User:Z3417458 - Revision history

Z8600021 at 01:45, 27 November 2014

2014-11-27T01:45:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 27 November 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The study was able to demonstrate positive results and thus proved that cardiac regeneration proceeding myocardial infarction could be treated with hiPSCS-derived from cardiac tissue sheet transplantation.		The study was able to demonstrate positive results and thus proved that cardiac regeneration proceeding myocardial infarction could be treated with hiPSCS-derived from cardiac tissue sheet transplantation.

			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] Very good, several students have used this same paper. (5/5)
	==Lab 10 Assessment==		==Lab 10 Assessment==
	'''1. Research paper on sensory-taste development the research methods and findings.'''		'''1. Research paper on sensory-taste development the research methods and findings.'''
Line 83:		Line 84:
	Finally, the page so far is done well however it will need a little bit more work to be completely finished. Try to just gather as much info as you can to ensure you have enough content and then add images and any other visual aids later. Keep up the good work and good luck :).		Finally, the page so far is done well however it will need a little bit more work to be completely finished. Try to just gather as much info as you can to ensure you have enough content and then add images and any other visual aids later. Keep up the good work and good luck :).

			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] You have prepared a reasonable critical assessment of peer projects. (9/10)
	==Lab 8 Assessment==		==Lab 8 Assessment==

Line 123:		Line 125:
	[[File:Historic-ovary.jpg\|400px]]		[[File:Historic-ovary.jpg\|400px]]

			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] You have simply used the existing online resource rather than a research article or review article for the source of your summary. I also asked for just the embryonic period. Historic image is fine. (4/5)
	==Lab 7 Assessment==		==Lab 7 Assessment==

Line 145:		Line 148:

	https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Integumentary_System_-_Tooth_Development		https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Integumentary_System_-_Tooth_Development

			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] Pancreas paper is relevant and summarised well. Yes but for tooth origins you have not matched the layers to the cell types. (3/5)

	==Lab 5 Assessment==		==Lab 5 Assessment==
Line 164:		Line 169:
	<ref>http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf</ref>		<ref>http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf</ref>

			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] Very good summary (5/5)
	==Lab 4 Assessment==		==Lab 4 Assessment==

Line 184:		Line 190:

	* Ductus venosus becomes the ligamentum venosum, located in the liver, connects the inferior vena cava to the umbilical vein		* Ductus venosus becomes the ligamentum venosum, located in the liver, connects the inferior vena cava to the umbilical vein


			--[[User:Z8600021\|Mark Hill]] Very good, these clinical studies though are hard to interpret. Shunts are correct. (4/5)

	==Lab 3 Assessment ==		==Lab 3 Assessment ==

Z3417458: /* References */

2014-10-29T06:58:54Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 29 October 2014
Line 162:		Line 162:

	<pubmed>12566773</pubmed>		<pubmed>12566773</pubmed>
	<ref>http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf<ref/>		<ref>http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf</ref>

	==Lab 4 Assessment==		==Lab 4 Assessment==

Z3417458: /* References */

2014-10-29T06:57:05Z

References

← Older revision

Revision as of 17:57, 29 October 2014

Z3417458: /* References */

2014-10-29T06:56:54Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 29 October 2014
Line 162:		Line 162:

	<pubmed>12566773</pubmed>		<pubmed>12566773</pubmed>
	http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf		<ref>http://ult.sagepub.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/content/12/1/8.full.pdf<ref/>

	==Lab 4 Assessment==		==Lab 4 Assessment==

Z3417458 at 06:53, 29 October 2014

2014-10-29T06:53:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 29 October 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:
	'''2. Link to the relevant wiki sensory notes page'''		'''2. Link to the relevant wiki sensory notes page'''

	~~<ref>https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development<ref/>~~
	https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development		https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development

Line 59:		Line 58:
	This page is laid out really well in its organization of each heading and then corresponding subheadings. A well-developed introduction, clearly establishes what will be covered. The development overview is written really well and images are incorporated adequately. The use of a table with images is really good effort, might consider using it on our group page.		This page is laid out really well in its organization of each heading and then corresponding subheadings. A well-developed introduction, clearly establishes what will be covered. The development overview is written really well and images are incorporated adequately. The use of a table with images is really good effort, might consider using it on our group page.
	Try to be more consistent with the formatting in each subsequent component of the overviews, e.g the ‘nails’ are dot points but then the ‘teeth’ section is a paragraph. This is just a minor observation that could be changed later.		Try to be more consistent with the formatting in each subsequent component of the overviews, e.g the ‘nails’ are dot points but then the ‘teeth’ section is a paragraph. This is just a minor observation that could be changed later.
	The in text citations seem to be only in some parts of the page, this could be due to the reference not being a pubmed site. Here are some tips that may be helpful with referencing; for the pubmed sites it’s the following format <ref name=PMIDnumber><pubmed>pubmedIDnumber</pubmed></ref> and then for all others its <ref> nsertsource </ref>. Then after those are inserted, add an additional referencing heading and under it write <references/>.		The in text citations seem to be only in some parts of the page, this could be due to the reference not being a pubmed site. Here are some tips that may be helpful with referencing; for the pubmed sites it’s the following format <ref name=PMIDnumber><pubmed>pubmedIDnumber</pubmed></ref> and then for all others its <ref> nsertsource </ref>. Then after those are inserted, add an additional referencing heading and under it write <references/>(see these in edit mode).

