2016 Group Project 5
2016 Student Projects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Signalling: 1 Wnt | 2 Notch | 3 FGF Receptor | 4 Hedgehog | 5 T-box | 6 TGF-Beta | ||||
2016 Group Project Topic - Signaling in Development
OK you are now in a group, add a topic with your student signature to the group page. | ||||
This page is an undergraduate science embryology student project and may contain inaccuracies in either descriptions or acknowledgements. |
Group Assessment Criteria |
---|
Science Student Projects
|
More Information on Assessment Criteria | Science Student Projects |
T-box genes and their signalling
Introduction
The T-box family of transcription factors exhibits widespread involvement throughout development in all metazoans. [1]
PMID 9504043
Features of the T-box family
(Briefly talk about each of the different T-boxs)
Origins of the T-box genes
The story of the T-box genes began in Paris at the Pasteur laboratory in the 1920s with the Russian scientist Nadine Dobrovolskaïa-Zavadskaïa, who embarked on a pioneering screen for X-ray-induced developmental mouse mutants. Her isolation of a mouse strain with a short tail, caused by a semidominant heterozygous mutation in a locus she called T, represented one of the first successful mammalian genetic screens, and provided one of the earliest links between gene activity and cell behaviour during embryogenesis[2]. The mid-gestational death of homozygous T embryos, with perturbed development of the posterior mesoderm and notochord, demonstrated an essential requirement for T during gastrulation, and led to the earliest insights into the inductive influences of notochord on neural tube and somite development. Over 60 years later T, now also known as brachyury, meaning ‘short tail’ in Greek, was cloned in one of the earliest positional cloning efforts in the mouse[3]. At the time, lack of homology in the T-gene product to any previously characterized protein gave no clues as to its biochemical role until, in 1993, it was revealed to be a novel sequence-specific DNA-binding protein[4]. Crystallographic determination of the structure of the DNA-binding domain, now called the Tbox, revealed a new way through which proteins recognize DNA[5].
Functions of T-box in development
(including current research)
Cardiac development
PMID 15580613 PMID 16258075 PMID 1851989
Limb Development
PMID 11782414
PMID 22872086
Respiratory Development
PMID 22876201
Palate Development
PMID 22371266
Abnormalities
Z5039628 (talk) 19:37, 1 September 2016 (AEST)
TBX1/DIGEORGE SYNDROME; TBX3/ULNAR-MAMMARY SYNDROME; TBX5/HOLT– ORAM SYNDROME; TBX19/ISOLATED ACTH DEFICIENCY; TBX22/CLEFT PALATE
Z5039628 (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2016 (AEST)
PMID 10235264 PMID 18505863 PMID 15066124
Holt-Oram Syndrome primary article PMID 11161571
OMIM 142900
Animal models
Marsupial forelimb development PMID 21098569
PMID 24299415
PMID 11427155
PMID 22235805
This study [6]published in 2012 is the first which describes the HOX gene expression in a marsupial (Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii) and how these genes are also responsible for limb and digit formation.
The genes responsible for digit patterning are the HOXA13 and HOXD13 which are also present and highly conserved in other vertebrates such as the chicken and the mouse. In the tammar wallaby the forelimbs develop much faster than the hind limbs. In the tammar wallaby the hindlimb autopod has only four digits and the fourth digit is greatly elongated while the digits two and three are syndactylous. The authors found that the differences in the gene structure in the tammar and the changes in the expression and timing may be driving the difference in the development of the syndactylous hind limb. They suggest that the polyserine region may be responsible for marsupial syndactyly. This also needs to be studied in other marsupials with syndactyl hind limbs such as bandicoots and bibles (Peramelemorphia). Our findings support the hypothesis that changes to the structure and function of HOXA13 and HOXD13 affect regulation of digit identity in this marsupial.