Paper - The intra-uterine growth-cycles of the guinea-pig: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Historic Disclaimer}} | {{Historic Disclaimer}} | ||
=The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig= | |||
By J. Marion Bead. | |||
(From the Kudolph Spreckels Physiological Laboratory of the University of California.) | |||
With 2 diagrams. | |||
Eingegangen am 5. November 1912. | |||
Archly f. Entwicklungsmechanik. XXIV. | |||
The idea was expressed by LOEB *) in 1906 that some of the phenomena acompanying the early stages of development suggest 'that gr.o/w-i^ .tpayl be determined by an autocatalysed chemical reaction. He,, is jnclined to. believe that cell division in the developing egg ceases wBen: jfo-.^'atio of nuclear to cytoplasmic material reaches a certain limit, and expresses the belief that This ratio is determined by the laws of mass action and equilibrium . Following up this idea, ROBERTSON 2 ) and OSTWALD S ) published almost simultaneously in 1908 their investigations showing the great similarity between growth curves and the curves expressing the relationship between time and amount of transformation in a monomolecular autocatalytic reaction. | |||
The work of numerous investigators has rendered available a large amount of data upon the growth of plants and animals of various species. Especially accurate data upon the growth of man have been accumulated by the British Association Anthropometric Committee and by QUETELET in Belgium. It was these data in addition to those published by DONALDSON 4 ) upon the growth of rats which ROBERTSON 5 ) chiefly utilized in illustrating his thesis. | |||
) J. LOEB, >Dynamics of Living Matter.* New York 1906. p. 56 et seq. | |||
2) T. B. ROBERTSON, Arch. f. Entw.-Mech. Bd. 25. 1908. | |||
3 ) Wo. OSTWALD, Uber die zeitlichen Eigenschaften der Entwicklungsvorg'ange.* Vortrage u. Aufs. iiber Entwicklungsmech. d. Organismen, herausgeg. von WILH. Roux. Heft 5. Juli 1908. | |||
4 ) DONALDSON, BOAS Memorial Volume. New York 1906. p. 5. | |||
5) T. B. ROBERTSON, Joe. cit. | |||
Mammals seem to have furnished the greatest amount of accurate information which we possess upon this subject, for it is an easy matter to weigh a mammal at birth and at stated times thereafter and thus to ascertain its increase in weight, which is the best measure of the growth of the whole organism. From information thus obtained, however, we get no idea of the rate of growth before birth. A curve representing this period of growth is in many respects the most important, for, if obtained, it would show the beginning of growth, the changes following upon fertilization, that is to say, the actual starting point of the reaction. | |||
OSTWALD *) published curves showing the intra-uterine growth of the human foetus. These curves were constructed from the data of His and TOLDT in which length was taken as the measure of the rate of growth. OSTWALD also showed a curve of the prenatal growth of man based upon the weights obtained by FEHLING. Such data must, of necessity, be limited in number and consequently be insufficient for generalization, although OSTWALD'S curves are remarkably smooth. So far as I am aware, this is the only information we have concerning the intra-uterine growth of any mammal. | |||
I have observed that curves constructed from the daily weights of guinea-pigs during pregnancy were not straight but somewhat S-shaped. MiNOT 2 ) in his exhaustive work on growth gives a table of the weight changes of pregnant guinea-pigs. The curve constructed from his data so nearly resembled the one I obtained that the possibility occurred to me of utilizing these data for the purpose of following the course of intra-uterine growth. | |||
That the guinea-pig is particularly suited for work upon this subject is shown: | |||
1) In that the ratio of the weight of the litter to that of the mother is very high, the average weight of a litter of three being about 225 gms. and the average weight of the adult mothers about 740 gms. These figures give a ratio of nearly 1 : 3. | |||
2) In that the small number in the litter is an advantage, for the weight of the unit organism is considerable, even after the weight of the litter is divided by the number born. | |||
) OSTWALD, loc. cit. | |||
2) C. S. MINOT, Journ. of Physiol. Vol. 12. 1891. | |||
The ten cases considered herein were selected from eighteen or twenty available ones. They were chosen because they seemed to | |||
be normal m every way. As far as possible adult mothers were chosen, and so no litters consisting of only one are included J ). The cases designated as Xj and Kj were first litters, however, containig three and two respectively. No cases were included in which the mother became pregnant immediately after parturition, thus nursingone litter while carrying another. | |||
All of my animals were weighed every second day, so there is a complete record of the weights of all for the past fifteen months. Table I, column A, gives the weights of the mothers at copulation. Except in the cases noted under remarks the weight is that actually observed, recorded within twenty- four hours before or after copulation. In the four cases noted under remarks the weight in column A was raised to an average of the weights for a week or two preceding. In most cases the weight at copulation was very close to the average weight. | |||
For the sake of comparison and as an aid to correct valuation of the results, I am publishing two tables. Table I gives the weights as they were actually recorded and Table II shows these weights again with six of them corrected as explained under > remarks . | |||
It may be noted here while discussing the weights of adult guinea-pigs and the corrections I have deemed it advisable to make, that these animals display considerable variation in weight from day to day. In an adult guinea-pig of 650 850 gins, a variation of ten or twenty grams is not exceptional. MiNOT 2 ) says, In all the weighings there is necessarily an error . A positive error because the digestive tract, particularly the wide caecum, contains always considerable quantities of undigested material; moreover the bladder may hold a greater or less quantity of urine. A negative error because every illness, even a very slight indisposition and every injury such as a bite for instance, causes a greater or less loss of weight. The quantitative value of these errors is presumably not very great; they probably counterbalance one another to a certain extent in the averages which may be accepted as approximately accurate. Guinea-pigs are very sensitive animals and a very slight disturbance will cause considerable change in weight. At a recent weighing almost all of my animals had lost heavily due to the fact that they had been moved the day before from one animal house | |||
) Immature mothers usually bear one in a litter. | |||
2 ) C. S. MINOT, loc. cit. | |||
Table I. Actual, observed weights. | |||
A | |||
Weight at copulation | |||
B | |||
Weight | |||
just before parturition | |||
B-A | |||
Increase of weight during gestation | |||
C | |||
Weights of the young ones in the litter | |||
(B-A)-C | |||
Weight due to fat | |||
placentae and growth of mother | |||
Bern arks upon revision of weights, too high or too low | |||
A 2 | |||
749 | |||
940 | |||
191 | |||
64, 67, 72 | |||
12 | |||
B is too low, average | |||
of weights for 16 days | |||
preceding parturition | |||
is 952 g. | |||
A 3 | |||
810 | |||
1042 | |||
232 | |||
69, 68, 76 | |||
29 | |||
B 3 | |||
760 | |||
1030 | |||
270 | |||
67,92 | |||
111 | |||
B 4 | |||
855 | |||
1110 | |||
255 | |||
80, 84, 97 | |||
-13 | |||
A is too high, average | |||
of weights for two | |||
weeks preceding co | |||
pulation being 834 g. | |||
C 4 | |||
750 | |||
1091 341 | |||
57, 82, 95 | |||
108 | |||
A is too low, average | |||
of weights for 10 days | |||
preceding copulation | |||
being 770 g. | |||
H 2 | |||
542 | |||
908 | |||
366 | |||
76, 77, 79 | |||
132 | |||
A is too low, average | |||
of weights for two | |||
weeks preceding co | |||
pulation being 579 g. | |||
Xt | |||
560 | |||
881 | |||
321 | |||
64, 67, 70 | |||
120 | |||
Bpi | |||
766 | |||
1090 | |||
324 | |||
72, 77, 79 | |||
96 | |||
A is too low, average | |||
of weights for two | |||
weeks preceding co | |||
pulation bein^ 783 g. | |||
Bp 2 | |||
772 | |||
1030 | |||
268 | |||
74, 75, 79 | |||
30 | |||
B is too low, average | |||
of weights for a week | |||
preceding parturition | |||
being 1055 g. | |||
K, | |||
430 | |||
716 | |||
285 | |||
79,81 | |||
125 | |||
into another, a distance of 50 feet perhaps. The disturbance was sufficient to cause one of the animals to give birth prematurely (59 days) to a litter of three. | |||
The low weight at copulation in the four cases under consideration I belive to be due to the excitement and muscular work which is always attendant when a male is put into the pen with a female. The chasing is often quite severe and continues for some time. Upon many occasions I have noted a loss of weight after copulation. | |||
Table II. Observed weights and weights corrected. | |||
A | |||
Weight at copulation | |||
