Difference between revisions of "2012 Group Project 3"

From Embryology
(Timeline of Developmental Processes of the Gustatory System)
(Introduction)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
  
These different modalities not only function to maintain the proper intake of nutrients within the body but also, by way of aversion, prohibit the consumption of undesired or poisonous materials. The bitter modality for example is generally regarded as displeasing to the human palate. It represents a high acid content which may be a result of foods which have become rotten or are inherently poisonous to the body.<ref name=Cellbiology>{{Cite doi|10.1083/jcb.20100314420100927c}}</ref>
+
These different modalities not only function to maintain the proper intake of nutrients within the body but also, by way of aversion, prohibit the consumption of undesired or poisonous materials. The bitter modality for example is generally regarded as displeasing to the human palate. It represents a high acid content which may be a result of foods which have become rotten or are inherently poisonous to the body.<ref name=PMID20696704><pubmed>20696704</pubmed></ref>
  
  
Research has historically limited itself to investigating the mechanisms of these five taste qualities though it must be noted many other modalities may exist. Of particular conjecture is the existence of fatty acid recognition. In the past the detection of fat in food has been attributed to somatosensory inputs <ref name=Cellbiology/> from the tongue, that is, the oily feel and texture of fat  rather than its actual ‘taste’ allows the brain to encode for its presence. Further research is therefore required to elicit the precise mechanisms of fat detection.
+
Research has historically limited itself to investigating the mechanisms of these five taste qualities though it must be noted many other modalities may exist. Of particular conjecture is the existence of fatty acid recognition. In the past the detection of fat in food has been attributed to somatosensory inputs <ref name=PMID20696704/> from the tongue, that is, the oily feel and texture of fat  rather than its actual ‘taste’ allows the brain to encode for its presence. Further research is therefore required to elicit the precise mechanisms of fat detection.
  
 
===Cell Biology===
 
===Cell Biology===

Revision as of 23:07, 25 September 2012

Taste Development

Gustatory System

Introduction

The five basic tastes

Taste or more appropriately gustation, is a fundamental survival tool in animals as it directs the consumption of essential nutrients. The five tastes that exist within the human gustatory system: salty, sweet, sour, bitter and umami, all signify basic physiological requirements. Salty tastes denote the presence of Na+, an important ion involved in the transportation and retention of water across cell membranes. Sweetness is the recognition of carbohydrates, essential for maintaining optimal brain function and providing the basis for energy production in muscle tissue via ATP hydrolysis. Similarly umami codes for the presence of L-amino acids, especially L-glutamate which is an integral component of protein synthesis.


These different modalities not only function to maintain the proper intake of nutrients within the body but also, by way of aversion, prohibit the consumption of undesired or poisonous materials. The bitter modality for example is generally regarded as displeasing to the human palate. It represents a high acid content which may be a result of foods which have become rotten or are inherently poisonous to the body.[1]


Research has historically limited itself to investigating the mechanisms of these five taste qualities though it must be noted many other modalities may exist. Of particular conjecture is the existence of fatty acid recognition. In the past the detection of fat in food has been attributed to somatosensory inputs [1] from the tongue, that is, the oily feel and texture of fat rather than its actual ‘taste’ allows the brain to encode for its presence. Further research is therefore required to elicit the precise mechanisms of fat detection.

Cell Biology

The five taste qualities are not all detected by the same type of receptor cell located within the taste bud. Like rods and cones in the eye which detect different wavelengths of light, there are specific types of receptors for different tastes. For example, sweet, umami and bitter are recognised by Type II G-protein coupled receptors, whereas sour is related to Type III presynaptic cells. The cell type involved in salty taste transduction is unknown however it is known that sodium ions can enter the receptor cell membrane via ion channel permeation.

Type II receptors

When a bitter, sweet or umami ligand binds to a type II G-coupled receptor, a cascade of chemical reactions causes the release of Ca2+ which in turn mediates exocystosis of ATP. The function of this ATP is threefold:

  1. Stimulates gustatory nerve afferents which project to gustatory nuclei in the spinal cord
  2. Excites Type III presynaptic nerve fibres to release serotonin.
  3. Has a positive feedback effect on type II receptor cells, increasing the level of ATP production.


The role of serotonin is believed to be in the form of lateral inhibition i.e. when a bitter quality is recognised, adjacent receptors for sweetness are deactivated and thus the two tastes may be clearly differentiated. It also has a negative feedback effect on receptor cells, inhibiting umami, bitter and sweet taste transduction.

