User:Z5093005 - Revision history

Z5093005: /* Peer Reviews */

2017-10-19T05:20:28Z

Peer Reviews

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 19 October 2017
Line 36:		Line 36:
	A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.		A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.

	~~----~~

	'''Review: Group 4- Eye'''		'''Review: Group 4- Eye'''
Line 52:		Line 51:
	The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.		The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.

	~~----~~

	'''Review: Group 5- Lung'''		'''Review: Group 5- Lung'''

Z5093005: /* Peer Reviews */

2017-10-19T05:19:45Z

Peer Reviews

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 19 October 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Peer Reviews==		==Peer Reviews==

	'''Review: ~~2nd Project~~- Kidney'''		'''Review: Group 2- Kidney'''

	'''Regarding content: ''' <br/>		'''Regarding content: ''' <br/>
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.		Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.

	'''Group 3- Heart'''		'''Review: Group 3 Heart'''

	'''Regarding content:''' <br/>		'''Regarding content:''' <br/>
Line 38:		Line 38:
	----		----

	'''Review: ~~4th Project~~- Eye'''		'''Review: Group 4- Eye'''

	'''Regarding content:''' <br/>		'''Regarding content:''' <br/>
Line 54:		Line 54:
	----		----

	'''Review: ~~5th Project~~- Lung'''		'''Review: Group 5- Lung'''

	'''Regarding content:'''<br/>		'''Regarding content:'''<br/>
Line 68:		Line 68:
	However, due to the sizing of some of the images, they are not that clear.		However, due to the sizing of some of the images, they are not that clear.

	'''Review: ~~6th Project~~- Cerebellum'''		'''Review: Group 6- Cerebellum'''

	'''Regarding content:'''<br/>		'''Regarding content:'''<br/>

Z5093005: /* Peer Reviews */

2017-10-19T05:18:24Z

Peer Reviews

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 19 October 2017
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.		Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.

	'''~~Review: 3rd Project~~- Heart'''		'''Group 3- Heart'''

	'''Regarding content:''' <br/>		'''Regarding content:''' <br/>
Line 35:		Line 35:
	'''Other Comments:'''<br/>		'''Other Comments:'''<br/>
	A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.		A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.

			----

	'''Review: 4th Project- Eye'''		'''Review: 4th Project- Eye'''
Line 49:		Line 51:
	Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable.		Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable.
	The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.		The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.

			----

	'''Review: 5th Project- Lung'''		'''Review: 5th Project- Lung'''

Z5093005: /* Peer Reviews */

2017-10-19T05:01:34Z

Peer Reviews

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 19 October 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	'''Review: 2nd Project- Kidney'''		'''Review: 2nd Project- Kidney'''

	'''Regarding content: '''		'''Regarding content: ''' <br/>
			The content is written in simple language, making it easy to understand. The development stages were put in the form of a timetable which enabled its clear and easy understanding. Furthermore, in order for the reader to smoothly follow, there were clear headings and subheadings given. Having too many or too less can both hinder the flow and this project had a good balance between the two. Furthermore, the choice of subheadings are all relevant. Development abnormalities has been addressed well.<br/>
	The content is written in simple language, making it easy to understand. The development stages were put in the form of a timetable which enabled its clear and easy understanding. Furthermore, in order for the reader to smoothly follow, there were clear headings and subheadings given. Having too many or too less can both hinder the flow and this project had a good balance between the two. Furthermore, the choice of subheadings are all relevant. Development abnormalities has been addressed well.
	It is noticeable however that two headings have been inserted “Questions for the future” and “General info on the renal system” though there is no information written under that. They are both relevant to the topic, yet information has not been added. Furthermore, the information below “Current Research” does not just do justice to that research area. Only one point has been mentioned. Another weakness was that the terms were not always explained, with the assumption that the reader knows their meanings.		It is noticeable however that two headings have been inserted “Questions for the future” and “General info on the renal system” though there is no information written under that. They are both relevant to the topic, yet information has not been added. Furthermore, the information below “Current Research” does not just do justice to that research area. Only one point has been mentioned. Another weakness was that the terms were not always explained, with the assumption that the reader knows their meanings.

