Paper - Localization of the hereditary material in the germ cells (1915)

From Embryology
Revision as of 15:57, 30 September 2020 by Z8600021 (talk | contribs)
Embryology - 19 Apr 2024    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Morgan TH. Localization of the hereditary material in the germ cells. (1915) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1(7):420-9. PMID 16576035

Online Editor  
Mark Hill.jpg
This 1915 historic paper by Morgan describes the localization of the hereditary material in the germ cells.



Modern Notes: oocyte | spermatozoa


Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

Localization of the Hereditary Material in the Germ Cells

By T. H. Morgan

Department Of Zoology, Columbia University Presented To The Academy, May 17, 1915


It has come to be recognized that it must be more than a coincidence that in each animal and plant there are two representatives of each hereditary character (one derived from the mother and one derived from the father), and that there are two of each kind of chromosome (one de rived from the mother and one derived from the father). Moreover. this relation becomes much more impressive when it is found that in the formation of the germ cells the representatives of the different characters separate from each other, and that the chromosomes separate also, so that each germ cell has but one set of factors and but one set of chromosomes. The comparison does not stop even here, and I propose to. review briefly the further evidence that leads to the conclusion that the chromosomes are the bearers of the hereditary characters and that. the known chromosomal behavior suffices as a mechanism to explain, Mendel’s law.


FIG. 1. DIAGRAMS OF SEX DETERMINATION; A, TYPE IN WHICH THE FEMALE IS XX AND THE MALE XO; B, TYPE IN WHICH THE FEMALE IS XX AND THE MALE XY.

Sex Linked Inheritance and the Sex Chromosomes

There is one exception to the rule of the dual nature of the chromosomes and at the same time an exception to the rule of the dual nature of the hereditary factors. In many species of animals it has been shown that while there are two sex chromosomes in the female, there is only one in the male (fig. 1a). Itis true in other animals often closely related to these, that the male may have one sex chromosome like the two in the female, and in addition a smaller Y chromosome, and in a few cases the Y may be as large as the X (fig. 1b). In Drosophila there is an XY pair in the male, but the Y chromosome has been shown not to carry any factors that, affect the characters due to factors carried by the X chromosomes. The influence of the Y is therefore nil, and the results are the same as though no Y were present.


The unequal distribution of the X chromosomes in the two sexes has furnished an opportunity to examine the theory that the chromosomes are the bearers of the hereditary factors, because it can be shown that the inheritance of a certain class of characters follows the known i stribution of the sex chromosomes. For example, color blindness in man is inherited in the following way (figs. 2 and 3). A color blind man married to a normal woman (fig. 2) produces normal sons and daughters. If two individuals that have had this origin should marry each other, the daughters will all be normal, half of the sons will be normal but half will be color blind. In other words the color blind grandfather has transmitted his defect to none of his granddaughters, but to half of his grandsons. If we assume that color blindness is due to factors carried by the X chromosomes—in this case by the single X chromosome of the grandfather—the inheritance of the chromosome (to the right) and of the defect (to the left) is the same, as shown by the scheme (fig. 2).


Conversely if a color blind female is married to a normal male (fig. 3), all of the sons will be color blind, but all of the daughters will be normal, If such a color blind male (or any color blind male in fact) is mated with a female having this origin, half of the daughters will be color blind, half normal; half of the sons will be color blind, half will be normal. In other words the color blind grandmother transmits her defect to all of her sons, and to half of her granddaughters and to half of her grandsons. The inheritance of the chromosomes and of the defect is strictly parallel in this case also, as seen in the diagram (fig. 3). In the fruit-fly Drosophila ampelo hila) there have been found over 40 sex-linked Earactes aor whch ae inherited according to the scheme given above. Moreover all possible combinations and tests that have been made and there are many ways of testing such a conclusion—have given results that are entirely consistent with this scheme.

Linkage

If the hereditary characters are carried by the chromosomes we should expect that there would be great groups of characters that go together in inheritance, because while the number of the chromosomes is limited the number of the hereditary characters must be very great.

In Drosophila the number of pairs of chromosomes is only four, while over one hundred mutant characters have been studied. These characters fall into four great groups. The names of some of these characters that involve nearly all parts of the body, are given in the following list : -


FIG. 2. DIAGRAM OF INHERITANCE OF COLOR BLINDNESS IN MAN. THE COLOR BLIND EYE AND THE X CHROMOSOME THAT CARRIES THE FACTOR FOR COLOR BLINDNESS ARE REPRESENTED IN SOLID BLACK. IN THIS DIAGRAM THE CHARACTER ENTERS THROUGH MALE.


