Paper - The trochlear nerve in human fetuses: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
(Created page with "{{Header}} {{Ref-Pearson1943}} {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! Online Editor  |- | 90px|left This historic 1943 paper by Pearson...")
 
Tag: New redirect
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Header}}
#REDIRECT [[Paper - The trochlear nerve in human fetuses (1943)]]
{{Ref-Pearson1943}}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
! Online Editor 
|-
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|90px|left]] This historic 1943 paper by Pearson described development of the fetal human trochlear nerve.
 
<br>
 
'''Modern Notes'''
 
{{Neural Links}}
<br>
 
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=trochlear+nerve+development Search PubMed trochlear nerve development]
|}
{{Historic Disclaimer}}
=The Trochlear Nerve in Human Fetuses=
 
Anthony A. Pearson
 
 
Loyola University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
 
TEN FIGURES (1943)
 
INTRODUCTION
 
The early development of the trochlear nerve in mammalian
embryos has been described by Windle (’32 a, ’32 b),
Zahajszky ( ’40), and others. The discussion will be limited to
the later development of the trochlear nerve and its relation
to the trigeminal nerve.‘ This study is based on serial sections
of human embryos and fetuses stained with various silver
methods. The whole heads of the smaller fetuses and em—
bryos were sectioned and studied; however, only the brains of
the larger fetuses were prepared. Most of the material used
in this study has been listed in previous papers (Pearson,
’41 a, ’41 b) and only necessary data will be given here.
 
NUCLEUS OF ORIGIN
 
The nucleus of the trochlear nerve is easily recognized in
older human embryos and fetuses as a large mass of multipolar neurons located just caudal to the nucleus of the oculo—
motor nerve. There is no wide interval between the nuclei of
the third and fourth cranial nerves. A distinct thinning out
of the cells of the motor column, however, indicates a boundary
between the nuclei of these two nerves. The trochlear nucleus
is in line with the lateral groups of cells of the oculomotor
nucleus. It is located i11 its characteristic position, dorsal to
and partly imbedded in the medial longitudinal fasciculus.
 
The nucleus of the trochlear nerve is formed by one main
 
mass of cells and sometimes by an additional smaller mass of cells which lies farther caudad (figs. 1, 2, 3). The caudal group
of cells may be bilateral or unilateral. VVhen it is unilateral,
it may occur on either the right _or the left side.
 
This subdivision of the trochlear nucleus into a larger
cephalic portion and a smaller caudal portion has been observed by several investigators (Sabin, ’O1; Tsuchida, ’06;
van Valkenburg, ’12; and Sano, ’41). Tsuchida reported a subdivision in the trochlear nucleus in some 20 to 30% of the
brainstems studied, this differentiation occurring in most of
the specimens on only one side. In the material studied‘ by
the author the percentages were somewhat higher. The caudal
division of the trochlear nucleus occurred nearly as often on both sides as on only one side. When the caudal division was
present on one side only, it was found to occur about as frequently on the right side as on the left side.
 
 
 
ABBREVIATIONS
 
aq.cer., or cer.aq., aquaeductus cerebri
 
cer., cerebellum
 
c.mes.V., cells of the mesencephalic root
/of V
 
dcc.N.IV, decussation of the trochlear
nerve
 
f.1.m., fasciculus longitudinalis medialis
 
4th vent., fourth ventricle
 
gang.N.V, ganglion semilunare
 
med.ob1., medulla oblongata
 
me.root V, mesencephalic root of the
trigeminal nerve
 
mes.V et nu., mesencephalic root of V
and nucleus
 
N.III, nervus oculomotorius
 
N .IV, ncrvus trochlearis
 
N.V, nervus trigeminus
 
nu.IV, nucleus nervi trochlearis
 
nu.IV p.caud., nucleus trochlearis (pars
caudali)
 
V., or vent., ventriculus
 
X, 3. group of cells in the path of the
trochlear nerve
 
 
Fig. 1 A agittal section through the brainstem of a 29-mm. human fetus
(no. 29). Note the rostral and caudal divisions of the trochlear nucleus. Copper protargol preparation (section 16-1-2). X 12.
 
 
 
Fig. 2 A transverse section through the mesencephalon of a 5-month-old fetus
(no. 64) at the level of the main nucleus of the trochlear nerve. In the left nucleus
of the IV nerve there are two cells of the mesencephalic V type. Pyridine silver
preparation (section 29-3-4). X 24.
 
