Template:Group Assessment Criteria table: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! Group Assessment Criteria  |- | 50px # The key points relating to the topic that your group al...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
! Group Assessment Criteria 
! Group Assessment Criteria  
|-  
|-  
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|50px]]  
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|50px]] [[Science Student Projects]]
# The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
# The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
# The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
# The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
Line 13: Line 13:
# The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
# The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
# Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
# Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
|-
| [[Template talk:Group Assessment Criteria table|More Information on Assessment Criteria]] | [[Science Student Projects]]
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 14:21, 31 July 2018

Group Assessment Criteria  
Mark Hill.jpg Science Student Projects
  1. The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
  2. The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  3. Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  4. The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  5. Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  6. Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
  7. Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
  8. Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  9. The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  10. Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
More Information on Assessment Criteria | Science Student Projects
Retrieved from ‘https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php?title=Template:Group_Assessment_Criteria_table&oldid=348422’
Powered by MediaWiki