FIG. 3. AS IN FIG. 2, BUT HERE THE COLOR BLINDNESS ENTERS THROUGH THE FEMALE.

Group I Group II Group LIT Group IV

Abnormal Antlered ‘Band Bent

Bar Apterous Beaded Eyeless

Bifid Arc Cream ITI

Bow Balloon Deformed

Cherry Black Dwarf

Chrome Blistered Ebony

Cleft Comma Giant

Club Confluent Kidney

Depressed Cream IT Low crossing over

Dotted Curved Maroon

Eosin Dachs Peach

Facet Extra vein. Pink

Forked Fringed Rough

Furrowed Jaunty Safranin

Fused Limited Sepia

Green Little crossover Sooty

Jaunty Morula Spineless

Lemon Olive Spread

Lethal’s, 13 Plexus Trident

Miniature Purple Truncate intensifier

Notch Speck Whitehead

Reduplicated Strap White ocelli

Ruby Streak

Rudimentary Trefoil

Sable Truncate

Shifted Vestigial

Short

Skee

Spoon

Spot

Tan

Truncate intensifier Vermilion

White

Yellow

A group consists of those characters that are inherited together, or rather tend to be inherited together. The chromosome groups of the male and of the female of Drosophila ampelophila are shown in figure 4.

There is a pair of sex chromosomes, two pairs of large chromosomes, and a very small pair—four pairsin all. The coincidence between the number of hereditary groups and of the chromosomes is sufficiently evident to render comment unnecessary.

Crossing over

I have said that the characters that belong to the first group tend to be inherited together. Thus, if a fly with white eyes and yellow wings be crossed to the wild type, having red eyes and gray wings, the second generation of flies will be white yellow and gray red gray, except that once in a hundred times a fly will be found that is white gray or else red yellow. In other words an exchange of characters has in some way taken place, but not oftener than once in a hundred times. We can see the exchange taking place in the reverse way if we cross a white eyed, gray winged fly to a red eyed, yellow winged fly. In the second generation the flies will now be white gray and red yellow, except that once in a hundred times a fly will appear that is white yellow or red gray.

Now if at the time when the chromosomes conjugate the two like chromosomes should exchange pieces, a consistent explanation of the results described above can be given. As a matter of fact there are several stages before, during and after conjugation of the chromosomes when interchange of pieces might take place. One of the phases is illustrated in the following diagram (fig. 5). Two homologous chromosomes are represented as each made up of a single line of beads. During conjugation, like chromosomes come together, and as they unite they can be seen often to twist around each other in consequence of which the parts come to line up on opposite sides of each other, as shown in the figure. When the chromosomes move apart the beads on- one side are represented as passing to one pole, and those on the opposite side to the other pole; this means that during conjugation the pairs of factors, here represented by the beads, segregate independently of each other, and that the forces that draw the beads apart are often stronger than those that hold consecutive beads in their original line or series.


FIG. 4. DIAGRAMS OF THE CHROMOSOMES OF DROSOPHILA AMPELOPHILA: TO THE LEFT, NORMAL FEMALE; IN THE MIDDLE, NORMAL MALE; TO THE RIGHT, NON-DISJUNCTIONAL FEMALE.


It may then, I think, be fairly claimed that the facts of crossing-over which must be due to interchange between homologous chromosomes, if chromosomes be admitted as the bearers of the hereditary factors, can be accounted for without departing from the known behavior of the chromosomes at the time of conjugation. On the other hand it should be clearly understood that the conclusion. as to the way in which the interchange takes place is not as yet on the same footing as are the other relations previously described.

Non-disjunction

In some experiments carried out by Mr. C. B. Bridges a race of flies was found that gave in 5% of cases exceptional results. There were 23% of males that were like their father (patroclinous) when the expectation was that all of the males should be like their mother, in the sex-linked character in question; and there were 23% of females that were like their mother (matroclinous) when the expectation was that they should all be like their father. From certain evidence that I can not now consider, Bridges was led to suspect that an additional sex chromosome was present in the mother that gave these results; and from certain genetic evidence it was predicted that this chromosome could be none other than the Y chromosome. A cytological study of these females has demonstrated that the inference was correct.