B | |||
Weight just before parturition | |||
B-A | |||
Increase of weight during gestation | |||
C | |||
Total weight of litter | |||
(B-A)-C | |||
Weight due to fat placentae and growth of mother | |||
Remarks upon revision of weights, too high or too low | |||
A 2 | |||
730 | |||
956 | |||
225 | |||
203 | |||
22 | |||
A observed (749) was | |||
too high, average for | |||
10 days preceding | |||
was 731. | |||
A 3 | |||
810 | |||
1042 | |||
232 | |||
203 | |||
29 | |||
B 3 ' | |||
760 | |||
1030 | |||
270 | |||
159 | |||
111 | |||
B 4 | |||
834 | |||
1110 | |||
276 | |||
261 | |||
15 | |||
C 4 | |||
760 | |||
1091 | |||
331 | |||
233 | |||
98 | |||
Though the average for | |||
A is 770, I believe | |||
it is a little too high | |||
and that 760 repre | |||
sents better the | |||
weight at copulation. | |||
H 2 | |||
575 | |||
908 | |||
333 | |||
234 | |||
99 | |||
X! | |||
560 | |||
881 | |||
321 | |||
201 | |||
120 | |||
Bpi | |||
783 | |||
1090 | |||
307 | |||
228 | |||
79 | |||
Bp 2 | |||
772 | |||
1045 | |||
273 | |||
228 | |||
45 | |||
The weight parturi | |||
tion has not been | |||
raised to the average | |||
of 1055, for reasons | |||
discussed in the text. | |||
Ki | |||
430 | |||
715 | |||
285 | |||
160 | |||
125 | |||
In only two cases was the weight in column B corrected and in both it was raised to approach an average for a week or two preceding. It sometimes happens that the mother becomes upset somewhat before birth and eats lightly, thus gaining but little or even losing weight just before parturition. In most cases there is a steady gain up to the time of birth so in the two which suffered a loss it seemed reasonable to correct the weight. It must be understood that in all cases in which the weight is corrected it has never been raised or lowered to reach the average, but a weight has been chosen between the observed and averaged weight. | |||
In the third column of Table II the increase of weight during gestation is given. This is in every case greater than the total weight of the litter. The difference between these two figures (found | |||
The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 713 | |||
in the fifth column) represents the weight of placentae, amniotic fluid and blood lost at birth, as well as the growth of the mother. The mother's growth can be obtained separately by getting the difference between the weight at copulation and just after delivery. A figure thus obtained however, would represent two kinds of growth, namely, 1) continuous growth of the mother, and 2) fat accumulated during pregnancy. This accumulation of fat during the period of gestation seems to be a general phenomenon and is especially to be noted in the case of the guinea-pig, the milk of which contains such a high percentage of fat 1 ). For our purpose, we will disregard as far as we can, everything which is not growth of young in utero; this is represented by the value in the fifth column of Table II. | |||
Table III is an illustrative page of the calculations showing the figures for A 2 , Bp 2 , and K t . The weight of the mother on every second day is placed in the first column and in the second appears the increase at each period over the weight at copulation. The last value in the second column corresponds to that in the third column of Table II. | |||
Since we are concerned here with the increase in the weight of the litter only, it becomes necessary to eliminate the growth due to placentae and fat accumulated by the mother, in short, everything not representing the growth of the litter. We have only one determination upon the weight of the litter itself, that is, its weight just after birth. The difference between the weight of the litter and the total increase in the mother's weight during gestation is the value representing all increase in weight other than that of the litter. But this extra weight has accumulated along with the young in utero, so in eliminating it we must distribute it over the whole period of gestation. In order to eliminate this weight justly and to distribute it proportionally throughout the whole period, the following method has been adopted. A horizontal line was ruled off on coordinate paper. It represented by its length the number of days of gestation, each day being represented by one space on the paper. At the right end of this line a perpendicular was erected which corresponded in height to the value in the fifth column of Table II. Each space represented one gram. A right-angled triangle was formed when the free ends of the horizontal and perpendicular lines were joined by a straight line, which formed the hypotenuse. The distance | |||
) J. MARION BEAD, Observations on the suckling period in the guineapig. University of Cal. publications in Zoology. Vol. 9. pp. 342, 343. | |||
714 | |||
J. Marion Read | |||
Table III. | |||
Illustrative page of calculations, showing complete figures obtained from three of the ten litters utilized. | |||
Days after cop. | |||
A 2 | |||
Weights of mother during pregnancy | |||
Increase over weight at copulation | |||
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth | |||
Bp 2 | |||
Weights of mother during pregnancy | |||
Increase over weight at copulation | |||
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth | |||
Ki | |||
Weights of mother during pregnancy | |||
Increase over weight at copulation | |||
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth | |||
Three in the litter | |||
Three in the litter | |||
Two in the litter | |||
730 | |||
772 | |||
430 | |||
2 | |||
730 | |||
776 | |||
4 | |||
3 | |||
453 | |||
23 | |||
19 | |||
4 | |||
757 | |||
27 | |||
25 | |||
785 | |||
13 | |||
11 | |||
433 | |||
3 | |||
- 4 | |||
6 | |||
757 | |||
27 | |||
25 | |||
785 | |||
13 | |||
10 | |||
449 | |||
19 | |||
8 | |||
8 | |||
760 | |||
30 | |||
27 | |||
785 | |||
13 | |||
8 | |||
455 | |||
25 | |||
10 | |||
10 | |||
747 | |||
17 | |||
14 | |||
790 | |||
18 | |||
12 | |||
456 | |||
26 | |||
9 | |||
12 | |||
755 | |||
25 | |||
21 | |||
778 | |||
6 | |||
463 | |||
33 | |||
13 | |||
14 | |||
781 | |||
51 | |||
47 | |||
800 | |||
28 | |||
19 | |||
480 | |||
50 | |||
26 | |||
16 | |||
785 | |||
13 | |||
3 | |||
490 | |||
60 | |||
32 | |||
18 | |||
782 | |||
52 | |||
47 | |||
800 | |||
28 | |||
17 | |||
486 | |||
56 | |||
25 | |||
20 | |||
777 | |||
47 | |||
41 | |||
792 | |||
20 | |||
8 | |||
485 | |||
55 | |||
20 | |||
22 | |||
779 | |||
49 | |||
42 | |||
820 | |||
48 | |||
35 | |||
500 | |||
70 | |||
31 | |||
24 | |||
782 | |||
52 | |||
45 | |||
880 | |||
108 | |||
93 | |||
509 | |||
79 | |||
35 | |||
26 | |||
821 | |||
49 | |||
33 | |||
511 | |||
81 | |||
33 | |||
28 | |||
788 | |||
58 | |||
50 | |||
860 | |||
88 | |||
70 | |||
512 | |||
82 | |||
30 | |||
30 | |||
813 | |||
83 | |||
74 | |||
868 | |||
96 | |||
77 | |||
617 | |||
87 | |||
32 | |||
32 | |||
826 | |||
96 | |||
86 | |||
840 | |||
68 | |||
57 | |||
519 | |||
89 | |||
28 | |||
34 | |||
846 | |||
116 | |||
106 | |||
878 | |||
106 | |||
84 | |||
36 | |||
848 | |||
118 | |||
107 | |||
886 | |||
114 | |||
90 | |||
570 | |||
140 | |||
75 | |||
38 | |||
870 | |||
140 | |||
128 | |||
895 | |||
123 | |||
98 | |||
584 | |||
154 | |||
85 | |||
40 | |||
875 | |||
145 | |||
133 | |||
930 | |||
158 | |||
132 | |||
576 | |||
145 | |||
73 | |||
42 | |||
883 | |||
163 | |||
140 | |||
913 | |||
141 | |||
114 | |||
580 | |||
160 | |||
74 | |||
44 | |||
915 | |||
185 | |||
172 | |||
927 | |||
155 | |||
127 | |||
585 | |||
165 | |||
75 | |||
46 | |||
908 | |||
178 | |||
164 | |||
924 | |||
152 | |||
123 | |||
592 | |||
162 | |||
79 | |||
48 | |||
918 | |||
188 | |||
173 | |||
956 | |||
184 | |||
153 | |||
618 | |||
178 | |||
91 | |||
60 | |||
944 | |||
214 | |||
199 | |||
1000 | |||
228 | |||
196 | |||
624 | |||
194 | |||
103 | |||
52 | |||
950 | |||
220 | |||
204 | |||
1007 | |||
235 | |||
202 | |||
629 | |||
199 | |||
103 | |||
64 | |||
960 | |||
230 | |||
213 | |||
1000 | |||
228 | |||
197 | |||
640 | |||
210 | |||
110 | |||
56 | |||
960 | |||
230 | |||
213 | |||
1020 | |||
248 | |||
212 | |||
655 | |||
225 | |||
120 | |||
58 | |||
985 | |||
255 | |||
237 | |||
1020 | |||
248 | |||
210 | |||
664 | |||
234 | |||
125 | |||
60 | |||
932 | |||
202 | |||
184 | |||
1010 | |||
238 | |||
199 | |||
668 | |||
238 | |||
126 | |||
62 | |||
940 | |||
210 | |||
191 | |||
1040 | |||
268 | |||
228 | |||
680 | |||
250 | |||
134 | |||
64 | |||
935 | |||
205 | |||
185 | |||
1040 | |||
268 | |||
226 | |||
684 | |||
254 | |||
135 | |||
66 | |||
945 | |||
215 | |||
195 | |||
1030 | |||
258 | |||
214 | |||
717 | |||
287 | |||
164 | |||
68 | |||
955 | |||
225 | |||
203 | |||
1045 | |||
273 | |||
228 | |||
715 | |||
285 | |||
160 | |||
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. | |||
v | |||
