Book - Sex and internal secretions (1961) 8: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
(Created page with "{{Ref-Young1961}} '''SECTION C Physiology of the Gonads and Accessory Organs'''")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Ref-Young1961}}
{{Young1961 header}}


'''SECTION C Physiology of the Gonads and Accessory Organs'''
'''SECTION C Physiology of the Gonads and Accessory Organs'''
=The Mammalian Female Reproductive Cycle and its Controlling Mechanisms=
John W. Everett, Ph.D.
Professor Of Anatomy, Duke University Durham, North Carolina
__TOC__
==I. Introduction==
The chain of events that constitutes the
female reproductive process is characteristically repeated from time to time with
considerable regularity during the adult life
of an individual, and is therefore a cycle.
In the broad sense, this sequence begins
with ovogenesis and terminates when the
progeny require no further shelter and
nurture. In mammals this has become a
highly complex process, involving profound
maternal adjustments synchronized with
successive stages in development of the
ovum, fetus, and offspring. The complete
mammalian cycle comprises a sequence of
stages which may be identified as follows:
(II follicle growth, including growth of the
ovocyte; (2) ovulation, a progressive process including preovulatory maturation of
follicles and ova, and the structural change
of ruptured follicles to corpora lutea; (3)
progravidity; (4) gravidity; (5) parturition; and (6) postpartum nurture, including
lactation, protection, and training. Although
it is obvious that this full sequence is often
realized, it may nevertheless be retarded or
frankly interrupted at almost any point.
In advanced human societies economic
and social factors have diminished the number of complete cycles to such degree that
they are rarities in the lifetime of an individual and infertile ("menstmal") cycles
are the rule. Inasmuch as corresponding
factors operate among domesticated animals, the expression "female reproductive
cycle" commonly refers to those truly
abortive cycles that succeed one another in
the absence of insemination. The term is
used in that restricted sense in this chapter.
With even that restriction, the female cycle is actually a multiplicity of interlocking
cycles, in which the rhythmic interplay between hypophysis and ovary is fundamental. Attention must therefore be focused
on the physiology of the ovary and on the
hormonal and neural mechanisms that integrate hypophysis and ovary as a functional system. Cyclic alterations in sex accessories and other nongonadal tissues are
considered mainly as indicators. The
"menstrual cycle," being strictly a uterine
cycle, comes in this category, together with
changes in behavior.
No attempt is made to present an exhaustive description of the varied adaptive
modifications of the ovarian cycle among
the several mammalian orders. The reader
may consult works of the late F. H. A.
Marshall whose full bibliography is given
by Parkes (1949 1. Asdell's Patterns of
Mammalian Reproduction (1946» is anotlu'i' A-alual)lo source.
==II. Cycles Spontaneously Interrupted==
Cycles in the natural state are only imperfectly known, from random and often erratic sampling. One may safely assume that,
as a rule, under optimal conditions they
are complete, fertile cycles. There are, then,
relatively few subhuman species in wdiich
the characteristics of incomplete cycles have
been studied. These species are necessarily
the very ones that have been amenable to
some form of human restraint.
Segregation of the sexes or any other
interference with insemination should be regarded as a first experimental approach
to understanding the complete cycle. Such
factors unriuestionably operate in nature on
occasion. Controlled changes of environmental conditions afford another approach
in which natural factors are simulated.
The statement was made earlier that the
complete cycle may conceivably be interrupted at almost any point. It has been learned that in different species segregated
females interrupt their cycles at different
stages and that usually the point of interruption is species-characteristic. These facts
have been of great service to the study of
reproduction, first, by arousing the curiosity of the investigator and, second, by
supplying a variety of ready made conditions individually appropriate for particular
experimental studies.
Examples of mammalian cycles are
schematically diagrammed in Figure 8.1.
It is customary to state that the usual, or
standard, infertile cycle is like that in primates or the guinea pig. The follicular
phase culminates in spontaneous ovulation,
after which corpora lutea are organized and
become spontaneously functional for a
period of time that is usually considerably
shorter than in pregnancy.
In a few animals (rat, mouse, hamster)
the cycle terminates shortly after ovulation
before the corpora lutea become fully functional. Such corpora lutea are said to be
inactive, in the sense that they cannot produce a decidual response to uterine trauma
(Long and Evans, 1922). Sterile mating or
analogous stimulation induces a luteal phase
which corresponds to that of the "standard"
mammal. This phenomenon is not entirely
limited to the small rodents, having been
described in the European hedgehog
(Deanesly, 1934).
To this writer's knowledge there have not
been described any mammalian species in
which it is the rule that in isolated females
the process of ovulation begins (follicle maturation, prelutein changes in granulosa,
secretion of secondary liquor folliculi, and
so on) without proceeding to eventual rupture of the follicles. Many cases could l3e
cited, however, in which this has occurred
"abnormally." Characteristically, some degree of luteinization occurs in the wall of
such a follicle and a lutein cyst is formed.
On the other hand, there are numerous
species (reflex ovulators) in which the preovulatory maturation of follicles and ovulation nearly always fail in the absence of
the male. The known species in which this
is true are widely distributed among the
mammalian orders and are often closely related to other species in which spontaneous ovulation is usual. The domestic rabbit
Fig. 8.1. Diagrams of cycles of representative, familiar mammals. , the follicular phase, highly schematized and inaccurate in detail ; , atresia ; i , ovulation ; • , fully active corpora lutea; O, corpora lutea regressing or otherwise not fully active. When sterile mating or equivalent stimulation (SM) is introduced, the cycles of the rat, rabbit and cat become
directly comparable with those of the other species.
furnishes the classic exaini)le of reflex ovulation. Other reflex ovulators are the domestic cat (Greulich, 1934), the ferret (Hammond and Walton, 1934), mink (Hansson,
1947), marten (Pearson and Enders, 1944),
the 13-lined ground squirrel (Foster, 1934),
and the mole shrew (Pearson, 1944). To this
list have been added the muskrat (Miegel,
1952) and a field mouse, Microtus californicus (Greenwald, 1956). Even among
the marsupials, the female Didelphijs azarae
is said not to form corpora lutea in the absence of the male (Martinez-Esteve, 1937).
A few of these species display nearly constant estrus (rabbit, ferret), competent
follicles being present most of the time in
the isolated female during the breeding season.
Among even the spontaneous ovulators
the cycle may sometimes not progress beyond the follicular phase. Thus, at the
approach of puberty, waves of advanced
follicle development and secretion of estrogen may take place without, however, leading to ovulation or corpus luteum formation. The first cycles of primates are often
anovulatory ones. In the adult macacjue, at
least in some colonies, such cycles are characteristic during the summer months (Hartman, 1932) . A somewhat comparable seasonal effect has been reported in girls soon
after the menarche (Engle and Shelesnyak,
1934). Menstrual cycles without ovulation
have frecjuently been recognized in adult
women in recent years, bearing no evident
relationship to seasonal factors (Lopez Colombo de Allende, 1956). Anovulatory cycles
were described in the mouse by Allen (1923)
and have been noted occasionally in other
species, but without clear measure of their
incidence.
==III. Pituitary-Ovarian Dormancy==
Varying levels of pituitary-ovarian dormancy are expressed in different ways from
species to species or even from habitat to
habitat within a given species. A general
similarity exists between the anestrum of
seasonal breeders and the prepubertal state.
In fact, in animals that have a distinct season, puberty occurs at the very time when
older females are emerging from anestrum.
Whereas anestrum is often correlated with
season of the year, there are exceptions,
notably among dogs, in which the correlation is ill defined (Engle, 1946).
In its shortest form ovarian quiescence
lasts for only a few days, probably often
without being recognized, between the end
of one cycle and the active follicular phase
of the next. In the chimpanzee it is thought
to be the chief factor in the irregularity of
length of the cycle (Young and Yerkes,
1943). Rossman and Bartelmez (1946) described a comparable occurrence in monkeys. At the other extreme, anestrum may
occupy the major part of the year in monestrous animals that have a very limited
breeding season.
===A. The Ovary in Anestrum===
Generally speaking, depression of ovarian
function is most extreme in greatly prolonged periods of quiescence. In the ferret,
Hammond and Marshall (1930) reported
that in the anestrous ovary follicles can
hardly be recognized with the naked eye,
because they remain small and deeply
placed. The largest follicles at the "end of
the season" averaged 460 /x in diameter
whereas a "long time after" the average
was only 240 jx, increasing again to 720 yu,
at the api^roach of a new season. By contrast, the largest follicles of animals in full
heat ranged between 1220 and 1440 /x. Follicle atresia abounds in the anestrous ovary
of the 13-lined ground squirrel (Johnson,
Foster and Coco, 1933). In sheep, however,
follicles of large size may be present at
any time during anestrum (Kammlade,
Welch, Nalbandov and Norton, 1952).
Some moderate degree of secretory activity of the ovary is indicated even at the
depth of i^rolonged seasonal anestrum (13lincd ground squirrel, Moore, Simmons,
Wells, Zalesky and Nelson, 1934; ferret,
Hill and Parkes, 1933; opossum, Risman,
1946). Although at this time uterus, vagina,
and vulva are small, ovariectomy or hypol^hysectomy causes a further reduction. On
the other hand, these structures are readily
stimulated by injection of estrogens.
It may be said that low-grade follicular
cycles proceed throughout the anestrous interval, but whether there is any synchronization of one follicle with another is
unknown. Some insight into this problem
is furnished by study of (1) the transition
from anestrum to the breeding season, and
(2) the closely analogous phenomena of
adolescence. In the report by Hammond and
Marshall, it was shown that in ferrets during anestrum and proestrum there is a progressive increase in size of the vulva which
directly parallels the diameter of the largest
follicles. The absence of overt cyclic change
is not surprising in view of the fact that
estrus is continuous in this species. In
polyestrous animals, on the other hand, it
might be expected that during anestrum follicle growth and accompanying estrogen secretion are cyclic, at least at the approach
of puberty or of "the season." Important information on this question has been obtained from some of the primates, notably
the macaque (Allen, 1927; Hartman, 1932)
and the chimpanzee (Zuckerman and Fulton, 1934; Schultz and Snyder, 1935).
Slight transitory reddening of the skin of
the perineum ("sex skin") of the monkey
may occur at intervals for several months
preceding the onset of menses, accompanied
by moderate desquamation of vaginal epithelium. During the long intervals of amenorrhea that some individuals exhibit during
the summer, there is a tendency toward
cyclic vaginal desciuamation (Fig. 8.2). The
sex skin of the chimpanzee may begin to
swell more than a year before the first
menstruation. During the ensuing months
the swelling may be irregularly cyclic or
continuous. Thus, one may judge that lowgrade follicular cycles, accompanied by periodic increases in estrogen secretion, may
succeed one another during seasonal or
prepubertal anestrum, but that in certain
cases these cycles may overlap to such degree that rather continuous estrogen secretion takes place.
===B. The Hypophysis===
The secretory activity of the anestrous
ovary is apparently adequate to prevent
"castration" changes in the adenohypophysis, for as shown by Moore, Simmons,
\^'ells, Zalesky and Nelson (1934) removal
of the ovary of anestrous ground squirrels
results in hypertrophy of the hypophysis,
Fig. 8.2. Vaginal cycles during seasonal amenorrhea in a monkey. (A portion of the record
of monkey ^38 from C. G. Hartman, Contr. EmbryoL, Carnegie Inst. Washington, 13,
Fig. 26, p. 121, 1932.)
increased gonadotrophin content thereof,
and increased numbers of basophile cells.
Warwick (1946) reported a highly significant increase of pituitary potency in
spayed anestrous ewes. This is closely analogous to the results of ovariectomy in immature animals (Hohlweg, 1934). As measured by ovarian activity, gonadotrophin
secretion (release) may be greatly diminished during profound anestrum. The actual
hypophyseal content of gonadotrophin
seems to be markedly reduced during anestrum in some species (Moore, Simmons,
Wells, Zalesky and Nelson, 1934), but
possibly not in others. Cole and Miller
(1935) and Warwick (1946) reported that
there is no seasonal variation in sheep. A
study by Kammlade, Welch, Nalbandov
and Norton (1952) indicates that the average content is somewhat higher during anestrum than it is in cycling ewes. The major
factor in this difference, however, seems
to be that during the cycle the potency of
the pituitary drops during estrus and the
early luteal phase.
Somewhat similarly the potency of the
immature rat hypophysis has been stated
to be as high as that of the sexually active
adult (Clark, 1935). The fact that the
ovaries of the immature female or of the
anestrous adult can be stimulated by injection of gonadotrophin indicates that gonadotrophin content of, the hypophysis in
these cases is not a fair measure of liberation of the hormone into the blood stream.
Therefore, it seems justifiable to assume, as
Robinson (1951) did in the interpretation
of anestrum in the ewe, that, in spite of the
possible absence of seasonal assay variation.
there is, nevertheless, a depression of hypophyseal gonadotrophin release during anestrum. We may further assume that it is not
completely depressed, for the ovary remains
slightly active. Ovary and hypophysis are
evidently in a state of equilibrium at a
relatively low level of function. It seems
likely that this state of affairs is brought
about by the central nervous system, inasmuch as the seasonal depression in some
species is closely dependent on the daily
ratio of light to darkness.
===C. Relationship of the Anestrum to the Seasons===
This relationship is so varied among different species that many interesting questions are raised. In many cases the midpoint
of anestrum coincides approximately with
the shortest days of the year (Fig. 8.3).
There are other examples, however, largely
among the Artiodactyla, in which it coincides with the longest days. Sheep are notable examples (Robinson, 1951). Others,
like the European common hare, experience
a short anestrum during the time of rapidly
decreasing daylight (Asdell, 1946). The
Russian yak, on the other hand, is said
to experience anestrum from December to
May (i.e., while day length is increasing).
A general explanation of these varied adaptive manifestations is elusive. There is reason to believe that although illumination,
or the light/darkness ratio, (Kirkpatrick
and Leopold, 1952; Hammond, Jr., 1953)
has a rather direct and primary effect in
some cases, its role is more or less indirect
in others where such things as temperature,
humidity, availability of food and water
assume major importance (Marshall, 1942).
Fig. 8.3. Some representative seasonal breeders. Solid bars indicate breeding seasons
(according to Asdell, 1946); blank intervals, periods of anestrum. Months of the year represented by letters at top of chart ; winter and summer solstaces marked by wavy lines. Southern hemisphere seasons converted to corresponding ones of the northern hemisphere. End of season for the Bighorn is vmcertain.
The complexity of the i)rol)lem is well
illustrated by the 13-lined ground squirrel
whose breeding season, like that of a multitude of small rodents, comes in the spring.
Moore, Simmons, Wells, Zalesky and Nelson (1934) reported that increasing illumination, elevated temperature, and feeding
all failed to bring the females into estrus
out of season. If, however, hibernation was
first induced by low temperature and darkness, premature estrus would follow. The
conclusion was reached that hibernation itself is a necessary prerequisite. Ovarian development actually begins, under natural
conditions, in early January in the midst
of hibernation. Females exix'i-imentally
maintained "continually for several months
in cold and darkness, with more or less
normal hibernation, [exhibit] sexual development at any time of the year, and
periods of estrum have thus been . . . maintained for many months. ..." The impression is given tliat the conditions favoring
hibernation also favor sexual development
to such extent that breeding potentiality
continues for a few months after emergence,
in spite of elevated temperatures and long
periods of illumination. In another rodent,
Peromyscus leucopus, however, the length
of daily illumination is of paramount importance. Temperature changes (4 to 25°C. )
have no effect on rejiroduction when lighting
is adequate (Whitaker, 1940). Whereas a
similar primaiy dependence on lighting
can be shown in a number of other species
from several orders, it is unwise to generalize that this is usually true.
==IV. Attainment of Maturity. Emergence of Full Ovarian Function==
Ahhough ('merg(>nce of the ovary from
the state of quiescence is gradual, there is
usually some outward sign that allows the
observer to say that puberty has ari'ived
or the breeding season has begun. In primates the accepted sign is the first menstruation ; in rats it is the opening of the vagina ;
in many animals it is the swelling and reddening of the genitalia heralding the initial
proestrum. In other eases, e.g., sheep, the
only clear indication may be the behavior
of the female toward the male. From these
facts it is readily apparent that any one
sign is employed simply because it happens
to be accessible to easy observation. Yet
the increasing output of estrogen, whether
steady or cyclic, affects many parts of the
organism at the same time. Furthermore, in
any one individual the threshold for exl)ression of a given sign may be relatively
liigh with respect to that of some other
manifestation. Thus, in Hartman's monkeys (1932), some were noted in which desquamation of vaginal epithelium occurred
in wave-like manner for a long time before
menstruation. In others "menstrual" bleeding occurred with regularity while the uterus
remained very small and A'aginal desquamation was negligible.
Hartman summarized the step-wise manner of maturation of ovary and accessory
organs of the monkey during adolescence
or following amenorrheic episodes somewhat as follows. The color of the sex skin
may be the first to appear. A slight menstrual flow usually takes place before desquamation of vaginal epithelium becomes
measurable. "More rarely there may be
one or more low desquamation cycles before
a bleeding is recorded. Whole cycles marked
liy jieriodic bleeding and some vaginal desquamation may occur before there is any
noticeable increase in size of the ovaries
and uterus. These organs increase also in a
saltatory manner, hence the term 'staircase'
phenomenon for the process. Finally, the
endocrines effect the acme of the reproductive process — ovulation."
Individual variation in the degree of abruptness with which the first ovulation is
achieved is well illustrated in a study of
puljertal guinea pigs by Ford and Young
(1953). In most cases the first period of
vaginal opening was much longer than in
subsequent cycles. Whatever the duration,
ovulation was more closely related to the
end than to the beginning of the period, as
indicated by histologic study of ovaries.
Even ovulation and corpus luteum formation do not signify that full power of
reproduction has arrived. For example, the
first cycle of the adolescent rat may culminate in ovulation without sexual receptivity
(Blandau and Money, 1943). In the ewe,
an ovulation without overt signs of heat
may at times take place during the anestrum, especially just before and just after
the breeding season (McKenzie and Terrill,
1936). The phenomenon is occasional in
ewes during the season and has also been
described in cattle (Hammond, 1946). In
fact, the full manifestation of estrus in
sheep seems to require the presence of a
"waning" corpus luteum (Robinson, 1951).
In sheep the transition from seasonal or
prepubertal anestrum to the breeding season may involve relatively minor changes
in hypophyseal activity. Even in the immature rat both the hypophysis and the
ovary are capable of far greater secretory
function than they normally display. In the
equilibrium that prevails, the ovary appears to hold the upper hand by reason of
a low hypophyseal threshold at which estrogen suppresses gonadotrophin secretion in
the immature individual (Hohlweg and
Dohrn, 1932; Byrnes and Meyer, 1951b)
and a low ovarian threshold at which gonadotrophin stimulates estrogen secretion.
Byrnes and Meyer (1951a) reported that
suppression of hypophyseal gonadotrophin
content in immature rats can be accomplished with doses of estrogen much smaller
than those that affect uterine growth. It is
also known that the immature ovary can be
induced experimentally to secrete estrogen
by injection of amounts of gonadotrophin
that are too small to produce significant
increase of ovarian weight or follicle development (Levin and Tyndale, 1937; Moon
and Li, 1952). When a gonadectomized immature rat is united in parabiosis (Kallas,
1929, 1930 » with a normal or hypophysectomized female littermate, precocious puberty is induced in the latter animal because
insufficient estrogen passes to the first partner to inhibit gonadotrophin secretion (see
Finerty, 1952). The somewhat analogous
experiment of transplanting ovaries to the
spleen produces ovarian hypertrophy in
much the same way. Here again, it is
thought that the hypophysis becomes hyperactive because the amount of estrogen reaching the ghmd is greatly diminished,
through inactivation bj^ the liver (Biskind,
1941).
Although it is true that estrogens have
a suppressing action on gonadotrophin secretion, it has become increasingly evident
that they can also stimulate hypophyseal
function in certain ways, as Engle pro{)osed in 1931. Thus short-term injection of
estrogen into intact immature rats and mice
will invoke precocious puberty not only by
stimulating the sex accessories, but also by
increasing gonadotrophin secretion and thus
causing ovarian growth and even ovulation.
Frank, Kingery and Gustavson (1925j reported that after such treatment regular
cycles continued after treatment was withdrawn. Lane (1935) found that when 22day-old female rats were injected daily
with estrogen there was an early increase in
number of ovarian follicles, including vesicular stages. After the first 10 days the nonvesicular follicles became depressed although vesicular follicles were retained.
This was interpreted to mean that for a
short time estrogen actually stimulates the
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) l)ut
eventually suppresses it, although luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion remains
elevated. Hohlweg (1934) had already demonstrated that when somewhat older prepubertal rats are given single, rather large
injections of estrogen, ovulation and corpus
luteum formation are induced within a few
days (p. 514). Obviously LH secretion is
greatly increased.
Various bits of evidence implicate the
nervous system in the processes leading to
puberty and to the onset of estrus in seasonal breeders. This will be discussed in the
following section with respect to the general
(juestion of the relationship of the hypothalamus to gonadotrophin secretion.
==V. Follicular Cycles. Growth and Atresia==
Attention will be focused here on the
dynamic pattern of follicle development
throughout the cycle, the extent to which
this i)attern depends on hyi)o[)hyseal conti'ol, and the functional changes in the
o\aiy associated with estrus in preparation
foi' the more specialized events that lead to
ovuhition and corpus luteum formation.
Production of primordial follicles and
the early growth stages have been said to
be independent of the hypophysis (Smith,
1939; Hisaw, 1947). This view derives from
the fact that following hypophysectomy the
ovaries retain large numbers of healthy
proliferating follicles below the stage of
antrum formation. There are, however, several indications that these developmental
stages may be accelerated by gonadotrophic
stimulation. It was briefly reported by
Simpson and van Wagenen (1953) that administration of purified FSH to immature
monkeys caused not only a 10- to 20-fold
'increase of ovarian weight, but also stimulation of granulosa in follicles of all sizes.
Indirect evidence comes from the fact that
follicle atresia generally becomes maximal
late in estrus or metestrum, when depressed
FSH might be expected on theoretical
grounds. Harrison (1948) reported tliat in
ovaries of goats killed on the third or fourth
days of estrus healthy primary ovocytes are
rare. Some few, however, presumably remain. Myers, Young and Dempsey (1936)
stated that in the estrous guinea pig there
are few nonatretic follicles aside from those
destined for ovulation. However, small
numbers of normal ai)pearing nonvesicular
follicles were found.
There seems to be general agreement that,
very quickly after this catastrophic elimination of follicles, renewed growth promptly
ensues. Whether or not the wave of atresia
represents a depression of FSH secretion, no
one would deny that the new growth reflects
this type of gonadotrophic stimulation.
Characteristically the population of small
and medium follicles is restored early in the
luteal phase of the polyestrous cycle. This
is clearly indicated for the guinea pig ovary
(Myers, Young and Dempsey, 1936) when
the data are converted from average volumes to average diameters (Fig. 8.4). Beginning on the fourth day after estrus, when
the largest follicles are approximately 300 fx
in diameter and when theca interna and
antra have formed, rapid growth of granulosa, theca, and antra continues for several
days. This is confirmed by counts of mitotic
figures obtained by the colchicine technique
(Schmidt, 1942), indicating greatest mitotic
activity in theca and granulosa of follicles
between 300 fi and 600 fx in diameter. By the
Fig. 8.4. A schematic repiesentation of the folhcuhir cycle in the guinea pig. The heavj^
sohd curve represents the diameters of the largest follicles, recalculated from the data of
Myers, Young and Dempsey (1936). The arrow point indicates ovulation. The other solid
curves and broken lines represent impressionistically the growth and atresia, respectivelj^
of other groups of follicles that are not ordinarily destined for ovulation.
11th or 12th day the largest follicles (ca.
800 /x) are "competent," i.e., capable of
being ovulated (Dempsey, Hertz and
Young, 1936; Dempsey, 1937). While the
largest follicles are developing to this stage,
multitudes of others begin to grow, being
carried on to various stages of development
before regression sets in.
This pattern of the follicular cycle seems
to be generally true among mammals that
have been carefully studied, when allowance
is made for the fact that from one species to
another the characteristic maxima of follicle
diameter are extremely variable (shrew, 350
fjL-, rat, 900 /*; cow, 19,000 /x; mare 70,000 /x;
Asdell, 1946). In ovulatory cycles of polyestrous animals the greater part of follicle
growth is accomplished while the luteal
phase of the preceding cycle is in progress.
In successive anovulatory cycles like those
of the cat the patterns of the follicular cycles are probably much the same (Evans
and Swezy, 1931 » . In the rabbit and ferret,
where more or less constant estrus characterizes the isolated females in season,
there is probably considerable telescoping
of successive waves of follicle growth such
that as one set of follicles begins to undergo
atresia another set is ready to take its place
(Hill and White, 1933). The difference between cat cycles and rabbit cycles seems to
be chiefly one of degree. The writer has seen
both types represented in persistent-estrous
rats, among litter mates of inbred strains
(Everett, 1939, and unpublished).
At the end of the luteal phase of the
cycle in polyestrous animals there are already present several competent follicles
among an extensive population of smaller
ones. For example, the guinea pig corpus
luteum usually shows signs of regression on
day 13 of the cycle. It has been proved that
ovulation can be induced as early as day
12 by injection of LH (Dempsey, 1937),
several days earlier than it would normalh^
occur (Fig. 8.5). In the human and monkey
it is possible that the "preferred" follicles
are recognizable by their larger size during
Fig. 8.5. The guinea pig follieular cycle and some of its experimental modifications. (After
E. W. Dempsey, Am. J. Physiol., 120, 126-132, 1937.)
or soon after menstruation (Allen, Pratt,
Newell and Bland, 1930; Hartman, 1932).
In many mammals competent follicles may
be present much earlier. Ablation of corpora
lutea soon after ovulation in sheep (McKenzie and Terrill, 1936) and cattle (Hammond, Jr., and Bhattacharya, 1944) is followed in 2 to 4 days by another ovulation,
much sooner than in the guinea pig (Fig.
8.5). Removal of the primate corpus luteum,
at the other extreme, produces no such immediate response, judging from the details
of three cases among Hartman's (1932) protocols (#40, #41, and #99). Whereas the
next ovulations took place earlier than expectation, the intervals between unilateral
ovariectomy and ovulation were 16, 14, and
22 days, respectively.
From detailed investigations in the rat,
only the earlier stages of follicle growth
may properly be regarded as pure FSH effects (Lane, 1935). Lane and Greep (1935)
found that addition of Lli to FSH causes a
marked increase in the proportion of vesicular follicles to follicles without antra. The
use of more highly purified materials
((irecp, van Dyke and Chow, 1942; Fraenkel-Conrat, Li and Simpson, 1943) has
amply confirmed the necessity for combination of the two gonadotrophins to yield maximal follicle growth and estrogen secretion
ill rats. Morphologic evidence indicates that
LH acts selectively on thecal tissue and,
therefore, on the interstitial tissue derived
therefrom. Inasmuch as thecal tissue is the
presumptive major source of ovarian estrogen (see below), it follows, perhaps, as Hisaw (1947) suggested that "the theca interna through the action of LH acquires
competence to respond to FSH" (by secreting estrogen) .
Convincing evidence that thecal tissue
and its derivatives are the principal sources
of ovarian estrogen was assembled by Corner (1938). The status of this question remains essentially the same today. Few endocrinologists, however, would assume that no
other ovarian cells have this capacity (see
discussion in the chapter on the ovary).
Nevertheless, there is a direct correlation in
time between the marked rise in estrogen
secretion as the follicular jihase of the cycle
advances, on the one hand, and the organization of tlicca interna of the largest follicles into organs of obvious endocrine character, on the other. "When especially
])rominent the theca interna is referred to
as the "thecal gland" (Mossman, 1937;
Stafford, Collins and ]\Iossman (1942).
Thecal tissue from the multitudes of
atretic follicles should not be neglected as
a possible additional source of estrogen.
From the standpoint of chronologic relations to the cycle this (iiiestioii has hardly been touched. Pointing up our ignorance,
Sturgis (1949) in a careful study of atresia
of large follicles in the monkey ovary, speculated that their hypertrophied thecal tissue
may serve the useful purpose of estrogen
secretion during the interim between follicle
rupture and organization of the corpus
luteum.
We are in need of ciuantitative appraisals
not only of the total numbers of healthy and
atretic follicles of all categories present in
representative species at progressive stages
of the cycle, as in the work on the rat by
Mandl and Zuckerman (1952), but also of
the respective volumes of theca, granulosa,
interstitial tissue, and corpora lutea. Lane
and Davis (1939) determined in rat ovaries
at four stages of the cycle the respective
total volumes of theca, granulosa, and antra
in all healthy follicles, as well as the separate mitotic indices of theca and granulosa.
Such differential information on multiplication of cells and increase of antral volume
is important. Although the latter accounts
for a major part of the increase in volume
of the larger follicles, it represents a function quite apart from protoplasmic growth
per se.
There is now considerable evidence that
estrogen itself exerts a growth -promoting
influence on the follicle and, furthermore,
sensitizes it to gonadotrophic stimulation.
Details may be found in papers by Pencharz
(1940), Williams (1940, 1944, 1945a, b),
Simpson, Evans, Fraenkel-Conrat and Li
(1941) , Gaarenstroom and de Jongh (1946) ,
and Desclin (1949a,) . Although it seems that
these effects have not been elicited by physiologic doses, the possibility remains that
estrogen operates within the confines of the
ovary as a mediator of some of the effects
of the gonadotrophins. In the neighborhood
of cells that produce it the estrogen concentration is probably far above that which
would be considered physiologic for the remainder of the body.
===A. Correlation of Ovarian Secretion with the Follicular Cycle===
Knowledge of the secretory output of
the ovary during the cycle is almost entirely
indirect and derives chiefly from (1) substitution experiments carried out in a vari
ety of si)ecies, and (2) assays of urine,
mainly human but occasionally from other
forms. Satisfactory assays of blood estrogen
have been very limited and chemical analysis of the steroid content of ovarian venous
blood is in only its preliminary stages.
The early substitution experiments are
chiefly of historic interest (Allen, Danforth
and Doisy, 1939). In great measure these
investigations constitute crucial steps in
proof that the ovary secretes steroid hormones which are fundamentally responsible
for the manifestations of estrus. Conversely, then, these manifestations might be
considered to reflect an increase of estrogen
secretion and their absence a relative decrease. It has been learned, however, that
the action of estrogen in certain instances
may be greatly modified by progesterone,
androgens, and certain adrenocortical steroids (notably desoxycorticosterone). Androgens are known to be secreted in the female
by the adrenal cortex (Dorfman and van
Wagenen, 1941 ; Gassner, 1952) and by the
ovaries (Hill, 1937a, b; Parkes, 1950;
Deanesly, 1938; Burrill and Greene, 1941;
Pfeiffer and Hooker, 1942; Alloiteau, 1952).
Progesterone secretion is probably not confined to the luteal phase of the cycle (see p.
519j. Evidence for its secretion during follicle maturation is considerable and its possible production even earlier cannot be
excluded. These considerations make it unwise, therefore, to regard phenomena such
as vaginal cornification, turgescence of
vulva and sex skin, uterine growth, as direct
ciuantitative measures of estrogen output.
This point may be illustrated by certain observations made in chim])anzees by Fish,
Young and Dorfman (1941) and illustrated
in Figure 8.6. Assays of urinary estrogens
during the cycle exhibited two peaks, only
the first of which coincided with the swelling
of sex skin. The second peak of estrogen excretion was unaccompanied by swelling, presumably because of the coordinate increase
of progesterone secretion. Had swelling been
the only guide only the first peak would
have been apparent.
Assays of urinary estrogen in primates
have often shown double peaks such as illustrated for the chimpanzee. PedersenBjergaard and Pederson-Bjergaard (1948i.
Fig. 8.6. E.strogen and androgen excretion by a female chimpanzee, Mamo. , total estrogens; , estradiol; -•-•, estrone; , estriol. Menstruation indicated by solid  areas on base line. (From W. R. Fish, W. C. Young and R. I. Dorfman, Endocrinology, 28,
588,1941.)
studying one woman for 2 years, found
single peaks at midinterval in 8 cycles and
double peaks in 12 cycles. On the average
the first peak was reached on day 12 and the
second on day 21. Similar double peaks were
noted in blood estrogen assays in a large
group of normal young women (Markee
and Berg, 1944). An additional lesser rise
was observed during menstruation.
None of the available assays of urinary or
blood estrogen can be accepted as an absolute measure of the rate of hormone production. Urinary assays have certain advantages, in spite of the fact that probably only
a variable fraction of the ovarian product
is measured. Intrinsically they are measures
of rate, whereas assays of blood estrogen
measure concentration alone at the moment
of bleeding. Attempts have been made to
measure estrogens in ovarian venous blood,
but with little success because of the extreme dilution (Rakoff and Cantarow,
1950). We may hope that development of
sufficiently sensitive methods of detection
will soon allow systematic evaluation of
ovarian output by such direct means. Tracer
techniciucs have shown (Werthessen,
Schwenk and Baker, 1953) in perfused ovaries of the sow that C^^-acetate enters into
the synthesis of estrone and /^-estradiol.
Several years ago Corner (1940) estimated, from the known amounts of injected
estrone required to maintain the normal
status of sex skin and endometrium in castrates that the ovaries of an adult rhesus
monkey secrete the equivalent of about 20
fig. estrone daily. On a weight basis the estrone equivalent secreted by the ovaries of
a woman would then be on the order of 300
/Ag. per day. Actual substitution data from
castrated women gave an estimate of the
same order of magnitude (420 ;u,g. per day).
Whatever the rate of secretion may be at
different times, it would seem a 'priori that
effects on extra-ovarian tissues should be
more directly related to amount of estrogen
in circulation. The assays of human bloodestrogen in normal women by Markee and
Berg (1944) and in gynecologic patients by
Fluhmann (1934), although differing in absolute values, agree in indicating that the
variation of blood estrogen concentration
from one stage of the cycle to another may
be relatively small. If this is true, then it
nuist be supposed that cyclic changes in the
accessory organs are brought about by relatively moderate changes in circulating estrogen. In support of this view Markee (1948)
demonstrated in the macaque that a mere 50
per cent reduction in the daily dose of estrogen can invoke menstruation if the
change is abrupt.
===B. Cyclic Manifestations After Ovariectomy Or Hypophysectomy===
Residual cyclic changes in the vagina
liave been reported in ovariectomized mice
(Kostitch and Telebakovitch, 1929) and
rats (Mandl, 1951). The periodicity is very
nearly that of the normal cycles, at least in
the latter species. Vaginal cycles of similar
duration with more extreme estrous changes
are found in ovariectomized rats receiving
daily injection of threshold doses of estrogens (del Castillo and Calatroni, 1930;
Bourne and Zuckerman, 1941). The same
was remarked in mice by Emmens (1939)
and a report by Veziris (1951) indicates
that vaginal periodicity may obtain in castrated or menopausal women receiving estrogen. Although sucli events have been
called ''threshold cycles," the term may
simply express the fact that they are most
easily recognized when estrogen is given at
threshold level. Hartman (1944), employing
a modified Shorr stain for vaginal smears,
found that castrated rats given large
amounts of estrogen daily (5 to 100 fig. estradiol dipropionate) displayed complete
cornification at 4- to 5-day intervals. During the time intervening there was admixture of Shorr cells, smaller epithelial cells,
and leukocytes.
Analogous phenomena have been recognized in the endometrium of castrated monkeys (Zuckerman, 1937, 1941) injected daily
for as long as 1 year with threshold doses of
estrone (10 fig.). Larger doses prevent cyclic
bleeding (see Hisaw, 1942). From the report
of Veziris (1951) it may be judged that
threshold endometrial cycles also occur in
women and that the vaginal and endometrial cycles are synchronized in considerable extent.
Full explanation of these phenomena is
not at hand. From the standpoint of the
present discussion certain considerations are
especially noteworthy. (1) Vaginal "threshold cycles" have been obtained in castrated
rats in the absence of either hypophysis or
adrenals (Bourne and Zuckerman, 1941 ; del
Castillo and di Paola, 1942) . The former authors encountered the phenomenon in two
rats from which both the hypophysis and
adrenals had been removed. It is important to remember, however, that the pars tuberalis remains in situ after the usual hypophysectomy procedure, that accessory
adrenocortical tissue is frequent in rats, and
that gonadal rests might remain unrecognized. (2) The reported lengths of vaginal
and endometrial cycles agree favorably with
the cycle lengths in intact individuals of the
respective species. The degree of conformity
between vaginal and uterine cycles indicated by Veziris {loc. cit.) suggests some
sort of integrating mechanism. Much more
information is required, however, before one
may reject the alternative view that rhythmic activity is an innate characteristic of
these organs.
===C. Cyclic Manifestations in the Absence of Ovarian Follicles===
Many years ago Parkes (1926a, b) and
Brambell, Parkes and Fielding (1927a, b)
reported vaginal and uterine cycles in mice
in which the entire follicular apparatus had
been destroyed by x-radiation. Schmidt
(1936) described the phenomenon in the
guinea pig, noting that, although most of
her estrous animals had one or more large
atretic or cystic follicles, as she had earlier
reported (Genther, 1931), a few animals
exiiil)ited periodic vaginal opening of short
duration and correlated proestrous vaginal
smears, in the absence of follicles. Her assays of urinary estrogen were negative in
these animals, unlike the positive assays in
those in which one or more follicles were
demonstrable. Attempts by several workers
(Drips and Ford, 1932; Levine and Witschi,
1933; Mandel, 1935) to reproduce in rats
the results that Parkes and Brambell had
found in mice, were unsuccessful, a fact indicating no estrogenic activity in ovaries
completely lacking follicles and ova. Parkes
(1952) more recently returned to this problem, reporting vaginal cycles and "fully
functional" uteri in castrated rats bearing
grafts of ovaries in which all organized follicles and ovocytes had been destroyed by
deep freezing. These were true estrous cycles, in the sense that the animals would
mate.
Many questions are posed by these observations. The fundamental one seems to
be whether these cycles express periodicity
of hypophyseal gonadotrophin secretion.
The answer may be long in coming. Meanwhile, one would like to know whether castration changes are visible in the hypophysis
and whether constant estrus may be invoked
by exposure to continuous light or by postnatal treatment of the host with androgen
or other steroids (see p. 529 1 .
===D. Hypothalamus and Gonadotrophin Secretion. General Considerations===
Experimental studies, ostensibly addressed to the general problem of neural
control of gonadotropin secretion, have in
fact often been concerned with the special
problems of reflex ovulation <p. 520) or
of provoked pseudopregnancy (p. 532).
Whereas substantial information is now
available w^ith respect to these special phenomena, particularly ovulation, information
is limited about control of the day-to-day
secretion of gonadotrophin that in the female is responsible for follicle stimulation
and estrogen secretion (Benoit and Assenmacher, 1955; Harris, 1955). However, evidence in regard to induction of precocious
puberty and early onset of estrus in seasonal
breeders leaves no doubt that the nervous
system is in some manner a regulator of
follicle-stimulating activitv of the i)ars distalis.
Numerous reports associate precocious
l)uberty with lesions in the hypothalamus
(Weinberger and Grant, 1941; Bauer, 1954;
Harris, 1955). Donovan and van der Werff
ten Bosch (1956) reported off-season estrus
in ferrets and precocious puberty in rats
following retrochiasmatic lesions in the hyjiotlialamus. Exposure of immature rats to
continuous light causes the vagina to open
prematurely (Fiske, 1941). When 22-dayold female rats were given electrical stimulation of the cervix uteri daily for 10 days
(Swingle, Seay, Perlmutt, Collins, Fedor
and Barlow, 1951), a large proportion exhibited significant increase in uterine weight
beyond that found in control animals, without change in ovarian weight. In fact, 7 of
50 rats ovulated or at least formed "several
well-developed corpora lutca." Somewhat
similarly, according to Aron and AronBrunetierc (1953), mechanical stimulation
of the vagina or the adjacent segment of the
uterus in immature guinea pigs regularly  provoked follicle growth and estrogen secretion. In gregarious birds the development of
ovulable follicles requires that other individuals of the species be present. In the pigeon, even the mirror image of the female
constitutes a sufficient stimulus (Matthews,
1939).
Studies by Flerko and his associates
(1954-1957) present consistent evidence
that restricted bilateral lesions in the region
of the paraventricular nuclei serve to liberate the hypophysis from inhibitory effects
of estrogen and androgen. This work is in
agreement with that of Donovan and van
der Werff ten Bosch in that somewhat similarly located lesions brought on precocious
puberty. As noted elsewhere, gonadectomy
in immature rats quickly results in hypersecretion of gonadotrophin.
Transplantation of the hypophysis to
sites remote from the hypothalamus has
produced divergent results. At the present
writing, the chief divergence seems to rest
between the sexes. In male guinea pigs and
rats several workers have reported maintenance of male reproductive tracts by intra-ocular transplants of hypophyses (May,
1937; Schweizer, Charipper and Kleinberg,
1940; Cutuly, 1941a; Courrier, 1956; Goldberg and Knobil, 1957). Quite to the contrary, however, there has at best been only
equivocal evidence of maintenance of female tracts, a matter of sex difference which
needs full investigation. JNIay's (1937) report of 2 fertile female rats is unacceptable
because of inadequate controls. Schweizer,
Charipper and Haterius (1937) found in
several hypophysectomized guinea pigs that
intra-ocular pituitary grafts produced constant estrus and significant follicle stimulation, accompanied by uterine and mammary
gland develoi)inent. Although the search for
pituitary remnants in the sella turcica was
reported negative, the histologic check was
limited to scrapings from the sella floor.
Other authors, notably Phelps, Ellison and
Burch (1939), Westman and Jacobsohn
(1940), Harris and Jacobsohn (1952), and
Elverett ( 1956a) obtained in female rats little or no evidence of gonadotrophin secretion from apparently healthy, well vascularized grafts. The respective sites were
intraniusculai', intra-ocular, in the subarachnoid space under the temporal lobe of
the brain, and beneath the renal capsule —
all distant from the hypothalamus.
Transplantation of the pars distalis into
sites close to the hypothalamus, on the other
hand, is characteristically followed by
maintenance of the female reproductive
tract and essentially normal sex functions.
Greep (1936) found that re-implantation
of hypophyses into the (presumably) emptied capsule was frequently followed in both
male and female rats by return of virtually
normal reproductive powers. Females exhibited cycles and even went through successful pregnancy and lactation. The result
observed in male rats was confirmed by
Cutuly (1941a). The obvious difficulty of
establishing completeness of hypophysectomy has been the only criticism of these
instructive experiments. This fault has been
eliminated by an improved procedure devised by Harris and Jacobsohn (1952). Hypophysectomy was performed by the parapharyngeal route, after which the tissue to
l)e grafted was introduced by a transtemporal approach to a site immediately beneath the median eminence. This permitted
later histologic search for remnants of the
original gland in its capsule. In many cases,
including all in which the graft comprised
several hypophyses from the animal's own
newborn young, entirely normal gonadotrophic function was recorded. This included
resumption of regular estrous cycles, typically during the 2nd or 3rd postoperative
week. Several of the rats became pregnant
and delivered viable litters. In marked contrast, none of the grafts that were placed
under the temporal lobe gave any indication
of gonadotrophin secretion, although they
were as well preserved and richly vascularized as the others. Explanation of the difference seems to be that grafts under the
median eminence acquire blood supply from
regenerated hypophyseal portal veins and
iience a neurovascular linkage with the hypothalamus. The importance of this relationship has been amply confirmed by Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett (1957, 1958d)
in studies described below.
In lieu of significant numbers of nerve fibers entering the pars distalis (see Rasmussen, 1938; Harris. 1948a I, the hypophyseal portal veins afford the most likely means
by which the gland is brought under hypothalamic control. Recently it was demonstrated in rats and monkeys that these vessels have the power of rapid regeneration
after simple stalk-section (Harris, 1949,
1950a, b). This fact at once gives a ready
explanation of many of the discordant results of stalk-section experiments reported
in the past. Harris (1950b) explored in rats
the efficacy of various materials as barriers
to regeneration, with the result that numerous examples of partial regeneration were
produced. Degree of recovery of gonadotropliic activity by the hypophysis was
strikingly correlated with degree of anatomic vascular recovery. Restoration of normal ovarian function after simple interruption of the stalk, as reported in the guinea
pig by Dempsey (1939), in rats by Dempsey and Uotila (1940) , and in the human by
Dandy (1940), is thus explained by the assumption that portal vein regeneration had
taken place. On the other hand, Westman
and Jacobsohn (1937-1938), who always
inserted a barrier of metal foil between the
median eminence and hypophyseal capsule,
consistently found ovarian atrophy, as did
Harris when portal vein regeneration was
completely obstructed. Attempting to prove
that the portal vessels are not essential in
regulating the hypophysis, Thompson and
Zuckerman (1954) stated that increased
illumination induced estrus in two ferrets
after stalk-section and in the absence of
demonstrable regeneration of portal vessels.
Donovan and Harris (1954), however, examining the histologic sections prepared
from 1 of the 2 animals, found many such
vessels that were uninfected. In their own
experimental series, an estrous response to
light was always associated with regeneration of the portal veins.
Greep and Barrnett (1951) rightly emphasized the prime importance of a good
vascular supply for recovery of function by
the pars distalis after either transplantation
or stalk-section. They pointed to the extensive central infarction and scarring that
characteristically followed stalk-section by
their technique, an obvious factor contributing to hypopituitarism. Harris (1950a I,
however, reported good function from several hypophyses in which there was pronounced central necrosis in company with
well regenerated portal vessels. A study by
Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett (1957,
1958b) established beyond doubt that qualitative functional losses after stalk-sectron
or transplantation of the pars distalis result,
not from impaired blood supply per se, but
from the loss of the intimate neurovascular
relationship with the hypothalamus. Hypo])hyseal autografts, after first being
placed under the kidney capsule for several weeks with the usual atrophy of the
ovarian follicular apparatus and interstitial
tissue, were later retransplanted to a site
immediately under the median eminence. In
the definitive series of 14 such experiments,
13 rats resumed estrous cycles spontaneously 8 to 68 days after retransplantation ;
7 were fertile and carried litters to term. A
correlated study (Nikitovitch-Winer and
Everett, 1959) demonstrated clearly that on
the occasion of each of these successive
transplantations there was massive necrosis
of the interior of the glandular mass, leaving but a thin shell from which the functional tissue of the graft was reconstituted.
In spite of this double insult some special
influence of the hypothalamus brought
about renewed function in a surprising number of cases. Together with the restoration
of gonadotrophic activity there was significant improvement in thyroid-stimulating
hormone (TSH) and adrenocorticotrophic
hormone (ACTH) secretion. The considerable net loss of hypophyseal parenchyma
resulting from the two operations was reflected only quantitatively in the effects on
the various target organs. Ovarian weights,
numbers of follicles and corpora lutea, adrenal weights and extent of adrenal hypertroi)liy after unilateral adrenalectomy, and
thyroid uptake of P^^ were all intermediate
between those of the normal female rat and
control animals in which the graft remained
on the kidney or was retransplanted under
the temporal lobe of the brain.
Regulation of pars distalis secretion by
means of the stalk vessels may conceivably
be carried out either by regulation of blood
How or by transmission of chemical mediatoi-s from the proximal capillary plexus in
the median eminence to the pars distalis. An experiment describetl by Swingle, Seay,
Perlmutt, Collins, Fedor and Barlow (1951)
suggested that a mediator subject to Dibenamine blockade might be involved in precocious puberty. Although significant uterine enlargement was produced in immature
rats by daily stimulation of the cervix uteri
for 10 days, no such effects were observed
in similar rats given Dibenamine daily by
stomach tube. Unfortunately, there were no
controls for the possible effect of Dibenamine in nonstimulated or gonadotrophininjected animals.
Fluhmann (1952) invoked precocious
vaginal opening and ovarian stimulation in
immature rats by injection of neostigmine.
The locus of such cholinergic action is unknown. Parenthetically, Barbarossa and di
Ferrante (1950) reported follicle stimulation in immature rats after injection of
intermedin, an effect not found in hypophysectomized subjects. Benoit and Assenmacher (1955) proposed that, in the drake,
gonad-stimulating activity is governed by
an agent contained in neurosecretory substance, which is demonstrable in abundance
in the retrochiasmatic region of the median
eminence. Capillaries there drain selectively
into an anterior set of portal venules. Oxytocin has been suggested as a possible mediator for gonadotrophin secretion (Shibusawa, Saito, Fukuda, Kawai, Yamada
and Tomizawa, 1955; Armstrong and
Hansel, 1958). There is much interest
as this is being written (1958) in the
jiossibility that vasopressin, oxytocin, or
other agents associated with neurosecretory substances of the neui-ohyjioiihysis
are responsible for control of production and release of the various trophic
hormones of the pars distalis. As an
alternative or even a supplement to neurochemical regulation, a vasomotor mechanism cannot be denied (Green, 1951), for
conceivably only a slight shift in blood flow
through the jiars distalis might tip the balance of hormone production one way oi- anothei-. Thus the matter stands: whereas it
is apjiarent that the hypothalamus intervenes in follicle growth and estrogen secretion, how it does so is little more than speculative.
==VI. Follicle Maturation and Ovulation==
A variety of evidence indicates discontinuity between growth of large follicles, on
the one hand, and their preovulatory maturation, on the other. Such is clearly the case
among "reflex ovulators." Evidence that the
same is true for spontaneous ovulators will
be outlined below. Follicle maturation, ovulation, and structural transformation of the
follicles to corpora lutea seem to represent
successive stages in a distinct physiologic
process, superimposed on the follicle growth
cycle and brought about by a relatively
abrupt increase in circulating gonadotrophin
(theoretically LH). Since there is evidence
(p. 519) that progesterone secretion may
become detectable as this process begins,
there might be justification for regarding it
as merely the first portion of the luteal
phase. However, the fact that luteinization
( i.e., the organization per se of luteal tissue)
does not necessarily lead to functional cor|)ora lutea warrants treatment of the ovulation-luteinization phase as a distinct phenomenon.
Although it is customary to state that the
hypopliysis invokes ovulation by release of
LH, there is considerable question about
the auxiliary roles played by other gonadotrophic hormones (Hisaw, 1947). Inasmuch
as the time of release has been known in
only the reflex ovulators, one might look to
them for information. However, the available data (Hill, 1934) pertain only to the
ovulating i)otency of the total gonadotrophin content of the hypophysis at various
times after coitus. Substitution experiments
are unsatisfactory because the presence of
competent follicles implies the presence of
l)oth FSH and a small amount of LH. The
substitution of even the purest hormone
preparations immediately after hypophysectomy leads to equivocal results inasmuch
as it must be assumed that some FSH and
LH of intrinsic origin remain in circulation.
Talbert, Meyer and McShan (1951) determined that in rats, when hypophysectomy
is performed at the onset of proestrum, the
follicles remain capable of responding to injected LH for about 6 hours. Morphologic
signs of follicle deterioration do not appear
until nuich later. Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that relatively pure preparations
of either FSH or LH will ovulate an estrous
rabbit (Greep, van Dyke and Chow, 1942).
On the other hand, until the recent use of
species-specific gonadotrophins (van Wagenen and Simpson, 1957), the primate ovary
was notoriously difficult to ovulate therapeutically. Until effluent blood from the hypophysis can be assayed, there is little
likelihood that the gonadotrophin complex
that is normally responsible for ovulation
can be known. Thus, whereas the expression,
LH-release, will be employed occasionally
to refer to the release of gonadotrophin that
invokes ovulation, the term is used purely
for convenience and brevity, and should be
appropriately qualified by the reader.
===A. Time Of Ovulation===
The time of ovulation with respect to
other events of the cycle is relatively easy
to determine in reflex ovulators, but in spontaneous ovulators has proven to be more
elusive. In the former, laparotomy at various intervals after the stimulus enables exact measure to be made of the time required