	'''Referencing and Research: '''		'''Referencing and Research: '''<br/>

	The references that have been provided at the end of the project have been referenced correctly. The research effort is fair evident by the number of sources used. The articles used are also primarily from journals, thus being mostly authentic and reliable. Under the subheadings also, in various places, the citing has been done.		The references that have been provided at the end of the project have been referenced correctly. The research effort is fair evident by the number of sources used. The articles used are also primarily from journals, thus being mostly authentic and reliable. Under the subheadings also, in various places, the citing has been done.
	However, there are some images in the project which have not been cited properly; these include figures 1, 2, 4 and 5. Kidney structure is also missing the correct referencing. The research effort could have been more rigorous to further enrich the information.		However, there are some images in the project which have not been cited properly; these include figures 1, 2, 4 and 5. Kidney structure is also missing the correct referencing. The research effort could have been more rigorous to further enrich the information.

	'''Other Comments''':		'''Other Comments''':<br/>

	Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.		Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.

	'''Review: 3rd Project- Heart'''		'''Review: 3rd Project- Heart'''

	'''Regarding content:'''		'''Regarding content:''' <br/>
	Glossary is provided in which key terms are clearly defined for the reader. This is a commendable effort to make the project easy to understand. Overall, the project is also presented in simple terms making it easy to follow. Headings, subheadings and the use of paragraphs are also done appropriately. The topics chosen are all relevant to the topic.		Glossary is provided in which key terms are clearly defined for the reader. This is a commendable effort to make the project easy to understand. Overall, the project is also presented in simple terms making it easy to follow. Headings, subheadings and the use of paragraphs are also done appropriately. The topics chosen are all relevant to the topic.
	However, for some topics, the information is a bit lengthy, such as that under the “Development Signalling Process”. It would also help to have the same structure throughout the project. There are variations under the headings. Perhaps highlighting key words by bolding or italics would make it easier to follow the text.		However, for some topics, the information is a bit lengthy, such as that under the “Development Signalling Process”. It would also help to have the same structure throughout the project. There are variations under the headings. Perhaps highlighting key words by bolding or italics would make it easier to follow the text.

	'''Referencing and Research:'''		'''Referencing and Research:''' <br/>
	Both referencing and research were done quite excellently in the project. The number of sources used were very extensive, and mostly being peer-reviewed articles. A variety of journals were also explored. The referencing list at the end had been properly listed and also throughout the project.		Both referencing and research were done quite excellently in the project. The number of sources used were very extensive, and mostly being peer-reviewed articles. A variety of journals were also explored. The referencing list at the end had been properly listed and also throughout the project.
	However, for some images, the references are not done correctly.		However, for some images, the references are not done correctly.
	Other Comments: A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.
	~~Grade: Distinction~~		'''Other Comments:'''<br/>
	Review: 4th Project		A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.
	Regarding content: The material is provided in a concise way, which demonstrates the ability to consolidate large volumes of information accordingly. Furthermore, various tables have been used which helps the reader to understand the more simply. The organization is also improved. Many topics have been addressed that are all relevant to the topic. Headings and subheadings have been added properly also.
			'''Review: 4th Project- Eye'''