from the horizontal line to the hypotenuse along the ordinates, increases as we pass from left to right, and approach the perpendicular line whose length represents the weight increase during gestation, which was due to other factors than the weight of the litter. The length of each ordinate (distance between the base and hypotenuse) represents the increase in weight which is in excess of the litter's weight on that day, just as the length of the perpendicular forming one side of the triangle represents the difference at birth between the total increase of weight during gestation and the weight of the litter. The length of every second ordinate (i. e. every second day) was obtained, and this figure subtracted from the weight for that day in the second column of Table III. The remainder obtained was set down in the third column of Table III. It represented the weight of the litter on that day, the last figure in the column being the total weight of the litter at birth. This correction was made in all ten cases. The results are tabulated in Table IV. | |||
This method of eliminating the weight of the deciduae, growth of the mother, and the accumulation of fat by the mother during the progress of gestation is undoubtedly open to criticism. It seems, however, to be the only feasible way of doing it and although there are doubtless errors involved, still the essential point which I believe that my data establish is the S-shaped form of the curve of growth in utero. Now a brief consideration of the probable effect of the above interpolation upon the form of -the empirical curve shows that the method employed, far from exaggerating this result, would tend to mask it for the following reasons. | |||
1) It is reasonable to assume that the growth of the placentae and other foetal membranes will keep pace with the growth of the embryos and follow the same curve which would represent their growth. In assuming that the rate of growth is constant, as we have in the method of eliminating their weight, we tend to make the curve of the embryo's growth a straight line and thus straighten out any curved lines which may rightfully be a part of it. | |||
2) What has been said regarding the deciduae may very well be true also of the fat accumulated by the mother during pregnancy. In the light of our present knowledge of hormones and the part they play in life phenomena, especially those connected with reproduction, we may well assume that this accumulation of fat is controlled by internal secretions whose amount and activity in turn are controlled by the growing embryos in utero. In eliminating this fat as if it | |||
716 | |||
J. Marion Kead | |||
Table IV. | |||
Intra-uterine growth of ten litters and the growth of an individual represented by an average. | |||
A 2 | |||
A 3 B 3 | |||
B 4 | |||
C 4 | |||
H 2 | |||
Xt | |||
Bpi | |||
Bp 2 | |||
K! | |||
No. of young | |||
Total weight | |||
Average weight | |||
No. in litter | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
2 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
2 | |||
2 | |||
17 | |||
15 | |||
34 | |||
-3 | |||
16 | |||
5 | |||
3 | |||
19 | |||
22 | |||
106 | |||
4.8 | |||
4 | |||
25 | |||
21 | |||
11 | |||
74 | |||
4 | |||
28 | |||
9 | |||
11 | |||
-4 | |||
25 | |||
179 | |||
7.1 | |||
6 | |||
25 | |||
3 | |||
36 | |||
12 | |||
53 | |||
11 | |||
32 | |||
10 | |||
8 | |||
25 | |||
190 | |||
7.6 | |||
8 | |||
27 | |||
7 | |||
47 | |||
8 | |||
54 | |||
28 | |||
29 | |||
3 | |||
8 | |||
10 | |||
28 | |||
221 | |||
7.9 | |||
10 | |||
14 | |||
33 | |||
51 | |||
4 | |||
60 | |||
17 | |||
49 | |||
12 | |||
9 | |||
25 | |||
249 | |||
9.8 | |||
12 | |||
21 | |||
19 | |||
30 | |||
3 | |||
37 | |||
38 | |||
31 | |||
13 | |||
22 | |||
192 | |||
8.7 | |||
14 | |||
47 | |||
10 | |||
30 | |||
11 | |||
19 | |||
40 | |||
19 | |||
26 | |||
22 | |||
202 | |||
9.2 | |||
16 | |||
24 | |||
20 | |||
58 | |||
36 | |||
38 | |||
3 | |||
32 | |||
20 | |||
211 | |||
10.5 | |||
18 | |||
47 | |||
32 | |||
43 | |||
32 | |||
55 | |||
49 | |||
48 | |||
12 | |||
17 | |||
25 | |||
28 | |||
360 | |||
12.8 | |||
20 | |||
41 | |||
30 | |||
23 | |||
27 | |||
52 | |||
36 | |||
59 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
20 | |||
28 | |||
303 | |||
10.8 | |||
22 | |||
42 | |||
36 | |||
43 | |||
44 | |||
35 | |||
22 | |||
13 | |||
35 | |||
31 | |||
25 | |||
301 | |||
12.0 | |||
24 | |||
45 | |||
46 | |||
28 | |||
20 | |||
37 | |||
18 | |||
25 | |||
93 | |||
35 | |||
25 | |||
347 | |||
13.9 | |||
26 | |||
45 | |||
43 | |||
62 | |||
62 | |||
63 | |||
61 | |||
25 | |||
33 | |||
33 | |||
25 | |||
427 | |||
17.1 | |||
28 | |||
50 | |||
42 | |||
49 | |||
78 | |||
64 | |||
79 | |||
55 | |||
24 | |||
70 | |||
30 | |||
28 | |||
541 | |||
19.3 | |||
30 | |||
74 | |||
71 | |||
61 | |||
48 | |||
66 | |||
69 | |||
82 | |||
44 | |||
77 | |||
32 | |||
28 | |||
624 | |||
22.4 | |||
32 | |||
86 | |||
57 | |||
76 | |||
79 | |||
74 | |||
93 | |||
103 | |||
34 | |||
57 | |||
28 | |||
28 | |||
687 | |||
24.5 | |||
34 | |||
106 | |||
66 | |||
64 | |||
109 | |||
107 | |||
119 | |||
54 | |||
84 | |||
24 | |||
709 | |||
29.5 | |||
36 | |||
107 | |||
98 | |||
103 | |||
98 | |||
98 | |||
102 | |||
103 | |||
62 | |||
90 | |||
75 | |||
28 | |||
936 | |||
33.4 | |||
38 | |||
128 | |||
101 | |||
98 | |||
158 | |||
106 | |||
114 | |||
119 | |||
45 | |||
98 | |||
85 | |||
28 | |||
1052 | |||
37.6 | |||
40 | |||
133 | |||
78 | |||
100 | |||
135 | |||
167 | |||
132 | |||
155 | |||
79 | |||
132 | |||
73 | |||
28 | |||
1164 | |||
41.5 | |||
42 | |||
140 | |||
112 | |||
117 | |||
125 | |||
158 | |||
113 | |||
157 | |||
70 | |||
114 | |||
74 | |||
28 | |||
1180 | |||
42.1 | |||
44 | |||
172 | |||
141 | |||
133 | |||
136 | |||
157 | |||
143 | |||
167 | |||
87 | |||
127 | |||
75 | |||
28 | |||
1388 | |||
47.8 | |||
46 | |||
164 | |||
131 | |||
120 | |||
156 | |||
165 | |||
170 | |||
185 | |||
96 | |||
123 | |||
79 | |||
28 | |||
1389 | |||
49.6 | |||
48 | |||
173 | |||
147 | |||
145 | |||
155 | |||
193 | |||
173 | |||
123 | |||
153 | |||
91 | |||
26 | |||
1353 | |||
52.0 | |||
50 | |||
199 | |||
154 | |||
129 | |||
188 | |||
164 | |||
177 | |||
167 | |||
124 | |||
196 | |||
103 | |||
28 | |||
1601 | |||
57.1 | |||
52 | |||
204 | |||
158 | |||
136 | |||
192 | |||
154 | |||
186 | |||
163 | |||
126 | |||
202 | |||
103 | |||
28 | |||
1627 | |||
58.1 | |||
54 | |||
213 | |||
192 | |||
150 | |||
189 | |||
145 | |||
208 | |||
160 | |||
115 | |||
197 | |||
110 | |||
28 | |||
1679 | |||
60.0 | |||
56 | |||
213 | |||
205 | |||
126 | |||
221 | |||
152 | |||
210 | |||
158 | |||
130 | |||
212 | |||
120 | |||
28 | |||
1747 | |||
62.4 | |||
58 | |||
237 | |||
180 | |||
146 | |||
220 | |||
162 | |||
218 | |||
154 | |||
165 | |||
210 | |||
125 | |||
28 | |||
1817 | |||
64.9 | |||
60 | |||
184 | |||
175 | |||
167 | |||
245 | |||
198 | |||
225 | |||
146 | |||
180 | |||
199 | |||
126 | |||
28 | |||
1845 | |||
65.8 | |||
62 | |||
191 | |||
145 | |||
159 | |||
234 | |||
184 | |||
254 | |||
173 | |||
178 | |||
228 | |||
134 | |||
28 | |||
1880 | |||
67.1 | |||
64 | |||
185 | |||
174 | |||
143 | |||
240 | |||
186 | |||
246 | |||
202 | |||
205 | |||
226 | |||
134 | |||
28 | |||
1941 | |||
69.3 | |||
66 | |||
195 | |||
179 | |||
159 | |||
256 | |||
203 | |||
237 | |||
204 | |||
203 | |||
214 | |||
164 | |||
28 | |||
2014 | |||
71.9 | |||
68 | |||
203 | |||
203 | |||
159 | |||
261 | |||
233 | |||
234 | |||
201 | |||
228 | |||
228 | |||
160 | |||
28 | |||
2110 | |||
75.4 | |||
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 717 | |||
increased at a constant rate, we again tend to make the growth curve of the young more nearly resemble a straight line. | |||
3) The hypotenuse of our triangle resembles more closely the growth curve of the mother during the gestation period, for by this time puberty is passed and the growth curve of the mother is approaching an asymptote and is nearly rectilinear. | |||
A few corrections have been made by interpolation in the weights of the pregnant mothers in cases where all the animals were heavy or light due to over- or under-feeding. But this was done only when the difference exceeded twenty grams. In Table IV only 19 out of 314 figures have been thus corrected. | |||
Turning now to the consideration of the curve of intra- uterine growth thus obtained (Fig. 1) certain features of it demand careful attention. The first part of the curve representing the first four days of gestation is not significant of the growth of the fertilized ova but represents the rapid return of the mother to normal weight after the loss occasioned by chasing and copulation. The dotted line, therefore, probably represents the correct course of growth for this period. Although the most rapid cell division and relatively the fastest rate of growth, occurs in the early cleavage stages, still such growth will not be perceptible by the means employed in obtaining this curve. So we should not expect a very rapid increase during the first eight or ten days; for implantation of the ova does not take place till seven days after fertilization 1 ). The slight increase in weight shown may be due to the commencement of the accumulation of fat or to other physiological processes in preparation for the coming pregnancy; but this cannot be counted as growth of the litter in utero. | |||
That portion of the curve from ten to sixty days closely resembles other growth curves which represent one cycle of growth. It appears probable, therefore, that one cycle begins at the fertilization of the egg and ends a week or ten days before birth, at which time (or before) another cycle begins and continues on after birth. | |||
