Paper - Simple methods of correlating crown-rump and crown-heel lengths of the human fetus
|Embryology - 25 Oct 2020 Expand to Translate|
|Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)|
العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)
Noback GL. Simple methods of correlating crown-rump and crown-heel lengths of the human fetus. (1922) Anat. Rec. 22(4): 241-244.
|Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages|
|Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)|
Simple Methods Of Correlating Crown-Rump And Crown-Heel Lengths Of The Human Fetus
G. J. Noback
University of Minnesota and the Medical College of Virginia
Investigators in prenatal anatomy and development report their ﬁndings in one of three ways as regards length of the indi- viduals studied. Some writers use both crown-rump and crown- heel length (Michaelis, ’O6; Mall, ’10). Others use only the crown-rump (Streeter, ’20), and some use the crown-heel alone (Meyer, ’ 15 ; Scammon, ’19; Noback, ’21). Work based on one of these measurements alone is obviously difficult to compare with work based upon the other.
The relation between the crown-rump and the crown-heel lengths during fetal life is practically constant. The formulae here presented further demonstrate this fact.
The crown-heel length of the human fetus is equal to the crown-rump length (in millimeters) minus one, plus one-half of this amount. The following formula makes possible the utilization of data reported in crown-rump length which is to be compared or combined with data based upon the crown-heel length alone.
Illustration: The known crown-rump length is 95 mm. What is the corresponding crown-heel length?
on = 3:2<_9E 2 i.e., the crown-heel length is 141 mm.
1 The formulae in this report were demonstrated at the thirty-seventh session of the American Association of Anatomists, March, 1921.
The second formula may be used to determine the crown- rump length when the crown—heel length is known. It is ex-
pressed as follows: OR = 20%?
Illustration: The known crown—heel length is 141 mm. What is the corresponding crown-rump length?
OR = 2 x 1? + 3 i'.e., the crown-rump length is 95 mm.
In order to determine to what extent measurements made by different observers would deviate from the formulae, I have plotted them on ordinate paper against the curve obtained by use of the formulae. The crown-rump lengths are represented by the abscissas and the crown—heel lengths by the ordinates. The accompanying plate shows the formulae curve as a straight line, and it is readily seen that the measurements made by the several observers are distributed quite evenly about it?
The following table shows the extent of deviation from the lengths derived by formula in the data of Mall, MacKeen, and Michaelis.
AGE DEVMHON mwwrron
Mall (weekly averages of 1000 cases) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. MacKeen (161 cases) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Michaelis (weekly averages from 14 weeks to birth) . . . . . . . ..
I—l o—4<DN> OIUIIF 03600 CA7°3\I
Two sets of data on measurements of the newborn infant are also plotted against the curve. These observations were made by Taylor ’19 and by Weissenberg ’06. The averages of their measurements vary but a triﬂe from the curve derived by the formulae.
2 Besides data of Mall and of Michaelis I have used measurements made in the Institute of Anatomy, University of Minnesota, by Helen Adams MacKeen and
by Halbert Dunn. The work of the latter two investigators will appear in due course.
FDRWULRE 5orTHe CORRELATION as SﬂT1NCx (Crown—Rump) and STANDING (Crotm—HaeU
as oivmna 450
A O o
2: CROWN~RUMP = 3%-*3
8: C, . . , _ .;1_l_1Lll.l..L._].1_1_..l_1_L|lL1J:;'
MRCKEEN ,DUNN,NOBRCK. O MALL - Weeklg R».-arages. $ TAYLOR -' Ncwborn,/-Ivzraga. ® WEISSENBEHG "N¢w\>om,Rv¢vage
so we 150 200 250 300mm ' " ‘
MICHAELIS, PAUL 1906 Alterbestimmung menschlichen Embryonen. Archiv fiir Gynakologie, Bd. 70.
MEYER, A. W. 1915 Fields, graphs and other data on fetal growth. Contr. to Embryol., no. 4, Carnegie Inst., Wash.
NOBACK, G. J. 1921 A contribution to the topographic anatomy of the thymus gland, with particular reference to its changes at birth and in the period of the newborn. Amer. Jour. Dis. Child., vol. 22, pp. 120-144.
SCAMMON, R. E. 1919 Some graphs and tables illustrating the growth of the human stomach. Amer. Jour. Dis. Child., vol. 17, pp. 395-422.
TAYLOR, Roo1) 1919 The measurements of 250 full-term, new-born infants. Amer. Jour. Dis. Child., vol. 17, pp. 351—362.
WEISSENBERG, S. 1906 Die Korperproportionen des Neugeborenen. Jahrb. f. Kinderheilkunde, Bd. 64, S. 839.
Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2020, October 25) Embryology Paper - Simple methods of correlating crown-rump and crown-heel lengths of the human fetus. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Paper_-_Simple_methods_of_correlating_crown-rump_and_crown-heel_lengths_of_the_human_fetus
- © Dr Mark Hill 2020, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G