Talk:2014 Group Project 7: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
On current findings, good choice on research articles. They’re very relevant to the topic and to the project as well. Maybe try to add some images if possible. Also, try to add some dates or anything to show how recent these studies are. There is a bit of imbalance in terms of the amount of content for each study but nonetheless, this section was written well. Good job! As for “abnormalities”, this section was done well. Each disease was written with lots of detail but very concisely. I do suggest adding more images that show the clinical manifestation of each disease. Also, don’t just focus on the manifestations of each defects. Try to look for current treatments or techniques on managing the abnormality. Also, maybe look for more references. | On current findings, good choice on research articles. They’re very relevant to the topic and to the project as well. Maybe try to add some images if possible. Also, try to add some dates or anything to show how recent these studies are. There is a bit of imbalance in terms of the amount of content for each study but nonetheless, this section was written well. Good job! As for “abnormalities”, this section was done well. Each disease was written with lots of detail but very concisely. I do suggest adding more images that show the clinical manifestation of each disease. Also, don’t just focus on the manifestations of each defects. Try to look for current treatments or techniques on managing the abnormality. Also, maybe look for more references. | ||
On historic findings, where is it? | On historic findings, where is it? There is a section on the Wikipage that has old books on embryology. It’s under the “Explore” tab and you’ll see “Historic embryo”. | ||
I’ve check all the images and there are no issues with them in terms of copyright. I can see that you tried to add captions to each photo, which is good but you can format the image in a way so that the caption is framed with the photo. Check out the [[https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Help:Image_Tutorial#Image_Formatting| Image Formatting]] guide to do this. Overall, this page is very detailed and written very well. Just try to edit the page and make it look cleaner. | I’ve check all the images and there are no issues with them in terms of copyright. I can see that you tried to add captions to each photo, which is good but you can format the image in a way so that the caption is framed with the photo. Check out the [[https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Help:Image_Tutorial#Image_Formatting| Image Formatting]] guide to do this. Overall, this page is very detailed and written very well. Just try to edit the page and make it look cleaner. |
Revision as of 22:42, 12 October 2014
This is the discussion page for your project.
- Use this page to discuss online the project with your group members.
- Paste useful resources here.
- Remember to use your signature button to identify who you are when adding content here.
- The following collapsed tables provide starting points for students during project work, you also have tutorials built into practical classes and practice exercises for individual assessmet items.
|
|
|
Project Analysis 24 Sep |
---|
--Mark Hill (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2014 (EST) Individual student data for each group has also been analysed. |
--Mark Hill (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2014 (EST) I have masked student ID.
|
2014 Student Projects: Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | Group 6 | Group 7 | Group 8
--Mark Hill (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2014 (EST) These student projects have now been finalised and undergoing final assessment.
Group Assessment Criteria |
---|
|
Peer Reviews
Good introduction but I would move what happens in the embryonic development to the “development” section. Also, don’t forget any references and in-text citations for this section. Maybe add more on what the page is about and what the readers should be expecting. Nonetheless, it gives a good background of the key organs in this system. The diagram for the timeline of development is quite complex. Try to explain what is happening in this diagram within the “development” section. For example, maybe try to have the same headings (cell multiplication, cell migration, etc.) as the diagram for the “development” subheadings. Or, if you’re willing, make a timeline of your own. At least, you can make a simpler diagram where only relevant information is included. Good job on the “Visible Anatomical Details” table.
On current findings, good choice on research articles. They’re very relevant to the topic and to the project as well. Maybe try to add some images if possible. Also, try to add some dates or anything to show how recent these studies are. There is a bit of imbalance in terms of the amount of content for each study but nonetheless, this section was written well. Good job! As for “abnormalities”, this section was done well. Each disease was written with lots of detail but very concisely. I do suggest adding more images that show the clinical manifestation of each disease. Also, don’t just focus on the manifestations of each defects. Try to look for current treatments or techniques on managing the abnormality. Also, maybe look for more references.
On historic findings, where is it? There is a section on the Wikipage that has old books on embryology. It’s under the “Explore” tab and you’ll see “Historic embryo”.
I’ve check all the images and there are no issues with them in terms of copyright. I can see that you tried to add captions to each photo, which is good but you can format the image in a way so that the caption is framed with the photo. Check out the [Image Formatting] guide to do this. Overall, this page is very detailed and written very well. Just try to edit the page and make it look cleaner.
