  
infer that similar changes occur in other mammals during the  
growth of the brain. To test how^ far my conclusions on the  
mode of the development of the cerebral elements during postnatal life may be extended, I shall review and summarize in the  
present paper the results obtained by several authors on the  
development of the cortex in other mammals and make a comparison of their results with the data obtained by me.  


II. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN THE ALBINO RAT  
II. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN THE ALBINO RAT


The results obtained by me regarding the cortical thickness  
The results obtained by me regarding the cortical thickness in the brain of the albino rat may be summarzed as follows (Sugita, '17 a):
in the brain of the albino rat may be summarzed as follows  
(Sugita, '17 a):  


1. The cortex at the frontal pole of the hemisphere is the  
1. The cortex at the frontal pole of the hemisphere is the thickest and that at the occipital pole is the thinnest. Speaking in general terms, the cortex diminishes in thickness from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect.
thickest and that at the occipital pole is the thinnest. Speaking  
in general terms, the cortex diminishes in thickness from the  
frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral  
aspect.  


2. After birth, the general average of the cortical thickness  
2. After birth, the general average of the cortical thickness increases very rapidly during the first ten days, thickening from 0.74 mm. at birth to 1.73 mm. at ten days, more than twice the thickness at birth, while the brain weight increases from 0.25 gram to 0.95 gram during the same period. This is designated by me the first phase of the cortical development.
increases very rapidly during the first ten days, thickening from  
0.74 mm. at birth to 1.73 mm. at ten days, more than twice the  
thickness at birth, while the brain weight increases from 0.25  
gram to 0.95 gram during the same period. This is designated  
by me the first phase of the cortical development.  


3. Between the tenth and the tw^entieth day after birth, the  
3. Between the tenth and the tw^entieth day after birth, the cortical thickness increases more slowly, attaining at twenty days to within 4 per cent of the full thickness of the cortex, namely, 1.84 mm., or about 2.5 times the thickness at birth, while the brain weight increases to 1.15 grams. This is designated the second phase of the cortical development.
cortical thickness increases more slowly, attaining at twenty  
days to within 4 per cent of the full thickness of the cortex,  
namely, 1.84 mm., or about 2.5 times the thickness at birth,  
while the brain weight increases to 1.15 grams. This is designated the second phase of the cortical development.  


4. From the twentieth to the ninetieth day, the cortical thickness increases but little on the average, attaining at ninety days  
4. From the twentieth to the ninetieth day, the cortical thickness increases but little on the average, attaining at ninety days the thickness of 1.93 mm., or 2.6 times the thickness at birth, w^hile the brain weight has increased to about 1.80 grams. This is designated the third phase of the cortical development.
the thickness of 1.93 mm., or 2.6 times the thickness at birth,  
w^hile the brain weight has increased to about 1.80 grams. This  
is designated the third phase of the cortical development.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 243  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 243


After the ninetieth day, there is no significant change in the  
After the ninetieth day, there is no significant change in the thickness of the cortex, but the area of the cortex increases as the brain weight rises and at 2.0 grams is greater than at 1.15 grams (20 days) by about 45 per cent.
thickness of the cortex, but the area of the cortex increases as the  
brain weight rises and at 2.0 grams is greater than at 1.15 grams  
(20 days) by about 45 per cent.  


5. In the first phase the cortex increases its thickness by receiving some newly formed cells from the matrix and many  
5. In the first phase the cortex increases its thickness by receiving some newly formed cells from the matrix and many already formed from the transitional layers and at the same time by the general enlargement of the neurons, especia ly the cell bodies; in the second phase, however, it grows main'y by the enlargement of the cell bodies and the growth of the axons and dendrites; while during the third phase it thickens only slightly, but extends in area as the result of the ingrowing axons and the formation of the myelin sheaths and non-nervous structures.
already formed from the transitional layers and at the same time  
by the general enlargement of the neurons, especia ly the cell  
bodies; in the second phase, however, it grows main'y by the  
enlargement of the cell bodies and the growth of the axons and  
dendrites; while during the third phase it thickens only slightly,  
but extends in area as the result of the ingrowing axons and the  
formation of the myelin sheaths and non-nervous structures.  


6. The cortex at the frontal pole increases its thickness very  
6. The cortex at the frontal pole increases its thickness very rapidly and steadily, continuing to do this even after the end of the second phase, while at all the other localities the cortex thickens in the same proportion, so that at the end of the second phase all the localities reach nearly the full thickness, but maintain their initial relations. The localities heterogeneous in their cell lamination show in the course of thickening some deviation from the localities which are typical.
rapidly and steadily, continuing to do this even after the end  
of the second phase, while at all the other localities the cortex  
thickens in the same proportion, so that at the end of the second  
phase all the localities reach nearly the full thickness, but maintain their initial relations. The localities heterogeneous in their  
cell lamination show in the course of thickening some deviation  
from the localities which are typical.  


7. The cortex generally attains nearly its full thickness before  
7. The cortex generally attains nearly its full thickness before myelination, as shown by the Weigert staining method, occurs in it. In the Albino, the cortex has nearly its mature thickness at twenty days, just before the young rat is weaned and when the brain has attained only a trifle more than half its final weight. The growth of the cortex in thickness is therefore precocious.
myelination, as shown by the Weigert staining method, occurs  
in it. In the Albino, the cortex has nearly its mature thickness  
at twenty days, just before the young rat is weaned and when  
the brain has attained only a trifle more than half its final  
weight. The growth of the cortex in thickness is therefore  
precocious.  


III. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING GROWTH OF THE  
III. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING GROWTH OF THE BRAINS OF THE MOUSE AND THE GUINEA-PIG
BRAINS OF THE MOUSE AND THE GUINEA-PIG  


Mouse. Isenschmid ('11) has made a study of the cortical  
Mouse. Isenschmid ('11) has made a study of the cortical cell lamination in the brain of the mouse and given a map of the topographic localization in the hemisphere, which is reproduced here as figure 1. De Vries ('12) and Rose ('12) have also presented a brain map of the mouse according to their studies on the cell architecture of the cortex ; a map which resembles that
cell lamination in the brain of the mouse and given a map of the  
topographic localization in the hemisphere, which is reproduced here as figure 1. De Vries ('12) and Rose ('12) have also  
presented a brain map of the mouse according to their studies  
on the cell architecture of the cortex ; a map which resembles that  






244  
244






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA








[k  
[k




\  
\




[■\ \w\  
[■\ \w\




"^^l \  
"^^l \




w  
w








\\ '\  
\\ '\




^•rm.  
^•rm.




/ ^  
/ ^








1 i \  
1 i \




---~M°  
---~M°








e  
e




/ i- "  
/ i- "




^•^ oa|?  
^•^ oa|?




V,  
V,




^  
^




/.--■■' ,'V  
/.--■■' ,'V




rA^  
rA^






— f  
— f






Fig. 1 Cortical area of the mouse (Mus musculus) — reproduced from the  
Fig. 1 Cortical area of the mouse (Mus musculus) — reproduced from the original by Isenschmid ('11); the thickness of the cortex at each area designated on the map is tabulated in table 1 of this paper. Double lines show borders of three — the dorsolateral, the frontomedial, and the suboccipital — regions of the neopallium. Shaded parts (areas t, s, and h) do not lie in the same (median) plane as the other areas. A = Dorsal view of the right hemisphere; B = Lateral view of the right hemisphere; C = Medial view of the right hemisphere. B.olf. = Bulbus olfactorius; C = Corpus callosum; c.A. = Cornu Ammonis; cl. = Claustrum; s.;?. = Septum pellucidum. s — s' = the level corresponding to that from which the sagittal sections of the Albino brain were taken by me; /— /' = the evel corresponding to that from which the frontal sections of the Albino brain were taken by me; h — h' = the level corresponding to that from which the horizontal sections of the Albino were taken by me.
original by Isenschmid ('11); the thickness of the cortex at each area designated on the map is tabulated in table 1 of this paper. Double lines  
show borders of three — the dorsolateral, the frontomedial, and the suboccipital —  
regions of the neopallium. Shaded parts (areas t, s, and h) do not lie in the same  
(median) plane as the other areas. A = Dorsal view of the right hemisphere;  
B = Lateral view of the right hemisphere; C = Medial view of the right hemisphere. B.olf. = Bulbus olfactorius; C = Corpus callosum; c.A. = Cornu Ammonis; cl. = Claustrum; s.;?. = Septum pellucidum. s — s' = the level corresponding to that from which the sagittal sections of the Albino brain were  
taken by me; /— /' = the evel corresponding to that from which the frontal  
sections of the Albino brain were taken by me; h — h' = the level corresponding  
to that from which the horizontal sections of the Albino were taken by me.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






245  
245






TABLE 1  
TABLE 1 Giving for each localiUj of the brain of the adult mouse the characteristics of the cell lamination, the thickness of the cortex on the slide as deterinined from the photograms given by Isenschmid {'11), and the relative thickness of the outer and inner layers as presented by the same author. For the localities consult figure 1 in this paper, which was reproduced from the original of Isenschmid {'11)
Giving for each localiUj of the brain of the adult mouse the characteristics of the  
cell lamination, the thickness of the cortex on the slide as deterinined from the  
photograms given by Isenschmid {'11), and the relative thickness of the outer and  
inner layers as presented by the same author. For the localities consult figure 1  
in this paper, which was reproduced from the original of Isenschmid {'11)  






AKEA  
AKEA


(fig. 1)  
(fig. 1)






CHARACTERISTICS OF. THE AREA IN CELL-LAMINATION  
CHARACTERISTICS OF. THE AREA IN CELL-LAMINATION






e  
e


f  
f


i  
i


k  
k


1  
1


m  
m


r  
r


q  
q


s  
s t
t  






Largest ganglion cells contained (18 X 20 m)-
Largest ganglion cells contained (18 X 20 m)- Not so large cells
Not so large cells  


IV layer thick  
IV layer thick


Transitional part  
Transitional part


Paleopallium  
Paleopallium


IV layer not so well developed  
IV layer not so well developed


Adjoins to fovea limbica, cell lamination not  
Adjoins to fovea limbica, cell lamination not clear
clear  


Transitional part (ganglion cells: 13 X 15 m)At the corner (ganglion cells: 12 X 14 /u)  
Transitional part (ganglion cells: 13 X 15 m)At the corner (ganglion cells: 12 X 14 /u)


(Ganglion cells : 15 X 18 m)  
(Ganglion cells : 15 X 18 m)


Similar to area q  
Similar to area q






THICKNESS OF  
THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX
THE CORTEX  






0.73  
0.73


0.86  
0.86 0.50 0.53
0.50  
0.53  






0.62  
0.62 0.44 0.81 0.78 0.71-0.61 1.201 0.56 0.26 0.34
0.44  
0.81  
0.78  
0.71-0.61  
1.201  
0.56  
0.26  
0.34  






RELATIVE  
RELATIVE


THICKNESS OF  
THICKNESS OF


THE OUTER AND  
THE OUTER AND


INNER LAYERS  
INNER LAYERS


OF THE  
OF THE


CORTEX  
CORTEX


outer: inner'  
outer: inner'






48:52  
48:52


45:55  
45:55 45:55 45:55
45:55  
45:55  






42:58  
42:58






34:66  
34:66 23:77
23:77  


22:78  
22:78 28:72
28:72  






1 Section cut obliquely.  
1 Section cut obliquely.


^ The outer layer = the lamina granularis externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granularis interna. The inner layer = the lamina  
^ The outer layer = the lamina granularis externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granularis interna. The inner layer = the lamina ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis.
ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis.  


of Isenschmid. Isenschmid ('11) has recorded the thickness  
of Isenschmid. Isenschmid ('11) has recorded the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the mouse on the sHde at every locahty mapped in his figure (fig. 1). But the actual thickness not being given explicitly for each locality, I calculated the values from the direct measurements made on the photograms. The brain was fixed in alcohol, imbedded in paraffine and cut in 10-micra sections and stained with kresyl- violet. The thicknesses of the cortex on the slide as thus obtained are given for each locality in table 1 and also are condensed in table 2, in which the data
of the cerebral cortex of the mouse on the sHde at every locahty  
mapped in his figure (fig. 1). But the actual thickness not being  
given explicitly for each locality, I calculated the values from  
the direct measurements made on the photograms. The brain  
was fixed in alcohol, imbedded in paraffine and cut in 10-micra  
sections and stained with kresyl- violet. The thicknesses of the  
cortex on the slide as thus obtained are given for each locality  
in table 1 and also are condensed in table 2, in which the data  






246  
246






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 2  
TABLE 2


A com'parison of the thicknesses of the cerebral cortex at several corresponding  
A com'parison of the thicknesses of the cerebral cortex at several corresponding localities in the albino rat and in the mouse. The data for the albino rat were taken from table 11 in ?ny previous paper (Sugita, '17 a, p. 578) and the data for the mouse were taken from a paper by Isenschmid {'11). The order of increasing thickness is the same in both animals
localities in the albino rat and in the mouse. The data for the albino rat were taken  
from table 11 in ?ny previous paper (Sugita, '17 a, p. 578) and the data for the  
mouse were taken from a paper by Isenschmid {'11). The order of increasing  
thickness is the same in both animals  






ALBINO RAT  
ALBINO RAT




MOUSE  
MOUSE




Locality  
Locality




Average  
Average


thickness of  
thickness of


cortex by  
cortex by


locality  
locality




Corresponding locality  
Corresponding locality




Thickness of cortex at  
Thickness of cortex at each of the localities
each of the localities  




Average  
Average


thickness of  
thickness of


cortex by  
cortex by


locality  
locality








mm .  
mm .








mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




V and XIII  
V and XIII




1.24  
1.24




C  
C




0.50  
0.50




0.50  
0.50




IV  
IV




1.42  
1.42




d  
d




0.53  
0.53




0.53  
0.53




XII and VIII  
XII and VIII




1.67  
1.67




e and i  
e and i




0.65 and 0.44  
0.65 and 0.44




0.55  
0.55




III and XI  
III and XI




1.91  
1.91




a and e  
a and e




0.73 and 0.65  
0.73 and 0.65




0.69  
0.69




VI  
VI




2 01  
2 01




1 (corner)  
1 (corner)




0.78  
0.78




0.78  
0.78




II and X  
II and X




2.03  
2.03




k and b  
k and b




0.81 and 0.86  
0.81 and 0.86




0.84  
0.84




VII  
VII




2.29  
2.29




b  
b




0.86  
0.86




0.86  
0.86




I and IX  
I and IX




2.99  
2.99




frontal pole  
frontal pole




1.00  
1.00




1.00  
1.00




Average  
Average




1.94  
1.94




Average  
Average




0.72  
0.72




Line 64,661: Line 59,321:




for the Albino are so entered that the cortical thicknesses at the  
for the Albino are so entered that the cortical thicknesses at the corresponding localities in the two forms may be compared. The order of the localities is arranged according to the increasing thickness in the Albino (taken from table 11, Sugita, '17 a, p. 578). The average value of the cortical thickness in the mouse is, on the slide, 0.72 mm., and if corrected to the fresh condition would probably be somewhat thinner than one-half the average thickness of the Albino cortex. The order of the thickness according to localities is quite the same, so that in both forms the cortical thickness decreases from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect. Moreover, the cortex at the frontal pole is the thickest and has double the thickness of that at the occipital pole.
corresponding localities in the two forms may be compared.  
The order of the localities is arranged according to the increasing  
thickness in the Albino (taken from table 11, Sugita, '17 a, p.  
578). The average value of the cortical thickness in the mouse  
is, on the slide, 0.72 mm., and if corrected to the fresh condition  
would probably be somewhat thinner than one-half the average  
thickness of the Albino cortex. The order of the thickness according to localities is quite the same, so that in both forms the  
cortical thickness decreases from the frontal to the occipital  
pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect. Moreover, the  
cortex at the frontal pole is the thickest and has double the thickness of that at the occipital pole.  


As seen in figure 1, the cerebral hemisphere is divided by Isenschmid into three main regions — the dorsolateral, frontomedial  
As seen in figure 1, the cerebral hemisphere is divided by Isenschmid into three main regions — the dorsolateral, frontomedial and suboccipital regions — separated by the double line in figure 1.
and suboccipital regions — separated by the double line in figure 1.  


The average cortical thickness in the dorsolateral region  
The average cortical thickness in the dorsolateral region (fig. 1 a) is 0.56 mm. at its hinder-medial part and 0.90 mm.
(fig. 1 a) is 0.56 mm. at its hinder-medial part and 0.90 mm.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






247  
247






at its fore-lateral part, and in this region the lamina zonalis is  
at its fore-lateral part, and in this region the lamina zonalis is about one-twelfth, the main outer layers (the lamina granulans externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granulans interna) about two-fifths and the main inner layers (the lamina ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis) about one-half the total thickness of the cortex. In the frontomedial region (fig. 1 c) the cortical thickness at the frontal pole is 1.00 mm. and that at the caudal part is 0.35 mm., while in the suboccipital region the cortical thickness ranges between 0.2 and 0.3 mm.
about one-twelfth, the main outer layers (the lamina granulans  
externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granulans  
interna) about two-fifths and the main inner layers (the lamina  
ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis) about one-half the  
total thickness of the cortex. In the frontomedial region (fig.  
1 c) the cortical thickness at the frontal pole is 1.00 mm. and  
that at the caudal part is 0.35 mm., while in the suboccipital  
region the cortical thickness ranges between 0.2 and 0.3 mm.  




Line 64,704: Line 59,344:




o o  
o o








I  
I II
II  


in  
in


IV  
IV






vr  
vr






B 3J^4 6 7% 3Va \Va 17 M  
B 3J^4 6 7% 3Va \Va 17 M


Fig. 2 Showing diagrammatically the thickness of the cerebral cortex at locality a in the mouse at different ages. Reproduced from the original given by  
Fig. 2 Showing diagrammatically the thickness of the cerebral cortex at locality a in the mouse at different ages. Reproduced from the original given by Isenschmid ('11). B = at birth. M = at maturity. The other arable numbers show the age in days. I = lamina zonalis; II = lamina granularis externa; III = lamina pyramidalis; IV = lamina granularis interna; V = lamina ganglionaris; VI = lamina multiformis. The cell outlines found between the last two diagrams indicate the relative size and shape of the cells in each cortical layer.
Isenschmid ('11). B = at birth. M = at maturity. The other arable numbers show the age in days. I = lamina zonalis; II = lamina granularis externa;  
III = lamina pyramidalis; IV = lamina granularis interna; V = lamina ganglionaris; VI = lamina multiformis. The cell outlines found between the last  
two diagrams indicate the relative size and shape of the cells in each cortical  
layer.  


Isenschmid has given also diagrams illustrating the growth in  
Isenschmid has given also diagrams illustrating the growth in cortical thickness at locality 'a' (fig. 1 a, corresponding approximately to locality III in my study, fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a, p. 525), sampled from material at several different ages and magnified uniformly. These are also reproduced here as figure 2. The diagrams show that as age advances the lamina pyramidalis (II and III) thickens steadily and continuously while the lamina
cortical thickness at locality 'a' (fig. 1 a, corresponding approximately to locality III in my study, fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a, p. 525),  
sampled from material at several different ages and magnified  
uniformly. These are also reproduced here as figure 2. The  
diagrams show that as age advances the lamina pyramidalis  
(II and III) thickens steadily and continuously while the lamina  






248  
248






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






ganglionaris (V) and especially the lamina multiformis (VI)  
ganglionaris (V) and especially the lamina multiformis (VI) grow much less rapidly. Chart 1 gives a comparison of the increase in the cortical thickness at corresponding localities (locality 'a' of the mouse and locality III of the albino rat) in the albino rat and the mouse, the data being from Isenschmid ('11) and Sugita ('17 a). In the Albino the cortex attains nearly its full thickness at twenty days (weaning time), while in the mouse this stage was reached between twelve and seventeen days of age, very closely corresponding to the weaning time of
grow much less rapidly. Chart 1 gives a comparison of the increase in the cortical thickness at corresponding localities (locality 'a' of the mouse and locality III of the albino rat) in the  
albino rat and the mouse, the data being from Isenschmid ('11)  
and Sugita ('17 a). In the Albino the cortex attains nearly its  
full thickness at twenty days (weaning time), while in the  
mouse this stage was reached between twelve and seventeen  
days of age, very closely corresponding to the weaning time of  






mm.  
mm. 2.0r
2.0r  


18  
18


16  
16


lA  
lA


J.2  
J.2


1.0  
1.0


0.8  
0.8


0.6  
0.6


0.4  
0.4


Q2  
Q2




Line 64,810: Line 59,433:




1  
1




Line 64,842: Line 59,465:




■ —  
■ —




.  
.








AlbinocortexJocIH.  
AlbinocortexJocIH.




Line 64,863: Line 59,486:




J  
J




/^  
/^




Line 64,903: Line 59,526:




/  
/




Line 64,940: Line 59,563:




\/  
\/




Line 64,975: Line 59,598:




/  
/




/  
/




Line 65,015: Line 59,638:




/  
/




Line 65,058: Line 59,681:




^^  
^^








-^  
-^




Line 65,092: Line 59,715:




-^  
-^




Line 65,168: Line 59,791:




B 2, 4 6 8 iO 12 14 16 18 20 22 24- 26 28 30 AgeindaysL  
B 2, 4 6 8 iO 12 14 16 18 20 22 24- 26 28 30 AgeindaysL






Chart 1 Giving the cortical thickness of the albino rat and of the mouse according to age. The data for the albino rat are taken from Sugita ('17 a) at  
Chart 1 Giving the cortical thickness of the albino rat and of the mouse according to age. The data for the albino rat are taken from Sugita ('17 a) at locality III measured on the sagittal section and the data for the mouse are taken from Isenschmid ('11) at locality 'a.' These two localities approximately correspond.
locality III measured on the sagittal section and the data for the mouse are  
taken from Isenschmid ('11) at locality 'a.' These two localities approximately  
correspond.  


the mouse, which is fifteen days. The remarkable phase during  
the mouse, which is fifteen days. The remarkable phase during which the rapid increase in cortical thickness takes place in the Albino (first ten days after birth) cannot be clearly identified on the graph for the mouse cortex. It must be recalled, however, that data on the mouse cortex have not been corrected for the action of the reagents, while the data for the rat have been so corrected. The outstanding fact, however, is that the cerebral cortex in both forms attains nearly its full thickness just before the weaning time.
which the rapid increase in cortical thickness takes place in the  
Albino (first ten days after birth) cannot be clearly identified  
on the graph for the mouse cortex. It must be recalled, however, that data on the mouse cortex have not been corrected for  
the action of the reagents, while the data for the rat have been so  
corrected. The outstanding fact, however, is that the cerebral  
cortex in both forms attains nearly its full thickness just before  
the weaning time.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 249  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 249


Guinea-pig. I have had the opportunity at The Wistar Institute to examine the sections of the guinea-pig brains prepared  
Guinea-pig. I have had the opportunity at The Wistar Institute to examine the sections of the guinea-pig brains prepared by Allen ('04) for her study on the myelination of the nervous system of that animal. The sections were cut in series in the frontal plane from material fixed in Miiller's fluid, imbedded in celloidin and stained by Weigert's method for the myelin sheaths. The thickness of the cerebral cortex in the adult guinea-pig (body weight, 618 grams; brain weight not recorded) is on the average 1.90 mm. (1.80 mm., 1.88 mm,, and 2.01 mm., respectively, at the localities corresponding to localities VI, VII, and VIII examined by me on the frontal section of the Albino brain at the level of the commissura anterior). The corresponding measurements at birth (body weight, 108 grams) are 1.71 mm. (and 1.51 mm., 1.75 mm., and 1.86 mm., respectively) and those at thirty-five days (body weight, 250 grams) are 1.85 mm. (and 1.77 mm., 1.86 mm., and 1.92 mm., respectively). So, from birth on to the maturity, the cortical thickness has on the average increased only 11 per cent. According to Allen, the guineapig at birth is covered with hair, has complete muscular development, and is almost independent of the mother, the central nervous system being practically completely myelinated, whereas, by contrast, the albino rat is born quite naked, extremely helpless and undeveloped, and myelination in the brain has not begun. The guinea-pig is psychically mature soon after birth (three days after birth) ; the degree of development of the central nervous system of the new-born guinea-pig corresponds to that of the albino rat at twenty-three to twenty-seven days or its period of first psychical maturity. A new-born guinea-pig is fobnd to have a cerebral cortex in which the myelination is going on.
by Allen ('04) for her study on the myelination of the nervous  
system of that animal. The sections were cut in series in the  
frontal plane from material fixed in Miiller's fluid, imbedded in  
celloidin and stained by Weigert's method for the myelin sheaths.  
The thickness of the cerebral cortex in the adult guinea-pig  
(body weight, 618 grams; brain weight not recorded) is on the  
average 1.90 mm. (1.80 mm., 1.88 mm,, and 2.01 mm., respectively, at the localities corresponding to localities VI, VII, and  
VIII examined by me on the frontal section of the Albino brain  
at the level of the commissura anterior). The corresponding  
measurements at birth (body weight, 108 grams) are 1.71 mm.  
(and 1.51 mm., 1.75 mm., and 1.86 mm., respectively) and those  
at thirty-five days (body weight, 250 grams) are 1.85 mm. (and  
1.77 mm., 1.86 mm., and 1.92 mm., respectively). So, from  
birth on to the maturity, the cortical thickness has on the average increased only 11 per cent. According to Allen, the guineapig at birth is covered with hair, has complete muscular development, and is almost independent of the mother, the central  
nervous system being practically completely myelinated, whereas,  
by contrast, the albino rat is born quite naked, extremely helpless and undeveloped, and myelination in the brain has not begun. The guinea-pig is psychically mature soon after birth  
(three days after birth) ; the degree of development of the central nervous system of the new-born guinea-pig corresponds to  
that of the albino rat at twenty-three to twenty-seven days or  
its period of first psychical maturity. A new-born guinea-pig  
is fobnd to have a cerebral cortex in which the myelination is  
going on.  


Comparing the sections from the guinea-pig brain with those  
Comparing the sections from the guinea-pig brain with those from the albino rat brain, it appears that the new-born guinea-pig corresponds to the albino rat of about ten days in cortical thickness, but seems to be older when judged by the myelination of the cortex. This coincides with observation that the guineapig is, almost from the start, relatively independent of the mother.
from the albino rat brain, it appears that the new-born guinea-pig  
corresponds to the albino rat of about ten days in cortical thickness, but seems to be older when judged by the myelination of  
the cortex. This coincides with observation that the guineapig is, almost from the start, relatively independent of the  
mother.  






250 NAOKI SUGITA  
250 NAOKI SUGITA


IV. THE CORTICAL THICKNESS AT SEVERAL LOCALITIES IN THE  
IV. THE CORTICAL THICKNESS AT SEVERAL LOCALITIES IN THE BRAINS OF SOME MAMMALS OTHER THAN THE RAT
BRAINS OF SOME MAMMALS OTHER THAN THE RAT  


Few papers have been published regarding the differences in  
Few papers have been published regarding the differences in the thickness of the cerebral cortex at given localities of the brain in mammals other than the rat, except for man. Yet even in these cases, the techniques of hardening, imbedding, and staining used by the different authors are dissimilar and their results are accordingly not precisely comparable. Despite this, however, it has seemed worth while to make a survey of the data at hand.
the thickness of the cerebral cortex at given localities of the brain  
in mammals other than the rat, except for man. Yet even in  
these cases, the techniques of hardening, imbedding, and staining  
used by the different authors are dissimilar and their results are  
accordingly not precisely comparable. Despite this, however, it  
has seemed worth while to make a survey of the data at hand.  


Rabbit. Bevan Lewis (^81) has given as the natural thickness^  
Rabbit. Bevan Lewis (^81) has given as the natural thickness^ of the cerebral cortex of the adult rabbit the following figures (table 3) according to localities. For the localities, the map made by him and reproduced by me in a previous paper (Sugita, '17 a, fig. 10, p. 544) should be here consulted. He has presented the thicknesses of every layer of the cortex separately, but here only the total cortical thicknesses, as computed by me from his data, are given in round numbers.
of the cerebral cortex of the adult rabbit the following figures  
(table 3) according to localities. For the localities, the map  
made by him and reproduced by me in a previous paper (Sugita,  
'17 a, fig. 10, p. 544) should be here consulted. He has presented the thicknesses of every layer of the cortex separately,  
but here only the total cortical thicknesses, as computed by me  
from his data, are given in round numbers.  


Pig. Lewis ('79) has also determined the cortical thickness  
Pig. Lewis ('79) has also determined the cortical thickness at several localities in the pig brain (the names of the localities
at several localities in the pig brain (the names of the localities  


TABLE 3  
TABLE 3


The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the rabbit, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'81)  
The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the rabbit, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'81)


Depth of cortex on a plane with genu of corpus callosum :  
Depth of cortex on a plane with genu of corpus callosum :


mm.  
mm.


Gyrus fornicatus 1.72  
Gyrus fornicatus 1.72


Sagittal angle 2.23  
Sagittal angle 2.23


Extra-limbic 2.81  
Extra-limbic 2.81


Near limbic sulcus 2.31  
Near limbic sulcus 2.31


Depth of cortex on a jilane with posterior border of corpus eallosum:  
Depth of cortex on a jilane with posterior border of corpus eallosum:


Gyrus fornicatus 1 . 70  
Gyrus fornicatus 1 . 70


Sagittal angle 1.91  
Sagittal angle 1.91


Extra-limbic 2 . 46  
Extra-limbic 2 . 46


Depth of cortex of the modified lower limbic t3'pe 2.23 to 2.47  
Depth of cortex of the modified lower limbic t3'pe 2.23 to 2.47


Depth of cortex in the cornu Ammonis:  
Depth of cortex in the cornu Ammonis:


Anterior regions 2 . 27  
Anterior regions 2 . 27


Average at six different sites 2 . 23  
Average at six different sites 2 . 23


1 Lewis measured the cortical thickness on sections cut by the freezing microtome from fresh material and then hardened by osmic acid, stained by aniline  
1 Lewis measured the cortical thickness on sections cut by the freezing microtome from fresh material and then hardened by osmic acid, stained by aniline black and mounted in Canada balsam. According to his statement we obtain, by this method, the natural depth o"" the cortex, no shrinkage occurring if the preparations have been carefully made (Lewis, '78).
black and mounted in Canada balsam. According to his statement we obtain,  
by this method, the natural depth o"" the cortex, no shrinkage occurring if the  
preparations have been carefully made (Lewis, '78).  






Limbic lobe <  
Limbic lobe <






Upper parietal convolutions <  
Upper parietal convolutions <






Lower parietal convolutions.  
Lower parietal convolutions.






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 251  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 251


TABLE 4  
TABLE 4


The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the pig, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'79)  
The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the pig, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'79)


Depth of cortex from before backward:  
Depth of cortex from before backward:


mm.  
mm.


'4.97  
'4.97 4.48 3.70 4.98 3.53 3.77
4.48  
3.70  
4.98  
3.53  
3.77  


Average 4.22  
Average 4.22


fa. 28  
fa. 28 2.65 3.08 3.91 4.23 3.44
2.65  
3.08  
3.91  
4.23  
3.44  


Average 3 .50  
Average 3 .50


■3.44  
■3.44 3.91 3.95 3.35 3.02 3.67
3.91  
3.95  
3.35  
3.02  
3.67  


Average 3.64  
Average 3.64


are analogous to those given for the rabbit brain, loc. cit.)- His  
are analogous to those given for the rabbit brain, loc. cit.)- His results are summarized in table 4. These values are distinctly high compared with those for other mammals, as shown in the various tables in this paper. These results taken together with those for the rabbit just given, which are also noticeably high, suggest that the determination by Lewis are for some reason systematically too high.
results are summarized in table 4. These values are distinctly  
high compared with those for other mammals, as shown in the  
various tables in this paper. These results taken together with  
those for the rabbit just given, which are also noticeably high,  
suggest that the determination by Lewis are for some reason  
systematically too high.  


Marsupials to man. Table 5 is quoted (slightly modified)  
Marsupials to man. Table 5 is quoted (slightly modified) from Brodmann ('09) and gives for several species of mammals, including man, the cortical thickness at six localities (areae precentralis, frontalis, parietalis, occipitaUs, hippocampica et retrosplenialis) in the brain of each animal. The sections were made by hardening the material in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedding in paraffine, and staining by the modified Nissl's method, and the cortical thickness was measured by the micrometer directly on the slide. The average thickness was calculated by me for the four areas, excluding the areae hippocampica et retrosplenialis which are heterogeneous in cell lamination.
from Brodmann ('09) and gives for several species of mammals,  
including man, the cortical thickness at six localities (areae  
precentralis, frontalis, parietalis, occipitaUs, hippocampica et  
retrosplenialis) in the brain of each animal. The sections were  
made by hardening the material in 4 per cent formaldehyde,  
imbedding in paraffine, and staining by the modified Nissl's  
method, and the cortical thickness was measured by the micrometer directly on the slide. The average thickness was calculated  
by me for the four areas, excluding the areae hippocampica et  
retrosplenialis which are heterogeneous in cell lamination.  






252  
252






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 5  
TABLE 5


The cortical thickness at the corresponding parts of the cerebral hemisphere in different mammals, quoted from Brodmann i'09). According to his nomenclature,  
The cortical thickness at the corresponding parts of the cerebral hemisphere in different mammals, quoted from Brodmann i'09). According to his nomenclature, area precentralis = type 4, area frontalis agranularis = typed, area parietalis = type 7, area occipitalis = type 17, area hippocampica = type 28, and area retrosplenialis = type 29, as given in his 'Hirnkarte' {Brodmann, '09)
area precentralis = type 4, area frontalis agranularis = typed, area parietalis =  
type 7, area occipitalis = type 17, area hippocampica = type 28, and area retrosplenialis = type 29, as given in his 'Hirnkarte' {Brodmann, '09)  






Homo sapiens (man)  
Homo sapiens (man) Cercopithecus (longtailed ape)
Cercopithecus (longtailed ape)  


Lemur  
Lemur


Hapale (marmoset) .  
Hapale (marmoset) .


Pteropus edwardsii  
Pteropus edwardsii (vampire bat). . . .
(vampire bat). . . .  


Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)  
Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)


Cercoleptes caudivolvulus (kinkajou)  
Cercoleptes caudivolvulus (kinkajou)


Lepus cuniculus  
Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)
(rabbit)  


Spermophilus citillus (ground  
Spermophilus citillus (ground squirrel)
squirrel)  


Macropus giganteus (kangaroo). .  
Macropus giganteus (kangaroo). .






grams  
grams


60,000  
60,000


2,500  
2,500


1,800  
1,800


200  
200






375  
375 700
700  


2,000  
2,000


2,200  
2,200


200  
200


5,000  
5,000






grams  
grams


1,400  
1,400


85  
85 23
23  






7  
7 3.5
3.5  






10  
10






2.2  
2.2






3.0-4.5  
3.0-4.5


3.0  
3.0 2.3 2.15
2.3  
2.15  






1.9  
1.9 1.87
1.87  


2.17  
2.17


2.7  
2.7


2.1  
2.1


2.8-3.1  
2.8-3.1






O <  
O < 03 t^
03 t^  






3.0-3.8  
3.0-3.8


2.5  
2.5 2.3
2.3  


2.17  
2.17






1.6  
1.6 2.1
2.1  


2.0  
2.0


2.33  
2.33


2.18  
2.18






3.08  
3.08


2.0  
2.0


1.67  
1.67


1.73  
1.73






1.7  
1.7 1.78
1.78  


1.7  
1.7 2.2 1.73 2.2
2.2  
1.73  
2.2  






2.3-2.6  
2.3-2.6


1.7  
1.7


1.55  
1.55


1.26  
1.26






1.76  
1.76 1.5
1.5  


1.9  
1.9






1.37  
1.37






1.9  
1.9






mm.  
mm.


2.5  
2.5


1.6  
1.6


1.35  
1.35


1.14  
1.14






1.52  
1.52 1.6
1.6  


1.9  
1.9 1.2 1.13 1.7
1.2  
1.13  
1.7  






< 2  
< 2






2.3  
2.3


1.1  
1.1


1.19  
1.19


1.07  
1.07






1.4-1.76  
1.4-1.76 0.8
0.8  


1.67  
1.67


0.8-1.5  
0.8-1.5


0.75  
0.75


1.2  
1.2






3.0  
3.0


1.95  
1.95 1.73 1.59
1.73  
1.59  






1.66  
1.66 1.61
1.61  


1.89  
1.89 1.79 1.54 2.15
1.79  
1.54  
2.15  






Reviewing this table, it is readily seen that, within each  
Reviewing this table, it is readily seen that, within each order, the animal which has a greater brain weight shows also a greater cortical thickness, but a fixed relation between the brain weight and the cortical thickness has not been here revealed. In different orders, this relation is not true; the lemur and the kangaroo have a similar brain weight (23 to 25 grams),
order, the animal which has a greater brain weight shows also a  
greater cortical thickness, but a fixed relation between the  
brain weight and the cortical thickness has not been here revealed. In different orders, this relation is not true; the lemur  
and the kangaroo have a similar brain weight (23 to 25 grams),  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






253  
253






while the cortical thickness in the latter is much greater (by  
while the cortical thickness in the latter is much greater (by about 25 per cent).
about 25 per cent).  


Prosimiae and primates. The following table (table 6) is  
Prosimiae and primates. The following table (table 6) is summarized from a paper by Marburg ('12) and shows for some species of the prosimiae and primates the total cortical thickness measured at four representative localities (gyri centralis, frontalis, temporalis et occipitalis) . The average values were taken by me.
summarized from a paper by Marburg ('12) and shows for some  
species of the prosimiae and primates the total cortical thickness  
measured at four representative localities (gyri centralis, frontalis, temporalis et occipitalis) . The average values were taken  
by me.  


TABLE 6  
TABLE 6


Thickness of the cerebral cortex at several localities in monkeys, as presented by  
Thickness of the cerebral cortex at several localities in monkeys, as presented by


Marburg {'12). Averages are calculated by me  
Marburg {'12). Averages are calculated by me






Simla satyrus  
Simla satyrus


Hylobates (sp.?)  
Hylobates (sp.?)


Semnopithecus nasicus. . .  
Semnopithecus nasicus. . .


Macacus rhesus  
Macacus rhesus


Cynocephalus hamadryas  
Cynocephalus hamadryas


Ateles niger  
Ateles niger


Lemur varius  
Lemur varius




Line 65,656: Line 60,157:




AVEI  
AVEI




CENTRAL,  
CENTRAL, GYRUS
GYRUS  




FRONTAL  
FRONTAL GYRUS
GYRUS  




TEMPORAL  
TEMPORAL GYRUS
GYRUS  




OCCIPITAL,  
OCCIPITAL, GYRUS
GYRUS  




Of the  
Of the four
four  


localities  
localities


m »i .  
m »i .




7n7n .  
7n7n .




7)1 711 .  
7)1 711 .




mm.  
mm.




mm.  
mm.




3.11  
3.11




2.97  
2.97




2.43  
2.43




Line 65,708: Line 60,204:




3.78  
3.78




3.24  
3.24




2.51  
2.51




1.78  
1.78




2.83  
2.83




3.78  
3.78




2.43  
2.43




2.43  
2.43




1.35  
1.35




2.50  
2.50




"2.84  
"2.84




2.70  
2.70




2.15  
2.15




1.49  
1.49




2.30  
2.30




2.97  
2.97




2.70  
2.70




2.03  
2.03




1.35  
1.35




2.26  
2.26




2.97  
2.97




2.84  
2.84




2.43  
2.43




Line 65,781: Line 60,277:




1.30  
1.30




1.76  
1.76




1.76  
1.76




1.67  
1.67




1.62  
1.62






Of the  
Of the three localities
three  
localities  






2.84  
2.84 3.18 2.88 2.56 2.57 2.75 1.61
3.18  
2.88  
2.56  
2.57  
2.75  
1.61  






This table also suggests that, in the order of monkeys, the  
This table also suggests that, in the order of monkeys, the average thickness of the cortex varies so that those which have the greater brain weight have also t|ie greater thickness of the cerebral cortex, but the brain weights are not available for comparison.
average thickness of the cortex varies so that those which have  
the greater brain weight have also t|ie greater thickness of the  
cerebral cortex, but the brain weights are not available for  
comparison.  


V. THE THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN MAN  
V. THE THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN MAN


Man. There are scores of papers giving the measurements of  
Man. There are scores of papers giving the measurements of the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man, but they are diverse in the techniques used for preparing the material, in the localities selected for measurement, and also in the manner of measurement. The results published before 1891 were all summarized by Donaldson ('91), but the table is not reproduced here as, owing to the lack of the information necessary for the interpretation of the values found, it has mainly an historical interest.
the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man, but they are diverse  
in the techniques used for preparing the material, in the localities selected for measurement, and also in the manner of measurement. The results published before 1891 were all summarized by Donaldson ('91), but the table is not reproduced here as,  
owing to the lack of the information necessary for the interpretation of the values found, it has mainly an historical interest.  






254  
254






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






Donaldson ('91) measured also the thickness of the cerebral  
Donaldson ('91) measured also the thickness of the cerebral cortex at fourteen localities from each hemisphere of nine normal brains (six males and three females), as shown in figure 3 reproduced from his original paper, in order to obtain control
cortex at fourteen localities from each hemisphere of nine normal brains (six males and three females), as shown in figure 3  
reproduced from his original paper, in order to obtain control  




Line 65,845: Line 60,324:




Fig. 3 This figure shows the localities on the hemispheres from which the  
Fig. 3 This figure shows the localities on the hemispheres from which the samples of cortex were taken by Donaldson ('91). For the thickness of cortex at each locality see table 8 and chart 2. A = Lateral aspect. 3 is used to designate the insula, here not exposed. B = Ventral aspect; C = Mesial aspect.
samples of cortex were taken by Donaldson ('91). For the thickness of cortex  
at each locality see table 8 and chart 2. A = Lateral aspect. 3 is used to designate the insula, here not exposed. B = Ventral aspect; C = Mesial aspect.  


values for the study of the brain of a blind deaf-mute, Laura  
values for the study of the brain of a blind deaf-mute, Laura Bridgeman. The technique employed by Donaldson was fixation in bichromate and alcohol (potassium bichromate 2| per cent plus I its volume of 95 per cent alcohol) for six to eight
Bridgeman. The technique employed by Donaldson was fixation in bichromate and alcohol (potassium bichromate 2| per  
cent plus I its volume of 95 per cent alcohol) for six to eight  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






255  
255






TABLE 7  
TABLE 7


Giving the average cortical thickness of man, arranged according to age and sex,  
Giving the average cortical thickness of man, arranged according to age and sex, together with the brain weight. Quoted from Donaldson {'91)
together with the brain weight. Quoted from Donaldson {'91)  






BRAI^f WEIGHT  
BRAI^f WEIGHT






AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS  
AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS






Males  
Males






years  
years




grams  
grams




7nm.  
7nm.




35  
35




1419  
1419




2.81  
2.81




35  
35




1443  
1443




2.98  
2.98




39  
39




1393  
1393




2.82  
2.82




45  
45




1367  
1367




2.92  
2.92




57  
57




1464  
1464




2.94  
2.94




?  
?




1210  
1210




3.11  
3.11






Females  
Females






40  
40




1196  
1196




2.74  
2.74




45  
45




1173  
1173




2.90  
2.90




?  
?




1312  
1312




3.07  
3.07






Average  
Average






1331  
1331






2.92  
2.92






weeks, washing in water for twenty-four hours, 95 per cent alcohol for two days, final preservation in 80 per cent alcohol, and  
weeks, washing in water for twenty-four hours, 95 per cent alcohol for two days, final preservation in 80 per cent alcohol, and imbedding in celloidin. The sections were cut about 100 micra thick and measured unstained under a low magnifying power with a micrometer eyepiece, at the summit of the gyrus arid at the side, midway between the summit and the bottom of the bounding sulcus. To obtain the average thickness at the locality, the smaller figure was multiplied by 2, added to the larger figure, and the sum divided by 3.
imbedding in celloidin. The sections were cut about 100 micra  
thick and measured unstained under a low magnifying power  
with a micrometer eyepiece, at the summit of the gyrus arid at  
the side, midway between the summit and the bottom of the  
bounding sulcus. To obtain the average thickness at the locality, the smaller figure was multiplied by 2, added to the larger  
figure, and the sum divided by 3.  


Table 7 shows the average thickness of the cortex (taken from  
Table 7 shows the average thickness of the cortex (taken from the fourteen localities) arranged according to sex and age, quoted from Donaldson ('91). If we take the nine cases in this table as the basis for computation, we find the mean thickness of the cortex to be 2.92 mm., with a probable error of the mean equal to ±0.026 mm.
the fourteen localities) arranged according to sex and age,  
quoted from Donaldson ('91). If we take the nine cases in this  
table as the basis for computation, we find the mean thickness  
of the cortex to be 2.92 mm., with a probable error of the mean  
equal to ±0.026 mm.  


I wish to cite also the average thickness of the cortex, as thus  
I wish to cite also the average thickness of the cortex, as thus obtained by Donaldson ('91), according to locality (table 8). These localities are shown in figure 3 and the relative thickness
obtained by Donaldson ('91), according to locality (table 8).  
These localities are shown in figure 3 and the relative thickness  






256  
256






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






of the cortex at each is graphically presented in chart 2. Generally summarized, the average thicknes of the cortex of the adult  
of the cortex at each is graphically presented in chart 2. Generally summarized, the average thicknes of the cortex of the adult man is 2.92 mm.; females have a slightly thinner cortex than males (differences less than 1 per cent, or 0.02 mm.) and the right hemisphere usually has a cortex a few per cent less thick than the left (maximmn difference 7 per cent).
man is 2.92 mm.; females have a slightly thinner cortex than  
males (differences less than 1 per cent, or 0.02 mm.) and the  
right hemisphere usually has a cortex a few per cent less thick  
than the left (maximmn difference 7 per cent).  


With the foregoing determinations are to be compared the  
With the foregoing determinations are to be compared the measurements by three other observers.
measurements by three other observers.  






wm  
wm




\  
\




1^  
1^




Line 66,077: Line 60,533:




\  
\




\  
\




\.  
\.




-^  
-^




Line 66,147: Line 60,603:




4 A  
4 A




Line 66,204: Line 60,660:




A  
A




Line 66,233: Line 60,689:




t  
t




5 I  
5 I




' 6  
' 6




)4  
)4




2  
2




, £  
, £




1(  
1(




) 1  
) 1




i  
i




M\  
M\




li  
li




l^  
l^




> S  
> S




M4  
M4






Chart 2. -The curve was plotted according to table 8 to show the cortical  
Chart 2. -The curve was plotted according to table 8 to show the cortical thickness at each locality as measured by Donaldson ('91. The numbers placed by the ordinates indicate the thickness of the cortex in millimeters. The numbers for the localities are given below, and correspond to those in figure 3, A. B and C.
thickness at each locality as measured by Donaldson ('91. The numbers placed  
by the ordinates indicate the thickness of the cortex in millimeters. The numbers for the localities are given below, and correspond to those in figure 3, A.  
B and C.  


In accordance with this plan, the results obtained in a careful  
In accordance with this plan, the results obtained in a careful study by Hammarberg ('95) are tabulated in table 8. The material used for this study was a brain of a male, twenty-eight years old, mentally normal, and who died of typhoid fever. The technique employed was fixation in 95 per cent alcohol, imbedding in paraffine by means of xylol, sections 10 micra in
study by Hammarberg ('95) are tabulated in table 8. The  
material used for this study was a brain of a male, twenty-eight  
years old, mentally normal, and who died of typhoid fever.  
The technique employed was fixation in 95 per cent alcohol,  
imbedding in paraffine by means of xylol, sections 10 micra in  






TABLE 8  
TABLE 8 Giving for several localities on the hemisphere of the adult human brain the thickness of the cortex, as measured by different authors. The general average thickness was taken, averaging all measurements presented by each author. For reasons given in the text, these averages as they stand are by no means comparable with each other. The data were taken from Donaldson ('91), Hammarberg {'95), Campbell {'05), and Brodmann {'08)
Giving for several localities on the hemisphere of the adult human brain the thickness of the cortex, as measured by different authors. The general average thickness was taken, averaging all measurements presented by each author. For  
reasons given in the text, these averages as they stand are by no means comparable with each other. The data were taken from Donaldson ('91), Hammarberg  
{'95), Campbell {'05), and Brodmann {'08)  




Line 66,299: Line 60,744:




ocaJLtu  
ocaJLtu




Au/A-<jT  
Au/A-<jT




Tlanaldsan  
Tlanaldsan




Hamtnurfc&rj  
Hamtnurfc&rj




C(Xtm  
C(Xtm




pbel/  
pbel/




Brocf  
Brocf




T)ann  
T)ann




L  
L




Ki^iti o/ secti'uTv  
Ki^iti o/ secti'uTv




Cell  
Cell




Cell  
Cell




Cell  
Cell




Fi ber  
Fi ber




Cell  
Cell




Fiber 1  
Fiber 1








U.n,U  
U.n,U




rvvrn.  
rvvrn.




m^  
m^




m^  
m^




n\/yn.  
n\/yn.




«^  
«^








^  
^




Gyi-ixs centralis  
Gyi-ixs centralis




o/n tenor  
o/n tenor








2.?7  
2.?7




2.^-0  
2.^-0




2.62.  
2.62.




a gi'  
a gi'




4 05
4 05


^.  
^.




Gyrus fenfroJIs  
Gyrus fenfroJIs pos/erior
pos/erior  




oral sic^e  
oral sic^e




3.08  
3.08




2.70  
2.70




2.20  
2.20




^.1:1,  
^.1:1,




/ ?6  
/ ?6




/.9i  
/.9i




^  
^




ir\Ter mediate p^rf  
ir\Ter mediate p^rf




Z.9S  
Z.9S




3./6  
3./6








ccL^otf/ai. s^ale.  
ccL^otf/ai. s^ale.




2.6  
2.6




/■ <Jo  
/■ <Jo




2.4 3  
2.4 3




2. ST/  
2. ST/




Q.  
Q.




IiOTver end of su  
IiOTver end of su




cus Rolo/nJ;.  
cus Rolo/nJ;.




Line 66,468: Line 60,912:




;2.53


2.53






P  
P




Lobu-lus pa-ra.ce  
Lobu-lus pa-ra.ce




■ntra/is  
■ntra/is




2.?6  
2.?6




Line 66,495: Line 60,939:




O  
O o s p
o
s  
p  


1:  
1:




Gyr«s fron-talis  
Gyr«s fron-talis Superior
Superior  




fwnc/e<* po^t  
fwnc/e<* po^t








a/0  
a/0




2.62^  
2.62^




Z.SZ.  
Z.SZ.




3.8 2  
3.8 2




3.84  
3.84




m-i^<J/e fjcw-r  
m-i^<J/e fjcw-r








3.93  
3.93








fore fa^f  
fore fa^f








2.60  
2.60




3.45  
3.45








G^rus -fronfa/is  
G^rus -fronfa/is




«ec/ius  
«ec/ius




3.09  
3.09




3.4-0  
3.4-0




2.A-0  
2.A-0




%.I0  
%.I0




3.5 7  
3.5 7








Gyrus froTitcdis  
Gyrus froTitcdis i/nferioT
i/nferioT  




?iM-s ofjerccilarij  
?iM-s ofjerccilarij




ao8  
ao8




2.50  
2.50




Line 66,590: Line 61,029:




3.sa  
3.sa








Ta^s tria/*^£^a.f''s
Ta^s tria/*^£^a.fs




2.98  
2.98




3.00  
3.00




Line 66,608: Line 61,047:




3.34  
3.34








Po/rs or ()i Tali's  
Po/rs or ()i Tali's




Line 66,624: Line 61,063:




3.60  
3.60








Gyrus rectus  
Gyrus rectus




2. J3  
2. J3




Line 66,641: Line 61,080:




3.17  
3.17








Frcmtal pole  
Frcmtal pole




Line 66,653: Line 61,092:




2.37  
2.37




1. EZ  
1. EZ




3.07  
3.07








» o  
» o 1"^
1"^  




Gyrus ^(wictalis  
Gyrus ^(wictalis




su.f)e^ioT  
su.f)e^ioT




Line 66,678: Line 61,116:




2.3 7  
2.3 7




%2,5  
%2,5




3.08  
3.08




3.2.0  
3.2.0




extr&mc fore f!(irt  
extr&mc fore f!(irt




Line 66,701: Line 61,139:




2.93  
2.93




2.SS
2.SS


Gyrus ficurieTaJis  
Gyrus ficurieTaJis mfe/ricn
mfe/ricn


Gyrus a^gn-laris  
Gyrus a^gn-laris








2.4-3  
2.4-3




2.50  
2.50




2,0  
2,0




3.3 5  
3.3 5




3.n  
3.n




G)frus suprama/rsmalis  
G)frus suprama/rsmalis




Line 66,738: Line 61,175:




3.3 1  
3.3 1




3.25  
3.25




§ ^  
§ ^


u  
u




Gyrus occt ti/oVci  
Gyrus occt ti/oVci




fore p<M-t  
fore p<M-t




2.6/  
2.6/




(. 80  
(. 80




2.50  
2.50




Z.5Z  
Z.5Z




2.. 6 8  
2.. 6 8




2.8 3  
2.8 3




polflu- pa^t  
polflu- pa^t




:2-.S4


2-.S4


a. 33  
a. 33




Line 66,789: Line 61,226:




%.52,  
%.52,




2.3 8  
2.3 8




1. g%  
1. g%




1. 4  
1. 4




a. 3 8  
a. 3 8




a.47  
a.47








Gyrws lu*7gK.a/i's  
Gyrws lu*7gK.a/i's




2.65  
2.65




Line 66,827: Line 61,264:
t
t


Gyrus Temboro-lis  
Gyrus Temboro-lis




iu./)erlor  
iu./)erlor




3. /O  
3. /O




2.64
2.64


Z.GO  
Z.GO




2.4  
2.4




38 1  
38 1




3.8 3  
3.8 3








in -f'lssu-ra. Sy/vli  
in -f'lssu-ra. Sy/vli




Line 66,859: Line 61,296:




Z.SI  
Z.SI




1. 90  
1. 90




3.3 5  
3.3 5




3.80  
3.80




w  
w




tio. exfarMO,! pa^f  
tio. exfarMO,! pa^f




Line 66,881: Line 61,318:




3.57  
3.57




3. 9^  
3. 9^




1  
1




Pole of fem^o  
Pole of fem^o




cd lobe  
cd lobe




Line 66,904: Line 61,341:




3 70  
3 70




3.8 7  
3.8 7




-k
-k


Gyrus Te-rK-fKrraJis  
Gyrus Te-rK-fKrraJis




m^JUujti  
m^JUujti




3./ 5  
3./ 5








2.68  
2.68




2.25  
2.25




3.SZ  
3.SZ




3.64  
3.64




L  
L




Gyrus TewJioraliS  
Gyrus TewJioraliS




mf&rior  
mf&rior




Line 66,948: Line 61,385:




3.47  
3.47




3.4 2/  
3.4 2/




extreme lundie^ pmrt  
extreme lundie^ pmrt




Line 66,961: Line 61,398:




Z.91  
Z.91








lr,s^Ia.  
lr,s^Ia.




3.38  
3.38




2.34
2.34


2.67  
2.67




2.6 2.  
2.6 2.




Line 66,984: Line 61,421:




G  
G




yrcs  
yrcs




pe^i rhyiina.1 pcwt  
pe^i rhyiina.1 pcwt




Line 67,001: Line 61,438:




2.07  
2.07








ec/or/tina-l ^a-rt"  
ec/or/tina-l ^a-rt"




Line 67,015: Line 61,452:




2.93  
2.93








presu>bi(U<.(ar fort  
presu>bi(U<.(ar fort




Line 67,029: Line 61,466:




Z.Z5  
Z.Z5




2.70  
2.70




It^CU-S  
It^CU-S




Line 67,044: Line 61,481:




2.53  
2.53




3.10  
3.10




Sic-t'i C-M-lu/m  
Sic-t'i C-M-lu/m




Line 67,059: Line 61,496:




2 33  
2 33




2.60  
2.60




Gv/rns  
Gv/rns




— fjosterior y/eirfra/is  
— fjosterior y/eirfra/is




27 S  
27 S




Line 67,080: Line 61,517:




2.<?7  
2.<?7




2,.94
2,.94


- posl&rior clorsaJ'\s  
- posl&rior clorsaJ'\s




Line 67,094: Line 61,531:




3 10  
3 10




303  
303




-otifericnr ve^tra^is  
-otifericnr ve^tra^is




Line 67,109: Line 61,546:




2.0s  
2.0s




3.) 7  
3.) 7




— cuiTerror tJorso/is  
— cuiTerror tJorso/is




Line 67,124: Line 61,561:




3.48  
3.48




3 44  
3 44




Prege^uoJ piwt  
Prege^uoJ piwt




Line 67,139: Line 61,576:




I. 80  
I. 80








Su^bgc/nuo.! pO/rt  
Su^bgc/nuo.! pO/rt




Line 67,153: Line 61,590:




2.35  
2.35








rerro5f>l&»via.l fiO/rt  
rerro5f>l&»via.l fiO/rt




Line 67,167: Line 61,604:




2.3  
2.3 2.9 7
2.9 7  




Line 67,175: Line 61,611:




G-e*icro.| cxve  
G-e*icro.| cxve




rage.  
rage.




2.<?2.  
2.<?2.




£.i"7  
£.i"7




Z.^6  
Z.^6




2-/7  
2-/7




3.00  
3.00




3. 17  
3. 17






257  
257






THE JOUBNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3  
THE JOUBNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3






258 NAOKI SUGITA  
258 NAOKI SUGITA


thickness and staining with methyleneblue. Hammarberg claims  
thickness and staining with methyleneblue. Hammarberg claims that after twenty-four hours in 95 per cent alcohol the brain piece shrinks about 20.5 per cent in volume and the cortical thickness diminishes by 0.1 to 0.2 mm., but that during the subsequent procedures no significant size changes occur. According to his results, the gyri frontales have the thickest cortex (about 3.0 mm.) and the lobus centralis or insula is the thinnest among localities typical in cell lamination. This latter part as measured by Donaldson shows the thickest cortex.
that after twenty-four hours in 95 per cent alcohol the brain  
piece shrinks about 20.5 per cent in volume and the cortical  
thickness diminishes by 0.1 to 0.2 mm., but that during the  
subsequent procedures no significant size changes occur. According to his results, the gyri frontales have the thickest cortex  
(about 3.0 mm.) and the lobus centralis or insula is the thinnest  
among localities typical in cell lamination. This latter part as  
measured by Donaldson shows the thickest cortex.  


Campbell ('05) gave two series of determinations of the cortical  
Campbell ('05) gave two series of determinations of the cortical lamination of the human brain, after cell staining and after fiber staining, represented by uniformly magnified illustrations of the sections at the several localities. Making use of his illustrations, I obtained a series of cortical thicknesses at different localities (table 8), reduced to the actual thickness on the slide, by dividing the direct measurement on the illustration by the magnification. His sections were taken from the material fixed in Miiller's or Orth's fluid and imbedded in celloidin, cut at 25 micra, and stained with thionine. The general average thickness thus obtained, the two series combined, is about 2.3 mm.
lamination of the human brain, after cell staining and after fiber  
staining, represented by uniformly magnified illustrations of the  
sections at the several localities. Making use of his illustrations,  
I obtained a series of cortical thicknesses at different localities  
(table 8), reduced to the actual thickness on the slide, by dividing the direct measurement on the illustration by the magnification. His sections were taken from the material fixed in  
Miiller's or Orth's fluid and imbedded in celloidin, cut at 25  
micra, and stained with thionine. The general average thickness thus obtained, the two series combined, is about 2.3 mm.  


Brodmann ('08) also has measured the thickness of the cortex  
Brodmann ('08) also has measured the thickness of the cortex on the human brains at forty-two different localities on sections prepared by two different methods: one set was fixed in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraffine, and stained by Nissl's method for cell study, and the other, fixed in Miiller's fluid, imbedded in celloidin, and stained by Weigert's method for the myelin sheaths. His results, which are the averages from brains between seventeen and forty-five years in age, are also tabulated in table 8 for a comparison. The general average thickness given by Brodmann is about 3.09 mm.
on the human brains at forty-two different localities on sections  
prepared by two different methods: one set was fixed in 4 per  
cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraffine, and stained by  
Nissl's method for cell study, and the other, fixed in Miiller's  
fluid, imbedded in celloidin, and stained by Weigert's method  
for the myelin sheaths. His results, which are the averages  
from brains between seventeen and forty-five years in age, are  
also tabulated in table 8 for a comparison. The general average  
thickness given by Brodmann is about 3.09 mm.  


Kaes ('07) also studied the growth in thickness of the human  
Kaes ('07) also studied the growth in thickness of the human cerebral cortex, measured at twelve different localities on the hemisphere, using sections fixed in Miiller's fluid and stained by Weigert's method. His results are remarkably high, giving 4.9 mm. on the general average. His method of measuring the cortex is so arbitrary and peculiar, however, that his results are not included in this table 8.
cerebral cortex, measured at twelve different localities on the  
hemisphere, using sections fixed in Miiller's fluid and stained by  
Weigert's method. His results are remarkably high, giving 4.9  
mm. on the general average. His method of measuring the cortex is so arbitrary and peculiar, however, that his results are not  
included in this table 8.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 259  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 259


Bevan Lewis ('79) has given as the average depth of the  
Bevan Lewis ('79) has given as the average depth of the human cortex the figures as high as 4,84 to 5.70 mm., a higher vahie even than that of Kaes. His results for both the pig and rabbit cortex were also very high, compared with those obtained for other mammals. These results suggest that his technique, which he claims gives the natural depth of the cortex, is likely to produce very high values.
human cortex the figures as high as 4,84 to 5.70 mm., a higher  
vahie even than that of Kaes. His results for both the pig and  
rabbit cortex were also very high, compared with those obtained  
for other mammals. These results suggest that his technique,  
which he claims gives the natural depth of the cortex, is likely  
to produce very high values.  


Reviewing the table (table 8) , the values for the cortical thickness given for a fixed part of the hemisphere by different authors  
Reviewing the table (table 8) , the values for the cortical thickness given for a fixed part of the hemisphere by different authors are by no means in accord ; the results by Brodmann stand close to the results by Donaldson, while those given by Campbell are the lowest, less than one-half the values given by Lewis. These differences are probably due mainly to differences in technique and are not to be attributed to variations within the sanie species, as the series of Donaldson (table 7) and my previous study (Sugita, '17 a) both have shown that individual variations in cortical thickness, obtained by the use of the same technique, are low as compared with the variations for other body measurements.
are by no means in accord ; the results by Brodmann stand close  
to the results by Donaldson, while those given by Campbell are  
the lowest, less than one-half the values given by Lewis. These  
differences are probably due mainly to differences in technique  
and are not to be attributed to variations within the sanie species,  
as the series of Donaldson (table 7) and my previous study  
(Sugita, '17 a) both have shown that individual variations in  
cortical thickness, obtained by the use of the same technique,  
are low as compared with the variations for other body measurements.  


On the average, the figures given by Donaldson and Brodmann  
On the average, the figures given by Donaldson and Brodmann are fairly close and the former being somewhat lower, probably because Donaldson took the average from the values at the summit and at the sides of the gyrus, while Brodmann has measured the thickness at the summit only. The figures given by Hammarberg and Campbell are low, probably owing to the shrinkage of the material during preparation, as may be inferred from the descriptions by the authors and from the studies on the effects of fixing fluids by King ('10) and by me (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b, '18 c).
are fairly close and the former being somewhat lower, probably  
because Donaldson took the average from the values at the  
summit and at the sides of the gyrus, while Brodmann has measured the thickness at the summit only. The figures given by  
Hammarberg and Campbell are low, probably owing to the  
shrinkage of the material during preparation, as may be inferred from the descriptions by the authors and from the studies  
on the effects of fixing fluids by King ('10) and by me (Sugita,  
'17 a, '18 b, '18 c).  


Despite the apparent irregularity among the figures given for  
Despite the apparent irregularity among the figures given for the cortical thickness at different localities by the several authors, as shown in table 8, there are some general relations which are fairly clear. If we examine table 9 in which has been entered for each region the average thickness obtained by each author, it may be safely said that this table (and also table 6 for the monkeys) shows that in man (and the primates) the cerebral cortex differs normally according to locality. The
the cortical thickness at different localities by the several authors, as shown in table 8, there are some general relations which  
are fairly clear. If we examine table 9 in which has been entered for each region the average thickness obtained by each  
author, it may be safely said that this table (and also table 6  
for the monkeys) shows that in man (and the primates) the  
cerebral cortex differs normally according to locality. The  






260  
260






NAOKI SUGITA  
NAOKI SUGITA






TABLE 9  
TABLE 9


Giving the average cortical thickness for several lobes and regions {with typical  
Giving the average cortical thickness for several lobes and regions {with typical cell lamination) of the cerebral hemisphere as given by different authors, and the order of localities according to the cortical thickness, together with the difference in thickness between. the temporal and occipital regions. R = regio Rolandica, F = lobus frontalis, P = lobus parietalis, = lobus occipitalis, T = lobus temporalis. Based on table 8 in this paper
cell lamination) of the cerebral hemisphere as given by different authors, and the  
order of localities according to the cortical thickness, together with the difference  
in thickness between. the temporal and occipital regions. R = regio Rolandica,  
F = lobus frontalis, P = lobus parietalis, = lobus occipitalis, T = lobus  
temporalis. Based on table 8 in this paper  






LOCALITY  
LOCALITY




DONALDSON  
DONALDSON


('91)  
('91) (Cell)
(Cell)  




HAMMARBERG  
HAMMARBERG


('95)  
('95) (Cell)
(Cell)  




CAMPBELL  
CAMPBELL


('05)  
('05) (Cell)
(Cell)  




CAMPBELL  
CAMPBELL


('05)  
('05) (Fiber)
(Fiber)  




BRODMANN  
BRODMANN


('08)  
('08) (Cell)
(Cell)  




BRODMANN  
BRODMANN


("08)  
("08) (Fiber)
(Fiber)  




Regio Rolandica  
Regio Rolandica


Lobus frontalis  
Lobus frontalis


Lobus parietalis  
Lobus parietalis


Lobus occipitalis  
Lobus occipitalis


Lobus temporalis  
Lobus temporalis




mm.  
mm.


2.92  
2.92 2 92
2 92  


2.59  
2.59 3.21
3.21  




mm.  
mm.


2.34  
2.34 2.92
2.92  


2.43  
2.43


2.09  
2.09


2.49  
2.49




mm.  
mm.


2.43  
2.43 2.46
2.46  


2.44  
2.44


2.16  
2.16


2.64  
2.64




77im.  
77im.


2.21  
2.21 2.15
2.15  


2.13  
2.13


1.96  
1.96


2.29  
2.29




mm.  
mm.


2.74  
2.74 3.50
3.50  


3.17  
3.17


2.47  
2.47


3.48  
3.48




mtn.  
mtn.


2.93  
2.93 3.84
3.84  


3.12  
3.12


2.54  
2.54


3.75  
3.75




Line 67,429: Line 61,792:




Average  
Average




2.91  
2.91




2.45  
2.45




2.43  
2.43




2.15  
2.15




2.92  
2.92




3.16  
3.16




Order of the  
Order of the above five localities as to the thickness
above five  
localities as  
to the thickness  




TFRO?  
TFRO?




FTPRO  
FTPRO




TFPRO  
TFPRO




TRFPO  
TRFPO




FTPRO  
FTPRO




FTPRO  
FTPRO




Difference between T and  
Difference between T and






0.62  
0.62




0.40  
0.40




0.48  
0.48




0.33  
0.33




1.01  
1.01




1.21  
1.21




Line 67,501: Line 61,861:




frontal and temporal regions have in all cases the thickest cortex  
frontal and temporal regions have in all cases the thickest cortex and the occipital region is the thinnest, while the position for the cortex of the parietal and Rolandic regions is less fixed. These thickness relations support the earlier statement made by me for the rat cortex that the thickness diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect.
and the occipital region is the thinnest, while the position for  
the cortex of the parietal and Rolandic regions is less fixed.  
These thickness relations support the earlier statement made  
by me for the rat cortex that the thickness diminishes from the  
frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral  
aspect.  


Brodmann ('08) has concluded from his careful study that  
Brodmann ('08) has concluded from his careful study that regional characteristics for the cortical thickness clearly exist. Diese sind in alien normalen Gehirnen gesetzmassig und kon
regional characteristics for the cortical thickness clearly exist.  
''Diese sind in alien normalen Gehirnen gesetzmassig und kon




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






261  
261






stant und bilden ein Hauptmerkmal der struktuellen Verschiedenheiten der Gehirnoberflache; jedes Strukturfeld besitzt  
stant und bilden ein Hauptmerkmal der struktuellen Verschiedenheiten der Gehirnoberflache; jedes Strukturfeld besitzt demnach eine bestimmte, mittlere Durchschnittsbreite, durch welche es sich von den Nachbarfeldern auszeichnet." On the other hand, local variations within a fixed area are small, while individual differences between different brains for each locality may run sometimes as high as 0.5 mm. or more.
demnach eine bestimmte, mittlere Durchschnittsbreite, durch  
welche es sich von den Nachbarfeldern auszeichnet." On the  
other hand, local variations within a fixed area are small, while  
individual differences between different brains for each locality  
may run sometimes as high as 0.5 mm. or more.  


VI. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING THE GROWTH OF  
VI. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN OF THE MAN
THE BRAIN OF THE MAN  






From the point of view of the growth changes, there have been  
From the point of view of the growth changes, there have been only few studies on the human cerebral cortex ever published. Kaes ('05, '07, '09), employing forty-one human brains (twentyeight males and thirteen females, normal and pathological combined) of different ages and of different grades of intelligence, studied the cerebral cortex for the purpose of following the growth changes in it. He took his sections from twelve localities in each hemisphere, stained the fibers by Weigert's method and measured the so-called cortical thickness from the ectal border of the Meynert's arcuate fibers (or fibrae propriae) to the ectal border of the zonal layer. His conclusions on the growth
only few studies on the human cerebral cortex ever published.
Kaes ('05, '07, '09), employing forty-one human brains (twentyeight males and thirteen females, normal and pathological combined) of different ages and of different grades of intelligence,  
studied the cerebral cortex for the purpose of following the  
growth changes in it. He took his sections from twelve localities in each hemisphere, stained the fibers by Weigert's method  
and measured the so-called cortical thickness from the ectal  
border of the Meynert's arcuate fibers (or fibrae propriae) to the  
ectal border of the zonal layer. His conclusions on the growth  


^ His ('04) has given the following values as the cortical thicknesses measured at different localities of the hemisphere of the human embryos in early  
^ His ('04) has given the following values as the cortical thicknesses measured at different localities of the hemisphere of the human embryos in early months, at different stages of intrauterine development- — measured directly on the sections imbedded in paraffine.
months, at different stages of intrauterine development- — measured directly on  
the sections imbedded in paraffine.  






AGE OF  
AGE OF EMBRYOS
EMBRYOS  




AT CORPUS  
AT CORPUS STRIATUM
STRIATUM  


M  
M




AT LATERAL  
AT LATERAL WALL OP THALAMUS
WALL OP  
THALAMUS  




AT LATERAL  
AT LATERAL


WALL OF  
WALL OF HEMISPHERE (BASAL PART)
HEMISPHERE  
(BASAL PART)  


M  
M




AT LATERAL  
AT LATERAL


WALL OF  
WALL OF


HEMISPHERE  
HEMISPHERE


(MID PART)  
(MID PART)


M  
M




AT MEDIAN  
AT MEDIAN


WALL OF  
WALL OF HEMISPHERE
HEMISPHERE  




AT BOTTOM  
AT BOTTOM OF
OF  


SULCUS  
SULCUS CINGULI
CINGULI  


M  
M




1  
1 2
2  




50-55  
50-55 65-75
65-75  




4  
4 5 6
5  
6  


7  
7 8
8  




150  
150


360  
360


800  
800


1300  
1300


2000  
2000




130  
130


160  
160 300 600 900
300  
600  
900  




300  
300


400  
400




110  
110 120 130
120  
130  


170  
170 200
200  




90  
90 110
110  


130  
130




60  
60


50  
50 40 30 30
40  
30  
30  






262 NAOKI SUGITA  
262 NAOKI SUGITA


changes, briefly stated, are as follows: The average thickness of  
changes, briefly stated, are as follows: The average thickness of the cortex diminishes rapidly from his first entry (three months old, 5.58 mm.) to the twenty-third year (4.44 mm.) and is followed by an increase up to the forty-fifth year (5.71 mm.), where it is to be noted that the thickness attained is even greater than that at birth. Then it undergoes a second thinning up to the old age (at ninety-seventh year, his last entry, 4.62 mm.).
the cortex diminishes rapidly from his first entry (three months  
old, 5.58 mm.) to the twenty-third year (4.44 mm.) and is followed by an increase up to the forty-fifth year (5.71 mm.), where  
it is to be noted that the thickness attained is even greater  
than that at birth. Then it undergoes a second thinning up  
to the old age (at ninety-seventh year, his last entry, 4.62 mm.).  


These conclusions have been disputed by Donaldson ('08)  
These conclusions have been disputed by Donaldson ('08) and by Brodmann ('09), and I am in agreement with these critics that Kaes' results cannot be taken seriously.
and by Brodmann ('09), and I am in agreement with these critics  
that Kaes' results cannot be taken seriously.  


Brodmann ('08), in his paper on the cortical measurement,  
Brodmann ('08), in his paper on the cortical measurement, has noted only in a general way the average cortical thickness at the lateral surface of the hemisphere at several ages, as shown in table 10 (columns A and C). Nevertheless, these data can be used for a comparison.
has noted only in a general way the average cortical thickness  
at the lateral surface of the hemisphere at several ages, as shown  
in table 10 (columns A and C). Nevertheless, these data can  
be used for a comparison.  


Donaldson ('08) has compared the albino rat with man in  
Donaldson ('08) has compared the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and reached the conclusion that man and the rat show growth curves for the brain which are similar in form when the data are compared at equivalent ages, and the condition of the brain of the rat at five days of age is taken as like that of the human brain at birth. The relative growth rates of the rat and man are as 30 to 1 and the brain of the child at one year corresponds to that of the albino rat at seventeen days of age in its stage of development (Donaldson, MS.). These statements are also confirmed by me for the cortical thickness, as shown in table 10 (see below), and I have already noted that the transitional cortical cell layers, which are no longer to be seen in a new-born child, do not disappear in the albino rat until after four days of age (Sugita, '17 a, p. 539).
respect to the growth of the brain and reached the conclusion  
that man and the rat show growth curves for the brain which  
are similar in form when the data are compared at equivalent  
ages, and the condition of the brain of the rat at five days of  
age is taken as like that of the human brain at birth. The relative growth rates of the rat and man are as 30 to 1 and the brain  
of the child at one year corresponds to that of the albino rat at  
seventeen days of age in its stage of development (Donaldson,  
MS.). These statements are also confirmed by me for the cortical thickness, as shown in table 10 (see below), and I have  
already noted that the transitional cortical cell layers, which  
are no longer to be seen in a new-born child, do not disappear  
in the albino rat until after four days of age (Sugita, '17 a, p. 539).  


