File:Meyer1920 fig08.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
(==Fig. 8.== Plate 2: Fig. 8 | Fig. 9 | Fig. 10 | Fig. 11 | Fig. 12 | [[)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Fig. 8.==
==Fig. 8.==
No. 70 (Dr. Charles H. Ellis) is a small, fimi, degenerate-looking, almost solid mass 40X30X28 mm., composed of small cysts, degenerate decidua, exudate and degeneration products.
As figure 8 shows, it is very similar to a very much larger specimen. No. 323 (Dr. V. Van Williams). The latter is a large, firm, felt-fike mass 120X90X65 mm., represented in figure 9.
The individual cysts, which vary from 1 to 20 mm., are packed together rather firmly, though a few large ones are free. The exterior of the specimen is formed by a thick layer of degenerate decidua and gives only a slight indication of its true nature upon closer inspection or upon examination of the cut surface. No fetal remnants were noticed, and microscopic examination shows tliat the specimen is composed merely of a large hydatiform mass which was retained for a long tune and then aborted in toto with the surrounding decidua and exudate.




Line 5: Line 11:


{{Meyer1920}}
{{Meyer1920}}
[[Category:Hydatidiform Mole]]

Latest revision as of 23:29, 11 May 2014

Fig. 8.

No. 70 (Dr. Charles H. Ellis) is a small, fimi, degenerate-looking, almost solid mass 40X30X28 mm., composed of small cysts, degenerate decidua, exudate and degeneration products.

As figure 8 shows, it is very similar to a very much larger specimen. No. 323 (Dr. V. Van Williams). The latter is a large, firm, felt-fike mass 120X90X65 mm., represented in figure 9.

The individual cysts, which vary from 1 to 20 mm., are packed together rather firmly, though a few large ones are free. The exterior of the specimen is formed by a thick layer of degenerate decidua and gives only a slight indication of its true nature upon closer inspection or upon examination of the cut surface. No fetal remnants were noticed, and microscopic examination shows tliat the specimen is composed merely of a large hydatiform mass which was retained for a long tune and then aborted in toto with the surrounding decidua and exudate.


Plate 2: Fig. 8 | Fig. 9 | Fig. 10 | Fig. 11 | Fig. 12 | Fig. 13


Meyer Links: Plate 1 | Plate 2 | Plate 3 | Plate 4 | Plate 5 | Plate 6 | Contribution No.40 | Volume IX | Contributions to Embryology | Hydatidiform Mole | Tubal Pregnancy
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

Reference

Meyer AW. Hydatiform degeneration in tubal and uterine pregnancy. (1920) Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ., Contrib. Embryol., 40: 327- 364.


Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, June 26) Embryology Meyer1920 fig08.jpg. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/File:Meyer1920_fig08.jpg

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G

File history

Yi efo/eka'e gwa ebo wo le nyangagi wuncin ye kamina wunga tinya nan

GwalagizhiNyangagiDimensionsUserComment
current09:57, 8 April 2012Thumbnail for version as of 09:57, 8 April 2012718 × 591 (56 KB)Z8600021 (talk | contribs)==Fig. 8.== Plate 2: Fig. 8 | Fig. 9 | Fig. 10 | Fig. 11 | Fig. 12 | [[