Talk:Hamburger Hamilton Stages: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
(Created page with ' ==Developmental stages of the Japanese quail.== J Anat. 2010 Jan;216(1):3-15. Epub 2009 Nov 19. Ainsworth SJ, Stanley RL, Evans DJ. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Universi…')
 
Line 20: Line 20:


PMID: 17383805
PMID: 17383805
==Staging of intestinal development in the chick embryo.==
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Aug;288(8):909-20.
Southwell BR.
Gut Motility Laboratory, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Victoria, Australia. bridget.southwell@mcri.edu.au
Abstract
Comparisons between developmental studies rely on embryonic staging systems. It is important for comparison of molecular, immunohistochemical, and physiological studies of the developing chick intestine that the developmental stage of embryos is reliably determined. Good staging systems exist for the external features of the chick embryo but not for development of internal organs. To facilitate precise comparisons of chick embryo intestine development, we prepared an intestinal staging system. Embryos were fixed, other tissues dissected away, and the intestine and associated organs were then drawn to scale using a camera lucida. This produced black-and-white drawings with features of the gut clearly visible. The detailed drawings of intestine from chick embryos aged 2.5 to 10 days were correlated with age of embryos and developmental stages described in three common staging systems, Hamilton and Hamburger, Thompson and Fitzharris, and Allan and Newgreen. Descriptions of key changes in gut morphology and position are given for each stage. This staging of chick gut development will allow future studies to quote and compare development of the gut rather than external features or incubation time. This will allow much more precise reporting and comparisons in developmental studies of cell migration and gene expression.
PMID: 16835928

Revision as of 07:35, 9 August 2010

Developmental stages of the Japanese quail.

J Anat. 2010 Jan;216(1):3-15. Epub 2009 Nov 19. Ainsworth SJ, Stanley RL, Evans DJ.

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK. Abstract Developmental biology research has used various avian species as model organisms for studying morphogenesis, with the chick embryo being used by the majority of groups. The focus on the chick embryo led Hamburger and Hamilton to develop their definitive staging series nearly 60 years ago and this series is still the mainstay of all laboratories working with avian embryos. The focus on the chick embryo has somewhat overshadowed the importance of another avian embryo that has proved to be equally powerful, the Japanese quail. Since the late 1960s, chimeras have been produced using chick and quail embryos and this technique has revolutionized the approach taken to the investigation of the cellular and molecular interactions that occur during development. Reviews of the literature demonstrate that many research groups are using the quail embryo in a number of established and new ways, and this species has become a primary animal model in developmental biology. Some staging of quail has been performed but this has been incomplete and variations in descriptions, stages and incubation timings mean that comparisons with the chick are not always easily made. There appears to be general agreement that, at the early stages of embryogenesis, there is little developmental difference between chick and quail embryos, although the basis for this has not been established experimentally. The accelerated ontogeny of quail embryos at mid to late stages of development means that registration with the chick is lost. We have therefore developed a definitive developmental stage series for Japanese quail so that differences are fully characterized, misconceptions or assumptions are avoided, and the results of comparative studies are not distorted.

PMID: 19929907


High frequency ultrasound imaging of the growth and development of the normal chick embryo.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 May;33(5):751-61. Epub 2007 Mar 26. Schellpfeffer MA, Bolender DL, Kolesari GL.

Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. maschellpfeffer@gmail.com Abstract The purpose of this study is to delineate with high frequency ultrasound imaging the normal growth and development of the chick embryo throughout its incubation period. White Leghorn chick embryos were imaged through an opening in the egg air cell from incubation day 0-19 (Hamburger & Hamilton stage 1-45) using a 13 MHz clinical high frequency linear small parts transducer. Multiple anatomic growth parameters were measured. Normal growth was confirmed with Hamburger and Hamilton staging. A timeline was constructed showing when each anatomic growth parameter could be visualized. Means and standard deviations of each parameter were plotted against incubation days studied to create nomograms and numerical tables of normal growth and development of the chick embryo. With this set of data, abnormal growth and development of the chick embryo can now be assessed.

PMID: 17383805


Staging of intestinal development in the chick embryo.

Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Aug;288(8):909-20. Southwell BR.

Gut Motility Laboratory, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Victoria, Australia. bridget.southwell@mcri.edu.au Abstract Comparisons between developmental studies rely on embryonic staging systems. It is important for comparison of molecular, immunohistochemical, and physiological studies of the developing chick intestine that the developmental stage of embryos is reliably determined. Good staging systems exist for the external features of the chick embryo but not for development of internal organs. To facilitate precise comparisons of chick embryo intestine development, we prepared an intestinal staging system. Embryos were fixed, other tissues dissected away, and the intestine and associated organs were then drawn to scale using a camera lucida. This produced black-and-white drawings with features of the gut clearly visible. The detailed drawings of intestine from chick embryos aged 2.5 to 10 days were correlated with age of embryos and developmental stages described in three common staging systems, Hamilton and Hamburger, Thompson and Fitzharris, and Allan and Newgreen. Descriptions of key changes in gut morphology and position are given for each stage. This staging of chick gut development will allow future studies to quote and compare development of the gut rather than external features or incubation time. This will allow much more precise reporting and comparisons in developmental studies of cell migration and gene expression.

PMID: 16835928