--Z3418981 (talk) 14:21, 16 August 2014 (EST) Hey everyone,
What's everyone's ideas about doing the neural system for our project? there are lots of interesting Neurologic deficits that we could talk about!!!
--Z3419587 (talk) 23:25, 16 August 2014 (EST) That's a good idea. Neural system is a complex structure and it should be fun to work on it! Any other ideas?
--Z3374116 (talk) 23:51, 19 August 2014 (EST) I talked to Yas before, sorry couldnt respond faster haha. Agree that Neural system would be interesting to research :p
Do you guys have facebook as well? It might be an additional way to communicate
--Z3422484 (talk) I also agree on this topic being quite interesting as well --Z3418981
--Z3418981 (talk) 10:54, 25 August 2014 (EST) hey guys it's yas! so we each need to choose one of the following: Review the neural system development during the fetal period. Identify current research models and finding. Identify historic findings. Identify abnormalities that can occur in this system during fetal period.
--Z3419587 (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2014 (EST) Thanks! This is vivian. Can I do "the review of the neural system development during the fetal period"? Or if anyone wants to do this section?
--Z3374116 (talk) 12:07, 26 August 2014 (EST) Hey guys, Can i do historic findings for fetal neutral system development :) - Sean
--Z3419587 (talk) 17:47, 26 August 2014 (EST)I have put some subtitles to give a brief structure to our webpage, feel free to change them if you want!
--Z3418981 (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2014 (EST) sure and I'll do the abnormalities - Yas
--Z3419587 (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2014 (EST) hey Yas, see if this helps. <pubmed>25007063</pubmed>
--Z3418981 (talk) 21:14, 26 August 2014 (EST) Thanks Vivian!! the article is very helpful! and the page looks really good too :)
--Z3374116 (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2014 (EST) Hey guys, I think the last entry from my section will help alot in the Development section for our project :) - Sean
<pubmed>17848161</pubmed>
--Z3419587 (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2014 (EST) That's true! thanks Sean :) - vivian
--Z3422484--Z3422484 (talk) 12:50, 27 August 2014 (EST) Hey guys, this is a useful article for the abnormalities area
<pubmed>24664314</pubmed>
--Z3374116 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2014 (EST) nice one :D How are you guys going with your sections?
--Z3374116 (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2014 (EST) <pubmed>10226791</pubmed> maybe for development
--Z3374116 (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2014 (EST) http://www.ehd.org/cache/pdf/fd7e47f291dded855c38ffb3418fbdc8/timeline.pdf
something which might help us figure out a timeline structure
--Z3374116 (talk) 11:56, 24 September 2014 (EST) http://discovery.lifemapsc.com/library/review-of-medical-embryology A textbook which has great information on the development of the CNS during the fetal period
--Z3422484 (talk) 11:35, 8 October 2014 (EST) Hey guys i will be adding a few extra research articles to the current research tab
--Z3422484 (talk) 11:35, 8 October 2014 (EST) Also is there anything else anyone needs help on as well?
--Z3422484 (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2014 (EST) Forgot to mention that I'll also be adding spinal cord abnormalities
For Historial Research and Findings <pubmed>19339620</pubmed> <pubmed>8005032</pubmed> <pubmed>9311417</pubmed> <pubmed>17848161</pubmed> <pubmed>12768653</pubmed> <pubmed>17060425</pubmed> <pubmed>21042938</pubmed> for brain de
abnormalities
<pubmed>12454899</pubmed>
<pubmed>25007063</pubmed>
<pubmed>16530991</pubmed>
<pubmed>7504639</pubmed>
<pubmed>19651588</pubmed>
<pubmed>25135350</pubmed>
<pubmed>25128525</pubmed>
<pubmed>24397701</pubmed>
- Good start on the introduction. Maybe have it used to explicitly state what your entire page will be covering rather than just a background on what the CNS is.
- You're missing references for the huge chunks of information in the introduction section
- The image of the timeline of development seems overly complex and I can't tell if you've explained it. If it's not relevant, maybe just come up with your own concise table of what happens during the course of development
- Maybe think of re-creating some simpler images by hand and uploading them. That way you can choose to focus on what you actually need from the image to show what you're explaining
- Include the years of when your current findings were discovered
- For the "abnormalities" section, as there are many, maybe the amount of detail you've included for the first couple of ones isn't needed, but of course, use your own discretion to how much is relevant. Otherwise, the bullet points are a good way to simplify information
- Collate all your references in the bottom from all the separate sections