From these relations, we conclude that the course of growth in  
From these relations, we conclude that the course of growth in the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man and the albino rat would probably be similar, if the brains were compared at the equivalent ages. Such a comparison is attempted in table 10. Here the increase in cortical thickness in man and in the albino rat is compared, employing data given by Brodmann ('08) and by me (Sugita, '17 a). From the age (column A) given by Brodmann, the approximate brain weight (column B) was de
the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man and the albino rat  
would probably be similar, if the brains were compared at the  
equivalent ages. Such a comparison is attempted in table 10.  
Here the increase in cortical thickness in man and in the albino  
rat is compared, employing data given by Brodmann ('08) and  
by me (Sugita, '17 a). From the age (column A) given by  
Brodmann, the approximate brain weight (column B) was de




GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






263  
263






TABLE 10  
TABLE 10


Giving a comparison in the course of increase in cortical thickness in ynan and in  
Giving a comparison in the course of increase in cortical thickness in ynan and in the albino rat, according to data given by Brodmann {'08) and by Sugita {'17 a). Approximate brain weight in man and in the Albino for the equivalent ages were assumed in round numbers according, respectively, to Vierordt {'90) and Donaldson {'08)
the albino rat, according to data given by Brodmann {'08) and by Sugita {'17 a).  
Approximate brain weight in man and in the Albino for the equivalent ages were  
assumed in round numbers according, respectively, to Vierordt {'90) and Donaldson {'08)  






A  
A




B  
B




C  
C




D  
D




E  
E




F  
F




G  
G




MAN  
MAN




ALBINO RAT  
ALBINO RAT




Line 67,768: Line 62,049:




Approximate  
Approximate




Line 67,775: Line 62,056:




ing cortical  
ing cortical




Line 67,782: Line 62,063:




Observed  
Observed




brain  
brain








Thickness  
Thickness




thickness in  
thickness in








Approximate  
Approximate




thickness of  
thickness of




weight, at the  
weight, at the




Equivalent  
Equivalent




of the cortex  
of the cortex




human brain,  
human brain,




Age  
Age




brain  
brain




the cortex.  
the cortex.




equivalent  
equivalent




(observed)  
(observed)




at ages  
at ages




when the  
when the








weight  
weight




Brodmann  
Brodmann




(observed)  
(observed)




age  
age




given in  
given in




adult values  
adult values




Line 67,861: Line 62,142:




('08)  
('08)




ages  
ages (Donaldson)
(Donaldson)  








Column E  
Column E




in the both  
in the both are taken as the standards
are taken as  
the standards  








grains  
grains




m m .  
m m .




grams  
grams




days  
days




mm.  
mm.




7nm,  
7nm,




Fetus  
Fetus




Line 67,913: Line 62,191:




8-9 months  
8-9 months








1.0-1.5  
1.0-1.5








Birth  
Birth




0.80  
0.80




1.25  
1.25




Birth  
Birth




380  
380




1.5-2.0  
1.5-2.0




0.50  
0.50




5  
5




1.10  
1.10




1.75  
1.75




1 year  
1 year




950  
950




2.0-3.0  
2.0-3.0




1.10  
1.10




17  
17




1.75  
1.75




2.76  
2.76




Adult  
Adult




1400  
1400




2.0-4.0  
2.0-4.0




1.90  
1.90




Adult  
Adult




1.90  
1.90




3.00  
3.00






termined according to Vierordt ('90) and then the final weight  
termined according to Vierordt ('90) and then the final weight (1400 grams) was entered corresponding to the adult brain weight of the albino rat (1.9 grains). The other corresponding brain weights of the Albino of the equivalent ages were entered also according to Donaldson ('08) (column D). The cortical thickness (column F) for the given brain weights of the Albino were then entered according to my former determination (Sugita, '17 a). If the cortical thickness of the adult man be assumed as 3.00 mm. (the mean value of 2.0 to 4.0 mm.) and the corresponding thickness at each age be calculated on the basis of the course of increase in cortical thickness in the Albino (given in column F), the results given in column G — a mere inference, to be sure — are fairly in accord with the figures presented by Brodmann (column C).
(1400 grams) was entered corresponding to the adult brain weight  
of the albino rat (1.9 grains). The other corresponding brain  
weights of the Albino of the equivalent ages were entered also  
according to Donaldson ('08) (column D). The cortical thickness (column F) for the given brain weights of the Albino were  
then entered according to my former determination (Sugita,  
'17 a). If the cortical thickness of the adult man be assumed  
as 3.00 mm. (the mean value of 2.0 to 4.0 mm.) and the corresponding thickness at each age be calculated on the basis of the  
course of increase in cortical thickness in the Albino (given  
in column F), the results given in column G — a mere inference,  
to be sure — are fairly in accord with the figures presented by  
Brodmann (column C).  


In this connection, I had the opportunity, through the courtesy  
In this connection, I had the opportunity, through the courtesy of Dr. W. H. F. Addison, to prepare sections and examine the cortical thickness at the dorsal part of the gyrus centralis anterior (regio Rolandica) from a child thirteen months old (material hardened in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraf
of Dr. W. H. F. Addison, to prepare sections and examine the  
cortical thickness at the dorsal part of the gyrus centralis anterior (regio Rolandica) from a child thirteen months old (material hardened in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraf




264 NAOKI SUGITA  
264 NAOKI SUGITA


fine, and stained by Nissl's method). The mean value of the  
fine, and stained by Nissl's method). The mean value of the cortical thickness at the summit of the gyrus was 3.55 mm., or within 10 per cent the value obtained by Brodmann at the same locality in the adult brain and on a section similarly prepared and measured (table 8) . So far, then, as this observation goes, it helps to support my conclusion presented earlier that the human cortex has attained nearly its full thickness at the age of fifteen months (Sugita, '17 a).^
cortical thickness at the summit of the gyrus was 3.55 mm.,  
or within 10 per cent the value obtained by Brodmann at the  
same locality in the adult brain and on a section similarly prepared and measured (table 8) . So far, then, as this observation  
goes, it helps to support my conclusion presented earlier that the  
human cortex has attained nearly its full thickness at the age of  
fifteen months (Sugita, '17 a).^  


VII. THE BRAIN WEIGHT, THE CORTICAL VOLUME, AND THE BODY  
VII. THE BRAIN WEIGHT, THE CORTICAL VOLUME, AND THE BODY


WEIGHT  
WEIGHT


Dhere and Lapicque ('98) and DuBois ('98 a, '98 b), working  
Dhere and Lapicque ('98) and DuBois ('98 a, '98 b), working independently, found several important relations existing between the body and the brain weights in man and a number of other vertebrates. Recently DuBois ('13) has obtained results which he has formulated in following terms:
independently, found several important relations existing between the body and the brain weights in man and a number of  
other vertebrates. Recently DuBois ('13) has obtained results  
which he has formulated in following terms:  


1) In species of vertebrates that are alike in organization of  
1) In species of vertebrates that are alike in organization of their nervous system and their shape, but differ in size, and also in the two sexes of one and the same species, the quantity of the brain increases; A) as the quotient of the superficial dimension divided by the cube root of the longitudinal dimension. B) as the product of the longitudinal dunension by the square of its cube root.
their nervous system and their shape, but differ in size, and also  
in the two sexes of one and the same species, the quantity of the  
brain increases; A) as the quotient of the superficial dimension  
divided by the cube root of the longitudinal dimension. B) as  
the product of the longitudinal dunension by the square of its  
cube root.  


2) In individuals of one and the same species and of the  
2) In individuals of one and the same species and of the same sex, but differing in size, the quantity of brain increases as the square of the cube root of the longitudinal dimension of the body.
same sex, but differing in size, the quantity of brain increases  
as the square of the cube root of the longitudinal dimension of  
the body.  


So, briefly stated, 1) reads: in any species of vertebrates that  
So, briefly stated, 1) reads: in any species of vertebrates that are equal in organization, in form of activity and in shape, the weights of the respective brains are proportional to the 0.55 power
are equal in organization, in form of activity and in shape, the  
weights of the respective brains are proportional to the 0.55 power  


' According to a study by Fuchs ('83), the child is born without any myelinated fibers in the cerebral cortex. In the lamina zonalis the first myelination  
' According to a study by Fuchs ('83), the child is born without any myelinated fibers in the cerebral cortex. In the lamina zonalis the first myelination appears at five months, in the lamina pyramidalis at the end of the first year, while in the innermost layers we see some faintly stained fibers at two months. The fibrae arcuate (association fibers) appear clearly at seven months. Later the myelinated fibers increase in caliber and number as the age advances, and at eight years they attain nearly the appearance which they have in the adult cortex.
appears at five months, in the lamina pyramidalis at the end of the first year,  
while in the innermost layers we see some faintly stained fibers at two months.  
The fibrae arcuate (association fibers) appear clearly at seven months. Later  
the myelinated fibers increase in caliber and number as the age advances, and  
at eight years they attain nearly the appearance which they have in the adult  
cortex.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 265  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 265


of the weights of bodies, and 2) the exponent of correlation within  
of the weights of bodies, and 2) the exponent of correlation within the same species is for all vertebrates the 0.22 power.
the same species is for all vertebrates the 0.22 power.  


These relations were based on a series of observations, and  
These relations were based on a series of observations, and this illuminating idea is now generally accepted as true.
this illuminating idea is now generally accepted as true.  


The brain in general consists of the white and the gray matter,  
The brain in general consists of the white and the gray matter, and in higher animals the gray matter as represented by the cerebral cortex occupies a relatively large part of the entire cerebrum. This cortex is the seat of a complex series of physiological nerve centers, and the possibility that it has definite quantitative relations with the body as a whole is suggested by the following statement made by Du Bois ('13) :
and in higher animals the gray matter as represented by the  
cerebral cortex occupies a relatively large part of the entire  
cerebrum. This cortex is the seat of a complex series of physiological nerve centers, and the possibility that it has definite  
quantitative relations with the body as a whole is suggested by  
the following statement made by Du Bois ('13) :  


If the quantity of brain does not increase proportionally to the  
If the quantity of brain does not increase proportionally to the volume of the body, exprassed by the weight, it might be that this is really the case with regard to the superficial dimension, as being proportional with the receptive sensitive surfaces and with the sections of the muscles, thus measuring the passive and active relations of the animal to the outer world, for which in this waj" the quantity of brain can be a measure.
volume of the body, exprassed by the weight, it might be that this is  
really the case with regard to the superficial dimension, as being proportional with the receptive sensitive surfaces and with the sections  
of the muscles, thus measuring the passive and active relations of the  
animal to the outer world, for which in this waj" the quantity of brain  
can be a measure.  


This statement, to be sure, is applied by DuBois to the weight  
This statement, to be sure, is applied by DuBois to the weight or volume of the entire brain, but if the volume of the cortex stands in some definite relation to the volume of the entire brain, then the cortical volume should be also in a definite relation to the size or weight of the body.
or volume of the entire brain, but if the volume of the cortex  
stands in some definite relation to the volume of the entire  
brain, then the cortical volume should be also in a definite relation to the size or weight of the body.  


The cortica' volume is determined by the area of surface of the  
The cortica' volume is determined by the area of surface of the cerebral hemisphere and the thickness of the cortex. The former factor is not easy to determine exactly, even in lissencephala, while in higher animals the hemispheres have many convolutions which increase still further the difficulty of this determination. In lissencephala, the surface area of the hemispheres in two brains, which are nearly similar in the form of cerebrum, are approximately comparable with squares of the corresponding diameters of the cerebra.
cerebral hemisphere and the thickness of the cortex. The former  
factor is not easy to determine exactly, even in lissencephala,  
while in higher animals the hemispheres have many convolutions  
which increase still further the difficulty of this determination.  
In lissencephala, the surface area of the hemispheres in two  
brains, which are nearly similar in the form of cerebrum, are  
approximately comparable with squares of the corresponding  
diameters of the cerebra.  


The cortical thickness, on the other hand, is not so hard to  
The cortical thickness, on the other hand, is not so hard to determine exactly. The average thickness of the cortex in different mammals is given in table 11, quoted from various sources, and, as seen from this table, it is not directly related to the size or weight of the brain, since, as Marburg's ('12) table shows, the
determine exactly. The average thickness of the cortex in different mammals is given in table 11, quoted from various sources,  
and, as seen from this table, it is not directly related to the size  
or weight of the brain, since, as Marburg's ('12) table shows, the  






266 NAOKI SUGITA  
266 NAOKI SUGITA


cortical thickness in several primates ranges within rather narrow limits (2.3 mm. to 2.8 mm.), while the brain weight shows a  
cortical thickness in several primates ranges within rather narrow limits (2.3 mm. to 2.8 mm.), while the brain weight shows a distinctly wider range (82 grams to 400 grams) (table 11). In some cases indeed the smaller brain has a thicker cortex, even in the same family (e.g., the smaller hapale has a thicker cortex than the larger lemur) . But in general we may conclude with Brodmann ('09) that, within one and the same order or family of mammals, the large brain tends to have a larger average value for the cortical thickness.
distinctly wider range (82 grams to 400 grams) (table 11). In  
some cases indeed the smaller brain has a thicker cortex, even in  
the same family (e.g., the smaller hapale has a thicker cortex than  
the larger lemur) . But in general we may conclude with Brodmann ('09) that, within one and the same order or family of  
mammals, the large brain tends to have a larger average value  
for the cortical thickness.  


The relative cortical volume has been formerly computed by  
The relative cortical volume has been formerly computed by me, employing the formula especially devised for this purpose, in the albino and the Norway rat brains, so that the two forms may be compared directly (Sugita, '18 b). The ratio of the cortical volumes in the adult Albino (brain weight, 2.0 grams) and the Norway (brain weight, 2.3 grams) is 1.31, as the relative cortical volumes are, respectively, 393 and 517 (Sugita, '18 b, table 15), and the ratio of the body surfaces in the two animals amounts also to 1.30, when the body weights of the adult albino and the Norway rats are taken as 300 grams and 450 grams, respectively. Moreover, the ratio of cortical volumes in the two forms at any given age will prove to be almost equal to the ratio of body surfaces of the two at the same age.'*
me, employing the formula especially devised for this purpose,  
in the albino and the Norway rat brains, so that the two forms  
may be compared directly (Sugita, '18 b). The ratio of the  
cortical volumes in the adult Albino (brain weight, 2.0 grams)  
and the Norway (brain weight, 2.3 grams) is 1.31, as the relative cortical volumes are, respectively, 393 and 517 (Sugita,  
'18 b, table 15), and the ratio of the body surfaces in the two  
animals amounts also to 1.30, when the body weights of the  
adult albino and the Norway rats are taken as 300 grams and  
450 grams, respectively. Moreover, the ratio of cortical volumes  
in the two forms at any given age will prove to be almost equal  
to the ratio of body surfaces of the two at the same age.'*  


As above tested, the body weight and the cortical volume of  
As above tested, the body weight and the cortical volume of the animals in the same family stand in a definite relation, at least in this instance. But, as we cannot compute the volume of the cortex in other mammals from the data given in table 11, the relation can not be tested further.
the animals in the same family stand in a definite relation, at  
least in this instance. But, as we cannot compute the volume  
of the cortex in other mammals from the data given in table 11,  
the relation can not be tested further.  


■' For example, according to my former presentation (Sugita, '18 b), the computed cortical volume in the Albino Group XV (brain weight, 1.54 grams) is  
■' For example, according to my former presentation (Sugita, '18 b), the computed cortical volume in the Albino Group XV (brain weight, 1.54 grams) is about 346 and that in the Norway Group N XVIII (brain weight, 1.83 grams) is about 423, and according to another determination (Sugita, '18 a) these two groups may be regarded nearly equal in age, as the Albino brain weight would be about 18 per cent less than the Norway brain weight of the like age. The ratio in cortical volume of the above two is 1.22. The body weight corresponding to the brain weight of 1.54 grams in the albino rat is 64 grams and that corresponding to the brain weight of 1.83 grams in the Norway rat is 90 grams ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The ratio of the body surface in the above two, therefore, is about 1.25, quite near to the ratio in cortical volume.
about 346 and that in the Norway Group N XVIII (brain weight, 1.83 grams)  
is about 423, and according to another determination (Sugita, '18 a) these two  
groups may be regarded nearly equal in age, as the Albino brain weight would  
be about 18 per cent less than the Norway brain weight of the like age. The  
ratio in cortical volume of the above two is 1.22. The body weight corresponding to the brain weight of 1.54 grams in the albino rat is 64 grams and that corresponding to the brain weight of 1.83 grams in the Norway rat is 90 grams  
('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The ratio of the body surface in the above two,  
therefore, is about 1.25, quite near to the ratio in cortical volume.  






TABLE 11  
TABLE 11 Giving for several species of mammals the adult body weight and brain weight, the average cortical thickness and the name of author from whom the data for the cortical thickness or for the brain and body weights were cited, arranged in the order of decreasing body weight within each family of inammals. The abbreviations of the names of authors are as follows: B = Brodmann {'09), I — Isenschmid {'11), L = Lewis {'79), M= Marburg, {'12), S = Sugita {'17 a, '18 a, MS.)
Giving for several species of mammals the adult body weight and brain weight, the  
average cortical thickness and the name of author from whom the data for the  
cortical thickness or for the brain and body weights were cited, arranged in the  
order of decreasing body weight within each family of inammals. The abbreviations of the names of authors are as follows: B = Brodmann {'09), I — Isenschmid {'11), L = Lewis {'79), M= Marburg, {'12), S = Sugita {'17 a,  
'18 a, MS.)  






OF MAMMALIA  
OF MAMMALIA






Rodentia  
Rodentia






Chiroptera  
Chiroptera






Marsvipialia  
Marsvipialia






Primates  
Primates






Prosimiae  
Prosimiae






Artiodactyla f  
Artiodactyla f et Carnivo- \ ra I
et Carnivo- \  
ra I  






Insectivora  
Insectivora






NAME OF SRECIES  
NAME OF SRECIES






Simia satyrus (orang-outang).  
Simia satyrus (orang-outang).


Hylobates  
Hylobates


Cynocephalus hamadryas  
Cynocephalus hamadryas


Macacus rhesus (macaques). . .  
Macacus rhesus (macaques). . .


Cercopithecus (long-tailed ape)  
Cercopithecus (long-tailed ape)


Lemur varius  
Lemur varius


Lemur  
Lemur


Hapale (marmoset)  
Hapale (marmoset)


Microcebus  
Microcebus


Ovis musimon (sheep)  
Ovis musimon (sheep)


Felis domestica (cat)  
Felis domestica (cat)


Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)  
Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)


Talpa europaea (mole)  
Talpa europaea (mole)


Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)  
Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)


Cavia cobaya (guinea-pig)  
Cavia cobaya (guinea-pig)


Mus norvegicus (Norway rat) .  
Mus norvegicus (Norway rat) . Mus norv. albinus (albino rat) Spermophilus citillus (groundsquirrel)
Mus norv. albinus (albino rat)  
Spermophilus citillus (groundsquirrel)  


Mus musculus (mouse)  
Mus musculus (mouse)


Pteropus edwardsii (vampire  
Pteropus edwardsii (vampire


bat)  
bat)


Vespertilio murinus (bat)  
Vespertilio murinus (bat)


Macropus giganteus (kangaroo)  
Macropus giganteus (kangaroo)


Didelphys  
Didelphys






BODY  
BODY WEIGHT'
WEIGHT'  






7,350  
7,350 950 920 356
950  
920  
356  


2,500  
2,500


2,170  
2,170


1,800  
1,800


200  
200


62  
62


23,000  
23,000 3,000
3,000  






700  
700 75
75  


2,200  
2,200 600 450 300
600  
450  
300  


200  
200 20
20  






375  
375 23
23  






5,000  
5,000 1,100
1,100  






BR.\IN  
BR.\IN WEIGHT'
WEIGHT'  






grains  
grains


400.0  
400.0


130.0  
130.0


142.0  
142.0


82.0  
82.0


85.0  
85.0


28.7  
28.7


23.0  
23.0


8.0  
8.0


1.9  
1.9






100.0  
100.0 30.0
30.0  






3.5  
3.5 1.3
1.3  


10.0  
10.0 4.5 2.5 2.0
4.5  
2.5  
2.0  


2.2  
2.2 0.4
0.4  






AVERAGE  
AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS
CORTICAL  
THICKNESS  






7.0  
7.0 0.3
0.3  






25.0  
25.0 5.5
5.5  






mm.  
mm. 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.3
2.8  
2.8  
2.3  
2.3  


2.3  
2.3 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.5
1.6  
1.7  
2.0  
1.5  


1.6(2.6)2  
1.6(2.6)2


1.5(2.6)2  
1.5(2.6)2






1.8  
1.8 1.0
1.0  


2.2  
2.2 1.9 2.1 1.9
1.9  
2.1  
1.9  


1.8  
1.8 0.8
0.8  






1.7  
1.7 0.4
0.4  






2.3  
2.3 1.2
1.2  






K tS  
K tS


fa p  
fa p S <
S <  






M  
M


M  
M M M
M  
M  


B  
B M B B B
M  
B  
B  
B  


L  
L L
L  






1 The body and brain weights of some animals were not given by the author  
1 The body and brain weights of some animals were not given by the author who has given the cortical thickness. In such cases the body and brain weights were taken from the list given by Weber ('96).
who has given the cortical thickness. In such cases the body and brain weights  
were taken from the list given by Weber ('96).  


2 According to Lewis (79), the values given here without brackets were taken  
2 According to Lewis (79), the values given here without brackets were taken from Meynert and show the value measured on the slide and the values given within brackets were obtained by his own observation and represent the natural depth of the cortex.
from Meynert and show the value measured on the slide and the values given  
within brackets were obtained by his own observation and represent the natural  
depth of the cortex.  


267  
267






268 NAOKI SUGITA  
268 NAOKI SUGITA


VIII. SIZE AND GROWTH CHANGES IN SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE  
VIII. SIZE AND GROWTH CHANGES IN SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE


^VIAMMALIAN BRAIN  
^VIAMMALIAN BRAIN


Albino rat. The results obtained by me regarding the size  
Albino rat. The results obtained by me regarding the size and the growth changes of the pyramidal cells and of the ganglion cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat were summarized in a previous study (Sugita, '18 c). Four of the conclusions are here quoted:
and the growth changes of the pyramidal cells and of the ganglion  
cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat were summarized in  
a previous study (Sugita, '18 c). Four of the conclusions are  
here quoted:  


1. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is  
1. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is cell body 21 x 27 m and nucleus 18 x 20 /x in the fresh condition (on the slide, respectively, 16 x 21 ju and 14xl5yu). The full size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body 27 X 37 M and nucleus 23 x 25 ^ in the fresh condition (on the slide, respectively, 21 x 29 ^ and 18 x 19 m) 2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age. Up to ten days they still retain their fetal morphology. After having passed the maximum size at about twenty-five daj^s, they diminish somewhat in size, but the internal structure differentiates as the age advances.
cell body 21 x 27 m and nucleus 18 x 20 /x in the fresh condition  
(on the slide, respectively, 16 x 21 ju and 14xl5yu). The full  
size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body  
27 X 37 M and nucleus 23 x 25 ^ in the fresh condition (on the  
slide, respectively, 21 x 29 ^ and 18 x 19 m)
2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their  
maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age. Up to ten days  
they still retain their fetal morphology. After having passed  
the maximum size at about twenty-five daj^s, they diminish  
somewhat in size, but the internal structure differentiates as the  
age advances.  


3. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain  
3. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain nearly their maximum size at ten days, when they remain still in fetal form. After this stage, the size of the cell body still increases slowly but steadily as the age advances, while the nucleus remains nearly unchanged in size throughout life.
nearly their maximum size at ten days, when they remain still  
in fetal form. After this stage, the size of the cell body still increases slowly but steadily as the age advances, while the nucleus  
remains nearly unchanged in size throughout life.  


4. Taking a general view of the data already presented in this  
4. Taking a general view of the data already presented in this series of studies, it is very interesting to observe that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells, all attain nearly their full values at the same age of twenty days; that is, at the weaning time of the albino rat.
series of studies, it is very interesting to observe that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells,  
and the size of the cortical cells, all attain nearly their full values  
at the same age of twenty days; that is, at the weaning time of  
the albino rat.  


For comparison with these results on the cells of the cerebral  
For comparison with these results on the cells of the cerebral cortex, there are some observations by Addison ('11) on the postnatal growth of the Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex of the albino rat. His material was also obtained from the rat colony at The Wistar Institute and the cerebellum was fixed in Ohlmacher's solution, imbedded in paraffine, and stained with
cortex, there are some observations by Addison ('11) on the postnatal growth of the Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex of the  
albino rat. His material was also obtained from the rat colony  
at The Wistar Institute and the cerebellum was fixed in Ohlmacher's solution, imbedded in paraffine, and stained with  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 269  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 269


carbol-thionine and acid fuchsin. A part of his results on the  
carbol-thionine and acid fuchsin. A part of his results on the Purkinje cells is here quoted:
Purkinje cells is here quoted:  


The Purkinje cells are easily distinguishable at birth along the  
The Purkinje cells are easily distinguishable at birth along the inner boundary of the molecular layer by their relatively large size and lightly staining nucleus. These cells measure 12 x 7 m and nuclei 8 X 6.3 At. During the first week, there is great increase in size of both nucleus and cytoplasm. The main bulk of the latter is at the ectal pole and from it several fine processes radiate into the molecular layer. At eight days the cells measure 18 x 12 /x and nuclei 10 x 8 ^ to 12 x 9 IX. At eight to ten days there is definite change in form by the elongation of the cytoplasm of the ectal pole to form the main dendrite, the previously existing fine processes becoming its branches. At the same time all the dendries become arranged in one plane, and this plane is parallel to sections directed across the folia. Nissl granules appear in the cj^oplasm at eight to ten days. The arrangement of Purkinje cells changes with the increase in the surface area of the cortex. At birth they are arranged in two to three irregular rows; at three days in one to two irregular rows, and at five days in one continuous row. As growth of the cortex continues, the space intervening between the Purkinje cells becomes greater. Some nuclei reach their maximum size of 12 x 9 /x at eight days, while the cell bodies usually continue to grow, reaching a maximum size of 24 x 19 ^ at twenty days. The dendrites reach the outer limiting membrane when all the outer granule eel's have migrated (twenty-one to twentyfive days), and continue to develop new branches until a much later period as is .diown by a comparison of cells from a 31 day with cells from a 110-day cerebelhun.
inner boundary of the molecular layer by their relatively large size and  
lightly staining nucleus. These cells measure 12 x 7 m and nuclei  
8 X 6.3 At. During the first week, there is great increase in size of  
both nucleus and cytoplasm. The main bulk of the latter is at the  
ectal pole and from it several fine processes radiate into the molecular  
layer. At eight days the cells measure 18 x 12 /x and nuclei 10 x 8 ^  
to 12 x 9 IX. At eight to ten days there is definite change in form by  
the elongation of the cytoplasm of the ectal pole to form the main  
dendrite, the previously existing fine processes becoming its branches.  
At the same time all the dendries become arranged in one plane, and  
this plane is parallel to sections directed across the folia. Nissl granules appear in the cj^oplasm at eight to ten days. The arrangement  
of Purkinje cells changes with the increase in the surface area of the  
cortex. At birth they are arranged in two to three irregular rows;  
at three days in one to two irregular rows, and at five days in one  
continuous row. As growth of the cortex continues, the space intervening between the Purkinje cells becomes greater. Some nuclei reach  
their maximum size of 12 x 9 /x at eight days, while the cell bodies  
usually continue to grow, reaching a maximum size of 24 x 19 ^ at  
twenty days. The dendrites reach the outer limiting membrane  
when all the outer granule eel's have migrated (twenty-one to twentyfive days), and continue to develop new branches until a much later  
period as is .diown by a comparison of cells from a 31 day with cells  
from a 110-day cerebelhun.  


From this it is plain that the Purkinje cells (cell bodies) of the  
From this it is plain that the Purkinje cells (cell bodies) of the albino rat cerebellum have also reached full size at about the weaning time (twenty days of age) .
albino rat cerebellum have also reached full size at about the  
weaning time (twenty days of age) .  


From the foregoing, we see that the functional cortical cells  
From the foregoing, we see that the functional cortical cells both in the cerebrum and in the cerebellum reach their full size at an early age — before the weaning time — and though they continue to mature after that they change only slightly in size, sometimes even diminishing. Thus the cortical nerve elements are all precocious in their growth, which is nearly complete when the young become independent of the mother and their education begins. Addison ('11) has stated also that the development of motor control in the young rat is closely correlated with the completion of the cerebellum and the rat attains its full motor control when the cerebellum has attained structural
both in the cerebrum and in the cerebellum reach their full size  
at an early age — before the weaning time — and though they  
continue to mature after that they change only slightly in size,  
sometimes even diminishing. Thus the cortical nerve elements  
are all precocious in their growth, which is nearly complete  
when the young become independent of the mother and their  
education begins. Addison ('11) has stated also that the development of motor control in the young rat is closely correlated  
with the completion of the cerebellum and the rat attains its  
full motor control when the cerebellum has attained structural  






270 NAOKI SUGITA  
270 NAOKI SUGITA


maturity at twenty-one to twenty-five days of age. At that age  
maturity at twenty-one to twenty-five days of age. At that age the cells are nearly full size. We may conclude, therefore, at least regarding some of the nerve cells, that the beginning of functional education of the cells at twenty days is preceded by the attainment of nearly full size, and after this period there is very little change in size, though the internal structures mature as the age advances.
the cells are nearly full size. We may conclude, therefore, at  
least regarding some of the nerve cells, that the beginning of  
functional education of the cells at twenty days is preceded by  
the attainment of nearly full size, and after this period there is  
very little change in size, though the internal structures mature  
as the age advances.  


Mouse. A study in this field was made by Stefanowska ('98)  
Mouse. A study in this field was made by Stefanowska ('98) on the cortical cells of the mouse. She stained the cells by the method of silver impregnation and studied mainly the development of the cell attachments. Her conclusions may be condensed as follows:
on the cortical cells of the mouse. She stained the cells by the  
method of silver impregnation and studied mainly the development of the cell attachments. Her conclusions may be condensed  
as follows:  


1. In the new-born mouse most of the cortical nerve cells have a  
1. In the new-born mouse most of the cortical nerve cells have a simple morphology. 2. The cells are usually arranged in chains, disposed perpendicularly to the surface of the cortex. 3. Besides these, there are some groups of cells more advanced in developmen and having many dendrites, and cells which have the adult form having many, long, ramified dendrites. 4. The different parts of the cortex do not attain the same degree of development at the same time. Some cell groups are more precocious. 5. In the lamina multiformis and in the lamina ganglionaris, we find always the most advanced cells in large numbers. 6. In the lamina pyramidalis the development of the cells is very slow. On the ectal surface, near the pia mater, many cells not at all differentiated are often found. 7. At one day after birth, the dendrites of cortical cells are covered with varicosities. The axis-cylinders have also many nodal swellings. 8, As the neurons develop, the varicosities become more and more rare. At fifteen days, varicosities are no longer seen on the dendrites and the neurons at this age have completed their development. 9. The appearance of the piriform appendices on the dendrites is somewhat delayed. At ten days all pyramidal cells show these appendices. These latter are the constant feature of the neuron, while the varicosities are only a temporary formation. The piriform appendices may be the terminal apparatus of the dendrites. 10. The piriform appendices are the last element which appears on the cortical cells during growth. This fact seems to suggest the high importance of these appendices for this nerve function.
simple morphology. 2. The cells are usually arranged in chains, disposed perpendicularly to the surface of the cortex. 3. Besides these,  
there are some groups of cells more advanced in developmen and  
having many dendrites, and cells which have the adult form having  
many, long, ramified dendrites. 4. The different parts of the cortex  
do not attain the same degree of development at the same time. Some  
cell groups are more precocious. 5. In the lamina multiformis and  
in the lamina ganglionaris, we find always the most advanced cells  
in large numbers. 6. In the lamina pyramidalis the development of  
the cells is very slow. On the ectal surface, near the pia mater, many  
cells not at all differentiated are often found. 7. At one day after  
birth, the dendrites of cortical cells are covered with varicosities. The  
axis-cylinders have also many nodal swellings. 8, As the neurons  
develop, the varicosities become more and more rare. At fifteen  
days, varicosities are no longer seen on the dendrites and the neurons  
at this age have completed their development. 9. The appearance  
of the piriform appendices on the dendrites is somewhat delayed.  
At ten days all pyramidal cells show these appendices. These latter  
are the constant feature of the neuron, while the varicosities are only  
a temporary formation. The piriform appendices may be the terminal  
apparatus of the dendrites. 10. The piriform appendices are the  
last element which appears on the cortical cells during growth. This  
fact seems to suggest the high importance of these appendices for this  
nerve function.  


As seen from the foregoing, the morphological completeness in  
As seen from the foregoing, the morphological completeness in respect of the dendrites and the axis-cylinder of the cortical cells is attained at fifteen days or at the weaning time of the mouse also.
respect of the dendrites and the axis-cylinder of the cortical cells  
is attained at fifteen days or at the weaning time of the mouse  
also.  






GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX  
GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX






271  
271






TABLE 12  
TABLE 12 Giving for man and other mammals the size of the largest ganglioncells in the lamina ganglionaris of the cerebral cortex as presented by different authors. Data are arranged according to the order of the average diameters
Giving for man and other mammals the size of the largest ganglioncells in the lamina ganglionaris of the cerebral cortex as presented by different authors. Data  
are arranged according to the order of the average diameters  






NAME OF SPECIES  
NAME OF SPECIES






Homo sapiens (man)  
Homo sapiens (man)


Homo sapiens (man)  
Homo sapiens (man)


Homo sapiens (man)  
Homo sapiens (man)


Homo sapiens (man)  
Homo sapiens (man)


Felis leo (lion)  
Felis leo (lion)


Felis tigris (tiger)  
Felis tigris (tiger)


Cercoleptiis caudivolvulus (kinkajou).  
Cercoleptiis caudivolvulus (kinkajou).


Ursus syriacus (bear)  
Ursus syriacus (bear)


Indris (babakoto)  
Indris (babakoto)


Felis domestica (cat)  
Felis domestica (cat)


Cercopithecus mona (African monkey)  
Cercopithecus mona (African monkey)


Elephas (elephant)  
Elephas (elephant)


Lemur  
Lemur


Mus norvegicus (Norway rat)  
Mus norvegicus (Norway rat)


Ovis musimon (sheep)  
Ovis musimon (sheep)


Sus (pig)  
Sus (pig)


Mus norvegicus albinus (albino rat) . .  
Mus norvegicus albinus (albino rat) . .


Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)  
Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)


Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)  
Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)


Pteropus edwardsii (vampire bat)  
Pteropus edwardsii (vampire bat)


Mus musculus (mouse)  
Mus musculus (mouse)






MAXIMUM SIZE  
MAXIMUM SIZE




REPORTED IN MICBA  
REPORTED IN MICBA




Linear  
Linear diameters
diameters  




Average  
Average


diameter or  
diameter or


square root  
square root


of the  
of the








product  
product




60X120  
60X120




85  
85




55X126  
55X126




83  
83




53X106  
53X106




75  
75




40 X 80  
40 X 80




57  
57




60X133  
60X133




90  
90




60X100  
60X100




78  
78




50X110  
50X110




74  
74




53X100  
53X100




73  
73




44 X 80  
44 X 80




59  
59




32X106  
32X106




58  
58




40 X 72  
40 X 72




54  
54




35 X 60  
35 X 60




46  
46




SOX 70  
SOX 70




46  
46




33 X 48  
33 X 48




40  
40




23 X 65  
23 X 65




39  
39




27 X 48  
27 X 48




36  
36




30 X 42  
30 X 42




36  
36




18 X 60  
18 X 60




33  
33




18X 40  
18X 40




27  
27




16X 36  
16X 36




24  
24




18X 20  
18X 20




19  
19
 
 
 
Author
 
 
 
Betz
Lewis
Brodmann
Hammarberg
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Lewis
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Brodmann
 
Sugita


Lewis


Lewis


Sugita
Author


Lewis


Brodmann


Brodmann  
Betz Lewis Brodmann Hammarberg


Isenschmid
Brodmann


Brodmann


Brodmann


There are no other systematic investigations on the postnatal
Brodmann
development of the cortical nerve cells in mammals, although
there are some studies on the growth of nerve cells in the fetus,
among which the researches by His ('04) (see footnote 2),
Koelliker ('96), and Vignal ('89) are the most important.


Table 12 was compiled by me in order to compare the size of
Brodmann
the largest ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (the fifth
layer of Brodmann) of the cerebral cortex of man and some
other mammals. The tabulated data were taken from Brodmann ('09), Lewis ('79, '82), Hammarberg ('95), and others.


Lewis


Brodmann


272 NAOKI SUGITA
Brodmann


The results obtained by me (Sugita, '18 c) in the albino and the
Brodmann
Norway rats have been also entered.


IX. THE SIZE OF THE LARGEST CORTICAL CELLS IN MAN AND
Sugita
SOME OTHER MAMMALS


From table 12 we can draw only very general conclusions as to
Lewis
the significance of the size of the largest cortical cells. The giant
Betz cells even in man vary rather widely in size according to the
different authors, probably owing largely to the different technical methods used, as has been pointed out repeatedly in the
course of this paper.


From time to time attempts have been made to formulate a
Lewis
general interpretation of the size of the Betz cells and of the
nerve cells in general. From the examination of table 12, it is
seen that the values for the mean diameters do not, except in
the very most general way, follow the size of the animal, but
that the Felidae, even the cat, stand high in the series.


We are not able to contribute any general explanation for the
Sugita
size of these cells, although it may not be out of place to repeat
that in the Norway rat with the heavier brain these cells are
larger than in the albino rat with the lighter brain (Sugita,
'18 c), and so will merely call attention to the various authors
who have had something to say in the matter: Lewis ("79),
Hughlings Jackson ('90), Schwalbe ('81), Barratt ('01), Dunn
('00, '02), Herrick ('02), Donaldson ('03), Campbell ('05),
Boughton ('06), Johnston ('08), and Kidd ('15).


X. SUMMARY
Lewis


1. In the present paper I have attempted to compare my conclusions regarding the development of the cortical elements in the
Brodmann
brains of the albino and the Norway rats with the corresponding
changes in other mammals. The data used for these comparisons
were taken from various sources, but the comparisons are in
many instances hampered by differences in technique or the
lack of essential information.


2. The relations of the cortical thickness at different locali
Brodmann


Isenschmid


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 273'


ties in the cerebrum are quite the same in the mouse and rabbit
as in the rat. The development of the cortical thickness has
proved to be similar in the mouse and guinea-pig: it attains
nearly its full value at the weaning time of the animal.


3. The statement that the cortical thickness diminishes from
There are no other systematic investigations on the postnatal development of the cortical nerve cells in mammals, although there are some studies on the growth of nerve cells in the fetus, among which the researches by His ('04) (see footnote 2), Koelliker ('96), and Vignal ('89) are the most important.
the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect probably holds true throughout mammals, including
man.  


4. The results given by different authors for the cortical
Table 12 was compiled by me in order to compare the size of the largest ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (the fifth layer of Brodmann) of the cerebral cortex of man and some other mammals. The tabulated data were taken from Brodmann ('09), Lewis ('79, '82), Hammarberg ('95), and others.
thickness of human brain (averages or for each locality) are by no
means in accord. Even for the same locality there are wide
deviations. The best data indicate that the average cortical
thickness of the adult human brain is about 3 mm.  


5. The mode of increase in cortical thickness in man according
to age appears to be similar to that in the albino rat, if the brains
are compared at equivalent ages. The developmental stage of
the brain of a new-born child corresponds to that of an albino
rat of five days of age, and throughout the postnatal life the relative growth rate of the rat and man are as 30 to 1. The span of
life 30 for man corresponds to 1 for the rat and the equivalent
ages are represented by like fractions of the span of life. The
human cortex probably attains nearly its full thickness at fifteen
months, equivalent to twenty days of rat age.


6. The relative cortical volumes of the albino and the Norway
rat brains, computed formerly by me (Sugita, '18 b), appear to be
proportional to the surface areas of the entire bodies at the like
age. This relation may be generally applicable within a given
order of mammalia. The cortical thickness or the brain weight
is in general only loosely correlated with the body weight or size
of the animal.


7. The cortical nerve cells in the cerebruni and in the cerebellum of the albino rat are precocious in their growth, attaining
272 NAOKI SUGITA
almost the full size at twenty days, the weaning time. The
maturation of the intracellular structures probably continues
after the size is apparently completed. This process is shown
also in the mouse.


8. The size of the Betz giant cells in the adult human cortex
The results obtained by me (Sugita, '18 c) in the albino and the Norway rats have been also entered.


THE JOURNAL OF COMPABATIVE NEUBOLOGT, VOL. 29, NO. 3
IX. THE SIZE OF THE LARGEST CORTICAL CELLS IN MAN AND SOME OTHER MAMMALS


From table 12 we can draw only very general conclusions as to the significance of the size of the largest cortical cells. The giant Betz cells even in man vary rather widely in size according to the different authors, probably owing largely to the different technical methods used, as has been pointed out repeatedly in the course of this paper.


From time to time attempts have been made to formulate a general interpretation of the size of the Betz cells and of the nerve cells in general. From the examination of table 12, it is seen that the values for the mean diameters do not, except in the very most general way, follow the size of the animal, but that the Felidae, even the cat, stand high in the series.


274 NAOKI SUGITA
We are not able to contribute any general explanation for the size of these cells, although it may not be out of place to repeat that in the Norway rat with the heavier brain these cells are larger than in the albino rat with the lighter brain (Sugita, '18 c), and so will merely call attention to the various authors who have had something to say in the matter: Lewis ("79), Hughlings Jackson ('90), Schwalbe ('81), Barratt ('01), Dunn ('00, '02), Herrick ('02), Donaldson ('03), Campbell ('05), Boughton ('06), Johnston ('08), and Kidd ('15).


(found ill the gyrus centralis anterior) is reported differently by
==X. Summary==
different authors. The mean value is about 75 micra in average
diameter.  


9. The size of the cortical cells, especially the Betz motor
1. In the present paper I have attempted to compare my conclusions regarding the development of the cortical elements in the brains of the albino and the Norway rats with the corresponding changes in other mammals. The data used for these comparisons were taken from various sources, but the comparisons are in many instances hampered by differences in technique or the lack of essential information.
ganglion cells, of adult animals has no clear relationship to
brain size or body size. These cells are notably large in the  
Felidae.  


10. As a general conclusion to this series of studies the following statement may be made:  
2. The relations of the cortical thickness at different localities in the cerebrum are quite the same in the {{mouse}} and {{rabbit}} as in the rat. The development of the cortical thickness has proved to be similar in the mouse and guinea-pig: it attains nearly its full value at the weaning time of the animal.


The morphological organization of the cerebral cortex is generally precocious. The size of individual cortical nerve cells, the  
3. The statement that the cortical thickness diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect probably holds true throughout mammals, including man.
total number of cortical cells, and the thickness of the cortex,
all attain nearly their full values at the same time and very
early in life (corresponding to the weaning time in some rodents) ,
after which the maturation of internal structures of the cell body
and the nucleus continues. The brain weight and the cortical
volume continue to increase even after this stage throughout the
postnatal life, though not so rapidly as during the early period.
This later growth is due principally to the development of the
cell attachments, intercellular tissues (neuroglia tissue and bloodvessels), the ingrowth of axons into the cortex and their myelination, which together separate the cells from each other, and
cause an increase in cortical volume. The cortical volume is
primarily dependent on the size of individual cortical cells and
their total number and it appears in animals belonging to a
given zoological order to have a definite relationship to the
size (or area of surface) of the body of the animal.  


4. The results given by different authors for the cortical thickness of human brain (averages or for each locality) are by no means in accord. Even for the same locality there are wide deviations. The best data indicate that the average cortical thickness of the adult human brain is about 3 mm.


5. The mode of increase in cortical thickness in man according to age appears to be similar to that in the albino rat, if the brains are compared at equivalent ages. The developmental stage of the brain of a new-born child corresponds to that of an albino rat of five days of age, and throughout the postnatal life the relative growth rate of the rat and man are as 30 to 1. The span of life 30 for man corresponds to 1 for the rat and the equivalent ages are represented by like fractions of the span of life. The human cortex probably attains nearly its full thickness at fifteen months, equivalent to twenty days of rat age.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 275
6. The relative cortical volumes of the albino and the Norway rat brains, computed formerly by me (Sugita, '18 b), appear to be proportional to the surface areas of the entire bodies at the like age. This relation may be generally applicable within a given order of mammalia. The cortical thickness or the brain weight is in general only loosely correlated with the body weight or size of the animal.


LITERATURE CITED
7. The cortical nerve cells in the cerebruni and in the cerebellum of the albino rat are precocious in their growth, attaining almost the full size at twenty days, the weaning time. The maturation of the intracellular structures probably continues after the size is apparently completed. This process is shown also in the mouse.


Addison, VV. H. F. 1911 The development of the Purkinje cells and of the
8. The size of the Betz giant cells in the adult human cortex (found ill the gyrus centralis anterior) is reported differently by different authors. The mean value is about 75 micra in average diameter.
cortical layers in the cerebellum of the albino rat. Jour. Comp.
Neur., vol. 21, no. 5.  


Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of
9. The size of the cortical cells, especially the Betz motor ganglion cells, of adult animals has no clear relationship to brain size or body size. These cells are notably large in the Felidae.
the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.  


Allen, Jessie Blount 1904 The associative processes of the guinea-pig. A
10. As a general conclusion to this series of studies the following statement may be made:
study of the psychical development of an animal with a nervous system well medullated at birth. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol.
14, no. 4.


Barratt, J. O. Wakelin 1901 Observations on the structure of the third,  
The morphological organization of the cerebral cortex is generally precocious. The size of individual cortical nerve cells, the total number of cortical cells, and the thickness of the cortex, all attain nearly their full values at the same time and very early in life (corresponding to the weaning time in some rodents) , after which the maturation of internal structures of the cell body and the nucleus continues. The brain weight and the cortical volume continue to increase even after this stage throughout the postnatal life, though not so rapidly as during the early period. This later growth is due principally to the development of the cell attachments, intercellular tissues (neuroglia tissue and bloodvessels), the ingrowth of axons into the cortex and their myelination, which together separate the cells from each other, and cause an increase in cortical volume. The cortical volume is primarily dependent on the size of individual cortical cells and their total number and it appears in animals belonging to a given zoological order to have a definite relationship to the size (or area of surface) of the body of the animal.
fourth, and sixth cranial nerves. Jour. Anat. and Physiol., vol. 35,  
p. 214.  


BouGHTON, T. H. 1906 The increase in the number and size of the medullated
==Literature Cited==
fibers in the oculomotor nerve of the white rat and of the cat at different ages. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 16, pp. 153-165.


Brodmann, K. 1908 Uber Rindenmessungen. Centralbl. f. Nervenheilkunde
Addison, VV. H. F. 1911 The development of the Purkinje cells and of the cortical layers in the cerebellum of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, no. 5.
u. Psychiatrie, Bd. 19.  


1909 Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig.  
Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.
1909 Antwort an Herrn Dr. Th. Kaes. tJber Rindenmessungen.
Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 635.  


Campbell, A. W. 1905 Histological studies on the localisation of cortical
Allen, Jessie Blount 1904 The associative processes of the guinea-pig. A study of the psychical development of an animal with a nervous system well medullated at birth. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 14, no. 4.
function. Cambridge.  


Dhere and Lapicque, Louis 1898 8ur le rapport entre la grandeur du corps et
Barratt, J. O. Wakelin 1901 Observations on the structure of the third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerves. Jour. Anat. and Physiol., vol. 35, p. 214.
le developpement de I'encephale. Archives de Physiologie normale
et pathologique, no. 4.  


Donaldson, H. H. 1891 Cerebral localization. Am. Jour, of Psychol., vol. 4,  
BouGHTON, T. H. 1906 The increase in the number and size of the medullated fibers in the oculomotor nerve of the white rat and of the cat at different ages. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 16, pp. 153-165.
no. 1.  


1891 Anatomical observations on the brain and several sense-organs
Brodmann, K. 1908 Uber Rindenmessungen. Centralbl. f. Nervenheilkunde u. Psychiatrie, Bd. 19.
of the blind deaf-mute, Laura Dewey Bridgeman. II. On the thickness and structure of the cerebral cortex. Am. Jour, of Psychol.,
vol. 4, no. 2.  


1897 The growth of the brain. New York.  
1909 Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig. 1909 Antwort an Herrn Dr. Th. Kaes. tJber Rindenmessungen. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 635.


1903 On a law determining the number of medullated nerve fibers
Campbell, A. W. 1905 Histological studies on the localisation of cortical function. Cambridge.
innervating the thigh, shank, and foot of the frog— Rana virescens.  
Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 13, no. 3.  


1908 Review "Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen" von Dr. Th. Kaes.
Dhere and Lapicque, Louis 1898 8ur le rapport entre la grandeur du corps et le developpement de I'encephale. Archives de Physiologie normale et pathologique, no. 4.
Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 7, no. 4. Anat. Rec, no. 8.
1908 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect to the growth
of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 18, no. 4.
1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and
Biology, no. 6.
Dubois, Eugene 1898 Uber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der
Korpergrosse bei den Saugetieren. Archiv f. Anthropologic, Bd.
25.  


1898 tJber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der Korpergrosse beim Menschen. Archiv f. Anthropologie, Bd. 25.  
Donaldson, H. H. 1891 Cerebral localization. Am. Jour, of Psychol., vol. 4, no. 1.


1891 Anatomical observations on the brain and several sense-organs of the blind deaf-mute, Laura Dewey Bridgeman. II. On the thickness and structure of the cerebral cortex. Am. Jour, of Psychol., vol. 4, no. 2.


1897 The growth of the brain. New York.


276 NAOKI SUGITA
1903 On a law determining the number of medullated nerve fibers innervating the thigh, shank, and foot of the frog— Rana virescens. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 13, no. 3.


Dubois, EuGE^fE 1913 On the relation between the quantity of brain and the
1908 Review "Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen" von Dr. Th. Kaes. Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 7, no. 4. Anat. Rec, no. 8. 1908 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 18, no. 4. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6. Dubois, Eugene 1898 Uber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der Korpergrosse bei den Saugetieren. Archiv f. Anthropologic, Bd. 25.
size of the body in vertebrates. Proceedings of the meeting of December 27, 1913. Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, vol. 16.  


Dunn, Elizabeth Hopkins 1900 The number and size of the nerve fibers innervating the skin and muscles of the thigh in the frog (Rana virescens
1898 tJber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der Korpergrosse beim Menschen. Archiv f. Anthropologie, Bd. 25.
brachycephala, Cope). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 10, no. 2.
1902 On the number and on the relation between diameter and distribution of the nerve fibers innervating the leg of the frog, Rana
virescens brachycephala. Cope. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12, no. 4.  


FucHS, SiGMUND 1883 Zur Histogenese der menschlichen Grosshirnrinde.  
Dubois, EuGE^fE 1913 On the relation between the quantity of brain and the size of the body in vertebrates. Proceedings of the meeting of December 27, 1913. Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, vol. 16.
Sitzungsber. der K. Akad. der Wissenschaft, Wien., Bd. 88. III.  
Abtheil.  


His, Wilhelm 1904 Die Entwickelung des menschlichen Gehirns wahrend der
Dunn, Elizabeth Hopkins 1900 The number and size of the nerve fibers innervating the skin and muscles of the thigh in the frog (Rana virescens brachycephala, Cope). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 10, no. 2. 1902 On the number and on the relation between diameter and distribution of the nerve fibers innervating the leg of the frog, Rana virescens brachycephala. Cope. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12, no. 4.
ersten Monate. Leipzig.  


Hammarberg, Carl 1895 Studien liber Klinik und Pathologic der Idiotie
FucHS, SiGMUND 1883 Zur Histogenese der menschlichen Grosshirnrinde. Sitzungsber. der K. Akad. der Wissenschaft, Wien., Bd. 88. III. Abtheil.
nebst Untersuchungen tiber die normale Anatomie der Hirnrinde.  
Upsala.  


Herrick, C. Judson 1902 A note on the significance of the size of nerve fibers
His, Wilhelm 1904 Die Entwickelung des menschlichen Gehirns wahrend der ersten Monate. Leipzig.
in fishes. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12.  


Isenschmid, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abh.
Hammarberg, Carl 1895 Studien liber Klinik und Pathologic der Idiotie nebst Untersuchungen tiber die normale Anatomie der Hirnrinde. Upsala.
Akad. Wiss. Berlin, physik-math. CI. Jahrg. 1911 Anh. no. 3.  


Jackson, J. Huglings 1890 On convulsive seizures. British Medical Journal, vol. 1.  
Herrick, C. Judson 1902 A note on the significance of the size of nerve fibers in fishes. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12.


Johnston, J. B. 1908 On the significance of the caliber of the parts of the
Isenschmid, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abh. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, physik-math. CI. Jahrg. 1911 Anh. no. 3.
neurone in vertebrates. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 18,
no. 6.  


Kaes, Theodor 1905 Die Rindenbreite als wesentlicher Faktor zur Beurtheilung der Entwickelung des Gehirns und namentlich der Intelligenz. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 24, Nr. 22.
Jackson, J. Huglings 1890 On convulsive seizures. British Medical Journal, vol. 1.
1907 Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen in ihren Massen und in ihren
Fasergehalt. 2 volumes. Jena.  


1909 tjber Rindenmessungen. Eine Erwiederung an Dr. K. Brodmann. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 178.  
Johnston, J. B. 1908 On the significance of the caliber of the parts of the neurone in vertebrates. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 18, no. 6.
1909 Replik. Zu "Dr. Brodmanns Antwort an Rindenmessungen."
Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 639.  


KiDD, Leonard J. 1915 Factors which determine the calibre of nerve cells and
Kaes, Theodor 1905 Die Rindenbreite als wesentlicher Faktor zur Beurtheilung der Entwickelung des Gehirns und namentlich der Intelligenz. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 24, Nr. 22. 1907 Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen in ihren Massen und in ihren Fasergehalt. 2 volumes. Jena.
fibres. Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, vol. 13, pp. 1-27.  


King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the
1909 tjber Rindenmessungen. Eine Erwiederung an Dr. K. Brodmann. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 178. 1909 Replik. Zu "Dr. Brodmanns Antwort an Rindenmessungen." Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 639.
albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material or
a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 214-244.  


Lapicque, Louis 1907 Tableau gen6ra' du poids encephalique en ionction du
KiDD, Leonard J. 1915 Factors which determine the calibre of nerve cells and fibres. Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, vol. 13, pp. 1-27.
poids du corps. Paris.  


Lewis, W. Bevan 1878 Application of freezing methods to the microscopic
King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material or a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 214-244.
examination of the brain. 'Brain,' Part 3, pp. 348-359.
1879 Re^arches on the comparative structure of the cortex cerebri.  
III. Phil. Trans., pp. 36-64.  


1882 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents. Phil.
Lapicque, Louis 1907 Tableau gen6ra' du poids encephalique en ionction du poids du corps. Paris.
Trans., pp. 699-749.  


Lewis, W. Bevan 1878 Application of freezing methods to the microscopic examination of the brain. 'Brain,' Part 3, pp. 348-359. 1879 Re^arches on the comparative structure of the cortex cerebri. III. Phil. Trans., pp. 36-64.


1882 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents. Phil. Trans., pp. 699-749.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 277


Marburg, Otto 1907 Beitrage zui Kenntniss der Grosshirnrinde der Affen.  
Marburg, Otto 1907 Beitrage zui Kenntniss der Grosshirnrinde der Affen.


Arbeiten aus dem Neurologischen Institute an der Wiener UniversitJit  
Arbeiten aus dem Neurologischen Institute an der Wiener UniversitJit


(Obersteiner). Bd. 16.  
(Obersteiner). Bd. 16. Mayer, Otto 1912 Mikrometrische Untersuchungen iiberdie Zelldichtigkeit
Mayer, Otto 1912 Mikrometrische Untersuchungen iiberdie Zelldichtigkeit  


der Grosshirnrinde bei den Affen. Jour. f. Psychol, u. Neurol., Bd.  
der Grosshirnrinde bei den Affen. Jour. f. Psychol, u. Neurol., Bd.


19, Heft 6.  
19, Heft 6. Rose, M. 1912 Histologische Lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde bei kleinen
Rose, M. 1912 Histologische Lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde bei kleinen  


Saugetieren (Rodentia, Insectivora, Cheiroptera). Jour. f. Psychol.  
Saugetieren (Rodentia, Insectivora, Cheiroptera). Jour. f. Psychol.


u. Neurol., Bd. 19, Ergonzungshefte 2.  
u. Neurol., Bd. 19, Ergonzungshefte 2. ScHWALBE 1881 Lehrbuch der Neurologie. Erlangen. Stefanowska, Micheline 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales
ScHWALBE 1881 Lehrbuch der Neurologie. Erlangen.  
Stefanowska, Micheline 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales  


chez la souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Societe Royale des  
chez la souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Societe Royale des


Sciences med. et naturelles de Bruxelles, vo . 7.  
Sciences med. et naturelles de Bruxelles, vo . 7.  
Sugita, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during
the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur.,
vol. 28, no. 3.
1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the
postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol.
28, no. 3.
1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus
norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.
1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus
norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness
in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.


1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
{{Ref-Sugita1917a}}


V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in
{{Ref-Sugita1917b}}
a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the
albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the
frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus
norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat.
Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.


1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
{{Ref-Sugita1918a}}


VI. Parti. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes
{{Ref-Sugita1918b}}
of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the
growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve
cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp.


. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.  
1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


1918 d Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.  
V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.


VII. On the influence of starvation at an early age upon the development of the cerebral cortex. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur.,
1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.
vol. 29, no. 3.  


VI. Parti. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.


1918 d Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.


278 NAOKI SUGITA
VII. On the influence of starvation at an early age upon the development of the cerebral cortex. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 3.


ViERORDT, H. 1890 Das Massenwachstum der Korperorgane des Menschen.


Archiv f. Anatomie u. Physiologic, Anat. Abtheil., pp. 62-94.  
ViERORDT, H. 1890 Das Massenwachstum der Korperorgane des Menschen. Archiv f. Anatomie u. Physiologic, Anat. Abtheil., pp. 62-94.  
ViGNAL, William 1889 Developpement des elements du systeme nerveux


cerebro-spinal. Paris.  
ViGNAL, William 1889 Developpement des elements du systeme nerveux cerebro-spinal. Paris. De Vries, I. 1912 tjber die Zytoarchitektonik der Grosshirnrinde der Maus und iiber die Beziehungen der einzelnen Zellschichten zum Corpus
De Vries, I. 1912 tjber die Zytoarchitektonik der Grosshirnrinde der Maus  


und iiber die Beziehungen der einzelnen Zellschichten zum Corpus
Callosum auf Grund von experimentellen Ltisionen. Folia Neuro Biolog ca, Bd. 6, Nr. 4. Weber, Max 1896 Vorstudien iiber das Hirngew'cht der Saugetiere. Fest schr It iir Carl Gegenbaur. Pp. 105-12].


Callosum auf Grund von experimentellen Ltisionen. Folia Neuro
{{footer}}
Biolog ca, Bd. 6, Nr. 4.
Weber, Max 1896 Vorstudien iiber das Hirngew'cht der Saugetiere. Fest
schr It iir Carl Gegenbaur. Pp. 105-12].

Revision as of 10:26, 17 May 2020

Embryology - 4 May 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 11-.

Online Editor  
Mark Hill.jpg
This 1917 fourth in a series of historic papers by Sugita on the development of the cortex in the rat.



More by this author: Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. (1917) J Comp. Neurol. 28: 495-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increases in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. (1917) J Comp. Neurol. 28: 511-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 1-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 11-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. V. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the c responding data for the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 61-117.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. VI. Part I. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the growth of the brain. VI. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 119-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. VII. On the influence of starvation at an early age upon the development of the cerebral cortex. Albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 177-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. VIII. General review of data for the thickness of the cerebral cortex and the size of the cortical cells in several mammals, together with some postnatal growth changes in these structures. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 241-.

Modern Notes: cortex | rat

Neural Links: ectoderm | neural | neural crest | ventricular | sensory | Stage 22 | gliogenesis | neural fetal | Medicine Lecture - Neural | Lecture - Ectoderm | Lecture - Neural Crest | Lab - Early Neural | neural abnormalities | folic acid | iodine deficiency | Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | neural postnatal | neural examination | Histology | Historic Neural | Category:Neural



Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

Comparative Studies on the Growth of the Cerebral Cortex

IV. On the Thickness of the Cerebral Cortex of the Norway Rat (Mus Norvegicus) and a Comparison of the Same with the Cortical Thickness in the Albino Rat

Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949)
Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949)

Naoki Sugita

From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

Ten Charts

Embryology Navigation Teaching Movies Embryonic Systems Abnormal Explore


Paper - Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex 4 (1918) Jump to:navigation, search ExpandEmbryology - 17 May 2020 Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link Expand to Translate Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 11-.

ExpandOnline Editor ExpandHistoric Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages

Contents 1 Comparative Studies on the Growth of the Cerebral Cortex 1.1 IV. On the Thickness of the Cerebral Cortex of the Norway Rat (Mus Norvegicus) and a Comparison of the Same with the Cortical Thickness in the Albino Rat 1.2 I. Introduction 1.2.1 Table 1 1.2.2 Table 2 Comparative Studies on the Growth of the Cerebral Cortex[edit] IV. On the Thickness of the Cerebral Cortex of the Norway Rat (Mus Norvegicus) and a Comparison of the Same with the Cortical Thickness in the Albino Rat[edit] Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949) Prof. Naoki Sugita (1887-1949) Naoki Sugita

From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

Ten Charts

I. Introduction[edit] In my second study in this series (Sugita, '17a), I described in detail the postnatal growth of the cortex in thickness in the brain of the albino rat. With the same purpose and by the same technique, I have examined also the growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, the wild form from which the albino rat has been derived. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) have been interested in a comparison of the wild Norway with the albino rats in respect of their body measurements and the size of the central nervous system. They have concluded that on account of domestication the albino rat grows less well than the wild Norway rat, from which it has been derived, and especially that the relative weight of the brain of the adult albino rat is about 16 per cent less than that of the Norway rat of like body weight. It has been assumed as probable that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat is due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number. The percentage of water appears to be nearly the same in the central nervous system of both forms during the period of active growth, but after this period it remains slightly higher in the Norway rat. From these differences between the two forms as regards the weight and the water content of their brains, it is also inferred that there will be some structural

1]


12 NAOKI SUGITA

differences in the cerebral cortex. Consequently, it became desirable for me to compare in these two forms, one wild and aggressive and -the other gentle and domesticated, the course of the growth of the cerebral cortex.

Using my previous studies on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) and on the form of the Norway brain (Sugita, '18) as a point of de-. parture, I will present in this paper the data on the cortical thickness of the Norway rat and will compare these with the data for the Albino. In this comparison of the brains of the two forms, the data, other than those on cortical thickness, are all quoted from Donaldson and Hatai ('11, '15).

II. MATERIAL

The Noxway rats used in this study, were all supplied through the courtesy of The Wistar Institute and were trapped alive in Philadelphia and its vicinity, between April and November, 1916. There were 36 males and 18 females, representing every stage of growth between 17 and 394 grams in body weight. In the preparation of the material and the arrangement of the data, the same methods as those described in my former study on the Albino (Sugita, '17a) were followed. For the discrimination of a Ncfway group from an albino group of the same tabular number, the Norway records carry the capital letter N before their group number.

The following tables, tables 1 and 2, give the sex, body and tail lengths, and body and brain weights of the Norway rats used in this study, grouped according to their brain weights and averaged for each group. Table 1 contains the material used for the sagittal and frontal sections and table 2 that for the horizontal sections.

Comparing the body measurements of this series with those given in table 85 in The Rat" (Donaldson, '15), it is found that the average values for my material by groups correspond fairly well with the table values.

The increase in the body measurements of the Norway rat according to age is imperfectly known, so that we can not infer the age from the body measurements with any exactness.

Table 1[edit] TABLE 1

Showing the sex, body weight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway rats used in this study (sagittal and frontal sections) accompanied by the averages for each brain weight group

NO.


LITTER NO.


SEX


BODY WEIGHT


BODY LENGTH


TAIL LENGTH


BRAIN WEIGHT

grams


mm.


7)1 m.


grams


NXI b


(1)


m


19.8


84


41


1.155


a


(1)


m


20.8


86


44


1.160


i


(2)


m


17.8


85


65


1.175


19.5


85


50


1.164


NXII


N XIII a


(3)


m


35.3


110


66


1.369





35.3


110


86


1.369


NXIVb


(4)


m


33.1


104


84


1.407


g


(3)


m


37.5


112


88


1.429


a


(4)


m


33.8


113


94


1.431


i


(3)


m


36.3


107


86


1.431


e


(5)


m


43.6


124


108


1.437


k


(3)


f


36.1


112


87


1.445


36.7


112


91


1.430


NXVc



m


42.6


122


102


1.517


e



m


66.7


135


114


1.557

54.7


129


108


1.537


NXVI a



m


74.8


137



1.619


g



m


54.8


130


107


1.632


e



m


56.3


128


105


1.636


62.0


132


106


1 .'629


N XVII e



f


81.0


152


120


1.710


g



m


57.0


137


113


1.721


a



f


118.5


172


136


1.738


c



f


104.0


164


132


1.788





90.1


156


125


1.739


N XVIII c



f


136.9


157


147


1.825


a



m


128.1


177


142


1.833


132.5


167


145


1.829


NXIX b



m


160.7


177


158


1.962


a



f


251.0


210


174


1.981


205.9


194


166


1.972


14



TABLE I — Coitinnol


NO.


LITTER NO.


SEX


BODY WEIGHT


BODY LENGTH


TAIL LENGTH


BRAIN WEIGHT


grams


mm.


mm.


grams


NXX c



f


254.0


215


180


2.015


a


(1)


f


253.1


213

2.089


253.6


2H


180


2.052


NXXI g



m


331.0


215


195


2.156


d m


231.8


215


174


2.187

281.4


215


185


2.172


NXXII


N XXIII a



m


394.0


256


202


2.345


3H.0


256


202


2.345


Table 2[edit] TABLE 2

Showing the sex, body tveight and length, tail length and brain weight of the Norway rats used in this study (horizontal sections) accompanied by the averages for each brain weight group


NO.


LITTER NO.


SEX


BODY WEIGHT


BODY LENGTH


T.\IL LENGTH


BRAIN WEIGHT

grams


mm.


mm.


grams


NXI d


(1)


m


20.0


85


42


1.133


h


(2)


m


17.0


83


64


1.160


c


(1)


m


20.7


87


41


1.199

19.2


85


49


1.164


NXII

N XIII b


(3)


m


35.7


lOS


87


1.343

35.7


108


87


1.343


N XIV c


(4)


m


31.7


103


83


1.407


h


(3)


m


38.7


111


87


1.428


J


(3)


m


38.4


115


88


1.443


f


(5)


f


43.8


126


102


1.475


d


(4)


m


34.7


108


87


1.481


37.1


113


89


1.447


NXV b



m


48.5


121


100


1.511


d

m


54.1


122


101


1.529

51.3


122


101


/ 520


TABLE 2— Contmued


NO.


LITTER NO.


SEX


BODY WEIGHT


BODY LENGTH


TAIL LENGTH


BRAIN WEIGHT

grams


mm.


mm.


grams


NXVIf



f


56.7


129


109


1.613


h



f


73.9


148


132


1.666


d



f


66.7


138


112


1.674


b



m


98.3


156


141


1.699





73.9


H3


m


1.663


N XVII f



m


71.8


140


112


1.717


b



m


95.4


155


130


1.718


d



m


125.0


180


150


1.773


h



f


97.7


152


139


1.779

97.5


157


133


1.747


N XVIII b



f


128.5


168


153


1.815


d



f


134.0


163


148


1.870





131.3


166


151


1.843


NXIXc



m


167.6


175


160


1.953

167.6


175


160


1.953


NXXe



f


321.8


230


188


2.008


b


(4)


f


227.0


206


178


2.028





27 4.


218


183


2.018


NXXIf



m


339.4


244


190


2.150


i



f


282.3


216


195


2.162





310.9


230


193


2.156


NXXII


N XXIII a



m


394.0


256


202


2.345


394.0


256


202


2.345


But, according to the authors cited above, the marked difference between the two forms in body size does not appear during the period of rapid growth, but later, so that at maturity the Norway rat has a body weight 25 to 40 per cent above that of the Albino rat of hke age. For the same age however, the percentages of water in the central nervous system is just a trifle higher in the case of the Norway. Relative to the body weight, the Norway rat at maturity has a heavier brain than the albino rat, the difference being about 16 per cent in favor of the Norway.


On the basis of these rough data, the approximate age of the individuals in tables 1 and 2 can be inferred.

To my regret, I did not obtain material under 17 grams in body weight. I could, therefore, not make a complete study of the postnatal growth of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat from birth on and must in consequence be content to present in this paper the data beginning with material probably from 10 to 12 days old. It may, however, be noted here, that, among the rats trapped, the following were evidently members of the same litter and still following the mother.

(1) NXIa, NXIb, NXIc, N XI d, with their mother N XX a, and three other young which were used for another purpose.

(2) N XI i, N XI h, and four others.

(3) N XIII a, N XIII b, N XIV g, N XIV h, N XIV i, NXIVj,NXIVk.

(4) N XIV e, N XIV f, and two others.

(5) NXIVa, NXIVb, NXIV.c, N XIV d and two others, with their mother N XX b.

This suggests that the Norway rats whose brain weighs less than 1.5 grams or whose body weighs less than about 40 grams are not yet independent of their mothers.

III. TECHNIQUE

For the technique of fixation and imbedding and the making and staining of the sections, the same procedures which have been already described (Sugita, '17 a) were followed. Thirteen different localities were measured on sections in three planes corresponding to those used in the former study of the Albino cortex (cf. figs. 2, 4 and 6 in the paper cited).

As to the cortical cell-lamination of the Norway rat, two sets of figures with explanations were given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a) reproduced from Lewis (^1881) and Fortuyn ('14) and to those I would like to call attention on this occasion. There does not appear to be any important difference between the Norway and the albino rats in the cell-lamination of the cerebral cortex.


IV. OBSERVED DATA GIVEN IN TABLE AND CHART

As in the case of the albino rat, the measurement of the cortical thickness of the Norway brain was made at the localities I-XIII by the direct measurement of the sections as prepared and was then recorded without correction. The results thus obtained are condensed in table 3.

Table 3 shows for each brain weight group the average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat as directly observed in each of the three sections and the general average obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections. The average brain weight corresponding to the average thickness of the cortex is obtained by doubling the weight of the brain, from which the sagittal and frontal sections were taken, adding the weight of the brain from which the horizontal sections were taken, and dividing the sum by three.

Chart 1 is based on table 3 and shows the increase in the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat,

TABLE 3

Showin.g the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to brain xveight groups, also the average thickness in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections. Observations on slide, without correction


BR.«N


SAGITT.VL SECTION


FRONTAL SECTION


HORIZONTAL SECTION


GENERAL AVERAGE


WEIGHT







GROUP


Number


Brain


Thick

Thick

Number


Brain


Thick

Brain


Thick


of cases


weight


ness


ness


of cases


weight


ness


weight


ness




grams


mm.


mm.



grams


m m .


grams


mm.


NXI


3


1.164


1.34


1.43


3


1.164


1.44


1.164


1.40


NXII






NXIII


1


1.369


1.35


1.50


1


1.343


1.50


1.360


1.45


NXIV


6


1.430


1.43


1.48


5


1.447


1.54


1.436


1.48


NXV


2


1.537


1.40


1.50


2


1.520


1.58


1.532


1.49


N XVI


3


1.629


1.41


1.54


4


1.663


1.63


1.640


1.53


NXVII


4


1.739


1.51


1.56


4


1.747


1.59


1.742


1.55


N XVIII


2


1.829


1.51


1.64


2


1.843


1.63


1.834


1.59


NXIX


2


1.972


1,56


1.5S


1


1.953


1.68


1.965


1.61


NXX


2


2.052


1.49


1.48


2


2.018


1.58


2.041


1.52


NXXI


2


2.172


1.53


1.53


2


2.156


1.75


2.166


1.60


NXXII


N XXIII


1


2.345


1.60



1


2.345


1.73


2.345


1.67


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGV, VOL. 29, NO. 1


18


NAOKI SUGITA


as directly observed, and without correction and also the average values for the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, according to the increase of the brain weight.

V. CORRECTED DATA PRESENTED IN TABLES AND CHARTS

Using the detailed observed values which were all carefully tabulated, although they have not been published, a series of



iO 11 12 J3 14 15 16 IT 18 19 ^0 2t 22 23 J-'


Chart 1 Giving the average thickness of the cortex on slide (not corrected)' in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections and the general average thickness

on brain weight group in the Norway rat. Based on table 3. S Average

thickness of the cortex in sagittal section. Measured on slide. F Average

thickness of the cortex in frontal section. Measured on slide. H Average

thickness of the cortex in horizontal section. Measured on slide. • "A General average thickness of the cortex of three kinds of sections. Measured on slide.


correction-coefficients, obtained in exactly the same manner as for the albino rat, were found and applied to the observations on the Norway cortex. The corrected values are those entered in tables 4, 5 and 6. The tables also contain in each case the measurements from which the correction-coefficient was obtained and for each brain weight group the average value of the correction-coefficient for that group.

Table 7 shows the corrected values for the average thickness of the cortex, obtained in the same way as were the uncorrected


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


19


TABLE 4 Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the sagittal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given loilh the average for each group




CORRECTION


THICKNESS OF


THE CORTEX




BRAIN


COEFFICIENT



(SAGITTAL


section)




BRAIN WEIGHT










GROUP


WEIGHT


Diam.

L. F

on fresh

brain


Diam.

L. F

on slide


Loc. I


Loc. II


Log. Ill


Loc. IV


Loc. V


Avera«e



grams


myn.


m TO .


m m .


TO TO.


mm.


mm.


mm.


mm.


NXIb


1.155


11.75


10.40


2.18


1.73


1.44


1.21


1.05


1.52


a


1.160


12.10


10.15


2.40


1.83


1.63


1.32


1.07


1.65


i


1.175


12.55


9.80


2.61


1.83


1.61


1.26


1.04


1.67



i.m


1.


20


2.40


1.80


1.56


1.26


1.05


1.61


NXII











N XIII a


1.369


12.95


10.10


2.47.


1.87


1.72


1.33


1.27


1.73



1.369


1.


