Talk:2010 Group Project 5: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dez--[[User:Z3318446|Seow Liew]] 09:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | Dez--[[User:Z3318446|Seow Liew]] 09:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Hi,members,i have split the project up to 3 different constituent parts and each of us will get to pick 1 and do it.In addition,i have also roughly split the progress up to 3 stages, which is: | |||
Hi,members,i have split the project up to 3 different constituent parts and each of us will get to pick 1 | |||
and do it.In addition,i have also roughly split the progress up to 3 stages, which is: | |||
a)collecting the information from different sources, | a)collecting the information from different sources, | ||
b)grouping the information,and | b)grouping the information,and | ||
c)put what we get on group page. | c)put what we get on group page. | ||
Note: | Note: | ||
-you just need to put your name next to the capitalised heading,(e.g PART C-Dez)to indicate you are up to that part. | -you just need to put your name next to the capitalised heading,(e.g PART C-Dez)to indicate you are up to that part. | ||
-PART C is picked by me, so,options left are PART A and B only. | -PART C is picked by me, so,options left are PART A and B only. | ||
-You can always add in additional info, but i think it`s better we discuss it first when we figure or find it out(the ones you cant decide if they`re your part),so that we can discussion whose part it belongs to and who should do it, to kinda maintain the flow of the content. | -You can always add in additional info, but i think it`s better we discuss it first when we figure or find it out(the ones you cant decide if they`re your part),so that we can discussion whose part it belongs to and who should do it, to kinda maintain the flow of the content. | ||
-i`m aware that PART B is relatively short,i was outta ideas.Well, the point of PART B i make it mainly emphasizes on info related to how this test is carried out and 3rd party`s voices on this test. | -i`m aware that PART B is relatively short,i was outta ideas.Well, the point of PART B i make it mainly emphasizes on info related to how this test is carried out and 3rd party`s voices on this test. | ||
The 3 different parts that i have split up are as following: | The 3 different parts that i have split up are as following: | ||
PART A | PART A | ||
Introduction: | Introduction: | ||
-what does this technique rely on? | -what does this technique rely on? | ||
Line 26: | Line 38: | ||
PART B | PART B | ||
-how does the test work? like,steps and procedures involve. | -how does the test work? like,steps and procedures involve. | ||
3rd party`s voices: | 3rd party`s voices: | ||
Line 34: | Line 47: | ||
PART C-Dez | PART C-Dez | ||
-who should take the test? | -who should take the test? | ||
-What will the results tell about risk of delivering early? | -What will the results tell about risk of delivering early? | ||
Line 41: | Line 55: | ||
-treatments for those who tested with positive result. | -treatments for those who tested with positive result. | ||
and i think our primary source would be pubmed,of course there`re others too, but then the info isnt as extensive and specific as pubmed,so go to it,look for the related journals and extract only details that you need. | and i think our primary source would be pubmed,of course there`re others too, but then the info isnt as | ||
It`d be great if we could find more images and videos related to the info we get,by doing so,we could make the page less lengthy and readers understand it better. | |||
extensive and specific as pubmed,so go to it,look for the related journals and extract only details that | |||
you need. | |||
It`d be great if we could find more images and videos related to the info we get,by doing so,we could | |||
make the page less lengthy and readers understand it better. |
Revision as of 19:05, 9 August 2010
Projects: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Students Page | Help:Editing Basics
Dez--Seow Liew 09:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,members,i have split the project up to 3 different constituent parts and each of us will get to pick 1
and do it.In addition,i have also roughly split the progress up to 3 stages, which is:
a)collecting the information from different sources,
b)grouping the information,and
c)put what we get on group page.
Note:
-you just need to put your name next to the capitalised heading,(e.g PART C-Dez)to indicate you are up to that part.
-PART C is picked by me, so,options left are PART A and B only.
-You can always add in additional info, but i think it`s better we discuss it first when we figure or find it out(the ones you cant decide if they`re your part),so that we can discussion whose part it belongs to and who should do it, to kinda maintain the flow of the content.
-i`m aware that PART B is relatively short,i was outta ideas.Well, the point of PART B i make it mainly emphasizes on info related to how this test is carried out and 3rd party`s voices on this test.
The 3 different parts that i have split up are as following:
PART A
Introduction: -what does this technique rely on? -Stuff about fFN,like the time or stage it forms during pregnancy. -what does fFN do in mom`s tummy during pregnancy. -what kind of abnormalities can this technique predict? (mainly used for predict preterm birth) -signs and events of preterm birth in mom`s tummy if there`s a high possibility the mom`s having a preterm birth,like,cervix dilation , fFN leaks outta vagina,etc. -the relationship of fFN and prediction of preterm birth. like comparison of fFN between pregnant woman who are not at risk of preterm birth and those who are, etc.
PART B
-how does the test work? like,steps and procedures involve. 3rd party`s voices: -what did the public doctors , pregnant woman say about this technique?-interview thing, vids( how this test is carried out)) -related images.
PART C-Dez
-who should take the test? -What will the results tell about risk of delivering early? -diagnostic accuracy. -side effects. -advantages of knowing the prediction. -treatments for those who tested with positive result.
and i think our primary source would be pubmed,of course there`re others too, but then the info isnt as
extensive and specific as pubmed,so go to it,look for the related journals and extract only details that
you need.
It`d be great if we could find more images and videos related to the info we get,by doing so,we could
make the page less lengthy and readers understand it better.