Talk:2010 Group Project 2: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi guys, only two weeks to go, we really need to do some more work, the editing at the end will be the hardest, so the sooner we finish, the easier it will be.
Can we incorporate some sort of timeline? what do you think? maybe we can do a timeline of embryo development and note the time that CVS is done - Jill --[[User:Z3265772|z3265772]] 00:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Can we incorporate some sort of timeline? what do you think? maybe we can do a timeline of embryo development and note the time that CVS is done - Jill --[[User:Z3265772|z3265772]] 00:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)



Revision as of 09:46, 30 August 2010

Hi guys, only two weeks to go, we really need to do some more work, the editing at the end will be the hardest, so the sooner we finish, the easier it will be.

Can we incorporate some sort of timeline? what do you think? maybe we can do a timeline of embryo development and note the time that CVS is done - Jill --z3265772 00:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Mark has kindly shown us how to reference, ill try to sort that out tonight or tomorrow - Jill --z3265772 23:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Ive just discovered, you can use almost any picture on wiki, the copyrights have usually expired, which is why wiki can use them, just search CVS on wiki and if there is a picture you like, check the copyright and copy away!! :D -Jill --z3265772 01:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi guys, please feel free to edit any work i have done, or add to it, or even suggest to me on this page what to add. what i have put up so far really is a rough draft and will be trying to add to it later anyway :) -Jill --z3265772 00:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


Co-ordinator Comments
--This is an area for members of the group to communicate online and to place links and information relevant to the project. Do not forget to sign your additions and always add the newer material to the top of this page.

Projects: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Students Page | Help:Editing Basics



Hi guys, we need to get on top of this, its due for peer assessment in 3 weeks! Im going to do related research. does anyone want to do the drawing? ill also try and get some more references and photos up, as Mark has suggested. If you want a picture, just email the website with the picture on it, thats what ive been doing, they are usually pretty good about it. let me know of any other ideas you guys might have - Jill --z3265772 09:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


--Mark Hill 04:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC) OK there are a few references here, but you will need more than these few and there should be some related images.


Link for group assessment criteria: group assessment criteria - Jill--z3265772 00:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


For current associated research:


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pd.2410/abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11263542

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19683693

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T7V-4BWVXPY-F9&_user=10&_coverDate=03%2F31%2F1994&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1427646674&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a3c3f2d47ad01c562a3baea8c60a48bc

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a913951525

http://www.escardiocontent.org/periodicals/ejcpr/article/S0002-9378%2807%2900305-5/abstract

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/3/6/811

- Jill--z3265772 00:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi guys, i put up the link for Search Pubmed for our topic, did we want to assign ourselves a role to do or just see how the page goes? i thought maybe we could find a page that we like and follow a similar format, that way we know what our page will look like and can follow a layout as we go. -Jill --z3265772 01:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


also, see this web page http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00038393.htm Jill --z3265772 11:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


project outline:

1. Intro

2. historic background

3. current associated research

4. simplified description of technique

http://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Abstract/2010/04000/Chorionic_villus_sampling__technique_and_training.11.aspx

5. student drawn figure or animation

6. reference list

7. glossary

8. external links

-Jill --z3265772 03:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


Can anyone tell me how to paste a picture from an outside source? i cant seem to figure it out. thanks :) -Jill --z3265772 05:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

dont worry, i figured it out :)


i think we should put the references list on this page to begin with to make sure we dont double up - Jill --z3265772 05:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey guys sorry for the delay in replies. I see you have made a contribution to the topic already :) By the way, where did you find the project outline criteria? Oh and if you don't mind I can do research on the description of technique and current research. Feel free to contribute :) oh and any ideas on how to work on the drawings? --Jenny Huang 15:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


Hello guys,

So I found some journal articles that is of interest especially this one: http://apps.who.int/rhl/reviews/langs/CD003252.pdf which is long and has extensive information on the topic.. So I'll be editing my section in word and will be posting some info on technique in the future.

Btw here are some other articles that are of interest that can be accessed through unsw sirius:


http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889854505702916

http://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Abstract/2010/04000/Chorionic_villus_sampling__technique_and_training.11.aspx

http://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Abstract/2005/04000/Chorionic_villus_sampling_and_amniocentesis.16.aspx

Complications:

http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2007/09000/Procedure_Related_Complications_of_Amniocentesis.24.aspx

http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2008/10000/Evaluating_the_Rate_and_Risk_Factors_for_Fetal.12.aspx

I'll be adding more once I find some that are useful..


Oh and about the topic headings are we just going to use the ones in the assesment criteria?


--z3224500 15:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


Hey Jenny!! i think its a great idea to use more headings, add as many as you like/can think of, i just cant think of any more. i think the assessment criteria is just the bare minimum we have to do, so please add more! Also, can we add the new discussion posts to the top of the page? so we dont have to scroll to the bottom every time? what do you think? (it says up the top of this page to add newer material at the top, just wondering what you thought). i really like the articles you have found too :) see you tomorrow - Jill --z3265772 00:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)