Paper - Abnormal development of the brain in an 8 mm pig embryo (1938)

From Embryology
Embryology - 6 Apr 2020    Facebook link Pinterest link Twitter link  Expand to Translate  
Google Translate - select your language from the list shown below (this will open a new external page)

العربية | català | 中文 | 中國傳統的 | français | Deutsche | עִברִית | हिंदी | bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | မြန်မာ | Pilipino | Polskie | português | ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ | Română | русский | Español | Swahili | Svensk | ไทย | Türkçe | اردو | ייִדיש | Tiếng Việt    These external translations are automated and may not be accurate. (More? About Translations)

Baxter JS. and Boyd JD. Abnormal development of the brain in an 8 mm. pig embryo. (1938) J Anat. 72: 422-429. PMID 17104710

Online Editor 
Mark Hill.jpg
This historic 1938 paper by Baxter and Boyd describes an early abnormal brain development in an 8 mm pig.


Also by this author - Hunter RH. Notes on the development of the prepuce. (1935) J Anat. 70: 68-75. PMID 17104576

See also - Frazer JE. Report on an anencephalic embryo. (1921) J Anat. 56(1): 12-9. PMID 17103933


Modern Notes: neural abnormalities | pig

Neural Links: ectoderm | neural | neural crest | ventricular | sensory | Stage 22 | gliogenesis | neural fetal | Medicine Lecture - Neural | Lecture - Ectoderm | Lecture - Neural Crest | Lab - Early Neural | neural abnormalities | folic acid | iodine deficiency | Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | neural postnatal | neural examination | Histology | Historic Neural | Category:Neural


Pig Links: Introduction | Estrous Cycle | 1897 Pig Embryo Development Plates | 1951 Pig Embryology | Category:Pig

  Historic Papers: 1894 Blastodermic Vesicle | 1903 12mm Pig | 1903 Adrenal | 1905 Thymus | 1908 Pancreas | 1908 Pharyngeal Pouches | 1908 Intestinal Diverticula | 1910 Hypoglossal Ganglia | 1911 Prenatal Growth | 1911 Embryo 7.8 mm | 1916 Colon | 1916 Yolk Sac | 1918 Wolffian body | 1919 Corpus Luteum | 1919 Postnatal Thyroid | 1919 Placental Cord | 1921 Estrous and Implantation | 1922 Limb Arteries | 1924 Pig | 1937 Coronary Circulatory | 1938 Abnormal Brain


Historic Disclaimer - information about historic embryology pages 
Mark Hill.jpg
Pages where the terms "Historic" (textbooks, papers, people, recommendations) appear on this site, and sections within pages where this disclaimer appears, indicate that the content and scientific understanding are specific to the time of publication. This means that while some scientific descriptions are still accurate, the terminology and interpretation of the developmental mechanisms reflect the understanding at the time of original publication and those of the preceding periods, these terms, interpretations and recommendations may not reflect our current scientific understanding.     (More? Embryology History | Historic Embryology Papers)

Abnormal Development of the Brain in an 8 mm Pig Embryo

By J. S. Baxter and J. D. Boyd

Anatomy School, Cambridge

Introduction

The specimen, which is described here, is one of a series of 8 mm. pigembryos prepared for routine class teaching in this Department. In order to determine its developmental age it has been compared with a number of normal pig embryos from our collection, and it corresponds essentially with a normal pig embryo of 8 mm. C.R. length. We have therefore used an embryo of this size as a standard of comparison in our study of the abnormal embryo. At the outset it should be stressed that the latter is in excellent histological condition. As may be seen from PI. I, fig. 6, the tissues have been preserved in a very good state, mitotic figures being numerous and clear. It is not an unreasonable assumption then, that this embryo has been obtained and fixed while still in a living condition. In a survey of the literature upon developmental defects in the cephalic part of the central nervous system we have been impressed by the fact that, so far as we have been able to ascertain, all recorded specimens of comparable abnormalities are in a poor histological state; this may, in some cases, be due to post-mortem change; in others, secondary mechanical and pathological processes have obscured the picture of the primary defect. Our specimen, then, is of considerable significance, as its age and histological condition rule out such complications.

Description of Specimen

The embryo was one of a batch which had been stained in bulk with haematoxylin and eosin, the amnion in each case being intact. It was therefore only after sectioning that the abnormality was discovered. Consequently two reconstructions of the head end of the embryo have been prepared, each made at a magnification of 50 diameters. The first is a plaster of Paris model of the external form of the head (constructed by Lewis’s modification of Born’s method), while the second is a conventional Born wax-plate model of the corresponding portion of the central nervous system.