to accomplish ovulation. For most of the
spontaneous ovulators, save the few in
which the ripening follicles can be palpated
as in monkeys and cattle, it has been necessary to attempt to correlate ovulation with
some easily detectable external sign. Inasmuch as the ovulation stimulus to the hyj)oiihysis in these animals is probably invoked by ovarian hormones and these are
equally responsible for phenomena such as
vaginal cornification and behavioral estrus,
a considerable degree of correlation might
be expected between ovulation and a given
change in the vaginal smear or onset of estrous behavior. The predictability of the
relationship, however, must depend in great
measure on the degree of correlation among
thresholds of response in the various tissues
concerned. In the primates that have no
sharply limited period of sex desire the
i:)roblem is even more troublesome. When
reference is made to the date of the last
menstruation, prediction is erratic because
of the variable occurrence of postmenstrual
quiescence (Rossman and Bartelmez, 1943;
Young and Yerkes, 1943). Consequently,
attempts must be made to find indicato: such as basal body temperature fluctuations
which may bear some intrinsically closer
relationship to the event in question. (See
Hartman, 1936, and Buxton and Engle,
1950, for discussion of this very practical
]iroblera. )
Among mammals generally, si)ontaneous
ovulation takes place sometime during estrus (Asdell, 1946) . It is found during early
estrus in the opossum, red fox, dog, mouse
and hamster. In the rat some authors have
placed it early (Young, Boling and Blandau,
1941) and others late (Long and Evans,
19221 with respect to vaginal estrus. In the
writer's colony both relations hold, in 4-day
and 5-day cycles, respectively. Ovulation in
late estrus is reported for the cotton rat,
bank vole, guinea pig, pig, horse, and ass.
Sheep usually ovulate shortly before the
end of heat, sometimes a few hours afterward. As stated earlier, ovulation may even
occur in guinea pigs, rats, sheep, and cattle
without overt estrus. The cow usually ovulates several hours after the end of heat. The
marsupial cat is said to ovulate 5 days
afterward (Hill and O'Donoghue, 1913).
The extreme is represented by certain bats
(Asdell, 1946) which copulate in autumn
and ovulate in the spring after a prolonged
state of subestrus. These variations probably express several factors.
Among reflex ovulators there is considerable interspecies variation in the interval
between the stimulus that invokes release
of gonadotroj^hin from the hypophysis and
the eventual rupture of the Graafian follicles
(rabbit, ca. 10 hours; ferret, ca. 30 hours;
cat, 24 to 54 hours; 13-lined ground sciuirrcl,
8 to 12 hours; mink, 36 to 50 hours) . Among
spontaneous ovulators the comparable interval is clearly defined for only the rat, 10
to 12 hours (Everett, Sawyer and Markce,
1949) . In the cow the data obtained by Hansel and Trimberger (1951) and Hough,
Bearden and Hansel (1955) i)lace the outside limit at about 30 hours. Here again,
threshold differentials among tlic various tissues of the individual are piobably of gicat importance. 'I'hus in one
species the threshold foi' gonadoti'ophin
release may be lower than that foi' estrous behavior with the result tliat by
the time the latter makes its ai)pearance
the former has already transpired and ovulation will shortly take place. The rat,
for example, releases LH during the afternoon, begins to show estrous behavior
around 8 p.m., and ovulates around 2 a.m.
(Everett, 1948, 1956b). In other species
these time relationships may be reversed.
In the cow, activation of the hypophysis apparently occurs several hours after the onset
of estrus (Hansel and Trimberger, 1951).
The cow remains in heat 10 to 18 hours and
ovulates 13!/2 to 151/2 hours after going out
of heat (Asdell, 1946). The early termination of estrus apparently reflects a refractory state which sets in after estrogen
activity has continued for a time, for castrates receiving continued estrogen therapy
remain in estrus for similarly brief periods.
In the mare, ovulation is delayed until a few
hours before the end of estrous periods that
may extend for 5 to 10 days or longer. This
suggests a relative refractoriness of the LHrelease mechanism in this animal. Such a
state of affairs approaches that in persistent
estrus or in the anovulatory cycle.
===B. Ovarian Steroms and Ovulation===
1. Estrogens
Chronic administration of estrogen to the
intact animal eventually produces ovarian
atrophy by suppression of gonadotrophin
secretion. However, some moderate basic
level of continuous estrogen secretion must
be compatible with normal function of the
hypophyseal-ovarian system; witness the
fact that blood estrogen assays in normal
women (]Markee and Berg, 1944) indicate
only a 2-fold increase at midinterval above
a base value of considerable magnitude.
Induction of corpus luteum formation by
injected estrogen was first demonstrated by
Hohlweg (1934) in prepubertal rats^ and
the phenomenon has been repeatedly observed by other woi'kers (Desclin, 1935;
Mazer, Israel and Aljjcrs, 1936; Westman
and Jacobsolm, 1938b; Herold and Effkemann, 1938; Price and Ortiz, 1944; Cole,
1946). The fact that the effect was not obtained in rats younger than 30 to 36 days
l>y Piice and Ortiz, whereas Cole observed
it in the age-range of 21 to 28 days, demonstrates the existence of strain differences in
the age factor. This probably explains the
absence of luteinization in the experience of
Lane (1935) and Merckel and Nelson
(1940). Hohlweg and Chamorro (1937)
demonstrated the importance of the hypophysis in the response. When hypophysectomy was performed 2 days after injection
of estrogen no corpora liitea developed, but
hypophysectomy on the 4th day did not interfere with corpus luteum formation. The
effect could be produced in 50-gm. rats with
as little as 4 |U,g. estradiol benzoate. Westman and Jacobsohn (1938b) reported that
transsection of the hypophyseal stalk less
than 2Vt days after injection prevented the reaction, but after that time the operation
did not interfere. Bradbury (1947) assayed
the gonadotrophin content of hypophyses of
normal and castrated immature rats (30 to
32 days old at autopsy) 2 to 5 days after
injection of estrogen or other steroids. These
rats were apparently too young to form
corpora lutea in response to the treatment,
l)ut marked interstitial-cell stimulation, indicative of LH (ICSH) activity, was observed as early as 96 hours. In the intact
animals significant loss of potency occurred
72 to 96 hours after injection, in agreement
with the hypophysectomy data of Hohlweg
and Chamorro (1937). In castrated rats,
however, there was no loss of potency, thus
suggesting that some ovarian factor in addition to estrogen is essential for stimulation
of the hypophysis. It is unfortunate that the
study was confined to animals too young to
give the full response of luteinization.
* The effect was later obtained with androgens (Holilwpg, 1937; Salmon, 1938; Xathanson, Fianspen and Sweenev, 1938).
Fig. 8.7. Experimental modifications of the 5-day cycle in rats. Two units of the ordinate
represent full vaginal estrus. Time in days on abscissa, each unit 24 hours (midnight to midnight). X, ovulation time; -p, progesterone, usually 1 to 2 mg.; e, estradiol benzoate, standard
do.se 50 /xg. (From J. W. Everett, Endocrinology, 43, 393, 1948.)
Induction of ovulation in adult animals
by estrogen was first reported by Hammond,
Jr., Hammond and Parkes (1942) and by
Hammond, Jr. (1945) in the anestrous ewe.
Whereas the s])ontaneous occurrence of occult ovulation was approximately 5 per
cent, injection of stilbestrol was followed by
corpus luteum formation in 4 of 11 ewes,
with recovery of ova in 3. Injection of stilbestrol di-n-butyrate was followed by corpus luteum formation in 5 of 6 ewes and ova
were recovered in 3. The finding was confirmed by Casida (1946) who stated that in
cycling ewes ovulation can be invoked by
injection of diethylstilbestrol on the 4th day
of the cycle, but not at other times. In 1947
Everett reported the induction of ovulation
in pregnant rats within 40 hours after injection of estradiol benzoate (as little as 2 or
3 /xg.) or implantation of estradiol crystals
or pellets. The response was not obtained in
animals autopsied 24 hours after treatment
nor in other animals hypophysectomized at
24 hours and autopsied the following day. In
other studies with adult rats it was demonstrated (Everett, 1948) that in 5-day cyclic
rats the injection of estrogen at mid-diestrum will regularly induce ovulation 24
hours earlier than exi:)ected (Figs. 8.7D,
8.8F|. Persistent-estrous rats were refractory to estrogen in this respect.- Nevertheless, when such animals were made pseudopregnant by daily injection of progesterone,
"The tendency toward refractoriness of similar
animals with respect to induction of estrous 1) ha\'ior had earlier been reported by Boling,
Blandau, Rundlett and Young (1941).
Fig. 8.8. Experimental modification of the 4-day cycle in rats. Same key as in Figure 8.7.
Progesterone dosage 1.5 mg. per day. Artificial 5-day cycles in D, E, and F indicated by
dotted lines and numbering. (From J. W. Everett, Endocrinology, 43, 395, 1948.)
Fig. 8.9. Experiment with persistent-estrous rats. Units of ordinate and abscissa have same
meaning as in Figure 8.7. A. Secjuence of "progesterone cycles." Each dose of progesterone
(p) is 1.0 mg. Ovulation (x) in about 70 per cent of the cycles. B. Progesterone cycle followed
by unsuccessful attempt to induce ovulation by estrogen during the second c-ycle. C . Pseudopregnancy maintained by daily iiijoctinn of 1.5 mg. ]irogosteronr. Ovulation induced by
estrogen in several such cases. (From .1. \V. Everett, EiKhxTinolojiy. 43, ;5i»9, 194S.)
ovulation and corpus luteuni loiniatioii were
induced by estrogen (Fig. 8.9 1.
Early attempts to induce luteinization in
the guinea pig with estrogen were unsuccessful ( Dempsey, 1937; see Fig. 8.5), but iiioiv
recently Lipschutz, Iglesias, Bruzzone, 11 uniercz and Penaranda (1948) have shown by
the use of intrasplenic ovarian autografts that luteinization is a reguhir feature in experiments in which estrogen is administered
systcniically. Interestingly enough the implantation of estrogen jiellets in or near the
ox'ariaii grafts had the coiitrai'y effect of
pi'cvcnliiig luteinization.
it was early I'cportcd that rabbits fail to
ovulate in response to estrogen injection
(Bachman, 1936; Mazer, Israel and Alpers,
1936 ». Hisaw (1947j inferred that this is
generally true for reflex ovulators. Nevertheless, it was found by Klein and Mayer
( 1946) and Klein (1947) that when pseudol^regnant or pregnant rabbits were treated
with estrogen and then mated, new ovulation resulted and new corpora lutea were
formed, events that do not otherwise occur.
The phenomenon was further explored by
Sawyer (1949). Whereas untreated rabbits,
unlike cats, do not ovulate in response to
mechanical stimulation of the vagina, treatment with estrogen on the preceding 2 days
results in a positive response to this stimulus. In fact, his later observations (1959)
indicate that estrogen priming for a longer
period (4 days) occasionally results in
"spontaneous" ovulation, especially during
the winter and spring.
In the anestrous cat, in the response to
mechanical stimulation of the vagina, estrogen facilitates the ovulation of follicles
primed with equine gonadotrophin (Sawyer
and Everett, 1953).
Induction of ovulation by estrogen in
primates remains to be demonstrated. It is
of interest in this connection that Funnell,
Keaty and Hellbaum (1951) observed in
menopausal women an increased excretion
of LH during estrogen therapy, in contrast
to FSH excretion at other times. The general
experience has been that injection of estrogen during the early part of the cycle significantly postpones the next expected ovulation and menstruation (monkey, Ball and
Hartman, 1939; baboon, Gillman, 1942; human, Sturgis and ^leigs, 1942; Brown, Bradbury and Jennings, 1948). Gillman reported
that a single injection of estrogen precipitates widespread atresia of vesicular follicles. Brown and Bradbury (1947) reported
IH-eliminary data that in 4 of 6 women
there was increased gonadotrophin excretion
during the 24 hours following estrogen administration. They proposed that delay of
ovulation by estrogen given early in the
primate cycle may be the result of premature discharge of gonadotrophin before the
Graafian follicle is competent. Sturgis and
Meigs had suggested, on the contrary, that
the estrogen suppresses hypophyseal function. D'Amour (1940), finding in urinary
assays that the initial peak of estrogen ex
cretion preceded the peak excretion of urinary gonadotrophin, postulated that the
increase of estrogen stimulates the gonadotrophin release that is responsible for ovulation. O. W. Smith (1944) proposed that
not estrogen itself, but some metabolite resulting from inactivation by the liver, is
responsible for LH release. This interesting
hypothesis has not been substantiated.
====3. Gestagens====
Suppression of estrus and ovulation by
functional corpora lutea, suggested by
Beard (1898), was experimentally demonstrated in the guinea pig by Loeb (1911). It
is now well established in several species
that removal of the corpora lutea results in
early resumption of estrus and ovulation
(see p. 506), and that administration of
progesterone suppresses these events. There
is considerable evidence favoring the view
that the primary effect is to selectively suppress the secretion of LH. Dempsey (1937)
noted that in guinea pigs receiving daily injection of progesterone (50 /^g.) all stages of
follicle development proceeded except the
maturation enlargement that heralds LH
release (Fig. 8.5). Astwood and Fevold
(1939) and Cutuly (1941b) found similar
results in rats. Essentially the same phenomenon has been noted in sheep by Dutt
and Casida (1948). Bradbury (1947) reported that in immature rats the injection of
progesterone at the time of estrogen injection prevented the release of gonadotrophin
(LH?) which otherwise followed estrogen
injection by 72 to 96 hours. In ovariectomized guinea pigs containing intrasplenic
autografts, preparations in which luteinization can be induced by estrogen (see above) ,
the simultaneous administration of gestagens prevented this action (Lipschutz, Iglesias, Bruzzone, Humerez and Pefiaranda,
1948; Iglesias, Lipschutz and Guillermo,
1950; Mardones, Bruzzone, Iglesias and
Lipschutz, 1951). Mardones and co-w^orkers
also made the interesting observation that
among several steroids having progestational activity, "antiluteinizing activity is
not concomitant with, or subordinated to"
the former function. Proportionately very
large amounts of ethinyl testosterone and
ethinyl-A-'^-androstenediol exhibited very
little antiluteinizing activity. There is evidence in mice (Solve,, 1939) that suppression
of FSH secretion may occur when as much
as 1 mg. of progesterone is injected daily.
Alloiteau ( 1954 ) believes that this also occurs in the rat, although Cutuly (1941b)
found only slight evidence of FSH suppression when as much as 6 mg. progesterone
were given daily for several weeks.
So much emphasis has been placed on the
suppressing effect of progesterone that its
facilitating actions were recognized only in
recent years. The first indication that progesterone can promote ovulation and corpus
luteum formation in mammals was encountered in a study of persistent-estrous rats
(Everett, 1940a, b). Daily injection of 0.25
to 1.0 mg. caused the prompt interrujition
of the state of persistent follicle and the resumption of outwardly normal cycles. Corjiora lutea were formed in approximately
70 per cent of these cycles.^ The effect was
obtained not only in older rats in which
persistent estrus had developed spontaneously, but also in young rats in which the
condition had been induced by continuous
illumination. The dose level employed is below that required to suppress cycles in normal rats (1.5 mg. daily; Phillips, 1937).
Subsequently, it was found (Everett, 1943)
that the daily injection could be avoided if
a single "interrupting" dose was given, followed by a single injection during proestrum
or early estrus of each recurrent cycle (Fig.
8.9.4). The histologic appearance of the
ovaries reverted toward the normal after a
succession of "i)rogesterone cycles" and, significantly, the interstitial-cell nuclei were
"repaired." Attempts in normal rats to invoke o\'u]ati()n earliei' than the expected
time were sticcessful in the 5-day cycle
(Figs. S.7B, 8.8^). Injection of from 0.5 mg.
to 2 mg. on the "third day of diestrum" regularly (4 mg. occasionally) invoked ovulation (luring the coming night (Everett,
1944a, 1948) unless the treatment was given
too late in the dai/ (EA'erett and Sawyer,
1949; see discussion on ]). 526 I'egarding the
diurnal rhythm and ovulation). Attempts
to advance ovulation in the 4-day cycle
were unsuccessful, possibly because the follicles were not competent or the animals'
''Marvin (1947) described a similar rosull willi
desoxycorticosterone acetate.
intrinsic estrogen levels were not elevated
sufficiently early.
Ovulation induced by progesterone has
been reported in several species. A direct
action on the excised ovary of the toad
Xeno-pns was early demonstrated by Zwarenstein (1937) but such action is apparently
not found in higher vertebrates. In the domestic hen injection of progesterone can
invoke ovulation several hours ahead of
schedule (Fraps and Dury, 1943; Rothchild
and Fraps, 1949). Pfeiffer (1950) observed
new corpora lutea in 10 rhesus monkeys
treated with progesterone during presumptive anovulatory cycles of the summer
months. Similar attempts have been made in
women (Rothchild and Koh, 1951); although there were said to be definite indications of induced ovulation, the evidence
is equivocal. On the other hand, a rei~)ort
(Hansel and Trimberger, 1952) states that
in heifers the injection of small doses of progesterone (5 to 10 mg. ) at the beginning of
estrus significantly advances ovulation time.
This is in contrast with the inhibitory effect
of larger doses (50 mg.) beginning before
the onset of estrus (Ulberg, Christian and
Casida, 1951). Even in the rabbit (Sawyer,
Everett and Markee, 1950), spontaneous
ovulation was noted in 4 of 10 animals after
combined estrogen and progesterone injection.
From certain of the foregoing statements
it may be inferred that whether suppression
or stimulation follows administration of
ju-ogestcrone depends critically on the time
of injection, on the amount given, on the
status of the ovary, and probal)ly on a
l)riming action of estrogen. A significant illustration of the critical nature of the time
factor in rats is given by the experiments
represented in Figure 8.8r and E. If after
the first injection of 1.5 mg. progesterone
on the first day of diesti'uni, a second injection follows in. about 24 lioui's. the imjiending estrus and o\-ulation are retarded an
additional 24 hours. However, if the second
injection is given 48 hours after the first,
the impending estrus and ovulation are advanced. Evidence^ of the synergistic action
of estrogen and progesterone in evoking
ovulation is given by the ex]ieriments represented in Figuiv 8.9/> and (\ Sawver (1952)
investigated the synergism in rabl^ts. Employing estrogen-primed animals, he found
that ovulation was facilitated when progesterone was injected less than 4 hours
before either mating, mechanical stimulation of the vagina, or intravenous injection of copper acetate. Inhibition was obtained when progesterone was injected 24
hours before such stimulation, thus confirming the often-cited observations of ]Makepeace, Weinstein and Friedman (1937 » and
Friedman (1941) that progesterone inhiijits
ovulation in rabbits.
Preovulatory secretion of gestagens now
seems likely. Morphologic luteal changes in
preovulatory follicles are considered in the
chapter on the ovary. A variety of evidence
in primates indicates that progestational
clianges in the endometrium begin before
ovulation (Bartelmez, Corner and Hartman, 1951). Several workers have reported
tiie excretion of small amounts of pregnanediol during the follicular phase of the
human cycle (Wilson, Randall and Osterberg, 1939; Smith, Smith and Schiller, 1943;
Davis and Fugo, 1948). Determination of
plasma progesterone in women by the
Hooker-Forbes test indicates the presence
of significant amounts a day or two before
a major rise in basal body temperature
(Forbes, 1950). In monkeys a small quantity (ca. 0.5 to 1.0 ixg. per ml.) was detected
l)etween the 4th and 9th days, rising in the
10- to 15-day period to concentrations of 2
to 6 jxg. per ml. (Forbes, Hooker and Pfeiffer, 1950; Bryans, 1951). In both species a
transient decline seems to intervene before
the marked rise to still higher concentrations during the luteal phase. In the rat,
Constantinides (1947) studied the stromal
nuclei of the endometrium at different
stages of the cycle and found that by the
Hooker-Forbes criteria there is evidence of
progesterone secretion during proestrum.
Astwood (1939) on the basis of water content of rat uteri concluded that progesterone
secretion begins with proestrum. In the rabl)it, Forbes (1953) assayed peripheral blood
at various intervals after mating or gonadotrophin injection. Although no progesterone
was detectable in controls, significant
amounts appeared an average of 97 minutes
after mating and 66 minutes after gonadotrophin injection. As much as 2.5 /xg. ])er ml.
was found during the first 8 to 10 hours,
although marked fluctuations were noted
from time to time in the blood of individual
animals. Verly (1951) reported that soon
after mating the urine of rabbits contains
significant amounts of pregnanediol.
It has become customary to state that
the gestagen that appears during the follicular phase of the cycle is probably formed by
the maturing follicle itself. Indeed, assays
of fluid from Graafian follicles and cysts
have indicated the presence of the hormone
(Duyvene de Wit, 1942; Hooker and
Forbes, 1947; Edgar, 1952, 1953). However,
if it is to take part in the release of ovulating hormone gestagen must be secreted earlier than preovulatory maturation. For this
also there is some evidence. Two reports
cited above indicate that in monkeys, at
least, there is a detectable amount present
in the blood during the early follicular
phase. The known fact that a waning corpus luteum favors the experimental induction of estrus and/or ovulation in sheep and
cattle (Hammond, Jr., 1945; Robinson,
1951 ; Alarden, 1952) is suggestive. Although
Hammond, Jr., Hammond and Parkes
(1942) tested this possibility by progesterone sul)stitution with negative results, the
amount given may have been too small, as
Robinson suggested. A waning corpus luteum in the rat favors ovulation, as disclosed in persistent-estrous animals in which
pseudopregnancy had been induced (Everett, 1939). Each of three pseudopregnancies
was followed b}' a short cycle before the
animals returned to persistent estrus.
In the course of studies growing out of
this observation evidence was advanced
(Everett, 1945) which indicated that corpora lutea of the normal rat are not wholly
inactive during the short cycle. Transient
depletion of cholesterol was observed in
such corpora lutea during the proestrum
that followed their formation. This implies
a transient increase of luteotrophin secretion. Significantly this occurs before the release of LH. It is this writer's opinion that
gestagen from such sources is not essential
for the induction of ovulation but that it
does facilitate the action of estrogen.
===C. Role of the Nervous System in Ovulation===
Historically, the fact of neural control of
reflex ovulation has been recognized in the
ral)bit for many years. The comparable role
of the nervous system in spontaneous ovulation, on the other hand, has more recently
become apparent. It now seems justifiable
and useful to postulate in the hypothalamus
of reflex ovulators and spontaneous ovulators alike the existence of a mechanism
that is peculiarly concerned with release
of ovulating hormone. Whether it consists
in a discrete anatomic entity is immaterial
for the present.
The suggestion has been made that the
outstanding difference between reflex and
sjiontaneous ovulation may be in the kinds
of afferent impulses that most readily excite the hypothalamus (Sawyer, Everett
and Markee, 1949). The difference is not
absolute, for spontaneous ovulation has been
induced in rabbits by estrogen-progesterone
injection (see p. 519) and reflex ovulation
has been demonstrated under special circumstances in rats (Dempsey and Searles,
1943; Everett, 1952a) and cattle (Marion,
Smith, Wiley and Barrett, 1950). The random distribution of reflex ovulators and
spontaneous ovulators among mammalian
orders becomes more understandable if one
assumes that dual controls are widely represented and that special adaptations favor
one or the other in given species.
The ovulation reflex in rabbits is apparently initiated by afferent impulses of multiple origin, among them not only impulses
from the genitalia, but also propriocejUive
impulses from muscles that are utilized in
coitus. Brooks (1937, 1938) found that,
although the sacral segments of the spinal
cord and the abdominal sympathetic chains
could be eliminated without jM'eventing ovulation, the luml)ai' cord must remain. Only
by paralysis of the lower half of the body
so that the female could not take pai't in
coitus was ovulation pi'cvcntfMl. The neocortex could be removed, together with the
olfactory bulbs, labyrinths, auditory apparatus and eyes without impairing the
ovulation response. Even after complete decortication, ovulation followecl coitus in 1
out of 3 j'abbits. It must be admitted, however, that, although various parts of the
nervous system may thus be eliminated
without changing the end result, some of
them may normally play a considerable
role. With little cjuestion, direct stimuli from
the genitalia play a part in the natural
reflex. Under certain experimental conditions detectable electrical activity in the
rabbit rhinencephalon is associated with the
induction of ovulation (Sawyer, 1955).
Electrical stimulation of the amygdala will
induce ovulation in rabbits and cats (Koikegami, Yamada and Usei, 1954; Shealy
and Peele, 1957 ) .
In rats, Davis (1939) found that removal of the neocortex had no effect on the
estrous cycle and ovulation. Removal of
portions or of the entire sympathetic chains
of rats likewise did not interfere with ovulation (Bacq, 1932). Bunn and Everett
(1957) reported ovulation in constantestrous rats after electrical stimulation of
the amygdala.
The importance of the dorsal thalamus is
unknown. The reticular activating system
has been implicated as a component of the
ovulation mechanism (Sawyer, 1958), but
the manner of its contribution is not clear.
There is little cjuestion, on the other hand,
of the indispensability of the hypothalamus
and its neurovascular connection to the
adenoliyi:)ophysis through the median eminence and the hypophyseal portal veins.
Although the observation by ]\Iarshall
and Verney (1936) that ovulation can be
induced by passing an electric current
through the heads of estrous rabbits hardl}^
limited the effect to the hypothalamus itself, it was later shown that more localized
electrical stimuli api)lied to certain hypothalamic regions are consistently effective
(preoptic area, Haterius, 1937; Christian.
1956; posterior hypothalamus or tuber
cinereum, Harris, 1937, 19481); tuber cinereum or adjacent hypothalamic areas,
Markee, Sawyer anirHollinshead. 1946;
medial hypothalamus fi'om ])i-eo])tic area
to mammillai'V bodies. Kui'otsiu Kurachi
and Ban, 195o"; Kuiotsu, Kurachi, Tabaya>hi and Ban, 1952).
Ahliougli liypotliahimic lesions. l)oth
natural and expeiimental. hax'c frecjuently
been reported to interfere with normal sex function (.see Harris. 1948a, 1955, for
references), the majority of these reports
do not api^ly to the question at issue — control of ovulation. When ovarian atrophy
occurs, as it frequently did in these cases,
it reflects a profound depression of gonadotroi)hin secretion and absence of competent
follicles. However, Dey, Fisher, Berry and
Ranson (1940) and Dey (1941, 1943) 'found
in guinea pigs that gross bilateral electrolytic lesions placed in the rostral hypothalamus resulted in persistent follicles with
continuous estrogen secretion. Similar results were obtained in rats by Hillarp
(1949) when small bilateral electrolytic lesions were placed in the anterior hypothalamic area near the paraventricular nuclei
or between this region and the median eminence. Greer (1953) reported continuous
estrus in rats after placing certain small
lesions in the ventromedial nucleus, provided they were bilateral. There was no
correlation with obesity. There are at least
four significant points in common among
these several ablation experiments. ( 1 ) The
effective lesions were rost rally placed and
either were limited to or included the
medial group of nuclei. (2) The tuber
cinereum, median eminence, and stalk
connection to the hypophysis were intact.
(3) Although development of competent
follicles was not evidently impaired, estrogen secretion became continuous instead of
cyclic. (4) The proper impetus for release
of ovulating hormone from the hypophysis
was absent. It would be most instructive to
learn whether ovulation can be invoked
in such animals by reflex stimulation or by
direct electrical stimulation of the tuber.
AUoiteau and Courvoisier (1953) reported
that rats in constant estrus as a result of
hypothalamic lesions did not undergo
pseudopregnancy after stimulation of the
cervix uteri. This observation, confirmed
by Greer (1953), could be construed as indirect evidence of failure of reflex ovulation,
for Greer regularly obtained pseudopregnancy by cervical stimulation, once corpora
lutea had been formed by other means.
Other findings by Greer are important
because of their bearing on the location and
character of a presumptive ovulation center.
Althougli the onset of persistent estrus after making the lesions was sometimes almost
immediate (following a brief anestrous interval), in other cases it was preceded by
several apparently normal cycles. In any
event, once the condition had become established, the daily injection of small amounts
of progesterone brought about the recurrence of cycles and corpus luteum formation. In about half of the cases these cycles
continued for awhile after withdrawal of
treatment, whereas in the remainder there
was a prompt return to persistent estrus.
Essentially the same results were reported
by AUoiteau (1954), and the observations
suggest that the areas involved in such lesions may be of only secondary importance.
The use of radioactive phosphorus for
estimating energy exchange in tissues affords a different approach to the problem
of neural control of ovulation (Borell, Westman and Orstrom, 1947, 1948). This method
has the virtue that the experimental subject
remains undamaged until injection of P'*compounds 30 minutes before the end of
the experiment. In rabbits there is a marked
increase in phosphorus turn-over in the
tuber cinereum within 2 minutes post
coitum, and continuing for about an hour
thereafter (Table 8.1). The adenohypoi)hysis shows increasing activity during the
first 10 minutes which reaches a peak at
about 1 hour and then regresses somewhat,
although it remains relatively high for 24
hours. Response of the ovary to gonadotroi:)hin release is marked by a rapid rise
during the second half-hour and another
pronounced increase near the time of ovulation. In rats, at various stages of the
estrous cycle, phosphorus exchange in both
tuber cinereum and adenohypophysis is
maximal during proestrum. In the ovary
high values were reported during diestrum
and proestrum, somewhat lower values during estrus and metestrum.
Possibly correlated with the above information is the observation (Gitsch,
1952b) that in rats the acetylcholine (ACh)
content of the tuberal region becomes elevated during proestrum and estrus. It is
said that ACh synthesis requires high
energy phosphate (see Bain, 1952). Further
investigation by Gitsch (1952a) and Gitscl:
and Reitinger (1953) revealed that ACh
TABLE 8.1
Sequence of events in rabbit ovulation
Time Post Coitum Central Nervous System
Hypophysis
Ovary
Circulating Blood
<30 sec.
<2 mill.
10 mill.
30 mill.
60 mill.
75-90 mill.
13^-2 hrs.
3-5 hrs.
6-7 hrs.
7-8 hrs.
9-11 hrs.
Barbiturate-sensitive and atropinesensitive mechanisms^
t Phosphorylation
in tuber cinereum^
t Phosphorylation
in tuber ciner
reumt Phosphoryhition
in tuber cine
reum^
t Phosphorylation
in tuber cinereum
t Phosphoryhition^
Release of LH ca.
20 per cent. 6 Hypophysectomy
prevents ovulation^' 12
Release of LH nowsufficient for ovulation."' 12 Phosphorylation at
peak^
I Phosphor\iatioii
i Animal may be bled
and transfused
without prevent
! ing ovulationi2
folliculi.
in egg
f Liquor
Tetrad.'
nuclei*
Cholesterol depletion in interstitial
gland. ^ Egg nucleus migrates,
membrane dissolves.** • " Prominent corona*
Liquor folliculi increasingly viscous*
First polar hotly'*
Marked .swelling of
follicles. Thecal
hypertrophy,! ■ i°
hyperemia
OvuL.^Tion."
t Phosphorylation2
Bleeding and transfusion now prevent
ovulationi2
Progesterone detectable ^
Increased estrogen
(endometrial hj-peremia)'
' Asdell, 1946.
2 Borell, Westman and Orstrom, 1947.
3 Claesson and Hillarp, 1947a.
" Fee and Parkes, 1929.
'^ Forbes, 1953.
« Hill, 1934.
^ Sawyer, Markee and Hollinshcad, 1947.
* Pincus and Enzmann, 1935.
^ Sawyer and associates, 1947, 1949, 1950.
1" Walton and Hammond, 192S.
" Waterman, 1943.
'2 Weslmaii and .lacohsohn, 1936.
in the rat hypothalamus is increased also
by administration of estrogen or by castration, conditions that similarly increase
lihosphorus exchange (Borell and Westman,
1949). The ACh content is depressed during
pregnancy or when the rat has been injected with progesterone. It is also lowered
by Pentothal anesthesia, a matter of interest
in relation to the fact that the barbiturates
suppress ovulation (see p. 526).
The location and measurement of activity
in discrete nuclei and pathways are largely
in the future, although a beginning has been
made in the rabbit, cat, rat, and mouse.
Sawyer (1955) found in rabbits, after the
combined administration of pentobarbital
intravenously and histamine by way of the
3rd ventricle, that there was associated
with induction of ovulation a characteristic
change in intrinsic electrical activity of the
rhinencephalon, extending into the preoptic
area. If the olfactory tracts were cut, however, this activity could not be elicited and
ovulation failed. According to Porter, Cavanaugh and Sawyer (1954), vaginal stimulation of estrous cats caused altered electrical activity in two hypothalamic regions:
(1 ) in the lateral hypothalamic area at
the anterior tuberal level during stimulation
and for 15 to 45 seconds afterward; and
(2) in the anterior hypothalamic area near
the medial forebrain bundle, where response
was delayed as much as 5 n:iinutes after
stimulation. According to a i)reliminary
account (Critchlow and Sawyer, 1955) in
curarized, proestrous rats, there were i)eriods lasting approximately 20 minutes in
the midafternoon, during which altered
electrical activity appeared differentially in
the preoptic area or anterior hypothalamus.
Another approach to localization has been
described by Hertl (1952, 1955). On the
pro])Osition that increased function of particular cells is reflected by increased volume
of their nuclei, cell nuclear volumes were
measured in hypothalamic nuclei of female
mice at different stages of the estrous cycle.
During proestrum and estrus there was
said to be a functional edema in hypothalamic nucleus 20 of Griinthal (possibly the
pars posterior of the ventromedial nucleus
of Krieg) and to lesser extent in nucleus 16
(Nucl. arcuatus).
====1. The Hypophyseal Portal Veins and the Chemotransmitter Hypothesis====
As noted elsewhere, hypothalamic control
of the jiars distalis is probably mediated by
the hypophyseal portal circulation. Evidence for this has been especially convincing with respect to control of ovulation,
although indications are that other phases
of the cycle are also regulated by this
means. Pertinent data from numerous transplantation and stalk-section experiments
may be summarized by the following statement. Aside from a questionable grafting
experiment (2 rats) reported by May
(1937), in no case has ovulation or luteinization been reported in the absence of vascular linkage of the pars distalis with the
median eminence; on the other hand, ovulatory cycles have often been cjuickly restored when the gland has been revascularized by the portal vessels (see especially,
Harris, 1950a; Harris and Jacobsohn, 1952;
Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1957,
1958b).
Although the importance of local vasomotor regulation in the stalk vessels remains
to be evaluated (Green, 1951), there is extensive support for the hypothesis that ovulatory release of gonadotrophin is invoked
by a chemotransmitter (Harris, 1948a,
1955). If one accei)ts the prevailing opinion
that nerve fibers entering the pars distalis
are too few to account for its secretomotor
control and that the flow of blood in the
hyi^ophyseal portal vessels is toward the
gland (Wislocki and King, 1936; Green,
1947; Green and Harris, 1947, 1949; Barrnett and Greep, 1951 ; Landsmeer, 1951 ;
]McConnell, 1953; Xuereb, Prichard and
Daniel, 1954; Worthington, 1955), the
plausibility of the chemotransmitter hypothesis becomes inescapable.^
Evidence that the transmitter may be
^ For a dissenting view, see Zuckerman (1952).
Reference should also be made to the hypothesis
formulated by Spatz (1951) and associates (see
Nowakowski, 1950, 1952). They postulated that
a descending pathway in the spinal cord is the
connecting link between hypothalamus and ovaries. With respect to ovulation, this is clearly
denied by the fact that local stimulation of the
hypotlialamus provokes ovulation in rabbits in
which the thoracic spinal cord has been transsected (Christian, Markee and Markee, 1955).
adrenergic was presented by Markee, Sawyer and Hollinshead (1948), who provoked
ovulation in rabbits by instilling epinephrine directly into the pars distalis. Detailed
experiments supporting this w^ere fully reviewed by Markee, Everett and Sawyer
(1952). In discussion following that paper,
Sawyer reported the induction of ovulation
in rabbits by the injection into the third
ventricle of either epinephrine or norepinephrine, and suggested that the latter is
"more closely related to the natural mediator than is epinephrine." Donovan and
Harris (1956), from studies in which the
rabbit hypophysis was slowdy infused in
situ with solutions of epinephrine or norepinephrine, concluded that neither substance
is the agent in question, and that the positive results of Markee, Sawyer and Hollinshead (1948) were the effects of low pH and
not of the drugs per se. Proof of the negative
is elusive, however, and one must note that
Donovan and Harris did not meet the conditions of timing and drug concentration
that obtained in the earlier work.
Intravenous injection of Dibenamine or
its congener, SKF-501,-^ will usually prevent
ovulation in rabl)its when injection is completed within 1 minute after coitus (Sawyer
and associates, 1947-50). On the other
hand, when injection is delayed until 3 minutes or later, ovulation is unaffected. The
nonadrenergic hydrolysis product of Dibenamine, 2-dibenzylaminoethanol, does not
have the blocking action, although its central excitatory powers are much like those
of the parent substance. The failure of
blockade by Dibenamine, if injection is
withheld for 3 minutes, demonstrates that
the drug does not interfere with the actual
discharge of ovulating hormone into the
l)lood stream, for that process recjuires
about an hour (Fee and Parkes, 1929; Westman and Jacobsohn, 1936). The Dibenamine-sensitive mechanism thus serves as a
trigger, the gland being adequately stimulated within 1 01' 2 minutes post coitum.
This estin^ate is in remarkal)le agreement
with the earlier mentioned obscMA'ations on
•'■' Dibenamine is iV,iV-dibenzyl-/:i-cliloioetliy lamine. SKF-501 is A'-(9-fluorenyl)-.V-ethyl-/i-chlor()ethylamine hydrochlorifle. Banthine is /i-dictliylaminuc'tliyl-.\anthene-9-cai'l)Oxvlak' niclliohroiniilc
phosphorus exchange in the tuber cinereum
and hypoi)hysis (p. 521, and Table 8.1 1.
A mechanism that is subject to blockade by atropine or Banthine^ evidently precedes the Dibenamine-sensitive process
— temjDorally if not anatomically. To accomplish blockade in rabbits, these anticholinergic drugs must be injected intravenously within about 30 seconds after
coitus (Sawyer and associates, 1949-1951).
It should be recalled that Foster, Haney
and Hisaw (1934) reported failure of ovulation in several rabbits treated with small
amounts of atropine before mating. ]\Iakepeace (1938), however, was unable to confirm the effect with somewhat larger doses
and the former observation was forgotten.
A seemingly crucial experiment devised
by Sawyer gives conclusive evidence that
the atropine-sensitive process is antecedent
to the Dibenamine-sensitive one. It was
based on two facts: (1) intravenous injection of nearly lethal doses of epinephrine
does not induce ovulation in estrous rabbits,
and (2) atropine protects rabbits against
fatal pulmonary edema after injection of
large amounts of epinephrine. In rabbits
protected by atropine in dosage that was
also sufficient to block the ovulation reflex,
the injection of twice-lethal doses of epinephrine caused ovulation or significant degrees of follicle maturation in 5 of 7 cases.
These effects were not found in rabbits protected by Dibenamine. Supporting evidence
was adduced by Christian (1956i who
found that atropine would not prevent
ovulation in response to electi'ical stimulation of the medial preoptic area or adjacent
parts of the hypothalanuis, whereas in a significant number of such rabliits ovulation
was blocked by SKF-501.
Extension of the blocking experiments to
the rat, as an example of a spontaneous ovulator, disclosed that in this species also ovulation can be blocked by Dibenamine, SKF501, atropine, and Banthine, when the injections ai'c appropriately timed with respect to the stage- of the cycle and time of
day (Sawyer, Everett and Markee, 1949;
Everett, Sawyer and Markee, 1949; Everett
and Sawyer, 1949, 1950, 1953: see \). 526).
Furthermore, blockade of ])oth estrogenimhiccd and pi'ogcstci-oiic-induced ovuhition was aceomi)lished with cither Dibonamine
or atropine. Neither agent, however, prevented ovulation after injection of sheep
liypophyseal LH. A report by Hansel and
Trimberger (1951) stated that in cattle a
significant delay of ovulation (as great as
72 hours) followed atropine administration.
In control experiments the simultaneous
injection of atropine and human chorionic
gonadotrophin was followed by ovulation
slightly earlier than the normally expected
time. Treatments were begun 1 to 5 hours
after the onset of estrus. This work was confirmed and extended by Hough, Beardon
and Hansel (1955). In the hen, blockade of
ovulation, normal or induced by progesterone, has been reported after administration of Dibenamine, Dibenzyline, SKF-501
or atropine (Zarrow and Bastian, 1953;
van Tienhoven, 1955). According to van
Tienhoven, the drugs did not interfere with
the ovulating action of extrinsic gonadotrophin.
It is important that the same drugs will
block ovulation in lioth rabbits and rats
(Table 8.2) . Of ec^ual significance is the fact
that several agents that are ineffective in
rabbits are also ineffective in rats (notably
2-dibenzylaminoethanol, the imidazoline
adrenolytic drugs, and the ganglion blocking
agents). These considerations are interjireted to mean that spontaneous ovulation
is invoked by neurohumoral mechanisms
that are very like those in the reflex ovulation of rabbits.
The suggestion that the l)locking effects
might result from nonspecific stress, causing
the hypophysis to be so actively secreting
ACTH that gonadotroiihin secretion is interfered with (Dordoni and Timiras, 1952),
is clearly denied by several facts. ( 1 ) In
the rabbit studies, none of the various
agents prevented ovulation when injected
more than a minute post coitum. (2) In one
study (Sawyer, Markee and Everett, 1950b)
ovulation was actually induced by the intravenous injection of "lethal" doses of epinephrine when the animals WTre protected
by atropine. (3) In rats ovulation is unaffected by massive intravenous doses of
either the imidazoline drugs or 2-dibenzylamionethanol in amounts known to be
stressing (Sawyer and Parkerson, 1953).
TABLE 8.2
Pharmacologic Agents and Blockade of Ovulation
Antiadrenergics
/3-Haloalkylamines
Dibenamine
SKF-501
Dibenzyline
ImidazoHnes
Priscoline
Regitine
Yohimbine
Anticholinergics
Atropine
Banthine
Antihistaminics
Neo-antergan
Ganglion blockers
Tetraethvlammonium. .
SC-1950/
Barbiturates
Nembutal
Dial
Ipral
Amvtal
Barbital
Phenobarl)ital
Prominal
Others
Morphine
Procaine, locally near
tuber
Procaine, systemically .
Chlorpromazine
Reserpine
Ether
2,4-Dimtrophenol
Rabbit
Rat
Cow
Bi
Bi
Bi
Bi
01
01
0^
01
■?4. 5
Bi
BI
B6
Bi
Bi
01
01
01
01
Bi
Bi
Bi
Bi
Bi
B'
Bi 8
B9
BIO
Bii
01
B12
B13
B14
B16
B3
I Sawyer and associates, 1947-1951; Everett
and associates, 1949-1950; Christian, 1956; and see
present text.
^ van Tienhoven, 1955; van Tienhoven, Nalbandov and Norton, 1954.
3 Zarrow and Bastian, 1953.
•• Fugo and Gross, 1942.
5 Sulman and Black, 1945.
^Hansel and Triml)erger, 1951; Hough, Beardon and Hansel, 1955.
' Fraps and Case, 1953.
* Doring and Goz, 1952.
» Westman, 1947.
1" Barraclough and Sawyer, 1955.
II Westman and Jacol)8ohn, 1942.
1- Barraclough, 1956.
13 Barraclough, 1955.
" Unpublished. Temporary, during deep anesthesia.
1^ Unpublished. EDso : 25 mg. per kg. subcutaneously.
Key: B = Blockade.
= No blockade.
1 = Ovulation induced by the drug.
Nor is it influenced by severe trauma, heat,
cold, or formalin injection coincident with
the known "critical period" (Everett, unpublished).
====2. Central Depressants and Ovulation====
Reported evidence of a blocking action
of barbiturates on ovulation traces back
to experiments by Westman (1947) who injected female rats with Prominal twice
daily for 3 weeks. Approximately 30 per
cent of these rats experienced prolonged
vaginal estrus and had ovaries containing
only follicles at the end of the experiment.
Almost identical results were reported by
Doring and Goz (1952) when rats were
treated daily with phenobarbital. The agreement is not unexpected in view of the fact
that in the body Prominal is quickly demethylated to phenobarbital. It was shown
by Everett and Sawyer (1950) that when
administration of barbiturates to rats is
critically timed with respect to stage of the
cycle and the time of day, blockade of ovulation can be accomplished at will in shortterm experiments (Fig. 8.10). Chronic
administration introduces considerable uncertainty for reasons that are not yet clear
(Everett, 1952b). In the rabbit, the rapid
intravenous injection of pentobarbital or
Pentothal, within as short a time as 12
seconds after coitus, generally failed to
block ovulation (Sawyer, Everett and
Markee, 1950) . However, it was later shown
that barbiturate anesthesia will prevent the
ovulation that is otherwise caused in the
estrogen-primed rabbit by mechanical
stimulation of the vagina, the anesthesia
t)eing induced in advance of the stimulation
(unjuiblished i.
Other central dcpi-es^ants reported to
block ovulation in the rat are morj^hine,
reserj^ine, chlorpromazine (Barraclough and
Sawyer, 1955; Barraclough, 1955, 1956),
and even meprobamate acting synergistically with an anticholinergic drug (Gitscli,
1958). Special interest attaches to the
mori)hine work, in that anicnoi'i lica and
sterility often a('C()in|)any moiphinc addiction in the human female. Related studies
(Sawyer, Critchlow and Barraclough, 1955),
in which recordings were made of electi'ical
acti\ity in various regions in the brain.
demonstrated in rats that morphine acts
nmch like the barbiturates in depressing
activity in the reticular activating system.
The effect was also shown by atropine, in
doses that would block ovulation. The inference is that all three agents block by
striking at the same central elements of
the LH-release apparatus.
An interesting peculiarity of domestic
hens with respect to barbiturates was encountered by Fraps and Case (1953), who
noted that pentobarbital induces ovulation
jirematurely, and that pentobarbital and
progesterone supplement each other in this
capacity. Although these developments may
represent pharmacologic curiosities limited
to the bird, the possibility should be seriously considered that similar effects may
occur in other animals. In fact, pentobarbital in rabbits facilitates the release of
hypophyseal gonadotrophin in response to
intraventricular injection of histamine,
seemingly by an effect in the rhinencephalon
(Sawyer^ 1955).
====3. The Central Nervous System as a Timing Mechanism for Ovulation====
In the rat and the hen and probably many
other species the pro-ovulatory excitation of
the hypophysis is dejiendent in large measure on time of day.
In the rat, the blocking agents have
served to delimit a critical period on the day
of proestrum, before which ovulation can be
blocked and after which it will occur in
sjiite of injection of the blocking agent.
Under controlled illumination for 14 hours
daily, this critical period extends from
about 2 P.M. to 4 P.M. Administration of
either atroi^ine or i^entobarbital at 2 p.m.
consistently blocks ovulation (Fig. 8.10),
whereas injections later in the period are
progressively less eff"ecti\-e ( l']\-erett and
Sawyer, 1950, 1953; Everett, 1956b). Such
l)redictability of the hour of pituitary activation is, in itself, evidence of a relationship
between this event and diunial physiologic
I'liythnis.
Furthei' e\-i(lence is seen in the seciuelae
of pentobarbital injection (Fig. 8.11). Repetition at 2 P.M. on successive days results in a follicular cycle and prolonged
vaginal estrus with eventual atresia of all
Fig. 8.10. Deinoni^lration of 24-lioiir penodu-ity in the luteinizing hormone-release apparatus of female rats (Vanderbilt strain, 4-day cycle, controlled lighting: 14 hours per day).
Schematic representations of the normal cycle (A) and of characteristic results of different
regimes of Nembutal treatment (B to F). Vaginal stages indicated by Roman numerals over
each time scale; symbols above these show the corresponding follicle and corpus luteum
stages. The device marked <S defines the "critical period," the time limits of pituitary activation as experimentally determined (Fig. 8.11). OV indicates normal ovulation iinic in .1 and
estimated ovulation time elsewhere. NBTL indicates intraperitoneal injection of Nembutal.
(From J. W. Everett and C. H. Saw.yer, Endocrinology, 47, 200, 1950.)
large follicles, providing that on the second
and third days the dose is increased or
supplemented by a second injection. Omission of any of these injections results in
ovulation during the ensuing night. Thus,
there is a clearly defined 24-hour rhythm
in the LH-release mechanism. The results
confirm a similar conclusion based on the
Fig. 8.11. The "critical period" in certain rats on the afternoon of proestrum (Vanderbilt
strain, 4-day cycle, controlled lighting: 14 hours per day). Complete blockade of ovulation
(solid bars) is regularly found if either atropine or Nembutal is administered at 2:00 p.m.
Failure of blockade is usual when injections are made at 4:00 p.m. or later. Injection of
atropine at different times during the critical period results in jarogressive decline of percentage blocked and often accomplishes only partial blockade (cross-hatching). (From J. W.
Everett, Ciba Foundation Colloquia Endocrinol., 4, 172, 1952.)
24-hour advancement of ovulation l)y i)rogcsterone. Approximately 24 hours before
pituitary stimulation would occur spontaneously there is a period limited to a
few hours during which progesterone can
he effective (Everett and Sawyer, 1949).
Although these time relationships were first
recognized in a colony of inbred rats in
North Carolina, they have since been confirmed in commercial rats (Sprague-Dawley ) kept under controlled lighting for only
a few weeks in southern California (Barraclough and Sawyer, 1955; Barraclough,
1955, 1956). In these studies morphine,
reserpine, and chlorj^romazine wcic consistently effective when injected during pioestrus at 2 p.m., and ineffective at 4 p..m.
Not only is the critical period pictlictablc
under controlled lighting, but it may be
readily changed by sliiftiiig the ligliting
schedule. For example, after an abrupt 3
liour advance of the time switch controlling
the lights, the animals slowly readjusted
over a 2- to 3-week period (Everett, 1952b ) ;
when the switch was later returned to the
original setting, they required again about
2 weeks to readjust. After a full 12-hour
change of lighting schedule, full reversal of
diurnal rhythms of activity and estrous
behavior similarly requires about 2 weeks
(Hemmingsen and Krarup, 1937).
The duration of the process of ])ituitai'y
activation in rabbits and its time relationship to release of LH and the subsequent
o\-uhiti()ii ha\'e l)een well defined (Table
8.1 I. In no other species is the available
iufoi'uiation so complete, but some advance
has been luadt' in the rat (also the hen; see
chapter l)y van Tienhoven).
Diu'ation of the activating stimulus in the
rat has been estimated from the frequency
of partial blockade of ovulation after atropin injections in the midst of the critical
period (Everett and Sawyer, 1953; Everett,
1956b L Unlike the trigger-like stimulus in
rabbits, that in rats is prolonged to about a
half-hour. In different individuals the stimulus begins at different times, (Fig. 8.11 L
Release of LH is probably coextensive with
the stimulus. In parallel experiments carried
out at various times during the critical
period, groups of proestrous rats w^ere hypophysectomized and other similar groups
were injected with atropine. The two procedures gave essentially the same results,
as measured on the following morning by
the proportionate numbers of rats in which
ovulation w^as found blocked or partially
blocked (Everett, 1956b). The time interval
from stimulation of the hypophysis to ovulation is 10 to 12 hours in rats (Everett,
Sawyer and INIarkee, 19491. thus ai)out
the same as in rabbits.
===D. Persistent Follicle===
The state of persistent follicle may be
considered as one in which for some reason
there is a physiologic blockade of the hypothalamic ovulating stimulus. In the rabbit
one may attribute failure of ovulation to
absence of reflex stimulation, on the one
hand, and a relatively high threshold of the
hypothalamo-pituitary apparatus for estrogen and progesterone, on the other. In the
rat certain conditions {e.g., continuous illumination) elevate the threshold of the
hypothalamo-pituitary system, with the
result that persistent estrus and jicrsistent
follicle occur (Hemmingsen and Krarup,
1937; Browman, 1937; Everett, 1940a;
Dempsey and Searles, 1943). Additional
stimulation, furnished by either progesterone or coitus, is necessary to overcome this
blockade.
An age factor is operative in the spontaneous onset of persistent follicle in old
female rats. This condition is well recognized as an occasional occurrence (Evans
and Long, 1921 ; Doling, Blandau, Rundlett
and Young, 1941 ; Marvin and Meyer, 1941 ;
Hartman, 1944). In the DA strain (Everett,
1939-1944) the age of onset was unusually
early in segregated females under normal
lighting conditions, i.e., about 150 days of
age which was more than 200 davs earlier than in a normal strain. In Fi hyljrids the
age of onset was intermediate. This factor,
ill defined though it is, is also expressed in
sensitivity to continuous illumination. Postpubertal rats of the normal strain in continuous light continued to experience regular
cycles for as long as 40 days, whereas older
animals (200 to 250 days) began to show
persistent estrus within 10 days. Postpubertal DA rats, on the other hand, responded
as promptly as 250-day-old normal rats.
Hybrids again were intermediate. It was
also found in older DA rats that had spontaneously developed persistent estrus under
a lighting schedule of 14 hours per day, that
reduction of the light ration to 9 hours usually restored cyclic function. It seems, then,
that the age factor in cjuestion intensifies
the effect of a given amount of daily illumination.
Interference with ovarian cii'culation in
rats causes persistent follicle and failure
of luteinization. This effect has been reported after ligation of the pedicle (Fels,
1952) , ligation of the oviduct with resultant
increase of pressure within the ovarian capsule (Haterius, 1936; Navori, Fugo and
Davis, 1952), hysterectomy with increased
pressure (Bradbury, Brown and Gray,
1950), and transplantation of the ovary to
the tip of the tail (Hernandez, 1943; Bielschowsky and Hall, 1953). A possible explanation of this result is that the diminished
blood flow releases insufficient estrogen
to reach the threshold of the LH-release
mechanism. An alternative explanation may
l)e a change in the character of the secretory
product of the ovary. "Cystic" changes
of the ovaries are not uncommon after pelvic surgery in women.
The occurrence of persistent follicle in
rats following partial nephrectomy (Diaz,
1940) has never been explained. It seemed
to be correlated with the development of
high blood pressure. Hence it may be allied
with the experiments just described.
Pfeiffer (1936, 1937) reported that when
testes are temporarily grafted into female
rats during early infancy and removed before puberty the host animals exhibit constant estrus after reaching maturity. The
same phenomenon has been observed after
postnatal treatment with testosterone or  chorionic gonadotroi)hin (Selye, 1940;
Bradbury, 1940, 1941), estrogen, progesterone, or desoxycorticosterone (Hale, 1944;
Takasugi, 1954). The adult ovaries develop
])rominent follicles which never luteinize.
Pfeiffer reported that his constant-estrous
animals would not copulate. The conclusion
was reached that the hypophyses of these
rats had been masculinized by the early action of androgen. Subsequently (1941), he
attempted unsuccessfully to invoke ovulation in similar animals by daily injection of
small amounts of progesterone. Kempf
(1950) later accomplished this with 2 injections, more widely spaced (interval, 1
week ) . Takasugi was unable to produce
corpora lutea in postnatally estrogenized
rats by chronic progesterone treatment after
puberty, although vaginal cycles were observed. The further addition of androgen,
interestingly enough, brought about luteinization. It would seem that a prime effect of
the hormones during infancy is to produce
a permanently high threshold in the hypothalamic ovulating mechanism without destroying it.
==VII. The Luteal Phase==
The luteal phase presents more enigmas
than the phases that precede it. What initiates it? What keeps it going? What brings it
to an end? How is its duration determined?
Its beginning may arbitrarily be defined
as the moment of ovulation, yet gestagen secretion may start during the follicular
phase, and structural changes in the follicle
wall during pre-ovulatory maturation may
be considered as first steps in luteinization.
Fi'om the time of follicle rupture onward the
ac(iuisition of full secretory activity by the
cori)ora lutea roughly parallels their morphologic differentiation. It is even then a
gi'adual process.
Luteinization as a structural change does
not insure the attainment of secretory activity. The former is the ultimate effect of
the preovulatory discharge of hypojihyseal
luteinizing hormone; some other (lutcotrol)hic) factor must come into play to bring
about and maintain gestagen secretion. We
must, then, hv concerned with the special
