Paper - The Factors Involved in the Excavation of the Cavities in the Cartilaginous Capsule of the Ear in the Human Embryo: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
Line 42: Line 42:
throughout the Whole embryonic period.
throughout the Whole embryonic period.




'''Fig. 1''' Median views of wax-plate models of the left membranous labyrinth
'''Fig. 1''' Median views of wax-plate models of the left membranous labyrinth
Line 50: Line 48:
They are all on the same scale of enlargement (4.4 diameters) and thus comparison of them shows graphically the amount of growth the labyrinth experiences
They are all on the same scale of enlargement (4.4 diameters) and thus comparison of them shows graphically the amount of growth the labyrinth experiences
during this period.
during this period.
1 Schoenemann, A. Die Topographic des menschlichen Gehiirorganes. Verlag Von Bergmann, Wiesbaden, 1904. Plate 2, figure 20.




In addition to this increase in size, there is a change in the form of the cartilaginous labyrinth. The general proportions
In addition to this increase in size, there is a change in the form of the cartilaginous labyrinth. The general proportions
are maintained but there are alterations in the detailed form.
As the canals become larger and longer they describe arcs of
lesser curvature. If one compares the superior canal of an 80
mm. fetus with that of a 30 mm. fetus it will be found that in
the former it has doubled its diameter and trebled its length.
There is, moreover, a constant change in the relative position
of the cartilaginous canals. The lateral canal, for instance,
progressively recedes from the lateral wall of the vestibule. In
studying this canal, therefore, one may know that it is steadily
becoming larger by means of a process of excavation, but this
is so managed that the canal as a whole moves in a lateral direction through the substance of the cartilaginous capsule. The
topography of the cartilaginous labyrinth is so well provided with
known landmarks that these changes in its size and form can be
accurately followed. It is possible to determine deductively
at what points new cartilage is being laid down and at what
points it is being removed. On this account the cartilaginous
capsule of the ear is a particularly favorable place for determining the histological features of the ‘growth of cartilage.




1 Schoenemann, A. Die Topographic des menschlichen Gehiirorganes. Verlag Von Bergmann, Wiesbaden, 1904. Plate 2, figure 20.
As has been noted above the growth of the cartilaginous otic
capsule resolves itself into an increase in its external dimensions
with a simultaneous hollowing out and reshaping of its contained
chambers. It at once becomes evident that this cannot be
accounted for on the basis of a simple interstitial increase in the
mass of cartilage together with its passive rearrangement to
allow for the enlarging cavities, due for instance to a mechanical
expansive pressure from the growing membranous labyrinth
with its surrounding tissue and fluid. Such a passive rearrangement could only occur in a tissue that is very plastic, whereas
cartilage is one of the least plastic of the embryonic tissues.
Moreover the histological picture is not that of mechanical pressure. The cartilaginous chambers are always excavated slightly
in advance of the space actually required by the membranous
labyrinth, and there is no evidence of the labyrinth being
cramped or of the creation of pressure grooves in the margins of
the cartilage. Nor is the situation improved by the introduction of the conjectured activity of the perichondrium, either in explanation of the deposit of new cartilage or of the excavation
of the old, since the perichondrium, as will be shown, does not
make its appearance until after a considerable amount of the
growth and hollowing-out of the labyrinth had been already
completed. Therefore there is involved in the development of
the cartilaginous capsule something more than interstitial and
perichondrial growth, in the ordinary sense of the terms. On
account of its bearing upon this problem, it is the purpose of
the present paper to call attention to the occurrence of dedifferentiation of cartilage in the human embryo, and to point out
the important part which this process normally plays in the
hollowing out and reshaping of the otic capsule during its
development.
 
 
The term dedifferentiation is applied here in the sense of a
regression of certain areas of cartilaginous tissue to a more
embryonic form, the same areas being subsequently rebuilt or
redifferentiated into quite a different type of tissue. Dedifferentiation is defined by Child as “a process of loss of differentiation, of apparent simplification, of return or approach to
the embryonic or undifferentiated condition.” In his noteworthy review of this subject he makes the assertion that the
wide occurrence and significance of dedifferentiation in the
lower animals and plants “must at least raise the question
whether similar processes do not occur to some extent in higher
forms.”2 From the context it is evident that he refers to man
as well as other mammals. The materialization of his prediction is here at hand in the development of the cartilaginous
capsule of the ear. Before entering into this further it will be
necessary to outline the earlier steps in the histogenesis of this
particular tissue.
 
==The Three Stages in the Development of Cartilage==
 
The cartilage of the otic capsule in its transition from embryonic mesenchyme to true cartilage passes through three
fairly definite phases: firstly, the condensation of mesenchyme
 


‘Child, O. M. Senescence and rejuvenescence. University of Chicago Press, 1915. Page 293.




