Vagina Development

From Embryology
Revision as of 00:00, 13 April 2010 by S8600021 (talk | contribs) (Created page with '==Introduction== * The development of the human vagina. BULMER D. J Anat. 1957 Oct;91(4):490-509. No abstract available. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13475148 PMID: 13475…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Introduction

  • New concepts on the development of the vagina. Shapiro E, Huang H, Wu XR. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;545:173-85. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 15086027
  • Revisiting old vaginal topics: conversion of the Müllerian vagina and origin of the "sinus" vagina. Cai Y. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53(7):925-34. Review. PMID: 19598112 | IJDB
"Vaginal development has been a longstanding controversy, which hampers studies on vaginal diseases as well as cervical and uterine diseases. Most concerns center on: why is the vaginal epithelium different from the uterine epithelium; and where does the vagina originate from? It is commonly held that the rodent vagina has a dual origin: the cranial part is derived from the Mullerian duct (Mullerian vagina) and the caudal part derived from the urogenital sinus (sinus vagina). This concept was deduced from morphological observations. However, it cannot explain the difference between the Mullerian vagina and the uterus. Moreover, accumulating new data from genetic and molecular studies contradicts the urogenital sinus origin of the sinus vagina. The present review summarizes previous morphological observations and new findings from genetic and molecular studies, and addresses molecular mechanisms underlying the origin and organogenesis of the vagina in rodents. It provides evidence to show that the whole vagina is derived the Mullerian duct. BMP4 reshapes the intermediate mesoderm-derived Mullerian duct into the vaginal primordium. The latter thus exhibits different features from the uterus, including the stratified squamous epithelium and insensitivity to anti-Mullerian hormone. The sinus vagina is formed by extrinsic BMP4-mediated caudal extension of the Mullerian duct. The present review thus shows how a century of controversy over the origin and organogenesis of the vagina has been resolved. This new understanding will provide additional insight into genetic diseases and tumors of the female reproductive tract."


  • Fetal development of the female external urinary sphincter complex: an anatomical and histological study. Sebe P, Fritsch H, Oswald J, Schwentner C, Lunacek A, Bartsch G, Radmayr C. J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1738-42; discussion 1742. PMID: 15821572


  • Helper function of the Wolffian ducts and role of androgens in the development of the vagina. Drews U. Sex Dev. 2007;1(2):100-10. PMID: 18391520
"Here experiments with the complete androgen receptor defect in the testicular feminisation (Tfm) mouse are reported which show that the vagina is formed by caudal migration of Wolffian and Müllerian ducts. The cranial ends of the Wolffian ducts successively regress while the Müllerian ducts fuse to form the vagina. Immunohistochemistry of the androgen receptor reveals that the caudal ends of the Wolffian ducts remain in the indifferent stage and therefore have been mistaken as sinuvaginal bulbs. The Wolffian ducts do not contribute to the vagina itself but have a helper function during downward movement of the vaginal bud in the female. In the male the caudal ends serve as androgen operated switch for the negative control of vaginal development. The results indicate that the rudimentary vagina in the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) corresponds to non obliterated caudal ends of the Müllerian ducts. Selective atresia of the vagina in the MRKH (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser) syndrome may be explained by the failure of Wolffian and Müllerian ducts to descend caudally"