28


2.47


1.87


1.72


1.33


1.27


1.73


NXIVb


1.407


13.45


10.50


2.76


2.04


1.73


1.59


1.36


1.90


g


1.429


13.05


10.10


2.56


1.82


1.72


1.40


1.32


1.76


a


1.431


13.15


10.40


2.64


2.01


1.82


1.56


1.34


1.87


i


1.431


13.05


10.25


2.56


1.90


1.71


1.48


1.31


1.79


e


1.437


12.80


10.05


2.47


1.87


1.73


1.40


1.24


1.74


k


1.445


13.35


10.30


2.83


2.03


1.78


1.64


1.38


1.93



14^0


1.


28


2.64


1.95


1.75


1.51


1.33


1.84


NXVc


1.517


12.70


10.10


2.56


1.92


1.72


1.38


1.20


1.76


e


1.557


13.75


10.25


2.83


1.93


1.72


1.49


1.44


1.88



1.537


1.


30


2.70


1.93


1.72


1.44


1.32


1.82


NXVIa


1.619


13.50


10.25


2.68


2.04


1.77


1.46


1.34


1.86


g


1.632


13.45


10.00


2.86


2.17


1.84


1.53


1.21


1.92


e


1.636


13.55


10.10


2.73


1.98


1.77


1.49


1.31


1.86



1.629


1.


33


2.76


2.06


1.79


1.49


1.29


1.88


N XVII e


1.710


13.70


10.50


2.84


2.09


1.95


1.55


1.42


1.97


g


1.721


13.40


10.35


2.78


2.13


1.98


1.63


1.38


1.98


a


1.738


13.60


10.70


2.72


2.00


1.76


1.40


1.21


1.82


c


1.788


14.20


11.20


2.93


2.15


1.92


1.65


1.33


2.00



1.739


1.


29


2.82


2.09


1.90


1.56


1.34


1.94


N XVIII c


1.825


14.30


10.85


2.91


2.07


1.88


1.49


1.28


1.93


a


1.833


14.20


11.50


2.89


2.06


1.69


1.51


1.48


1.93



1.829


1.27


2.90,


2.07


1.79


1.50


1.38


1.93


20


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 4— Continued




CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


thickness op the cortex (sagittal section)


GROUP


WEIGHT


Diam.

L.F

on fresh

brain


Diam.

L.F

on slide


Loc. I


Loc. II


JLoc. Ill


Loc. IV


Loc. V


Average



grams


mm.


v\ m .


mm.


mm.


vim.


mrn.


mm.


mm.


N XIX b


1.962


14.70


11.50


2.98


2.12


1.97


1.54


1.46


2.01


a


1.981


14.40


11.50


2.83


2.08


1.75


1.54


1.44


1.93



1.972


1.


26


2.91


2.10


1.86


1.54


i.45


1.97


NXXc


2.015


14.55


11.50


2.86


2.00


1.81


1.55


1.43


1.93


a


2.089


14.95


12.00


2.75


1.93


1.67


1.34


1.30


1.80



2.052


1.


25


2.81


1.97


i.74


1.45


i.ST'


1.87


NXXIg


2.156


15.15


11.90


3.01


2.15


1.82


1.58


1.40


1.99


d


2.187


15.30


11.50


2.94


2.09


1.85


1.60


1.41


1.98



2.172


1.


30


2.98


^..?^


1.84


1.59


/.4i


^.SS


NXXII











N XXIII a


2.345


14.50


12.50


2.74


2.07


1.75


1.38


1.33


1.86



2.345


1.16


2.74


2.07


1.75


1.38


1.33


.1.86


values shown in table 3. This table (table 7) serves as a standard for discussing the actual thickness of the fresh cortex of the Norway rat. The average thickness in the adult Norway rat is 2.06 mm., as obtained by averaging the thicknesses of the cortex in Groups N XV-N XXIII, in which stages the cortex may be considered to have reached its full thickness.

Charts 2 to 7 show graphically the data given in tables 4 to 6 respectively, and chart 8, which is based on table 7 giving the average values, presents a general picture of the growth changes in the cortex according to brain weight.

Charts 2, 4 and 6 show the individual determinations for the thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, respectively, plotted according to the brain weight. Chart 2 gives the individual records for locality I and locality V with the average for all localities from I to V in the sagittal sections. In a like manner, chart 4 gives the values for localities VIT and VIII with the average of localities VI to VIII for the


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


21


TABLE 5


Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the frontal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correction-coefficients are indicated separately for each brain and the coefficient is given with the average for each group




COEFFICIENT


thickness of the cortex (frontal section)



BRAIN ■^EIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT







GROUP


Diam. W. D

on fresh brain


Diam. W. D on slide


Loc. VI


Log. VII


Loc. VIII


Average



grams


7nm.


Tnm.


m7n.


mm.


mm.


mm.


NXIb


1.155


13.00


9.90


2.05


2.11


1.68


1.95


a


1.160


12.70


10.00


1.94


1.92


1.62


1.83


i


1.175


12.50


9.20


1.96


1.99


1.62


1.86



1.164


1.


31


1.98


2.01


1.64


1.88


NXII









N XIII a


1.369


13.00


10.00


2.07


2.21


1.59


1.96



1.369


1.


30


2.07


2.21


1.59


1.96


NXIVb


1.407


13.05


9.90


2.27


2.13


1.71


2.04


g


1.429


13.20


9.50


2.18


2.29


1.71


2.06


a


1.431


12.85


10.70


2.04


2.00


1.73


1.92


i


1.431


13.40


10.30


1.90


2.06


1.57


1.84


e


1.437


13.25


9.80


1.89


2.13


1.56


1.86


k


1.445


13.30


9.90


2.12


2.15


1.65


1.97



1.430


1.32


2.07


2.13


1.66


1.9S


NXVc


1.517


13.20


10.00


1.98


2.21


1.62


1.94


e


1.557


13.50


9.60


2.28


2.39


1.76


2.14



1.537


/.


36


2.13


2.30


1.69


2.04


NXVIa


1.619


13.80


10.80


2.01


2.13


1.72


1.95


g


1.632


13.70


9.90


2.24


2.57


1.83


2.21


e


1.636


13.80


10.00


2.14


2.36


1.75


2.08



1.629


1.


35


2.13


2.35


1.77


2.08


N XVII e


1.710


13.80


10.00


2.15


2.31


1.68


2.05


g


1.721


13.60


10.40


2.20


2.35


1.75


2.10


a


1.738


14.10


10.60


2.01


2.17


1.66


1.95


c


1.788


13.95


10.60


2.35


2.40


1.82


2.19



1.739


1.


33


2.18


2.31


1.73


2.07


N XVIII c


1.825


14.45


10.70


2.20


2.35


1.73


2.09


a


1.833


13.95


11.70


2.18


2.22


1.80


2.07



1.829


1.27


2.19


2.29


1.77


2.08


22


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 5— Concluded


BRAIN WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


GROUP



grams


NXIXb


1.962


a


1.981



1.972


NXXc


2.015


a


2.089



2.052


NXXIg


2.156


d


2.187



2.172


NXXII



N XXIII



COEFFICIENT


Diam.W'.D

on fresh brain


14.60 13.95


T>is.m.W. D on slide


11.60 10.80


1.26


14.30 14.50


10.50 11.20


1.33


14.75 15.05


11.10 10.80


1.36


thickness of the cortex (frontal section)


Loc. VI Loc. VII


2.08

2.04 2.06

2.14 1.80 1.97

2.03 2.19 2.11


2.28 2.21 2.25

2.32

2.08 2.20

2.24 2.54

2.39


Loc. VIII


1.68 1.72 1.70

1.73 1.66 1.70

1.69 1.77 1.73


Average


2.01 1.99 2.00

2.06 1.85 1.96

1.99 2.17

2.08


frontal sections. Chart 6 does the same for locahties IX and XIII with the average of localities IX to XIII in the horizontal sections. Charts 3, 5 and 7 show the average values of the cortical thickness in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections, for each brain weight group. Further, on each chart is shown the change in thickness at each one of the localities measured in that section.

Chart 8 is based on table 7 and shows the general average (corrected) thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat according to the brain weight and also the average thickness in each of the sections.

VI. DISCUSSION

The relations existing between each of the several localities measured in this study of the Norway are quite similar to the relations found in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. Individual variations appear, but these are no higher than ±6 per cent, compared with the average values of the group. No sex differ


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


23


TABLE 6


Showing the corrected values of the cortical thickness in the horizontal section for each individual and for each brain weight group. The data for the correctioncoefficients are indicated separately for each brain and. the coefficient is given with the average for each group


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


NXI d

h c


NXII


N XIII b


X XIV c

h

J f d


NXVb d


NXVIf

h d b


NXVII f b d h


N XVIII b d


BRAIN WEIGHT


1.133 1.160 1.199 1.164


1.343

1.S4S

1.407 1.428 1.443

1.475 1.4S1 1.447

1.511 1.529 1.520

1.613 1.666 1.674 1.699 1.663

I. in

1.718 1.773 1.779 i.747

1.815 1.870 1.843


COEFFICIEXT


Diam. W. B on

fresh brain


13.80 13.80 13.90


Diam.

W.B

on slide


11.00 10.10 10.80


30


14.20 10.30 1


14.20 14.35 14.35 14.55 14.60 1.

14.65 14.50

1 .


10.60 10.70 10.50 10.90 10.25


10.10 10.50


41


14


90


15.00 j


15


15


14


75


11.00 10.95 11.30 11.05


1.35


15.45 14.60 15.10 15.40

1.

15.00 15.40

1.


11.45 11.30 10.75 11.35


35


11.00 10.85


Loc. IX


2.52 2.85 2,52 2.63


2.91 2.91

2.57 3.19 2.96 2.92 2.91 2.91

3.19 3.11

3.15

3.25 2.95 2.93 3.33

3.12

2.89 2.73

2.77 3.27 2.92

3.06 3.60

3.33


THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX (HORIZON r.\L SEr;TION)


Loc. X


1.91 1.99 1.84 1.91


2.02

2.02

2.06 2.14 2.22

2.08 2.22 2.14

2.32 2.21

2.27

2.34 2.23 2.14 2.36

2.27

2.18 2.17 2.23 2.31

2.22

2.21

2.38 2.30


XI


1.72 1.92 1.75 1.80


2.03

2.03

1.93

2.08 2.24 2.03

1.88 2.03

2.15 2.12

2.14

2.10 2.22 2.12 1.92

2.09

2.16 2.04 2.13 2.18

2.13

2.08 2.14

2.11


Loc. XII


1.56 1.69 1.62 1.62


1.85 1.85

1.72 1.82 1.95 1.81 1.74 1.81

1.97 1.91

1.94

1.96 1.94 1.85 1.76 1.88

1.93 1.80 1.84 2.02 1.90


Loc. XI IJ


1.31 1.50 1.33

1.38


1.57

1.57

1.48 1.57 1.69 1.55 1.56 1.57

1.78 1.62 1.70

1.66 1.76 1.52 1.48 1.61

1.62 1.41 1.51 1.72

1.57


1.84 1.57 1.96 1.76 1.90 1.67


.A verage


1.80 1.99 1.81 1.87


2.08 2.08

1.95 2.16 2.21 2.08 2.06 2.09

2.28 2.19


2.26 2.22 2.12 2.17 2.19

2.16 2.03 2.10 2.30

2.15

2.15 2 37


24


NAOKI SUGITA





TABLE 6— Concluded







BRAIN WEIGHT


COEFFICIEXT


THICKXESS OF THE CORTEX (HORIi,OXT.U. section)


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


Diam. W. B on

fresh brain


Diam. W. B

on slide


Loc. IX


Loc. X


Loc. XI


Lof. XII


Loc. XIII


Average



grams


m m .


m m .


m VI .


711 m.


mm.


mm.


mm..


mm.


NXIX c


1.953


15.65


11.70


3.14


2.17


2.14


2.01


1.81


2.25



1.95S


1.34


3.U


2.17


2.14


2.01


1.81


^.^5


NXXe


2.008


15.55


11.90


3.10


2.28


2.09


1.87


1.52


2.17


b


2.028


15.85


12.00


2.78


2.05


1.97


1.71


1.43


1.99



2.018


1.31

1


2.H


2.17


2.03


1.79


i.4S


2.08


NXXIf


2.150


16.55


12.10


3.30


2.66


2.22


1.94


1.57


2.34


J


2.162


16.25


12.40


3.60


2.38


2.16


1.98


1.57


2.34



2.156


1.34

1


3.45


2.52


2.19


1.96


1.57


^.54


NXXII











N XXIII a


2.345


16.55


12.90


3.14


2.58


2.17


1.69


1.54


2.22



2.3j^5


1.28


3.14


2.58


2.17


1.69


i.54


2.22


ence in cortical thickness is recognizable when the brain weights are similar.

In the sagittal sections, the cortex attains nearly its full thickness when the brain weighs 1.63 grams (Group N XVI), while in the frontal and horizontal sections, this is attained somewhat earlier, that is, in the brains weighing 1.53 grams (Group N XV) (cf. charts 3, 5, 7, 8). In the general average thickness of the cortex of the Norway rat, the full thickness is attained in the brains w^eighing about 1.53 grams, at which phase the body weight observed is about 55 grams (tables 1 and 2) (chart 8). In the full grown Norway rat at brain weights between 1.6 and 2.4 grams, the average cortical thickness ranges between 1.97 and 2.14 mm., with a mean value for Groups N XVI-N XXIII (table 7) of 2.06 mm. The average thickness for each locality is given in table 8 for the Norway rat, together with the corresponding values for the Albino, thus making it possible to compare the cortical thickness in the two forms.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


25


TABLE 7


Showing the average corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat for each brain weight group.



SAGITTAL


SECTION


FRONTAL


HORIZONTAL SECTION


GENER.\L


.AVERAGE


BRAIN WEIGHT










Brain

weight


Thickness


Thickness


Brain weight


Thickness


Brain weight


Thickness



grams


mm.


mm.


grams


mm.


grams


mm.


NXI


1.164


1.61


1.88


1.164


1.87


1.164


1.79


NXII









N XIII


1.369


1.73


1.96


1.343


2.08


1.360


1.92


NXIV


1.430


1.84


1.95


1.447


2.09


1.436


1.96


NXV


1.537


1.82


2.04


1.520


2.24


1.532


2.03


NXVI


1.629


1.88


2.08


1.663


2.19


1.640


2.05


NXVII


1.739


1.94


2.07


1.747


2.15


1.742


2.05


N XVIII


1.829


1.93


2.08


1.843


2.26


1.834


2.09


NXIX


1.972


1.97


2.00


1.953


2.25


1.965


2.07


NXX


2.052


1.87


1.96


2.018


2.08


2.041


1.97


NXXI


2.172


1.99


2.08


2.156


2.34


2.166


2.14


NXXII









N XXIII


2.345


1.86



2.345


2.22


2.345


2.04


Within the limits of our material, the course of development of the cortical thickness in every locality seems, in general, similar to that in the corresponding locality of the albino rat, the descriptions of which were given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a, pp. 574-577).

VII. A COMPARISON OF THE NORWAY RAT WITH THE ALBINO RAT IN RESPECT OF CORTICAL THICKNESS

The main object of the present paper is to compare the data from the Norway with those from the albino rat, in respect of the cortical thickness, a comparison of much interest, since the two forms are so closely related genetically and at the same time show differences in body size and in absolute brain weight which have been already noted.

Comparing the mature brains, which weigh alike, of the both forms (table 8), the Norway cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups NXVI to NXX (brain weight average 1.844 grams) is 2.05 mm., surpasses by 0.15 mm. or 8 per cent the albino cortex, whose thickness on the average in Groups XVI to XX


26


NAOKI SUGITA


(brain weight average 1.815 grams) is 1.90 mm. Here the albino cortex is taken as the standard for the determination of the percentage difference. For the comparison of each locaUty and the averages of each section, table 8 is to be consulted. It is remarkable that both in the sagittal and horizontal sections the


12 JO

Z8 Z6 2+

aj

10 48

i.b

1412 10 aS a6

+ Oi







































.


,


-.


.


.











'.
















.




















































.'.



"






.








••






















.












'<








































































































10 H 12 1.5 1+ 15 16 17


19 2,0 2,1 22 23 2+ fs.


Chart 2 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the sagittal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities I and V, and the average thickness of the sagittal section (localities I, II, III, IV and V) are given. Based on table 4. ° Cortical thickness at locality I. Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality V. Corrected. • Average thickness of the sagittal section. Corrected.


percentage differences follow in the same order from the frontal to the occipital pole, rising towards the occipital pole.- The occipital parts, represented by the pair of localities V and XIII, are the most developed in the Norway, surpassing the corresponding parts of the Albino by 15 and 28 per cent respectively. The pair of localities IV and XII, whose positions are adjoining, show also a marked excess in thickness, that is, 10 and 11 per cent


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


27


respectively. The only other large difference is 15 per cent at locality VI.

Accordingly, in the mature rats, the average thicknesses in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections are respectively 6.7, 9.1


























1
















J


^—


-

y^


^x










-'-

'"








^ 1







__/







































...-.,





-,i








'ZJ


"^^





.,^



^


■~^s



l^-^-..







^

--.


--'






^ '




-i« 


1












7'\



'"








■"'^■


-

--

--







-v






^■"





















































































j









i


1


i 1


2 1


3 1


+ 1


5 J


6 1


r 1


8 1


9 2


2


1 2


2 2


3 'it


t r


Chart 3 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities I, II, III, IV and V in the sagittal section and the average thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in sagittal section. Based on table 4. ■ — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality I.

Corrected. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality II.

Corrected. • — ■ — • — (near the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality III.

Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality IV.

Corrected. (below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality V.

Corrected. • 'S Average thickness of the sagittal section by each brain

weight group.

and 8.0 per cent greater and the general average thickness is, consequently, 8 per cent greater in the Norway than in the albino rat, while the brain weights are almost the same (about 1.8 grams) .

As regards the differences in cortical thickness here found a few comments may be made. Possibly all of the larger differ


28


NAOKI SUGITA





1









1


















.






.









.•



•.


/


%







■.




t







.








■\














^
































































































10 1.1 12 13 M is J6 17 18 19 20 21 22 %"■

Chart 4 Giving the corrected thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norwayrat in the frontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities VII and VIII, and the average thickness of the frontal section (localities VI, VII and VIII) are given. Based on table 5. ° Cortical thickness at locality VII. Corrected >< Cortical thickness at locality VIII. Corrected. • Average thickness of the frontal section. Corrected.




































,


-~




^ /


/






^-'


T..-

^.Z'


"^







^'^





'






-^







■-<-'









^__

-^


' ~~



'" —


1



«« 





















































































































10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 20 21 U ^^

Chart 5 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities VI, VII and VIII in the frontal section and the average thickness at three localities for each brain weight group in frontal section. Based on table 5.

Cortical thickness at locality VI. Corrected. Cortical

thickness at locality VII. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality VIII.

Corrected. • 'F Average thickness of the frontal section by each brain

weight group.


ences noted may be correlated with differences in function, but at present we shall consider only those which appear in the occipital cortex, that is, at localities IV, V, XII, and XIII. There is reason to think that the eye and the visual apparatus in general are less well developed in the Albino than in the Norway rat.




Chart 6 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex of the Norway rat in the horizontal section. Individual entries for the cortical thickness at localities IX and XIII and the average thickness of the horizontal section (localities IX, X, XI, XII and XIII) are given. Based on table 6. ° Cortical thickness at locality IX. Corrected. ^ Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected. • Average thickness of the horizontal section. Corrected.

The visual cortex of the rat is at the occipital end of the brain (Ferrier, '86) and would probably be underdeveloped in the Albino in which vision was less perfect. The relatively less thickness of the cortex in the localities IV, V, XII and XIII in the Albino brain would therefore fit with the diminished visual function in this form.



If, during the growing period, a comparison of cortical thickness in brains of Hke weight is made, the result is somewhat puzzling, as seen in chart 9, which gives the thickness of the cortices of the Norway and the albino rats in brains of the same weight.




^


'\





•^-.n


1

1





_^


^








V^


■^~



^m
















Chart 7 Giving the average thickness of the cortex for each brain weight group at localities IX, X, XI, XII and XIII in the horizontal section and the average thickness at five localities in each brain weight group in horizontal section. Based on table 6. (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality

IX. Corrected. — • — • — (above the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality

X. Corrected. Cortical thickness at locality XI. Corrected.

(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XII. Corrected.

(below the heavy line) Cortical thickness at locality XIII. Corrected.

• •!! Average thickness of the horizontal section for each brain weight group.


Generally the cortical thickness of the Norway rat, whose brain weighs more than 1.3 grams, is clearly higher than that of the albino rat of like brain weight, while in brains weighing less than 1.2 grams the relation is reversed. This seems surprising, but


has its reason,. If the data are treated as follows, which seems to me quite a rational treatment, the reason will be disclosed." The brain of the Norway rat at birth weighs usually somewhat more than that of the newborn albino rat, and the final brain weight in the full grown Norway is ca. 2.5 grams or 25 pe*r cent higher than that in the mature albino rat of like age, which weighs about 2.0 grams. As already shown by Donaldson and

Chart 8 Giving the corrected thickness of the cortex in the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections and the general average thickness for each brain weight group. Based on table 7. Nbrway rat. • — • — ■ — S Average thickness of the

cortex in sagittal section. Corrected. F Average thickness of the cortex in

frontal section. Corrected. H Average thickness of the cortex in

horizontal section. Corrected • "A General average thickness of the cortex

of three kinds of sections. Corrected.

Hatai ('11), the span of life is probably the same in both the forms, extending to about three years. So, if throughout this span of life the developmental course of the brains was quite similar for both forms, the brains which have like weights would not represent the same stage of the development, but on the contrary, a brain of the Norway rat would be under these conditions, in a younger stage.

Table 9 gives the percentage of water in the brains of the Norway and of the albino rats. The comparison of the data of the


TABLE 8

A comparison of the cortical thicknesses at each locality ayid on the average, in the adult Norway and the albino brains of the same absolute weight. The measurements used here are average values of Groups N XVI-N XX and Groups XVI-XX respectively, taken from tables 4 to 6 of this paper and tables 6 to 8 (Sugita, '17a). The Gorresponding brain iveights are 1.844 grams in the Norway and 1.815 grams in the Albino. The thickness of the Albino cortex is ahoays taken as the standard for computing the percentage differences




THICKNESS OF


THE CORTEX


CORTEX OP THE


SECTIONS


LOCALITIES




NORWAY R.\T EX


Norway rat


Albino rat


CEEDS BT




■mvi.


mm.


per cent



Locality I


2.84


2.80


1.4



II


2.06


1.92


7.3


Sagittal


III


1.82


1.74


4.6



IV


1.51


1.36


10.0



V


1.37


1.19


15.1



Average


1.92


1.80


6.7



Locality VI


2.11


1.84


14.8


Frontal


VII


2.28


2.18


4.6



VIII


1.73


1.59


8.9



Average


2.04


1.87


9.1



Locality IX


3.09


3.08


0.3



X


2.23


2.06


8.2


Horizontal


XI


2.10


2.04


3.0



XII


1.90


1.71


11.1



XIII


1.63


1.27


28.3



Average


2.19


2.03


8.0


General avers


lore


2.05


1.90


8.0




two forms is made so as to bring those of approximately the same age on the same hue of the table. It will be seen by these comparisons that the Norway rat brain, if paired with the albino rat brain of like age, shows almost the same value of the percentage of water, while the brain weight differs by 16 to 20 per cent in favor of the Norway rat brain, the weight of the Norway brain being taken as the standard.

So, from the point of view of age, a Norway rat brain should be in the same phase of development with an albino brain,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


33


TABLE 9

Giving the percentage of water in the brain of the Norway and of the albino rats of the same age. The comparison of the data of the two forms is made so as to bring those of approximately the same age on the same line of the table. Based principally on tables 10 and 12, given by Donaldson and' Hatai {'11) on pp. 439-443, Jour, of Comp. Neur., vol. 21



STORWAY RAl


(males)



ALBINO RAT (mALES) OF LIKE


AGE


AGE


BODY WEIGHT OBSERVED


BRAIN WEIGHT


PERCENTAGE OP WATER ON BRAIN


BODY WEIGHT

CALCULATED


BRAIN

WEIGHT

CALCULATED


LESS THAN

NORWAY

BRAIN



Observed


Calculated


WEIGHT


days


grafns


grams


per cent


per cent


grams


grams


per cent


1


5.1


0.2361


88.2


88.00


4.7


0.217


8


10


12.2


0.859


86.9


87.05


11.8


0.840


2


13


18.1


1.245


85.3


85.39


14.9


1,011


19


15


17.7


1.195


84.5


84.58


16.1


1.057


12


16


26.1


1.368


82.8


84.19


16.7


1.077


21


19


25.5


1.423


81.5


83.12


18.7


1.131


21


25


32.6


1.498


80.9


81.39


23.9


1.237


17


40


35.83


1.525


79.2


79.39


42.5


1.434


6


47


38. 5»


1.522


79.3*


79.24


54.1


1.507


1


106


68.63


1.878


78.4


78.50


174.0


1.830


3



200.0


2.152


78.7


78.59


160.0


1.807


16



215.0


2.17


78.8


78.53


170.0


1.824


16



231.0


2.20


78.6


78.45


180.0


1.838


16



248.0


2.23


78.7


78.38


190.0


1.854


17



267.0


2.25


78.2


78.32


200.0


1.866


17



287.0


2.28


78.2


78.24


210.0


1.879


18



308.0


2.31


78.9


78.18


220.0


1.890


18



331.0


2.33


78.2


78.12


230.0


1.903


18



355.0


2.33


78.3


78.11


240.0


1.913


19



380.0


2.38


78.2


78.10


250.0


1.923


19



406.0


2.41


78.0


78.06


260.0


1.933


19



434.0


2.43


78.2


77.96


270.0


1.944


20



463.0



77.9


77.50


280.0


1.954




494.0



78.0



290.0





525.0



78.0



300.0




^ The data given in this column below this entry are based on unpublished observations of Donaldson and Hatai, the records of which are kept in the Wistar Institute.

- The data given in this column below this entry were obtained by calculation according to body weight.

3 As the result of confinement, the body growth in the Norway is remarkably retarded.

THE JOURNAL OF COMPAR.\TIVB NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 1


34


NAOKI SUGITA


which weighs 16 to 20 per cent less. With this relation in view, I reduced by 18 per cent — which is the mean value of 16 to 20 per cent (see table 9) — the weight of the Norway rat brains in table 7, and assumed that I thus obtained brain weights which represent the corresponding brain weights of the albino ra,'t in respect to the cortical development. I have plotted the values for the actual cortical thickness on the reduced brain weights by



















































































































































































































































0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Q6 0.7


0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 L5 16 1.7


19 20 Z\ 2.2 2.3 J« 


Chart 9 Giving a comparison of the thickness of the Norway cortex with that

of] the albino cortex, on brain weight. • 'N General average thickness of the

Norway cortex according to the actual brain weight group. AL General

average thickness of the Albino cortex according to the brain weight group. Smoothed. Taken from chart 9 of the second paper of this series. • — • — • N' General average thickness of the Norway cortex entered according to the reduced brain weight representing the albino brain weight of the corresponding age.


the dot and dash line in chart 9, in which the smoothed graph for the cortical thickness of the albino rat is represented by a dotted Une. Glancing at the chart, my assumption appears to be justified as both the graphs for the reduced Norway and the Albino are found to run a similar course. This relation is acceptable, since, as shown in the tables given by Donaldson and Hatai ('11), and also by Miller ('11), the relative weight of the brain in the mature albino rat is 12 to 16 per cent less than in the Norway rat of like body weight, and, furthermore, the relative weight of the


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 35

body in the Albino is about 20 to 40 per cent less than in the Norway rat of like age (table 9). Accordingly, the albino brain should be about 18 per cent or more, less than the Norway brain of like age, and the data for the thickness of the cortex in the two forms show a fairly constant relation, when plotted as in chart 9 in accordance with this assumption (see also table 3, Sugita, '17 a).

As stated, Norway rats under about 10 days of age have not been studied, but a comparison of the graph for the thickness of the cortex in the normal albino rat with the graph for the Norway cortex displaced for age makes it reasonable to assume that a Norway brain which weighs 1.16 grams (Group N XI) corresponds to an albino brain which weighs about 0.95 grams (Group IX), at which stage the cerebral cortices of the both forms have nearly completed their active growth in thickness and are going over to the second phase, during which the cortical area keeps pace with the increase in brain volume. It may be assumed also (see later) that, in the Norway rat, with a brain weight of about 1.4 grams the cortical myelination is beginning to take place.

Thus in the postnatal life of the Norway rat, the first phase of the development of the cerebral cortex covers the period during which the brain weight increases to 1.16 grams from birth, when the brain weight is about 0.25 grams, and the second phase of the cortical development covers the period, during which the brain weight increases from 1.16 grams to about 1.44 (Group N XIV) when the cortex attains within 4 per cent the full thickness. By the middle of the second phase the process of myelination is active, and before the end of this phase the cortex has already attained nearly its full thickness.

This assumption, that the completion of the cortical development in thickness coincides with the period of active myelination, is supported by another set of facts. Table 10 gives the absolute weights of the dry substance in the brain of the Norway rat, arranged according to brain weight. These values were calculated by me from tables originally given by Donaldson and Hatai ('11). The data are plotted in chart 10, which also gives the corresponding data for the albino rat, in a dotted curve.


36


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 10


Giving the weight of the dry substances in the brain of the Norway rat according to brain weight. Based on the observed data given by Donaldson and Hatai {'11), in p. 448, Jour. Camp. Neur., vol. 21. Both sexes averaged. *Males only.



WEIGHT OF THE



WEIGHT OF THE


TOTAL BRAIN WEIGHT


DRY SUBSTANCES IN


TOTAL BR.UN WEIGHT


DRY SUBSTANCES IN



THE BRAIN



THE BRAIN


grams


grams


grams


grams


0.25


0.041


1.55


0.309


0.35



1.65


0.339


0.45



1.75


0.377


0.55



1.85


0.400


0.65


0.067*


1.95


0.407


0.75


0.100


2.05


0.445


0.85


0.100


2.15


0.460


0.95



2.25


0.498


1.05



2.35


0.500


1.15


0.155


2.45


0.540


1.25


0.210


2.55


0.534


1.35


0.229


2.65


0.575


1.45


0.291


2.75


0.600*


Q6










1



















/



as













/


r^














y


/





01+











J


V














,/








as









/}


'^























az








'/















..•'


l>.










ai






■<^


^




^










^


y















^"'















02 a4 06


10 tZ W M> 18 ZO II 24 26 2,8 /«.


Chart 10 Giving the absolute weights of the dry substance in the -Norway brain, arranged according to brain weight, based on the observations of Donaldson and Hatai ('11), accompanied by the corresponding data for the albino rat, in a dotted line. ^ and * show the turning points of the curves.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 37

This chart shows clearly that the solids in the Norway brain increase rapidly after the brain weight has reached something more than 1.2 grams (see x). This turning point of the graph corresponds to 0.95 grams of brain weight in the Albino (see *). It was found in the albino rat that, when the brain weight has surpassed 1.15 grams, namely 0.95 plus 0.20 grams, myelination of the cortical fibers is active. Hence, in the Norway brain, the myelination in the cortex should be active when the brain weight has reached 1.44 grams, namely somewhat more than 1.2 plus 0.2 grams. Furthermore, as we have seen that in the albino rat the beginning of myelination in the cortex coincides with the phase when the cortex has nearly attained its full thickness, so we see the same relations in the Norway rat also.

From these facts we conclude that the brains of the both forms pass through the same course of cortical development according to age, as the span of life is the same in the two. The weights of the brains which are in the same stage of development, are however not the same in the both forms, being in the Norway rat about 18 per cent — the Norway brain weight being taken as the standard — heavier than in the albino rat. The statement of Donaldson which was expressed in the paper cited, to wit: "If in the animals compared the brain weights are the same, then the Norway rat has a smaller body weight and a higher percentage of water in the central nervous system," might be rewritten as follows : When ages are the same, the Norway rat has a greater body weight, a heavier brain (18 per cent more in weight), a tlTicker cortex and nearly the same percentage of water in the central nervous system.

A comparison of the cortical development in the two forms can be made adequately only by first reducing by 18 per cent the actual brain weight of the Norway rat and then comparing the cortex in both forms according to the corrected brain weight. Since mature Norway brains have only a slightly greater volume than the Albino brains of Uke weight (see table 4 A, Sugita, '18), but at the same time have a cerebral cortex on the average 8 per cent thicker, it follows that in the Norway brain the proportion of gray substance is greater. This difference apparently accounts for the higher percentage of water found in the Norway brain.


38 NAOKI SUGITA

VIII. SUMMARY

1. The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat has been systematically investigated, employing as material 36 males and 18 females, all over 17 grams in body weight, and using uniformly the methods w^hich were adopted by me for the investigation of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat.

2. The observed data are first given and later are corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material. The corrected data are given fully in tables and in charts.

3. The relations of the cortical thicknesses at the several localities measured are quite similar among themselves to those found in the albino rat. The average thickness of the cortex in the adult Norway rat is always higher (1 to 28 per cent) than that of the corresponding locality in the adult albino rat. The occipital cortex is better developed (thicker) in the Norway rat. This is to be associated with the more perfect visual apparatus in the Norway rat.

4. As to the phases of development of the cortical thickness, a Norway brain of a given age corresponds to an albino brain, which weighs about 16 to 20 per cent less. The Norway brain weighing 0.25 to 1.16 grams (Groups N II to N XI) is in its first phase of active development which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing 0.25 to 0.95 grams. The Norway brain weighing 1.16 to 1.44 grams (Groups N XI to N XIV) is in its second phase of development of the cortex corresponding to the albino brain weighing 0.95 to 1.15 grams.

5. The cortex of the Norway rat attains nearly its full thickness at th-e time when the brain weighs somewhat more than 1.44 grams, corresponding to the age of twenty days and to a body weight of something more than 36 grams. At this phase probably the rapid myelination of the fibers in the cerebral cortex is taking place.

6. The general average thickness of the cortex in the mature Norway rat is 2.06 mm., exceeding by about 8 per cent that of the albino rat brain of the same weight.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 39

7. Owing to the greater thickness of the cerebral cortex the mature Norway brain contains more gray matter than does the albino brain of like weight and this excess of gray matter explains the somewhat higher percentage of water found in the Norway brain.

LITERATURE CITED

Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.

Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. No. 6.

Ferrier, David 1886 The functions of the brain. 2nd ed. Smith, Elder & Co., London, pp. 261-262.

FoRTUYN, A. B. D. 1914 Cortical cell-lamination of the hemispheres of some rodents. Arch. Neurol., Path. Lab. London County Asyl., vol. 6, pp. 221-354. Mus decumanus (Pall), p. 260.

Lewis, Bevan 1881 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents. Phil. Trans., 1882, pp. 699-749.

Miller, Newton 1911 Reproduction in the brown rat (Mus norvegicus). Am. Naturalist, vol. 45, pp. 625-635.

Sugita, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increases in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, pp. 495 510.

SuGiTA, Naoki 1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29.


author's abstract of this paper i«sued by the bibliographic service, february 16


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

II. THE PARTITION OF NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN IN THE BRAIN OF.

THE GRAY SNAPPER (nEOMAENIS GRISEUS) AND ALSO THE

BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO THE BODY

LENGTH OF THIS FISH

SHINKISHI HATAI

The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, and Department of Marine Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington

ONE CHART

The prime object of the present investigation was to extend some observations made recently concerning the metabolic activity of the central nervous system of the albino rat (Hatai, '17) to the nervous system of lower vertebrates. It was my hope that such a comparative study might yield valuable data for an understanding of the complex phenomena of metabolism in this important organ.

In the course of the? present investigation I was able to accumulate a considerable amount of data on the weight of the brain together with its water content, a study which has revealed several interesting facts which have not been yet fully appreciated, so that I have decided to present these data also in the following pages. In connection with this work, it is a pleasure to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr. A. G. Mayer, Director of the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Dr. Mayer not only granted me the privileges of the laboratory at the Dry Tortugas, but gave me encouragement and many helpful suggestions throughout the cour&e of this work.

41


42 SHINKISHI HATAI

MATERIAL USED

The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was chosen for this investigation not only because these fish are abundant in subtropical seas, but also because they possess numerous virtues for experimental purposes. The snapper may be kept in the laboratory for a long period, and in captivity as well as when free, takes almost any kind of food, cooked or raw, animal or .vegetable. The fish is well known for sagacity and boldness and is suited for various kinds of experimentation. Indeed the snapper has already been carefully studied by Reighard ('08) as to its behavior. Thus, with the hope that the gray snapper may in future prove to be a suitable form for certain lines of experimental work, I have utilized all the brains which have been used for chemical investigation, together with some others, for studying the growth of the brain in weight with respect to body length. Most of the fish were secured by netting them, but on account of the difficulty of getting the larger fish by this method, I have also used dynamite as well as the hook and line. I have noted in table 1 the method adopted for catching each individual.

TECHINQUE EMPLOYED

The fish w^ere examined as soon as they were brought into the laboratory. However, as in the case, of netting them, when too many were caught at once some were kept in a live box for not more than two days, except in a few cases in which they were kept for special purposes for several days. When the fish were kept in a live box for more than two days it is so stated in table 1.

In every instance the length of body was recorded in the following way. The fish was laid on its side and the length was determined by means of calipers from the tip of the snout to the middle of the caudal edge of the tail. The body weights of the fish were also taken in a few instances. Although I reahzed the desirability of recording the body weight in all cases, yet it was not always possible to make this measurement.


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM


43


TABLE 1 Shoiving the brain weights according to various body lengths, together with the percentage of ivater in the brain, of the gray snapper. Arranged according to increasing body length


BODY


BRAIN WEIGHT


WATER IN


REMARKS



Length


Weight



BRAIN




7/1 m.


grams


grams


per cent




88


12


0.122


78.85


Net



137


43


0.234


78.63


Net



155


59


0.284


79.33


Net



215



0.622


79.52


Net



216


140


0.628


81.12


Dynamited



217



0.483


78.34


Net



225



0.670


79.05


Net



227


173


0.627


80.43


Dynamited



237



0.575


78.19


Net



• 238


197


0.660


79.91


Hook



240



0.711


79.92


Net



245


220


0.732


81.48


Dynamited



249


218


0.723


80.69


Dynamited



252



0.748


79.55


Net



252



0.762


78.64


Net



253


229


0.897


80.65


Dynamited



256



0.748


77.51


Net



258



0.828


79.47


Net



259



0.844


78.32


Net



262



0.833


78.75


Net



262



0.882


77.85


Net



263



0.864


77.29 9


Net



'263


269


0.803


80.08


Hook



263


261


0.816


79.68


Hook



268



0.859


79.74


Net



269



0.781*


77.49


Net



271



0.921


78.78 cf


Net



277



0.816


78.57


Net



278



0.843


78.32


Net



278


311


0.871


82.91


Hook



285



0.985


79.17 9


Net



293



1.006


77.28 d"


Net



294



0.861


78.86 d"


Net



295



0.925


77.56 d"


Dynamited



296



0.900


78.07


Net



298



0.982


78.49 d


Kept in live box


4 days


300



0.907


79.21 d


Dynamited



300



0.971


78.17 9


Net



301



0.952


77.10 o^


Net



44


SHINKISHI HATAI




TABLE


1 — Continued




BODY


BRAIN WEIGHT


WATER IN BRAIN


REMARKS



Length


Weight



mm.


grams


grajiis


per cent




302



1.042


77.87 9


Net



302



1.042


77.06 d"


Net



303



0.776


75.40 9


Dynamited



306



1.079


79.17 9


Kept in live box



317



0.974


78.03 d"


Net



318



1.072


79.57 9


Net



330



1.124


76.51 c?


Net



335


681


1.164


80.07 9


Kept several days in


box


336



1.124


77.67 9


Kept several days in


box


340


908


1.126


76.16 9


Net



345 ,



1.061


79.15 9


Net



348


iHbs.


1.141


77.46 9


Net



353


2 lbs.


1.117


76.63 9


Net



353


2 lbs.


1.169


77.81 9


Net



360



1.178


77.88 d


Net



362



1.257


78.65 d


Net



367


781


1.262


76.67 d


Hook



369



1.286


77.08 9


Net



374


2 lbs.


1.249


76.24 d


Net



380


3 lbs.


1.281


75.33 cf


Net



385



1.418


d"


Net



390



1.336


77.59 d


Net



392



1.353


79.67 d


Net



392



1.644


9


Dynamited



401



1.584


9


Dynamited



408



1.618


9


Dynamited



416



1.632


d^


Dynamited



424



1.369


78.54 9


Dynamited



430



1.400


' 9


Dynamited



432



1.424


79.97 d


Dynamited



438



1.530


d


Dynamited



439



1.400


9


Dynamited



439



1.499


83.00 9


Dynamited



441



1.601


9


Dynamited



448



1.591


9


Dynamited



As soon as the brain was exposed by means of a small bone forceps, it was separated from the spinal cord between the firstvertebra and the base of the skull. It was not practicable to find the first spinal nerve or to determine the caudal end of the fourth ventricle, methods which are usually adopted in separat


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM


45


ing the brain from the spinal cord in the mammalian nervous system. Anteriorly the olfactory nerves were cut close to the olfactory bulbs. The saccus vasculosus was not included with the brain. The brain which was thus removed was placed in a small bottle which had been previously weighed, and this was weighed again to a milligram. After the fresh weight of the brain was determined, the bottle with its contents was placed in a steam oven at a temperature of 80°-90°C. for several days (Tortugas laboratory) and then later dried at the Wistar Institute under better laboratory conditions at 96°C. The various other methods used for the analysis of the brain will be described later.


THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN RELATION TO BODY LENGTH

Altogether observations on 74 brains of the gray snapper have been made.

From table 1 the average brain weight of the sanpper for several values of the body length has been calculated and the results are given in table 2.

In order to show the general distribution of the brain weights in relation to the body length, I have prepared a chart based on the data given in tables 1 and 2.

In the chart males and females are not distinguished. As will be seen from chart 1, the distribution of brain weight in respect

TABLE 2

Shoiving the average brain iveight of the gray snapper for the several values of the body

length




BRAIN


WEIGHT



BODY LENGTH


BODY LENGTH OBSERVED




NUMBER OF


HANGE


Observed


Calculated by formula


SNAPPERS


mm.


mm.





200-250


231


0.643


0.667


10


250-300


271


0.860


0.840


23


300-350


319


1.037


1.048


15


350-400


373


1.296


1.282


12


400-450


428


1.513


1.520


11


Average


1.070


1.071





46


SHINKISHI HATAI


to the increasing body length from 150 mm. upward is practically linear. This linear relation between these two characters is better shown by the positions of the averaged values, which are also plotted. It is well known that in the adult stage the relation between brain weight and body length or body weight is practically linear, even in the case of some mammals (see for instance growth of brain in weight in the albino rat in respect to body length or body weight, Donaldson, '09) but it is remarkable to find the linear relation in fish when they are so small. This linearity during the period of early growth probably means that in the gray snapper the brain reaches its struc


BRAIN WEIGHT








_j •



• ' -c-^^ u


1.5


. . •. _i-- t-_



^^^^ '



^^*



^i^L^



^-.i"^ '


1.0


^^^l5fL*



^^11 '


iT J^'l M n 1 1 1 1 1 1 M M 1 1 M 1 1


^v>





.5 "*









n 1 1 — 1 1 — 1 \ — 1 — 1 — ^ — ' — ' — 1 — 1 — ' — ' — ' — ' —


1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 -L




50


100


150


200


250


.^00


350


400


450


Chart 1 Showing the weight of the brain of the gray snapper according to body length. The observed weights are represented by 74 fish. • = observed weight — o — o — = average observed weight (table 2).


tural maturity early, and that the subsequent increase in weight indicates merely a uniform swelling of the nervous system as a whole. The maturity of the brain at a relatively early stage of growth may be inferred also from practical constancy of the percentage of water in the brain from the very small to the very large fish in this series (page 48).

It is to be regretted that it was not possible to obtain data on smaller specimens, though every effort was made to obtain such specimens while I was at the Tortugas Laboratory. We were even unable to find any of the gray snapper fry, though the fry of the school master (Neomaenis apodus) which is most closely


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 47

related to the gray snapper, was abundant everywhere. Possibly the months of June and July were not a proper season to find them, or the fry of the gray snapper may not live in the open seas or along the beach, but may be in hiding under the intricate roots of mangroves, a tree not found on the Tortugas Islands.

On account of the scantiness of the data on the gray snapper less than 200 mm. in body length, I am unable to present a complete record of the growth of the brain. However it appears from the general trend of the growth curve that, with the possible exception of the very early period, the relation between the brain weight and body length does not deviate much from linearity.

Kellicott ('08) who studied the growth of the brain in the smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill) in respect to the body weight, found the graph to resemble that for the mammalian brain; that is the graph shows a rapid rise at the early period which is followed by a slower rate of growth. The form of the curve suggests a logarithmic formula such as was used to represent the growth of the brain in the albino rat (Hatai, '09). In other words the form of the graph for the gray snapper is strikingly different from that for the dogfish. This difference may be due to the fact that in the dogfish the brain possesses a voluminous cerebellum, as well as olfactory bulbs, and the combined weights of these two structures may be greater than that of the rest of the brain, while these two structures in the gray snapper are very small and the latter was not included. It appears that these two parts, olfactory bulbs and cerebellum, of the dogfish brain grow very rapidly during the earlier period, thus giving the form of the graph similar to that for the mammal.

Since the brain weight of the gray snapper shows a linear relation to the body length through a wide range, and since the fish which are usually caught fall within this range, I have devised the following formula for brain weight on body length, in hopes that it may prove useful for some future investigation.

Brain weight (gms.) = 0.00433 Body length (mm.) - 0.333.

The results of the calculation are given in table 2 and there


48 SHINKISHI HATAI

contrasted with the observed values. The agreement is highly satisfactory, and thus the formula may be employed when the probable brain weight of the gray snapper in which body length is known, is desired. I may point out that the absolute amount of increment of the weight of the brain following every millimeter increase of the body length is slightly over four milligrams (4,33 milligrams).

PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN THE BRAIN

Altogether 64 snappers were examined to determine the water content in the brain, and the results have been already given n table 1. An examination of the table reveals several striking relations in regard to the percentage of water. The percentage of water given by the smallest fish is 78.85 per cent while that of the larger fish, having a body length of 424 mm. and ranking in length third from the largest in which the water determination was made, gives 78.54 per cent. The frequency distribution of the percentage of water gives the following results.

TABLE 3

Showiny the frequency distribution of the percentage of water in the brain of the

gray snapper


PER CENT OF WATER


NUMBER OF CASES


75-76


2


76-77


5


77-78


15


78-79


17


79-80


16


80-81


6


81-82


2


82-83


1


Total number


64




Despite the fact of a wide range in the percentage o" water, the distribution of the frequencies is practically normal, and furthermore the high and low values are well mingled, when these


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 49

values are arranged according to the body length of the snapper (table 1) and there is no noticeable tendency for the lower values of the percentage of water to occur more frequently among larger fish, or vice versa. From this we infer that so far as the present data are concerned, the percentage of water in the small and large fish is nearly identical within a wide range of body length, and therefore the percentage of water does not vary regularly with the length or size of the fish. The average of 64 determinations gives the percentage of water as 78.61 per cent.

This wide variation in the percentage of water I am unable to explain at the present moment. It was thought at first that the method of capture, particularly the use of dynamite, might be responsible for it. Careful examination however (see remarks in table 1) of the table shows at once that such is not the case, and these wide variations are not correlated with the method of capture. It is true that the cranial cavity of the fish contains liquid as well as a jellylike substance, and the adhesion of particles of this substance may alter to some extent the percentage of water, but this factor is too insignificant to cause the wide variations shown in the table.

One other factor, though it appears to be important, cannot be readily tested, namely, masked age; that is a failure of the size and weight of the fish to indicate the age. We have no way to determine the age of the gray snapper. It may be that the size of the fish shows a wide range of variation for any given age. If size was positively correlated with age, then the low percentage of water would be given by the older fish, and vice versa. Therefore should we be able to arrange the data according to the ages of the fish, not the size of the fish as has been done, the values for the water should arrange themselves in a regular descending order with increasing age. This is, however, a mere speculation and must wait the test of future investigation.

Still another possible factor is the low grade of organization of the fish brain compared with that of the higher vertebrates. It is conceivable that owing to this low grade of organization, the structural maturity, or especially the process of myelination, may not progress regularly, and that within the same size or at

THE JOURNAX, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO, 1


50 SHINKISHI HATAI

the same age, a wide range of variation might exist in respect to the degree of myehnation, according to the environment of the fish or to the general nutritional conditions. Whether or not this suggestion has a value, only further investigation can determine.

Scott ('12) found that the percentage of water in the brain of the smooth dogfish differs very little between small and large specimens, and gives on the average 78.5 per cent. Donaldson ('05) who examined the brains of the summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) noted also but slight variation in the percentage of water in the brains of large and small individuals. The average from sixteen flounders in which the body weight ranges from 539 grams to 1290 grams, is 78.45 per cent. Thus the average percentages of water obtained by Donaldson, Scott and by myself are 78.45 per cent (flounder), 78.5 per cent (dogfish) and 78.61 per cent (gray snapper) respectively. For the purpose of comparison I gave the percentages of water in the brain of several fish, as determined by various investigators.

As will be seen from table 4 despite the widely different sizes and probably wide differences in the age of fish, the percentages of water in the brains are very close to one another, and further interest lies in the fact that the values given by the fish brains are not much different from the percentage of water in the adult mammalian brain.

Since the reduction in the water in the brain is induced by the deposition of the so called 'myelin substance' (Donaldson, '16) we may infer that the process of myelin ation in the fish brain attains its mature form at a very early period' thus permitting but very slight variation from small to large individuals. Scott ('12) also concludes from his observations on the water content

' In a private communication Dr. G. W. Bartelmez informs me that in Ameiurus melas, larvae 10 to 12 mm. long show already well advanced myelination of the roots of all the cranial nerves, as well as of the fasciculus longitudinalis medialis. The age of the larvae, according to Dr. Bartelmez 's estimate, is about ten to twelve days after fertilization. The largest adults measure as much as 120 mm. or nearly ten times the length of the larvae in which the myelination is already well advanced. From the above we may safely assume that myelination takes place in the fish at an early stage of development.


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM


51


of the dogfish that the differences in the reduction of water in the two cases is that "the nervous (and body) changes which occur in the mammal are post-embryonic and extra-utero. In the

TABLE 4

Showing the percentage of ivater in thebrainsof several fish. Data compiled from

various sources




X




ALCO



SPECIES


BODY WEIGHT


o "


BRAIN WEIGHT


PER CENT OF WATER


HOLETHER

EXTRACT


SEX


OBSERVER


Cyprinus carpio





77.50


8.33



Von Bibra (1854)


Cyprinus barbus





78.00


9.37



Von Bibra (1854)


Salmo farco





78.92


8.42



Von Bibra (1854)






-80.00





Lucius esox





81.93


7.25 9.10



Von Bibra (1854)


Fish


Schlossberger

(1856)









Cyprinus auratus





77.80




Bezold (1857)


Summer flounder


539


393


0.253


78.05




Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


540


397


0.305


79.06



C^


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


540


386


0.351


78.00



<f


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


560


411


0.338


78.70




Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


630


409


0.279


78.06



&


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


640


404


0.293


78.43



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


682


405


0.288


79.56




Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


834


440


0.311


78.60



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


840


462


0.358


78.98



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


860


453


0.406


78.37



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


880


459


0.381


77.11



cf


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


890


459


0.417


77.98



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


1010


460


0.355


78.22



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


1010


447


0.369


78.72



cf


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


1080


478


0.412


79.06



9


Donaldson (1905)


Summer flounder


1290


505


0.391


78.27



9


Donaldson (1905)


Average


78.45



Mustelus canis^





78.5




Scott (1912)


Barracuda


12 lbs.


1047


1.554


79.39 78.61



d'


Hatai (1917)


Neomaenis griseus^


Hatai (1917)


Cherna americana:









Red Grouper


14i lbs.


807


1.230


78.80




Hatai (1917)


Shark Sp?


160 lbs.



32.593


80.07



d"


Hatai (1917)




1 Average of 97 determinations from very small to very large. Percentage of water shows very slight variation.

2 Average of 51 gray snappers. Range of variation is shown in table (1).


52


SHINKISHI HATAI


dogfish they take place in utero." He, however, has not determined the water content in the brain of the dogfish in utero. From the foregoing it is clearly important to determine the water content in the brain of the fish at very early stages in order to discover the period of rapid reduction which must take place in consequence of the appearance of myelin in the brain. It is the hope of the writer to do this in the near future.


CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIN (GRAY SNAPPER)

Utilizing the materials which were employed for the determination of the percentage of water, I have determined the nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the amount in the etheralcohol soluble fraction extracted from the total solids. The results of these determinations are shown in table 5.

TABLE 5

Showing the amount of the ether-alcohol soluble and insoluble fractions in the brain of the gray snapper; also the amount of nitrogen in the total solids, as well as the nitrogen in the ether alcohol fraction



BRAINS





WEIGHT OF


NITROGEN IN












SERIES


a

m

D Z


m K


SOLIDS


W.^TER


NITROGEN


Residue


Alcoholether Extract


Residue


Alcoholether Extract




weight



per cent


mgms.


gins.


gms.


mgms.


711 gms.


1


28


27.303


5.665


79.14


462


2.707


2.958


364


98







8.15%


47.79%


52.21%


78.79%


21.21%


2


19


20.013


4.588


77.07


334


1.938


2.650


269


65







7.28%


42.24%


57.75%


80.54%


19.46%


Ave


rage . .



78.11


7.72%


45.02%


54.98%


79.67%


20.33%




To carry out the determinations presented in table 5, I have divided the entire materials into two groups in which group 1 gives for the brain a percentage of water which ranges between 78 per cent and 80 per cent, while in group 2 the percentage of water ranges between 76 per cent and 77 per cent. All the other brains which gave percentages of water beyond these limits were excluded. Since all these data for the fish may be discussed conveniently by comparing them with similar data obtained


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 53;

from the rat brain, I may state simply that the values for the alcohol-ether soluble fraction obtained in this series of fish are similar to those obtained by Von Bibra ('54) and by Schlossberger ('56) in other forms of fish (table 3).

CONTENT OF 'NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN' IN THE BRAIN

Altogether 44 snappers of medium size were used for the purpose of determining the various extractive nitrogenous substances in the brain. These brains were divided into three samples, each giving nearly the same amount of moist brain weight. One additional sample was obtained from the brains of the schoolmaster (Neomaenis apodus) which is a species most closely related to the gray snapper.

The fresh brains of each sample were ground finely and then preserved in 150 cc. of 2.5 per cent solution of trichloracetic acid in water. - The ground brains were transferred to a bottle by means of 50 cc. water, thus making altogether 200 cc. of solution. The filtrates from this mixture were brought back to the Wistar Institute for analysis. The methods used for the determination of various nitrogen fractions were as follows:

1. Total non-protein nitrogen. Micro method of FoTin and Farmer as modified by Benedict and Bock.

2. Amino-acid nitrogen. Van Slyke's nitrous acid method. Also the same author's micro apparatus.

3. Urea nitrogen. Urease method.

4. Ammonia nitrogen. By the usual aerat on method.

In all cases, except the case of the amino acid, the nitrogen content was determined by means of the DuBoscq colorimeter. The results obtained from these determinations are given in table 6. i

Since it is my intention to discuss this subject later in comparison with the similar data recently obtained from the brain of the albino rat, I shall merely direct attention to the fact that these three samples give results very close to each other. - Furthermore the results obtained from the sample of the schoolmaster also agree with those found in the case of the gray snapper.


54


SHINKISHI HATAI


TABLE 6


Showing nitrogen content in terms of the 7io7i-proteins, the amino acids, the urea and the ammonia, in the brains of the gray snapper and of the 'schoolmaster.'


Number


Weight


MILLIGRAMS NITROGEN PER 100 GRAMS OF FRESH BRAIN


NonProtein


Anino acids


Urea


Ammonia


"Undetermined nitrogen




Neomaenis griseus







gms.







1


16


13.166


204


101.8


13.2


17.7


71.3


2


13


10.713


224


125.0


17.8


18.9


62.3


3


15


12.048


203


121.2


15.8


17.4


48.6


Average


11.976


210


116.0


15.6


18.0


60.7


Neomaenis apodus


10


11.195


225


126.0


17.3


17.2


64.5


This agreement in the various substances might also be taken to support the behef of the systematists that these two species are closely related.


COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GRAY SNAPPER AND THE ALBINO RAT IN REGARD TO THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE BRAIN

In order to compare the data on the chemical composition of the brain in the gray snapper with those for the brain of the albino rat, table 7 was prepared. The entries for the fish are based on tables 5 and 6, while the data on the albino rat were obtained from an earlier paper (Hatai, '17).

When comparison is made between the fish brain and the entire brain of the albino rat, we find a distinct difference in regard to the content of the total nitrogen and of the nitrogen in the lipoids, as well as in the total amount of the ether-alcohol extractive materials. These differences must undoubtedly be correlated with anatomical differences 'n the two forms of the brains. In the rat we find a well developed cerebrum and cerebellum in which the myelinated nerve fibers are relatively less than in the stem, while the cell bodies are more abundant. On the other hand in these fish brains we find a mere trace of the


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM


55


TABLE 7

Showing the comparison of the gray snapper with the albino rat in regard to the chemical composition of their brains


Water in brain, per cent

Total nitrogen in fresh tissue, per cent

Total nitrogen in solids, per cent

Alcohol-ether extract in solids, per cent

Nitrogen in alcohol-ether soluble fraction, per cent Percentage of water in lipoid-free tissue, per cent. . . Milligrams of non-protein nitrogen per 100 grams

of fresh tissue, milligrams '.

Partition of nitrogen in milligrams of nitrogen per

gram of solids

[Non-pro tein-N

JAmino-acids-N

|Urea-N

[Ammonia-N

Partition of non-protein nitrogen in percent of protein nitrogen I Non-proteins Amino acids Urea Ammonia


GR.^Y


ALBINO R.\T


SNAPPER


STEM OF


ENTIRE


ENCEPH.i

BRAIN


LON


78.11


75.16


1.69


1.89


7.72


7.75


54.98


55.03


20.60


19.90


88.80


87.06


225


150


9.6


6.0


5.3


2.9


0.7


0.7


0.8


0.6


13.04


9.72


7.20


4.68


0.97


1.05


1.11


1.04


ALBINO RAT ENTIRE BR.^IN


77.96 1.95 8.98 47-. 14 18.20 87.00

159


7.6 3.5 0.7 0.7


10.37 4.60 0.95 1.01


cerebrum and cerebellum compared with the size of the stem in which the myelinated nerve fibers are abundant. Consequently we should expect a higher value of the total nitrogen in the rat brain than in the fish brain, since the former possesses relatively a much greater number of cell bodies in those two well developed parts, the cerebrum and cerebellum. At the same time the rat brain ought to give relatively a less amount of hpoids, owing to tjhe great,er abundance of the gray matter in the predominant parts. In the fish brain the insignificant growth of the cerebrum and cerebellum makes the stem of the brain relatively predominant in the quantitative relations, and since the stem is the portion of the brain in which the myehnated fibers are mostly found, we should expect the percentage value of the lipoid fraction in the fish brain to be relatively higher than in the rat.


56 SHINKISHI HATAI

If we compare now the entire brain of the snapper with the stem of the albino rat brain (table 7) we notice a surprisinglyclose similarity. This we should expect since as was already stated the fish brain is practically represented by the stem, since the cerebral and cerebellar portions are relatively insignificant. Thus we notice the practical identity in the percentage values of the total nitrogen, hpoid nitrogen, and the amount of the Upoids. The percentage of water in the stem of the rat is however far less than in the entire brain of the fish which may be accounted for by the fact that in the brain of the fish the cerebrum and the cerebellum, though small ia relative quantity,* nevertheless are composed of structures rich in water, and thus bring the value of the water higher in the fish than in the stem alone of the albino rat brain.

The nitrogen content of the Upoid is sUghtly higher in the fish brain than in the albino rat brain, though almost identical with that in the stem. This difference may be due to the quantitative difference in the proportion of various lipoids in which the nitrogen content is not the same.

I now wish to consider the partition of the non-protein nitrogen in the fish brain compared with the brain of the albino rat. As will be seen from table 7 the content of the non-protein nitrogen is considerably greater in the fish than in the rat brain. We also notice that the greater part of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the nitrogen of the amino acids. The nitrogen values given by both the urea and ammonia are small and are practically identical both in the fish and rat. The greater amount of non-protein nitrogen found in the fish brain in comparison to the rat is interesting, though I am unable to explain this difference satisfactorily. I wish however to call attention to two factors which may have some bearing on the difference just noted.

1. It seems probable that on account of the low grade of organization of the fish brain the physical consistence of the nervous system may not be as stable as that of the more highly organized mammalian nervous system, and thus the wear and tear process may be greater and produce a correspondingly greater amount of waste products in the fish brain.


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 57

2. According to Folin and Denis ('14) the normal human blood contains, on the average of four cases, 32 milligrams of nonprotein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood, while Wilson and Adolph ('17) found in the blood of various fresh water fish much higher values for the non-protein nitrogen (42 mgms. per 100 cc.) than in the human blood, and furthermore these investigators found a greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen was represented by the nitrogen of amino acids (23 mgms. per 100 cc. or about 55 per cent of the total non-protein nitrogen). Thus my own observations on the fish brain closely agree with those of Wilson and Adolph on the fish blood, so far as the relative abundance of the non-protein nitrogen is concerned, as well as in the relation of the amino acid nitrogen to the total non-protein nitrogen.

Denis ('13-' 14) found also a considerably greater amount of non-protein nitrogen in the blood of marine fishes when contrasted with human blood. Denis found 62 mgms. of non-protein nitrogen per 100 cc. of blood (average of 10 species of teleosts) and as high as 1087 mgms. in the case of the elasmobranchs (average of three species). Thus the greater abundance of the non-protein nitrogen in the fish blood, accompanied by a slow circulation, might be largely responsible for a greater accumulation of the non-protein nitrogenous extractive substances in the fish brain.

SUMMARY

The gray snapper, Neomaenis griseus, was mainly used for the present investigation. The following are the more important facts brought out.

1. The relation between brain weight and body length is practically linear. This linear relation appears in the fish as small as 150 mm. in length. The fish smaller than 150 mm. were not studied because they could not be obtained.

2. The percentage of water in the brain varies very little from small to large (body length : 88 mm. to 448 mm.). A similar relation was observed by Donaldson ('05) in the brain of the summer flounder and by Scott ('12) in the brain of the smooth dogfish. The probable explanation is that the process of mye


58 SHINKISHI HATAI

lination is completed in the fish brain relatively earlier than in the mammalian brain.

3. With respect to the total nitrogen, nitrogen in ether-alcohol extract, and the lipoid content, the fish brain closely resembles the stem of the rat brain, but significantly differs from the entire rat brain. This is explained by the fact that the mature fish brain resembles essentially the stem of the mammalian brain owing to the small growth of cerebrum and cerebellum.

4. The non-protein nitrogen is considerably greater (42 per cent) in amount in the fish brain than in the rat brain. The suggestions were made that probably on account of unstable physical consistence of the fish nervous system, the wear and tear of the neurons may be greater than in the more highly organized mammalian nervous system, thus producing a larger quantity of the waste products, and also that on account of higher nonprotein nitrogen content of the fish blood, accompanied by a slow circulation, the deposition of the waste products might become greater, and at the same time a less vigorous removal further tends to increase the accumulation.

5. The greater fraction of the non-protein nitrogen is represented by the amino acid nitrogen in both the fish and the rat.

6. The amounts of urea nitrogen and of ammonia nitrogen are closely similar to those found in the rat braiuc


METABOLIC ACTIVITY OF NERVOUS SYSTEM 59

LITERATURE CITED

Be?old, a. von 1857 Untersuchungen liber die Vertheilung von Wasser, organisdher Materie und anorganischen Verbindungen im Thierreiche. Zeitschr. f. wiss. ZooL, vol. 8.

BiBRA, Ernest von 1854 Vergleichende Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn des Menschen und der Wirbelthiere. Verlag von Basserman u. Mathy. Mannheim.

Denis, W. 1913-1914 Metabolism studies on cold-blooded animals. 2, The blood and urine of fish. J. Biol. Chem., vol. 16, pp. 389-393.

Donaldson, H. H. 1905 On the percentage of water in the brain of the summer flounder, according to body weight. Not published — in manuscript. 1909 On the relation of the body length to the body weight and to the weight of the brain and of the spinal cord in the albino rat (Mus norvegicus var. albus). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 155-167.

1915 The Rat. Reference tables and data for the albino rat (Mus norvegicus albinus) and the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus). Memoirs of the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.

1916 A preliminary determination of the part played by myelin in reducing the water content of the mammalian nervous system (albino rat). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 26, pp. 443-451.

FoLiN, Otto and Denis, W. 1914 On the creatinine and creatine content of

blood. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 17, pp. 487-491. Hatai, S. 1909 Note on the formulas used for calculating the weight of the

brain in the albino rats. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 19, pp. 169-173.

1917 Metabolic activity of the nervous system. I. Amount of nonprotein nitrogen in the central nervous system of the normal albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, pp. 361-378.

Kellicott, W. E. 1908 The growth of the brain and viscera in the smooth

dogfish (Mustelus canis, Mitchill). Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 8, pp.

319-353. Reighard, J. 1908 An experimental field study of warning coloration in coral

reef fishes. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Inst.

Washington, vol. 2. Schlossberger, J. E. 1856 Allegemeinen und vergleichenden Thierchemie.

Leipzig u. Heidelberg. Scott, G. G. 1912 The percentage of water in the brain of the dogfish. Proc.

Soc. Exp. Biol, and Med., vol. 9, no. 3. Wilson, D. W. and Adolph, E. F. 1917 The partition of non-protein nitrogen

in the blood of fresh water fish. Jour. Biol. Chem., vol. 29, pp. 405 41L


author's abstract of this paper issued

BY the bibliographic SERVICE, FEBRUARY 2


COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

V. PART I. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE ALBINO RAT BRAIN, TOGETHER WITH THE CHANGES IN THESE CHARACTERS ACCORDING TO THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN

V. PART II. ON THE AREA OF THE CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), compared WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ALBINO RAT

NAOKI SUGITA From the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biologij

THREE FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS

PART I

I. INTRODUCTION

The present study is an extension of an earlier one on the thickness of the cerebral cortex in the albino rat (Sugita, '17 a) and aims to present the extent of the actual area occupied by the cortical cells, as seen in sections which were taken from the fixed levels of the albino brain, and also to follow the changes in this area during the postnatal growth of the brain. In the course of this investigation, the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume of a fixed locahty in the frontal i section was counted and the changes in this number with advancing age were ascertained. Furthermore the relation between the cell number and the cortical area was critically examined.

For this study, the sections, which had been previously used for the investigation of the thickness of the cortex of the albino rat brain, were again utilized. The material, amounting to 78

61

THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2 APRIL, 1918


62 NAOKI SUGITA

albino rats, sexes combined, which was used in the present study, is identical with that listed in table 1 of the former paper (Sugita, '17 a), to which the reference should be made for this studyalso.

These studies were made during the winter semester of 19161917.

II. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS

A. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section

As previously described (Sugita, '17 a), the sagittal section (fig. 1) was taken in a plane passmg through the frontal pole afid parallel to the mesial surface of the hemisphere. This section from each individual brain was projected on a sheet of paper by the Leitz-Edinger Projection apparatus, at a magnification of exactly twenty diameters, and the outline of the image then accurately traced on the sheet. At the transitional part of the cortex at the frontal pole to the olfactory bulb and at the subiculum, where the cortex goes over into the structure of the cornu Ammonis, the borderlines were drawn along the radiation of the cells in those parts (fig. 1). The anterior borderline (a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. The posterior borderline (p-p') is clearly located, because this was drawn at the point where the thickness of the ganglionic layer abruptly diminishes at the beginning of the ganglion cell band characteristic for the cornu Ammonis. The area of the cortex, including the lamina zonalis, which contains no proper nerve cells, was then repeatedly measured to a square millimeter on the drawing, using the Ott Compensating Planimeter. The values obtained were then averaged, and 1/400 of the value, which corresponds to the cortical area on the slide, was recorded. This value was then converted into that for the fresh condition of the material, by the following procedure.

On the outline, which was taken from the section on the slide, the diameter from frontal pole to the occipital pole (L. F) was measured and reduced, and, according to the formula given in the former paper (Sugita, '17 a), which reads


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


63


Correction-coefficient =


The diameter L. F in fresh cerebrum


The diameter L. F on the shde the correction-coefficient was determined. The value for the area obtained by the (first) direct measurement from the slide was then corrected to the corresponding value for the fresh condition of the material, by multiplying by the square of the correction-coefficient. The corrected values thus obtained are given in the last column of table 1.

The values for the cortical areas in the respective sagittal sections of each individual were then grouped according to the



Fig. 1 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the sagittal section of the albino rat brain. The anterior borderline ((a-a') is formed by a prolongation of the line bounding the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. The posterior borderline {p-p') is drawn at the point where the ganglionic layer goes over abruptly to the ganglion cell band in the cornu Ammonis.

brain weight, into twenty groups, as in the other studies of this series, and the average value for each group was found. The average areas of the cortex in the sagittal section for each group (table 1) were plotted in chart 1 (graph s), which shows the increase in area according to the increase in brain weight.

B. Area of the cortex in the frontal section

The frontal section (fig. 2) was cut in the plane passing through approximately the middle point of the mesial surface of the


64


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 1

Shoiving the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correctioncoefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum



BRAIX WEIGHT


OBSERVED

AREA OF CORTEX


CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


GROUP


L. F in fresh brain


The same on slide


AREA OF CORTEX



grams


mm.

mm.


mm.


mm."^


la


0.153


3.2


5.50


4.97


4.1


c


0.154


3.0


5.60


4.80


4.1


b


0.177


4.0


5.70


5.13


4.9



0.161


5.4


1.


13^


4.4


II a


0.213


4.0


5.80


5.13


5.1


b


0.221


3.9


6.00


5.43


4.8


c


0.261


4.8


6.60


5.60


6.7


d


0.271


4.8


6.75


5.80


6.5


e


0.288


4.5


6.70


5.75


6.1


■ (Birth)


0.251


4.4


1.


15-^


5.8


III a


0.311


6.1


7.35


6.45


7.9


1)


0.322


6.3


7.20


6.40


8.0


g


0.374


8.1


7.40


7.40


8.1


c


0.390


6.7


7.50


6.70


8.4


i


0.395


7.4


7.95


7.20


9.0



0.S58


6.9


1.


10^


8.3


IV b


0.400


6.7


7.70


6.65


9.0


a


0.402


8.4


7.75


7.30


9.4


e


0.420


8.2


7.95


7.20


10.0


i


0.443


10.6


8.30


8.10


11.1


d


0.459


8.8 •


8.05


7.60


9.9


e


0.466


9.6


8.40


7.80


11.1



0.^32


8.6


/.


082


10.1


Vi


0.501


10.2


8.35


7.90


11.4


a


0.525


12.7


8.55


8.45


12.9


b


0.528


11.1


8.50


8.05


12.4


c


0.534


9.0


8.65


7.60


11.6


d


0.537


10.1


8.30


7.70


11.7


e


0.555


12.3


9.25


8.65


14.0


f


0.558


11.0


9.20


8.50


12.9


g


0.564


11.4


8.85


8.40


12.7


h


0.579


11.5


9.10


8.35


13.6



0.542


11.0


1.07'^


12.6


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


65


TABLE 1— Continued



BRAIN WEIGHT


OBSERVED

ARE.\ OF CORTEX


CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


GROUP


L. F in fresh brain


Th


e same on slide


AREA OF CORTEX



(/rams


mm."


m m .



??i m .


?« m .2


VI c


0.610


12.0


9.35



8.35


14.9


a


0.617


10.7


9.25



7.95


14.4


e


0.090


15.0


9.60



9.00


17.1



0.639


12.6


1.


ir


15.5


VII a


0.740


15.7


10.50



9.80


18.1


b


0.760


11.5


10.65



8.50


18.1



0.750


13.6


1.15-'


18.1


VIII a


0.800


14.4


10.50



9.25


18.5


h


0.805


13.8


10.90



9.20


19.4


b

0.822


16.2


10.45



9.60


19.2


c


0.849


18.0


10.50



9.70


21.1


k


0.870


15.1


10.95



9.40


20.5


d


0.898


17.0


11.45



10.15


21.6



0.841


15. S


1.13^ 1



20.1


IX d


0.959


17.9


11.60



10.50


21.8


e


0.960


16.9


11.40



9.85


22.5


a


0.972


15.4


11.30



9.70


20.9


(10 days)


0.964


16.7


/.


W



21.7


X a


1.033


13.9


11.90



9.40


22.3


b


1.036


15.9


11.85



9.85


23.1


e


1.051


17.5


12.05



10.05


25.0



1.040


15.8


1.


22"


23.5


XI a


1.107


17.3


12.00



10.00


25.2


b


1.189


18.8


12.50



10.25


28.0


c


1 . 193


19.1


12.65



10.50


27.8


d


1.195


16.0


12.60



10.00


25.4


(20 days)


1.171


17.8


1.22' 1



26.6


'XII c


1.234


18.4


12.30



10.35


26.0


a


1.273


15.7


12.45



9.65


26.2



1.253


17.1


1.


2J,'



26.1


XIII a


1.301


18.7


13.00



11.10


25.7


g


1.307


15.6


12.95



10.00


26.2


b


1.327


17.2


13.20



10.50


27.2


c


1.346


17.8


13.00



10.10


29.5


h


1.392


21.9


13.45



11.60


29.5



1.335


18.2


1.2S'


27.6


66


naoki sugita


TABLE \— Concluded



BRAIN WEIGHT


OBSERVED AREA CORTEX


CO RRECTION-COEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


GROUP


L. F in fresh brain


The same on slide


AREA OF CORTEX



grams.


mm.


mm.



mm.


mm. 2


XIV a


1.412


17.5


13.40



10.40


29.1


e


1.441


15.2


13.25



10.10


26.2


b


1.483


21.1


13.30



11.30


29.3



1.U5


17.9


1.


26^



28.2 ■


XV a


1.530


17.4


13.70



10.80


28.1


b


1.542


19.6


13.50



11.40


27.5


c


1.552


17.2


13.70



10.65


28.6


d


1.573


20.0


13.70



11.15


30.1


e


1.574


18.9


13.75



11.05


29.3



1.554


18.6


l.£


4'



28.7


XVI a


1.642


18.9


14.10



11.30


29.4


g


1.643


18.7


14.65



11.60


29.7


c


1.647


18.7


13.75



11.05


29.0


e


1.690


17.5


13.65



10.70


28.6



1.656


18.4


1.


26^



29.2


XVII f


1.720


18.3


14.90



11.60


30.2


a


1.721


18.4


13.90



10.90


29.8


b


1.730


23.5


13.85



11.70


32.8


c


1.731


20.8


14.30



11.60


31.7



1.726


20.2


1.


u^



31.1


XVIII c


1.817


18.5


15.20



11.50


32.4


a


1.844


24.7


14.00



12.10


33.0


e


1.855


21.6


15.05



12.15


33.1



1.839


21.6


1.