{{Footer}}
{{Footer}}

Revision as of 00:51, 12 September 2015

Embryology - 6 May 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Streeter G.L. The Factors Involved in the Excavation of the Cavities in the Cartilaginous Capsule of the Ear in the Human Embryo

Historic Embryology Papers

Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

The Factors Involved in the Excavation of the Cavities in the Cartilaginous Capsule of the Ear in the Human Embryo

George L. Streeter


Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, Maryland

Twelve Figures

The main mass of the cartilaginous capsule of the ear matures into true cartilage when the human embryo reaches a length of 20 to 30 mm., at which time it has acquired what may be considered its adult form with characteristic chambers and openings. From this time on, throughout its whole cartilaginous period, and even after ossification has begun, it undergoes continuous growth, maintaining at the same time, however, its general form and proportions. Such a growth involves both an increase in the surface dimensions of the capsule and a gradual enlargement or excavation of its contained cavities. It is to the manner in which this excavation is accomplished that the writer wishes to call attention and particularly to the factors concerned in its progress whereby a suitable space is always provided for the enlarging membranous labyrinth. The actual amount of increase in size of the labyrinth is graphically pictured in figure 1. The outlines are made so that they show on the same scale of enlargement a series of wax-plate models of the left membranous labyrinth of human embryos having a crown-rump length of 20, 30, 50, 85 and 130 mm., as indicated in the figure. This covers the periodiduring which the otic capsule is in a cartilaginous state. Ossification begins when the fetus has attained a crown-rump length of about 130 mm. The growth from then until the adult condition is reached may be judged by comparing the above with the final stage, labelled adult, which is taken from Schonemann’s reconstruction1 and reproduced here so as to be on the same scale of enlargement as the younger stages. Since the cartilaginous labyrinth corresponds closely in form to the membranous labyrinth, particularly as regards the canals, one can see from figure 1 that there is a progressive increase in the size of the cartilaginous chambers throughout the Whole embryonic period.


Fig. 1 Median views of wax-plate models of the left membranous labyrinth in human embryos having crown-rump lengths as indicated in the figure. The largest one is taken from Schonemann (’04) and represents the adult condition. They are all on the same scale of enlargement (4.4 diameters) and thus comparison of them shows graphically the amount of growth the labyrinth experiences during this period.


1 Schoenemann, A. Die Topographic des menschlichen Gehiirorganes. Verlag Von Bergmann, Wiesbaden, 1904. Plate 2, figure 20.


In addition to this increase in size, there is a change in the form of the cartilaginous labyrinth. The general proportions

are maintained but there are alterations in the detailed form.

As the canals become larger and longer they describe arcs of lesser curvature. If one compares the superior canal of an 80 mm. fetus with that of a 30 mm. fetus it will be found that in the former it has doubled its diameter and trebled its length. There is, moreover, a constant change in the relative position of the cartilaginous canals. The lateral canal, for instance, progressively recedes from the lateral wall of the vestibule. In studying this canal, therefore, one may know that it is steadily becoming larger by means of a process of excavation, but this is so managed that the canal as a whole moves in a lateral direction through the substance of the cartilaginous capsule. The topography of the cartilaginous labyrinth is so well provided with known landmarks that these changes in its size and form can be accurately followed. It is possible to determine deductively at what points new cartilage is being laid down and at what points it is being removed. On this account the cartilaginous capsule of the ear is a particularly favorable place for determining the histological features of the ‘growth of cartilage.


As has been noted above the growth of the cartilaginous otic capsule resolves itself into an increase in its external dimensions with a simultaneous hollowing out and reshaping of its contained chambers. It at once becomes evident that this cannot be accounted for on the basis of a simple interstitial increase in the mass of cartilage together with its passive rearrangement to allow for the enlarging cavities, due for instance to a mechanical expansive pressure from the growing membranous labyrinth with its surrounding tissue and fluid. Such a passive rearrangement could only occur in a tissue that is very plastic, whereas cartilage is one of the least plastic of the embryonic tissues. Moreover the histological picture is not that of mechanical pressure. The cartilaginous chambers are always excavated slightly in advance of the space actually required by the membranous labyrinth, and there is no evidence of the labyrinth being cramped or of the creation of pressure grooves in the margins of the cartilage. Nor is the situation improved by the introduction of the conjectured activity of the perichondrium, either in explanation of the deposit of new cartilage or of the excavation of the old, since the perichondrium, as will be shown, does not make its appearance until after a considerable amount of the growth and hollowing-out of the labyrinth had been already completed. Therefore there is involved in the development of the cartilaginous capsule something more than interstitial and perichondrial growth, in the ordinary sense of the terms. On account of its bearing upon this problem, it is the purpose of the present paper to call attention to the occurrence of dedifferentiation of cartilage in the human embryo, and to point out the important part which this process normally plays in the hollowing out and reshaping of the otic capsule during its development.


The term dedifferentiation is applied here in the sense of a regression of certain areas of cartilaginous tissue to a more embryonic form, the same areas being subsequently rebuilt or redifferentiated into quite a different type of tissue. Dedifferentiation is defined by Child as “a process of loss of differentiation, of apparent simplification, of return or approach to the embryonic or undifferentiated condition.” In his noteworthy review of this subject he makes the assertion that the wide occurrence and significance of dedifferentiation in the lower animals and plants “must at least raise the question whether similar processes do not occur to some extent in higher forms.”2 From the context it is evident that he refers to man as well as other mammals. The materialization of his prediction is here at hand in the development of the cartilaginous capsule of the ear. Before entering into this further it will be necessary to outline the earlier steps in the histogenesis of this particular tissue.

The Three Stages in the Development of Cartilage

The cartilage of the otic capsule in its transition from embryonic mesenchyme to true cartilage passes through three fairly definite phases: firstly, the condensation of mesenchyme


‘Child, O. M. Senescence and rejuvenescence. University of Chicago Press, 1915. Page 293.



Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, May 6) Embryology Paper - The Factors Involved in the Excavation of the Cavities in the Cartilaginous Capsule of the Ear in the Human Embryo. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Paper_-_The_Factors_Involved_in_the_Excavation_of_the_Cavities_in_the_Cartilaginous_Capsule_of_the_Ear_in_the_Human_Embryo

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G