Taste Map

The traditional tongue map concept

The idea of a tongue map has disseminated through society for many years. This concept purports that different areas of the tongue are specialised to detect either sweet, salty, sour and bitter tastes. Recent research however has completely nullified such claims and suggests instead that different forms of taste are recognised all over the tongue as well as via the palate. Thus the term taste map has come to take on a new meaning and that is, the precise areas of taste modalities processing in areas of cortex and its subsequent neural inputs.

Neural Pathways

First order neurons - From the receptors located in the taste buds, gustatory nerve afferents project to the ipsilateral rostral 1/3 of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), located in the medulla. This rostral 1/3 is commonly referred to as the gustatory nucleus.

The gustatory nucleus receives input from cranial nerves VII (Facial n.), IX (Hypglossal n.), and X (Vagus n.) via special visceral afferent (SVA) nerve fibres. A summary of their functions is as follows:

  • Facial nerve n. - carries taste information from the anterior 2/3 of the tongue.
  • Hypoglossal n. - carries taste information from the posterior 1/3 of the tongue.
  • Vagus n. - carries taste information from the palate


Second order neurons - From the NTS second order neurons carry taste information to the Ventral posteromedial (VPM) nucleus in the thalamus.[2]

Copious scientific conjecture surrounds how each taste modality is transmitted to the brain. The ‘labelled-line’ hypothesis suggests that there are taste specific neurons which exclusively carry that taste modality to cortical areas. In analogous terms it can be viewed like the pipelines leading toward a house. Each pipeline carries its own utility, there is one for gas, another for water and finally for electricity with each terminating in slightly different areas of the house. In the same way, on the tongues there are different receptors for each taste which concurrently have individual nerve tracts leading to the primary gustatory cortex.

Contrapuntally there is electrophysiological evidence that single nerve afferents carry multiple modalities. These studies show one nerve afferent may have both a strong and a weak activation in response to a multiple taste stimuli.

Cortical Areas

Primary gustatory cortex

The location of the taste perception centres has been observed via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. The primary taste cortex has been identified as being located in the anterior insula/frontal operculum (I/fO)[3], with the secondary taste cortex in the caudolateral orbitofrontal cortex.[4] Within the insula there are further subdivisions related to each taste modality. Two photon calcium imaging research has outlined certain ’hot-spots’ of activation which are clearly delineated in relation to each taste. For example, the bitter modality is represented on the insula cortex approximately 1mm posterior to the middle cerebral artery whereas the sweet modality is represented 2.5mm rostrodorsal to the bitter field with no apparent overlap.[2] These findings lend weight to the idea that there is only one receptor for each taste quality.


It is interesting to note the relationship between taste and the reward centres of the brain. There is evidence of neural input to the ventral tegmental area (the origin of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward pathway) and nucleus accumbens (involved in the conversion of motivation into physical action).[2] Neural connections such as this provide the foundations in explaining concepts such as flavour learning and preference. It may also give some insight into chronic problems such as food addiction and craving. As of yet however the gustatory neural network is not well understood and more research is required to elucidate the relationship between pleasure and taste sensation

Timeline of Developmental Processes of the Gustatory System

Postovulatory Week Description Image
Week 6

The surface of the developing tongue is covered by nearly flat epitheliuem (Figure 1) [5]. The first gustatory papillae of the tongue appears in the caudal midline near the foramen caecum and the first circumvallate papilla develop on the dorsal midline [5] .

image

Weeks 6 to 7

Nerve fibres approach the basal lamina of lingual epithelium [6]. At this stage the lingual epithelium consists of two to three cell layers and there is not yet any sign of cell specializations indicating early taste bud formation[6].

Image

Week 7

A series of epithelial swellings in the anterior part and midline of the tongue indicate early forming fungiform papillae (figure 2) [5].

Image

Week 8

The lingual epithelium shows first signs of taste bud development as nerve fibres penetrate epithelial basal lamina [6] and form synapses with taste bud progenitor cells. The synapses reach a maximum around the 12th to 13th week [6]. However, at this time these cells are still poorly differentiated, elongated epithelial cells [6] . The synapses demonstrate the neuronal connection between the taste bud primordium and the central nervous system [6]. Ciliated cells also appear around the 8th week, however the significance of these cells which are scattered randomly across the lingual surface remains unclear [6].

Image

Weeks 8-9

“By this stage the top surface of circumvallate papillae usually contains a taste pit partly filled with microvilli of presumed underlying taste bud cells” (Figure 10) [5]

Image

Weeks 10-11

At this stage, the lingual epithelium compromises of about four cell layers, and the first shallow grooves above the taste bud primordium are developed [6].

Fungiform papillae appear on the lateral margins and the tip of the tongue [5], containing taste bud primordial that display the first signs of a primitive pore formation [6].