In Table V are to be found the weights and average weights for twenty days after birth of the same twenty-eight young whose growth in utero is represented by the first part of the curve. The curve constructed from the averages in Table V is added to the curve at the 68 day ordinate. There is a slight loss of weight at birth | |||
l ) GROSSER, Vergleichende Anatomic und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Eihaute und der Placenta.* Wien u. Leipzig 1909. S. 162. | |||
Archiv f. Entwicklungsmechanik. XXXV. 47 | |||
718 | |||
Crams | |||
J. Marion Read Fig.l. | |||
~~^~ 20 30 40 50 60 70 | |||
Intra-uterine growth of the guinea-pig. (Constructed from data in Tables IV and V.) | |||
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. | |||
719 | |||
Table V. | |||
Weights and average weights of the twenty-eight young under consideration, for twenty days following birth. | |||
Age in days | |||
1 | |||
2 3 | |||
4 | |||
6 | |||
8 | |||
10 | |||
12 14 | |||
16 18 | |||
20 | |||
1 | |||
! | |||
G | |||
67 | |||
66 | |||
66 | |||
67 | |||
70 | |||
75 | |||
82 | |||
87 | |||
97 | |||
108 | |||
110 | |||
116 | |||
H | |||
64 | |||
64 | |||
63 | |||
64 | |||
70 | |||
77 | |||
85 | |||
93 | |||
105 | |||
111 | |||
116 | |||
123 | |||
I | |||
72 | |||
71 | |||
70 | |||
72 | |||
75 | |||
84 | |||
87 | |||
95 | |||
107 | |||
119 | |||
122 | |||
133 | |||
W | |||
76 | |||
79 | |||
82 | |||
89 | |||
91 | |||
102 | |||
112 | |||
125 | |||
122 | |||
128 | |||
137 | |||
133 | |||
136 | |||
Aa | |||
68 | |||
69 | |||
74 | |||
78 | |||
80 | |||
91 | |||
100 | |||
107 | |||
118 | |||
119 | |||
125 | |||
132 | |||
134 | |||
Ab | |||
69 | |||
61 | |||
63 | |||
67 | |||
70 | |||
78 | |||
86 | |||
95 | |||
102 | |||
107 | |||
114 | |||
118 | |||
122 | |||
R | |||
92! 96 | |||
101 101 | |||
136 | |||
144 | |||
162 | |||
168 | |||
180 | |||
182 | |||
S | |||
67 | |||
72 | |||
79 81 | |||
114 | |||
124 | |||
135 | |||
139 | |||
160 | |||
152 | |||
Ca | |||
95 | |||
93 | |||
96 | |||
99 | |||
102 | |||
109 | |||
Cb | |||
57 | |||
56 | |||
61 | |||
61 | |||
67 | |||
71 | |||
84 | |||
Cc | |||
82 ! 76 | |||
80 | |||
84 | |||
88 | |||
98 | |||
111 | |||
M | |||
79 | |||
77 | |||
82 | |||
84 | |||
93 | |||
108 | |||
N | |||
77 | |||
75 | |||
77 | |||
80 | |||
84 | |||
100 | |||
130 | |||
134 | |||
139 | |||
72 | |||
72 | |||
73 | |||
78 | |||
84 | |||
110 | |||
136 | |||
147 | |||
161 | |||
166 | |||
180 | |||
Bpa | |||
74 | |||
74 | |||
77 | |||
84 | |||
87 | |||
Bpb | |||
75 | |||
75 | |||
77 | |||
85 | |||
89 | |||
100 | |||
Bpc | |||
79 | |||
79 | |||
82 | |||
90 | |||
91 | |||
V | |||
67 | |||
63 | |||
65 | |||
68 | |||
74 | |||
79 | |||
91 | |||
102 | |||
108 | |||
127 | |||
140 | |||
142 | |||
160 | |||
K | |||
70 | |||
66 | |||
69 | |||
71 | |||
74 | |||
80 | |||
94 | |||
106 | |||
108 | |||
127 | |||
138 | |||
138 | |||
155 | |||
L | |||
64 | |||
60 | |||
63 | |||
66 | |||
70 | |||
77 | |||
86 | |||
95 | |||
99 ; 114 | |||
130 | |||
133 | |||
147 | |||
Ea | |||
81. | |||
77 | |||
83 | |||
99 | |||
107 | |||
119 | |||
123 132 | |||
144 | |||
163 | |||
Kb | |||
79 | |||
74 | |||
81 | |||
98 | |||
106 | |||
115 | |||
117 119 | |||
132 | |||
140 | |||
Ba | |||
80 | |||
79 | |||
86 | |||
94 | |||
Bb | |||
84 | |||
84 | |||
Be | |||
97 | |||
95 | |||
101 | |||
110 | |||
Hb | |||
76 | |||
77 | |||
88 | |||
He | |||
77 | |||
78 | |||
84 | |||
Hd | |||
79 | |||
81 | |||
89 | |||
Number | |||
of obser | |||
28 | |||
28 | |||
22 | |||
27 | |||
18 | |||
15 | |||
16 | |||
15 | |||
15 | |||
15 | |||
14 | |||
14 | |||
8 | |||
vations | |||
Total | |||
2110 2087 1685 | |||
2188 | |||
1459 | |||
1318 | |||
1549 | |||
1655 | |||
1755 | |||
1908 | |||
1881 | |||
1981 | |||
1177 | |||
Average | |||
75.4 | |||
74.6 | |||
76.6 | |||
81.0 | |||
81.0 | |||
87.8 | |||
96.8 | |||
110.3 | |||
117.0 | |||
127.2 | |||
134.3 | |||
141.5 | |||
147.1 | |||
47* | |||
720 | |||
J. Marion Read | |||
which is characteristic of almost all mammals, but the animals pick up in two or three days and the curve continues on at the same inclination as the line representing the intra- uterine growth of the last eight or ten days before birth. This fact would seem to indicate that the figures and curve representing the intra-uterine growth, although obtained indirectly, have some degree of accuracy. | |||
OsTWALD 1 ) in discussing the curve showing the growth of man says, It is worthy to note again the continuity of the weight changes during the last foetal month and the first years of life. The well known loss of weight of the new born during the first days of life is so insignificant that in comparison to the remaining | |||
Fig. 2. | |||
30 | |||
20 | |||
10 | |||
Per Cent | |||
10 20 30 40 | |||
Curve of pregnancies resulting in abortion {constructed from data in Table VI). | |||
weight changes of the development of man it scarcely needs to be considered . | |||
It is interesting to note that, as far as we can learn from the data so far obtained, the birth of both guinea-pigs and man does not take place at the juncture of two cycles. This is especially interesting in the case of the guinea-pig, which is born in a very mature state 2 ). The period of gestation is very long when we compare it with the gestation period of other rodents. This has led one investigator 3 ) to venture the belief that in some remote period in its evolution the guinea-pig was born in a less mature state, such as | |||
) OSTWALD, loc. cit. | |||
2 ) READ, loc. cit. | |||
3 ) ABDERHALDEN, Text-book of Physiological Chemistry, p. 371. | |||
New York 1908. | |||
The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. | |||
721 | |||
Table VI. | |||
Per cent of weight gained or lost, during the period of gestation, by five guinea-pigs which gave birth to dead, premature litters. | |||
Days | |||
after copulation | |||
Y | |||
7 Born | |||
C | |||
5 Born | |||
A | |||
3 Born | |||
HA | |||
1 Born | |||
K | |||
5 Born | |||
Average per cent increase | |||
2 | |||
5.8 | |||
5.1 | |||
0.9 | |||
3.0 | |||
4.4 | |||
0.0 | |||
4 | |||
2.8 | |||
3.0 | |||
5.7 | |||
4.4 | |||
1.3 | |||
2.7 | |||
6 | |||
0.7 | |||
0.2 | |||
3.6 | |||
0.0 | |||
-4.7 | |||
-1.5 | |||
8 | |||
0.7 | |||
4.7 | |||
-2.1 | |||
-0.8 | |||
2.9 | |||
1.1 | |||
10 | |||
1.0 | |||
4.2 | |||
0.5 | |||
1.0 | |||
0.8 | |||
1.3 | |||
12 | |||
0.0 | 1.0 | |||
2.0 | |||
-1.2 | |||
-1.6 | |||
-0.6 | |||
14 | |||
4.0 | |||
4.9 | |||
-2.9 | |||
2.1 | |||
0.6 | |||
1.5 | |||
16 | |||
2.5 | |||
2.0 | |||
-0.7 | |||
0.3 | |||
0.6 | |||
-0.1 | |||
18 | |||
0.5 | |||
-0.2 | |||
0.4 | |||
-7.4 | |||
2.2 | |||
1.7 | |||
20 | |||
0.0 | |||
5.1 | |||
0.3 | |||
1.9 | |||
1.2 | |||
1.7 | |||
22 | |||
3.1 | |||
1.3 | |||
2.7 | |||
0.1 | |||
-2.0 | |||
0.5 | |||
24 | |||
1.5 | |||
-2.0 | |||
-4.3 | |||
1.1 | |||
3.4 | |||
-0.2 | |||
26 | |||
-3.6 | |||
0.7 | |||
1.6 | |||
-1.8 | |||
2.2 | |||
-0.1 | |||
28 | |||
2.0 | |||
1.2 | |||
0.9 | |||
5.0 | |||
3.8 | |||
2.5 | |||
30 | |||
1.8 | |||
3.2 | |||
2.0 | |||
1.9 | |||
4.3 | |||
2.6 | |||
32 | |||
4.8 | |||
-0.7 | |||
-1.0 | |||
4.2 | |||
1.5 | |||
1.7 | |||
34 | |||
2.5 | |||
2.8 | |||
3.4 | |||
1.1 | |||
1.8 | |||
2.3 | |||
36 | |||
2.8 | |||
2.4 | |||
6.0 | |||
4.0 | |||
2.8 | |||
36 | |||
38 | |||
2.2 | |||
0.1 | |||
4.6 | |||
0.6 | |||
0.3 | |||
1.7 | |||
40 | |||
1.5 | |||
2.2 | |||
3.3 | |||
1.2 | |||
1.3 | |||
0.6 | |||
42 | |||
3.4 | |||
1.0 | |||
3.0 | |||
1.8 | |||
1.8 | |||
2.1 | |||
44 | |||
-0.1 | |||
0.7 | |||
1.4 | |||
1.0 | |||
3.0 | |||
1.2 | |||
46 | |||
1.0 | |||
2.6 | |||
3.2 | |||
-1.6 | |||
3.5 | |||
1.7 | |||
48 | |||
1.7 | |||
3.0 | |||
4.4 | |||
0.3 | |||
4.1 | |||
1.8 | |||
50 | |||
5.2 | |||
2.0 | |||
0.0 | |||
1.5 | |||
7.6 | |||
1.2 | |||
52 | |||
8.0 | |||
0.0 0.2 | |||
0.0 | |||
0.0 | |||
-1.6 | |||
54 | |||
0.1 | |||
-1.0 | |||
4.9 | |||
-4.2 | |||
7.3 | |||
-3.5 | |||
56 | |||
3.6 | |||
-1.6 | |||
-4.2 | |||
-53 | |||
-1.9 | |||
58 | |||
0.4 | |||
-4.3 | |||
4.6 | |||
0.9 | |||
0.4 | |||
60 | |||
1.0 | |||
25 | |||
-0.7 | |||
62 | |||
1.0 | |||
0.4 | |||
0.3 | |||
64 | |||
0.5 | |||
-0.5 | |||
that in which rabbits, mice, and rats are born. If such were the case, the young must have been born before 50 days, for the two cycles seem to join or overlap between 50 and 60 days. This period seems to be a critical one in the development of the foetus. Inspection of the weights of mothers which gave birth to dead young | |||
722 J. Marion Read | |||
shows that these mothers lost weight rapidly during this period. Table VI gives the percentage of weight gained or lost every second day by five mothers who gave birth to premature, dead litters. Fig. 2 shows the curve constructed from this data. A distinct loss of weight is shown after 50 days. Whether or not this phenomenon has any connection with growth cycles, it is impossible now to say with certainty. But it is possible that the death of the young in utero may be due to a failure of the second cycle to connect properly with the first. The fact of the death in utero at this period is undeniable and I mention it as possibly having some significance and bearing upon this and perhaps other questions of intra-uterme development. | |||