 
 
In one human fetus of about 5 months of age (no. 63) the
trochlear nucleus on each side was a single mass of cells. In another fetus (no. 64) of about the same age, there was a
caudal division of the trochlear nucleus on each side (fig. 3).
This caudal division was a small group of darkly staining
Inultipolar neurons. It was located about 1 mm. caudal to the
 
 
Fig. 3 A transverse section through the mesencephalon of a 5-month-old fetus
(no. 64) at the level of the caudal division of the trochlear nucleus. Pyridine silver
preparation (section 24-3-3). X 24.
 
main nucleus and was approximately 0.2 mm. in length. This
caudal nucleus of the trochlear nerve was slightly smaller on
the right side than on the left. There are about sixty cells
in the caudal nucleus on the right side and about eighty-three
cells on the left side. This is only an approximation, as the
cells were closely packed and it was difficult to make an exact count. In the fetus which possessed only the main nucleus
of the trochlear nerve it is interesting to note that this main
nucleus measured slightly more than 1 mm. in length and was
quite symmetrical. In the other fetus of this same age, tl1e
main nucleus measured less than 1 mm. in length. On the right
side, the main nucleus was about 0.9 mm. in length and the
caudal division contained about sixty cells. The main nucleus
of the trochlear nerve on the left side measured about 0.6 mm.
and the caudal division contained about eighty—three cells.
The cross sectional area of the main nuclei of the trochlear
nerve in both fetuses appeared to be approximately equal.
These two fetuses are thought to be fair examples of the
cellular arrangement of the trochlear nerve nuclei. This suggests that the size of the main nucleus is in inverse proportion
to the size of the caudal division. There is no indication that
the fiber connections of the caudal division are any different
from those of the main nucleus of the trochlear nerve nor is
there any apparent physiological significance to the separation
of the cells of the trochlear nerve into groups.
 
A few cells of the mesencephalic V type were observed in the
main nucleus of the trochlear nerve (fig. 2, left). These cells
are easily distinguished from the usual multipolar neurons
of the trochlear nucleus by their shape and size. Weinbe1'g'
(’28) has made a similar observation.
 
In certain embryos, scattered cells have been observed along
the course of the trochlear nerve central to its" decussation
(fig. 4). These cells are thought to resemble neuroblasts, although their exact character is diflicult to determine. Occasionally, such cells form a distinct cluster. In one 3-month-old
human fetus, such a group was found in the central course
of the trochlear nerve on each side (fig. 5). This group is
located dorsolateral to the medial longitudinal fasciculus and
at a plane slightly caudal to the level of the trochlear nuclei.
Some of the cells appear to be bipolar, although their exact
shapes are not distinct. Sabin (’01) has also reported the
presence of groups of cells along the root fibers of the trochlear
nerve.
 
 
 
Fig. 4 A sagittal section through the brainstem of a 17-mm. human embryo
(no. 16). Scattered cells are shown along the course of the trochlear nerve.
Pyridine silver preparation (8—3~2). X 75.
 
cm. car,
 
 
Fig. 5 A transverse section through the mesencephalon of 9. 63-mm. human
fetus (no. 57). A small cluster of cells is hown in the path of the IV nerve.
Copper protargol preparation (section 48—2—3). X 14.
 
 
THE COURSE OF THE NERVE
 
Fibers of the trochlear nerve are collected into several small
bundles along the dorsolateral border of the trochlear nucleus
toward its caudal end. When a caudal division of the trochlear
nucleus is present an additional bundle of fibers arises here.
This bundle soon joins the larger bundles of the trochlear
nerve. The fibers of the trochlear nerve follow an oblique
course through the periphery of the central gray which surrounds the cerebral aqueduct. At first the fibers pass dorsolaterad. On reaching the lateral part of the central gray, the
course of the trochlear nerve fibers is directed caudad and
dorsad. The caudal course of the nerve is attributed in part
to the shifting forward of the cells of origin during development (Ariens Kappers, Huber, and Crosby, ’36). The fibers
of the trochlear nerve runalmost parallel to the mesencephalic
root of the trigeminal nerve for a short distance. As the fibers
of the trochlear nerve approach the anterior medullary velum,
they begin to turn toward the midline. Here they lie almost
perpendicular to the fibers of the mesencephalic root of the
trigeminal nerve. As the midline is approached, the fibers of
the trochlear nerve can then be traced into the ventral part of
the decussation of that nerve. After they pass to the other
side, the fibers of the trochlear nerve emerge from the decussation and make their exit from the dorsolateral surface of the
brainstem. No trochlear fibers were observed which failed to
decussa.te as van Gehuchten (’03) noted in the rat and rabbit.
' The course of the trochlear nerve within the brain lies deep,
but close to the mesencephalic root of the trigeminal nerve and
the nucleus of that root. It has been suggested by several
authors that there are connectionsxbetween the mesencephalic
root of the trigeminal nerve and the trochlear nerve (Freeman,
’27, Weinberg, ’28 and others). Such a connection has been
difficult to demonstrate or rule out. There are cells of the
 
