Difference between revisions of "User:Z3416557"

From Embryology
Line 51: Line 51:
  
 
GROUP 5
 
GROUP 5
 +
 +
Lung Anatomy/Histology/Cardiovasculature: I think this section is an excellent start to your groups page - the histology section especially adds some depth. The drawings are really nice to view too!
 +
Developmental Origins/Timeline: the table is really well structured and there is a nice amount of depth in the description. I like the inclusion of historical developments also
 +
Structure/Developmental Signalling: This section flows nicely on from the previous subheadings and is also well written. However there is a lack of referencing in both of these sections
 +
Abnormal development: again a good amount of depth and well written.
 +
 +
Overall: not much to fault with this project it looks like you guys are on the right track!

Revision as of 13:29, 12 October 2017

    2017 Project Groups
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6

Z5177691

Z5178570

Z5093005

Z5059696

Z5059949

Z5178275

Z5178407

Z5076039

Z5017644

Z5015446

Z5178463

Z5076019

Z5059996

Z5076466

Z5018962

Z5177670

Z5117343

Z5075309

Z5075778

Z3416557

Z5178462

Z5059373

Z5114217

Z5062492

Z5076351

Z5177699

Z5113034

Z5114433

Z5076158

Z5018156

Mark Hill - Lab 1 page

Chicken embryo E-cad and P-cad gastrulation.png

Chicken embryo E-cadherin and P-cadherin in gastrulation[1]

Here is the Student Page demonstration page I showed in the Practical class.

Use this page to practice editing and don't forget to add a topic to the 2017 Group Project 4 page.



 2017 ANAT2341 - Timetable | Course Outline | Group Projects | Moodle | Tutorial 1 | Tutorial 2 | Tutorial 3

Labs: 1 Fertility and IVF | 2 ES Cells to Genome Editing | 3 Preimplantation and Early Implantation | 4 Reproductive Technology Revolution | 5 Cardiac and Vascular Development | 6 CRISPR-Cas9 | 7 Somitogenesis and Vertebral Malformation | 8 Organogenesis | 9 Genetic Disorders | 10 Melanocytes | 11 Stem Cells | 12 Group

Lectures: 1 Introduction | 2 Fertilization | 3 Week 1/2 | 4 Week 3 | 5 Ectoderm | 6 Placenta | 7 Mesoderm | 8 Endoderm | 9 Research Technology | 10 Cardiovascular | 11 Respiratory | 12 Neural crest | 13 Head | 14 Musculoskeletal | 15 Limb | 16 Renal | 17 Genital | 18 Endocrine | 19 Sensory | 20 Fetal | 21 Integumentary | 22 Birth | 23 Stem cells | 24 Revision

 Student Projects: 1 Cortex | 2 Kidney | 3 Heart | 4 Eye | 5 Lung | 6 Cerebellum

Student Page

__

GROUP PROJECTS - PEER REVIEW

GROUP 1

Early Development of the Brain: Well written, maybe a little concise, there are some great images which could be useful for this section also Development of Cerebral Cortex: Lots of good information, maybe try to make this section a bit more fluid - comes of a little disjointed Anatomy of the Cerebral Cortex/Functions of the Cerebral Cortex: This section does not read well to the eye - that's not to say it is incorrect - I would try putting this into a friendly format Abnormalities associated with Cerebral Cortex Development: This section is huge, but each condition has a fairly concise explanation so well done

Overall: There is lots of sound information on the page - main emphasis would be giving the page a clean up of the format and trying to make the sections flow together a little nicer


GROUP 2

Kidney: I would restructure this section to give a clearer introduction and description of the anatomy (and clearer heading) - this could occur just by switching around the order of some of the content. Images are well captioned. Timeline of Kidney Embryology/Kidney development: This section is great. I like the very concise timeline as an introduction to this section. The stages are well written and contain good detail (just watch out with that last section of blood supply which I am sure you will fix) Developmental abnormalities: I would give the first few paragraphs a bit more context through a heading - or going into greater detail with an example. Lots of good detail and good visual examples Current Research/Questions for the future/General info on the renal system: obviously this section will be completed more over the coming weeks

Overall: I would try and style the other sections of the page in a similar light to Kidney Development section which has a great format. I like the use of imaged throughout which add good value to the text. A bit more detail to be added to some sections but definitely on the right track

GROUP 3

Introduction: Well written and concise - sets up a good expectation of whats to come Developmental Origin: I like how you have referenced the images in the text - though I would try to fix the image placement (it's hard - I am struggling also!) Developmental Timeline: This section is excellent - great amount of detail, well written, and great supporting images Developmental Signalling Processes: Also a very good section (just keep writing how you have for the rest of the subheadings!) - also need to fix up the referencing of that 2nd image Current Research And Findings: There is a commendable effort here to summarize current research. I might be nitpicking here but maybe try to make this section a little more concise as it is large blocks of text Glossary of Terms: Useful section to include

Overall: The level of research and depth of writing of this page is excellent. There isn't too much to change - and if the rest of the subheadings left to complete are in the same style as the rest of the page I think you guys should be pretty happy!


GROUP 5

Lung Anatomy/Histology/Cardiovasculature: I think this section is an excellent start to your groups page - the histology section especially adds some depth. The drawings are really nice to view too! Developmental Origins/Timeline: the table is really well structured and there is a nice amount of depth in the description. I like the inclusion of historical developments also Structure/Developmental Signalling: This section flows nicely on from the previous subheadings and is also well written. However there is a lack of referencing in both of these sections Abnormal development: again a good amount of depth and well written.

Overall: not much to fault with this project it looks like you guys are on the right track!

  1. <pubmed>27097030</pubmed>