Paper - The growth of the human foot

From Embryology
Revision as of 11:59, 11 June 2017 by Z8600021 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Header}} {{Ref-Davenport1932}} {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! Online Editor   |- | 90px|left This historic 1932 paper by Dave...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Embryology - 22 Jan 2021    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Davenport CB. The growth of the human foot. (1932) J Physical Anthropology 17(2): 167-

Online Editor  
Mark Hill.jpg
This historic 1932 paper by Davenport describes foot growth.



Modern Notes:


Limb Links: limb | limb axis | appendicular skeleton | Limb Rotation Timetable | Upper limb ossification | Lower limb ossification | Mouse limb | SHH | FGF | BMP | WNT | limb abnormalities | ICD-11 limb anomalies | Category:Limb
Historic Limb Embryology  
1901 Limb Development | 1902 Limbs | 1905 Rabbit Limb Veins | 1906 Hand papillary ridges | 1906 Digit Abnormalities | 1908 Two Subclavian Arteries | 1910 Limb Muscles | 1910 Upper Limb Bursae | 1915 Femur Epiphysis | 1919 Lower Limb Arteries | 1922 Pig Limb Vasculature | 1924 Rare Malformations | 1932 Postnatal Foot Growth | 1948 Chick Wing | 1968 Knee Development | 1990 Upper Limb Innervation


Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)