Text-figs. 1 and 2 depict the left lateral aspect of these reconstructions. On comparison of the two it is clearly to be seen that a certain part of the cephalic portion of the neural tube has been splayed out upon the surface of the head of the embryo. This eversion of the neural folds extends from the rostral limit of the metencephalon to the neighbourhood of the upper border of the lamina terminalis. The line of demarcation between the neural tissues and the somatic ectoderm is everywhere quite distinct (Pl. I, fig. 1). The roof of the hind brain appears to be essentially normal in its configuration. The deep cavity to be seen (Text-fig. 2) just rostral to the metencephalon leads caudally into the cavity of the hind brain. The telencephalic vesicles are present on either side, and are comparable in their form and structure with those of the control embryo. Just behind the telencephalic vesicles are the optic stalks, the development of which has proceeded to a rather greater degree on the right than on the left, but even here the condition of the optic diencephalic outgrowth is much arrested as compared with the normal embryo of this stage. In association with this condition there is failure of development of the lens placode. On the left side there is no trace of an ectodermal thickening to form the primordium of the lens; on the right side, where the neural optic evagination is somewhat better developed, there is a slight ectodermal thickening (PI. I, fig. 4). In the case of the 8 mm. control embryo the lens placode has already separated on each side from the ectoderm and is lying in the primitive optic cup. There has obviously, then, been a marked retardation in the development of the optic primordia in this specimen. In order to lay further stress upon this point we present in Text-fig. 3 camera lucida drawings of four consecutive sections through the optic primordia on the right side of this embryo; and it will readily be seen in these figures that the lens primordium is merely a slightly thickened area of ectoderm in continuity with the general somatic ectoderm. There is only a small depression to indicate its future possible invagination. On the left side neither ectodermal thickening nor indication of invagination are present.


Text-fig. 1. External form of the head end of the embryo.


Text-fig. 2. Reconstruction of the cranial end of the nervous system.


The neural and stomodaeal components of the hypophysis appear to be normal (PI. I, fig. 5).

The attachments of the trigeminal, acoustico-facial and glossopharyngeal nerves to the brain stem are indicated in the second reconstruction (see also Pl. I, fig. 2). These nerves in their entire course are quite comparable with those of the control embryo. The otic vesicle also appears quite normal. The vagus, accessory and hypoglossal nerves (which however have not been modelled) are normal, but, in striking contrast, there is no trace of the oculomotor, trochlear or abducens nerves. These latter three nerves were clearly to be seen in our control embryo.

Anteriorly the reconstructions present several significant features. There are two foramina of Munro to be seen at the anterior edge of the exposed neural tissue, and they lead into the telencephalic vesicles. Immediately inferior to this level the end of the neural tube is closed so that a small rostral cul-de-sac is formed. We take the closing membrane to be (PI. I, fig. 8, Textfig. 4) the lamina terminalis, and the cul-de-sac must then be the telencephalic part of the third ventricle. This is in accordance with the description of Streeter (1912) regarding the two component parts of the third ventricle. Thalamic swellings can be seen exposed on the surface immediately behind the foramina of Munro. These swellings are separated by a deep cleft which is continued throughout the exposed mid-brain as a median fissure.


Text-fig. 3. Successive sections through the right optic primordium.


Text-fig. 4. Sagittal graphic reconstruction of the head end of the embryo.


A sagittal graphic reconstruction of the brain (Text-fig. 4) emphasizes several of the points previously mentioned. The extent of defective union of the neural folds is shown; the intact lamina terminalis is seen bounding the telencephalic part of the third ventricle and behind this cavity is seen Rathke’s pouch. A further point, not hitherto stressed, is the marked upward “ buckling” of the whole of the neural plate in the region of the mid brain. This may also be seen in Text-fig. 2. If this embryo had developed further, it is possible that solution of continuity of the nervous system might have occurred in this region (cp. Frazer, 1921).

We have been able to satisfy ourselves that the blood vessels of the head of the embryo are normal. The internal carotid arteries may be seen on PI. I, fig. 1, and these vessels could be traced throughout their course. The significance of this observation will be discussed later.

