Talk:Pregnancy Test: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
Line 8: Line 8:


==2012==
==2012==
===False-positive urine pregnancy test due to leukocyte interference===
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Mar;32(2):167-8. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.167. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Jao HF, Er TK, Hsiao JK, Chiang CH.
Source
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
PMID 22389886
==2011==
===False-positive urine pregnancy tests--clinicians as detectives===
Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:41. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
Valenzuela R, Iserson KV, Punguyire D.
Source
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract
Reliably diagnosing pregnancy in women presenting with nonspecific abdominal pain can be lifesaving. If diagnostic tests are unreliable, however, valuable time and resources can be wasted pursuing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. After four false positive-urine pregnancy tests in one week, we began investigating the laboratory's entire process involving the UPreg tests. We discovered that, as is common in resource-poor settings, the laboratory repeatedly reused test tubes. We found that the false-positive tests resulted from performing the UPreg tests in test tubes that were improperly cleaned and, for the most part, had been used immediately beforehand to test women coming into the maternity ward. Sufficient residua from the pregnant women's high ß-HCG levels had remained in the test tubes to cause subsequent false-positive results in our emergency ward patients. Although pregnancy can now be reliably diagnosed with inexpensive, disposable and simple tests, these tests must not only be used properly, but also, when used in the laboratory, be accompanied by appropriate cleaning and quality-control procedures. This is particularly essential in resource-constrained environments.
PMID 22121449

Revision as of 10:38, 13 November 2012

About Discussion Pages  
Mark Hill.jpg
On this website the Discussion Tab or "talk pages" for a topic has been used for several purposes:
  1. References - recent and historic that relates to the topic
  2. Additional topic information - currently prepared in draft format
  3. Links - to related webpages
  4. Topic page - an edit history as used on other Wiki sites
  5. Lecture/Practical - student feedback
  6. Student Projects - online project discussions.
Links: Pubmed Most Recent | Reference Tutorial | Journal Searches

Glossary Links

Glossary: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Numbers | Symbols | Term Link

Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, June 27) Embryology Pregnancy Test. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Talk:Pregnancy_Test


10 Most Recent

Note - This sub-heading shows an automated computer PubMed search using the listed sub-heading term. References appear in this list based upon the date of the actual page viewing. Therefore the list of references do not reflect any editorial selection of material based on content or relevance. In comparison, references listed on the content page and discussion page (under the publication year sub-headings) do include editorial selection based upon relevance and availability. (More? Pubmed Most Recent)

Urine Pregnancy Test

<pubmed limit=10>Urine+Pregnancy+Test</pubmed>

2012

False-positive urine pregnancy test due to leukocyte interference

Ann Lab Med. 2012 Mar;32(2):167-8. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.167. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Jao HF, Er TK, Hsiao JK, Chiang CH. Source Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. PMID 22389886

2011

False-positive urine pregnancy tests--clinicians as detectives

Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:41. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

Valenzuela R, Iserson KV, Punguyire D. Source Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

Abstract

Reliably diagnosing pregnancy in women presenting with nonspecific abdominal pain can be lifesaving. If diagnostic tests are unreliable, however, valuable time and resources can be wasted pursuing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. After four false positive-urine pregnancy tests in one week, we began investigating the laboratory's entire process involving the UPreg tests. We discovered that, as is common in resource-poor settings, the laboratory repeatedly reused test tubes. We found that the false-positive tests resulted from performing the UPreg tests in test tubes that were improperly cleaned and, for the most part, had been used immediately beforehand to test women coming into the maternity ward. Sufficient residua from the pregnant women's high ß-HCG levels had remained in the test tubes to cause subsequent false-positive results in our emergency ward patients. Although pregnancy can now be reliably diagnosed with inexpensive, disposable and simple tests, these tests must not only be used properly, but also, when used in the laboratory, be accompanied by appropriate cleaning and quality-control procedures. This is particularly essential in resource-constrained environments.

PMID 22121449