Talk:Neural Crest Development

From Embryology
Revision as of 16:50, 8 December 2010 by S8600021 (talk | contribs) (→‎2010)

2010

Glial versus melanocyte cell fate choice: Schwann cell precursors as a cellular origin of melanocytes

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010 Sep;67(18):3037-55. Epub 2010 May 9.

Adameyko I, Lallemend F.

Unit of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Scheeles väg 1-A1-plan2, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. igor.adameyko@ki.se Abstract Melanocytes and Schwann cells are derived from the multipotent population of neural crest cells. Although both cell types were thought to be generated through completely distinct pathways and molecular processes, a recent study has revealed that these different cell types are intimately interconnected far beyond previously postulated limits in that they share a common post-neural crest progenitor, i.e. the Schwann cell precursor. This finding raises interesting questions about the lineage relationships of hitherto unrelated cell types such as melanocytes and Schwann cells, and may provide clinical insights into mechanisms of pigmentation disorders and for cancer involving Schwann cells and melanocytes.

PMID: 20454996

Sox10-Venus mice: a new tool for real-time labeling of neural crest lineage cells and oligodendrocytes

Molecular Brain 2010, 3:31 doi:10.1186/1756-6606-3-31

  • Sox-E is the earliest marker of a subset of cells at the border of the neural plate that will give rise to NC-lineage cells
    • see Haldin CE, LaBonne C: SoxE factors as multifunctional neural crest regulatory factors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010, 42:441-444.

2009

Relationship between neural crest cells and cranial mesoderm during head muscle development

PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4381. Epub 2009 Feb 9. Grenier J, Teillet MA, Grifone R, Kelly RG, Duprez D. CNRS, UMR 7622 Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du Développement, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Abstract BACKGROUND: In vertebrates, the skeletal elements of the jaw, together with the connective tissues and tendons, originate from neural crest cells, while the associated muscles derive mainly from cranial mesoderm. Previous studies have shown that neural crest cells migrate in close association with cranial mesoderm and then circumscribe but do not penetrate the core of muscle precursor cells of the branchial arches at early stages of development, thus defining a sharp boundary between neural crest cells and mesodermal muscle progenitor cells. Tendons constitute one of the neural crest derivatives likely to interact with muscle formation. However, head tendon formation has not been studied, nor have tendon and muscle interactions in the head. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Reinvestigation of the relationship between cranial neural crest cells and muscle precursor cells during development of the first branchial arch, using quail/chick chimeras and molecular markers revealed several novel features concerning the interface between neural crest cells and mesoderm. We observed that neural crest cells migrate into the cephalic mesoderm containing myogenic precursor cells, leading to the presence of neural crest cells inside the mesodermal core of the first branchial arch. We have also established that all the forming tendons associated with branchiomeric and eye muscles are of neural crest origin and express the Scleraxis marker in chick and mouse embryos. Moreover, analysis of Scleraxis expression in the absence of branchiomeric muscles in Tbx1(-/-) mutant mice, showed that muscles are not necessary for the initiation of tendon formation but are required for further tendon development. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This results show that neural crest cells and muscle progenitor cells are more extensively mixed than previously believed during arch development. In addition, our results show that interactions between muscles and tendons during craniofacial development are similar to those observed in the limb, despite the distinct embryological origin of these cell types in the head. PMID: 19198652

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19198652

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0004381

Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder

Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder. Matsuoka T, Ahlberg PE, Kessaris N, Iannarelli P, Dennehy U, Richardson WD, McMahon AP, Koentges G. Nature. 2005 Jul 21;436(7049):347-55.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1352163/

Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny

Development. 1996 Oct;122(10):3229-42.

Köntges G, Lumsden A.

MRC Brain Development Programme, Department of Developmental Neurobiology, UMDS, Guy's Hospital, London, UK. Abstract To investigate the influence of hindbrain segmentation on craniofacial patterning we have studied the long term fate of neural crest (NC) subpopulations of individual rhombomeres (r), using quail-chick chimeras. Mapping of all skeletal and muscle connective tissues developing from these small regions revealed several novel features of the cranial neural crest. First, the mandibular arch skeleton has a composite origin in which the proximal elements are r1+r2 derived, whereas more distal ones are exclusively midbrain derived. The most proximal region of the lower jaw is derived from second arch (r4) NC. Second, both the lower jaw and tongue skeleton display an organisation which precisely reflects the rostrocaudal order of segmental crest deployment from the embryonic hindbrain. Third, cryptic intraskeletal boundaries, which do not correspond to anatomical landmarks, form sharply defined interfaces between r1+r2, r4 and r6+r7 crest. Cells that survive the early apoptotic elimination of premigratory NC in r3 and r5 are restricted to tiny contributions within the 2nd arch (r4) skeleton. Fourth, a highly constrained pattern of cranial skeletomuscular connectivity was found that precisely respects the positional origin of its constitutive crest: each rhombomeric population remains coherent throughout ontogeny, forming both the connective tissues of specific muscles and their respective attachment sites onto the neuro- and viscerocranium. Finally, focal clusters of crest cells, confined to the attachment sites of branchial muscles, intrude into the otherwise mesodermal cranial base. In the viscerocranium, an equally strict, rhombomere-specific matching of muscle connective tissues and their attachment sites is found for all branchial and tongue (hypoglossal) muscles. This coherence of segmental crest populations explains how cranial skeletomuscular pattern can be implemented and conserved despite evolutionary changes in the shapes of skeletal elements.

PMID: 8898235