mesencephalic V type, however, which are thought to be '
 
definitely related to the trochlear nerve. Cells of this type
occasionally occur -in the trochlear nucleus (fig. 2), as already
mentioned. There are cells of the mesencephalic V type in the
region lateral to the anterior medullary velum. Some of these cells appear to be connected with the trochlcar nerve. An
occasional cell may be found directly in the course of this
nerve (fig. 7). These cells may appear singly or in clusters.
Occasionally, a process of one of these cells may be followed
directly among the fibers of the trochlear nerve (fig. 8). A
few scattered cells of the mesencephalic V type may be found
in the anterior medullary Velum. An example of one of these
cells is shown in figure 9. A bipolar cell is shown in the anterior medullary velum lying; ventral to the fibers of the
trochlear nerve. A process from either end of the cell extends
out among the fibers of the trochlear nerve. A similar cell
was described by Golgi (1893). V-*'indle (’32 a) described a
cell which sent one branch into the trochlear nerve and
another branch into the mesencephalic tract of a cat.
 
 
Fig. 6 A diagram made from several sagittal sections of the brainstem of 2:
25-mm. human embryo (no. B. 1194). Pyridine silver preparation (13-20).
 
 
 
 
Fig. 7 A section through the trochlear nerve within the rnesencephalon. Note
the nerve cell in the path of the nerve. From a 5»month—old human fetus (no. 64).
Pyridine silver preparation (19—3—4).
 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 8 A transverse section through the mesencephalon of a 5-m.onth~old fetus
(no. 64) at the level of tl1e anterior medullary velum. Note the close relation of the
IV nerve to the meseneephalie root of the V nerve and its nucleus. Pyridine silver
preparation (section 21-3-3). X 94.
 
 
 
Fig. 9 A photomicrograph of a nerve cell in the anterior medullary velum
of a. 5—month—old human fetus (no. 63). The processes of the nerve cell extend
dorsally among the fibers of the troehlear nerve. Pyridine silver preparation (193—4). X 450.
 
 
Peripheral to the decussation in the anterior medullary
veluin, the fibers of the trochlear nerve leave the dorsolateral
surface of the brainstem grouped in one or two small bundles.
After leaving the brain, these fibers collect into a single small
trunk, which can be traced ventrad close along the surface of
the brainstem. Before reaching the orbit the fibers of the
trochlear nerve pierce the dura mater and pass forward between the layers of the tentorium cerebelli.
 
As the trochlear nerve passes forward to enter the orbit it is
joined by a small bundle of fibers from the ophthalmic division
of the trigeminal nerve. This branch of the trigeminal nerve
leaves the ophthalmic division just peripheral to the semilunar ganglion. It joins the trochlear nerve (figr. 10) and may
be followed back toward the brain. Part of these fibers are
thought to be distributed to the dura mater along the course
of the trochlear nerve. A few of them can be followed between
the layers of the dura mater into the 1'0/gion of the transverse
sinus.
 
Just peripheral to the place where the above anastomotic
branch joins the trochlear nerve, a short part of the course of
the trochlear nerve lies in intimate relationship with the
ophthalmic nerve. The fibers of the two nerves lie so close
together that it is extremely difficult to determine in serial
sections whether there is an exchange of fibers between them.
After crossing the ophthalmic nerve, the trochlear nerve may
be traced forward into the superior oblique muscle. The part
of the trochlear nerve peripheral to the place where it crosses
the ophthalmic nerve is larger than the part of the nerve at
its exit from the brain. This difference in size is sufficient to
lead one to conclude that the trigeminal nerve contributes
fibers to the distal part of the trochlear nerve.
 
 
The lacrimal nerve occasionally receives ‘a small branch
from the trochlear nerve. This contribution to the lacrimal
nerve is probably composed of fibers which are derived from
the ophthalmic nerve and which simply accompany the
trochlear nerve for a short distance. It has been reported
that the trochlear nerve occasionally sends a branch to the
 
Fig. 10 A diagram drawn from the sagittal sections of the brainstem of a
36-mm. human fetus (no. 34) showing a portion of the course of the trochlear
 
nerve. Copper protargol preparation.
 
orbicularis oculi muscle (Piersol, ’30).‘ This branch, however, was not observed in any of the material studied by the
author. In addition to the other communicating branches
already mentioned, there are small filaments from the
cavernous plexus of nerves Which join the trochlear nerve.
 