character of luteotrophins, with nieclianisnis tliat favor their secretion by the hypo])hysis, with mechanisms that shortcMi or
lengthen the Hfc of the corpus luteum and,
therefore, witli the mechanisms that normally bring the corpus luteum phase to an
end. In the final analysis this last has an
im])oi-tance equal to the ovulation mechanism in the timing of recurrent cycles.
1. Lutcotrophic Snbstances
The term luteotropliin was proposed by
Astwood ( 1941 j to I'efer to a substance that
maintains function of corpora lutea, in distinction to substances that cause them to
form. It is now conceded that the substance
desci'ibed in that paper was probably the
lactogenic hormone. Evans, Simpson, Lyons
and Turpeincn (1941) demonstrated that
purified lactogen is luteotrophic in hypophysectomized rats. This has been confirmed by
several later investigations (Tobin, 1942;
Nelson and Pichette, 1943; Everett, 1944b;
Desclin, 1948; Gaarenstroom and de Jongh,
1946 ) . Although lactogen seems to be the
hypophyseal luteotrophin in rats, such is not
necessarily true for all species (Bradbury,
Brown and Gray, 1950). Nevertheless, the
expression luteotrophin in the generic sense
continues to be desirable.
In the rabbit, lactogen is said to have little, if any, luteotrophic effect (Klein and
Mayer, 1943; Mayer, 1951). Yet rabbits
have never been tested with rabbit lactogen.
Several workers have failed to demonstrate
a luteotrophic function of lactogen preparations in monkeys (Hisaw, 1944; Bryans,
1951) and women (Holmstrom and Jones,
1949; Bradbury, Brown and Gray, 1950).
Positi^•e evidence of such activity in primates furnished by Fried and Rakoff ( 1952)
and more recently by Lyon (1956) lias not
gained wide acceptance. The former authors
re])orted that amounts of chorionic gonadoti'ophin which were tluMUseh-es inadequate,
wlicii siipplciiicnrcd by lacrogcii ( Luteoti-()pliiii, S(|uil)l>l prolonged the functional
life of the coi'pus luteuni in nonpregnant
women. Lyon rejjorted such prolongation
using lactogen alone. The Squibl) lactogen
was also used by Moore and Nalbandov
(1955) in prolonging the luteal phase of the
cycle in the ewe. As in the human experiments, howe\-er. one would like to know
whether lactogen is capable of initial stimul.'iiioii of secretory activity of corpora lutea
and of maintaining their function in the absence of the hypophysis. There is no evidence for or against the lactogenic liormone
in this capacity, except in rats.
Estrogens have direct hiteotrophic action
in the rabbit (Robson, 1937, 1938, 1947).
The effect does not depend on the hypophysis and has been produced by impLantation
of estrogen crystals within corpora liitea
(Hammond, Jr., and Robson, 1951; Hammond, Jr., 1952). Westman (1934) had earlier shown that operative reduction of
ovarian stroma in pseudopregnant rabbits
results in corpus luteum regression and that
this can be prevented by administration of
estrogen. Corpora lutea induced by gonadotrophin injection or by mating, as the case
may be, require the presence of the hypophysis for their continued function ( Smith and
White, 1931; Westman and Jacobsohn,
1936). Theoretically, then, in rabbits the
hypophysis liberates FSH and LH which act
on the interstitial tissue to cause estrogen
secretion. This in turn stimulates the corpora lutea to secrete progesterone.
The effect of estrogen on the corpora lutea
of rats is largely indirect and requires the
presence of the hypophysis. Massive dosage
with estrogen beginning soon after ovulation results in the enlargement of the corpora lutea and the production of sufficient
amounts of progesterone to mucify the vaginal mucosa (Selye, Collip and Thomson,
1935; Wolfe, 1935; Desclin, 1935; Merckel
and Nelson, 1940). In fact, a single injection of 50 /Ag. estradiol bcnzoate on the day
after ovulation is sufficient to cause pseudopregnancy. These effects are now judged to
be the result of induced liberation of hypophyseal luteotrophin. vSimilar effects have
been reported after administration of androgens (McKeown and Zuckerman, 1937;
Wolfe and Hamilton, 1937; Freed, Greenhill
and Soskin, 1938; Laqueur and Fluhmann,
1942).
Desclin (1949b) stated that in hypophysectomized rats the administration of estrogen augments the hiteotrophic action of
lactogen, producing functional corpora lutea in the presence of subthreshold doses of
the latter hormone. A physiologic synergism
of the two substances has thus been indicated. Mayer (1951) suggested that this
may explain the stimulation of corpora lutea
of lactation which follows estrogen treatment in this species. Greep and Chester
Jones (1950) postulated that estrogen favors corpus luteum function in the rat by
causing the luteal cells to produce cholesterol as a precursor of progesterone. Their
actual data, however, indicate that the increase of visible cholesterol after estrogen
treatment was confined to the interstitial
tissue.
Factors responsible for cholesterol storage
and mobilization in corpora lutea of the rat
were analyzed by Everett (1947). In hypophysectomized rats in which corpora lutea
were maintained by lactogen the injection
of pituitary LH induced the storage of
cholesterol, but this effect did not occur in
hypophysectomized rats in the absence of
lactogen. It could be induced during pregnancy or pseudopregnancy by estrogen if
the hypophysis remained in place. Addition
of an excess of lactogen prevented cholesterol storage. Lactogen thus tends to deplete
cholesterol content of rat luteal tissue as
ACTH tends to deplete adrenocortical cholesterol.
2. ''XonfunctionaV' Corpora Lutea
In the short cycles of the rat, mouse,
hamster, and so on, the corpora lutea are
commonly said to be nonfunctional. The
meaning of this statement, of course, is that
they are incapable of supporting a decidual
reaction (Long and Evans, 1922), or of lireventing ovulation. They need not be totally
inactive, however, to fail to cause these
manifestations. Whereas daily injection of
1.5 mg. or more of progesterone into intact
female rats will simulate pseudopregnancy
and indefinitely delay ovulation (Selye,
Browne and Collii^, 1936; Phillips, 1937),
smaller amounts of 1.0 rag. or less are compatible with the short cycle (Lahr and
Riddle, 1936; Phillips, 1937; Everett, 1940a,
b; and unpublished). In the absence of estrogen in castrated females, daily injection
of as little as 0.25 rag. progesterone will support deciduomata (Velardo and Hisaw,
1951). Very small amounts of estrogen augment this action of progesterone (Rothchild,
Meyer and Spielman, 1940) but somewhat
larger amounts are inhibitory unless the
progesterone dose is proportionately increased (Velardo and Hisaw, 1951). In the
intact animal the progestational effects of less than 1.0 mg. progesterone would be inhibited by the periodic rise in estrogen secretion.
Evidence that some rats, but not all, actually experience low-grade corpus luteum
activity during the short cycle was furnished
by Everett (1945). In the comparison of
ovaries from females of two strains of rats,
it was noted in the supposedly normal Vanderbilt strain that on the two days immediately following ovulation the corpora
lutea of the next youngest generation contained a great quantity of cholesterol, giving a strong Schultz reaction. By contrast,
comparable corpora lutea of the DA strain
were usually free of visible lipid in Sudan
preparations or the Schultz test. Administration of small amounts of lactogen (luteotrophin I during the cycle preceding the
current one, amounts inadequate to cause
l)seudopregnancy, resulted in the rich deposition of cholesterol in these otherwise lipidfree corpora lutea. The conclusion was
reached that the corpora lutea of the Vanderbilt rat must be slightly active during the
short cycle and those of the DA rat less so, if
at all. This would easily explain the relative
indifference of the Vanderbilt rat to continuous light and the ease with which persistent
cstrus could be induced in the DA rat by
such treatment (Everett, 1942a, b). In fact,
the low dosages of lactogen mentioned substituted for progesterone treatment in maintaining regular cycles in persistent-estrous
rats of the DA strain (Everett, 1944b). Significantly, the treatment was effective in
only those animals in which a set of corpora
lutea had been induced by other means at
the beginning of the experiment.
To be correlated with the above indications of low-grade function during the short
cycle, is the finding that corpora lutea of
the Vanderl)ilt rat retain full responsiveness
to luteotrophin throughout most of the diestrous interval (Nikitovitch-Winer and
Everett, 1958a). Responsiveness diminishes
near the onset of i:)roestrum. Once the rat
has entered proestrum these older corpora
lutea are not capable of sustained function.
The loss is not a function of time per se, but
of stage of the cycle.
.\. I'.^KTI)OPRE(;\.\XrY
The terms coi-pu,^ hitcuni of ()^•ulation and
corpus luteum of pscudojji'cgnancy are com
monly u.sed to differentiate the luteal bodies
occurring during the normal cycles from
those found during some unusually long
period of luteal activity. However, the
terms deny the fundamental similarity of
the luteal phase in the cycles of such animals as the guinea pig and the luteal phase
induced by sterile mating or its equivalent
in animals like the rat. In the unmated bitch
the spontaneous luteal phase of the cycle is
commonly called pseudopregnancy, yet it
is equally common to say that the guinea
pig does not experience pseudopregnancy.
The truth is that the luteal phase of the
canine cycle is simply longer than the luteal
phase in the guinea pig and may be marked
by a period of lactation near its close. In
the present discussion, the expression pseudopregnancy will be equivalent to saying
the luteal phase of the infertile cycle. Under
experimental conditions it will refer to any
period of sustained luteal function similar
to that of the normal progestational state.
Wherever appropriate, the distinction will
be made between a pseudopregnancy that is
spontaneous and one that is induced.
In most of the familiar animals that ovulate spontanously corpus luteum function
also begins spontaneously and continues for
at least several days after ovulation. With
respect to the rabbit, cat, and ferret, it is
often said that pseudopregnancy is invoked
by sterile copulation, whereas strictly speaking it is only ovulation and corpus luteum
formation which are invoked. The pseudopregnancy then follows automatically. This
interpretation seems appropriate, inasmuch
as in all three species the formation of
corpora lutea by l)rief treatment with hypophyseal or chorionic gonadotrophin is followed by long periods of progesterone secretion which can hardly be the direct effect
of the injected substances (Hill and Parkes,
1930a, b; Foster and Hisaw, 1935; van
Dyke and Li, 1938). Quite different is the
pseudopregnancy of the rat, mouse, and
hauistei', in \\liich progestational activity is
invoked by stinudation of the cervix uteri,
l^verett (1952a) described the ex])eriiuental
dissociation in rats of the o^•^llati()n and
luteotr()])hic mechanisms. respectively.
When o\-uhition is blocked (by pentobarbital) in the cycle dui'ing which controlled
uiatinu occurs, pseudopi-egnancy begins
Fig. 8.12. Experimental dissociation in rats of the ovulation mechanism and that causing
pseudopregnancy. A. Control cycles for comparison with B and C . Points on base line
represent diestrum, on ascending lines proestrum, on highest level full vaginal estrum. X,
ovulation. B. Blockade with Nembutal {'NB) on day of proestrum and following day (see
Fig. 8.11E'). Ovulation during third night. C. Same basic procedure as B, but with copulation
during first night (M). Ovulation usually failing in this cycle (contrast with B) . Corpora
lutea formed after spontaneous ovulation in second cycle regularly become functional without further stimulation : the wavy line represents pseudopregnancy. The early copulation has
introduced some change in the animal such that this pseudopregnancy "spontaneously"
follows ovulation as in the standard mammalian cycle. (From J. W. Everett, Ciba Foundation Collofiuia Endocrinol.. 4, 172. 1952.)
"spontaneously" a]ter the next cyclic estrus
(Fig. 8.12). Dissociation of the two mechanisms is expressed in another way by certain Mustelidae, e.g., the mink and marten.
Ovulation in these forms is invoked by
mating, whereas corpus luteum activation
awaits appropriate environmental conditions, i.e., temperature and length of daily
illumination (Pearson and Enders, 1944;
Hansson, 1947). In the mink, during the period of relative luteal inactivity that follows mating early in the season, recurrent
estrus continues. If reraating takes place at
an interval of 6 days or more, new ovulations are induced (Hansson, 1947). Matings
late in the season are immediately followed
by luteal activity. The pseudopregnant cycles of a representative series of mammals
are much alike when conditions appropriate to the respective species are applied
(Fig. 8.1).
====1. Duration of Psciidopregndncn====
The length of time that corpora lutea remain functional in the pseudopregnant cycle is thought to be relatively uniform in
the great majority of mammals, usually
about 10 to 15 days. Rarely it is shorter,
e.g., the hamster, 7 days, although usually
9 to 10 days (Asdell, 1946). At the other
extreme, the corpora lutea remain functional
for periods corresponding to the duration of
pregnancy, as in the ferret, 5 to 6 weeks. In
fact, corpus luteum function lasting over a
month is usual in the other two carnivores
for which information is at hand: cat, 30 to
44 days (Foster and Hisaw, 1935) ; and dog,
30 days or more (Evans and Cole, 1931).
These figures are only approximations,
however, as the criteria on which they are
based differ. In the rat, in which pseudopregnancy is said to last 12 to 14 days, its
termination is taken to be the onset of the
next estrus, whereas the corpora lutea must
have undergone a decline of activity 2 or 3
days earlier (Everett, 1948). The decline is
probably not abrupt, inasmuch as the vaginal smear during the next estrus is very
strongly mucified and, as mentioned earlier
(p. 519), enough progesterone seems to be
secreted by the waning corpora lutea to facilitate ovulation. Morphologic criteria are
often employed as indicators of corpus luteum regression: characteristically, fatty
vacuolation of luteal cells, decrease in size
of the individual cells or of the entire corpus luteum. and changes in the smusoidal pattern suggesting reduced circulation. Such
changes are first observed in the guinea pig
corpora lutea on about the 13th day of the
cycle. One has the choice of taking this date
as the end of the pseudopregnant phase or,
alternatively, the date on which the first
indications of estrus are noted. Either choice
is arbitrary, but the former seems preferable
as it suggests that progesterone secretion is
diminishing and probably is no longer sufficient to maintain progestational changes
in the uterus. In fact, regression of the endometrium sets in about a day earlier than
frank degenerative changes in the corpora
lutea. In the cat, according to van Dyke and
l.i (1938) the corpora lutea 20 days after
ovulation no longer secrete enough progesterone to cause motor effects of epinephrine in the myometrium, the so-called "epinephrine-reversal" effect, yet by histologic
criteria corpus luteum regression is not apparent until 28 days or later (Liche, 1939;
Foster and Hisaw, 1935). In the bitch the
uterus begins regression 20 to 30 days after
heat, l)ut the corpora lutea are said to remain in good condition for a longer time
(see Asdell, 1946, for references). Regression is so gradual that anestrum is not
reached until about 85 days. In the primates
the beginning of menstruation offers a means
of delimiting the luteal phase, inasmuch as
menstruation in the ovulatory cycle reflects
a marked reduction in corpus luteum function. Nevertheless, this reduction probably
occurs a few days before bleeding begins.
The i^eak of pregnanediol excretion in
women (Venning and Browne, 1937) and of
plasma progesterone concentration in
women and monkeys (Forbes, 1950; Bryans.
1951 ) is passed about midway between ovuhition and menstruation.
====2. Xciivdl Factors in Pseudopregnancy====
The importance of the nervous system
in control of pseudopregnancy is well recognized in only the few species re])resented
by the rat. .\ neural effect in the mink and
similar Mustelidae is implied by the relation of hiteal function to daily illumination,
as mentioned earlier. Beyond that fact, however, no information is available. Att(>ntion
will therefore be directed largely to the rat.
Not only sterile mating, but se\'eral other
procedures involving neural stimulation will
cause rats to become pseudopregnant. Stimulation of the cervix by mechanical means
(Long and Evans, 1922) or electric shock
(Shelesnyak, 1931) have become standard
methods. In fact, Greep and Hisaw (1938)
obtained pseudopregnancies after electrical
stimulation during early diestrum, several
days before ovulation. Pseudopregnancy is
also invoked by continuous stimulation of
the nipples for several days (Selye and McKeown, 1934). According to Harris (1936)
electric shock through the head is effective.
His negative results with "spinal shock"
are difficult to explain. From the description
of position of the electrode it seems doubtful that the current passed through the cord
itself, yet the sacral plexus must have been
stimulated.
Al)dominal sympathectomy or superior
cervical ganglionectomy are said to diminish
the numbers of animals responding to electrical or mechanical stimulation of the cervix (Vogt, 1931; Haterius, 1933; Friedgood
and Bevin, 1941). On the other hand, there
is no diminution of response to sterile copulation, which shows that the sympathetic
chains are not essential. Ball (1934) emphasized the quantitative aspects of the
problem, noting that partial resection of the
uterus or excision of the cervix diminished
the response to sterile copulation, but only
when "single-plug" matings were allowed.
Multiple plugs gave pseudopregnancy in 100
per cent of the animals. It may be assumed
that Vogt's (1933) negative results after
hysterectomy resulted from single-jilug copulations. Kollar (1953) re-opened the cjuestion and found that pelvic nerve resection
usually pi-evented the response to mating. It
is not clear, howevei', whether multiple copulations wnv the rule, although it seems that
the I'outiiie procedure was to leave the male
with the female overnight. His contention
was that cervicectomy fails to abolish the
resjionse completely because the vagina remains sensitive.
Anesthesia with ether, nitrous oxide, or
ethylene ( Mcyei', Leonard and Hisaw, 1929)
diniiiiished the ficciuency of response to
inecliaiiical stimulation of tlu> (•er\-ix. The
statement was made, although without v\\(len(c, that spinal anesthesia |)re\-ents pseudopreiinanev. Aeeoi'ding to A'ogt (1933),
local anesthesia of the vagina and cervix by
cocaine or procaine prevented the response
to sterile copulation in 23 of 35 rats.
Removal of neocortex (Davis, 1939) did
not interfere with the pseudopregnancy response to electrical stimulation of the cervix, although there was slight impairment of
the response to mechanical stimulation or
sterile mating (single-plug?).
These results taken together have been
construed to mean that induction of pseudopregnancy in rats involves a reflex similar to
the ovulation reflex in rabbits. Certain considerations, however, raise the possibility
that it may not be a "trigger" stimulus to
the hypophysis as long believed (Everett,
1952a). In the first place, it seems doubtful
that a trigger stimulus would result in continuation of a new pattern of secretion
(luteotrophin) for as long as 10 to 12 days.
Furthermore, as noted above, cervical stimulation during the diestrum preceding ovulation may induce pseudopregnancy (Greep
and Hisaw, 1938). Similarly, copulation
during a cycle in which ovulation is blocked
by pentobarbital results in a pseudoi)regnancv that begins after the next estrus (Fig.
8.12)^.
We turn now to experiments concerned
directly with the hypothalamo-pituitary
system and pseudopregnancy. Westman and
Jacobsohn (1938c) cut the pituitary stalks
of estrous female rats. Barriers of metal foil
were inserted to prevent regeneration of
nerve fibers assumed to innervate the adenohypophysis. Regeneration of blood vessels
must have been equally impossible. Controls
were simply hypophysectomized. Two to 5
hours after the operations electrical stimulation of the cervix was administered to all
animals. Pseudopregnancies were demonstrated by deciduomas in traumatized uteri
of all the stalk-sectioned animals but not in
the completely hypophysectomized rats.
Desclin (1950) reported the maintenance of
pseudopregnancy in estrogen-treated rats
in which the only remaining hypophyseal
tissue was in the form of grafts in the kidney. Whereas in hypophysectomized controls the estrogen treatment (stilbestrol pellets) produced cornification of the vagina
and no enlargement of corpora lutea, the engrafted-estrogenized rats developed mucified vaginas and enlarged corpora lutea as in intact rats similarly treated with estrogen. Desclin concluded that the grafted hypophysis is able to respond to estrogen by
liberating luteotrophin.
It is now apparent, however, that neither
cervical stimulation nor estrogen treatment
is needed to invoke pseudopregnancy when
the gland is isolated from the hypothalamus
(Everett, 1954, 1956a; Nikitovitch-Winer
and Everett, 1958a; Sanders and Rennels,
1957; Desclin, 1956a, b). When autografts
of anterior hypophysis were made to the renal capsule or near the common carotid
artery on the day after ovulation in adult
cyclic rats, corpus luteum function was invoked and maintained without any stimulus other than the operative procedures
themselves. In short-term experiments in
which the uteri were traumatized 4 days
after the transplantation large deciduomas
were regularly found at 8 days in the proven
absence of residual hypophyseal tissue at
the original site (Everett, 1954). Hypophysectomized controls were negative. In longterm experiments, continuing luteal function
was demonstrated for as long as 3 months.
Here the test for luteal function was vaginal
mucification in the presence of massive
amounts of estrogen administered during
the final week of the experiment (Everett,
1956a). Controls in which the grafts or the
ovaries were removed at the beginning of
such estrogen treatment responded with full
vaginal cornification. Follicular apparatus
and interstitial tissue of the ovaries atrophied promptly after the grafting operations, whereas corpora lutea forming at that
time were maintained for the long periods
without histologic sign of deterioration. In
later work, the decidual reaction was used
as the test for luteal function, positive reactions being elicited as late as 2 months
after the transplantation. It was discovered
that function of the graft is not influenced
by stage of the cycle at which transplantation is carried out and that grafts in the
anterior chamber of the eye secrete luteotrophin like those on the kidney (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a). Transsection of the pituitary stalk is sufficient
in itself to provoke pseudopregnancy. If an
effective barrier to vascular regeneration is
inserted, the pseudopregnancy will heorve
permanent, but otherwise it will l:i •■ i;!* usual length of time (Xikitovitch-Winer,
1957 j. In fact, there is reason to suspect
that even a transient impairment of circulation in the median eminence-hypophj'seal
linkage can be a sufficient impetus to pseudopregnancy. The experiments of Taubenhaus and Soskin ( 1941 ) in which application of an acetylcholine-prostigmine mixture
to the exposed hypophysis was followed by
pseudopregnancy, may well be explained
in some such way.
It thus seems that in the rat the deprivation of, or interference with, the normal connection of the pars distalis with the median
eminence facilitates secretion of luteotrophin and at the same time eliminates luteolytic mechanisms. It is significant that
transplants of pars distalis into the pituitary
capsule or to the immediate vicinity of the
median eminence resume cyclic function
(see page 512). The hypothalamus may
have an inhibitory effect on luteotrophic activity of the pars distalis during the short
cycle in this species. Greep and Chester
Jones (1950) made the pertinent suggestion
in attempting to explain the induction of
pseudopregnancy by estrogen treatment,
that the fundamental action of estrogen
here is the suppression of FSH and LH,
after which luteotrophic secretion may
"proceed apace."
There is necessarily some uncertainty
concerning the amount of luteotrophin secreted by the pars distalis when dissociated
from the brain. Three sets of facts indicate
that the output is larger than that in the
cycling animal. (1) Sufficient gestagen is
secreted by the engrafted animal to maintain a ])regnancy (Everett, 1956c; Meyer,
I'rasad and Cochrane, 1958) when the pituitary is trans])lanted on the day after
mating. (2) After stalk-transsection, in
which there is less initial destruction of
glandular parenchyma than in transplantation experiments, the corpora lutea enlarge
to a diameter like that usually found in late
pregnancy rather than remaining like those
of pseudopregnancy (Nikitovitch-Winer,
1957). (3) A single homotransplant of pars
distalis placed subcutaneously in an otherwise normal female mouse will maintain a
se(iueiicc of pseudopregnancies that override
the short cycles expected of the animal's
own hypophysis (Miihlbock and Boot,
19591. This is also true of rats (Nikitovitch Winer, uni)ublislie(l). To avoid the conclusion that in such preparations the grafted
gland is secreting luteotrophin at an increased rate, one must assume that the outl)ut of this hormone from the intact gland
is only slightly below threshold and that the
graft adds just enough to make the total
output effective. To explain the maintenance
of pregnancy one might assume that the
luteotrophin output and the resulting gestagen secretion are no greater than during the
normal short cycle and that the formation
of deciduomas takes place because of the
deficiency of estrogen. The results of stalksection, however, cannot easily be explained
away. The weight of evidence, then, is in
favor of increased luteotrophin secretion by
hypophyses isolated from the brain by
severance of the stalk or transplantation.
Under certain experimental conditions it
has seemed that to establish pseudopregnancy all that is necessary is to block out
the forthcoming estrus and ovulation. Thus,
in cycling rats, when the hypophysis is
transplanted to the kidney as late as 60
hours after ovulation, the current diestrum
transforms into a permanent pseudopregnancy supported by the existing set of corpora lutea (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett,
1958a ». Similarly, injections of chlorpromazine (Barraclough, 1957) or Pathilon
(ditsch and Everett, 1958) begun during
diestrum, may transform it into a pseudopregnancy by blocking out the expected
estrus.
The Miihlhock-Boot experiment mentioned above furnishes an instructive model
of the standard mammalian cycle, in which
both ovulation and pseudopregnancy are
spontaneous events. Given the extra pituitary tissue producing luteotrophin at a presumably constant rate, with the output of
the normal ghmd fluctuating (juantitatively
and (jualitatively, the mouse or rat undergoes one ])seudopregnancy after another.
Possibly, in animals that normally liave a
spontaneou.- hiteal phase, thei'c is a considei'ahle poUion ot' the pars distalis which
I'unctions somewhat indepeiidentl}- of the
hyputhalaiiius. with a continuous output of
luteotrophin as from the grafted gland in
the Mvihlb()ck-P)Oot pi-epaiation. The portion nioic (Hrectly under control of the
me(lian eminence I zona tuberaHs'.'l would then act like the intact hypoiihysis of the
Miihlbock-Boot mouse. Such a view, unfortunately, continues to set apart species
in which the luteal phase is not spontaneous,
by suggesting that only in them are special
neui'al nieclianisnis involved.
===B. Luteolytic Mechanisms===
By luteolysis we shall refer to corpus luteum regression in any of its manifestations.
Supposedly the initial change is functional,
after which overt cytologic and histologic
changes appear, leading eventually to the
total loss of glandular tissue. Very likely
the initial stages are occult and only gradually reach recognizable proportions. Mention was made earlier of the fact that in
women and monkeys the peak of gestagen
secretion is about midway between ovulation and menstruation. In rats indirect evidence from progesterone injection experiments leads to the deduction that toward
the close of a pseudoi)regnancy gestagen
secretion must drop below the estrus-suppressing level several days before estrous
changes appear in the vaginal smear (see
Fig. 8.8). A more al)rupt drop is reported
for the ewe l)etween the 16th and 17th
(last) days of the cycle (Edgar and Ronaldson, 1958).
Long-term experiments with pituitary
autotransplants indicate that at least in the
rat the life span of the corpus luteum is not
limited by intrinsic factors. Some agent (s)
of extra-ovarian origin must, therefore, be
res]5onsible for at least the initial luteolytic changes. Various bits of information
suggest that the agent is associated with, if
not identical with, FSH and/or LH. Greep
(1938) noted that after hypophysectomy
in rats the daily injection of LH over a period of 10 days caused the corpora lutea to
regress more rapidly than otherwise. Greep,
van Dyke and Chow (1942) later were unable to repeat this with a more highly purified LH C'metakentrin") , a fact suggesting
that the earlier material was effective because of impurity. During the short cycle
of the rat, luteolysis is interrupted by translilantation of the pars distalis (Everett,
1954; Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett,
1958a). Whatever regressive changes are
in progress at that moment are evidently
suspended forthwith. They are first apparent during the third day of diestrum and become increasingly pronounced during proestrum and estrus. In this connection, it
should be recalled that during late diestrum
and proestrum patches of cells undergoing
fatty necrosis are first recognizable histologically (Boling, 1942; Everett, 1945).
Why is it that, in the face of a continuing
supply of luteotrophin in the MiihlbockBoot preparation, or in intact animals injected daily with lactogen (Lahr and Riddle,
1936; Aschheim, 1954), luteolysis sets in
during the 2nd week? The question obviously cannot be answered from present
knowledge. Nevertheless, it is clear that the
pseudopregnancy that transpires when a
significant i)ortion of hypophyseal tissue
remains in normal relation to the hypothalamus is far from the steady state of that
which becomes established by total removal of the pars distalis to an extracranial
site. It is also apparent that the onset of
luteolysis may be postponed by such means
as hysterectomy or production of artificial
deciduomas (see p. 538). Furthermore,
during lactation-pseudoi)regnancies in rats,
Canivenc and Mayer (1953) prolonged luteal function to 34 days by substituting successive new litters of suckling young. This
technique should prove especially valuable
in experimental analysis of both luteotrophic and luteolytic mechanisms.
Benson and Folley (1956) suggested that
lactogen secretion is activated by oxytocin,
inasmuch as its injection prevented the normal inv'olution of the mammary glands after
withdrawal of the litters from lactating rats.
This observation has been confirmed by
McCann, Mack and Gale (1958), who also
noted the interruption of lactation by lesions of the sui)raoi)tico-hyiiophyseal tract.
Selye and ]\lcKeown (1934) long ago found
that pseudopregnancy could be induced in
cycling rats by the introduction of a suckling litter. Although all this is consistent
with the above-mentioned observation by
Canivenc and Alayer, other workers have
observed luteolytic effects of gonadotrophinfree oxytocin administered to cycling dairy
heifers (Armstrong and Hansel, 1958). Furthermore, Grosvenor and Turner (1958),
after first noting that the administration of
Dibenamine, atropine, or pentobarbital to
rats prevented the expected drop in assay able pituitary lactogen at nursing, found no
decrease when pentobarbitalized mothers
were injected with physiologic doses of oxytocin intravenously. When the dosage was
increased 30 to 60 times there was apparently some moderate discharge, but the authors regard it as insignificant.
===C. Effect of the Uterus on Luteal Function===
This subject has been reviewed by Bradbury, Brown and Gray (1950). In three
species (Fig. 8.13) hysterectomy results in
significant prolongation of the functional
life-span of corpora lutea (guinea pig, Loeb,
1927; rabbit, Asdell and Hammond, 1933;
rat, Bradbury, 1937). In each case the period of luteal function approximates that of
normal pregnancy. The fact that corpora lutea in the pseudopregnant ferret normally
function as long as in the pregnant animal
may be a clue to the noncffect of hysterectomy in that species (Deanesly and Parkes, 1933). Ahhough Burford and Diddle (1936)
rej^orted that in monkeys total hysterectomy was followed by vaginal cycles of normal length, examination of their protocols
shows that during the several postoperative
months just 1 corpus luteum was produced
among all 5 animals. The experiment thus
seems inconclusive. Impairment of pelvic
circulation seems to be a common factor
complicating the results of hysterectomy in
women and may have been one cause of the
failure of luteinization in these monkeys.
An interpretation given by Loeb (1927)
and Bradbury, Brown and Gray (1950) for
the prolongation of luteal function by hysterectomy is that in species in which the effect is demonstrable the uterus secretes a
specific substance which abbreviates the life
of the corpus luteum. Hechter, Fraenkel,
Lev and Soskin (1940) found in rats that
grafts of estrous uteri shortened the pseudopregnancies of hysterectomized animals to
normal length. Implantation of similar tis
Fig. 8.13. Reliilive duiation.s of p.seiulopicgnaiicy in normal and hysterectomizeil animals
of four species in relation to the duration of j^ostation characteristic of each. Gestation
plotted as a common unit of time. (After J. T. Bradbury, W. E. Brown and L. A. Gray,
Recent Proj,n-. Hormone Res., 5, 151-194, 1950.)
SIR' which had been killed by freezing had
no such effect, nor did successful grafts of
uteri from diestrous donors. Bradbury,
Brown and Gray (1950) found that partially hysterectomized rats in which the remaining uterine tissue was continuous with
the cervix, hence properly drained, experienced pseudopregnancies of normal length.
However, when the continuity was interrupted the uterine remnants became greatly
distended, the endometrium was destroyed,
and the animals had prolonged pseudopregnancies. Possibly the endometrium is the
source of the hypothetical "luteolytic" substance.*'
Under other circumstances the endometrium of rats has a luteotrophic rather than
luteolytic effect, for when deciduomas are
induced by trauma the pseudopregnancies of
otherwise normal animals are lengthened to
22 days or more (Ershoff and Duell, 1943;
Velardo, Dawson, Olsen and Hisaw, 1953).
This is not true in mice, however, and Kamell and Atkinson (1948) suggest that the
I'eason may lie in the shorter life-span of the
decidual tissue in that species. Loeb (1927)
reported that deciduomas in cyclic guinea
pigs ])rolonged the luteal phase, i.e., delayed
the next ovulation from 3 to 7 days, which
is far less than the prolongation after hysterectomy.
As an alternative to the concept of conI rol of the corpus luteum by humoral agents
" The denial by Velardo, Olsen, Hisaw and
Dawson (1953) that hysterectomy in rats prolongs
l)seiidopregnancy is based on operations performed
later in the luteal phase than those of Bradbury,
Brown and Gray and of Hechter, Fraenkel, Lev
and Soskin. Whereas the latter workers had operated in the range from the 4th to the 7th day.^^
of p.seudopregnancy and many of Bradbury's
cases lacked uteri when they entered pseudopregnancy, Velardo and associates excised the uteri
on the 9th day. It seems possible that this difference in time may be crucial, for by the 9th
day of a 12-day pseudopregnancy the corpora
lutea must be on the verge of regression, if that
in'ocess has not already been initiated. After
maintaining pseudopregnancy in estrogenized,
liypophysectomized rats b}^ means of lactogen,
its withdrawal is followed about 3 days later by
estrous smears (Nelson and Bichette, 1943; Nelson, 1946). A slightly longer delay occurs in nonestrogenized, intact rats at the end of a lactogeninduced pseudopregnancy (Everett, unpublished)
or after withdrawal of progesterone treatment
(Fig. 8C).
formed in the uterus, Loeb considered the
jjossibility that neural mechanisms are involved. The idea was not acceptable, he felt,
because in partial hysterectomies the result
was not detennined by the locus of the part
removed. The finding by Hechter, Fraenkel,
Lev and Soskin (1940) that grafts of uterine
tissue in hysterectomized rats return the
duration of pseudopregnancy to normal, is
significant evidence pointing in the same direction.
A third hypothesis was advanced by
Heckel (1942) who found in rabbits that
the extent of prolongation of luteal function by subtotal hysterectomy is roughly
proportional to the amount of uterine tissue removed. The suggestion was offered
that removal of the uterus has an estrogensparing effect. The greater amount of estrogen thus available to the corpora lutea prolongs their life, according to this view.
Later investigations by Moore and Nalbandov (1953) revive the possibility that
the uterus influences the ovary by way of
the nervous system. In sheep the implantation of a plastic bead in utero during the
early luteal phase shortened the cycle by
several days. Successive cycles tended to be
unusually short. When the uterine segments
containing the beads were denervated, however, the cycles were essentially normal.
Other work from the same laboratory (Huston and Nalbandov, 1953) which indirectly
may bear on this problem, indicates that
the presence of a mechanical irritant (a
thread) in the oviduct of the domestic fowl
tends to block ovulation. The blockade may
extend for as long as 20 days if the thread
is placed in the isthmus (van Tienhoven,
1953). The ovaries remain functional, producing large follicles which may be ovulated
at will by injection of LH. The authors feel
that this phenomenon, like the effect of the
bead in the sheep uterus, involves a neural
mechanism, Init crucial information is lacking. It may be significant that stimulation
of the ovaries was found in some hens, in
place of blockade.
We may hope that as more information
becomes available the assortment of facts
given in these paragraphs will fit into a
rational system. Not until this is realized
can we hope to understand the regulation of
the luteal phase.
==VIII. Concluding Comments==
From what has been written here it is
readily apparent that present knowledge of
the mechanisms controlling the reproductive
cycle is extremely spotty. The number of
assumptions necessary to knit the various
items of factual information into an orderly
pattern is disturbing. In spite of a voluminous literature which has grown during the
last 60 years, we are really only a few steps
ahead of our predecessors at the turn of
the century in terms of fundamental understanding. A brief recounting of some of
these steps may be desirable.
The first three decades saw the gradual
development of proof that the ovary is a
gland of internal secretion as well as the
producer of eggs, governing the uterus and
other accessory organs by secretion of hormones into the blood stream. For a while it
seemed that the events of the reproductive
cycle could be neatly explained, with the
ovary in the capacity of controlling agent.
Yet there were indications that the ovary
itself is not independent. As early as 19091910 (Aschner; Crowe, Gushing and Honuins) it was noted that destruction of the
hypophysis is accompanied by atrophy of
the gonads and reproductive tract. In 1927
the separate investigations of Smith and
Engle and of Zondek and Aschheim demonstrated conclusively that function of the
ovary depends vitally on the anterior hyjiophysis. Promptly it was learned that the
hypophyseal secretion of gonadotrophic
hormone is in turn modified by estrogens. In
the early 1930's the "push-pull" hypothesis
of pituitary-ovarian interaction was separately stated by Brouha and Simonnet and
by Moore (see Moore and Price, 1932).
Modified in detail as new facts appeared,
this hypothesis is held to the present day in
some quarters as a simple exi)lanation of
how the cycle comes about in polyestrous,
continuous breeders in which ovulation takes
l)lacc spontaneously. Much of the investigation of pituitary-ovarian i)hysiology during
the 1930's was performed within the framework of this hypothesis.
For seasonal breeders and reflex ovulators,
however, the assumption was necessary that
special controlling mechanisms are superimjiosed. It bccaiiie iccognizcd also that in some vaguely defined manner even the human cycle is subject to intervention of the
nervous system. The possible importance of
the hypothalamus was debated at some
length in the twenties. In 1932 the existence
of a sex center there was proposed by Hohlweg and Junkmann. In an attempt to explain the coital excitation of the rabbit hypophysis which causes the liberation of
gonadotrophin, Hinsey and Markee (1933)
suggested diffusion of a chemical substance
from the posterior lobe to the anterior lobe.
Hinsey (1937) later elaborated on this possibility and mentioned the hypophyseal portal vessels as a plausible route by which the
substance might travel. We have seen the
later history of these ideas.
The "Sexualcentrum" of Hohlweg and
Junkmann was proposed as a mediator of
the effects of estrogen on the anterior hypophysis of rats. Westman and Jacobsohn
(1936-1940), on the other hand, believed
that through its stalk connection with the
hypophysis the rat hypothalamus governs
gonadotrophin synthesis, not release. The
latter they regarded as a direct effect of estrogen on the gland. These views did not
afford a common basis for spontaneous and
refiex ovulation.
Schweizer, Chari])i)er and Haterius
( 1937) offered the first surmise of similarity,
after finding that guinea pigs bearing intraocular pituitary grafts developed persistent
estrus and large follicles that failed to go
through maturation changes. Their feeling
was that the normal connection of hypophysis with hypothalamus may be necessary for
cyclic liberation of LH. Almost concurrently, Dempsey (1937) expressed a similar
view as one alternative explanation of his
experimental results with the guinea i)ig cycle. Suggesting cautiously that release of
luteinizer may be brought about l)y a
"rhythmic discharge" from the central nervous system, he went on to mention the "possibility that a high level of oestrin is necessary but not directly responsible for the
release of luteinizer" (italics added). From
this it is only a short transition to certain
concepts set forth in the present exposition.
According to current views: (1) Reflex
ovulation and spontaneous ovulation alike
are governed by a hypothalamo-pituitary apparatus whose final link to the pituitaiy
is neurohumoral by way of the hypophyseal
portal veins and whose activity precipitates
release of LH. (2) The apparatus includes
a hypothalamic center or centers whose excitation depends on estrogen-progesterone
levels and afferent impulses of various
kinds. (3) The sensitivity of the center (s)
is influenced not only by the sex steroids, but
by other poorly understood factors that
vary from species to species and from time
to time in individuals, e.g., the diurnal
rhythm in rats. Here in bare outline is a
plausible hypothesis that may be generally
applied to the events immediately relating
to ovulation.
Satisfactory hypotheses respecting other
phases of the cycle must await future developments. The extent and manner of intervention of the nervous system in the follicular and luteal phases remain unsettled.
Although the hypophyseal hormones concerned in ovarian follicle development have
been characterized, their exact chemical descrijition has not been accomplished. The
rate of their output at different stages of the
cycle is largely a matter of conjecture.
Structural changes that they jiroduce in the
ovary are well known, but in chemical terms
only the end products of ovarian activity are
well recognized, and these probably incompletely. The fact that the estrogens, in turn,
have a regulating effect on follicle-stimulating activity of the hypophysis is known, but
the mechanisms by which this effect is accomplished are uncertain. The hypophyseal
hormones that maintain the luteal phase
are recognized with any certainty in only
three species and there is a wide difference
between rabbits, on the one hand, and rats
and mice, on the other. For mammals generally, the luteotrophic factors have not been
identified. Whether the hypothalamus is
actively concerned in maintenance of the
luteal i)hase in the majority of mammals is
unknown. The morphologic effects of luteotrojihic stimulation on corpora lutea are well
recognized, but here again the chemical
mechanisms leading to the end products are
obscure. The action of the corpus luteum
hormone in regulation of the cycle is partially known, including the well established
fact that its continual jiresence in large
amount will suiijiress the estrogenic and ovulatory phases. Yet, one cannot say
whether this effect is accomplished by direct
action on the hypophysis or by indirect action through the central nervous system.
Nor can one state how the hypophysisgonad equilibrium of the luteal phase is interrupted in the absence of a conceptus.
With respect to the ovulation mechanism
itself, the hypothesis outlined above requires
verification in additional species. Assuming
its validity, many details remain to be studied, e.g., the neural pathways and nuclei
involved, identification of neurochemical
activators of the pars distalis and their
sources and loci of action, the precise nature
of mechanisms whereby the gonadal steroids
excite or suppress, the cellular mechanisms
by which ovulating hormone is released into
circulation by the hypoi^hysis, and the cytochemical effects within the ovary. All too
evidently an encompassing theory of the
female reproductive cycle is far from realization.
==IX. References==
Allex. E., Daxforth, C. H., .and Doisy, E. A.,
Eds. 1939. Sex and Internal Secretions, 2nd
ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company.
Allen, E. 1923. Racial and familial cyclic inheritance and other evidence from the mouse
concerning the cause of estrous phenomena.
Am. J. Anat., 32, 293-304.
Allen, E. 1927. The menstrual cycle of the monkey, Macacus rhesus: observations on normal
animals, the effects of removal of the ovaries
and the effects of injection of ovarian and placental extracts into the spayed animals. Contr.
Embrvol., Carnegie Inst. Washington. 19,
1-14.
Allen, E., Pratt, J. P., Newell, Q. U.. and Bland,
L. J. 1930. Human ova from large follicles:
including a search for maturation divisions and
observations of atresia. Am. J. Anat., 46, 1-53.
Alloiteau, J. J. 1952. La lordose reflexe par excitation du col uterin chez la rate. Son controle endocrinien. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 146,
237-238.
Alloiteau, J. J. 1954. Effets de doses minimes de
progesterone sur les fonctions gonadotropes de
la Ratte en oestrus permanent hypothalamique. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 148, 875-877.
Alloiteau, J. J., .\nd Courvoisier, B. 1953. Effets
de I'excitation du col uterin chez la rate apres
lesions hypothalamique. Compt. rend. Soc.
biol., 147, 1040-1042.
Arm.strong, D. T., and Hansel, W. 1958. Alteration of the bovine estrous cvcle with oxvtocin.
Fed. Proc, 17, 6.
Arox, C, and Aron-Brunetiere, R. 1953, Effets de la stimulation mecani(|ue du vagin et du
segment supracervical de Tutorus sur I'ovaire
du Cobaye. Compt. rend. Acad. Sc, 237, 846848.
AscHHEiM, p. 1954. Influence du tissue decidual
sur la pseudogestation provociuee par I'administration de prolactine chez le rat. Compt. rend.
Soc. biol., 148, 185-187.
Aschner, B. 1909. Demonstration von Hiinden
nach Extirpation der Hypophysis. Wien. klin.
Wchnschr., 22, 1730-1732.
AsDELL, S. A. 1946. Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Ithaca, X. Y.: Comstock Publishing Company.
AsDELL, S. A., .^ND Hammond, J. 1933. The effects
of prolonging the life of the corpus luteum in
the rabbit by hysterectomy. Am. J. Physiol.,
103, 600-605".
AsTwooD, E. B. 1939. Changes in weight and
water content of the uterus of the normal
adult rat. Am. J. Physiol., 126, 162-170.
AsTWOOD, E. B. 1941. The regulation of corpus
luteum function by hypophyseal luteotrophin.
Endociinology, 28, 309-320.
AsTwooD, E. B., AND Fevold, H. L. 1939. Action
of progesterone on the gonadotropic activity
of the pituitary. Am. J. Physiol., 127, 192-198.
B.ACHMAN, C. 1936. Oestrogenic hormone and the
mechanism of corpus luteum formation in the
rabbit. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 33,
551-554.
Bacq, Z. M. 1932. Effect of sympathectomy on
sexual functions, lactation and maternal behavior in the albino rat, with a description of
the technique of svmpathectomy in the rat.
Am. J. Physiol., 99, 444-453.
B.'MN, J. A. 1952. Enzymatic aspects of barbiturate action. Fed. Proc, 11, 653-658.
B.ALL, J. 1934. Demonstration of quantitative relation between stimulus and response in pseudopregnancy in the rat. Am. J. Physiol., 107,
698-703.
Ball, J., and Hartman, C. G. 1939. A case of delayed ovulation after estrin administration in
the intact monkev. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. &
Med., 40, 629-631.
B.^RBARo.ssA, C, AND Di Ferrante, H. 1950. Sugli
effetti dell'ipofisectomie nel correlazione intermedina-ovaio. Arch. "E. Maragliano" pat. e
clin., 5, 887-890.
Barraclouoh, C. A. 1955. Blockad(< of the release
of i)itui1arv gonadotrophin b\- ic.^^erijine. Fed.
Proc, 14, 9-10.
Bahracloucii, C. a. 1956. Blockade of the release of i)ituitary gonadotrophin by chlorpromazine. Anat. Rec, 124, 255.
Barraclough, C. a. 1957. Indiiction of i^seudopregnancy in the rat by reseri)ine and chlorpiomazine. Anat. Rec, 127, 262-263.
Barraclough, C. A., and Sawyer, C. H. 1955. Inhibition of the release of pituitaiy oxuhiloiy
hormone in th(> rat bv morphine. iMidociinology, 57, 329-337.
B.\rrnp:tt, R. J., AND Grlei', R. O. 1951. The d\rection of flow in the blood vessels of the infundibular stalk. Science, 113, 185.
Bahtelmez, G. W., Corner, G. W., and Hartman, C.
G. 1951. Cyclic changes in the endometrium
of the rhesus monkey {Macaca mulatta).
Contr. EmbryoL, Carnegie Inst. Washington,
34, 99-144.
Bauer, H. G. 1954. Endocrine and other clinical raanife.stations of hypothalamic di.-;ease. J.
Clin. Endocrmol., 14, i3-31.
Beard, J. 1898. The rhythm of reproduction in
animals. Anat. Anz., 14, 97-102.
Benoit, J., and Assenmacher, I. 1955. Le controle hypothalamique de I'activite prehypophysaire gonadotrope. J. Phvsiol., Paris, 47, 427567.
Benson, G. K., .\nd Folley, S. J. 1956. Oxytocin
as stimulator for the release of prolactin from
the anterior pituitarv. Nature, London, 177,
700.
Bielschowsky, F., and Hall. W. H. 1953. The
endocrine imbalance induced in female rats by
autotransplantation of the ovary into the tail.
Australian J. Exper. Biol. & Med. Sc, 31, 8598.
Blskind, G. R. 1941. Tiie inactivation of estradiol and estradiol benzoate in castrate female
lats. Endocrinology, 28, 894-896.
Blandau, R. J., AND Money, W. L. 1943. The attainment of sexual maturity in the female albino rat as determined by the copulatory respon.se. Anat. Rec, 86, 197-215.
Block, K. 1945. Biological conversion of cholesterol to pregnanediol. J. Biol. Chem., 157, 661666.
BoLiNG, J. L. 1942. Growtii and regression of
corpora lutea during the normal estrous cvcle
of the rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 131-145.
BoLiNG, J. L., Bl.>\ndau, R. J., Rundlett. B., and
Young, W. C. 1941. Factors underlying the
failure of cyclic mating behavior in the albino
rat. Anat. Rec, 80, 155-171.
Borell, U., Westman, A., and Orstrom, A. 1947.
Studies on the functions of the hypophysealdiencephalic system and of the ovaries by
means of radioactive phosphorus. Gvnaecologia, 123, 186-200.
Borell, U., Westman, \., a.nd Orstrom, A. 1948.
The jtliosj^hate metabolism in the hypophyseal(ii(>nc{'i)lialic system and ovaries of rats determined by means of P''-. Acta phvsiol. scandinav., 15, 245-253.
Borell, U., and WEST.^L\N, A. 1949. The effect of
oi'strogen on th(> i)hosiiliate turnover in th(>
hyiio])hy.'^eal-dienceplialic .system. Acta endocrmol., 3, 111-118.
Bourne, G., and Zucker.m.\n, S. 1941. Changes
in the adrenals in relation to the normal and
artificial threshokl oestrous cycle in {he ra(. J.
Endocrinol., 2, 283-310.
Bkadkury, J. T. 1937. Piolongation of the life
of the corpus luleum li\' hvsterectomv in the
rat. .\nat. Kec, 70, Sup].!. 1, 51.
linADiiiin, .1. T. 1940. Ob.^^ervations following the
cc>.-,iiion of treatment of the infantile female
lai witli an(h-og(>ns and gonadotropic extracts. Am. J. Pliysiol., 129, P315.
Bradiurv, J. T. 1941. Permanent after-effects followinji nia^^cvilinization of the infantile female lat. Endocrinology, 28, 101-106.
Bradbury, J. T. 1947. Ovarian influence on the
response of the anterior pituitary to estrogens.
Endocrinology, 41, 501-513.
Br.adbury, J. T., Brown, W. E.. .and Gr.\y, L. A.
1950. Maintenance of the corpus luteum and
Ithysiologic actions of progesterone. Recent
Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 151-194.
Br.\mbell, F. W. R., P.arkes, A. S., .^^nd Fielding, U.
1927a. Changes in the ovary of the mouse
following exposure to X-rays. I. Irradiation at
three weeks old. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser.
B, 101, 29-56.
Br.\.mbell, F. W. R., P.\rkes, A. S., .and Fielding, U.
1927b. Changes in the ovary of the mouse
following exposure to X-rays. II. Irradiation
at or before birth. Proc. Roy. Soc, London,
ser. B, 101, 95-114.
Brooks, C. McC. 1937. The role of the ceroliral
cortex and of various sense organs in the excitation and execution of mating acti\itv m
the rabbit. Am. J. Physiol., 120, 544-553.
Brooks, C. McC. 1938. A study of the mechanism whereby coitus excites the ovulation producing activitv of the rabbit's pituitary. Am.
J. Physiol., 121, 157-177.
Brouha, L.. and Simonnet, H. 1930. Considerations sur le determinisme du cycle ovarien chez
les Mammiferes. In Proceedings 2nd International Congress Sex Research, pp. 339-344.
Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Browman, L. G. 1937. Light in its relation to
activity and e.strus rhythms ui the alljino rat,
J. Exper. Zool., 75, 375-388.
Brown, W. E., and Bradbury, J. T. 1947. Estrogen release of pituitary gonadotropin in
women. Tr. Conference Sterility & Infertility.
Am. Soc. Stud. Steril.. 3, 117-124.
Brown, W. E., Br.adbury, J. T., and Jennings, A. F.
1948. Experimental alteration of the human
ovarian cycle bv estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol.,
8, 453-460.
Bryans, F. E. 1951. Progesterone of the blood
in the menstrual cycle of the monkey. Endocrinology, 48, 733-740.
BuNN, J. P., .AND Everett, J. W. 1957. Ovulation
in persistent-estrous rats after electrical stimulation of the brain. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. &
Med., 96, 369-371.
BURFORD. T. H., AND DiDDLE, A. W. 1936. Effect of
total hysterectomy upon the o\ary of Macacus
rhesus. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 62," 701-707.
BuRRiLL, M. W., AND Greene, R. R. 1941. Androgen jiroduction in the female rat. Endocrinology, 28, 871-873.
Buxton, C. L., .and Engle, E. T. 1950. Time of
ovulation: a correlation between basal temperature, the appearance of the endometrium
and the appearance of the ovary. Am. J. Obst.
& Gynec. 60, 539-551.
Byrnes, W. W., and Meyer, R. K. 1951a. The
inhibition of gonadotrophic hormone secretion
by physiological doses of estrogen. Endocrinology, 48, 133-136.
Byrnes, W. W., and Meyer. R. K. 1951b. Effect
of physiological amounts of estrogen on the secretion of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing
hormones. Endocrinology, 49, 449-460.
C.ANivENc, R., AND M.AYER, G. 1953. Les corps
gestatifs de la rate sont-ils prolonges par la
prolactine? Etude de I'aecouchement et de
I'ablation des cornes gray ides au cours de la
lactation prolongee. Compt. rend. Soc. bioL,
147, 2025-2027.
Casida, L. E. 1946. Induction of ovulation and
subsequent fertility in domestic animals. In
The Problem oj Fertility, E. T. Engle, Ed.,
pp. 49-59. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Christian, C. D. 1956. Studies on the neuroendocrine control of ovulation in the rabbit.
Dissertation, Duke L^niversity.
Christian, C. D., M.arkee, S. J., and M.arkee, J. E.
1955. Failure of spinal cord transection to
prevent ovulation following hypothalamic
stimulation in the rabbit. Anat. Rec. 121, 275.
Cl.aesson, L., and Hillarp, N.-A. 1947a. The
formation mechanism of oestrogenic hormones.
I. The presence of an oestrogen-precursor in
the labbit ovary. Acta physiol. scandinav., 13,
115-129.
Claesson, L., and Hillarp, N.-A. 1947b. The
formation mechanism of oestrogenic hormones.
II. The presence of oestrogen precursor in the
OA'aries of rats and guinea-pigs. Acta physiol.
scandinav., 14, 102-119.
Cl.ark. H.M. 1935. A prepubertal reversal of the
sex difference in the gonadotropic hormone
content of the pituitary gland of the rat. Anat.
Rec. 61, 175-192.
Cole, H. H. 1946. Estrogen in late pregnancy
mare serum and ovarian inhibition. Endocrinology, 39, 177-182.
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F. 1935. Changes
of the reproducti\e organs of the ewe with
some data bearing on their control. Am. J.
Anat., 57, 39-97.
Constantinides, p. 1947. Progesterone secretion
during the oestrous cycle of the unmated rat.
J. Endocrinol., 5, Ixiv.
CoppEDGE, R. L., .AND Segalof^, A. 1951. Urinary
prolactin excretion in man. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 11,465-476.
Corner, G. W. 1937. The rate of .secretion of
progestin by the corpus luteum. Cold Spring
Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 62-65.
Corner, G. W. 1938. The sites of formation of
estrogenic substances in the animal body.
Physiol. Rev., 18, 154-172.
Corner, G. W. 1940. Rate of secretion of estrogenic hormones by the ovaries of the monkey,
Macacus rhesus. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.,
67, 407-413.
Corner, G. W. 1942. The Hormones in Human
Reproduction. Princeton, X. J.: Princeton
LTniversity Press.
CouRRiER, R. 1956. Remarque sur la greffe d'hypophyse. Arch. Biol., Paris, 67, 461-469.
Critchlow, B. v., AND Sawyer, C. H. 1955. Electrical activity of the rat brain correlated with neurogenic rstinuilation of the adenohypophysis. Fed. Pioc, 14, 32-33.
Crowe, S. J., Gushing, H., and Homans, J. 1910.
Experimental hvpophysectomy. Bull. Johns
Hopkins Hosp., 21, 127-169.
CrTULY, E. 1941a. Autoplastic grafting of the
anterior pituitary in male rats. Anat. Rec, 80,
83-97.
CuTULY, E. 1941b. Studies on the histology and
physiology of the pituitary of rats treated with
progesterone. Endocrinology, 29, 695-701.
D'Amour, F. 1940. Further studies on hormone
excretion during the menstrual cycle. Am. J.
Obst. & Gynec, 40, 958-965.
D^NDY, W. E. 1940. Section of the human hypophysial stalk. J. A. M. A., 114, 312-314.
Davis, C. D. 1939. The effect of ablations of
neocortex on mating, maternal behavior and
the production of pseudopregnancy in the female rat and on copulatory activity in the
male. Am. J. Physiol., 127, 374-380.
D.AVis, M. E., AND FuGO, N. W. 1948. Does administration of diethylstilbestrol to pregnant
women result in increased output of urinary
pregnanediol? Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med.,