24^



32.8


XIX a


1.924


20.6


15.40



12.30


32.3



i.m


20.6


1.


25^



32.3


XX a


2.039


22.6


15.10



12.60


32.5


b


2.069


25.1


15.55



13.20


34.8



2.054


23.9


1.19'


33.7


hemisphere and cutting the corpus callosum, the conunissura anterior and the chiasma opticum (Sugita, '17 a). On the drawing of the outhne of the frontal section (fig. 2), which was traced


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


67


in the same manner as that for the sagittal section, the dorsal and the ventral borderlines of the cortical are^ were drawn. The dorsal border (d) was determined by the ectal borderline of the corpus callosum, which lies under the tip of the cortex at the bottom of the fissura sagittalis, and the ventral border {v-v') was drawn perpendicular to the surface at the basal end of the cell group which is found under the cortex proper just below the region of the fissura rhinalis, latero-basal to the cap


Fig. 2 Showing, by shading, the cortical area measured on the frontal section of the albino rat brain. The dorsal border (d) is chosen at the borderline of the corpus callosum. The ventral border (v-v') was drawn perpendicular to the surface at the basal end of the cell group found near the fissura rhinalis, latero-basal to the capsula externa. The double shaded part, locality VII, indicates the area where the cell number and cell size were determined.

sula externa. This latter border is not so sharply defined, but we could not find any better marking point than this cell group. The area of the cortex, thus bounded, was then measured and recorded. In making the measurement, the area of the cortex was at first measured and then the total area of the frontal section, — of one hemicerebrum — excluding the cavity of the lateral ventricle and the tractus opticus, was measured. The ratio of the cortical area to the total area of the section was then computed. Correction of the observed values to those for the


68


NAOKI SUGITA


fresh condition of the material was made in the same manner as for the sagittal cortex, by multiplying by the square of the value of the correction-coefficient. This latter was obtained by the formula given in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), as follows:

The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum


Correction-coefficient =


The diameter W. D on the slide


li 70 (,5 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5










































..-T





















/


/'


















^


'


~y
















-;>-'


>



















i^


















^^

^'




















v




i




'




1

t





i



■■/^












^,.--'


i 1 !













^

-^j


.--'


-'—





---^


! i





,y.


y






^.^


^^











s




/f




^'^


^


■^















/


i



^


■>^














i




^


^


'^
















1 ■



s=

j i


















\ 1


'O 0.1 Q2 0.3 Q4 Q5 06 07 Q8 Q9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT 18 19 2.0 ^s.

Chart 1 Showing the corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal

and the frontal sections and the area of the whole frontal section, all according

to the brain weight, accompanied by the theoretical value of the last which is

assumed to be proportional to the square of the cube root of the brain weight.

Albino rat. X— • — ■ — • X, Cortical area in the sagittal section, o oof

Cortical area in the frontal section. • 'F, Area of the whole frontal section.

T, Theoretical area of the frontal section, i.e., the square of the

cube root of the brain weight. All graphs are based on the data in tables 1 and 2.

These data are all entered in table 2, in which the average measurements for each brain weight group are also given. The graphs for the total area of the frontal section (graph F) and for the area of the frontal cortex (graph f) in chart 1 are based on the corrected data given in table 2.


TABLE 2

Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex and of the total frontal section and the percentage of the cortical area to the total frontal section of the albino rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum




OBSERVED


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


PERCENTAGE OF



BRAIN WEIGHT







CORTICAL


GROUP


Area of cortex


Area of

total section


W. D

in fresh brain


The same on slide


Area of cortex


Area of

total section


AREA IN

TOTAL

c SECTION



grams


mm. 2


mTO.2


mm .


m m .


»i m .2


vim.^


per cent


la


0.153


2.8


9.2


6.45


5.65


3.7


12.0


34


c


0.154


2.6


8.2


6.35


5.40


3.6


11.4


34


b


0.177


3.5


9.9


6.95


6.26


4.3


12.2


35



0.161


3.0


9.1


1.


W


3.9


11.9


35


II a


0.213


4.4


13.0


8.40


7.35


5.7


17.0


34


b


0.221


3.6


11.9


7.95


6.50


5.4


17.8


30


c


0.261


4.6


13.0


7.80


7.10


5.6


15.7


36


d


0.271


4.4.


13.1


7.75


6.80


5.7


16.9


34


e


0.288


4.1


11.8


8.55


7.05


6.0


17.4


35


(Birthj


0.251


4.2


12.6


1.


16"

5.7


17.0


34


III a


0.311


5.1


15.3


8.50


7.65


6.3


18.9


33


b


0.322


5.1


13.0


8.70


6.80


8.3


21 .2


39


g


0.374


7.2


19.0


8.95


8.40


8.2


21.6


38


c


0.390


6.5


15.9


8.85


7.60


8.8


21.5


39


i


0.395


7.5


17.8


9.10


8.60


8.4


20.0


42



0.358


6.3


16.2


1.13^


8.0


20.6


39


IV b


0.400


7.6


19.4


9.00


8.50


8.5


21.7


39


a


0.402


6.8


16.7


9.10


7.90


9.0


22.2


41


c


0.420


6.7


17.9


9.00


8.15


8.2


21. g


38


i


0.443


8.0


19.0


9.15


8.40


9.4


22.3


42


cl


0.459


6.9


17.2


9.50


7.95


9.8


24.5


40


e


0.466


9.4


21.8


9.30


9.25


9.5


22.1


43



o.m


7.6


18.7


l.W

9.1


22.4


41


Vi


0.501


9.0


22.3


9.80


9.20


10.2


25.3


40


a


0.525


9.8


22.4


9.65


9.10


11.0


25.2


44


b


0.528


8.7


19.6


9.90


8.60


11.5


26.0


44


c


0.534


7.6


18.6


10.30


8.25


11.4


29.0


39


d


0.537


8.8


20.1


10.00


8.80


11.4


26.0


44


e


0.555


9.9


22.5


9.90


9.00


12.0


27.2


44


f


0.558


9.2


20.0


10.00


8.55


12.6


27.4


46


g


0.564


10.2


22.9


10.10


9.15


12.4


28.0


44


h


0.579


10.1


22.1


10.10


9.05


12.8


27.6


46



0.542


9.3


21.2


1.13

11.7


26.9


u


69


TABLE 2~Continued




OBSERVED


CORRECTIONCOEFriCIENT


CORRECTED


PERCENTAGE OP



BRAIN WEIGHT







CORTICAL


GROUP


Area of cortex


Area of

total

section


W. D

in fresh brain


The same on slide


Area of cortex


Area of

total section


AREA IN

TOTAL SECTION



grams


WOT .2


invi.^


mm.


7)1 m.


TOOT.2


mm.

per cent


Vie


0.610


9.9


21.7


10.15


8.50


14.1


31.0


46


a


0.617


9.6


21.6


10.55


8.65


14.3


32.2


44


e


0.690


11.6


23.7


10.60


9.40


14.8


30.2


49


N


0.639


10.4


22.3


1.


19'

14.4


31.1


46


Vila


0.740


11.1


22.1


11.00


9.20


15.9


31.6


50


b


0.760


10.2


20.3


11.20


8.70


16.9


33.6


50



0.750


10.7


21.2


1.,


24'


16. 4


32.6


50


Villa


0.800


10.6


21.8


11.15


8.60


18.8


36.7


51


h


0.805


11.3


23.6


10.60


8.30


18.5


38.6


48


b


0.822


13.6


28.5


11.85


10.20


18.4


38.5


48


c


0.849


13.7


28.8


11.40


9.90


18.2


38.3


48


k


0.870


13.4


27.7


11.45


9.60


19.1


39.5


48


d


0.898


13.1


31.2


11.75


10.20


17.4


41.5


42



0.841


12.6


26.9


1.


202


18. 4


38.9


48


IX d


0.959


13.5


28.4


11.80


9.70


20.0


42.0


48


e


0.960


13.8


29.4


12.15


10.10


20.0


42.6


47


a


0.972


14.3


28.4


11.95


9.80


21.3


42.4


50


(10 days)


0.964


13.9


28.7


1.


2P


20.4


42. 3


48


Xa


1.033


14.1


30.3


12.40


10.30


20.4


44.0


46


b


1.036


13.4


30.5


12.40


10.15


20.0


45.5


44


e


1.051


13.2


25.9


12.10


9.40


21.8


43.0


51



1.040


13.6


28.9


1.


23'

20.7


44.2


47


XI a


1.107


13.7


28.7


12.90


10.20


21.8


45.7


48


b


1.189


13.3


27.8


13.15


10.30


21.7


45.4 '


48


c


1 . 193


14.6


30.8


12.70


10.30


22.2


47.0


47


d


1.195


12.8


27.2


12.50


9.80


21.0


44.5


47


(20 days)


1.171


13.6


28.6


1.


26^


21.7


45.7


48


XII c


1.234


15.0


31.9


12.95


10.70


22.0


46.8


47


a


1.273


11.9


23.6


12.90


9.10


24.0


47.5


50



1.25S


13.5


27.8


1.


3r

23.0


47.2


49


XIII a


1.301


13.9


28.3


13.20


10.25


23.0


47.1


49


g


1.307


13.9


29.9


12.70


10.00


22.5


48.3


47


b


1.327


12.2


28.2


13.35


9.70


23.2


53.3


43


c


1.346


13.3


29.0


13.15


9.85


23.7


51.8


46


h


1.392


16.3


34.8


13.10


10.90


23.6


50.3


47



1.335


13.9


30.0


1.29^


23.2


50.2


46


70


TABLE 2—Co7icluded




OBSERVED


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


PERCENTAGE OF



BHAIN WEIGHT







CORTICAL


GROUP


Area of cortex


Area of

total

section


W. D.

in fresh brain


The same on slide


Area of corte.x


Area of

total section


AREA IN

TOTAL SECTION



grams


mm. 2


m m .

171 m.


mm.


»»m.2


mm. 2


■per cent


XIV a


1.412


13.9


29.4


13.65


10.30


24.4


51.6


47


e


1.441


12.4


25.7


13.10


9.20


25.2


51.0


49


b


1.483


15.2


33.3


13.80


10.80


24.8


54.4


46



1445


13.8


29.5


1.34""


24.8


52.3


47


XV a


1.530


14.4


33.6


13.80


10.80


23.5


54.8


43


b


1.542


13.9


30.5


13.70


10.40


24.2


53.0


46


c


1.552


14.2


31.7


13.50


10.30


24.4


54.4


45


d


1.573


14.2


30.8


13.90


10.60


24.4


53.1


46


e


1.574


14.8


32.2


13.70


10.50


25.2


54.8


46



1.554


14-3


31.8


l.l


?02


24-3


54.0


45


XVI a


1.642


16.4


37.0


13.80


11.20


24.9


56.2


44


g


1.643


11.6


27.4


13.40


9.50


23.2


54.7


42


c


1.647


14.3


29.8


14.00


10.50


25.5


53.2


48


e


1.690


13.0


30.7


13.45


10.00


23.5


55.3


42



1.656


13.8


31.2


l.t


J32


24.3


54.9


44


XVII f


1.720


12.5


28.7


13.50


9.60


24.8


56.8


44


a


1.721


14.8


34.5


14.00


11.00


24.0


56.0


43


b


1.730


17.5


40.4


14.70


12.35


24.8


57.2


43


c


1.731


17.5


39.2


14.40


12.10


24.8


55.6


45



1.726


15.6


35.7


l.i


W


24.6


56.4


44


XVIII c


1.817


13.3


31.1


14.00


10.10


25.6


59.8


43


a


1.844 1.855


17.4


38.1


15.00


12.10


26.7


58.5


46


e


14.2


32.0


14.30


10.60


25.8


58.3


44



1.839


15.0


33.7


l.t


?^2


26.0


58.9


44


XIX a


1.924


14.8


33.9


14.10


10.90


24.8


57.0


44



1.924


U.8


33.9


l.i


w

2^.8


57.0


44


XX a


2.039


16.8


42.7


■ 14.80


12.10


25.2


63.9


39


b


2.069


15.7


40.3


14.60


11.70


24.5


62.8


39



2.054


16.3


41.5


1.23'

24-9


63.4


39


C. Number of nerve cells

On the frontal sections used for the measurement of the cortical area, the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume at a fixed locality in the cortex was counted. The locality selected was at the middle part of the cortical band (fig. 2, VII), designated as locality VII in figure 4 in a former paper (Sugita,

71


72 NAOKI SUGITA

'17 a). To represent the cortex, the lamina pyramidaHs and the lamina ganglionaris were selected. By the use of the ocular net-micrometer (with Zeiss Comp. Ocular 6 and Zeiss objectives 2 mm. and 4 mm.), the number of nerve cells in five adjoining squares along the cortical band, each square 100 micra on a side, was counted in a given location. The numbers obtained were added together and then, by multiplying by two, was converted to the number in a unit area of 0.1 mm.- on the section. This value, the number of nerve cells in a slice of cortex, 0.1 mm." in area and 10 micra thick (the thickness of the section) or 0.001 mm.^ in volume, was then reduced to the number in this volume in the fresh condition of the brain. To make this reduction, I used as the correction-coefficient the cube of the reciprocal of the correction-coefficient obtained by the for The diameter W. D in fresh cerebrum , . , , , ,

mula: =- v-. -— — 7r\ ' which had been

1 he diameter W . D on the slide

previously employed, because the section on the slide was assumed to have shrunken in all three dimensions equally at the rate of the correction-coefficient and therefore a unit volume in the fresh condition would correspond to the volume of the unit on the slide multiplied by the cube of the reciprocal of the correction-coefficient.

In the lamina pyramidalis, the pyramids are more densely crowded at the ectal than at the ental part of the lay?r, which adjoins the lamina granulans interna. I adjusted the upper line of the net-micrometer squarely on the border between the lamina zonalis and the lamina pyramidalis and counted the cell number included in a square, 100 micra on each side, at the ectal part of the layer, where the cells are crowded densely. If large blood vessels appeared in the microscopic field, I gave up such a field and counted an adjoining one where no large vessels were present.

In the lamina ganglionaris the large ganglion cells are mixed with a number of small pyramids, almost equal in size to, or somewhat smaller than, the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. At first, the number of all the nerve cells, the large and small combined, was counted. Then the large ganglion cells, which


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 73

surely represent a group distinct from the small pyramids, were counted alone. So, by subtraction, the number of small pyramids only in the lamina ganglionaris was obtained. In counting the ganglion cells, I adjusted the lower line on the net-micrometer accurately on the border between the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina multiformis, because between the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina granulans interna there is found a pale band poor in cells and therefore it was not convenient to adjust the upper line of the net-micrometer at this border. The number of cells observed, in a slice of 0.1 mm.'- in area and 10 micra thick on the slide, were in the similar manner recorded and by the use of the same correction-coefficients, as were used in the case of the pyramidal cells, were reduced to the number for the fresh condition of the brain.

Out of the total number of cells, which came in view in the microscopic field, about one-third does not contain the nucleoli in the cell nuclei. This means that the nucleoli in question lie outside of the section. Nevertheless I counted the cells having nuclei without nucleoli together with those in which nucleoli were to be seen, because my object was to ascertain the cell density in the locality chosen and not to determine the total number of nerve cells in a series of sections. In the latter case, the double counting of one and the same cell must be necessarily avoided. On the other hand, the cells which were represented in the section by only fractions of the cell bodies without nuclei were omitted from the counting. The number of such cells was small. Neuroglia nuclei, which were to be easily distinguished by their smaller size, and the intima cells of the capillaries, if they came in view, were not counted.

Table 3 shows the results of these enumerations.

III. DISCUSSION

D. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section

Examinmg table 1 and chart 1 (graph s), which give the area of the cortex in the sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, it is seen that the area increases steadily with increasing brain weight.


TABLE 3

Giving for each individual and for each brain weight group the number of nerve cells in 0.001 vim.^ in volume of the cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglio7iaris, and also the mimber of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris, all counted at the middle part of the cortex in the frontal section, as shown in figure 2. Albino rat



BRAINWEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


NUMBED


OF CELLS


IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX, 0.001 MM.^


GROUP


\V. D

in fresh brain


W.D on slide


Lam. pyramid.


Lam. ganglion.


Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.



Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected



grams


mm.


m m .








la


0.153


6.45


5.65


1150


775






c


0.154


6.35


5.40


1130


695






b


0.177


6.95


6.26


945


690







0.161


(1/1


14)'


1075


720






II a


0.213


8.40


7.35


830


556


370


248


91


61


b


0.221


7.95


6.50


930


509


393


215


114


62


c


0.261


7.80


7.10


735


554


322


242


104


78


d


0.271


7.75


6.80


726


490


358


242


114


77


e


0.288


8.55


7.05


715


402


424


238


120


67


(Birth)


0.251


(1/1


ley


787


502


373


237


109


69


Ilia


0.311


8.50


7.65


625


456


330


241


112


82


b


0.322


8.70


6.80


730


348


415


198


122


58


g


0.374


8.95


8.40


504


417


270


223


98


82


c


0.390


8.85


7.60


493


312


312


197


104


66


i


0.395


9.10


8.60


401


337


262


220


90


76



0.358


(1/1.13)^


551


374


318


216


105


73


IV b


0.400


9.00


8.50


410


345


258


217


94


79


a


0.402


9.10


7.90


473


309


267


175


^5


62


c


0.420


9.00


8.15


451


334


240


178


74


55


i


0.443


9.15


8.40


424


327


227


176


73


56


d


0.459


9.50


7.95


440


258


250


146


77


45


e


0.466


9.30


9.25


355


348


186


182


59


58



0.432


(1/i


loy


426


320


238


179


79


59


Vi


0.501


9,80


9.20


371


307


199


165


69


57


a


0.525


9.65


9.10


362


303


183


154


67


56


b


0.528


9.90


8.60


365


240


205


134


77


51


c


0.534


10.30


8.25


432


222


228


117


78


40


d


0.537


10.00


8.80


412


281


210


143


71


48


e


. 555


9.90


9.00


368


277


164


123


62


47


74


TABLE Z— Continued



BRAIN WEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF


ORTBX, 0.001 MM.'

GROUP


W.D

in fresh brain


W.D

on slide


Lam. pyramid.


Lam. ganglion.


Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.



Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


,


grams


m m .


mm.








Vf


0.558


10.00


8.55


357


223


182


114


79


49


g


0.564


10.10


9.15


326


242


178


132


62


46


h


0.579


10.10


9.05


318


229


194


140


64


46



0.542


{1/1


i3y


368


258


194


136


70


49


Vic


O.GIO


10.15


8.50


325


190


182


106


65


38


a


0.617


10.55


8.65


322


177


200


110


60


33


e


0.690


10.60


9.40


286


199


191


133


58


40



0.639


(.1/1


19)^


311


189


191


116


61


37


Vila


0.740


11.00


9.20


277


186


149


100


48


32


b


0.760


11.20


8.70


300


140


188


88


47


22



0.750


(1/1


24)'


289


163


169


94


48


27


VIII a


0.800


11.15


8.60


302


138


170


78


43


20


h


0.805


10.60


8.30


293


140


168


80


48


23


b


0.822


11.85


10.20


266


170


138


88


38


24


c


0.849


11.40


9.90


242


158


140


92


37


24


k


0.870


11.45


9.60


257


151


152


90


45


26


d


0.898


11.75


10.20


255


167


138


90


38


25



0.841


(1/1


20y


269


154


151


86


42


24


IX d


0.959


11.80


9.70


241


133


156


86


40


22


e


0.960


12.15


10.10


224


130


147


85


39


23


a


0.972


11.95


9.80


220


122


150


83


41


23


(10 days)


0.964


(1/1. 2iy


228


128


151


85


40


23


Xa


1.033


12.40


10.30


223


128


153


88


45


26


b


1.036


12.40


10.15


212


116


136


75


41


23


e


1.051


12.10


9.40


244


115


149


70


43


20



1.040


(1/1 ■


23y


226


120


142


78


43


23


XI a


1.107


12.90


10.20


234


116


150


74


44


22


b


1.189


13.15


10.30


229


110


148


71


49


24


c


1.193


12.70


10.30


220


118


144


77


42


23


d


1 . 195


12.50


9.80


222


107


142"


68


44


21


(20 days)


1.171


(1/1.


26)^


226


lis


146


73


45


23


XII c


1.234


12.95


10.70


210


118


136


76


48


27


a


1.273


12.90


9.10


248


■ 87


171


60


55


19



1.253


(1/1. 3iy 1


229


103


154


68


52


23


TABLE 3— Concluded



BRAIN

WEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


NU.MBER


OF CELLS


IN .V VOLUME OF CORTE.X, 0.001 MM. 3


GROUP


W.D

in fresh brain


W. D on slide


Lam. pyramid.


Lam. ga


nglion.


Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.



Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected



grams


m in .


m m .








XIII a


1.301


13.20


10.25


212


99


177


83


56


26


g


1.307


12.70


10.00


205


100


163


80


52


25


b


1.327


13.35


9.70


243


94


180


69


60


23


c


1.346


13.15


9.85


218


92


174


73


57


24


h


1.392


13.10


10.90


190


110


140


81


50


29



1.335


(1/i


29)3


214


99


167


77


55


25


XIV a


1.412


13.65


10.30


212


91


164


71


58


25


e


1.441


13.10


9.20


248


86


176


61


63


22


b


1.483


13.80


10.80


218


105


172


82


60


29



1.U5


U/1


■ 34)'


226


94


171


71


60


25


XV a


1.530


13.80


10.80


185


88


134


64


47


23


b


1.542


13.70


10.40


207


90


144


63


49


22


c


1.552


13.50


10.30


183


81


152


67


52


23


d


1.573


13.90


10.60


184


82


130


58


53


24


e


1.574


13.70


10.50


204


93


134


60


52


23



1.55i


(1/1


.30)3


193


87


139


62


51


23


XVI a


1.642


13.80


11.20


170


91


127


68


50


27


g


1.643


13.40


9.50


225


81


148


53


56


20


c


1.647


14.00


10.50


186


79


134


57


55


23


e


1.690


13.45


10.00


207


84


148


61


63


26



1.656


(1/1.33)3

1


197


84


139


60


56


24


XVII f


1.720


13.50


9.60


208


75


151


54


60


22


a


1.721


14.00


11.00


178


86


132


64


55


27


b


1.730.


14.70


12.35


142


84


118


70


44


26


c


1.731


14.40


12.10


144


85


106


63


42


25



1.726


(1/1


.26)3


16%


83


127


63


50


25


XVIII c


1.817


14.00


10.10


188


71


142


53


54


20


a


1.844


15.00


12.10


170


89


126


66


48


25


e


1.855


14.30


10.60


192


78


139


57


60


24



1.839


(.1/1


.32)3


183


79


136


59


54


23


XIX a


1.924


14.10


10.90


174


81


110


51


52


24



1.924


(1/1


.29)3


174


81


110


51


52


24


XX a


2.039


14.80


12.10


150


82


95


52


38


27


b


2.069


14.60


11.70


151


78


96


49


37


19



2.054


(i/i.23y'


151


80


96


51


38


20


76


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 77

As already shown (Sugita, '17, '17 a), the longitudinal diameter of the sagittal section (from the frontal pole to the occipital pole), that is L. F, as well as the cortical thickness, are both steadily increasing as the brain weight increases. The thickness of the cortex is one component of its area in the section, the other being obtained by dividing the area by the thickness, and the length thus found is correlated with the longitudinal diameter of the section (L. F) as defined above. The increase of the cortical area will therefore depend on the increase in cortical thickness and the increase in the longitudinal diameter of the section (L. F). Table 4 shows these relations. Column B gives the average brain weight by groups, column C the average corrected area of the cortex (taken from table 1), column D the cortical thickness (Tg) and column F the diameter L. F, all in the fresh condition of the brain and the last two quoted from the data already pubHshed (Sugita, '17, '17 a). In column E is given the ratio C/D or the computed length of the long side, when the cortical area is reduced to a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness. If these computed lengths are compared with the actual longitudinal diameters of the cerebrum (L. F), given in column F, it is of interest to note that, in brains weighing more than 0.5 gram, the ratios, given in column G as E/F, are quite similar, ranging between 1.16 and 1.25 (average 1.22).i In the newborn or before birth (Group I), the ratio is somewhat higher. So, if necessary, the cortical area in the* sagittal sections may be obtained by the following formula

L.F X T^X 1.22 (L. F and T„ in millimeters)

As the. sagittal cortical thickness in brains weighing more than 1.17 grams increases only slowly, the cortical area in the sagittal section in brains older than twenty days is approximately proportional to the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F).

E. The area of the cortex in the frontal section

Reviewing table 2 and chart 1 (graph f), we see that the cortical area in the frontal section increases in the same manner

1 In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average is 1.21.

THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


78


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 4

Showing the relations of the cortical area in the sagittal section to the longitudinal diameter (L. F) of the cerebrum and the cortical thickness. All values for the fresh condition. Albino rat.


A


B


c


D


E


F


G


GBOTTP


BRAIN WEIGHT


CORTICAL

AREA

IN SAGITTAJ.,

SECTION


CORTJCAL THICKNESS

IN SAGITTAL SECTION


c

D


L.F

IN FflESH BRAIN


E F



grams


m m .

mm.


mm.


mm.



r


0.161


AA


0.52


8.5


5.6


1.52


II (birth)


0.251


5.8


0.67


8.7


6.4


1.36


III


0.358


8.3


0.90


9.2


7.4


1.24


IV


0.432


10.1


0.99


10.2


8.0


1.27


V


0.542


12.6


1.14


11.0


8.9


1.24


VI


0.639


15.5


1.29


12.0


9.6


1.25


VII


0.750


18.1


1.43


12.7


10.4


1.22


VIII


0.841


20.1


1.48


13.6


11.0


1.24


IX (10 days)


0.964


21.7


1.55


14.0


11.6


1.21


X


1.040


23.5


1.59


14.8


12.0


1.23


XI (20 days)


1.171


26.6


1.72


15.5


12.5


1.24


XII


1.253


26.1


1.75


14.9


12.8


1.16


XIII


1.335


27.6


1.72


16.0


13.0


1.23


XIV


1.445


28.2


1.70


16.6


13.3


1.25


XV


1.554


28.7


1.76


16.3


13.7


1.19


XVI


1.656


29.2


1.77


16.5


14.1


1.17


XVII


1.726


31.1


1.79


17.4


14.3


1.22


XVIII


1.839


32.8


1.86


17.6


14.7


1.20


XIX


1.924


32.3


1.80


17.9


15.0


1.19


XX


2.054


33.7


1.80


18.7


15.3


1.22


Average (Groups V

-XX)






1.22








Average (Groups X


III-XX) .






1.21







as in the sagittal section though more slowly. The cortical area in the frontal section is a product of the cortical thickness (7",,) and the length of the cortex along the cerebral surface. This surface line of the cortex in the frontal section may be regarded as a part of a circle and its length may be taken as proportional to the length of the radius or the measurement W. D (the frontal diameter of the cerebrum), which was measured across the section horizontally (Sugita, '17). As shown in table 5,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 79

which is comparable with table 4, the relative value C/D or

-, — and the ratio of this value to W. D were

Cortical thickness

calculated. The ratio, given in column G, table 5, falls between

0.85 and 0.99 (average 0.91)^ in brains weighing more than 0.5

gram, but shows a tendency to gradually increase as the brain

weight increases. In the newborn or before birth (Group I)

it is somewhat higher. If the average ratio be taken as usable

for all groups, as in the case of the sagittal section, the cortical

area in the frontal section may be approximately obtained by

the following formula:

If. D X T^ XO.91 (W. D and T^, in millimeters)

As, in brains weighing more than 0.95 gram, the cortical thickness in the frontal section (Tp) varies only slightly, the cortical area in the frontal section in these brains will be practically proportional to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D). The agreement of the calculated with the observed values is however not so good as in the case of the sagittal section.

F. The area of the entire frontal section

In chart 1, the graph F, representing the total area of the frontal section, is accompanied by a dotted line T, which represents the value of the square of the cube root of the brain weight (in grams). Theoretically, under the assumption that the specific gravity of the brain remains the same throughout the life, the latter should run a similar course to the former, if the brain enlarges proportionally in all dimensions as it grows. Between Groups II to XIV, both curves take nearly the same course, if some slight discrepancies in the observed values are neglected. But in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams, the differences become so distinct, that they can no longer be regarded as due to errors in measurement. This is probably due to the fact that the brain is not enlarging proportionally in all diameters,

- In making comparisons with the Norway rat in part II of this paper, the average ratio given by Groups XIII to XX will be that used. This average is 0.93.


80


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 5

Showing, in columns A to E, the relations of the cortical area in the frontal section to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW . D) and the cortical thickness, and, in columns H to J, the relations of the total area of the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum. All values for the fresh condition. Albino rat.


A


B


c


D


E


F


G


H


I


J


GROUP


BRAIN WEIGHT


CORTICAL AREA

INFRONTAL SECTION


CORTICAL THICKNESS INFRONTAL SECTION


D


W. D

IN

FRESH MRAIN


E F


TOTAL AREA

OF FRONTAL SECTION


SQUARE

OF

W. D




gra7ns


irim.'^


m m .


mm.


m m .



mm.^


7)1 m."



I


0.161


3.9


0.56


7.0


6.6


1.06


11.9


43.6


0.27


Ilfbirth)


0.251


5.7


0.78


7.3


7.7


0.95


17.0


59.3


0.29


III


0.358


8.0


1.02


7.9


8.7


0.91


20.6


75.7


0.27


IV


0.432


9.1


1.11


8.2


9.3


0.88


22.4


86.5


0.26


V


0.542


11.7


1.33


8.7


10.1


0.86


26.9


102.0


0.26


VI


0.639


14.4


1.55


9.3


10.6


0.88


31.1


112.4


0.28


VII


0.750


16.4


1.74


9.5


11.2


0.85


32.6


125.4


0.26


VIII


0.841


18,4


1.82


10.1


11.6


0.87


38.9


134.6


0.29


IX (10 days)


0.964


20.4


1.86


11.0


12.1


0.91


42.3


146.4


0.28


X


1.040


20.8


1.82


11.4


12.4


0.92


44.2


153.8


0.29


XI (20 days)


1.171


21.7


1.91


11.4


12.7


0.90


45.7


161.3


0.28


XII


1.253


23.0


1.91


12.0


13.0


0.92


47.2


169.0


0.28


XIII


1.335


23.2


1.94


12.0


13.2


0.91


50.2


174.2


0.29


XIV


1.445


24.8


1.99


12.5


13.4


0.93


52.3


179.6


0.29


XV


1.554


24.3


1.97


12.3


13.5


0.91


54.0


182.3


0.30


XVI


1.656


24.3


1.94


12.5


13.7


0.91


54.9


187.7


0.29


XVII


1.726


24.6


1.90


12.9


13.8


0.94


56.4


190.4


0.30


XVIII


1.839


26.0


1.97


13.2


14.1


0.94


58.9


198.8


0.30


XIX


1.924


24.8


1.83


13.5


14.3


0.94


57.0


204.5


0.28


XX


2.054


24.9


1.72


14.5


14.6


0.99


63.4


213.2


0.30


Average (Groups


^-XX)






0.91



0.28







Average (Groups ]


^111-5


x) . . . .




0.93










the increase in the frontal diameter being retarded relative to the sagittal diameter in brains weighing more than 1.4 grams (Sugita, '17).

If, as given in columns H and I, table 5, the area of the total frontal section is compared with the square of W. D of the corresponding brain group, the above inference will be supported by the fact that the ratio, given in column J of the same table,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 81

is almost equal throughout all brain weight groups, swinging within the narrow limits of 0.26 to 0.30.

G. Percentage of the area of cortex in the total area of the frontal section (one hemicerehrum)

Figure 2 shows the outline of the frontal section. In the section we see as the principal divisions the cortex, the striatum, the thalamus, the capsula externa and the lateral ventricle, and, among these, the cortex and the striatum stand in marked contrast. In the young brains, the lateral ventricle is wide. This cavity was not included in the measurement of the area. In the wall of it, especially at the dorso-lateral corner, there are seen masses of dividing cells and of neuroblasts, which are due to migrate into the cortex. But in the older brains weighing more than 1.1 grams, the ventricular wall is almost free from dividing cells and the cortex is no longer receiving new cells. By determining the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the frontal section, we may obtain some clue as to mass relation of the cortex to the other structures seen in the frontal section.

As previously given in table 2, the cortical area in the frontal section amounts to 34 per cent of the total area at birth. It increases from birth up to bi'ains weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams, when the percentage reaches its highest figure, that is, 50 or sometimes 51, on the average 48 per cent. After this stage, the percentage slowly diminishes as the brain weight increases, and, at full maturity, it reaches 44 per cent or less; even 39 per cent in an old brain weighing more than 2.0 grams. This means clearly that the cortical area increases rapidly by receiving new cells from the matrix and at the same time by the enlargement and separation of the cell bodies, during the first phase, covering the first ten days after birth.

In this phase, as a matter of fact, the remainder of the section is for the most part composed of the matrix and migrating cells, the central nuclei being not yet so largely developed. The transitional layers, or the areas previously occupied by the


OZ NAOKI SUGITA

transitional layers, which will be replaced by the capsula externa, are relatively wide during this phase.

After twenty daj^s, when the brain has attained nearly the weight of 1.17 grams, the remainder of the section (the central nuclei and the white substance) increases more rapidly than the cortical area and the group of proliferating cells in the ventricular wall disappears. The percentage of the cortical area to that of the whole section consequently decreases under these conditions, though the absolute value of the cortical area is steadily increasing.

From the mode of the changes in the percentage value of the cortical area, we may conclude that, in the albino rat, at least, the period during which the brain weight increases from 0.25 gram (birth) to 1.2 grams (about 20 daj^s), is the period when the cortical elements are principally produced, matured and arranged, and that the cortex is precocious in its construction. The growth or construction of the remaining parts in the frontal section, so far at least as this is expressed by increase in volume, is relatively retarded or delayed until the cortex has acquired all its characteristic elements.

H. The volume of the entire cortex

The true volume of the entire cerebral cortex can not be measured by the methods here used. It will require a special study for that purpose. My present object is to obtain relative values for the cortical volume and a record of the change in these relative values according to brain growth. If the data for the area of the cerebral cortex as measured by me in the two typical sections be reduced to a simple geometrical form, it will be very easy to compare the changes in the computed volume in successive brain weight groups. As already mentioned, the cortical area in the sagittal and the frontal sections, which sections cross one another at right angles, may be reduced to rectangles which have as the long side the lengths proportional respectively to the sagittal and the frontal diameters of the cerebrum (L. F and W. D), and as the short side the cortical


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


83


thicknesses {T^ and Tp). For the present purpose, the mean cortical thickness (T) may be substituted for both the foregoing values of the cortical thickness, when the brain weight is the same, because T falls at the mean of the T^ and T^, so that the gain in T^ would be compensated by the loss in T^ (fig. 3). As a consequence the volume of the cortex may be represented by an index value, the formula for which follows.^


L.FX W. D XT


(all in millimeters)



CKNES5 OF CORTEX


Fig. 3 The solid lines show the simplified geometrical form used to indicate the volume of the entire cortex, which is assumed to be proportional to the rectangular form designated by dotted lines in the figure. The volume of the rectangular figure, which was obtained by the value: L. F y, W . F X T, has been tabulated in column F, table 6, and plotted as graph LWT in chart 2.

The values thus obtained — which mean the actual volume of the rectangle denoted by dotted lines in figure 3 — stand in a fixed relation to the true cortical volume which is denoted by solid lines in the same figure, as far as the latter retains a similar form during growth.

5 In this formula, the coefficients 1.22 and 0.91, which were empirically determined, were eliminated, because these coefficients are fixed throughout all the groups to be compared. For Groups XIII to XX, the coefficients are respectively 1.21 and 0.93, and these will be taken into consideration when comparison is made between the Albino and the Norway rats.


8-i


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 6

Giving for each brain weight group the average brain weight, ratio in cerebral volume, computed cortical volume and the data used to obtain the computed cortical volume, and ratio in cortical volume



A


B


C


D


E


F


G


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


BRAIN WEIGHT


RATIO

OF

VOLUME

OF

CEREBRUM


L.F

IN FRESH BRAIN


W. D

IN FRESH BRAIN


AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS


L. FX W. DXT,

COMPUTED VOLUME

OF CORTEX


RATIO OF

COMPUTED

VOLUME

OF COKTEX



grams



m m .


m m .


m m .


?n»i.'



I


0.161



5.6


6.6


0.54


19.96



II (birth)


0.251


1.00


6.4


7.7


0.73


35.97


1.00


III


0.358


1.34


7.4


8.7


0.96


61.81


1.72


IV


0.432


1.66


8.0


9.3


1.10


81.84


2.28


V


0.542


2.12


8.9


10.1


1.24


111.46


3.10


VI


0.639


2.53


9.6


10.6


1.42


144.50


4.02


VII


0.750


3.12


10.4


11.2


1.58


184.04


5.12


vni


0.841


3.50 '~


11.0


11.6


1.65


210.54


5.85


IX (10 days)


0.964


4.04


11.6


12.1


1.71


240.02


6.67


X


1.040


4.10


12.0


12.4


1.72


255.94


7.12


XI (20 days)


1.171


4.61


12.5


12.7


1.82


288.93


8.03


XII


1.253


4.80


12.8


13.0


1.8S


304.51


8.47


XIII


1.335


5.17


13.0


13.2


1.83


314.03


8.73


XIV


1.445


5.40


13.3


13.4


1.85


329.71


9.17


XV


1.554


5.89


13.7


13.5


1.87


345.86


9.62


XVI


1.656


6.05


14.1


13.7


1.86


359.30


9.99


XVII


1.726


6.44


14.3


13.8


1.85


365.08


10.15


XVIII


1.839


6.72


14.7


14.1


1.92


397.96


11.06


XIX


1.924


6.91


15.0


14.3


1.82


390.39


10.85


XX


2.054


7.85


15.3


14.6


1.76


393.15


10.93


1 T, here entered, is the mean value of Ts and T^, previously given in tables 4 and 5 and is not the general average thickness of the cortex of the sagittal, frontal add horizontal sections formerly presented in my second paper in this series (Sugita, '17 a) .

Table 6 shows the values for the cortical volume computed by the above method and the ratios, the cortical volume at birth being taken as the unit of the comparison.

Chart 2 (graph LWT) shows graphically the ratios obtained (table 6, column G), accompanied by the graph (graph LWH) which shows the increase in volume of the cerebrum (table 6, column B). The volume of the cerebrum was computed according to my previous procedure (Sugita, '17). From this


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


86


chart we see that the cortical volume increases more rapidly than the entire cerebral volume, until the brain attains the weight of 1.17 grams (20 days) (see crosses in chart 2), If we take these marks as the starting points, then the cerebral volume increases to about 1.7 times at full maturity and in the same way the cortical volume increases to about 1.4 times compared with the value at twenty days (table 6). So, it may be stated that after twenty days the increase in cortical volume becomes























^2

n

10 9




















































X



y—


~-«v,_




-:^


'°N.


■ L\A


T








-^


y^"


-■

^^



"~tf'



^'^


"^s^


"°"




■Tiu


VT°







_^-'






x^


^•^


-^^









6




\


/


/'"







y


/









^'^


f


6

5

4




-^


A






y


y








,,,


'-"


•'■






/


\


\




/


/•'






,..„


'-


'











\


\


/


/




,

'-'■'


"■"















>


\


__,


,-'


'


















/


^'


V


^-^


~^.-_


















^










— »—


-" —


-.-_













'


N



^


^





















0.1 0.2 B 0.3 0.4 05 0.6 0.7


09 10 11 12 13 14- 15 ife i? 18 19 2.0 Jmi


Chart 2 Showing the ratios of the values for the cortical volume, the volume of the cerebrum, the cell density in two unit volumes and the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the albino rat, according to the

brain weight. • • LWT, The ratios of the computed volume of the cerebral

cortex, the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data in table

6. . • LWH, The ratios of the volume of the entire cerebrum,

the volume at birth being taken as the unit. Based on the data presented in a former paper (Sugita, '17) and given also in table 6. X XN, The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Based on the data given in column C, table 7, as N", and plotted here according to the values corresponding to one onehundredth of the number given in column C, table 7. •■ — •" * NLWT, The ratios of the computed number of nerve ce»lls in the entire cortex, the value at birth being taken as the unit. Here the unit chosen on the ordinate is 5. The data are given in column E, table 7.


86 NAOKI SUGITA

slower and is somewhat less in rate than the increase in cerebral volume or brain weight, as is also seen in the graphs given in chart 2.

/. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex

In the lamina pyramidalis of the newborn Albino brain, at a dorso-lateral part of the pallium, where, in the frontal section, the cell count was irfade (fig. 2, VII), there were in the fresh condition about 500 pyramids crowded in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^' This number decreases, as the brain grows, and falls to 110 in a brain weighing about 1.2 grams (20 days) (table 3). In a brain weighing about 1.5 grams (50 days), the number has dropped nearly to 90, from which it is only slightly reduced in the heavier brains. In an old rat, whose brain weighs more than 2.0 grams, the number is about 80, or less than one-sixth the number at birth. According to another study, which will be published later, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, measured at this same locality, increases very rapidly during the first ten days after birth, till the brain has attained 0.9 gram in weight, when these structures reach their maximum size (Cell body 16/x X 20ju; Nucleus 14;u X 15m). After this stage the cell body and the nucleus ar'e mature in their nucleus-plasma relation, but still changing their chemical composition, as revealed by the stains, while the neuron as a whole is still growing as shown by the developing axon and the dendrites.' This fact is in accord with the observation that the number of pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis decreases rapidly after birth, until the brain weight reaches about 0.9 gram (10 days), after which the rate of decrease becomes slow.

The change in cell number in a given volume of the cortex during the growth of the brain is determined by two main factors: (1) the enlargement of the cell body proper and the growth of the cell branches and (2) the development of the intercellular structures (that is, incoming nerve fibers, neuroglia, blood vessels) and myelin formation, separating the cells more and more from each other.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 87

As to the cells in the lamina ganglionaris, the relation is somewhat different from that just described. The total number of cells, including both the small and large pyramids, decreases relatively rapidly after birth, until the brain weight reaches 1.25 grams (25 days). It then shows a slight increase (table 3, Groups XIII and XIV), but decreases again by slow steps and remains almost fixed after 35 days (brain weight 1.4 grams) at 60. Finally, in old rats, only 50 cells were counted in a unit volume of 0.001 mm. ,3 or about one-fifth the number at birth.

If the number of the large pyramids alone is considered, then the number decreases rapidly from birth to a brain weight of 0.8 gram (9 days). After this, it decreases slightly and remains almost fixed at 23 up to a brain w^eighing 1.2 grams. In brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams it shows a tendency to increase slightly for a time — corresponding to the increase in total number of cells in this layer (above mentioned) — but finally becomes fixed again at 23 to 24 throughout maturity. In old age, it has diminished to 20 or about two-sevenths the number at birth. The large ganglion cells attain nearly their full size (Cell bod}^ 21^ X 28m; Nucleus 18m X 19m) at 0.9 gram in brain weight (10 days), almost at the same time as the small pyramids.

I can not, from the data at hand, satisfactorily explain the increase in cell number in the lamina ganglionaris in the period during which the brain grows from 1.2 grams to 1.4 grams in weight. This fact might however have some connection with the chemical structure of the cells and consequently be related to a change in reaction to the reagents used, so that the size of the large pyramids, after having attained a maximum (21m X 28m) at a brain weight of 0.9 gram, diminishes slightl}^ at the same time that their response to the stain changes somewhat, measuring only 20m X 27m at a brain weight of 1.3 to 1.4 grams, after which they again enlarge to a full size of the cell body (sometimes over 23m X 30m). In the carbol-thionine staining the sections from brains weighing less than 1.0 gram show a violet tone, those from brains weighing more than 1.2 grams a blue tone while those from brains weighing 1.0 to 1.2 grams are intermediate in tone. We shall pass over this question now,


88 NAOKl SUGITA

as a detailed description of the size of each cell type and its mode of enlargement according to age will be the theme of a later paper.

To represent the relative cell density in the cerebral cortex for each brain weight group, the sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, given in table 3, was used, in order to balance, in some measure, the inequality of the cell distribution. These values are given in table 7, column C, and in chart 2 (graph N). Both table and chart show that the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cortex decreases verj^ rapidly during the first ten days after birth (up to the brain weight of 0.95 gram) and after that time it decreases slowly but steadily as the age advances. The cell number at maturity is nearly one-fifth the value at birth.

J . Values for the co7nputed yiumher of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex, according to brain weight

The number of nerve cells given in table 3 does not means the actual volume of complete cells contained in a unit volume, because the parts of cells which showed a nucleus but no nucleolus in the section were also counted. In spite of this, the number in the table indicates fairly the relative number of cells or the relative cell density at different ages in the localities examined, and from this we may be able to get some indication as to the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex.

If the actual number of cells in a unit volume be proportional to the number of cells counted, the number of cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be indicated (theoretically) by this number multiplied by the number obtained by dividing the volume of the entire cerebral cortex by the unit volume.

The actual volume of the cortex was not measured, but the computed volume is indicated by the following formula, as explained already.

L.F XW.D XT (all in millimeters)

So, if N means the cell number in a unit volume (for example,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 89

N is 240 for Group VIII, as shown in table 7, column C), the relative value of the number of nerve cells in the entire cortex may be computed by the following formula.^

NxL.FxW.DxT (L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters)

The results of this computation are shown in table 7 and in chart- 2 (graph NLWT), where the necessary data were all taken from the present or former papers and the relative value of N X L. F X W. D X T is calculated. For N, the corrected sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris, given in table 3, was used (table 7, column C). The results are quite interesting. As seen from table 7, columns D and E, and chart 2 (graph NLWT based on column E,), the relative value of the computed number of cells in the entire cortex increases rapidly from birth to a brain weighing 0.9 gram (about 10 days), and then for a while the increase becomes slow up to a brain weight of 1.17 grams (20 days), attaining at this time nearly the complete number of nerve cells (see graph NLWT, mark X in chart 2) . After having passed this phase, the value for the number of cells remains almost constant throughout the life. The average of the values for Groups XI-XX in table 7 is 530, so that between birth and maturity the number of cells counted has increased two times, but nearly al^ of this increase has taken place during the first ten days of life. These results coincide v.ery well with the conclusions of Allen ('12), that in the cerebrum mitosis continues with diminishing activity to the 20th day after birth.

'^ By this computation the number of cells in the entire cortex will be equal to the number of times the unit of volume, 0.001 mm.' in which the cells were counted, is contained in the entire volume of the cortex, multiplied by the number of cells in a unit volume. The number of cells designated by N is however the sum of the numbers in two unit volumes, that is, the number in one unit volume of the lamina pyramidalis plus the number in one unit volume of the lamina ganglionaris.

Since the numbers of cells used, N, is that in two unit volumes, the foregoing product must be divided by two. As dividing the volume of the cortex by 0.001 is equivalent to multiplying it by 1000, and as the product must be divided by two, the operation may be expressed as follows:

N X L. F X W. D X T X oOO = Number of cells


90


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 7

Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex, obtained on the basis of the measurements given in this series of studies. The ratio of the mimber of cells of each later group to that of Group 11 (birth) is also given



A


B


C


D


E






COMPUTED



BRAI.V WEIGHT GROUP


BRAIX WEIGHT


COMPUTED

VOLUME OF

CORTEX

L.FX ir. D X T


SUM OF XOS. OF CELLS I.V L.\M. PYR. AXD ■LAM. GAXG. IX TWO UNIT


NUMBER OF

CELLS IN CORTEX,'

A XL.FX W. D XT


RATIO

OF NU.MBER

OF CELLS




VOLUMES, K


^ 100




gra m s


mrn.^





II fbirthi


0.251


35.97


739


265.8


1.00


III


0.358


61.81


590


364.7


1.37


IV


0.432


81.84


499


408.4


1.54


^'


0.542


111.46


394


439.2


1.65


VI


0.639


144.50


305


440.8


1.66


VII


0.750


184.04


257


473.0


1.78


VIII


0.841


210.54


240


505.3


1.90


IX flO days)


0.964


240.02


213


511.2


1.92


X


1.040


255.91


198


506.8


1.91


XI (20 davs)


1.171


288.93


186


537.4


2.02


XII


1.253


304.51


171


520.7


1.96


XIII


1.335


314.03


176


552.7


2.08


XIV


1.445


329.71


165


544.0


2.05


XV


1,554


345.86


149


515.3


1.94


XVI


1.656


359.30


144


517.4


1.95


XVII


1.726


365.08


146


533.0


2.01


XVIII


1.839


397.96


138


549.2


2.07


XIX


1.924


390.39


132


515.3


1.94


XX


2.854


393.15


131


515.0


1.94


Average (Groups !X


i-xx) ....



530.0


2.00






Average (Groups ^


iii-xx) ..



530.2


2.00






1 As explained in a footnote (footnote 4j, the actual number of cells contained in the computed volume of the cortex should be N X L. F X W. D X T X 500, but, for the convenience, 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T, or 1/50,000 of the actual numbet of cells contained in the computed volume, was given here as the computed number of cells in the cortex.

The above statement that between birth and maturity the nmnber of nerve cells in the entire cortex has increased twofold, does not necessarily mean that the additional cells have been all newly formed after birth. As a matter of fact, we see,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 91

in the sections of the newborn brains, many immature cells, the indifferent cells and the neuroblasts, crowded densely together in the ventricular wall and in the transitional layers and these are all migrating to the cortex. The number of cells in the cortex is increased after birth by receiving these cells already formed but lying at birth still outside of the cortex proper, besides by receiving the cells which are newly formed after birth. So the nerve cells, destined for the cortex, are largely present in immature form in the cerebrum at birth, but lie outside of the cortex proper, while the actual number of cells formed after birth may amount only to a small fraction of the total number of nerve cells in the cortex at maturity, though there is active mitosis during the first days after birth.

I have previously recognized three developmental phases in the growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17a), as f ollow^s :

First phase, from birth to the 10th day.

Second phase, from the 10th to the 20th day.

Third phase, from the 20th to the 90th day.

The first and the second phases here given may also be applied, without any modification, to the changes in cell number in the cerebral cortex, while the third phase does not appear in this connection.

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In an earlier study on the cerebral cortex of the albino rat (Sugita, '17 a), I stated that the cerebral cortex attains nearly its full thickness at the age of twenty days, before myelination in the cortex had begun, and that the organization of the cerebral cortex might be considered as precocious, having been provided with all its mechanisms at the time of weaning. At this age, the brain weight is only a little more than one-half the weight at maturity. Size, volume and weight of the entire brain are^ all midway in their growth, but there have appeared no striking changes by which we might guess from the gross appearance of the brain anything about the numerical completeness of its cortical elements. Just at this stage, however, cell division in the cerebrum has almost ceased (Allen, '12).


92 NAOKI SUGITA

From the data now available, I conclude that, in the albino rat, the cerebral cortex exhibits the complete number of nerve cells at about the 20th day after birth, at which age some of the cells have attained their full size. The area of the cortex in the sagittal and in the frontal sections has shown a continuous increase throughout life and no radical change in rate occurs at this time. But, if the thickness of the cortex be taken into consideration and the volume of the entire cortex be calculated, it becomes clear that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex has stopped the more active increase, which it made earlier, at about the 20th day, and after that the increase becomes slow, and lower in rate than the increase in the volume of the cerebrum. If, further, the' cell density in the cortex be considered, it is found that the number of cells as computed for the cerebral cortex (table 7, column E) increases rapidly, especially during the first ten days after birth, but exhibits nearly its complete number at the age of twenty daj^s, after which it shows no significant change.

We may conclude therefore that the cerebral cortex has been completely organized at the age of about twenty days, and that the further development of the cortex does not involve an increase in cell number, but involves mainly the maturing of elements already provided. The education of the cerebral cortex as a whole might properly be said to begin after this age, the preceding period having been largely one of preparation or construction. It is of interest to note that this epoch corresponds to the weaning time of the rat.

According to the study of Donaldson ('08) on the comparison of the albino rat and man, the rat grows thirty times as fast as man. When however the brain of the rat is to be compared with that of man, it must be remembered that at birth the human brain is somewhat more mature and corresponds in organization not with the rat brain at birth but at five days of age (Donaldson MS.). This being the case, the rat cortex at the 20th day of postnatal life probably corresponds with the human cortex at the 15th month (20 less 5). This conclusion has not yet been tested.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAI CORTEX 93

V. SUMMARY

1. Empl-oying the sagittal and the frontal sections of 78 albino rats, which were formerly used for the investigation on the thickness of the cerebral cortex (Sugita, '17 a), I made further measurements on the area of the cortex in these sections and counted at a fixed locality the number of nerve cells contained in a unit volume of 0.001 mm,,^ in brains from birth to maturity.

2. The observed data were all corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material, by the use of the correctioncoefficients based on the observations. The results were grouped and averaged according to the brain weight groups and the postnatal growth changes systematically analysed.

3. The area of the cortex shown in the sagittal section is found to be proportional to the value L. F X T^, where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is the average thickness of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section. The actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the formula: L. F X T^ X 1.22 (L. F and T^, in millimeters), where 1.22 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (see table 4, column G).

4. The area of the cortex shown in the frontal section (of one hemicerebrum) is found to be proportional to the value W.D X T^, where W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum and T^ is the average thickness of the cortex in the frontal section. The actual area (after five days of age) may be calculated by the formula: W.D xT^ X 0.91 {W.D and T^, in millimeters), where 0.91 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (table 5, column G).

5. The percentage of the total' area of that frontal section which is represented by the cortical area is least at birth (34 per cent) and increases as the age advances till it reaches the maximum (50 per cent) at the period of 7 to 20 days (brain weight 0.75 to 1.25 grams). It then decreases, slowly and at maturity is less than 44 per cent (table 2). This means that durihg the first 7 days the cortex is increasing in area more rapidly than the remainder of the section, while during the

THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


94 NAOKI SUGITA

following 13 days its rate of increase is similar to that of the remainder. After 20 days the rate of increase for the remainder surpasses that for the cortex.

6. The actual volume of the cortex could not be obtained by the use of the data now available, but the cornputed volumes of the cerebral cortex at different ages (comparable among themselves), may be found by the use of the formula: L. F X W.D xT (all in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum and T is the average thickness of the cortex. The volume increases most rapidly during the first ten days after birth and the rate of increase in the cortical volume continues to surpass the rate of increase in the entire cerebral volume, during the first twenty days. After twenty days the cortex increases at a somewhat lower rate than the increase of the entire cerebrum in volume (chart 2).

7. The number of cells contained in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.-^ of the cortex indicates the cell density of the locality where the count was made. In the lamina pyramidalis the pyramids are most crowded at birth and the number in the unit volume decreases rapidly during the first ten days after birth. After twenty days it decreases slowly but steadily, the number at maturity being about one-sixth the number at birth. As for the lamina ganglionaris, the total cell number in the unit volume (the small and the large pyramids taken together), is at its highest value at birth. It decreases relatively rapidly during the first twenty-five days after birth, then is slightly increased for a time, after which it decreases again slowly and at full maturity it shows about one-fifth the number present at birth. Taking the large ganglion cells alone, we find that the number decreases rapidly during the first eight to ten days, then remains the same up to twenty days, after which it decreases again, showing two-sevenths the initial number at full maturity. The decrease in cell density according to brain growth is due to the enlargement of cell bodies, the deA'elopment of cell attachments, the separation of cells from each other through myelination, ingrowing fibers and other changes. The average cell density,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 95

represented by the sum of the numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gariglionaris, given as A^ in table 7, decreases rapidly during the first ten days and after that the decrease becomes very slow and steady, showing at maturity a density of about one-fifth of that at birth.

8. The computed value for the number of cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be determined by the formula: N X L. F X W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, all in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, W. D the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T the average thickness of the sagittal and frontal cortex and A^ the average number of the nerve cells in two unit volumes of the cortex, at the particular locality (locality VII) where the counts were made. This computed value for the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex increases rapidly during the first ten days, at the end of which period it attains nearly 1.9 times the value at birth. During the following ten days, it increases slowly but steadily, and it attains its complete number at the age of twenty days (brain weight 1.17 grams). After this age the number of nerve cells is almost constant. The number of cells at maturity is twice the number at birth.

It is recognized that this conclusion concerning the number of nerve cells in the cortex at various ages is based on enumerations in only two cortical layers at but one locality, and that on this ground its general value might be questioned. When it is recalled however that table 11 in a preceding study on the growth of the cortex in thickness (Sugita, '17 a) shows all the localities measured in the cortex to undergo the same relative increase in thickness between birth and maturity, and always to stand in the same relation to one another, the doubts with regard to the general value of these particular results are largely removed.

9. Considered all together, the data on the development of the cerebral cortex indicate that it has been completely organized in the albino rat at the age of twenty days. The further development after this age represents a maturing of the elements. The completion of the cerebral organization corresponds to the


96 NAOKI SUGITA

weaning time of the rat.. If the cerebral organization of the rat brain at five days of age is similar to that of the man at birth, and the growth processes in the rat are thirty times as rapid as in man, then the completion of the cortex which occurs in the rat brain at twenty days should occur in the human brain at about fifteenth month of age.


PART II

ON THE AREA OF THE, CORTEX AND ON THE NUMBER OF CELLS IN A UNIT VOLUME, MEASURED ON THE FRONTAL AND SAGITTAL SECTIONS OF THE BRAIN OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), AND COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING DATA FOR THE ALBINO RAT

VI. INTRODUCTION

In the Part I of this paper, I have presented the data on the area of the cerebral cortex measured on the sagittal and the frontal sections of the Albino rat brain and on the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cerebral cortex, and, by calculations based on these data, I have come to the conclusion that the entire volume of the cerebral cortex is increasing most rapidly during the first ten days after birth, while from twenty days onwards it increases at a lower rate than the entire cerebral volume. Further, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex also increases very rapidly during the first ten days after birth and attains nearly its complete number at the age of twenty days.

I now wish to compare these relations in the Albino with those in the Norway rat, in the same manner as I have already done in the matter of the growth of the brain in size (Sugita, '18) and of the thickness of the cortex (Sugita, '18 a).

Employing for the Norway brains the sections on which the cortical thickness was measured earlier and for which the individual body measurements have been already given in table 1 in mj^ fourth paper (Sugita, '18 a), I have measured the area


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 97

of the cortex in the sagittal and the frontal section, following methods of measurement just described (part I) in the case of the Albino rat. Correction of the observed values to the values in the fresh condition of the material was also made by the use of the correction-coefficients obtained in the same way as those used for the Albino.

This study was made between March and May, 1917, at the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.

VII. MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS

A'. Area of the cortex in the sagittal section {Nonvay rat)

Table 8 shows the observed and corrected areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the Norway brain, also the data for the correction-coefficient for each individual, and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. The method of measurement and the positions of the borderlines of the measured area have been already described in part I of this paper, so that the explanations need not be repeated here (fig. 1). Chart 3 (graph s) has been plotted on the basis of table 8.

L. Area of the cortex in the frontal section {Nonvay rat)

Table 9 gives the observed and corrected areas of the cortex and the total area of the frontal section (one hemicerebrum) of the Norway brain with the data for the correction-coefficient for each individual and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. It gives also the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section. Chart 3 shows also in graphs (graphs F and f) the corrected data given in table 9.

M. Number of nerve cells (Norway rat)

Table 10 gives the observed and corrected number of nerve cells in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.-^ (0.1 mm.- in area and 0.01 mm. in thickness) at a fixed locality (locality VII) of the cortex in the frontal section, for each individual and for each brain weight group. The locality was chosen at a middle part of the cortical band in the frontal section as shown in figure 2, VII,


9.8


NAOKI SUGITA


for the Albino rat. The numbers of cells in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris respectively and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris in five adjoining squares, each 100 micra on each side, were counted and the numbers in the unit volume of 0.001 mm. computed (see part I) and recorded in table 10. The relative cell density












^


F










/


^


— ^


/^










^


.^


^y












/












^


-^'







































._.








__.


--











■■"""


r^-—


-^



1


-^/






■ —





















































« 














1 1 1


10 11 1.2 13 14- 15 16 IT 1& 1.9 2.0 2.1 22 23 jws.

Chart 3 Showing the areas of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal and the frontal sections and the areas of the whole frontal section according to the brain weight. Norway rat. This chart is comparable with chart 1, which gives the corresponding graphs for the albino rat. X — . — . — Xs Cortical area in the

sagittal section. • 'f, Cortical area in the frontal section. •——•F, Area of

the whole frontal section. All graphs were based on the data in tables 8 and 9.

represented by the sum of the numbers of nerve cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris is tabulated in table 16, column D, and plotted in chart 4 as graph N' .

VIII. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON

The foregoing data, treated in a manner similar to that adopted in the case of the Albino (part I), may now be used for discussion and comparison.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


99


TABLE 8

Showing the observed and corrected values of the area of the cerebral cortex in the sagittal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for each brain weight group. L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum





CORRECTION-COEFFICIENT




BR.\IN WEIGHT


OBSERVED

.\RE.\^ OF CORTEX




CORRECTED


GROUP


L.F

on fresh brain


The same on slide


.\RE.4. OP CORTEX



aravix


mm.'

m m .



m m .


Hi m .2


N XI b


1.155


18.4


11.75



10.40


23.5


a


1.160


17.0


12.10



10.15


24.2


i


1.175


14.2


12.55



9.60


24.3



1.163


16.5


l.'A


?P



24.0


NXII








N XIII a


1.369


16.7


12.95



10.10


27.5



1.369


16.7


l.i


W



27.5


NXIVb


1.407


18.2


13.45



10.50


29.8


g


1.429


16.3


13.05



10.10


27.2


a


1.431


19.1


13.15



10.40


30.6


i


1.431


18.1


13.05



10.25


29.4


e


1.437


15.8


12.80



10.05


25.7


k


1.445


19.2


13.35



10.30


32.3



1.430


17.8


l.i


W



29.2


N XV c


1.517


16.4


12.70



10.10


26.0


e


1.557


17. 3


13.75



10.30


30.8



1.537


16.9


l.t


w



28.4


N XVI a


1.619


17.2


13.50



10.20


30.2


g


1.632


16.8


13.45



9.75


32.0


e


1.636


15.9


13.55



10.00


29.2



1.629


16.6


l.t


w



30.5


N XVII e


1.710


18.8


13.70



10.40


32.6


g


1.721


18.7


13.40



10.20


32.3


a


1.738


16.8


13.60



10.40


28.8


c


1.788


20.1


14.20



11.00


33.5



1.739


18.6


l.i


w



31.8


N XVIII c


1.825


18.1


14.30



10.70


32.4


a


1.833


22.0


14.20



11.50


33.5



1.829


20.1


1.28'


33.0


100


NAOKl SUGITA

TABLE S— Continued



BRAIN- WEIGHT


OBSERVED

AHE.\ OF CORTEX


C ORRECTION-COEFFICIEXT


CORRECTED


GROUP


L.F on fresh brain


The same on slide


ARE.\ OF CORTEX



grains


mm.

mm.



mm.


m m .

N XIX b


1.962


19.9


14.70



11.25


34.1


a


1.981


19.5


14.40



11.00


33.5



1.972


19.7


1.31-'



33.8


NXXc


2.015


20.6


14.55



11.30


34.2


a


2.089


20.7


14.95



11.80


33.3



2.052


20.7


1.28'


33.8


NXXIg


2.156


21.1


15.15



11.90


34.2


d


2.187


20.2


15.30



11.50


35.7



2.172


20.7


l.t


w


35.0


NXXII








N XXIII a


2.345


22.4


14.50



11.50


35.7



2.345


22.4


1.26'


35.7


N. The area of the cortex in the sagittal section. Norway rat compared with the Albino

Table 11 shows the relations between the cortical area in the sagittal section and the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F). Column B gives the average brain weight by groups, column C the average area of the cortex in the sagittal section, column D the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section {T ), column F the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F), all of these being the corrected values. In column E the value C ; D or relative length of the long side, when the cortical area was reduced to a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness, appears. iVs shown in column G a.s E IF. these computed lengths show similar ratios when divided by the actual diameters L.F (column F), that is, 1.16 to 1.24 or on the average 1.20 for Groups N XI-N XXIII, but 1.19 for Groups N XIIIJN^ XX.- If necessary, therefore, the cortical area in the sagittal


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


101


TABLE 9

Showing the observed and corrected value's of the area of the cerebral cortex and of the total section in the frontal section and the -percentage of the cortical area in the total frontal section of the Norway rat brain, accompanied by the data for the correction-coefficient in the individual cases and the correction-coefficient for the group. W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum,




OBSERVED


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


PERCENTAGE OP



BRAIN WEIGHT







CORTICAL


GROUP


Area of cortex


Area of total section


W.D

in fresh brain


The

same on

slide


Area of cortex


Area of

total section


AREA IN TOTAL SECTION



gra ms


vim.

»jm.2


mm .


m m .


mm.

mm .2


per cent


NXIb


1.155


13.8


28.1


13.00


10,00


23.4


47.5


49


a


1.160


12.8


27.9


12.70


9.80


21.5


47.0


46


i


1.175


10.9


23.6


12.50


8.80


22.1


47.7


. 46



1.163


12.5


26.5


1..


u

22.3


47.4


47


NXII










N XIII a


1.369


13.7


27.9


13.00


9.80


24.2


49.2


49



1.369


13.7


27.9


l.i


?32


24.2


49.2


49


N XIV b


1.407


14.0


27.8


13.05


9.50


26.5


52.7


!o


g


1.429


14.0


28.5


13.20


9.50


27.1


55.0


49


a


1.431


14.6


30.4


12.85


10.20


23.2


48.4


48


i


1.431


14.9


29.6


13.40


10.30


25.3


50.2


50


e


1.437


12.6


28.7


13.25


9.60


24.1


54.1


44


k


1.445


13.2


28.4


13.30


9.50


26.0


55.8


47



1.430


13.9


28.9


1.35-^


25.4


52.7


48


NXVc


1.517


13.0


29.0


13.20


9.60


24.7


55.0


45


e


1.557


12.7


25.7


13.50


9,20


27.4


55.4


49


a


1.564


14.1


29.0


13.50


9.80


. 26.8


55.0


49



1.546


13.3


27.9


lA


.0=


26.3


55.1


48


N XVI a


1.619


14.7


31.3


13.80


10.50


25.4


54.2


47


g


1.632


13.8


27.6


13.70


9.50


28.8


57.6


50


e


1.636


13.2


28.2


13.80


9.60


27.3


58.2


47



1.629


13.9


29.0


1.^


.0'


27.2


56.7


48


N XVII e


1.710


13.4


29.5


13.80


9.70


27.2


59.8


.44


g


1.721


15.7


32.1


13.60


10.10


28.5


58.4


49


a


1.738


15.2


33.2


, 14.10


10.60


27.0


58.8


46


c


1.788


15.0


30.7


13.95


10.10


28.6


58.6


49



1.739


U.8


31.4


1.37-^


27.8


58.9


47


102


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 9— Continued



BRAIN WEIGHT


OBSERVED


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


CORRECTED


PERCENTAGE OF CORTICAL



Area of cortex


Area of total section


W. D

in fresh brain


The

same on

slide


Area of corte.x:


Area of

total

section


AREA IN TOTAL SECTION



grams


mm.

mm .

m m .


mm.


7)1 m.

mm.

per cent


N XVIII c


1.825


15.0


32.3


14.45


10.30


29.6


63.7


47


a


1.833


19.0


39.2


13.95


11.20


29.5


61.0


49



1.829


17.0


35.8


1.32

29.6


62.4


48


NXIXb


1.962


16.6


36.6


14.60


11.20


28.3


62.3


44


a


1.981


15.3


32.9


13.95


10.30


28.1


60.5


47



1.972


16.0


34.8


1.33'


28.2


61. 4


46


NXXc


2.015


14.6


33.1


14.30


10.20


28.7


65.2


44


a


2.089


15.7


35.5


14.50


10.95


27.6


62.3


44



2.052


15.2


3^.3


1.36^

28.2


63.8


u


N XXI g


2.156


15.1


35.1


14.75 10.70


28.7


67.0


43


d


■2.187


15.3


34.0


15.05 10.70


30.3


67.4


45


« 


2.172


15.2


3J^.6


1.39-^


29.5


67.2


44


section may be calculated by the following formula, in which Ts denotes the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section.


L. F X T^X 1.20


(L. F and T^,, in millimeters)


The corresponding coefficient was found to be 1.22 in the Albino brains weighing more than 0.5 gram (table 4), but 1.20 for brains weighing more than 1.3 grams (Groups XIII-XX). The coefficients in the two forms may therefore be considered similar, that for the Albino being a trifle the larger.

If comparison is made between the absolute values of the cortical areas in the sagittal sections of the Norway and the Albino brains of like weight, no great difference appears (table 12). In the pair of Groups N XI and XI, the Norway is 10 per cent smaller in the area. This may be explained by the fact that the Norway brain weighing 1.16 grams is in a younger stage of cortical development, as compared with the Albino brain of like weight, the cortex of which is already provided with nearly all its nerve elements. But, in the pairs of Groups N XIII-XIII


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


103


TABLE 10 Giving for each individual and for each hrain weight group the number of nerve cells in 0.001 mm.^ of the cerebral cortex, in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris , and also the number of the ganglion cells only in the same volume of the lamina ganglionaris, counted at locality VII in the frontal section, as shown in fig. 2. Norway rat



BRAIN WEIGHT


CORRKCriOXCOEFFICIENT


XU.MBER OF CELLS IX .\ VOLU.MB 0.001 MM.-"


OF CORTEX,


GROUP


ir. D

in fresh brain


W.D

on slide


Lam. p.


•raniid.


Lam. ganglion.


Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.



Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected



grams


mm.


mm.








N XI b


1.155


13.00


10.00


253


115


170


78


44


20


a


1.160


12.70


9.80


242


111


164


76


41


19


i


1 . 175


12.50


8.80


271


95


199


69


48


17



1 . 163


(1/1


34)'


255


107


178


74


44


19


NXII











N XIII a


1.369


13.00


9.80


225


96


164


70


45


19



1.369


{1/1.33)^


225


96


164


70


45


19


N XIV b


1.407


13.05


9.50


243


94


174


67


46


18


g


1.429


13.20


9.50


227


85


176


65


48


18


a


1.431


12.85


10.20


200


100


142


71


40


20


i


1.431


13.40


10.30


222


101


175


79


47


21


e


1.437


13.25


9.60


225


86


165


63


49


19


k


1.445


13.30


9.50


230


84


178


65


51


19



1430


il/l


35)^


225


92


168


68


47


19


NXVc


1.517


13.20


9.60


235


90


169


65


52


20


e


1.557


13.50


9.20


250


79


176


56


58


IS


a


1.564


13.50


9.80


208


79


166


63


55


21



1.546


{l/l


40)'


231


83


170


61


55


20


NXVIa


1.619


13.80


10.50


203


90


143


63


50


22


g


1.632


13.70


9.50


235


78


159


56


60


20


e


1.636


13.80


9.60


214


72


164


55


57


19



1.629


{1/1


40)^


217


80


155


58


56


20


N XVII e


1.710


13.80


9.70


213


74


155


54


58


20


g


1.721


13.60


10.10


182


75


147


60


54


22


a


1.738


14.10


10.60


190


81


131


56


54


23


c


1.788


13.95


10.10


192


73


142


54


53


20



1.739


{1/1. 37Y


194


76


lU


56


55


21


104


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 10— Continued


'


BRAINWEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT


NUMBER OF CELLS IN A VOLUME OF CORTEX, 0.001 MM. 3


■ GROUP


\V. D

in fresh brain


W.D on slide


Lam. pyramid.


Lam. ganglion.


Ganglion cells in lam. gangl.



Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


Observed


Corrected


N XVIII c

a

NXIX b

a

NXXc

a

NXXIg

d


grams

1.825 1.833

1.829

1.962 1.981 1.972

2.015 2.089 2.052

2.156

2.187 2.172


mm.

14.45 13.95

(1/1

14.60 13.95

(1/1

14.30 14.50

(1/1

14.75 15.05

(.1/1


?nm.

10.30 11.20

32)^

11.20 10.30

33y

10.20 10.95

36y

10.70 10.70

39y


200 147 174

164 176

170 ■

189 170

180

180 186

183


• 73

76

75

74 71 73

69

74

72

69 67 68


146

114

130

120 134

127

140 116

128

118 120

119


53 59 56

54

54 54

51 50

51

45 43

u


55 42

49

45

48 47

49 44

47

45 46

46


20

22

21

20 19

20

18 19 19

17

17

17


to N XX-XX the Norway shows a sHght excess in the area ; on the average 2 per cent.

In spite of the fact that an adult Norway brain has a thicker cortex (by about 6.7 per cent in the sagittal section) than the Albino brain of the same weight, yet between the two a smaller difference in the area of the cortex in the sagittal section is found, because of the shorter longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F) in the Norway (Sugita, '18).


0. The area of the cortex in the frontal section, pared with ihe Albino


Norway rat com


bust as in the case of the sagittal section, table 13 shows relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum iW. D). As a result, we see

that the relative value C/D or ^ ,.- i -, • , stands almost

' Cortical thickness

in a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter TF. D, that is, from 0.94


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


105


TABLE 11

Shotving relations between the cortical area in the sagittal section and the sagittal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F). Column E gives the relative lengths of the long side when the area is reduced to. a rectangle with the short side equal to the cortical thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the sagittal diameter of the cerebrum (L. F) in each group, the average being 1.20. For the ex-planation see the text


A


B


C


D


E


P


G


' BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


BRAIN WEIGHT


CORTICAL AREA IN

S.^GITTAL SECTION


CORTICAL

THICKNESS

IN SAGITTAL

SECTION


c

D


L.F


E F



grams


TO?«2


mm.


mm..


mm.



NXI


1.163


24.0


1.61


14.9


12.2


1.22


NXII








NXIII


1.369


27.5


1.73


15.9


13.1


1.21


NXIV


1.430


29.2


1.84


15.9


13.2


1.21


NXV


1.537


28.4


1.82


15.6


13.5


1.16


NXVI


1.629


30.5


1.88


16.2


13.6


1.19


NXVII


1.739


31.8


1.94


16.4


13.9


1.18


N XVIII


1.829


33.0


1.93


17.1


14.3


1.20


NXIX


1.972


33.8


1.97


17.2


14.6


1.18


NXX


2.052


33.8


1.92


17.6


14.7


1.17


NXXI


2.172


35.0


1.99


17.6


15.1


1.17


NXXII








N XXIII


2.345


35.7


1.86


19.2


15.5


1.24


Average (Groups N XI-N XXIII)





1.20



'




Average (Groun.s N XIIT-N XX^


1.19









to 1.00 or on the average 0.97 for Groups N XI-N XXI, so that the cortical area in the frontal section may be obtained by the following formula, in which T^ denotes the average cortical thickness in the frontal section:

W. D X T^ X 0.97 (W. D and T,-, in millimeters)

For Groups N XIII-N XX, the coefficient is 0.98 (table 13). The corresponding coefficient in the Albino, Groups XIII-XX, is about 0.93, as shown in table 5. Comparing the absolute values of the cortical area in the frontal sections in two forms of like brain weight group (Groups N XIII-N XX to Groups XIII-XX), we find that in the Norway it is on the average larger by about 10 per cent (table 12).


