UNSW Embryology

DEVELOPMENT OF THE URINARY SYSTEM

Embryology Home Page

PRUNE BELLY SYNDROME

Select Entry from OMIM

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (Internet Link)

This page is for computers without external internet access.

Back to UNSW Embryology-Kidney Notes

List of OMIM search results

100100 ABDOMINAL MUSCLES, ABSENCE OF, WITH URINARY TRACT ABNORMALITY AND CRYPTORCHIDISM

Alternative titles; symbols

PRUNE BELLY SYNDROME

table OF CONTENTS

 

Database Links

"16 MEDLINE Citations"

Note: pressing the symbol will find the citations in MEDLINE whose text most closely matches the text of the preceding OMIM paragraph, using the Entrez MEDLINE neighboring function.

 

TEXT

This condition was first described by Frolich (1839). The appellation 'prune belly syndrome' is descriptive because the intestinal pattern is evident through the thin, lax, protruding abdominal wall in the infant (Osler, 1901). (Osler did not use the term 'prune belly.' His article on this subject and one 'on a family form of recurring epistaxis, associated with multiple telangiectases of the skin and mucous membranes'--see 187300--appeared successively in the November 1901 issue of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin. Osler wrote: 'In the summer of 1897 a case of remarkable distension of the abdomen was admitted to the wards, with greatly distended bladder, and on my return in September, Dr. Futcher, knowing that I would be interested in it, sent for the child.') The full syndrome probably occurs only in males (Williams and Burkholder, 1967). Multiple cases (of the full syndrome) in families have rarely been reported, and the mode of inheritance, indeed whether this is a mendelian condition, is still unclear. Autosomal recessive inheritance is suggested by some reports. In Lebanon, where the rate of consanguinity is high, Afifi et al. (1972) described an affected offspring of first-cousin parents. Garlinger and Ott (1974) described 2 affected brothers in 1 family and 2 affected male cousins in a second, and found 3 other reports of affected sibs, 2 of affected cousins and 1 of concordant male twins. In the first family the parents were nonconsanguineous. In the second family the affected boys' mothers were half-sisters; they had different maternal grandmothers. If this is an X-linked recessive, multiple affected brothers should be observed. If the disorder is due to fresh dominant mutation in each case, the male-limitation would be unexpected but not impossible. In British Columbia, Baird and MacDonald (1981) found a frequency of 1 in 29,231 live births. This malformation syndrome is similar to Poland syndrome (173800) in being rather consistently reproduced in many cases but having no clearly demonstrable mendelian basis. A possibly related syndrome was described in a single patient by Texter and Murphy (1968). The triad consisted of absence of the right testis, kidney, and rectus abdominis muscle. King and Prescott (1978) presented evidence to support the suggestion that the maldevelopment of the abdominal musculature and abdominal laxity are secondary phenomena, the primary event being marked distension of the abdomen in the fetal period because of obstruction of the urinary tract. Likewise, Pagon et al. (1979) suggested that the abdominal muscle deficiency is secondary to fetal abdominal distension of various causes, most often perhaps, urethral obstruction with enlarged bladder. 'Prune belly' occurs, in the main, as a consequence of posterior urethral valves; thus the predominance as a male-limited multifactorial trait. Gaboardi et al. (1982) reported 2 brothers and a sister with prune belly syndrome with bilateral hydronephrosis, megaureter and megabladder, but no urethral stenosis. A better prognosis than is usually thought to obtain was suggested by the series of 19 patients reported by Burke et al. (1969). Greskovich and Nyberg (1988) gave a review in which they stated incorrectly that the term prune belly syndrome was coined by Osler.

 

SEE ALSO

Burton and Dillard (1984) ; Harley et al. (1972) ; Lee (1977) ; Monie and Monie (1979) ; Riccardi and Grum (1977) ; Roberts (1956) ; Welch and Kearney (1974) ; Woodhouse et al. (1982)

 

REFERENCES

1. Afifi, A. K.; Rebeiz, J.; Mire, J.; Andonian, S. J.; Der Kaloustian, V. M. :
The myopathology of the prune belly syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 15: 153-166, 1972.
PubMed ID : 4400845

 

2. Baird, P. A.; MacDonald, E. C. :
An epidemiologic study of congenital malformations of the anterior abdominal wall in more than half a million consecutive live births. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 33: 470-478, 1981.
PubMed ID : 6454342