	The ‘recent findings’ section is written well, with in depth detail, might want to consider using a few dot points to avoid lengthy paragraphs. Once this section is completely filled with info, it will prove to be really great as it seems a lot of research has been carried out here. There seem to be more referencing issues and the lack of in text citations, try to fix these with the use of the formatting mentioned above. A well written section on ‘historic findings’, again the use of formatting would complete this part. The abnormalities section is done exceptionally well as the cause, risk and management has all been covered. The in text citations are used well as well as the structure of the paragraphs. Some confronting images but well done for finding them for each abnormality, consider adding a few more abnormalities and this will be a really great section.		The ‘recent findings’ section is written well, with in depth detail, might want to consider using a few dot points to avoid lengthy paragraphs. Once this section is completely filled with info, it will prove to be really great as it seems a lot of research has been carried out here. There seem to be more referencing issues and the lack of in text citations, try to fix these with the use of the formatting mentioned above. A well written section on ‘historic findings’, again the use of formatting would complete this part. The abnormalities section is done exceptionally well as the cause, risk and management has all been covered. The in text citations are used well as well as the structure of the paragraphs. Some confronting images but well done for finding them for each abnormality, consider adding a few more abnormalities and this will be a really great section.
Line 67:		Line 66:
	'''Group 6 Endocrine'''		'''Group 6 Endocrine'''

	The page is set out really well especially since the endocrine development covers so many organs. It’s a nice clear and concise way of structuring the page. Each particular organ is addressed really well. There is good consistency with each one on the page that is great. The page contains a sufficient about of content and detail in the info for each section of an organ addressed. It is good to see the use of tables and some dot point formatting which always helps to keep the content clear. There are parts in each section that are missing info these include the abnormalities and tables. The use of images with captions containing well detailed descriptions are also constant under each section. Some suggestions to consider include adding more info to the abnormalities would be great. Focusing on discussing what each abnormality is, how it’s contracted, statistics and then treatment. Throughout the whole page in text citations have not been used at all which should be included, especially when research studies are mentioned. A way to assist with this is to use the following format; for pubmed <ref name=PMIDnumber><pubmed>pubmedIDnumber</pubmed></ref> and then for other references <ref>insert source</ref> . Then after those are inserted, add an additional referencing heading and under it write <references/>		The page is set out really well especially since the endocrine development covers so many organs. It’s a nice clear and concise way of structuring the page. Each particular organ is addressed really well. There is good consistency with each one on the page that is great. The page contains a sufficient about of content and detail in the info for each section of an organ addressed. It is good to see the use of tables and some dot point formatting which always helps to keep the content clear. There are parts in each section that are missing info these include the abnormalities and tables. The use of images with captions containing well detailed descriptions are also constant under each section. Some suggestions to consider include adding more info to the abnormalities would be great. Focusing on discussing what each abnormality is, how it’s contracted, statistics and then treatment. Throughout the whole page in text citations have not been used at all which should be included, especially when research studies are mentioned. A way to assist with this is to use the following format; for pubmed <ref name=PMIDnumber><pubmed>pubmedIDnumber</pubmed></ref> and then for other references <ref>insert source</ref> (see these in edit mode) . Then after those are inserted, add an additional referencing heading and under it write <references/>

	Overall the page does not need too many changes, just a few adjustments mostly with formatting and references. Then some sections need a little bit more info to be completed. An introduction would also be a great way to provide an overview of the content that will be covered since there is a lot discussed. So far it can be seen that a great deal of research has been conducted. It’s also understandable that not all sections are completed just yet as this is a pretty lengthy system. Try to also incorporate some graphs, drawings and even video’s, they are a great visual aids. Keep up the good and the page will be really great, good luck :).		Overall the page does not need too many changes, just a few adjustments mostly with formatting and references. Then some sections need a little bit more info to be completed. An introduction would also be a great way to provide an overview of the content that will be covered since there is a lot discussed. So far it can be seen that a great deal of research has been conducted. It’s also understandable that not all sections are completed just yet as this is a pretty lengthy system. Try to also incorporate some graphs, drawings and even video’s, they are a great visual aids. Keep up the good and the page will be really great, good luck :).