Untypically differentiated apical cellular processes extend onto the surface [5]

Some taste bud primordial contain cells that perforate the covering epithelial later with short, broad untypically differentiated apical cellular processes. (Figure 3,4) [6] [5]

Image

Week 12

Taste bud cells are more clearly differentiated into epithelial cell types II and III [6].

Image

Weeks 12-13

By this stage the taste bud primordial are all located on the top of dermal papillae (Fig 6a) [6]. There is also maximum synapses between cells and afferent nerve fibres, which intermingle with each other to form a plexus-like structure [6].

Image

Weeks 14 -15

The shape of the taste buds primordial begins to resemble those of adult taste buds [6]. By the 14th week the taste pores develop as the taste pits are filled by microvilli [6], indicating the possibility that the taste buds begin their gustatory function [6], however they still lack an electron-dense mucous material (Fig.10) [6]. The tastebuds only achieve a fully developed function in week 15 of gestation with the development of type I cells to produce the mucous material in the taste pit [6].

Image

History of Discoveries

Date Significant Discovery
350BC Aristotle writes about the basic tastes, sweet and bitter, which can be modified, he says, by salty and acidic.
1901 D. Hanig publishes a paper containing data of taste sensitivity in different regions of the tongue. The data are later misinterpreted, giving rise to the myth of the ‘tongue map’
1908 Fifth basic taste discovered: savouriness, described as umami, which is conferred by glutamate.
1931 Bitter taste sensitivity found to vary among humans (1)
1931-32 Genetecists confirm findings about sensitivity to bitter tasting PTC and discover non-tasting is a recessive genetic trait (2,11)
1939 Geneticists show that chimpansees like humans, vary in their ability to perceive the bitterness of PTC
1992 Discovery of gustucin, a teste cell-specific G-protein, in the taste buds. Gustucin is later shown to mark bitter, umami and sweet cells (13)
1996 Witt M and Reutter K of the Source Department of Anatomy, Technical University Dresden, Germany, carried out a transmission electron microscopy study to investigate the embryonic and fetal development of Human taste buds. Their results suggest an "at least dual function of embryonic/fetal taste buds", including non-gustatory, paracrine functions prior to the 14th week and gustatory after the 14th week. PMID 8955790
2000 First taste sonsors, the T2R receptors, discovered (3)
2001 The sweet receptor is discovered (5): a combination of TaR2 and T1R3.
2002 Amino acid detector, T1R1 and T1R3 identified (6) = Umami
2005 Sweet taste receptor found (15) in the GI tract
2006 Cells for sour taste discovered, identified by PKD2L1 (4-7)
2007 Harlow DE, Barlow LA of the Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center provide evidence of the embryonic origin of gustatory cranial sensory neurons PMID 17826760
2009 The Car4 receptor, which senses the carbon dioxide in fizzy drinks is found on sour cells (8)


A study by Hevezi P et al, presents the first comprehensive characterization of gene expression in primate taste buds, as opposed to previous studies which focused on rodents. PMID 19636377

2010 ENaC identified as the sodium-salt taste receptor (9)


Adult Tongue and Taste Buds – Structure and Function

Structure

The tongue is located on the floor of the oral cavity, It is a muscular structure with sensory units crowning. The tongue is divided into an anterior two thirds and a posterior one third. These regions are divided by a V-shaped groove at the back of the tongue (sulcus terminalis). The anterior two thirds of the tongue is covered by stratified squamous epithelium, It contains a roughened surface and has projections called papillae that vary in shape and number.

'The Image Below is a very simplistic Diagram of the surface of the Tongue showing the locations of the different papillae and other important features

Drawing of Tongue.png


Papillae

Close up of Human Tongue Papillae

There are 4 types of papillae on the tongue. The most numerous papillae are the filiform papillae, which function to provide a surface that aids in holding food on the tongue during chewing but do not contain taste buds. The larger, less numerous fungiform papillae which contain taste buds, as do foliate papillae. Circumvallate papillae form a wide V at the sulcus terminalis also containing taste bus. There are no papillae or taste buds located on the posterior third of the tongue, having mucosal folds and the lingual tonsils instead.


Function

The tongue is for tasting, swallowing, and speech. The functional unit of the taste bud is a taste cell, there are between 50 and 100 taste cells in each taste bud these taste cells represent all 5 different tastes. Historically is was believed that different areas of the tongue were responsible for different taste sensations although this has since been disregarded.[1] The papillae contain taste buds which are connected to the oral cavity via a taste pore, the function of the taste bud is to transmit a chemical signal from the oral cavity to a taste cell, this chemical signal is the converted into an electrical impulse and delivered to the brain via nerve fibres for interpretation.


