Talk:ANAT2341 2010 Students: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
==Group Assessment Criteria==
==Group Assessment Criteria==
===The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described===
===The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described===
While formatting is easy to discuss it is structure and content that is critical to the assessment.


===The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area===
===The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area===

Latest revision as of 11:27, 1 November 2010

2010 Students: z3305561 | z3288088 | z3254433 | z3186755 | z3292955 | z3265772 | z3252833 | z3224500 | z3245851 | z3252635 | z3318446 | z3292208 | z3252083 | z3291079 | z3293029 | z3241780 | z3290040 | z3254753 | z3216889


Group Assessment Criteria

The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described

While formatting is easy to discuss it is structure and content that is critical to the assessment.

The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area

Content is correctly cited and referenced

The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations

Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities

Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology

Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki

Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement

The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning

Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines