Talk:Echidna Development
| About Discussion Pages |
|---|
On this website the Discussion Tab or "talk pages" for a topic has been used for several purposes:
Glossary Links
Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2026, October 1) Embryology Echidna Development. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Talk:Echidna_Development |
2011
Monotreme ossification sequences and the riddle of mammalian skeletal development
Evolution. 2011 May;65(5):1323-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01234.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
Weisbecker V. Source Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing St. CB2 3EQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom. vw248@cam.ac.uk
Abstract
The developmental differences between marsupials, placentals, and monotremes are thought to be reflected in differing patterns of postcranial development and diversity. However, developmental polarities remain obscured by the rarity of monotreme data. Here, I present the first postcranial ossification sequences of the monotreme echidna and platypus, and compare these with published data from other mammals and amniotes. Strikingly, monotreme stylopodia (humerus, femur) ossify after the more distal zeugopodia (radius/ulna, tibia/fibula), resembling only the European mole among all amniotes assessed. European moles also share extreme humeral adaptations to rotation digging and/or swimming with monotremes, suggesting a causal relationship between adaptation and ossification heterochrony. Late femoral ossification with respect to tibia/fibula in monotremes and moles points toward developmental integration of the serially homologous fore- and hindlimb bones. Monotreme cervical ribs and coracoids ossify later than in most amniotes but are similarly timed as homologous ossifications in therians, where they are lost as independent bones. This loss may have been facilitated by a developmental delay of coracoids and cervical ribs at the base of mammals. The monotreme sequence, although highly derived, resembles placentals more than marsupials. Thus, marsupial postcranial development, and potentially related diversity constraints, may not represent the ancestral mammalian condition.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
PMID: 21521190 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21521190
<pubmed>20413907</pubmed>
<pubmed>20332607</pubmed>
<pubmed>20004116</pubmed>
<pubmed>19874726</pubmed>
<pubmed>19874722</pubmed>
<pubmed>19874718</pubmed>
<pubmed>19874717</pubmed>
<pubmed>19726493</pubmed>
<pubmed>19152842</pubmed>
<pubmed>19121219</pubmed>
<pubmed>19051249</pubmed>
<pubmed>19021737</pubmed>
<pubmed>18985616</pubmed>
<pubmed>18805821</pubmed>
<pubmed>18800367</pubmed>
<pubmed>18769071</pubmed>
<pubmed>18662710</pubmed>
<pubmed>18463305</pubmed>
<pubmed>18454841</pubmed>
<pubmed>8351802</pubmed>