Template:Patten 1920: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|90px|left]] This historic 1920 paper by Bradley Patten described the understanding of chicken development.  If like me you are interested in development, then these historic embryology textbooks are fascinating in the detail and interpretation of embryology at that given point in time. As with all historic texts, terminology and developmental descriptions may differ from our current understanding. There may also be errors in transcription or interpretation from the original text. Currently only the text has been made available online, figures will be added at a later date.  My thanks to the Internet Archive for making the original scanned book available.
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|90px|left]] This historic 1920 paper by Bradley Patten described the understanding of chicken development.  If like me you are interested in development, then these historic embryology textbooks are fascinating in the detail and interpretation of embryology at that given point in time. As with all historic texts, terminology and developmental descriptions may differ from our current understanding. There may also be errors in transcription or interpretation from the original text. Currently only the text has been made available online, figures will be added at a later date.  My thanks to the Internet Archive for making the original scanned book available.


Those interested in chicken development should also see the earlier text [[Book_-_The_Elements_of_Embryology_-_Volume_1|The Elements of Embryology (1883)]] and the onilne notes on [[Chicken Development]].
Those interested in chicken development should also see the earlier text [[Book_-_The_Elements_of_Embryology_-_Volume_1|The Elements of Embryology (1883)]] and the current onilne notes on [[Chicken Development]].


--[[User:S8600021|Mark Hill]] 13:24, 14 January 2011 (EST)


<br>
<br>

Revision as of 14:12, 28 February 2017

Embryology - 25 Apr 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Patten BM. The Early Embryology of the Chick. (1920) Philadelphia: P. Blakiston's Son and Co.

Online Editor 
Mark Hill.jpg
This historic 1920 paper by Bradley Patten described the understanding of chicken development. If like me you are interested in development, then these historic embryology textbooks are fascinating in the detail and interpretation of embryology at that given point in time. As with all historic texts, terminology and developmental descriptions may differ from our current understanding. There may also be errors in transcription or interpretation from the original text. Currently only the text has been made available online, figures will be added at a later date. My thanks to the Internet Archive for making the original scanned book available.

Those interested in chicken development should also see the earlier text The Elements of Embryology (1883) and the current onilne notes on Chicken Development.



Modern Notes

chicken

The Early Embryology of the Chick: Introduction | Gametes and Fertilization | Segmentation | Entoderm | Primitive Streak and Mesoderm | Primitive Streak to Somites | 24 Hours | 24 to 33 Hours | 33 to 39 Hours | 40 to 50 Hours | Extra-embryonic Membranes | 50 to 55 Hours | Day 3 to 4 | References | Figures

Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)