DISCUSSION
 
The investigations of several authors (Huber, ’00; Tozer
and Sherrington, ’10, and others) have shown that there are sensory endings in the extrinsic muscles of the eye and that
these endings degenerate after cutting the third and fourth
cranial nerves (Tozer and Sherrington, ’10, and Tarkhan, ’34) .
It has been more difficult to demonstrate clearly the location
of the cell bodies of the sensory neurons involved.
 
The anatomical evidence submitted here would indicate that
the proprioceptive neurons for the superior oblique muscle are
of the mesencephalic V type. They are thought to be located
in the brainstem close to the level of the trochlear nerve. The
details of the connections of these neurons have been discussed,
and they are in general agreement with the position taken by
Weiriberg (’28) and Tar-khan (’34) on this question. The
experimental work of Freeman (’27), Tarkhan_ (’34), and
others strongly suggests that there are proprioceptive fibers
in the fourth cranial nerve. The existence of proprioceptive
neurons is indicated, after the removal of the orbital contents,
by changes in the cells of the mesencephalic nucleus at the
level of the trochlear nerve (Freeman, ’27). Corbin (’40)
states that such fibers from the mesencephalic nucleus do not
join the trochlear nerve extracranially from branches of the
trigeminal nerve. Corbin and Harrison (’40 and ’42) found
that no action potentials were elicited from the mesencephalic
root of V as a result of stretching the extrinsic muscles of the
eye. It was possible, however, to obtain action potentials from
the oculomotor nucleus and the intramedullary portion of the
oculomotor nerve. Corbin (’40) pointed out that if cells of the
mesencephalic nucleus do contribute fibers to the trochlear nerve, this contribution must come from cells located between
 
the levels of the trochlear nucleus and the decussation of that
nerve. It seems quite likely that the majority of the cells in
question may occupy this position. Tozer (’12), however,
found no change in the meseneephalic nucleus after cutting
the third and fourth cranial nerves. VVe thus have experimental evidence for and against the theory that eertainlcells
of the mesencephalic nucleus contribute fibers to the trochlear
nerve. It should be remembered that the results gained from
the chromatolysis of cells and the Marchi method are not always reliable and that conclusions should be made with care.
The more recent Work of Corbin and Oliver (’42) further
indicates that the extrinsic ocular muscles are not innervated
by the mesencephalic root of the fifth nerve. These authors
are of the opinion that the cell bodies of the sensory neurons
in question are located within the brainstem and are intermingled With the motor cells. Leinfelder and Black (’42) suggest that proprioceptive impulses may originate in other
tissues than the extraocular muscles and their tendons.
Tenon’s capsule is listed as a possibility for such nerve
endings.
 
Proprioceptive fibers for the oculomotor nerve may have an
origin similar to those of the trochlear nerve. The origin for
those of the abducens nerve is a little more difficult to explain.
While it seems to the author that cells of the mesencephalic V
type offer the most likely source of proprioceptive fibers for
the extrinsic ocular muscles, other possibilities should be examined. Perhaps there are patterns of proprioceptive conduction entirely different from those we now understand. Is
it possible that motor nerves, as we know them, may play
some part in this function“?
 
SUMMARY
 
The nucleus of the trochlear nerve in human embryos and
fetuses is formed by a main mass of cells and often by an
additional smaller mass of cells which lies farther caudad.
This caudal group of cells may be bilateral or unilateral.
When it is unilateral, it may occur on either the right or the
left side. The size of the main nuclear group is often in inverse proportion to the size of the caudal group. Small cells
are scattered along the course of the trochlear nerve Within
the brain during certain stages of development. Sometimes
these cells form a distinct cluster.
 
Occasional cells of the mesencephalic fifth type occur in the
main nucleus of the trochlear nerve. These cells are easily
recognized in older fetuses. They also occur in relation to the
course of the trochlear nerve within the brain. The processes of some of these cells extend among the fibers of the trochlear
nerve.
 
The cou1'se of the trochlear nerve at one point lies in close
relation to the mesencephalic root of the fifth nerve. It is
difficult to determine to what extent there is an exchange of
fibers. The trigeminal nerve contributes fibers to the trochlear
nerve along its peripheral course. Some of these fibers
 
accompany the trochlear nerve toward the brain and are lost
in the meninges.
 
