User:Z3417843

From Embryology
Revision as of 11:19, 10 September 2014 by Z3417843 (talk | contribs)

Welcome to the 2014 Embryology Course!

Links: Timetable | How to work online | One page Wiki Reference Card | Moodle
  • Each week the individual assessment questions will be displayed in the practical class pages and also added here.
  • Copy the assessment items to your own page and provide your answer.
  • Note - Some guest assessments may require completion of a worksheet that will be handed in in class with your student name and ID.
Individual Lab Assessment
  1. Lab 1 Assessment - Fertilization References
  2. Lab 2 Assessment - Uploading a Research Image
  3. Lab 3 Assessment - Researching your Project Sub-Heading
  4. Lab 4 Assessment - Cord Stem Cells
  5. Lab 5 Assessment - Abnormalities
  6. Lab 6 Assessment - Group Work (As announced in the lecture, No individual assessment item for this Lab, but I do expect you to have added content to your Group project by tomorrow's Lab.)
  7. Lab 7 Assessment - Endocrine+Teeth
  8. Lab 8 - Genital
  9. Lab 9 - Peer Assessment
  10. Lab 10 - Sensory Development
  11. Lab 11 - Stem Cells
  12. Lab 12 - Stem Cells Presentation (see preparation information)
Lab 12 - Stem Cell Presentation Assessment More Info
Group Comment Mark (10)
1/8
  • Lots of effort to place article in larger context
  • Slide lay out could be improved: lots of empty space, use larger images and talk through them
  • Results presentation a bit convoluted. Try to finish discussion of each experiment with a clear conclusion.
  • Repetition of information towards the end
  • One presenter had an unprofessional style of presentation
7
2
  • Good well-structured presentation
  • Good introduction
  • Methods discussed separately. Try to avoid this, and incorporate in discussion of experiments. Not sure if technology was understood very well.
7.5
3
  • Good well-structured presentation
  • Do not discuss methods as a separate section
  • Discussion of results not always very clear, comprehension?
7.5
4
  • Good well-structured presentation
  • Lots of text on slides, improve talking through images, blow up images
  • Good discussion
8.5
5
  • Good well-structured presentation, amount of text on slides relatively good.
  • Figures too small, discussion bit convoluted
  • Slightly over time
8.5
6
  • Good comprehension and well-structured presentation.
  • Too much text on slides
  • Experiments discussed in a lot of detail. Try to be more concise and discuss aim of experiment, approach, summarize results, conclude.
  • No talking through figures
8.5
7
  • Good well-structured presentation, great introduction, inclusion of images in presentation done relatively well.
  • Methods discussed separately. Incorporate methods in discussion of the experiments in the results section.
  • Try not to depend too much on text on your slides
  • Talking through results images was not very clear, comprehension?
7.5
More Useful Links
Student Projects
Group 1 Respiratory User:Z3330991 User:Z3332339 User:Z3333429 User:Z3372817
Group 2 Renal User:Z3463310 User:Z3465141 User:Z3465654 User:Z5030311
Group 3 Gastrointestinal User:Z3414515 User:Z3375627 User:Z3415141 User:Z3415242
Group 4 Genital User:Z3415716 User:Z3416697 User:Z3417458 User:Z3417753
Group 5 Integumentary User:Z3417796 User:Z3417843 User:Z3418340 User:Z3418488
Group 6 Endocrine User:Z3418702 User:Z3418837 User:Z3418698 User:Z3414648
Group 7 Neural User:Z3418981 User:Z3419587 User:Z3422484 User:Z3374116
Group 8 Musculoskeletal User:Z3418779 User:Z3418718 User:Z3418989
Student Projects Fetal Development of a specific System.
2014 Course: Week 2 Lecture 1 Lecture 2 Lab 1 | Week 3 Lecture 3 Lecture 4 Lab 2 | Week 4 Lecture 5 Lecture 6 Lab 3 | Week 5 Lecture 7 Lecture 8 Lab 4 | Week 6 Lecture 9 Lecture 10 Lab 5 | Week 7 Lecture 11 Lecture 12 Lab 6 | Week 8 Lecture 13 Lecture 14 Lab 7 | Week 9 Lecture 15 Lecture 16 Lab 8 | Week 10 Lecture 17 Lecture 18 Lab 9 | Week 11 Lecture 19 Lecture 20 Lab 10 | Week 12 Lecture 21 Lecture 22 Lab 11 | Week 13 Lecture 23 Lecture 24 Lab 12
Student Projects - Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 | Group 7 | Group 8 | Moodle

Lab Attendance

Individual Online Assessment

Assessment 1

Effect of vitamin D status on clinical pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization.

