File:Carnegie stages species comparison.jpg

From Embryology
Revision as of 19:41, 14 April 2010 by MarkHill (talk | contribs) (Carnegie stages species comparison The data in relation to days is only an approximation (an average of the range) due to the variability that occurs in normal developmental. The most common measurement is the crown to rump length (CRL) and the effects o)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Carnegie_stages_species_comparison.jpg(800 × 514 pixels, file size: 85 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Carnegie stages species comparison

The data in relation to days is only an approximation (an average of the range) due to the variability that occurs in normal developmental. The most common measurement is the crown to rump length (CRL) and the effects of fixation should always be considered when making these measurements.

http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/OtherEmb/CStages.htm


Based on data from: Butler, H. and Juurlink, B.H.J. An atlas for staging mammalian and chick embryos. CRC Press Inc., Florida (1987).

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current19:11, 3 June 2011Thumbnail for version as of 19:11, 3 June 2011800 × 514 (85 KB)S8600021 (talk | contribs)
19:41, 14 April 2010Thumbnail for version as of 19:41, 14 April 2010556 × 357 (50 KB)MarkHill (talk | contribs)Carnegie stages species comparison The data in relation to days is only an approximation (an average of the range) due to the variability that occurs in normal developmental. The most common measurement is the crown to rump length (CRL) and the effects o