Talk:Implantation

Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles

Pinopodes are small, finger-like protrusions from the endometrium.

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/3/787.short

The formation of endometrial pinopodes detected by scanning electron microscopy may be a specific marker for uterine receptivity. Aiming to assess the effects of ovarian stimulation on pinopode formation, we examined sequential endometrial biopsies from 17 oocyte donors. Seven normally menstruating women served as controls. Up to four samples were taken from each woman at 24–72 h intervals between days 14 and 24, giving a total of 69 samples. The day of oocyte retrieval was designated day 14 in ovarian stimulation cycles and the day of luteinizing hormone surge was designated day 13 in natural cycles. Endometrial morphology and pinopode numbers were similar in both groups. Fully developed pinopodes appeared in only one sample per cycle, indicating their short life span. However, the cycle day these structures appeared varied up to 5 days between women and the distribution was as follows: day 18 (n=2), day 19 (n=7), day 20 (n=4), day 21 (n=3), day 22 (n=1) in ovarian stimulation cycles, and day 20 (n=2), day 21 (n=2), day 22 (n=3) in natural cycles. Furthermore, accelerated pinopode formation in ovarian stimulation cycles was positively correlated with day 13 progesterone. Our findings show that ovarian stimulation does not affect endometrial pinopode formation in terms of quantity and life span. The cycle days when pinopodes form are specific to the individual, being on average 1–2 days earlier in ovarian stimulation than in natural cycles. These changes in pinopode expression may reflect shifts in the window of receptivity, resulting in ovo-endometrial asynchrony and limiting implantation success in in-vitro fertilization.

Myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 (MEIS) 1 involvement in embryonic implantation

Scanning EM http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/6/1394/F6.expansion

1: Kondoh E, Okamoto T, Higuchi T, Tatsumi K, Baba T, Murphy SK, Takakura K, Konishi I, Fujii S. Stress affects uterine receptivity through an ovarian-independent pathway. Hum Reprod. 2009 Apr;24(4):945-53. Epub 2008 Dec 20. PubMed PMID: 19098291.

2: Quinn CE, Casper RF. Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):229-36. Epub 2008 Nov 8. Review. PubMed PMID: 18997181.

3: Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Wu G. Interferons and progesterone for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy: interactions among novel cell signaling pathways. Reprod Biol. 2008 Nov;8(3):179-211. Review. PubMed PMID: 19092983.

4: Horcajadas JA, Goyri E, Hig√≥n MA, Mart√≠nez-Conejero JA, Gambadauro P, Garc√≠a G, Meseguer M, Sim√≥n C, Pellicer A. Endometrial receptivity and implantation are not affected by the presence of uterine intramural leiomyomas: a clinical and functional genomics analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;93(9):3490-8. Epub 2008 Jun 17. PubMed PMID: 18559911.

5: Xu B, Geerts D, Qian K, Zhang H, Zhu G. Myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 (MEIS) 1 involvement in embryonic implantation. Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1394-406. Epub 2008 Apr 11. PubMed PMID: 18408019; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2387222.

6: Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Griesinger G; Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):365-77. Epub 2007 Jun 4. Review. PubMed PMID: 17548368.

7: Kurihara I, Lee DK, Petit FG, Jeong J, Lee K, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. COUP-TFII mediates progesterone regulation of uterine implantation by controlling ER activity. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jun;3(6):e102. Erratum in: PLoS Genet. 2007 Aug;3(8):e149. PubMed PMID: 17590085; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1892047.

8: Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3036-43. Epub 2006 Aug 12. Review. PubMed PMID: 16905766.

9: Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):731-46. Epub 2006 Sep 18. Review. PubMed PMID: 16982667.

10: Ruan HC, Zhu XM, Luo Q, Liu AX, Qian YL, Zhou CY, Jin F, Huang HF, Sheng JZ. Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in mice. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2521-9. Epub 2006 Jun 21. PubMed PMID: 16790614.