			'''Regarding content:''' <br/>
			The material is provided in a concise way, which demonstrates the ability to consolidate large volumes of information accordingly. Furthermore, various tables have been used which helps the reader to understand the more simply. The organization is also improved. Many topics have been addressed that are all relevant to the topic. Headings and subheadings have been added properly also.
	However, the information is too brief. There could have been a clear introduction. Current research that is being done on the topic is not covered, nor the developmental signaling process. Abnormalities could have been dealt with better also. Glossary could have been added also for greater clarity of key terms.		However, the information is too brief. There could have been a clear introduction. Current research that is being done on the topic is not covered, nor the developmental signaling process. Abnormalities could have been dealt with better also. Glossary could have been added also for greater clarity of key terms.
	Referencing and Research: A proper reference list has been provided in the done which has been correctly written. Throughout the project also, references have been added in the most part. The images have been correctly cited also. There has been research effort with reliable sources being used, many being peer-reviewed.
			'''Referencing and Research:'''<br/>
			A proper reference list has been provided in the done which has been correctly written. Throughout the project also, references have been added in the most part. The images have been correctly cited also. There has been research effort with reliable sources being used, many being peer-reviewed.
	It is notable however that while citing information, references are missing under some sections. Furthermore, the research needs to be more extensive.		It is notable however that while citing information, references are missing under some sections. Furthermore, the research needs to be more extensive.
	Other Comments: Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable.
			'''Other Comments:'''<br/>
			Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable.
	The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.		The diagrams have however not been labeled correctly, such as under Anterior Structure.
	~~Grade: Pass~~
	Review: 5th Project		'''Review: 5th Project- Lung'''
	Regarding content: The structure of the project is easy to follow and has been done well. Headings and subheadings have been added appropriately.
			'''Regarding content:'''<br/>
			The structure of the project is easy to follow and has been done well. Headings and subheadings have been added appropriately.
	However, information is needed under some sections. “Current Understandings and Areas of Research” does not have the essential details. There are some subheadings which have little or no information under them altogether.		However, information is needed under some sections. “Current Understandings and Areas of Research” does not have the essential details. There are some subheadings which have little or no information under them altogether.
	Referencing and Research: Most of the images have been referenced quite well.
			'''Referencing and Research:'''<br/>
			Most of the images have been referenced quite well.
	It is notable however that while citing information, references are missing under some sections, such as Lung Histology. There are some images which do not have copyright information provided.		It is notable however that while citing information, references are missing under some sections, such as Lung Histology. There are some images which do not have copyright information provided.
	Other Comments: Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable. Videos have been used which not only display creativity, but give provide visual aids which help with understanding.
			'''Other Comments:'''<br/>
			Various hand drawn diagrams have been used which reflect the effort and understanding of the topic. The development timeline is also commendable. Videos have been used which not only display creativity, but give provide visual aids which help with understanding.
	However, due to the sizing of some of the images, they are not that clear.		However, due to the sizing of some of the images, they are not that clear.
	~~Grade: Pass~~
	Review: 6th Project		'''Review: 6th Project- Cerebellum'''
	Regarding content: The page has been arranged in an easy to follow way with appropriate headings and subheadings. The introduction is well-written, though it has been split into various smaller paragraphs that affect the flow. The headings and subheadings were all relevant to the topic.
			'''Regarding content:'''<br/>
			The page has been arranged in an easy to follow way with appropriate headings and subheadings. The introduction is well-written, though it has been split into various smaller paragraphs that affect the flow. The headings and subheadings were all relevant to the topic.
	A glossary could have also been added in order to get the understanding of the key terms, as some terms were difficult.		A glossary could have also been added in order to get the understanding of the key terms, as some terms were difficult.
	More information is however needed under “Abnormalities”, “Future questions” and “Current research”.		More information is however needed under “Abnormalities”, “Future questions” and “Current research”.
	Referencing and Research: The referencing and research are well done. There have been extensive sources used from a wide variety of journals. A proper reference list has been provided at the end. The sources are reliable, mostly being peer-reviewed. Throughout the page also, referencing has mostly been done. The images have also been cited properly in most cases.
			'''Referencing and Research:'''<br/>
			The referencing and research are well done. There have been extensive sources used from a wide variety of journals. A proper reference list has been provided at the end. The sources are reliable, mostly being peer-reviewed. Throughout the page also, referencing has mostly been done. The images have also been cited properly in most cases.
	Referencing is however missing in some places throughout the project, such as that in the Development Timeline. Some images have also not been cited correctly.		Referencing is however missing in some places throughout the project, such as that in the Development Timeline. Some images have also not been cited correctly.
	Other Comments: There have been many images used throughout the page which help the reader understand through visual aids. The development timeline is also commendable.
			'''Other Comments:'''<br/>
			There have been many images used throughout the page which help the reader understand through visual aids. The development timeline is also commendable.
	However, some images do not have the correct description. Further video aids such as videos could have been used for further betterment.		However, some images do not have the correct description. Further video aids such as videos could have been used for further betterment.

Z5093005 at 04:56, 19 October 2017

2017-10-19T04:56:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 19 October 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Use this page to practice editing and don't forget to add a topic to the [[2017 Group Project 1]] page.		Use this page to practice editing and don't forget to add a topic to the [[2017 Group Project 1]] page.

	~~[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed The PUBMED LINK]~~

	~~Here is some random text for practice.~~

	~~[[File:Chicken embryo E-cad and P-cad gastrulation.png\|500px]]~~

	~~Chicken embryo E-cadherin and P-cadherin in gastrulation<ref><pubmed>27097030</pubmed></ref>~~

	==Peer Reviews==		==Peer Reviews==
Line 33:		Line 26:
	Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.		Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.