69, 436-438.
Deanesly, R. 1934. The reproductive processes
of certain mammals. VI. The reproductive
cycle of the female hedgehog. Phil. Tr. Roy.
Soc, London, ser. B, 223, 239-276.
Deanesly, R. 1938. The androgenic activity of
ovarian grafts in castrated male rats. Proc.
Rov. Soc, London, ser. B, 126, 122-135.
Deanesly, R., and Parkes, A. S. 1933. The effect
of hysterectomy on the oestrous cycle of the
ferret. J. Physiol., 78, 80-84.
DEL Castillo, E. B., and Calatroni. C. J. 1930.
Cycle sexual periodiciue et foUiculine. Gompt.
rend. Soc. biol., 104, 1024-1028.
DEL Castillo, E. B., and di P.aola, G. 1942. Cyclical vaginal response to the daily administration of estradiol in castrated rats. Endocrinology, 30, 48-53.
Dempsey, E. W. 1937. Follicular growth rate and
ovulation after various experimental procedures in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 120,
126-132.
Dempsey, E. W. 1939. The relationshi]) between
the central ncrxous sysleni and the rei)roductive cvcle in the female guinea pig. Am. J.
Physiol., 126, 758-765.
Dk.mpsey, E. W., Hektz, R.. and Young, W. G.
1936. The expcrinicntal induction of oestrus
(.<exual receptivily) in (lie normal and ovariectomized guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 116,
201-209.
Dempsey, E. W., and Uotila, V. U. 1940. The
effect of pituitary stalk section upon reproductive phenomena in the female rat. Endocrinology. 27, 573-579.
Dempsey, E. W., and Searles, H. F. 1943. Environmental modification of certain endocrine
phenomena. Endocrinology, 32, 119-128.
Desclin, L. 1935. Action ile fortes doses d'hormone folliculaire sur la structme de I'ovaire et (hi lobe anterievne de I'hvpophyse chez le rat
blanc. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 120, 526-528.
Desclin, L. 1948. Action de la prolactine sur la
structure de I'ovaire du rat normale et hypophvsectomise. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 142,
1436-1438.
Desclin, L. 1949a. Action des oestrogenes .•^ur
I'ovaire chez le rat normal et hypophy.sectomise. Gompt. rend. Soc biol., 143, 1004-1006.
Desclin, L. 1949b. A propos de Taction combinee de la prolactine et des oestrogenes sur la
structure de I'ovaire chez le rat. Gompt. rend.
Soc. biol., 143, 1154-1155.
Desclin, L. 1950. A propos du mechanisme d'action des oestrogenes sur le lobe anterieur de
I'hvpophvse chez le rat. Ann. endocrinol., 11,
656-659.
Desclin, L. 1956a. Hypothalamus et liberation
d'hormone luteotrophiciue. Experiences de
greffe hypophysaire chez le rat hypophysectomise. Action luteotrophicjue de I'ocytocine.
Ann. endocrinol., 17, 586-595.
Desclin, L. 1956b. L'ocytocine peut-elle declencher la liberation de luteotrophine hypophvsaire chez le rat? Gompt. rend. Soc. biol.. 150,
1488-1491.
Dey, F. L. 1941. Changes in ovaries and uteri
in guinea pigs with hypothalamic lesions. Am.
J. Anat., 69, 61-87.
Dey, F. L. 1943. Evidence of hypothalamic control of liypophyseal gonadotropic function
in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 33,
75-82.
Dey, F. L., Fisher, G., Berry, G. M., and Ranson,
S. W. 1940. Disturbances in reproductive
functions caused by hypothalamic lesions in
female guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol., 129, 39-46.
Diaz, J. T. 1940. Effect of subtotal nephrectomy
upon the e.strous cvcle of the albino rat. Proc.
Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 45, 226-229.
Donovan, B. T., and H.^rris. G. W. 1954. Effect
of pituitary stalk .section on light-induced oestrus in the ferret. Nature, London, 174, 503504.
Donovan, B. T., and H.^rris, G. W. 1956. Adrenergic agents and the release of gonadotropliic
hormone in the rabbit. J. Physiol.. 132, 577585.
Donovan, B. T.. a.xd van dek Wekfk ten lioscH,
J. .L 1956. Oestrus in winter following hypothalamic lesions in the ferret. J. Physiol.,
132, 57P.
DoRDONi, F., AND TiMiRAS, P. S. 1952. Inhibitory
action of stre.ss on the relea,-*e of luteinizing
liormone bv estrogen in the rat. J. Pliarmacol.
^- Exper. fherap., 106, 381-382.
DoHKMAN, R. I.. AND VAN W.\GENEN, G. 1941. The sex hormone excretion of adult female and
jiregnant monkeys. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 73,
545-548.
DciRiMi, C. K.. AM) r,nz, E.-M. 1952. I'lx'r die
WirUung des Zwisclienhirnnarkoticums Luminal auf den Scheidencvclus der weissen Ratte.
Arcli. (ivniik.. 181, 185-189.
Drips. D. (;.. and Ford, F. A. 1932. The efTect of X-rays on the estrual cycle and ovaries of the
white rat. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 55, 596-606.
DuTT, R. H., AND C.^siDA, L. E. 1948. Alteration
of the estrual cycle in sheep by use of progesterone and its effect upon subsecjuent ovulation and fertility. Endocrinology, 43, 208217.
DuYVENE DE WiT, J. J. 1942. Presence of progesterone and 17-ketosteroids in the follicular
fluid of the pig, cow, and human being. Acta
brev. neeri., 12, 23-25.
Edg.^r, D. G. 1952. Progesterone in body fluids.
Nature, London, 170, 543-544.
Edgar, D. G. 1953. The progesterone content of
body fluids and tissues. J. Endocrinol., 10,
54-64.
Edg.^r, D. G., .'vnd Ro-naldsoxX, J. W. 1958. Blood
le\'els of progesterone in the ewe. J. Endocrinol., 16, 378-384.
Emmens, C. W. 1939. The duration of action of
certain natural and synthetic oestrogens when
administered orally or by injection. J. Endocrinol., 1, 142-146.
ExGLE, E. T. 1931. The pituitary gonadal relationship and the problem of precocious sexual
maturity. Endocrinology, 15, 405-420.
Engle, E. T. 1946. No seasonal breeding cycle in
dogs. J. Mammal., 27, 79-81.
Engle, E. T., and Shelesnyak, M. C. 1934. First
menstruation and subsetiuent menstrual cycles
of pubertal girls. Human Biol., 6, 431-453.
Ershoff, B. H., and Duell, H. J., Jr. 1943. Prolongation of pseudopregnancy by induction of
deciduomata in the rat. Proc. Soc. E.xper. Biol.
& Med., 54, 167-168.
Evans, H. M., .\nd Long, J. A. 1921. On the association of continued cornification of the
vaginal mucosa with the presence of large
vesicles in the ovary and the absence of corpus
luteum formation. Anat. Rec, 21, 60-61.
Evans, H. M., and Cole, H. H. 1931. An introduction to the stud}' of the oestrous cycle in
the dog. Mem. Univ. California, 9, 67-117.
Evans, H. M., and Swezy, 0. 1931. Ovogenesis
and the normal follicular cycle in adult mammalia. Mem. Univ. California, 9, 119-225.
Evaxs, H. M., Si-mpson, M. E., Lyons, W. R., and
Turpeinen, K. 1941. Anterior pituitary hormones which favor the production of traumatic uterine placentomata. Endocrinologv,
28, 933-945.
Everett, J. W. 1939. Spontaneous persistent estrus in a strain of albino rats. Endocrinology,
25, 123-127.
Everett, J. W. 1940a. The restoration of cyclic
e.strus and ovulation in persistent-estrous rats
bv progesterone. Anat. Rec, 76, No. 2, Suppl.,
21.
Everett, J. W. 1940b. The restoration of o\ulatory cycles and corpus luteum formation in
persistent-estrous rats by progesterone. Endocrinology, 27, 681-686.
Everett, J. W. 1942a. Certain functional interrelationships between spontaneous persistent
estrus, "light estrus" and short-day anestrus in
the albino rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 409.
Everett, J. W. 1942b. Hereditary factors which
condition the "light estrus" response in the
albino rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 463.
Everett, J. W. 1943. Further studies on the relationship of progesterone to ovulation and luteinization in the persistent-estrous rat. Endocrinology, 32, 285-292.
Everett, J. W. 1944a. Evidence in the normal
albino rat that progesterone facilitates ovulation and corpus-luteum formation. Endocrinology, 34, 136-137.
Everett, J. W. 1944b. Evidence suggesting a
role of the lactogenic hormone in the estrous
cycle of the albino rat. Endocrinology, 35, 507520.
Everett, J. W. 1945. The microscopically demonstrable lipids of cyclic corpora lutea in the
rat. Am. J. Anat., 77, 293-323.
Everett, J. W. 1947. Hormonal factors responsible for deposition of cholesterol in the corpus
luteum of the rat. Endocrinology, 41, 364-377.
Everett, J. W. 1948. Progesterone and estrogen
in the experimental control of ovulation time
and other features of the estrous cycle in the
rat. Endocrinology, 43, 389-405.
Everett, J. W. 1952a. Presumptive hypothalamic
control of spontaneous ovulation. Ciba Foundation Colloquia Endocrinol., 4, 167-176.
Everett, J. W. 1952b. Factors affecting the success of liharmacological blockade of ovulation
in rats. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 12, 923.
Everett, J. W. 1954. Luteotrophic function of
autografts of the rat hypophysis. Endocrinology, 54, 685-690.
Everett, J. W. 1956a. Functional corpora lutea
maintained for months by autografts of rat
hypophyses. Endocrinology, 58, 786-796.
Everett, J. W. 1956b. The time of release of
ovulating hormone from the rat hypophysis.
Endocrinology, 59, 580-585.
Everett, J. W. 1956c. Maintenance of pregnancy
in rats by hvpophj^seal autografts. Anat. Rec,
124, 287-288.
Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H. 1949. A neural timing factor in the mechanism by which
progesterone advances ovulation in the cyclic
rat. Endocrinology, 45, 581-595.
Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H. 1950. A 24hour periodicity in the "LH-release apparatus"
of female rats, disclosed by barbiturate sedation. Endocrinology, 47, 198-218.
Everett, J. W., and S.\wyer, C. H. 1953. Estimated duration of the spontaneous acti\-ation
which causes release of ovulating hormone
from the rat hvpophvsis. Endocrinology, 52,
83-92.
Everett, J. W., Sawyer, C. H., and Markee, J. E.
1949. A neurogenic timing factor in control
of the ovulatory discharge of luteinizing hormone in the cyclic rat. Endocrinologv, 44, 234250.
Fee, a. R., and Parkes, A. S. 1929. Studies on
ovulation. I. The relation of the anterior
546
PHYSIOLOGY OF GONADS
pituitarv body to o\'ulation in the rabbit. J.
PhysioL, 67, 383-388.
Fel.s, E. 1952. Die Unterbindung des Ovaiienstieles als Ursach anatomischer und fiinktioneller Genitalstorimgen. Arch. Gynak.. 181,
380-390.
FixERTY, J. C. 1952. Parabiosi.s in physiological
■studies. Physiol. Rev., 32, 277-302.
Fish, W. R., Young, W. C, and Dorfm.an, R. I.
1941. Excretion of estrogenic and androgenic
substances by male and female chimpanzees
with known mating behavior records. Endocrinologv, 28, 585-592.
FisKE, V. M. 1941. Effect of light on sexual
maturation, estrous cycles, and anterior pituitary of the rat. Endocrinology, 29, 187-196.
Flerko, B. 1954. Zur hypothalamischen Steuerung der gonadotrophen Funktion der Hypophyse. Acta morphol. 4, 475-492.
Flerko, JB. 1957a. Einfluss experimenteller Hypothalamuslasion auf die durch Follikelhormon
indirekt hervorgerufene Hemmung der Luteinisation. Endokrinologie, 34, 201-208.
Flerko, B. 1957b. Le role des structures hypothalamiciues dans Taction inhibitrice de la
foUiculine sur la secretion de I'hormone folhculo-stimulante. Arch. Anat. microscop. Morphol. exper., 46, 159-172.
Flerko, B., and Illei, G. 1957. Zur Frage der
Spezifitat des Einflusses von Sexualsteroiden
auf hvpothalamische Nervenstrukturen. Endokrinologie, 35, 123-127.
Flerko, B., and Szent.xgothai, J. 1957. Oestrogen
sensitive nervous structures in the hypothalamus. Acta endocrinol., 26, 121-127.
Fluhmann, C. F. 1934. A new procedure for the
demonstration of estrin in the blood of women.
Endocrinology, 18, 705-713.
Fluhmann, C. F. 1952. Induction of precocious
opening of immature rat vagina w^ith neostigmine. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 81, 315317.
Forbes, T. R. 1950. Systemic plasma progesterone levels during the human menstrual cycle.
Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 60, 180-186.
Forbes, T. R. 1953. Pre-ovulatory i)rogesterone
in the peripheral blood of the rabbit. Endocrinology, 53, 79-87.
Forbes, T. R., Hooker, C. W., and Pfeiffer, C. A.
1950. Plasma progesterone levels and the
menstrual cycle of the monkey. Proc. Soc.
Exper. Biol."& Med., 73, 177-179.
Ford, D. H., and Young, W. C. 1953. Duration
of the first cyclic vaginal openings in maturing
guinea pigs and related o\;iriaii cDiulit ions.
Anat. Rec, 115, 495-503.
Foster, M. A. 1934. The reproductive cycle in
the female ground sriuirrel, Citellus tridecewlinenluH (Mitchell). Am. J. Anat., 54, 487-511.
Foster, M. A., Haney, H. F., and Hisaw, F. L.
1934. Parasympathetic drugs and ovulation.
Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 351-353.
Foster, M. A., and Hisaw, F. L. 1935. Experimental ovulation and the resulting jiscnidopregnancy in anoestrous cats. .\nat. Hec, 62,
75-93.
Fra?:nkel-Conr.\t, H., Li, C. H., and Simpson, M. E.
1943. Pituitary gonadotropins. In Essays in
Biology, pp. 183-191. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Frank, R. T., Kingery, H. M., .\nd Gustavson, R.
G. 1925. The female sex hormone. II. An
analvsis of factors producing pubertv. J. A.
M.A., 85, 1558-1559.
FRAPS, R. M., AND Case, J. F. 1953. Premature
ovulation in the domestic fowl following administration of certain barbiturates. Proc. Soc.
Exper. Biol. & Med., 82, 167-171.
Fraps, R. M., and Dury, A. 1943. Occurrence of
premature o\-ulation in the domestic fowl following administration of progesterone. Proc.
Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 52, 346-349.
Freed, S. C., Greenhill, J. P., and Soskin, S.
1938. Biphasic effect of male sex hormone on
the pituitarv of the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 39, 440-442.
Fried. P. H., and Rakoff, A. E. 1952. The effects of chorionic gonadotrophin and prolactin
on the maintenance of corpus luteum function.
J. Chn. Endocrinol., 12, 321-337.
Friedgood, H. B., and Bevin, S. 1941. Relation of
the cervical sympathetics to anterior pituitary
gonadotrophic activitv in the rat. Am. J. Physiol., 133, P282.
Friedman, M. H. 1941. The inhibition of copper-induced ovulation in the rabbit by progesterone. Endocrinology, 29, 628-632.
FuGo, N. W., and Gross, E. G. 1942. Anterior
pituitary-stimulating action of yohimbine. Endocrinology, 31, 529-534.
FuNNELL, J. W., Ke.aty, C, .\nd Hellbaum, A. A.
1951. Action of estrogens on release of luteinizing hormone in menopausal women. J.
Clin. Endocrinol., 11, 98-102.
Gaarenstroom, J. H., and de Jongh, S. E. 1946.
Contribution to the Knowledge of the Influences oj Gonadotropic and Sex Hormones on
the Gonads oj Rats. New York: Elsevier Publishing Company.
Gassner, F. X. 1952. Some physiological and
medical aspects of the gonadal cycle of domestic animals. Recent Progr. Hormone Res.,
7, 165-208.
Genther, I. T. 1931. Irradiation of the ovaries
of guinea-pigs and its effect on the oestrous
cycle. Am. J. Anat., 48, 99-137.
Gillman. J. 1942. Tem]i()raiy o\arian damage
luodnccd in l>ab{H)ns 1)\- single administrations
ol' i'sti;i(h()l Ix-nzoatc and progesterone in the
first part of the cycle. Endocrinology, 30, 6170.
Grrs.ii, K. 1952a. Ub(>r die Wirkung der KasIralion auf den diencephalen Azetylcholingeli.ill und .seine beeinflussung durch Pentothal.
Wnn. klin. Wchn,schr., 64, 710-711.
Gitscii, K. 19521). Uber periodische, zum gonadalen Cyclus in Korrelation stehende Funktionsanderungen in Hypothalamus. Arch. Gyniik., 182, 52-57.
(_!its('ii,E. 1958. Synergistic actions of meprobamate and an anticholinergic drug, Pathilon, on reproductive cycles in the rat. Endocrinology,
62, 533-535.
GIT.SCH, E., .AND Everett, J. W. 1958. Influence
of the anticholinergic drug, Pathilon, on the
reproductive cycle of the female rat. Endocrinology, 62, 400-409.
GiTSCH, E., -AND Reitixger, J. 1953. tjber die
Wirkung exogener Hormone auf den Azetylcholingehalt des mittleren Hypothalamu,s der
Ratte. Zentralbl. Gynak., 75, 209-218; 373376; 734-738.
Goldberg, R. C, .and Knobil, E. 1957. Structure
and function of intraocular hypophyseal grafts
in the hypophysectomized male rat. Endocrinology, 61, 742-752.
Green, J. D. 1947. Vessels and nerves of the
amphibian hypophysis. A study of the li\ing
circulation and of the histology of the hypophysial yes.sels and nerves. Anat. Rec, 99,
21-54.
Green, J. D. 1951. The comparative anatomy of
the hypophysis, with special reference to its
blood supply and innervation. Am. J. Anat.,
88,225-311."
Green, J. D., and H.arris, G. W. 1947. The neurovascular link between the neurohypophysis
and adenohypophysis. J. Endocrinol., 5, 136146.
Green, J. D., .and Harris, G. W. 1949. Observation of the hypophysioportal vessels of the
living rat. J. Pliysiol.," 108, 359-361.
Greenwald, G. S. 1956. The reproductive cycle
of the field mouse, Microlus calijomicus. J.
Mammal., 37, 213-222.
Greep, R. O. 1936. Functional pituitary grafts in
rats. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 34, 754755.
Greep, R. O. 1938. The effect of gcniadotropic
hormones on persisting corpora lutea in liypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology, 23, 154163.
Greep, R. O., and B.arrnett, R. J. 1951. The effect of pituitary stalk-section on the reproductive organs of female rats. Endocrinology, 49,
172-184.
Greep, R. 0., and Chester Jones, I. 1950. Steroid control of pituitary function. Recent
Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 197-261.
Greep, R. O., and HI.SA^y, F. L. 1938. Pseudopregnancies from electrical stimulation of the
cervix in the diestrum. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol.
& Med., 39, 359-360.
Greep, R. O., van Dyke, H. B., and Chow, B. F.
1942. Gonadotropins of the swine pituitary.
I. Various biologic effects of purified th>iakentrin (FSH) and pure metakentrin (ICSH).
Endocrinology, 30, 635-649.
Greer, M. A. 1953. The effect of progesterone
on persistent vaginal estrus produced by hypothalamic lesions in the rat. Endocrinology, 53,
380-390.
Greulich, W. W. 1934. Artificially induced ovulation in the cat. Anat. Rec, 58, 217-224.
Grosvenor, C. E., and Turner, C. W. 1958. Effects of oxytocin and blocking agents upon pi
tuitary lactogen discharge in lactating rats.
Proc.Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 97, 463-465.
Hale, H. B. 1944. Functional and morphologic
alterations of the reproductive system of the
female rat following prepubertal treatment
with estrogens. Endocrinology, 35, 499-506.
Hammond, J. 1946. The induction of ovulation
in domestic animals. In The Problem oj Fertility, E. T. Engle, Ed. Princeton, N. J.:
Princeton LTniversity Press.
H.AMMOND, J., AND M.ARSHALL, F. H. A. 1930. Oestrous and pseudopregnancy in the ferret. Proc.
Roy. Soc, London, .ser. B, 105, 607-629.
Hammond, J., and Walton, A. 1934. Notes on
ovulation and fertilization in ferrets. J. Exper.
Biol., 11, 307-319.
H.AMMOND, J., Jr. 1945. Induced ovulation and
heat in anoestrous sheep. J. Endocrinol., 4,
169-180.
Hammond, J., Jr. 1952. Maintenance of grafted
luteal tissue. Nature, London, 169, 330-331.
Hammond, J., Jr. 1953. Photopcriodicity in animals: the lole of darkness. Science, 117, 389391.
Hammond, J., Jr., .and Bhattacharya, P. 1944.
Control of ovulation in the cow. J. Agric. Sc,
34, 1-15.
H.AMMOND, J., Jr., Hammond, J., .and Parkes. A. S.
1942. Hormonal augmentation of fertility in
sheep. I. Induction of ovulation, superovulation, and heat in sheep. J. Agric Sc, 32, 308323.
H.AMMOND, J., Jr., and Robson, J. M. 1951. Local
maintenance of the rabbit corpus luteum with
oestrogen. Endocrinology, 49, 384-389.
H.ANSEL, W., AND Trimberger, G. W. 1951. Atropine blockage of ovulation in the cow and its
possible significance. J. Anim. Sc, 10, 719-725.
Hansel, W., .and Trimberger, G. W. 1952. The
effect of progesterone on ovulation time in
dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sc, 35, 65-70.
Hansson, a. 1947. The physiology of reproduction in mink (Mustela vison, Schreb.) with
special reference to delayed implantation. Thesis, Stockholm.
H.ARRis, G. W. 1936. The induction of pseudopregnancy in the rat by electrical stimulation
through the head. J. Physiol.. 88, 361-367.
Harris, G. W. 1937. Induction of ovulation in
rabbits by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamo-hypophysial mechanism. Proc. Roy.
Soc, London, ser. B, 122, 374-394.
Harris, G. W. 1948a. Neural control of the pituitary gland. Physiol. Rev., 28, 139-179.
H.ARRIS, G. W. 1948b. Electrical stimulation of
the hypothalamus and the mechanism of neural control of the adenohypophysis. J. Physiol.,
107, 418-429.
H.ARRIS, G. W. 1949. Regeneration of the hypophvsio-portal vessels. Nature, London, 163,
70.
Harris, G. W. 1950a. Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels, after section of the
hypophysial stalk, in the monkey (Macacus
rhesus). Nature, London, 165, 819.
Harris, G. W. 1950b. Oestrous rhythm, pseudopregnancy and the pituitary stalk in the rat.
J. Phvsiol.. 111,347-360.
Harris, G. W. 1955. Neural Control oj the Pituitary Gland. London: Edward Arnold, Ltd.
Harris, G. W., and Jacobsohn, D. 1952. Functional grafts of the anterior pituitary gland.
Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 139, 263-276.
Harrison, R. J. 1948. The changes occurring in
the ovary of the goat during the estrous cycle
and in early pregnancy. J. Anat., 82, 21-48.
Hartman, C. G. 1932. Studies in the reproduction of the monkey, Macacus (Pithecus) rhesus, with special reference to menstruation and
pregnancy. Contr. Embryol., Carnegie Inst.
Washington, 13, 1-161.
Hartman, C. G. 1936. Time of Ovulation in
Women. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins
Company.
H.-VRTMAN, C. G. 1944. Some new ob.scrvations on
the vaginal smear of the rat. Yale J. Biol. &
Med., 17, 99-112.
Haskins, a. L., Jr. 1950. Assay of circulating
progesterone bv ultraviolet spesctroscopy. Proc.
Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 73, 439-443.
H.\TERius, H. O. 1933. Partial sympathectomy
and induction of pseudopregnancy. Am. J.
Physiol., 103, 97-103.
H.-VTERius, H. O. 1936. Reduction of litter size
and maintenance of pregnancy in the oophorectomized rat: evidence concerning the endocrine role of the placenta. Am. J. Physiol.,
114,399-406.
H.\TERius, H. O. 1937. Studies on a neurohypophyseal mechanism influencing gonadotropic activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 280-288.
Hechter, 0., Fr.\enkel, M., Lev, M., and Soskin,
S. 1940. Influence of the uterus on the corpus luteum. Endocrinology, 26, 680-683.
Heckel, G. p. 1942. The estrogen sparing effect
of hvsterectomv. Surg. Gvnec. & Obst., 75,
379-390.
Hemmingsen. a. M., and Krarup, X. B. 1937.
Rhythmic diurnal variations in the oe.^trnus
phenomena of the rat and their suscciitibUity
to light and dark. Kgl. Danske Vidcnsk. Sclsk.
Biol. Med., 13 (Nr. 7),1-61.
Hernandez, T. 1943. Hormonal ambisexuality of
ovarian grafts in female rats. Am. J. Anat., 73,
127-151.
Herold, L., and Effkemann, G. 1938. Die Bedeutung des vegetativen Nervensystems fiir die
innersekretorische Funktion des Hypophysenvorderlappens. Arch. Gynak., 167, 389-396.
Hertl, M. 1952. Brunstzeitige Kernschwellung
im Tuber cinereum der weissen Maus.
Morphol. Jahrb., 92, 75-94.
Hertl, M. 1955, Das Verhalten einiger Hypothalamu.skerne der weissen Maus wjihrend
verschicdener Entwicklungs- und Fimktionsphasen des weiblichcn Genitalapparates.
Ztschr. Zellforsch., 42, 481-507.
Hill, J. P., .xnd O'Donoghue, C. H. 1913. The repro(lucli\^e cycle in the marsupi.Ml Dasi/iirvs viverrinus. Quart. J. Microscop. Sc, 59, 133174.
Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1930a. The relation
between the anterior pituitary body and the
gonads. I. The factors concerned in the formation of the corpus luteum. Proc. Roy. Soc,
London, ser. B, 107, 30-38.
Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1930b. On the relation between the anterior pituitary body
and the gonads. II. The induction of ovulation in the anestrous ferret. Proc. Roy. Soc.
London, ser. B, 107, 39^8.
Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1933. Studies on
the hypophysectomized ferret. VI. Comparison of the response to oestrin of anoestrous,
ovariectomized and hypophysectomized ferrets. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 113,
541-544.
Hill, M., and White, W. E. 1933. The growth
and regression of follicles in the oestrous rabbit. J. Physiol., 80, 174-178.
Hill, R. T. 1934. Variation in the activity of
the rabbit hypophysis during the reproductive
cycle. J. Physiol., 83, 129-136.
Hill, R. T. 1937a. Ovaries secrete male hormone. I. Restoration of the castrate type of
seminal vesicle and prostate glands to normal
by grafts of ovaries in mice. Endocrinology,
21, 495-502.
Hill, R. T. 1937b. Ovaries secrete male hormone. III. Temperature control of male
hormone output by grafted ovaries. Endocrinology, 21, 633-636.
HiLL.\RP, N.-A. 1949. Studies on the localization of hypothalamic centres controlling the
gonadotrophic function of the hypoph.vsis.
Acta endocrinol., 2, 11-23.
HiNSEY, J. C. 1937. The relation of the nervous
system to ovulation and other phenomena of
the female reproductive tract. Cold Spring
Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 269-279.
HixsEY, J. C., and Markee, J. E. 1933. Pregnancy following bilateral section of the cervical
sympathetic trunks in the rabbit. Proc. Soc.
Exper. Biol. & Med., 31, 270-271.
Hisaw, F. L. 1942. The interaction of the ovarian hormones in experimental menstruation.
Endocrinology, 30, 301-308.
Hisaw, F. L. 1944. The ]ilacental gonadotrophin
and hiteal function in monkeys (Macaca
inakdLa). Yale J. Biol. & Med., 17, 119-137.
HiSAM', F. L. 1947. Development of the Graafian follicle and ovulation. Physiol. Rev., 27,
95-119.
HoHLWEG, W. 1934. \'('r;in(l('rungcn (l(>s Hypophysenvorderlappcn.s und ties Ovariums nach
Behandlungen mit grossen Doscn von FoUikelliormon. Klin. W^hnschr., 13, 92-95.
HoiiLWEG, W. 1937. MJinnliohe Wirkstoff(> und
Corpus luteum-Bildung. Klin. Wchnschr., 16,
586-587.
HoHLWEG, W., AND Ch.\morro, A. 1937. tjber
die luteinisiercndo Wirkung des Follikelhormons (lurch Bccinflussung dor luteogenenHvpophvsenvorderlappensekretiou. Klin.
Wchnschr, 16, 196-197.
HoHLWEG, W., .\ND DoHRN, M. 1932. Uber die
Beziehungen zwisehen Hypophysenvorderlappen iind Keimdriisen. Klin. Wchnschr.,
11, 233-235.
HoHLWEG, W., .\XD JrxK>uNN, K. 1932. Die hormonal-nervose Regulierung der Fimktion des
Hypophvsenvorderlappens. Klin. Wchnschr.,
11,321-323.
HOLMSTROM, E. G., .AND JONES, W. J. 1949. The
experimental production of menorrhagia by
administration of gonadotropins. Am. J. Obst.
& Gynec, 58, 308-317.
Hooker, C. W., and Forbes, T. R. 1947. A bioassay for minute amounts of progesterone.
Endocrinology, 41, 158-169.
Hough, W. H., Be.arden, H. J., asd Hansel, W.
1955. Further studies on factors affecting
ovulation in the cow. J. Anim. Sc, 14, 739-745.
Huston, T. M., .\nd N.albandov, A. V. 1953.
Neurohumoral control of the pituitarj^ in the
fowl. Endocrinology, 52, 149-156.
Iglesias, R., Lipschutz, a., and Guillermo, R.
1950. Experiments with the local action of
oestrogen on the intrasplenic ovarian graft.
Endocrinology, 46, 414-419.
Johnson, G. E., Fcster, M. A., and Coco, R. M.
1933. The sexual cycle of the thirteen-lined
ground scjuirrel in the laboratorv. Tr. Kansas
Acad. Sc, 36, 250-269.
Kallas, H. 1929. Sur le passage de substances
hypophvsaires pendant la parabiose. Compt.
rend. Soc. biol., 102, 280-282.
Kallas, H. 1930. Zur Frage nach der innersekretorischen Tiitigkeit des infantilen Eierstockes. Klin. Wchnschr., 9, 1345-1346.
Kamell, S. a., and Atkinson, W. B. 1948. Absence of prolongation of pseudopregnancy by
induction of deciduomata in the mouse. Proc.
Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 67, 415-416.
Kammlade, W. G., Jr., Welch, J. A., Nalbandov,
A. v., and Norton, H. W. 1952. Pituitary
activity of sheep in relation to the breeding
season. J. Anim. Sc, 11, 646-655.
Kempf, R. 1950. Contribution a I'etude du uiechanisme de liberation des hormones gonadotropes hypophysaire chez le rat. Arch, biol.,
61, 501-594.
Kirkpatrick, C. M., .and Leopold, A. C. 1952.
The role of darkness in sexual activity in the
quail. Science, 116, 280-281.
Klein, M. 1947. Oestrogen level and ovarian hypophysial relationship during pseudopregnancy
and pregnancy in the rabbit. J. Endocrinol.,
5, xxv-xxvii.
Klein, M., and Mayer, G. 1943. Cited from
Mayer, 1951.
Klein, M., and Mayer, G. 1946. Production
d'une nouvelle phase luteinique au cours de la
gestation chez la lapin. Compt. rend. Soc. biol.,
140, 600-602.
Koikeoami, H., Y.amada, T., and U.sei, K. 1954.
Stimulation of the amygdaloid nuclei and peri
amygdaloid cortex with special reference to its
effects on uterine movements and ovulation.
FoHa Psychiat. Neurol. Japon., 8, 7-31.
KoLLAR, E. J. 1953. Reproduction in the female
rat after pelvic nerve neurectomy. Anat. Rec,
115,641-658.
KosTiTCH, A., AND Telebakovitch, A. 1929. Sur
un rhythme vaginal chez les animaux ovariectomises. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 100, 51-54.
KuROTSu, T., KuRACHi, K., AND Ban, T. 1950.
Experimental studies on ovulation by the
electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus of
rabbits. Med. J. Osaka Univ., 2, 1-12.
KuROTSU, T., KUR.\CHI, K., T.AB.AYASHI, C, AND
Ban, T. 1952. Experimental studies on ovulation by the electrical stimulation of the
hypothalamus in hypophysectomized rabbits.
Med. J. Osaka Univ., 3, 139-150.
Lahr, E. L., and Riddle, O. 1936. Temporary
suppression of estrous cycles in the rat by
prolactin. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 34,
880-883.
L.andsmeer, J. M. F. 1951. Vessels of the rat's
hypophysis. Acta Anat., 12, 84-109.
Lane, C. E. 1935. Some influences of oestrin
on the hypophyseal-gonad complex of the
immature female rat. Am. J. Physiol., 110,
681-685.
Lane, C. E., and Davis, R. F. 1939. The ovary
of the adult rat. I. Changes in growth of the
follicle and in volume and mitotic activity of
the granulosa and theca during the estrous
cycle. Anat. Rec, 73, 429-442.
L.ANE, C. E., and Creep, R. O. 1935. The follicular apparatus of the ovary of the hypophysectomized immature rat and the effects of
hypophyseal gonadotropic hormones on it.
Anat. Rec, 63, 139-146.
L.AQUEUR, G. L., AND Fluhmann, C. F. 1942. Effects of testosterone propionate in immature
and adult female rats. Endocrinologv, 30, 93101.
Levin, L., and Tyndale, H. H. 1937. Quantitative
assay of "follicle stimulating" substances. Endocrinology, 21, 619-628.
Levine, W. T., and Witschi, E. 1933. Endocrine
reactions in female rats after X-ray treatment
of the ovaries. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med.,
30, 1152-1153.
Liche, H. 1939. Oestrous cycle in the cat. Nature, London, 143, 900.
Lipschutz, A., Iglesias, R., Bruzzone, S., HuMEREz, J., and Penaranda, J. M. 1948. Progesterone and desoxycorticosterone in the steroid control of the gonadotrophic function of
the hypophysis. Endocrinology, 42, 201-209.
LoEB, L. 1911. Uber die Bedeutung des Corpus
luteum fiir die Periodizitiit des sexuellen Zyklus beim weiblichen Saugetierorganismus.
Deutsche med. Wchnschr., 37, 17-21.
LoEB, L. 1927. Effects of hysterectomy on the
system of .sex organs and on periodicity of the
sexual cycle in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol.,
83, 202-224.
Long, J. A., a.xd Evans, H. M. 1922. The oestrous
cycle ill the rat and its associated phenomena.
Mem. Univ. California, 6, 1-148.
Lopez Colombo de Allende, I. 1956. Anovulatory C3'cles in women. Am. J. Anat., 98, 293305.
Lyon, R. A. 1956. Prolongation of human corpus luteum life span. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 16,
922.
Makepeace, A. W. 1938. Failure of atropine to
prevent ovulation following coitus in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 23, 241-242.
Makepeace, A. W., Weinstein, G. L., and Friedman, M. H. 1937. The effect of progestin and
progesterone on ovulation in the rabbit. Am.
J.Physiol., 119, 512-516.
Mandel, J. 1935. Experimental study of ovarian
irradiation and transplantation in the rat.
Anat. Rec, 61, 295-309.
Mandl, A. M. 1951. Cyclical changes in the
vaginal smear of adult ovariectomized rats.
J. Exper. Biol., 28, 585-592.
Mandl, A. M., and Zuckerjl\x, S. 1952. Cyclical
changes in the number of medium and large
folhcles in the adult rat ovary. J. Endocrinol.,
8, 341-346.
Marden, W. G. R. 1952. The hormone control
of ovulation in the calf. Endocrinology, 50,
456-461.
Mardones, E., Bruzzone, S., Iglesias, R., and
LiPSCHUTz, A. 1951. The non-concomitancy
of the progestational and antiluteinizing actions of steroids. Endocrinology, 49, 817-825.
Marion, G. B,, Smith, V. R., Wiley, T. E., and
Barrett, G. R. 1950. The effect of sterile
copulation on time of ovulation in dairy
heifers. J. Dairy Sc, 33, 885-889.
Markee, J. E. 1948. Morphological basis for
menstrual bleeding. Bull. New Y'ork Acad.
Med., 24, 253-268.
Markee, J. E., and Berg, B. 1944. Cyclic fluctuations in blood estrogen as a possible cause of
menstruation. Stanford Med. Bull., 2, 55-60.
Markee, J. E., Sawyer, C. H., and Hollinshead,
W. H. 1946. Activation of the anterior hypophysis by electrical stimulation in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 38, 345-357.
Markee, J. E., Sawyer, C. H., and Hollinshead,
W. H. 1948. Adrenergic control of the release of luteinizing hormone from the hypophvsis of the rabbit. Recent Progr. Hormone
Res., 2, 117-131.
Markee, J. E., Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H.
1952. The relationship of the nervous system
to the release of gonadotroph in and the regulation of the sex cvc'le. Recent Progr. Hormone
Res., 7, 139-163. '
Marshall, F. H. A. 1942. Exteroceptive factors
in sexual periodicity. Biol. Rev., 17, 68-90.
Marshall, F. H. A., "and Verney, E. B. 1936.
The occurrence of ovulation and pscudopregnancy in the rabbit, as a result of central nervous stimulation. J. Physiol., 86, 327-336.
Martinez-Estkve, p. 1937. Le cycle sexual vagi
nal chez le mar.supial Dklclphys azarae.
Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 124, 502-504.
Marvin, H. N. 1947. Diestrus and the formation of corpora lutea in rats with persistent
estrus, treated with desoxycorticosterone acetate. Anat. Rec, 98, 383-392.
Marvin, H. N., and Meyer, R. K. 1941. Diestrus
and corpus luteum formation in persistentestrous rats by luteinizing hormone and antigonadotrophic serum. Entlocrinologv, 29, 965968.
Matthews, L. H. 1939. Visual stimulation and
ovulation in pigeons. Proc. Roy. Soc, London,
ser. B, 126, 557-560.
May, R. M. 1937. La greffe brephoplastique de
I'hypophyse chez le rat. LXX Congress Soc.
savantes, pp. 241-248.
M.\YER, G. 1951. La prolactine, facteur luteotrophique. Arch. sc. physiol., 5, 247-275.
Mazer, C, Israel, S. L., and Alpers, B. J. 1936.
The time element in the pituitary-ovarian response to large doses of the estrogenic hormone. Endocrinologv, 20, 753-761.
McCann, S. M., M.\ck, R., and Gale, C. 1958.
Neural control of lactation. Fed. Proc, 17,
107.
McConnell, E. M. 1953. The arterial blood
supplv of the human hypophysis cerebri. Anat.
Rec, 115,175-201.
McKenzie, F. F., and Terrill, C. E. 1936. Estrus, ovulation, and the related phenomena
in the ewe. Univ. Missouri Agric Exper. Sta.
Res. Bull., 264, 1-88.
McKeown, T., and Zuckerman, S. 1937. Stimulation of the corpora lutea of the rat by means
of progesterone and testosterone. Proc. Roy.
Soc. London, ser. B, 124, 362-368.
Merckel, C, and Nelson, W. O. 1940. The relation of the estrogenic hormone to the formation and maintenance of corpora lutea in
mature and immature rats. Anat. Rec, 76,
391-409.
Meyer, R. K., Leon.\rd, S. L., and Hisaw, F. L.
1929. Effect of anesthesia on artificial production of pseudopregnancv in the rat. Proc Soc.
Exper. Biol. & Med., 27, 340-342.
Meyer, R. K., Prasad, M. R. N., and Cochrane,
R. Jj. 1958. Delayed implantation in the rat
induced by autografts of ili(^ hy]io])]iysis. Anat.
Rec, 130^ 339.
MiEGEL, B. 1952. Die Biologie und Morphologic
der Fortpflanzung der Bisamratte (Ondatra
zibethica L.). Ztschr. mikroskop.-anat. Forsch.,
58, 531-598.
Moon, H. D., and Li, C. H. 1952. Effect of follicle-stimulating iiorinone on gonads of immature C57 black mice. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol.
* Med., 79, 505-507.
Mooke, C. R., and Price, D. 1932. Gonad hormone functions and the reciprocal influence
between gonads and hypophysis, with its bearing on sex hormone antagonism. Am. J. .\nat.,
50, 13-71.
MooRE, C. R., Simmons, G. F., Wells, L. J., ZaLESKY, M., AND Nelson, W. O. 1934. On the
control of reproductive activity in an annualbreeding mammal {Citellus tridecemlineatus) .
Anat. Rec, 60, 279-289.
Moore, W. W., .\nd Nalbandov, A. V. 1953.
Neurogenic eifects of uterine distention on the
estrous cycle of the ewe. Endocrinology, 53,
1-11.
MooRE, W. W., AND Nalbandov, A. V. 1955.
Maintenance of corpora lutea in sheep with
lactogenic hormone. J. Endocrinol. 13, 18-25.
Mossman, H. W. 1937. The thecal gland and
its relation to the reproductive cycle: a study
of the cyclic changes in the ovary of the pocket
gopher, Geomys bursarius (Shaw). Am. J.
Anat., 61, 289-319.
MtiHLBOCK, O., AND BooT, L. M. 1959. Induction
of mammary cancer in mice without the mammarv tumor agent bv isografts of hvpophvscs.
Cancer Res., 19, 402-412.
Myers, H. I., Young, W. C, and Dempsey, E. W.
1936. Graafian follicle development throughout the reproductive cycle in the guinea pig,
with especial reference to changes during estrus
(sexual receptivity). Anat. Rec, 65, 381-401.
Nathanson, I. T., Fr.^nseen, C. C, and Sweeney,
A. R., Jr. 1938. Nature of the action of testosterone on genital tract of the immature female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 39,
385-388.
N.woRi, C. A., FuGo, N. W., and D.avis, M. E.
1952. Effect of tulial ligation on ovarian
function in the rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. &
Med., 81, 649-652.
Nelson, W. 0. 1946. Factors concerned in the
maintenance of function of the corpus luteum.
J. Clin. Endocrinol., 6, 465-466.
Nelson, W. 0., and PICH^:TTE, J. W. 1943. Maintenance of corpora lutea in hypophysectomized
rats by lactogenic hormone. Fed. Proc, 2, 36.
NiKiTOviTCH-WiNER, M. 1957. Hormonal influence of the hypothalamus on gonadotrophin
secretions. Dissertation, Duke University.
NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W. 1957.
Resimiption of gonadotrophic function in pituitary grafts following re-transplantation from
kidney to median eminence. Nature, London,
180, 1434-1435.
NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W.
1958a. Comparative study of luteotropin secretion by hypophysial autotransplants in the
rat. Effects of site and stages of the estrus
cycle. Endocrinology, 62, 522-532.
NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W.
1958b. Functional restitution of pituitary
grafts re-transplanted from kidney to median
eminence. Endocrinology, 63, 916-930.
NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W. 1959.
Histocytologic changes in grafts of rat pituitary on the kidney and upon re-transplantation
imder the diencephalon. Endocrinologv, 65,
357-368.
NissiM, J. A., AND RoBSON, J. M. 1952. The conversion of pregnenolone to a more active pro
gestational substance by incubation with endocrine tissues in vitro. J. Endocrinol., 8,
329-335.
NowAKOwsKi, H. 1950. Zur Auslosung der Ovulation durch elektrische Reizung des Hypothalamus beim Kaninchen und ihre Beeinflussung durch Riickenmarksdurchschneidung.
Acta neuroveg., 1, 13-39.
NowAKOw\SKi, H. 1952. Gomori-positive and
Gomori-negative nerve fibers in the neurohypophysis and their physiological significance.
Ciba Foundation Collociuia Endocrinol., 4,
65-71.
Parkes, a. S. 1926a. On the occurrence of the
oestrous cycle after X-ray sterilization. III.
Periodicity of oestrus after sterilization of the
adult. Proc Rov. Soc, London, ser. B, 101,
421-449.
Parkes, a. S. 1926b. On the occurrence of the
oestrous cycle after X-ray sterilization. IV.
Irradiation of the adult during pregnancy and
lactation; and general summary. Proc Roy.
Soc, London, ser. B, 102, 51-62".
Parkes, A. S. 1949. Obituary, F. H. A. Marshall.
J. Endocrinol., 6, 1-5.
Parkes, A. S. 1950. Androgenic activity of the
ovary. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 101114.
Parkes, A. S. 1952. Ovarian periodicity in the
absence of cyclic structures. Ciba Foundation
Colloquia Endocrinol., 4, 264-267.
Pearson, O. P. 1944. Reproduction in the shrew
{Bhirinu brevicmida, Sav). Am. J. Anat., 75,
39-93.
Pe.\rson, O. p., .^nd Enders, R. K. 1944. Duration of pregnancy in certain Mustelids. J.
Exper. Zool., 95, 21-35.
Pedersen-Bjerg.a.^rd, G., and Pedersen-Bjerga.\rd,
K. 1948. Sex liormone analysis. III. Estrogenic and gonadotropic substances in the
mine from a woman with normal menstrual
cycles and normal pregnancies. Acta endocrinol., 1, 263-281.
Pencharz, R. I. 1940. Effect of estrogens and
androgens alone and in combination with
chorionic gonadotropin on the ovary of the
hypophysectomized rat. Science, 91, 554-555.
Pfeiffer, C. a. 1936. Sexual differences of the
hypophyses and their determination by the
gonads. Am. J. Anat., 58, 195-225.
Pfeiffer, C. A. 1937. Hypophyseal gonadotropic hormones and the luteinization phenomenon in the rat. Anat. Rec, 67, 159-175.
Pfeiffer, C. A. 1941. Hormone factors in the
formation and maintenance of corpora lutea
in "constant" estrous rats. Anat. Rec, 79, (No.
3,Suppl.),50.
Pfeiffer, C. A. 1950. Effects of progesterone on
ovulation in Rhesus monkeys. Anat. Rec, 106,
233.
Pfeiffer, C. A., and Hooker, C. W. 1942. Experiments on the source of ovarian androgen
in the mouse. Anat. Rec, 83, 543-571.
Phelps, D., Ellison, E. T., .and Burch, J. C. 1939. Survival, structure and function of pituitarygrafts in untreated rats, and in rats injected
with estrogen. Endocrinology, 25, 227-236.
Phillips, W. A. 1937. The inhibition of estrous
cycles in the albino rat by progesterone. Am.
J. Phvsiol., 119,623-626.
PiNCUS, G. 1948. The Hormones, Vol. 1. New
York: Academic Press, Inc.
PiNCUS, G., AND Enzmann, E. V. 1935. Comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and
in vitro. J. Exper. Med., 62, 665-675.
Porter, R. W., Cavanaugh, E. B., and S.\wyer,
C. H. 1954. Alterations in hypothalamic activity of estrous cats following vaginal stimulation. Anat. Rec, 120, 775.
Price, D., and Ortiz, E. 1944. The relation of
age to reactivity in the reproductive system
of the rat. Endocrinology, 34, 215-239.
Rakoff, a. E., and C.^ntarow, A. 1950. Estrogen
content of blood of ovarian vein of the dog
and spermatic vein of the stallion. Fed. Proc,
9, 103.
Rasmussen, a. T. 1938. Innervation of the hypophysis. Endocrinology, 23, 263-278.
Risman, G. C. 1946. Experimental stimulation
of the female reproductive tract in the opossum {Didelphys virginianu). Anat. Rec, 94,
408.
Robinson, T. J. 1951. Reproduction in the ewe.
Biol. Rev., 26, 121-157.
Robson, J. M. 1937. Maintenance by estrin of
the luteal function in hj'pophyseetomized rabbits. J. Physiol., 90, 435-439.
RoBsoN, J. M. 1938. The role of gonadotrophic
hormone in the maintenance of luteal function. Quart. J. Exper. Physiol., 28, 49-59.
RoBSON, J. M. 1947. Recent Advances in Sex and
Reproductive Physiology. Philadelphia: Blakiston Company.
Ros.SMAN, I., and Bartelmez, G. W. 1946. Delayed ovulation, a significant factor in the
variability of the menstrual cycle. Am. J.
Obst. & Gynec, 52, 28-33.
Rothchild, I., Meyer, R. K., and Spielman, M. A.
1940. A ciuantitative study of oestrogen-progesterone interaction in the formation of placentomata in the castrate rat. Am. J. Phvsiol.,
128, 213-224.
Rothchild, I., .^nd Fraps, R. M. 1949. The induction of ovulating hormone release from the
liituitary of the domestic hen by means of
progesterone. Endocrinology, 44, 141-149.
Rothchild, I., and KoH, N. K. 1951. The effects
of a single preovulatory injection of jnogestcione on indices of ovulation in women. J.
Clin. Endocrinol., 11, 789.
Salmon, U. J. 1938. The effect of testosterone
propionate on tlic genital tract of the immature female rat. Kndocrinologv, 23, 779783.
Sanders, A., a.nd Rennels, E. (i. 1957. The
cytology and functional cai)acity of the rat
pituitary gland after autotransi)lantation.
Anat. Rec, 127,360.
Sawyer, C. H. 1919. Rrllrx induction of ovula
tion in the estrogen-treated rabbit by artificial vaginal stimulation. Anat. Rec, 103, 502.
Sawyer, C. H. 1952. Progesterone initially facilitates and later inhibits release of pituitary
ovulating hormone in the rabbit. Fed. Proc,
11, 138.
Sawyer, C. H. 1955. RhinencephaUc involvement in pituitary activation bj' intraventricular histamine in the rabbit under Nembutal
anesthesia. Am. J. Physiol., 180, 37-46.
Sawyer, C. H. 1958. Activation and blockade of
the release of pituitaiy gonadotropin as influenced by the reticular formation. In Reticular Formation of the Brain (Henry Ford Hospital Sj'mposium). Boston: Little, Brown &
Company.
Sawyer, C. H. 1959. Seasonal variation in the incidence of spontaneous ovulation in rabbits
following estrogen treatment. Endocrinology,
65, 523-525.
Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., .\nd Hollinshe.'^d,
W. H. 1947. Inhibition of ovulation in the
rabbit by the adrenergic-blocking agent Dibenamine. Endocrinology, 41, 395-402.
S.\wyer, C. H., Everett, J. W., .\nd M.^rkee, J. E.
1949. A neural factor in the mechanism by
which estrogen induces the release of luteinizing hormone in the rat. Endocrinology, 44,
218-233.
Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Townsend, B. F.
1949. Cholinergic and adrenergic components
in the neurohumoral control of the release of
LH in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 44, 18-37.
Sawyer, C. H., Everett, J. W., and M.^rkee, J. E.
1950. "Spontaneous" ovulation in the rabbit
following combined estrogen-progesterone
treatment. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med.,
74, 185-186.
Sawyer, C. H., M.'VRkee, J. E., and Everett, J. W.
1950a. Further experiments on blocking pituitary activation in the rabbit and the rat. J.
Exper. Zool., 113, 659-682.
Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., .\nd Everett, J. W.
1950b. Activation of the rabbit adenohypophysis bj^ intravenous injections of epinephrine
in the atropinized rabbit. Endocrinologv, 46,
536-543.
Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Everett, J. W.
1951a. Failure of nerve-blocking agents to
prevent the effects of placental gonadotrophins
in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 49, 162-167.
Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Everett, J. W.
1951b. Blockade of neurogenic stimulation of
the rabbit adcnohypoiihysis by Banthino. Am.
J . Physiol ., 1 66, 223-228 ."
Sawyer, C. H., and Imerktt, ,I. W . 1953. Priming
the anoslrous cat for reflex discharge of pituitarv ()\ ulating hormone. Proc Soc Exper. Biol,
it ivied., 83, 820-821.
Sawyer, C. H., and Parkerson, G. R., Jr. 1953.
Mechanisms of partial blockade of the stress
response in rats by Dibenamine analogues.
Endocrinology, 52, 346-356.
Sawyer, C. H., Chitchi.ow, B. V.. and B,\rraci.orcii, C. .\. 19.")5. Mechanism of blockade of pituitary activation in the rat by morphine,
atropine and barbiturates. Endocrinology, 57,
345-354.
Schmidt, I. G. 1936. The excretion of theelin in
the urine of guinea pigs with irradiated ovaries.
Anat. Rec, 64, 255-266.
Schmidt, I. G. 1942. Mitotic proliferation in the
ovary of the normal mature guinea pig treated
with colchicine. Am. J. Anat., 71, 245-270.
ScHULTZ, A. H., .\ND Snyder, F. F. 1935. Observations on reproduction in the chimpanzee. Bull.
Johns Hopkins Hosp., 57, 193-205.
ScHWEiZER, M., Ch.aripper, H. a., and Haterius,
H. O. 1937. Experimental studies of the
anterior pituitary. IV. The replacement capacity and the non-cyclic behavior of homoplastic anterior pituitary grafts. Endocrinology, 21, 30-39.
ScHWEizER, M. H., Charipper, H. a., and Kleinberg, W. 1940. Experimental studies of the
anterior pituitary. Endocrinology, 26, 979-986.
Selye, H. 1939. The effect of progesterone on the
mouse ovary as influenced by gestation. Anat.
Rec, 75, 59-73.
Selye, H. 1940. Production of persistent changes
in the genital organs of immature female rats
treated with testosterone. Endocrinologv, 27,
657-660.
Selye, H., and McKeown, T. 1934. Studies on
pseudopregnancy. Am. J. Physiol., 109, 96.
Selye, H., Collip, J. B., and Thomson, D. L.
1935. Effect of oestrin on ovaries and adrenals. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 13771381.
Selye, H., Browne, J. S. L., .^nd Collip, J. B. 1936.
Effects of large doses of progesterone in the
female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol, and Mefl.,
34, 472-474.
Shealy, C. N., and Peele, T. L. 1957. Studies on
the amygdaloid nucleus of the cat. J. Neurophj^sioL, 20, 125-139.
Shelesnyak, M. C. 1931. Induction of pseudopregnancy in the rat by means of electrical
stimulation. Anat. Rec, 49, 179-183.
Shibusawa, K., Saito, S., Fukuda, M., Kaw.m, T.,
Y.\MADA, H., and Tomiz.'Wva, K. 1955. Neurosecretion of oxytocin stimulates the release of
the pituitary gonadotrojjhin. Endocrinol.
Japon., 2, 183-188.
Simpson, M. E., Ev.\ns, H. M., Fraenkel-Conrat,
H. L., AND Li, C. H. 1941. Synergism of estrogens with pituitary gonadotropins in hypophvsectomized rats. Endocrinology, 28, 3741.
Simpson, M. E., and v.^n Wagenen, G. 1953. Response of the ovary of the monkey {Macaca
mulatta) to the administration of pituitary
follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Anat.
Rec, 115,370.
Smith, O. W. 1944. The pituitary responses of
mature male rats to an oxidation inactivation
product of estrone. Endocrinologv, 35, 146157.
Smith, O. W., Smith, G. VanS., .\nd Schiller, S.
1943. Clinical experiments in relation to the excretion of the estrogens. III. Urinary estrogens in a normal menstrual cycle and in a
case of essential dysmenorrhea. Am. J. Obst.
& Gynec, 45, 15-22.
Smith, P. E. 1939. The effect on the gonads of
the ablation and implantation of the hypophysis and the potency of the hypophysis under
various conditions. In Sex and Internal Secretions, 2nd ed., E. Allen, C. H. Danforth, and
E. A. Doisy, Eds., Ch. XVI. Baltimore: The
Williams & Wilkins Company.
Smith, P. E., and Engle, E. T. 1927. Experimental evidence regarding the role of the anterior pituitary in the development and regulation of the genital sy.stem. Am. J. Anat., 40,
159-217.
SiHTH, P. E., and White, W. E. 1931. The effect
of hypophy.sectomy on ovulation and corpus
luteum formation in the rabbit. J. A. M. A.,
97, 1861-1863.
Spatz, H. 1951. Neues liber die Verkniipfung von
Hyjjophyse und Hypothalamus. Mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Regulation sexueller Leistungen. Acta neuroveg., 3, 5-49.
Stafford, W. T., Collins, R. F., and Mossman,
H. W. 1942. The thecal gland in the guinea
pig ovary. Anat. Rec, 83, 193-203.
Sturgis, S. H. 1949. Rate and significance of
atresia of the ovarian follicle of the rhesus
monkey. Contr. Embryol., Carnegie Inst.
Washington, 33, 67-80.
Sturgis, S. H., ami Mi;i<;s. J. V. 1942. The use of
estradiol dii'iupionair in the treatment of essential dvsniriKirrliL'a. Surg. Gvnec & Obst.,
75, 87-92.
Sulman, F., and Black, R. 1945. The alleged
endocrine effect of Yohimbine. Endocrinologv,
36,70-71.
Swingle, W. W., Seay, P., Perlmutt, J., Collins,
E. J., Fedor, E. J., and B.^rlow, G., Jr. 1951.
Effect of electrical stimulation of uterine cervix upon sexual development of prei)ubertal
rats. Am. J. Physiol., 167, 599-604.
Takasugi, N. 1954. Einfliisse von Androgen und
Progestogen auf die Ovarien der Ratten, denen
sofort nach der Geburt Oestrogeninjection
durchgefiihrt wurde. J. Fac Sc Univ. Tokvo,
sec.IV, 7, 299-311.
Talbert, G. B., Meyer, R. K., and McShan, W. H.
1951. Effect of hypophysectomy at the beginning of proestrus on maturing follicles in the
ovary of the rat. Endocrinology, 49, 687-694.
Taubenhaus, M., and Soskin, S. 1941. Relea.se
of luteinizing hormone from the anterior
hypophysis by an acetylcholine-like substance
from the hvpotlialamic region. Endocrinologv,
29, 958-964.
Thompson, A. D. P., and Zuckerman, S. 1954.
The effect of pituitary-stalk section on lightinduced oestrus in ferrets. Proc Roy. Soc
London, ser. B, 142, 437-451.
ToBiN, C. E. 1942. Effects of lactogen on normal and adrenalectomized rats. Endocrinologv,
31, 197-200.
Ulberg, L. C. Christian, R. E., and Casida, L. E. 1951. Ovarian response in heifers to progesterone injections. J. Anim. Sc. 10, 752-759.
VAN Dyke, H. B., and Li, R. C. 1938. The secretion of progesterone by the cat's ovary following the formation of corpora lutea due to
the injection of anterior pituitary extract or
prolan. Chinese J. Physiol., 13, 213-228.
VAN TiENHOVEN, A. 1953. Further study on the
neurogenic blockage of LH release in the hen.
Anat. Rec, 115, 374-375.
VAN TiENHOVEN, A. 1955. The duration of stimulation of the fowl's anterior pituitary for progesterone-induced LH release. Endocrinology,
56, 667-674.
VAN TiENHOVEN, A., NaLBANDOV, A. V., AND NORTON,
H. W. 1954. Effect of Dibenamine on progesterone-induced and "spontaneous" ovulation in the hen. Endocrinology, 54, 605-611.
VAN Wagenen, G., and Simpson, M. E. 1957. Induction of multiple ovulation in the rhesus
monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology,
61, 316-318.
Velardo, J. T., AND Hisaw, F. L. 1951. Quantitative inhibition of progesterone by estrogens in
development of deciduomata. Endocrinology,
49, 530-537.
Vel.\rdo, J. T., Dawson, A. B., Olsen, A. G., and
His.wv, F. L. 1953. Sequence of histological
changes in the uterus and vagina of the rat
diu'ing prolongation of pseudopregnancy associated with the presence of deciduomata. Am.
J. Anat., 93, 273-305.
Velardo, J. T., Olsen, A. G., Hisaw, F. L., and
Dawson, A. B. 1953. The influence of decidual tissue upon pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology, 53, 216-220.
Venning, E. H., and Browne, J. S. L. 1937.
Studies on corpus luteum function. I. The
m-inary excretion of sodium pregnanediol glucnronidate in the human menstrual cvcle. En<l.)crmology, 21, 711-721.
Verly, W. G. 1951. The urinary excretion of
prenane-3a:20a-diol in the female rabbit immediatelv after mating. J. Endocrinol., 7, 258259.
Veziris, C. D. 1951. Cycle vaginal chez les femmes castrees ou menopausees. Ann. endocrinol., 12,917-921.
VoGT, M. 1931. ijber den Mechanismus der Auslosung der Graviditiit und Pseudograviditjit
zugleicli ein ]jhysiologischer Beweis fiir die
sympathische Innervation des Hypophysenvor(lerla])i>("ns. Arch, exper. Path. Pharmakol.,
162, 197-208.
VoGT, M. 1933. Uber den Mecli.iiiismus der Ausl().sung der Graviditiit. II. Mitlcilunji- Arcli.
exper. Path. Pharmakol., 170, 72-83.
Walton, A., and Hammond, J. 1928. Observations
on ovulation in the rabbit. Brit. J. Exper.
Biol., 6, 190-204.
W.\RWiCK, ]•]. J. 1946. Gonadolrophic potc^ncy of
ewe pituitary glands as affected by spaying,
.season, and breed. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. <fe
Med., 63, 530-533.
W.\ti;r.\ia\, A. J. 1943. Studies of normal development of the New Zealand White .strain
of rabbit. Am. J. Anat., 73, 473-515.
Weinberger, L. M., .\nd Grant, F. C. 1941. Precocious pubert}^ and tumors of the hypothalamus. Arch. Int. Med., 67, 762-792.
Werthessen, N. T., Schwenk, E., and Baker, C.
1953. Biosynthesis of estrone and /3-estradiol
in the perfused ovary. Science, 117, 380-381.
Westman, A. 1934. Untersuchung iiber die Abhangigkeit der P^unktion des Corpus luteum
von den 0\arialfollikeln und iiber die Bildungsstiitte der Hormone im Ovarium. Arch.
Gynak., 158, 476-504.
Westman, A. 1947. The effect of Prominal on
the sexual cvcle. Acta med. scandinav., 128,
Suppl. 196, 111-115.
Westman, A., and J.\cobsohn, D. 1936. tjber
Ovarialveranderungen beim Kaninchen nach
Hj'poph3^sektomie. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 16, 483-508.
Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1937a. Uber
Oestrinwirkung auf die Corpus luteum-Funktion. I. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17,
1-12.
Westman, A., .\nd Jacobsohn, D. 1937b. Uber
Oestrinwirkung auf die Corpus luteum-Funktion. II. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17,
13-23.
W^estman, a., and Jacobsohn, D. 1937c. Experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber die Bedeutung
des Hypophysen-Zwischenhirnsystems fiir die
Produktion gonadotroper Hormone des Hypophysenvorderlappens. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17, 235-265.
Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1938a. Endokrinologische Untersuchungen an Ratten mit
durchtrenntem Hypophysenstiel. I. Hypophysenveranderungen nach Kastration untl
nach Oestrinbehandlungen. Acta obst. gynec.
scandinav., 18, 99-108.
Westman, A., and Jacob.sohn, D. 1938b. Endokrinologische Untersuchungen an Ratten mit
durchtrenntem Hypophysenstiel. III. Uber
die luteinizierende Wirkung des Follikelhormons. Acta obst. gvnec. scandinav., 18, 115123.
Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1938c. Endokrinologische Untersuchimgen an Ratten mit
durchtrenntem Hy])<)i>h\ x ii-t iil. VI. Produktion und Abgabe (1< : iiini.ulotropcn Hormone. Acta path, et niii-niliKil. scandinav., 15,
445-453.
Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1940. Endokrinologische Unteisucliungen an Kaninchen
mit durchtrenntcMi Hypophyse.stic^l. Acta obst.
gynec. scandinav., 20, 392-433.
Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1942. Die Wirkung transorbital an das Tuber cinereum injizierten Novocains auf die Ovulation. Acta
ob.st. gynec. scandinav., 22, 16-23.
Whitaker, W. L. 1940. Some effects of artificial
ilhunin.ition on reproduction in the whiteI'ootcd mouse, Peromyscus leucopns Novel>uracrnsis. J. Exper. Zool., 83, 33-60.
Williams. P. C. 1940. Effect of stilboestrol on the ovaries of hyi>ophyseftomized rats. Nature, London, 145, 388-389.
WiLLi.AMS, P. C. 1944. 0\'arian stimulation by
oestrogens: effects in immature hypophysectomized rats. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B,
132, 189-199.
Williams, P. C. 1945a. Ovarian stimulation by
oestrogens. II. Stimulation in the absence of
the hypophysis, uterus, and adrenal glands.
J. Endocrinol., 4, 125-126.
WiLLi.AMS, P. C. 1945b. Studies of the biological
action of serum gonadotrophin. II. Ovarian
response after hypophysectomy and oestrogen
treatment. J. Endocrinol., 4, 131-136.
WiLsox, R. B., R.AXD.ALL, L. M., and Osterberg,
A. E. 1939. Studies on pregnandiol. Am.
J. Obst. & Gynec, 37, 59-74.
WiSLocKi, G. B., AND King, L. S. 1936. The permeability of the h.vpophysis and hypothalamus
to vital dyes, with a study of the hypophyseal
vascular supply. Am. J. Anat., 58, 421-472.
Wolfe, J. M. 1935. Reaction of ovaries of mature female rats to injection of oestrin. Proc.
Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 757-759.
Wolfe, J. M., and H.a.milton, J. B. 1937. Action
of male sex hormone with and without estrin
in the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. &
Med., 37, 189-193.
WoRTHiNGTON, W. C, Jr. 1955. Some observations on the hypophyseal portal system in the
living mouse. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 97,
343-357.
XuEREB, G. P., Prichard, M. M. L., and Daniel,
P. M. 1954. The hypophysial portal \essels
in man. Quart. J. Exper. Physiol., 39, 219-230.
Young, W. C, Boling, J. L., and Blandau, R. J.
1941. The vaginal smear picture, sexual receptivity, and time of ovulation in the albino
rat. Anat. Rec, 80, 37-45.
Young, W. C, and Yerkes, R. M. 1943. Factors
influencing the reproductive cycle in the chimpanzee; the period of adolescent sterility and
related problems. Endocrinology, 33, 121-154.
Z.ARRow, M. X., and Bastian, J. W. 1953. Blockade of ovulation in the hen with adrenolytic
and parasympatholytic drugs. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 84, 457-459.
Zondek, B., and Aschheim, S. 1927. Hypophysenvorderlappen und Ovarium. Beziehungen der
endokrinen Driisen zur Ovarialfunktion. Arch.
Gynak., 130, 1^5.
ZucKERMAN, S. 1937. The menstrual cycle of
primates. X. The oestrone threshold of the
uterus of the rhesus monkey. Proc. Rov. Soc.
London, ser. B, 123, 441-471.
ZucKERMAN, S. 1941. Periodic uterine bleeding in
spayed rhesus monkeys injected daily with a
constant threshold dose of oestrone. J. Endocrinol., 2, 263-267.
ZucKERMAN, S. 1952. The influence of environmental changes on the anterior pituitary.
Ciba Foundation CoUociuia Endocrinol., 4,
213-228.
ZucKERMAN, S., AND FuLTON, J. F. 1934. The
menstrual cycle of the primates. VII. The
sexual skin of the chimpanzee. J. Anat., 69,
38-46.
ZwARENSTEiN, H. 1937. Experimental induction
of ovulation with progesterone. Nature, London, 139, 112-113.