The Image Below is a very simplistic Hand drawn Diagram of a taste bud, in an extreme close up, cross section view of the the taste bud unit, not to scale


Taste bud 1.jpg

Abnormalities

Knocking out P2X Receptors

Evoking taste - ATP release in tongue

Gustatory abnormalities has not been widely researched and what has been researched has been through animal testing, most commonly we have found on mice.

In Huang, 2008 this team used the release of the neurotransmitter, ATP (adenosine triphosphate) as a quantitative measurement of gustatory sensation and taste. This was done by using a comparison of wild type (WT) and double knockout (DKO) mice. P2X receptors, P2X2 and P2X3 were knocked out in the DKO mice. The premise of this article was that knocking out P2X receptors reduces transmitter secretion of ATP in taste buds, therefore they cannot taste.

It should be noted that the taste buds in DKO are functional, but are not stimulated by the administration of tastants.

The transmission of release of ATP is secretion through gap junction hemichannels (pannexin 1 gap junction).

When both P2X2 and P2X3 are knocked out, no taste is elicited. However they found that if either P2X2 OR P2X3 was knocked out there was a taste response. So the inference made from this is that if one of the two receptors from the P2X family was knocked out there still can have taste response. The WT mice showed significant stimulation by tastants whereas DKO had little to no stimulation of ATP release.[8]

FGF signalling and genes

Sprouty, or Srpy, genes have been related to regulating the development of circumvillate papillae (CVP). The CVP are large dome shaped papillae, which form a 'V' just in front of the terminal sulcus.

By knocking out Spry genes using mice which had Spry1 and Spry2 knocked out showed that the number of CVP doubled. However, when Fibroblast Growth Factor gene ("Fgf10") was absent, the number of CVP was significantly reduced, if not completely absent. The correlation between Spry1/2 and Fgf10 is that Spry1/2 antagonises "Fgf10" to limit the size of the CVP progenitor placode. Exclusive expression of Fgf10 in the mesenchyme is necessary for the formation of CVP.

This image shows the CVP stained with H&E and scanned by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) CVP of WT(top) and DKO(bottom) mice with H&E and SEM.png

This image shows the location of the CVP and the increased number in DKO mice by SEM Mouse circumvallate papilla 01.jpg

Taste buds develop from the mesenchyme but require local signalling to properly differentiate. Some signalling factors for proper development of taste buds besides FGF are: Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF).


Additionally, this proves that the anterior and posterior developments of the tongue are derived from embryonic tissues, where the anterior tongue is derived from the ectoderm and the posterior tongue is derived from the endoderm. Taste buds develop from the mesenchyme but require local signalling to properly differentiate. Some signalling factors for proper development of taste buds besides FGF are: Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF).

As mentioned above, this article shows that the anterior and posterior developments of the tongue are derived from embryonic tissues, where the anterior tongue is derived front the ectoderm and the posterior tongue is derived from the endoderm. Secondly, FGF is required to regulate the growth of taste buds, while Spry genes limit the number of CVP. Fgf10& Spry 1&2work antagonistically through receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)signalling.

However, the deletion of Spry2led to the increase of CVPs it should be noted that they found that a significant decrease in number of fungiform papillae. Contrastingly, the absence of Fgf10, while leading to the absence of CVPs lead to an increase in number and size of fungiform papillae. Therefore these genes have different effects on the anterior and posterior developing tongue and taste buds.[9]

Current Research

We have an evolving understanding of Embryonic Taste development, through the use of state-of-the-art technology and research techniques we are able to make brilliant discoveries that continue to connect the dots of this amazing natural process of human development. The majority of research in taste development is involving mice, these mammals show similar embryonic pathways to humans and research is performed in ethical and humane methods.

the below image shows histological stains of a mice tongue showing dysplasia"

Histology.jpg

Synergistic relationships of Six Genes

In an animal study using mice by Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, Kawakami K.(2011) Firstly nominating "Six Genes" as a major component in gustatory development, stating that deficiencies in certain Six genes (specifically Six1 & Six4) leads to poor development. Their research also highlights evidence of cooperative relationships between Six genes for normal advance. This experiment involved breeding mice containing exclusively Six1 and Six4 genes and examining the expression of these genes in papillae under high powered microscope observation. Understanding the role of certain genes along with the intrinsic relationships they hold is crucial for the ability to identify possible causes and correction of any abnormalities [10]