	Review: 3rd Project		'''Review: 3rd Project- Heart'''
	Regarding content: Glossary is provided in which key terms are clearly defined for the reader. This is a commendable effort to make the project easy to understand. Overall, the project is also presented in simple terms making it easy to follow. Headings, subheadings and the use of paragraphs are also done appropriately. The topics chosen are all relevant to the topic.
			'''Regarding content:'''
			Glossary is provided in which key terms are clearly defined for the reader. This is a commendable effort to make the project easy to understand. Overall, the project is also presented in simple terms making it easy to follow. Headings, subheadings and the use of paragraphs are also done appropriately. The topics chosen are all relevant to the topic.
	However, for some topics, the information is a bit lengthy, such as that under the “Development Signalling Process”. It would also help to have the same structure throughout the project. There are variations under the headings. Perhaps highlighting key words by bolding or italics would make it easier to follow the text.		However, for some topics, the information is a bit lengthy, such as that under the “Development Signalling Process”. It would also help to have the same structure throughout the project. There are variations under the headings. Perhaps highlighting key words by bolding or italics would make it easier to follow the text.
	Referencing and Research: Both referencing and research were done quite excellently in the project. The number of sources used were very extensive, and mostly being peer-reviewed articles. A variety of journals were also explored. The referencing list at the end had been properly listed and also throughout the project.
			'''Referencing and Research:'''
			Both referencing and research were done quite excellently in the project. The number of sources used were very extensive, and mostly being peer-reviewed articles. A variety of journals were also explored. The referencing list at the end had been properly listed and also throughout the project.
	However, for some images, the references are not done correctly.		However, for some images, the references are not done correctly.
	Other Comments: A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.		Other Comments: A wide variety of useful images and diagrams have been used which enhances the understanding of the topic. There are good descriptions also provided when images are clicked on. However, it needs to be noted that on the page itself, descriptions of the images are missing. Adding a sentence or two would help. Also in some cases, the writing of the hand-written drawings was difficult to decipher.
Line 63:		Line 60:
	Referencing is however missing in some places throughout the project, such as that in the Development Timeline. Some images have also not been cited correctly.		Referencing is however missing in some places throughout the project, such as that in the Development Timeline. Some images have also not been cited correctly.
	Other Comments: There have been many images used throughout the page which help the reader understand through visual aids. The development timeline is also commendable.		Other Comments: There have been many images used throughout the page which help the reader understand through visual aids. The development timeline is also commendable.
	However, some images do not have the correct description. Further video aids such as videos could have been used for further ~~bettermen~~		However, some images do not have the correct description. Further video aids such as videos could have been used for further betterment.



			[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed The PUBMED LINK]

			Here is some random text for practice.

			[[File:Chicken embryo E-cad and P-cad gastrulation.png\|500px]]

			Chicken embryo E-cadherin and P-cadherin in gastrulation<ref><pubmed>27097030</pubmed></ref>

	==Search Databases==		==Search Databases==

Z5093005 at 03:31, 19 October 2017

2017-10-19T03:31:41Z

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Use this page to practice editing and don't forget to add a topic to the [[2017 Group Project 1]] page.
-[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed The PUBMED LINK]
+==Peer Reviews==
-Here is some random text for practice.
+'''Other Comments''':
-[[File:Chicken embryo E-cad and P-cad gastrulation.png|500px]]
+Images and diagrams have been used which help the reader get a better understanding. It needs to be noted however that there are no hand-drawn diagrams.
-Chicken embryo E-cadherin and P-cadherin in gastrulation<ref><pubmed>27097030</pubmed></ref>
+Review: 3rd Project
 ==Search Databases==

Z5093005 at 06:56, 10 August 2017

2017-08-10T06:56:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 10 August 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']		[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']
	===References===		===References===
	<pubmed> 28786202 </pubmed>		<ref><pubmed> 28786202 </pubmed></ref>
	<references/>		<references/>

	<br>		<br>
	{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}		{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}

Z5093005 at 06:56, 10 August 2017

2017-08-10T06:56:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 10 August 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']		[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']
	===References===		===References===
	<pubmed> 28786202 <pubmed>		<pubmed> 28786202 </pubmed>
	<references/>		<references/>

	<br>		<br>
	{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}		{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}

Z5093005 at 06:55, 10 August 2017

2017-08-10T06:55:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 10 August 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']		[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']
	===References===		===References===
			<pubmed> 28786202 <pubmed>
	<references/>		<references/>

	<br>		<br>
	{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}		{{2017ANAT2341 footer}}

Z5093005 at 06:51, 10 August 2017

2017-08-10T06:51:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 10 August 2017
Line 22:		Line 22:
	[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/gquery?term=embryo ''embryo'']		[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/gquery?term=embryo ''embryo'']

			[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=notochord ''notochord'']
	===References===		===References===