Vitamin D plays an essential role in the process of human reproduction. Women in their reproductive age are more prone to vitamin D deficiency. In recent studies, the levels of vitamin D in the body is somewhat correlated to the prevalence of vitamin deficiency in the population. For example, 79% of women undergoing IVF is suffering from vitamin deficiency. In a different study, female rats were tested for the link between vitamin D deficiency and infertility. Two groups of female rats were given different diets, one rich in vitamin D and the other low in vitamin D. Female rats fed with the vitamin D deficient diet had 75% reduced fertility and 30 % smaller litter sizes compared to the group fed with vitamin D rich diet.

The goal of this study is to investigate the correlation between vitamin D deficiency and lower rates of clinical pregnancy after IVF in women. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, 25(OH)D, is a marker for vitamin D levels. 173 women gave consent to participate in the experiment. The serum was used to determine the vitamin D level of each and were segregated in terms of their 25(OH)D levels, whether they are sufficient or insufficient.

It is unclear how vitamin D affects fertility in women. However, it is likely that vitamin D has an effect on the implantation process. Findings show that women in the sufficient group had higher rates of clinical pregnancy after IVF as well as implantation rates. It also suggested that vitamin D supplementation is an easy and cost-effective way of combatting vitamin D insufficiency. Furthermore, it suggested that vitamin D status should be taken into consideration when assessing for infertility in women.

[1]

Neurotensin Enhances Sperm Capacitation and Acrosome Reaction in Mice.

In order for a spermatozoa to be fertile, it has to undergo capacitation. Capacitation refers to the change in the physiology of spermatozoa when inside the uterus, which allows them to penetrate and fertilise the oocyte. While in the uterus, these cells are subject to influence by various factors that affect sperm function, Neurotensin (NT) is a hormone known to have multiple functions. It can function as a neurotransmitter and even participate in gastrointestinal motility and secretion. NT stimulation results to the production of secondary messengers such as cAMP and Ca2-, which are important for fertility in sperm. However, its function relating to reproduction is still unknown. This study is aimed to clarify the role and function of NT in the capacitation and acrosome reaction in spermatozoa.

Sperm were gathered from the epididymis of male mice, aged more than 12 weeks. To test for the effect of NT on acrosome reaction, the suspension of spermatozoa capacitated in HTF medium were divided into microtubules and given varying amounts of NT stock solution. Under a fluorescence microscope, the sperm that underwent acrosome reaction were identified and the acrosome reaction rate was calculated. To test for NT concentration, cumulus oocyte-complexes (COCs) were cultured in media with FSH and EGF.

The study’s results showed a rapid increase in the rate of acrosome reaction in sperm depending on the dosage of NT stock solution introduced. Acrosome reaction is triggered by the increase in levels of calcium ion (Ca2+), which occurs when NTR1 is stimulated. However, it is still unsure whether this is the direct cause for acrosome reaction in the spermatozoa. For the NT concentration test, it showed that the addition of FSH and EGF stimulated the production of NT in cumulus cells. All together, these evidences show that neurotensin play a role in the capacitation of spermatozoa and acrosome reaction.

[2]

  1. <pubmed>25077107</pubmed>
  2. <pubmed>25031361</pubmed>

PubMed

Assessment 2

Myofiber tractography of the lateral wall of the left ventricle at different weeks of a human fetal heart. (A) A few fiber tracts present at week 10. (B) An increase in the density of the fiber tracts and crossing-helical pattern is visible at week 14. (C) At week 19, the arrangement of the fiber tracts is similar to that of the heart after birth. (D) Fiber tracts of an adult heart (PN = P6 neonatal). (E) A complete tractography of the heart at week 19.