In conclusion, I may say that I realize fully the fact that the data upon which the curve has been constructed have been obtained indirectly and that more accurate data could be obtained only by the sacrifice of hundreds of animals. But as a first attempt to arrive at the truth in regard to the appearance of a curve representing the growth following fertilization, I it submit with the hope that it may serve as a starting point for further work. | |||
Summary and Conclusions. | |||
From the facts and figures set forth and discussed in this paper and from the appearance of the curve constructed from the data, it seems reasonable to conclude that: | |||
I. It is possible to obtain a curve showing the growth of embryos in utero by indirect means, i. e. by weighing the mother at regular intervals during pregnancy. | |||
II. In the case of guinea-pigs, one cycle begins at fertilization of the ova and ends about 60 days after. Another cycle begins a little before the end of the first cycle and continues on after birth. | |||
III. In both the guinea-pig and man birth occurs during the course of a cycle and not at or near the juncture of two cycles. | |||
IV. The human young are born before the completion of the first cycle, while the guinea-pig completes one cycle and begins a second in utero. It is quite likely that this fact accounts for the advanced state of development of the latter animal at birth. | |||
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 723 | |||
Zusammenfassung, | |||
Nach den in dieser Arbeit vorgebrachten und ero'rterten Figuren und Tatsachen und nach dem Aussehen der aus diesen Tatsachen konstruierten Kurve scheinen mir nachstehende SchluBfolgerungen erlaubt: | |||
1) Es ist moglich, eine Kurve zu erhalten, welche das intrauterine Wachstum von Embryonen durch indirekte Mittel veranschaulicht, so durch regelma'Cig wiederholte Wagung der Mutter in regelma'Bigen Zwischenraumen wahrend der Schwangerschaft. | |||
2) Fur das Meerschweinchen beginnt ein Zyklus bei der Befruchtung der Eier und endet ungefahr 60 Tage spater. Ein andrer Zyklus beginnt eine kleine Weile vor dem Ablauf des ersten Zyklus und dauert noch nach der Geburt an. | |||
3) Sowohl beim Meerschweinchen wie beim Menschen fallt die Geburt in den Verlauf eines Zyklus und nicht in oder nahe an die gemeinsame Ablaufszeit zweier Zyklen. | |||
4) Die Jungen des Menschen werden noch vor der Vollendung des ersten Zyklus geboren, wahrend das Meerschweinchen noch im Uterus einen Zyklus vollendet und einen zweiten anfangt. Es ist durchaus wahrscheinlich, daC dieser Umstand die Ursache fur das vorgeriickte Entwicklungsstadium des letzteren Tien, bei der Geburt abgibt. ((Jbersetzt y(m ^ WebImi . dt-) | |||
VERLAG VON WILHELM EN6ELMANN IN LEIPZIG | |||
Archiv fur Zellforschung | |||
hcrausgegeben von | |||
Dr. Richard Goldschmidt | |||
Professor an der Universitat Miinchen | |||
Neunter Baud, 3. Heft | |||
Hit 26 Figuren im Text und 4 Tafeln (Seite 351-484) gr. 8. M 13. | |||
Inhalt: Jan Hirschler, Uber die Plasraastrukturen (Mitochondrien, Golgischer Apparat u. a.) in den Geschlechtszellen der Ascariden. (Spermato- und Ovogenese.) (Mit Tafel XX XXI.) Iwan Sokolow, Untersuchungen Uber die Spermatogenese bei den Arachniden. I. Uber die Spermatogenese der Skorpione. (Mit 1 Figur ira Text und Tafel XXII XXIII.) Kristine Bonnevie, Uber die Struktur und Genese der Ascarichromosomen. (Mit 7 Figuren im Text.) Emerico Luna, Sulla importanza dei condriosomi nella genesi delle miofibrille. (Con 18 Figure nel Testo.) Referate. | |||
Atlas zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des menschlichen Auges | |||
von | |||
Ludwig Bach und R. Seefelder | |||
well. Professor in Marburg Privatdozent in Leipzig | |||
I. Liefernng gr. 4. S. 118. Mit 24 Figuren im Text und Tafel I XV mit 15 Blatt Tafelerklarungen. M 20. | |||
II. Liefernng gr. 4. S. 1974. Mit 30 Figuren im Text und Tafel XYI XXXIV mit 19 Blatt Tafelerklarungen. Jt 36. | |||
Die III. Lleferniig (SchluB) erscheint im Laufe des Jahres 1913 | |||
Eine hervorragende, iiuGerst wertvolle Bereicherung der medizinischen Literatur bedeutet das vorliegende Werk, und nicht nur der Ophthalmologe, sondern jeder, der sich fur Entwicklungsgeschichte interessiert, wird den beiden Verfassern fur diese wohl einzig in ihrer Art dastehende Arbeit Dank wissen. Es ist ein wahrer GenuC, mit Hilfe der pracbtigen Abbildungen sich in das Studium der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschenauges zu vertiefen. | |||
Deutsche Arzte-Zeitung. | |||
, .'. | |||
Inhalt des vierten Heftes. | |||
Seite | |||
HERM. JOSEPHY, Uber eine Doppelbildung bei einer Tritonenlarve. (Mit | |||
1 Figur im Text und Tafel XIV) 539 | |||
C. M. CHILD, Certain Dynamic Factors in Experimental Reproduction and | |||
their Significance for the Problems of Reproduction and Development. (With 3 figures in text) f 598 | |||
GERHARD KAUTZSCH, Studien iiber Entwicklungsanomalien bei Ascaris. II | |||
(Mit 63 Figuren im Text und Tafel XV und XVI) 642 | |||
T. BRAILSFORD ROBERTSON, Further Explanatory Remarks Concerning the | |||
Chemical Mechanics of Cell-Division. (With 3 figures in text) ... 692 | |||
J. MARION READ, The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. (With | |||
2 diagrams) 708 | |||
I. IZIKSOHN, Uber die gestaltliche Anpassungsfahigkeit des Froschherzens | |||
an groCen Substanzverlust ?24 | |||
B. HANK6, tlber die Regeneration des Operculums bei Murex brandaris. | |||
(Mit Tafel XVII) ; . . 740 | |||
W. HARMS, Ubefpflanzung von Ovarien in eine fremde Art. II. Mitteilung: | |||
Versuche an Tritonen. (Mit 6 Figuren im Text und Tafel XVIII | |||
und XIX) 748 | |||
RH. ERDMANN, Referate iiber Experimente an Protisten . 781 | |||
JENNINGS, H. S., Assortative Mating, Variability and Inheritance of Size | |||
in the Conjugation of Paramaecium 781 | |||
ZWEIBAUM, J., Conjugaison et diffe"renciation sexuelle chez les infusories. 782 WOODRUFF and BAITSELL, G. A., Rhythms in the Reproductive Activity | |||
of Infusoria 783; | |||
WOODRUFF, L. L., Evidence on the Adaption of Paramaecium to different | |||
Environments 783] | |||
WOODRUFF, L. L., and BAITSELL, G. A., The Temperature Coefficient of | |||
the Rate of Reproduction of Paramaecium aurelia. ........ 783] | |||
GRUBER, K., Biologische und experimentelle Untersuchungen an Amoeba | |||
proteus | |||
PEEBLES, FL., Regeneration and Regulation in Paramaecium caudatum ERDMANN, RH., Depression und fakultative Apogamie bei Amoeba di ploidea _. | |||
ERDMANN, RH., Experimentelle Untersuchungen Uber den Zusammenhang | |||
von Befruchtung und Fortpflanzung bei Protozoen, besonders bei | |||
Amoeba diploidea | |||
Druck von Breitkopf & Hartel in Leipzig. |
Latest revision as of 15:41, 6 December 2019
Embryology - 19 Apr 2024 Expand to Translate |
---|
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page) |
العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations) |
Marion Read J. The intra-uterine growth-cycles of the guinea-pig. (1913)
Online Editor |
---|
This historic 1913 paper by Marion Read describes guinea-pig intra-uterine growth.
Internet Archive
|
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages |
---|
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding. (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers) |
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig
By J. Marion Bead.
(From the Kudolph Spreckels Physiological Laboratory of the University of California.)
With 2 diagrams.
Eingegangen am 5. November 1912.
Archly f. Entwicklungsmechanik. XXIV.
The idea was expressed by LOEB *) in 1906 that some of the phenomena acompanying the early stages of development suggest 'that gr.o/w-i^ .tpayl be determined by an autocatalysed chemical reaction. He,, is jnclined to. believe that cell division in the developing egg ceases wBen: jfo-.^'atio of nuclear to cytoplasmic material reaches a certain limit, and expresses the belief that This ratio is determined by the laws of mass action and equilibrium . Following up this idea, ROBERTSON 2 ) and OSTWALD S ) published almost simultaneously in 1908 their investigations showing the great similarity between growth curves and the curves expressing the relationship between time and amount of transformation in a monomolecular autocatalytic reaction.
The work of numerous investigators has rendered available a large amount of data upon the growth of plants and animals of various species. Especially accurate data upon the growth of man have been accumulated by the British Association Anthropometric Committee and by QUETELET in Belgium. It was these data in addition to those published by DONALDSON 4 ) upon the growth of rats which ROBERTSON 5 ) chiefly utilized in illustrating his thesis.
) J. LOEB, >Dynamics of Living Matter.* New York 1906. p. 56 et seq. 2) T. B. ROBERTSON, Arch. f. Entw.-Mech. Bd. 25. 1908.
3 ) Wo. OSTWALD, Uber die zeitlichen Eigenschaften der Entwicklungsvorg'ange.* Vortrage u. Aufs. iiber Entwicklungsmech. d. Organismen, herausgeg. von WILH. Roux. Heft 5. Juli 1908.
4 ) DONALDSON, BOAS Memorial Volume. New York 1906. p. 5.
5) T. B. ROBERTSON, Joe. cit.