FIG. 5. DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING CROSSING OVER OF THE MEMBERS OF A PAIR OF HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMES REPRESENTED BY A SERIES OF BLACK AND A SERIES OF WHITE CIRCLES.

These XXY females contain three elements that might be expected to come together during conjugation. The following situation then arises: X and X may conjugate and later pass to opposite poles (one going into the polar body), and Y would then be left to go to either pole. Two classes of eggs would result namely XY and X eggs. On the other hand X and Y might conjugate and pass to opposite poles (one going into the polar body) and the other X would then be left to go to either pole. The two classes of eggs that would result are XX and XY. There would be expected then, in all, four classes of eggs from an XXY female. These might be fertilized by the female producing sperm of a male with the results shown in (1), (2); (3), (4) of figure 6; or by a male producing sperm with the results shown in the lower line of the same figure (5), (6), (7), (8). If the XXY female were a white eyed female (her two white bearing X’s are represented by the two open X’s in the diagram) and if she were fertilized by a red eyed male (whose single X is represented by the black X in the diagram) the offspring will be expected to fall into the eight classes shown in the same diagram. ‘The exceptional sons (4) arise when a Y bearing egg is fertilized by a female producing sperm (which here carries the factor for red). Thus a female producing sperm gives rise to a male, because maleness results from one X and not from anything else in the nature of the sperm that made him. The exceptional daughters (7) are the white eyed XXY females which arise when an XX egg is fertilized by a male producing sperm. Here again we see that femaleness is due to the occurrence of two X chromosomes, and it: makes no difference whence these two X’s have come.


FIG. 6. DIAGRAM TO ILLUSTRATE THE PRODUCTION OF FOUR CLASSES OF EGGS OF A WHITE EYED FEMALE THROUGH NON-DISJUNCTION, AND THEIR FERTILIZATION BY AN X-BEARING SPERM, GIVING ZYGOTES 1, 2, 3, 4; AND BY Y-BEARING SPERM, GIVING ZYGOTES 5, 6, 7, 8.


FIG. 7. DIAGRAM TO ILLUSTRATE INTERFERENCE: THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE POINTS WHERE THE HEAVY LINES CROSS REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO POINTS OF CROSSING OVER; THE LIGHTER LINES INDICATE THE LESS FREQUENT POINTS OF CROSSING OVER IN THE PROTECTED REGION.

There are many ways in which the hypothesis that non-disjunction is due to the presence of a Y chromosome, in the females that give these unique results, can be tested. For instance, the exceptional white females should repeat the non-disjunctional process. In fact, all such white females give non-disjunction. On the other hand the exceptional red males should neither give, nor transmit, non-disjunction, and this has been found to be true. The red females should be of two kinds; half (2) are expected to behave like normal females, and half (1) should show non-disjunction. These two kinds of females are found, and in equal numbers. There are two kinds of white males, XYY (5), and XY (6). The former should produce some XY spermatozoa. Such sperm would produce daughters, that would be XXY in composition, and from them non-disjunctional offspring are to be expected. This also has been tested and it has been found that half of the white males transmit through their daughters the peculiarity of non-disjunction. A diagram of a chromosome group of an XXY female is shown in figure 4. Interference. If there is an average length of loop between crossingover points, it would seem to follow that the region of the chromosomes on each side of the point where crossing over occurs would be protected, as it were, from another crossing over. This relation is illustrated in the diagram (fig. 7). If crossing over occurs at some point between two pairs of factors a and 6 indicated on the diagram, the next crossing over point of the chromosome would, if it occurred at all, lie at some distance away, rather than near by. This possibility can be tested in a case where several known points are present in a pair of chromosomes. If in such a case we determine how often crossing over occurs between A and a in general and then determine how often it occurs between A and a in those cases where it is known to have taken place between a and 6, we find an enormous decrease in the number of times it occurs between A and a when at the same time it has occurred between a and 6. In general one may say that crossing over at any level interferes with crossing over in the region of each side of that level.


Conclusions

The chromosomes not only furnish a mechanistic explanation of Mendelian heredity, but in the case of Non-disjunction and in the case of the point by point correspondence between the Linkage Groups and the chromosomes, furnish a verifiable explanation of the results. In the case of Crossing-over and of Interference the chromosomes give us the only objective explanation of the results that has been as yet offered.


Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, April 19) Embryology Paper - Localization of the hereditary material in the germ cells (1915). Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Paper_-_Localization_of_the_hereditary_material_in_the_germ_cells_(1915)

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G