Template:Quain figures9: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


:[[Book_-_Quain%27s_Embryology_9|'''Heart and Blood-Vessels Figures''']]: [[:File:Quain597.jpg|597. Foetus Organs of Circulation]]
:[[Book_-_Quain%27s_Embryology_9|'''Heart and Blood-Vessels Figures''']]: [[:File:Quain594.jpg|594. Development of Great Veins]] | [[:File:Quain595.jpg|595. A and B. Vestige of Left Superior Cava and a Case of its Persistence]] | [[:File:Quain596.jpg|596. Foetal Heart and Great Vessels]] | [[:File:Quain597.jpg|597. Foetus Organs of Circulation]]


----
----
Line 7: Line 7:


{{Quain TOC}}
{{Quain TOC}}
 
<noinclude>[[Category:Template]]</noinclude>
{{Historic Disclaimer}}
{{Historic Disclaimer}}
[[Category:Cardiovascular]]
[[Category:Cardiovascular]]

Latest revision as of 11:47, 8 June 2014

Heart and Blood-Vessels Figures: 594. Development of Great Veins | 595. A and B. Vestige of Left Superior Cava and a Case of its Persistence | 596. Foetal Heart and Great Vessels | 597. Foetus Organs of Circulation

Reference: Quain's Elements of Anatomy. William Sharpey, Allen Thomson and Edward Albert Schafer (1878) William Wood And Co., New York.

1878 Elements of Anatomy: The Ovum | The Blastoderm | Fetal Membranes | Placenta | Musculoskeletal | Neural | Gastrointesinal | Respiratory | Cardiovascular | Urogenital
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)