LITERATURE CITED
 
AR1i:'Ns KAPPERS, C. U., G. C. HUBER AND E. C. CROSBY 1936 The comparative
anatomy of the nervous system of verteberates, including man. The
Macmillan Co., New York.
 
CORBIN, K. B. 1940 Observations of the peripheral distribution of fibers arising
in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve. J. Comp. Neur.,
vol. 73, pp. 153-177.
 
Comanv, K. B., AND F. HARRISON 1940 Function of mesencephalic root of fifth
cranial nerve. J. Nenrophysio1., vol. 3, pp. 4234135.
 
~——~—~~——- 1942 Further attempts to trace the origin of afferent nerves to the
extrinsic eye muscles. J. Comp. Neur., vol. 77, pp. 187~190.
 
CORBIN, K. B., AND R. K. OLIVER 1942 The origin of fibers to the grape-like
endings in the insertion third of the extra-ocular muscles. J. Comp.
Neur., vol. 77, pp. 171—186.
 
FREEMAN W. 1927 The columnar arrangement of the primary afferent centers
in the brain-stem of man. J. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., vol. 65, pp. 378——397.
 
GEIICCHTEN, A. VAN 1903 Recherches sur 1’origine réelle et le trajet intracérebral des nerfs moteurs par la méthode de la dégénérescence wallérienne
indirecte. Le Névraxe, vol. 5, pp. 265-337.
 
GOLGI, C. 1893 Interim a1l’origine del quarto nervo cerebrale. Arch. Ital. de
Biologie, vol., 19. (Quoted from Freeman.)
 
1117131112, G. C. 1900 Sensory nerve terminations in the tendons of the extrinsic
eye~muscles of the cat. J. Comp. Neur., vol. 10, pp. 152-158.
 
LEINFELDER, P. J ., AND N. M. BLACK, JR. 1942 Experimental transposition of
extraocular muscles in monkeys. Amer. J. 0phth._. vol. 25, pp. 974-976.
 
PEARSON, A. A. 19412» The development of the nervus terminalis in man. J.
Comp. Neux-., vol. 75, pp. 39-66.
1941b The development of the olfactory nerve in man. J. Comp.
Neur., vol. 75, pp. 199-217.
PIn1>.soL, G. A. 1930 Human Anatomy. Ninth edition (Huber). J. B. Lippincott 00., Philadelphia.
 
SABIN, F‘. R. 1901 An atlas of the medulla and midbrain. The Friedenwald Co.,
Baltimore, Md.
 
SANO, F. 1941 fiber die zwei«order mehrfache Teilung des Trochleariskerns
 
beim Menschen und einigen Saugetieren. Tokyo Igakkwai Zassi, vol. 55,
pp. 490-497.
 
TARKHAN, A. A. 1934 The innervation of the extrinsic ocular muscles. J. Anat.,
vol. 68, pp. 293—313.
 
TOZER, F. M. 1912 On the presence of ganglion cells in the roots of the III, IV,
and VI cranial nerves. J. Physiol., vol. 45. Proc. Physiol. Soc., p. XV.
 
Toznn, F. M., AND C. S. SHERRJNGTON 1910 Receptors and afferents of the
 
third, fourth and sixth cranial nerves. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. l-3,.
 
vol. 82, pp. 450-457.
 
TSUCHIDA, U. 1906 Ueber die Ursprungskerne der Augenbewegungsnerven und
fiber die mit diesen in Beziehung stehenden Bahnen im Mittel« und
Zwischenhirn. Arb. a.. d. hirnanat. Inst. in Ziirich, Bd. 2, S. 1. (Quoted
from Ariéns Kappers, Huber and Crosby.)
 
VAN VALKENBURG, C. T. 1912 On the splitting of the nucleus trochlearis. Kon.
Akad. v. Wetensch. te Amsterdam, Proc. sect. sc., vol. 14, pt. 2, p. 1023.
 
WEINBERG, E. 1928 The mesencephalic root of the fifth nerve. J. Comp. New-.,
vol. 46, pp. 249-405.
 
WINDLE, W. F. 1932a The neurofibrillar structure of the 7-mm. cat embryo.
J. Comp. Neur., vol. 55, pp. 99-138.
1932b The neurofibrillar structures of the five-and-one-half-millr
meter cat embryo. J. Comp. Neur., vol. 55, pp. 315—331.
 
ZAHAJSZKY, E. VON 1940 Beitréige zur Kenntnis der Entvvickelung des N. ocula
motorius, des N. trochlearis und des motorischen N. trigeminus. Anat.
Anz., Bd. 89, S. 316-332.

Latest revision as of 15:53, 8 June 2020