 

3. Burke, E. C.; Shin, M. H.; Kelalis, P. P. :
Prune belly syndrome: clinical findings and survival. Am. J. Dis. Child. 117: 668-671, 1969.
PubMed ID : 4239017

 

4. Burton, B. K.; Dillard, R. G. :
Prune belly syndrome: observations supporting the hypothesis of abdominal overdistention. Am. J. Med. Genet. 17: 669-672, 1984.
PubMed ID : 6231862

 

5. Frolich, F. :
Der Mangel der Muskeln, insbesondere der Seitenbauchmuskeln. Dissertation: Wurzburg (pub.) 1839.

 

6. Gaboardi, F.; Sterpa, A.; Thiebat, E.; Cornali, R.; Manfredi, M.; Bianchi, C.; Giacomoni, M. A.; Bertagnoli, L. :
Prune-belly syndrome: report of three siblings. Helv. Paediat. Acta 37: 283-288, 1982.
PubMed ID : 7118560

 

7. Garlinger, P.; Ott, J. :
Prune belly syndrome: possible genetic implications. Birth Defects Orig. Art. Ser. X(8): 173-180, 1974.

 

8. Greskovich, F. J., III; Nyberg, L. M., Jr. :
The prune belly syndrome: a review of its etiology, defects, treatment and prognosis. J. Urol. 140: 707-712, 1988.
PubMed ID : 3047433

 

9. Harley, L. M.; Chen, Y.; Rattner, W. H. :
Prune belly syndrome. J. Urol. 108: 174-176, 1972.
PubMed ID : 4402425

 

10. King, C. R.; Prescott, G. :
Pathogenesis of the prune-belly anomaly. J. Pediat. 93: 273-274, 1978.
PubMed ID : 27602

 

11. Lee, S. M. :
Prune-belly syndrome in a 54-year-old man. J.A.M.A. 237: 2216-2217, 1977.
PubMed ID : 16145

 

12. Monie, I. W.; Monie, B. J. :
Prune-belly syndrome and fetal ascites. Teratology 19: 111-117, 1979.
PubMed ID : 156413

 

13. Osler, W. :
Congenital absence of the abdominal muscles with distended and hypertrophied urinary bladder. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 12: 331-333, 1901.

 

14. Pagon, R. A.; Smith, D. W.; Shepard, T. H. :
Urethral obstruction malformation complex: a cause of abdominal deficiency and the 'prune belly.'. J. Pediat. 94: 900-906, 1979.
PubMed ID : 156252

 

15. Riccardi, V. M.; Grum, C. M. :
The prune belly anomaly: heterogeneity and superficial X-linkage mimicry. J. Med. Genet. 14: 266-270, 1977.
PubMed ID : 144797

 

16. Roberts, P. :
Congenital absence of the abdominal muscles with associated abnormalities of the genito-urinary tract. Arch. Dis. Child. 31: 236-239, 1956.

 

17. Texter, J. H.; Murphy, G. P. :
The right-sided syndrome: congenital absence of the right testis, kidney and rectus: urologic diagnosis and treatment. Johns Hopkins Med. J. 122: 224-228, 1968.
PubMed ID : 4231058

 

18. Welch, K. J.; Kearney, G. P. :
Abdominal musculature deficiency syndrome: prune belly. J. Urol. 111: 693-700, 1974.
PubMed ID : 4150949

 

19. Williams, D. I.; Burkholder, G. V. :
The prune belly syndrome. J. Urol. 98: 244-251, 1967.
PubMed ID : 4382958

 

20. Woodhouse, C. R. J.; Ransley, P. G.; Innes-Williams, D. :
Prune belly syndrome--report of 47 cases. Arch. Dis. Child. 57: 856-859, 1982.
PubMed ID : 6128960

 

CLINICAL SYNOPSIS

View Clinical Synopsis Entry

 

CREATION DATE

Victor A. McKusick : 6/4/1986

EDIT HISTORY

dholmes : 10/6/1997
terry : 2/13/1997
terry : 2/13/1997
carol : 7/12/1996
mimadm : 4/18/1994
carol : 2/13/1994
carol : 8/25/1992
supermim : 3/16/1992
carol : 9/4/1990

Back to UNSW Embryology-Kidney Notes


m.hill@unsw.edu.au
Date Last Modified: 11/3/99
This site maintained by Dr M. Hill