11: Campbell EA, O'Hara L, Catalano RD, Sharkey AM, Freeman TC, Johnson MH. Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2495-513. Epub 2006 Jun 21. PubMed PMID: 16790611.

12: Strowitzki T, Germeyer A, Popovici R, von Wolff M. The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5):617-30. Epub 2006 Jul 10. Review. PubMed PMID: 16832043.

13: Taylor HS, Fei X. Emx2 regulates mammalian reproduction by altering endometrial cell proliferation. Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Nov;19(11):2839-46. Epub 2005 Jun 30. PubMed PMID: 15994197.

14: Nie G, Li Y, Wang M, Liu YX, Findlay JK, Salamonsen LA. Inhibiting uterine PC6 blocks embryo implantation: an obligatory role for a proprotein convertase in fertility. Biol Reprod. 2005 Apr;72(4):1029-36. Epub 2004 Dec 15. PubMed PMID: 15601911.

15: Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC. Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep. Reproduction. 2004 Dec;128(6):657-68. Review. PubMed PMID: 15579583.

16: Kao LC, Germeyer A, Tulac S, Lobo S, Yang JP, Taylor RN, Osteen K, Lessey BA, Giudice LC. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology. 2003 Jul;144(7):2870-81. PubMed PMID: 12810542.

17: Ma WG, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2963-8. Epub 2003 Feb 24. PubMed PMID: 12601161; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC151449.

18: Perrier D'hauterive S, Charlet-Renard C, Goffin F, Foidart M, Geenen V. [The implantation window]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Sep;31(5):440-55. Review. French. PubMed PMID: 12379828.

19: Basak S, Dhar R, Das C. Steroids modulate the expression of alpha4 integrin in mouse blastocysts and uterus during implantation. Biol Reprod. 2002 Jun;66(6):1784-9. PubMed PMID: 12021063.

20: Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, Imani B, Yang JP, Germeyer A, Osteen K, Taylor RN, Lessey BA, Giudice LC. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2002 Jun;143(6):2119-38. PubMed PMID: 12021176.

21: Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Hum Reprod. 2002 May;17(5):1141-5. Review. PubMed PMID: 11980729.

22: Gray CA, Bartol FF, Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Developmental biology of uterine glands. Biol Reprod. 2001 Nov;65(5):1311-23. Review. PubMed PMID: 11673245.

23: Bagot CN, Kliman HJ, Taylor HS. Maternal Hoxa10 is required for pinopod formation in the development of mouse uterine receptivity to embryo implantation. Dev Dyn. 2001 Nov;222(3):538-44. PubMed PMID: 11747087.

24: Bildirici I, Bukulmez O, Ensari A, Yarali H, Gurgan T. A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2422-6. PubMed PMID: 11679532.

25: Paria BC, Song H, Wang X, Schmid PC, Krebsbach RJ, Schmid HH, Bonner TI, Zimmer A, Dey SK. Dysregulated cannabinoid signaling disrupts uterine receptivity for embryo implantation. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 8;276(23):20523-8. Epub 2001 Mar 8. PubMed PMID: 11279117.

26: Damario MA, Barmat L, Liu HC, Davis OK, Rosenwaks Z. Dual suppression with oral contraceptives and gonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonists improves in-vitro fertilization outcome in high responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1997 Nov;12(11):2359-65. PubMed PMID: 9436663.

27: Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, Sagoskin AW, Doyle M, Harris JE, Lessey BA. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1997 Jul;12(7):1393-8. PubMed PMID: 9262264.

28: Somkuti SG, Yuan L, Fritz MA, Lessey BA. Epidermal growth factor and sex steroids dynamically regulate a marker of endometrial receptivity in Ishikawa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Jul;82(7):2192-7. PubMed PMID: 9215293.

29: Benson GV, Lim H, Paria BC, Satokata I, Dey SK, Maas RL. Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression. Development. 1996 Sep;122(9):2687-96. PubMed PMID: 8787743.

30: Manwaring WH. Cytoplasmic Implantation. Cal West Med. 1946 Jan;64(1):6. PubMed PMID: 18747200; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1473955.