Paper - Congenital cataract following German measles in the mother: Difference between revisions
From Embryology
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''Modern Notes:''' [[Abnormal Development - Rubella Virus]] | '''Modern Notes:''' [[Abnormal Development - Rubella Virus]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{ | {{Viral Links}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Historic Disclaimer}} | {{Historic Disclaimer}} |
Revision as of 15:02, 27 November 2017
Embryology - 19 Apr 2024 Expand to Translate |
---|
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page) |
العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations) |
Gregg NM. Congenital cataract following German measles in the mother. (1941) Trans Ophthalmol Soc Aust. 3: 35–46. PubMed 1879476
Online Editor |
---|
This historic 1941 paper by Gregg is one of the first descriptions of the occurrence of malformations associated with maternal Rubella infection.
See also Swan C. A study of three infants dying from congenital defects following maternal rubella in the early stages of pregnancy. (1944) J. Pathol. Bact. 41(3): 289-295.
|
Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages |
---|
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding. (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers) |