Template:ANAT2341Project2016discussionheader: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| {{Group Assessment Criteria table}}
| {{Group Assessment Criteria table}}
| {{ANAT2341Projects2016}}
| {{ANAT2341Projects2016}}
 
|-
 
| Here are some starting places for the topic. Can be patterning, differentiation, etc. as long as a developmental signal process/pathway.
Here are some starting places for the topic. Can be patterning, differentiation, etc. as long as a developmental signal process/pathway.
|
* [[Molecular Development - Signaling]]
* [[Molecular Development - Signaling]]
* [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/?term=Developmental+Signaling Bookshelf]
* [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/?term=Developmental+Signaling Bookshelf]
Line 11: Line 11:
* Interactive Fly - [http://www.sdbonline.org/sites/fly/aimain/aadevinx.htm Evolutionarily conserved developmental pathways]
* Interactive Fly - [http://www.sdbonline.org/sites/fly/aimain/aadevinx.htm Evolutionarily conserved developmental pathways]
* PMID 12509752 PMID 19399989
* PMID 12509752 PMID 19399989
|}

Latest revision as of 15:22, 19 August 2016

Group Assessment Criteria  
Mark Hill.jpg Science Student Projects
  1. The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
  2. The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
  3. Content is correctly cited and referenced.
  4. The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
  5. Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
  6. Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
  7. Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
  8. Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
  9. The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
  10. Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
More Information on Assessment Criteria | Science Student Projects
Signalling: 1 Wnt | 2 Notch | 3 FGF Receptor | 4 Hedgehog | 5 T-box | 6 TGF-Beta
Here are some starting places for the topic. Can be patterning, differentiation, etc. as long as a developmental signal process/pathway.