106


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 12

Com/parison of the Norway rat brain with the Albino rat brain of like weight in the areas of the cortex^ in the sagittal and the frontal sections and in the area of the total frontal section. The data were taken fram tables 1, 2, 8 and 9


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


BRAIX


WEIGHT


AREA OF CORTEX INSAGITTAL SECTIOX


AREA OF

CORTEX IN

FRONTAL

SECTION


AREA OF

TOTAL FRONTAL

SECTION



Albino


Norway


Albino


Norway


Albino


Norway


Albino


Norway



gram s


grams


mm.

TOm.2


7mn .2


mm.^


mm. 2


TO TO. 2


XI


1.171


1.163


26.6


24.0


21.7


22.3


45.7


47.4


XII


1.253



26.1



23.0



47.2



XIII


1.335


1.369


27.6

27.5


23.2


24.2


50.2


49.2


XIV


1.445


1.430


28.2


29.2


24.8


25.4


52.3


52.7


XV


1.554


1.542


28.7


28.4


24.3


26.3


54.0


55.1


XVI


1.656


1.629


29.2


30.5


24.3


27.2


54.9


56.7


XVII


1.726


1.739


31.1


31.8


24.6


27.8


56.4


58.9


XVIII


1.839


1.829


32.8


33.0


26.0


29.6


58.9


62.4


XIX


1.924


1.972


32.3


33.8


24.8


28.2


57.0


61. 4


XX


2.054


2.052


33.7


33.8


24.9


28.2


63.4


63.8


XXI



2.172



35.0



29.5



67.2


XXII










XXIII



2.345



35.7






Average for Groups XIII









XX


1.692


1.695


30.5


31.0


24.6


27.1


55.9


57.5


The total area of the frontal section is also slightly in favor of the Norway (table 12).

P. Percentage of the urea of the cortex to the lotal area of the frontal

section (one hemicerehrum) . Norway rat compared

with the Albino

As for the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section, a comparison between the two forms is interesting. In the Albino this percentage value increases from birth to a brain weighing 0.7 to 1.2 grams when it attains the value of about 48 per cent (table 2), but in the Norway the highest percentage is attained in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.8 grams. This indicates that the cortical organization is more retarded in the Norway, if the brain weight be taken as the basis of comparison. In a fully mature Norway brain (from Group N XX onwards,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


107


TABLE 13 Showing relations between the cortical area in the frontal section and the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D). Column E gives relative lengths of the long side ivhen the area is reduced to a rectangle toith the short side equal to the cortical thickness. These values have almost a fixed ratio to the frontal diameter of the cerebrum {W. D) in each group, the average being 0.97. For the detailed explanation see also the text. Norway rat


A


B


C


D


E


F


G




CORTICAL


CORTICAL





BRAIN WEIGHT


B BAIN

AREA IN


THICKNESS


C


ir D


E


GROUP


WEIGHT


FRONTAL SECTION


IN FRONT.\^L SECTION


D



F



grams


mm.

vim.


vim.


mm.



NXI


1.163


22.3


1.88


11.9


12.7


0.94


NXII








NXIII


1.369


24.2


1.96


12.3


13.0


0.95


NXIV


1.430


25.4


1.95


13.0


13.2


0.98


NXV


1.546


26.3


2.04


12.9


13.4


0.96


NXVI


1.629


27.2


2.08


13.1


13.7


0.96


N XVII


1.739


27.8


2.07


13.4


13.9


0.96


N XVIII


1.829


29.6


2.08


14.2


14.2


1.00


NXIX


1.972


28.2


2.00


14.1


14.3


0.99


NXX


2.052


28.2


1.96


14.4


14.4


1.00


NXXI


2.172


29.5


2.08


14.2


14.9


0.95


Average (Gro


ups N XI

N XXI) . . .





0.97







Average (Gro


ups N XIIT-N XX)





0.98








table 9) this percentage amounts to 44 per cent, which is equal to that seen in the mature Albino brain (Groups XVI to XIX, table 2), if we disregard one case of advanced age (Group XX).


Q. Number of cells in a unit volume of the cortex, compared with the Albino


Norway rat


Reviewing table 10 which gives separately the numbers of nerve cells in the unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at a fixed locality m the frontal section of the cerebrum and counted by the same method used for the Albino rat and comparing these numbers with those in table 3 in part I, it is easily seen that, if the like brain weight groups of the two forms are paired, the number of cells in the unit volume of both layers is slightly lower in the Norway rat.


108


NAOKI SUGITA


These relations are shown in table 14. As for the number of the ganghon cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, it is always lower by 2 to 6 in the Norway and the highest figure (21) in the Norway is seen in Groups N XVII and N XVIII, while in the Albino the highest figure (25) is attained in Groups- XIII and XIV and again in Group XVII. In the Albino a temporary increase of cell number in the lamina ganglionaris was seen in Groups XIII and XIV, and in my Norway sections a similar phenomenon is indicated in Groups N XVII and N XVIII. Generally speaking, therefore, the cell densit}^ in the cerebral cortex, as far as represented by my observations, is slightly


600 ■i'in





X















•r^


.---'


--°


'•^


^o—


-o —


.^



■- -0^


-.

— .r


iLwr




tsn













/'


,wr












■^


.•


-~.y






350 300








^













^.=^


""'













^













-LV\


H'


200










_










rr

^:


^











100








"~"






— ~-r


M




50






















1










do 11 12 1.3 14 d.5 1.6 L7


1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4


yns.


Chart 4 Showing the computed values for the cortical volume, the volume of the cerebrum, the cenn density in two unit volumes and the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex of the Norway rat, according to the brain weight. This chart is equivalent to, but not directly comparable with chart 2, which gives the similar data in the Al'bino in ratios of the values at birth. • •LWT', The computed volume of the cerebral cortex, based on table 15.

hWH' , The relative volume of the entire cerebrum, based on the data

presented in a former paper (Sugita, '18) and given also in table 15. X— — XN', The cell density in two unit volumes of the cortex. Graph based on the data

given as N in column D, table 16. -" — ^NLWT', The computed number of

nerve cells in the entire cortex, based on the figures given in column E, table 16. Mark X shows the phase in growth corresponding to that indicated by the same mark in chart 2, which shows the end of the second developmental phase in the Albino.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


109


TABLE 14. Comparison of the Norway rat brain with the albino rat brain of lilie weight for the nuvibers of nerve cells in the lamina pijramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris and the number of ganglion cells only in the lamina ganglionaris, in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^, and also for N, which is the sum of the numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and in, the lamina ganglionaris. The data were taken from tables 3 and 10




NUMBER OF


CELL.S


IX .4 UNIT VOLUME


N,





OF


ORTEX


0.001


MM. 3


THE SUM OF



DRAIN WEIGHT







NUMBERS


DRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


Lam.


pyrani .


Lam .


gangl.


Ganglion

cells in lam.

gangl.


OF CELLS IN

L.iM. PYR.

AND IN

LAM. GANG.



Al

Nor

Al

Nor

Al

Nor

Al

Nor

Al

Nor


bino


way


bino


way


bino


way


bino


way


bino


way



grams


grams










XI


1.171


1.163


113


107


73


74


23


19


186


181


XII


1.253



103



68



23



171



XIII


1.335


1.369


99


96


77


70


25


19


176


166


XIV


1.445


1.430


94


92


71


68


25


19


165


160


XV


1.554


1.546


87


83


62


61


23


20


149


144


XVI


1.65G


1.629


84


80


60


58


24


20


144


138


XVII


1.726


1.739


83


76


63


56


25


21


146


132


XVIII


1.839


1.829


79


75


59


56


23


21


138


131


XIX


1.924


1.972


81


73


51


54


24


20


132


127


XX


2.054


2.052


80


72


51


51


20


19


131


123


XXI



2.172



68



44



17



112


Average for Groups












XIII-XX


1.Q92 1. 695


86


81


62


60


24


20


148


140






lower in the Norway rat, if the brain weight be selected as a standard of comparison.


/?. The computed volume of the entire cerebral cortex, compared with the Albino


Norumij rat


The computed volume of the cerebral cortex for the Norway may also be obtained and expressed in values comparable among themselves, by the use of the formula: L. F X W. D X T (where T denotes the mean thickness of the cortices in the sagittal and the frontal sections), as already explained in detail in part I (see p. 82). But for a comparison between the cortical volumes of the Norway and of the Albino brains, the direct comparison


THE JOURNAL OP COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


110 NAOKI SUGITA

of the values obtained by the above fonnuhxs is not allowable, since, comparing the areas in the Albino among themselves, the fixed coefficients"' 1.21 and 0.93 were ehminated from the formula, as already stated, and similarly in the Norway the corresponding coefficients'^ 1.19 and 0.98 were also eliminated from the formula. In order to compare the areas in these two forms, the coefficients must be taken into consideration. As the product 1.19 X 0.98 is higher by 3.6 per cent than theproduct 1.21 X 0.93, the value of L. F X W.D X T for the Norway should be raised by 3.(3 per cent to be directly comparable with the \'alue of L. F X

1 1 Q V 98 IF. D X T for the Albino. The ratio =,','! r^L (= 1-03(3)

1.21 X 0.93 ^

being represented by C, the comparable value of the cortical

volume for the Norway may be obtained by the corrected formula

as follows:

L. F X W. D X T XC (C ^ 1.036)

Table 15 gives the computed cortical volume of the Norway brain, obtained according to the above corrected formula, and this is shown graphically in chart 4 (graph LWT').

As the available data in the Norway do not extend to the earlier ages, I could not determine the early increase in the cortical volume of the Norway, but our data show that the cortical volume is increasing somewhat more rapidly during the period when the brain weight is increasing from 1.16 to 1.54 grams and after that it increases more slowly but steadily as the entire cerebral volume increases, as shown in table 15 and in chart 4 (graph LWH'). In the Albino, as has been shown, the cortical volume increases relatively rapidly until the brain attains 1.17 grams in weight, a phase which probably corresponds to the phase in the Norway of 1.43 grams in brain weight.

To compare the cortical volume in the Norway rat with that of the Albino, I have paired, in table 15, the Norway data {L. F XW. D X T X C] directly with the corresponding Albino

For a proper (;onii)arisoii, the eoeflficieuts here used are those for the same brain weight groups compared in both forms, l)eing respectively the averages for Groups XIII to XX and for Groups N XIII to N XX, taken from tables 4, 5, 11 and 13.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


111


TABLE 15

Showing the computed volume for the entire cerebral cortex of the N'orway rat hraiii, calculated by the formula: L.F X W. D X T X C for each brain iveight group, C being a fixed coefficient used to convert the computed volume of the Norway cortex so as to make it comparable with that of the Albino {C = 1.036). The computed volume of the cerebrum is quoted from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18). These values are paired ivith the corresponding values for the cortical volume of the Albino and the ratios between them, calculated


NORWAY RATS


ALBINO RATS


A


B


C


D


E


F


G


H


I


Brain weight group


Brain

wciglit


Computed

volume

of

cerelirum

L.G X W.DXHt.


L.F

in fre.sli

brain


\V. D

in fresh

brain


average cortical

thickness


L.FX W. D XT

XC

Computed

volume

of corte\


Corresponding computed volume of the Albino cortex, of the same group number


Ratio

of cortical

volume

of the

Norwav

to that of

the

Albino



grams


)H tn .3


mm .


)// m .


m m .


mm .^


7)1 m.^



NXI


1.163


156


12.2


12.7


1.75


281.00


288.93


0.973


NXII








304.51



NXIII


1.369


182


13.1


13.0


1.85


326.51


314.03


1.040


NXIV


1.430


185


13.2


13.2


1.90


343.09


329.71


1.040


NXV


1.537


194


13.5


13.4


1.93


361.83


345.86


1.046


NXVI


1.629


203


13.6


13.7


1.98


382.32


359.30


1.064


NXVII


1.739


218


13.9


13.9


2.01


402.47


365.08


1.102


N XVIII


1.829


226


14.3


14.2


2.01


423.00


397.96


1.063


NXIX


1.972


241


14.6


14.3


1.99


430.57


390.39


1.103


NXX


2.052


249


14.7


14.4


1.94


425.59


393.15


1.0S3


NXXI


2.172


264


15.1


14.9


2.04


475.66




Average


(Groups


N XIII

N XX) .




386.92


361.94


1.069






1 T, here entered, is the mean value of T, and Tp, previously given in tables 11 and 13 and is not the general average thickness of the corte.x of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections formerly presented in my fourth paper in this series (Sugita, '18 a).


data (L. F X W. D X T) according to the brain weight groups, quoted from part I. In table 15 the ratios show the volume of the cortex in the Norway to be greater (1.040 to 1.103) in all the comparisons for brain weights above Groups XIII (brain weight 1.87 grams). The average value is about 1.07. In Group XI (brain weight 1.17 grams), the ratio for the Norway is less than 1. At this weight the Norway brain is regarded as less mature than


112 NAOKI SUGITA

the corresponding Albino brain. The ratio tends to increase as the brain weight increases, showing roughly the relative growth in the Norway cortex.

Since, as has been shown (Sugita, '18 a), the cortex in the mature Norw^ay is about 8 per cent thicker (average of the sagittal and frontal sections) than in the Albino, and since this value enters as T into the formula under discussion, this would tend to give a greater \'olume of the cortex in the Norway than in the Albino. The mean value found for the ratio of the cortical volume — 1.07 — is about that to be expected, in view of the relatively smaller value of L. F in the Norway.

>S. Computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex. Norway rat compared with the Albino

As described in part I, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex may be obtained by the following formula :^

NXL.FX W. D X T XC (L.F, ]V. D and T, in miUimeters) where L. F X W. D X T X C is the computed volume of the Norway cortex made comparable directly with the corresponding volume for the Albino, as explained in the foregoing chapter, and A^ is the cell density, represented by the sum of the numbers of cells in a unit volume in the lamina pjTamidalis and in a unit volume in the lamina ganglionaris (two unit volumes altogether), given separately in table 10 and combined in table 16.

Table 16 gives the computed value of the cell number in the entire cerebral cortex for each brain weight group of the Norway rats (column E), calculated by the use of the above formula, and also in the corresponding case of the Albino (column G).

On examining table 16, column E, w^e find the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex to be nearly completed in a brain weighing 1.37 grams (Group N XIII), while in the Albino this condition was reached in a brain weighing 1.17 grams (Group XI). The value of the completed cell number is indicated in

The formula for the total number of nerve cells in the Norway cortex is like that for the Albino cortex with the addition of the factor C (footnote 4) .


GROWTH OP THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


113


TABLE 16

Giving the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex of the Norivay rat brain, obtained on the basis of the m.easurements given in this series of studies. These values are made to be comparable ivith the corresponding values of the computed number of nerve cells in the cortex of the albino rat brains of like brain weight groups


NORW.W R.\TS


ALBINO RATS


A


B


C


D


E


F


G


Brain weight group


Brain weight


Computed

volume of

cortex

L.FX n'. D

XT XC


Sum of numbers of

cells in lam. pyr.

and lam. gang, in two

unit volumes, N


Computed

number of cells

in entire

cortex,!

X XL.F

X It'. DXT

x^'x'iTo


Ratio of number of

cells in the Norway

to that in the Albino


Corresponding

computed number of cells

in the

Albino, of the

same group

number


NXI

NXII

NXIII

NXIV

NXV

NXVI

N XVII

N XVIII

NXIX

NXX

NXXI


grams

1.163

1.369 1.430 1.537 1.629 1.739 1.829 1.972 2.052 2.172


m m .3

281.00

326.51 343.09 361.83 382.32 402.47 423.00 430.57 425.59 475.66


181

166 160 144 138 132 131 127 123 112


508.6

542.0 548.9 521.0 527.6 531.3 554.1 546.8 523.5 532.7


0.946

0.981 1.009 1.011 1.020 0.997 1.009 1.061 1.016


537.4 520.7 552.7 544.0 515.3 517.4 533.0 549.2 515.3 515.0


Average (Groups N XIII-N XX)


536.9


1.013


530.2


1 As remarked in a note to table 7, the number given in this column corresponds to 1/100 of N X L. F X W. D X T,or 1/50,000 of the actual number of cells contained in the computed volume of the cortex.

the Norway by about 537 (the average of Groups N XIIIN XX) or about 1 per cent more than that of the Albino, which has been indicated by about 530 (the average of Groups XIIIXX, see table 7), so that the number of nerve cells in the entire cortex of the mature Norway and of the Albino rats may be regarded as practically the same, as suggested by Donaldson (Donaldson and Hatai, '11).


114 NAOKI SUGITA

IX. CONCLUSIONS

Putting together the foregoing observations, we come to the conclusion that in the case of the Norway rat brain the entire volume of the cerebral cortex is actively increasing up to a brain weight of something more than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV) and that the number of nerve cells in the cortex is completed in a brain weighing something less than 1.43 grams (Group N XIV) (chart 4). After this, the increase in cortical volume keeps pace with the enlargement of the entire cerebrum, showing that the cortical mass and the remainder of the cerebrum are growing at the same rate. So, the end of the short period during which the brain has attained 1.37 to 1.54 grams in weight (Groups N XIII to N XV) marks an epoch in the development of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat, at which the structural completion of the cortex has been acquired and the full preparation for the functional education has been established. This period corresponds approximately to the age of twenty days.

In the Albino, the same degree of development is reached when the brain attains a weight of 1.17 grams or is twenty days old. As I suggested in an earlier paper (Sugita, '18 a), a Norway brain corresponds in the development of the cortex to an Albino brain weighing about 18 per cent less. This assumption has held true in the present examinations of the cortical volume and cell number, because an Albino brain weighing 1.17 grams just corresponds to a Norway brain weighing 1.43 grams.

The number of cells in the Norway cortex has been shown to be but slightly (1 per cent) different from that in the Albino rat cortex and may be regarded as the same in both forms. This fact justifies at the same time a conclusion reached by Donaldson in his former comparison of the Norway with the Albino rats, that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat, compared with the Albino of the same body weight or of the same age, is probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number (Donaldson and Hatai, '11). The results of my study regarding the cell size in the cortex in these two forms will be discussed in a forthcoming paper and will support the statement just made.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 115

X. SUMMARY

1. On the sagittal and the frontal sections from 28 Norway rats, whose brain weights fall between 1.1 and 2.4 grams and which were formerly used for the investigation on the cortical thickness (Sugita, '18 a), the area of the cortex was measured and the number of nerve cells, in a unit volume of 0.001 mm.^ at a fixed locality of the cortex, was counted. These values were all later corrected to the corresponding values in the fresh condition of the material, using the correction- coefficients devised for this purpose. These results have been grouped and averaged according to the brain weight and then compared with the corresponding data in the Albino, which were presented in part I of this paper.

2. The actual area of the cortex in the sagittal section may be obtained by the formula: L. F X T^X 1.20 (L. F and T^, in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter of the cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the sagittal section and 1.20 is a constant coefficient which was empirically determined (table 11, column G).

3. The actual area of the cortex in the frontal section may be obtained, though less precisely, by the formula: W. D xT^ X 0.97 {W. D and T^ in millimeters), where W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T^ is the thickness of the cortex in the frontal section and 0.97 is a constant coefficient which was determined empirically (table 12, column G).

4. The percentage of the cortical area to the area of the whole frontal section is highest (48 per cent) in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.8 grams. In a fully mature brain it has fallen to 44 per cent.

5. The computed value for the volume of the entire cortex, indicated by the formula: L. F X W. D X T X C (L. F, W. D and T, in millimeters), where L. F is the longitudinal diameter, W. D is the frontal diameter of the cerebrum, T is the average thickness of the cortex in the two sections and C a theoretically determined coefficient necessary to make the values directly comparable with the corresponding values for the albino rat, shows that the cortex is increasing relatively rapidly in the


116 NAOKI SUGITA

Norway brains weighing less than 1.43 grams. After that stage its increase nearly keeps pace with the increase in the volume of the entire cerebrum.

6. In Norway brains weighing from 1.1 to 2.2 grams, the cell density or the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, in a fixed locality of the cortex, decreases slowly but steadily as the brain weight advances. It has proved sHghtly less than that in the Albino (compare table 16, column D, with table 7, column C). In the lamina ganglionaris the number of ganglion cells onl}^ in a unit volume is at its highest in the brains weighing 1.7-1.8 grams (table 14).

7. The value for the computed number of nerve cells in the entire Norway cortex, indicated by the formula: A*^ X L. F X Wl D XT XC (L. F, W. D and T, in millimeters), where A^ is the number of cells in two unit volumes and L.F x W. D X T X C is the computed volume of the cortex, shows that it is almost completed in a brain weighing something more than .37 grams.

8. Comparisons in respect of the above characters between the Norway and the Albino brains of the like weight show that, in the cortical areas in the sagittal and the frontal sections and in the volume of the entire cortex, the Norway rat surpasses the albino rat, but the number of cells as computed for the entire cortex may be regarded as the same in both forms. We conclude therefore that the difference in absolute brain weight between the two forms is not correlated with a difference in the number of nerve cells in the cerebral cortex. In a Norway brain weighing 1.4 to 1.5 grams, which corresponds to an Albino brain weighing 1.17 grams and is about twenty days in age, the elemental organization of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat is considered to be almost completed.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 117

LITERATURE CITED

Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.

Donaldson, H. H. 19 8 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 18, pp. 345-392.

1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.

Donaldson, H. H. and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino rat in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.

Stjgita, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.

1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.

1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.

1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.


AUTHOR S ABSTRACT OP THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 2.


COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

VI. PART I. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE AND ON THE DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE ALBINO RAT DURING THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN

VI. PART II. ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS), COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES IN THE ALBINO RAT

NAOKI SUGITA

From the Wislar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

WITH SIX FIGURES AND FOUR CHARTS

PART I

I. PRELIMINARY STUDIES

As a preliminary to the study of cell size, I made a comparison of effects of several fixatives and imbedding media on the size and shape of the cortical nerve cells in a small number of albino rats. These studies were made after considering the results of King ('10) and Allen ('16), both of whom were endeavoring to find methods which caused the minimum alteration in the nerve cells.

For this comparison, ten kinds of preparations were made from albino rat brains of like age: thus, as the fixative, (1) Bouin's fluid, (2) 4 per cent formaldehyde, (3) 95 per cent alcohol, (4) Muller's or Orth's fluid, and (5) Ohlmacher's fluid were successively^ tried, and each sample was inbedded in (A) parafine and in (B) celloidin.

119


120 NAOKI SUGITA

Formaldehyde fixation and paraffine imbedding (2A) causes considerable shrunkage of nuclei and cell bodies, especially in young brains, but material so prepared takes any aniline dye excellently well (fig. l,b). Fixation in Miiller's or Ortti's fluid and paraffine imbedding (4A) causes also shrinkage and deformation of the cell bodies and nuclei, the contours of which become zigzag. Formaldehyde fixation and celloidin imbedding (2B) give good figures of cell bodies, which stain excellently with any aniline dye. The shrinkage of cells and nuclei which was seen after paraffine imbedding of the material similarly fixed (2A) is no longer observed. But the size of cell bodies and nuclei seems to have suffered some diminution. Miiller or Orth fixation and celloidin imbedding (4B) causes considerable deformation of the contours of the cells and nuclei, which is probably an affect of the potassium bichromate.

In material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol, the brain is subject to much shrinkage, and consequently the cell size and cortical thickness diminish also, though, after paraffine imbedding (3A), the contours of cells and nuclei are preserved pretty well (fig. 1,a). Alcohol fixation only or alcohol fixation and celloidin imbedding (3B) is ideal for the study of the cytoplasmic strticture as originally emphasized by Nissl. The cell bodies stain very well with aniline dyes, but the section shrinks so that the individual cells must have been more or less reduced in size. Fixation in Ohlmacher's fluid and paraffine imbedding (5A) or celloidin imbedding (5B) proved to be most excellent for cell study, as pointed out by King ('10), but it is followed after fixation by a considerable reduction in the volume of the total brain and some change in shape.

After a number of tests, I decided to use as the fixative Bouin's fluid, which is composed of:

cc.

Picric acid, saturated aqueous solution 75

40 per cent formaldehyde (formalin) 25

Glacial acetic acid 5

Fixed in this fluid the total weight or ^'olume of the brain suffers no significant change after complete fixation and preserves its original shape quite well, though a slight shrinkage occurs,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


121


no matter what the age of the brain is. It takes only a couple of hours to complete fixation in this fluid, if the fluid is kept in the oven at 37C., but, as a matter of convenience, I left each brain in 20 cc. of this fluid for 24 hours at the room temperature. By this treatment the form of the cells was well preserved, even after imbedding in paraffine (lA) (figs. 3 and 4).

Comparing this w^ith the material which was fixed in the same fluid but imbedded in celloidin (IB), the contours of cell bodies were, in the former, somewhat indistinct and the size of the nuclei somewhat larger (fig. 1, c). But after paraffine imbedding the nuclei have yet good contours which are not zigzag and the




Fig. 1 Showing pj'ramids from the lamina pyramidalis at a fixed locality (locality VII) of the cerebral cortex of Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams. Magnification of about 950 diameters, measured directly on the slide, a = from a brain imbedded in paraffine after fixation in 95 per cent alcohol, b = from a brain imbedded in ])araffine after fixation in 4 per cent formaldehyde, c = from a brain imbedded in celloidin after fixation in Bouin's fluid.

so-called Nissl bodies are also well stained. Since paraffine was used exclusively for the imbedding medium, Bouin's fluid proved to be the best fixative for the albino rat brain, when it is required to follow the growth changes of the cortex by the measurements of the cells of the cortex.

Figure 1 shows a comparison of the effects of several fixatives on the shape and contours of the cell bodies and the nuclei when applied to albino rat brains of like age. The examples are all from Albino brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams and represent pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis taken near the locality VII in frontal sections, being comparable with VII in figure 2, a and h.


122


NAOKI SUGITA


II. MATERIAL

For the present study on cell size in the cerebral cortex, the frontal and horizontal sections of the Albino brains which were used earlier for studies on the cortical thickness, cortical areas, and cell density (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b) were alone taken. No locahty in the sagittal sections was examined. These sections were from 128 individuals, sexes combined. The data for these 128 rats appear in tables 1 and 2 in a previous paper (Sugita, '17 a) and it is not thought necessary to repeat the tables here. This study was begun in January, 1916, and carried on with interruptions till Fel)ruary, 1917, at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.


/^f



a



Fig. 2 Showing on tlie brain surface the localities at which the sizes of the pyramids and the ganglion cells were measured. FF' indicates the level from which the frontal section was taken and HH' indicates the level from which the horizontal section was taken. VII = locality \TI;X = locality X. a = the dorsal view of an Albino brain weighing 1.5 grams. Enlarged l.S diameters, b = the lateral view of the same.


III. TECHNIQUE

The nerve cells have been measured at fixed localities in the sections; that is, in the frontal sections at locality VII (fig. 4, Sugita, '17 a) and in the horizontal sections at locality X (fig. 6, Sugita, '17 a). For convenience, these locahties are here shown on two corresponding figures (fig. 2, a and b). From the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris at each of these localities, ten of the largest cells were selected and measured. The cells in the other layers were not systematically investigated,


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 123

but in several stages of growth, a few were measured, in order to be able to make some comparisons.

The study of the cells under the microscope was made with a Zeiss Comp. Ocular no. (3 with a micrometer, combined with the objective 2 mm., oil immersion. Each division in the micrometer scale was equal to two micra. The measurement of the cell size was executed in the following way : the transverse diameter of the cell body (the greatest width of the cell body) was measured on a line, parallel to the base line, which crossed about the middle of the nucleus. For the longitudinal diameter the measurement was made \'ertical to the trans\'erse diameter from the base of the cell body to the beginning of the apical dendrite. This last limit was assumed to be at the point where the Nissl bodies are no more to be seen and the side lines of the apical dendrite begin to run nearly parallel to each other. Sometimes this upper limit was very hard to determine, especially in fully grown cells, because of the irregularity of the cell outline and the relatively slow transition from cell bod}- to the apical dendrite. In these latter cases, the upper limit was somewhat arbitrarily fixed, but this procedure has apparently been without much effect on the results.

The measurements of the ten largest cells of the same kind from within the fixed locality in the same individual were then averaged for each diameter and recorded on cards without any correction. The average measurements from the frontal section and the horizontal section are denoted in the records by the letters F and H, respectively. The individual averages for each series of ten cells in each section have all been tabulated and the respective averages for the brain-weight groups found. The values for the individuals in each brain-weight group are so well correlated with their respective indi\ddual brain weights that it has seemed necessary to publish only the averages for the successive brain-weight groups. Table 1 contains the cell measurements on the frontal section averaged for each brainvk^eight group. The results of the measurements on the horizontal sections, which were taken from the other individuals,


124 NAOKI SUGITA

are given in table 2, and here also only the averages for the brain-weight groups are given. ^

The maximal diameters of the nuclei of the same cells were measured in the two directions in which the cell measurements were made. The nuclei have sharp contours, so that it was always easy to find the border points of the diameters. The results of the nuclear measurements ha\'e been treated in the same manner as the cell-body measurements and the average values are recorded also in the same way — ^without any correction — in tables 1 and 2.

In table 3 the final average diameters of the cell bodies and their nuclei for each brain-weight group are given for each section. These final average values were obtained by multiplying the values of the transverse and longitudinal diameters together and by extracting the square root of the product, thus assuming the cell- and nucleus-figures to form a plane instead of a solid body. By this treatment, the results for the nucleus do not differ much from those which would be obtained by using a planimeter, because the nucleus has a nearly spherical or ellipsoidal form. The cell body, on the contrary, appears as a somewhat irregular cone or pyramid in the outline. Nevertheless, its relative volume may be denoted by a^fe, or its area by ah, in which a is the transverse and h the longitudinal diameter. Accordingly, the relative values of the average diameter may be represented by 's/ab, but these values should not be compared directly with the average diameter of the nucleus, because the forms of the cell body and of the nucleus are quite different. The size of cell bodies and their nuclei was assumed to have shrunken in the same proportion as the total brain volume during the procedure of fixation, imbedding and mounting and the values observed were therefore corrected for the fresh condition of the material by the use of the correction-coefficient which was formerly used for the correction of the cortical thickness or other measurements made on the same section. The cell bodies and nuclei were assumed to have shrunken similarly in transverse and

^ The detailed data for tables 1 and 2 and also for tables 6 and 7 have all been tabulated and are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.


GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


125


TABLE I Giving the average uibcorrecled diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality VII) on the frontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are given for each brain iveight group only


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


I

II (B)

III

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

X

XI

XII

XIII

XIV

XV

XVI

XVII

XVIII

XIX

XX


NO. OF


BRAIN


TASKS


WEIGHT



grams


3


0.161


5


0.251


5


0.358


6


0.432


9


0.542


3


0.639


2


0.750


6


0.841


3


0.964


3


1.040


4


1.171


2


1.253


5


1.335


3


1.445


5


1 554


4


1.656


4


1.726


3


1.839


1


1.924


2


2.054


LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


Cell body diameter


Transv. Longit.


7.5 10.3 11.9 14.1 14.4 15.0 15.2 16.5 16.9 16.6 16.8 16.2 16.0 15.4 15 5 15.0 15.7 14.7 15.6 15.2


M

10.7

13.0

15.5

17

17

17

18.

19.

20.2

20.1

20.6

20.7

20.7

20 4

20.0

19.6

19.9

19.4

19.9

19.5


Nucleus diameter


Transv. Longit.


6.6 9.2 10.7 12.4 12.4 12.9 13.5 14.0 15.7 14.8 14.7 14.6 14.6 14.3 14.2 13.8 14 3 13.6 14.0 13.5


7.6 10.3 12.4 13.5 13.4 13.9 14.2 14.8 16.4 15.3 16.1 15.4 15.2 15.1 14.8 14.7 15.2 14.5 14.3 14.3


LAMINA GANGLIONARIS


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter


Transv.


Longit.


Transv.


Longit.


M


M


A*


M


10.1


14.1


8.7


10.5


14.4


18.2


12.0


13.6


16.1


20.6


13.5


15.0


18.4


23.3


15.5


ir.i


19.5


23.4


16.2


ir.4


19.4


23.7


16.2


17.2


20.2


25.7


16.1


16.9


20.8


26.7


17.4


18.3


21.4


28.6


19.1


19.6


21.0


27.7


17.8


18.6


21.5


28.6


18.2


19.4


21.1'


27.7


18.0


18.6


20.4'


26.8


17.8


18.4


20.1'


27.0


17.5


18.3


21 2


27.4


18.0


18.6


21.7


29.1


18.1


19.4


22.0


28.0


18.7


19.5


22.3


28.5


18.4


19.0


22.7


29.3


18.8


19.4


23.2


31.4


19.3


20.2


' The uncorrected measurements of the cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells in these groups (Groups XII-XIV) show a slight decrease, while in the corrected measurements (see table 3) no diminution in cell size has occurred in this stage. This slight decrease in size on the slide is probably due to some chemical changes which takes place in cytoplasm during this phase of development. The same phenomenon is to be seen also in the ganglion cells measured on the horizontal section, given in table 2, in Groups XII-XVI.


longitudinal diameters and in the same proportion as the width of the brain has shrmiken. As in the other measurements (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b), the correction-coefficient was


based on


W. D in fresh brain W. D. on the slide


for the frontal section and on


THE JOURN.\L OF COMP.VRATtVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 2


126


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 2

Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality X) on the horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The data are given for each brain weight group only



NO. OF

CASES


BRAIN WEIGHT


LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


LAMINA GANGLIONARIS


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter



Transv.


Longit.


Transv.


Longit.


Transv.


Longit.


Transv.


Longit.




grams


M


M


M


fJ

M


M


M


M


11(B)


2


0.292


9.9


12.7


8.5


9.8


15.4


19.3


13.0


14.2


III


3


0.317


10.6


13.8


9.4


10.9


14.6


19.0


12.7


14.4


IV


3


0.419


13.0


14.0


10.2


12.9


16.0


21.4


14.2


16.3


V


5


0.546


13.9


16.5


12.5


13.5


18.7


23.5


16.0


17.5


VI


2


0.631


15.6


18.1


13.8


15.2


19.7


23.7


17.2


18.3


VII


2


0.761


15.6


18.5


14 3


15.7


19.4


24.9


17.6


19.0


VIII


4


0.848


15.5


19.1


14.4


15.8


20.1


26.3


18.1


19.3


IX


2


939


15.9


19.8


14.8


16.0


20.9


28.1


18.8


19.6


X


.3


1.054


16.1


20.6


14.9


15.7


20.7


28.5


18.8


19.8


XI


1


1.121


16.5


21.2


15.6


16.6


20.8


28.8


19.1


19.9


XII


3


1.240


16.0


20.5


14.7


15.9


19.51


27.8


17.6


19.2


XIII


3


1.351


15.9


20.9


14.6


15.5


20.31


29.1


17.6


19.0


XIV


2


1.455


15.1


20.1


13.9


14.9


20.7


28.4


18.1


19.1


XV


2


1.566


15.3


20.8


14.0


15.1


20.7


29.5


18.2


19.4


XVI


4


1.678


15.2


19.9


14.0


15.0


20.4


27.9


17.8


19.3


XVII


2


1.730


15.3


20.3


14.1


15.1


20.8


29.6


18.2


19.5


XVIII


2


1.823


15.5


20.5


14.3


15.1


21.1


29.9


18.4


19.6


XX


1


2.004


14.6


19.3


13.5


14.0


21.5


31.0


18.4


19.6


1 See note on table 1.


W. B in fresh brain


for the horizontal section, and apphed di


W. B on the sKde rectly to the final average diameters for the cell bodies and the nuclei. The corrected results, with the average correctioncoefficient for each brain-weight group, taken from previous papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), are tabulated in table 3, accompanied with the averages of all the diameters in both sections for each brain-weight group.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


127


TABLE 3 Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei of the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and the horizontal sections of the albino rat brain. The average values of the two for each brain iveight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each brain weight group was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b). F = the frontal sectio7i. H = the horizontal section.





LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS


L.\MINA GANGLIONARIS


BRAIN WEIGHT


BRAINWEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT






OROUP


Cell body diameter


Nuc'eus diameter


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter



grams



M


M


M


i"


FI


0.161


1.14


10.3 •


8.1


13.6


10.9


HI




• —






0.161



10.3


8.1


13.6


10.9


FII


0.251


1.16


13.5


11.2


18.8


14.8


HII


0.292


1.10


12.3


10.0


18.9


15.0


(Birth)


0.272



12.9


10.6


18.9


14-9


Fill


0.358


1.13


15.4


13.0


20.6


16.0


HIII


0.317


1 21


14.6


12.2


20.1


16.3



0.338



15.0


12.6


20.4


16.2


FIV


0.432


1.10


17.2


14.2


22.8


17.9


HIV


0.419


1.30


17.5


14.8


24.0


19.6



0.426



17.4


14-5


23.4


18.8


FV


0.542


1.13


17.9


14.6


24.2


19.0


H V


0.546


1.22


18.5


15.9


25.6


20.4



0.5U



18.2


15.3


24.9


19.7


F VI


0.639


1.19


19.4


16.0


25.4


19.9


H VI


0.631


1 24


20.4


18.0


26.8


21.9



0.635



19.9


17.0


26.1


20.9


F VII


0.750


1.24


21.0


17.2


28.2


20.5


HVII


0.761


1.27


21.6


19.0


28.0


23.2



0.756



21.3


18.1


28.1


21.9


FVIII


0.841


1.20


21.5


17.3


28.3


21.4


H VIII


0.848


1.38


23.7


20.8


31.8


25.8



0.845



22.6


19.1


30.1


23.6


FIX


0.964


1.21


22.4


19.4


29.9


23.4


HIX


0.939


1.31


23.2


20.2


31.7


25.2


(10 days)


0.952



22.8


19.8


30.8


24.3


128


NAOKl SUGITA


TABLE 3— Continued





LAMINA PYRA.MIDALIS


LAMINA GANGLIONARI8


BRAIN- WEIGHT


BRAINWEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT






GROUT


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter



grams



At


M


M


M


FX


1 040


1.23


22.5


18.6


29.6


22.4


HX


1.054


1.36


24.8


20.8


33.0


26.3



1.047



23.7


19.7


31.3


24-4


FXI


1.171


1.26


23.4


19.4


31.4


23.8


HXI


1.121


1.26


23.7


20.4


31.0


24.6


(20 days)


1.146



23.6


19.9


31.2


24.2


FXII


1 253


1.31


24.0


19.6


31.6


24.0


HXII


1.240


1.36


24.6


20.0


31.7


25.9



1.247



24.3


20.3


31.7


24.5


FXIII


1.335


1.29


23.4


19.2


30.2


23.4


HXIII


1.351


1.34


24.4


20.2


32.6


24.5



1.343



23.9


19.7


31.4


24.0


FXIV


1.445


1.34


23.8


19.7


31.2


24.0


HXIV


1.455


1.31


22.8


18.9


31.7


24.4



1.450



23.3


19.3


31.5


24.2


FXV


1.554


1.30


22.9


18.9


31.4


23.8


HXV


1.566


1.28


22.9


18.6


31.6


24.1



1.560



22.9


18.8


31.5


24.0


FXVI


1.656


1.33


22.9


19.0


33.4


24.8


H XVI


1.678


1.32


23.0


19.2


31.4


24.4



1.667



23.0


19.1


32.4


24.6 .


FXVII


1.726


1.26


22.3


18.6


31.3


24.1


H XVII


1.730


1.36


23.9


19.8


33.7


25.6



1.728



23.1


19.2


32.5


24-9


F XVIII


1.839


1.32


22.3


18.5


33.2


24.7


H XVIII


1.823


1.29


23.0


19.0


32.4


24.5



1.831



22.7


18.8


32.8


24.6


FXIX


1.924


1.29


22.7


18.2


33.2


24.6


HXIX









1.924



22.7


18.2


33:2


24.6


FXX


2.054


1.23


21 .2


17.1


33.2


24.2


HXX


2.004


1.31


22.0


17.9


33.8


24.9



2.029



21.6


17.5


33.5


24.6


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


129


IV. GROWTH IN THE DIAMETERS OF THE CELL BODY AND OF THE

NUCLEUS

Chart 1 shows graphically the data given in table 3. As ordinates the average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus of the pyramids (lamina pyramidalis) and of the ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) are jDlotted on the abscissa for the aveiage brain weights.

D iameter in micra





































^^_


,^


.-0 — '^



GC










x^


..—

XX.,



— „


_.o—


~"^













/


/



















y




















.y


r




X



XX







- —




_,




/


/■




/



-„

^.o—


--^




--»-.


^.o

-0

--.


.-,—


-».







y


/<















PC



1



r^


/


/


y


l^




-n



^5""


~^








i

1


/


a^



^















Tti


/


/


/


/'


^

















/


//


/



















/


/


/



















/


/




































































































O.i OZ B 03 Q4 Q5 Q6 07


0.9 10 \\ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1.9 %()


^s


Chart 1 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the albino rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 3. Graph GC, average diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph GN, average diameter of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph PC, average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. Ciraj^h PN, average diameter of the nuclei of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. X, 10 days of age. XX and *, 20 days of age. **, 30 days of age.


130 NAOKI SUGITA

If the length of the average diameters represents relatively the cube root of the volume of the cell body or of the nucleus, the actual volume of them may be comparable among themselves by the cube of the diameters. It is clearly seen from the chart that the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the Albino cortex attain their maximum size in a brain weighing from 1.1 to 1.3 grams or 20 to 30 days in age, the curve showing the maximum size in a brain weighing about 1.25 grams, and after that they diminish slightly but steadily in size as the age (brain weight) advances, while, on the other hand, the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris attain nearly their full size in a brain weighing about 0.95 gram or ten days in age; that is, earlier than the pyramids, and after that slowly but steadily increase their size as the brain weight increases. The nuclei in the pyramids and in the ganglion cells change their sizes in much the same way as the cell bodies to which they belong, the graphs for the cell body and that for the nucleus for each kind of cell running nearly similar courses (chart 1).

As shown in chart 1, the graphs suggest that both kinds of cells increase in size very rapidly during the first ten days after birth, and then the rate diminishes rather abruptly during the following ten days (0.95 to 1.15 grams in brain weight) or more, at the end of which phase the pyramids reach the maximum size, after which they decrease slowly, while the ganglion cells still continue to increase somewhat even after this phase.

On examining all the sections which I made, it was seen that the ground tone of the sections uniformly stained with the carbol-thionine has been gradually changing as the age of the brain, from which the sections were taken, increases. In successfully stained sections — even if stained by decoloration — of brains from birth to those weighing less than 1.0 gram, the ground tone is rather purple or violet, when viewed Avith the naked eye by transmitted light. On the other hand, the sections from brains weighing more than 1.3 grams have a rather distinctly blue tone. The intercellular tissue takes more easily the pale blue color — owing to a less decoloration — in older brains, while in younger brains the intercellular tissue remains


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 131

quite unstained. The period during which the brain weiglit increases from 1.1 to 1.3 grams coincides with a transitional phase of the color. I regret that I have not been able to reproduce these distinctions of color for the illustration of this paper.

These changes in color suggest that at the 20 to 30 day phase some chemical changes in the structure of the cell body and the nucleus have been occurring.'- At this phase of growth, the cells having attained nearl}^ the full size, the rate of increase in size abruptly diminishes, suggesting that during this phase important changes have occurred. Myelination is proceeding very activel}^ after the brain has attained the weight of 1.0 gram (Sugita, '17 a), and the fact that the cell bodies and nuclei of the pyramids decrease in size as the brain weight passes 1.3 grams while the growth of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells become very slow may have some connection with the myelin formation.

Table 3 enables us to examine the measurements for the frontal and for the horizontal sections separately. Generally speaking, at the locality VII, measured in the frontal section (lines denoted by F in table 3) and at the locality X measured in the horizontal section (see lines denoted by H in table 3), the corrected sizes of the cell body and of the nucleus show some differences in the younger brains, but the sizes may be regarded on the whole as practically the same in these two localities in mature brains. If stated more minutely according to the data presented in table 3, the pyramids and the ganglion cells at locality VII (frontal section) grow in size somewhat more slowly as compared with those at locahty X (horizontal section), so that in Groups IV to X the diameters are all smaller for the frontal section than for the horizontal section, in averaged values (see table 3). But if these slight discrepancies be not

2 As noticed in tables 1 and 2, the size of the ganglion cells directly measured on the slides shows a slight decrease during this phase (1.0 to 1.3 grams in brain weight), while, in corrected measurements given in table 3, there cannot be detected any diminution in cell size during the same phase. This decrease in size of the ganglion cells on the slide may have some connection with the chemical changes occurring in the cytoplasm and karyoplasm, which cause different reactions to the reagents used for fixation.


132


NAOKI SUGITA


taken too seriously, it may be stated that on the average the cell bodies and the nuclei of the pyramids attain their maximum size at about tAventy-five days (brain weight, 1.25 grams) and those of the ganglion cells attain nearly the full size at about ten days of age (brain weight, 0.95 gram).

The largest ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral cortex of the adult albino rat brain are found in the middle part of the sagittal section, denoted by locality III (Sugita, '17 a). The size of these largest cells at different ages was not systematically investigated by me, but a careful comparison of them with the ganglion cells at localities VII and X, tabulated in this study, show them to be on the average (in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams) 4 to 7 micra greater in the transverse diameter, 7 to 10 micra greater in the longitudinal diameter of the cell body, and 3 to 5 micra greater in both diameters of the nucleus — all in corrected values — than the corresponding diameters of the ganglion cells in localities VH and X, as shown in the following summary :

Average corrected diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris {Groups XIII-XX)


Cell body. Nucleus. . .


LOCALITIES VII AND X


28 X 37 M (average 32.4 ju) 24 X 25 ;u (average 24.4 ;u)


LOCALITY III


33 X 46 M (average 39.0 m) 28 X 30 yu (average 29.0 m)


The size of the cell bodies and their nuclei in the other layers of the Albino cortex will be considered in a later chapter in this paper.

Figures 3 and 4 give the typical appearance of the pyramids and the ganglion cells, respectively, for each brain-weight group (with a few omissions), all drawn proportional in size to the uncorrected diameters and magnified about 950 times.


V. MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE CORTICAL NERVE CELLS

DURING GROWTH

Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the typical pyramids and the ganglion cells from each brain-weight group, as seen in the sections pre


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


133


pared by me, from the material fixed in Bouin's fluid, imbedded in paraffine, stained with the carbol-thionine, and projected and enlarged by a fixed number of diameters. The size of the pictures, therefore, corresponds to the uncorrected measurements given in tables 1 and 2.

Though they are increasing in volume very rapidly after birth, the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis retain up to a brain weight of 0.6 gram (VI, 6 days in age) the characteristics of the



Fig. 3 Showing somi-diagrammatically the increase in size and the morphological changes, in the typical pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. The Roman nmnber by each cell figure indicates the brain weight group from which the typical pyramid was selected and the drawing made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according to the uncorrected measurements.


134


NAOKI SUGITA



Fig. 4 Showing scmi-diagraminatically the increase in size and the morphological changes in the typical ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat. The Roman number by each cell figure indicates the brain-weight group from which the typical ganglion cell was selected and the drawing made. All cell figures have been uniformly magnified to 950 diameters, according to the uncorrected measurements.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 135

fetal form of the cells, ^ represented by a relatively large, round nucleus thinly enveloped by a small amount of homogeneous cytoplasm and with processes from both poles. The Nissl bodies begin to appear first in a brain weighing 0.8 gram (VIII), showing first in a part of cytoplasm adjoining the nucleus at the apical pole and forming the so-called 'Kernkappe.' The cytoplasm matures rapidly in structure as the brain weight increases from 0.8 to 1.2 grams. As the measurements show, the nucleus attains nearly the full size when the brain weighs 0.95 gram (10 days), but at that phase the cytoplasm has not yet been fully developed. It is meagre in mass, enveloping the nucleus thinly,



Fig. 5 iShowing the cerebral cortex proper at the locality II (fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a) on a fetal brain of the albino rat. Body weight about 1.0 gram, body length (neck-rump) about 19.5 mm., eighteenth day of gestation. Magnification of about 500 diameters, measured directly on the slide.

the Nissl bodies not being yet fully differentiated, but only suggesting the 'Kernkappe.' The cell continues to grow very slowly up to a brain weight of 1.1 to 1.3 grams or about 20 to 30 days in age. Then, as the age advances, the sizes of both the cell body and of the nucleus slowly diminish, while within the cytoplasm the differentiation of the Nissl bodies progresses. As the differentiation progresses, the general tone of color of the section

^ The form of the fetal nerve cells from the locality II of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat is shown diagrammatically in figure 5, which was taken from an Albino fetus of 1.0 gram in body weight, 19.5 mm. in body length at the eighteenth day of gestation. The cortex proper, not regarding the transitional layer, consists of four or five rows of cells with scanty cytoplasm. The average diameter of the nucleus is about 5 to 7 micra on the slide and the thickness of the cortex at this age is about 0.06 mm. on the slide.


136 NAOKI SUGITA

changes from violet to blue, owing to the deeper staining of the Nissl bodies and of the intercellular tissue with the carbolthionine. The apical dendrite thickens rapidly during the period in which the brain weight increases from 1.0 to 1.3 grams, but the basal dendrites are not clearly stained until the brain attains 1.6 grams in weight. Throughout the later life, the cytoplasm is slowly but continuously decreasing in the absolute mass as the age advances, and the size of the nucleus is also diminishing. The nucleolus in the nucleus attains also its full size (the diameter is somewhat less than 2 micra) at the time when the nucleus has attained the maximum size, but it tends to grow shghtly in late rages, w^hile the nucleus show some decrease in size.

The structure of the nucleus of the pyramids is not clearly demonstrable with this stain. As far as can be judged from the present preparations, the chromatin substance in the nucleus begins to develop notably only after the brain has attained the weight of 1.0 gram, and after the nucleus has passed its phase of rapid enlargement.

From the foregoing it will be seen that up to a brain weight of 0.95 gram, the pyramids may be regarded as in the preparatory stage of structural development, attaining at the end of this period nearly the full size of the cell body and of the nucleus. And after this stage increase and differentiation in the cytoplasm and the nucleus chromatin continue slowly until a brain weight of 1.1 to 1.3 grams. After that time they begin rather to diminish in size, but nevertheless, to advance more and more in differentiation, which latter change probably indicates the maturing of the function of the pyramids. Morphologically, the pyramids first attain their fully mature aspects at a brain weight of about 1.6 grams (about 50 days in age).

In my previous studies on the development of the cortex (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), I named three phases of cortical growth in the early life of the albino rat; the first phase: from birth to the tenth day; the second phase: from the tenth to the twentieth day, and the third phase: from the twentieth to the ninetieth day. Applying this series of phases to the cytological development of the pyramids, the following appears.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 137

In the first phase occurs the rapid enlargement of the cell body and the nucleus, the cell retaining still the fetal form, and not showing any significant differentiation in the internal structure. The Nissl bodies first appear as the so-called ' Kernkappe' at the end of this phase. The tone of color of the sections stained with the carbol-thionine is rather violet.

In the second phase, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus continues to increase, but very slowly, and both attain their maximum sizes at the end of this phase. The differentiation in cytoplasm goes slowly on and the chromatin in the nucleus begins also to differentiate. The tone of the stain is transitional from violet to blue.

Throughout the third phase and afterwards, the size of the cell body and of the nucleus decreases slowly from the maximum values attached at the end of the second phase. But the differentiations of the cytoplasm and the nucleus chromatin steadily continue as the age advances. The apical dendrites gain in diameter and the basal dendrites begin to take the stain. The nucleus sometimes shows the 'Kernfalte.' The tone of the stain is rather blue and the contour of the pyramids clear cut.

The ganglion cells of the lamina ganglionaris enlarge very rapidly and attain nearly their full size at the age of ten days — somewhat earlier than do the pyramids. But the morphological changes which take place in the ganglion cell body and the nucleus are similar to those just described in the pyramids. In the lamina ganglionaris there can be recognized two distinct kinds of nerve cells, one the smaller-sized pyramids, which seem to be very like the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis, and the other, the larger-sized neurons, which are usually called ganglion cells or giant cells and which characterize the layer. Some of the cells found in the lamina ganglionaris and which grow to be the ganglion cells are from the first somewhat large-sized. These develop more rapidly than the other small cells in this layer, which are intermingled with them. In earlier stages the ganglion cells manifest no structural difference or characteristics marking them off from the smaller cells, but differ only in the size of the cell body and of the nucleus. They retain their fetal


138 NAOKI SUGITA

appearance, that is, an ovoid form with a relatively large nucleus also ovoid or ellipsoid in form and a small amount of envelop-: ing cytoplasm, which seems almost homogeneous in its staining, together with slender processes, until a brain weight of 0.75 gram. The Nissl bodies begin at first to appear in a brain weighing 0.9 gram, as the 'Kernkappe' covering the apical part of the nucleus. The differentiation of the cytoplasm becomes more and more distinct as the brain weight increases and, in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams, the section as a whole takes a blue tone. This change in color tone is probably due to the development of the Nissl bodies in the cytoplasm and the structural changes in the intercellular tissue. The apical dendrites rapidly thicken in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams and, in brains weighing more than 1.3 grams, we see distinctly some relatively thick basal dendrites and the axis-cylinder becomes visible. The mass of the cytoplasm and the differentiation of the Nissl bodies proceeds steadily as the age advances. In the fully grown brain we see very often small satellite cells surrounding or indenting the cytoplasm of the ganglion cells, though satellite cells appear in relation to some other types of neurons also. Whatever the significance of these satellite cells, it is to be noted that in younger brains they are very rarely seen. The outline of the ganglion cell body is not necessarily sharp nor is the form regularly pyramidal, being sometimes indeed quite irregular and often appearing ovoid or ellipsoid in shape. Lipochrome or fat pigment, usually seen in the adult human cells of this type, is never seen in those of the adult albino rat, even in old age.

The nucleus of the young ganglion cell seems quite simple in structure and it attains nearly the full size in a brain weighing 0.95 gram. After passing this stage, the chromatin structure of the nucleus begins to appear. The size of the nucleus may be said to remain practically the same after this stage, while the cytoplasmic development continues relatively rapidly. The 'Kernfalte' is sometimes visible in brains weighing more than 1.5 grams. The nucleolus in the nucleus of the ganglion cells attains also nearly the full size (diameter is somewhat less than 4 micra) at the phase when the nucleus has reached nearly


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 139

the full size (10 days), but continues to grow steadily, though slightly, throughout later life. The size of the nucleolus in the ganglion cells is relatively much larger than in the pyramids.

As for the developmental phases of the ganglion cells according to age, a statement similar to that made concerning the pyramids of the lamina pyramidalis holds true, though in the ganglion cells the size development seems to be accomphshed in general somewhat earlier. In a brain under 1.2 grams in weight, more mature ganglion cells are seen mixed up with those less mature, indicating that the development of the ganglion cells is not uniform, but that some progress more slowly. In a brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, all the ganglion cells seem to have already passed the first phase of development in size, and all the cells are now of full size and probably fully functional.

One observation which I think it important to notice here is that cells in the same layer but in different parts of the cortex do not always show a like degree of development at a given age. Some cells or some cell groups are more precocious or more retarded than their neighbors. My observations apply only to the size and morphology of the most developed cells found together in a selected locality, regardless of the relative maturity of that locality. So the statement that the ganglion cells attain full size at ten days does not necessarily mean that the lamina ganglionaris is completely mature at that age, but it only applies to the size or morphology of the most advanced cells found in the layer. As a matter of fact, the lamina ganglionaris matures in toto earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams all the ganglion cells found in the lamina ganglionaris are apparently completely mature, while at the same age the lamina pyramidalis still contains many immature cells among the mature ones, and the full maturity of the latter layer is attained only in a brain weighing more than 1.6 grams (more than 50 days in age).

In respect of cell size and morphological changes, the lamina ganglionaris and the lamina multiformis are the earliest to mature all the elements in them, while the lamina pramidalis matures more slowly, for example, and in a section from a brain twenty days old, we can still see many immature cells mixed with the mature ones in this latter layer.


140 NAOKI SUGITA

VI. ON THE NERVE CELLS IN OTHER LAYERS OF THE CEREBRAL

CORTEX

Figure 6 shows a diagram of cell-lamination of the adult albino rat brain, taken from locality II of the sagittal section (fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a). In comparison with the data on the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (III) and the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (V), the measurements of the cells found in the lamina granulans interna (IV) and the lamina multiformis (VI) show nothing peculiar. Generally speaking, the cell body and the nucleus of the granules do not take the stain as well as in the case of the pyramids and remain rather pale in color. The cells of the lamina multiformis, on the other hand, generally stain deeply. Especially the cytoplasm of the cells forming the inner (ental) sublayer of the lamina multiformis tints very well, so that this sublayer is easily distinguished even at a low magnification by the deep staining of the elements.

The granules in the lamina granulans interna (IV) are smaller in size and lie more crowded than do the pyramids. This layer is not clearly differentiated in brains weighing less than 0.6 gram or less than six days of age, at which stage the immature cells of fetal form prevail in both the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina granularis interna and no characteristic granules are shown. On the sections from a brain weighing 0.5 to 0.6 gram, which had been fixed in formaldehyde and imbedded in paraffine, I could see distinctly a dark band due to the deep staining of the ground substance and characteristic for the adult lamina granularis interna (cf. Sugita, '17 a, p. 526), though the contained cells do not show any of the characteristics of the granules. This is probably the first step in the differentiation of the granular layer. Later we see that the cells lying near the lamina ganglionaris become more and more crowded and somewhat small in size compared with the cells lying in the lamina pyramidalis. In an adult brain weighing more than 1.3 grams, a distinct band of smallersized cells (the lamina granularis interna) appears above the lamina ganglionaris.


GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


141


Fig. 6 Diagram of cell-lamination of the frontal cerebral cortex (locality II, fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a) of the adult albino rat brain weighing 1.8 grams, schematically enlarged 66 diameters. I = lamina zonalis, III = lamina pyramidalis, IV = lamina granularis interna, V = lamina ganglionaris, VI = lamina multiformis, which is divided into two sublayers at * by a.band poor in cells.



|ll#'?-'



Mm






J'o V *


■A . f


o»^


Mil


>VI


SaJt- fc'^Jc ^ VT^ ' C jag



THE JOTIRNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


142


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 4 Giving both corrected and the uncorrected values for the two diameters of the cell body and the nucleus respectively, of the granule cells in the lamina granularis interna {IV, fig. 6) for several brain weight groups


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


Group II (birth)

Group III

Group V

Groups VI-VIII

Groups X-XIII

Groups XIII-XV

Groups XVI and above


CELL BODY


Corrected


M

12x15 14x16 15x18 16x20 19x21 16x20 15x20


On the slide


M (10 X 12) (11 X 13) (12 X 14) (13 X 16) (15 X 17) (13 X 16) (12 X 16)


Corrected


11 xl2 12x14 14x15 15x16 16x19 15x16 14x16


On the slide


M

(9 X 10)

(10 X 11)

(11 X 12) (12 X 13) (13 X 15) (12 X 13) (11 X 13)


The average size of the granules measured on the sections here used is given in table 4. In brain-weight Groups II-V, at which stages the layer is not yet clearly differentiated, the measurements were made on the small cells which lie nearest to the lamina ganglionaris and the cells were assumed to be the future granules.

So, in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams (Group XVI), the size of the granules diminishes shghtly as the age advances. Most of the nuclei of the granules are more or less elongated or elliptical in shape and the cytoplasm is very scanty, so that sometimes there can be seen only a thin envelope of the cytoplasm around the nucleus.

In short, the granules at the earlier age are ahnost equal to the growing pyramids in size, but they increase in size somewhat less rapidly as compared with the pyramids, among which they are interspersed at first. They reach their maximum size in a grain weighing between 1.2 and 1.4 grams, and after that period the size decreases as the age advances, showing ^ somewhat compact nucleus.

As already indicated in a former paper (Sugita, '17 a), the lamina multiformis is divided by a pale band (fig. 6,*), poor in cells, into two sublayers. The polymorphous cells in the ectal sublayer have the shapes indicated by their name, but in general they are pyramidal in form, the apex directed ectally, being somewhat flattened and rich in cytoplasm, as compared with the


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 143

pyramids. The density of the polymorphous cells in this sublayer is greatest at the earlier ages. During the early ages the most densely crowded pyramids are in the lamina pyramidalis, while by contrast the lamina multiformis seems rather poor in cells. But in adults the cell population of the ectal sublayer of the lamina multiformis appears to be only slightly less than that of the lamina pyramidalis and the size of the polymorphous cells appears nearly equal to that of the pyramids, though, by an exact measurement, they prove to be slightly larger (fig. 6). The shape of polymorphous cells is not uniform and they show many dendritic processes, irregularly arranged. Some, though pyramidal, lie obliquely or transversely, while some hold a reversed position, with the apical dendrite directed entally (Martinotti's cells).

The cells of the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are quite different in their appearance. They are polygonal or spindle-shaped and generally lie with their long axis in the plane of the lamina. The cytoplasm of the cells is massive and takes the stain well. The Nissl bodies, however, are not well differentiated. Though not always pyramidal in shape, the assumed apex of the cells appears to be directed towards the occipital pole in the sagittal and the horizontal sections or towards the ventral surface in the frontal section, thus indicating the direction of the migration of the nerve cells from the matrix to the cortex proper. As already stated by me (Sugita, '17a), this sublayer probably serves as a secondary station for cells migrating from the matrix at the ventricular wall to their final destination in the cortex and the number of cells in this sublayer diminishes as the age of the brain advances. So one has some reason to think that a fraction of the cells found in this sublayer are still in transit, at least during the early ages. It should be noted at least that the cells of this sublayer have a morphology in respect of the mass and the staining reaction of their cytoplasm which indicates the stage of migration.

The neuroglia nuclei are abundantly scattered in the ental cortical layers (that is, in the lamina multiformis and the lamina ganglionaris) as compared with the ectal layers (that is, in the


144


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 5

Giving the cubes of the average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of both the pyramids {lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells (lamina ganglionaris) at birth, 10 days, 20 days and 90 days, the ages indicating respectively the beginning of each developmental phase. The values given represent merely the relative volumes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei. Ratios based on the initial value taken as unity are given for each column. The data, on the basis of which the calculations were made, were taken from table 3



BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


PYRAMIDS IN THE LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


GANGLION CELLS I.N THE L.tMINA GANGLIONARIS


THE BEGINNING OF EACH


Cell


body


Nucleus


Cell body


Nucleus


DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE


S5 >


la


> o

M


o


> <o

Pi >


_0


^ 3 Ph >


.2

1


Birth


II

IX

XI

XVIII


m3

215 1185 1315 1170


1.00 5.51 6.12 5.44


m3

119

775 790 665


1.00 6.50 6.63

5.58


m3

675 2925 3070 3530


1.00 4.33 4.55 5.23


m3

330 1440 1415 1490


1.00


10 days


4.36


20 days


4.29


90 days


4.52




lamina granulans interna and the lamina pyramidalis) (see fig. 6). At earlier ages, neuroglia nuclei are comparatively scarce in the lamina pyramidalis, but at maturity they are well distributed in this layer, though in the lamina multiformis they are found always abundantly. With the method of . staining here used, we can distinguish two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei, one staining a relatively deep blue, which is the smaller in size (2 to 5 micra in diameter on the slide) , with crowded granules in the chromatin sometimes arranged radially ('Radkern'), and surrounded by evident cytoplasm, and the other staining rather paler and with a violet tone, vesicular ('blasig') in appearance, somewhat larger in size (3 to 6 micra in diameter on the slide) , with scanty chromatin and enveloped by a small amount of cytoplasm. This metachromatism in the staining of the two kinds is very remarkable. Both kinds are found intermingled. In the white matter glia cells are distributed in rough chains, while in the cortex they are, under normal conditions, less well distnbuted than in the white matter. Sometimes, especially in old age, the glia cells are found gathered around the ganghon cells or the pyramids or near the blood-vessels. The satelhte cells which are attached to or


GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 145

even invade the cytoplasm of the nerve cells, are usually regarded as neuroglia cells.

vThe method here used, of staining with the carbol-thionine the material fixed in Bouin's fluid and imbedded in paraffine, reveals clearly only the size and shape of the nerve cells in the cerebral cortex. The more detailed structure of the cytoplasm and of the nucleus or the structure of the axis-cylinder and dendrites is not brought out by this method, and for the investigation of these characters other methods are required.

VII. DISCUSSION

According to the foregoing observation, the full size of the largest pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (about 25 daj^s in age)^ is about 21 x 27 /x for the cell body and 19 x 21 n for the nucleus, and the measurement of those largest atbirth^ is 11 x 15 /x for the cell body and 10 x 11 m for the nucleus, in the fresh condition of the material. The full size of the largest ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (at localities VII and X, about 25 days, for example)"* is 27 x 37 /j. for the cell body and 24 x 25 fx for the nucleus, and the measurement of the largest ganglion cells at birth^ is 17x21 /x for the cell body and 14x16 /x for the nucleus, all in the fresh condition of the brain.

If the volume of the cell bodies or of the nuclei be comparable among themselves according to the cubes of their average diameters, the figures given in table 5 "vvhich presents the cubes of the average diameters of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the nerve cells at different ages, and which were calculated from the data in table 3, may be used as the basis of discussions on the volume development of the cells. It will be seen from table 5, by a

■* To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body and the nucleus in Groups XI-XIII in the frontal and the horizontal sections (tables 1 and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected b^ multiplying by the mean correction-coefficient of Groups XI-XIII for the frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).

To obtain the values here given, the uncorrected diameters of the cell body and the nucleus in Group II in the frontal and the horizontal sections (tables 1 and 2) were respectively averaged and the results were corrected by multiplying by the mean correction-coefficient of Group II for the frontal and the horizontal sections (see table 3).


146 NAOKI SUGITA

simple calculation, that at birth the largest ganglion cells are almost 3.1 times as voluminous, at 20 days about 2.3 times, and at 90 days 3.0 times, as the pyramids of the same stage, and the nuclei of the ganglion cells are at birth 2.8 times as voluminous, at 20 days 1.8 times, and at 90 days, 2.2 times as the nuclei of the pyramids of the same stage, if both kinds of cells are assumed to have the similar forms throughout their enlargement.^ It is also seen that, using the same method, the cell body of the pyramids has increased from birth 6.1 times in volume at 20 days and 5.4 times at 90 days, and the nuclei 6.6 times at 20 days and 5.6 times at 90 days, while the cell body of the ganglion cells has increased only 4.6 times at 20 days, 5.2 times at 90 days and the nuclei of the ganglion cells 4.3 times at 20 days and 4.5 times at 90 days, as compared with their initial volumes at birth.

It may therefore be concluded that, throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells after birth, the rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nuclei and in the cell bodies of both kinds of cells, though the rate is slightly higher in the pyramids than in the ganglion cells in both the cell body and the nucleus during the first twenty days after birth, because the initial volume of the pyramids is small at birth.

As the shape of the cell body is different from that of the nucleus, it is not proper' to compare directly their respective volumes as determined by the foregoing use of their diameters, but they must be first reduced to forms which are comparable as

• Here the nucleus was considered as an ellipsoid, the volume of which is to be calculated by the formula ^ira'^b, when b is the long radius and a is the short radius of the body. As the transverse diameter (n.i) of the nucleus is equal to 2a and the longitudinal diameter (n^) is equal to 26 the volumes of the nuclei may be compared among themselves simply by the factor a-b or ni^nj.

On the other hand, if the volume of the cell body was considered as a circular cone, in which the diameter of the basic circle is equal to the transverse diameter (ci) of the cell body and the height of the cone is equal to the longitudinal diameter (C2) of the cell body, then the volume of the cell body will be

Jtt ( ^ yc2, and the values for the relative volumes of the cell bodies may be compared on the basis of the factor Ci-Cj.

As the average diameters given in table 3 are respectively the square roots of the products nin-i and CiCo, the cubes of the average diameters will be approximately proportional to the values nihi2 and ci^c-2, respectively.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 147

explained in the accompanying note and then table 5 may be consulted again. ^ It is seen from table 5 that at birth the entire cell has almost double the volume of the nucleus, so that the cytoplasm and the nucleus have nearly the same volume. The nucleus-plasm relation changes according to the brain weight. In the pyramids, the total cell body comes to 1.7 times at 20 days and to 1.8 times at 90 days, compared with the volume of the nucleus at the same age. This is owing to the relatively rapid growth of the nucleus. In the ganglion cells, on the other hand, the total cell body is 2.2 times at 20 days and 2.4 times at 90 days, compared with the volume of the nucleus at the same stage. As the pyramids decreases in size after 30 days, the cell size of the pyramids in old age (brain weight more than 2.0 grams) becomes almost equal to that at 8 days of age, but the nucleus-plasm relation is quite different at the two stages. At 8 days the nucleus is relatively large (total cell body is 1.7 or less times the nuclear volume), but in old age the volume of cytoplasm has increased somewhat in relation to the nuclear volume (total cell body is nearly 2.0 times the nuclear volume). These values for comparison were taken from the data here used alone, but, as already noted, sections which were taken from material fixed in 95 per cent alcohol or in Bouin's fluid and imbedded in celloidin show a nucleus which is relatively smaller. In series of sections which have been prepared by methods other than that used by me, the volume relations between the cell body and the nucleus (nucleus-plasm relation) would probably be different from those which I have reported here, but I think it will be fair to assume that the growth changes in the cell body on

^ If the cell body were considered as having an ellipsoidal form with diameters equal to Ci and c^ which denote respectively the transverse longitudinal diameters measured on the cell body the volume, would be \t^( ^ )'{ ^ ) ^'^ ^t^Cx^CiAnd if, on the other hand, the same cell body were considered as a circular cone, the volume may be calculated by 57r( -^ \ ^co, or ^-kc-cCi. As the difference between

these two formulas is not higher than ^ of crC2, I have here compared the

volumes of the cell body and of the nucleus under the assumption that both have the ellipsoidal form, employing once more the figures given in table 5 as the basis of comparison.


148 NAOKI SUGITA

one hand and in the nucleus on the other would probably be similar by the use of any uniform method, even if the absolute values differed for the different methods, and none of them gave exactly the fresh values.

It is remarkable that both the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical cells attain nearly their full size at an early stage of development (at about ten days of age) and then continue to undergo cytomorphic development, without much change in cell size (chart 1). As already pointed out in former papers (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b), the elementary completeness of the cerebral cortex of the albino rat is attained at the age of twenty days, the final thickness of the cortex and the total number of the cortical nerve cells being apparently reached at this age. .\fter this age, the volume of the cortex increases as the age ad\'ances nearly in proportion to, or at a slightly slower rate than, the total volume of the cerebrum. As noted, the size of the pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis attains the maximum size in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams and the volume of the cell body and the nucleus becomes slightly less during later phases, while the size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris increases slightly as the age advances, even after the above-named stage. It must be concluded, therefore, that the subsequent increase in cortical volume is effected by changes in structures other than the cell bodies themselves. And, as a consequence, in mature brains, the cell density in the cortex diminishes more and more, as has been already pointed out in a previous paper (table 3, Sugita, '18 b).

It is very interesting to find that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells all have reached nearly their maximum at the same age of twenty days, which is the weaning time of the rat. These relations appear also in the mouse. According to the results obtained by Isenschmid ('11), the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the mouse, measured at a fixed locality — corresponding to locality VII in my sections — attains nearly its full value something before seventeen days in age. And according to the systematic work of Stefanowska ('98), who has studied the devel


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 149

opment of the cortical nerve cells by the method of silver impregnation of Golgi, the cortical nerve cells of the mouse have completed their development in respect of their attachments at the age of fifteen days, and the age of fifteen days is the weaning time of the mouse. It appears, therefore, that the completion of certain features of cortical development in relation to the weaning time, the time when the j^oung become independent of the mother, is similar in both the albino rat and the mouse.

VIII. SUMMARY

1. The size of the nerve cells most advanced in development from a fixed locality of the cerebral cortex was systematically^ measured and the developmental changes during postnatal growth studied on the material represented by the grains of 128 albino rats of different ages. The data have been averaged for each brain-weight group and then corrected for the fresh condition of the material, using the correction-coefficients devised for this purpose. The results are given in tables and charts.

2. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII) is cell body 21 x 27 /j. and nucleus 19 x 21 n and the largest size at birth is cell body 11 x 15 m and nucleus 10 x 11 /x. The size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris at the same stage (about twenty-five days in age, average of Groups XI-XIII) is cell body 27 x 37^ and nucleus 24 x 25 fx, while the largest size at birth is cell body 17 x 21 ix and nucleus 14 x 16 n.

In the full-grown albino rat (Groups XVI-XX), the average size of the pyramids is cell body 20 x 26 fj., nucleus 18x19 m and the average size of the ganglion cells is cell body 28 x 38 /jl, nucleus 24 x 25 //.

3. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age (1.1 to 1.3 grams in brain weight) . Up to the tenth day of age they retain their fetal morphology. After having passed the maximum at twenty to thirty days, they diminish in size, but the internal structure matures more and more as the age advances.


150 NAOKI SUGITA

4. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain nearly their full size at ten days (0.95 gram in brain weight), when they still show the fetal appearance. After this stage, the size of the cell body increases slowly but steadily as the age advances, while the nucleus remains nearly unchanged in size throughout life.

5. Both the pyramids and the ganglion cells retain clearly the fetal character of form until the brain weighs 0.6 gram or more. The differentiation of the cytoplasm and the Nissl bodies begins to appear in my preparations first in a brain weighing something more than 0.9 gram, the latter showing first as the 'Kernkappe' at the apex of the nucleus. The cells exhibit the mature appearance in a brain weighing more than 1 .4 grams.

6. As for the maturation of the several layers, in general, disregarding the maturation of the individual cells in them, the lamina ganglionaris is completed earliest, so that in a brain weighing 1.3 grams (thirty days in age) all the ganglion cells in this layer are apparently mature, while at the same age the lamina pyramidalis is less mature as it contains relatively many immature cells mingled with the others. The full maturity of the lamina pyramidalis is attained, probably, in a brain weighing 1.6 grams (more than fifty days in age).

7. Throughout the developmental stage of the nerve cells, the rate of enlargement is almost similar in the nucleus and in the cell body in both the pyramids and the ganglion cells ; but when the pyramids are compared with the ganglion cells it appears that' the rate is more rapid in the pyramids than in the ganglion cells in both the cell body and the nucleus during the first ten days after birth.