Latest revision as of 10:01, 15 June 2020

Embryology - 16 Jun 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Young WC. Sex and internal secretions. (1961) 3rd Eda. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore.
Section A Biologic Basis of Sex Cytologic and Genetic Basis of Sex | Role of Hormones in the Differentiation of Sex
Section B The Hypophysis and the Gonadotrophic Hormones in Relation to Reproduction Morphology of the Hypophysis Related to Its Function | Physiology of the Anterior Hypophysis in Relation to Reproduction
The Mammalian Testis | The Accessory Reproductive Glands of Mammals | The Mammalian Ovary | The Mammalian Female Reproductive Cycle and Its Controlling Mechanisms | Action of Estrogen and Progesterone on the Reproductive Tract of Lower Primates | The Mammary Gland and Lactation | Some Problems of the Metabolism and Mechanism of Action of Steroid Sex Hormones | Nutritional Effects on Endocrine Secretions
Section D Biology of Sperm and Ova, Fertilization, Implantation, the Placenta, and Pregnancy Biology of Spermatozoa | Biology of Eggs and Implantation | Histochemistry and Electron Microscopy of the Placenta | Gestation
Section E Physiology of Reproduction in Submammalian Vertebrates Endocrinology of Reproduction in Cold-blooded Vertebrates | Endocrinology of Reproduction in Birds
Section F Hormonal Regulation of Reproductive Behavior The Hormones and Mating Behavior | Gonadal Hormones and Social Behavior in Infrahuman Vertebrates | Gonadal Hormones and Parental Behavior in Birds and Infrahuman Mammals | Sex Hormones and Other Variables in Human Eroticism | The Ontogenesis of Sexual Behavior in Man | Cultural Determinants of Sexual Behavior
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

SECTION C Physiology of the Gonads and Accessory Organs

The Mammalian Female Reproductive Cycle and its Controlling Mechanisms

John W. Everett, Ph.D.

Professor Of Anatomy, Duke University Durham, North Carolina


I. Introduction

The chain of events that constitutes the female reproductive process is characteristically repeated from time to time with considerable regularity during the adult life of an individual, and is therefore a cycle. In the broad sense, this sequence begins with ovogenesis and terminates when the progeny require no further shelter and nurture. In mammals this has become a highly complex process, involving profound maternal adjustments synchronized with successive stages in development of the ovum, fetus, and offspring. The complete mammalian cycle comprises a sequence of stages which may be identified as follows: (II follicle growth, including growth of the ovocyte; (2) ovulation, a progressive process including preovulatory maturation of follicles and ova, and the structural change of ruptured follicles to corpora lutea; (3) progravidity; (4) gravidity; (5) parturition; and (6) postpartum nurture, including lactation, protection, and training. Although it is obvious that this full sequence is often realized, it may nevertheless be retarded or frankly interrupted at almost any point.

In advanced human societies economic and social factors have diminished the number of complete cycles to such degree that they are rarities in the lifetime of an individual and infertile ("menstmal") cycles are the rule. Inasmuch as corresponding factors operate among domesticated animals, the expression "female reproductive cycle" commonly refers to those truly abortive cycles that succeed one another in the absence of insemination. The term is used in that restricted sense in this chapter.

With even that restriction, the female cycle is actually a multiplicity of interlocking cycles, in which the rhythmic interplay between hypophysis and ovary is fundamental. Attention must therefore be focused on the physiology of the ovary and on the hormonal and neural mechanisms that integrate hypophysis and ovary as a functional system. Cyclic alterations in sex accessories and other nongonadal tissues are considered mainly as indicators. The "menstrual cycle," being strictly a uterine cycle, comes in this category, together with changes in behavior.

No attempt is made to present an exhaustive description of the varied adaptive modifications of the ovarian cycle among the several mammalian orders. The reader may consult works of the late F. H. A. Marshall whose full bibliography is given by Parkes (1949 1. Asdell's Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction (1946» is anotlu'i' A-alual)lo source.

II. Cycles Spontaneously Interrupted

Cycles in the natural state are only imperfectly known, from random and often erratic sampling. One may safely assume that, as a rule, under optimal conditions they are complete, fertile cycles. There are, then, relatively few subhuman species in wdiich the characteristics of incomplete cycles have been studied. These species are necessarily the very ones that have been amenable to some form of human restraint.

Segregation of the sexes or any other interference with insemination should be regarded as a first experimental approach to understanding the complete cycle. Such factors unriuestionably operate in nature on occasion. Controlled changes of environmental conditions afford another approach in which natural factors are simulated.

The statement was made earlier that the complete cycle may conceivably be interrupted at almost any point. It has been learned that in different species segregated females interrupt their cycles at different stages and that usually the point of interruption is species-characteristic. These facts have been of great service to the study of reproduction, first, by arousing the curiosity of the investigator and, second, by supplying a variety of ready made conditions individually appropriate for particular experimental studies.

Examples of mammalian cycles are schematically diagrammed in Figure 8.1. It is customary to state that the usual, or standard, infertile cycle is like that in primates or the guinea pig. The follicular phase culminates in spontaneous ovulation, after which corpora lutea are organized and become spontaneously functional for a period of time that is usually considerably shorter than in pregnancy.

In a few animals (rat, mouse, hamster) the cycle terminates shortly after ovulation before the corpora lutea become fully functional. Such corpora lutea are said to be inactive, in the sense that they cannot produce a decidual response to uterine trauma (Long and Evans, 1922). Sterile mating or analogous stimulation induces a luteal phase which corresponds to that of the "standard" mammal. This phenomenon is not entirely limited to the small rodents, having been described in the European hedgehog (Deanesly, 1934).

To this writer's knowledge there have not been described any mammalian species in which it is the rule that in isolated females the process of ovulation begins (follicle maturation, prelutein changes in granulosa, secretion of secondary liquor folliculi, and so on) without proceeding to eventual rupture of the follicles. Many cases could l3e cited, however, in which this has occurred "abnormally." Characteristically, some degree of luteinization occurs in the wall of such a follicle and a lutein cyst is formed.

On the other hand, there are numerous species (reflex ovulators) in which the preovulatory maturation of follicles and ovulation nearly always fail in the absence of the male. The known species in which this is true are widely distributed among the mammalian orders and are often closely related to other species in which spontaneous ovulation is usual. The domestic rabbit



Fig. 8.1. Diagrams of cycles of representative, familiar mammals. , the follicular phase, highly schematized and inaccurate in detail ; , atresia ; i , ovulation ; • , fully active corpora lutea; O, corpora lutea regressing or otherwise not fully active. When sterile mating or equivalent stimulation (SM) is introduced, the cycles of the rat, rabbit and cat become directly comparable with those of the other species.


furnishes the classic exaini)le of reflex ovulation. Other reflex ovulators are the domestic cat (Greulich, 1934), the ferret (Hammond and Walton, 1934), mink (Hansson, 1947), marten (Pearson and Enders, 1944), the 13-lined ground squirrel (Foster, 1934), and the mole shrew (Pearson, 1944). To this list have been added the muskrat (Miegel, 1952) and a field mouse, Microtus californicus (Greenwald, 1956). Even among the marsupials, the female Didelphijs azarae is said not to form corpora lutea in the absence of the male (Martinez-Esteve, 1937). A few of these species display nearly constant estrus (rabbit, ferret), competent follicles being present most of the time in the isolated female during the breeding season.

Among even the spontaneous ovulators the cycle may sometimes not progress beyond the follicular phase. Thus, at the approach of puberty, waves of advanced follicle development and secretion of estrogen may take place without, however, leading to ovulation or corpus luteum formation. The first cycles of primates are often anovulatory ones. In the adult macacjue, at least in some colonies, such cycles are characteristic during the summer months (Hartman, 1932) . A somewhat comparable seasonal effect has been reported in girls soon after the menarche (Engle and Shelesnyak, 1934). Menstrual cycles without ovulation have frecjuently been recognized in adult women in recent years, bearing no evident relationship to seasonal factors (Lopez Colombo de Allende, 1956). Anovulatory cycles were described in the mouse by Allen (1923) and have been noted occasionally in other species, but without clear measure of their incidence.

III. Pituitary-Ovarian Dormancy

Varying levels of pituitary-ovarian dormancy are expressed in different ways from species to species or even from habitat to habitat within a given species. A general similarity exists between the anestrum of seasonal breeders and the prepubertal state. In fact, in animals that have a distinct season, puberty occurs at the very time when older females are emerging from anestrum. Whereas anestrum is often correlated with season of the year, there are exceptions, notably among dogs, in which the correlation is ill defined (Engle, 1946).

In its shortest form ovarian quiescence lasts for only a few days, probably often without being recognized, between the end of one cycle and the active follicular phase of the next. In the chimpanzee it is thought to be the chief factor in the irregularity of length of the cycle (Young and Yerkes, 1943). Rossman and Bartelmez (1946) described a comparable occurrence in monkeys. At the other extreme, anestrum may occupy the major part of the year in monestrous animals that have a very limited breeding season.


A. The Ovary in Anestrum

Generally speaking, depression of ovarian function is most extreme in greatly prolonged periods of quiescence. In the ferret, Hammond and Marshall (1930) reported that in the anestrous ovary follicles can hardly be recognized with the naked eye, because they remain small and deeply placed. The largest follicles at the "end of the season" averaged 460 /x in diameter whereas a "long time after" the average was only 240 jx, increasing again to 720 yu, at the api^roach of a new season. By contrast, the largest follicles of animals in full heat ranged between 1220 and 1440 /x. Follicle atresia abounds in the anestrous ovary of the 13-lined ground squirrel (Johnson, Foster and Coco, 1933). In sheep, however, follicles of large size may be present at any time during anestrum (Kammlade, Welch, Nalbandov and Norton, 1952).

Some moderate degree of secretory activity of the ovary is indicated even at the depth of i^rolonged seasonal anestrum (13lincd ground squirrel, Moore, Simmons, Wells, Zalesky and Nelson, 1934; ferret, Hill and Parkes, 1933; opossum, Risman, 1946). Although at this time uterus, vagina, and vulva are small, ovariectomy or hypol^hysectomy causes a further reduction. On the other hand, these structures are readily stimulated by injection of estrogens.

It may be said that low-grade follicular cycles proceed throughout the anestrous interval, but whether there is any synchronization of one follicle with another is unknown. Some insight into this problem is furnished by study of (1) the transition from anestrum to the breeding season, and (2) the closely analogous phenomena of adolescence. In the report by Hammond and Marshall, it was shown that in ferrets during anestrum and proestrum there is a progressive increase in size of the vulva which directly parallels the diameter of the largest follicles. The absence of overt cyclic change is not surprising in view of the fact that estrus is continuous in this species. In polyestrous animals, on the other hand, it might be expected that during anestrum follicle growth and accompanying estrogen secretion are cyclic, at least at the approach of puberty or of "the season." Important information on this question has been obtained from some of the primates, notably the macaque (Allen, 1927; Hartman, 1932) and the chimpanzee (Zuckerman and Fulton, 1934; Schultz and Snyder, 1935).

Slight transitory reddening of the skin of the perineum ("sex skin") of the monkey may occur at intervals for several months preceding the onset of menses, accompanied by moderate desquamation of vaginal epithelium. During the long intervals of amenorrhea that some individuals exhibit during the summer, there is a tendency toward cyclic vaginal desciuamation (Fig. 8.2). The sex skin of the chimpanzee may begin to swell more than a year before the first menstruation. During the ensuing months the swelling may be irregularly cyclic or continuous. Thus, one may judge that lowgrade follicular cycles, accompanied by periodic increases in estrogen secretion, may succeed one another during seasonal or prepubertal anestrum, but that in certain cases these cycles may overlap to such degree that rather continuous estrogen secretion takes place.


B. The Hypophysis

The secretory activity of the anestrous ovary is apparently adequate to prevent "castration" changes in the adenohypophysis, for as shown by Moore, Simmons, \^'ells, Zalesky and Nelson (1934) removal of the ovary of anestrous ground squirrels results in hypertrophy of the hypophysis,



Fig. 8.2. Vaginal cycles during seasonal amenorrhea in a monkey. (A portion of the record of monkey ^38 from C. G. Hartman, Contr. EmbryoL, Carnegie Inst. Washington, 13, Fig. 26, p. 121, 1932.)


increased gonadotrophin content thereof, and increased numbers of basophile cells. Warwick (1946) reported a highly significant increase of pituitary potency in spayed anestrous ewes. This is closely analogous to the results of ovariectomy in immature animals (Hohlweg, 1934). As measured by ovarian activity, gonadotrophin secretion (release) may be greatly diminished during profound anestrum. The actual hypophyseal content of gonadotrophin seems to be markedly reduced during anestrum in some species (Moore, Simmons, Wells, Zalesky and Nelson, 1934), but possibly not in others. Cole and Miller (1935) and Warwick (1946) reported that there is no seasonal variation in sheep. A study by Kammlade, Welch, Nalbandov and Norton (1952) indicates that the average content is somewhat higher during anestrum than it is in cycling ewes. The major factor in this difference, however, seems to be that during the cycle the potency of the pituitary drops during estrus and the early luteal phase.

Somewhat similarly the potency of the immature rat hypophysis has been stated to be as high as that of the sexually active adult (Clark, 1935). The fact that the ovaries of the immature female or of the anestrous adult can be stimulated by injection of gonadotrophin indicates that gonadotrophin content of, the hypophysis in these cases is not a fair measure of liberation of the hormone into the blood stream. Therefore, it seems justifiable to assume, as Robinson (1951) did in the interpretation of anestrum in the ewe, that, in spite of the possible absence of seasonal assay variation.


there is, nevertheless, a depression of hypophyseal gonadotrophin release during anestrum. We may further assume that it is not completely depressed, for the ovary remains slightly active. Ovary and hypophysis are evidently in a state of equilibrium at a relatively low level of function. It seems likely that this state of affairs is brought about by the central nervous system, inasmuch as the seasonal depression in some species is closely dependent on the daily ratio of light to darkness.


C. Relationship of the Anestrum to the Seasons

This relationship is so varied among different species that many interesting questions are raised. In many cases the midpoint of anestrum coincides approximately with the shortest days of the year (Fig. 8.3). There are other examples, however, largely among the Artiodactyla, in which it coincides with the longest days. Sheep are notable examples (Robinson, 1951). Others, like the European common hare, experience a short anestrum during the time of rapidly decreasing daylight (Asdell, 1946). The Russian yak, on the other hand, is said to experience anestrum from December to May (i.e., while day length is increasing). A general explanation of these varied adaptive manifestations is elusive. There is reason to believe that although illumination, or the light/darkness ratio, (Kirkpatrick and Leopold, 1952; Hammond, Jr., 1953) has a rather direct and primary effect in some cases, its role is more or less indirect in others where such things as temperature, humidity, availability of food and water assume major importance (Marshall, 1942).



Fig. 8.3. Some representative seasonal breeders. Solid bars indicate breeding seasons (according to Asdell, 1946); blank intervals, periods of anestrum. Months of the year represented by letters at top of chart ; winter and summer solstaces marked by wavy lines. Southern hemisphere seasons converted to corresponding ones of the northern hemisphere. End of season for the Bighorn is vmcertain.


The complexity of the i)rol)lem is well illustrated by the 13-lined ground squirrel whose breeding season, like that of a multitude of small rodents, comes in the spring. Moore, Simmons, Wells, Zalesky and Nelson (1934) reported that increasing illumination, elevated temperature, and feeding all failed to bring the females into estrus out of season. If, however, hibernation was first induced by low temperature and darkness, premature estrus would follow. The conclusion was reached that hibernation itself is a necessary prerequisite. Ovarian development actually begins, under natural conditions, in early January in the midst of hibernation. Females exix'i-imentally maintained "continually for several months in cold and darkness, with more or less normal hibernation, [exhibit] sexual development at any time of the year, and periods of estrum have thus been . . . maintained for many months. ..." The impression is given tliat the conditions favoring hibernation also favor sexual development to such extent that breeding potentiality continues for a few months after emergence, in spite of elevated temperatures and long periods of illumination. In another rodent, Peromyscus leucopus, however, the length of daily illumination is of paramount importance. Temperature changes (4 to 25°C. ) have no effect on rejiroduction when lighting is adequate (Whitaker, 1940). Whereas a similar primaiy dependence on lighting can be shown in a number of other species from several orders, it is unwise to generalize that this is usually true.

IV. Attainment of Maturity. Emergence of Full Ovarian Function

Ahhough ('merg(>nce of the ovary from the state of quiescence is gradual, there is usually some outward sign that allows the observer to say that puberty has ari'ived or the breeding season has begun. In primates the accepted sign is the first menstruation ; in rats it is the opening of the vagina ; in many animals it is the swelling and reddening of the genitalia heralding the initial proestrum. In other eases, e.g., sheep, the only clear indication may be the behavior of the female toward the male. From these facts it is readily apparent that any one sign is employed simply because it happens to be accessible to easy observation. Yet the increasing output of estrogen, whether steady or cyclic, affects many parts of the organism at the same time. Furthermore, in any one individual the threshold for exl)ression of a given sign may be relatively liigh with respect to that of some other manifestation. Thus, in Hartman's monkeys (1932), some were noted in which desquamation of vaginal epithelium occurred in wave-like manner for a long time before menstruation. In others "menstrual" bleeding occurred with regularity while the uterus remained very small and A'aginal desquamation was negligible.

Hartman summarized the step-wise manner of maturation of ovary and accessory organs of the monkey during adolescence or following amenorrheic episodes somewhat as follows. The color of the sex skin may be the first to appear. A slight menstrual flow usually takes place before desquamation of vaginal epithelium becomes measurable. "More rarely there may be one or more low desquamation cycles before a bleeding is recorded. Whole cycles marked liy jieriodic bleeding and some vaginal desquamation may occur before there is any noticeable increase in size of the ovaries and uterus. These organs increase also in a saltatory manner, hence the term 'staircase' phenomenon for the process. Finally, the endocrines effect the acme of the reproductive process — ovulation."

Individual variation in the degree of abruptness with which the first ovulation is achieved is well illustrated in a study of puljertal guinea pigs by Ford and Young (1953). In most cases the first period of vaginal opening was much longer than in subsequent cycles. Whatever the duration, ovulation was more closely related to the end than to the beginning of the period, as indicated by histologic study of ovaries.

Even ovulation and corpus luteum formation do not signify that full power of reproduction has arrived. For example, the first cycle of the adolescent rat may culminate in ovulation without sexual receptivity (Blandau and Money, 1943). In the ewe, an ovulation without overt signs of heat may at times take place during the anestrum, especially just before and just after the breeding season (McKenzie and Terrill, 1936). The phenomenon is occasional in ewes during the season and has also been described in cattle (Hammond, 1946). In fact, the full manifestation of estrus in sheep seems to require the presence of a "waning" corpus luteum (Robinson, 1951). In sheep the transition from seasonal or prepubertal anestrum to the breeding season may involve relatively minor changes in hypophyseal activity. Even in the immature rat both the hypophysis and the ovary are capable of far greater secretory function than they normally display. In the equilibrium that prevails, the ovary appears to hold the upper hand by reason of a low hypophyseal threshold at which estrogen suppresses gonadotrophin secretion in the immature individual (Hohlweg and Dohrn, 1932; Byrnes and Meyer, 1951b) and a low ovarian threshold at which gonadotrophin stimulates estrogen secretion. Byrnes and Meyer (1951a) reported that suppression of hypophyseal gonadotrophin content in immature rats can be accomplished with doses of estrogen much smaller than those that affect uterine growth. It is also known that the immature ovary can be induced experimentally to secrete estrogen by injection of amounts of gonadotrophin that are too small to produce significant increase of ovarian weight or follicle development (Levin and Tyndale, 1937; Moon and Li, 1952). When a gonadectomized immature rat is united in parabiosis (Kallas, 1929, 1930 » with a normal or hypophysectomized female littermate, precocious puberty is induced in the latter animal because insufficient estrogen passes to the first partner to inhibit gonadotrophin secretion (see Finerty, 1952). The somewhat analogous experiment of transplanting ovaries to the spleen produces ovarian hypertrophy in much the same way. Here again, it is thought that the hypophysis becomes hyperactive because the amount of estrogen reaching the ghmd is greatly diminished, through inactivation bj^ the liver (Biskind, 1941).

Although it is true that estrogens have a suppressing action on gonadotrophin secretion, it has become increasingly evident that they can also stimulate hypophyseal function in certain ways, as Engle pro{)osed in 1931. Thus short-term injection of estrogen into intact immature rats and mice will invoke precocious puberty not only by stimulating the sex accessories, but also by increasing gonadotrophin secretion and thus causing ovarian growth and even ovulation. Frank, Kingery and Gustavson (1925j reported that after such treatment regular cycles continued after treatment was withdrawn. Lane (1935) found that when 22day-old female rats were injected daily with estrogen there was an early increase in number of ovarian follicles, including vesicular stages. After the first 10 days the nonvesicular follicles became depressed although vesicular follicles were retained. This was interpreted to mean that for a short time estrogen actually stimulates the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) l)ut eventually suppresses it, although luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion remains elevated. Hohlweg (1934) had already demonstrated that when somewhat older prepubertal rats are given single, rather large injections of estrogen, ovulation and corpus luteum formation are induced within a few days (p. 514). Obviously LH secretion is greatly increased.

Various bits of evidence implicate the nervous system in the processes leading to puberty and to the onset of estrus in seasonal breeders. This will be discussed in the following section with respect to the general (juestion of the relationship of the hypothalamus to gonadotrophin secretion.

V. Follicular Cycles. Growth and Atresia

Attention will be focused here on the dynamic pattern of follicle development throughout the cycle, the extent to which this i)attern depends on hyi)o[)hyseal conti'ol, and the functional changes in the o\aiy associated with estrus in preparation foi' the more specialized events that lead to ovuhition and corpus luteum formation.


Production of primordial follicles and the early growth stages have been said to be independent of the hypophysis (Smith, 1939; Hisaw, 1947). This view derives from the fact that following hypophysectomy the ovaries retain large numbers of healthy proliferating follicles below the stage of antrum formation. There are, however, several indications that these developmental stages may be accelerated by gonadotrophic stimulation. It was briefly reported by Simpson and van Wagenen (1953) that administration of purified FSH to immature monkeys caused not only a 10- to 20-fold 'increase of ovarian weight, but also stimulation of granulosa in follicles of all sizes. Indirect evidence comes from the fact that follicle atresia generally becomes maximal late in estrus or metestrum, when depressed FSH might be expected on theoretical grounds. Harrison (1948) reported tliat in ovaries of goats killed on the third or fourth days of estrus healthy primary ovocytes are rare. Some few, however, presumably remain. Myers, Young and Dempsey (1936) stated that in the estrous guinea pig there are few nonatretic follicles aside from those destined for ovulation. However, small numbers of normal ai)pearing nonvesicular follicles were found.

There seems to be general agreement that, very quickly after this catastrophic elimination of follicles, renewed growth promptly ensues. Whether or not the wave of atresia represents a depression of FSH secretion, no one would deny that the new growth reflects this type of gonadotrophic stimulation. Characteristically the population of small and medium follicles is restored early in the luteal phase of the polyestrous cycle. This is clearly indicated for the guinea pig ovary (Myers, Young and Dempsey, 1936) when the data are converted from average volumes to average diameters (Fig. 8.4). Beginning on the fourth day after estrus, when the largest follicles are approximately 300 fx in diameter and when theca interna and antra have formed, rapid growth of granulosa, theca, and antra continues for several days. This is confirmed by counts of mitotic figures obtained by the colchicine technique (Schmidt, 1942), indicating greatest mitotic activity in theca and granulosa of follicles between 300 fi and 600 fx in diameter. By the


Fig. 8.4. A schematic repiesentation of the folhcuhir cycle in the guinea pig. The heavj^ sohd curve represents the diameters of the largest follicles, recalculated from the data of Myers, Young and Dempsey (1936). The arrow point indicates ovulation. The other solid curves and broken lines represent impressionistically the growth and atresia, respectivelj^ of other groups of follicles that are not ordinarily destined for ovulation.


11th or 12th day the largest follicles (ca. 800 /x) are "competent," i.e., capable of being ovulated (Dempsey, Hertz and Young, 1936; Dempsey, 1937). While the largest follicles are developing to this stage, multitudes of others begin to grow, being carried on to various stages of development before regression sets in.

This pattern of the follicular cycle seems to be generally true among mammals that have been carefully studied, when allowance is made for the fact that from one species to another the characteristic maxima of follicle diameter are extremely variable (shrew, 350 fjL-, rat, 900 /*; cow, 19,000 /x; mare 70,000 /x; Asdell, 1946). In ovulatory cycles of polyestrous animals the greater part of follicle growth is accomplished while the luteal phase of the preceding cycle is in progress. In successive anovulatory cycles like those of the cat the patterns of the follicular cycles are probably much the same (Evans and Swezy, 1931 » . In the rabbit and ferret, where more or less constant estrus characterizes the isolated females in season, there is probably considerable telescoping of successive waves of follicle growth such that as one set of follicles begins to undergo atresia another set is ready to take its place (Hill and White, 1933). The difference between cat cycles and rabbit cycles seems to be chiefly one of degree. The writer has seen both types represented in persistent-estrous rats, among litter mates of inbred strains (Everett, 1939, and unpublished).


At the end of the luteal phase of the cycle in polyestrous animals there are already present several competent follicles among an extensive population of smaller ones. For example, the guinea pig corpus luteum usually shows signs of regression on day 13 of the cycle. It has been proved that ovulation can be induced as early as day 12 by injection of LH (Dempsey, 1937), several days earlier than it would normalh^ occur (Fig. 8.5). In the human and monkey it is possible that the "preferred" follicles are recognizable by their larger size during



Fig. 8.5. The guinea pig follieular cycle and some of its experimental modifications. (After E. W. Dempsey, Am. J. Physiol., 120, 126-132, 1937.)


or soon after menstruation (Allen, Pratt, Newell and Bland, 1930; Hartman, 1932). In many mammals competent follicles may be present much earlier. Ablation of corpora lutea soon after ovulation in sheep (McKenzie and Terrill, 1936) and cattle (Hammond, Jr., and Bhattacharya, 1944) is followed in 2 to 4 days by another ovulation, much sooner than in the guinea pig (Fig. 8.5). Removal of the primate corpus luteum, at the other extreme, produces no such immediate response, judging from the details of three cases among Hartman's (1932) protocols (#40, #41, and #99). Whereas the next ovulations took place earlier than expectation, the intervals between unilateral ovariectomy and ovulation were 16, 14, and 22 days, respectively.

From detailed investigations in the rat, only the earlier stages of follicle growth may properly be regarded as pure FSH effects (Lane, 1935). Lane and Greep (1935) found that addition of Lli to FSH causes a marked increase in the proportion of vesicular follicles to follicles without antra. The use of more highly purified materials ((irecp, van Dyke and Chow, 1942; Fraenkel-Conrat, Li and Simpson, 1943) has amply confirmed the necessity for combination of the two gonadotrophins to yield maximal follicle growth and estrogen secretion ill rats. Morphologic evidence indicates that


LH acts selectively on thecal tissue and, therefore, on the interstitial tissue derived therefrom. Inasmuch as thecal tissue is the presumptive major source of ovarian estrogen (see below), it follows, perhaps, as Hisaw (1947) suggested that "the theca interna through the action of LH acquires competence to respond to FSH" (by secreting estrogen) .

Convincing evidence that thecal tissue and its derivatives are the principal sources of ovarian estrogen was assembled by Corner (1938). The status of this question remains essentially the same today. Few endocrinologists, however, would assume that no other ovarian cells have this capacity (see discussion in the chapter on the ovary). Nevertheless, there is a direct correlation in time between the marked rise in estrogen secretion as the follicular jihase of the cycle advances, on the one hand, and the organization of tlicca interna of the largest follicles into organs of obvious endocrine character, on the other. "When especially ])rominent the theca interna is referred to as the "thecal gland" (Mossman, 1937; Stafford, Collins and ]\Iossman (1942).

Thecal tissue from the multitudes of atretic follicles should not be neglected as a possible additional source of estrogen. From the standpoint of chronologic relations to the cycle this (iiiestioii has hardly been touched. Pointing up our ignorance, Sturgis (1949) in a careful study of atresia of large follicles in the monkey ovary, speculated that their hypertrophied thecal tissue may serve the useful purpose of estrogen secretion during the interim between follicle rupture and organization of the corpus luteum.

We are in need of ciuantitative appraisals not only of the total numbers of healthy and atretic follicles of all categories present in representative species at progressive stages of the cycle, as in the work on the rat by Mandl and Zuckerman (1952), but also of the respective volumes of theca, granulosa, interstitial tissue, and corpora lutea. Lane and Davis (1939) determined in rat ovaries at four stages of the cycle the respective total volumes of theca, granulosa, and antra in all healthy follicles, as well as the separate mitotic indices of theca and granulosa. Such differential information on multiplication of cells and increase of antral volume is important. Although the latter accounts for a major part of the increase in volume of the larger follicles, it represents a function quite apart from protoplasmic growth per se.

There is now considerable evidence that estrogen itself exerts a growth -promoting influence on the follicle and, furthermore, sensitizes it to gonadotrophic stimulation. Details may be found in papers by Pencharz (1940), Williams (1940, 1944, 1945a, b), Simpson, Evans, Fraenkel-Conrat and Li (1941) , Gaarenstroom and de Jongh (1946) , and Desclin (1949a,) . Although it seems that these effects have not been elicited by physiologic doses, the possibility remains that estrogen operates within the confines of the ovary as a mediator of some of the effects of the gonadotrophins. In the neighborhood of cells that produce it the estrogen concentration is probably far above that which would be considered physiologic for the remainder of the body.


A. Correlation of Ovarian Secretion with the Follicular Cycle

Knowledge of the secretory output of the ovary during the cycle is almost entirely indirect and derives chiefly from (1) substitution experiments carried out in a vari


ety of si)ecies, and (2) assays of urine, mainly human but occasionally from other forms. Satisfactory assays of blood estrogen have been very limited and chemical analysis of the steroid content of ovarian venous blood is in only its preliminary stages.

The early substitution experiments are chiefly of historic interest (Allen, Danforth and Doisy, 1939). In great measure these investigations constitute crucial steps in proof that the ovary secretes steroid hormones which are fundamentally responsible for the manifestations of estrus. Conversely, then, these manifestations might be considered to reflect an increase of estrogen secretion and their absence a relative decrease. It has been learned, however, that the action of estrogen in certain instances may be greatly modified by progesterone, androgens, and certain adrenocortical steroids (notably desoxycorticosterone). Androgens are known to be secreted in the female by the adrenal cortex (Dorfman and van Wagenen, 1941 ; Gassner, 1952) and by the ovaries (Hill, 1937a, b; Parkes, 1950; Deanesly, 1938; Burrill and Greene, 1941; Pfeiffer and Hooker, 1942; Alloiteau, 1952). Progesterone secretion is probably not confined to the luteal phase of the cycle (see p. 519j. Evidence for its secretion during follicle maturation is considerable and its possible production even earlier cannot be excluded. These considerations make it unwise, therefore, to regard phenomena such as vaginal cornification, turgescence of vulva and sex skin, uterine growth, as direct ciuantitative measures of estrogen output. This point may be illustrated by certain observations made in chim])anzees by Fish, Young and Dorfman (1941) and illustrated in Figure 8.6. Assays of urinary estrogens during the cycle exhibited two peaks, only the first of which coincided with the swelling of sex skin. The second peak of estrogen excretion was unaccompanied by swelling, presumably because of the coordinate increase of progesterone secretion. Had swelling been the only guide only the first peak would have been apparent.

Assays of urinary estrogen in primates have often shown double peaks such as illustrated for the chimpanzee. PedersenBjergaard and Pederson-Bjergaard (1948i.


Fig. 8.6. E.strogen and androgen excretion by a female chimpanzee, Mamo. , total estrogens; , estradiol; -•-•, estrone; , estriol. Menstruation indicated by solid areas on base line. (From W. R. Fish, W. C. Young and R. I. Dorfman, Endocrinology, 28, 588,1941.)


studying one woman for 2 years, found single peaks at midinterval in 8 cycles and double peaks in 12 cycles. On the average the first peak was reached on day 12 and the second on day 21. Similar double peaks were noted in blood estrogen assays in a large group of normal young women (Markee and Berg, 1944). An additional lesser rise was observed during menstruation.

None of the available assays of urinary or blood estrogen can be accepted as an absolute measure of the rate of hormone production. Urinary assays have certain advantages, in spite of the fact that probably only a variable fraction of the ovarian product is measured. Intrinsically they are measures of rate, whereas assays of blood estrogen measure concentration alone at the moment of bleeding. Attempts have been made to measure estrogens in ovarian venous blood, but with little success because of the extreme dilution (Rakoff and Cantarow, 1950). We may hope that development of sufficiently sensitive methods of detection will soon allow systematic evaluation of ovarian output by such direct means. Tracer techniciucs have shown (Werthessen, Schwenk and Baker, 1953) in perfused ovaries of the sow that C^^-acetate enters into the synthesis of estrone and /^-estradiol.

Several years ago Corner (1940) estimated, from the known amounts of injected estrone required to maintain the normal status of sex skin and endometrium in castrates that the ovaries of an adult rhesus monkey secrete the equivalent of about 20 fig. estrone daily. On a weight basis the estrone equivalent secreted by the ovaries of a woman would then be on the order of 300 /Ag. per day. Actual substitution data from castrated women gave an estimate of the same order of magnitude (420 ;u,g. per day). Whatever the rate of secretion may be at different times, it would seem a 'priori that effects on extra-ovarian tissues should be more directly related to amount of estrogen in circulation. The assays of human bloodestrogen in normal women by Markee and Berg (1944) and in gynecologic patients by Fluhmann (1934), although differing in absolute values, agree in indicating that the variation of blood estrogen concentration from one stage of the cycle to another may be relatively small. If this is true, then it nuist be supposed that cyclic changes in the accessory organs are brought about by relatively moderate changes in circulating estrogen. In support of this view Markee (1948) demonstrated in the macaque that a mere 50 per cent reduction in the daily dose of estrogen can invoke menstruation if the change is abrupt.


B. Cyclic Manifestations After Ovariectomy Or Hypophysectomy

Residual cyclic changes in the vagina liave been reported in ovariectomized mice (Kostitch and Telebakovitch, 1929) and rats (Mandl, 1951). The periodicity is very nearly that of the normal cycles, at least in the latter species. Vaginal cycles of similar duration with more extreme estrous changes are found in ovariectomized rats receiving daily injection of threshold doses of estrogens (del Castillo and Calatroni, 1930; Bourne and Zuckerman, 1941). The same was remarked in mice by Emmens (1939) and a report by Veziris (1951) indicates that vaginal periodicity may obtain in castrated or menopausal women receiving estrogen. Although sucli events have been called threshold cycles," the term may simply express the fact that they are most easily recognized when estrogen is given at threshold level. Hartman (1944), employing a modified Shorr stain for vaginal smears, found that castrated rats given large amounts of estrogen daily (5 to 100 fig. estradiol dipropionate) displayed complete cornification at 4- to 5-day intervals. During the time intervening there was admixture of Shorr cells, smaller epithelial cells, and leukocytes.

Analogous phenomena have been recognized in the endometrium of castrated monkeys (Zuckerman, 1937, 1941) injected daily for as long as 1 year with threshold doses of estrone (10 fig.). Larger doses prevent cyclic bleeding (see Hisaw, 1942). From the report of Veziris (1951) it may be judged that threshold endometrial cycles also occur in women and that the vaginal and endometrial cycles are synchronized in considerable extent.

Full explanation of these phenomena is not at hand. From the standpoint of the present discussion certain considerations are especially noteworthy. (1) Vaginal "threshold cycles" have been obtained in castrated rats in the absence of either hypophysis or adrenals (Bourne and Zuckerman, 1941 ; del Castillo and di Paola, 1942) . The former authors encountered the phenomenon in two rats from which both the hypophysis and adrenals had been removed. It is important to remember, however, that the pars tuberalis remains in situ after the usual hypophysectomy procedure, that accessory adrenocortical tissue is frequent in rats, and that gonadal rests might remain unrecognized. (2) The reported lengths of vaginal and endometrial cycles agree favorably with the cycle lengths in intact individuals of the respective species. The degree of conformity between vaginal and uterine cycles indicated by Veziris {loc. cit.) suggests some sort of integrating mechanism. Much more information is required, however, before one may reject the alternative view that rhythmic activity is an innate characteristic of these organs.


C. Cyclic Manifestations in the Absence of Ovarian Follicles

Many years ago Parkes (1926a, b) and Brambell, Parkes and Fielding (1927a, b) reported vaginal and uterine cycles in mice in which the entire follicular apparatus had been destroyed by x-radiation. Schmidt (1936) described the phenomenon in the guinea pig, noting that, although most of her estrous animals had one or more large atretic or cystic follicles, as she had earlier reported (Genther, 1931), a few animals exiiil)ited periodic vaginal opening of short duration and correlated proestrous vaginal smears, in the absence of follicles. Her assays of urinary estrogen were negative in these animals, unlike the positive assays in those in which one or more follicles were demonstrable. Attempts by several workers (Drips and Ford, 1932; Levine and Witschi, 1933; Mandel, 1935) to reproduce in rats the results that Parkes and Brambell had found in mice, were unsuccessful, a fact indicating no estrogenic activity in ovaries completely lacking follicles and ova. Parkes (1952) more recently returned to this problem, reporting vaginal cycles and "fully functional" uteri in castrated rats bearing grafts of ovaries in which all organized follicles and ovocytes had been destroyed by deep freezing. These were true estrous cycles, in the sense that the animals would mate.

Many questions are posed by these observations. The fundamental one seems to be whether these cycles express periodicity of hypophyseal gonadotrophin secretion.


The answer may be long in coming. Meanwhile, one would like to know whether castration changes are visible in the hypophysis and whether constant estrus may be invoked by exposure to continuous light or by postnatal treatment of the host with androgen or other steroids (see p. 529 1 .


D. Hypothalamus and Gonadotrophin Secretion. General Considerations

Experimental studies, ostensibly addressed to the general problem of neural control of gonadotropin secretion, have in fact often been concerned with the special problems of reflex ovulation <p. 520) or of provoked pseudopregnancy (p. 532). Whereas substantial information is now available w^ith respect to these special phenomena, particularly ovulation, information is limited about control of the day-to-day secretion of gonadotrophin that in the female is responsible for follicle stimulation and estrogen secretion (Benoit and Assenmacher, 1955; Harris, 1955). However, evidence in regard to induction of precocious puberty and early onset of estrus in seasonal breeders leaves no doubt that the nervous system is in some manner a regulator of follicle-stimulating activitv of the i)ars distalis.

Numerous reports associate precocious l)uberty with lesions in the hypothalamus (Weinberger and Grant, 1941; Bauer, 1954; Harris, 1955). Donovan and van der Werff ten Bosch (1956) reported off-season estrus in ferrets and precocious puberty in rats following retrochiasmatic lesions in the hyjiotlialamus. Exposure of immature rats to continuous light causes the vagina to open prematurely (Fiske, 1941). When 22-dayold female rats were given electrical stimulation of the cervix uteri daily for 10 days (Swingle, Seay, Perlmutt, Collins, Fedor and Barlow, 1951), a large proportion exhibited significant increase in uterine weight beyond that found in control animals, without change in ovarian weight. In fact, 7 of 50 rats ovulated or at least formed "several well-developed corpora lutca." Somewhat similarly, according to Aron and AronBrunetierc (1953), mechanical stimulation of the vagina or the adjacent segment of the uterus in immature guinea pigs regularly provoked follicle growth and estrogen secretion. In gregarious birds the development of ovulable follicles requires that other individuals of the species be present. In the pigeon, even the mirror image of the female constitutes a sufficient stimulus (Matthews, 1939).

Studies by Flerko and his associates (1954-1957) present consistent evidence that restricted bilateral lesions in the region of the paraventricular nuclei serve to liberate the hypophysis from inhibitory effects of estrogen and androgen. This work is in agreement with that of Donovan and van der Werff ten Bosch in that somewhat similarly located lesions brought on precocious puberty. As noted elsewhere, gonadectomy in immature rats quickly results in hypersecretion of gonadotrophin.

Transplantation of the hypophysis to sites remote from the hypothalamus has produced divergent results. At the present writing, the chief divergence seems to rest between the sexes. In male guinea pigs and rats several workers have reported maintenance of male reproductive tracts by intra-ocular transplants of hypophyses (May, 1937; Schweizer, Charipper and Kleinberg, 1940; Cutuly, 1941a; Courrier, 1956; Goldberg and Knobil, 1957). Quite to the contrary, however, there has at best been only equivocal evidence of maintenance of female tracts, a matter of sex difference which needs full investigation. JNIay's (1937) report of 2 fertile female rats is unacceptable because of inadequate controls. Schweizer, Charipper and Haterius (1937) found in several hypophysectomized guinea pigs that intra-ocular pituitary grafts produced constant estrus and significant follicle stimulation, accompanied by uterine and mammary gland develoi)inent. Although the search for pituitary remnants in the sella turcica was reported negative, the histologic check was limited to scrapings from the sella floor. Other authors, notably Phelps, Ellison and Burch (1939), Westman and Jacobsohn (1940), Harris and Jacobsohn (1952), and Elverett ( 1956a) obtained in female rats little or no evidence of gonadotrophin secretion from apparently healthy, well vascularized grafts. The respective sites were intraniusculai', intra-ocular, in the subarachnoid space under the temporal lobe of the brain, and beneath the renal capsule — all distant from the hypothalamus.

Transplantation of the pars distalis into sites close to the hypothalamus, on the other hand, is characteristically followed by maintenance of the female reproductive tract and essentially normal sex functions. Greep (1936) found that re-implantation of hypophyses into the (presumably) emptied capsule was frequently followed in both male and female rats by return of virtually normal reproductive powers. Females exhibited cycles and even went through successful pregnancy and lactation. The result observed in male rats was confirmed by Cutuly (1941a). The obvious difficulty of establishing completeness of hypophysectomy has been the only criticism of these instructive experiments. This fault has been eliminated by an improved procedure devised by Harris and Jacobsohn (1952). Hypophysectomy was performed by the parapharyngeal route, after which the tissue to l)e grafted was introduced by a transtemporal approach to a site immediately beneath the median eminence. This permitted later histologic search for remnants of the original gland in its capsule. In many cases, including all in which the graft comprised several hypophyses from the animal's own newborn young, entirely normal gonadotrophic function was recorded. This included resumption of regular estrous cycles, typically during the 2nd or 3rd postoperative week. Several of the rats became pregnant and delivered viable litters. In marked contrast, none of the grafts that were placed under the temporal lobe gave any indication of gonadotrophin secretion, although they were as well preserved and richly vascularized as the others. Explanation of the difference seems to be that grafts under the median eminence acquire blood supply from regenerated hypophyseal portal veins and iience a neurovascular linkage with the hypothalamus. The importance of this relationship has been amply confirmed by Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett (1957, 1958d) in studies described below.

In lieu of significant numbers of nerve fibers entering the pars distalis (see Rasmussen, 1938; Harris. 1948a I, the hypophyseal portal veins afford the most likely means by which the gland is brought under hypothalamic control. Recently it was demonstrated in rats and monkeys that these vessels have the power of rapid regeneration after simple stalk-section (Harris, 1949, 1950a, b). This fact at once gives a ready explanation of many of the discordant results of stalk-section experiments reported in the past. Harris (1950b) explored in rats the efficacy of various materials as barriers to regeneration, with the result that numerous examples of partial regeneration were produced. Degree of recovery of gonadotropliic activity by the hypophysis was strikingly correlated with degree of anatomic vascular recovery. Restoration of normal ovarian function after simple interruption of the stalk, as reported in the guinea pig by Dempsey (1939), in rats by Dempsey and Uotila (1940) , and in the human by Dandy (1940), is thus explained by the assumption that portal vein regeneration had taken place. On the other hand, Westman and Jacobsohn (1937-1938), who always inserted a barrier of metal foil between the median eminence and hypophyseal capsule, consistently found ovarian atrophy, as did Harris when portal vein regeneration was completely obstructed. Attempting to prove that the portal vessels are not essential in regulating the hypophysis, Thompson and Zuckerman (1954) stated that increased illumination induced estrus in two ferrets after stalk-section and in the absence of demonstrable regeneration of portal vessels. Donovan and Harris (1954), however, examining the histologic sections prepared from 1 of the 2 animals, found many such vessels that were uninfected. In their own experimental series, an estrous response to light was always associated with regeneration of the portal veins.

Greep and Barrnett (1951) rightly emphasized the prime importance of a good vascular supply for recovery of function by the pars distalis after either transplantation or stalk-section. They pointed to the extensive central infarction and scarring that characteristically followed stalk-section by their technique, an obvious factor contributing to hypopituitarism. Harris (1950a I, however, reported good function from several hypophyses in which there was pronounced central necrosis in company with well regenerated portal vessels. A study by Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett (1957, 1958b) established beyond doubt that qualitative functional losses after stalk-sectron or transplantation of the pars distalis result, not from impaired blood supply per se, but from the loss of the intimate neurovascular relationship with the hypothalamus. Hypo])hyseal autografts, after first being placed under the kidney capsule for several weeks with the usual atrophy of the ovarian follicular apparatus and interstitial tissue, were later retransplanted to a site immediately under the median eminence. In the definitive series of 14 such experiments, 13 rats resumed estrous cycles spontaneously 8 to 68 days after retransplantation ; 7 were fertile and carried litters to term. A correlated study (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1959) demonstrated clearly that on the occasion of each of these successive transplantations there was massive necrosis of the interior of the glandular mass, leaving but a thin shell from which the functional tissue of the graft was reconstituted. In spite of this double insult some special influence of the hypothalamus brought about renewed function in a surprising number of cases. Together with the restoration of gonadotrophic activity there was significant improvement in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion. The considerable net loss of hypophyseal parenchyma resulting from the two operations was reflected only quantitatively in the effects on the various target organs. Ovarian weights, numbers of follicles and corpora lutea, adrenal weights and extent of adrenal hypertroi)liy after unilateral adrenalectomy, and thyroid uptake of P^^ were all intermediate between those of the normal female rat and control animals in which the graft remained on the kidney or was retransplanted under the temporal lobe of the brain.

Regulation of pars distalis secretion by means of the stalk vessels may conceivably be carried out either by regulation of blood How or by transmission of chemical mediatoi-s from the proximal capillary plexus in the median eminence to the pars distalis. An experiment describetl by Swingle, Seay, Perlmutt, Collins, Fedor and Barlow (1951) suggested that a mediator subject to Dibenamine blockade might be involved in precocious puberty. Although significant uterine enlargement was produced in immature rats by daily stimulation of the cervix uteri for 10 days, no such effects were observed in similar rats given Dibenamine daily by stomach tube. Unfortunately, there were no controls for the possible effect of Dibenamine in nonstimulated or gonadotrophininjected animals.

