Medicine Learning and Teaching Forum 2012 - Online Projects: Difference between revisions

From Embryology
Line 67: Line 67:
The following collapsed tables provide starting points for students during project work, you also have tutorials built into practical classes and practice exercises for individual assessmet items.
The following collapsed tables provide starting points for students during project work, you also have tutorials built into practical classes and practice exercises for individual assessmet items.
{|
{|
|
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
! Group Assessment Criteria
|-
| [[File:Mark_Hill.jpg|50px]]
# The key points relating to the topic that your group allocated are clearly described.
# The choice of content, headings and sub-headings, diagrams, tables, graphs show a good understanding of the topic area.
# Content is correctly cited and referenced.
# The wiki has an element of teaching at a peer level using the student's own innovative diagrams, tables or figures and/or using interesting examples or explanations.
# Evidence of significant research relating to basic and applied sciences that goes beyond the formal teaching activities.
# Relates the topic and content of the Wiki entry to learning aims of embryology.
# Clearly reflects on editing/feedback from group peers and articulates how the Wiki could be improved (or not) based on peer comments/feedback. Demonstrates an ability to review own work when criticised in an open edited wiki format. Reflects on what was learned from the process of editing a peer's wiki.
# Evaluates own performance and that of group peers to give a rounded summary of this wiki process in terms of group effort and achievement.
# The content of the wiki should demonstrate to the reader that your group has researched adequately on this topic and covered the key areas necessary to inform your peers in their learning.
# Develops and edits the wiki entries in accordance with the above guidelines.
|}
|
|
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"

Revision as of 07:36, 30 November 2012

Dr Mark Hill

Online Projects

Developing online student group project work.

Wednesday 7 December 2012


Draft Page - notice removed when complete.

Abstract

This presentation will discuss the experiences in developing small science student group projects (3 to 5 students) that are prepared online in an interactive manner throughout the semester. This group assessment item replaced a previous poster presentation project. This assessment has now been running for a number of years, and the current presentation will describe the pedagogy of this assessment as well as associated practical issues. Key practical issues discussed include: initial tutorials to train students, literature researching strategies, copyright issues, plagiarism and peer assessment.

Introduction

Pedagogically, I see great value in designing group assessment items for students as this really tests their ability to work collaboratively and to determine their own strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of others, in a team environment. Please note that many students initially do not like this form of assessment, as it relies on them making to much of an "ongoing contribution" (more work than they intended) and they are also concerned about project "free riders" (academic plagiarism).


In the past, designing group assessment items often involved working inside practical class times, or preparation of posters/talks on a specific topic either inside class times or with an option for some independent work outside those times. I have previously used both these techniques in designing course assessments.


Currently, I have designed a semester-long group assessment project that allows students an option to work together over an extended period researching topics that relate directly to the course goals. There are many different components to this project process, and given the limited time for my presentation, I will only be able to touch on a few key concepts outlined in the abstract. Note that there is also a Medicine online group assessment project, that works a little differently in structure from the model described here.


Further details and links are made available here for you to explore further in your own time, and I am always happy to respond to emailed questions.


--Mark Hill 11:32, 27 November 2012 (EST)

Project Design

  • Students are introduced to group project in the first lecture when going through the course outline.

Practical Issues

Training Tutorials

The following collapsed tables provide starting points for students during project work, you also have tutorials built into practical classes and practice exercises for individual assessmet items.

Literature Researching Strategies

Copyright

Plagiarism

Peer Assessment

Concluding Remarks

Given the brief time available for this presentation, I would suggest that you open the various collapsed tables and links shown on this current page for reading in your own time.

Links


Online Projects


Glossary Links

Glossary: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Numbers | Symbols | Term Link

Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2024, April 19) Embryology Medicine Learning and Teaching Forum 2012 - Online Projects. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Medicine_Learning_and_Teaching_Forum_2012_-_Online_Projects

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2024, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G