8. The lamina granulans interna is first differentiated in brains weighing more than 0.6 gram. In younger brains it is confused with the pyramidal layer and cannot be clearly discriminated. The granules attain their maximum size in brains weighing 1.0 to 1.3 grams and then diminish slightly. The final size ( orrected) of the granules in Groups XVI and above, is cell body 15 X 20 // and nucleus 14 x 16 ix.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 151

9. The polymorphous cells in the ectal sublayer of the lamina multiformis are slightly larger than the pyamids of the same age. The polymorphous cells in the ental sublayer of the lamina multiformis are somewhat larger than those of the ectal sublayer, but are irregular in shape and rich in cytoplasm.

10. Two kinds of the neuroglia nuclei are found in the cortex. One staining deep blue with the carbol-thionine, smaller in size (2 to 5 micra in diameter on the slide) and having a radiating structure of the chromatin, and the other staining paler, swollen ('blasig') and somewhat larger in size (3 to 6 micra in diameter on thp slide).

11. Taking a general view of the d^ta already presented in this series of studies, it is very interesting to note that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells all attain nearly their full values at the same age of twenty days (1.15 grams in brain weight) ; that is, at the weaning time of the albino rat.

PART II

ON THE INCREASE IN SIZE OF SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE NORWAY RAT (mUS NORVEGICUS) COMPARED WITH THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES IN THE ALBINO RAT

To compare with the results of the preceding study on the growth in size of the cortical nerve cells in the albino rat brain, data were gathered for the cortical cells of the Norway rat also. According to my previous studies (Sugita, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b), the measurements of the cerebral cortex in the Norway rat in thickness, in total number of cells, etc., have shown some interesting relations to the corresponding measurenients for the Albino. Donaldson and Hatai ('11) made a comparison of these two animals in respect of their body measurements and the size of the central nervous system, and concluded that the greater weight of the brain in the Norway rat is probably due to an enlargement of the constituent neurons rather than to an increase in their number. As my former study (Sugita, '18 b) has de


152


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 6

Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina gangi.ionaris measured at the fixed, locality {locality VII) on the frontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are given for each brain iveight group only. This table is comparable with table 1



XO. OF


BRAIN


BRAIN- WEIGHT


GROUP


CASES


WEIGHT




grams


NXI


3


1.164


NXIII


1


1.369


NXIV


6


1.430


NXV


3


1.546


NXVI


3


1.629


N XVII


4


1.739


N XVIII


2


1.829


NXIX


2


1,972


NXX


2


2.052


NXXI


2


2.172


N XXIII


1


2.345


LAMIN'.^ PYR.AMIDALIS


Cell body diameter


Transv. Longit


15.2 15.5 15.4 14.8 14.6 14.9 15.0 14.8 14.5 14.3 14.6


20.8 20.9 20.6 19.8 19.8 20.4 20.7 19.4 19.8 20.0 21.0


Nucleus diameter


Transv. Longit


14.5 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.4 13.8 14.1 13.9 13.6 13.3 13.3


15.5 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.1 14.7 14.8 14.3 14.3 14.2 13.9


LAMIXA GANGLIONARIS


Cell body diameter


Transv. Longit


20.5 20.6

21.6 20.5 21.2 21.9 23.5 24.3 23.9 23.9 25.0


29.0 29.9 29.6 28.9 29.0 29.8 32.8 33.7 33.2 34.0 36.0


Nucleus diameter


Transv. Longit


18.1 18.3 18.4 17.8 17.8 18.9 20.7 20.3 20.3 19.4 18.51


19.3 20.2 19.4 19.6 19.2 20.2 21.5 21.6 21.6 21.0 20.51


1 In this group the size of the nucleus of the ganglion cells has fallen down remarkably (see also chart 2), which fact was not seen in the Albino (Group XX). Whether this is due to an actual change in old age or due to incidental variation cannot be definitely affirmed here.

termined that in both fornivS the total number of the nerve cells in the cerebral cortex is practically the same, it becomes desirable to compare the size of the nerve cells in the two animals in order to test the assumption of the above authors.

The material used in. this study comprised 54 Norway rats, sexes combined, the data for which are given in tables 1 and 2 in a former paper (Sugita, '18 a) and which are the same material that was formerly employed for the other measurements on the cortex. It seems unnecessary to repeat these tables here. »

In the selection of the localities in which the largest cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris were measured and in making the measurements, the same procedure was followed as has been described minutely for the albino rat in part I of this paper.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


153


TABLE 7

Giving the average uncorrected diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris measured at the fixed locality {locality X) on the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The data are given for each brain weight group only. This table is comparable with table 2


BRAIN WEIGHT GROUP


NXI

NXIII

NXIV

NXV

NXVI

NXVII

X XVIII

NXIX

NXX

NXXI

X XXIII


NO. OF


BRAIN


CASES


WEIGHT



grams


3


1.164


1


1.343


5


1.447


2


1.520


4


1.663


4


1.747


2


1.843


1


1.953


2


2.018


2


2.156


1


2.345


LAMIN.l. PYRAMIDALIS


Cell body diameter


Transv. Longit.


15.4 15.2 15.4 14.8 14.9 14.8 14.5 15.1 15.5 14.7 15.0


20.3 19.9 20.6 20.2 20.0 20.0 20.2 20.8 21.1 20.9 20.8


Nucleus diameter


Transv. Longit


14.1 14.1

14.4 13.9 13.8 13.7 13.8 14.5 14.2 13.8 13.4


15.4 15.1 15.3 15.1 14.9 15.0 14.7 15.3 14.7 14.4 14.0


LAMINA GANGLIONARIS


Cell body diameter


Transv. Longit


20.6 20.4 20.8 20.5 21.0 20.9 20.2 23.5 23.5 23.0 25.8


29.3 28.2 29.0 28.8 29.8 29.5 29.4 30.5 31.0 29.4 32.0


Nucleus diameter


Transv. Longit


18.0 17.8 18.4 18.2 18.3 18.5 18.0 19.5 18.8 18.8 18.41


19.2 19.0 19.7 19.0 19.3 19.5 19.5 20.3 19.0 20.0 19.21


1 See note on table 6.


The results of the measurements aire presented in tables 6 and 7 arranged in the same way as in the corresponding tables 1 and 2 for the Albino. Chart 2 shows graphically the data presented in table 8 which gives the average diameters of the cell bodies and the nuclei for each brain-weight group, corrected for the fresh condition of the material, by multiplying by the correctioncoefficient for the group, which is cited from my previous paper (Sugita, '18 a) and explicitly given in table 8 also. Charts 3 and 4 show some comparisons in cell sizes in the two forms. Chart 3 was plotted according to the actual brain weights of the two forms, and chart 4 was plotted, using the same data for the Norway, but entering these according to the brain weights reduced by 18 per cent, which presumably correspond to the brain weights of the Albino at the same age (see Sugita, '18 a), while the data of the Albino were plotted according to the actual brain weight.


154


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 8

Giving the corrected final average diameters of the nerve cells and their nuclei in the lamina pyramidalis and the laynina ganglionaris measured on the frontal and the horizontal sections of the Norway rat brain. The average values of the two for each brain weight group are also given. The correction-coefficient for each brain weight group ^ was taken from previous papers (Sugita, '18 a, '18 b). F = frontal section. H — horizontal section.





LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


LAMINA GANGLIONARIS


BRAIN WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT






GROUP


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter



grams



M


M


M


M


FN XI


1.164


1.34


23.8


20.1


32.7


25.0


HNXI


1.164


1.30


23.0


19.1


31.8


24.2



1.164



23.4


19.6


32.3


24.6


F N XIII


1.369


1.33


23.9


19.8


33.0


25.5


H N XIII


1.343


1.39


24.2


20.3


33.4


25.6



1.356



24-1


20.1


33.2


25.6


FN XIV


1.430


1.35


24.0


19.7


34.2


25.5


HNXIV


1.447


1.36


24.2


20.3


33.5


25.9



H39



24-1


20.0


33.9


25.7


FN XV


1.546


1.40


23.9


20.2


34.2


26.2


HNXV


1.520


1.42


24.5


20.5


34.5


26.4



1.533



24-2


20.4


34.4


26.3


F N XVI


1.629


1.40


23.8


19.3


34.7


25.9


HNXVI


1.663


1.34


23.2


19.2


33.5


25.2



1.646



23.5


19.3


34.1


25.6


F N XVII


1.739


1.37


23.8


19.5


35.1


26.7


H N XVII


1.747


1.35


23.4


19.3


33.5


25.7



1.743



23.6


19.4


34.3


26.2


F N XVIII


1.829


1.32


23.2


19.0


36.7


27.8


H N XVIII


1.843


1.39


23.8


19.7


34.0


26.0



1.836



23.5


19.4


35.4


26.9


FN XIX


1.972


1.33


22.5


18.8


38.0


27.9


HNXIX


1.953


1.34


23.6


19.8


35.7


26.5



1.963



23.1


19.3


36.8


27.2


FN XX


2.052


1.36


23.1


18.9


38.3


28.5


HNXX


2.018


1.32


23.9


19.0


35.6


25.0



2.035



23.5


19.0


37.0


26.8


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


155




TABLE 8— Continued







L.\MINA PYRAMIDALIS


LAMINA GANGLIONARI8


BRAIN WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


CORRECTIONCOEFFICIENT






GROUP


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter


Cell body diameter


Nucleus diameter



grams



M


M


M


M


FN XXI


2.172


1.39


23.5


19.2


39.6


28.1


HNXXI


2.156


1.34


23-. 5


18.9


34.8


26.0



2.164



23.5


19.1


37.2


27.1


F N XXIII


2.345


1.26


22.0


17.2


37.8


24.6


H N XXIII


2.345


1.28


22.6


17.4


36.8


24.1



2.345



22.3


17.3


37.3


244'


^See note on table 6.


Chart 2 shows for the Norway also that the gangHon cells are enlarging slowly but steadily throughout life, while the pyramids rather decrease in size slightly in later life, after having attained the maximum size in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams. So, in the Norway as in the case of the Albino, the pyramidal cells in the lamina pyramidalis undergo some diminution in the adult brain.

Chart 3 gives a comparison of the cell sizes in brains of like weight in the two forms. In Group N XI, the sizes of the cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids are slightly smaller in the Norway than in the Albino. This is probably explicable by the fact that the Norway brain at this stage is still immature and younger than the Albino brain of like weight. Such a relation has been revealed in other measurements also; for example, in the cortical thickness, the cortical area, etc. (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b). The ganglion cells in the Norway are larger than in the Albino and the difference in the size of the ganglion cells in the two forms increases somewhat as the brain weight advances.

In Groups above N XIII, the ceU size (pyramidal and ganglion cells) in the Norway proved to be generally larger than that in the Albino of the same brain weight.

The summary in table 9 gives the average diameters for the adult Albino (Groups XIII to XX) and the adult Norway (Groups N XIII to N XX).


156


NAOKl SUGITA


TABLE 9

Comparison of diameters of cortical cells in the Norway and the albino rats. The data used here are the averages in Groups XIII to XX and in Groups N XIII to N XX, taken from tables 3 and 8. Differences in diameter and in volume are calcxilated here, the data of the Albino being taken as the standard of comparison



AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


PYR.\MIDS


GANGLION CELLS



Cell body


Nucleus


Cell body


Nucleus


Albino

Norway


grams

1.691 1.694


22.9 23.7


18.8

19.6


32.4 34.9


24.9 26.3


Difference in diameter

Difference in volume


3.5% 10.9%


4.2% 13.1%


7.7% 24.9%


5.6% 17.8%


This summary shows that in mature brains of like weight, the pyramids (cell body and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those in the Albino in average diameters by about 4 per cent and in volume by about 12 per cent, and the ganglion cells (cell body and nucleus) in the Norway exceed those in the Albino in average diameters by about 7 per cent and in volume by about 20 per cent, if the Albino be taken as the standard of comparison. It may be said, therefore, that in the Norway the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris exceed much in size those in the Albino, while the pyramids in the Norway are only somewhat greater than those in the Albino.

In chart 4, which gives a comparison of the nerve-cell sizes between brains of presumably the same age in the two forms, it is shown clearly that the changes in sizes of cell body and the nucleus according to age are quite similar in both forms. The pyramids attain the maximum size at about twenty to thirty days (in the Albino in brains weighing 1.1 to 1.3 grams, in the Norway in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, which both come to the same relative position in the curves), and after that they decrease slowly. The ganglion cells in the Norway grow more rapidly than those in the Albino, even in later life. In the latter the ganglion cells remain almost unchanged in size in brains weighing 1.0 to 1.6 grams, while those in the Norway increase in size rather steadily as the age advances.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


157


I

40


)iame


er in

micra


I













38 36












-o—


_-^



""GC


.










/







34







,— o— -.



__</^











__.


0^'


"












32

30 28
































26







— -^



_.^-

"^




'n







^^^


-"—


"•'



■-.--■










24















s




■^'l





■~-°— '


-^

-.-.


— -- o-

r-"


— ^


.^




22 20



1












~„








^^









PC'









■\, [_.


,





^




48







— •


^














^.



.< 1













PN'



' 1















i2 ^






























s

















i i 6 !














/i





1

1










„ 1 i



1 i











i 1


i ! '









10 11 12 1.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 2.0 21 2.2 23 24 yns.


Chart 2 Showing the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the cortical nerve cells of the Norway rat, plotted according to increasing brain weight. Based on the data in table 7. Graph GC, average diameter of the cell body of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph GN ', average diameter of the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. Graph PC', average diameter of the cell body of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis. Graph PN', average diameter of the nucleus of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis.


THE JOURNAL OF COMPAE.^^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


158


NAOKI SUGTTA


Diaineterinmicra


























/^


—-


GC








.^..










1 ^.


,."


-^'^





.. —


-r


•• —


GC






-







































— -t —

"X





__^


==^I





-—



^ ! GM



\


N





I












2b




i !







1





24 22




-•-i



_^_











■■


.

■"



-•—^.


- —


ri:!:^


~

- —


— — ■


--0


— -"-^


--.


^^




1









"pc




PC




1 ■


""f^




b--^


-r:q- 1 — ^


-.


7— V





18








^^~^>-,^^




^•V^


















^^











rpri!



PM'



i4













1


















1





1



1 (












8





























1



6

4 2 o














1















1



























!



JO it 12 1.3 14- 1.5 16 iT 18 19 2.0 21 12 33 24 yns.


Chart 3 Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to the actual brain weights. The data are taken from tables 3 and 7. The chart has been divided and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent confusion among graphs for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC, and the graphs for the nuclei of the ganglion cells, GN and GN'. In the upper chart: Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Albino. Graph GN', nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino. In the lower chart: Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.


GROWTH OF THE CEEEBRAL CORTEX


159


Diameter in micra.




















/


o^



-fee








-^'


y








^.


^■'

o^"






,




--—


-"be



^ -"


f"


--

"











/





















.-—


-^.

—N


\,





^







^^.-'



\


k



i V».»



/


























^


":;


^



"*"'--'<■.-


! — ' —


^r-jn


OS


1-.:^.


=i-.



1




^^.





\



PC


"pc



^i="





"^




>-«

=— V


'^^




/•


h~^.J












pre


"PN























































1






































1



a9 LO 1.1 32 13 14 15 16 IT IS 19 20 ^s.


Chart 4 J Showing a comparison of sizes of the cell bodies and of the nuclei of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris and of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis in brains of the Norway and the Albino, according to age. The Norway brain weight was reduced by 18 per cent and entered at the corresponding brain weight of the Albino. The data were taken from tables 3 and 7. The chart has been divided and the values 22-26 on the ordinate repeated to prevent confusion among the graphs for the cell bodies of the pyramids, PC and PC, and the graphs for the nuclei of the ganglion cells, GN and ON'. In the upper chart: Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GC, cell body of the ganglion cells in the Albino. Graph GN ', nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Norway. Graph GN, nucleus of the ganglion cells in the Albino. In'the lower chart : Graph PC ', cell body of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PC, cell body of the pyramids in the Albino. Graph PN', nucleus of the pyramids in the Norway. Graph PN, nucleus of the pyramids in the Albino.


160 NAOKI SUGITA

My study of the Norway cortex did not extend to the early life of the animal, but, from the courses of the curves shown in chart 4, it seems probable that, in early life, before ten days after birth, the developmental changes in the cell size would be quite similar to those in the Albino, which have been minutely described in part I, and that we may therefore apply to the Norway rat also the same developmental phases as were formerly applied to the Albino.

Morphological changes in the cytoplasmic and nuclear structures in the Norway rat cells are similar to those in the Albino, if the comparison is made at like ages, so that figures 3 and 4 in part I of this paper may be considered to represent Norway cells as well.

Briefly stated, in the case of the Norway rat, the maximum size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis (in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams) is cell body 21 x 28 m and nucleus 20x21 n; values only slightly larger than those in the Albino. The final size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (in brains weighing 1.9 to 2.3 grams) is cell body 32x43 n and nucleus 26 X 27 n, which is much larger than the corresponding measurements for the Albino.

Nissl bodies are already seen in brains weighing 1.13 grams — the youngest case in my material — but these bodies assume their mature appearance first in brains weighing more than 1.6 grams.. As regards other developmental changes both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, the statements made for the Albino are all applicable to the Norway, if the comparison is made at like ages.

SUMMARY

1. In the full-grown Norway rat (Groups N XIX to N XXIII), the average size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is cell body 20 x 27 ii, nucleus 18x19 m, and the average size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body 32 x 43 n, nucleus 26 x 27 At.

2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size (cell body 21 x 28 m, nucleus 20 x 21 m) in brains weighing 1.3 to 1.5 grams, and after that they slightly diminish


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 161

in size, but the internal structure matures progressively as the brain weight increases. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells increases in size continuously throughout life. The last entry for the nucleus of the ganglion cells is an exception to this statement.

3. As compared with the corresponding cells in the albino rat, the pyramids in the adult Norway rat (Groups N XIII to N XX) exceed those in the Albino in diameter on the average by 4 per cent and in volume by 12 per cent and the ganglion cells also exceed in diameter on the average by 7 per cent and in volume by 20 or more per cent.

4. The course of development and the morphological changes in the Norway cells are similar to those in the albino rat, if compared at like ages. At the same age, the Norway brain weight, less 18 per cent, is taken as equal to the brain weight of the Albino.


162 NAOKT SUGITA

LITERATURE CITED

Allen, Ezra 1916 Studies in cell division in the Albino rat (Mus norvegicus var. alba). II. Experiments on technique, with description of a method for demonstrating the cytological details of dividing cells in brain and testis. Anat. Rec, vol. 10, pp. 565-586.

Donaldson, H. H. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6.

Donaldson, H. H., and Hatai, S. 1911 A comparison of the Norway rat with the albino in respect to body length, brain weight, spinal cord weight and the percentage of water in both the brain and spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, pp. 417-458.

IsENSCHMiD, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abhandl. der Konigl. Preussischen Akad. d. Wissenschaften.

King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material for a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 213-244.

Stefanowska, Michelinb 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales chez las souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Soc. Royale des Sciences nied. et naturelles de Bruxelles,, vol. 7.

SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growl-h of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Oomp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3. 1918 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.

1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the Albino. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.

1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal section of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.


author's abstract of this paper issued by the bibliographic service, march 30.


ON TACTILE RESPONSES OF THE DE-EYED HAMLET (EPINEPHELUS STRIATUS)i

W. J. CROZIER

1 . The observations herein discussed grew out of a first attempt to examine the physiology of excitation of the ' common chemical' sense in a teleost bearing a well-developed investment of scales. The work contemplated was rendered impossible, for reasons which will shortly appear, but the cause of the failure has a distinct bearing upon the original problem and a certain significance in several other directions as well.

Epinephelus striatus Bloch, the 'hamlet' or 'grouper,' was used in these experiments. The tests which were contemplated involved the local application of solutions to the skin of the hamlet, and it was necessary to employ fishes in which the chance of visual response had been eliminated. Recourse was had to the removal of the eyes rather than to the use of temporary blinding devices. Hamlets are exceedingly handy, and the removal of one or both eyes, usually while under chloretone anaesthesia, was followed, by quick recovery. Blinded individuals lived in the laboratory for more than four months.

In preliminary tests different regions of the surface of de-eyed hamlets were examined by applying to them from a pipette small volumes of acid and other solutions. Control experiments quickly demonstrated, however, that these fishes were reactive to the mere presence (or near approach) of the undischarged pipette, even when it contained only sea-water. A thoroughly cleaned glass rod, when carefully brought near a de-eyed hamlet, also induced responses of a deliberate and well-defined character.

A very pronounced degree of sensitivity is manifest in these responses, and the source of stimulation is rather precisely located

^ Contributions from the Bermuda Biological Station for Research. No. 86.

163


164 W. J. CROZIER

by the blind fish. When a clean glass rod is carefully and very slowly brought near one side of the head, say to within 4.5 or 5 cm. of the gill cover, the fish bends in the opposite direction and swims slowly backward; or it may back deliberately away for 10 or 15 cm., then abruptly turn away from the side stimulated and assume a position at right angles to that held before being stimulated. When one side of the caudal peduncle is stimulated in this way, the tail is caused to bend away from that side, and the fish swims forward and usually turns in a complete half-circle away from the area of activation.

Unblinded fishes, when not resting on the bottom, usually give somewhat similar responses, although rarely so if any region other than the anterior end is being 'stimulated' by the near approach of a glass rod. With de-eyed individuals the best results are obtained when the fish is quietly swimming or is stationary in mid-water. As noted by Jordan ('17, p. 447), the normal hamlet usually lies on the bottom of an aquarium, particularly in the angle between a wall and the base of the container. When in the latter position, the hamlet does not usually react by body movements to the close approach of a glass or metal rod, although eye movements and increased vibrations of the pectoral or other fins may show that the foreign object is seen and perhaps also sensed in some additional manner. It frequently happened that responses of the kind described were not obtained from totally blinded hamlets when they were in a similar position; that is, when they were resting in a corner of the aquarium.

This applies also to hamlets from which only one eye had been removed; animals so prepared characteristically seek a corner of the aquarium- — a dark corner, if such be available — and for long periods remain in a fixed position with the side

- The aquarium used in most of these experiments was that already described in Jordan's paper ('17). It had solid wooden ends and plane glass sides. In working with hamlets having one or both eyes functional the arrangements were such that the experimenter was screened from the fish, and the glass, or other, rod was suspended from above and moved about by an appropriate arrangement of strings.


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 165

carrying the intact eye pressed against the confining wall. They seldom, if ever, moved in any way as the result of a solid object being brought near them on the hlmd side, although when actually touched on that side, however lightly, they made exceedingly violent escaping movements — much more vigorous movements, in fact, than are ordinarily evidenced by the normal seeing fish.

Whether or not the delicate form of sensitivity described for the completely blinded hamlet is present and actively functional in the unblinded animal cannot be decided from the facts so far given; but it can be shown that the responses in question are not the result of special sensory alterations determined by or during anaesthesia, since 1) different anaesthetics (chloroform, ether, chloretone) and various degrees of narcosis could be used for the de-eying operation without affecting the result in any way;

2) there is no discernible increase in sensitivity after a fish previously de-eyed has recovered from a second anaesthetization ;

3) a non-de-eyed fish does not give responses of the character under discussion after recovery from (chloretone) anaesthesia;

4) several hamlets from which the eyes were removed without anaesthesia, gave well-defined reactions of this nature.

Inasmuch as the reactions to the careful approximation of solid bodies were secured very shortly after the operation, and were evident almost to their maximal extent within twenty-four hours, it is doubtful if the inere absence of the eyes has produced this form of sensitivity; the following results, as well as the studies upon normal individuals, support such a conclusion:

a) When the eyes of a medium-sized hamlet were covered by a cap of black velvet, the fish became very restless (owing to mechanical irritation of the harness required to fasten the cap) ; but after about ten hours, good 'avoiding reactions' were obtained upon the careful approach of a glass rod, both at the snout and at the caudal peduncle.

b) In several hamlets the cornea of either eye, or of both eyes, was rendered opaque by searing with a hot iron. The fishes so treated behaved respectively as did those with one or both eyes removed.


166 W. J. CROZTER

The delicate sensitivity manifested in the responses of the bhnd hamlet upon the near approach of foreign objects is therefore not induced by the absence of the eyes or by procedures incidental to their removal; it is present in the normal seeing fish, although reactions to which it might give rise are largely inhibited through visual and coarse mechanical stimulations (touch). It is obvious that this form of irritability, if present but unrecognized, might lead to serious errors in the interpretation of different phases of behavior not only in the hamlet, but also in other, fishes where it may occur.

" 2. De-eyed hamlets, stationary in mid-water or slowly swimming, but not in contact with the bottom or walls of the aquarium, were found to show the following regional distribution of sensitivity to the gentle approach of the rounded end of a clean glass rod (3 mm. diameter) : tip of the snout, side of head, caudal peduncle, top of head, side of body (especially in the region covered by the pectoral fin w^^hen it is folded back on to the body), anterior edge of the erect spinous dorsal fin, soft dorsal fin, caudal fin (except near its distal extremity).

The parts are arranged in the foregoing list according to the vigor of the reactions induced. No well-defined responses could be secured from the ventral surface of the animal nor from the pectoral or pelvic fins. The nature of the response varies with the different regions of the animal; thus, the spinous dorsal was pulled down close to the body when its anterior edge was approached, while the soft dorsal responded by vibratory movements.

About twenty-five individuals were carefully studied to determine the distribution of this sensitivity to 'contact at a distance.' The critical tests were made in filtered 'outside' seawater (the circulating water of the laboratory being less alkaline than normal sea-water), and the conditions were so arranged that no shadows from the body of the experimenter or from the glass rod fell upon the surface of the fish. These tests were made upon single isolated fishes in non-running water.

Rods or wires of a number of different materials were found to induce reactions of this type. In all cases the rods were well


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 167

cleaned; metal rods or wires were brightly polished and the strips of wood were freshly planed. Tests were made with rods immediately after cleaning and also when they had lain in seawater for an hour or more. The substances used were:

Metals: copper, platinum, gold, zinc, cadmium, aluminum, wrought iron, steel, galvanized iron, and brass.

Woods: 'cedar,' spruce, oak, elm and cypress.

Miscellaneous: glass, hard rubber, sealing-wax, soft rubber (red, white, and black tubing), porcelain, hard paraffin, sandstone, and compressed carbon.

The great variety of materials which induced the same response is sufficient to show that the process of stimulation did not depend upon the diffusion of chemical excitants nor (in the case of the metals) upon any 'action at a distance,' either primarily electrical or through the escape of charged atoms of metal (cf. Mathews, '07). The cadmium stick and the wires of platinum used in the tests were particularly pure, and no difference in the response they induced could be detected after they had been covered with neutral paraffin. The reactions are somewhat variable, and it is conceivable that some substance may stimulate in this fashion (i.e., 'chemically') more than others, but I could find no evidence of it in the hamlet. This point was tested with some care, because I had learned from Prof. G. H. Parker of reactions found by him with the catfish when approached by metal rods. Nor could I find anything of this sort in Amphioxus, Balanoglossus, sea-anemones, crabs (blinded), the 'rhinophores' of nudibranchs, or several teleosts that were examined.

Rods of brass, iron, glass, or wood of different diameters and shapes were then tried. Fishes of fairly uniform size (about 30 cm. length) were used in comparative experiments. To avoid, as far as possible, communicating undesired trembling movements to the rods, and thus to the water, the rods were in many tests clamped firmly in the middle of the aquariuni and the behavior of the blinded hamlet when approaching them during slow swimming movements was compared witlj the result when a rod was carefully brought near a part of the body. The result was in


168 W. J. CROZIER

either case the same; when slowly swimming the de-eyed hamlet will most often neatly avoid contact with a rod or wire situated in its path, but more successfully if the end or edge of the rod presents a sharp corner. Similarly, in many cases, the fish is somewhat better stimulated by a thin wire (less than 1 mm. in diameter) than by a thicker one and by a rod of square cross section than by one of similar size (several centimeters in diameter) but with a smoothly rounded end and circular cross section.

The inference from these tests is, unavoidably, that mechanical deformations in the water, of a somewhat irregular character, are the means of stimulation. It was shown by appropriate elimination experiments that the nostrils and lateral-line organs could not be concerned, and this is further made obvious from a consideration of the local nature and manner of distribution of these reactions over the body of the fish.^

The mode of excitation in these reactions is in certain particulars significantly different from that in some reactions which have previously been attributed to tactile excitation of the skin in teleosts (cf. Parker, '04, pp. 61, 62; Jordan, '17). A current from a pipette or ripples at the water surface frequently failed to induce any perceptible reaction in a de-eyed hamlet, although immediately after this, or immediately before, a slender rod or wire slowly brought to within 5 cm. of the snout or caudal peduncle led to well-defined reactions. Moreover, it was often possible to get good reactions to a thin rod in water much disturbed by a current of relatively large volume.

The snout and lips of the hamlet were the most sensitive regions of the animal's surface. There is thus a general parallelism between the distribution of this delicate tactile sensitivity and that of skin sensitivity to currents, as described by Jordan ('17). Whether or not this indicates the actvity of the tactile corpuscles in the reactions herein discussed, I am not sure; but I suspect that the tactile corpuscles may not be involved, although con ^ It may be suggested that the reactions of Amoebae to insoluble substances, as described by Schaeffer ('16), are possibly due to some such form of irritability as that herein considered. Certain peculiar phenomena obtainable with human erythrocytes (Oliver, '14; Kite) are also suggestive in this connection.


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 169

elusive evidence for this belief cannot be adduced. The higher sensitivity of the anterior end of the de-eyed hamlet was not occasioned by the presence of freshly exposed tissue surfaces in the orbits or by other injuries, since in several cases the animals were kept in aquaria for more than four months, long after the orbit surfaces had cleanly healed, and their reactions were as distinct as those of recently de-eyed fishes.

The relatively acute sensitivity of the region behind each pectoral fin, as judged by the reactions obtained when it was approached by a rod, is probably a secondary condition, due to the fact that the pectoral fins are usually in slight motion, creating in the water waves which impinge upon tl^se surfaces; any disturbance of these wave fronts or fin currents would result in a greater stimulus than that afforded by the near approach of a rod or wire to a stationary part.

3. I have ventured to describe these tactile reactions of the de-eyed hamlet at some length, because the fine, 'epicritic' nature of the sensitivity evidenced toward minute mechanical disturbances in the water is of particular use for the purposes of certain critical experiments regarding chemical stimulation of the skin of fishes. It will be observed that crude tests made by applying solutions from a ffipette to the skin of Epinephelus would be quite pointless, since the blinded fish reacts with precision to the presence of the undischarged pipette. The degree of sensitivity in these delicate tactile reactions is nevertheless rather definitely fixed at a uniform level, as seen in the more than twenty-five individuals I have examined. The speed, vigor, and amplitude of these reactions give them a perfectly definite character. It is conceivable that this tactile sensitivity might be enhanced or diminished under various conditions and that such variations would be reflected in the behavior of the de-eyed fishes, and that, in fact, a good opportunity would be offered for discovering the way in which tactile terminals may be influenced by such treatment of the skin as is involved in the local application of chemical excitants. If, as is supposed by Coghill ('14, p. 197; '16, p. 302), those responses of fishes and amphibians usually regarded as being initiated through excitation of ter


170 W. J. CROZIER

minals representing a 'common chemical sense/ are in realitj'^ due to the heterologous activation of tactile and pain terminals/ owing to destruction of the epithelium, then it would be expected that the local application of irritants to the skin of the hamlet would produce one of two effects; either tactile sensitivity would be noticeably increased immediately thereafter or, following relatively severe treatment, it would be found more difficult to bring about tactile activation. In the former case it might be held that excitants for the 'common chemical' sense are capable of acting upon tactile receptors in a sensory way.

In testing this matter, my experiments dealt mainly with the areas of skin on QJther side of the caudal peduncle, although other regions were also examined, notably, the lips and giU-covers.

In different individuals these areas were treated with solutions of cocaine hydrochloride in sea-water by painting the surface in question (held out of water) with a brush. The dermal chromatopores in the region cocainized quickly contract and remain contracted for some hours. The area treated is sharply outlined by the blanching of the skin. The narcotized area is thus clearly delimited for reference in stimulation trials.

Even slight cocainization causes a complete suppression of the sensitivity to rods or wires, as well* as to water currents; slightly stronger narcosis obliterates all responses to touch. Even then, however, the anaesthetized surface is fully active in the reception of stimulation from acid and alkaline solutions (HCl, NaOH, NH4OH, n/20-n/40) or from dilute solutions of quinine. The sensitivity to delicate mechanical stimulation in these experiments returns with equal rapidity whether or not the narcotized area has been stimulated chemically while under anaesthesia.

The hamlet, normal or de-eyed, reacts to local treatment with n/20 NaOH or NH4OH on the caudal peduncle after the spinal cord has been transected, but this operation obliterates the sensitivit}^ to minute mechanical disturbances at all levels posterior to the cut and decreases the amplitude of responses of this nature in other regions.

■* A view suggested also hy Watson ('14, pp. 419) and apparentfj^ accepted in some degree by Herrick ('16, pp. 85).


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 171

By several stimulations in rapid succession the vigor of the response elicited upon the near approach of a glass rod may be to some extent heightened. Such reactions are never so vigorous as those called forth by acid or alkali. If, however, tactile stimulation by this means be induced immediately after relatively severe chemical irritation (n/10 HCl from apippette), it is found either that the local irritability is quite unaffected or that it is slightly decreased. With weaker acid, inducing, nevertheless, very vigorous reactions, no effect could be detected upon subsequent excitability by the near presence of glass rods or wires.

The results of the test thus briefly outlined are uniformly in agreement with the idea that (within physiological limits) the excitation of the 'common chemical sense' has nothing to do with tactile receptors or with the destruction of the epithelium, since the delicate form of 'touch at a distance' employed in the de-eyed hamlet shows no specific effects of a sort otherwise to be expected when the receptive areas of this sense are bathed with chemical excitants. These results make it impossible to suppose that acid, for example, could disorganize the skin (as suggested by Coghill) sufficiently to induce violent painful excitation and yet at the same time leave sensitivity to minute mechanical disturbances practically unaffected.

And if acid acted directly upon tactile receptors, it would be expected that organs of delicate tactile receptivity would behave toward subsequent mechanical activation as if they had recently been activated; as previously described, this is apparently not the case. It might be objected that the source of stimulation could not, in the 'tactile' experiments with wires and rods, be localized with sufficient precision for critical use. Yet this would be incorrect, as could very nicely be shown in tests made upon small narcotized areas of the skin. Regions (on the caudal peduncle) not more than 2 cm. in diameter were painted with cocaine, and when the pale anaesthetized part was approached with the end of a thin rod, no reactions followed, although similar spots 3 cm. away were of fully normal sensitivity.

This result confirms the conclusion which I supported in a previous paper ('16), to which Coghill ('16) has made further and (it


172 W. J. CROZIER

seems to me) quite miwarranted objection. According to a conception first formally advanced by Botezat ('10) and later applied by Parker ('12) to the general chemical irritability of moist surfaces in vertebrates, the stimulation of epithelial free nerve terminals is accomplished secondarily through the activity of substances diffusing from the more external epithelial cells (some of which may be supposed to be in a special receptive state, although this is not necessary) to deeper parts. There is obviously no necessity that the nerve terminals concerned be situated near the surface immediately exposed to the activating agent. The cells primarily activated by acid or alkali in the 'common chemical sense' experiments are undoubtedly those of the very outermost layer of the skin. A study of the conditions of chemical activation in primary receptors (of the earthworm) shows, or seems to show, that a chemical reaction occurs between the activating agent and some receptor constituent.^

This means that the acid or other agent stimulates after union with, or penetration of, the surface of the superficial cells. The acid or other substance does not act directly upon deeper layers of the skin, for the good and sufficient reason that the stimulation time is utterly inadequate for any such process, even though the changed condition in the cell primarily affected can obviously be transmitted from cell to cell through the whole depth of the epidermis in a very brief time.^ The fact that one small area of the skin may be excited repeatedly by acid or by alkali shows that no destructive action is wrought by these excitants (within reasonable limits of concentration).

It is becoming more and more necessary to recognize that receptor organs depend for their differential irritability upon the possession of specific substances which enter into excitation reactions. There is reason to suppose that in mechanical stimulation surfaces (intracellular, intercellular, or both) are tempo ^ Some of the results of this investigation are in course of publication.

^ This primary effect may or may not be an increase in cell permeability, but it undoubtedly does involve an alteration in the relations between ions at the surfaces of the stimulated cells; hence the violent stimulating effect of distilled water under certain circumstances, as Loeb long ago found in the case of the frog's foot.


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 173

rarily broken down, to a certain extent, so that substances normally kept apart are free to intermix and react. There is no reason to expect that the products of the chemical activation of epithelial cells should be able to bring about a specific action upon tactile nerve endings or upon the specialized accessory end organs of the tactile sense. Tactile organs, 'corpuscles,' or what not may obviously be (and in fact frequently are) situated at some distance from the outer epithelial surface; it is probable, however, that the 'epicritic' form of irritability described in the hamlet depends upon very superficial structures; hence their particular value for the present research.

These considerations may enable one to see why it w^ould be somewhat surprising to find tactile organs in fishes capable of being normally excited by acids, for example.

It is easily seen that differential anaesthesia is, by itself, in many cases a poor criterion of sensory differentiation ; and yet, in the case of cocaine, when the results obtained by this method agree perfectly with other and quite independent methods of analysis, the results must perforce be accepted. In the present case it is rendered probable that the production of stimulation by chemical irritants applied to the general surface of Epinephelws has nothing to do with tactile receptors, and that the obliteration of tactile ('epicritic') sensitivity by cocaine is not an 'artifact' due to the specifically more intense action of the chemical irritants. Even in coelenterates there are indications that irritant chemicals and mechanical agencies respectively act in a sensory way upon differentiated receptors having diverse internal connections (Parker, '17), and the present observations confirm the idea that these agencies have modes of action in lower vertebrates as separate as they are in man.

4. Responses similar to those described for the de-eyed hamlet are exhibited by the normally blind cave fishes, according to Eigenmann (cited by Whitman, '99, p. 303). The parallehsm is striking, since in both cases the direction from which a rod is being brought near is accurately located, while vibrations of a coarser order may not be responded to. In^the blind fishes, however, this form of sensitivity is said to be more active in younger individuals than in adults.

THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 2


174 W. J. CROZIER

Inasmuch as tactile sensitivity of a very highly developed character is present in the hamlet possessing well-developed functional eyes, there is no reason to believe that a similar superior degree of tactile irritability has been developed in the blind cave fishes as the result of their lack of vision."

Concerning the function of this sense in Epinephelus, it may be suggested that it is useful at night or when the fish is maneuvering in darkened crannies of the 'coral reefs.'

SUMMARY

The de-eyed hamlet (Epinephelus striatus) gives well-defined reactions to the near approach of solid bodies. In the seeing fish this form of sensitivity is present, but motor effects which it might induce are almost completely inhibited. Mechanical deformations in the water of very minute amplitude and of a somewhat irregular nature are the source of stimulation in these responses, which cannot be attributed to chemical or to electrical disturbances. The presence of this exceedingly delicate form of sensitivity, generally distributed over the surface of the fish and leading to deliberate reactions of a well-defined character, has been used to discover any influence of chemical excitants, locally applied, upon the end organs of tactile sensitivity. Although the existence of this 'epicritic' form of irritabilit}^ interferes with any direct study of the mode of excitation in 'common chemical sense' reactions, it can nevertheless be shown, with its aid, that the generally distributed 'common chemical' irritability of this fish does not involve tactile receptors. Since the hamlet with well-developed eyes exhibits a high degree of tactile discrimination, such as has been described for blind cave fishes, — although the existence of this sensitivity would be quite overlooked unless

^ It should be added that after living in the laboratory for more than four months after the removal of the eyes, three hamlets were cai-efuUy compared with several others recently de-eyed as regards their comparative 'tactile' irritability; no differences could be detected. Hence continued lack of vision does not lead to an increased development of the hamlet's 'epicritic' tactile irritability.


TACTILE RESPONSES OF DE-EYED HAMLET 175

blinded animals were studied, — it is unnecessary to suppose that sensory structures appropriate to this type of irritability have been determined either by blindness or by life in caves. Agar's Island. Bermuda.

LITERATURE CITED

BoTEZAT, E. 1910 tJber Sinnesdriisenzellen und die Funktion von Sinnesap paraten. Anat. Anz., Bd. 37, pp. 513-530. CoGHiLL, G. E. 1914 Correlated anatomical and physiological studies of the

growth of the nervous system of Amphibia. I. The afferent system

of the trunk of Amblystoma. .Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 24, pp. 161 233.

1916 II. The afferent system of the head of Amblystoma. Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 247-340.

Crozier, W. J. 1916 Regarding the existence of the 'common chemical sense'

in vertebrates. Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 1-8. Herrick, C. J. 1916 An introduction to neurology. Phila., 355 pp. Jordan, H. 1917 Rheotropic responses of Epinephelus striatus Bloch. Amer.

Jour. Physiol., vol. 43, pp. 438-454. Mathews, A. P. 1907 An apparent pharmacological 'action at a distance' by

metals and metalloids. Ibid., vol. 18, pp. 39-46. Oliver, W. W. 1914 The crenation and flagellation of human erythrocytes.

Science, N. S., vol. 40, pp. 645-648. OsTERHouT, W. J. V. 1916 The nature of mechanical stimulation. Proc. Nat.

Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 237-239. Parker, S. H. 1904 Hearing and allied senses in fishes. Bull. U. S. Fish.

Comm., vol. 22 (for 1902), pp. 45-64.

1912 The relation of smell, taste, and the common chemical sense

in vertebrates. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., Ser. 2, vol. 15, pp. 221 234.

1917 Nervous transmission in the actinians. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 22, pp. 87-94.

ScHAEFFER, A. A. 1916 On the behavior of Ameba toward fragments of glass and carbon and other indigestible substances, and toward some very soluble substances. Biol. Bull., vol. 31, pp. 303-326.

Watson, J. B. 1914 Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. New York, xii + 439 pp., ills.

Whitman, C. O. 1899 Animal behavior. Biol. Lect., Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods Hole (1898). Boston, pp. 285-338.


author's abstract of this paper issued bt the bibliographic service, march 30


COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

VII. ON THE INFLUENCE OF STARVATION AT AN EARLY AGE UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX. ALBINO RAT

NAOKI SUGITA

From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

TWO CHARTS

1. INTRODUCTION

Investigations on the influence of partial or complete starvation upon the growth of the body under various conditions have been made by many authors, and it has long been known that of all the organs the brain is least affected in weight by underfeeding while, in younger animals in active growth, the brain weight may even increase during severe underfeeding. These facts were early observed by Chossat ('43) in pigeons, Falck ('54) in dogs and Voit ('66) in cats, later by Bechterew ('95) in kittens and puppies and Lassarew ('97) in guinea-pigs, and recently by Hatai ('04, '08, '15), Donaldson ('11), Jackson ('15 a, '15 b), and others working in the albino rat. Jackson made experiments with complete and partial starvation on adult albino rats and also held the young albino rats at constant body weight for a considerable period by partial underfeeding, and in all his experiments the brain was found to be only slightly affected in weight. Hatai underfed young rats so as to cause a reduction of 30 per cent in total body weight, while the average loss in brain weight was only 5 per cent. According to Donaldson's experiments on the young albino rats (thirty days old) under moderate underfeeding for three weeks, it was found that the underfed are on the average 41.2 per cent less in body weight than the controls and nevertheless only 7.7 per cent less in brain weight.

177

THE JOURNAL OF COJIPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3

JUNE. 1018


178 NAOKI SUGITA

According to lYiy previous studies on the normal development of the cerebral cortex during the period of most active growth (Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c), it was found that the growth of the cortex is precocious and that its elementary organization (that is, the cortical thickness, the cortical cell number and cell size, etc.) is nearly completed at the time of weaning, when the albino rat is twenty days of age. The investigations by the several authors cited above were, however, made mostly on animals which were already weaned, because, of course, feeding experiments necessitate a strict food control. But at this stage (after weaning), the elementary organization of the cerebral cortex is already completed. For my object, which was to determine the effect of starvation on the early development of the cerebral cortex, it was necessary to use animals in which the growth of the cerebral cortex was still in active progress and to note the influence upon the organization of the cortex of longer and shorter periods of inadequate feeding.

For this it is necessary to use the very young animals, still dependent on the mother. During this period the growth impulse in the brain is especially strong and the results of underfeeding are somewhat peculiar, as the brain weight may even increase under severe underfeeding. In complete starvation, growth is stopped and the brain weight remains constant. Thus, von Bechterew ('95) studied on new-born kittens and puppies the influence of complete starvation upon the brain w^eight. His results were that the brain weight, at the time of death after three or four days of starvation, was like the initial weight of the organ at birth. The brain had not grown, but also it had not lost in weight.

By applying severe starvation to the albino rat immediately after birth, it has been my object in the present study to obtain answers to the following questions:

1. How far will the growth of the body and of the brain be arrested?

2. Will the normal relation between body weight, body length, and tail length be modified?


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 179

3. What will be the relation between body weight and brain weight in the underfed rats?

4. How far will the size and shape of the cerebrum be influenced?

5. Will the thickness of the cortex of the stunted rats be different from that of the standard?

6. How far will the Volume of the cerebral cortex be modified?

7. Will the number of the cortical cells increase normally according to age?

8. Will the development in the size of the nerve cells be influenced by starvation?

9. What will be the effect of the starvation on the percentage of water and on the alcohol extractives?

2. THE TEST ANIMALS

After several preliminary tests on producing underfed young, I adopted the following three procedures, which are fairly reliable:

I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for a maximum period each day.

II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of young and thus reducing the amount of milk available for each of the young.

III. Underfeeding the nursing mother and thus reducing the quantity of milk secreted.

I treated five litters by the first method (Series I), two litters by the second method (Series II), and one litter by the third method (Series III). The detailed records of these experiments are on file at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. All the material, consisting of forty-six test individuals and fourteen controls, from the above eight litters, was supplied from the rat colony at The Wistar Institute. They are all from mothers of standard size which were kept throughout the experiment under good sanitary conditions.

This study was carried on from October, 1916 to July, 1917, at The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.


180 ■ NAOKI SUGITA

3. MATERIAL

Series I (Litters A, B, C, D, and E, table 1)

Procedure. In each litter, half of the young were selected for the experiment and marked with hectograph ink on the back and the remaining individuals were used as the controls. The young under experiment were taken away from 'the mother each day and kept packed in cotton in a warm place, but without any food or water, for the time which had been determined. Table 1 contains the records of the number of hours during which each test individual in this series was isolated each day.

Litter A {horn October 16, 1916) was composed of nine young. Five (c, a, d, f, and h) were subjected to experiment and were separated from the mother daily beginning on the very day of birth, the f oodless interval being increased day by day, as recorded in table 1. Sundays were excluded from any experimentation. The duration of starvation, daily and total, and the age at which the animals were killed is recorded also in table 1. Four controls (b, e, g, and i) were also killed one by one at the same' ages as the test animals. The total hours of isolation, the average per day, and the percentage of hours isolated during the total life of the individual in hours, are given in the lower part of the table. As the young are not fed continuously, even when they were with the mother, this percentage will but roughly indicate the grade of underfeeding to which the young were subjected. They were killed for examination at the ages of 3, 4, 9, 11, and 15 days (see X in table 1).

Litter B {born October 15, 1916) consisted of ten young. Five (a, c, e, f and i) were separated daily from their mother, as in the case of Litter A, and the remaining young (b, d, g, h, and j) were used as controls. The experiment was begun at the age of one day in Litter B, a day later than in the case of Litter A. They were killed for examination at the ages of 4, 8, 11, 12, and 19 days.

Litter A and B represent groups in which mild starvation was instituted from a very early age.

Litter C {born October 18, 1916) was composed of seven young, of which four (a, c, d, and f) were used for experiment and three


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 181

(b, e, and g) for control. The experiment was begun five days after birth. One test rat (f) and one control (g) were killed by the mother. For the first three days mild starvation was tried, and then, from the age of nine days, severe starvation was instituted. They were killed for examination at the ages of '15, 17, and 28 days.

Litter D {horn October 23, 1916) consisted initially of eight young, of which five (a, c, d, e, and g) were used for experiment and three (b, f, and h) for control. One underfed (g) and one control (h) were killed by the mother. In this litter severe starvation was begun at the age of three days. The animals were killed at the ages of 9, 10, 16, and 18 days.

Litter E {horn Novernher 4, 1916\ was composed of eight rats, of which six (a, b, c, d, g, and h) were selected for experiment and two (e and f) for control. Severe starvation with some intervals of feeding was begun at the age of three days. In this litter pairs of test rats of the same age were killed for examination (on the 7th, 10th, and 17th days of the experiment) to determine individual variations.

Litters D and E represent groups in which relatively severe starvation was begun at an early age.

Series II {Litters F and H)

Procedure. In this series one nursing mother was placed in charge of an excessive number of young. The results were not very good, because some relatively lucky or strong ones always got more than their share of milk, while the others were in a condition of severe underfeeding.

Litter F {horn Octoher 15, 1916). To a young small primipara, which had just given birth to ten young, were entrusted ten more young from two other litters which had been born on the same day. Unhappily, the young from three different litters were not separately marked. The rate of growth among them was later found to be unequal, owing probably partly to litter characteristics and partly to the inequality of the milk ration. Individuals were selected arbitrarily and killed for examination at intervals of one to three days (at the ages of 11, 14, 17, 19,


S S e

2 e


Sj


5' _


»j tii g


5 o S


w


c


t*


^


hJ


=c


"^l^



<


•^.f^


e


H


™»



5


C5


cs


■^





H e





t. >

CD O


o


COOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOv


o


cococoooooooo- OOOv



OOCOOOOOy


o


0<300000000v/


•b

SI


s ?, = = r, X


03


g"=g?, ° = f5X


in


30






(M^"


b


+^ CD



C<M



OJ t^


ii


e ^



o


^.a



^i?


r^


><C3



ij


CQ




C



3to




L.


02


OOOOOOCSOOO'MfM


<: o o o o o o


c^ o o o o

(M (M (M


o ^


p—


!:DC0OOGCOOOC5iOOC5O>OOC^C-)OO 1— '<M C<JC^C^C<I<M (MMMC^J


ciOOOOOOOOOOOOO ^ CS (N (M CVJ C^J


COCDOO«:000


c g


— ^CO^t--OOC:0'*'r~'0'^OOOOOCOO \^ CI -r^ C^M C<IC^-nC^A




■^■tO'^t^coo^o-yr^O^y


■b



•^COCDt^GCClO-^r^ON^



■* to CO 1- cc C-. ^


o a to o <b2


totor^ooo30"^f^cjooooO(3CD




^cotot--cjCc;0'<rr^ccoG\/



-^tOtOt^COOiO-^r^^



•^ CO to t^ S/


-<c^co-^^«or^acciC«— iM


coi-oocrio»-<c^ec


182











_













r


O






o








"



■*





^



~





■*


M


?q



""



OO



"



■^





OO



OO



o



5!


O




o



o



^



(M


OO


OS





o





-^


2


O











00



«^



o



(M



O


00





CD






00


o











OO



1^



o

00



^



00


00


o











OS











00



00



^



2



CO


o












OO

















'^



m


r^


00



"^



00







o











£?



t^



Oi



2



00


S












CO















OO



"



■^


CO


o











»o











o


o o


O C5 V CO C<J -^ d





IM



o


I^















(M






« 


"■











o



(M



o



_



IC


f^


o



"



CO



"



■^


o












o



o



o



05



00


o





o:*






CO












"55













CO








r^


o





^



""



M<













"oO

















o



o



cc



"



2





Ml


CO


CJ



o





~



-*


<M


g~





00





CO


OO


o











CO



^^



o



CO



■*


o





-*







o











cs



m



^



■o



s


CO


".










UO


o











^

















o





o



"



t3





-<**


CO












"36











t^





r-




^



OO



"



"



"




o


o











~CD















CO





n


o


o











§



•w



IM



CO



■^ M


»c


•*











T}<



CO



CO



U5



c^


00


CO





"





<N


•*


o













"i

















J3


j3






L^



Ut



bD


bc


■^ lo


s

CO f^ OO "^



>


01



0)

a



'S


'S



w


^


1


t^


>)


£


0)


>>


a



>,


3


3


C3


3


-^


'3



C3


O



O


■a


O





Q M



tc



a:



P3


« 


183


184 NAOKI SUGITA

20, 23, 24, 26, 30, and 40 days). Those killed were replaced by individuals of like age from other litters, so as to keep the number in this litter always above thirteen. After twenty days, the mother was removed and the young fed with a small amount of ordinary food. The last eight young, which survived beyond the age of forty days, were rejected as too old for the purpose of this study.

Litter H {born January 2, 1917). A mother having just given birth to eight young was entrusted with nine more young from another litter which had been born on the same day. The underfed young of this litter were all employed for the study on the percentage of water and for the histological study of myelination in the brain and not included in the study of the cerebral cortex.

Series III {Litter G)

Litter G (born October 23, 1916). In this series a nursing mother was severely underfed immediately after the parturition. This litter consisted of eleven young. Only a fraction (one-tenth to one-twentieth) of the ordinary diet with unlimited water was supplied daily to the mother. She was found to lose slowly in body weight day by day. The amount of milk was consequently much reduced, but not completely stopped, as could be determined by examining daily the stomach contents of the young. By this method I was able to get a series of young which were very poorly developed. The young were killed for examination at the ages of 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, and 25 days.

Table 2 contains the observed body weight and brain weight of the young in Litters F, G, and H, when examined, for a comparison with table 1.

•4. BODY WEIGHT, BODY LENGTH AND TAIL LENGTH

Table 3a (not published, because of its complexity, but on file at The Wistar Institute), gives for each individual in this study the sex, age, observed body length, tail length, and brain weight. The standard tail length and the standard brain weight for the observed body length were also entered for comparison, the


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


185


TABLE 2

Showing for each test individual in Series II and III (Litters F, G, and H) the sex, age, and body and brain loeights, at time of examination


LITTER (series II AND III)


SEX


AGE OF KILLING


BODY WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT




days


grams •


grains


Fa


m


11


8.5


0.709


b


f


14


9.8


•0.954


c


f


17


13.5


1.106


d


f


19


13.3


1.218 •


e


m


20


12.4


1.148


f


m


23


11.2


1.230


g


f


• 23


14.2


1.224


h


m


24


13.5


1.170


i


f


26


17.0


1.197


J


f


30


24.2


1.219


k


m


30


18.7


1.222


1


f


40


40.0


1.310


Ga


m


8


7.5


0.679


b


f


8


7.4


0.703


c


f


10


10.3


0.864


d


m


11


9.8


0.929


e


f


12


8.8


0.907


f


m


15


7.3


0.881


g


in


16


7.3


0.948


h


m


18


9.6


1.119


i


f


22


12.2


1.110


J


m


25


17.2


1.234


Ha


f


13


8.8


0.880


b


f


17


10.8


1.024


c


f


23


14.7


1.135


d •


f


28


17.2


1.166


e


m


32


20.0


1.215


f


f


37


19.3


1.101


g


m


43


21.1


1.295


values having been calculated for each individual by the use of formulas given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15). Here the body length was chosen as the basis for comparison, because the increase in body length has proved less variable than body weight. Table 3 was condensed from the original complete table (table 3a) by dividing the individuals, the tests, and controls within each litter into two groups, according to the observed brain


186 NAOKI SUGITA

weight and taking averages for each group. Group I consists of those which have brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and presumably still in the first phases of cortical development (Sugita, '17 a) and Group II those which have brains weighing more than 1.0 gram and probably in the second or third phase of cortical development. So, one litter in Series I was divided into four groups, the tests having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (T. I), the tests having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (T. II), the controls having brain weights less than 1.0 gram (C. I) and the controls having brain weights more than 1.0 gram (C. II). This grouping prevails throughout all condensed tables (tables 3 to 13, 16 and 17) published in this paper. The average values were all obtained according to individual measurements, and the average standard values were also obtained by averaging from the full tables, which give the individual cases. As the standard values were not based on the average measurements given in the condensed tables, those standards given in the condensed tables sometimes deviate slightly from the standard values which would be directly obtained for the given average measurements.

On comparing, in table 3, the observed measurements with the corresponding standards, no significant difference between them has been detected, either in the underfed or in the controls. Only the body weight in the underfed is slightly lower as compared with the standard for the same body length, but it amounts to no more than 8 per cent.

This comparison indicates that, though the underfed young show a considerable retardation in total growth according to age (see table 4), yet the relation between the body and the tail lengths and the body weight is but little affected, at least during the early period of active growth. So the only marked difference between the underfed and the controls of the same body length or body weight would be the age, if their brain weights are disregarded. The effect on the brain weight will be discussed in the next chapter.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


187


TABLE 3

Giving for each litter group in this sttidy the average age, body length, tail length, and body weight, the last two compared with the corresponding standard measurements for the observed body length, calculated according to sex by the use of formulas given in 'The Rat' 'Donaldson, '15). The general averages for the test and the control groups are given at the foot of the table. T = test, C = control.



TEST CONTROL


SEX


AVERAGE AGE


BODY

LENGTH


TAIL LENGTH


BODY WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Observed


standard

aocord ina to

body

length


Observed


Standard according to bodylength


Series 1

A c, a, d, f

h

b, e, g i


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


1 m, 3 f 1 f

3 m 1 f


days

715

8 17


ni m .

56.3 74.0

66.7 96.0


mm.

26.5 48.0

31.7 62.0


mm. 26.3 47 .0

37.0

71.0


grams

7.2

13.9

11.7 30.1


grams 7.1

13.9

10.2 26.3


Series I

B a, c, e, f

i

b, d g, h, j


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


3 m, 1 f 1 m

2f 3f


919

6

18

59.8 75.0

57.0 86.3


27.8 50.0

25.5 53.3


29.8 46.0

27.5 61 3


7.3 12.7

7.1 20.5


7.9 13.6

7.0 20.3


Series I C a, c, d

b, e


T. II C. II


2 m, 1 f 2 f


20 22 —


82.0 98.5


51.7 71.5


54.3 73.5


15.1

27.6


17.5 29.4


Series I

D a, c, d

e

b

f


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


1 m, 2 f 1 m

1 m 1 m


12 18

9 22


61.0

78.0

69.0 91.0


39.0 54.0

39.0 65.0


31.7 49.0

40.0 63.0


6.9 13.0

11.2 24.0


8.2 15.0

1.0

21.9


Series I

E a, b, c, d

g, h

e, f


T. I T. II

C. II


3 m, 1 f 2 f

1 m, 1 f


1220

17

65.8 82.0

87.0


35.0 58.0

56.5


36.8 56.0

60.0


9.7 16.2

21.6


9.9 17.9

0.4


Series II

Fa, b

c-1


T. I T. II


1 m, I'f 4 m, 6 f


13 25+


63.5 83.9


33.0 61.5


34.5 57.1


9.2 18.1


9.1 19.4


188


NAOKI SUGITA

TABLE Z— Continued



TEST CONTROL


SEX


AVE RAGE AGE


BODY LENGTH


TAIL LENGTH


BODY WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Ob

Standard accord

Ob

Stsadard accord







served


ing to body length


served


ing to body length






days


mm.


7)1 m.


mm.


grams


grams


Series III











Ga-g


T.


I


4 m, 3 f


11 +


63.0


32.9


33.7


8.3


8.8


h-j


T.


II


2m, If


22

7i.O


48.7


46.7


13.0


14.1


Series II











H a


T.


I


1 f


13


63.0


33.0


34.7


8.8


9.


b-g


T.


II


2 m, 4 f


30


81.7


64.0


53.8


17.2


17.1


Average 1


T.


I



11

61.8


32.5


32.5


8.2


8.6


.(Series I-III)J


T.


II



21+


79.0


54.5


51.2


14.9


16.1


Average )


C.


I



8

64.2


32.1


34.8


10.0


9.4


(Series I)/


C.


II



19+


91.8


61.7


65.8


24.8


23.7


5. BODY WEIGHT AND BRAIN WEIGHT

Table 4 was condensed from table 4 a (unpublished), which gives data for each individual in this study, and shows for each group, in the three series, the sexes, average age, average duration of starvation (denoted by percentage value of the hours of isolation), and the observed body and brain weights, accompanied by the average values for the group of the individual standard weights, for the same ages, and of the individual standard brain weights for the same ages and for the same body weights. For the calculation of the standard values for each individual the sex was regarded, because in body and brain weights the sex difference is clear ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The average differences of the observed values from the standards are given for each group in percentage, the standards being taken, respectively, as the norms for comparison.

A glance at the table reveals three differences which are clearly marked :

1. The underfed rats have, as a rule, body weights considerably less than the standard values for the same age.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 189

2. The underfed rats have brain weights somewhat less than the standard values for the same age.

3. The underfed rats have brain weights mar" edly higher than the standard values for their observed body weight.

It was already noted in the introduction that the central nervous system as represented by the brain suffers little or no loss of initial weight even in the case of severe starvation. In my series-T-underfeeding of the albino rat at an early age — the body weight of the rats stunted by starvation, as compared with the standards for the same age, were deficient (on the average by litters, table 4) by from 19 to 44 per cent. On the other hand, the brain weights were less than the standards for the same age by from 4 to 12 per cent (for litters, table 4, but by from 3 to 17 per cent for individuals, table 4 a), while for the same body weights they were from 15 to 29 per cent (for litters, table 4, but up to 65 per cent for individuals, table 4 a) above the standard values.

Considering together all the five litters (A to E) of Series I, in which the young were starved by separating them at an early age from the mother daily, it appears that the underfed rats at the end of the first twenty days after birth (during the suckling period) are about 29 per cent (average of A, T. I and II, B, T. I and II, C, T. II, D, T. I and II, and E, T. I and II) behind the standards in body weight, while they are only 8 per cent (averge of the above-cited cases) behind in the brain weight. In Series II and III, in both of which the young were subjected to early and continuous underfeeding, increasing in intensity, by the method of reducing the ration of milk, but without removal from the nest, the underfed young have shown a slightly better development in brain weight (in relation to body weight), the average being also 8 per cent (average of F, T. I and II, G, T. I and II, and H, T. I and II) less than the standard for the same age, while the body weight is on the average as much as 39 per cent (average of the above-cited cases) below the standard value. Whether removing the young from the nest increases the relative effect of underfeeding on the brain, as these results suggest, can be determined only by experiments with that question as the main point in view.


190 NAOKI SUGITA

In connection with the underfeeding, as practiced in Series I, some interesting results of overfeeding have been noticed in the control animals ; overfeeding having taken place in the case of the controls of Litters A to E on account of the periodic isolation of a number of the members of the litter. The controls have shown generally, as seen in table 4 a (unpublished) and also in table 4, some excess in body and brain weights, as compared with the standard values for the same age. The excess in body weight is on the average 19 per cent (average of A, C. I and II, B, C. I and II, C, C. II, D, C. I and II, and E, C. II), while the brain weight is on the average 6 per cent (average of the above-cited cases) higher than the standard for the same age and 2 per cent higher than the standard for the same body weight. Thus, by moderate overfeeding, the growth in body weight is definitely accelerated and, at the same time, the growth in brain weight is also accelerated, nearly in proportion to the increase in body weight.

If the observed brain weights are compared with the standard brain weights for the observed body weight, it is clearly seen that the observed brain weights are higher than the standard by 24 per cent (average of all eight litters T. groups only). Of course, the younger the individual, the higher is the percentage, because the standard brain weight is smaller in the young animals and they are not increasing in direct proportion to the body weight, but nearly as the logarithm of the latter value. So it may be roughly stated that the brain weights in the underfed young albino rats have values below the standard weights for the same age and above those for the same body weights, but always falling nearer to the standard age values.

6. THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM

The five diameters of the cerebrum of the underfed young were measured and recorded according to the procedure already described in my first paper of this series (Sugita, '17, figs. 1 and 2). The measurement W.B, represents the greatest frontal diameter; the measurement W.D, the frontal diameter passing the middle point of the fissura sagittalis; the measurement L.G, the greatest distance from the frontal pole to the occipital


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


191


TABLE 4 Shuiv ng for each litter group in this study the average age, duration of isolation denoted by the percentage of the life span, observed body weight, compared with the standard body weight for the same age, and observed rain weight, compared with the standard values for the same age and the observed body weight, respectively. Standard values were all calculated by the use of the formulas given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15). Within each litter the starved animals were divided nto two groups, T I having brains weighing less than 1.0 gram and T. II having brains weighing more than 1.0 gram. The control animals were also grouped in the same way into two groups, C. I and C. II. Averages ivere taken within each group. In lines designated 'percentage difference' (abbreviated 'per. diff.'), the deviations of the observed measuremmts from the standard values were given in percentage, the respective standard values being taken as standards of comparison. At the foot of the table, the average as to the test and control groups are given and the percentage differences from the standards are also ca'culated



TEST CONTROL


SEX


AVERAGE AGE


a a w

d fc

K «  Eh 1


BODY WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Observed


Standard according to age


Ob served


Stanflard according to age


Standard according to observed body weight





days


per cent


gramf


(jrains


grams


grams


grams


Series I











A 0, a, d, f


T. I


1 m, 3 f


t —


32


7.2


.9.7


0.584


0.6U


0.441


h


T. II


1 f


15


44


13.9


16.5


1.C24


1.048


0.952


(per. diff.)







(-19)



(- 5)


(+15)


b, e, g


C. I


3 m


S



11.7


10.9


0.740


0.750


0.790


i


C. II


1 f


17



30.1


18.1


1.278


1.099


1.301


(per. diff.)







(+44)



(+ 9)


(- 4)


Series I











B a, c, e, f


T. I


3 m, 1 f


9

30


7.3


in


0.644


0.775


0.468


i


T. II


1 m


19


44


12.7


18.7


1.052


1 .131


0.901


(per. diff.)







(-34)



(-11)


(+24)


b, d


C. I


2 f


6



7.1


8.6


0.543


0.559


0.437


g. h, J


C. II


3 f


18


20.5


18.7


1.144


1.112


1.148


(per. diff.)







(+ 1)



(+ 1)


(+ 6)


Series I











C a, c, d


T. II


2 in, 1 f


20


44


15.1


20.4


1.105


1.146


0.946


(per. diff.)







(-26)



(- 4)


(+17)


b, e


C. II


2 f


22


27.6


22.6


1.307


1.165


1.234


(per. diff.)







(+22)



(+12)


+ 6)


192


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE i— Continued



TEST CONTROL


SEX


AVERAGE AGE


5 H H 3 2; b Q 0. 1=

« 2 > a

K > 6, CO


BODT WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Observed


Standard according to age


Observed


Standard according to age


Standard according to observed body weight


Series I D a, c, d

e (per. diff.)

b

f

(per. diff.)


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


Im, 2f

1 m

1 m 1 m


days

12 18

9 22


per cent

57 65


grams

6.9 13.0

11.2 24.0


grams

14.0

18.0

(-38)

11.8 21.1 (+ 7)


grams

0.778 1.089

0.870 1.220


grams 0.943

1.112 (- 9)

0.840 1.184

(+ 3)


grams . 0.437

0.921

(+37)

0.782 1.237 (+ 4)


Series I E a, b, c, d

(per. diff.)

e. f (per. diff.)


T. I T. II

C. II


3m, If 2f

Im, If


1220

17

46 44


9.7 16.2

21.6


14.3 20.7 (-26)

17.S (+25)


0.835 1.122

1.179


0.977 1.159

(- 8)

1.077 (+ 9)


0.664

1.042

(+15)

1.171 (+ 1)


Series II

Fa, b

c-1

(per. diff.)


T. I T. II


Im, If 4 m, 6 f


13 25+



9.2 18.1


14.9 25.6 (-33)


0.832 1.204


1.000 1.231 (- 9)


0.631 1.046

(+21)


Series III

Ga-g

h-j

(per. diff.)


T. I T. II


4 m, 3 f 2m, If


11+ 22


8.3 13.0


13.6 21.5 (-39)


0.844 1.154


0.914 1.181

(- 5)


0.561 0.871 (+39)


Series II

H a

b-g (per. diff.)


T. I T. II


1 f 2 m, 4 f


13 30



8.8 17.2


15.1 31.5

(-44)


0.880 1.156


1.003 1.298 (-12)


0.600 1.045 (+24)


Average 1

(Series I-III)J

(per. diff.)

Average }

(Series I-III)j

(per. diff.)


T. I T. II



11 21 +



8.2 14.9


13.3 (-38)

21.6 (-31)


0.771 1.113


0.895

(-14)

1 . 163

(- 4)


0.543 (+42)

0.966

(+15)


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


193


TABLE i— Continued



TEST CONTROL


SEX


AVERAGE AGE


. !Z H W O O fa

p. K


BODY WEIGHT


BRAIN WEIGHT


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Observed


Standard according to age


Observed


Standar 1 according to age


Standard according to observed boily weight


Average 1

(Series I) J

(per. diff.)


C. I



days

8

per cent


grn7ns

10.0


grams

10.4

(- 4)


grams

0.718


grains 0.716

(+ 0)


grams

0.670

(+7)


Average \

(Series I) /

(per. diff.)


C. II



19+



24.8


19.6

(+27)


1.226


1.127 (+ 9)


1.218

(+ 1)


pole; the measurement L.F, the sagittal diameter from the frontal to the occipital pole running parallel to the sagittal fissure, and the measurement Hi. is the greatest vertical height at the stalk of the hypophysis. In table 5, which was condensed from table 5 a (unpubhshed) for each individual, the average brain weight, the average measurements W.B, L.G and Ht. are given for each group, both test and control, compared with the corresponding standard measurements for the brains of the same weight, which were originally calculated for each individual using the formulas formerly presented by me (Sugita, '17), and then condensed. The measurements L.F and W.D are given, also condensed for each group, in table 9.

On examining table 5, it appears that the measurement W.B of the underfed is smaller on the average by 2 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only) than standard for the brains of the same weight, while the measurement L.G of the underfed is greater on the average by 2 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only). The height in the underfed seems to be slightly less, by about 1 per cent on the average. On the other hand, if the controls be considered in the same way, they show also slight deviations from the calculated standard values, thus, on the average (Litters A to E, C. groups only), W.B is smaller by 1 per cent, L.G greater by 0.8 per cent and Ht. smaller by about 3 per


THE JOURNAL OF COMP.^R.^TIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3


194 NAOKI SUGITA

cent in the controls. As a matter of fact, the measurement of Ht. could not be so accurate on' account of difficulty in fixing the dorsal limit, so that these slight differences in Ht. should not be taken too seriously. The measurement of L.G and W.G can be made accurately so that these results are trustworthy.

Taking these deviations in the controls into account, the general statement may be made that underfeeding alters the shape of the cerebrum, so that it becomes slightly elongated, when compared with the normal cerebrum of the same weight. This difference is probably due to the fact that, although the underfed cerebrum is arrested in growth, it nevertheless tends to enlarge normally and, as already determined (Sugita, '17) becomes more and more elongated as the age advances.

If, for the brains of like weight, the width-length indices

obtained bv the formula ^^^ are compared between

L.t

the underfed and the controls (compare table 9) or the standard values (based on table 3, Sugita, '17), it will be seen that the index value tends to be lower in the underfed, especially in the members of Litters F and G which were underfed continuously and rather severely. In the latter litters the index values for each individual are smaller by 2 to 7 points than the index values for the standard brains of like weights (the data for these calculations are contained in table 9 a, not here published). The average index values in Litters F and G are 102 (for T. I groups) and 97 (for T. II groups), while the corresponding standard values are, respectively, 106 and 103 (Sugita, '17).

7. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

Tables 6 a, 6 b, and 6 c (all unpublished) were originally prepared to give the cortical thickness for each individual as measured at the localities I to VIII in the sagittal and frontal sections and to give the average cortical thickness in each section and the general average thickness, to be compared with the respective standards presented in a former paper (Sugita, '17a). Table 6, which follows, contains in condensed form the corrected data for the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the underfed Albinos and that of


TABLE 5

Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight and the average tneasurements L.G, W.B and Hi. of the cerebrum, each corn-pared with the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight, calculated by the use of the for7nulas given by. me (Sugita, '17). The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table.


SERIES, LITTER AND


TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


W.


B.


L.


G.


Ht.



Observed


Standard


Observed


Standard


Observed


Standard





grams


turn.


mm.


mm.


Tnm.


mm.


mm.


Series I











A c, a, d, f


T.



0.584


10.79


10.94


9.69


9.20


6.99


7.06


h


T.



1.024


13.05


13.00


12.30


12.30


8.45


8.70


b, e, g


C.



0.740


11.63


11.90


10.73


10.63


7.50


7.68


i


C.



1.278


13.85


14-00


13.15


13.25


8.95


9.30


Series I











B a, c, e, f


T.



0.644


11.11


11.38


10.25


9.96


7.36


7.38


i


T.



1.052


13.20


13.15


12.35


12.40


8.50


8.75


b, d


C.



0.543


10.50


10.78


9.73


9.18


6.90


6.95


g., h, j


C.



1.144


13.47


13.48


12.75


12.77


8.68


9.00


Series I











C a, c, d


T.



1.105


13.10


13.35


12.72


12.62


8.70


8.88


b, e


C.



1.307


13.78


14-10


13.63


13.33


8.83


9.40


Series I











D a, c, d


T.



0.778


11.67


12.17


11.25


10.80


7.98


7.92


e


T.



1.089


12.90


13.30


12.75


12.55


8.60


8.85


b


C.



0.870


12.25


12.60


11.40


11.65


8.00


8.20


f


C.



1.220


13.95


13.80


13.30


13.05


8.80


9.20


Series I











E a, b, c, d


T.



0.835


12.08


12.41


11.35


11.16


8.29


8.10


g, h


T.



1.122


13.35


13.40


12.68


12.70


8.98


8.95


e, f


C.



1.179


13.55


13.60


12.78


12.85


8.88


9.05


Series II











F a, b


T.



0.832


12.00


12.53


11.50


11.13


7.95


8.05


c-1


T.



1.204


13.30


13.73


13.11


12.98


9.30


9.15


Series III











Ga-g •


T.



0.844


12.22


12.46


11.46


11.32


8.13


8.69


h-j


T.



1.154


13.27


13.53


13.03


12.80


8.95


9.00


Average 1


T.



0.753


11.65


11.98


10.92


10.60


7.78


7.87


(Ser. I-III)J


T.



1.107


13.17


13.35


12.71


12.62


8.78


8.90


Average 1


C.



0.718


11.46


11.76


10.62


10.49


7.47


7.61


(Ser. I) /


C.


II.


1.226


13.72


13.80


13.12


13.05


8.83


9.19


195


196 NAOKI SUGITA

the controls from the same litter, and it gives for each group, underfed and controls, the average brain weight and the corrected cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections of the brain, together with the average thickness. The data for obtaining the correction-coefficient are given in the full table for each individual, but in the condensed table 6 orily the average values of the correction-coefficients for each group appear. The application of the correction-coefficient was made in the way formerly described (Sugita, '17 a). The horizontal sections of underfed brains were not prepared for this study.

