Talk:Abnormal Development - Cleft Palate: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| n/a | | n/a | ||
|} | |} | ||
==2008== | |||
===Palatoplasty: evolution and controversies=== | |||
Chang Gung Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(4):335-45. | |||
Leow AM1, Lo LJ. | |||
Abstract | |||
Treatment of cleft palate has evolved over a long period of time. Various techniques of cleft palate repair that are practiced today are the results of principles learned through many years of modifications. The challenge in the art of modern palatoplasty is no longer successful closure of the cleft palate but an optimal speech outcome without compromising maxillofacial growth. Throughout these periods of evolution in the treatment of cleft palate, the effectiveness of various treatment protocols has been challenged by controversies concerning speech and maxillofacial growth. This article reviews the history of cleft palate surgery from its humble beginnings to modern-day palatoplasty, and describes various palatoplasty techniques and commonly used modifications. Current controversial issues on the timing of cleft palate repair, and the effects on speech and maxillofacial growth are also discussed. | |||
PMID 18935791 |
Revision as of 17:21, 18 May 2014
About Discussion Pages |
---|
On this website the Discussion Tab or "talk pages" for a topic has been used for several purposes:
Glossary Links
Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, June 23) Embryology Abnormal Development - Cleft Palate. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Talk:Abnormal_Development_-_Cleft_Palate |
Table 1 :Neuromeric origins and developmental field defects of the Tessier craniofacial clefts
Tessier Zone | Neuromere Origin | Developmental Field | Neurovascular Supply |
---|---|---|---|
0 | n/a | fusion failure
n/a | |
1 | r2’ | premaxilla- central incisor | medial sphenopalatine |
2 | r2’ | premaxilla-central, lateral incisors/frontal process | medial sphenopalatine |
3 | r2 | maxilla, palatine bone, inferior turbinate | lateral sphenopalatine |
4 | r2 | ||
5 | r2 | ||
6 | r2 | ||
7 | r2 | ||
8 | r2 | ||
9 | alisphenoid | middle meningeal, anterior deep temporal | r2 |
10 | p5 | postfrontal | supraorbital |
11 | p5, r1 | prefrontal, lacrimal | supratrochlear, dorsal nasal |
12 | p5, r1 | ethmoid labryinth | anterior/posterior ethmoid, lateral nasal branches |
13 | p5, r1 | ethmoid cribiform | anterior/posterior ethmoid, medial nasal branches |
14 | n/a | fusion failure | n/a |
2008
Palatoplasty: evolution and controversies
Chang Gung Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(4):335-45.
Leow AM1, Lo LJ.
Abstract
Treatment of cleft palate has evolved over a long period of time. Various techniques of cleft palate repair that are practiced today are the results of principles learned through many years of modifications. The challenge in the art of modern palatoplasty is no longer successful closure of the cleft palate but an optimal speech outcome without compromising maxillofacial growth. Throughout these periods of evolution in the treatment of cleft palate, the effectiveness of various treatment protocols has been challenged by controversies concerning speech and maxillofacial growth. This article reviews the history of cleft palate surgery from its humble beginnings to modern-day palatoplasty, and describes various palatoplasty techniques and commonly used modifications. Current controversial issues on the timing of cleft palate repair, and the effects on speech and maxillofacial growth are also discussed. PMID 18935791