Assessment 3

[1] [2] [3]

  1. <pubmed>23723064</pubmed>
  2. <pubmed>22709652</pubmed>
  3. <pubmed>10222336</pubmed>

Assessment 4

Migration and Differentiation of Human Umbilical Cord Stem Cells After Heart Injury in Chicken Embryos

With the increasing cases of myocardial infarction, or heart attack, the heart is a popular organ for regenerative cell therapy. Stem cells are known for their ability to differentiate and form into different organs, given the right signalling and stimulation, including myocardial structures. Because of this, stem cells are widely used in regenerative cell therapy. Cardiac injuries in animal models have been treated with the use of stem cells, including a few clinical trials of patients suffering myocardial infarction. Evidence shows that in a myocardial injury, stem cells are activated. Although, there is still little knowledge on the mechanisms and signalling pathways regarding the differentiation of stem cells. This study aims to analyse human umbilical cord blood stem cells (scHUCBs) and their behaviour when grafted onto the hearts of chicken embryos, whether normal (control) or damaged.

Stem cells where extracted by processing the whole blood from a human umbilical cord. The chicken eggs used were incubated and windowed to give access to the embryo. With a microinjector, scHUCBs were injected into the epicardium of the left or right ventricle of the chicken embryo’s heart. Some hearts were injured, specifically at the myocardial wall, using a needle. Experimental hearts, i.e. hearts with the microinjuries, had the stem cells introduced at the farthest site of the contralateral ventricle to test for the migration of scHUCBs. In addition to that, stem cells were grafted at different times (6hr, 12hr, 24hr later), to test for the effect of time on the result of this regenerative procedures.

The study’s results showed that the stem cells spread throughout the heart walls and it’s chamber’s walls. Stem cells have differentiated into myocardiocytes and were also seen within the lumen of blood vessels, suggesting that the stem cells have differentiated into endothelial cells as well. Majority (95%) of the grafted cells, introduced to the injured heart, migrated to the injury. This evidence proves that signals may promote the migration and differentiation of stem cells towards sites of injury and other parts of the organ. Grafted cells that were introduced 6hr after the injury showed a similar migration pattern; whereas grafted cells introduced 24hr later showed no signs of migration at all. This evidence shows that the gap between the ischaemic event and grafting could affect and predict the likely result of regenerative cell therapy.

[1]

  1. <pubmed>18393637</pubmed>

There are three vascular shunts in the vasculature of the fetus:

  • foramen ovale - passage of blood from the right atrium to the left atrium, which bypasses blood flow to the right ventricle
  • ductus arterioles - passage of blood from the pulmonary trunk to the aorta, which bypasses blood flow to the lungs
  • ductus venous - passage of blood from the umbilical vein to the inferior vena cava, which bypasses blood flow to the liver

Assessment 5

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) is a rare condition in neonates, that could lead to death if untreated or failed to be detected. It occurs when a foetus aspirates meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) during development, i.e. before or during labour. Meconium refers to the first stool of the infant, which consists of the contents of foetal gastrointestinal tract during development. This is excreted as a greenish-brown material in utero or post birth. In response to stress, e.g. hypoxia-ischaemia, stimulation of the GIT can occur, which results to peristalsis and relaxation of the anal sphincter. This will then result to the release of meconium by the foetus to the amniotic fluid, which contaminates it and is now meconium-stained. Foetal gasping is also a reflex in response to stress. This reflex leads to the aspiration of MSAF and result to MAS. This process allows the meconium to enter the foetal upper airway and eventually, the distal airways. A foetus may be hypoxic due to abnormal patterns in the heart rate.

In return, meconium aspiration can cause hypoxia in neonates via:

  • airway obstruction
  • surfactant dysfunction
  • chemical pneumonitis
  • pulmonary vasoconstriction

Signs of tachypnoea, cyanosis (when the neonate appears blue), and chest inflation are present in neonates with MAS. Further complications of this abnormality could lead to more serious diseases, such as atelectasis and pneumothorax, or respiratory failure. MAS can also result to chemical pneumonia and pneumonitis. There are currently a few methods of preventing or managing MAS, such as intratracheal intubation and suctioning, which was reported to have 100% survival. [1]

  1. <pubmed>19381312 </pubmed>
  1. Jane Yizhen Lim, S. Arulkumaran Meconium aspiration syndrome Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine: 2009, 18(4);106-109
  2. Benjamin J. Stenson, Allan D. Jackson Management of meconium aspiration syndrome Pediatrics and Child Health: 2009, 19(4);174-177

Group Assignment

Notes