Difference between revisions of "ANAT2341 Lab 12"

From Embryology
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ANAT2341Lab12}}
 
=Fetal Development and Birth=
 
  
{{2016ANAT2341}}
+
== 1. QUIZ ==
 +
 
 +
== 2. Group Projects ==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Peer Assessment===
 +
* This will form part of your individual assessment for the course.
 +
* Each student should now look at each of the other Group projects in the class.
 +
* Next prepare a critical assessment (should include both positive and negative issues) of each project using the project group assessment criteria.
 +
* This assessment should be pasted without signature on the top of the specific project's discussion page. (minimum length 3-5 paragraphs/project)
 +
* This critical assessment should also be pasted on your own student page.
 +
* Each student should therefore have 5 separate reports pasted on their own page for this assessment item.
 +
* Length, quality and accuracy of your reports will be part of the overall mark for this assessment.
 +
** there will be a greater loading on this than simple question assessments.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
 +
! Group Assessment Criteria
 +
|-
 +
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|50px]]
 +
# The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
 +
# The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
 +
# Content is correctly cited and referenced.
 +
# The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
 +
# Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
 +
# Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
 +
# Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
 +
# Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
 +
# The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
 +
# Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
 +
|}

Revision as of 12:38, 13 December 2016

1. QUIZ

2. Group Projects

Peer Assessment

  • This will form part of your individual assessment for the course.
  • Each student should now look at each of the other Group projects in the class.
  • Next prepare a critical assessment (should include both positive and negative issues) of each project using the project group assessment criteria.
  • This assessment should be pasted without signature on the top of the specific project's discussion page. (minimum length 3-5 paragraphs/project)
  • This critical assessment should also be pasted on your own student page.
  • Each student should therefore have 5 separate reports pasted on their own page for this assessment item.
  • Length, quality and accuracy of your reports will be part of the overall mark for this assessment.
    • there will be a greater loading on this than simple question assessments.


Group Assessment Criteria
Mark Hill.jpg
  1. The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
  2. The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  3. Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  4. The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  5. Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  6. Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
  7. Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
  8. Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  9. The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  10. Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.