Fluhmann (1952) invoked precocious vaginal opening and ovarian stimulation in immature rats by injection of neostigmine. The locus of such cholinergic action is unknown. Parenthetically, Barbarossa and di Ferrante (1950) reported follicle stimulation in immature rats after injection of intermedin, an effect not found in hypophysectomized subjects. Benoit and Assenmacher (1955) proposed that, in the drake, gonad-stimulating activity is governed by an agent contained in neurosecretory substance, which is demonstrable in abundance in the retrochiasmatic region of the median eminence. Capillaries there drain selectively into an anterior set of portal venules. Oxytocin has been suggested as a possible mediator for gonadotrophin secretion (Shibusawa, Saito, Fukuda, Kawai, Yamada and Tomizawa, 1955; Armstrong and Hansel, 1958). There is much interest as this is being written (1958) in the jiossibility that vasopressin, oxytocin, or other agents associated with neurosecretory substances of the neui-ohyjioiihysis are responsible for control of production and release of the various trophic hormones of the pars distalis. As an alternative or even a supplement to neurochemical regulation, a vasomotor mechanism cannot be denied (Green, 1951), for conceivably only a slight shift in blood flow through the jiars distalis might tip the balance of hormone production one way oi- anothei-. Thus the matter stands: whereas it is apjiarent that the hypothalamus intervenes in follicle growth and estrogen secretion, how it does so is little more than speculative.


VI. Follicle Maturation and Ovulation

A variety of evidence indicates discontinuity between growth of large follicles, on the one hand, and their preovulatory maturation, on the other. Such is clearly the case among "reflex ovulators." Evidence that the same is true for spontaneous ovulators will be outlined below. Follicle maturation, ovulation, and structural transformation of the follicles to corpora lutea seem to represent successive stages in a distinct physiologic process, superimposed on the follicle growth cycle and brought about by a relatively abrupt increase in circulating gonadotrophin (theoretically LH). Since there is evidence (p. 519) that progesterone secretion may become detectable as this process begins, there might be justification for regarding it as merely the first portion of the luteal phase. However, the fact that luteinization ( i.e., the organization per se of luteal tissue) does not necessarily lead to functional cor|)ora lutea warrants treatment of the ovulation-luteinization phase as a distinct phenomenon.

Although it is customary to state that the hypopliysis invokes ovulation by release of LH, there is considerable question about the auxiliary roles played by other gonadotrophic hormones (Hisaw, 1947). Inasmuch as the time of release has been known in only the reflex ovulators, one might look to them for information. However, the available data (Hill, 1934) pertain only to the ovulating i)otency of the total gonadotrophin content of the hypophysis at various times after coitus. Substitution experiments are unsatisfactory because the presence of competent follicles implies the presence of l)oth FSH and a small amount of LH. The substitution of even the purest hormone preparations immediately after hypophysectomy leads to equivocal results inasmuch as it must be assumed that some FSH and LH of intrinsic origin remain in circulation. Talbert, Meyer and McShan (1951) determined that in rats, when hypophysectomy is performed at the onset of proestrum, the follicles remain capable of responding to injected LH for about 6 hours. Morphologic signs of follicle deterioration do not appear until nuich later. Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that relatively pure preparations of either FSH or LH will ovulate an estrous rabbit (Greep, van Dyke and Chow, 1942). On the other hand, until the recent use of species-specific gonadotrophins (van Wagenen and Simpson, 1957), the primate ovary was notoriously difficult to ovulate therapeutically. Until effluent blood from the hypophysis can be assayed, there is little likelihood that the gonadotrophin complex that is normally responsible for ovulation can be known. Thus, whereas the expression, LH-release, will be employed occasionally to refer to the release of gonadotrophin that invokes ovulation, the term is used purely for convenience and brevity, and should be appropriately qualified by the reader.


A. Time Of Ovulation

The time of ovulation with respect to other events of the cycle is relatively easy to determine in reflex ovulators, but in spontaneous ovulators has proven to be more elusive. In the former, laparotomy at various intervals after the stimulus enables exact measure to be made of the time required to accomplish ovulation. For most of the spontaneous ovulators, save the few in which the ripening follicles can be palpated as in monkeys and cattle, it has been necessary to attempt to correlate ovulation with some easily detectable external sign. Inasmuch as the ovulation stimulus to the hyj)oiihysis in these animals is probably invoked by ovarian hormones and these are equally responsible for phenomena such as vaginal cornification and behavioral estrus, a considerable degree of correlation might be expected between ovulation and a given change in the vaginal smear or onset of estrous behavior. The predictability of the relationship, however, must depend in great measure on the degree of correlation among thresholds of response in the various tissues concerned. In the primates that have no sharply limited period of sex desire the i:)roblem is even more troublesome. When reference is made to the date of the last menstruation, prediction is erratic because of the variable occurrence of postmenstrual quiescence (Rossman and Bartelmez, 1943; Young and Yerkes, 1943). Consequently, attempts must be made to find indicato: such as basal body temperature fluctuations which may bear some intrinsically closer relationship to the event in question. (See Hartman, 1936, and Buxton and Engle, 1950, for discussion of this very practical ]iroblera. )

Among mammals generally, si)ontaneous ovulation takes place sometime during estrus (Asdell, 1946) . It is found during early estrus in the opossum, red fox, dog, mouse and hamster. In the rat some authors have placed it early (Young, Boling and Blandau, 1941) and others late (Long and Evans, 19221 with respect to vaginal estrus. In the writer's colony both relations hold, in 4-day and 5-day cycles, respectively. Ovulation in late estrus is reported for the cotton rat, bank vole, guinea pig, pig, horse, and ass. Sheep usually ovulate shortly before the end of heat, sometimes a few hours afterward. As stated earlier, ovulation may even occur in guinea pigs, rats, sheep, and cattle without overt estrus. The cow usually ovulates several hours after the end of heat. The marsupial cat is said to ovulate 5 days afterward (Hill and O'Donoghue, 1913). The extreme is represented by certain bats (Asdell, 1946) which copulate in autumn and ovulate in the spring after a prolonged state of subestrus. These variations probably express several factors.

Among reflex ovulators there is considerable interspecies variation in the interval between the stimulus that invokes release of gonadotroj^hin from the hypophysis and the eventual rupture of the Graafian follicles (rabbit, ca. 10 hours; ferret, ca. 30 hours; cat, 24 to 54 hours; 13-lined ground sciuirrcl, 8 to 12 hours; mink, 36 to 50 hours) . Among spontaneous ovulators the comparable interval is clearly defined for only the rat, 10 to 12 hours (Everett, Sawyer and Markce, 1949) . In the cow the data obtained by Hansel and Trimberger (1951) and Hough, Bearden and Hansel (1955) i)lace the outside limit at about 30 hours. Here again, threshold differentials among tlic various tissues of the individual are piobably of gicat importance. 'I'hus in one species the threshold foi' gonadoti'ophin release may be lower than that foi' estrous behavior with the result tliat by the time the latter makes its ai)pearance the former has already transpired and ovulation will shortly take place. The rat, for example, releases LH during the afternoon, begins to show estrous behavior around 8 p.m., and ovulates around 2 a.m. (Everett, 1948, 1956b). In other species these time relationships may be reversed. In the cow, activation of the hypophysis apparently occurs several hours after the onset of estrus (Hansel and Trimberger, 1951). The cow remains in heat 10 to 18 hours and ovulates 13!/2 to 151/2 hours after going out of heat (Asdell, 1946). The early termination of estrus apparently reflects a refractory state which sets in after estrogen activity has continued for a time, for castrates receiving continued estrogen therapy remain in estrus for similarly brief periods. In the mare, ovulation is delayed until a few hours before the end of estrous periods that may extend for 5 to 10 days or longer. This suggests a relative refractoriness of the LHrelease mechanism in this animal. Such a state of affairs approaches that in persistent estrus or in the anovulatory cycle.

B. Ovarian Steroms and Ovulation

1. Estrogens

Chronic administration of estrogen to the intact animal eventually produces ovarian atrophy by suppression of gonadotrophin secretion. However, some moderate basic level of continuous estrogen secretion must be compatible with normal function of the hypophyseal-ovarian system; witness the fact that blood estrogen assays in normal women (]Markee and Berg, 1944) indicate only a 2-fold increase at midinterval above a base value of considerable magnitude.

Induction of corpus luteum formation by injected estrogen was first demonstrated by Hohlweg (1934) in prepubertal rats^ and the phenomenon has been repeatedly observed by other woi'kers (Desclin, 1935; Mazer, Israel and Aljjcrs, 1936; Westman and Jacobsolm, 1938b; Herold and Effkemann, 1938; Price and Ortiz, 1944; Cole, 1946). The fact that the effect was not obtained in rats younger than 30 to 36 days l>y Piice and Ortiz, whereas Cole observed it in the age-range of 21 to 28 days, demonstrates the existence of strain differences in the age factor. This probably explains the absence of luteinization in the experience of Lane (1935) and Merckel and Nelson (1940). Hohlweg and Chamorro (1937) demonstrated the importance of the hypophysis in the response. When hypophysectomy was performed 2 days after injection of estrogen no corpora liitea developed, but hypophysectomy on the 4th day did not interfere with corpus luteum formation. The effect could be produced in 50-gm. rats with as little as 4 |U,g. estradiol benzoate. Westman and Jacobsohn (1938b) reported that transsection of the hypophyseal stalk less than 2Vt days after injection prevented the reaction, but after that time the operation did not interfere. Bradbury (1947) assayed the gonadotrophin content of hypophyses of normal and castrated immature rats (30 to 32 days old at autopsy) 2 to 5 days after injection of estrogen or other steroids. These rats were apparently too young to form corpora lutea in response to the treatment, l)ut marked interstitial-cell stimulation, indicative of LH (ICSH) activity, was observed as early as 96 hours. In the intact animals significant loss of potency occurred 72 to 96 hours after injection, in agreement with the hypophysectomy data of Hohlweg and Chamorro (1937). In castrated rats, however, there was no loss of potency, thus suggesting that some ovarian factor in addition to estrogen is essential for stimulation of the hypophysis. It is unfortunate that the study was confined to animals too young to give the full response of luteinization.

  • The effect was later obtained with androgens (Holilwpg, 1937; Salmon, 1938; Xathanson, Fianspen and Sweenev, 1938).



Fig. 8.7. Experimental modifications of the 5-day cycle in rats. Two units of the ordinate represent full vaginal estrus. Time in days on abscissa, each unit 24 hours (midnight to midnight). X, ovulation time; -p, progesterone, usually 1 to 2 mg.; e, estradiol benzoate, standard do.se 50 /xg. (From J. W. Everett, Endocrinology, 43, 393, 1948.)


Induction of ovulation in adult animals by estrogen was first reported by Hammond, Jr., Hammond and Parkes (1942) and by Hammond, Jr. (1945) in the anestrous ewe. Whereas the s])ontaneous occurrence of occult ovulation was approximately 5 per cent, injection of stilbestrol was followed by corpus luteum formation in 4 of 11 ewes, with recovery of ova in 3. Injection of stilbestrol di-n-butyrate was followed by corpus luteum formation in 5 of 6 ewes and ova were recovered in 3. The finding was confirmed by Casida (1946) who stated that in cycling ewes ovulation can be invoked by injection of diethylstilbestrol on the 4th day of the cycle, but not at other times. In 1947 Everett reported the induction of ovulation in pregnant rats within 40 hours after injection of estradiol benzoate (as little as 2 or 3 /xg.) or implantation of estradiol crystals or pellets. The response was not obtained in animals autopsied 24 hours after treatment nor in other animals hypophysectomized at 24 hours and autopsied the following day. In other studies with adult rats it was demonstrated (Everett, 1948) that in 5-day cyclic rats the injection of estrogen at mid-diestrum will regularly induce ovulation 24 hours earlier than exi:)ected (Figs. 8.7D, 8.8F|. Persistent-estrous rats were refractory to estrogen in this respect.- Nevertheless, when such animals were made pseudopregnant by daily injection of progesterone,

"The tendency toward refractoriness of similar animals with respect to induction of estrous 1) ha\'ior had earlier been reported by Boling, Blandau, Rundlett and Young (1941).


Fig. 8.8. Experimental modification of the 4-day cycle in rats. Same key as in Figure 8.7. Progesterone dosage 1.5 mg. per day. Artificial 5-day cycles in D, E, and F indicated by dotted lines and numbering. (From J. W. Everett, Endocrinology, 43, 395, 1948.)



Fig. 8.9. Experiment with persistent-estrous rats. Units of ordinate and abscissa have same meaning as in Figure 8.7. A. Secjuence of "progesterone cycles." Each dose of progesterone (p) is 1.0 mg. Ovulation (x) in about 70 per cent of the cycles. B. Progesterone cycle followed by unsuccessful attempt to induce ovulation by estrogen during the second c-ycle. C . Pseudopregnancy maintained by daily iiijoctinn of 1.5 mg. ]irogosteronr. Ovulation induced by estrogen in several such cases. (From .1. \V. Everett, EiKhxTinolojiy. 43, ;5i»9, 194S.)


ovulation and corpus luteuni loiniatioii were induced by estrogen (Fig. 8.9 1.

Early attempts to induce luteinization in the guinea pig with estrogen were unsuccessful ( Dempsey, 1937; see Fig. 8.5), but iiioiv recently Lipschutz, Iglesias, Bruzzone, 11 uniercz and Penaranda (1948) have shown by the use of intrasplenic ovarian autografts that luteinization is a reguhir feature in experiments in which estrogen is administered systcniically. Interestingly enough the implantation of estrogen jiellets in or near the ox'ariaii grafts had the coiitrai'y effect of pi'cvcnliiig luteinization.

it was early I'cportcd that rabbits fail to ovulate in response to estrogen injection


(Bachman, 1936; Mazer, Israel and Alpers, 1936 ». Hisaw (1947j inferred that this is generally true for reflex ovulators. Nevertheless, it was found by Klein and Mayer ( 1946) and Klein (1947) that when pseudol^regnant or pregnant rabbits were treated with estrogen and then mated, new ovulation resulted and new corpora lutea were formed, events that do not otherwise occur. The phenomenon was further explored by Sawyer (1949). Whereas untreated rabbits, unlike cats, do not ovulate in response to mechanical stimulation of the vagina, treatment with estrogen on the preceding 2 days results in a positive response to this stimulus. In fact, his later observations (1959) indicate that estrogen priming for a longer period (4 days) occasionally results in "spontaneous" ovulation, especially during the winter and spring.

In the anestrous cat, in the response to mechanical stimulation of the vagina, estrogen facilitates the ovulation of follicles primed with equine gonadotrophin (Sawyer and Everett, 1953).

Induction of ovulation by estrogen in primates remains to be demonstrated. It is of interest in this connection that Funnell, Keaty and Hellbaum (1951) observed in menopausal women an increased excretion of LH during estrogen therapy, in contrast to FSH excretion at other times. The general experience has been that injection of estrogen during the early part of the cycle significantly postpones the next expected ovulation and menstruation (monkey, Ball and Hartman, 1939; baboon, Gillman, 1942; human, Sturgis and ^leigs, 1942; Brown, Bradbury and Jennings, 1948). Gillman reported that a single injection of estrogen precipitates widespread atresia of vesicular follicles. Brown and Bradbury (1947) reported IH-eliminary data that in 4 of 6 women there was increased gonadotrophin excretion during the 24 hours following estrogen administration. They proposed that delay of ovulation by estrogen given early in the primate cycle may be the result of premature discharge of gonadotrophin before the Graafian follicle is competent. Sturgis and Meigs had suggested, on the contrary, that the estrogen suppresses hypophyseal function. D'Amour (1940), finding in urinary assays that the initial peak of estrogen ex


cretion preceded the peak excretion of urinary gonadotrophin, postulated that the increase of estrogen stimulates the gonadotrophin release that is responsible for ovulation. O. W. Smith (1944) proposed that not estrogen itself, but some metabolite resulting from inactivation by the liver, is responsible for LH release. This interesting hypothesis has not been substantiated.

3. Gestagens

Suppression of estrus and ovulation by functional corpora lutea, suggested by Beard (1898), was experimentally demonstrated in the guinea pig by Loeb (1911). It is now well established in several species that removal of the corpora lutea results in early resumption of estrus and ovulation (see p. 506), and that administration of progesterone suppresses these events. There is considerable evidence favoring the view that the primary effect is to selectively suppress the secretion of LH. Dempsey (1937) noted that in guinea pigs receiving daily injection of progesterone (50 /^g.) all stages of follicle development proceeded except the maturation enlargement that heralds LH release (Fig. 8.5). Astwood and Fevold (1939) and Cutuly (1941b) found similar results in rats. Essentially the same phenomenon has been noted in sheep by Dutt and Casida (1948). Bradbury (1947) reported that in immature rats the injection of progesterone at the time of estrogen injection prevented the release of gonadotrophin (LH?) which otherwise followed estrogen injection by 72 to 96 hours. In ovariectomized guinea pigs containing intrasplenic autografts, preparations in which luteinization can be induced by estrogen (see above) , the simultaneous administration of gestagens prevented this action (Lipschutz, Iglesias, Bruzzone, Humerez and Pefiaranda, 1948; Iglesias, Lipschutz and Guillermo, 1950; Mardones, Bruzzone, Iglesias and Lipschutz, 1951). Mardones and co-w^orkers also made the interesting observation that among several steroids having progestational activity, "antiluteinizing activity is not concomitant with, or subordinated to" the former function. Proportionately very large amounts of ethinyl testosterone and ethinyl-A-'^-androstenediol exhibited very little antiluteinizing activity. There is evidence in mice (Solve,, 1939) that suppression of FSH secretion may occur when as much as 1 mg. of progesterone is injected daily. Alloiteau ( 1954 ) believes that this also occurs in the rat, although Cutuly (1941b) found only slight evidence of FSH suppression when as much as 6 mg. progesterone were given daily for several weeks.

So much emphasis has been placed on the suppressing effect of progesterone that its facilitating actions were recognized only in recent years. The first indication that progesterone can promote ovulation and corpus luteum formation in mammals was encountered in a study of persistent-estrous rats (Everett, 1940a, b). Daily injection of 0.25 to 1.0 mg. caused the prompt interrujition of the state of persistent follicle and the resumption of outwardly normal cycles. Corjiora lutea were formed in approximately 70 per cent of these cycles.^ The effect was obtained not only in older rats in which persistent estrus had developed spontaneously, but also in young rats in which the condition had been induced by continuous illumination. The dose level employed is below that required to suppress cycles in normal rats (1.5 mg. daily; Phillips, 1937). Subsequently, it was found (Everett, 1943) that the daily injection could be avoided if a single "interrupting" dose was given, followed by a single injection during proestrum or early estrus of each recurrent cycle (Fig. 8.9.4). The histologic appearance of the ovaries reverted toward the normal after a succession of "i)rogesterone cycles" and, significantly, the interstitial-cell nuclei were "repaired." Attempts in normal rats to invoke o\'u]ati()n earliei' than the expected time were sticcessful in the 5-day cycle (Figs. S.7B, 8.8^). Injection of from 0.5 mg. to 2 mg. on the "third day of diestrum" regularly (4 mg. occasionally) invoked ovulation (luring the coming night (Everett, 1944a, 1948) unless the treatment was given too late in the dai/ (EA'erett and Sawyer, 1949; see discussion on ]). 526 I'egarding the diurnal rhythm and ovulation). Attempts to advance ovulation in the 4-day cycle were unsuccessful, possibly because the follicles were not competent or the animals'

Marvin (1947) described a similar rosull willi desoxycorticosterone acetate.


intrinsic estrogen levels were not elevated sufficiently early.

Ovulation induced by progesterone has been reported in several species. A direct action on the excised ovary of the toad Xeno-pns was early demonstrated by Zwarenstein (1937) but such action is apparently not found in higher vertebrates. In the domestic hen injection of progesterone can invoke ovulation several hours ahead of schedule (Fraps and Dury, 1943; Rothchild and Fraps, 1949). Pfeiffer (1950) observed new corpora lutea in 10 rhesus monkeys treated with progesterone during presumptive anovulatory cycles of the summer months. Similar attempts have been made in women (Rothchild and Koh, 1951); although there were said to be definite indications of induced ovulation, the evidence is equivocal. On the other hand, a rei~)ort (Hansel and Trimberger, 1952) states that in heifers the injection of small doses of progesterone (5 to 10 mg. ) at the beginning of estrus significantly advances ovulation time. This is in contrast with the inhibitory effect of larger doses (50 mg.) beginning before the onset of estrus (Ulberg, Christian and Casida, 1951). Even in the rabbit (Sawyer, Everett and Markee, 1950), spontaneous ovulation was noted in 4 of 10 animals after combined estrogen and progesterone injection.

From certain of the foregoing statements it may be inferred that whether suppression or stimulation follows administration of ju-ogestcrone depends critically on the time of injection, on the amount given, on the status of the ovary, and probal)ly on a l)riming action of estrogen. A significant illustration of the critical nature of the time factor in rats is given by the experiments represented in Figure 8.8r and E. If after the first injection of 1.5 mg. progesterone on the first day of diesti'uni, a second injection follows in. about 24 lioui's. the imjiending estrus and o\-ulation are retarded an additional 24 hours. However, if the second injection is given 48 hours after the first, the impending estrus and ovulation are advanced. Evidence^ of the synergistic action of estrogen and progesterone in evoking ovulation is given by the ex]ieriments represented in Figuiv 8.9/> and (\ Sawver (1952) investigated the synergism in rabl^ts. Employing estrogen-primed animals, he found that ovulation was facilitated when progesterone was injected less than 4 hours before either mating, mechanical stimulation of the vagina, or intravenous injection of copper acetate. Inhibition was obtained when progesterone was injected 24 hours before such stimulation, thus confirming the often-cited observations of ]Makepeace, Weinstein and Friedman (1937 » and Friedman (1941) that progesterone inhiijits ovulation in rabbits.

Preovulatory secretion of gestagens now seems likely. Morphologic luteal changes in preovulatory follicles are considered in the chapter on the ovary. A variety of evidence in primates indicates that progestational clianges in the endometrium begin before ovulation (Bartelmez, Corner and Hartman, 1951). Several workers have reported tiie excretion of small amounts of pregnanediol during the follicular phase of the human cycle (Wilson, Randall and Osterberg, 1939; Smith, Smith and Schiller, 1943; Davis and Fugo, 1948). Determination of plasma progesterone in women by the Hooker-Forbes test indicates the presence of significant amounts a day or two before a major rise in basal body temperature (Forbes, 1950). In monkeys a small quantity (ca. 0.5 to 1.0 ixg. per ml.) was detected l)etween the 4th and 9th days, rising in the 10- to 15-day period to concentrations of 2 to 6 jxg. per ml. (Forbes, Hooker and Pfeiffer, 1950; Bryans, 1951). In both species a transient decline seems to intervene before the marked rise to still higher concentrations during the luteal phase. In the rat, Constantinides (1947) studied the stromal nuclei of the endometrium at different stages of the cycle and found that by the Hooker-Forbes criteria there is evidence of progesterone secretion during proestrum. Astwood (1939) on the basis of water content of rat uteri concluded that progesterone secretion begins with proestrum. In the rabl)it, Forbes (1953) assayed peripheral blood at various intervals after mating or gonadotrophin injection. Although no progesterone was detectable in controls, significant amounts appeared an average of 97 minutes after mating and 66 minutes after gonadotrophin injection. As much as 2.5 /xg. ])er ml. was found during the first 8 to 10 hours, although marked fluctuations were noted from time to time in the blood of individual animals. Verly (1951) reported that soon after mating the urine of rabbits contains significant amounts of pregnanediol.

It has become customary to state that the gestagen that appears during the follicular phase of the cycle is probably formed by the maturing follicle itself. Indeed, assays of fluid from Graafian follicles and cysts have indicated the presence of the hormone (Duyvene de Wit, 1942; Hooker and Forbes, 1947; Edgar, 1952, 1953). However, if it is to take part in the release of ovulating hormone gestagen must be secreted earlier than preovulatory maturation. For this also there is some evidence. Two reports cited above indicate that in monkeys, at least, there is a detectable amount present in the blood during the early follicular phase. The known fact that a waning corpus luteum favors the experimental induction of estrus and/or ovulation in sheep and cattle (Hammond, Jr., 1945; Robinson, 1951 ; Alarden, 1952) is suggestive. Although Hammond, Jr., Hammond and Parkes (1942) tested this possibility by progesterone sul)stitution with negative results, the amount given may have been too small, as Robinson suggested. A waning corpus luteum in the rat favors ovulation, as disclosed in persistent-estrous animals in which pseudopregnancy had been induced (Everett, 1939). Each of three pseudopregnancies was followed b}' a short cycle before the animals returned to persistent estrus.

In the course of studies growing out of this observation evidence was advanced (Everett, 1945) which indicated that corpora lutea of the normal rat are not wholly inactive during the short cycle. Transient depletion of cholesterol was observed in such corpora lutea during the proestrum that followed their formation. This implies a transient increase of luteotrophin secretion. Significantly this occurs before the release of LH. It is this writer's opinion that gestagen from such sources is not essential for the induction of ovulation but that it does facilitate the action of estrogen.


C. Role of the Nervous System in Ovulation

Historically, the fact of neural control of reflex ovulation has been recognized in the ral)bit for many years. The comparable role of the nervous system in spontaneous ovulation, on the other hand, has more recently become apparent. It now seems justifiable and useful to postulate in the hypothalamus of reflex ovulators and spontaneous ovulators alike the existence of a mechanism that is peculiarly concerned with release of ovulating hormone. Whether it consists in a discrete anatomic entity is immaterial for the present.

The suggestion has been made that the outstanding difference between reflex and sjiontaneous ovulation may be in the kinds of afferent impulses that most readily excite the hypothalamus (Sawyer, Everett and Markee, 1949). The difference is not absolute, for spontaneous ovulation has been induced in rabbits by estrogen-progesterone injection (see p. 519) and reflex ovulation has been demonstrated under special circumstances in rats (Dempsey and Searles, 1943; Everett, 1952a) and cattle (Marion, Smith, Wiley and Barrett, 1950). The random distribution of reflex ovulators and spontaneous ovulators among mammalian orders becomes more understandable if one assumes that dual controls are widely represented and that special adaptations favor one or the other in given species.

The ovulation reflex in rabbits is apparently initiated by afferent impulses of multiple origin, among them not only impulses from the genitalia, but also propriocejUive impulses from muscles that are utilized in coitus. Brooks (1937, 1938) found that, although the sacral segments of the spinal cord and the abdominal sympathetic chains could be eliminated without jM'eventing ovulation, the luml)ai' cord must remain. Only by paralysis of the lower half of the body so that the female could not take pai't in coitus was ovulation pi'cvcntfMl. The neocortex could be removed, together with the olfactory bulbs, labyrinths, auditory apparatus and eyes without impairing the ovulation response. Even after complete decortication, ovulation followecl coitus in 1 out of 3 j'abbits. It must be admitted, however, that, although various parts of the nervous system may thus be eliminated without changing the end result, some of them may normally play a considerable role. With little cjuestion, direct stimuli from the genitalia play a part in the natural reflex. Under certain experimental conditions detectable electrical activity in the rabbit rhinencephalon is associated with the induction of ovulation (Sawyer, 1955). Electrical stimulation of the amygdala will induce ovulation in rabbits and cats (Koikegami, Yamada and Usei, 1954; Shealy and Peele, 1957 ) .

In rats, Davis (1939) found that removal of the neocortex had no effect on the estrous cycle and ovulation. Removal of portions or of the entire sympathetic chains of rats likewise did not interfere with ovulation (Bacq, 1932). Bunn and Everett (1957) reported ovulation in constantestrous rats after electrical stimulation of the amygdala.

The importance of the dorsal thalamus is unknown. The reticular activating system has been implicated as a component of the ovulation mechanism (Sawyer, 1958), but the manner of its contribution is not clear. There is little cjuestion, on the other hand, of the indispensability of the hypothalamus and its neurovascular connection to the adenoliyi:)ophysis through the median eminence and the hypophyseal portal veins.

Although the observation by ]\Iarshall and Verney (1936) that ovulation can be induced by passing an electric current through the heads of estrous rabbits hardl}^ limited the effect to the hypothalamus itself, it was later shown that more localized electrical stimuli api)lied to certain hypothalamic regions are consistently effective (preoptic area, Haterius, 1937; Christian. 1956; posterior hypothalamus or tuber cinereum, Harris, 1937, 19481); tuber cinereum or adjacent hypothalamic areas, Markee, Sawyer anirHollinshead. 1946; medial hypothalamus fi'om ])i-eo])tic area to mammillai'V bodies. Kui'otsiu Kurachi and Ban, 195o"; Kuiotsu, Kurachi, Tabaya>hi and Ban, 1952).

Ahliougli liypotliahimic lesions. l)oth natural and expeiimental. hax'c frecjuently been reported to interfere with normal sex function (.see Harris. 1948a, 1955, for references), the majority of these reports do not api^ly to the question at issue — control of ovulation. When ovarian atrophy occurs, as it frequently did in these cases, it reflects a profound depression of gonadotroi)hin secretion and absence of competent follicles. However, Dey, Fisher, Berry and Ranson (1940) and Dey (1941, 1943) 'found in guinea pigs that gross bilateral electrolytic lesions placed in the rostral hypothalamus resulted in persistent follicles with continuous estrogen secretion. Similar results were obtained in rats by Hillarp (1949) when small bilateral electrolytic lesions were placed in the anterior hypothalamic area near the paraventricular nuclei or between this region and the median eminence. Greer (1953) reported continuous estrus in rats after placing certain small lesions in the ventromedial nucleus, provided they were bilateral. There was no correlation with obesity. There are at least four significant points in common among these several ablation experiments. ( 1 ) The effective lesions were rost rally placed and either were limited to or included the medial group of nuclei. (2) The tuber cinereum, median eminence, and stalk connection to the hypophysis were intact. (3) Although development of competent follicles was not evidently impaired, estrogen secretion became continuous instead of cyclic. (4) The proper impetus for release of ovulating hormone from the hypophysis was absent. It would be most instructive to learn whether ovulation can be invoked in such animals by reflex stimulation or by direct electrical stimulation of the tuber. AUoiteau and Courvoisier (1953) reported that rats in constant estrus as a result of hypothalamic lesions did not undergo pseudopregnancy after stimulation of the cervix uteri. This observation, confirmed by Greer (1953), could be construed as indirect evidence of failure of reflex ovulation, for Greer regularly obtained pseudopregnancy by cervical stimulation, once corpora lutea had been formed by other means.

Other findings by Greer are important because of their bearing on the location and character of a presumptive ovulation center. Althougli the onset of persistent estrus after making the lesions was sometimes almost immediate (following a brief anestrous interval), in other cases it was preceded by several apparently normal cycles. In any event, once the condition had become established, the daily injection of small amounts of progesterone brought about the recurrence of cycles and corpus luteum formation. In about half of the cases these cycles continued for awhile after withdrawal of treatment, whereas in the remainder there was a prompt return to persistent estrus. Essentially the same results were reported by AUoiteau (1954), and the observations suggest that the areas involved in such lesions may be of only secondary importance.

The use of radioactive phosphorus for estimating energy exchange in tissues affords a different approach to the problem of neural control of ovulation (Borell, Westman and Orstrom, 1947, 1948). This method has the virtue that the experimental subject remains undamaged until injection of P'*compounds 30 minutes before the end of the experiment. In rabbits there is a marked increase in phosphorus turn-over in the tuber cinereum within 2 minutes post coitum, and continuing for about an hour thereafter (Table 8.1). The adenohypoi)hysis shows increasing activity during the first 10 minutes which reaches a peak at about 1 hour and then regresses somewhat, although it remains relatively high for 24 hours. Response of the ovary to gonadotroi:)hin release is marked by a rapid rise during the second half-hour and another pronounced increase near the time of ovulation. In rats, at various stages of the estrous cycle, phosphorus exchange in both tuber cinereum and adenohypophysis is maximal during proestrum. In the ovary high values were reported during diestrum and proestrum, somewhat lower values during estrus and metestrum.

Possibly correlated with the above information is the observation (Gitsch, 1952b) that in rats the acetylcholine (ACh) content of the tuberal region becomes elevated during proestrum and estrus. It is said that ACh synthesis requires high energy phosphate (see Bain, 1952). Further investigation by Gitsch (1952a) and Gitscl: and Reitinger (1953) revealed that ACh


TABLE 8.1 Sequence of events in rabbit ovulation


Time Post Coitum Central Nervous System


Hypophysis


Ovary


Circulating Blood


<30 sec.

<2 mill.

10 mill. 30 mill.

60 mill.

75-90 mill.

13^-2 hrs. 3-5 hrs.

6-7 hrs.

7-8 hrs. 9-11 hrs.


Barbiturate-sensitive and atropinesensitive mechanisms^

t Phosphorylation in tuber cinereum^

t Phosphorylation

in tuber ciner reumt Phosphoryhition

in tuber cine reum^


t Phosphorylation in tuber cinereum


t Phosphoryhition^


Release of LH ca. 20 per cent. 6 Hypophysectomy prevents ovulation^' 12

Release of LH nowsufficient for ovulation."' 12 Phosphorylation at peak^


I Phosphor\iatioii


i Animal may be bled and transfused without prevent ! ing ovulationi2


folliculi. in egg


f Liquor Tetrad.' nuclei*

Cholesterol depletion in interstitial gland. ^ Egg nucleus migrates, membrane dissolves.** • " Prominent corona*

Liquor folliculi increasingly viscous*

First polar hotly'*

Marked .swelling of follicles. Thecal hypertrophy,! ■ i° hyperemia

OvuL.^Tion." t Phosphorylation2


Bleeding and transfusion now prevent ovulationi2

Progesterone detectable ^


Increased estrogen (endometrial hj-peremia)'


' Asdell, 1946.

2 Borell, Westman and Orstrom, 1947.

3 Claesson and Hillarp, 1947a. " Fee and Parkes, 1929.

'^ Forbes, 1953.

« Hill, 1934.

^ Sawyer, Markee and Hollinshcad, 1947.

  • Pincus and Enzmann, 1935.

^ Sawyer and associates, 1947, 1949, 1950.

1" Walton and Hammond, 192S.

" Waterman, 1943.

'2 Weslmaii and .lacohsohn, 1936.



in the rat hypothalamus is increased also by administration of estrogen or by castration, conditions that similarly increase lihosphorus exchange (Borell and Westman, 1949). The ACh content is depressed during pregnancy or when the rat has been injected with progesterone. It is also lowered by Pentothal anesthesia, a matter of interest in relation to the fact that the barbiturates suppress ovulation (see p. 526).

The location and measurement of activity in discrete nuclei and pathways are largely in the future, although a beginning has been made in the rabbit, cat, rat, and mouse. Sawyer (1955) found in rabbits, after the combined administration of pentobarbital intravenously and histamine by way of the 3rd ventricle, that there was associated with induction of ovulation a characteristic change in intrinsic electrical activity of the rhinencephalon, extending into the preoptic area. If the olfactory tracts were cut, however, this activity could not be elicited and ovulation failed. According to Porter, Cavanaugh and Sawyer (1954), vaginal stimulation of estrous cats caused altered electrical activity in two hypothalamic regions:

(1 ) in the lateral hypothalamic area at the anterior tuberal level during stimulation and for 15 to 45 seconds afterward; and

(2) in the anterior hypothalamic area near the medial forebrain bundle, where response was delayed as much as 5 n:iinutes after stimulation. According to a i)reliminary account (Critchlow and Sawyer, 1955) in curarized, proestrous rats, there were i)eriods lasting approximately 20 minutes in the midafternoon, during which altered electrical activity appeared differentially in the preoptic area or anterior hypothalamus.

Another approach to localization has been described by Hertl (1952, 1955). On the pro])Osition that increased function of particular cells is reflected by increased volume of their nuclei, cell nuclear volumes were measured in hypothalamic nuclei of female mice at different stages of the estrous cycle. During proestrum and estrus there was said to be a functional edema in hypothalamic nucleus 20 of Griinthal (possibly the pars posterior of the ventromedial nucleus of Krieg) and to lesser extent in nucleus 16 (Nucl. arcuatus).


1. The Hypophyseal Portal Veins and the Chemotransmitter Hypothesis

As noted elsewhere, hypothalamic control of the jiars distalis is probably mediated by the hypophyseal portal circulation. Evidence for this has been especially convincing with respect to control of ovulation, although indications are that other phases of the cycle are also regulated by this means. Pertinent data from numerous transplantation and stalk-section experiments may be summarized by the following statement. Aside from a questionable grafting experiment (2 rats) reported by May (1937), in no case has ovulation or luteinization been reported in the absence of vascular linkage of the pars distalis with the median eminence; on the other hand, ovulatory cycles have often been cjuickly restored when the gland has been revascularized by the portal vessels (see especially, Harris, 1950a; Harris and Jacobsohn, 1952; Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1957, 1958b).

Although the importance of local vasomotor regulation in the stalk vessels remains to be evaluated (Green, 1951), there is extensive support for the hypothesis that ovulatory release of gonadotrophin is invoked by a chemotransmitter (Harris, 1948a, 1955). If one accei)ts the prevailing opinion that nerve fibers entering the pars distalis are too few to account for its secretomotor control and that the flow of blood in the hyi^ophyseal portal vessels is toward the gland (Wislocki and King, 1936; Green, 1947; Green and Harris, 1947, 1949; Barrnett and Greep, 1951 ; Landsmeer, 1951 ; ]McConnell, 1953; Xuereb, Prichard and Daniel, 1954; Worthington, 1955), the plausibility of the chemotransmitter hypothesis becomes inescapable.^

Evidence that the transmitter may be

^ For a dissenting view, see Zuckerman (1952). Reference should also be made to the hypothesis formulated by Spatz (1951) and associates (see Nowakowski, 1950, 1952). They postulated that a descending pathway in the spinal cord is the connecting link between hypothalamus and ovaries. With respect to ovulation, this is clearly denied by the fact that local stimulation of the hypotlialamus provokes ovulation in rabbits in which the thoracic spinal cord has been transsected (Christian, Markee and Markee, 1955).


adrenergic was presented by Markee, Sawyer and Hollinshead (1948), who provoked ovulation in rabbits by instilling epinephrine directly into the pars distalis. Detailed experiments supporting this w^ere fully reviewed by Markee, Everett and Sawyer (1952). In discussion following that paper, Sawyer reported the induction of ovulation in rabbits by the injection into the third ventricle of either epinephrine or norepinephrine, and suggested that the latter is "more closely related to the natural mediator than is epinephrine." Donovan and Harris (1956), from studies in which the rabbit hypophysis was slowdy infused in situ with solutions of epinephrine or norepinephrine, concluded that neither substance is the agent in question, and that the positive results of Markee, Sawyer and Hollinshead (1948) were the effects of low pH and not of the drugs per se. Proof of the negative is elusive, however, and one must note that Donovan and Harris did not meet the conditions of timing and drug concentration that obtained in the earlier work.

Intravenous injection of Dibenamine or its congener, SKF-501,-^ will usually prevent ovulation in rabl)its when injection is completed within 1 minute after coitus (Sawyer and associates, 1947-50). On the other hand, when injection is delayed until 3 minutes or later, ovulation is unaffected. The nonadrenergic hydrolysis product of Dibenamine, 2-dibenzylaminoethanol, does not have the blocking action, although its central excitatory powers are much like those of the parent substance. The failure of blockade by Dibenamine, if injection is withheld for 3 minutes, demonstrates that the drug does not interfere with the actual discharge of ovulating hormone into the l)lood stream, for that process recjuires about an hour (Fee and Parkes, 1929; Westman and Jacobsohn, 1936). The Dibenamine-sensitive mechanism thus serves as a trigger, the gland being adequately stimulated within 1 01' 2 minutes post coitum. This estin^ate is in remarkal)le agreement with the earlier mentioned obscMA'ations on

•'■' Dibenamine is iV,iV-dibenzyl-/:i-cliloioetliy lamine. SKF-501 is A'-(9-fluorenyl)-.V-ethyl-/i-chlor()ethylamine hydrochlorifle. Banthine is /i-dictliylaminuc'tliyl-.\anthene-9-cai'l)Oxvlak' niclliohroiniilc


phosphorus exchange in the tuber cinereum and hypoi)hysis (p. 521, and Table 8.1 1.

A mechanism that is subject to blockade by atropine or Banthine^ evidently precedes the Dibenamine-sensitive process — temjDorally if not anatomically. To accomplish blockade in rabbits, these anticholinergic drugs must be injected intravenously within about 30 seconds after coitus (Sawyer and associates, 1949-1951). It should be recalled that Foster, Haney and Hisaw (1934) reported failure of ovulation in several rabbits treated with small amounts of atropine before mating. ]\Iakepeace (1938), however, was unable to confirm the effect with somewhat larger doses and the former observation was forgotten.

A seemingly crucial experiment devised by Sawyer gives conclusive evidence that the atropine-sensitive process is antecedent to the Dibenamine-sensitive one. It was based on two facts: (1) intravenous injection of nearly lethal doses of epinephrine does not induce ovulation in estrous rabbits, and (2) atropine protects rabbits against fatal pulmonary edema after injection of large amounts of epinephrine. In rabbits protected by atropine in dosage that was also sufficient to block the ovulation reflex, the injection of twice-lethal doses of epinephrine caused ovulation or significant degrees of follicle maturation in 5 of 7 cases. These effects were not found in rabbits protected by Dibenamine. Supporting evidence was adduced by Christian (1956i who found that atropine would not prevent ovulation in response to electi'ical stimulation of the medial preoptic area or adjacent parts of the hypothalanuis, whereas in a significant number of such rabliits ovulation was blocked by SKF-501.

Extension of the blocking experiments to the rat, as an example of a spontaneous ovulator, disclosed that in this species also ovulation can be blocked by Dibenamine, SKF501, atropine, and Banthine, when the injections ai'c appropriately timed with respect to the stage- of the cycle and time of day (Sawyer, Everett and Markee, 1949; Everett, Sawyer and Markee, 1949; Everett and Sawyer, 1949, 1950, 1953: see \). 526). Furthermore, blockade of ])oth estrogenimhiccd and pi'ogcstci-oiic-induced ovuhition was aceomi)lished with cither Dibonamine or atropine. Neither agent, however, prevented ovulation after injection of sheep liypophyseal LH. A report by Hansel and Trimberger (1951) stated that in cattle a significant delay of ovulation (as great as 72 hours) followed atropine administration. In control experiments the simultaneous injection of atropine and human chorionic gonadotrophin was followed by ovulation slightly earlier than the normally expected time. Treatments were begun 1 to 5 hours after the onset of estrus. This work was confirmed and extended by Hough, Beardon and Hansel (1955). In the hen, blockade of ovulation, normal or induced by progesterone, has been reported after administration of Dibenamine, Dibenzyline, SKF-501 or atropine (Zarrow and Bastian, 1953; van Tienhoven, 1955). According to van Tienhoven, the drugs did not interfere with the ovulating action of extrinsic gonadotrophin.

It is important that the same drugs will block ovulation in lioth rabbits and rats (Table 8.2) . Of ec^ual significance is the fact that several agents that are ineffective in rabbits are also ineffective in rats (notably 2-dibenzylaminoethanol, the imidazoline adrenolytic drugs, and the ganglion blocking agents). These considerations are interjireted to mean that spontaneous ovulation is invoked by neurohumoral mechanisms that are very like those in the reflex ovulation of rabbits.

The suggestion that the l)locking effects might result from nonspecific stress, causing the hypophysis to be so actively secreting ACTH that gonadotroiihin secretion is interfered with (Dordoni and Timiras, 1952), is clearly denied by several facts. ( 1 ) In the rabbit studies, none of the various agents prevented ovulation when injected more than a minute post coitum. (2) In one study (Sawyer, Markee and Everett, 1950b) ovulation was actually induced by the intravenous injection of "lethal" doses of epinephrine when the animals WTre protected by atropine. (3) In rats ovulation is unaffected by massive intravenous doses of either the imidazoline drugs or 2-dibenzylamionethanol in amounts known to be stressing (Sawyer and Parkerson, 1953).


TABLE 8.2 Pharmacologic Agents and Blockade of Ovulation


Antiadrenergics

/3-Haloalkylamines

Dibenamine

SKF-501

Dibenzyline

ImidazoHnes

Priscoline

Regitine

Yohimbine

Anticholinergics

Atropine

Banthine

Antihistaminics

Neo-antergan

Ganglion blockers

Tetraethvlammonium. .

SC-1950/

Barbiturates

Nembutal

Dial

Ipral

Amvtal

Barbital

Phenobarl)ital

Prominal

Others

Morphine

Procaine, locally near tuber

Procaine, systemically .

Chlorpromazine

Reserpine

Ether

2,4-Dimtrophenol


Rabbit


Rat


Cow


Bi


Bi



Bi


Bi



01


01



0^


01

■?4. 5



Bi


BI


B6


Bi


Bi



01




01


01



01




Bi


Bi Bi Bi Bi B' Bi 8

B9

BIO



Bii




01


B12 B13 B14 B16



B3


I Sawyer and associates, 1947-1951; Everett and associates, 1949-1950; Christian, 1956; and see present text.

^ van Tienhoven, 1955; van Tienhoven, Nalbandov and Norton, 1954.

3 Zarrow and Bastian, 1953.

•• Fugo and Gross, 1942.

5 Sulman and Black, 1945.

^Hansel and Triml)erger, 1951; Hough, Beardon and Hansel, 1955.

' Fraps and Case, 1953.

  • Doring and Goz, 1952.

» Westman, 1947.

1" Barraclough and Sawyer, 1955.

II Westman and Jacol)8ohn, 1942. 1- Barraclough, 1956.

13 Barraclough, 1955.

" Unpublished. Temporary, during deep anesthesia.

1^ Unpublished. EDso : 25 mg. per kg. subcutaneously.

Key: B = Blockade.

= No blockade.

1 = Ovulation induced by the drug.



Nor is it influenced by severe trauma, heat, cold, or formalin injection coincident with the known "critical period" (Everett, unpublished).

2. Central Depressants and Ovulation

Reported evidence of a blocking action of barbiturates on ovulation traces back to experiments by Westman (1947) who injected female rats with Prominal twice daily for 3 weeks. Approximately 30 per cent of these rats experienced prolonged vaginal estrus and had ovaries containing only follicles at the end of the experiment. Almost identical results were reported by Doring and Goz (1952) when rats were treated daily with phenobarbital. The agreement is not unexpected in view of the fact that in the body Prominal is quickly demethylated to phenobarbital. It was shown by Everett and Sawyer (1950) that when administration of barbiturates to rats is critically timed with respect to stage of the cycle and the time of day, blockade of ovulation can be accomplished at will in shortterm experiments (Fig. 8.10). Chronic administration introduces considerable uncertainty for reasons that are not yet clear (Everett, 1952b). In the rabbit, the rapid intravenous injection of pentobarbital or Pentothal, within as short a time as 12 seconds after coitus, generally failed to block ovulation (Sawyer, Everett and Markee, 1950) . However, it was later shown that barbiturate anesthesia will prevent the ovulation that is otherwise caused in the estrogen-primed rabbit by mechanical stimulation of the vagina, the anesthesia t)eing induced in advance of the stimulation (unjuiblished i.

Other central dcpi-es^ants reported to block ovulation in the rat are morj^hine, reserj^ine, chlorpromazine (Barraclough and Sawyer, 1955; Barraclough, 1955, 1956), and even meprobamate acting synergistically with an anticholinergic drug (Gitscli, 1958). Special interest attaches to the mori)hine work, in that anicnoi'i lica and sterility often a('C()in|)any moiphinc addiction in the human female. Related studies (Sawyer, Critchlow and Barraclough, 1955), in which recordings were made of electi'ical acti\ity in various regions in the brain.

demonstrated in rats that morphine acts nmch like the barbiturates in depressing activity in the reticular activating system. The effect was also shown by atropine, in doses that would block ovulation. The inference is that all three agents block by striking at the same central elements of the LH-release apparatus.

An interesting peculiarity of domestic hens with respect to barbiturates was encountered by Fraps and Case (1953), who noted that pentobarbital induces ovulation jirematurely, and that pentobarbital and progesterone supplement each other in this capacity. Although these developments may represent pharmacologic curiosities limited to the bird, the possibility should be seriously considered that similar effects may occur in other animals. In fact, pentobarbital in rabbits facilitates the release of hypophyseal gonadotrophin in response to intraventricular injection of histamine, seemingly by an effect in the rhinencephalon (Sawyer^ 1955).

3. The Central Nervous System as a Timing Mechanism for Ovulation

In the rat and the hen and probably many other species the pro-ovulatory excitation of the hypophysis is dejiendent in large measure on time of day.

In the rat, the blocking agents have served to delimit a critical period on the day of proestrum, before which ovulation can be blocked and after which it will occur in sjiite of injection of the blocking agent. Under controlled illumination for 14 hours daily, this critical period extends from about 2 P.M. to 4 P.M. Administration of either atroi^ine or i^entobarbital at 2 p.m. consistently blocks ovulation (Fig. 8.10), whereas injections later in the period are progressively less eff"ecti\-e ( l']\-erett and Sawyer, 1950, 1953; Everett, 1956b). Such l)redictability of the hour of pituitary activation is, in itself, evidence of a relationship between this event and diunial physiologic I'liythnis.

Furthei' e\-i(lence is seen in the seciuelae of pentobarbital injection (Fig. 8.11). Repetition at 2 P.M. on successive days results in a follicular cycle and prolonged vaginal estrus with eventual atresia of all





Fig. 8.10. Deinoni^lration of 24-lioiir penodu-ity in the luteinizing hormone-release apparatus of female rats (Vanderbilt strain, 4-day cycle, controlled lighting: 14 hours per day). Schematic representations of the normal cycle (A) and of characteristic results of different regimes of Nembutal treatment (B to F). Vaginal stages indicated by Roman numerals over each time scale; symbols above these show the corresponding follicle and corpus luteum stages. The device marked l prolonged the functional life of the coi'pus luteuni in nonpregnant women. Lyon rejjorted such prolongation using lactogen alone. The Squibl) lactogen was also used by Moore and Nalbandov (1955) in prolonging the luteal phase of the cycle in the ewe. As in the human experiments, howe\-er. one would like to know whether lactogen is capable of initial stimul.'iiioii of secretory activity of corpora lutea and of maintaining their function in the absence of the hypophysis. There is no evidence for or against the lactogenic liormone in this capacity, except in rats.

Estrogens have direct hiteotrophic action in the rabbit (Robson, 1937, 1938, 1947). The effect does not depend on the hypophysis and has been produced by impLantation of estrogen crystals within corpora liitea (Hammond, Jr., and Robson, 1951; Hammond, Jr., 1952). Westman (1934) had earlier shown that operative reduction of ovarian stroma in pseudopregnant rabbits results in corpus luteum regression and that this can be prevented by administration of estrogen. Corpora lutea induced by gonadotrophin injection or by mating, as the case may be, require the presence of the hypophysis for their continued function ( Smith and White, 1931; Westman and Jacobsohn, 1936). Theoretically, then, in rabbits the hypophysis liberates FSH and LH which act on the interstitial tissue to cause estrogen secretion. This in turn stimulates the corpora lutea to secrete progesterone.

The effect of estrogen on the corpora lutea of rats is largely indirect and requires the presence of the hypophysis. Massive dosage with estrogen beginning soon after ovulation results in the enlargement of the corpora lutea and the production of sufficient amounts of progesterone to mucify the vaginal mucosa (Selye, Collip and Thomson, 1935; Wolfe, 1935; Desclin, 1935; Merckel and Nelson, 1940). In fact, a single injection of 50 /Ag. estradiol bcnzoate on the day after ovulation is sufficient to cause pseudopregnancy. These effects are now judged to be the result of induced liberation of hypophyseal luteotrophin. vSimilar effects have been reported after administration of androgens (McKeown and Zuckerman, 1937; Wolfe and Hamilton, 1937; Freed, Greenhill and Soskin, 1938; Laqueur and Fluhmann, 1942).

Desclin (1949b) stated that in hypophysectomized rats the administration of estrogen augments the hiteotrophic action of lactogen, producing functional corpora lutea in the presence of subthreshold doses of the latter hormone. A physiologic synergism of the two substances has thus been indicated. Mayer (1951) suggested that this may explain the stimulation of corpora lutea of lactation which follows estrogen treatment in this species. Greep and Chester Jones (1950) postulated that estrogen favors corpus luteum function in the rat by causing the luteal cells to produce cholesterol as a precursor of progesterone. Their actual data, however, indicate that the increase of visible cholesterol after estrogen treatment was confined to the interstitial tissue.

Factors responsible for cholesterol storage and mobilization in corpora lutea of the rat were analyzed by Everett (1947). In hypophysectomized rats in which corpora lutea were maintained by lactogen the injection of pituitary LH induced the storage of cholesterol, but this effect did not occur in hypophysectomized rats in the absence of lactogen. It could be induced during pregnancy or pseudopregnancy by estrogen if the hypophysis remained in place. Addition of an excess of lactogen prevented cholesterol storage. Lactogen thus tends to deplete cholesterol content of rat luteal tissue as ACTH tends to deplete adrenocortical cholesterol.

2. XonfunctionaV' Corpora Lutea

In the short cycles of the rat, mouse, hamster, and so on, the corpora lutea are commonly said to be nonfunctional. The meaning of this statement, of course, is that they are incapable of supporting a decidual reaction (Long and Evans, 1922), or of lireventing ovulation. They need not be totally inactive, however, to fail to cause these manifestations. Whereas daily injection of 1.5 mg. or more of progesterone into intact female rats will simulate pseudopregnancy and indefinitely delay ovulation (Selye, Browne and Collii^, 1936; Phillips, 1937), smaller amounts of 1.0 rag. or less are compatible with the short cycle (Lahr and Riddle, 1936; Phillips, 1937; Everett, 1940a, b; and unpublished). In the absence of estrogen in castrated females, daily injection of as little as 0.25 rag. progesterone will support deciduomata (Velardo and Hisaw, 1951). Very small amounts of estrogen augment this action of progesterone (Rothchild, Meyer and Spielman, 1940) but somewhat larger amounts are inhibitory unless the progesterone dose is proportionately increased (Velardo and Hisaw, 1951). In the intact animal the progestational effects of less than 1.0 mg. progesterone would be inhibited by the periodic rise in estrogen secretion.

Evidence that some rats, but not all, actually experience low-grade corpus luteum activity during the short cycle was furnished by Everett (1945). In the comparison of ovaries from females of two strains of rats, it was noted in the supposedly normal Vanderbilt strain that on the two days immediately following ovulation the corpora lutea of the next youngest generation contained a great quantity of cholesterol, giving a strong Schultz reaction. By contrast, comparable corpora lutea of the DA strain were usually free of visible lipid in Sudan preparations or the Schultz test. Administration of small amounts of lactogen (luteotrophin I during the cycle preceding the current one, amounts inadequate to cause l)seudopregnancy, resulted in the rich deposition of cholesterol in these otherwise lipidfree corpora lutea. The conclusion was reached that the corpora lutea of the Vanderbilt rat must be slightly active during the short cycle and those of the DA rat less so, if at all. This would easily explain the relative indifference of the Vanderbilt rat to continuous light and the ease with which persistent cstrus could be induced in the DA rat by such treatment (Everett, 1942a, b). In fact, the low dosages of lactogen mentioned substituted for progesterone treatment in maintaining regular cycles in persistent-estrous rats of the DA strain (Everett, 1944b). Significantly, the treatment was effective in only those animals in which a set of corpora lutea had been induced by other means at the beginning of the experiment.