Mammals seem to have furnished the greatest amount of accurate information which we possess upon this subject, for it is an easy matter to weigh a mammal at birth and at stated times thereafter and thus to ascertain its increase in weight, which is the best measure of the growth of the whole organism. From information thus obtained, however, we get no idea of the rate of growth before birth. A curve representing this period of growth is in many respects the most important, for, if obtained, it would show the beginning of growth, the changes following upon fertilization, that is to say, the actual starting point of the reaction.
OSTWALD *) published curves showing the intra-uterine growth of the human foetus. These curves were constructed from the data of His and TOLDT in which length was taken as the measure of the rate of growth. OSTWALD also showed a curve of the prenatal growth of man based upon the weights obtained by FEHLING. Such data must, of necessity, be limited in number and consequently be insufficient for generalization, although OSTWALD'S curves are remarkably smooth. So far as I am aware, this is the only information we have concerning the intra-uterine growth of any mammal.
I have observed that curves constructed from the daily weights of guinea-pigs during pregnancy were not straight but somewhat S-shaped. MiNOT 2 ) in his exhaustive work on growth gives a table of the weight changes of pregnant guinea-pigs. The curve constructed from his data so nearly resembled the one I obtained that the possibility occurred to me of utilizing these data for the purpose of following the course of intra-uterine growth.
That the guinea-pig is particularly suited for work upon this subject is shown:
1) In that the ratio of the weight of the litter to that of the mother is very high, the average weight of a litter of three being about 225 gms. and the average weight of the adult mothers about 740 gms. These figures give a ratio of nearly 1 : 3.
2) In that the small number in the litter is an advantage, for the weight of the unit organism is considerable, even after the weight of the litter is divided by the number born.
) OSTWALD, loc. cit. 2) C. S. MINOT, Journ. of Physiol. Vol. 12. 1891.
The ten cases considered herein were selected from eighteen or twenty available ones. They were chosen because they seemed to
be normal m every way. As far as possible adult mothers were chosen, and so no litters consisting of only one are included J ). The cases designated as Xj and Kj were first litters, however, containig three and two respectively. No cases were included in which the mother became pregnant immediately after parturition, thus nursingone litter while carrying another.
All of my animals were weighed every second day, so there is a complete record of the weights of all for the past fifteen months. Table I, column A, gives the weights of the mothers at copulation. Except in the cases noted under remarks the weight is that actually observed, recorded within twenty- four hours before or after copulation. In the four cases noted under remarks the weight in column A was raised to an average of the weights for a week or two preceding. In most cases the weight at copulation was very close to the average weight.
For the sake of comparison and as an aid to correct valuation of the results, I am publishing two tables. Table I gives the weights as they were actually recorded and Table II shows these weights again with six of them corrected as explained under > remarks .
It may be noted here while discussing the weights of adult guinea-pigs and the corrections I have deemed it advisable to make, that these animals display considerable variation in weight from day to day. In an adult guinea-pig of 650 850 gins, a variation of ten or twenty grams is not exceptional. MiNOT 2 ) says, In all the weighings there is necessarily an error . A positive error because the digestive tract, particularly the wide caecum, contains always considerable quantities of undigested material; moreover the bladder may hold a greater or less quantity of urine. A negative error because every illness, even a very slight indisposition and every injury such as a bite for instance, causes a greater or less loss of weight. The quantitative value of these errors is presumably not very great; they probably counterbalance one another to a certain extent in the averages which may be accepted as approximately accurate. Guinea-pigs are very sensitive animals and a very slight disturbance will cause considerable change in weight. At a recent weighing almost all of my animals had lost heavily due to the fact that they had been moved the day before from one animal house
) Immature mothers usually bear one in a litter. 2 ) C. S. MINOT, loc. cit.
Table I. Actual, observed weights.
A
Weight at copulation
B
Weight
just before parturition
B-A
Increase of weight during gestation
C
Weights of the young ones in the litter
(B-A)-C
Weight due to fat
placentae and growth of mother
Bern arks upon revision of weights, too high or too low
A 2
749
940
191
64, 67, 72
12
B is too low, average
of weights for 16 days
preceding parturition
is 952 g.
A 3
810
1042
232
69, 68, 76
29
B 3
760
1030
270
67,92
111
B 4
855
1110
255
80, 84, 97
-13
A is too high, average
of weights for two
weeks preceding co
pulation being 834 g.
C 4
750
1091 341
57, 82, 95
108
A is too low, average
of weights for 10 days
preceding copulation
being 770 g.
H 2
542
908
366
76, 77, 79
132
A is too low, average
of weights for two
weeks preceding co
pulation being 579 g.
Xt
560
881
321
64, 67, 70
120
Bpi
766
1090
324
72, 77, 79
96
A is too low, average
of weights for two
weeks preceding co
pulation bein^ 783 g.
Bp 2
772
1030
268
74, 75, 79
30
B is too low, average
of weights for a week
preceding parturition
being 1055 g.
K,
430
716
285
79,81
125
into another, a distance of 50 feet perhaps. The disturbance was sufficient to cause one of the animals to give birth prematurely (59 days) to a litter of three.
The low weight at copulation in the four cases under consideration I belive to be due to the excitement and muscular work which is always attendant when a male is put into the pen with a female. The chasing is often quite severe and continues for some time. Upon many occasions I have noted a loss of weight after copulation.
Table II. Observed weights and weights corrected.
A
Weight at copulation
B
Weight just before parturition
B-A
Increase of weight during gestation
C
Total weight of litter
(B-A)-C
Weight due to fat placentae and growth of mother
Remarks upon revision of weights, too high or too low
A 2
730
956
225
203
22
A observed (749) was
too high, average for
10 days preceding
was 731.
A 3
810
1042
232
203
29
B 3 '
760
1030
270
159
111
B 4
834
1110
276
261
15
C 4
760
1091
331
233
98
Though the average for
A is 770, I believe
it is a little too high
and that 760 repre
sents better the
weight at copulation.
H 2
575
908
333
234
99
X!
560
881
321
201
120
Bpi
783
1090
307
228
79
Bp 2
772
1045
273
228
45
The weight parturi
tion has not been
raised to the average
of 1055, for reasons
discussed in the text.
Ki
430
715
285
160
125
In only two cases was the weight in column B corrected and in both it was raised to approach an average for a week or two preceding. It sometimes happens that the mother becomes upset somewhat before birth and eats lightly, thus gaining but little or even losing weight just before parturition. In most cases there is a steady gain up to the time of birth so in the two which suffered a loss it seemed reasonable to correct the weight. It must be understood that in all cases in which the weight is corrected it has never been raised or lowered to reach the average, but a weight has been chosen between the observed and averaged weight.
In the third column of Table II the increase of weight during gestation is given. This is in every case greater than the total weight of the litter. The difference between these two figures (found
The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 713
in the fifth column) represents the weight of placentae, amniotic fluid and blood lost at birth, as well as the growth of the mother. The mother's growth can be obtained separately by getting the difference between the weight at copulation and just after delivery. A figure thus obtained however, would represent two kinds of growth, namely, 1) continuous growth of the mother, and 2) fat accumulated during pregnancy. This accumulation of fat during the period of gestation seems to be a general phenomenon and is especially to be noted in the case of the guinea-pig, the milk of which contains such a high percentage of fat 1 ). For our purpose, we will disregard as far as we can, everything which is not growth of young in utero; this is represented by the value in the fifth column of Table II.
Table III is an illustrative page of the calculations showing the figures for A 2 , Bp 2 , and K t . The weight of the mother on every second day is placed in the first column and in the second appears the increase at each period over the weight at copulation. The last value in the second column corresponds to that in the third column of Table II.
Since we are concerned here with the increase in the weight of the litter only, it becomes necessary to eliminate the growth due to placentae and fat accumulated by the mother, in short, everything not representing the growth of the litter. We have only one determination upon the weight of the litter itself, that is, its weight just after birth. The difference between the weight of the litter and the total increase in the mother's weight during gestation is the value representing all increase in weight other than that of the litter. But this extra weight has accumulated along with the young in utero, so in eliminating it we must distribute it over the whole period of gestation. In order to eliminate this weight justly and to distribute it proportionally throughout the whole period, the following method has been adopted. A horizontal line was ruled off on coordinate paper. It represented by its length the number of days of gestation, each day being represented by one space on the paper. At the right end of this line a perpendicular was erected which corresponded in height to the value in the fifth column of Table II. Each space represented one gram. A right-angled triangle was formed when the free ends of the horizontal and perpendicular lines were joined by a straight line, which formed the hypotenuse. The distance
) J. MARION BEAD, Observations on the suckling period in the guineapig. University of Cal. publications in Zoology. Vol. 9. pp. 342, 343.
714
J. Marion Read
Table III.
Illustrative page of calculations, showing complete figures obtained from three of the ten litters utilized.
Days after cop.
A 2
Weights of mother during pregnancy
Increase over weight at copulation
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth
Bp 2
Weights of mother during pregnancy
Increase over weight at copulation
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth
Ki
Weights of mother during pregnancy
Increase over weight at copulation
Corrected for weight of placentae fat and growth
Three in the litter
Three in the litter
Two in the litter
730
772
430
2
730
776
4
3
453
23
19
4
757
27
25
785
13
11
433
3
- 4
6
757
27
25
785
13
10
449
19
8
8
760
30
27
785
13
8
455
25
10
10
747
17
14
790
18
12
456
26
9
12
755
25
21
778
6
463
33
13
14
781
51
47
800
28
19
480
50
26
16
785
13
3
490
60
32
18
782
52
47
800
28
17
486
56
25
20
777
47
41
792
20
8
485
55
20
22
779
49
42
820
48
35
500
70
31
24
782
52
45
880
108
93
509
79
35
26
821
49
33
511
81
33
28
788
58
50
860
88
70
512
82
30
30
813
83
74
868
96
77
617
87
32
32
826
96
86
840
68
57
519
89
28
34
846
116
106
878
106
84
36
848
118
107
886
114
90
570
140
75
38
870
140
128
895
123
98
584
154
85
40
875
145
133
930
158
132
576
145
73
42
883
163
140
913
141
114
580
160
74
44
915
185
172
927
155
127
585
165
75
46
908
178
164
924
152
123
592
162
79
48
918
188
173
956
184
153
618
178
91
60
944
214
199
1000
228
196
624
194
103
52
950
220
204
1007
235
202
629
199
103
64
960
230
213
1000
228
197
640
210
110
56
960
230
213
1020
248
212
655
225
120
58
985
255
237
1020
248
210
664
234
125
60
932
202
184
1010
238
199
668
238
126
62
940
210
191
1040
268
228
680
250
134
64
935
205
185
1040
268
226
684
254
135
66
945
215
195
1030
258
214
717
287
164
68
955
225
203
1045
273
228
715
285
160
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig.
v
from the horizontal line to the hypotenuse along the ordinates, increases as we pass from left to right, and approach the perpendicular line whose length represents the weight increase during gestation, which was due to other factors than the weight of the litter. The length of each ordinate (distance between the base and hypotenuse) represents the increase in weight which is in excess of the litter's weight on that day, just as the length of the perpendicular forming one side of the triangle represents the difference at birth between the total increase of weight during gestation and the weight of the litter. The length of every second ordinate (i. e. every second day) was obtained, and this figure subtracted from the weight for that day in the second column of Table III. The remainder obtained was set down in the third column of Table III. It represented the weight of the litter on that day, the last figure in the column being the total weight of the litter at birth. This correction was made in all ten cases. The results are tabulated in Table IV.