The remainder of the specimen calls for no comment except that its condition is everywhere that of an ordinary 8 mm. pig embryo. This is shown in Text-fig. 1 where the external appearance of the branchial arch region is . perfectly normal. Particular attention was paid to the primordia of the ductless glands in the study of the sections in view of the stress which has been laid by some writers upon changes in these glands in similar developmental abnormalities of the nervous system. We found no discernible changes from the normal picture of the endocrine gland primordia in an 8 mm. pig embryo.

Discussion

The obvious lesion in this abnormal embryo is non-closure of the neural ’ folds in the mesencephalic and diencephalic regions. Associated with this abnormality is absence of the oculo-motor, trochlear and abducens nerves of each side and defective development of the optic outgrowths and, particularly, the lens primordia.

A comparable abnormality has been described by Sternberg (1927). He had available for study a human embryo of 5 mm. G.L. in which there were three clefts in the dorsal part of the medullary tube. The first of these he judged, from its relations, to be the still open anterior neuropore. There was a further rhomboidal cleft in the region of the mid-brain separated from the first by a connective tissue bridge, while a third small fissure was present in the upper part of the spinal cord. The gross and microscopic condition of this embryo was admittedly poor. Nevertheless certain important features could be made out. A number of the cranial nerves and their attachments to the brain stem were discernible; they were the trigeminal nerve, the acousticofacial complex, the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and cranial portion of the accessory nerves. Both optic outgrowths were present, each communicating widely with the cavity of the diencephalon. There was a slight degree of ectodermal thickening indicating the lens primordia, more marked upon the right side, and a minor degree of cupping here to indicate future invagination of the optic vesicle.


The resemblances between this specimen and the pig embryo we have described are striking. In both, a non-union of the neural folds in the mesencephalic and diencephalic regions is associated with defective development of the optic primordia. Further, in the pig embryo there is failure of development of the IIIrd, [Vth and VIth cranial nerves. Sternberg does not refer to these nerves in the description of his abnormal embryo. The presence of marked optic abnormalities in the two embryos prevents them from being regarded as early examples of what is usually designated ‘“‘anencephaly’’.


What the subsequent developmental history of these embryos might have been can only be surmised. An abnormal human embryo of 35 mm. c.R. length described by Hunter (1984) as a case of “‘extroversion of the cerebral hemispheres” probably represents such a later stage in so far as the brain itself is concerned. His specimen showed a marked exposure of neural tissue on the surface of the head in the mid- and forebrain regions. This neural tissue was continuous laterally with the body ectoderm but bulged over it. A portion of the exposed tissue showed the structure of normal choroid plexus and projected from the surface into the amniotic cavity. It is clear that the condition of the brain found by Hunter could easily have been derived from an earlier abnormality such as is present in Sternberg’s and our specimens. Continued growth of exposed neural tissue in such embryos could easily result in the bulging of this tissue over the somatic ectoderm to produce the condition which Hunter has called ‘“extroversion”’.


To none of these three specimens can the term anencephaly properly be applied as, in each of them, there is present an intact neural plate, abnormally developed in a certain region, but with no evidence whatsoever of rupture of the brain stem. The latter has been emphasized by Frazer (1921), and later by Mann (19387) as the essential lesion in anencephaly. Thus Mann writes (1987, p. 57): “in any case the essential lesion is a transverse solution of continuity of the brain stem. This will account for most of the known facts and is borne out by examination of a human embryo with the defect in process of developing”. The embryo referred to here is the one described by Frazer but, in our opinion, the condition of ‘“‘anencephaly ” is already well established in his specimen and there is no clue to the nature of the primary defect. Frazer and Mann both stress rupture of the internal carotid arteries distal to the origin of the ophthalmic arteries as an important secondary factor in the production of the final condition. They both admit, however, that the primary factor is a cerebral defect due, according to Mann, to “a sudden fortuitous accident occurring during an otherwise normal development rather than a dysgenic process present and acting from the first”. This explanation may be applicable to some cases of anencephaly but, if our specimen had continued to develop, a cerebral condition closely resembling anencephaly would probably have resulted. This condition would primarily have been due to failure of union of the neural folds and any secondary processes resulting in solution of continuity of the brain stem (such as excessive “‘buckling” of the neural plate or stretching of the internal carotid arteries) are superimposed upon this primary lesion. We find this explanation more acceptable than one which implies normal closure of the neural tube and then invokes supposititious foetal hydrocephalus to rupture the roof plate and initiate the abnormality. Our explanation has the further advantage of bringing anencephalic conditions into line with spina bifida, the former being, in the first instance, examples of encephalon bifidum.’ The two conditions, spina bifida and encephalon bifidum, occasionally coexist (see Wrete, 1924) in which case there has been non-closure of the whole length of the neural folds.