To be correlated with the above indications of low-grade function during the short cycle, is the finding that corpora lutea of the Vanderl)ilt rat retain full responsiveness to luteotrophin throughout most of the diestrous interval (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a). Responsiveness diminishes near the onset of i:)roestrum. Once the rat has entered proestrum these older corpora lutea are not capable of sustained function. The loss is not a function of time per se, but of stage of the cycle.

.\. I'.^KTI)OPRE(;\.\XrY

The terms coi-pu,^ hitcuni of ()^•ulation and corpus luteum of pscudojji'cgnancy are com


monly u.sed to differentiate the luteal bodies occurring during the normal cycles from those found during some unusually long period of luteal activity. However, the terms deny the fundamental similarity of the luteal phase in the cycles of such animals as the guinea pig and the luteal phase induced by sterile mating or its equivalent in animals like the rat. In the unmated bitch the spontaneous luteal phase of the cycle is commonly called pseudopregnancy, yet it is equally common to say that the guinea pig does not experience pseudopregnancy. The truth is that the luteal phase of the canine cycle is simply longer than the luteal phase in the guinea pig and may be marked by a period of lactation near its close. In the present discussion, the expression pseudopregnancy will be equivalent to saying the luteal phase of the infertile cycle. Under experimental conditions it will refer to any period of sustained luteal function similar to that of the normal progestational state. Wherever appropriate, the distinction will be made between a pseudopregnancy that is spontaneous and one that is induced.

In most of the familiar animals that ovulate spontanously corpus luteum function also begins spontaneously and continues for at least several days after ovulation. With respect to the rabbit, cat, and ferret, it is often said that pseudopregnancy is invoked by sterile copulation, whereas strictly speaking it is only ovulation and corpus luteum formation which are invoked. The pseudopregnancy then follows automatically. This interpretation seems appropriate, inasmuch as in all three species the formation of corpora lutea by l)rief treatment with hypophyseal or chorionic gonadotrophin is followed by long periods of progesterone secretion which can hardly be the direct effect of the injected substances (Hill and Parkes, 1930a, b; Foster and Hisaw, 1935; van Dyke and Li, 1938). Quite different is the pseudopregnancy of the rat, mouse, and hauistei', in \\liich progestational activity is invoked by stinudation of the cervix uteri, l^verett (1952a) described the ex])eriiuental dissociation in rats of the o^•^llati()n and luteotr()])hic mechanisms. respectively. When o\-uhition is blocked (by pentobarbital) in the cycle dui'ing which controlled uiatinu occurs, pseudopi-egnancy begins




Fig. 8.12. Experimental dissociation in rats of the ovulation mechanism and that causing pseudopregnancy. A. Control cycles for comparison with B and C . Points on base line represent diestrum, on ascending lines proestrum, on highest level full vaginal estrum. X, ovulation. B. Blockade with Nembutal {'NB) on day of proestrum and following day (see Fig. 8.11E'). Ovulation during third night. C. Same basic procedure as B, but with copulation during first night (M). Ovulation usually failing in this cycle (contrast with B) . Corpora lutea formed after spontaneous ovulation in second cycle regularly become functional without further stimulation : the wavy line represents pseudopregnancy. The early copulation has introduced some change in the animal such that this pseudopregnancy "spontaneously" follows ovulation as in the standard mammalian cycle. (From J. W. Everett, Ciba Foundation Collofiuia Endocrinol.. 4, 172. 1952.)


"spontaneously" a]ter the next cyclic estrus (Fig. 8.12). Dissociation of the two mechanisms is expressed in another way by certain Mustelidae, e.g., the mink and marten. Ovulation in these forms is invoked by mating, whereas corpus luteum activation awaits appropriate environmental conditions, i.e., temperature and length of daily illumination (Pearson and Enders, 1944; Hansson, 1947). In the mink, during the period of relative luteal inactivity that follows mating early in the season, recurrent estrus continues. If reraating takes place at an interval of 6 days or more, new ovulations are induced (Hansson, 1947). Matings late in the season are immediately followed by luteal activity. The pseudopregnant cycles of a representative series of mammals are much alike when conditions appropriate to the respective species are applied (Fig. 8.1).

1. Duration of Psciidopregndncn

The length of time that corpora lutea remain functional in the pseudopregnant cycle is thought to be relatively uniform in the great majority of mammals, usually about 10 to 15 days. Rarely it is shorter,


e.g., the hamster, 7 days, although usually 9 to 10 days (Asdell, 1946). At the other extreme, the corpora lutea remain functional for periods corresponding to the duration of pregnancy, as in the ferret, 5 to 6 weeks. In fact, corpus luteum function lasting over a month is usual in the other two carnivores for which information is at hand: cat, 30 to 44 days (Foster and Hisaw, 1935) ; and dog, 30 days or more (Evans and Cole, 1931).

These figures are only approximations, however, as the criteria on which they are based differ. In the rat, in which pseudopregnancy is said to last 12 to 14 days, its termination is taken to be the onset of the next estrus, whereas the corpora lutea must have undergone a decline of activity 2 or 3 days earlier (Everett, 1948). The decline is probably not abrupt, inasmuch as the vaginal smear during the next estrus is very strongly mucified and, as mentioned earlier (p. 519), enough progesterone seems to be secreted by the waning corpora lutea to facilitate ovulation. Morphologic criteria are often employed as indicators of corpus luteum regression: characteristically, fatty vacuolation of luteal cells, decrease in size of the individual cells or of the entire corpus luteum. and changes in the smusoidal pattern suggesting reduced circulation. Such changes are first observed in the guinea pig corpora lutea on about the 13th day of the cycle. One has the choice of taking this date as the end of the pseudopregnant phase or, alternatively, the date on which the first indications of estrus are noted. Either choice is arbitrary, but the former seems preferable as it suggests that progesterone secretion is diminishing and probably is no longer sufficient to maintain progestational changes in the uterus. In fact, regression of the endometrium sets in about a day earlier than frank degenerative changes in the corpora lutea. In the cat, according to van Dyke and l.i (1938) the corpora lutea 20 days after ovulation no longer secrete enough progesterone to cause motor effects of epinephrine in the myometrium, the so-called "epinephrine-reversal" effect, yet by histologic criteria corpus luteum regression is not apparent until 28 days or later (Liche, 1939; Foster and Hisaw, 1935). In the bitch the uterus begins regression 20 to 30 days after heat, l)ut the corpora lutea are said to remain in good condition for a longer time (see Asdell, 1946, for references). Regression is so gradual that anestrum is not reached until about 85 days. In the primates the beginning of menstruation offers a means of delimiting the luteal phase, inasmuch as menstruation in the ovulatory cycle reflects a marked reduction in corpus luteum function. Nevertheless, this reduction probably occurs a few days before bleeding begins. The i^eak of pregnanediol excretion in women (Venning and Browne, 1937) and of plasma progesterone concentration in women and monkeys (Forbes, 1950; Bryans. 1951 ) is passed about midway between ovuhition and menstruation.

2. Xciivdl Factors in Pseudopregnancy

The importance of the nervous system in control of pseudopregnancy is well recognized in only the few species re])resented by the rat. .\ neural effect in the mink and similar Mustelidae is implied by the relation of hiteal function to daily illumination, as mentioned earlier. Beyond that fact, however, no information is available. Att(>ntion will therefore be directed largely to the rat.

Not only sterile mating, but se\'eral other


procedures involving neural stimulation will cause rats to become pseudopregnant. Stimulation of the cervix by mechanical means (Long and Evans, 1922) or electric shock (Shelesnyak, 1931) have become standard methods. In fact, Greep and Hisaw (1938) obtained pseudopregnancies after electrical stimulation during early diestrum, several days before ovulation. Pseudopregnancy is also invoked by continuous stimulation of the nipples for several days (Selye and McKeown, 1934). According to Harris (1936) electric shock through the head is effective. His negative results with "spinal shock" are difficult to explain. From the description of position of the electrode it seems doubtful that the current passed through the cord itself, yet the sacral plexus must have been stimulated.

Al)dominal sympathectomy or superior cervical ganglionectomy are said to diminish the numbers of animals responding to electrical or mechanical stimulation of the cervix (Vogt, 1931; Haterius, 1933; Friedgood and Bevin, 1941). On the other hand, there is no diminution of response to sterile copulation, which shows that the sympathetic chains are not essential. Ball (1934) emphasized the quantitative aspects of the problem, noting that partial resection of the uterus or excision of the cervix diminished the response to sterile copulation, but only when "single-plug" matings were allowed. Multiple plugs gave pseudopregnancy in 100 per cent of the animals. It may be assumed that Vogt's (1933) negative results after hysterectomy resulted from single-jilug copulations. Kollar (1953) re-opened the cjuestion and found that pelvic nerve resection usually pi-evented the response to mating. It is not clear, howevei', whether multiple copulations wnv the rule, although it seems that the I'outiiie procedure was to leave the male with the female overnight. His contention was that cervicectomy fails to abolish the resjionse completely because the vagina remains sensitive.

Anesthesia with ether, nitrous oxide, or ethylene ( Mcyei', Leonard and Hisaw, 1929) diniiiiished the ficciuency of response to inecliaiiical stimulation of tlu> (•er\-ix. The statement was made, although without v\\(len(c, that spinal anesthesia |)re\-ents pseudopreiinanev. Aeeoi'ding to A'ogt (1933),


local anesthesia of the vagina and cervix by cocaine or procaine prevented the response to sterile copulation in 23 of 35 rats.

Removal of neocortex (Davis, 1939) did not interfere with the pseudopregnancy response to electrical stimulation of the cervix, although there was slight impairment of the response to mechanical stimulation or sterile mating (single-plug?).

These results taken together have been construed to mean that induction of pseudopregnancy in rats involves a reflex similar to the ovulation reflex in rabbits. Certain considerations, however, raise the possibility that it may not be a "trigger" stimulus to the hypophysis as long believed (Everett, 1952a). In the first place, it seems doubtful that a trigger stimulus would result in continuation of a new pattern of secretion (luteotrophin) for as long as 10 to 12 days. Furthermore, as noted above, cervical stimulation during the diestrum preceding ovulation may induce pseudopregnancy (Greep and Hisaw, 1938). Similarly, copulation during a cycle in which ovulation is blocked by pentobarbital results in a pseudoi)regnancv that begins after the next estrus (Fig. 8.12)^.

We turn now to experiments concerned directly with the hypothalamo-pituitary system and pseudopregnancy. Westman and Jacobsohn (1938c) cut the pituitary stalks of estrous female rats. Barriers of metal foil were inserted to prevent regeneration of nerve fibers assumed to innervate the adenohypophysis. Regeneration of blood vessels must have been equally impossible. Controls were simply hypophysectomized. Two to 5 hours after the operations electrical stimulation of the cervix was administered to all animals. Pseudopregnancies were demonstrated by deciduomas in traumatized uteri of all the stalk-sectioned animals but not in the completely hypophysectomized rats. Desclin (1950) reported the maintenance of pseudopregnancy in estrogen-treated rats in which the only remaining hypophyseal tissue was in the form of grafts in the kidney. Whereas in hypophysectomized controls the estrogen treatment (stilbestrol pellets) produced cornification of the vagina and no enlargement of corpora lutea, the engrafted-estrogenized rats developed mucified vaginas and enlarged corpora lutea as in intact rats similarly treated with estrogen. Desclin concluded that the grafted hypophysis is able to respond to estrogen by liberating luteotrophin.

It is now apparent, however, that neither cervical stimulation nor estrogen treatment is needed to invoke pseudopregnancy when the gland is isolated from the hypothalamus (Everett, 1954, 1956a; Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a; Sanders and Rennels, 1957; Desclin, 1956a, b). When autografts of anterior hypophysis were made to the renal capsule or near the common carotid artery on the day after ovulation in adult cyclic rats, corpus luteum function was invoked and maintained without any stimulus other than the operative procedures themselves. In short-term experiments in which the uteri were traumatized 4 days after the transplantation large deciduomas were regularly found at 8 days in the proven absence of residual hypophyseal tissue at the original site (Everett, 1954). Hypophysectomized controls were negative. In longterm experiments, continuing luteal function was demonstrated for as long as 3 months. Here the test for luteal function was vaginal mucification in the presence of massive amounts of estrogen administered during the final week of the experiment (Everett, 1956a). Controls in which the grafts or the ovaries were removed at the beginning of such estrogen treatment responded with full vaginal cornification. Follicular apparatus and interstitial tissue of the ovaries atrophied promptly after the grafting operations, whereas corpora lutea forming at that time were maintained for the long periods without histologic sign of deterioration. In later work, the decidual reaction was used as the test for luteal function, positive reactions being elicited as late as 2 months after the transplantation. It was discovered that function of the graft is not influenced by stage of the cycle at which transplantation is carried out and that grafts in the anterior chamber of the eye secrete luteotrophin like those on the kidney (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a). Transsection of the pituitary stalk is sufficient in itself to provoke pseudopregnancy. If an effective barrier to vascular regeneration is inserted, the pseudopregnancy will heorve permanent, but otherwise it will l:i •■ i;!* usual length of time (Xikitovitch-Winer, 1957 j. In fact, there is reason to suspect that even a transient impairment of circulation in the median eminence-hypophj'seal linkage can be a sufficient impetus to pseudopregnancy. The experiments of Taubenhaus and Soskin ( 1941 ) in which application of an acetylcholine-prostigmine mixture to the exposed hypophysis was followed by pseudopregnancy, may well be explained in some such way.

It thus seems that in the rat the deprivation of, or interference with, the normal connection of the pars distalis with the median eminence facilitates secretion of luteotrophin and at the same time eliminates luteolytic mechanisms. It is significant that transplants of pars distalis into the pituitary capsule or to the immediate vicinity of the median eminence resume cyclic function (see page 512). The hypothalamus may have an inhibitory effect on luteotrophic activity of the pars distalis during the short cycle in this species. Greep and Chester Jones (1950) made the pertinent suggestion in attempting to explain the induction of pseudopregnancy by estrogen treatment, that the fundamental action of estrogen here is the suppression of FSH and LH, after which luteotrophic secretion may "proceed apace."

There is necessarily some uncertainty concerning the amount of luteotrophin secreted by the pars distalis when dissociated from the brain. Three sets of facts indicate that the output is larger than that in the cycling animal. (1) Sufficient gestagen is secreted by the engrafted animal to maintain a ])regnancy (Everett, 1956c; Meyer, I'rasad and Cochrane, 1958) when the pituitary is trans])lanted on the day after mating. (2) After stalk-transsection, in which there is less initial destruction of glandular parenchyma than in transplantation experiments, the corpora lutea enlarge to a diameter like that usually found in late pregnancy rather than remaining like those of pseudopregnancy (Nikitovitch-Winer, 1957). (3) A single homotransplant of pars distalis placed subcutaneously in an otherwise normal female mouse will maintain a se(iueiicc of pseudopregnancies that override the short cycles expected of the animal's own hypophysis (Miihlbock and Boot, 19591. This is also true of rats (Nikitovitch Winer, uni)ublislie(l). To avoid the conclusion that in such preparations the grafted gland is secreting luteotrophin at an increased rate, one must assume that the outl)ut of this hormone from the intact gland is only slightly below threshold and that the graft adds just enough to make the total output effective. To explain the maintenance of pregnancy one might assume that the luteotrophin output and the resulting gestagen secretion are no greater than during the normal short cycle and that the formation of deciduomas takes place because of the deficiency of estrogen. The results of stalksection, however, cannot easily be explained away. The weight of evidence, then, is in favor of increased luteotrophin secretion by hypophyses isolated from the brain by severance of the stalk or transplantation.

Under certain experimental conditions it has seemed that to establish pseudopregnancy all that is necessary is to block out the forthcoming estrus and ovulation. Thus, in cycling rats, when the hypophysis is transplanted to the kidney as late as 60 hours after ovulation, the current diestrum transforms into a permanent pseudopregnancy supported by the existing set of corpora lutea (Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a ». Similarly, injections of chlorpromazine (Barraclough, 1957) or Pathilon (ditsch and Everett, 1958) begun during diestrum, may transform it into a pseudopregnancy by blocking out the expected estrus.

The Miihlhock-Boot experiment mentioned above furnishes an instructive model of the standard mammalian cycle, in which both ovulation and pseudopregnancy are spontaneous events. Given the extra pituitary tissue producing luteotrophin at a presumably constant rate, with the output of the normal ghmd fluctuating (juantitatively and (jualitatively, the mouse or rat undergoes one ])seudopregnancy after another. Possibly, in animals that normally liave a spontaneou.- hiteal phase, thei'c is a considei'ahle poUion ot' the pars distalis which I'unctions somewhat indepeiidentl}- of the hyputhalaiiius. with a continuous output of luteotrophin as from the grafted gland in the Mvihlb()ck-P)Oot pi-epaiation. The portion nioic (Hrectly under control of the me(lian eminence I zona tuberaHs'.'l would then act like the intact hypoiihysis of the Miihlbock-Boot mouse. Such a view, unfortunately, continues to set apart species in which the luteal phase is not spontaneous, by suggesting that only in them are special neui'al nieclianisnis involved.


B. Luteolytic Mechanisms

By luteolysis we shall refer to corpus luteum regression in any of its manifestations. Supposedly the initial change is functional, after which overt cytologic and histologic changes appear, leading eventually to the total loss of glandular tissue. Very likely the initial stages are occult and only gradually reach recognizable proportions. Mention was made earlier of the fact that in women and monkeys the peak of gestagen secretion is about midway between ovulation and menstruation. In rats indirect evidence from progesterone injection experiments leads to the deduction that toward the close of a pseudoi)regnancy gestagen secretion must drop below the estrus-suppressing level several days before estrous changes appear in the vaginal smear (see Fig. 8.8). A more al)rupt drop is reported for the ewe l)etween the 16th and 17th (last) days of the cycle (Edgar and Ronaldson, 1958).

Long-term experiments with pituitary autotransplants indicate that at least in the rat the life span of the corpus luteum is not limited by intrinsic factors. Some agent (s) of extra-ovarian origin must, therefore, be res]5onsible for at least the initial luteolytic changes. Various bits of information suggest that the agent is associated with, if not identical with, FSH and/or LH. Greep (1938) noted that after hypophysectomy in rats the daily injection of LH over a period of 10 days caused the corpora lutea to regress more rapidly than otherwise. Greep, van Dyke and Chow (1942) later were unable to repeat this with a more highly purified LH C'metakentrin") , a fact suggesting that the earlier material was effective because of impurity. During the short cycle of the rat, luteolysis is interrupted by translilantation of the pars distalis (Everett, 1954; Nikitovitch-Winer and Everett, 1958a). Whatever regressive changes are in progress at that moment are evidently suspended forthwith. They are first apparent during the third day of diestrum and become increasingly pronounced during proestrum and estrus. In this connection, it should be recalled that during late diestrum and proestrum patches of cells undergoing fatty necrosis are first recognizable histologically (Boling, 1942; Everett, 1945).

Why is it that, in the face of a continuing supply of luteotrophin in the MiihlbockBoot preparation, or in intact animals injected daily with lactogen (Lahr and Riddle, 1936; Aschheim, 1954), luteolysis sets in during the 2nd week? The question obviously cannot be answered from present knowledge. Nevertheless, it is clear that the pseudopregnancy that transpires when a significant i)ortion of hypophyseal tissue remains in normal relation to the hypothalamus is far from the steady state of that which becomes established by total removal of the pars distalis to an extracranial site. It is also apparent that the onset of luteolysis may be postponed by such means as hysterectomy or production of artificial deciduomas (see p. 538). Furthermore, during lactation-pseudoi)regnancies in rats, Canivenc and Mayer (1953) prolonged luteal function to 34 days by substituting successive new litters of suckling young. This technique should prove especially valuable in experimental analysis of both luteotrophic and luteolytic mechanisms.

Benson and Folley (1956) suggested that lactogen secretion is activated by oxytocin, inasmuch as its injection prevented the normal inv'olution of the mammary glands after withdrawal of the litters from lactating rats. This observation has been confirmed by McCann, Mack and Gale (1958), who also noted the interruption of lactation by lesions of the sui)raoi)tico-hyiiophyseal tract. Selye and ]\lcKeown (1934) long ago found that pseudopregnancy could be induced in cycling rats by the introduction of a suckling litter. Although all this is consistent with the above-mentioned observation by Canivenc and Alayer, other workers have observed luteolytic effects of gonadotrophinfree oxytocin administered to cycling dairy heifers (Armstrong and Hansel, 1958). Furthermore, Grosvenor and Turner (1958), after first noting that the administration of Dibenamine, atropine, or pentobarbital to rats prevented the expected drop in assay able pituitary lactogen at nursing, found no decrease when pentobarbitalized mothers were injected with physiologic doses of oxytocin intravenously. When the dosage was increased 30 to 60 times there was apparently some moderate discharge, but the authors regard it as insignificant.


C. Effect of the Uterus on Luteal Function

This subject has been reviewed by Bradbury, Brown and Gray (1950). In three species (Fig. 8.13) hysterectomy results in significant prolongation of the functional life-span of corpora lutea (guinea pig, Loeb, 1927; rabbit, Asdell and Hammond, 1933; rat, Bradbury, 1937). In each case the period of luteal function approximates that of normal pregnancy. The fact that corpora lutea in the pseudopregnant ferret normally function as long as in the pregnant animal may be a clue to the noncffect of hysterectomy in that species (Deanesly and Parkes, 1933). Ahhough Burford and Diddle (1936) rej^orted that in monkeys total hysterectomy was followed by vaginal cycles of normal length, examination of their protocols shows that during the several postoperative months just 1 corpus luteum was produced among all 5 animals. The experiment thus seems inconclusive. Impairment of pelvic circulation seems to be a common factor complicating the results of hysterectomy in women and may have been one cause of the failure of luteinization in these monkeys.

An interpretation given by Loeb (1927) and Bradbury, Brown and Gray (1950) for the prolongation of luteal function by hysterectomy is that in species in which the effect is demonstrable the uterus secretes a specific substance which abbreviates the life of the corpus luteum. Hechter, Fraenkel, Lev and Soskin (1940) found in rats that grafts of estrous uteri shortened the pseudopregnancies of hysterectomized animals to normal length. Implantation of similar tis








Fig. 8.13. Reliilive duiation.s of p.seiulopicgnaiicy in normal and hysterectomizeil animals of four species in relation to the duration of j^ostation characteristic of each. Gestation plotted as a common unit of time. (After J. T. Bradbury, W. E. Brown and L. A. Gray, Recent Proj,n-. Hormone Res., 5, 151-194, 1950.)



SIR' which had been killed by freezing had no such effect, nor did successful grafts of uteri from diestrous donors. Bradbury, Brown and Gray (1950) found that partially hysterectomized rats in which the remaining uterine tissue was continuous with the cervix, hence properly drained, experienced pseudopregnancies of normal length. However, when the continuity was interrupted the uterine remnants became greatly distended, the endometrium was destroyed, and the animals had prolonged pseudopregnancies. Possibly the endometrium is the source of the hypothetical "luteolytic" substance.*'

Under other circumstances the endometrium of rats has a luteotrophic rather than luteolytic effect, for when deciduomas are induced by trauma the pseudopregnancies of otherwise normal animals are lengthened to 22 days or more (Ershoff and Duell, 1943; Velardo, Dawson, Olsen and Hisaw, 1953). This is not true in mice, however, and Kamell and Atkinson (1948) suggest that the I'eason may lie in the shorter life-span of the decidual tissue in that species. Loeb (1927) reported that deciduomas in cyclic guinea pigs ])rolonged the luteal phase, i.e., delayed the next ovulation from 3 to 7 days, which is far less than the prolongation after hysterectomy.

As an alternative to the concept of conI rol of the corpus luteum by humoral agents

" The denial by Velardo, Olsen, Hisaw and Dawson (1953) that hysterectomy in rats prolongs l)seiidopregnancy is based on operations performed later in the luteal phase than those of Bradbury, Brown and Gray and of Hechter, Fraenkel, Lev and Soskin. Whereas the latter workers had operated in the range from the 4th to the 7th day.^^ of p.seudopregnancy and many of Bradbury's cases lacked uteri when they entered pseudopregnancy, Velardo and associates excised the uteri on the 9th day. It seems possible that this difference in time may be crucial, for by the 9th day of a 12-day pseudopregnancy the corpora lutea must be on the verge of regression, if that in'ocess has not already been initiated. After maintaining pseudopregnancy in estrogenized, liypophysectomized rats b}^ means of lactogen, its withdrawal is followed about 3 days later by estrous smears (Nelson and Bichette, 1943; Nelson, 1946). A slightly longer delay occurs in nonestrogenized, intact rats at the end of a lactogeninduced pseudopregnancy (Everett, unpublished) or after withdrawal of progesterone treatment (Fig. 8C).


formed in the uterus, Loeb considered the jjossibility that neural mechanisms are involved. The idea was not acceptable, he felt, because in partial hysterectomies the result was not detennined by the locus of the part removed. The finding by Hechter, Fraenkel, Lev and Soskin (1940) that grafts of uterine tissue in hysterectomized rats return the duration of pseudopregnancy to normal, is significant evidence pointing in the same direction.

A third hypothesis was advanced by Heckel (1942) who found in rabbits that the extent of prolongation of luteal function by subtotal hysterectomy is roughly proportional to the amount of uterine tissue removed. The suggestion was offered that removal of the uterus has an estrogensparing effect. The greater amount of estrogen thus available to the corpora lutea prolongs their life, according to this view.

Later investigations by Moore and Nalbandov (1953) revive the possibility that the uterus influences the ovary by way of the nervous system. In sheep the implantation of a plastic bead in utero during the early luteal phase shortened the cycle by several days. Successive cycles tended to be unusually short. When the uterine segments containing the beads were denervated, however, the cycles were essentially normal. Other work from the same laboratory (Huston and Nalbandov, 1953) which indirectly may bear on this problem, indicates that the presence of a mechanical irritant (a thread) in the oviduct of the domestic fowl tends to block ovulation. The blockade may extend for as long as 20 days if the thread is placed in the isthmus (van Tienhoven, 1953). The ovaries remain functional, producing large follicles which may be ovulated at will by injection of LH. The authors feel that this phenomenon, like the effect of the bead in the sheep uterus, involves a neural mechanism, Init crucial information is lacking. It may be significant that stimulation of the ovaries was found in some hens, in place of blockade.

We may hope that as more information becomes available the assortment of facts given in these paragraphs will fit into a rational system. Not until this is realized can we hope to understand the regulation of the luteal phase.


VIII. Concluding Comments

From what has been written here it is readily apparent that present knowledge of the mechanisms controlling the reproductive cycle is extremely spotty. The number of assumptions necessary to knit the various items of factual information into an orderly pattern is disturbing. In spite of a voluminous literature which has grown during the last 60 years, we are really only a few steps ahead of our predecessors at the turn of the century in terms of fundamental understanding. A brief recounting of some of these steps may be desirable.

The first three decades saw the gradual development of proof that the ovary is a gland of internal secretion as well as the producer of eggs, governing the uterus and other accessory organs by secretion of hormones into the blood stream. For a while it seemed that the events of the reproductive cycle could be neatly explained, with the ovary in the capacity of controlling agent. Yet there were indications that the ovary itself is not independent. As early as 19091910 (Aschner; Crowe, Gushing and Honuins) it was noted that destruction of the hypophysis is accompanied by atrophy of the gonads and reproductive tract. In 1927 the separate investigations of Smith and Engle and of Zondek and Aschheim demonstrated conclusively that function of the ovary depends vitally on the anterior hyjiophysis. Promptly it was learned that the hypophyseal secretion of gonadotrophic hormone is in turn modified by estrogens. In the early 1930's the "push-pull" hypothesis of pituitary-ovarian interaction was separately stated by Brouha and Simonnet and by Moore (see Moore and Price, 1932). Modified in detail as new facts appeared, this hypothesis is held to the present day in some quarters as a simple exi)lanation of how the cycle comes about in polyestrous, continuous breeders in which ovulation takes l)lacc spontaneously. Much of the investigation of pituitary-ovarian i)hysiology during the 1930's was performed within the framework of this hypothesis.

For seasonal breeders and reflex ovulators, however, the assumption was necessary that special controlling mechanisms are superimjiosed. It bccaiiie iccognizcd also that in some vaguely defined manner even the human cycle is subject to intervention of the nervous system. The possible importance of the hypothalamus was debated at some length in the twenties. In 1932 the existence of a sex center there was proposed by Hohlweg and Junkmann. In an attempt to explain the coital excitation of the rabbit hypophysis which causes the liberation of gonadotrophin, Hinsey and Markee (1933) suggested diffusion of a chemical substance from the posterior lobe to the anterior lobe. Hinsey (1937) later elaborated on this possibility and mentioned the hypophyseal portal vessels as a plausible route by which the substance might travel. We have seen the later history of these ideas.

The "Sexualcentrum" of Hohlweg and Junkmann was proposed as a mediator of the effects of estrogen on the anterior hypophysis of rats. Westman and Jacobsohn (1936-1940), on the other hand, believed that through its stalk connection with the hypophysis the rat hypothalamus governs gonadotrophin synthesis, not release. The latter they regarded as a direct effect of estrogen on the gland. These views did not afford a common basis for spontaneous and refiex ovulation.

Schweizer, Chari])i)er and Haterius ( 1937) offered the first surmise of similarity, after finding that guinea pigs bearing intraocular pituitary grafts developed persistent estrus and large follicles that failed to go through maturation changes. Their feeling was that the normal connection of hypophysis with hypothalamus may be necessary for cyclic liberation of LH. Almost concurrently, Dempsey (1937) expressed a similar view as one alternative explanation of his experimental results with the guinea i)ig cycle. Suggesting cautiously that release of luteinizer may be brought about l)y a "rhythmic discharge" from the central nervous system, he went on to mention the "possibility that a high level of oestrin is necessary but not directly responsible for the release of luteinizer" (italics added). From this it is only a short transition to certain concepts set forth in the present exposition.

According to current views: (1) Reflex ovulation and spontaneous ovulation alike are governed by a hypothalamo-pituitary apparatus whose final link to the pituitaiy is neurohumoral by way of the hypophyseal portal veins and whose activity precipitates release of LH. (2) The apparatus includes a hypothalamic center or centers whose excitation depends on estrogen-progesterone levels and afferent impulses of various kinds. (3) The sensitivity of the center (s) is influenced not only by the sex steroids, but by other poorly understood factors that vary from species to species and from time to time in individuals, e.g., the diurnal rhythm in rats. Here in bare outline is a plausible hypothesis that may be generally applied to the events immediately relating to ovulation.

Satisfactory hypotheses respecting other phases of the cycle must await future developments. The extent and manner of intervention of the nervous system in the follicular and luteal phases remain unsettled. Although the hypophyseal hormones concerned in ovarian follicle development have been characterized, their exact chemical descrijition has not been accomplished. The rate of their output at different stages of the cycle is largely a matter of conjecture. Structural changes that they jiroduce in the ovary are well known, but in chemical terms only the end products of ovarian activity are well recognized, and these probably incompletely. The fact that the estrogens, in turn, have a regulating effect on follicle-stimulating activity of the hypophysis is known, but the mechanisms by which this effect is accomplished are uncertain. The hypophyseal hormones that maintain the luteal phase are recognized with any certainty in only three species and there is a wide difference between rabbits, on the one hand, and rats and mice, on the other. For mammals generally, the luteotrophic factors have not been identified. Whether the hypothalamus is actively concerned in maintenance of the luteal i)hase in the majority of mammals is unknown. The morphologic effects of luteotrojihic stimulation on corpora lutea are well recognized, but here again the chemical mechanisms leading to the end products are obscure. The action of the corpus luteum hormone in regulation of the cycle is partially known, including the well established fact that its continual jiresence in large amount will suiijiress the estrogenic and ovulatory phases. Yet, one cannot say whether this effect is accomplished by direct action on the hypophysis or by indirect action through the central nervous system. Nor can one state how the hypophysisgonad equilibrium of the luteal phase is interrupted in the absence of a conceptus. With respect to the ovulation mechanism itself, the hypothesis outlined above requires verification in additional species. Assuming its validity, many details remain to be studied, e.g., the neural pathways and nuclei involved, identification of neurochemical activators of the pars distalis and their sources and loci of action, the precise nature of mechanisms whereby the gonadal steroids excite or suppress, the cellular mechanisms by which ovulating hormone is released into circulation by the hypoi^hysis, and the cytochemical effects within the ovary. All too evidently an encompassing theory of the female reproductive cycle is far from realization.

IX. References

Allex. E., Daxforth, C. H., .and Doisy, E. A., Eds. 1939. Sex and Internal Secretions, 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company.

Allen, E. 1923. Racial and familial cyclic inheritance and other evidence from the mouse concerning the cause of estrous phenomena. Am. J. Anat., 32, 293-304.

Allen, E. 1927. The menstrual cycle of the monkey, Macacus rhesus: observations on normal animals, the effects of removal of the ovaries and the effects of injection of ovarian and placental extracts into the spayed animals. Contr. Embrvol., Carnegie Inst. Washington. 19, 1-14.

Allen, E., Pratt, J. P., Newell, Q. U.. and Bland, L. J. 1930. Human ova from large follicles: including a search for maturation divisions and observations of atresia. Am. J. Anat., 46, 1-53.

Alloiteau, J. J. 1952. La lordose reflexe par excitation du col uterin chez la rate. Son controle endocrinien. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 146, 237-238.

Alloiteau, J. J. 1954. Effets de doses minimes de progesterone sur les fonctions gonadotropes de la Ratte en oestrus permanent hypothalamique. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 148, 875-877.

Alloiteau, J. J., .\nd Courvoisier, B. 1953. Effets de I'excitation du col uterin chez la rate apres lesions hypothalamique. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 147, 1040-1042.

Arm.strong, D. T., and Hansel, W. 1958. Alteration of the bovine estrous cvcle with oxvtocin. Fed. Proc, 17, 6.

Arox, C, and Aron-Brunetiere, R. 1953, Effets de la stimulation mecani(|ue du vagin et du segment supracervical de Tutorus sur I'ovaire du Cobaye. Compt. rend. Acad. Sc, 237, 846848.

AscHHEiM, p. 1954. Influence du tissue decidual sur la pseudogestation provociuee par I'administration de prolactine chez le rat. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 148, 185-187.

Aschner, B. 1909. Demonstration von Hiinden nach Extirpation der Hypophysis. Wien. klin. Wchnschr., 22, 1730-1732.

AsDELL, S. A. 1946. Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Ithaca, X. Y.: Comstock Publishing Company.

AsDELL, S. A., .^ND Hammond, J. 1933. The effects of prolonging the life of the corpus luteum in the rabbit by hysterectomy. Am. J. Physiol., 103, 600-605".

AsTwooD, E. B. 1939. Changes in weight and water content of the uterus of the normal adult rat. Am. J. Physiol., 126, 162-170.

AsTWOOD, E. B. 1941. The regulation of corpus luteum function by hypophyseal luteotrophin. Endociinology, 28, 309-320.

AsTwooD, E. B., AND Fevold, H. L. 1939. Action of progesterone on the gonadotropic activity of the pituitary. Am. J. Physiol., 127, 192-198.

B.ACHMAN, C. 1936. Oestrogenic hormone and the mechanism of corpus luteum formation in the rabbit. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 33, 551-554.

Bacq, Z. M. 1932. Effect of sympathectomy on sexual functions, lactation and maternal behavior in the albino rat, with a description of the technique of svmpathectomy in the rat. Am. J. Physiol., 99, 444-453.

B.'MN, J. A. 1952. Enzymatic aspects of barbiturate action. Fed. Proc, 11, 653-658.

B.ALL, J. 1934. Demonstration of quantitative relation between stimulus and response in pseudopregnancy in the rat. Am. J. Physiol., 107, 698-703.

Ball, J., and Hartman, C. G. 1939. A case of delayed ovulation after estrin administration in the intact monkev. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 40, 629-631.

B.^RBARo.ssA, C, AND Di Ferrante, H. 1950. Sugli effetti dell'ipofisectomie nel correlazione intermedina-ovaio. Arch. "E. Maragliano" pat. e clin., 5, 887-890.

Barraclouoh, C. A. 1955. Blockad(< of the release of i)itui1arv gonadotrophin b\- ic.^^erijine. Fed. Proc, 14, 9-10.

Bahracloucii, C. a. 1956. Blockade of the release of i)ituitary gonadotrophin by chlorpromazine. Anat. Rec, 124, 255.

Barraclough, C. a. 1957. Indiiction of i^seudopregnancy in the rat by reseri)ine and chlorpiomazine. Anat. Rec, 127, 262-263.

Barraclough, C. A., and Sawyer, C. H. 1955. Inhibition of the release of pituitaiy oxuhiloiy hormone in th(> rat bv morphine. iMidociinology, 57, 329-337.

B.\rrnp:tt, R. J., AND Grlei', R. O. 1951. The d\rection of flow in the blood vessels of the infundibular stalk. Science, 113, 185.

Bahtelmez, G. W., Corner, G. W., and Hartman, C. G. 1951. Cyclic changes in the endometrium of the rhesus monkey {Macaca mulatta). Contr. EmbryoL, Carnegie Inst. Washington, 34, 99-144.

Bauer, H. G. 1954. Endocrine and other clinical raanife.stations of hypothalamic di.-;ease. J. Clin. Endocrmol., 14, i3-31.

Beard, J. 1898. The rhythm of reproduction in animals. Anat. Anz., 14, 97-102.

Benoit, J., and Assenmacher, I. 1955. Le controle hypothalamique de I'activite prehypophysaire gonadotrope. J. Phvsiol., Paris, 47, 427567.

Benson, G. K., .\nd Folley, S. J. 1956. Oxytocin as stimulator for the release of prolactin from the anterior pituitarv. Nature, London, 177, 700.

Bielschowsky, F., and Hall. W. H. 1953. The endocrine imbalance induced in female rats by autotransplantation of the ovary into the tail. Australian J. Exper. Biol. & Med. Sc, 31, 8598.

Blskind, G. R. 1941. Tiie inactivation of estradiol and estradiol benzoate in castrate female lats. Endocrinology, 28, 894-896.

Blandau, R. J., AND Money, W. L. 1943. The attainment of sexual maturity in the female albino rat as determined by the copulatory respon.se. Anat. Rec, 86, 197-215.

Block, K. 1945. Biological conversion of cholesterol to pregnanediol. J. Biol. Chem., 157, 661666.

BoLiNG, J. L. 1942. Growtii and regression of corpora lutea during the normal estrous cvcle of the rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 131-145.

BoLiNG, J. L., Bl.>\ndau, R. J., Rundlett. B., and Young, W. C. 1941. Factors underlying the failure of cyclic mating behavior in the albino rat. Anat. Rec, 80, 155-171.

Borell, U., Westman, A., and Orstrom, A. 1947. Studies on the functions of the hypophysealdiencephalic system and of the ovaries by means of radioactive phosphorus. Gvnaecologia, 123, 186-200.

Borell, U., Westman, \., a.nd Orstrom, A. 1948. The jtliosj^hate metabolism in the hypophyseal(ii(>nc{'i)lialic system and ovaries of rats determined by means of P-. Acta phvsiol. scandinav., 15, 245-253.

Borell, U., and WEST.^L\N, A. 1949. The effect of oi'strogen on th(> i)hosiiliate turnover in th(> hyiio])hy.'^eal-dienceplialic .system. Acta endocrmol., 3, 111-118.

Bourne, G., and Zucker.m.\n, S. 1941. Changes in the adrenals in relation to the normal and artificial threshokl oestrous cycle in {he ra(. J. Endocrinol., 2, 283-310.

Bkadkury, J. T. 1937. Piolongation of the life of the corpus luleum li\' hvsterectomv in the rat. .\nat. Kec, 70, Sup].!. 1, 51.

linADiiiin, .1. T. 1940. Ob.^^ervations following the cc>.-,iiion of treatment of the infantile female lai witli an(h-og(>ns and gonadotropic extracts. Am. J. Pliysiol., 129, P315.

Bradiurv, J. T. 1941. Permanent after-effects followinji nia^^cvilinization of the infantile female lat. Endocrinology, 28, 101-106.

Bradbury, J. T. 1947. Ovarian influence on the response of the anterior pituitary to estrogens. Endocrinology, 41, 501-513.

Br.adbury, J. T., Brown, W. E.. .and Gr.\y, L. A. 1950. Maintenance of the corpus luteum and Ithysiologic actions of progesterone. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 151-194.

Br.\mbell, F. W. R., P.arkes, A. S., .^^nd Fielding, U. 1927a. Changes in the ovary of the mouse following exposure to X-rays. I. Irradiation at three weeks old. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 101, 29-56.

Br.\.mbell, F. W. R., P.\rkes, A. S., .and Fielding, U. 1927b. Changes in the ovary of the mouse following exposure to X-rays. II. Irradiation at or before birth. Proc. Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 101, 95-114.

Brooks, C. McC. 1937. The role of the ceroliral cortex and of various sense organs in the excitation and execution of mating acti\itv m the rabbit. Am. J. Physiol., 120, 544-553.

Brooks, C. McC. 1938. A study of the mechanism whereby coitus excites the ovulation producing activitv of the rabbit's pituitary. Am. J. Physiol., 121, 157-177.

Brouha, L.. and Simonnet, H. 1930. Considerations sur le determinisme du cycle ovarien chez les Mammiferes. In Proceedings 2nd International Congress Sex Research, pp. 339-344. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

Browman, L. G. 1937. Light in its relation to activity and e.strus rhythms ui the alljino rat, J. Exper. Zool., 75, 375-388.

Brown, W. E., and Bradbury, J. T. 1947. Estrogen release of pituitary gonadotropin in women. Tr. Conference Sterility & Infertility. Am. Soc. Stud. Steril.. 3, 117-124.

Brown, W. E., Br.adbury, J. T., and Jennings, A. F. 1948. Experimental alteration of the human ovarian cycle bv estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 8, 453-460.

Bryans, F. E. 1951. Progesterone of the blood in the menstrual cycle of the monkey. Endocrinology, 48, 733-740.

BuNN, J. P., .AND Everett, J. W. 1957. Ovulation in persistent-estrous rats after electrical stimulation of the brain. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 96, 369-371.

BURFORD. T. H., AND DiDDLE, A. W. 1936. Effect of total hysterectomy upon the o\ary of Macacus rhesus. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 62," 701-707.

BuRRiLL, M. W., AND Greene, R. R. 1941. Androgen jiroduction in the female rat. Endocrinology, 28, 871-873.

Buxton, C. L., .and Engle, E. T. 1950. Time of ovulation: a correlation between basal temperature, the appearance of the endometrium and the appearance of the ovary. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec. 60, 539-551.

Byrnes, W. W., and Meyer, R. K. 1951a. The inhibition of gonadotrophic hormone secretion by physiological doses of estrogen. Endocrinology, 48, 133-136.

Byrnes, W. W., and Meyer. R. K. 1951b. Effect of physiological amounts of estrogen on the secretion of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones. Endocrinology, 49, 449-460.

C.ANivENc, R., AND M.AYER, G. 1953. Les corps gestatifs de la rate sont-ils prolonges par la prolactine? Etude de I'aecouchement et de I'ablation des cornes gray ides au cours de la lactation prolongee. Compt. rend. Soc. bioL, 147, 2025-2027.

Casida, L. E. 1946. Induction of ovulation and subsequent fertility in domestic animals. In The Problem oj Fertility, E. T. Engle, Ed., pp. 49-59. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

Christian, C. D. 1956. Studies on the neuroendocrine control of ovulation in the rabbit. Dissertation, Duke L^niversity.

Christian, C. D., M.arkee, S. J., and M.arkee, J. E. 1955. Failure of spinal cord transection to prevent ovulation following hypothalamic stimulation in the rabbit. Anat. Rec. 121, 275.

Cl.aesson, L., and Hillarp, N.-A. 1947a. The formation mechanism of oestrogenic hormones.

I. The presence of an oestrogen-precursor in the labbit ovary. Acta physiol. scandinav., 13, 115-129.

Claesson, L., and Hillarp, N.-A. 1947b. The formation mechanism of oestrogenic hormones.

II. The presence of oestrogen precursor in the OA'aries of rats and guinea-pigs. Acta physiol. scandinav., 14, 102-119.

Cl.ark. H.M. 1935. A prepubertal reversal of the sex difference in the gonadotropic hormone content of the pituitary gland of the rat. Anat. Rec. 61, 175-192.

Cole, H. H. 1946. Estrogen in late pregnancy mare serum and ovarian inhibition. Endocrinology, 39, 177-182.

Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F. 1935. Changes of the reproducti\e organs of the ewe with some data bearing on their control. Am. J. Anat., 57, 39-97.

Constantinides, p. 1947. Progesterone secretion during the oestrous cycle of the unmated rat. J. Endocrinol., 5, Ixiv.

CoppEDGE, R. L., .AND Segalof^, A. 1951. Urinary prolactin excretion in man. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 11,465-476.

Corner, G. W. 1937. The rate of .secretion of progestin by the corpus luteum. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 62-65.

Corner, G. W. 1938. The sites of formation of estrogenic substances in the animal body. Physiol. Rev., 18, 154-172.

Corner, G. W. 1940. Rate of secretion of estrogenic hormones by the ovaries of the monkey, Macacus rhesus. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 67, 407-413.

Corner, G. W. 1942. The Hormones in Human Reproduction. Princeton, X. J.: Princeton LTniversity Press.

CouRRiER, R. 1956. Remarque sur la greffe d'hypophyse. Arch. Biol., Paris, 67, 461-469.

Critchlow, B. v., AND Sawyer, C. H. 1955. Electrical activity of the rat brain correlated with neurogenic rstinuilation of the adenohypophysis. Fed. Pioc, 14, 32-33.

Crowe, S. J., Gushing, H., and Homans, J. 1910. Experimental hvpophysectomy. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 21, 127-169.

CrTULY, E. 1941a. Autoplastic grafting of the anterior pituitary in male rats. Anat. Rec, 80, 83-97.

CuTULY, E. 1941b. Studies on the histology and physiology of the pituitary of rats treated with progesterone. Endocrinology, 29, 695-701. D'Amour, F. 1940. Further studies on hormone excretion during the menstrual cycle. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 40, 958-965.

D^NDY, W. E. 1940. Section of the human hypophysial stalk. J. A. M. A., 114, 312-314.

Davis, C. D. 1939. The effect of ablations of neocortex on mating, maternal behavior and the production of pseudopregnancy in the female rat and on copulatory activity in the male. Am. J. Physiol., 127, 374-380.

D.AVis, M. E., AND FuGO, N. W. 1948. Does administration of diethylstilbestrol to pregnant women result in increased output of urinary pregnanediol? Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 69, 436-438.

Deanesly, R. 1934. The reproductive processes of certain mammals. VI. The reproductive cycle of the female hedgehog. Phil. Tr. Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 223, 239-276.

Deanesly, R. 1938. The androgenic activity of ovarian grafts in castrated male rats. Proc. Rov. Soc, London, ser. B, 126, 122-135.

Deanesly, R., and Parkes, A. S. 1933. The effect of hysterectomy on the oestrous cycle of the ferret. J. Physiol., 78, 80-84.

DEL Castillo, E. B., and Calatroni. C. J. 1930. Cycle sexual periodiciue et foUiculine. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 104, 1024-1028.

DEL Castillo, E. B., and di P.aola, G. 1942. Cyclical vaginal response to the daily administration of estradiol in castrated rats. Endocrinology, 30, 48-53.

Dempsey, E. W. 1937. Follicular growth rate and ovulation after various experimental procedures in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 120, 126-132.

Dempsey, E. W. 1939. The relationshi]) between the central ncrxous sysleni and the rei)roductive cvcle in the female guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 126, 758-765.

Dk.mpsey, E. W., Hektz, R.. and Young, W. G. 1936. The expcrinicntal induction of oestrus (.<exual receptivily) in (lie normal and ovariectomized guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 116, 201-209.

Dempsey, E. W., and Uotila, V. U. 1940. The effect of pituitary stalk section upon reproductive phenomena in the female rat. Endocrinology. 27, 573-579. Dempsey, E. W., and Searles, H. F. 1943. Environmental modification of certain endocrine phenomena. Endocrinology, 32, 119-128.

Desclin, L. 1935. Action ile fortes doses d'hormone folliculaire sur la structme de I'ovaire et (hi lobe anterievne de I'hvpophyse chez le rat blanc. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 120, 526-528.

Desclin, L. 1948. Action de la prolactine sur la structure de I'ovaire du rat normale et hypophvsectomise. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 142, 1436-1438.

Desclin, L. 1949a. Action des oestrogenes .•^ur I'ovaire chez le rat normal et hypophy.sectomise. Gompt. rend. Soc biol., 143, 1004-1006.

Desclin, L. 1949b. A propos de Taction combinee de la prolactine et des oestrogenes sur la structure de I'ovaire chez le rat. Gompt. rend. Soc. biol., 143, 1154-1155.

Desclin, L. 1950. A propos du mechanisme d'action des oestrogenes sur le lobe anterieur de I'hvpophvse chez le rat. Ann. endocrinol., 11, 656-659.

Desclin, L. 1956a. Hypothalamus et liberation d'hormone luteotrophiciue. Experiences de greffe hypophysaire chez le rat hypophysectomise. Action luteotrophicjue de I'ocytocine. Ann. endocrinol., 17, 586-595.

Desclin, L. 1956b. L'ocytocine peut-elle declencher la liberation de luteotrophine hypophvsaire chez le rat? Gompt. rend. Soc. biol.. 150, 1488-1491.

Dey, F. L. 1941. Changes in ovaries and uteri in guinea pigs with hypothalamic lesions. Am. J. Anat., 69, 61-87.

Dey, F. L. 1943. Evidence of hypothalamic control of liypophyseal gonadotropic function in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 33, 75-82.

Dey, F. L., Fisher, G., Berry, G. M., and Ranson, S. W. 1940. Disturbances in reproductive functions caused by hypothalamic lesions in female guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol., 129, 39-46.

Diaz, J. T. 1940. Effect of subtotal nephrectomy upon the e.strous cvcle of the albino rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 45, 226-229.

Donovan, B. T., and H.^rris. G. W. 1954. Effect of pituitary stalk .section on light-induced oestrus in the ferret. Nature, London, 174, 503504.

Donovan, B. T., and H.^rris, G. W. 1956. Adrenergic agents and the release of gonadotropliic hormone in the rabbit. J. Physiol.. 132, 577585.

Donovan, B. T.. a.xd van dek Wekfk ten lioscH, J. .L 1956. Oestrus in winter following hypothalamic lesions in the ferret. J. Physiol., 132, 57P.

DoRDONi, F., AND TiMiRAS, P. S. 1952. Inhibitory action of stre.ss on the relea,-*e of luteinizing liormone bv estrogen in the rat. J. Pliarmacol. ^- Exper. fherap., 106, 381-382.

DoHKMAN, R. I.. AND VAN W.\GENEN, G. 1941. The sex hormone excretion of adult female and jiregnant monkeys. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 73, 545-548.

DciRiMi, C. K.. AM) r,nz, E.-M. 1952. I'lx'r die WirUung des Zwisclienhirnnarkoticums Luminal auf den Scheidencvclus der weissen Ratte. Arcli. (ivniik.. 181, 185-189.

Drips. D. (;.. and Ford, F. A. 1932. The efTect of X-rays on the estrual cycle and ovaries of the white rat. Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 55, 596-606.

DuTT, R. H., AND C.^siDA, L. E. 1948. Alteration of the estrual cycle in sheep by use of progesterone and its effect upon subsecjuent ovulation and fertility. Endocrinology, 43, 208217.

DuYVENE DE WiT, J. J. 1942. Presence of progesterone and 17-ketosteroids in the follicular fluid of the pig, cow, and human being. Acta brev. neeri., 12, 23-25.

Edg.^r, D. G. 1952. Progesterone in body fluids. Nature, London, 170, 543-544.

Edgar, D. G. 1953. The progesterone content of body fluids and tissues. J. Endocrinol., 10, 54-64.

Edg.^r, D. G., .'vnd Ro-naldsoxX, J. W. 1958. Blood le\'els of progesterone in the ewe. J. Endocrinol., 16, 378-384.

Emmens, C. W. 1939. The duration of action of certain natural and synthetic oestrogens when administered orally or by injection. J. Endocrinol., 1, 142-146.

ExGLE, E. T. 1931. The pituitary gonadal relationship and the problem of precocious sexual maturity. Endocrinology, 15, 405-420.

Engle, E. T. 1946. No seasonal breeding cycle in dogs. J. Mammal., 27, 79-81.

Engle, E. T., and Shelesnyak, M. C. 1934. First menstruation and subsetiuent menstrual cycles of pubertal girls. Human Biol., 6, 431-453.

Ershoff, B. H., and Duell, H. J., Jr. 1943. Prolongation of pseudopregnancy by induction of deciduomata in the rat. Proc. Soc. E.xper. Biol. & Med., 54, 167-168.

Evans, H. M., .\nd Long, J. A. 1921. On the association of continued cornification of the vaginal mucosa with the presence of large vesicles in the ovary and the absence of corpus luteum formation. Anat. Rec, 21, 60-61.

Evans, H. M., and Cole, H. H. 1931. An introduction to the stud}' of the oestrous cycle in the dog. Mem. Univ. California, 9, 67-117.

Evans, H. M., and Swezy, 0. 1931. Ovogenesis and the normal follicular cycle in adult mammalia. Mem. Univ. California, 9, 119-225.

Evaxs, H. M., Si-mpson, M. E., Lyons, W. R., and Turpeinen, K. 1941. Anterior pituitary hormones which favor the production of traumatic uterine placentomata. Endocrinologv, 28, 933-945.

Everett, J. W. 1939. Spontaneous persistent estrus in a strain of albino rats. Endocrinology, 25, 123-127.

Everett, J. W. 1940a. The restoration of cyclic e.strus and ovulation in persistent-estrous rats bv progesterone. Anat. Rec, 76, No. 2, Suppl., 21.

Everett, J. W. 1940b. The restoration of o\ulatory cycles and corpus luteum formation in persistent-estrous rats by progesterone. Endocrinology, 27, 681-686.

Everett, J. W. 1942a. Certain functional interrelationships between spontaneous persistent


estrus, "light estrus" and short-day anestrus in the albino rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 409.

Everett, J. W. 1942b. Hereditary factors which condition the "light estrus" response in the albino rat. Anat. Rec, 82, 463.

Everett, J. W. 1943. Further studies on the relationship of progesterone to ovulation and luteinization in the persistent-estrous rat. Endocrinology, 32, 285-292.

Everett, J. W. 1944a. Evidence in the normal albino rat that progesterone facilitates ovulation and corpus-luteum formation. Endocrinology, 34, 136-137.

Everett, J. W. 1944b. Evidence suggesting a role of the lactogenic hormone in the estrous cycle of the albino rat. Endocrinology, 35, 507520.

Everett, J. W. 1945. The microscopically demonstrable lipids of cyclic corpora lutea in the rat. Am. J. Anat., 77, 293-323.

Everett, J. W. 1947. Hormonal factors responsible for deposition of cholesterol in the corpus luteum of the rat. Endocrinology, 41, 364-377.

Everett, J. W. 1948. Progesterone and estrogen in the experimental control of ovulation time and other features of the estrous cycle in the rat. Endocrinology, 43, 389-405.

Everett, J. W. 1952a. Presumptive hypothalamic control of spontaneous ovulation. Ciba Foundation Colloquia Endocrinol., 4, 167-176.

Everett, J. W. 1952b. Factors affecting the success of liharmacological blockade of ovulation in rats. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 12, 923.

Everett, J. W. 1954. Luteotrophic function of autografts of the rat hypophysis. Endocrinology, 54, 685-690.

Everett, J. W. 1956a. Functional corpora lutea maintained for months by autografts of rat hypophyses. Endocrinology, 58, 786-796.

Everett, J. W. 1956b. The time of release of ovulating hormone from the rat hypophysis. Endocrinology, 59, 580-585.