Neural Crest responsibilities

Another Animal Study involving mice explores a new idea of Neural crest (NC) contribution in taste development, specifically the development of papillae and taste buds. Liu HX, Komatsu Y, Mishina Y, Mistretta CM. (2012) suggest that Neural crest cells travel to the location of the tongue in early embryonic stages, gain epithelium phenotypes, multiply and then differentiate to eventually form taste papillae. The experiment involved the comparison of 2 different types of Cre line mice, which both express Cre gene in neural crest protocol, the different distribution patterns where observed in specific regions that NC is responsible for.[11]

Augmentation of Endoderm

In an animal study conducted by Rothova M, Thompson H, Lickert H, Tucker AS.(2012) exploring the historically debated issue of endoderm contribution to tongue development showed promising evidence that position of taste buds are patterned by the border of ectoderm and endoderm derivative epithelium. This study was accomplished via microscopic examination of previously stained specimens. Concluding endoderm has direct influence on gustatory develoment [12]

Changes in Taste Cells over time

Research by Ozdener H, Spielman AI, Rawson NE.(2012) developing a culture which allows taste cells to survive for up to 12 months, empowers researchers to study the processes of proliferation, differentiation and function. This experiment will provide a precidnet for future study of taste cells, as these cells are able to operate and grow normally. [13]


Shh key component of taste bud proginators

A tamoxifen treatment which supresses Sonic hedgehog (Shh) secretion in mice proving to reduce the number of cells visable within papillae, in contrast mice not treated with tamoxifen showed a mark increase of cells within papillae, these cells are assumed to become taste cells in later development. Specific mice were bred to trace the destination of taste placode cells, the study concluded that Shh expressing placodes are taste bud proginators which in turn become taste cells within taste buds although do not have any prescuros relationship with pappilae. The results were obtain by examination of mice embryos using Bright-field or multichannel fluorescent images through the use of an "Axiocam CCD camera and Axioplan fluorescence microscope with Axiovision software" a study by Harlow, Yang, Williams, Barlow (2011)[14]


WNT family exhibit various roles

The WNT gene family has a function of signally proteins for various reason such as development, In 2010 Liu, Staubach Grosse, Walton, Saims, Gumucio, Mistretta explored recent findings on the role of WNT's in tongue and papillae development, Concluding that WNT/β-catenin is essential for fungiform papillae differing to WNT5a which proved to be principle in tongue development. Intrinsic chemical mediators were considered by manipulating a tissue culture and then throughaly examined by scanning photomicrograph. [15]


The below image shows and example of tongue abnormalities, this is called "double tongue" each side has independent movement [2] Abnormal of tongue.jpg

Useful links

Glossary

ectoderm- outer germ layer of embryo

endoderm - inner germ layer of embryo

epithelium - basic animal tissue that is composed of tightly packed cells, usually covering the outer portion of organs

exocystosis - movement of contents out of cell

ganglia - the accumulation of a nerve cell body

growth factor - a substance that stimulates the growth of cells

gustatory - anything that relates to the taste sense

hydrolysis - breakdown of a chemical when it reacts with water

mesoderm - middle germ layer of embryo

mesenchyme - multipotential cells

neural crest - a part of the ectoderm found on both sides of the neural tube

neuron - most simplistic unit of the nervous system

neurotransmitter - chemicals which allow the passing of signals from neuron to neuron via connecting part (synapse)

papillae - small rough surface projection

six genes - a family of genes

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) - signalling protein invloved in normal development

sulcus terminalis - describes a physical transition point separating the anterior 2/3 of the tongue from the posterior 1/3

tamoxifen - hormonal altering drug

Image gallery

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 <pubmed>20696704</pubmed>
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 <pubmed>21885776</pubmed>
  3. <pubmed>22245354</pubmed>
  4. <pubmed>21305668</pubmed>
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named PMID9455607
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 <pubmed>8955790</pubmed>
  7. <pubmed>22717400</pubmed>
  8. <pubmed>21940456</pubmed>
  9. <pubmed>21655085</pubmed>
  10. <pubmed>21978088</pubmed>
  11. <pubmed>22659543</pubmed>
  12. <pubmed>22581563</pubmed>
  13. <pubmed>22643728</pubmed>
  14. <pubmed>PMC2674259</pubmed>
  15. <pubmed>PMC2768563</pubmed>

External Links

External Links Notice - The dynamic nature of the internet may mean that some of these listed links may no longer function. If the link no longer works search the web with the link text or name. Links to any external commercial sites are provided for information purposes only and should never be considered an endorsement. UNSW Embryology is provided as an educational resource with no clinical information or commercial affiliation.

--Mark Hill 12:22, 15 August 2012 (EST) Please leave the content listed below the line at the bottom of your project page.


2012 Projects: Vision | Somatosensory | Taste | Olfaction | Abnormal Vision | Hearing