This method of eliminating the weight of the deciduae, growth of the mother, and the accumulation of fat by the mother during the progress of gestation is undoubtedly open to criticism. It seems, however, to be the only feasible way of doing it and although there are doubtless errors involved, still the essential point which I believe that my data establish is the S-shaped form of the curve of growth in utero. Now a brief consideration of the probable effect of the above interpolation upon the form of -the empirical curve shows that the method employed, far from exaggerating this result, would tend to mask it for the following reasons.
1) It is reasonable to assume that the growth of the placentae and other foetal membranes will keep pace with the growth of the embryos and follow the same curve which would represent their growth. In assuming that the rate of growth is constant, as we have in the method of eliminating their weight, we tend to make the curve of the embryo's growth a straight line and thus straighten out any curved lines which may rightfully be a part of it.
2) What has been said regarding the deciduae may very well be true also of the fat accumulated by the mother during pregnancy. In the light of our present knowledge of hormones and the part they play in life phenomena, especially those connected with reproduction, we may well assume that this accumulation of fat is controlled by internal secretions whose amount and activity in turn are controlled by the growing embryos in utero. In eliminating this fat as if it
716
J. Marion Kead
Table IV.
Intra-uterine growth of ten litters and the growth of an individual represented by an average.
A 2
A 3 B 3
B 4
C 4
H 2
Xt
Bpi
Bp 2
K!
No. of young
Total weight
Average weight
No. in litter
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
17
15
34
-3
16
5
3
19
22
106
4.8
4
25
21
11
74
4
28
9
11
-4
25
179
7.1
6
25
3
36
12
53
11
32
10
8
25
190
7.6
8
27
7
47
8
54
28
29
3
8
10
28
221
7.9
10
14
33
51
4
60
17
49
12
9
25
249
9.8
12
21
19
30
3
37
38
31
13
22
192
8.7
14
47
10
30
11
19
40
19
26
22
202
9.2
16
24
20
58
36
38
3
32
20
211
10.5
18
47
32
43
32
55
49
48
12
17
25
28
360
12.8
20
41
30
23
27
52
36
59
7
8
20
28
303
10.8
22
42
36
43
44
35
22
13
35
31
25
301
12.0
24
45
46
28
20
37
18
25
93
35
25
347
13.9
26
45
43
62
62
63
61
25
33
33
25
427
17.1
28
50
42
49
78
64
79
55
24
70
30
28
541
19.3
30
74
71
61
48
66
69
82
44
77
32
28
624
22.4
32
86
57
76
79
74
93
103
34
57
28
28
687
24.5
34
106
66
64
109
107
119
54
84
24
709
29.5
36
107
98
103
98
98
102
103
62
90
75
28
936
33.4
38
128
101
98
158
106
114
119
45
98
85
28
1052
37.6
40
133
78
100
135
167
132
155
79
132
73
28
1164
41.5
42
140
112
117
125
158
113
157
70
114
74
28
1180
42.1
44
172
141
133
136
157
143
167
87
127
75
28
1388
47.8
46
164
131
120
156
165
170
185
96
123
79
28
1389
49.6
48
173
147
145
155
193
173
123
153
91
26
1353
52.0
50
199
154
129
188
164
177
167
124
196
103
28
1601
57.1
52
204
158
136
192
154
186
163
126
202
103
28
1627
58.1
54
213
192
150
189
145
208
160
115
197
110
28
1679
60.0
56
213
205
126
221
152
210
158
130
212
120
28
1747
62.4
58
237
180
146
220
162
218
154
165
210
125
28
1817
64.9
60
184
175
167
245
198
225
146
180
199
126
28
1845
65.8
62
191
145
159
234
184
254
173
178
228
134
28
1880
67.1
64
185
174
143
240
186
246
202
205
226
134
28
1941
69.3
66
195
179
159
256
203
237
204
203
214
164
28
2014
71.9
68
203
203
159
261
233
234
201
228
228
160
28
2110
75.4
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 717
increased at a constant rate, we again tend to make the growth curve of the young more nearly resemble a straight line.
3) The hypotenuse of our triangle resembles more closely the growth curve of the mother during the gestation period, for by this time puberty is passed and the growth curve of the mother is approaching an asymptote and is nearly rectilinear.
A few corrections have been made by interpolation in the weights of the pregnant mothers in cases where all the animals were heavy or light due to over- or under-feeding. But this was done only when the difference exceeded twenty grams. In Table IV only 19 out of 314 figures have been thus corrected.
Turning now to the consideration of the curve of intra- uterine growth thus obtained (Fig. 1) certain features of it demand careful attention. The first part of the curve representing the first four days of gestation is not significant of the growth of the fertilized ova but represents the rapid return of the mother to normal weight after the loss occasioned by chasing and copulation. The dotted line, therefore, probably represents the correct course of growth for this period. Although the most rapid cell division and relatively the fastest rate of growth, occurs in the early cleavage stages, still such growth will not be perceptible by the means employed in obtaining this curve. So we should not expect a very rapid increase during the first eight or ten days; for implantation of the ova does not take place till seven days after fertilization 1 ). The slight increase in weight shown may be due to the commencement of the accumulation of fat or to other physiological processes in preparation for the coming pregnancy; but this cannot be counted as growth of the litter in utero.
That portion of the curve from ten to sixty days closely resembles other growth curves which represent one cycle of growth. It appears probable, therefore, that one cycle begins at the fertilization of the egg and ends a week or ten days before birth, at which time (or before) another cycle begins and continues on after birth.
In Table V are to be found the weights and average weights for twenty days after birth of the same twenty-eight young whose growth in utero is represented by the first part of the curve. The curve constructed from the averages in Table V is added to the curve at the 68 day ordinate. There is a slight loss of weight at birth
l ) GROSSER, Vergleichende Anatomic und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Eihaute und der Placenta.* Wien u. Leipzig 1909. S. 162.
Archiv f. Entwicklungsmechanik. XXXV. 47
718
Crams
J. Marion Read Fig.l.
~~^~ 20 30 40 50 60 70
Intra-uterine growth of the guinea-pig. (Constructed from data in Tables IV and V.)
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig.
719
Table V.
Weights and average weights of the twenty-eight young under consideration, for twenty days following birth.
Age in days
1
2 3
4
6
8
10
12 14
16 18
20
1
!
G
67
66
66
67
70
75
82
87
97
108
110
116
H
64
64
63
64
70
77
85
93
105
111
116
123
I
72
71
70
72
75
84
87
95
107
119
122
133
W
76
79
82
89
91
102
112
125
122
128
137
133
136
Aa
68
69
74
78
80
91
100
107
118
119
125
132
134
Ab
69
61
63
67
70
78
86
95
102
107
114
118
122
R
92! 96
101 101
136
144
162
168
180
182
S
67
72
79 81
114
124
135
139
160
152
Ca
95
93
96
99
102
109
Cb
57
56
61
61
67
71
84
Cc
82 ! 76
80
84
88
98
111
M
79
77
82
84
93
108
N
77
75
77
80
84
100
130
134
139
72
72
73
78
84
110
136
147
161
166
180
Bpa
74
74
77
84
87
Bpb
75
75
77
85
89
100
Bpc
79
79
82
90
91
V
67
63
65
68
74
79
91
102
108
127
140
142
160
K
70
66
69
71
74
80
94
106
108
127
138
138
155
L
64
60
63
66
70
77
86
95
99 ; 114
130
133
147
Ea
81.
77
83
99
107
119
123 132
144
163
Kb
79
74
81
98
106
115
117 119
132
140
Ba
80
79
86
94
Bb
84
84
Be
97
95
101
110
Hb
76
77
88
He
77
78
84
Hd
79
81
89
Number
of obser
28
28
22
27
18
15
16
15
15
15
14
14
8
vations
Total
2110 2087 1685
2188
1459
1318
1549
1655
1755
1908
1881
1981
1177
Average
75.4
74.6
76.6
81.0
81.0
87.8
96.8
110.3
117.0
127.2
134.3
141.5
147.1
47*
720
J. Marion Read
which is characteristic of almost all mammals, but the animals pick up in two or three days and the curve continues on at the same inclination as the line representing the intra- uterine growth of the last eight or ten days before birth. This fact would seem to indicate that the figures and curve representing the intra-uterine growth, although obtained indirectly, have some degree of accuracy.
OsTWALD 1 ) in discussing the curve showing the growth of man says, It is worthy to note again the continuity of the weight changes during the last foetal month and the first years of life. The well known loss of weight of the new born during the first days of life is so insignificant that in comparison to the remaining
Fig. 2.
30
20
10
Per Cent
10 20 30 40
Curve of pregnancies resulting in abortion {constructed from data in Table VI).
weight changes of the development of man it scarcely needs to be considered .
It is interesting to note that, as far as we can learn from the data so far obtained, the birth of both guinea-pigs and man does not take place at the juncture of two cycles. This is especially interesting in the case of the guinea-pig, which is born in a very mature state 2 ). The period of gestation is very long when we compare it with the gestation period of other rodents. This has led one investigator 3 ) to venture the belief that in some remote period in its evolution the guinea-pig was born in a less mature state, such as
) OSTWALD, loc. cit. 2 ) READ, loc. cit.
3 ) ABDERHALDEN, Text-book of Physiological Chemistry, p. 371.
New York 1908.
