ANAT2341 Lab 10: Difference between revisions
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==3. Group Projects== | ==3. Group Projects== | ||
Peer review process should now be completed. I will | Peer review process should now be completed. I will have unlocked the project pages before today's lab and you can continue editing before final submission (last week of semester). | ||
Now read through your peer reviews of your project. | Now read through your peer reviews of your project. | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
# Have many reviews identified specific strengths with the current project page? | # Have many reviews identified specific strengths with the current project page? | ||
# Are there simple errors that need correction. | # Are there simple errors that need correction. | ||
All members of your group have now reviewed all the other project pages. | All members of your group have now reviewed all the other project pages. |
Revision as of 08:58, 10 October 2017
1. QUIZ
2. Guest Lecturer - Dr. Kimberley Beaumont
Dr. Kimberley Beaumont |
Melanocyte Development, Differentiation and Melanoma
In her studies she utilizes a 3D melanoma spheroid model, which better mimics the tumour microenvironment compared to conventional 2D cell culture models, as well as mouse models. Dr Beaumont specialises in live, confocal and multi photon microscopy. Links: Sydney University Research Profile | PubMed - Beaumont KA |
References
Search PubMed: Beaumont KA
<pubmed>28634959</pubmed> <pubmed>23949769</pubmed>
3. Group Projects
Peer review process should now be completed. I will have unlocked the project pages before today's lab and you can continue editing before final submission (last week of semester).
Now read through your peer reviews of your project.
- Have many reviews identified specific faults with the current project page?
- Have many reviews identified specific strengths with the current project page?
- Are there simple errors that need correction.
All members of your group have now reviewed all the other project pages.
- How does your page compare to other projects?
- Have you thought now that parts of your own page that could be improved?
- Do other groups have good ideas you can incorporate into your own page?
Remember that peer assessors will not have identified all issues that will come out in the final assessment.
- Image information, referencing and copyright will not have been checked in detail. This is a common mistake (look at previous years assessments on their discussion page).
- Referencing and sources within the project page will not be checked in detail.
- Parts of your project page may be identified by peer assessment as incomplete, due to a group member not completing their assigned work. You need to contact me so that I can follow up with those individual(s). Remember the whole project mark will be affected by this issue now.
OK now get your content completed and start organising the "appearance" of the project page. Please contact me now if you are having any technical issues, it is to late to let me know when the project t is actually due.