Table 6 shows also a comparison of the average thickness of the cortex in the underfed young with that for the standard Albino of the same brain weights. As the present study was not extended to the horizontal sections, the average thickness of the cortex was determined from only the two kinds of sections from the same individual and it was compared with the corresponding average for the standards. In the standards, these values proved to be within 0.5 per cent of the general average thickness of the cortex based on the three kinds of sections. Here, in table 6, the standard values were obtained from the somewhat smoothed curve based on the data formerly presented (table 9 and chart 9, Sugita, '17a).

Table 6 a (unpubhshed) for the sagittal section showed for the underfed that the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality I) is evidently very much greater than that of the controls or the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight, comparison having been made on the basis of the data given formerly (table 6 and chart 4, Sugita, '17 a). Locality II was the next which exceeds in the cortical thickness on the side of the underfed. Localities III and IV stand in general slightly in favor of the underfed, but at locality V, the occipital pole, there was found no notable difference in the cortical thickness between the underfed and the standard. As a rule, the cortical thickness of the normal Albino diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole — from locality I to locality V — and the cortex at the frontal pole increases most rapidly in the early age. This is also just the order of the excesses in the cortical thickness of the underfed


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 197

when compared with the standard values for the brains weighing the same. The cortical thickness at each locality of the controls was on the average fairly in accord with the standard (the detailed evidence for these conclusions is contained in table 6 a, not here published).

In table 6 b (unpublished), in which the cortical thickness at localities VI, VII, and VIII of the frontal section was given, it was also clearly seen that the localities VI and VII are much greater in the cortical thickness, compared with those of the controls or the standard values of the same brain weight. The excess amounts on the average to more than 10 per cent. The locality VIII, at which the cortex is heterogeneous in laminar structure, did not show any significant difference in the cortical thickness, compared with the normal, though in some cases here and there it was found somewhat thicker in the underfed (the evidence for these determinations is contained in table G b, not here published).

One more notable thing found in the cerebral cortex of the underfed was that, while in the controls and standards the locality VII is always somewhat greater in thickness than the locality VI, the relation has, in many cases (18 out of 44) of the underfed, proved to be reversed (A a, h; B i; C a, c; D d, e; E c, h; F b, c, f, h; G a, c, g, e and h).

Generally considered, the localities which are situated nearer to the ventricular wall, the locus of the cell division, seem to have gained much more in the cortical thickness in the case of the underfed, while the localities remote from the matrix (for example, locality V) or the part constructed heterogeneousl}^ (for example, locality VIII) appear to be modified but little by underfeeding.

As is to be seen in table 6, the average thickness of the cortex is in favor of the underfed Albinos. If compared with the standard values for the same brain weight, the average cortical thickness in the underfed young (table 6) is greater than tjie standard on the average by 7 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only), while t^e controls are greater on the average by only 1.8 per cent (average of Litters A to E^ C. groups only). According


198


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 6 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, and the average cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections. The general average cortical thickness was obtained and compared with the standard value for the same brain weight, quoted from a previous paper (Sugita, '17a). The data for each individual and for each locality of the cortex were originally tabulated in three full tables (tables 6a, 6b and 6c) which are on file at The Wistar Institute and from which this table 6 was condensed. The correction-coefficients are given in averages for each litter group for each kind of section. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the end of the table.



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


SAGITTAL SECTION


FRONTAL SECTION


AVERAGE


SERIES, LITTER AND GRODP


Correction coefficient


Cortical thickness


Correction

coefficient


Cortical

thickness


Cortical

thickness


Standard for the same brain weight





days


grams



mm.



mm.


mm.


mm.


Series I












A c, a, d, f


T.



7

0.584


1.16


1.24


1.18


1.47


1.35


1.'9


h


T.



15


1.024


1.21


1.64


1.28


2.05


1.85


1.73


> b, g


C.



8

0.688


1.09


1.34


1.14


1.46


1.40


1.38


i


C.



17


1.278


1.23


1.77


1.26


2.00


1.89


1.84


Series I












B a, c, e, f


T.



9

0.644


1.12


l..;3


1.17


1.53


1.43


1.40


i


T.



19


1.052


1.20


1.66


1.37


2.15


1.91


1.74


b, d


C.



6


0.543


1.08


1.18


1.09


1.32


1.25


1.25


g, h, j


C.



18

1.144


1.24


1.74


1.31


2.01


1.88


1.80


Series I












C a, c, d


T.



20


1.105


1.17


1.74


1.25


2.08


1.91


1.77


b, e


C.



22

1.307


1.17


1.76


1.16


1.97


1.87


1.85


Series I












D a, c, d


T.



12

0.778


1.15


1.54


1.24


1.89


1.72


1.61


e


T.



18


1.089


1.17


1.73


1.28


2.10


1.92


1.77


b


C.



9


0.870


1.13


1.55


1.22


1.87


1.71


1.67


f


C.



22


1.220


1.14


1.78





1.82


Series I











E b, c, d ,


T.



12


0.867


1.11


1.53


1.23


1.95


1.74


1.66


g, h


T.



20


1.122


1.20


1.81


1.26


2.15


1.98


1.79


e, f


C.


II


17

1.179


1.10


1.68


1.21


1*94


1.81


1.79


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


199




TABLE 6

-Continued







TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


SAGITTAL SECTION


FRONTAL SECTION


AVERAGE


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Correction coefficient


Cortical thickness


Correction coefficient


Cortical

thickness


Cortical thickness


Standard for the same brain weight




days


grams



mm.



mm.


mm.


mm.


Series II











Fa, b


T. I


13

0.832


1.17


1.57


1.21


1.8


1.72


1.62


c-1


T. II


25+


1.204


1.24


1.81


1.32


2.15


1.98


1.82


Series III











Ga-g


T. I


11 +


0.844


1.14


1.55


1.24


1.89


1.72


1.63


h-j


T. II


22

1.154


1.19


1.78


1.26


2.15


1.97


1.80


Average 1


T. I


11

0.758


1.14


1.46


1.21


1.77


1.61


1.54


(Her. I-III) j


T. II


20

1.107


1.20


1.74


1.29


2. 2


1.93


1.77


Average 1


C. I


8

0.700


1.10


1.36


1.15


.55


1.45


US


(Ser. I) /


C. II


19+


1.226


1.18


1.75


1. 4


1.98


1.86


1.82


to table 6 c (unpublished), which gives comparisons of cortical thickness of the underfed with the standard in each section, the average cortical thickness in the sagittal section of the underfed exceeds the standard on the average by 5.3 per cent and that in the frontal section of the underfed on the average by 8.7 per cent.

8. AREA OF THE CORTEX IN THE SAGITTAL AND FRONTAL SECTIONS

Following the procedures which have been described earlier for the measurement of the area of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sections of the Albino brains (Sugita, '18 b), the data for the underfed Albinos were obtained. Table 7 presents in condensed form for each group the averaged data on the corrected area of the cortex together with the average correction-coefficient for each group, in the sagittal and frontal sections, respectively. The observed data, as measured on the slides, and the data for correction-coefficient for each individual were tabulated in tables 7 a and 7 b (unpublished), on the basis of which table 7 was made. In table 7 (and in table 7 b) the total areas of the frontal sections (one hemicerebrum) and the percentage of the cortical area to the total area of the section are also entered.


200


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 7

Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the corrected areas of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sect'ons, and the total area of the frontal section and the average correction-coefficients for each group for each kind of section. The percentage values of the cortical area to the area of the total section in the frontal section are also given for each group. This table was condensed from two detailed tables for individual observed data and the data for the correction-coefficients. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE

BRAIN WEIGHT


SAGITTAL SECTION



FRONTAL


SECTION



SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Correction-coefficient


Area of cortex


Correction-coefficient


Area of cortex


Total area of section


Percentage of cortical area to the total










area




grams



mm."



mm,.

mm.

per cent


Series I










A c, a, d, f


T. I


0.584


1.16


14.6


1.18


13.4


28.8


45


h


T. II


1.024


1.21


22.2


1.28


22.8


45.0


51


b, g


C. I


0.688


1.09


17.4


1.14


15.2


31.9


46


i


C. II


1.278


1.23


27.4


1.26


21.7


43.6


50


Series I










B a, c, e, f


T. I


0.644


1.12


16.9


1.17


15.0


31.6


47


i


T. II


1.052


1.20


23.3


1.37


23.4


45.7


51


b, d


C. I


0.543


1.08


9.1


1.09


11,6


25.1


46


g, h, j


C. II


1.144


1.24


24.6


1.31


21.7


45.3


47


Series I









C a, c, d


T. II


1 . 105


1.17


24.5


1.25


22.0


43.6


50


1), e


C. II


1.307


1.17


27.8


1.16


22.2


46.0


48


Series I










D a, c, d


T. I


0.778


1.15


19.4


1.24


17.9


36.1


50


e


T. II


1.089


1.17


24.2


1.28


20.0


41.0


49


b


C. I


0.870


1.13


20.6


1.11


18.7


38.8


48


f


C. II


1.220


1.14


26.7






Series I










E b, c, d


T. I


0.867


1.11


19.9


1.23


19.8


38.4


52


g. h


T. II


1.122


1.20


25.9


1.26


23.4


45.9


51


e, f


C. II


1.179


1.10


24.2


1.21


22.2


45.2


49


Series II










F a, b


T. I


0.832


1.17


20.8


1.21


18.6


38.0


50


c-I


T. II


1.204


1.24


26.0


1.32


23.4


47.3


50


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


201


TABLE l^Continued



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE

BRAIN WEIGHT


SAGITTAL


SECTION



FRONTAL


SECTION



SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Qorrection-coefficient


Area of cortex


Correction-coefficient


Area of cortex


Total area of section


Percentage of

cortical

area to

the total











area





grams



mm 2



mm.

mm .

per cent


Series III











G a-ig


T.


I


0.844


1.14


20.1


1.24


19.2


38.5


50


h-j


T.


II


1.154


1.19


25.6


1.26


22.9


46.2


50


Average 1


T.


I


0.758


1.14


18.6


1.21


17.3


35.2


49


(Ser. I-III)j


T.


II


1.107


1.20


24.5


1.29


22.6


45.0


50


Average \


C.


I


0.700


1.10


15.7


1.15


15.2


31.9


48


(Ser. I) /


C.


II


1.226


1.18


26.1


1.24


22.0


45.0


49


The above-mentioned corrected data for each individual were separately paired with the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight, quoted from my previous study (Sugita, '18 b) in table 8 a (unpul)lished) and from this latter table 8 was condensed, giving only the averages for each group.

Briefly stated, the area of the cortex in the sagittal section of the underfed is on the average greater by 1.4 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only) than in the standard, while the controls are on the average about 1.9 per cent less than the standard.

The average area of the total frontal section is in the underfed greater than that of the standard by 2.4 per cent (average of all eight litters, T. groups only), while the controls are less by 3.8 per cent (average of Litters A to E, C. groups only) than the standard, and the area of the cortex in the frontal section is in the . underfed greater on the average by 5.0 per cent, while in the controls less by 2.1 per cent, than the standard (table 8). From these observations, it may be easily concluded that in the underfed the proportion of the cortex to the total section is higher than in the standard or control, as shown by the percentage values directly calculated for each brain (table 7 b) and given in a condensed form in the last column of table 7, where the values are


202


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 8

Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain iveight, the corrected areas of the cortex in the sagittal and frontal sections, and the area, of the entire frontal section, respectively, compared tvith the corresponding standard values for the same brain weight. The standard values are all entered according to my previous presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original complete table 8a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the end of the table.



AVER

SAGITTAL SECTION


FRONTAL SECTION



Area of cortex


Tota


area


Area of cortex


SERIES, LITTER AND


AGE

BRAIN

WEIGHT









GROUP


Corrected


Stan^^ard


Area


Corrected


Standard


Corrected


Standard


Area



Thick

Thick





ness






ness



grams


mm.

mm.

mm.


mm. 2


mm.

wm.2


mm.'


mm.


Series I











A c, a, d, f


0.584


14.6


13.8


11.4


28.8


28.3


13.4


12.9


8.9


h


1.024


22.2


23.0


13.5


45.0


42.0


22.8


20.7


11.1


b, g


0.688


17.4


16.0


12.6


31.9


31.8


. 15.2


15.0


10.1


i


1.278


27.4


26.7


15.5


43.6


48.5


21.7


23.0


10.9


Series I











B a, c, e, f


0.644


16.9


15. Jt


12.5


31.6


30.4


15.0


14.2


9.6


i


1.052


23.3


23.6


14.0


45.7


43.0


23.4


21.0


10.9


b, d


0.543


13.1


13.0


11.0


25.1


28.3


11.6


11.9


8.6


g, h, j


1.144


24.6


25.2


14.1


45.3


45.2


21.7


21.7


10.8

Series I











C a, c, d


1.105


24.5


2Jt.h


14.0


43.6


44.1


22.0


21.5


10.6


b, e


1.307


27.8


27.1


15.8


46.0


49.3


22.2


23.3


11.3


Series I











D a, c, d


0.778


19.4


18.9


12.6


36.1


34-8


17.9


17.0


9.5


e


1.089


24.2


24.5


14.0


41.0


44-0


20.0


21.3


9.5


b


0.870


20.6


20.5


13.3


38.8


38.0


18.7


18.8


10.0


f


1.220


26.7


26.0


15.0



47.0



22.5



Series I











E b, c, d


0.867


19.9


20.3


13.0


38.4


37.5


19.8


18.7


10.1


g, h


1.122


25.9


25.0


14.3


45.9


44.5


23.4


21.5


10.9


e, f


1.179


24.2


25.3


14.4


45.2


46.0


22.2


23.6


11.4


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 203

TABLE 8— Continued



AVER

SAGITTAL SECTION



FRONTAL SECTION




Area of cortex


Tota


area


Area of cortex


SERIES, LITTER AND


AGE

BRAIN

WEIGHT








GROUP


Corrected


Sttt7ld ard


Area


Corrected


Standard


Corrected


Standard


Area



Thick

Thick





ness






ness



grams


mm. 2


nim.

mm.


m,m.'


mm."


mm. 2


m.m.

TOTO.


Series II











F a, b


0.832


20.8


19.4


13.2


38.0


36.5


18.6


17.9


9.9


c-1


1.204


26.0


25.9


14.4


47.3


46.7


23.4


22.3


10.9


Series III











Ga-g


0.844


20.1


19.8


13.0


38.5


36.9


19.2


18.2


10.2


h-j


1.154


25.6


25.7


14.3


46.2


45.3


22.9


21.9


10.7


Average 1 (T. I)


0.758


18.6


17.9


12.6


35.2


34-1


17.3


16.5


9.7


(Ser. I-III)/ (T.II)


1.107


24.5


24.6


14.1


45.0


44-2


22.6


21.5


10.7


Average\ (C. I)


0.700


15.7


16.5


12.3


31.9


32.7


15.2


15.2


9.6


(Ser. I) / (C. II)


1.226


26.1


26.1


15.0


45.0


47.2


22.0


22.8


11.1


higher on the average by 3 per cent (1 to 4 per cent in individual cases) than the standard or controls. These results fit with the observation that in the underfed the cortical thickness in the frontal section is 8.7 per cent greater than for the standard (chapter 7).

9. COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CORTEX

In a former paper (Sugita, '18 b), it was assumed that, as the form of the cerebrum of the albino rat is relatively simple and nearly constant, the relative volumes occupied by the cortical cells could be computed, and compared among themselves, by reducing the data obtained by measurement to a simple geometrical form, since the cortical areas in the sagittal and frontal sections stand in fixed relations to the respective diameters L.F and W.D and to the cortical thickness of the sections from the same brain. These relations have been expressed as follows (Sugita, '18 b):


204 NAOKI SUGITA

Cortical area (mm.-) in sagittal section


L.F (mm.) ^ constant (1)


Cortical thickness (mm.) in the same

Cortical area (mm.-) in frontal section ^rr t^ / x , , .^s

-7s — T- — 1 xi- r } w — Til -=- **^ Mimm..) = constant (2)

Cortical thickness (mm.) m the same ^ ^

And the computed volume of the cortex should be obtained simply by the following formula :

L.F X W.D X T (ah in millimeters), (3)

where T gives the general average thickness of the cerebral cortex of the same brain.

As shown in table 9, which has been condensed from table 9 a (unpublished) for each individual, the constant ratios obtained by the above formulas (1) and (2) fall between 1.10 and 1.29 for the sagittal sections and between 0.80 and 0.95 for the frontal sections, throughout both the underfed and the control groups. The averages of the ratios for the sagittal and frontal sections of the underfed are, respectively, 1.18 and 0.88, and those of the controls are, respectively, 1.20 and 0.88. I have previously given the figures 1.22 and 0.91, respectively, as these ratios of the standard albino rat brains weighing more than 0.5 gram. So it may be assumed that the ratios are nearly the same in both the underfed and the controls; slight differences in the underfed from the standard may be regarded as due to the facts that the cerebrum of the underfed is slightly more elongated and the cortical thickness is somewhat greater than in the standard. As the product of the coefficients in the underfed (I'.IS X 0.88) falls somewhat lower than that in the standard (1.22 X 0.91), the results of L.F X W.D X T should be about 5 per cent higher in the underfed than in the standard.

The relative volumes of the cortex, obtained by the formula (3), are computed and given in table 11 (without any special correction), compared with the corresponding standard values for brains of the same age, instead of for brains of the same weight. The relative volume of the cortex in the underfed brains, which are considerably retarded in total weight development, is greater than for the standard brains of the .same weight, which are necessarily younger and less developed as regards the cortical elements than the underfed brains of like weight.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 205

Since in the underfed the average cortical thickness in the sagittal and frontal sections was used in place of the standard T, based on the thickness of the sagittal, frontal and horizontal sections (compare Sugita, '17 a), therefore corresponding values of T have been used in calculating the standard values for the present comparison.

For this comparison, the test animals may be considered in two groups, T. I and T. II. In T. I groups, in which all test rats have a brain weight less than 1.0 gram, the average computed volume of the cortex is less than the standard by 16 per cent, while in T. II groups, which contain the test rats with brains weighing above 1.0 gram, it is more than the standard on the averagfe by 1 per cent. On the other hand, the cortical volume in C. I groups, which embraces the controls having brain weights less than 1.0 gram, is on the average 2.4 per cent less, and in C. II groups, the controls with brain weights above 1.0 gram, it is on the average 7.5 per cent more than the standard for the same age (table 11, last lines). As these comparisons are based on the numbers obtained by calculation and not on the direct measurement, slight discrepancies cannot be regarded as significant, and, as already noted, the results in the underfed are open to special correction of a few per cent for an accurate comparison.

The underfed brains are much retarded in the weight development and the brains weighing up to 1.0 gram include those of ages up to sixteen days, at which age the normal rats have a brain weight 10 per cent heavier than the test rats (chapter V). We conclude, therefore, that, calculated by the formula L.F X W.D X T, the relative volumes of the cortex in the underfed are nearly the same as in the standard in the brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (T. II groups), while, on the contrary, they are considerably smaller than the standard in the case of the brains weighing under 1.0 gram or under the age of sixteen days, if the age be taken as the standard of comparison.

It appears, therefore, that in rats underfed severely the cortical volume is considerably retarded in growth during the early period of development, but this is probably fairly compensated later when the brain attains a weight of more than 1 .0 gram or an age


206


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 9

Giving for each litter group in this study the average brain weight, the measurements L.F and W.D, the quotient of the cortical area divided by the cortical thickness {given also in table 8), and the ratio of the latter to the measurement L.F or W .D, for the sagittal and frontal sections. The width-length index which is obtained by {W .D X 100)/L.F is also given. This table was condensed from an U7ipublished table 9a for each individual. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table. The ratios given in this table 9 are based on the average of the individual ratios a7id not on those obtained directly from the average L.F or W.D and the average quotients





H




CORT.




CORT.





TEST CONTROL


<

m a <


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


L.F


.\REA


RATIO


W. D


AREA


RATIO


z


SERIES, LITTER AND GROrP


CORT.

THICKN.

IN

SAGITTAL


CORT. THICKN.

IN FRONTAL


is





•<:




SECTION




SECTION



^





days


grams


mm.


7nm.



mm.


mm.




Series I













A c, a, d, f


T.



7 —


0.584


9.28


11.4


1.23


9.88


8.9


0.89


106


h


T.


II


15


1.024


11.85


13.5


1.14


12.00


11.1


0.93


101


b, g


c.



8

0.688


9.90


12.6


1.27


10.60


10.1


0.95


107


i


c.


II


17


1.278


12.95


15.5


1.20


12.85


10.9


0.84


-99


Sey-ies I












B a, c, e, f


T.



9

0.644


9.70


12.5


1.29


10.46


9.6


0.92


108


i


T.


II


19


1.052


12.10


14.0


1.16


12.45


10.9


0.88


103


b, d


C.



6


0.543


8.78


, 11.0


1.24


9.85


8.0


0.88


112


g, h, J


C.


II


18

1.144


12.28


14.1


1.16


12.40


10.8


0.87


101


Series I













C a, c, d


T.


II


20


1.105


12.32


14.0


1.14


12.17


10.6


0.87


99


h, e


C.


II


22

1.307


13.30


15.8


1.19


12.98


11.3


0.87


98


Series I











D a, c, d


T.



12

0.778


10.90


12.6


1.15


10.77


9.5


0.88


99


e


T.


II


18


1.089


12.25


14.0


1.14


11.85


9.5


0.80


97


b


C.



9


0.870


10.95


13.3


1.21


11.45


10.0


0.82


104


f _


C.


II


22


1.220


12.40


15.0


1.21


12.80




103


Series I













E b, c, d


T.



12


0.867


10.65


13.0


1.22


11.30


10.1


0.90


106


g, h


T.


II


20


.1.122


12.10


14.3


1.19


12.35


10.9


0.88


102


e, f


C.


II


17

1.179


12.23


14.4


1.18


12.48


11.4


0.92


102


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


207


TABLE Q— Continued





»




CORT.




CORT.




SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


TEST CONTROL


o

<;

H

<


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


L.F


AREA

CORT.

THICKN.

IN SAGITT.\L


RATIO


W. D


AREA COKT.

THICKN. IN

FRONTAL


RATIO


m 1 X

Q 2





>

<




SECTION




SECTION



?





days


grams


mm.


mm.



mm.


mm..




Series II













F a, b


T.


I


13

0.832


11.18


13.2


1.19


11.23


9.9


0.88


101


c-1


T.


II


25+


1.204


12.66


14.4


1.14


12.30


10.9


0.88


97


Series III













Ba-g


T.


I


11 +


0.844


10.99


13.0


1.18


11.22


10.2


0.90


102


h-j


T.


II


22

1.154


12.58


14.3


1.14


12.20


10.7


0.87


97


Average 1


T.


I


11

0.758


10.45


12.6


1.21


10.81


9.7


0.90


104


(Ser. I-III)/


T.


II


20

1.107


12.27


14.1


1.15


12.19


10.7


0.87


99


Average \


C.


I


8

0.700


9.88


12.3


1.24


10.63


9.6


0.88


108


(Ser. I) /


C.


II


19+


1.226


12.63


15.0


1.19


12.70


11.1


0.88


101


of more than sixteen days, so that after this period there is no longer any significant difference in the cortical volumes between the test and the standard animals.

10. NUxMBER OF NERVE CELLS IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX •

The actual number of nerve cells in the frontal cortex in a unit volume of 0.001 mm,^, or 0.1 mm.^ in area on the shde by 10 micra in thickness, was counted in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris at locality VII, the middle part of the cortical band of the frontal section. The procedure for counting the cell number, adopted by me for the standard values and described in my previous paper (Sugita, '18 b), has been strictly followed here also. The number of cells in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris and the number of the ganglion cells in a unit volume have been recorded and then converted into the number of cells in the same unit volume in the fresh condition of the brain by the use of the correction-coefficients based on observations. All the data have been tabulated in table 10 a (unpublished) and condensed in table 10 for each group. The


208


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 10

Givitig for each litter group in. this study the average age, hraiti, weight, correctioncoefficient, and the corrected number of nerve cells in a unit volume {0.001 mm.^) in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris and the corrected number of ganglion cells only in the same volume, measured at locality VII. This table was condensed from a detailed table, table 10a (unpublished), which gives the same data for the individual cases. The averages for the test and qpntrol groups are given at the foot of the table.



TEST


AVERAGE


AVERAGE


CORRECTION


NUMBER OF CELLS IN


0.001 mm.'






GROUP


CONTROL


AGE


WEIGHT


COEFFI

Lamina


Lamina


Ganglion





CIENT


pvrami

gansjlio

cells in







dalis


nans


lam. gangl.




days


grams






Series I









A c, a, d, f


T. I


7 —


0.584


1.18


271


167


47


h


T. II


15


1.024


1.28


120


86


21


b, g


C. I


8

0.688


1.14


224


131


40


i


C. II


17


1.278


1.26


107


75


20


Series I









B a, c, e, f


T. I


-9

0.644


1.17


232


132


39


i


T. II


19


1.052


1.37


117


77


19


b, d


C. I


6


0.543


1.09


268


177


58


g, h, i


C. II


18

1.144


1.31


109


76


21


Series I









C a, c, d


T. II


20


1.105


1.25


109


73


20


b, e


C. II


22

1.307


1.16


109


79


26


Series









D a, c, d


T. I .


12

0.778


1.24


152


90


21


e


T. II


18


1.089


1.28


118


81


18


b


C. I


9


0.870


1.22


152


93


27


f


C. II


22


1.220


1.14


111


75


22


Series I









E a, b, c, d


T. I


12

0.835


1.21


144


101


25


g, h


T. II


20


1.122


1.26


116


79


21


e, f


C. II


17

1.179


1.21


116


79


23


Series II









Fa, b


T. I


13

0.832


1.21


162


98


29


c-1


T. II


25+


1.204


1.32


105


74


19


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


209


TABLE 10— Continued



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVERAGE

BRAIN WEIGHT


CORRECTION COEFFICIENT


ND.MBER OP CELLS IN 0.001 mm.^


GROUP


Lamina

pyrami dalis


Lamina

ganglio naris


Ganglion

cells in

lam.gangl


Series III Ga-g


days

T. I T. II


grams 11 +

22

0.844

1.154


1.24 1.26


149 108


94 80


24 20


Average ) (Ser. I-III)/

Average ) (Ser. I) /


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


1120 819+


0.753 1.107

0.700 1.226


1.21 1.29

1.15 1.24


185 113

215 110


, 114

79

134

77


31 20

42 22


sum of the cell numbers in the lamina pyramidalis and the lamina ganglionaris, which may be regarded as representing the average cell density in the cerebral cortex, are also given in table 11, as A^, and compared with the corresponding standard values for the brains of the same age, taken from a former paper (Sugita, '18 b). When compared in this way, it is seen that the observed cell number in a unit volume is generally higher than the standard in brains which weigh less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups). The excess in cell number in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups) is on the average 17 per cent, and that of the control brains weighing less than I.O gram (C. I groups) is on the average about 7 per cent. On the other hand, the average cell number of the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (T. II groups) is almost equal to, while that of the control brains weighing more than 1.0 gram (C. II groups) is less by 4 per cent than, the standard for the same age. The underfed brains are underdeveloped in weight and the brains weighing less than 1.0 gram (T. I groups) contain those of ages up to sixteen days. These relations lead me to conclude that, in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram or under sixteen days in age, the cell density denoted by A^ (the average cell number in two unit volumes) is distinctly high, when compared with the normal brains of the same age, probably because the brain size or weight


THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3


210 NAOKI SUGITA

or the cortical volume is relatively undeveloped in comparison with the cell number (see above) . In older brains weighing more than 1.0 gram or of ages above sixteen days, these discrepancies have been somewhat balanced, but, when compared with the controls, the underfed brains remain generally slightly higher in the cell density even in rats of sixteen days or older.

Considered in relation to the facts presented in the previous chapter showing that the computed volume of the cortex is below the standard in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram, it may inferred that the underfed brains, underdeveloped in weight and size, have a relatively higher cell density, because the normal number of cells is crowded into a cortex of smaller total volume.

11. RELATIVE VALUE OF THE COMPUTED NUMBER OF CELLS IN THE ENTIRE CORTEX

As previously shown (Sugita, '18 b), the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex may be obtained and the values compared among themselves by the use of the following formula :

N X L.F X W.D X T {L.F, W.D and T, in millimeters),

where N means the relative cell density represented by the sum of the cell numbers in the unit volume in the lamina pyramidalis and in the lamina ganglionaris (that is, the number in two unit volumes), given in table 11, based on table 9, and L.F X W.D X T is the computed volume of the cortex, as already given in the foregoing chapter.

In table 11, these relative values for the volume of the cortex and for the cell number in the cortex in the underfed Albinos are given for each group, each paired with the corresponding standard values for brains of the same age, all condensed from table 11a (unpublished), which gives the corresponding data for each individual. Every standard value was taken from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18 b). Throughout the underfed and the controls, these pairs of figures seem to be nearly in accord, showing on the average only 1.7 per cent excess in the underfed and 3,4 per cent excess in the control brains (average


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 211

of all groups), as compared with the standards. As alreadynoted in chapter 9, the results obtained by the use of formulas are open to some error, and in addition the results in the underfed are subject to special correction of a few per cent for a fair comparison, so that the differences recorded may be regarded as probably insignificant and the computed cell number in the entire cortex of the underfed may presumably be considered as equal to the standard number for brains of the same age. If this is so, the process of the cell division in the cerebrum during early life must have been going on undistui"bed even by the severe underfeeding, though both the size and the weight of the brain have been arrested in development by this, in some cases very considerably.

12. SIZE OF NERVE CELLS

The standard size of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris) in the cerebral cortex of the albino rats at different ages was presented in my sixth paper (Sugita, '18 c). In the present study on the influence of the severe underfeeding upon the growth of the cerebral cortex, the size of the nerve cells in the cortex was also determined bj^ the measurement of the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the cell body and the nucleus in the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and in the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris) at locality VII in the frontal section, in the same manner as for the standard determinations (Sugita, '18 c). The results have been tabulated in table 12 a (unpublished) and condensed in table 12 for each group. The average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus are obtained by extracting the square roots of the respective products of the transverse by the longitudinal diameters, and these have been corrected, by applying the correction-coefficient, to the fresh condition of the brain. The corrected average diameters have been tabulated in table 13 a (unpublished), compared respectively with the corresponding standard values for the brains of the same age, and condensed in table 13. The correction-coefficients which were used are given in table 12.


212


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 11

Giving for each litter group in this study the average hrain weight, the age, the computed cortical volume, the cell density and the computed number of cells in the entire cortex, as based on the observed measurements presented in this paper, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. Standard values were taken from my previous presentation (Sugita, '18b). This table was condensed from an original full table 11a {unpublished) , which gives the data for each individual. At the end of the table the averages for the test and control groups are given.



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVER AGE

BRAIN

WEIGHT


CORTICAL volume:

L.F X W.D X T


cell density:

N


CELL number: N XL.FX W.D XT


GEO UP


Starved

and control^


Standard

for the same age


Starved

and controls


Standard

for the same age


Starved

and controls


Standard for the same age





days


grams


mm J


OTTO. 3






Series I












A c, a, d, f


T.


I


7 —


0.584


134.4


151.8


437


375


482.9


450.8


h


T.


II


15


1.024


263.1


265.0


206


202


542.0


535.0


b, g


C.


I


8

0.688


159.9


165.0


355


354


452.4


467.5


i


C.


II


17


1.278


314.5


275.0


182


198


572.4


545.0


Series I












B a, c, e, f


T.


I


9

0.644


151.6


187.0


364


298


489.1


479.2


i


T.


II


19


1.052


287.7


285.0


194


191


558.1


544-0


b, d


C.


I


6


0.543


112.4


126.5


445


388


457.8


44s. 5


g, h, j


C.


II


18

1.144


285.5


278.3


184


195


526.2


543.3


Series I












C a, c, d


T.


II


20


1.105


287.3


284.7


182


191


521.6


542.0


b, e


C.


II


22

1.307


320.9


289.5


188


188


603.4


540.5


Series I












D a, c, d


T.


I


12

0.778


201.1


238.3


242


213


486.4


505.3


e


T.


II


18


1.089


278.7


280.0


199


195


554.6


546.0


b


C.


I


9


0.870


214.4


207.0


245


230


525.3


476.0


Series I












E b, c, d


T.


I


12


0.867


210.3


249.3


238


207


497.1


516.7


g, h


T.


II


20


1.122


295.9


290.0


194


188


574.0


545.0


e, f


C.


II


17

1.179


278.0


272.5


195


197


535.9


535.0


GEOWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


213


TABLE n— Continued



TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVER AGE

BRAIN

WEIGHT


CORTICAL VOLUME

L.F X W.D X T


CELL density:

N


CELL number:

NXL,FX

W.D X T


GROUP


Starved

and controls


Standard for the same


Starved

and controls


standard for the same


Starved

and controls


standard for the same








age



age



age





days


grams


rnm.^


mm.^






Series II












Fa, b


T.


I


13

0.832


218.7


252.5


260


206


550.4


520.0


c-1


T.


II


25+


1.204


307.9


SOS 4


178


180


548.7


545.7


Series III












Ga-g


T.


I


11 +


0.844


213.2


229.1


248


225


520.4


504.1


h-j


T.


II


22

1.154


302.2


294.7


189


186


570.3


546.7


Average 1


T.


I


11

0.758


188.2


218.0


298


254


504.4


496.0


(Ser. I-III)/


T.


II


20

1.107


289.0


286.1


192


190


552.8


543.5


Average 1


C.


I


8

0.700


162.2


166.2


348


S24


478.5


^62.3


(Ser. I) /


C.


II


19

1.227


299.7


278.8


187


195


559.5


541.0


By comparing the corrected values in the underfed with the standard values, the average diameters of the cell body and of the nucleus in the underfed brains are found to be generally smaller, on the average, by 9.8 per cent (cell body by 8.6 per cent and nucleus by 11.0 per cent) than the standard value. At the end of the following table 13 appears a summary of the comparisons, arranged as in the earlier tables in this study.

As seen in this summary, both the pyramids and the ganglion cells are much retarded in development in size of the cell body in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram or of ages under sixteen days, the average diameters of the cell body being 11.5 per cent (in the pyramids 11.2 per cent and in the ganglion cells 11.8 per cent) smaller than the standard for the same age. But in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram, this arrest in size-development of nerve cells is no longer so notable, the average diameters of the cell body being smaller than the standard by only 5.7 per cent (in the pyramids by 8.3 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 3.1 per cent). The size of the


214


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 12

Giving for each litter group in. this study the average brain iveight, the correctioncoefficient, and the observed {not corrected) diameters (transverse and longitudinal) of the cell body and the micleus of the pyramids (in the lamina pyramidalis) and of the ganglion cells (in the lamina ganglionaris), measured at locality VII in the frontal section. This table was condensed from table 12a (tin published) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups are given at the foot of the table



m



% o

o


CO < X

k2

<



■z

o

K S


LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


LAMINA GANGLIONARIS


SERIES, LITTER AND


Cell body diameters


Nucleus diameters


Cell body diameters


Nucleus

diameters



>

s 2


C

q


>

e

03

H


bl 13 O


a

OJ


■a

J


>

1


M

a o



grams


M


M


M


M


li


M


n


Series I














A c, a, d, f


T.



0.584


1.18


11.5


17.2


10.5


11.2


14.8


22.4


13.0


15.6


h


T.


II


1.024


1.28


14.2


19.5


13.3


15.1


19.8


29.2


17.2


19.8


' b, g


C.



0.688


1.14


14.1


19.0


12.9


14.3


18.2


25.8


16.1


18.2


i


C.


II


1.278


1.26


15.2


22.0


14.1


15.5


20.1


30.5


18.0


20.1


Series I














B a, c, e, f


T.



0.644


1.17


13.3


18.8


12.0


13.5


17.2


25.3


16.0


17.5


i


T.


II


1.052


1.37


14.0


20.4


13.4


15.7


19.5


28.3


17.4


19.6


b, d


C.



0.543


1.09


13.9


18.0


12.4


13.6


18.6


24.1


15.6


17.0


g, h, j


C.


II


1.144


1.31


14.7


20.8


14.4


15.4


19.9


30.3


18.3


19.6


Series I














C a, c, d


T.


II


1.105


1.25


14.6


21.3


13.9


14.3


18.8


29.9


17.7


19.3


b, e


C.


II


1.307


1.16


16.0


21.1


14.4


15.3


19.9


30.4


17.8


19.6


Series I














D a, c, d


T.



0.778


1.24


14.3


19.4


12.9


13.8


17.6


27.7


15.4


17.2


e


T.


II


1.089


1.28


14.0


20.0


12.2


14.0


18.3


28.8


16.2


19.4


b


C.



0.870


1.11


16.1


19.8


14.5


15.8


21.1


27.2


18.2


19.8


f


C.


II


1.220


1.14


14.9


21.5


14.2


14.8


19.2


28.6


17.2


18.0


Series I














E a, b, c, d


T.



0.835


1.23


13.5


19.8


12.8 14.3


17.9


28.3


16.0


18.2


g, h


T.


II


1.122


1.26


14.0


20.7


12.5 14.2


19.7


30.7


16.5


18.1


e, f


C.


II


1.179


1.21


15.1


21.7


13.9 15.4


19.2


30.6


17.6


19.2


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


215


TABLE 12— Continued



o

|i


<

n

w -< K

« 2


fa

m


u

z


e^

K H

§5


LAMINA PYRAMIDALI8


LAMINA GANGLIONABIB


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


Cell body diameters


Nucleus diameters


Cell body diameters


Nucleus diameters



>

C

2


M

C! O

1-1


>

a S


s o


>

c


C

o


>

H


bC

C

o




grams



M


M


M


M


M


M


M


Series I7













F a, b


T. I


0.832


1.21


14.8


19.7


13.6


14.7


19.3


28.6


17.6


19.3


c-1


T. II


1.204


1.32


14.9


21.0


13.7


14.8


19.0


30.0


17.3


19.1


Series III












Ga-g


T. I


0.844


1.24


14.0


19.8


13.1


14.3


17.9


28.4


16.8


18.4


h-j


T. II


1.154 0.753


1.26


13.9


19.8


12.6


13.9


18.3


28.7


16.2


18.1


Average \


T. I


1.21


13.6


19.1


12.5


13.6


17.5


26.8


15.8


17.7


(Ser. I-III) /


T. II


1.107


1.29


14.2


20.4


13.1


14.6


19.1


29.4


16.9


19.1


Average |


C. I


0.700


1.15


14.7


18.9


13.3


14.6


19.3


25.7


16.6


18.3


(Ser. I) /


C. II


1.226


1.22


15.2


21.4


14.2


15.3


19.7


30.1


17.8


19.3


nucleus is much more affected by the underfeeding than that of the cell body. In the underfed brains of T. I groups the average diameter of the nucleus is smaller by 13.9 per cent (in the pyramids by 15.3 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 12.5 per cent) and in those of T. II groups it is smaller by 8.0 per cent (in the pyramids by 11.0 per cent and in the ganglion cells by 5.1 per cent) than the standard for the same age. The deficiency in the average diameter of the cell body by 6 to 12 per cent and that of the nucleus by 8 to 14 per cent correspond to the inferiority in volume of about 20 to 45 per cent and 25 to 50 per cent, respectively.

On the other hand, in the control brains of all weights, the size of the cell body and of the nucleug have proved to be also somewhat smaller than the standards, but the deviations are not so much in comparison with the underfed, the deficiency in the average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus being on the average 5.3 per cent (table 13).


216


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 13 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, brain weight, the corrected average diameters of the cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids {in the lamina pyramidalis) and the ganglion cells {in the lamina ganglionaris), based on the condensed data in table 12, each compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age, taken from my former presentation {Sugita, '18c.) This table was condensed from table Ida {unpublished) for individual cases. The averages for the test and control groups and their percentage relations are given at the end of the table, {per. diff.) = percentage difference



TEST CONTROL


H O <

m o <

> <


» <

a

B

m o <

> <


L.\MIN.\ PYR.A.MID.\.L1S


L.\MIN.\*G.\NGLION.\^RIS


SERIES, LITTER AND


Cell body Aver, diameter


Nucleus Aver, diameter


Cell body Aver, diameter


Nucleus Aver, diameter



1 1

!:

o O


u

■a

a

o3


s


u


-d

a B




m


T3 01




a

S 02





days


grams


M


M


M


M


J"


M


M


M


Series I














Ac, a, d, f


T.



7 —


0.584


16.6


19.4


13.3


16.6


21.6


25.9


16.8


20.7


h


T.


II


15


1.024


21.1


23.7


18.1


19.8


30.6


31.3


23.6


24.4


b, g


C.



8

0.688


18.7


19.6


15.4


16.9


24.7


26.7


19.5


21.2


i


C.


II


17


1.27


23.1


23.8


18.7


20.0


31.2


31.3


2 .1


24.4


Series I













B a, c, e, f


T.



9

0.644


18.4


20.7


14.8


17.8


24.3


27.9


19.4


22.1


i


T.


II


19


1.052


23.2


24.0


19.8


20.0


32.1


31.4


25.1


24.5


b, d


C.



6


0.543


17.4


18.5


14.3


15.8


23.3


24.9


17.8


19.8


g, h, j


C.


II


18

1.144


23.1


23.9


19.7


20.0


32.4


31.3


25.0


24.4


Series I














C a, c, d


T.


II


20


1.105


22.1


23.9


17.6


20.0


29.7


31.4


22.9


24-4


b, e


C.


II


22

1.307


21.4


24.0


17.4


20.0


29.1


31.5


21.8


24.5


Series I












D a, c, d


T.



12

0.778


20.6


22.9


16.6


19.5


27.4


30.1


20.2


23.8


e


T.


II


18


1.089


21.4


23.9


16.8


20.0


29.5


31.3


22.8


24.4


b


C.



9


0.870


21.8


22.1


18.4


18.8


29.3


28.4


23.2


23.0


f


C.


II


22


1.220


22.4


24.1


18.2


20.1


29.5


31.6


22.1


24.5


Series I












E a, b, c, d


T.



X2

0.835


19.8


23.0


16.4


19.8


27.1


30.9


20.7


24-2


g, h


T.


II


20


1.122 21.5


24-0


16.8


20.0


31.0


31.4


21.7


24.5


e, f


C.


II


17

1.179 22.0


23.7


17.7


19.9


29.5


31.3


22.4


24.5


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


217






TABLE n— Continued







TEST CONTROL



O <

> <


s

z

a o m o <


LAMINA PYRAMIDALIS


LAMI.VA GANGLIONARIS


SERIES, LITTER


Cell body Aver, diameter


Nucleus Aver, diameter


Cell body Aver, diameter


Nucleus Aver, diameter



1

6



S

5

O


3


1

o

Q


-a c 5


o


■E

-0

a




dans


grams


ij

M


At


M


M


M


Series II













F a, b


T. I


13

0.832


20.8


2S.2


17.1


19.8


28.5


31.1


22.3


H.4


' c-1


T. II


25+


1.204


22.9


23.9


18.6


20.0


31.0


31.5


23.6


H.4


Series III












Fa-g


T. I


11 +


0.844


20.6


22.5


17.0


19.2


27.9


29.9


21.9


23.5


h-j


T. II


22

1.154


21.0


24.1


16.7


20.1


29.0


31.5


21.7


24.5


Average













(Ser. I-III)


T. I


11

0.753


19.5


22.0


15.9


18.8


26.1


29.3


20.2


23.1


(per. diff.)






(-11.2)



(-15.3)



(-11.8)



(-12.5)


Average













(Ser. I-III)


T. II


20

1.107


21.9


23.9


17.8


20.0


30.4


3H


23.1


24.4


(per. diff.)






(- 8.3)



(-11.0)



(- 3.1)



(- 5.1)


Average













- (Ser. I)


C. I


8

0.700


19.3


20.1


16.0


17.2


25.8


26.7


20.2


21.3


(per. diff.)






(- 3.8)



(- 6.7)



(- 3.2)



(- 5.1)


Average)













(Ser. I)


C. II


19+


1.226


22.4


23.9


18.3


20.0 30.3


31.4


23.1


24.5


(per. diff.)






(- 6.2)



(- 8.5)j


(- 3.3)



(- 5.5)


It is also seen that by underfeeding the nucleus is more affected than the entire cell body both in the pyramids (deficiency in diameters; T. I groups: cell body 11.2 per cent and nucleus 15.3 per cent, T. II groups: cell body 8,3 per cent and nucleus 11.0 per cent) and in the ganglion cells (deficiency in diameters; T. I groups: cell body 11.8 per cent and nucleus 12.5 per cent, T. II groups: cell body 3.1 per cent and nucleus 5.1 per cent) of brains of all weights, while the pyramids are more markedly affected than the ganglion cells both in the cell body (deficiency in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids 9.8 per cent and ganglion cells 7.5 per cent) and in the nucleus (deficiency


218 NAOKI SUGITA

in diameters on the average of T. I and T. II groups: pyramids 13.2 per cent and ganglion cells 8.8 per cent). In young brains which weigh less than 1.0 gram, the influence of the underfeeding is considerable, while in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram or of ages more than sixteen days we can not detect any large arrest in the size-development, especially of the ganglion cells (the sizes of the cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells in the T. II groups are quite equal to the corresponding sizes in C. II groups) (tables 12 and 13). These observations are in agreement with the conclusions reached by Morgulis Til).

13. PERCENTAGE OF WATER IN BRAIN

As stated earlier (in chapter III), Litter H in Series II, in which a young primipara mother was entrused with seventeen young in order to produce a series of underfed young, was used partly for the investigation of the percentage of water in the underfed brain and partly for a histological study of myelination (not considered at this time).

In this Series II the development in brain weight is not so greatly arrested, as compared with the arrest in body growth, as in Series I. As already shown, in Litter F, which was treated in a similar manner, the brain weight is on the average 9 per cent low, but in this Litter H it has been possible to arrest the brainweight growth on the average by about 12 per cent, compared with the standard of the same age (compare table 4) .

Table 14 gives for each individual examined in this litter the sex, the age, the brain weight, and percentage of water in the brain, each accompanied by the standard percentage of water contained in the brains of the same age and sex and also of the same weight and sex. The differences are given in special columns.

By obtaining averages, it is found that the underfed brain contains slightly (0.48 per cent) more water, when compared with the normal brain of the same age and somewhat (1.4 per cent) less water, when compared with the normal brain of the same weight. This means in terms of the percentage of water.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


219


TABLE 14

Showing for each brain in litter H the sex, the age, the brain weight, and the percentage value of water in the brain, accompanied with the standard values of percentage of water in brain for the same age and for the same brain weight. The differences between the observed percentages and the corresponding standard values are given in special columns, ivith their averages. *


NO.


.SEX


AGE IN

D.\ys


BRAIN WEIGHT


PERCENTAGE OF WATER

BRAIN OBSERVED


PERCENTAGE OF

WATER

STANDARD FOR THE


PERCENTAGE OP

WATER

STANDARD FOR THE



Same age


Difference in observed


Same brain weight


Difference in observed





grams







H a


f


13


0.880


86.39


85.^0


+0.99


86.82


-0.43


b


f


17


1.024


84.15


83.82


+0.33


85.08


-0.93


c


f


23


1 . 135


82.00


81.93


+0.07


83.21


-1.21


d


f


28


1.166


80.83


80.74


+0.09


82.70


-1.87


e


m


32


1.215


80.31


80.04


+0.27


81.70


-1.39


f


f


37


1.101


80.12


79.55


+0.57


83.78


-3.66


g


m


43


1.295


80.24


79.32


+0.92


80.56


-0.32






Averag


e


+0.48



-1.40


that the underfed brain is shghtly underdeveloped for its age, but somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. Similar relations have been revealed by the comparisons already made. Normally about 0,5 per cent excess in percentage of water in the brain would mean at the early ages approximately one or two days' retardation in development (compare table 74 in 'The Rat/ Donaldson, '15).

From the same litter (Litter H) I took with each of the above individuals a second rat for the study of the myelination, because it is known that the percentage of water in the brain is correlated with its myelination. The brains under seventeen days of age showed no fibers in the frontal sections, as stained with PalKultschitzky method. The twenty-eight-day brain showed only a few faintly stained fibers in the cortex, the fibers in the corona radiata (designated C. E. by Watson, '03) being already myelinated. Material above thirty-seven days was not examined. This passing examination of a small number of cases roughly indicates, therefore, that the first appearance of myelina


220 NAOKI SUGITA

tion in somewhat retarded, because, according to the investigation of Watson ('03), myelination in the corona radiata should have begun at eleven days and radiations into the cortex should have been recognized at twenty-four days. But a more detailed test for this j5rocess is required before any special use can be made of the results.

14. RELATIVE QUANTITIES OF THE ALCOHOL EXTRACTIVES

In my former paper (Sugita, '17 a) a chart, based on the data given in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), was presented to show the absolute quantity of sohds contained in the Albino brain according to the brain weight. For comparison with this, I calculated also the relative quantity of alcohol-extractive substances in the Albino brains, as shown by comparing the initial weight of the brain with its weight after extraction by 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure. As the brains were treated uniformly throughout the investigation, the results are comparable among themselves.

The results from 120 normal albino rat brains, grouped in twenty brain-weight groups (Groups I to XX), are given here in table 15 and plotted also in chart 1, in which the smooth curve (in a dotted line) represents the percentage weight of the extracted brain on the fresh brain weight. In chart 1, the graph which presents the absolute amounts of solids (in grams) according to the brain weight is also given in a solid line based on the chart in my former paper (chart 12, Sugita, '17 a). It was remarked previously (Sugita, '17 a) that in the Albino brains weighing between 0.95 gram and 1.4 grams, that is, between ten and thirty-five days of age, the rate of increase in solids is somewhat higher than in the periods before and after that phase, and this fact was formerly interpreted as indicating that, during this phase, the myelination in the brain had been proceeding very actively. This interpretation is now supported by the graph which gives the percentage weight of the brain. This graph varies inversely to the amount of the alcohol-extractives


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


221


and, as it decreases relatively rapidly in the phase during which the brain grows in weight from 0.9 gram to 1.35 grams, or in the ages between nine and thirty-three days, it shows that during that phase the alcohol-extractives increased.

The turning points in the both graphs marked with crosses X and XX) and asterisks (* and **), respectively, are in fair


•/n





















"•r




















500


78


!.






















"■■—


-...














y




400


74 72







--.'.._


. ~


c








>


^


y











^v


\






^

















'^











iou


68 66 64 62 60


1









/


/-'


i'i"









200


!







/












1





^


^













)00






-^


^















-^^
















i



Q2 0.3


0.5 Q6 QT


09 10 \\ i.2 13 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 19 2.0 W


Chart 1 The dotted line shows the ratio between the initial brain weight and the weight after its dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure, plotted on the brain weight. The data were taken from table 15. The graph was drawn connecting the middle points of each pair of entries, and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.

The solid line shows the absolute weight of the solids in the brain according to the brain weight. The data were taken from table 74 in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15) and calculated by me. * and ** indicate the turning points in the graph.

For the ratios of brain weight the scale is given on the left side of the chart and for the absolute weight of the solids the scale is given on the right side.


coincidence, so that it may be concluded that the mass of the alcohol-extractives would be in proportion to the grade of myelination in the brain, and by following the former the progress in myelination could be estimated roughly.

It must be emphatically stated that my figures given in table 15 do not represent the total quantity of the alcohol-extractives,


222


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 15

Giving for each brain-iveight group of the normal albino rat the average initial brain-weight in the fresh condition and the brain weight after dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent (for twentyfour hours) by a uniform procedure. The ratio of the final brain weight to the ^initial weight is given in the last column as a percentage value. Based on observations on 120 albino rats, sexes combined.





BRAIN WEIGHT



BRAIN-WEIGHT GROUP


NUMBER OF CASES


BRAIN WEIGHT WHEN FRESH


AFTER

DEHYDRATION IN

80 AND 90

PER CENT ALCOHOL


RATIO TO THE

INITIAL BRAIN WEIGHT




gravis


grams


per cent


II (birth)


6


0.271


0.213


78.6


III


8


0.343


0.267


77.8


IV


9


0.428


0.332


77.5


V


14


0.543


0.416


76.7


VI


5


0.636


0.479


75.4


VII


4


0.755


0.571


75.7


VIII


10


0.844


0.630


74.7


IX (10 days)


5


0.954


0.714


74.8


X


6


1.047


0.757


72.3


XI (20 days)


5


1.161


0.820


70.6


XII


5


1.245


0.874


70.2


XIII


8


1.341


0.921


68.6


XIV


5


1.449


0.989


68.2


XV


7


1.558


1.074


68.9


XVI


8


1.667


1.131


67.9


XVII


6


1.721


1.170


68.0


XVIII (90 days)


5


1.832


1 222


66.7


XIX


1


1.924


1.317


68.4


XX


3


2.037


1.369


67.2


because the extraction was not complete. My figures are only by-products in a study on histological technique, and to obtain the total quantity of the extractives the brain must have stayed much longer in alcohol of a higher concentration. My data therefore give merely the relative values for the quantity of the alcohol-extractives, but are comparable among themselves and with the values from the underfed brains treated in the same manner.

In giving the ratio of the brain weight after extraction in alcohol (by this method) to its initial weight, no correction was made for the weight of water replaced by alcohol, because my object was


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 223

only to compare the results among themselves and not to determined the exact quantity of the extractive substances.

Table 16 gives for each group in this study the ratio of the brain weight after dehydration in 80 per cent alcohol (for twentyfour hours) and in 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) to its initial weight in the fresh condition, calculated in the same way as in table 15 and each paired with the standard ratio for the same age, quoted from table 15. Thus compared, the underfed brains show in general a higher ratio, the difference amounts to 1.0-4.3 per cent, on the average 1.9 per cent, while the difference in the control brains is generally low, on the average + 0.4 per cent.

This examination tells us roughly that in the underfed brains the alcohol-extractives are somewhat less in quantity than in the normal brain, if the age be taken as the standard of comparison, and, therefore, it may be concluded that they are somewhat retarded in the formation of alcohol-extractive substances and therefore in myelination. Reviewing tables 14 and 16 together, we see that during underfeeding the myelination process or the increase in the alcohol-extractives is retarded slightly, but is going on, not greatly affected by the outside influence, regularly according to its age. It is fair to say, however, that the differences thus determined by extraction are seemingly less than those shown by the histological tests,

15. A DISCUSSION OX THE RELATION BETWEEN THE BODY

WEIGHT AND THE BRAIN WEIGHT IN THE UNDERFED

ALBINO RATS

By examining table 4 it will be readily seen that under severe underfeeding at an early age, the increase in the body weight and the brain weight, according to the age, is notably reduced, and, as a consequence, the acutely underfed (Series I, chapter 5 and table 1) have lost, in the course of first twenty days after birth (during suckling period), about 29 per cent in body weight, but only 8 per cent in brain weight, when compared with the corresponding standard values for the same age. By chronic starvation, during which the young (excessive in number) were left


224


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 16

Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the initial brain weight in the fresh condition and the brain weight after extraction in 80 per cent alcohol {for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol {for twenty-four hours) by a uniform procedure, and the ratio of the latter to the initial weight. The corresponding standard values for the same age loere calculated 07i the basis of the data in table 15 and compared with each arid the difference between them given as an average for each group. This table %uas condensed from table 16a {unpublished) for individual cases. The averages for the test andcontrol groups are given at the end of the table.


SERIES, LITTER AND


TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


AFTER EXTRACTION IN 80 PER CENT AND 90 PER CENT , ALCOHOL


standard ratio for the brain

of the same age


DIFFERENCE


GROUP


Final brain weight


Ratio to

the initial

brain

weight


FROM THE STANDARD


Series I

A c, a, d, f

b

b, g

i


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


days

715

817


gram.1

0.584 1.024

0.688 1.278


grams

0.450 0.779

0.517 0.928


per cent

77.2 76.0

75.7 72.7


per cent

75.7 72.8

75. li. 72.3


per cent

+ 1.5 +3.2

+0.3 +0.4


Series I

B a, c, e, f

i

b, d


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


919

6 18

0.644 1.052

0.543 1.144


0.488 0.799

0.414 0.826


76.1 76.0

76.4

72.2


74.9 71.7

76.1 72.1


+ 1.2 +4.3

+0.3 +0.1


Series I

C a, c, d

b, e


T. II C. II


20 22

1.105 1.307


0.816 0.934


73.9 71.5


72.9 71.8


+ 1.0 -0.3


Series I

D a, c, d

e

b f


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


1218

9 22


0.778 1.089

0.870 1.220


0.584 0.795

0.656 0.863


75.1 73.0

75.4 70.8


73.7 72.0

74.5 71.0


+ 1.4 + 1.0

+0.9 +0.2


Series I

Ea, b, c, d

e


T. I C. II


1213


0.835 1.024


0.626 0.760


75.0 74.1


73.7 73.4


+ 1.3 +0.7


Series II

F a, b

c-k


T. I T. II


13 25+


0.832 1.198


0.636 0.862


76.7 72.3


73.4 70.7


+3.3 + 1.6


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


225


TABLE IQ— Continued


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


AVERAGE BRAIN WEIGHT


.AFTER EXTRACTON

IN 80 PER CENT AND

90 PER CENT

ALCOHOL

■n.- , Ratio to hr«i. the initial


Standard ratio for the brain

of the same age


DIFFERENCE FROM THE STANDARD


Series III

Ga-g

h-j


T. I T. II


days

11+

22

gra m s

0.844 . 1.154


gratnts

0.641 0.833


per cent

76.0

72.2


per cent

73.9

71.2


per cent

+2.1 + 1.0


Average \ (Ser. I-III)/

Average 1 (Ser. I) j


T. I T. II

C. I C. II


11+

20+

818+


0.753 1.104

0.700 1.195


0.571 0.814

0.529 0.862


76.0 73.9

75.8 72.3


74.2 71.9

75.3

72.1


+ 1.8 +2.0

+0.5 +0.2


continuously with the mothers (Series II and III, chapter 2 and table 2), the loss in the brain weight is relatively less, in some individual cases nothing, while the body weight suffers much more, compared with the acutely underfed groups (Series I).

The observed body weight and the brain weight of each individual in this study are plotted separately for each litter in chart 2, A to H, according to the advancing age. Comparing the set of graphs both for the body weight and the brain weight within every litter, it is clearly seen at a glance that the courses of the graphs are similar, so that one, which advanced in age but has a smaller body weight, has also a relatively smaller brain weight, and vice versa. From this it is concluded that, though the brain, with a strong impulse to grow, regularly increases in weight with age and is only slightly affected by outside influence, yet it is controlled somewhat by the growth in the entire body. Thus, within certain limits, the brain weight may be said to be a function of the body weight: a rat reduced in body weight by starvation has a brain also reduced in weight and, on the other hand, a rat excessive in body weight for its age, through overfeeding, has an exces'S of brain weight for its age, as seen in the control groups shown in table 4. In the interrupted starvation tests (Series I), an average reduction of 29 per cent in the body weight

THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29. NO. 3


226


NAOKI SUGITA



yns, yni



"-^







JTli









« 





,--y








^








-"








15 20 25 <J.


10 15 20 25 30 35 #0 ic^t


Chart 2 Giving for each litter in this study the relation between the body weight and the brain weight of the individuals. The capital letters for each small chart designate the litter. The data given in table 3 were plotted according to the advancing age in days. • ■ ' '— '• Observed body weight of the underfed, in grams. %

o o Observed brain weight of the underfed, in grams.

Observed body weight of the controls, in grams.

Observed brain weight of the controls, in grams.

For the body weight the scale is given on the left side and for the brain weight the scale is given on the right side of the chart.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 227

is accompanied by 8 per cent reduction in the brain weight in the test rats, and an excess of 14 per cent in the body weight by an excess of 6 per cent in the brain weight in the controls. These relations indicate that the brain weight is affected in abnormal conditions of nutrition during early life so that its percentage is altered by about one-third the percentage of the change of the body weight, either plus or minus, as compared with the standard values. On the other hand, in chronic inanition (Series II and III) where the young rat is not disturbed, the brain-weight loss was also 8 per cent against a body weight loss of 39 per cent. It appears, therefore, that during the early helpless period the brain development is highly disturbed by the changes in the environmental conditions represented by removal from the nest, but that when the rats are not disturbed it is much less affected even by severe underfeeding.

Table 17 gives for each group in this study the brain weight — body weight ratio, in percentage value, paired with the ratio obtained from the corresponding standard values for the same age and sex, calculated on the data given in table 4. The complete data for each individual are contained in table 17 a (unpublished) from which table 17 was condensed. In the underfed the above ratios are all higher than the standard, as was to be expected, while in the controls lower ratios are sometimes seen, which, in turn, means an overgrowth of the body. The average differences for each litter and group are given and the values are indicative of the severity of starvation combined with the special characteristics of the litter. Within each litter the range of the differences is narrow but the evidence for this statement is furnished by the unpublished detailed table 17 a.

16. A DISCUSSION ON THE CHANGE IN SHAPE OF THE CEREBRUM

In my first paper (Sugita, '17) it was stated that the Albino cerebrum becomes relatively longer as the age advances. During starvation, the rate of increase in every dimension diminishes considerably, but the relations between the three dimensions remains nearly unchanged, so that, as a result, the underfed brain is somewhat elongated in shape in comparison with the standard


TABLE 17 Giving for each litter group in this study the average age, the sex, th


brain weight —

body weight ratio, compared with the same ratio for the standard rat of the same age and sex. The difference of the ratio for each group is given in the last column This table was condensed from table 17a (unpublished) for the indiAt the foot of the table the averages for the test and control groups


of the table, vidual cases are given.


SERIES, LITTER AND GROUP


TEST CONTROL


AVERAGE AGE


SEX


RATIO OF

BRAIN

WEIGHT TO

BODY

WEIGHT


The same

in standard

rat of the

savie age


DIFFERENCE FROM THE STANDARD




days



per cent


per cent


per cent


Series I








A c, a, d, f


T. I


7 —


1 m, 3 f


7.9


6.5


+ 1.4


h


T. II


15


a f


7.4


6.3


+ 1.1


b, e, g


C. I


8


3 m


6.4


6.8


-0.4


i


C. II


17


1 f


4.2


6.1


-1.9


Series I








B a, c, e, f


T. I


9

3 m, 1 f


8.7


6.7


+2.0


i


T. II


19


1 m


8.3


6.0


+2.3


b, d


C. I


6


2 f


7.6


6.5


+ 1.1


g, h, J


C. II


18

3 f


5.7


6.0


-0.3


Series I








C a, c, d


T. II


20


2 m, 1 f


7.7


5.8


+ 1.9


b, e


C. II


22


2f


5.3


5.6


-0.2


Series I








D a, c, d


T. I


12

1 m, 2 f


11.3


6.8


+4.5


e


T. II


18


1 m


8.4


6.2


+2.2


b


C. I


9


1 m


7.8


7.1


+0.7


f


C. II


22


1 m


5.1


5.6


-0.5


Series I








E a, b, c, d


T. I


12

3 m, 1 f


8.6


6.8


+ 1.8


g, h


T. II


20


2f


7,0


5.6


+ 1.4


e, f


C. II


17

Im, 1 f


5.6


6.4


-0.8


Series II








F a, b


T. I


13

1 m, 1 f


9.1


6.8


+2.3


c-1


T. II


25+


4 m, 6 f


7.5


5.1


+2.4


Series III








Ga-g


T. I


11 +


4 m, 3 f


10.3


6.9


+3.4


h-j


T. II


22

2 m, 1 f


9.3


5.5


+3.8


Average 1


T. I


11


9.3


6.8


+2.5


(Ser. I-III)/


T. II


21 +



7.9


5.8


+2.1


Average 1


C. I


8


7.3


6.8


+ 0.5


(Ser. I) /


C. II


19+



5.2


5.9


-0.7


228


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 229

brain, which is the same in weight but younger. As shown in table 5, in the underfed brains the measurement L.G (the sagittal diameter) is on the average nearly 2 per cent (about 0.25 mm. in a brain weighing 1.0 gram) greater. than the standard, while, on the other hand, as shown in table 6 a (unpublished), in the underfed the cortical thickness at the frontal pole (locality I) .which was measured almost in the same direction w^ith L.G is also greater by 10 per cent (about 0.25 mm. in a brain weighing 1.0 gram) than the standard for the same brain weight, while the cortex at the occipital pole (locality V) is nearly equal to the standard in thickness. Considering together the above facts, the sagittal length of the central nuclei only, if measured between the frontal and occipital poles, would be supposedly about the same in both the underfed and the standard brains weighing alike. On the other hand, the width W .B is, in the underfed, less by nearly 2 per cent (about 0.3 mm. for 1.0 gram brain) than in the standard, and the cortical thickness at locality VII, which was measured at the side of the cerebrum, is thicker in the underfed by nearly 10 per cent (about 0.4 mm. for the both hemispheres in a 1.0 gram brain (based on the unpublished table 6 b for each locality) , and therefore the central nuclei in the underfed are less in width by about 0.7 mm. (for a 1.0 gram brain) than the standard for the same brain weight. In short the central nuclei are notably elongated in shape in the underfed brain compared with the normal brain of like weight.

17. A DISCUSSION ON THE THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX IN THE

UNDERFED

As described in Chapter 7, the cortical thickness in the starved brain is on the average markedly greater than the standard for the same brain weight. In the sagittal sections, the locality I surpasses the standard most, the localities II and III are the next, while the localities IV and V are almost equal in thickness to the standard (these statements are based on the unpublished table 6 a for each locality). This order in which the localities surpass the standard in thickness is the same as the order in rate of increase in the cortical thickness during the post


230 NAOKI SUGITA

natal growth (Sugita, '17 a). The same statement is true for the iocahties VI, VII, and VIII in the frontal sections (based on the unpublished table 6 b). The order in the rate of increase in the cortical thickness is an index of the grade of intensity in cell migration to those localities and of the growth impulse of the elements there. From previous studies (Sugita, '17 a), it was found that, as a rule, the cortical thickness decreases from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect, and the nearer a locality is to the ventricular wall or the matrix the more rapid the rate of increase in the thickness of the cortex. In underfed brains, the localities which show normally the higher rate of increase in thickness are also greater in the cortical thickness when compared with the standard. So, in the underfed, the cerebral cortex is generally thicker than the standard for the same brain weight and thicker in each locality in proportion to the rate of increase in the thickness of that locality under normal conditions.

In short, the growth in the cortical thickness in the case of the underfed is more advanced than that of the normall brain of the same weight, which is, of course, younger.

18. A DISCUSSION ON THE RELATION BETWEEN CELL DENSITY AND THE COMPUTED VOLUME OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

As stated earlier, the cell density of the cerebral cortex, represented by the number of nerve cells in two unit volumes (N), is, in the underfed Albino brain, under sixteen days in age, considerably higher than the standard for the same age, and accordingly the cell size in the underfed must be smaller than the standard size and, by inference, the cell attachments also underdeveloped for the age. The relations between these data will be examined now according to my measurements as presented in this paper.

The cortical area as measured in the sections from the underfed brains proves to be slightly greater than the standard values for the same brain weight, but on the other hand, it is distinctly less in brains under sixteen days of age than the standard values


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 231

for the same age, which belong to brain weights higher by about 10 per cent.

Let us take as an example an underfed brain which weighs less than 1.0 gram for examination. The computed volume of the cerebral cortex is in the underfed smaller on the average by 16 per cent than the standard for the same age (chapter 9). As shown by calculation, the computed number of nerve cells in the entire cortex is almost the same in both the standard and the underfed, throughout all ages, so that the process of cell division appears to have been going on undisturbed by the condition of underfeeding. The cell density, the cell size, and the cortical volume must therefore be regulated so as to provide the cerebral cortex with the number of cells fixed according to the age, regardless of the starvation.

To present the relation, the formula A^ X L.F X W.D X T was used. The value. of iV X L.F X W.D X T has proved in my present material fro*n the underfed to have been 1,7 per cent higher than the standard, but as this is open to some correction, it may be regarded as approximately the same in both the underfed and the corresponding standard. To be less in the cortical volume, which was computed by the formula L.F X W.D X T, by about 16 per cent or more, the cell density must be increased by about 19 per cent or less theoretically. * This latter figure is fairly in accord with that obtained in my direct observation; that is, 17 per cent excess in the number of cells in a unit volume in the underfed brains (chapter 10). To be reduced in cortical volume by 16 per cent or more, the individual cell must theoretically be reduced in volume also in the same ratio, in order not to be reduced in total number. My results in cell-size measurement showed that the individual cells measured are reduced in average diameter by about 12 per cent, and accordingly in average volume by about 30 per cent or more. These figures appear somewhat higher than was to be expected, but it must be recalled that these figures apply only to the largest cells found in the measured locality, and this class of cells may suffer a disproportionate arrest, so that the figures do not indicate what has" taken place in the small cells and those of average size. Furthermore, in the


232 NAOKI SUGITA

cerebral cortex the neuroglia, the intercellular tissue and the blood-vessels occupy considerable space and these may not be reduced in volume in the same proportion as the large nerve cells. These facts combined seem to furnish an explanation why the largest nerve cells, which have been here studied, deviate somewhat in size from the figures theoretically to be expected.

The data here presented show, I think, that the relations betv/een the cell density and the cortical volume in the underfed fit with the formulas presented earlier and which represent the relations in the normal Albino brains.

19. A DISCUSSION ON THE PROCESS OF MYELIN ATION

Tables 14 and 16 supply the data on which the myelination process in the underfed Albino brain may be tentatively discussed.

In Donaldson's series ('11), which consisted of twenty-two litters of albino rats in which the underfeeding was begun at 30 days of age and in which all were killed after three weeks and compared with the controls from the same litter, the average brain weight of the underfed was 1 .402 grams and the percentage of water 79.28, while the average brain weight of the controls was 1.519 grams and the percentage of water 79.39. Here the underfed had 0.11 per cent less water. By examining the sections from the underfed and the controls, the author could not discover any recognizable difference in myelination between them. Hatai ('04) made a partial starvation experiment, extending over three weeks, using the albino rats in the growing stage, about thirty days old. In this series, the final average brain weight was 1.341 grams and the percentage of water 79.15 or 0.21 per cent less than in the controls from the same litter and killed at the same age and in which the final brain weight was 1.508 grams and the percentage of water 79.36. In the same series, the solids extracted with alcohol and ether were determined. The average amount c f the extractives in the test brains was 46.7 per cent, or 0.9 per cent more than in the controls, in which it was 45.8 per cent. Though higher in percentage in the underfed.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX . 233

the absolute mass of the extractive substances is 0.065 gram (about 5 per cent of the brain weight) less than in the controls of the same age. The absolute weights were in the underfed 0.626 gram and in the controls 0.691 gram. These extractives represent mainly the myelin which is contained in the sheaths of the nerve fibers, and the above results mean that the extractive substances are increasing at the same rate or slightly slower in the underfed than in the controls.

In my material as seen in table 14, the underfed brains contain slightly more water (by 0.48 per cent on the average) than the standard of like age, and, as presented above (chapter 13), the frontal section showed a higher percentage in area of the cortex against the area of the central nuclei, which latter contain the bulk of the mj'elin sheaths. On the other hand, the underfed brains contain less water (by 1.4 per cent on the average) than the standards of the same brain weight. Comparisons of the absolute weight of the solids in the underfed brain with the corresponding standard value for the same brain weight and for the same age, based on data in 'The Rat' (Donaldson, '15), are given in table 18. The underfed has shown as a rule considerably less in total solids than the standard for the same age, though it proved to be only slightly higher in percentage of water than the standard (also table 14). ■,

From the above, the absolute mass of the solids in the underfed brain seems to be more than in the standard for the same brain weight, but less than in the standard for the same age. So the increase in solid mass is somewhat retarded by starvation. It will be noted that in my series of rats the percentage of >vater in the underfed was 0.48 per cent above that in the standards of like age and this is the reverse of the results reported by Donaldson and by Hatai in the studies just cited. This discrepancy probably depends on the fact that my rats are absolutely much younger than those studied by the other authors, but the explanation must await further study.

Since, as shown in chart 1, the relative values of the quantity of the alcohol-extractives has a fixed relation to the absolute weight of the sohds in the brain, the above statement may be also


234


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 18

Giving for each individual in Litter H {Series II) the sex, the age, the observed brain weight, percentage of water, and the calculated absolute weight of the solids in the brain, compared with the standards for the percentage of water and the mass of solids for the brains of the same weight and of the same age. Averages are given in the last line.


STARVED


STANDARD



Sex


Age


Brain weight


Percentage of water


Mass of solids


For the same brain weight


For the same age


No.


Percentage of water


Mass of solids


Brain weight


Percentage of water


Mass of solids


H a b c d e f g


f

f

f

f

m

f

m


13 17 23 28 32 37 43


grams

0.880 1.024 1.135 1.166 1.215 1.101 1.295


per cent

86.39 84.15 82.00 80.83 80.31 80.12 80.24


grams

0.120 0.162 0.204 0.224 0.239 0.219 0.256


per cent

87.45 85.08 83.21 82.60 81.70 83.78 80.51


grams

0.110 0.153 0.191 0.203 0.222 0.179 0.252

0.187


grams

1.003 1.099 1.208 1.282 1.338 1.391 1.468


per cent

85.40 83.82 81.93 80.74 80.04 79.55 79.32


grams

0.146 0.178 0.218 0.247 0.267 0.285 0.304


Average


28

1.117


82.01


0.203


83.48


1.256


81.54


0.235


confirmed by the data given in table 16, in which it is clearly shown that in the underfed the alcohol-extractives are slightly less developed as compared with the standards for the same age.


20. SUMMARY

1. Young albino rats were experimentally starved throughout the suckling period, by one of the following methods :

Series I. Separation of the young from the nursing mother for the maximum time each day.

Series II. Entrusting one mother with an excessive number of young (over seventeen) at the same time and thus reducing the amount of milk for each young one.

Series III. Starving the nursing mother and thus reducing the quantity of milk secreted.

I employed five litters for Series I, two litters for Series II, and one litter for Series III; in all forty-six individuals were subjected to experiment and there were fourteen controls.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 235

2. The underfed and the controls were killed at different ages (between three and forty days) and the body measurements and the brain weights recorded. The brain was fixed, sectioned, stained, and examined according to the standard procedure previously adopted for these studies (Sugita, '17, '17 a, '18 b, '18 c) and the size of the cerebrum, the thickness of the cerebral cortex, the area of the cortex in the sections, the number of nerve cells in a unit volume of the cortex, and the size of the pyramidal and the ganglion cells, were all determined and then corrected to the values for the fresh condition of the material, by the use of the correction-coefficients devised for these purposes.

Using these data, the relative volume of the cerebral cortex and the number of nerve cells in the entire cerebral cortex were computed, employing the formulas already devised by me (Sugita, '18 b). All the observed and computed data were compared with the corresponding respective standard values for the normal Albino brain of the same weight or of the same age, as given in my previous papers (tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 and 13).

3. In Series I the underfed rats were found to be 29 per cent less in the body weight and 8 per cent less in the brain weight, than the standards for the same ages (between three and forty days). In Series II and III the underfed rats were 39 per cent less in the body weight while 8 per cent less in the brain weight. It appears from this that starvation without removal from the nest, and the corresponding disturbance to the young, retards the growth of the brain relatively less, despite the greater arrest in the body growth.