The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig.
721
Table VI.
Per cent of weight gained or lost, during the period of gestation, by five guinea-pigs which gave birth to dead, premature litters.
Days
after copulation
Y
7 Born
C
5 Born
A
3 Born
HA
1 Born
K
5 Born
Average per cent increase
2
5.8
5.1
0.9
3.0
4.4
0.0
4
2.8
3.0
5.7
4.4
1.3
2.7
6
0.7
0.2
3.6
0.0
-4.7
-1.5
8
0.7
4.7
-2.1
-0.8
2.9
1.1
10
1.0
4.2
0.5
1.0
0.8
1.3
12
0.0 | 1.0
2.0
-1.2
-1.6
-0.6
14
4.0
4.9
-2.9
2.1
0.6
1.5
16
2.5
2.0
-0.7
0.3
0.6
-0.1
18
0.5
-0.2
0.4
-7.4
2.2
1.7
20
0.0
5.1
0.3
1.9
1.2
1.7
22
3.1
1.3
2.7
0.1
-2.0
0.5
24
1.5
-2.0
-4.3
1.1
3.4
-0.2
26
-3.6
0.7
1.6
-1.8
2.2
-0.1
28
2.0
1.2
0.9
5.0
3.8
2.5
30
1.8
3.2
2.0
1.9
4.3
2.6
32
4.8
-0.7
-1.0
4.2
1.5
1.7
34
2.5
2.8
3.4
1.1
1.8
2.3
36
2.8
2.4
6.0
4.0
2.8
36
38
2.2
0.1
4.6
0.6
0.3
1.7
40
1.5
2.2
3.3
1.2
1.3
0.6
42
3.4
1.0
3.0
1.8
1.8
2.1
44
-0.1
0.7
1.4
1.0
3.0
1.2
46
1.0
2.6
3.2
-1.6
3.5
1.7
48
1.7
3.0
4.4
0.3
4.1
1.8
50
5.2
2.0
0.0
1.5
7.6
1.2
52
8.0
0.0 0.2
0.0
0.0
-1.6
54
0.1
-1.0
4.9
-4.2
7.3
-3.5
56
3.6
-1.6
-4.2
-53
-1.9
58
0.4
-4.3
4.6
0.9
0.4
60
1.0
25
-0.7
62
1.0
0.4
0.3
64
0.5
-0.5
that in which rabbits, mice, and rats are born. If such were the case, the young must have been born before 50 days, for the two cycles seem to join or overlap between 50 and 60 days. This period seems to be a critical one in the development of the foetus. Inspection of the weights of mothers which gave birth to dead young
722 J. Marion Read
shows that these mothers lost weight rapidly during this period. Table VI gives the percentage of weight gained or lost every second day by five mothers who gave birth to premature, dead litters. Fig. 2 shows the curve constructed from this data. A distinct loss of weight is shown after 50 days. Whether or not this phenomenon has any connection with growth cycles, it is impossible now to say with certainty. But it is possible that the death of the young in utero may be due to a failure of the second cycle to connect properly with the first. The fact of the death in utero at this period is undeniable and I mention it as possibly having some significance and bearing upon this and perhaps other questions of intra-uterme development.
In conclusion, I may say that I realize fully the fact that the data upon which the curve has been constructed have been obtained indirectly and that more accurate data could be obtained only by the sacrifice of hundreds of animals. But as a first attempt to arrive at the truth in regard to the appearance of a curve representing the growth following fertilization, I it submit with the hope that it may serve as a starting point for further work.
Summary and Conclusions.
From the facts and figures set forth and discussed in this paper and from the appearance of the curve constructed from the data, it seems reasonable to conclude that:
I. It is possible to obtain a curve showing the growth of embryos in utero by indirect means, i. e. by weighing the mother at regular intervals during pregnancy.
II. In the case of guinea-pigs, one cycle begins at fertilization of the ova and ends about 60 days after. Another cycle begins a little before the end of the first cycle and continues on after birth.
III. In both the guinea-pig and man birth occurs during the course of a cycle and not at or near the juncture of two cycles.
IV. The human young are born before the completion of the first cycle, while the guinea-pig completes one cycle and begins a second in utero. It is quite likely that this fact accounts for the advanced state of development of the latter animal at birth.
The Intra-Uterme Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. 723
Zusammenfassung,
Nach den in dieser Arbeit vorgebrachten und ero'rterten Figuren und Tatsachen und nach dem Aussehen der aus diesen Tatsachen konstruierten Kurve scheinen mir nachstehende SchluBfolgerungen erlaubt:
1) Es ist moglich, eine Kurve zu erhalten, welche das intrauterine Wachstum von Embryonen durch indirekte Mittel veranschaulicht, so durch regelma'Cig wiederholte Wagung der Mutter in regelma'Bigen Zwischenraumen wahrend der Schwangerschaft.
2) Fur das Meerschweinchen beginnt ein Zyklus bei der Befruchtung der Eier und endet ungefahr 60 Tage spater. Ein andrer Zyklus beginnt eine kleine Weile vor dem Ablauf des ersten Zyklus und dauert noch nach der Geburt an.
3) Sowohl beim Meerschweinchen wie beim Menschen fallt die Geburt in den Verlauf eines Zyklus und nicht in oder nahe an die gemeinsame Ablaufszeit zweier Zyklen.
4) Die Jungen des Menschen werden noch vor der Vollendung des ersten Zyklus geboren, wahrend das Meerschweinchen noch im Uterus einen Zyklus vollendet und einen zweiten anfangt. Es ist durchaus wahrscheinlich, daC dieser Umstand die Ursache fur das vorgeriickte Entwicklungsstadium des letzteren Tien, bei der Geburt abgibt. ((Jbersetzt y(m ^ WebImi . dt-)
VERLAG VON WILHELM EN6ELMANN IN LEIPZIG
Archiv fur Zellforschung
hcrausgegeben von
Dr. Richard Goldschmidt
Professor an der Universitat Miinchen
Neunter Baud, 3. Heft
Hit 26 Figuren im Text und 4 Tafeln (Seite 351-484) gr. 8. M 13.
Inhalt: Jan Hirschler, Uber die Plasraastrukturen (Mitochondrien, Golgischer Apparat u. a.) in den Geschlechtszellen der Ascariden. (Spermato- und Ovogenese.) (Mit Tafel XX XXI.) Iwan Sokolow, Untersuchungen Uber die Spermatogenese bei den Arachniden. I. Uber die Spermatogenese der Skorpione. (Mit 1 Figur ira Text und Tafel XXII XXIII.) Kristine Bonnevie, Uber die Struktur und Genese der Ascarichromosomen. (Mit 7 Figuren im Text.) Emerico Luna, Sulla importanza dei condriosomi nella genesi delle miofibrille. (Con 18 Figure nel Testo.) Referate.
Atlas zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des menschlichen Auges
von
Ludwig Bach und R. Seefelder
well. Professor in Marburg Privatdozent in Leipzig
I. Liefernng gr. 4. S. 118. Mit 24 Figuren im Text und Tafel I XV mit 15 Blatt Tafelerklarungen. M 20.
II. Liefernng gr. 4. S. 1974. Mit 30 Figuren im Text und Tafel XYI XXXIV mit 19 Blatt Tafelerklarungen. Jt 36.
Die III. Lleferniig (SchluB) erscheint im Laufe des Jahres 1913
Eine hervorragende, iiuGerst wertvolle Bereicherung der medizinischen Literatur bedeutet das vorliegende Werk, und nicht nur der Ophthalmologe, sondern jeder, der sich fur Entwicklungsgeschichte interessiert, wird den beiden Verfassern fur diese wohl einzig in ihrer Art dastehende Arbeit Dank wissen. Es ist ein wahrer GenuC, mit Hilfe der pracbtigen Abbildungen sich in das Studium der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschenauges zu vertiefen.
Deutsche Arzte-Zeitung.
, .'.
Inhalt des vierten Heftes.
Seite
HERM. JOSEPHY, Uber eine Doppelbildung bei einer Tritonenlarve. (Mit
1 Figur im Text und Tafel XIV) 539
C. M. CHILD, Certain Dynamic Factors in Experimental Reproduction and
their Significance for the Problems of Reproduction and Development. (With 3 figures in text) f 598
GERHARD KAUTZSCH, Studien iiber Entwicklungsanomalien bei Ascaris. II
(Mit 63 Figuren im Text und Tafel XV und XVI) 642
T. BRAILSFORD ROBERTSON, Further Explanatory Remarks Concerning the
Chemical Mechanics of Cell-Division. (With 3 figures in text) ... 692
J. MARION READ, The Intra-Uterine Growth-Cycles of the Guinea-Pig. (With
2 diagrams) 708
I. IZIKSOHN, Uber die gestaltliche Anpassungsfahigkeit des Froschherzens
an groCen Substanzverlust ?24
B. HANK6, tlber die Regeneration des Operculums bei Murex brandaris.
(Mit Tafel XVII) ; . . 740
W. HARMS, Ubefpflanzung von Ovarien in eine fremde Art. II. Mitteilung:
Versuche an Tritonen. (Mit 6 Figuren im Text und Tafel XVIII
und XIX) 748
RH. ERDMANN, Referate iiber Experimente an Protisten . 781
JENNINGS, H. S., Assortative Mating, Variability and Inheritance of Size
in the Conjugation of Paramaecium 781
ZWEIBAUM, J., Conjugaison et diffe"renciation sexuelle chez les infusories. 782 WOODRUFF and BAITSELL, G. A., Rhythms in the Reproductive Activity
of Infusoria 783;
WOODRUFF, L. L., Evidence on the Adaption of Paramaecium to different
Environments 783]
WOODRUFF, L. L., and BAITSELL, G. A., The Temperature Coefficient of
the Rate of Reproduction of Paramaecium aurelia. ........ 783]
GRUBER, K., Biologische und experimentelle Untersuchungen an Amoeba
proteus
PEEBLES, FL., Regeneration and Regulation in Paramaecium caudatum ERDMANN, RH., Depression und fakultative Apogamie bei Amoeba di ploidea _.
ERDMANN, RH., Experimentelle Untersuchungen Uber den Zusammenhang
von Befruchtung und Fortpflanzung bei Protozoen, besonders bei
Amoeba diploidea
Druck von Breitkopf & Hartel in Leipzig.