Z3417458: /* Lab 10 Assessment */

2014-10-29T06:50:33Z

Lab 10 Assessment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 29 October 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:
	'''2. Link to the relevant wiki sensory notes page'''		'''2. Link to the relevant wiki sensory notes page'''

			<ref>https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development<ref/>
	https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development		https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Sensory_-_Taste_Development

Z3417458: /* Lab 11 Assessment */

2014-10-29T06:48:46Z

Lab 11 Assessment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 29 October 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:

	<pubmed>25336194</pubmed>		<pubmed>25336194</pubmed>


	The leading cause of death continues to be Cardiovascular disease, there has been a significant amount of research into treatment and the use of different therapies. A key breakthrough has been the research into stem cells and stratergies in regards to regenerative therapy with the use of these cells. There are two types including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Both these cells have great potential for cardiac regeneration. Over time many obstacles have emerged that have proved to be difficult for the development to proceed and to be clinically utalised.		The leading cause of death continues to be Cardiovascular disease, there has been a significant amount of research into treatment and the use of different therapies. A key breakthrough has been the research into stem cells and stratergies in regards to regenerative therapy with the use of these cells. There are two types including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Both these cells have great potential for cardiac regeneration. Over time many obstacles have emerged that have proved to be difficult for the development to proceed and to be clinically utalised.

Z3417458: /* Lab 10 Assessment */

2014-10-29T06:48:00Z

Lab 10 Assessment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 29 October 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	<pubmed>PMC4083039</pubmed>		<pubmed>PMC4083039</pubmed>
	~~http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083039~~

	During development specific regions of the tongue are innervated by axons from gustatory neurons of the geniculate ganglion. The guidance of these axons is controlled by molecular cues in the environment through specific pathways. A number of neurons innervate each taste bud, which are controlled by molecular factors including neurotrophins. Gustatory neurons are regulated by brain derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF), that are manufactured among developing taste papillae and involved in axon guidance. Additionally survival of gustatory neurons is also regulated by Neurotrophin-4 (NT4). These neurotrophins have different functions, both control taste system development and act via the same receptors tyrosine kinase (TrkB) and pan-neurotrophic (p75). The aim of this research article was to observe the neurotrophin receptor p75 and its role in the development of the taste system. The investigation focused on whether p75 is necessary for neuron survival, geniculate ganglion axon guidance and sustaining taste buds throughout embryonic development. A comparison was made between wild type and mutant (p75-/-) mice, tongue innervation patterns and numbers where observed among geniculate ganglion neurons and taste buds.		During development specific regions of the tongue are innervated by axons from gustatory neurons of the geniculate ganglion. The guidance of these axons is controlled by molecular cues in the environment through specific pathways. A number of neurons innervate each taste bud, which are controlled by molecular factors including neurotrophins. Gustatory neurons are regulated by brain derived neurotrophic factors (BDNF), that are manufactured among developing taste papillae and involved in axon guidance. Additionally survival of gustatory neurons is also regulated by Neurotrophin-4 (NT4). These neurotrophins have different functions, both control taste system development and act via the same receptors tyrosine kinase (TrkB) and pan-neurotrophic (p75). The aim of this research article was to observe the neurotrophin receptor p75 and its role in the development of the taste system. The investigation focused on whether p75 is necessary for neuron survival, geniculate ganglion axon guidance and sustaining taste buds throughout embryonic development. A comparison was made between wild type and mutant (p75-/-) mice, tongue innervation patterns and numbers where observed among geniculate ganglion neurons and taste buds.

Z3417458: /* Lab 10 Assessment */

2014-10-29T06:46:01Z

Lab 10 Assessment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 29 October 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:
	'''1. Research paper on sensory-taste development the research methods and findings.'''		'''1. Research paper on sensory-taste development the research methods and findings.'''

	<pubmed>~~4083039~~</pubmed>		<pubmed>PMC4083039</pubmed>
	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083039		http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4083039

Z3417458: /* Lab 10 Assessment */

2014-10-29T06:44:06Z

Lab 10 Assessment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 29 October 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:

	<pubmed>25336194</pubmed>		<pubmed>25336194</pubmed>


	The leading cause of death continues to be Cardiovascular disease, there has been a significant amount of research into treatment and the use of different therapies. A key breakthrough has been the research into stem cells and stratergies in regards to regenerative therapy with the use of these cells. There are two types including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Both these cells have great potential for cardiac regeneration. Over time many obstacles have emerged that have proved to be difficult for the development to proceed and to be clinically utalised.		The leading cause of death continues to be Cardiovascular disease, there has been a significant amount of research into treatment and the use of different therapies. A key breakthrough has been the research into stem cells and stratergies in regards to regenerative therapy with the use of these cells. There are two types including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Both these cells have great potential for cardiac regeneration. Over time many obstacles have emerged that have proved to be difficult for the development to proceed and to be clinically utalised.