The underfed brain weight was found on the average 24 per cent higher than the standard for the same body weight. The brain weights in the underfed have values between the standards for the same age and those for the same body weight, but generally fall nearer to the former.

The brain weight is a function of the body weight : a rat which is more reduced in body weight by starvation has a more reduced brain weight. The brain weight — body weight ratio is always higher in the underfed than in the standard for the same age, and the difference between the ratios roughly indicates the severity of


236 NAOKI SUGITA

the starvation. Thus in those severely underfed the difference is higher than in those less severely underfed.

4. The shape of the cerebrum in the underfed is slightly elongated as compared with that of the standard with the same brain weight and approximates that for the same age. As the result of underfeeding, the growth of the central nuclei seems to be more arrested in width than in length and the changes in the growth in the cortex in thickness matter little for the shape of the cerebrum.

5. The thickness of the cortex is on the average 10 per cent greater in the underfed in the localities I, II, VI, and VII than in the standards for the same brain weight. By averaging according to the entire section, the average thickness in the sagittal section of the underfed exceeds that of the standard by 5.3 per cent and in the frontal section by 8.7 per cent. The general average thickness of the cortex in the underfed is consequently greater by about 7 per cent than the standard for the brain of the same w^eight. The locahties which normally show the higher rate of increase in thickness during the postnatal growth are those which are notably greater in the cortical thickness in the underfed brains.

6. The relative volume of the cerebral cortex, computed by the formula L.F X W .D X T, is generally smaller in the underfed than in the standard for the same age. In the underfed brains weighing up to 1.0 gram (that is, under sixteen days of age), it is on the average less by 16 per cent or more, while in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram it is 6 per cent greater than the standard. So it may be said that, in rats underfed severely, the cortical volume is considerably retarded in growth in early period of development, but this is somewhat compensated or overcompensated later when the brains attain the weight of more than 1.0 gram or in age of more than sixteen days.

7. The cell density in the cerebral cortex, represented by the sum of the number of pyramids in the lamina pyramidahs and the number of nerve cells in the lamina ganglionaris in two unit volumes of 0.001 mm.^, is considerably higher in the underfed than in the standard rat for the same age. The excess in cell


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 237

density in underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is on the average 17 per cent, and that in underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram is almost equal to the standard for the same age. As in the underfed brains weighing less than 1,0 gram, the relative volume of the cortex is smaller than in the standard, it follows that the underfed brains, if they contain the same number of cells, must have a relatively higher cell density in a unit volume to balance the smaller total volume of the cortex.

8. The relative value of the computed number of the nerve cells in the entire cortex, calculated by the formula A^ X L.F X W.D X T, in the underfed was compared with the corresponding standard value for the same age and the former was found to be only slightly higher than the latter, so that they may be regarded as practically the same. If so, the process of the cell division in the cerebrum must have progressed according to the advancing age, in spite of the starvation.

9. The size of the nerve cells was studied on the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis and on the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris. The cell body of the pyramids in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller by 11.2 per cent in average diameter and that in brains weighing more than 1.0 gram smaller by 8.3 per cent than the standards for the same age. The corresponding figures for the nuclei of the pj^ramids are 15.3 per cent and 11.0 per cent.

The cell body of the ganglion cells in the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram is smaller in average diameter by 11.8 per cent, and that in the underfed brains weighing more than 1.0 gram is smaller by 3.1 per cent than the standards for the same age. The corresponding values for the nuclei of the ganglion cells are less by 12.5 per cent and 5.1 per cent, respectively. So, on the average, the nerve cells in the cortex of the underfed of all weights are smaller in average diameter by about 9 per cent (for the underfed brains weighing less than 1.0 gram by about 12 per cent and for those weighing more than 1.0 gram only by about 6 per cent), and consequently smaller in volume by about 25 per cent than the standard cells of the same age. These determinations apply only to the largest cells found at the measured locality.


238 NAOKI SUGITA

10. The underfed brains (Series II) contain on the average sUghtly (0.48 per cent) more water, if compared with the normal brain of the same age, and somewhat (1.4 per cent) less water, if compared with the normal brain of the same weight. This means probably that, in terms of the percentage of water, the underfed brain is slightly underdeveloped for its age and somewhat overdeveloped for its weight. If the absolute weight of the soHd mass be calculated and compared with the standard for the same brain weight and sex, the solids are found to be somewhat more in the underfed and if the same compared with the standard for the same age and sex the solids are always less in the underfed. The relative value of the alcohol-extractives, obtained by comparing the initial brain weight with its weight after dehydration and extraction in 80 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) and 90 per cent alcohol (for twenty-four hours) according to a uniform procedure, shows that in the underfed brains the amount of the alcohol-extractives is somewhat smaller than in the normal of the same age.

The above observations indicate that in thie underfed the myelination process in the brain is somewhat retarded for the age. This assumption was supported in a general way by the direct examination on the sections obtained from the underfed brains.

11. Briefly, we conclude that by starvation in the early days the brain suffers much in its development in toto, but the cell division is going on quite normally according to its age. The growth of the cells in size is retarded and the formation of myelinated fibers somewhat diminished by inanition. So the smaller weight and size of the underfed brain is due to an arrest in the growth and development of the constituent neurons and not to a decrease in their number.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 239


LITERATURE CITED

Bechterew, W. von 1895 Uber den Einfluss des Hungerns auf die neugeborenen Tiere, insbesondere auf das Gewicht und die Entwicklung des Gehirns. Neurol. Centralbl., Bd. 14, pp. 810-817.

Chossat, Charles 1843 Recherches experimentales sur Tinanition. Memoire auquel I'Academie des Sciences a decerne en 1841 le prix de physiologie experimentale. Extrait des memoires de I'academie royale des sciences. Tome 8 des savants etrangers. Paris, Imprimiere Royal.

Donaldson, H. H. 1911 The effect of underfeeding on the percentage of water, on the ether-alcohol extract, and on medullation in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, no. 2. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology no. 6.

Falck, C. p. 1854 Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Wachstumsgeschichte des Tierkorpers. Virchow's Archiv, Bd. 7.

Hatai, S. 1904 The effect of partial starvation on the brain of the white rat. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 12, no. 1.

1908 Preliminary note on the size and condition of the central nervous system in albino rats experimentally stunted. Jour. Comp. Near., vol. 18, no. 2.

1915 Growth of the body and organs in albino rats fed with a lipoidfree ration. Anat. Record, vol. 9, pp. 1-20.

Jackson, C. M. 1915 a Effect of acute and chronic inanition upon the relative weights of the various organs and systems of adult albino rats. Amer. Jour. Anat., vol. 18, pp. 75-116.

1915 b Changes in the relative weights of the various parts, systems and organs of young albino rats held at constant body weight by underfeeding for various periods. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 19, pp. 99-156.

Lasarew, N. 1895 Zur Lehre von der Veranderung des Gewichts und der zelligen Elemente einiger Organe und Gewebe in verschiedenen Perioden des vollstandigen Hungerns. Dissertation, Wasschau (cited by Miihlmann, '99).

Morgulis, S. 1911 Studies of inanition in its bearing upon the problem of growth. I. Archiv f. Entw., Bd. 32, Heft 2.

MtJHLMANN, M. 1899 Russische Literatur liber die Pathologie des Hungerns (der Inanition). Sammelreferat. Centralbl. f. allg. Pathologie, Bd.

10, pp. 160-220; 240-242.

SuGiTA, Naoki 1917 Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3. 1917 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

11. On the increase in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 28, no. 3.


240 NAOKI SUGITA

1918 a Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 1.

1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections, of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.

1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

VI. Part I. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.

VoiT, Carl 1866 t'ber die Verschiedenheiten der Eiweisszersetzung beira

Hungern. Zeitschrift fiir Biologie, Bd. 2. Watson, John B. 1903 Animal education. Con. from the Psychol. Lab.

Univ. of Chicago, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. .5-122.


ADTHOR S ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICE, MARCH 30


COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX

VIII. GENERAL REVIEW OF DATA FOR THE THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX AND THE SIZE OF THE CORTICAL CELLS IN SEVERAL MAMMALS, TOGETHER WITH SOME POSTNATAL GROWTH CHANGES IN THESE STRUCTURES

NAOKI SUGITA

From The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology

THREE FIGURES AND TWO CHARTS

I. INTRODUCTION

Years ago Schwalbe ('81) pointed out as characteristic somatic expressions, which might be taken to indicate the grade of intelhgence of a species of animals, the following four measurements on the brain: 1) total weight of the brain; 2) total number of nerve cells in the brain; 3) total area of the surface of the hemispheres of the brain, and 4) the thickness of the cerebral cortex. Since then he and many other neurologists have endeavored to gather data on the morphological evidence for the development of mental ability. Donaldson and Hatai ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15) have made systematic observations on the growth changes in the central nervous system as well as in other organs and systems, using exclusively the albino rat. As a result of their investigations, the postnatal growth of the brain and the spinal cord, in gross measurements, and the relations of these to the other systems during growth have been determined. In line with these studies, I also made further researches on the growth in the thickness of the cerebral cortex, the size and shape of the cortical nerve cells and the relative number of the cortical cells in both the Norway and albino rats. The results of these researches have been already presented (Sugita, '17,, '17 a, '18, '18 a, '18 b, '18 c, '18 d), with references

241

THE JODRNAI, OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3


242 NAOKI SUGITA

to some similar studies by other authors. These data give us a general idea of the postnatal development of the cerebral cortex in a representative mammal (albino rat), and we may fairly infer that similar changes occur in other mammals during the growth of the brain. To test how^ far my conclusions on the mode of the development of the cerebral elements during postnatal life may be extended, I shall review and summarize in the present paper the results obtained by several authors on the development of the cortex in other mammals and make a comparison of their results with the data obtained by me.

II. THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN THE ALBINO RAT

The results obtained by me regarding the cortical thickness in the brain of the albino rat may be summarzed as follows (Sugita, '17 a):

1. The cortex at the frontal pole of the hemisphere is the thickest and that at the occipital pole is the thinnest. Speaking in general terms, the cortex diminishes in thickness from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect.

2. After birth, the general average of the cortical thickness increases very rapidly during the first ten days, thickening from 0.74 mm. at birth to 1.73 mm. at ten days, more than twice the thickness at birth, while the brain weight increases from 0.25 gram to 0.95 gram during the same period. This is designated by me the first phase of the cortical development.

3. Between the tenth and the tw^entieth day after birth, the cortical thickness increases more slowly, attaining at twenty days to within 4 per cent of the full thickness of the cortex, namely, 1.84 mm., or about 2.5 times the thickness at birth, while the brain weight increases to 1.15 grams. This is designated the second phase of the cortical development.

4. From the twentieth to the ninetieth day, the cortical thickness increases but little on the average, attaining at ninety days the thickness of 1.93 mm., or 2.6 times the thickness at birth, w^hile the brain weight has increased to about 1.80 grams. This is designated the third phase of the cortical development.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 243

After the ninetieth day, there is no significant change in the thickness of the cortex, but the area of the cortex increases as the brain weight rises and at 2.0 grams is greater than at 1.15 grams (20 days) by about 45 per cent.

5. In the first phase the cortex increases its thickness by receiving some newly formed cells from the matrix and many already formed from the transitional layers and at the same time by the general enlargement of the neurons, especia ly the cell bodies; in the second phase, however, it grows main'y by the enlargement of the cell bodies and the growth of the axons and dendrites; while during the third phase it thickens only slightly, but extends in area as the result of the ingrowing axons and the formation of the myelin sheaths and non-nervous structures.

6. The cortex at the frontal pole increases its thickness very rapidly and steadily, continuing to do this even after the end of the second phase, while at all the other localities the cortex thickens in the same proportion, so that at the end of the second phase all the localities reach nearly the full thickness, but maintain their initial relations. The localities heterogeneous in their cell lamination show in the course of thickening some deviation from the localities which are typical.

7. The cortex generally attains nearly its full thickness before myelination, as shown by the Weigert staining method, occurs in it. In the Albino, the cortex has nearly its mature thickness at twenty days, just before the young rat is weaned and when the brain has attained only a trifle more than half its final weight. The growth of the cortex in thickness is therefore precocious.

III. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING GROWTH OF THE BRAINS OF THE MOUSE AND THE GUINEA-PIG

Mouse. Isenschmid ('11) has made a study of the cortical cell lamination in the brain of the mouse and given a map of the topographic localization in the hemisphere, which is reproduced here as figure 1. De Vries ('12) and Rose ('12) have also presented a brain map of the mouse according to their studies on the cell architecture of the cortex ; a map which resembles that


244


NAOKI SUGITA



[k


\


[■\ \w\


"^^l \


w



\\ '\


^•rm.


/ ^



1 i \


---~M°



e


/ i- "


^•^ oa|?


V,


^


/.--■■' ,'V


rA^


— f


Fig. 1 Cortical area of the mouse (Mus musculus) — reproduced from the original by Isenschmid ('11); the thickness of the cortex at each area designated on the map is tabulated in table 1 of this paper. Double lines show borders of three — the dorsolateral, the frontomedial, and the suboccipital — regions of the neopallium. Shaded parts (areas t, s, and h) do not lie in the same (median) plane as the other areas. A = Dorsal view of the right hemisphere; B = Lateral view of the right hemisphere; C = Medial view of the right hemisphere. B.olf. = Bulbus olfactorius; C = Corpus callosum; c.A. = Cornu Ammonis; cl. = Claustrum; s.;?. = Septum pellucidum. s — s' = the level corresponding to that from which the sagittal sections of the Albino brain were taken by me; /— /' = the evel corresponding to that from which the frontal sections of the Albino brain were taken by me; h — h' = the level corresponding to that from which the horizontal sections of the Albino were taken by me.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


245


TABLE 1 Giving for each localiUj of the brain of the adult mouse the characteristics of the cell lamination, the thickness of the cortex on the slide as deterinined from the photograms given by Isenschmid {'11), and the relative thickness of the outer and inner layers as presented by the same author. For the localities consult figure 1 in this paper, which was reproduced from the original of Isenschmid {'11)


AKEA

(fig. 1)


CHARACTERISTICS OF. THE AREA IN CELL-LAMINATION


e

f

i

k

1

m

r

q

s t


Largest ganglion cells contained (18 X 20 m)- Not so large cells

IV layer thick

Transitional part

Paleopallium

IV layer not so well developed

Adjoins to fovea limbica, cell lamination not clear

Transitional part (ganglion cells: 13 X 15 m)At the corner (ganglion cells: 12 X 14 /u)

(Ganglion cells : 15 X 18 m)

Similar to area q


THICKNESS OF THE CORTEX


0.73

0.86 0.50 0.53


0.62 0.44 0.81 0.78 0.71-0.61 1.201 0.56 0.26 0.34


RELATIVE

THICKNESS OF

THE OUTER AND

INNER LAYERS

OF THE

CORTEX

outer: inner'


48:52

45:55 45:55 45:55


42:58


34:66 23:77

22:78 28:72


1 Section cut obliquely.

^ The outer layer = the lamina granularis externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granularis interna. The inner layer = the lamina ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis.

of Isenschmid. Isenschmid ('11) has recorded the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the mouse on the sHde at every locahty mapped in his figure (fig. 1). But the actual thickness not being given explicitly for each locality, I calculated the values from the direct measurements made on the photograms. The brain was fixed in alcohol, imbedded in paraffine and cut in 10-micra sections and stained with kresyl- violet. The thicknesses of the cortex on the slide as thus obtained are given for each locality in table 1 and also are condensed in table 2, in which the data


246


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 2

A com'parison of the thicknesses of the cerebral cortex at several corresponding localities in the albino rat and in the mouse. The data for the albino rat were taken from table 11 in ?ny previous paper (Sugita, '17 a, p. 578) and the data for the mouse were taken from a paper by Isenschmid {'11). The order of increasing thickness is the same in both animals


ALBINO RAT


MOUSE


Locality


Average

thickness of

cortex by

locality


Corresponding locality


Thickness of cortex at each of the localities


Average

thickness of

cortex by

locality



mm .



mm.


mm.


V and XIII


1.24


C


0.50


0.50


IV


1.42


d


0.53


0.53


XII and VIII


1.67


e and i


0.65 and 0.44


0.55


III and XI


1.91


a and e


0.73 and 0.65


0.69


VI


2 01


1 (corner)


0.78


0.78


II and X


2.03


k and b


0.81 and 0.86


0.84


VII


2.29


b


0.86


0.86


I and IX


2.99


frontal pole


1.00


1.00


Average


1.94


Average


0.72




for the Albino are so entered that the cortical thicknesses at the corresponding localities in the two forms may be compared. The order of the localities is arranged according to the increasing thickness in the Albino (taken from table 11, Sugita, '17 a, p. 578). The average value of the cortical thickness in the mouse is, on the slide, 0.72 mm., and if corrected to the fresh condition would probably be somewhat thinner than one-half the average thickness of the Albino cortex. The order of the thickness according to localities is quite the same, so that in both forms the cortical thickness decreases from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect. Moreover, the cortex at the frontal pole is the thickest and has double the thickness of that at the occipital pole.

As seen in figure 1, the cerebral hemisphere is divided by Isenschmid into three main regions — the dorsolateral, frontomedial and suboccipital regions — separated by the double line in figure 1.

The average cortical thickness in the dorsolateral region (fig. 1 a) is 0.56 mm. at its hinder-medial part and 0.90 mm.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


247


at its fore-lateral part, and in this region the lamina zonalis is about one-twelfth, the main outer layers (the lamina granulans externa plus the lamina pyramidalis plus the lamina granulans interna) about two-fifths and the main inner layers (the lamina ganglionaris plus the lamina multiformis) about one-half the total thickness of the cortex. In the frontomedial region (fig. 1 c) the cortical thickness at the frontal pole is 1.00 mm. and that at the caudal part is 0.35 mm., while in the suboccipital region the cortical thickness ranges between 0.2 and 0.3 mm.




o o



I II

in

IV


vr


B 3J^4 6 7% 3Va \Va 17 M

Fig. 2 Showing diagrammatically the thickness of the cerebral cortex at locality a in the mouse at different ages. Reproduced from the original given by Isenschmid ('11). B = at birth. M = at maturity. The other arable numbers show the age in days. I = lamina zonalis; II = lamina granularis externa; III = lamina pyramidalis; IV = lamina granularis interna; V = lamina ganglionaris; VI = lamina multiformis. The cell outlines found between the last two diagrams indicate the relative size and shape of the cells in each cortical layer.

Isenschmid has given also diagrams illustrating the growth in cortical thickness at locality 'a' (fig. 1 a, corresponding approximately to locality III in my study, fig. 2, Sugita, '17 a, p. 525), sampled from material at several different ages and magnified uniformly. These are also reproduced here as figure 2. The diagrams show that as age advances the lamina pyramidalis (II and III) thickens steadily and continuously while the lamina


248


NAOKI SUGITA


ganglionaris (V) and especially the lamina multiformis (VI) grow much less rapidly. Chart 1 gives a comparison of the increase in the cortical thickness at corresponding localities (locality 'a' of the mouse and locality III of the albino rat) in the albino rat and the mouse, the data being from Isenschmid ('11) and Sugita ('17 a). In the Albino the cortex attains nearly its full thickness at twenty days (weaning time), while in the mouse this stage was reached between twelve and seventeen days of age, very closely corresponding to the weaning time of


mm. 2.0r

18

16

lA

J.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

Q2

















1
















■ —


.



AlbinocortexJocIH.







J


/^



















/



















\/


















/


/



















/






















^^



-^















-^






































B 2, 4 6 8 iO 12 14 16 18 20 22 24- 26 28 30 AgeindaysL


Chart 1 Giving the cortical thickness of the albino rat and of the mouse according to age. The data for the albino rat are taken from Sugita ('17 a) at locality III measured on the sagittal section and the data for the mouse are taken from Isenschmid ('11) at locality 'a.' These two localities approximately correspond.

the mouse, which is fifteen days. The remarkable phase during which the rapid increase in cortical thickness takes place in the Albino (first ten days after birth) cannot be clearly identified on the graph for the mouse cortex. It must be recalled, however, that data on the mouse cortex have not been corrected for the action of the reagents, while the data for the rat have been so corrected. The outstanding fact, however, is that the cerebral cortex in both forms attains nearly its full thickness just before the weaning time.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 249

Guinea-pig. I have had the opportunity at The Wistar Institute to examine the sections of the guinea-pig brains prepared by Allen ('04) for her study on the myelination of the nervous system of that animal. The sections were cut in series in the frontal plane from material fixed in Miiller's fluid, imbedded in celloidin and stained by Weigert's method for the myelin sheaths. The thickness of the cerebral cortex in the adult guinea-pig (body weight, 618 grams; brain weight not recorded) is on the average 1.90 mm. (1.80 mm., 1.88 mm,, and 2.01 mm., respectively, at the localities corresponding to localities VI, VII, and VIII examined by me on the frontal section of the Albino brain at the level of the commissura anterior). The corresponding measurements at birth (body weight, 108 grams) are 1.71 mm. (and 1.51 mm., 1.75 mm., and 1.86 mm., respectively) and those at thirty-five days (body weight, 250 grams) are 1.85 mm. (and 1.77 mm., 1.86 mm., and 1.92 mm., respectively). So, from birth on to the maturity, the cortical thickness has on the average increased only 11 per cent. According to Allen, the guineapig at birth is covered with hair, has complete muscular development, and is almost independent of the mother, the central nervous system being practically completely myelinated, whereas, by contrast, the albino rat is born quite naked, extremely helpless and undeveloped, and myelination in the brain has not begun. The guinea-pig is psychically mature soon after birth (three days after birth) ; the degree of development of the central nervous system of the new-born guinea-pig corresponds to that of the albino rat at twenty-three to twenty-seven days or its period of first psychical maturity. A new-born guinea-pig is fobnd to have a cerebral cortex in which the myelination is going on.

Comparing the sections from the guinea-pig brain with those from the albino rat brain, it appears that the new-born guinea-pig corresponds to the albino rat of about ten days in cortical thickness, but seems to be older when judged by the myelination of the cortex. This coincides with observation that the guineapig is, almost from the start, relatively independent of the mother.


250 NAOKI SUGITA

IV. THE CORTICAL THICKNESS AT SEVERAL LOCALITIES IN THE BRAINS OF SOME MAMMALS OTHER THAN THE RAT

Few papers have been published regarding the differences in the thickness of the cerebral cortex at given localities of the brain in mammals other than the rat, except for man. Yet even in these cases, the techniques of hardening, imbedding, and staining used by the different authors are dissimilar and their results are accordingly not precisely comparable. Despite this, however, it has seemed worth while to make a survey of the data at hand.

Rabbit. Bevan Lewis (^81) has given as the natural thickness^ of the cerebral cortex of the adult rabbit the following figures (table 3) according to localities. For the localities, the map made by him and reproduced by me in a previous paper (Sugita, '17 a, fig. 10, p. 544) should be here consulted. He has presented the thicknesses of every layer of the cortex separately, but here only the total cortical thicknesses, as computed by me from his data, are given in round numbers.

Pig. Lewis ('79) has also determined the cortical thickness at several localities in the pig brain (the names of the localities

TABLE 3

The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the rabbit, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'81)

Depth of cortex on a plane with genu of corpus callosum :

mm.

Gyrus fornicatus 1.72

Sagittal angle 2.23

Extra-limbic 2.81

Near limbic sulcus 2.31

Depth of cortex on a jilane with posterior border of corpus eallosum:

Gyrus fornicatus 1 . 70

Sagittal angle 1.91

Extra-limbic 2 . 46

Depth of cortex of the modified lower limbic t3'pe 2.23 to 2.47

Depth of cortex in the cornu Ammonis:

Anterior regions 2 . 27

Average at six different sites 2 . 23

1 Lewis measured the cortical thickness on sections cut by the freezing microtome from fresh material and then hardened by osmic acid, stained by aniline black and mounted in Canada balsam. According to his statement we obtain, by this method, the natural depth o"" the cortex, no shrinkage occurring if the preparations have been carefully made (Lewis, '78).


Limbic lobe <


Upper parietal convolutions <


Lower parietal convolutions.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 251

TABLE 4

The thickness of the cerebral cortex of the pig, quoted from Bevan Lewis {'79)

Depth of cortex from before backward:

mm.

'4.97 4.48 3.70 4.98 3.53 3.77

Average 4.22

fa. 28 2.65 3.08 3.91 4.23 3.44

Average 3 .50

■3.44 3.91 3.95 3.35 3.02 3.67

Average 3.64

are analogous to those given for the rabbit brain, loc. cit.)- His results are summarized in table 4. These values are distinctly high compared with those for other mammals, as shown in the various tables in this paper. These results taken together with those for the rabbit just given, which are also noticeably high, suggest that the determination by Lewis are for some reason systematically too high.

Marsupials to man. Table 5 is quoted (slightly modified) from Brodmann ('09) and gives for several species of mammals, including man, the cortical thickness at six localities (areae precentralis, frontalis, parietalis, occipitaUs, hippocampica et retrosplenialis) in the brain of each animal. The sections were made by hardening the material in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedding in paraffine, and staining by the modified Nissl's method, and the cortical thickness was measured by the micrometer directly on the slide. The average thickness was calculated by me for the four areas, excluding the areae hippocampica et retrosplenialis which are heterogeneous in cell lamination.


252


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 5

The cortical thickness at the corresponding parts of the cerebral hemisphere in different mammals, quoted from Brodmann i'09). According to his nomenclature, area precentralis = type 4, area frontalis agranularis = typed, area parietalis = type 7, area occipitalis = type 17, area hippocampica = type 28, and area retrosplenialis = type 29, as given in his 'Hirnkarte' {Brodmann, '09)


Homo sapiens (man) Cercopithecus (longtailed ape)

Lemur

Hapale (marmoset) .

Pteropus edwardsii (vampire bat). . . .

Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)

Cercoleptes caudivolvulus (kinkajou)

Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)

Spermophilus citillus (ground squirrel)

Macropus giganteus (kangaroo). .


grams

60,000

2,500

1,800

200


375 700

2,000

2,200

200

5,000


grams

1,400

85 23


7 3.5


10


2.2


3.0-4.5

3.0 2.3 2.15


1.9 1.87

2.17

2.7

2.1

2.8-3.1


O < 03 t^


3.0-3.8

2.5 2.3

2.17


1.6 2.1

2.0

2.33

2.18


3.08

2.0

1.67

1.73


1.7 1.78

1.7 2.2 1.73 2.2


2.3-2.6

1.7

1.55

1.26


1.76 1.5

1.9


1.37


1.9


mm.

2.5

1.6

1.35

1.14


1.52 1.6

1.9 1.2 1.13 1.7


< 2


2.3

1.1

1.19

1.07


1.4-1.76 0.8

1.67

0.8-1.5

0.75

1.2


3.0

1.95 1.73 1.59


1.66 1.61

1.89 1.79 1.54 2.15


Reviewing this table, it is readily seen that, within each order, the animal which has a greater brain weight shows also a greater cortical thickness, but a fixed relation between the brain weight and the cortical thickness has not been here revealed. In different orders, this relation is not true; the lemur and the kangaroo have a similar brain weight (23 to 25 grams),


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


253


while the cortical thickness in the latter is much greater (by about 25 per cent).

Prosimiae and primates. The following table (table 6) is summarized from a paper by Marburg ('12) and shows for some species of the prosimiae and primates the total cortical thickness measured at four representative localities (gyri centralis, frontalis, temporalis et occipitalis) . The average values were taken by me.

TABLE 6

Thickness of the cerebral cortex at several localities in monkeys, as presented by

Marburg {'12). Averages are calculated by me


Simla satyrus

Hylobates (sp.?)

Semnopithecus nasicus. . .

Macacus rhesus

Cynocephalus hamadryas

Ateles niger

Lemur varius






AVEI


CENTRAL, GYRUS


FRONTAL GYRUS


TEMPORAL GYRUS


OCCIPITAL, GYRUS


Of the four

localities

m »i .


7n7n .


7)1 711 .


mm.


mm.


3.11


2.97


2.43




3.78


3.24


2.51


1.78


2.83


3.78


2.43


2.43


1.35


2.50


"2.84


2.70


2.15


1.49


2.30


2.97


2.70


2.03


1.35


2.26


2.97


2.84


2.43




1.30


1.76


1.76


1.67


1.62


Of the three localities


2.84 3.18 2.88 2.56 2.57 2.75 1.61


This table also suggests that, in the order of monkeys, the average thickness of the cortex varies so that those which have the greater brain weight have also t|ie greater thickness of the cerebral cortex, but the brain weights are not available for comparison.

V. THE THICKNESS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX IN MAN

Man. There are scores of papers giving the measurements of the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man, but they are diverse in the techniques used for preparing the material, in the localities selected for measurement, and also in the manner of measurement. The results published before 1891 were all summarized by Donaldson ('91), but the table is not reproduced here as, owing to the lack of the information necessary for the interpretation of the values found, it has mainly an historical interest.


254


NAOKI SUGITA


Donaldson ('91) measured also the thickness of the cerebral cortex at fourteen localities from each hemisphere of nine normal brains (six males and three females), as shown in figure 3 reproduced from his original paper, in order to obtain control




Fig. 3 This figure shows the localities on the hemispheres from which the samples of cortex were taken by Donaldson ('91). For the thickness of cortex at each locality see table 8 and chart 2. A = Lateral aspect. 3 is used to designate the insula, here not exposed. B = Ventral aspect; C = Mesial aspect.

values for the study of the brain of a blind deaf-mute, Laura Bridgeman. The technique employed by Donaldson was fixation in bichromate and alcohol (potassium bichromate 2| per cent plus I its volume of 95 per cent alcohol) for six to eight


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


255


TABLE 7

Giving the average cortical thickness of man, arranged according to age and sex, together with the brain weight. Quoted from Donaldson {'91)


BRAI^f WEIGHT


AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS


Males


years


grams


7nm.


35


1419


2.81


35


1443


2.98


39


1393


2.82


45


1367


2.92


57


1464


2.94


?


1210


3.11


Females


40


1196


2.74


45


1173


2.90


?


1312


3.07


Average


1331


2.92


weeks, washing in water for twenty-four hours, 95 per cent alcohol for two days, final preservation in 80 per cent alcohol, and imbedding in celloidin. The sections were cut about 100 micra thick and measured unstained under a low magnifying power with a micrometer eyepiece, at the summit of the gyrus arid at the side, midway between the summit and the bottom of the bounding sulcus. To obtain the average thickness at the locality, the smaller figure was multiplied by 2, added to the larger figure, and the sum divided by 3.

Table 7 shows the average thickness of the cortex (taken from the fourteen localities) arranged according to sex and age, quoted from Donaldson ('91). If we take the nine cases in this table as the basis for computation, we find the mean thickness of the cortex to be 2.92 mm., with a probable error of the mean equal to ±0.026 mm.

I wish to cite also the average thickness of the cortex, as thus obtained by Donaldson ('91), according to locality (table 8). These localities are shown in figure 3 and the relative thickness


256


NAOKI SUGITA


of the cortex at each is graphically presented in chart 2. Generally summarized, the average thicknes of the cortex of the adult man is 2.92 mm.; females have a slightly thinner cortex than males (differences less than 1 per cent, or 0.02 mm.) and the right hemisphere usually has a cortex a few per cent less thick than the left (maximmn difference 7 per cent).

With the foregoing determinations are to be compared the measurements by three other observers.


wm


\


1^






]--















\


\


\.


-^

















A.Q














4 A





























A















t


5 I


' 6


)4


2


, £


1(


) 1


i


M\


li


l^


> S


M4


Chart 2. -The curve was plotted according to table 8 to show the cortical thickness at each locality as measured by Donaldson ('91. The numbers placed by the ordinates indicate the thickness of the cortex in millimeters. The numbers for the localities are given below, and correspond to those in figure 3, A. B and C.

In accordance with this plan, the results obtained in a careful study by Hammarberg ('95) are tabulated in table 8. The material used for this study was a brain of a male, twenty-eight years old, mentally normal, and who died of typhoid fever. The technique employed was fixation in 95 per cent alcohol, imbedding in paraffine by means of xylol, sections 10 micra in


TABLE 8 Giving for several localities on the hemisphere of the adult human brain the thickness of the cortex, as measured by different authors. The general average thickness was taken, averaging all measurements presented by each author. For reasons given in the text, these averages as they stand are by no means comparable with each other. The data were taken from Donaldson ('91), Hammarberg {'95), Campbell {'05), and Brodmann {'08)



ocaJLtu


Au/A-<jT


Tlanaldsan


Hamtnurfc&rj


C(Xtm


pbel/


Brocf


T)ann


L


Ki^iti o/ secti'uTv


Cell


Cell


Cell


Fi ber


Cell


Fiber 1



U.n,U


rvvrn.


m^


m^


n\/yn.


«^



^


Gyi-ixs centralis


o/n tenor



2.?7


2.^-0


2.62.


a gi'


4 05

^.


Gyrus fenfroJIs pos/erior


oral sic^e


3.08


2.70


2.20


^.1:1,


/ ?6


/.9i


^


ir\Ter mediate p^rf


Z.9S


3./6



ccL^otf/ai. s^ale.


2.6


/■ <Jo


2.4 3


2. ST/


Q.


IiOTver end of su


cus Rolo/nJ;.






2.53


P


Lobu-lus pa-ra.ce


■ntra/is


2.?6







O o s p

1:


Gyr«s fron-talis Superior


fwnc/e<* po^t



a/0


2.62^


Z.SZ.


3.8 2


3.84


m-i^<J/e fjcw-r



3.93



fore fa^f



2.60


3.45



G^rus -fronfa/is


«ec/ius


3.09


3.4-0


2.A-0


%.I0


3.5 7



Gyrus froTitcdis i/nferioT


?iM-s ofjerccilarij


ao8


2.50




3.sa



Ta^s tria/*^£^a.fs


2.98


3.00




3.34



Po/rs or ()i Tali's






3.60



Gyrus rectus


2. J3





3.17



Frcmtal pole




2.37


1. EZ


3.07



» o 1"^


Gyrus ^(wictalis


su.f)e^ioT




2.3 7


%2,5


3.08


3.2.0


extr&mc fore f!(irt






2.93


2.SS

Gyrus ficurieTaJis mfe/ricn

Gyrus a^gn-laris



2.4-3


2.50


2,0


3.3 5


3.n


G)frus suprama/rsmalis





3.3 1


3.25


§ ^

u


Gyrus occt ti/oVci


fore p<M-t


2.6/


(. 80


2.50


Z.5Z


2.. 6 8


2.8 3


polflu- pa^t


2-.S4

a. 33


pr

Canei« 



%.52,


2.3 8


1. g%


1. 4


a. 3 8


a.47



Gyrws lu*7gK.a/i's


2.65







t

Gyrus Temboro-lis


iu./)erlor


3. /O


2.64

Z.GO


2.4


38 1


3.8 3



in -f'lssu-ra. Sy/vli




Z.SI


1. 90


3.3 5


3.80


w


tio. exfarMO,! pa^f




3.57


3. 9^


1


Pole of fem^o


cd lobe






3 70


3.8 7


-k

Gyrus Te-rK-fKrraJis


m^JUujti


3./ 5



2.68


2.25


3.SZ


3.64


L


Gyrus TewJioraliS


mf&rior




3.47


3.4 2/


extreme lundie^ pmrt




Z.91



lr,s^Ia.


3.38


2.34

2.67


2.6 2.




G


yrcs


pe^i rhyiina.1 pcwt


3.04




2.07



ec/or/tina-l ^a-rt"





2.93



presu>bi(U<.(ar fort





Z.Z5


2.70


It^CU-S





2.53


3.10


Sic-t'i C-M-lu/m





2 33


2.60


Gv/rns


— fjosterior y/eirfra/is


27 S





2.<?7


2,.94

- posl&rior clorsaJ'\s





3 10


303


-otifericnr ve^tra^is





2.0s


3.) 7


— cuiTerror tJorso/is





3.48


3 44


Prege^uoJ piwt





I. 80



Su^bgc/nuo.! pO/rt





2.35



rerro5f>l&»via.l fiO/rt





2.3 2.9 7




G-e*icro.| cxve


rage.


2.<?2.


£.i"7


Z.^6


2-/7


3.00


3. 17


257


THE JOUBNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, VOL. 29, NO. 3


258 NAOKI SUGITA

thickness and staining with methyleneblue. Hammarberg claims that after twenty-four hours in 95 per cent alcohol the brain piece shrinks about 20.5 per cent in volume and the cortical thickness diminishes by 0.1 to 0.2 mm., but that during the subsequent procedures no significant size changes occur. According to his results, the gyri frontales have the thickest cortex (about 3.0 mm.) and the lobus centralis or insula is the thinnest among localities typical in cell lamination. This latter part as measured by Donaldson shows the thickest cortex.

Campbell ('05) gave two series of determinations of the cortical lamination of the human brain, after cell staining and after fiber staining, represented by uniformly magnified illustrations of the sections at the several localities. Making use of his illustrations, I obtained a series of cortical thicknesses at different localities (table 8), reduced to the actual thickness on the slide, by dividing the direct measurement on the illustration by the magnification. His sections were taken from the material fixed in Miiller's or Orth's fluid and imbedded in celloidin, cut at 25 micra, and stained with thionine. The general average thickness thus obtained, the two series combined, is about 2.3 mm.

Brodmann ('08) also has measured the thickness of the cortex on the human brains at forty-two different localities on sections prepared by two different methods: one set was fixed in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraffine, and stained by Nissl's method for cell study, and the other, fixed in Miiller's fluid, imbedded in celloidin, and stained by Weigert's method for the myelin sheaths. His results, which are the averages from brains between seventeen and forty-five years in age, are also tabulated in table 8 for a comparison. The general average thickness given by Brodmann is about 3.09 mm.

Kaes ('07) also studied the growth in thickness of the human cerebral cortex, measured at twelve different localities on the hemisphere, using sections fixed in Miiller's fluid and stained by Weigert's method. His results are remarkably high, giving 4.9 mm. on the general average. His method of measuring the cortex is so arbitrary and peculiar, however, that his results are not included in this table 8.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 259

Bevan Lewis ('79) has given as the average depth of the human cortex the figures as high as 4,84 to 5.70 mm., a higher vahie even than that of Kaes. His results for both the pig and rabbit cortex were also very high, compared with those obtained for other mammals. These results suggest that his technique, which he claims gives the natural depth of the cortex, is likely to produce very high values.

Reviewing the table (table 8) , the values for the cortical thickness given for a fixed part of the hemisphere by different authors are by no means in accord ; the results by Brodmann stand close to the results by Donaldson, while those given by Campbell are the lowest, less than one-half the values given by Lewis. These differences are probably due mainly to differences in technique and are not to be attributed to variations within the sanie species, as the series of Donaldson (table 7) and my previous study (Sugita, '17 a) both have shown that individual variations in cortical thickness, obtained by the use of the same technique, are low as compared with the variations for other body measurements.

On the average, the figures given by Donaldson and Brodmann are fairly close and the former being somewhat lower, probably because Donaldson took the average from the values at the summit and at the sides of the gyrus, while Brodmann has measured the thickness at the summit only. The figures given by Hammarberg and Campbell are low, probably owing to the shrinkage of the material during preparation, as may be inferred from the descriptions by the authors and from the studies on the effects of fixing fluids by King ('10) and by me (Sugita, '17 a, '18 b, '18 c).

Despite the apparent irregularity among the figures given for the cortical thickness at different localities by the several authors, as shown in table 8, there are some general relations which are fairly clear. If we examine table 9 in which has been entered for each region the average thickness obtained by each author, it may be safely said that this table (and also table 6 for the monkeys) shows that in man (and the primates) the cerebral cortex differs normally according to locality. The


260


NAOKI SUGITA


TABLE 9

Giving the average cortical thickness for several lobes and regions {with typical cell lamination) of the cerebral hemisphere as given by different authors, and the order of localities according to the cortical thickness, together with the difference in thickness between. the temporal and occipital regions. R = regio Rolandica, F = lobus frontalis, P = lobus parietalis, = lobus occipitalis, T = lobus temporalis. Based on table 8 in this paper


LOCALITY


DONALDSON

('91) (Cell)


HAMMARBERG

('95) (Cell)


CAMPBELL

('05) (Cell)


CAMPBELL

('05) (Fiber)


BRODMANN

('08) (Cell)


BRODMANN

("08) (Fiber)


Regio Rolandica

Lobus frontalis

Lobus parietalis

Lobus occipitalis

Lobus temporalis


mm.

2.92 2 92

2.59 3.21


mm.

2.34 2.92

2.43

2.09

2.49


mm.

2.43 2.46

2.44

2.16

2.64


77im.

2.21 2.15

2.13

1.96

2.29


mm.

2.74 3.50

3.17

2.47

3.48


mtn.

2.93 3.84

3.12

2.54

3.75




Average


2.91


2.45


2.43


2.15


2.92


3.16


Order of the above five localities as to the thickness


TFRO?


FTPRO


TFPRO


TRFPO


FTPRO


FTPRO


Difference between T and


0.62


0.40


0.48


0.33


1.01


1.21




frontal and temporal regions have in all cases the thickest cortex and the occipital region is the thinnest, while the position for the cortex of the parietal and Rolandic regions is less fixed. These thickness relations support the earlier statement made by me for the rat cortex that the thickness diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect.

Brodmann ('08) has concluded from his careful study that regional characteristics for the cortical thickness clearly exist. Diese sind in alien normalen Gehirnen gesetzmassig und kon


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


261


stant und bilden ein Hauptmerkmal der struktuellen Verschiedenheiten der Gehirnoberflache; jedes Strukturfeld besitzt demnach eine bestimmte, mittlere Durchschnittsbreite, durch welche es sich von den Nachbarfeldern auszeichnet." On the other hand, local variations within a fixed area are small, while individual differences between different brains for each locality may run sometimes as high as 0.5 mm. or more.

VI. INCREASE IN CORTICAL THICKNESS DURING THE GROWTH OF THE BRAIN OF THE MAN


From the point of view of the growth changes, there have been only few studies on the human cerebral cortex ever published. Kaes ('05, '07, '09), employing forty-one human brains (twentyeight males and thirteen females, normal and pathological combined) of different ages and of different grades of intelligence, studied the cerebral cortex for the purpose of following the growth changes in it. He took his sections from twelve localities in each hemisphere, stained the fibers by Weigert's method and measured the so-called cortical thickness from the ectal border of the Meynert's arcuate fibers (or fibrae propriae) to the ectal border of the zonal layer. His conclusions on the growth

^ His ('04) has given the following values as the cortical thicknesses measured at different localities of the hemisphere of the human embryos in early months, at different stages of intrauterine development- — measured directly on the sections imbedded in paraffine.


AGE OF EMBRYOS


AT CORPUS STRIATUM

M


AT LATERAL WALL OP THALAMUS


AT LATERAL

WALL OF HEMISPHERE (BASAL PART)

M


AT LATERAL

WALL OF

HEMISPHERE

(MID PART)

M


AT MEDIAN

WALL OF HEMISPHERE


AT BOTTOM OF

SULCUS CINGULI

M


1 2


50-55 65-75


4 5 6

7 8


150

360

800

1300

2000


130

160 300 600 900


300

400


110 120 130

170 200


90 110

130


60

50 40 30 30


262 NAOKI SUGITA

changes, briefly stated, are as follows: The average thickness of the cortex diminishes rapidly from his first entry (three months old, 5.58 mm.) to the twenty-third year (4.44 mm.) and is followed by an increase up to the forty-fifth year (5.71 mm.), where it is to be noted that the thickness attained is even greater than that at birth. Then it undergoes a second thinning up to the old age (at ninety-seventh year, his last entry, 4.62 mm.).

These conclusions have been disputed by Donaldson ('08) and by Brodmann ('09), and I am in agreement with these critics that Kaes' results cannot be taken seriously.

Brodmann ('08), in his paper on the cortical measurement, has noted only in a general way the average cortical thickness at the lateral surface of the hemisphere at several ages, as shown in table 10 (columns A and C). Nevertheless, these data can be used for a comparison.

Donaldson ('08) has compared the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and reached the conclusion that man and the rat show growth curves for the brain which are similar in form when the data are compared at equivalent ages, and the condition of the brain of the rat at five days of age is taken as like that of the human brain at birth. The relative growth rates of the rat and man are as 30 to 1 and the brain of the child at one year corresponds to that of the albino rat at seventeen days of age in its stage of development (Donaldson, MS.). These statements are also confirmed by me for the cortical thickness, as shown in table 10 (see below), and I have already noted that the transitional cortical cell layers, which are no longer to be seen in a new-born child, do not disappear in the albino rat until after four days of age (Sugita, '17 a, p. 539).

From these relations, we conclude that the course of growth in the thickness of the cerebral cortex in man and the albino rat would probably be similar, if the brains were compared at the equivalent ages. Such a comparison is attempted in table 10. Here the increase in cortical thickness in man and in the albino rat is compared, employing data given by Brodmann ('08) and by me (Sugita, '17 a). From the age (column A) given by Brodmann, the approximate brain weight (column B) was de


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


263


TABLE 10

Giving a comparison in the course of increase in cortical thickness in ynan and in the albino rat, according to data given by Brodmann {'08) and by Sugita {'17 a). Approximate brain weight in man and in the Albino for the equivalent ages were assumed in round numbers according, respectively, to Vierordt {'90) and Donaldson {'08)


A


B


C


D


E


F


G


MAN


ALBINO RAT








Correspond




Approximate




ing cortical




Observed


brain



Thickness


thickness in



Approximate


thickness of


weight, at the


Equivalent


of the cortex


human brain,


Age


brain


the cortex.


equivalent


(observed)


at ages


when the



weight


Brodmann


(observed)


age


given in


adult values




('08)


ages (Donaldson)



Column E


in the both are taken as the standards



grains


m m .


grams


days


mm.


7nm,


Fetus








8-9 months



1.0-1.5



Birth


0.80


1.25


Birth


380


1.5-2.0


0.50


5


1.10


1.75


1 year


950


2.0-3.0


1.10


17


1.75


2.76


Adult


1400


2.0-4.0


1.90


Adult


1.90


3.00


termined according to Vierordt ('90) and then the final weight (1400 grams) was entered corresponding to the adult brain weight of the albino rat (1.9 grains). The other corresponding brain weights of the Albino of the equivalent ages were entered also according to Donaldson ('08) (column D). The cortical thickness (column F) for the given brain weights of the Albino were then entered according to my former determination (Sugita, '17 a). If the cortical thickness of the adult man be assumed as 3.00 mm. (the mean value of 2.0 to 4.0 mm.) and the corresponding thickness at each age be calculated on the basis of the course of increase in cortical thickness in the Albino (given in column F), the results given in column G — a mere inference, to be sure — are fairly in accord with the figures presented by Brodmann (column C).

In this connection, I had the opportunity, through the courtesy of Dr. W. H. F. Addison, to prepare sections and examine the cortical thickness at the dorsal part of the gyrus centralis anterior (regio Rolandica) from a child thirteen months old (material hardened in 4 per cent formaldehyde, imbedded in paraf


264 NAOKI SUGITA

fine, and stained by Nissl's method). The mean value of the cortical thickness at the summit of the gyrus was 3.55 mm., or within 10 per cent the value obtained by Brodmann at the same locality in the adult brain and on a section similarly prepared and measured (table 8) . So far, then, as this observation goes, it helps to support my conclusion presented earlier that the human cortex has attained nearly its full thickness at the age of fifteen months (Sugita, '17 a).^

VII. THE BRAIN WEIGHT, THE CORTICAL VOLUME, AND THE BODY

WEIGHT

Dhere and Lapicque ('98) and DuBois ('98 a, '98 b), working independently, found several important relations existing between the body and the brain weights in man and a number of other vertebrates. Recently DuBois ('13) has obtained results which he has formulated in following terms:

1) In species of vertebrates that are alike in organization of their nervous system and their shape, but differ in size, and also in the two sexes of one and the same species, the quantity of the brain increases; A) as the quotient of the superficial dimension divided by the cube root of the longitudinal dimension. B) as the product of the longitudinal dunension by the square of its cube root.

2) In individuals of one and the same species and of the same sex, but differing in size, the quantity of brain increases as the square of the cube root of the longitudinal dimension of the body.

So, briefly stated, 1) reads: in any species of vertebrates that are equal in organization, in form of activity and in shape, the weights of the respective brains are proportional to the 0.55 power

' According to a study by Fuchs ('83), the child is born without any myelinated fibers in the cerebral cortex. In the lamina zonalis the first myelination appears at five months, in the lamina pyramidalis at the end of the first year, while in the innermost layers we see some faintly stained fibers at two months. The fibrae arcuate (association fibers) appear clearly at seven months. Later the myelinated fibers increase in caliber and number as the age advances, and at eight years they attain nearly the appearance which they have in the adult cortex.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 265

of the weights of bodies, and 2) the exponent of correlation within the same species is for all vertebrates the 0.22 power.

These relations were based on a series of observations, and this illuminating idea is now generally accepted as true.

The brain in general consists of the white and the gray matter, and in higher animals the gray matter as represented by the cerebral cortex occupies a relatively large part of the entire cerebrum. This cortex is the seat of a complex series of physiological nerve centers, and the possibility that it has definite quantitative relations with the body as a whole is suggested by the following statement made by Du Bois ('13) :

If the quantity of brain does not increase proportionally to the volume of the body, exprassed by the weight, it might be that this is really the case with regard to the superficial dimension, as being proportional with the receptive sensitive surfaces and with the sections of the muscles, thus measuring the passive and active relations of the animal to the outer world, for which in this waj" the quantity of brain can be a measure.

This statement, to be sure, is applied by DuBois to the weight or volume of the entire brain, but if the volume of the cortex stands in some definite relation to the volume of the entire brain, then the cortical volume should be also in a definite relation to the size or weight of the body.

The cortica' volume is determined by the area of surface of the cerebral hemisphere and the thickness of the cortex. The former factor is not easy to determine exactly, even in lissencephala, while in higher animals the hemispheres have many convolutions which increase still further the difficulty of this determination. In lissencephala, the surface area of the hemispheres in two brains, which are nearly similar in the form of cerebrum, are approximately comparable with squares of the corresponding diameters of the cerebra.

The cortical thickness, on the other hand, is not so hard to determine exactly. The average thickness of the cortex in different mammals is given in table 11, quoted from various sources, and, as seen from this table, it is not directly related to the size or weight of the brain, since, as Marburg's ('12) table shows, the


266 NAOKI SUGITA

cortical thickness in several primates ranges within rather narrow limits (2.3 mm. to 2.8 mm.), while the brain weight shows a distinctly wider range (82 grams to 400 grams) (table 11). In some cases indeed the smaller brain has a thicker cortex, even in the same family (e.g., the smaller hapale has a thicker cortex than the larger lemur) . But in general we may conclude with Brodmann ('09) that, within one and the same order or family of mammals, the large brain tends to have a larger average value for the cortical thickness.

The relative cortical volume has been formerly computed by me, employing the formula especially devised for this purpose, in the albino and the Norway rat brains, so that the two forms may be compared directly (Sugita, '18 b). The ratio of the cortical volumes in the adult Albino (brain weight, 2.0 grams) and the Norway (brain weight, 2.3 grams) is 1.31, as the relative cortical volumes are, respectively, 393 and 517 (Sugita, '18 b, table 15), and the ratio of the body surfaces in the two animals amounts also to 1.30, when the body weights of the adult albino and the Norway rats are taken as 300 grams and 450 grams, respectively. Moreover, the ratio of cortical volumes in the two forms at any given age will prove to be almost equal to the ratio of body surfaces of the two at the same age.'*

As above tested, the body weight and the cortical volume of the animals in the same family stand in a definite relation, at least in this instance. But, as we cannot compute the volume of the cortex in other mammals from the data given in table 11, the relation can not be tested further.

■' For example, according to my former presentation (Sugita, '18 b), the computed cortical volume in the Albino Group XV (brain weight, 1.54 grams) is about 346 and that in the Norway Group N XVIII (brain weight, 1.83 grams) is about 423, and according to another determination (Sugita, '18 a) these two groups may be regarded nearly equal in age, as the Albino brain weight would be about 18 per cent less than the Norway brain weight of the like age. The ratio in cortical volume of the above two is 1.22. The body weight corresponding to the brain weight of 1.54 grams in the albino rat is 64 grams and that corresponding to the brain weight of 1.83 grams in the Norway rat is 90 grams ('The Rat,' Donaldson, '15). The ratio of the body surface in the above two, therefore, is about 1.25, quite near to the ratio in cortical volume.


TABLE 11 Giving for several species of mammals the adult body weight and brain weight, the average cortical thickness and the name of author from whom the data for the cortical thickness or for the brain and body weights were cited, arranged in the order of decreasing body weight within each family of inammals. The abbreviations of the names of authors are as follows: B = Brodmann {'09), I — Isenschmid {'11), L = Lewis {'79), M= Marburg, {'12), S = Sugita {'17 a, '18 a, MS.)


OF MAMMALIA


Rodentia


Chiroptera


Marsvipialia


Primates


Prosimiae


Artiodactyla f et Carnivo- \ ra I


Insectivora


NAME OF SRECIES


Simia satyrus (orang-outang).

Hylobates

Cynocephalus hamadryas

Macacus rhesus (macaques). . .

Cercopithecus (long-tailed ape)

Lemur varius

Lemur

Hapale (marmoset)

Microcebus

Ovis musimon (sheep)

Felis domestica (cat)

Erinaceus europaeus (hedgehog)

Talpa europaea (mole)

Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)

Cavia cobaya (guinea-pig)

Mus norvegicus (Norway rat) . Mus norv. albinus (albino rat) Spermophilus citillus (groundsquirrel)

Mus musculus (mouse)

Pteropus edwardsii (vampire

bat)

Vespertilio murinus (bat)

Macropus giganteus (kangaroo)

Didelphys


BODY WEIGHT'


7,350 950 920 356

2,500

2,170

1,800

200

62

23,000 3,000


700 75

2,200 600 450 300

200 20


375 23


5,000 1,100


BR.\IN WEIGHT'


grains

400.0

130.0

142.0

82.0

85.0

28.7

23.0

8.0

1.9


100.0 30.0


3.5 1.3

10.0 4.5 2.5 2.0

2.2 0.4


AVERAGE CORTICAL THICKNESS


7.0 0.3


25.0 5.5


mm. 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.3

2.3 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.5

1.6(2.6)2

1.5(2.6)2


1.8 1.0

2.2 1.9 2.1 1.9

1.8 0.8


1.7 0.4


2.3 1.2


K tS

fa p S <


M

M M M

B M B B B

L L


1 The body and brain weights of some animals were not given by the author who has given the cortical thickness. In such cases the body and brain weights were taken from the list given by Weber ('96).

2 According to Lewis (79), the values given here without brackets were taken from Meynert and show the value measured on the slide and the values given within brackets were obtained by his own observation and represent the natural depth of the cortex.

267


268 NAOKI SUGITA

VIII. SIZE AND GROWTH CHANGES IN SOME NERVE CELLS IN THE

^VIAMMALIAN BRAIN

Albino rat. The results obtained by me regarding the size and the growth changes of the pyramidal cells and of the ganglion cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat were summarized in a previous study (Sugita, '18 c). Four of the conclusions are here quoted:

1. The full size of the pyramids in the lamina pyramidalis is cell body 21 x 27 m and nucleus 18 x 20 /x in the fresh condition (on the slide, respectively, 16 x 21 ju and 14xl5yu). The full size of the ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris is cell body 27 X 37 M and nucleus 23 x 25 ^ in the fresh condition (on the slide, respectively, 21 x 29 ^ and 18 x 19 m) 2. The cell body and the nucleus of the pyramids attain their maximum size at twenty to thirty days in age. Up to ten days they still retain their fetal morphology. After having passed the maximum size at about twenty-five daj^s, they diminish somewhat in size, but the internal structure differentiates as the age advances.

3. The cell body and the nucleus of the ganglion cells attain nearly their maximum size at ten days, when they remain still in fetal form. After this stage, the size of the cell body still increases slowly but steadily as the age advances, while the nucleus remains nearly unchanged in size throughout life.

4. Taking a general view of the data already presented in this series of studies, it is very interesting to observe that the thickness of the cortex, the total number of the cortical nerve cells, and the size of the cortical cells, all attain nearly their full values at the same age of twenty days; that is, at the weaning time of the albino rat.

For comparison with these results on the cells of the cerebral cortex, there are some observations by Addison ('11) on the postnatal growth of the Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex of the albino rat. His material was also obtained from the rat colony at The Wistar Institute and the cerebellum was fixed in Ohlmacher's solution, imbedded in paraffine, and stained with


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX 269

carbol-thionine and acid fuchsin. A part of his results on the Purkinje cells is here quoted:

The Purkinje cells are easily distinguishable at birth along the inner boundary of the molecular layer by their relatively large size and lightly staining nucleus. These cells measure 12 x 7 m and nuclei 8 X 6.3 At. During the first week, there is great increase in size of both nucleus and cytoplasm. The main bulk of the latter is at the ectal pole and from it several fine processes radiate into the molecular layer. At eight days the cells measure 18 x 12 /x and nuclei 10 x 8 ^ to 12 x 9 IX. At eight to ten days there is definite change in form by the elongation of the cytoplasm of the ectal pole to form the main dendrite, the previously existing fine processes becoming its branches. At the same time all the dendries become arranged in one plane, and this plane is parallel to sections directed across the folia. Nissl granules appear in the cj^oplasm at eight to ten days. The arrangement of Purkinje cells changes with the increase in the surface area of the cortex. At birth they are arranged in two to three irregular rows; at three days in one to two irregular rows, and at five days in one continuous row. As growth of the cortex continues, the space intervening between the Purkinje cells becomes greater. Some nuclei reach their maximum size of 12 x 9 /x at eight days, while the cell bodies usually continue to grow, reaching a maximum size of 24 x 19 ^ at twenty days. The dendrites reach the outer limiting membrane when all the outer granule eel's have migrated (twenty-one to twentyfive days), and continue to develop new branches until a much later period as is .diown by a comparison of cells from a 31 day with cells from a 110-day cerebelhun.

From this it is plain that the Purkinje cells (cell bodies) of the albino rat cerebellum have also reached full size at about the weaning time (twenty days of age) .

From the foregoing, we see that the functional cortical cells both in the cerebrum and in the cerebellum reach their full size at an early age — before the weaning time — and though they continue to mature after that they change only slightly in size, sometimes even diminishing. Thus the cortical nerve elements are all precocious in their growth, which is nearly complete when the young become independent of the mother and their education begins. Addison ('11) has stated also that the development of motor control in the young rat is closely correlated with the completion of the cerebellum and the rat attains its full motor control when the cerebellum has attained structural


270 NAOKI SUGITA

maturity at twenty-one to twenty-five days of age. At that age the cells are nearly full size. We may conclude, therefore, at least regarding some of the nerve cells, that the beginning of functional education of the cells at twenty days is preceded by the attainment of nearly full size, and after this period there is very little change in size, though the internal structures mature as the age advances.

Mouse. A study in this field was made by Stefanowska ('98) on the cortical cells of the mouse. She stained the cells by the method of silver impregnation and studied mainly the development of the cell attachments. Her conclusions may be condensed as follows:

1. In the new-born mouse most of the cortical nerve cells have a simple morphology. 2. The cells are usually arranged in chains, disposed perpendicularly to the surface of the cortex. 3. Besides these, there are some groups of cells more advanced in developmen and having many dendrites, and cells which have the adult form having many, long, ramified dendrites. 4. The different parts of the cortex do not attain the same degree of development at the same time. Some cell groups are more precocious. 5. In the lamina multiformis and in the lamina ganglionaris, we find always the most advanced cells in large numbers. 6. In the lamina pyramidalis the development of the cells is very slow. On the ectal surface, near the pia mater, many cells not at all differentiated are often found. 7. At one day after birth, the dendrites of cortical cells are covered with varicosities. The axis-cylinders have also many nodal swellings. 8, As the neurons develop, the varicosities become more and more rare. At fifteen days, varicosities are no longer seen on the dendrites and the neurons at this age have completed their development. 9. The appearance of the piriform appendices on the dendrites is somewhat delayed. At ten days all pyramidal cells show these appendices. These latter are the constant feature of the neuron, while the varicosities are only a temporary formation. The piriform appendices may be the terminal apparatus of the dendrites. 10. The piriform appendices are the last element which appears on the cortical cells during growth. This fact seems to suggest the high importance of these appendices for this nerve function.

As seen from the foregoing, the morphological completeness in respect of the dendrites and the axis-cylinder of the cortical cells is attained at fifteen days or at the weaning time of the mouse also.


GROWTH OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX


271


TABLE 12 Giving for man and other mammals the size of the largest ganglioncells in the lamina ganglionaris of the cerebral cortex as presented by different authors. Data are arranged according to the order of the average diameters


NAME OF SPECIES


Homo sapiens (man)

Homo sapiens (man)

Homo sapiens (man)

Homo sapiens (man)

Felis leo (lion)

Felis tigris (tiger)

Cercoleptiis caudivolvulus (kinkajou).

Ursus syriacus (bear)

Indris (babakoto)

Felis domestica (cat)

Cercopithecus mona (African monkey)

Elephas (elephant)

Lemur

Mus norvegicus (Norway rat)

Ovis musimon (sheep)

Sus (pig)

Mus norvegicus albinus (albino rat) . .

Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)

Lepus cuniculus (rabbit)

Pteropus edwardsii (vampire bat)

Mus musculus (mouse)


MAXIMUM SIZE


REPORTED IN MICBA


Linear diameters


Average

diameter or

square root

of the



product


60X120


85


55X126


83


53X106


75


40 X 80


57


60X133


90


60X100


78


50X110


74


53X100


73


44 X 80


59


32X106


58


40 X 72


54


35 X 60


46


SOX 70


46


33 X 48


40


23 X 65


39


27 X 48


36


30 X 42


36


18 X 60


33


18X 40


27


16X 36


24


18X 20


19


Author


Betz Lewis Brodmann Hammarberg

Brodmann

Brodmann

Brodmann

Brodmann

Brodmann

Lewis

Brodmann

Brodmann

Brodmann

Sugita

Lewis

Lewis

Sugita

Lewis

Brodmann

Brodmann

Isenschmid


There are no other systematic investigations on the postnatal development of the cortical nerve cells in mammals, although there are some studies on the growth of nerve cells in the fetus, among which the researches by His ('04) (see footnote 2), Koelliker ('96), and Vignal ('89) are the most important.

Table 12 was compiled by me in order to compare the size of the largest ganglion cells in the lamina ganglionaris (the fifth layer of Brodmann) of the cerebral cortex of man and some other mammals. The tabulated data were taken from Brodmann ('09), Lewis ('79, '82), Hammarberg ('95), and others.


272 NAOKI SUGITA

The results obtained by me (Sugita, '18 c) in the albino and the Norway rats have been also entered.

IX. THE SIZE OF THE LARGEST CORTICAL CELLS IN MAN AND SOME OTHER MAMMALS

From table 12 we can draw only very general conclusions as to the significance of the size of the largest cortical cells. The giant Betz cells even in man vary rather widely in size according to the different authors, probably owing largely to the different technical methods used, as has been pointed out repeatedly in the course of this paper.

From time to time attempts have been made to formulate a general interpretation of the size of the Betz cells and of the nerve cells in general. From the examination of table 12, it is seen that the values for the mean diameters do not, except in the very most general way, follow the size of the animal, but that the Felidae, even the cat, stand high in the series.

We are not able to contribute any general explanation for the size of these cells, although it may not be out of place to repeat that in the Norway rat with the heavier brain these cells are larger than in the albino rat with the lighter brain (Sugita, '18 c), and so will merely call attention to the various authors who have had something to say in the matter: Lewis ("79), Hughlings Jackson ('90), Schwalbe ('81), Barratt ('01), Dunn ('00, '02), Herrick ('02), Donaldson ('03), Campbell ('05), Boughton ('06), Johnston ('08), and Kidd ('15).

X. Summary

1. In the present paper I have attempted to compare my conclusions regarding the development of the cortical elements in the brains of the albino and the Norway rats with the corresponding changes in other mammals. The data used for these comparisons were taken from various sources, but the comparisons are in many instances hampered by differences in technique or the lack of essential information.

2. The relations of the cortical thickness at different localities in the cerebrum are quite the same in the mouse and rabbit as in the rat. The development of the cortical thickness has proved to be similar in the mouse and guinea-pig: it attains nearly its full value at the weaning time of the animal.

3. The statement that the cortical thickness diminishes from the frontal to the occipital pole and from the dorsal to the ventral aspect probably holds true throughout mammals, including man.

4. The results given by different authors for the cortical thickness of human brain (averages or for each locality) are by no means in accord. Even for the same locality there are wide deviations. The best data indicate that the average cortical thickness of the adult human brain is about 3 mm.

5. The mode of increase in cortical thickness in man according to age appears to be similar to that in the albino rat, if the brains are compared at equivalent ages. The developmental stage of the brain of a new-born child corresponds to that of an albino rat of five days of age, and throughout the postnatal life the relative growth rate of the rat and man are as 30 to 1. The span of life 30 for man corresponds to 1 for the rat and the equivalent ages are represented by like fractions of the span of life. The human cortex probably attains nearly its full thickness at fifteen months, equivalent to twenty days of rat age.

6. The relative cortical volumes of the albino and the Norway rat brains, computed formerly by me (Sugita, '18 b), appear to be proportional to the surface areas of the entire bodies at the like age. This relation may be generally applicable within a given order of mammalia. The cortical thickness or the brain weight is in general only loosely correlated with the body weight or size of the animal.

7. The cortical nerve cells in the cerebruni and in the cerebellum of the albino rat are precocious in their growth, attaining almost the full size at twenty days, the weaning time. The maturation of the intracellular structures probably continues after the size is apparently completed. This process is shown also in the mouse.

8. The size of the Betz giant cells in the adult human cortex (found ill the gyrus centralis anterior) is reported differently by different authors. The mean value is about 75 micra in average diameter.

9. The size of the cortical cells, especially the Betz motor ganglion cells, of adult animals has no clear relationship to brain size or body size. These cells are notably large in the Felidae.

10. As a general conclusion to this series of studies the following statement may be made:

The morphological organization of the cerebral cortex is generally precocious. The size of individual cortical nerve cells, the total number of cortical cells, and the thickness of the cortex, all attain nearly their full values at the same time and very early in life (corresponding to the weaning time in some rodents) , after which the maturation of internal structures of the cell body and the nucleus continues. The brain weight and the cortical volume continue to increase even after this stage throughout the postnatal life, though not so rapidly as during the early period. This later growth is due principally to the development of the cell attachments, intercellular tissues (neuroglia tissue and bloodvessels), the ingrowth of axons into the cortex and their myelination, which together separate the cells from each other, and cause an increase in cortical volume. The cortical volume is primarily dependent on the size of individual cortical cells and their total number and it appears in animals belonging to a given zoological order to have a definite relationship to the size (or area of surface) of the body of the animal.

Literature Cited

Addison, VV. H. F. 1911 The development of the Purkinje cells and of the cortical layers in the cerebellum of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 21, no. 5.

Allen, Ezra 1912 The cessation of mitosis in the central nervous system of the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 22, no. 6.

Allen, Jessie Blount 1904 The associative processes of the guinea-pig. A study of the psychical development of an animal with a nervous system well medullated at birth. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 14, no. 4.

Barratt, J. O. Wakelin 1901 Observations on the structure of the third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerves. Jour. Anat. and Physiol., vol. 35, p. 214.

BouGHTON, T. H. 1906 The increase in the number and size of the medullated fibers in the oculomotor nerve of the white rat and of the cat at different ages. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 16, pp. 153-165.

Brodmann, K. 1908 Uber Rindenmessungen. Centralbl. f. Nervenheilkunde u. Psychiatrie, Bd. 19.

1909 Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig. 1909 Antwort an Herrn Dr. Th. Kaes. tJber Rindenmessungen. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 635.

Campbell, A. W. 1905 Histological studies on the localisation of cortical function. Cambridge.

Dhere and Lapicque, Louis 1898 8ur le rapport entre la grandeur du corps et le developpement de I'encephale. Archives de Physiologie normale et pathologique, no. 4.

Donaldson, H. H. 1891 Cerebral localization. Am. Jour, of Psychol., vol. 4, no. 1.

1891 Anatomical observations on the brain and several sense-organs of the blind deaf-mute, Laura Dewey Bridgeman. II. On the thickness and structure of the cerebral cortex. Am. Jour, of Psychol., vol. 4, no. 2.

1897 The growth of the brain. New York.

1903 On a law determining the number of medullated nerve fibers innervating the thigh, shank, and foot of the frog— Rana virescens. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 13, no. 3.

1908 Review "Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen" von Dr. Th. Kaes. Am. Jour. Anat., vol. 7, no. 4. Anat. Rec, no. 8. 1908 A comparison of the albino rat with man in respect to the growth of the brain and of the spinal cord. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 18, no. 4. 1915 The Rat. Memoirs of The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, no. 6. Dubois, Eugene 1898 Uber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der Korpergrosse bei den Saugetieren. Archiv f. Anthropologic, Bd. 25.

1898 tJber die Abhangigkeit des Hirngewichtes von der Korpergrosse beim Menschen. Archiv f. Anthropologie, Bd. 25.

Dubois, EuGE^fE 1913 On the relation between the quantity of brain and the size of the body in vertebrates. Proceedings of the meeting of December 27, 1913. Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, vol. 16.

Dunn, Elizabeth Hopkins 1900 The number and size of the nerve fibers innervating the skin and muscles of the thigh in the frog (Rana virescens brachycephala, Cope). Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 10, no. 2. 1902 On the number and on the relation between diameter and distribution of the nerve fibers innervating the leg of the frog, Rana virescens brachycephala. Cope. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12, no. 4.

FucHS, SiGMUND 1883 Zur Histogenese der menschlichen Grosshirnrinde. Sitzungsber. der K. Akad. der Wissenschaft, Wien., Bd. 88. III. Abtheil.

His, Wilhelm 1904 Die Entwickelung des menschlichen Gehirns wahrend der ersten Monate. Leipzig.

Hammarberg, Carl 1895 Studien liber Klinik und Pathologic der Idiotie nebst Untersuchungen tiber die normale Anatomie der Hirnrinde. Upsala.

Herrick, C. Judson 1902 A note on the significance of the size of nerve fibers in fishes. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 12.

Isenschmid, Robert 1911 Zur Kenntnis der Grosshirnrinde der Maus. Abh. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, physik-math. CI. Jahrg. 1911 Anh. no. 3.

Jackson, J. Huglings 1890 On convulsive seizures. British Medical Journal, vol. 1.

Johnston, J. B. 1908 On the significance of the caliber of the parts of the neurone in vertebrates. Jour. Comp. Neur. and Psychol., vol. 18, no. 6.

Kaes, Theodor 1905 Die Rindenbreite als wesentlicher Faktor zur Beurtheilung der Entwickelung des Gehirns und namentlich der Intelligenz. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 24, Nr. 22. 1907 Die Grosshirnrinde des Menschen in ihren Massen und in ihren Fasergehalt. 2 volumes. Jena.

1909 tjber Rindenmessungen. Eine Erwiederung an Dr. K. Brodmann. Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 178. 1909 Replik. Zu "Dr. Brodmanns Antwort an Rindenmessungen." Neurolog. Centralbl., Jahrgang 28, p. 639.

KiDD, Leonard J. 1915 Factors which determine the calibre of nerve cells and fibres. Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, vol. 13, pp. 1-27.

King, Helen Dean 1910 The effects of various fixatives on the brain of the albino rat, with an account of a method of preparing this material or a study of the cells in the cortex. Anat. Rec, vol. 4, pp. 214-244.

Lapicque, Louis 1907 Tableau gen6ra' du poids encephalique en ionction du poids du corps. Paris.

Lewis, W. Bevan 1878 Application of freezing methods to the microscopic examination of the brain. 'Brain,' Part 3, pp. 348-359. 1879 Re^arches on the comparative structure of the cortex cerebri. III. Phil. Trans., pp. 36-64.

1882 On the comparative structure of the brain in rodents. Phil. Trans., pp. 699-749.


Marburg, Otto 1907 Beitrage zui Kenntniss der Grosshirnrinde der Affen.

Arbeiten aus dem Neurologischen Institute an der Wiener UniversitJit

(Obersteiner). Bd. 16. Mayer, Otto 1912 Mikrometrische Untersuchungen iiberdie Zelldichtigkeit

der Grosshirnrinde bei den Affen. Jour. f. Psychol, u. Neurol., Bd.

19, Heft 6. Rose, M. 1912 Histologische Lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde bei kleinen

Saugetieren (Rodentia, Insectivora, Cheiroptera). Jour. f. Psychol.

u. Neurol., Bd. 19, Ergonzungshefte 2. ScHWALBE 1881 Lehrbuch der Neurologie. Erlangen. Stefanowska, Micheline 1898 Evolution des cellules nerveuses corticales

chez la souris apres la naissance. Annales de la Societe Royale des

Sciences med. et naturelles de Bruxelles, vo . 7.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. I. On the changes in the size and shape of the cerebrum during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. (1917) J Comp. Neurol. 28: 495-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. II. On the increases in the thickness of the cerebral cortex during the postnatal growth of the brain. Albino rat. (1917) J Comp. Neurol. 28: 511-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. III. On the size and shape of the cerebrum in the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of these with the corresponding characters in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 1-.

Sugita N. Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex. IV. On the thickness of the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus) and a comparison of the same with the cortical thickness in the albino rat. (1918) J Comp. Neurol. 29: 11-.

1918 b Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

V. Part I. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the albino rat brain, together with the changes in these characters according to the growth of the brain. Part II. On the area of the cortex and on the number of cells in a unit volume, measured on the frontal and sagittal sections of the brain of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding data for the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.

1918 c Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

VI. Parti. On the increase in size and on the developmental changes of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the albino rat during the growth of the brain. Part II. On the increase in size of some nerve cells in the cerebral cortex of the Norway rat (Mus norvegicus), compared with the corresponding changes in the albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 2.

1918 d Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex.

VII. On the influence of starvation at an early age upon the development of the cerebral cortex. Albino rat. Jour. Comp. Neur., vol. 29, no. 3.


ViERORDT, H. 1890 Das Massenwachstum der Korperorgane des Menschen. Archiv f. Anatomie u. Physiologic, Anat. Abtheil., pp. 62-94.

ViGNAL, William 1889 Developpement des elements du systeme nerveux cerebro-spinal. Paris. De Vries, I. 1912 tjber die Zytoarchitektonik der Grosshirnrinde der Maus und iiber die Beziehungen der einzelnen Zellschichten zum Corpus

Callosum auf Grund von experimentellen Ltisionen. Folia Neuro Biolog ca, Bd. 6, Nr. 4. Weber, Max 1896 Vorstudien iiber das Hirngew'cht der Saugetiere. Fest schr It iir Carl Gegenbaur. Pp. 105-12].


Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, May 4) Embryology Paper - Comparative studies on the growth of the cerebral cortex 4 (1918). Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Paper_-_Comparative_studies_on_the_growth_of_the_cerebral_cortex_4_(1918)

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G