I have now added a discussion Forum for your group to Moodle. You can add your discussion here (available to everyone) or in your Moodle Group Discussion (available to only your group members).
The collapsible table below shows the assessment criteria that will be used for this group project.
| Group Assessment Criteria
|
 Science Student Projects
- The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
- The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
- Content is correctly cited and referenced.
- The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
- Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
- Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
- Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
- Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
- The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
- Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
|
| More Information on Assessment Criteria | Science Student Projects
|
|
| Uploading Images
|
| First Read the help page Images
The following describes how to upload an image with all the information that must be associated with it.
The image must first be uploaded to the site.
- Open the left hand menu item “Toolbox” and click “Upload file” and a new window will open.
- Click the button ”Choose file” and navigate to where the image is located on your computer and double click the file.
- The window will now show the file name in the “Source filename” window.
- You can then rename the uploaded file in the “Destination filename” window.
- Make sure the new name accurately describes the image.
- Add a description of the image to the “Summary” window. Note the description must include:
- An image name as a section heading.
- Any further description of what the image shows.
- A subsection labeled “Reference” and under this the original image source, appropriate reference and all copyright information.
- Finally a template indicating that this is a student image. {{Template:Student Image}}
Images not including the above information will be deleted by the course coordinator and be considered in the student assessment process.
Students cannot delete uploaded images. Contact the course coordinator with the file address.
|
|
| Referencing
|
| First Read the help page Referencing
All references used in making your project page should be cited where they appear in the text or images.
In page edit mode where XXXX is the PubMed ID number use the following code.
- <ref name=”PMIDXXXX”><pubmed>XXXX</pubmed></ref>
For references not listed on PubMed, and text can be inserted between <ref></ref> tags.
Where the reference list will appear make a new section and on a new line the following code. <references/>
|
|
| Plagiarism
|
| First Read the help page Copyright Tutorial
Currently all students originally assigned to each group are listed as equal authors/contributors to their project. If you have not contributed the content you had originally agreed to, nor participated in the group work process, then you should contact the course coordinator immediately and either discuss your contribution or request removal from the group author list. Remember that all student online contributions are recorded by date, time and the actual contributed content. A similar email reminder of this information was sent to all current students.
Please note the Universities Policy regarding Plagiarism
"Plagiarism at UNSW is defined as using the words or ideas of others and passing them off as your own." (extract from UNSW statement on Academic Honesty and Plagiarism)
Academic Misconduct carries penalties. If a student is found guilty of academic misconduct, the penalties include warnings, remedial educative action, being failed in an assignment or excluded from the University for two years.
Please also read Copyright Tutorial with regard to content that can be used in your project.
|
|
About the Discussion Page
This should be considered as the "other side" of the project page. It is an area where you can:
- Assemble resources.
- Add useful links.
- Discuss your project with team members. (Please do not use student names on any page on this Wiki)
- Paste your Peer Assessments. (Added anonymously, do not identify yourself)
Suggested Starting Places
Mark Hill (talk) 10:15, 14 August 2017 (AEST) OK Group 5 below are some starting places.
PubMed Searches: Lung Development | Respiratory Development
BMC Dev Biol Search: Lung Development
Recent papers
<pubmed limit=5>Lung+Development</pubmed>
Peer Review
This paper is divided into logical categories however lacks an introduction to lead into the discussion of lung development. The student drawings are all good, and the developmental timeline is very informative. The images are well referenced and have the appropriate Copyright. The "Structure of Respiratory Network", "Developmental signalling processes", "Research" and "Animal models" sections of the page lack in-text citations and thus lack credibility. The references need to be fine tuned, and the formatting of images is required. Otherwise this is a very informative page.
---
Future questions and current research subheadings are incomplete. Don’t forget to add references, copyright statements and the student image template to each of the images that have been used on the wikipage. References should be used on Lung Histology to show the research that has been done. The animal models section is comprehensive but there are barely any references to show where the information was found.
Subheadings and content that have been used show a good understanding of the topic area. The team have used their own images to show their understanding. The team has used images in the ‘Developmental timeline’ table which shows comprehensive research. The images have brief descriptions below them, hence readers will be able to understand what the image is displaying. Important words in relation to the lung have been bolded. The abnormal development section is done comprehensively with references and images. References were cited properly, however there is an error on reference 20.
---