Everett, J. W. 1956c. Maintenance of pregnancy in rats by hvpophj^seal autografts. Anat. Rec, 124, 287-288.

Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H. 1949. A neural timing factor in the mechanism by which progesterone advances ovulation in the cyclic rat. Endocrinology, 45, 581-595.

Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H. 1950. A 24hour periodicity in the "LH-release apparatus" of female rats, disclosed by barbiturate sedation. Endocrinology, 47, 198-218.

Everett, J. W., and S.\wyer, C. H. 1953. Estimated duration of the spontaneous acti\-ation which causes release of ovulating hormone from the rat hvpophvsis. Endocrinology, 52, 83-92.

Everett, J. W., Sawyer, C. H., and Markee, J. E. 1949. A neurogenic timing factor in control of the ovulatory discharge of luteinizing hormone in the cyclic rat. Endocrinologv, 44, 234250.

Fee, a. R., and Parkes, A. S. 1929. Studies on ovulation. I. The relation of the anterior


546


PHYSIOLOGY OF GONADS


pituitarv body to o\'ulation in the rabbit. J. PhysioL, 67, 383-388.

Fel.s, E. 1952. Die Unterbindung des Ovaiienstieles als Ursach anatomischer und fiinktioneller Genitalstorimgen. Arch. Gynak.. 181, 380-390.

FixERTY, J. C. 1952. Parabiosi.s in physiological ■studies. Physiol. Rev., 32, 277-302.

Fish, W. R., Young, W. C, and Dorfm.an, R. I. 1941. Excretion of estrogenic and androgenic substances by male and female chimpanzees with known mating behavior records. Endocrinologv, 28, 585-592.

FisKE, V. M. 1941. Effect of light on sexual maturation, estrous cycles, and anterior pituitary of the rat. Endocrinology, 29, 187-196.

Flerko, B. 1954. Zur hypothalamischen Steuerung der gonadotrophen Funktion der Hypophyse. Acta morphol. 4, 475-492.

Flerko, JB. 1957a. Einfluss experimenteller Hypothalamuslasion auf die durch Follikelhormon indirekt hervorgerufene Hemmung der Luteinisation. Endokrinologie, 34, 201-208.

Flerko, B. 1957b. Le role des structures hypothalamiciues dans Taction inhibitrice de la foUiculine sur la secretion de I'hormone folhculo-stimulante. Arch. Anat. microscop. Morphol. exper., 46, 159-172.

Flerko, B., and Illei, G. 1957. Zur Frage der Spezifitat des Einflusses von Sexualsteroiden auf hvpothalamische Nervenstrukturen. Endokrinologie, 35, 123-127.

Flerko, B., and Szent.xgothai, J. 1957. Oestrogen sensitive nervous structures in the hypothalamus. Acta endocrinol., 26, 121-127.

Fluhmann, C. F. 1934. A new procedure for the demonstration of estrin in the blood of women. Endocrinology, 18, 705-713.

Fluhmann, C. F. 1952. Induction of precocious opening of immature rat vagina w^ith neostigmine. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 81, 315317.

Forbes, T. R. 1950. Systemic plasma progesterone levels during the human menstrual cycle. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 60, 180-186.

Forbes, T. R. 1953. Pre-ovulatory i)rogesterone in the peripheral blood of the rabbit. Endocrinology, 53, 79-87.

Forbes, T. R., Hooker, C. W., and Pfeiffer, C. A. 1950. Plasma progesterone levels and the menstrual cycle of the monkey. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol."& Med., 73, 177-179.

Ford, D. H., and Young, W. C. 1953. Duration of the first cyclic vaginal openings in maturing guinea pigs and related o\;iriaii cDiulit ions. Anat. Rec, 115, 495-503.

Foster, M. A. 1934. The reproductive cycle in the female ground sriuirrel, Citellus tridecewlinenluH (Mitchell). Am. J. Anat., 54, 487-511.

Foster, M. A., Haney, H. F., and Hisaw, F. L. 1934. Parasympathetic drugs and ovulation. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 351-353.

Foster, M. A., and Hisaw, F. L. 1935. Experimental ovulation and the resulting jiscnidopregnancy in anoestrous cats. .\nat. Hec, 62, 75-93.


Fra?:nkel-Conr.\t, H., Li, C. H., and Simpson, M. E. 1943. Pituitary gonadotropins. In Essays in Biology, pp. 183-191. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Frank, R. T., Kingery, H. M., .\nd Gustavson, R. G. 1925. The female sex hormone. II. An analvsis of factors producing pubertv. J. A. M.A., 85, 1558-1559.

FRAPS, R. M., AND Case, J. F. 1953. Premature ovulation in the domestic fowl following administration of certain barbiturates. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 82, 167-171.

Fraps, R. M., and Dury, A. 1943. Occurrence of premature o\-ulation in the domestic fowl following administration of progesterone. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 52, 346-349.

Freed, S. C., Greenhill, J. P., and Soskin, S. 1938. Biphasic effect of male sex hormone on the pituitarv of the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 39, 440-442.

Fried. P. H., and Rakoff, A. E. 1952. The effects of chorionic gonadotrophin and prolactin on the maintenance of corpus luteum function. J. Chn. Endocrinol., 12, 321-337.

Friedgood, H. B., and Bevin, S. 1941. Relation of the cervical sympathetics to anterior pituitary gonadotrophic activitv in the rat. Am. J. Physiol., 133, P282.

Friedman, M. H. 1941. The inhibition of copper-induced ovulation in the rabbit by progesterone. Endocrinology, 29, 628-632.

FuGo, N. W., and Gross, E. G. 1942. Anterior pituitary-stimulating action of yohimbine. Endocrinology, 31, 529-534.

FuNNELL, J. W., Ke.aty, C, .\nd Hellbaum, A. A. 1951. Action of estrogens on release of luteinizing hormone in menopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 11, 98-102.

Gaarenstroom, J. H., and de Jongh, S. E. 1946. Contribution to the Knowledge of the Influences oj Gonadotropic and Sex Hormones on the Gonads oj Rats. New York: Elsevier Publishing Company.

Gassner, F. X. 1952. Some physiological and medical aspects of the gonadal cycle of domestic animals. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 7, 165-208.

Genther, I. T. 1931. Irradiation of the ovaries of guinea-pigs and its effect on the oestrous cycle. Am. J. Anat., 48, 99-137.

Gillman. J. 1942. Tem]i()raiy o\arian damage luodnccd in l>ab{H)ns 1)\- single administrations ol' i'sti;i(h()l Ix-nzoatc and progesterone in the first part of the cycle. Endocrinology, 30, 6170.

Grrs.ii, K. 1952a. Ub(>r die Wirkung der KasIralion auf den diencephalen Azetylcholingeli.ill und .seine beeinflussung durch Pentothal. Wnn. klin. Wchn,schr., 64, 710-711.

Gitscii, K. 19521). Uber periodische, zum gonadalen Cyclus in Korrelation stehende Funktionsanderungen in Hypothalamus. Arch. Gyniik., 182, 52-57.

(_!its('ii,E. 1958. Synergistic actions of meprobamate and an anticholinergic drug, Pathilon, on reproductive cycles in the rat. Endocrinology, 62, 533-535.

GIT.SCH, E., .AND Everett, J. W. 1958. Influence of the anticholinergic drug, Pathilon, on the reproductive cycle of the female rat. Endocrinology, 62, 400-409.

GiTSCH, E., -AND Reitixger, J. 1953. tjber die Wirkung exogener Hormone auf den Azetylcholingehalt des mittleren Hypothalamu,s der Ratte. Zentralbl. Gynak., 75, 209-218; 373376; 734-738.

Goldberg, R. C, .and Knobil, E. 1957. Structure and function of intraocular hypophyseal grafts in the hypophysectomized male rat. Endocrinology, 61, 742-752.

Green, J. D. 1947. Vessels and nerves of the amphibian hypophysis. A study of the li\ing circulation and of the histology of the hypophysial yes.sels and nerves. Anat. Rec, 99, 21-54.

Green, J. D. 1951. The comparative anatomy of the hypophysis, with special reference to its blood supply and innervation. Am. J. Anat., 88,225-311."

Green, J. D., and H.arris, G. W. 1947. The neurovascular link between the neurohypophysis and adenohypophysis. J. Endocrinol., 5, 136146.

Green, J. D., .and Harris, G. W. 1949. Observation of the hypophysioportal vessels of the living rat. J. Pliysiol.," 108, 359-361.

Greenwald, G. S. 1956. The reproductive cycle of the field mouse, Microlus calijomicus. J. Mammal., 37, 213-222.

Greep, R. O. 1936. Functional pituitary grafts in rats. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 34, 754755.

Greep, R. O. 1938. The effect of gcniadotropic hormones on persisting corpora lutea in liypophysectomized rats. Endocrinology, 23, 154163.

Greep, R. O., and B.arrnett, R. J. 1951. The effect of pituitary stalk-section on the reproductive organs of female rats. Endocrinology, 49, 172-184.

Greep, R. 0., and Chester Jones, I. 1950. Steroid control of pituitary function. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 197-261.

Greep, R. O., and HI.SA^y, F. L. 1938. Pseudopregnancies from electrical stimulation of the cervix in the diestrum. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 39, 359-360.

Greep, R. O., van Dyke, H. B., and Chow, B. F. 1942. Gonadotropins of the swine pituitary. I. Various biologic effects of purified th>iakentrin (FSH) and pure metakentrin (ICSH). Endocrinology, 30, 635-649.

Greer, M. A. 1953. The effect of progesterone on persistent vaginal estrus produced by hypothalamic lesions in the rat. Endocrinology, 53, 380-390.

Greulich, W. W. 1934. Artificially induced ovulation in the cat. Anat. Rec, 58, 217-224.

Grosvenor, C. E., and Turner, C. W. 1958. Effects of oxytocin and blocking agents upon pi


tuitary lactogen discharge in lactating rats. Proc.Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 97, 463-465.

Hale, H. B. 1944. Functional and morphologic alterations of the reproductive system of the female rat following prepubertal treatment with estrogens. Endocrinology, 35, 499-506.

Hammond, J. 1946. The induction of ovulation in domestic animals. In The Problem oj Fertility, E. T. Engle, Ed. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton LTniversity Press.

H.AMMOND, J., AND M.ARSHALL, F. H. A. 1930. Oestrous and pseudopregnancy in the ferret. Proc. Roy. Soc, London, .ser. B, 105, 607-629.

Hammond, J., and Walton, A. 1934. Notes on ovulation and fertilization in ferrets. J. Exper. Biol., 11, 307-319.

H.AMMOND, J., Jr. 1945. Induced ovulation and heat in anoestrous sheep. J. Endocrinol., 4, 169-180.

Hammond, J., Jr. 1952. Maintenance of grafted luteal tissue. Nature, London, 169, 330-331.

Hammond, J., Jr. 1953. Photopcriodicity in animals: the lole of darkness. Science, 117, 389391.

Hammond, J., Jr., .and Bhattacharya, P. 1944. Control of ovulation in the cow. J. Agric. Sc, 34, 1-15.

H.AMMOND, J., Jr., Hammond, J., .and Parkes. A. S. 1942. Hormonal augmentation of fertility in sheep. I. Induction of ovulation, superovulation, and heat in sheep. J. Agric Sc, 32, 308323.

H.AMMOND, J., Jr., and Robson, J. M. 1951. Local maintenance of the rabbit corpus luteum with oestrogen. Endocrinology, 49, 384-389.

H.ANSEL, W., AND Trimberger, G. W. 1951. Atropine blockage of ovulation in the cow and its possible significance. J. Anim. Sc, 10, 719-725.

Hansel, W., .and Trimberger, G. W. 1952. The effect of progesterone on ovulation time in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sc, 35, 65-70.

Hansson, a. 1947. The physiology of reproduction in mink (Mustela vison, Schreb.) with special reference to delayed implantation. Thesis, Stockholm.

H.ARRis, G. W. 1936. The induction of pseudopregnancy in the rat by electrical stimulation through the head. J. Physiol.. 88, 361-367.

Harris, G. W. 1937. Induction of ovulation in rabbits by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamo-hypophysial mechanism. Proc. Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 122, 374-394.

Harris, G. W. 1948a. Neural control of the pituitary gland. Physiol. Rev., 28, 139-179.

H.ARRIS, G. W. 1948b. Electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus and the mechanism of neural control of the adenohypophysis. J. Physiol., 107, 418-429.

H.ARRIS, G. W. 1949. Regeneration of the hypophvsio-portal vessels. Nature, London, 163, 70.

Harris, G. W. 1950a. Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels, after section of the hypophysial stalk, in the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Nature, London, 165, 819.

Harris, G. W. 1950b. Oestrous rhythm, pseudopregnancy and the pituitary stalk in the rat. J. Phvsiol.. 111,347-360.

Harris, G. W. 1955. Neural Control oj the Pituitary Gland. London: Edward Arnold, Ltd.

Harris, G. W., and Jacobsohn, D. 1952. Functional grafts of the anterior pituitary gland. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 139, 263-276.

Harrison, R. J. 1948. The changes occurring in the ovary of the goat during the estrous cycle and in early pregnancy. J. Anat., 82, 21-48.

Hartman, C. G. 1932. Studies in the reproduction of the monkey, Macacus (Pithecus) rhesus, with special reference to menstruation and pregnancy. Contr. Embryol., Carnegie Inst. Washington, 13, 1-161.

Hartman, C. G. 1936. Time of Ovulation in Women. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company.

H.-VRTMAN, C. G. 1944. Some new ob.scrvations on the vaginal smear of the rat. Yale J. Biol. & Med., 17, 99-112.

Haskins, a. L., Jr. 1950. Assay of circulating progesterone bv ultraviolet spesctroscopy. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 73, 439-443.

H.\TERius, H. O. 1933. Partial sympathectomy and induction of pseudopregnancy. Am. J. Physiol., 103, 97-103.

H.-VTERius, H. O. 1936. Reduction of litter size and maintenance of pregnancy in the oophorectomized rat: evidence concerning the endocrine role of the placenta. Am. J. Physiol., 114,399-406.

H.\TERius, H. O. 1937. Studies on a neurohypophyseal mechanism influencing gonadotropic activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 280-288.

Hechter, 0., Fr.\enkel, M., Lev, M., and Soskin, S. 1940. Influence of the uterus on the corpus luteum. Endocrinology, 26, 680-683.

Heckel, G. p. 1942. The estrogen sparing effect of hvsterectomv. Surg. Gvnec. & Obst., 75, 379-390.

Hemmingsen. a. M., and Krarup, X. B. 1937. Rhythmic diurnal variations in the oe.^trnus phenomena of the rat and their suscciitibUity to light and dark. Kgl. Danske Vidcnsk. Sclsk. Biol. Med., 13 (Nr. 7),1-61.

Hernandez, T. 1943. Hormonal ambisexuality of ovarian grafts in female rats. Am. J. Anat., 73, 127-151.

Herold, L., and Effkemann, G. 1938. Die Bedeutung des vegetativen Nervensystems fiir die innersekretorische Funktion des Hypophysenvorderlappens. Arch. Gynak., 167, 389-396.

Hertl, M. 1952. Brunstzeitige Kernschwellung im Tuber cinereum der weissen Maus. Morphol. Jahrb., 92, 75-94.

Hertl, M. 1955, Das Verhalten einiger Hypothalamu.skerne der weissen Maus wjihrend verschicdener Entwicklungs- und Fimktionsphasen des weiblichcn Genitalapparates. Ztschr. Zellforsch., 42, 481-507.

Hill, J. P., .xnd O'Donoghue, C. H. 1913. The repro(lucli\^e cycle in the marsupi.Ml Dasi/iirvs viverrinus. Quart. J. Microscop. Sc, 59, 133174.

Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1930a. The relation between the anterior pituitary body and the gonads. I. The factors concerned in the formation of the corpus luteum. Proc. Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 107, 30-38.

Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1930b. On the relation between the anterior pituitary body and the gonads. II. The induction of ovulation in the anestrous ferret. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 107, 39^8.

Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S. 1933. Studies on the hypophysectomized ferret. VI. Comparison of the response to oestrin of anoestrous, ovariectomized and hypophysectomized ferrets. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 113, 541-544.

Hill, M., and White, W. E. 1933. The growth and regression of follicles in the oestrous rabbit. J. Physiol., 80, 174-178.

Hill, R. T. 1934. Variation in the activity of the rabbit hypophysis during the reproductive cycle. J. Physiol., 83, 129-136.

Hill, R. T. 1937a. Ovaries secrete male hormone. I. Restoration of the castrate type of seminal vesicle and prostate glands to normal by grafts of ovaries in mice. Endocrinology, 21, 495-502.

Hill, R. T. 1937b. Ovaries secrete male hormone. III. Temperature control of male hormone output by grafted ovaries. Endocrinology, 21, 633-636.

HiLL.\RP, N.-A. 1949. Studies on the localization of hypothalamic centres controlling the gonadotrophic function of the hypoph.vsis. Acta endocrinol., 2, 11-23.

HiNSEY, J. C. 1937. The relation of the nervous system to ovulation and other phenomena of the female reproductive tract. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol., 5, 269-279.

HixsEY, J. C., and Markee, J. E. 1933. Pregnancy following bilateral section of the cervical sympathetic trunks in the rabbit. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 31, 270-271.

Hisaw, F. L. 1942. The interaction of the ovarian hormones in experimental menstruation. Endocrinology, 30, 301-308.

Hisaw, F. L. 1944. The ]ilacental gonadotrophin and hiteal function in monkeys (Macaca inakdLa). Yale J. Biol. & Med., 17, 119-137.

HiSAM', F. L. 1947. Development of the Graafian follicle and ovulation. Physiol. Rev., 27, 95-119.

HoHLWEG, W. 1934. \'('r;in(l('rungcn (l(>s Hypophysenvorderlappcn.s und ties Ovariums nach Behandlungen mit grossen Doscn von FoUikelliormon. Klin. W^hnschr., 13, 92-95.

HoiiLWEG, W. 1937. MJinnliohe Wirkstoff(> und Corpus luteum-Bildung. Klin. Wchnschr., 16, 586-587.

HoHLWEG, W., AND Ch.\morro, A. 1937. tjber die luteinisiercndo Wirkung des Follikelhormons (lurch Bccinflussung dor luteogenenHvpophvsenvorderlappensekretiou. Klin.

Wchnschr, 16, 196-197.

HoHLWEG, W., .\ND DoHRN, M. 1932. Uber die Beziehungen zwisehen Hypophysenvorderlappen iind Keimdriisen. Klin. Wchnschr., 11, 233-235.

HoHLWEG, W., .\XD JrxK>uNN, K. 1932. Die hormonal-nervose Regulierung der Fimktion des Hypophvsenvorderlappens. Klin. Wchnschr., 11,321-323.

HOLMSTROM, E. G., .AND JONES, W. J. 1949. The experimental production of menorrhagia by administration of gonadotropins. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 58, 308-317.

Hooker, C. W., and Forbes, T. R. 1947. A bioassay for minute amounts of progesterone. Endocrinology, 41, 158-169.

Hough, W. H., Be.arden, H. J., asd Hansel, W. 1955. Further studies on factors affecting ovulation in the cow. J. Anim. Sc, 14, 739-745.

Huston, T. M., .\nd N.albandov, A. V. 1953. Neurohumoral control of the pituitarj^ in the fowl. Endocrinology, 52, 149-156.

Iglesias, R., Lipschutz, a., and Guillermo, R. 1950. Experiments with the local action of oestrogen on the intrasplenic ovarian graft. Endocrinology, 46, 414-419.

Johnson, G. E., Fcster, M. A., and Coco, R. M. 1933. The sexual cycle of the thirteen-lined ground scjuirrel in the laboratorv. Tr. Kansas Acad. Sc, 36, 250-269.

Kallas, H. 1929. Sur le passage de substances hypophvsaires pendant la parabiose. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 102, 280-282.

Kallas, H. 1930. Zur Frage nach der innersekretorischen Tiitigkeit des infantilen Eierstockes. Klin. Wchnschr., 9, 1345-1346.

Kamell, S. a., and Atkinson, W. B. 1948. Absence of prolongation of pseudopregnancy by induction of deciduomata in the mouse. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 67, 415-416.

Kammlade, W. G., Jr., Welch, J. A., Nalbandov, A. v., and Norton, H. W. 1952. Pituitary activity of sheep in relation to the breeding season. J. Anim. Sc, 11, 646-655.

Kempf, R. 1950. Contribution a I'etude du uiechanisme de liberation des hormones gonadotropes hypophysaire chez le rat. Arch, biol., 61, 501-594.

Kirkpatrick, C. M., .and Leopold, A. C. 1952. The role of darkness in sexual activity in the quail. Science, 116, 280-281.

Klein, M. 1947. Oestrogen level and ovarian hypophysial relationship during pseudopregnancy and pregnancy in the rabbit. J. Endocrinol., 5, xxv-xxvii.

Klein, M., and Mayer, G. 1943. Cited from Mayer, 1951.

Klein, M., and Mayer, G. 1946. Production d'une nouvelle phase luteinique au cours de la gestation chez la lapin. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 140, 600-602.

Koikeoami, H., Y.amada, T., and U.sei, K. 1954. Stimulation of the amygdaloid nuclei and peri


amygdaloid cortex with special reference to its effects on uterine movements and ovulation. FoHa Psychiat. Neurol. Japon., 8, 7-31.

KoLLAR, E. J. 1953. Reproduction in the female rat after pelvic nerve neurectomy. Anat. Rec, 115,641-658.

KosTiTCH, A., AND Telebakovitch, A. 1929. Sur un rhythme vaginal chez les animaux ovariectomises. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 100, 51-54.

KuROTSu, T., KuRACHi, K., AND Ban, T. 1950. Experimental studies on ovulation by the electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus of rabbits. Med. J. Osaka Univ., 2, 1-12.

KuROTSU, T., KUR.\CHI, K., T.AB.AYASHI, C, AND

Ban, T. 1952. Experimental studies on ovulation by the electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus in hypophysectomized rabbits. Med. J. Osaka Univ., 3, 139-150.

Lahr, E. L., and Riddle, O. 1936. Temporary suppression of estrous cycles in the rat by prolactin. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 34, 880-883.

L.andsmeer, J. M. F. 1951. Vessels of the rat's hypophysis. Acta Anat., 12, 84-109.

Lane, C. E. 1935. Some influences of oestrin on the hypophyseal-gonad complex of the immature female rat. Am. J. Physiol., 110, 681-685.

Lane, C. E., and Davis, R. F. 1939. The ovary of the adult rat. I. Changes in growth of the follicle and in volume and mitotic activity of the granulosa and theca during the estrous cycle. Anat. Rec, 73, 429-442.

L.ANE, C. E., and Creep, R. O. 1935. The follicular apparatus of the ovary of the hypophysectomized immature rat and the effects of hypophyseal gonadotropic hormones on it. Anat. Rec, 63, 139-146.

L.AQUEUR, G. L., AND Fluhmann, C. F. 1942. Effects of testosterone propionate in immature and adult female rats. Endocrinologv, 30, 93101.

Levin, L., and Tyndale, H. H. 1937. Quantitative assay of "follicle stimulating" substances. Endocrinology, 21, 619-628.

Levine, W. T., and Witschi, E. 1933. Endocrine reactions in female rats after X-ray treatment of the ovaries. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 30, 1152-1153.

Liche, H. 1939. Oestrous cycle in the cat. Nature, London, 143, 900.

Lipschutz, A., Iglesias, R., Bruzzone, S., HuMEREz, J., and Penaranda, J. M. 1948. Progesterone and desoxycorticosterone in the steroid control of the gonadotrophic function of the hypophysis. Endocrinology, 42, 201-209.

LoEB, L. 1911. Uber die Bedeutung des Corpus luteum fiir die Periodizitiit des sexuellen Zyklus beim weiblichen Saugetierorganismus. Deutsche med. Wchnschr., 37, 17-21.

LoEB, L. 1927. Effects of hysterectomy on the system of .sex organs and on periodicity of the sexual cycle in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol., 83, 202-224.


Long, J. A., a.xd Evans, H. M. 1922. The oestrous cycle ill the rat and its associated phenomena. Mem. Univ. California, 6, 1-148.

Lopez Colombo de Allende, I. 1956. Anovulatory C3'cles in women. Am. J. Anat., 98, 293305.

Lyon, R. A. 1956. Prolongation of human corpus luteum life span. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 16, 922.

Makepeace, A. W. 1938. Failure of atropine to prevent ovulation following coitus in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 23, 241-242.

Makepeace, A. W., Weinstein, G. L., and Friedman, M. H. 1937. The effect of progestin and progesterone on ovulation in the rabbit. Am. J.Physiol., 119, 512-516.

Mandel, J. 1935. Experimental study of ovarian irradiation and transplantation in the rat. Anat. Rec, 61, 295-309.

Mandl, A. M. 1951. Cyclical changes in the vaginal smear of adult ovariectomized rats. J. Exper. Biol., 28, 585-592.

Mandl, A. M., and Zuckerjl\x, S. 1952. Cyclical changes in the number of medium and large folhcles in the adult rat ovary. J. Endocrinol., 8, 341-346.

Marden, W. G. R. 1952. The hormone control of ovulation in the calf. Endocrinology, 50, 456-461.

Mardones, E., Bruzzone, S., Iglesias, R., and LiPSCHUTz, A. 1951. The non-concomitancy of the progestational and antiluteinizing actions of steroids. Endocrinology, 49, 817-825.

Marion, G. B,, Smith, V. R., Wiley, T. E., and Barrett, G. R. 1950. The effect of sterile copulation on time of ovulation in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sc, 33, 885-889.

Markee, J. E. 1948. Morphological basis for menstrual bleeding. Bull. New Y'ork Acad. Med., 24, 253-268.

Markee, J. E., and Berg, B. 1944. Cyclic fluctuations in blood estrogen as a possible cause of menstruation. Stanford Med. Bull., 2, 55-60.

Markee, J. E., Sawyer, C. H., and Hollinshead, W. H. 1946. Activation of the anterior hypophysis by electrical stimulation in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 38, 345-357.

Markee, J. E., Sawyer, C. H., and Hollinshead, W. H. 1948. Adrenergic control of the release of luteinizing hormone from the hypophvsis of the rabbit. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 2, 117-131.

Markee, J. E., Everett, J. W., and Sawyer, C. H. 1952. The relationship of the nervous system to the release of gonadotroph in and the regulation of the sex cvc'le. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 7, 139-163. '

Marshall, F. H. A. 1942. Exteroceptive factors in sexual periodicity. Biol. Rev., 17, 68-90.

Marshall, F. H. A., "and Verney, E. B. 1936. The occurrence of ovulation and pscudopregnancy in the rabbit, as a result of central nervous stimulation. J. Physiol., 86, 327-336.

Martinez-Estkve, p. 1937. Le cycle sexual vagi


nal chez le mar.supial Dklclphys azarae. Compt. rend. Soc. biol., 124, 502-504.

Marvin, H. N. 1947. Diestrus and the formation of corpora lutea in rats with persistent estrus, treated with desoxycorticosterone acetate. Anat. Rec, 98, 383-392.

Marvin, H. N., and Meyer, R. K. 1941. Diestrus and corpus luteum formation in persistentestrous rats by luteinizing hormone and antigonadotrophic serum. Entlocrinologv, 29, 965968.

Matthews, L. H. 1939. Visual stimulation and ovulation in pigeons. Proc. Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 126, 557-560.

May, R. M. 1937. La greffe brephoplastique de I'hypophyse chez le rat. LXX Congress Soc. savantes, pp. 241-248.

M.\YER, G. 1951. La prolactine, facteur luteotrophique. Arch. sc. physiol., 5, 247-275.

Mazer, C, Israel, S. L., and Alpers, B. J. 1936. The time element in the pituitary-ovarian response to large doses of the estrogenic hormone. Endocrinologv, 20, 753-761.

McCann, S. M., M.\ck, R., and Gale, C. 1958. Neural control of lactation. Fed. Proc, 17, 107.

McConnell, E. M. 1953. The arterial blood supplv of the human hypophysis cerebri. Anat. Rec, 115,175-201.

McKenzie, F. F., and Terrill, C. E. 1936. Estrus, ovulation, and the related phenomena in the ewe. Univ. Missouri Agric Exper. Sta. Res. Bull., 264, 1-88.

McKeown, T., and Zuckerman, S. 1937. Stimulation of the corpora lutea of the rat by means of progesterone and testosterone. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 124, 362-368.

Merckel, C, and Nelson, W. O. 1940. The relation of the estrogenic hormone to the formation and maintenance of corpora lutea in mature and immature rats. Anat. Rec, 76, 391-409.

Meyer, R. K., Leon.\rd, S. L., and Hisaw, F. L. 1929. Effect of anesthesia on artificial production of pseudopregnancv in the rat. Proc Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 27, 340-342.

Meyer, R. K., Prasad, M. R. N., and Cochrane, R. Jj. 1958. Delayed implantation in the rat induced by autografts of ili(^ hy]io])]iysis. Anat. Rec, 130^ 339.

MiEGEL, B. 1952. Die Biologie und Morphologic der Fortpflanzung der Bisamratte (Ondatra zibethica L.). Ztschr. mikroskop.-anat. Forsch., 58, 531-598.

Moon, H. D., and Li, C. H. 1952. Effect of follicle-stimulating iiorinone on gonads of immature C57 black mice. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol.

  • Med., 79, 505-507.

Mooke, C. R., and Price, D. 1932. Gonad hormone functions and the reciprocal influence between gonads and hypophysis, with its bearing on sex hormone antagonism. Am. J. .\nat., 50, 13-71.

MooRE, C. R., Simmons, G. F., Wells, L. J., ZaLESKY, M., AND Nelson, W. O. 1934. On the control of reproductive activity in an annualbreeding mammal {Citellus tridecemlineatus) . Anat. Rec, 60, 279-289.

Moore, W. W., .\nd Nalbandov, A. V. 1953. Neurogenic eifects of uterine distention on the estrous cycle of the ewe. Endocrinology, 53, 1-11.

MooRE, W. W., AND Nalbandov, A. V. 1955. Maintenance of corpora lutea in sheep with lactogenic hormone. J. Endocrinol. 13, 18-25.

Mossman, H. W. 1937. The thecal gland and its relation to the reproductive cycle: a study of the cyclic changes in the ovary of the pocket gopher, Geomys bursarius (Shaw). Am. J. Anat., 61, 289-319.

MtiHLBOCK, O., AND BooT, L. M. 1959. Induction of mammary cancer in mice without the mammarv tumor agent bv isografts of hvpophvscs. Cancer Res., 19, 402-412.

Myers, H. I., Young, W. C, and Dempsey, E. W. 1936. Graafian follicle development throughout the reproductive cycle in the guinea pig, with especial reference to changes during estrus (sexual receptivity). Anat. Rec, 65, 381-401.

Nathanson, I. T., Fr.^nseen, C. C, and Sweeney, A. R., Jr. 1938. Nature of the action of testosterone on genital tract of the immature female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 39, 385-388.

N.woRi, C. A., FuGo, N. W., and D.avis, M. E. 1952. Effect of tulial ligation on ovarian function in the rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 81, 649-652.

Nelson, W. 0. 1946. Factors concerned in the maintenance of function of the corpus luteum. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 6, 465-466.

Nelson, W. 0., and PICH^:TTE, J. W. 1943. Maintenance of corpora lutea in hypophysectomized rats by lactogenic hormone. Fed. Proc, 2, 36.

NiKiTOviTCH-WiNER, M. 1957. Hormonal influence of the hypothalamus on gonadotrophin secretions. Dissertation, Duke University.

NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W. 1957.

Resimiption of gonadotrophic function in pituitary grafts following re-transplantation from kidney to median eminence. Nature, London, 180, 1434-1435.

NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W.

1958a. Comparative study of luteotropin secretion by hypophysial autotransplants in the rat. Effects of site and stages of the estrus cycle. Endocrinology, 62, 522-532.

NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W.

1958b. Functional restitution of pituitary grafts re-transplanted from kidney to median eminence. Endocrinology, 63, 916-930.

NiKITOVITCH-WlNER, M., AND EvERETT, J. W. 1959.

Histocytologic changes in grafts of rat pituitary on the kidney and upon re-transplantation imder the diencephalon. Endocrinologv, 65, 357-368. NissiM, J. A., AND RoBSON, J. M. 1952. The conversion of pregnenolone to a more active pro


gestational substance by incubation with endocrine tissues in vitro. J. Endocrinol., 8, 329-335.

NowAKOwsKi, H. 1950. Zur Auslosung der Ovulation durch elektrische Reizung des Hypothalamus beim Kaninchen und ihre Beeinflussung durch Riickenmarksdurchschneidung. Acta neuroveg., 1, 13-39.

NowAKOw\SKi, H. 1952. Gomori-positive and Gomori-negative nerve fibers in the neurohypophysis and their physiological significance. Ciba Foundation Collociuia Endocrinol., 4, 65-71.

Parkes, a. S. 1926a. On the occurrence of the oestrous cycle after X-ray sterilization. III. Periodicity of oestrus after sterilization of the adult. Proc Rov. Soc, London, ser. B, 101, 421-449.

Parkes, a. S. 1926b. On the occurrence of the oestrous cycle after X-ray sterilization. IV. Irradiation of the adult during pregnancy and lactation; and general summary. Proc Roy. Soc, London, ser. B, 102, 51-62".

Parkes, A. S. 1949. Obituary, F. H. A. Marshall. J. Endocrinol., 6, 1-5.

Parkes, A. S. 1950. Androgenic activity of the ovary. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 5, 101114.

Parkes, A. S. 1952. Ovarian periodicity in the absence of cyclic structures. Ciba Foundation Colloquia Endocrinol., 4, 264-267.

Pearson, O. P. 1944. Reproduction in the shrew {Bhirinu brevicmida, Sav). Am. J. Anat., 75, 39-93.

Pe.\rson, O. p., .^nd Enders, R. K. 1944. Duration of pregnancy in certain Mustelids. J. Exper. Zool., 95, 21-35.

Pedersen-Bjerg.a.^rd, G., and Pedersen-Bjerga.\rd, K. 1948. Sex liormone analysis. III. Estrogenic and gonadotropic substances in the mine from a woman with normal menstrual cycles and normal pregnancies. Acta endocrinol., 1, 263-281.

Pencharz, R. I. 1940. Effect of estrogens and androgens alone and in combination with chorionic gonadotropin on the ovary of the hypophysectomized rat. Science, 91, 554-555.

Pfeiffer, C. a. 1936. Sexual differences of the hypophyses and their determination by the gonads. Am. J. Anat., 58, 195-225.

Pfeiffer, C. A. 1937. Hypophyseal gonadotropic hormones and the luteinization phenomenon in the rat. Anat. Rec, 67, 159-175.

Pfeiffer, C. A. 1941. Hormone factors in the formation and maintenance of corpora lutea in "constant" estrous rats. Anat. Rec, 79, (No. 3,Suppl.),50.

Pfeiffer, C. A. 1950. Effects of progesterone on ovulation in Rhesus monkeys. Anat. Rec, 106, 233.

Pfeiffer, C. A., and Hooker, C. W. 1942. Experiments on the source of ovarian androgen in the mouse. Anat. Rec, 83, 543-571.

Phelps, D., Ellison, E. T., .and Burch, J. C. 1939. Survival, structure and function of pituitarygrafts in untreated rats, and in rats injected with estrogen. Endocrinology, 25, 227-236.

Phillips, W. A. 1937. The inhibition of estrous cycles in the albino rat by progesterone. Am. J. Phvsiol., 119,623-626.

PiNCUS, G. 1948. The Hormones, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

PiNCUS, G., AND Enzmann, E. V. 1935. Comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. J. Exper. Med., 62, 665-675.

Porter, R. W., Cavanaugh, E. B., and S.\wyer, C. H. 1954. Alterations in hypothalamic activity of estrous cats following vaginal stimulation. Anat. Rec, 120, 775.

Price, D., and Ortiz, E. 1944. The relation of age to reactivity in the reproductive system of the rat. Endocrinology, 34, 215-239.

Rakoff, a. E., and C.^ntarow, A. 1950. Estrogen content of blood of ovarian vein of the dog and spermatic vein of the stallion. Fed. Proc, 9, 103.

Rasmussen, a. T. 1938. Innervation of the hypophysis. Endocrinology, 23, 263-278.

Risman, G. C. 1946. Experimental stimulation of the female reproductive tract in the opossum {Didelphys virginianu). Anat. Rec, 94, 408.

Robinson, T. J. 1951. Reproduction in the ewe. Biol. Rev., 26, 121-157.

Robson, J. M. 1937. Maintenance by estrin of the luteal function in hj'pophyseetomized rabbits. J. Physiol., 90, 435-439.

RoBsoN, J. M. 1938. The role of gonadotrophic hormone in the maintenance of luteal function. Quart. J. Exper. Physiol., 28, 49-59.

RoBSON, J. M. 1947. Recent Advances in Sex and Reproductive Physiology. Philadelphia: Blakiston Company.

Ros.SMAN, I., and Bartelmez, G. W. 1946. Delayed ovulation, a significant factor in the variability of the menstrual cycle. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 52, 28-33.

Rothchild, I., Meyer, R. K., and Spielman, M. A. 1940. A ciuantitative study of oestrogen-progesterone interaction in the formation of placentomata in the castrate rat. Am. J. Phvsiol., 128, 213-224.

Rothchild, I., .^nd Fraps, R. M. 1949. The induction of ovulating hormone release from the liituitary of the domestic hen by means of progesterone. Endocrinology, 44, 141-149.

Rothchild, I., and KoH, N. K. 1951. The effects of a single preovulatory injection of jnogestcione on indices of ovulation in women. J. Clin. Endocrinol., 11, 789.

Salmon, U. J. 1938. The effect of testosterone propionate on tlic genital tract of the immature female rat. Kndocrinologv, 23, 779783.

Sanders, A., a.nd Rennels, E. (i. 1957. The cytology and functional cai)acity of the rat pituitary gland after autotransi)lantation. Anat. Rec, 127,360.

Sawyer, C. H. 1919. Rrllrx induction of ovula


tion in the estrogen-treated rabbit by artificial vaginal stimulation. Anat. Rec, 103, 502.

Sawyer, C. H. 1952. Progesterone initially facilitates and later inhibits release of pituitary ovulating hormone in the rabbit. Fed. Proc, 11, 138.

Sawyer, C. H. 1955. RhinencephaUc involvement in pituitary activation bj' intraventricular histamine in the rabbit under Nembutal anesthesia. Am. J. Physiol., 180, 37-46.

Sawyer, C. H. 1958. Activation and blockade of the release of pituitaiy gonadotropin as influenced by the reticular formation. In Reticular Formation of the Brain (Henry Ford Hospital Sj'mposium). Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

Sawyer, C. H. 1959. Seasonal variation in the incidence of spontaneous ovulation in rabbits following estrogen treatment. Endocrinology, 65, 523-525.

Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., .\nd Hollinshe.'^d, W. H. 1947. Inhibition of ovulation in the rabbit by the adrenergic-blocking agent Dibenamine. Endocrinology, 41, 395-402.

S.\wyer, C. H., Everett, J. W., .\nd M.^rkee, J. E. 1949. A neural factor in the mechanism by which estrogen induces the release of luteinizing hormone in the rat. Endocrinology, 44, 218-233.

Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Townsend, B. F.

1949. Cholinergic and adrenergic components in the neurohumoral control of the release of LH in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 44, 18-37.

Sawyer, C. H., Everett, J. W., and M.^rkee, J. E.

1950. "Spontaneous" ovulation in the rabbit following combined estrogen-progesterone treatment. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 74, 185-186.

Sawyer, C. H., M.'VRkee, J. E., and Everett, J. W. 1950a. Further experiments on blocking pituitary activation in the rabbit and the rat. J. Exper. Zool., 113, 659-682.

Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., .\nd Everett, J. W. 1950b. Activation of the rabbit adenohypophysis bj^ intravenous injections of epinephrine in the atropinized rabbit. Endocrinologv, 46, 536-543.

Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Everett, J. W. 1951a. Failure of nerve-blocking agents to prevent the effects of placental gonadotrophins in the rabbit. Endocrinology, 49, 162-167.

Sawyer, C. H., Markee, J. E., and Everett, J. W. 1951b. Blockade of neurogenic stimulation of the rabbit adcnohypoiihysis by Banthino. Am. J . Physiol ., 1 66, 223-228 ."

Sawyer, C. H., and Imerktt, ,I. W . 1953. Priming the anoslrous cat for reflex discharge of pituitarv ()\ ulating hormone. Proc Soc Exper. Biol, it ivied., 83, 820-821.

Sawyer, C. H., and Parkerson, G. R., Jr. 1953. Mechanisms of partial blockade of the stress response in rats by Dibenamine analogues. Endocrinology, 52, 346-356.

Sawyer, C. H., Chitchi.ow, B. V.. and B,\rraci.orcii, C. .\. 19.")5. Mechanism of blockade of pituitary activation in the rat by morphine, atropine and barbiturates. Endocrinology, 57, 345-354.

Schmidt, I. G. 1936. The excretion of theelin in the urine of guinea pigs with irradiated ovaries. Anat. Rec, 64, 255-266.

Schmidt, I. G. 1942. Mitotic proliferation in the ovary of the normal mature guinea pig treated with colchicine. Am. J. Anat., 71, 245-270.

ScHULTZ, A. H., .\ND Snyder, F. F. 1935. Observations on reproduction in the chimpanzee. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 57, 193-205.

ScHWEiZER, M., Ch.aripper, H. a., and Haterius, H. O. 1937. Experimental studies of the anterior pituitary. IV. The replacement capacity and the non-cyclic behavior of homoplastic anterior pituitary grafts. Endocrinology, 21, 30-39.

ScHWEizER, M. H., Charipper, H. a., and Kleinberg, W. 1940. Experimental studies of the anterior pituitary. Endocrinology, 26, 979-986.

Selye, H. 1939. The effect of progesterone on the mouse ovary as influenced by gestation. Anat. Rec, 75, 59-73.

Selye, H. 1940. Production of persistent changes in the genital organs of immature female rats treated with testosterone. Endocrinologv, 27, 657-660.

Selye, H., and McKeown, T. 1934. Studies on pseudopregnancy. Am. J. Physiol., 109, 96.

Selye, H., Collip, J. B., and Thomson, D. L. 1935. Effect of oestrin on ovaries and adrenals. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 13771381.

Selye, H., Browne, J. S. L., .^nd Collip, J. B. 1936. Effects of large doses of progesterone in the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol, and Mefl., 34, 472-474.

Shealy, C. N., and Peele, T. L. 1957. Studies on the amygdaloid nucleus of the cat. J. Neurophj^sioL, 20, 125-139.

Shelesnyak, M. C. 1931. Induction of pseudopregnancy in the rat by means of electrical stimulation. Anat. Rec, 49, 179-183.

Shibusawa, K., Saito, S., Fukuda, M., Kaw.m, T., Y.\MADA, H., and Tomiz.'Wva, K. 1955. Neurosecretion of oxytocin stimulates the release of the pituitary gonadotrojjhin. Endocrinol. Japon., 2, 183-188.

Simpson, M. E., Ev.\ns, H. M., Fraenkel-Conrat, H. L., AND Li, C. H. 1941. Synergism of estrogens with pituitary gonadotropins in hypophvsectomized rats. Endocrinology, 28, 3741.

Simpson, M. E., and v.^n Wagenen, G. 1953. Response of the ovary of the monkey {Macaca mulatta) to the administration of pituitary follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Anat. Rec, 115,370.

Smith, O. W. 1944. The pituitary responses of mature male rats to an oxidation inactivation product of estrone. Endocrinologv, 35, 146157.

Smith, O. W., Smith, G. VanS., .\nd Schiller, S. 1943. Clinical experiments in relation to the excretion of the estrogens. III. Urinary estrogens in a normal menstrual cycle and in a case of essential dysmenorrhea. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 45, 15-22.

Smith, P. E. 1939. The effect on the gonads of the ablation and implantation of the hypophysis and the potency of the hypophysis under various conditions. In Sex and Internal Secretions, 2nd ed., E. Allen, C. H. Danforth, and E. A. Doisy, Eds., Ch. XVI. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company.

Smith, P. E., and Engle, E. T. 1927. Experimental evidence regarding the role of the anterior pituitary in the development and regulation of the genital sy.stem. Am. J. Anat., 40, 159-217.

SiHTH, P. E., and White, W. E. 1931. The effect of hypophy.sectomy on ovulation and corpus luteum formation in the rabbit. J. A. M. A., 97, 1861-1863.

Spatz, H. 1951. Neues liber die Verkniipfung von Hyjjophyse und Hypothalamus. Mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Regulation sexueller Leistungen. Acta neuroveg., 3, 5-49.

Stafford, W. T., Collins, R. F., and Mossman, H. W. 1942. The thecal gland in the guinea pig ovary. Anat. Rec, 83, 193-203.

Sturgis, S. H. 1949. Rate and significance of atresia of the ovarian follicle of the rhesus monkey. Contr. Embryol., Carnegie Inst. Washington, 33, 67-80.

Sturgis, S. H., ami Mi;i<;s. J. V. 1942. The use of estradiol dii'iupionair in the treatment of essential dvsniriKirrliL'a. Surg. Gvnec & Obst., 75, 87-92.

Sulman, F., and Black, R. 1945. The alleged endocrine effect of Yohimbine. Endocrinologv, 36,70-71.

Swingle, W. W., Seay, P., Perlmutt, J., Collins, E. J., Fedor, E. J., and B.^rlow, G., Jr. 1951. Effect of electrical stimulation of uterine cervix upon sexual development of prei)ubertal rats. Am. J. Physiol., 167, 599-604.

Takasugi, N. 1954. Einfliisse von Androgen und Progestogen auf die Ovarien der Ratten, denen sofort nach der Geburt Oestrogeninjection durchgefiihrt wurde. J. Fac Sc Univ. Tokvo, sec.IV, 7, 299-311.

Talbert, G. B., Meyer, R. K., and McShan, W. H. 1951. Effect of hypophysectomy at the beginning of proestrus on maturing follicles in the ovary of the rat. Endocrinology, 49, 687-694.

Taubenhaus, M., and Soskin, S. 1941. Relea.se of luteinizing hormone from the anterior hypophysis by an acetylcholine-like substance from the hvpotlialamic region. Endocrinologv, 29, 958-964.

Thompson, A. D. P., and Zuckerman, S. 1954. The effect of pituitary-stalk section on lightinduced oestrus in ferrets. Proc Roy. Soc London, ser. B, 142, 437-451.

ToBiN, C. E. 1942. Effects of lactogen on normal and adrenalectomized rats. Endocrinologv, 31, 197-200.

Ulberg, L. C. Christian, R. E., and Casida, L. E. 1951. Ovarian response in heifers to progesterone injections. J. Anim. Sc. 10, 752-759.

VAN Dyke, H. B., and Li, R. C. 1938. The secretion of progesterone by the cat's ovary following the formation of corpora lutea due to the injection of anterior pituitary extract or prolan. Chinese J. Physiol., 13, 213-228.

VAN TiENHOVEN, A. 1953. Further study on the neurogenic blockage of LH release in the hen. Anat. Rec, 115, 374-375.

VAN TiENHOVEN, A. 1955. The duration of stimulation of the fowl's anterior pituitary for progesterone-induced LH release. Endocrinology, 56, 667-674.

VAN TiENHOVEN, A., NaLBANDOV, A. V., AND NORTON,

H. W. 1954. Effect of Dibenamine on progesterone-induced and "spontaneous" ovulation in the hen. Endocrinology, 54, 605-611.

VAN Wagenen, G., and Simpson, M. E. 1957. Induction of multiple ovulation in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology, 61, 316-318.

Velardo, J. T., AND Hisaw, F. L. 1951. Quantitative inhibition of progesterone by estrogens in development of deciduomata. Endocrinology, 49, 530-537.

Vel.\rdo, J. T., Dawson, A. B., Olsen, A. G., and His.wv, F. L. 1953. Sequence of histological changes in the uterus and vagina of the rat diu'ing prolongation of pseudopregnancy associated with the presence of deciduomata. Am. J. Anat., 93, 273-305.

Velardo, J. T., Olsen, A. G., Hisaw, F. L., and Dawson, A. B. 1953. The influence of decidual tissue upon pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology, 53, 216-220.

Venning, E. H., and Browne, J. S. L. 1937. Studies on corpus luteum function. I. The m-inary excretion of sodium pregnanediol glucnronidate in the human menstrual cvcle. En<l.)crmology, 21, 711-721.

Verly, W. G. 1951. The urinary excretion of prenane-3a:20a-diol in the female rabbit immediatelv after mating. J. Endocrinol., 7, 258259.

Veziris, C. D. 1951. Cycle vaginal chez les femmes castrees ou menopausees. Ann. endocrinol., 12,917-921.

VoGT, M. 1931. ijber den Mechanismus der Auslosung der Graviditiit und Pseudograviditjit zugleicli ein ]jhysiologischer Beweis fiir die sympathische Innervation des Hypophysenvor(lerla])i>("ns. Arch, exper. Path. Pharmakol., 162, 197-208.

VoGT, M. 1933. Uber den Mecli.iiiismus der Ausl().sung der Graviditiit. II. Mitlcilunji- Arcli. exper. Path. Pharmakol., 170, 72-83.

Walton, A., and Hammond, J. 1928. Observations on ovulation in the rabbit. Brit. J. Exper. Biol., 6, 190-204.

W.\RWiCK, ]•]. J. 1946. Gonadolrophic potc^ncy of ewe pituitary glands as affected by spaying, .season, and breed. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. <fe Med., 63, 530-533.

W.\ti;r.\ia\, A. J. 1943. Studies of normal development of the New Zealand White .strain of rabbit. Am. J. Anat., 73, 473-515.

Weinberger, L. M., .\nd Grant, F. C. 1941. Precocious pubert}^ and tumors of the hypothalamus. Arch. Int. Med., 67, 762-792.

Werthessen, N. T., Schwenk, E., and Baker, C. 1953. Biosynthesis of estrone and /3-estradiol in the perfused ovary. Science, 117, 380-381.

Westman, A. 1934. Untersuchung iiber die Abhangigkeit der P^unktion des Corpus luteum von den 0\arialfollikeln und iiber die Bildungsstiitte der Hormone im Ovarium. Arch. Gynak., 158, 476-504.

Westman, A. 1947. The effect of Prominal on the sexual cvcle. Acta med. scandinav., 128, Suppl. 196, 111-115.

Westman, A., and J.\cobsohn, D. 1936. tjber Ovarialveranderungen beim Kaninchen nach Hj'poph3^sektomie. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 16, 483-508.

Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1937a. Uber Oestrinwirkung auf die Corpus luteum-Funktion. I. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17, 1-12.

Westman, A., .\nd Jacobsohn, D. 1937b. Uber Oestrinwirkung auf die Corpus luteum-Funktion. II. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17, 13-23.

W^estman, a., and Jacobsohn, D. 1937c. Experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber die Bedeutung des Hypophysen-Zwischenhirnsystems fiir die Produktion gonadotroper Hormone des Hypophysenvorderlappens. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 17, 235-265.

Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1938a. Endokrinologische Untersuchungen an Ratten mit durchtrenntem Hypophysenstiel. I. Hypophysenveranderungen nach Kastration untl nach Oestrinbehandlungen. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 18, 99-108.

Westman, A., and Jacob.sohn, D. 1938b. Endokrinologische Untersuchungen an Ratten mit durchtrenntem Hypophysenstiel. III. Uber die luteinizierende Wirkung des Follikelhormons. Acta obst. gvnec. scandinav., 18, 115123.

Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1938c. Endokrinologische Untersuchimgen an Ratten mit durchtrenntem Hy])<)i>h\ x ii-t iil. VI. Produktion und Abgabe (1< : iiini.ulotropcn Hormone. Acta path, et niii-niliKil. scandinav., 15, 445-453.

Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1940. Endokrinologische Unteisucliungen an Kaninchen mit durchtrenntcMi Hypophyse.stic^l. Acta obst. gynec. scandinav., 20, 392-433.

Westman, A., and Jacobsohn, D. 1942. Die Wirkung transorbital an das Tuber cinereum injizierten Novocains auf die Ovulation. Acta ob.st. gynec. scandinav., 22, 16-23.

Whitaker, W. L. 1940. Some effects of artificial ilhunin.ition on reproduction in the whiteI'ootcd mouse, Peromyscus leucopns Novel>uracrnsis. J. Exper. Zool., 83, 33-60.

Williams. P. C. 1940. Effect of stilboestrol on the ovaries of hyi>ophyseftomized rats. Nature, London, 145, 388-389.

WiLLi.AMS, P. C. 1944. 0\'arian stimulation by oestrogens: effects in immature hypophysectomized rats. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, 132, 189-199.

Williams, P. C. 1945a. Ovarian stimulation by oestrogens. II. Stimulation in the absence of the hypophysis, uterus, and adrenal glands. J. Endocrinol., 4, 125-126.

WiLLi.AMS, P. C. 1945b. Studies of the biological action of serum gonadotrophin. II. Ovarian response after hypophysectomy and oestrogen treatment. J. Endocrinol., 4, 131-136.

WiLsox, R. B., R.AXD.ALL, L. M., and Osterberg, A. E. 1939. Studies on pregnandiol. Am. J. Obst. & Gynec, 37, 59-74.

WiSLocKi, G. B., AND King, L. S. 1936. The permeability of the h.vpophysis and hypothalamus to vital dyes, with a study of the hypophyseal vascular supply. Am. J. Anat., 58, 421-472.

Wolfe, J. M. 1935. Reaction of ovaries of mature female rats to injection of oestrin. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 32, 757-759.

Wolfe, J. M., and H.a.milton, J. B. 1937. Action of male sex hormone with and without estrin in the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 37, 189-193.

WoRTHiNGTON, W. C, Jr. 1955. Some observations on the hypophyseal portal system in the living mouse. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 97, 343-357.

XuEREB, G. P., Prichard, M. M. L., and Daniel, P. M. 1954. The hypophysial portal \essels in man. Quart. J. Exper. Physiol., 39, 219-230.


Young, W. C, Boling, J. L., and Blandau, R. J. 1941. The vaginal smear picture, sexual receptivity, and time of ovulation in the albino rat. Anat. Rec, 80, 37-45.

Young, W. C, and Yerkes, R. M. 1943. Factors influencing the reproductive cycle in the chimpanzee; the period of adolescent sterility and related problems. Endocrinology, 33, 121-154.

Z.ARRow, M. X., and Bastian, J. W. 1953. Blockade of ovulation in the hen with adrenolytic and parasympatholytic drugs. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med., 84, 457-459.

Zondek, B., and Aschheim, S. 1927. Hypophysenvorderlappen und Ovarium. Beziehungen der endokrinen Driisen zur Ovarialfunktion. Arch. Gynak., 130, 1^5.

ZucKERMAN, S. 1937. The menstrual cycle of primates. X. The oestrone threshold of the uterus of the rhesus monkey. Proc. Rov. Soc. London, ser. B, 123, 441-471.

ZucKERMAN, S. 1941. Periodic uterine bleeding in spayed rhesus monkeys injected daily with a constant threshold dose of oestrone. J. Endocrinol., 2, 263-267.

ZucKERMAN, S. 1952. The influence of environmental changes on the anterior pituitary. Ciba Foundation CoUociuia Endocrinol., 4, 213-228.

ZucKERMAN, S., AND FuLTON, J. F. 1934. The

menstrual cycle of the primates. VII. The sexual skin of the chimpanzee. J. Anat., 69, 38-46. ZwARENSTEiN, H. 1937. Experimental induction of ovulation with progesterone. Nature, London, 139, 112-113.

Retrieved from ‘https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php?title=Book_-_Sex_and_internal_secretions_(1961)_8&oldid=414304’
Powered by MediaWiki