Paper - Human ova from large follicles

From Embryology
Revision as of 14:37, 27 November 2017 by Z8600021 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Header}} {{Ref-AllenPratt1930}} {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! Online Editor   |- | 90px|left This historic 1930 paper by All...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Embryology - 27 Nov 2020    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Template:Ref-AllenPratt1930

Online Editor  
Mark Hill.jpg
This historic 1930 paper by Allen and colleagues describes astral and Graffian follicle development in the ovary..

See also - Shaw W. The fate of the graafian follicle in the human ovary. (1925) J. Obst. and Gynaecol. 679-689.
Graffian follicle - Named after Regnier de Graaf (1641 – 1673) a Dutch anatomist and physician who described the anatomy of the uterine tube and the development of follicles in the ovary.
Modern Notes: Oocyte Development | Menstrual Cycle

Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)