Our conception of the condition known as anencephaly, then, is that it is the result of secondary changes masking the primary lesion which we believe to be non-closure of the neural folds. This may, occasionally, be a fortuitous accident of development, but that it can be a dysgenic, hereditary defect is shown by the fact that in certain inbred strains of rabbits a high proportion of the offspring have anencephaly (Dr J. Hammond, personal communication). The secondary changes which result in frank anencephaly may, in part, be due to the unrestrained growth of the exposed neural tissue and to its upward buckling. To these mechanical effects of non-closure of the neural plate may be added vascular changes (as suggested by Frazer, but which are not present in our specimen), interference with normal nervous metabolism as a result of the disorganized production and circulation of the cerebrospinal fluid and the exposure of the nervous tissue itself on the surface of the embryo.


It is impossible to be dogmatic about the relation between the non-closure of the neural folds in the mesencephalic and diencephalic regions of our embryo and the abnormal development of its optic apparatus and the associated nerves. We incline to the opinion that the two are closely connected and that the lesion is essentially a dysgenic one involving those parts of the embryo which have to do with the development of the visual apparatus.

Our thanks are due to Miss Joan Loewenthal for her kind assistance in the preparation of Text-figs. 1 and 2.

Summary

An abnormally developed nervous system in an 8mm. pig embryo is described. The abnormality consisted in non-closure of the neural folds in its mesencephalic and diencephalic regions, the complete absence of any trace of the IIIrd, IVth and VIth cranial nerves and markedly retarded development of the optic primordia. The excellent histological condition of the sectioned material enables one to state that no secondary pathological changes had supervened. The relationship of this abnormality to anencephaly is discussed.


References

Frazer JE. Report on an anencephalic embryo. (1921) J Anat. 56(1): 12-9. PMID 17103933

Hunter RH. An anencephalic embryo of 25 mm. C.R. length. (1934) Ulster Med J. 3(2):105-112.4. PMID: 20475996

Many, I. (1937). Developmental Abnormalities of the Eye. Cambridge.

STERNBERG, H. (1927). Z. ges. Anat. 1. Z. Anat. EntwGesch. Bd. Lxxxtl, p. 747.

Streeter GL. The Development of the Nervous System. (1912) chapter 14, vol. 2, in Keibel F. and Mall FP. Manual of Human Embryology II. (1912) J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.

Wrete, M. (1924). Z. mtkr.-anat. Forsch. Bd. 1, p. 563.

Explanation of Plate I

Fig. 1. Section through the diencephalic region of the embryo. The exposed neural tissue is shown and, on the left side, its continuity with the somatic ectoderm can be seen. Note the intact internal carotid arteries on either side of the basal portion of the nervous system. ( x 85.)

Fig. 2. Section through the hind brain. On the left side can be seen the trigeminal ganglion with its sensory root, the acoustico-facial ganglion, the ganglion superius of the glossopharyngeal nerve and the vagus nerve. The otocysts are seen on either side of the hind brain. ( x 55.) 3. Section to show the lamina terminalis region. ( x 85.)

Fig. 4. Section through the right optic outgrowth. The thickening of the ectoderm where the lens should have developed is shown. ( x 85.)

Fig. 5. Section through the optic stalks near their attachment to the diencephalon. The upper part of Rathke’s pouch is seen in the lower part of the microphotograph making contact with the floor of the IIIrd ventricle. ( x 85.)

Fig. 6. Section at a higher magnification through a portion of the exposed neural plate. The excellence of the histological condition of the sectioned material is obvious. Mitotic figures can be seen on the surface of the exposed medullary plate epithelium. ( x 250.)



Cite this page: Hill, M.A. (2020, April 6) Embryology Paper - Abnormal development of the brain in an 8 mm pig embryo (1938). Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Paper_-_Abnormal_development_of_the_brain_in_an_8_mm_pig_embryo_(1938)

What Links Here?
© Dr Mark Hill 2020, UNSW Embryology ISBN: 978 0 7334 2609 4 - UNSW CRICOS Provider Code No. 00098G